Field
The present disclosure relates to chemical reactor systems, and specifically to systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels in a chemical reactor system.
Technical Background
There is a constant need for clean and efficient energy generation systems. Most of the commercial processes that generate energy carriers such as steam, hydrogen, synthesis gas (syngas), liquid fuels and/or electricity are based on fossil fuels. Furthermore, the dependence on fossil fuels is expected to continue in the foreseeable future due to the lower costs when compared to renewable sources. Currently, the conversion of carbonaceous fuels such as coal, natural gas, and petroleum coke is usually conducted through a combustion or reforming process. However, combustion of carbonaceous fuels, especially coal, is a carbon intensive process that emits large quantities of carbon dioxide to the environment. Sulfur and nitrogen compounds are also generated in this process due to the complex content in coal.
Accordingly, there exists a continual need for improved fuel conversion systems which minimizes the production of undesirable pollutants and byproducts.
Embodiments of the present invention are related to systems and methods for the integrated distribution of a fuel material in a process utilizing circulation of an oxygen carrier solid. The fuel material can be in the form of gas, solid, liquid, or any combination thereof. The present disclosure is directly applicable to chemical looping systems for solid fuel conversion and for clarity reference to solid fuel will used throughout this disclosure.
Chemical looping technology is an approach for clean and efficient solid fuel conversion with reduced capital and operating costs. Chemical looping processes combust or gasify carbon-based fuels indirectly with oxygen carried by an oxygen carrier solid, for example metal oxides, in a reactor. The reduced oxygen carrier solid is then re-oxidized in one or more separate reactors with oxidizing gases such as air or steam. The chemical looping technology avoids the direct contact of air with the solid fuel, eliminating the need for energy intensive gas-gas CO2 separation techniques such as monoethanolamine scrubbing. Through the utilization of chemical looping strategy, the irreversibility of the fuel conversion process can be minimized, thereby resulting in significantly improved energy and energy conversion efficiencies.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, a system for converting carbonaceous fuels is provided. The system includes a gaseous fuel conversion reactor, a solid fuel conversion reactor, and a fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor disposed between the gaseous fuel conversion reactor and the solid fuel conversion reactor. The gaseous fuel conversion reactor has a gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid inlet, a gaseous fuel reactor off-gas inlet configured to receive off-gas from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor, and a gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet. The gaseous fuel conversion reactor is configured to convert the off-gas and oxygen carrier solids to a product gas stream including carbon dioxide and water, thereby reducing at least a portion of the oxygen carrier solids to reduced oxygen carrier solids. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor comprises a pretreatment reactor solid fuel inlet disposed in a fuel introduction section of the fuel pretreatment reactor, a pretreatment reactor oxygen carrier inlet configured to receive a mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids from the gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet, a pretreatment reactor intermediate gas inlet configured to receive intermediate gas from the solid fuel conversion reactor, wherein the intermediate gas is used for fluidization. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor also comprises a pretreatment reactor discharge in communication with the gaseous fuel conversion reactor off-gas inlet. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor is configured to volatilize solid fuel using heat from the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids to produce a devolatilized solid fuel and off-gas and subsequently discharge the off-gas, the devolatilized solid fuel, and the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids via the pretreatment reactor discharge. The solid fuel conversion reactor comprises a solid fuel conversion reactor inlet configured to receive the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids and devolatilized solid fuel from the pretreatment reactor discharge. The solid fuel conversion reactor also comprises a solid fuel conversion reactor intermediate gas outlet in communication with the pretreatment reactor intermediate gas inlet, and a solid fuel conversion reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet. The solid fuel conversion reactor is configured to react the devolatilized solid fuel with the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids to produce the intermediate gas comprising carbon dioxide and water, thereby further reducing oxygen carrier solids to reduced oxygen carrier solids.
In accordance with another embodiment, a system for converting carbonaceous fuels is provided. The system includes a gaseous fuel conversion reactor, a solid fuel conversion reactor, a fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor disposed between the gaseous fuel conversion reactor and the solid fuel conversion reactor, an oxidation reactor disposed downstream of the solid fuel conversion reactor, and a pretreatment gas-solids separation unit. The gaseous fuel conversion reactor having a gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid inlet, a gaseous fuel reactor off-gas inlet configured to receive off-gas from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor, and a gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet. The gaseous fuel conversion reactor is configured to convert the off-gas and oxygen carrier solids to a product gas stream comprising carbon dioxide and water, thereby reducing at least a portion of the oxygen carrier solids to reduced oxygen carrier solids. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor having a pretreatment reactor solid fuel inlet disposed in a fuel introduction section of the fuel pretreatment reactor, a pretreatment reactor oxygen carrier inlet configured to receive a mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids from the gaseous fuel reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet, a pretreatment reactor intermediate gas inlet configured to receive intermediate gas from the solid fuel conversion reactor, the intermediate gas being used for fluidization, and a pretreatment reactor discharge in communication with the gaseous fuel conversion reactor off-gas inlet. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor is configured to volatilize solid fuel using heat from the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids to produce a devolatilized solid fuel and off-gas, and subsequently discharge the off-gas, the devolatilized solid fuel, and the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids via the pretreatment reactor discharge. The solid fuel conversion reactor having a solid fuel conversion reactor inlet configured to receive the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids and devolatilized solid fuel from the pretreatment reactor discharge, a solid fuel conversion reactor intermediate gas outlet in communication with the pretreatment reactor intermediate gas inlet, and a solid fuel conversion reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet. The solid fuel conversion reactor being configured to react the devolatilized solid fuel with the mixture of oxygen carrier solids and reduced oxygen carrier solids to produce the intermediate gas comprising carbon dioxide and water, thereby further reducing oxygen carrier solids to reduced oxygen carrier solids. The oxidation reactor having a reduced oxygen carrier solid inlet configured to receive the reduced oxygen carrier solid and an oxidation reactor discharge configured to discharge the oxygen carrier solid and an oxygen depleted oxidation gas stream. The oxidation reactor being configured to react the reduced oxygen carrier solids from the solid fuel conversion reactor oxygen carrier solid outlet with an oxidation gas stream to convert the reduced oxygen carrier solid back to the oxygen carrier solid. Additionally, the pretreatment gas-solids separation unit is in communication with the pretreatment reactor discharge and configured to separate the off-gas from the devolatilized solid fuel and the oxygen carrier solid exiting the fuel pretreatment reactor.
Additional features and advantages of the systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the embodiments described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description describe various embodiments and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claimed subject matter. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the various embodiments, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate the various embodiments described herein, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the claimed subject matter.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels, examples of which are schematically depicted in the figures. Various embodiments of the systems and methods for converting carbonaceous fuels will be described in further detail herein with specific reference to the appended drawings.
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for converting a solid fuel in a process utilizing circulation of an oxygen carrier solid. The systems and methods described herein provide a commercially scalable design that provides reliable process operations. The exemplary embodiments are directly applicable to chemical looping systems for the full conversion of carbonaceous fuels in solids, liquid, and/or gas form to a product gas stream comprising predominantly CO2 and H2O.
Referring to
In an embodiment, the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 and the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 operate as moving beds or fluidized beds. In some embodiments, multiple fluidized bed reactor sections are connected in series to form the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 and/or the solid fuel conversion reactor 300. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 operates in a fluidized bed mode that distributes, heats, devolatilizes, and partially converts the solid fuel 10 in interaction with the oxygen carrier solid 20.
In an embodiment of the system 1000, the oxygen carrier solid 20 passes through the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100, the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200, and the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 to be gradually reduced and release its oxygen creating a reduced oxygen carrier solid 22, and the reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 is then transported to an oxidation reactor 500 for oxidation and regeneration.
With reference to
A highly concentrated CO2 stream can be obtained from the product gas stream 50 by condensing any present H2O from the product gas stream 50. The CO2 can thus be directly recovered and captured without further processing. This is in contrast to conventional post combustion carbon capture techniques where a solvent, absorbent, or adsorbent is required as an add-on to separate the dilute CO2 from other gases in the combustion flue gases. In the case of post combustion carbon capture solvent processes, a significant amount of energy is required to regenerate the solvent for re-use, ranging from an additional 11 to 40 percent of the gross energy output. There is no such energy penalties associated with CLC systems.
In an embodiment, the solid fuel 10 comprises solids, gases, or liquids such as, but not limited to, coal, tars, shale oil, tar/oil sands, biomass, wax, metallurgical coke, solid wastes, gasoline, oil, petroleum, diesel, jet fuel, ethanol, syngas, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, and other gaseous hydrocarbons (C1-C6). The solid fuel 10 can consist of any combination of the above and are not limited to the exemplary fuel materials disclosed.
In various embodiments, direct conversion of solid fuel 10 in a circulating process of oxygen carrier solid 20 occurs in two stages: gaseous volatile conversion and gasification of the devolatilized solid fuel 12.
Referring to
The oxygen carrier solid 20 successively passes through the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100, the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200, and the solid fuel conversion reactor 300. In various embodiments, the oxygen carrier solid 20 comprises an iron oxide. The iron oxide, for example Fe2O3, is reduced from its full oxidation state of 3+ to a nearly fully reduced state between 0 and 1+. The reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 is then be re-oxidized in the oxidation reactor 500 and sent back to the top of the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100. In the example using iron oxide (Fe2O3) the oxidation state of iron is specifically lowered from +3 to +2.66 (Fe3O4), +2 (FeO) or 0 (Fe). The reaction may be expressed as any of the following (unbalanced):
CxHy+Fe2O3→CO2+H2O+Fe3O4
CxHy+Fe2O3→CO2+H2O+FeO
CxHy+Fe2O3→CO2+H2O+Fe
where CxHy is the carbon-based solid fuel 10 and Fe2O3 is the oxygen carrier solid 20.
In additional embodiments, the solid fuel 10 is added into the system 1000 at the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 through a pretreatment reactor solid fuel inlet 216. The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 distributes, heats, devolatilizes, and partially converts the solid fuel 10. An off-gas 30 comprising the volatile components from the solid fuel 10, as well as remnants of other gaseous streams entering the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200, is then sent to gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 to be fully converted to CO2 and H2O. The devolatilized solid fuel 12, which is interspersed with the oxygen carrier solid 20 from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200, is separated from the off-gas 30 and sent to the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 to be gasified. In another embodiment, the intermediate gas 40 from the solid fuel 10 gasified in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is used as the fluidizing gas in the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 and sent to the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 as a component of the off-gas 30 for full solid fuel 10 conversion.
Still referring to
In various embodiments, the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 comprises a counter-current gas-solids moving bed reactor. The off-gas 30 from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 enters from through the gaseous fuel reactor off-gas inlet 150 near the bottom of the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 and the oxygen carrier solid 20 is fed from the top and discharged from the bottom. The gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 provides a full conversion of the off-gas 30 into a product gas stream 50 consisting of a predominantly CO2 and H2O rich stream, as well as partial conversion of the oxygen carrier solid 20 to a reduced oxygen carrier solid 22. The reducing degree of the oxygen carrier solid 20 in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 depends on the solid fuel 10 type, operational conditions, and mole ratio between oxygen carrier solid 20 and solid fuel 10. A higher percentage of volatile in the solid fuel 10 corresponds to a higher reducing degree of the oxygen carrier solid 20 in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100. For example, if coal is used as solid fuel 10 and Fe2O3 used as oxygen carrier solid 20, normally Fe2O3 is reduced to around Fe3O4 in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100, and then further reduced to FeO/Fe in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300.
In further embodiments, the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is divided into 2 or more staged fluidized/co-current bed reactors in series.
The gaseous reactant provided to the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is off-gas 30 and comprises the fluidizing gas and the removed volatile components from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 as well as the intermediate gas 40 which comprises the gasified fuel products from the solid fuel conversion reactor 300.
In some embodiments, the counter-current moving bed gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 has a short residence time needed for gaseous reactants. The residence time in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is in the range of less than approximately one second to approximately 5 minutes. In further embodiments, the residence time in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is approximately 1 second to approximately 3 minute. In still further embodiments, the residence time in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 of the off-gas 30 is approximately 1 second to approximately 1 minute. For example, a residence time in the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 of the off-gas 30 of approximately 1 second to approximately 1 minute for CO and H2, a residence time of less than approximately 5 seconds, for CH4, and a residence time of approximately 10 to 15 seconds for other carbonaceous gases are desired. The diameter and height of the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 determine residence time in conjunction with the flow rate of the off-gas 30 provided to the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100. The desired residence time of the off-gas 30 for full conversion is dependent on operating temperature and composition of both the gaseous and solid species.
In embodiments, the residence time of the oxygen carrier solid 20 is much longer than the residence time of the gaseous reactants. The residence time of the oxygen carrier solid 20 is between approximately 30 minutes and approximately 90 minutes for the different particles of the oxygen carrier solid 20 used. The temperature has an influence on the residence time of reactants. For example, when the temperature decreases, the reaction rate decreases dramatically. For a temperature over approximately 750° C., the residence time of volatiles would be in seconds.
In embodiments, the gas velocity through the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is less than the minimum fluidization velocity of the oxygen carrier solid 20 under the moving bed operational conditions. The design of the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is governed by the reaction kinetics of gaseous fuels, the reduction kinetics of oxygen carrier solid 20, the hydrodynamic characteristics of the oxygen carrier solid 20, the properties and composition of the off-gas 30, and operational conditions of the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100. For example, in an embodiment, the operating temperature of gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is in the range of approximately 500° C. to approximately 1250° C. and the operating pressure is in the range from approximately 1 to approximately 50 bars, depending on the requirements of potential downstream processes such as heat recovery, flue gas purification, and sequestration. In a further embodiment, the operating temperature of gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 is in the range of approximately 750° C. to approximately 900° C. and the operating pressure is approximately ambient pressure. In still a further embodiment, when high pressure CO2 is desired downstream, the operating pressure is at or above 10 atm.
Still referring to
In another embodiment, solid fuel 10 is fed into the bottom section of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 where the solid fuel 10 is rapidly heated and devolatilized. In accordance with various embodiments, the solid fuel 10 may be coal, tars, oil shales, oil sands, tar sand, biomass, wax, coke, solid waste, and/or other carbonaceous fuels.
The fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200, in various embodiments, is operated in a binary-solids fluidized bed mode with oxygen carrier solid 20 and solid fuel 10. A function of the oxygen carrier solid 20 in this chamber is to supply the thermal heat required for devolatilization of the solid fuel 10. The fluidization of the oxygen carrier solid 20 also provides agitation to decrease or eliminate the agglomeration tendencies present in some solid fuel 10, such as caking coals. The fluidized bed operation mode of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 also provides mixing of the oxygen carrier solid 20 with the solid fuel 10. The fluidization of the oxygen carrier solid 20 in the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 provides rapid heat transfer among particles of the oxygen carrier solid 20 to prevent temperature non-uniformity while reducing agglomeration issues present in some solid fuels 10.
In multiple embodiments, the fluidization gas for the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 is the intermediate gas 40 from the solid fuel conversion reactor intermediate gas outlet 310 of solid fuel conversion reactor 300. In further embodiments, the intermediate gas 40 is a mixture of CO, CO2, CH4, H2, H2O, and heavier hydrocarbons. The intermediate gas 40 composition is dependent on gases introduced into the solid fuel conversion reactor 300, the solid fuel 10 utilized, operating temperature, and composition of the oxygen carrier solid 20.
In further embodiments depicted in
In various embodiments, the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 operates in a counter-current gas-solids moving bed mode. The diameter and height of solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is determined to satisfy the desired residence time required for the gasification of devolatilized solid fuel 12 and conversion of the oxygen carrier solid 20. In an embodiment, the residence time in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is approximately 5 minutes to approximately 1 hour. In a further embodiment, the residence time in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is approximately 15 minutes to approximately 45 minutes. In still a further embodiment, the residence time in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is approximately 20 minutes to approximately 40 minutes.
In further embodiments, a conversion enhancement gas 350 is used to enhance the conversion of the devolatilized solid fuel 12 in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300. In an embodiment, the conversion enhancement gas 350 comprises primarily H2O and CO2. In another embodiment, the conversion enhancement gas 350 comprises a recycled split stream from the product gas stream 50 exiting the gaseous fuel conversion gas outlet 130 of gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100. In yet another embodiment, conversion enhancement gas 350 is not utilized, as the oxygen carrier solid 20 provides the gasification of the devolatilized solid fuel 12, such as in the case of atomic oxygen uncoupling from a metal oxide material.
In at least one embodiment, the conversion enhancement gas 350 flow rate to solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is up to 40 mol % of the carbon molar flow rate in the devolatilized solid fuel 12. In further embodiments, the conversion enhancement gas 350 flow rate to solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is up to 10 mol %, up to 20 mol %, up to 30 mol %, up to 50 mol %, or up to 60 mol % of the carbon molar flow rate in the devolatilized solid fuel 12. As the gasification of solid fuel 10 or devolatilized solid fuel 12 is a gas producing process, the total gas flow rate naturally gradually increases from the bottom to the top of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 due to evolving gas from partial oxidation of the devolatilized solid fuel 12. The solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is designed such that the gas velocity through the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is maintained below the minimum fluidization velocity of the oxygen carrier solid 20. Maintaining the gas velocity below the minimum fluidization velocity of the oxygen carrier solid 20 keeps the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 in the moving bed mode.
During conversion in the solid fuel conversion reactor 300, the devolatilized solid fuel 12 gradually reduces in size as a result of its gasification and eventually turns to ash 60. In an exemplary embodiment, the devolatilized solid fuel 12 is maintained in solid fuel conversion reactor 300 in the fluidized state while the ash 60 produced is entrained out of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 due to the small ash 60 size and density. The design of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is governed by the kinetics of the gasification of fixed carbon, the kinetics of oxygen carrier solid 20, the hydrodynamic characteristics of the oxygen carrier solid 20 and the solid fuel 10, the composition of solid fuel 10, as well as the operational conditions of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300. In an embodiment, the operational temperature of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is in the range of approximately 500° C. to approximately 1250° C. and the operational pressure is in the range from approximately 1 bar to approximately 50 bars, depending on the requirement of potential downstream processes such as heat recovery, flue gas purification, and sequestration. In a further embodiment, the operating temperature of solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is in the range of approximately 750° C. to approximately 900° C. and the operating pressure is approximately ambient pressure. In still a further embodiment, when high pressure CO2 is desired downstream, the operating pressure is at or above 10 atm.
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the oxygen carrier solid 20 is capable of undergoing numerous reduction-oxidation reaction regeneration cycles.
In embodiments of a fluidized bed oxidation reactor 500, the diameter and height of the oxidation reactor 500 are designed to ensure full and uniform oxidation of reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 with minimal operating costs. The design is governed by the kinetics and hydrodynamics of reduced oxygen carrier solid 22, stoichiometric ratio between reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 and oxidation gas stream 510, as well as the operational conditions of the oxidation reactor 500. In an exemplary embodiment, the operational temperature of oxidation reactor 500 is in the range of approximately 600° C. to approximately 1250° C. and the operational pressure is in the range from approximately 1 bar to approximately 50 bars, depending on the requirement of potential downstream processes such as heat recovery, flue gas purification, and sequestration. A relatively higher temperature in the upper end of the disclosed range is preferred as higher gas temperature gives a higher efficiency for secondary processes such as electricity generation.
Reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 is delivered to the oxidation reactor 500 through the use of non-mechanical seal 600 that will be described hereafter.
The oxygen carrier solid 20 generated from the oxidation of the reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 is transported from oxidation reactor 500 to oxygen carrier solid storage vessel 800 through an oxidizer gas-solids separation unit 700, in various embodiments. In one embodiment, pneumatic transport methods, such as a riser, are used with an oxygen depleted oxidation gas stream 512 as carrying gas to make the process more economically feasible. The oxygen depleted oxidation gas stream 512 representing the oxidation gas stream 510 after giving up oxygen molecules to oxidize the reduced oxygen carrier solid 22 and exits an oxidation reactor discharge 520 of the oxidation reactor 500.
In multiple embodiments, the oxidizer gas-solids separation unit 700 separates oxygen depleted oxidation gas in the oxygen depleted oxidation gas stream 512 and attrited solids from relatively larger oxygen carrier solid 20. In an embodiment, the oxidizer gas-solids separation unit 700 is a cyclone with a designed cut-off particle size and efficiency. In an embodiment, the cut-off particle size of the cyclone oxidizer gas solids separation unit 700 is particles larger than approximately 5 microns. In a further embodiment, the oxidizer gas-solids separation unit 700 is a disengagement chamber configured such that solid particles with a diameter less than a designed value are entrained and carried by the gas flow while larger particles, such as oxygen carrier solid 20, flow downwards as driven by gravity. In an embodiment, the cut-off particle size of the disengagement chamber oxidizer gas solids separation unit 700 is particles larger than approximately 50 microns. In a further embodiment, the cut-off particle size of the disengagement chamber oxidizer gas solids separation unit 700 is particles larger than approximately 100 microns. In yet another embodiment, a cyclone and a disengagement device are utilized in series for desired fine removal effectiveness and efficiency. Other methods for separating fine particles from bulk solids, through either non-mechanical or mechanical means, such as sieving and other methods known to one having ordinary skill in the art may be used.
In an embodiment, the oxygen carrier solid discharged from the oxidizer gas-solids separation unit 700 are stored in the oxygen carrier solid storage vessel 800. In further embodiments, the oxygen carrier solid storage vessel 800 is sealed from the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100 with a zone seal or other non-mechanical seal 600.
Now referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In further embodiments of the system 1000, the circulation rate of the oxygen carrier solid 20 is controlled by an oxygen carrier solid circulation device 610 installed between the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 and the oxidation reactor 500. The oxygen carrier solid circulation device provides control of the oxygen carrier solid circulation rate and prevents gas mixing between the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 and the oxidation reactor 500. Referring to
The non-mechanical seal 600 provides pressure differences across the system 1000. An embodiment of a system pressure profile is provided in
Referring to
With reference to
In at least one embodiment, referring now to
In embodiments, the substantially cone shaped bottom 240 of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 is configured such that gas velocity inside the substantially cone shaped bottom 240 is higher than the terminal velocity of the oxygen carrier solid 20. The gas-solids flow enters into the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 from underneath the cone and is propelled from the gas-solids jets 550 into the fluidized bed of oxygen carrier solid 20. In further embodiments, the number, locations and orientations of the injection nozzles of the gas-solids jets 550 provide smooth operation and uniform distribution of fluidizing gas and solid fuel 10 into the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200.
In various embodiments, the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 is an overflow fluidized bed, as shown in
In further embodiments, the off-gas 30, oxygen carrier solid 20, and devolatilized solid fuel 12 are entrained from the top of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200. The gas-solids flow is then transported through a pretreatment discharge line 420 and separated in pretreatment gas-solids separation unit 400, as shown in
Referring to the embodiment of
In other embodiments depicted in
In some embodiments, unconvertible composition of the solid fuel 10 is promptly removed from the system 1000 to avoid disruption of movement of oxygen carrier solid 20 and solid fuel 10 as well as agglomeration. The unconvertible composition of the solid fuel 10 in the system 1000 is transported from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 together with the rest of the solid fuel 10 into the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 wherein the unconvertible composition is converted to ash 60. In embodiments, the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 is configured to let the ash 60 be carried out by the intermediate gas 40 through the solid fuel conversion intermediate gas outlet of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300.
In embodiments wherein the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 comprises a meshed gas distributor 160, the ash 60 has to be separated from the intermediate gas 40 before being sent to the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200. With reference to
In still further embodiments, unconverted carbon together with ash 60 is entrained by intermediate gas 40 exiting the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 and separated from the intermediate gas 40 through the intermediate gas-solids separation unit 900. Referring to
In further embodiments, a two stage gas-solids separation system is installed downstream of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 to separate the exit stream from the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200. For example, with reference to
In some embodiments, the two stage gas-solids separation system is installed between the solid fuel conversion reactor intermediate gas outlet 310 of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 and the meshed gas distributor 160 of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 to separate ash 60 from unconverted carbon. The unconverted carbon is then sent back to the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 while the ash 60 is discarded.
In yet another embodiment, wherein the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 is a fluidized bed with a substantially cone shaped bottom 240 and no meshed gas distributor 160, a gas-solids separation device may not be needed between the solid fuel conversion reactor intermediate gas outlet 310 of the solid fuel conversion reactor 300 and the pretreatment reactor intermediate gas inlet 220 of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200. Referring to
In yet another embodiment, with reference to
In embodiments where ash 60 is carried with off-gas 30 of the fuel pretreatment fluidized bed reactor 200 to the gaseous fuel conversion reactor 100, conventional methods of injecting a gas stream into a moving-bed, such as a sparger ring, may not be applicable. Referring to
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Thus it is intended that the specification cover the modifications and variations of the various embodiments described herein provided such modification and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/028217, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/782,526, filed Mar. 14, 2013, the entire contents of both applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/028217 | 3/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/152914 | 9/25/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
971206 | Messerschmitt | Sep 1910 | A |
1078686 | Lane | Nov 1913 | A |
1658939 | Parsons | Feb 1928 | A |
2182747 | Marshall, Jr. | Dec 1939 | A |
2198560 | Marshall, Jr. | Apr 1940 | A |
2449635 | Barr | Sep 1948 | A |
2614067 | Reed et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2635947 | Reed et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
2686819 | Johnson | Aug 1954 | A |
2694622 | Reed et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2697686 | Leffer | Dec 1954 | A |
2899374 | Gomory | Aug 1959 | A |
3031287 | Benson et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3027238 | Watkins | Sep 1962 | A |
3338667 | Pundsack | Aug 1967 | A |
3353925 | Baumann et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3421869 | Benson | Jan 1969 | A |
3442613 | Grotz, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3442619 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3442620 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3494858 | Luckenback | Feb 1970 | A |
3573224 | Strelzoff et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3619142 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3726966 | Johnston | Apr 1973 | A |
4017270 | Funk et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4057402 | Patel et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4108732 | Nuttall, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4272399 | Davis et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4325833 | Scott | Apr 1982 | A |
4334959 | Green | Jun 1982 | A |
4343624 | Belke et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348487 | Goldstein et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4404086 | Oltrogge | Sep 1983 | A |
4420332 | Mori et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4521117 | Ouwerkerk et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4778585 | Graff | Oct 1988 | A |
4842777 | Lamort | Jun 1989 | A |
4861165 | Fredriksson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869207 | Engstrom et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4895821 | Kainer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4902586 | Wertheim | Feb 1990 | A |
5130106 | Koves et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5365560 | Tam | Nov 1994 | A |
5447024 | Ishida et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5509362 | Lyon | Apr 1996 | A |
5518187 | Bruno et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529599 | Calderon | Jun 1996 | A |
5630368 | Wagoner | May 1997 | A |
5730763 | Manulescu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5770310 | Noguchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5827496 | Lyon | Oct 1998 | A |
5858210 | Richardson | Jan 1999 | A |
6007699 | Cole | Dec 1999 | A |
6143253 | Radcliffe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180354 | Singh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6361757 | Shikada et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6395944 | Griffiths | May 2002 | B1 |
6412559 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6494153 | Lyon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509000 | Choudhary et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517631 | Bland | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6631698 | Hyppanen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642174 | Gaffney et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663681 | Kindig et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667022 | Cole | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669917 | Lyon | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682714 | Kindig et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685754 | Kindig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703343 | Park | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6797253 | Lyon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834623 | Cheng | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875411 | Sanfilippo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6880635 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7001579 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7244399 | Myöhänen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7404942 | Sanfilippo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7496450 | Ortiz Alemán et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7767191 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7837975 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840053 | Liao | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8116430 | Shapiro et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8192706 | Grochowski | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202349 | Molaison | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8419813 | Hoteit et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435920 | White et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8508238 | Mahalingam et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8761943 | Lou et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771549 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814963 | Apanel et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877147 | Fan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9376318 | Fan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20010055559 | Sanfilippo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030024388 | Scharpf | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031291 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030119658 | Allison et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130360 | Kindig et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030180215 | Niu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188668 | Bland | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028181 | Charles Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030214 | Schindler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040109800 | Pahlman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126293 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131531 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132833 | Espinoza et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138060 | Rapier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040197612 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213705 | Blencoe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233191 | Mukherjee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244289 | Morozumi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265224 | Papavassiliou et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002847 | Maroto-Valer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054880 | Dubois et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050175533 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050255037 | Otsuka et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265912 | Alvarez Jr et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274648 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060042565 | Hu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094593 | Beech et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070010588 | Pearson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049489 | Becue et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157517 | Tsay et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070258878 | Sanfilippo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080031809 | Norbeck et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080161624 | Glover et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209807 | Tsangaris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314838 | Becker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000194 | Fan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042070 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090160461 | Zangl et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100071262 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100184589 | Miyairi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187159 | Naunheimer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258429 | Ugolin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293845 | Zeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332170 | Gao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005395 | Vimalchand et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011720 | Rinker | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054049 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094226 | Mchugh et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110146152 | Vimalchand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176968 | Fan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110289845 | Davis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110291051 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300060 | Guillou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303875 | Hoteit et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120159841 | Fan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167585 | Wormser | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171588 | Fan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214106 | Sit et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130085365 | Marashdeh et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130149650 | Gauthier | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130255272 | Ajhar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140034134 | Fan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072917 | Fan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140144082 | Fan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140295361 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150238915 | Fan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101389734 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101426885 | May 2009 | CN |
102612625 | Jul 2012 | CN |
1134187 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1445018 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1580162 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1845579 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1933087 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2450420 | May 2012 | EP |
2515038 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2601443 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2924035 | May 2009 | FR |
H10249153 | Sep 1998 | JP |
406055 | Sep 2000 | TW |
426728 | Mar 2001 | TW |
9013773 | Nov 1990 | WO |
9965097 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0022690 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0068339 | Nov 2000 | WO |
01042132 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03070629 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2007082089 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007122498 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007134075 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008019079 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008071215 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008082312 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008115076 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009009388 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009021258 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009114309 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009007200 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010037011 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010063923 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010126617 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011021161 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011031752 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011031755 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011084734 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011153568 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012064712 | May 2012 | WO |
2012077978 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012155054 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012155059 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013040645 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2014085243 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abad et al., “Chemical-looping combustion in a 300 W continuously operating reactor system using a manganese-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, Issue 9, pp. 1174-1185. |
Abad et al., “Reduction Kinetics of Cu−, Ni−, and Fe− Based Oxygen Carriers Using Syngas (CO + H2) for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy Fuels, 2007, 21 (4), pp. 1843-1853. |
Abad et al., “The use of iron oxide as oxygen carrier in a chemical-looping reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issues 7-8, pp. 1021-1035. |
Adanez et al., “Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 215-282. |
Azis et al., “On the evaluation of synthetic and natural ilmenite using syngas as fuel in chemical-looping combustion (CLC),” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2010, vol. 88, Issue 11, pp. 1505-1514. |
Balasubramanian et al., “Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process,” Chem Engr Science, 1999, 54(15-16), 3543. |
Cao et al., “Investigation of Chemical Looping Combustion by Solid Fuels. 1. Process Analysis,” Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(5), pp. 1836-1844. |
Cho et al., “Comparison of iron−, nickel−, copper− and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 9, pp. 1215-1225. |
De Diego et al., “Development of Cu-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 13, pp. 1749-1757. |
Denton et al., “Simultaneous Production of High-Purity Hydrogen and Sequestration-Ready CO2 from Syngas,” 2003. |
Environmental Protection Agency, “Geological CO2 Sequestration Technology and Cost Analysis,” Technical Support Document, pp. i-vi & pp. 1-61, Jun. 2008. |
Fan et al., “Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion prospect and opportunity,” Energy Environmental Science, 2012, p. 7254-7280. |
Fan et al., “Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes,” Particuology, 2008, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 131-142. |
Forero et al., “Syngas combustion in a 500 Wth Chemical-Looping Combustion system using an impregnated Cu-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, vol. 90, Issue 12, pp. 1471-1479. |
Gao et al., “Production of syngas via autothermal reforming of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor over the combined CeO2−ZrO2/SiO2 supported Ni catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, vol. 33, p. 5493-5500. |
Garcia-Labiano et al., “Temperature variations in the oxygen carrier particles during their reduction and oxidation in a chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 851-862. |
Geldart, “Types of Gas Fluidization,” Power Technology, vol. 7, pp. 285-292, 1973. |
Ghanapragasam et al., “Hydrogen production from coal direct chemical looping and syngas chemical looping combustion systems: Assessment of system operation and resource requirements,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 2606-2615. |
Go et al., “Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, p. 1301-1309. |
Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes - a brief review,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999. |
Herzog, “Carbon Sequestration via Mineral Carbonation: Overview and Assessment,” MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environmental, http://sequestration.mit.edu/pfd/carbonates.pdf, Mar. 14, 2002. |
Hildebrandt et al., “Producing Transportation Fuels with Less Work,” Science, Mar. 27, 2009, vol. 323, pp. 1680-1681. |
Hossain et al., “Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations - a review,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, vol. 63, Issue 18, pp. 4433-4451. |
Hua et al., “Three Dimensional Analysis of Electrical Capacitance Tomography Sensing Fields,” 1999 IOP Publishing LTD, vol. 10, pp. 717-725. |
Huijgen et al., “Carbon dioxide sequestration by mineral carbonation,” ECN-C--03-016, www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/200e/c03016.pdf, Feb. 2003. |
Jadhav et al., “Carbonation of Mg-Bearing Minerals: Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies,” Ohio Coal Research Consortium/Ohio State University Project C3.12, www.ohiocoal.org/projects/year3/c3.12, Jul. 3, 2002. |
Jin et al., “Development of a Novel Chemical-Looping Combustion: Synthesis of a Looping Material with a Double Metal Oxide of Co0−NiO,” Energy & Fuels, 1998, vol. 12, 1272-1277. |
Johansson et al., “Combustion of Syngas and Natural Gas in a 300 W Chemical-Looping Combustor,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design Volume, 2006, vol. 84, Issue 9, pp. 819-827. |
Kaiser et al., “Precombustion and Postcombustion Decarbonization,” IEEE, Power Engineering Review, Apr. 2001, pp. 15-17. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion using oxide scale and unprocessed iron ore as oxygen carriers,” Fuel, 2009, vol. 88, Issue 10, pp. 1945-1954. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 180-193. |
Leion et al., “The use of petroleum coke as fuel in chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issue 12-13, pp. 1947-1958. |
Li et al., “Clean coal conversion processes—progress and challenges,” the Royal Society of Chemistry, Energy & Environmental Science, Jul. 30, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 248-267. |
Li et al., “Role of Metal Oxide Support in Redox Reactions of Iron Oxide for Chemical Looping Applications: Experiments and Density Functional Theory Calculations,” Energy Environmental Science, 2011, vol. 4, p. 3661-3667. |
Li et al., “Syngas chemical looping gasification process: Bench-scale studies and reactor simulations,” AICHE Journal, 2010, vol. 56, Issue 8, pp. 2186-2199. |
Li et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Gasification Process: Oxygen Carrier Particle Selection and Performance,” Energy Fuels, 2009, 23(8), pp. 4182-4189. |
Lyngfelt, “Chemical Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels—Status of Development,” Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 113, p. 1869-1873. |
Lyngfelt, “Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion Operational Experience,” 1st International Conference on Chemical Looping, Mar. 2010. |
Mamman et al., “Simultaneous steam and CO2 reforming of methane to syngas over NiO/MgO/SA-5205 in presence and absence of oxygen,” Applied Catalysis A, 1998, vol. 168, p. 33-46. |
Marashdeh, Q. et al., “A Multimodal Tomography System Based on ECT Sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, 426-433. |
Marashdeh, Q., Advances in Electrical Capacitance Tomography, Dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2006. |
Mattisson et al., “Application of chemical-looping combustion with capture of CO2,” Second Nordic Minisymposium on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Goeteborg, Oct. 26, 2001, pp. 46-51. |
Mattisson et al., “Chemical-looping combustion using syngas as fuel,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas control, 2007, vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 158-169. |
