The present application relates generally to the field of the analysis and management of information. More specifically, exemplary embodiments relate to systems and methods for gathering, analyzing and reporting information in a business context. More specifically, certain exemplary embodiments relate to systems and methods for presenting business metrics to system users in a reliable and efficient manner.
There have been developed over the past several decades software and hardware based systems for monitoring and administering business processes. These processes can include all aspects of a business, including inventory and supply chain management, business financing, personnel management, etc. These systems are sometimes called enterprise resource planning systems. Information generated and stored by enterprise resource planning systems can be extremely useful as “business intelligence”. It has been a task of business systems designers to help the right information be provided to the right people at the right time.
A business system may provide different metrics to a system user, which may also be called “aggregate data”. One example of such a metric involves the moving average price of products used by a business. If the moving average price of a business raw material exceeds a certain price, for example, it may be indicative of supply problems. The moving average price is also used for inventory revaluation. There is thus a need to develop systems and methods for evaluating the moving average price and other business metrics in a reliable and efficient fashion. There is further a need to recognize exceptional deviations from the standard business metrics and to quickly identify the underlying data that led to the deviation condition.
One aspect of the embodiments relates to a system for monitoring a data metric, comprising: a plurality of records relating to a data metric; a database for storing at least a portion of information from at least one of the plurality of records relating to a data metric; an extractor for querying the database for database data relevant to the data metric within a particular time frame and providing query results to a first data storage unit and a second data storage unit; wherein the first and second data storage units are used to generate first and second reports regarding the data metric.
A second aspect of the embodiments relates to a method for allowing monitoring of a data metric, comprising: scanning a plurality of records to determine those related to a data metric; storing information from at least some of the plurality of records in a database; extracting via a query information from the database related to the data metric; providing the query information to a first data storage unit and a second data storage unit; generating a report using the first data storage unit; and generating a report using the second data storage unit.
Another aspect of the embodiments relates to a machine readable medium with executable program code embedded therein, the code when executed performing a method, comprising: scanning a plurality of records to determine those related to a data metric; storing information from at least some of the plurality of records in a database; extracting via a query information from the database related to the data metric; providing the query information to a first data storage unit and a second data storage unit; generating a report using the first data storage unit; and generating a report using the second data storage unit.
The various embodiments of the invention will be described in further detail with reference to the Figures, of which
With reference to
The ERP system 202 exists within a business environment with various business units or installations 204, 206, 208 and 210. Each unit or installation generates or receives records 212, 214, 216, 218. The records may be invoices, sales records, records of inventory management, records of price changes, etc. Units 204, 206, 208, and 210 can be remote from each other or located near each other. Units 204, 206, 208 and 210 can be connected via a private or public computer network. Alternatively, units 204, 206, 208 and 210 are not connected and data can be collected by other means.
In order to monitor the progress of particular business metrics, for example the moving average price of a particular item, the ERP system 202 is equipped by means of a report to seek out those particular business records that are relevant to the particular metric. For example, for the calculation of a moving average price, an ERP system 202 might seek out inventory management records, sales price revaluation records, price change records and invoice records from among records 212 through 218. It should be understood that each business unit or installation 204 through 210 can generate a variety of different records.
Each relevant record is transmitted to the ERP system 202 as indicated by arrows 222, 224, 226 and 228. The record may be distilled into a data statement, comprising, by way of example, the date of the record, a record identifier that serves as a key, price and quantity data. The data statements are stored by the ERP, for example in a transparent database table.
The distillation and storage of record information is shown in
With the data obtained from records 304 through 310 and business information systems 312 and 314, the report 300 precalculates business metrics, for example, a moving average price of goods, as well as inventory quantities and inventory values. These are stored as part of the transparent table 302 accessible to the report. Each data sentence is also given a time-stamp.
With reference to
InfoSource 412 acts as a data source within the BW system 402 to two data targets: InfoCube 414 and Operational Data Store (ODS) Object 416. The InfoCube 414 is a multi-dimensional database structure optimized for fast querying. InfoCube 414 holds only the data statements for which the target business metric exceeds a threshold value, or in the event of a minimum threshold, is below the minimum. For example, if the moving average price is the target metric, the InfoCube 414 will store only those data statements for which the moving average price for a particular product exceeds or, in the event of a minimum, is below a particular customer defined threshold. ODS Object 416, on the other hand stores detailed information, such that a more comprehensive analysis of the data can be performed when required by the customer.
InfoCube 414 and ODS object 416 are linked over an interface 418, the function of which is to bring together more than one data stream for the purpose of generating a report. The interface 418 may be, for example, a MultiProvider from the SAP AG.