Mattisson et al., “Co 2 capture from coal combustion using chemical-looping combustion—Reactivity investigation of Fe, Ni and Mn based oxygen carriers using syngas,” Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Energy Technology and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Division of Environmental Inorganic Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, 2007. |
Mattisson et al., “Reactivity of Some Metal Oxides Supported on Alumina with Alternating Methane and Oxygen—Application for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2003, vol. 17, pp. 643-651. |
Mattisson et al., “The use of iron oxide as an oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of methane with inherent separation of CO2,” Fuel, 2001, vol. 80, pp. 1953-1962. |
Mattisson et al., “Use of Ores and Industrial Products As Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2307-2315. |
Ockwig et al., “Membranes for Hydrogen Separation,” American Chemical Society, Chem. Rev., Oct. 10, 2007, vol. 107, pp. 4078-4110. |
O'Connor et al., “Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Results from Recent Studies and Currents Status,” Abstract, USDOE Office of Fossil Energy, 2001. |
Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, “Ohio Coal Research Consortium (OCRC) - IV, Year 3 Proposal Solicitation,” http://www.ohioquality.org/ocdo/other—pdf/Consortium—IV—Year—3—RFP.podf (2006). |
Ortiz et al., “Hydrogen Production by Auto-Thermal Chemical-Looping Reforming in a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Reactor Using Ni-based Oxygen Carriers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, vol. 35, p. 151-160. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: Chemically Enhanced Aqueous Carbonation of Serpentine,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, vol. 81, pp. 885-890. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: physically activated dissolution of serpentine and pH swing process,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 5241-5247. |
Pröll et al., “Syngas and a separate nitrogen/argon stream via chemical looping reforming—A 140 kW pilot plant study,” Fuel, 2010, vol. 89, Issue 6, pp. 1249-1256. |
Ruchenstein et al., “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nickel/alkaline earth metal oxide catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, 1995, vol. 133, p. 149-161. |
Russo et al., “Impact of Process Design of on the Multiplicity Behavior of a Jacketed Exothermic CSTR,” AICHE Journal, Jan. 1995, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 135-147. |
Ryden et al., “Synthesis gas generation by chemical-looping reforming in a continuously operating laboratory reactor,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, p. 1631-1641. |
Scott et al., “In situ gasification of a solid fuel and CO2 separation using chemical looping,” AICHE Journal, 2006, vol. 52, Issue 9, pp. 3325-3328. |
Shen et al., “Chemical-Looping Combustion of Biomass in a 10kWth Reactor with Iron Oxide as an Oxygen Carrier,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2498-2505. |
Shen et al., “Experiments on chemical looping combustion of coal with a NiO based oxygen carrier,” Combustion and Flame, 2009, vol. 156, Issue 3, pp. 721-728. |
Sridhar et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Process: Design and Construction of a 25 kWth Subpilot Unit,” Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(4), pp. 2292-2302. |
Steinfeld et al., “Design Aspects of Solar Thermochemical Engineering—A case Study: Two-Step Water-Splitting Cycle Using the Fe3O4/FeO Redox System,” Solar Energy, 1999, pp. 43-53. |
Steinfeld, “Solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, vol. 27, pp. 611-619. |
Tian et al., “Thermodynamic investigation into carbon deposition and sulfur evolution in a Ca-based chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, vol. 89, Issue 9, p. 1524. |
U.S. Department of Energy, NCCTI Energy Technologies Group, Office of Fossil Energy, “CO2 Capture and Storage in Geologic Formations,” pp. 34, Revised Jan. 8, 2002. |
Usachev et al., “Conversion of Hydrocarbons to Synthesis Gas: Problems and Prospects,” Petroleum Chemistry, 2011, vol. 51, p. 96-106. |
Vernon et al., “Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas,” Catalysis Letters, 1990, vol. 6, p. 181-186. |
Warsito, W. et al., Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Yamazaki et al., “Development of highly stable nickel catalyst for methane-steam reaction under low steam to carbon ratio,” Applied Catalyst A, 1996, vol. 136, p. 49-56. |
Zafar et al., “Integrated Hydrogen and Power Production with CO2 Capture Using Chemical-Looping ReformingRedox Reactivity of Particles of CuO, Mn2O3, NiO, and Fe2O3 Using SiO2 as a Support,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44(10), pp. 3485-3496. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2007/000956 dated Jul. 24, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2010/048121 dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2010/048125 dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2011/059736 dated May 23, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2012/037544 dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US/2012/037557 dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/14877 dated May 14, 2014 (10 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/25520 dated Jul. 11, 2014 (13 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US14/26071 dated Jul. 10, 2014 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/000956 dated Dec. 4, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/058579 dated Aug. 3, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/048121 dated Apr. 1, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/048125 dated Dec. 17, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/059736 dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037544 dated Aug. 10, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037557 dated Aug. 13, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/027839 dated Jul. 24, 2014 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/028217 dated Jul. 28, 2014 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/018123 dated May 8, 2015 (10 pages). |
Advisory Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
Advisory Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Jun. 24, 2013. |
Examiner's Answer before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Nov. 4, 2013. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jan. 5, 2012. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
Final Rejection pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jun. 5, 2012. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Jun. 7, 2011. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,803 dated Feb. 23, 2016 (27 pages). |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/121,009 dated Sep. 6, 2012. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Dec. 18, 2014 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Jul. 2, 2015 (15 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Jan. 15, 2016 (13 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Apr. 9, 2014 (26 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Aug. 26, 2014 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Dec. 30, 2014 (19 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Oct. 13, 2015 (21 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Dec. 14, 2015 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,572 dated Feb. 22, 2016 (8 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Jun. 12, 2015 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Oct. 30, 2014 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/091,654 dated Jan. 4, 2016 (17 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,295 dated Sep. 28, 2015 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/162,199 dated Jun. 30, 2016 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/883,795 dated Jun. 20, 2016 (15 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Alowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/394,396 dated Aug. 3, 2016 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160016137 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61782526 | Mar 2013 | US |