In the detailed analysis ODS object 416, all data statements delivered by the Extractor are saved. Both data targets have as the lowest level of granularity Location/Article/Document Nr/Day. The Exception Reporting InfoCube 414 can be emptied as soon as the deviation is analyzed and no longer needed. The Detailed Analysis ODS object 416 should not be stored for longer than an appropriate period, for example two months. Then a new ODS Object should be constructed and, as soon as the information out of the previous ODS object 416 is no longer needed, it can be archived.
The BW system 402 generates two reports 420 and 422 for system users. The report 420 is an exception report, and represents a summary of all instances where the targeted business metric exceeded or, in the event of a minimum, was below the corresponding threshold. These are the “alert values” of the report 402. The data in report 402 also includes the most important documents which formed the basis for the alert values of the metric. For the case of a moving average price report, information about the corresponding inventory, the inventory values and the moving average price is also displayed. Report 422 represents a more detailed report based on all information provided by the ERP system 404, and displays material/location combinations.
Turning now to
Returning now to
The InfoCube for the daily reporting can comprise, for example, only those statements for which the deviation of the prior metric from the newest metric exceed a threshold to be defined by a system user. The InfoCube contains relatively few data statements, thus facilitating high-performance reporting. The ODS object for the detailed analysis comprises all statements delivered by the extractor. This is preferred in case it is desirable to analyze, for an exceptional metric, all other documents for a day, to, for example, display the development of the metric over a certain time period.
Due to the potentially large volumes of information transmitted to the analysis engine, it is beneficial to precalculate report parameters at point 610 prior to reporting at 612. This alleviates the calculation burden associated with massive amounts of data and can improve the appearance of system performance to the user.
The user may receive an exception report at point 618. If the exception report warrants it, the user may view more detailed reporting at point 612. The more detailed reporting is based on all data passed to the InfoSource, and can thus show exceptions in context. The detailed reporting can, for example, show the change over time of the business metric.
The results of the analysis itself should provide, along with adequate information regarding evidence that lead to the alert values of the average moving price, information regarding the corresponding inventory elements, the inventory values and the average moving price.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4752877 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5315508 | Bain et al. | May 1994 | A |
5400253 | O'Connor | Mar 1995 | A |
5444820 | Tzes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5546507 | Staub | Aug 1996 | A |
5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
5701400 | Amado | Dec 1997 | A |
5758327 | Gardner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5870716 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5930771 | Stapp | Jul 1999 | A |
5999914 | Blinn et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6029139 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6064984 | Ferguson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6341351 | Muralidhran et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405181 | Lent et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6505093 | Thatcher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507851 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6701299 | Kraisser et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725204 | Gusley | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6868528 | Roberts | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6910017 | Woo et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6980966 | Sobrado et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7031951 | Mancisidor et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082408 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092929 | Dvorak et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100083 | Little et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117165 | Adams et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124098 | Hopson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124984 | Yokouchi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139731 | Alvin | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7275048 | Bigus et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20010019778 | Gardaz et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032130 | Gabos et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039517 | Kawakatsu | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049634 | Stewart | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013731 | Bright et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023500 | Chikuan et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026368 | Carter, III | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020059108 | Okura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072986 | Aram | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073114 | Nicastro et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078159 | Petrogiannis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087389 | Sklarz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107713 | Hawkins | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116241 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123930 | Boyd et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138290 | Metcalfe et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147668 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152128 | Walch et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184116 | Tam et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023500 | Boies et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028393 | Coulston et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028437 | Grant et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046120 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046195 | Mao | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050852 | Liao et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074269 | Viswanath | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030126024 | Crampton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144916 | Mumm et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149631 | Crampton et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149674 | Good et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158791 | Gilberto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171998 | Pujar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172007 | Helmolt et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200150 | Westcott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208365 | Avery et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229502 | Woo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010463 | Hahn-Carlson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040098358 | Roediger | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122689 | Dailey et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162763 | Hoskin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172321 | Vemula et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186765 | Kataoka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186783 | Knight et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210489 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220861 | Morciniec et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267674 | Feng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015303 | Dubin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055283 | Zarovinsky | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060270 | Ramakrishnan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075915 | Clarkson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075941 | Jetter et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086122 | Cirulli et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086125 | Cirulli et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096122 | Nireki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096963 | Myr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102175 | Dudat et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102192 | Gerrits et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102227 | Solonchev | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165659 | Gruber | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171825 | Denton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060020512 | Lucas et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036507 | Pujar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060112099 | Musgrove et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070050272 | Godlewski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004-030343 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO 9945450 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0171635 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080133478 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |