This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/619,192 which was filed on Nov. 16, 2009 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure generally relates to systems and methods for delivering messages between devices communicating over a network. Such systems and techniques may be useful, for example, in providing messages from network-based services to set-top boxes, digital video recorders (DVRs), video game players, placeshifting devices and/or other clients.
The Internet and other digital communications networks continue to have significant effects on every aspect of personal and professional life. Network communications are becoming increasingly ubiquitous due to the reduced cost and increased capability of portable computing devices, as well as the increasing prevalence and capability of mobile telephony and other wireless communications technologies. Additionally, more and more devices, including set top boxes, television receivers, video game players, placeshifting devices, media players and the like, are becoming enabled for network communications.
While modern technologies allow increased mobility and improved access to data and services, a tradeoff often exists between network access and security. Although many homes and businesses have access to broadband network connectivity, for example, most of these network connections are protected by a firewall or the like to prevent unwanted intrusions. Firewalls and other structures, while effectively preserving the security of a home or other network, can have the undesired effect of preventing access to desired services or other features that are located on the opposite side of the firewall. For example, if a network service wishes to provide programming, data or instructions to a client that is located behind a firewall, such communications are often blocked to prevent security breaches. Configuring the firewall to allow access from the network service may be difficult for many users, and may also create undesirable security gaps that could be exploited by others. If a customer service representative, for example, needs to gain access to a device located behind a firewall to assist the user in configuring or using the device, such a connection may be very difficult to establish using conventional techniques.
In addition to preventing unwanted access to a secure network, then, firewalls and other security mechanisms may prevent legitimate and desired access to remotely-located content or services, particularly if the security mechanism is incorrectly or incompletely configured by the user. Challenges can therefore arise in effectively establishing connections between clients and services for media streaming, media recording, placeshifting, gaming and/or other applications.
As a result, it is now desirable to create systems and methods for reliably and conveniently transmitting messages from services to clients over a network. These and other desirable features and characteristics will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background section.
According to various exemplary embodiments, systems and methods are described for providing messages to devices communicating via a network. Certain methods and techniques described below may be used in some instances to provide messages to placeshifting devices, set top boxes, digital video recorders, video game players, media players, computing systems and/or other client systems. Such messages may be used, for example, to establish real-time or near real-time communications between the service and the client device as desired. While much of the following discussion uses placeshifting as an illustrative example, other embodiments may be equivalently applied in other applications and settings, including any settings relating to media streaming, media recording, game playing and/or the like.
Various embodiments provide a method to allow a first server to contact a client over a network using a message server. This method comprises receiving a first request identifying the client at the message server, establishing a connection between the message server and the client in response to the first request, receiving a second request from the first server at the message server, wherein the second request identifies the client, and, in response to the second request, transmitting a message from the message server to the client over the connection.
In other embodiments, a system to process messages from at least one service host to a plurality of clients is provided. The system comprises a plurality of message servers and a load balancer. The load balancer is configured to receive the connection requests from each of the plurality of clients and to assign each of the connection requests to one of the plurality of message servers. Each message server is configured to establish and maintain persistent connections with at least some of the plurality of clients in response to connection requests, and to transmit messages received from the at least one service host to the at least some of the plurality of clients over the persistent connections.
Still other embodiments provide a method to allow a first server to contact a client over a network. In this exemplary embodiment, a method comprises receiving a first request identifying the client, assigning the first request to an assigned one of a plurality of message servers, maintaining a persistent connection between the assigned one of the plurality of message servers and the client, receiving a second request from the first server, wherein the second request identifies the client, and, in response to the second request, transmitting a message from the assigned one of the plurality of message servers to the client over the persistent connection, wherein the message comprises information that allows the client to contact the first server and thereby establish the interaction between the service and the client.
Various other embodiments, aspects and features are described in more detail below.
Exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and
The following detailed description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any theory presented in the preceding background or the following detailed description.
According to various embodiments, client devices are configured to initially contact a message server that is located on a digital network. The message server establishes a persistent connection with the client device that can be maintained over time. When a service later wishes to contact a particular client, the service notifies the message server, which suitably sends a message to the client over the persistent connection that identifies the service or that otherwise allows the client device to contact the requesting service for further communications. Using the information contained in the message, the client can establish a direct or other connection with the requesting service, thereby allowing real-time (or near real-time) interaction between clients and servers. This basic structure may be used in any number of settings, including placeshifting, media streaming, game playing, and/or any other application as desired.
Unlike techniques that rely upon intermittent polling by the client to obtain information from network-based services, various embodiments of the network server may be able to provide improved flexibility in contacting any number of different network services. Moreover, the use of a pre-existing connection allows particular devices to be contacted by one or more network services as information becomes available (e.g., in real-time or pseudo-real-time) rather than waiting for polling from the device. That is, messages can be “pushed” in real-time (or near real time) from the network server rather than waiting for the client to “pull” the information from the server. This relative immediacy provides a greatly improved user experience.
Although the discussion herein often refers to placeshifting devices and techniques for convenience of illustration, equivalent embodiments could apply the same structures and methods described herein in any number of other settings. To that end, the techniques described herein could be readily used to establish communications with or between any sorts of clients and/or services over any sort of network. Examples of such applications may include any types of media streaming applications, any types of media sharing or storage applications, video recording, video or computer gaming, and/or any other application(s) as desired. Indeed, the messaging techniques used herein could be equivalently applied to any number of client devices, such as set top boxes (STBs) or other television content receivers, digital video recorders (DVRs), video game players, computer systems and/or the like. Such devices may be contacted in real-time or on any other basis to provide programming instructions, data and/or other information as desired.
Turning now to the drawing figures and with initial reference to
When a service 116 does intend to contact a particular client 102, the service 116 contacts the message server 114 that is maintaining the connection no to the desired client 102. Service 116 may forward messages to the appropriate message server 114 using one or more service load balancers 118 or the like. Upon receiving an instruction from a service 116, the appropriate message server 114 then sends a message to the client device 102 over the pre-existing and persistent connection no. The receiving device 102 is then able to process the message as desired. In various embodiments, the receiving client 102 contacts the requesting service 116 to establish a communications session, to receive further instructions, or for any other purpose.
Client 102 may be any device, component, module, hardware, software application and/or the like that is capable of communicating over network 111. To that end, many different types of clients 102 may be implemented with any sort of general or special purpose hardware, software and/or firmware. In some embodiments, clients 102 may include standalone devices having network connectivity, such as any sort of placeshifting device, video game player, STB or other television programming receiver, digital video recorder, and/or the like. Other embodiments of clients 102 may include conventional personal computers, workstations and/or other systems. In still other embodiments, some types of clients 102 may include software client applications, applets or other processes executing on any sort of general or special purpose computing hardware.
Although the concepts described herein could be used in many different applications other than placeshifting, several examples of clients 102 suitable for use in placeshifting applications may be implemented using any of the various SLINGBOX products available from Sling Media of Foster City, Calif. and/or any number of other suppliers. Many different types of placeshifting devices are generally capable of receiving media content from an external source, such as any sort of digital video recorder (DVR), set top box (STB), cable or satellite programming source, video disk player, and/or the like. In other embodiments, client 102 may be integrated with any sort of content-receiving or other capabilities. Some embodiments of client 102 may provide a hybrid STB or other receiver, for example, that also provides transcoding and placeshifting features. Such a device may receive satellite, cable, broadcast and/or other signals that encode television programming or other content received from an antenna, modem, server and/or other source. The receiver may further demodulate or otherwise decode the received signals to extract programming that can be locally viewed and/or place shifted to a remote media player as appropriate. Such devices may also include a content database stored on a hard disk drive, memory, or other storage medium to support a personal or digital video recorder (DVR) feature or other content library as appropriate. Hence, in some embodiments, a media receiver or other source of content may be physically and/or logically contained within a common component, housing or chassis with client 102. Examples of conventional placeshifting functions, features, systems and structures are described in United States Patent Publication No. 2006/0095471, al though the features described herein could be equivalently applied with any number of other techniques and structures in addition to those described in that particular publication.
Some implementations of client 102 may be software programs, applets or the like executing on a conventional computing system (e.g., a personal computer). In such embodiments, client 102 may encode, for example, some or all of a screen display typically provided to a user of the computing system for placeshifting to a remote location. One device capable of providing such functionality is the SlingProjector product available from Sling Media of Foster City, Calif., which executes on a conventional personal computer, al though other products could be used as well. And again, the types of clients 102 used in system 100 are not limited to placeshifting devices; any other clients 102 that are capable of communicating on network 111 could be equivalently applied. Other types of client applications may include media players, personal video recorders (PVRs), video games, and/or any other types of clients as desired.
Network 111 is any digital or other communications network capable of transmitting messages between senders (e.g., client 102) and receivers (e.g., client 102). In various embodiments, network 111 includes any number of public or private data connections, links or networks supporting any number of communications protocols. Network 111 may include the Internet, for example, or any other network based upon TCP/IP or other conventional protocols, including any protocols or standards that are presently known or subsequently developed. In various embodiments, network 111 may also incorporate a wireless and/or wired telephone network, such as a cellular communications network for communicating with mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and/or the like. Various embodiments of network 111 may also incorporate any sort of wireless or wired local area networks, such as one or more IEEE 802.3 and/or IEEE 802.11 networks.
As noted above, directly connecting to a client 102 from a network service 116 may not always be convenient due to the presence of one or more firewalls or other security mechanisms within network 111, or any number of other factors. Various embodiments therefore provide any number of message servers 114A-D that are each capable of maintaining separate connections no with one or more clients 102A-D. Each message server 114A-D is implemented using conventional computer server hardware, software and/or services, as described more fully below in conjunction with
Each connection 110A-D may be initiated by the client 102A-D to facilitate convenient access, since many network security mechanisms will permit outgoing requests from client 102A-D more readily than incoming requests from server 116. Hence, each client 102A-D can be configured (e.g., through software or firmware) to establish a connection 110 with a message server 114A-D, as described herein. Clients 102 may establish such connections at startup, and/or at any other convenient time.
In various embodiments, each connection 110A-D is a persistent connection that can be readily maintained over time even when active communications with the client 110A-D are not needed. Connections 110 may be established using any protocols or techniques. Transmission control protocol (TCP) connections, for example, could be readily established and maintained over time in some embodiments since many firewalls will permit outgoing TCP connections from clients 102 located on a trusted network. Moreover, the TCP “keepalive” feature can be used to maintain an active connection 110 to the client 102 without substantial network overhead when the connection 110 is not in active use. Once a TCP connection 110 is established, for example, the connection no may be maintained over time by simply transmitting relatively low-overhead “keepalive” messages using the connection 110 to prevent the connection 110 from timing out. Examples of conventional TCP features are described in Internet RFC 1122, although many embodiments will use TCP, TCP-like and/or other features that may vary from the features described in this particular document.
By pre-establishing the connection 110 from the client 102 to the messaging server 114, a persistent channel is maintained over time even though the server is behind a firewall or other security feature. The pre-existing connection no can be used to transmit subsequent instructions and/or other messages to client 102 on behalf of one or more networked services 116A-C, as described more fully below.
In the example of
In various embodiments, load balancers 112A-B may be provided to allocate message servers 114 and/or other resources efficiently and effectively. Load balancing 118 may be implemented using any combination of hardware and/or software resources or services, and may be based upon network traffic, processing loads on servers 120, geographic distribution of clients 102 and/or message servers 114, capabilities of clients 102 and/or any other factors as appropriate. In an exemplary embodiment, load balancers 112A-B receive loading information about each server 114 operating within the cluster 120. Loading information may be provided periodically (or on any other temporal basis) from each message server 114; in other embodiments, loading data may be additionally or alternately provided in response to requests from the load balancer 112 as desired.
As noted above, load balancing may be assigned to separate clusters 120A-B on any basis. In an example of such embodiments, clients 102 suitably contact an appropriate load balancer 112 (e.g., a load balancer 112 residing at a well-known or readily-obtainable URL or other network address) for the client location, type, or other parameters. The load balancer 112 associated with the proper cluster 120 would then assign the client request to an appropriate message server 114 operating within the cluster 120 based upon processing loads and/or other appropriate factors.
In other embodiments, some or all of the load balancing functionality may be shared between multiple clusters 120A-B as desired. Clients 102 may be configured, for example, to contact a common load balancer 112 at a well-known address or other network location. The common load balancer 112 may then allocate client connections between clusters 120A-B, message servers 114A-D or other resources on any basis. For example, clients of a particular type (e.g., a dedicated placeshifting device) may be directed toward a first cluster 120A, whereas clients of another type (e.g., a hybrid STB/placeshifting device) may be directed toward a different cluster 120B. The client type may be determined, for example, from a client identifier provided with the request message; the identifier value itself and/or the format of the identifier could indicate the type of client 102 that is sending the request. Differentiating clients 102 by type could allow message servers 114 operating within each cluster to be configured to support particular features that are appropriate for clients 102 of the assigned type. That is, certain types of clients 102 may not process certain types of messages that are available to other types of clients 102. In another example, clients 102 connecting from a particular geographic region may be directed toward a first cluster 120A that is located in (or otherwise associated with) that region, whereas clients 102 in a different geographic region may be directed toward a second cluster 120B in a different location. The geographic location of a client 102 may be determined from a network address (e.g., an internet protocol (IP) or other network address), or from any other physical or logical location information. Other embodiments may provide multiple levels of load balancing or routing; a first load balancer or router could determine a cluster 120 that is most appropriate for a requested connection, for example. The first load balancer could then forward the request to a second load balancer (e.g., load balancers 112A-B) associated with the appropriate cluster 120A-B for assignment to a particular message server 114A-D. Any number of additional clusters 120, load balancers 112 and/or message servers 114 may be provided and organized in any desired manner.
System 100 may support any number of network services 116A-C as desired. Each network service 116 is implemented using conventional network server hardware, software, services and/or other features as desired. The particular feature(s) provided by each network service 116 will vary from embodiment to embodiment. In an exemplary embodiment that supports placeshifting clients 102, for example, various network services 116 may support the establishment of relay connections between clients 102 and media players over network 111, online programming of DVR or other functions of clients 102 from remote locations, online viewing of content placeshifted from clients 102, customer service features, and/or any number of other features as desired. Other settings and applications may provide other network services 116, such as any services supporting online gaming, playing of media content, and/or the like.
In the embodiment shown in
To provide a message to a particular client 102 that has previously established a connection 110 to a particular message server 114, then, the network service 116 suitably provides a message the message server 114 that is maintaining the desired connection 110. The message may be routed to the appropriate server 114 from the service load balancer 118; that is, the network service 116 suitably provides a message to the load balancer 118, which performs a hash or other process on a client identifier or other data contained within the message to identify the particular message server 114 that is holding the connection no to the particular client 102. The message is then provided to the appropriate message server 114 to direct the message server 114 to contact the particular client 102 as desired. The message server 114 then transmits an appropriate message to the client 102 over the pre-existing connection 110. The particular message may contain a payload or other data provided by the network service 116 in some embodiments; other messages may simply contain information that directs the client 102 to contact network service 116 (or another host) for further action.
Upon receiving a message over connection 110, the receiving client 102 can process the received message in any manner. In some embodiments, the message may direct the client 102 to establish a second connection (e.g., a second outgoing TCP connection) to the requesting service 116 or another appropriate host. By pre-establishing a connection no with the client 102, then, various implementations may allow multiple services 116A-C to share the connection no with each client 102, thereby allowing a variety of messages to be transmitted to each client 102 from any number of different services 116. Moreover, messages sent from servers 116A-C can be provided to the client 102 on a relatively immediate basis in some embodiments. That is, if a server 116 wishes to contact a particular client 102, the server 116 need not wait until the client 102 polls the server 116, but rather can provide a message over connection 110 in real-time, or near real-time. “Real time” in this context refers to a communication that occurs in response to a stimulus (e.g., an initiating event such as a network request or a user input) without substantial delay between the stimulus and the communication. “Real time” communications, while typically occurring on a generally immediate basis, may nevertheless account for network and processing delays and other delays that are inherent in practical data communications systems.
In various embodiments, each message server 114 is an actual or virtual computer system executing an operating system 206 such as any version of LINUX, UNIX, SOLARIS, NETWARE, WINDOWS, OS/X, AIX and/or the like. The various UNIX/LINUX operating systems typically provide a computing core that is capable of executing a message server application 208, as well as any number of daemons, processes, applications or other instance modules as desired. For example, a message server application 208 could execute as a daemon on message server 114, with each client connection 114 being managed as a separate process or instance that communicates with message server application 208 using features provided by operating system 208.
Message server application 208 is typically initiated when message server 114 is booted or otherwise initialized. In various embodiments, application 208 suitably registers with any appropriate load balancers 112 and/or 118 so that connections 110 can be appropriately distributed to message server 114. Application 208 then processes connection requests from clients 102 and/or network services 116 as appropriate. In the embodiment shown in
As connection requests are received from load balancer 112, various implementations of application 208 will register the client connection 110 with message server 114 as appropriate. Registration may involve responding to the TCP or other request made by the requesting client 102 to establish the connection, updating a table, database or other log 212 of connections maintained by application 208, and/or notifying load balancer 112 when the connection 110 is successfully established. Additional detail about establishing connections 110 is presented below in conjunction with
As noted above, the established connections 110 may be used to send messages to clients 102 as requested by one or more network services 116. Messages may be sent to clients 102 via connections 110 in any manner. Some types of messages may simply provide a service identifier or other code to the client 102 that can be interpreted by the client 102 to provoke an appropriate reaction. A service identifier could simply provide a number of a requesting network service 116, for example, with a first value (e.g., “0001”) identifying a first service 116A, a second value (e.g., “0002”) identifying a second network service 116B, and so forth. When the client 102 receives a message containing the particular code, firmware or other logic within the client 102 can parse the code to contact the appropriate network service 116, or to take any other appropriate action. Certain codes could also be used to provide other responses by client 102. A simple “ping” service, for example, could be associated with a particular code (e.g., “0000”) to provoke the client to simply transmit a short response to the message server 114. Other codes could be used for status requests or to provide other instructions to client 102, as desired.
In some embodiments, messages with payload data may be used in place of or in combination with coded messages as described above. In various embodiments, the message may include a data field that indicates the length of the payload (e.g., in bytes). The payload provided may be of any fixed or variable length, and may be formatted in any manner as desired.
Some embodiments may provide the ability to reset connections in response to messages sent by the load balancer 112 and/or another controlling entity. Such messages can direct the message server 114 to terminate a connection 110 to a particular client 102, and to remove the connection from the connection log 212 as appropriate. This may be beneficial if a message server 114 were to fail, or if the connection no were to somehow enter an unknown state. If multiple connections to a single client 102 were inadvertently established, for example, one or more of the connections could be terminated to avoid redundancy and/or to provoke the client 102 to re-establish a new, more reliable connection. In the meantime, message server 114 may transmit any messages that are intended for client 102 on each of the parallel connections until an active connection is identified. Further, load balancer 112 may instruct one or more message servers 114 to close or otherwise reset a connection 110 if the client 102 is also connected to another server 114. In some embodiments, clients 102 may be configured through firmware or the like to automatically contact load balancer 112 to obtain a new connection 110 when the active connection is reset or otherwise terminated.
Message server application 208 may also be configured to provide any status or reporting information 214 as requested. In various embodiments, application 208 is able to provide reporting information 214 in response to requests from load balancers 112 and/or 118, or any other controlling entity as desired. Information provided in response to various queries may include system status (e.g., connections maintained, processor load, memory or storage utilization, and/or the like), lists of client connections 110 (e.g., some or all of the information contained in log 212) and/or other information as desired.
Message server application 208 may provide any alternate and/or additional functions and features as desired. Generally, message server application 208 is implemented using conventional compiled object code derived from source code in any programming language (e.g., C, C++ or the like). Other embodiments may make use of an interpreted or other abstracted environment, such as the JAVA environment available from Sun Microsystems of Sunnyvale, Calif. or the .NET environment available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. Other embodiments may implement the various components of message server 114 using any other programming languages, scripting languages, development or execution environments, and/or the like. Such programming may be stored in source or object code form on any digital storage medium (e.g, memory 204, mass storage, removable media, or any other medium) that is accessible to message system 114.
Turning now to
Typically, client 102 initially contacts a message server 114 at startup or any other initializing state (function 302). As noted above, client 102 may initialize a connection with a message server 114 at startup, in response to a prior connection being dropped or reset, in response to a hard or soft re-boot of the client 102, and/or at any other appropriate time. This initialization may be driven by software or firmware executing within client 102; hence, changes to the initialization or connection processes may be implemented by updating software or firmware in client 102 in many embodiments.
Client 102 initially transmits a registration request 304 to message server 114 in any manner. In the example shown in
Load balancer 112 receives and processes registration requests 304 from any number of clients 102 in any appropriate manner (function 305). In various embodiments, load balancer 112 suitably determines an appropriate message server 114 for maintaining the connection 110 with client 102. This determination may be based upon the client's geographic or logical location (as determined, for example, from an IP or other network address associated with client 102), the client type (as determined, for example, from a client identifier contained within request 304), current loading of servers 114 within a cluster 120, and/or any other factors as desired. Clients 102 may also be assigned based upon algorithmic processing (e.g., hashing) of a client identifier or the like that is contained within request 304. As noted above, multiple levels of load balancing may be provided to facilitate initial assignment to a cluster 120 of message servers 114 based upon client type and/or location, with subsequent assignment to a particular message server 114 based upon loading distribution within the assigned cluster 120. Any additional routing or load balancing may be provided as desired.
Load balancer 112 therefore assigns connections to various message servers 114 according to information about the requesting client 102, loading of the various message servers 114, and/or any other relevant information. Load balancer 112 suitably forwards the information in registration request 304 (including information about the requesting client 102) to the assigned message server 114 for subsequent processing. In various embodiments, load balancer 112 simply forwards the registration request 304 to the assigned message server 114 so that the assigned server 114 can respond to the TCP request 304 posited by the client 102. In equivalent embodiments, load balancer 112 may not provide the actual message to message server 114, but instead provides sufficient information (e.g., client identifiers, network address, etc.) to allow the message server 114 to appropriately respond to the request 304 and establish the persistent connection no.
Upon receiving an assigned connection request from the load balancer 112, message server 114 appropriately processes the request (function 306) to register the assigned client 102. As noted above, registration function 306 may involve adding the client identifier to a connection log 212, as appropriate, and responding to the client's request 304 with a registration acknowledgement 308. The registration acknowledgement 308 may be in TCP format in response to a TCP request 304 posited by the client.
After the request 304 and response 308 from the message server, a persistent connection 110 can be established for subsequent communications. As noted above, message server 114 and/or load balancer 112 will maintain the connection over time (function 310) by transmitting “keepalive” packets or the like to prevent the connection 110 from timing out or otherwise terminating. Such packets provide a relatively convenient mechanism for maintaining the reliable connection no without significant latency or overhead. Other embodiments may maintain the connection no in any other manner. Although not shown in
After the connection 110 is established, subsequent messages may be provided to client 102 via message server 114. As a network service 116 desires to contact a particular client 102 (function 312), the service 116 provides an appropriate message 314 to the message server 114 that is maintaining the connection no with the client 102 of interest. To that end, network service 116 may provide the message 314 to service load balancer 118, as shown in
When a message server 114 receives a message 314 from a network service 116, the message server is able to relay the message 316 to the client 102 via the pre-established connection 110. As briefly noted above, the message 316 may simply include a service identifier or other code that simply allows client 102 to contact the appropriate network service 116 at a well-known or easily determined location on network 111 (e.g., a known URL or IP address). Other messages 316 may include a payload portion that is provided from network service 116 as part of message 314. In embodiments that support this feature, the payload may be formatted and relayed to client 102 as appropriate. Other types of messages 316 may be formulated and transmitted in other embodiments.
After message 316 is sent, message server 114 may take any of various actions based upon the success or failure of message delivery to client 102. In some implementations, client 102 acknowledges message receipt with an acknowledgement message 318. This acknowledgement may be relayed back to the network service 116 in some embodiments. If no acknowledgement 318 is received, message server 114 may provide a timeout message 322 to network service 116 after an appropriate period of time. The “appropriate period” may be any pre-determined time period that is appropriately set for the particular application and network environment. In some embodiments, the appropriate period may be configured by an administrator. Some implementations may support additional message types, such as negative acknowledgements (NAK) for unsuccessful attempts to contact the recipient, “busy” messages if communications are already in progress, “invalid” messages if incorrectly formatted or otherwise invalid messages are received, and/or the like.
Client 102 processes the received message 316 as appropriate for the particular message 316 (function 324). In various embodiments, client 102 simply parses a service identifier or other code contained within the body of the message 316 to contact the associated network service 116. In such cases, client 102 suitably transmits a second TCP (or similar) request 326 directly to the server to establish an interaction session 328. Session 328 may be maintained on any temporary or persistent basis, and may be continued for any duration. In some implementations, the interaction 328 will be relatively short (e.g., if network service 116 simply wishes to provide brief instructions to client 102), whereas other connections may be more ongoing (e.g., if network service 116 is receiving, redirecting or otherwise processing a media stream from client 102).
In some cases (or for other types of messages 316), interaction 328 may not be needed if message 316 contains enough information to provoke the desired response in client 102. Certain embodiments may provide “payload” messages, for example, that allow client 102 to extract and process a payload contained within the message 316 as appropriate. Still other messages 316 may provide a service identifier or other code that can be interpreted by client 102 to produce an appropriate response.
Generally speaking, the various tasks shown in connection with process 300 may be carried out with any sort of hardware, software and/or firmware logic within system 100. Portions of process 300 may be carried out, for example, by a message server 114 (
Various examples of systems, devices and processes for establishing connections between clients and servers over a digital network have been described. Several of the exemplary techniques described herein allow clients and servers to initially establish persistent TCP or other connections with a message server. This connection may be used by any network service to support features associated with placeshifting, media playing, gaming and/or any other networked applications. For example, connections to clients located behind firewalls or other security mechanisms can be established in real-time (or near real-time) in a flexible yet efficient manner. This pre-established connection can be used for any number of applications. As an example, a network customer service application could use the pre-established connection to direct a particular client device to contact a server that allows a customer service representative to remotely configure the client device. Other embodiments may provide other services, such as remote programming (e.g., remote programming of a DVR or similar device), remote establishment of relay connections (e.g., between a client device and a media player or the like), or any other online interaction with the client device. Many other network services could be provided for placeshifting, media streaming, gaming, remote programming, remote monitoring, remote configuration and/or any number of other applications. Other embodiments may exhibit other benefits and features as well.
The term “exemplary” is used herein to represent one example, instance or illustration that may have any number of alternates. Any implementation described herein as exemplary is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. While several exemplary embodiments have been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of alternate but equivalent variations exist, and the examples presented herein are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. To the contrary, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described without departing from the scope of the claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3416043 | Jorgensen | Dec 1968 | A |
4254303 | Takizawa | Mar 1981 | A |
5161021 | Tsai | Nov 1992 | A |
5237648 | Mills et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5386493 | Degen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5434590 | Dinwiddie, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5493638 | Hooper et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5602589 | Vishwanath et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5661516 | Carles | Aug 1997 | A |
5666426 | Helms | Sep 1997 | A |
5682195 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5706290 | Shaw et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710605 | Nelson | Jan 1998 | A |
5722041 | Freadman | Feb 1998 | A |
5757416 | Birch et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774170 | Hite et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778077 | Davidson | Jul 1998 | A |
5794116 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822537 | Katseff et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831664 | Wharton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850482 | Meany et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852437 | Wugofski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880721 | Yen | Mar 1999 | A |
5898679 | Brederveld et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909518 | Chui | Jun 1999 | A |
5911582 | Redford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922072 | Hutchinson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936968 | Lyons | Aug 1999 | A |
5968132 | Tokunaga | Oct 1999 | A |
5987501 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002450 | Darbee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008777 | Yiu | Dec 1999 | A |
6014694 | Aharoni et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020880 | Naimpally | Feb 2000 | A |
6031940 | Chui et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036601 | Heckel | Mar 2000 | A |
6040829 | Croy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043837 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049671 | Slivka et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6075906 | Fenwick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088777 | Sorber | Jul 2000 | A |
6097441 | Allport | Aug 2000 | A |
6104334 | Allport | Aug 2000 | A |
6108041 | Faroudja et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115420 | Wang | Sep 2000 | A |
6117126 | Appelbaum et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141059 | Boyce et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141447 | Linzer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160544 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6201536 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212282 | Mershon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222885 | Chaddha et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223211 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240459 | Roberts et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240531 | Spilo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243596 | Kikinis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256019 | Allport | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263503 | Margulis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279029 | Sampat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282714 | Ghori et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286142 | Ehreth | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6310886 | Barton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340994 | Margulis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353885 | Herzi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356945 | Shaw et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357021 | Kitagawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370688 | Hejna, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389467 | Eyal | May 2002 | B1 |
6421429 | Merritt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434113 | Gubbi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442067 | Chawla et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456340 | Margulis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466623 | Youn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470378 | Tracton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476826 | Plotkin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487319 | Chai | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493874 | Humpleman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496122 | Sampsell | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505169 | Bhagavath et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510177 | De Bonet et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529506 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553147 | Chai et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557031 | Mimura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564004 | Kadono | May 2003 | B1 |
6567984 | Allport | May 2003 | B1 |
6584201 | Konstantinou et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584559 | Huh et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597375 | Yawitz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598159 | McAlister et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600838 | Chui | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609253 | Swix et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611530 | Apostolopoulos | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628716 | Tan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6642939 | Vallone et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647015 | Malkemes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658019 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665751 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665813 | Forsman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697356 | Kretschmer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701380 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704678 | Minke et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704847 | Six et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708231 | Kitagawa | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718551 | Swix et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732158 | Hesselink et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754266 | Bahl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754439 | Hensley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757851 | Park et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757906 | Look et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766376 | Price | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768775 | Wen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771828 | Malvar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774912 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781601 | Cheung | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785700 | Masud et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795638 | Skelley, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798838 | Ngo | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806909 | Radha et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807308 | Chui et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816194 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816858 | Coden et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826242 | Ojard et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834123 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839079 | Barlow et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847468 | Ferriere | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850571 | Tardif | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850649 | Malvar | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868083 | Apostolopoulos et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889385 | Rakib et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6892359 | Nason et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6898583 | Rising, III | May 2005 | B1 |
6907602 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927685 | Wathen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930661 | Uchida et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941575 | Allen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944880 | Allen | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952595 | Ikedo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981050 | Tobias et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7016337 | Wu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020892 | Levesque et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032000 | Tripp | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047305 | Brooks et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7110558 | Elliott | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7124366 | Foreman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127507 | Clark et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7137136 | Aratani | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151575 | Landry et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155734 | Shimomura et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155735 | Ngo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7184433 | Oz | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7224323 | Uchida et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239800 | Bilbrey | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7344084 | DaCosta | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7430686 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7464396 | Hejna, Jr. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478164 | Lango et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7478166 | Agnoli et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7502733 | Andrsen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505480 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516136 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549160 | Podar et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7558862 | Tyukasz et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7565681 | Ngo et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7594218 | Lozben | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7647430 | Ng et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676590 | Silverman | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706358 | Kitada | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7721300 | Tipton et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7721315 | Brown et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7895275 | Evans et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7917602 | Sweatt, III et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921150 | Schwartz | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7945688 | Lango et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7975047 | Dongre | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8009121 | Stuart et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8082545 | Prakash | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8171148 | Lucas et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194681 | Kaarela et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010021998 | Margulis | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020004839 | Wine et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010925 | Kikinis | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012530 | Bruls | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031333 | Mano et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042921 | Ellis | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046404 | Mizutani | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020053053 | Nagai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080166 | Sweatt, III et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080753 | Lee | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083153 | Sweatt, III et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090029 | Kim | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105529 | Bowser et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112247 | Horner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122137 | Chen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131497 | Jang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138843 | Samaan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141401 | Albert | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143972 | Christopoulos et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143973 | Price | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147634 | Jacoby et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147687 | Breiter et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167458 | Baudisch et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188818 | Nimura et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191575 | Kalavade et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001880 | Holtz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028873 | Lemmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065915 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074660 | McCormack et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093260 | Dagtas et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095791 | Barton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115167 | Sharif et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030159143 | Chan | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187657 | Erhart et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192054 | Birks et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198243 | Yamada | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208612 | Harris et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231621 | Gubbi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003406 | Billmaier | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040052216 | Roh | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068334 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083301 | Murase et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100486 | Flamini et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103340 | Sundareson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040139047 | Rechsteiner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162845 | Kim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162903 | Oh | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172410 | Shimojima et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177151 | Kryeziu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194141 | Sanders | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205830 | Kaneko | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212640 | Mann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216173 | Horoszowski et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221029 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236844 | Kocherlakota | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255249 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021398 | McCleskey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027821 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038981 | Connor et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044058 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050462 | Whittle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053356 | Mate et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055595 | Frazer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060759 | Rowe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097542 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114852 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132351 | Randall et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138560 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155077 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198584 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204046 | Watanabe | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216851 | Hull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227621 | Katoh | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229118 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246369 | Oreizy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251833 | Schedivy | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283791 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288999 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011371 | Fahey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031381 | Van Luijt et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034259 | Matsuda | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050970 | Gunatilake | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051055 | Ohkawa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064307 | Pakkala | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095401 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095471 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095472 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095942 | Van Beek | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095943 | Demircin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107226 | Matthews et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117371 | Margulis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146174 | Hagino | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171395 | Deshpande | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190616 | Mayerhofer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206526 | Sitomer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230345 | Weng et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060280157 | Karaoguz et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280177 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294183 | Agnoli et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003224 | Krikorian et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005783 | Saint-Hillaire et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019545 | Alt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022328 | Tarra et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043792 | O'Brien | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055728 | Shea et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067390 | Agnoli et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073767 | Springer, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074115 | Patten et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076604 | Litwack | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107019 | Romano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136778 | Birger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147263 | Liao et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168543 | Krikorian et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180485 | Dua | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183436 | Hunter | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192325 | Morris | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198532 | Krikorian et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217407 | Yuan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234213 | Krikorian et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286596 | Lonn | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288550 | Ise et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007651 | Bennett | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019276 | Takatsuji et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037573 | Cohen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059533 | Krikorian | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060035 | Tsang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080098472 | Enomoto et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134267 | Moghe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195698 | Stefanovic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195744 | Bowra et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199150 | Candelore | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209487 | Oswann et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215392 | Rajan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229404 | Siegrist et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294759 | Biswas et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301233 | Choi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307456 | Beetcher et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307462 | Beetcher et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307463 | Beetcher et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007198 | Lavender et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074380 | Boston et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090133088 | Kim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146779 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157777 | Golwalkar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164600 | Issa et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199248 | Ngo et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090254672 | Zhang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268740 | Sindhu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282445 | Yang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100005483 | Rao | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023642 | Ladd et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030880 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034511 | Kawai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046513 | Park et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061708 | Barton | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070925 | Einaudi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073202 | Mazed | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077438 | Ansari | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100898 | Pfleging et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100915 | Krikorian et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100146527 | Craib et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169477 | Stienhans et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100226444 | Thevathasan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268832 | Lucas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269144 | Forsman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281042 | Windes et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309916 | Oskouy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333162 | Lloyd et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002381 | Yang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110047079 | Du et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050908 | Nam | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110125861 | Evans et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110307608 | Chang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321079 | Lankford | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120039580 | Sweatt, III et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120166669 | Price | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120219001 | Sindhu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1981496 | Nov 1927 | CN |
1464685 | Dec 2003 | CN |
1981496 | Jun 2007 | CN |
4407319 | Sep 1994 | DE |
0838945 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1077407 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1255395 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1443766 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1691550 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1830558 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2071839 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2307151 | May 1997 | GB |
2001211416 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001345766 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003304231 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2005229152 | Aug 2005 | JP |
200654535 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006295909 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007181123 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008085470 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008172621 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009009582 | Jan 2009 | JP |
200907721 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009118032 | May 2009 | JP |
19990082855 | Nov 1999 | KR |
20010211410 | Aug 2001 | KR |
545059 | Aug 2003 | TW |
0133839 | May 2001 | WO |
0147248 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0193161 | Dec 2001 | WO |
03026232 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03052552 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003098897 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004032511 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005050898 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006064454 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006074110 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007027891 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007051156 | May 2007 | WO |
2007096001 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007141555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007149466 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008024723 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009073828 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073830 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009134073 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Mar. 21, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/426,103, filed Apr. 17, 2009. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” mailed Mar. 18, 2011; International Appln. No. PCT/US2010/060797, filed Dec. 16, 2010. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Apr. 27, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,983, filed Jun. 23, 2010. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Jun. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,852, filed Apr. 27, 2012. |
USPTO “Final Office Action” mailed Aug. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,983, filed Jun. 23, 2010. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” mailed Dec. 13, 2010; International Application No. PCT/US2010/029062 filed Mar. 29, 2010. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” mailed Nov. 16, 2011; International Patent Appln. No. PCT/US2011/039937, filed Jun. 10, 2011. |
Japan Patent Office, Notice of Rejection Grounds mailed Jan. 21, 2014 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-516600. |
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office as Examiner According to the Memorandum of Understanding Between Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report mailed Jan. 16, 2014 for Singapore Patent Application No. 201204603-3. |
Krikorian, Jason, U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,277, filed Apr. 12, 2007. |
Tarra, Raghuveer et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/975,239, filed Sep. 26, 2007. |
Williams, George Edward, U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,041, filed Jul. 2, 2008. |
Rao, Padmanabha R., U.S. Appl. No. 12/166,039, filed Jul. 1, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2005/020105, Feb. 15, 2007, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/04382, mailed Apr. 27, 2007. |
Archive of “TV Brick Home Server,” www.tvbrick.com, [online] [Archived by http://archive.org on Jun. 3, 2004; Retrieved on Apr. 12, 2006] retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20041107111024/www.tvbrick.com/en/affi liate/tvbs/tvbrick/document18/print>. |
Faucon, B. “TV ‘Brick’ Opens up Copyright Can of Worms,” Financial Review, Jul. 1, 2003, [online [Retrieved on Apr. 12, 2006] Retrieved from the Internet, URL:http://afr.com/cgi-bin/newtextversions.pl?storyid+1056825330084&3ate+2003/07/01&pagetype+printer§ion+1053801318705&path+articles/2003/06/30/0156825330084.html.]. |
Balster, Eric J., “Video Compression and Rate Control Methods Based on the Wavelet Transform,” The Ohio State University 2004, pp. 1-24. |
Kulapala et al., “Comparison of Traffic and Quality Characteristics of Rate-Controlled Wavelet and DCT Video,” Arizona State University, Oct. 11, 2004. |
Skodras et al., “JPEG2000: The Upcoming Still Image Compression Standard,” May 11, 2000, 14 pages. |
Taubman et al., “Embedded Block Coding in JPEG2000,” Feb. 23, 2001, pp. 1-8 of 36. |
Kessler, Gary C., An Overview of TCP/IP Protocols and the Internet; Jan. 16, 2007, retrieved from the Internet on Jun. 12, 2008 at http://www.garykessler.net/library/tcpip.html; originally submitted to the InterNIC and posted on their Gopher site on Aug. 5, 1994. |
Roe, Kevin, “Third-Party Observation Under EPC Article 115 on the Patentability of an Invention,” Dec. 21, 2007. |
Roe, Kevin, Third-Party Submission for Published Application Under CFR §1.99, Mar. 26, 2008. |
Bajpai, Parimal et al. “Systems and Methods of Controlling the Encoding of a Media Stream,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/339,878, filed Dec. 19, 2008. |
Malone, Edward D. et al. “Systems and Methods for Controlling Media Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/256,344, filed Oct. 22, 2008. |
Banger, Shashidhar et al. “Systems and Methods for Determining Attributes of Media Items Accessed Via a Personal Media Broadcaster,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,959, filed Dec. 15, 2008. |
Kulkarni, Anant Madhava “Systems and Methods for Creating Logical Media Streams for Media Storage and Playback,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,907, filed Nov. 26, 2008. |
Rao, Padmanabha R. “Systems and Methods for Linking Media Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/359,784, filed Jan. 26, 2009. |
Krikorian, Blake Gary et al. “Systems and Methods for Presenting Media Content Obtained From Multiple Sources,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/408,456, filed Mar. 20, 2009. |
Krikorian, Blake Gary et al. “Systems and Methods for Projecting Images From a Computer System,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/408.460, filed Mar. 20, 2009. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Sep. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,138. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870. |
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore “Search Report and Written Opinion” dated Nov. 8, 2012 for Singapore Appl. No. 201107539-7. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Dec. 21, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,024. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” dated Feb. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,852. |
Japan Patent Office, Notice of Rejection Ground, dated Mar. 26, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-506055. |
Australian Government, Patent Examination Report No. 1, dated Apr. 5, 2013 for Australian Patent Application No. 2010236888. |
Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2013 for Taiwan Patent Application No. 099111307. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated May 17, 2013 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,758,791. |
Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated May 20, 2013 for Taiwan Patent Application No. 099144605. |
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Written Opinion, dated May 30, 2013 for Singapore Patent Application No. 201204603-3. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,138. |
USPTO, Final Office Action, dated Aug. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870. |
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Search and Examination Report, dated Aug. 30, 2013 for Singapore Patent Application No. 201107539-7. |
USPTO “Non-Final Office Action” dated Oct. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,024. |
Japan Patent Office, Notice of Rejection Ground mailed Oct. 29, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-546061. |
China State Intellectual Property Office, First Office Action, dated Nov. 8, 2013 for China Patent Application No. 201080016835.6. |
Australian Government, Patent Examination Report No. 1, dated Nov. 15, 2013 for Australian Patent Application No. 2011271358. |
USPTO “Final Office Action” dated Nov. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,852. |
Japan Patent Office, Notice of Rejection Grounds, dated Dec. 3, 2013 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-506055. |
Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated Dec. 30, 2013 for Taiwan Patent Application No. 099144605. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report for European Application No. EP 08 16 7880, mailed Mar. 4, 2009. |
MythTV Wiki, “MythTV User Manual” [Online], Aug. 27, 2007, XP002515046; retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.mythtv.org/wiki?title=User_Manual:Introduction&oldid=25549>. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion and International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/077733, mailed Mar. 18, 2009. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion and International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087005, mailed Mar. 20, 2009. |
Watanabe Y. et al., “Multimedia Database System for TV Newscasts and Newspapers”; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany; vol. 1554, Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 208-220, XP002402824, ISSN: 0302-9743. |
Yasuhiko Watanabe et al., “Aligning Articles in TV Newscasts and Newspapers”; Proceedings of the International Conference on Computationallinguistics, XX, XX, Jan. 1, 1998, pp. 1381-1387, XP002402825. |
Sodergard C. et al., “Integrated Multimedia Publishing: Combining TV and Newspaper Content on Personal Channels”; Computer Networks, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands; vol. 31, No. 11-16, May 17, 1999, pp. 1111-1128, XP004304543, ISSN: 1389-1286. |
Ariki Y. et al., “Automatic Classification of TV News Articles Based on Telop Character Recognition”; Multimedia Computing and Systems, 1999; IEEE International Conference on Florence, Italy, Jun. 7-11, 1999, Los Alamitos, California, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc. US; vol. 2, Jun. 7, 1999, pp. 148-152, XP010519373, ISBN: 978-0-7695-0253-3; abstract, paragraph [03.1], paragraph [05.2], figures 1,2. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2004; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 28, 2005; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 10, 2006; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809.868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/111,265, filed Apr. 21, 2005. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/111,265, filed Apr. 21, 2005. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/111,265, filed Apr. 21, 2005. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,707, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 21, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,707, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 25, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,707, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 7, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,711, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,711, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,862, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,985, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,254, filed Jun. 30, 2006. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,254, filed Jun. 30, 2006. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,664, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
Sonic Blue “ReplayTV 5000 User's Guide,” 2002, entire document. |
Bluetooth-News; Main Future User Models Document Verification & Qualification: Bluetooth Technical Background, Apr. 21, 1999; pp. 1 of 7 and 2 of 7; http://www.bluetooth.com/v2/news/show.asp 1-2. |
Microsoft Corporation; Harman/Kardon “Master Your Universe” 1999. |
Matsushita Electric Corporation of America MicroCast : Wireless PC Multimedia Transceiver System, Nov. 1998. |
“Wireless Local Area Networks: Issues in Technology and Standards” Jan. 6, 1999. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,985, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
China State Intellectual Property Office “First Office Action,” issued Jul. 31, 2009, for Application No. 200580026825.X. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Aug. 4, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,277, filed Apr. 12, 2007. |
USPTO, Final Office Action, mailed Jul. 31, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,862, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Aug. 5, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,663, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Sep. 3, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,711, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
Einaudi, Andrew E. et al. “Systems and Methods for Selecting Media Content Obtained from Multiple Sources,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,278, filed Aug. 18, 2009. |
Malode, Deepak Ravi “Remote Control and Method for Automatically Adjusting the Volume Output of an Audio Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/550,145, filed Aug. 28, 2009. |
Akella, Aparna Sarma “Systems and Methods for Event Programming Via a Remote Media Player,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/537,057, filed Aug. 6, 2009. |
Shah, Bhupendra Natwerlan et al. “Systems and Methods for Transcoding and Place Shifting Media Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,130, filed Aug. 26, 2009. |
Banger, Shashidhar et al. “Systems and Methods for Automatically Controlling the Resolution of Streaming Video Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/537,785, filed Aug. 7, 2009. |
Panigrahi, Biswaranjan “Home Media Aggregator System and Method,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,681, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Nandury, Venkata Kishore “Adaptive Gain Control for Digital Audio Samples in a Media Stream,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,971, filed Jul. 23, 2009. |
Shirali, Amey “Systems and Methods for Providing Programming Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,676, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Thiyagarajan, Venkatesan “Systems and Methods for Virtual Remote Control of Streamed Media,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,664, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Thiyagarajan, Venkatesan et al. “Localization Systems and Method,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,783, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Shirali, Amey et al. “Methods and Apparatus for Seeking Within a Media Stream Using Scene Detection,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,784, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Thiyagarajan, Venkatesan “Systems and Methods for Updating Firmware Over a Network,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,661, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
Iyer, Satish “Methods and Apparatus for Fast Seeking Within a Media Stream Buffer,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/538,659, filed Aug. 10, 2009. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” for International Application No. PCT/US2009/049006, mailed Sep. 11, 2009. |
Conway, Frank et al. “Systems and Methods for Creating Variable Length Clips from a Media Stream,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/347,465, filed Dec. 31, 2008. |
Lucas, Brian et al. “Systems and Methods for Establishing Connections Between Devices Communicating Over a Network,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/426,103, filed Apr. 17, 2009. |
USPTO, Final Office Action, mailed Nov. 6, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 09/809,868, filed Mar. 15, 2001. |
Thiyagarajan, Venkatesan et al. “Always-On-Top Media Player Launched From a Web Browser,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,271, filed Nov. 12, 2009. |
USPTO Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,664, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,707, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/683,862, filed Mar. 8, 2007. |
USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2009; U.S. Appl. No. 11/778,287, filed Jul. 16, 2007. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report, mailed Sep. 28, 2009 for European Application No. EP 06 78 6175. |
PCT Partial International Search, PCT/US2009/054893, mailed Dec. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/069914 mailed Dec. 19, 2008. |
Sling Media “Sling Media Unveils Top-of-Line Slingbox PRO-HD” [online], Jan. 4, 2008, XP002560049; retrieved from the Internet: URL:www.slingmedia.com/get/pr-slingbox-pro-hd.html; retrieved on Oct. 12, 2009. |
Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 21st ed., Mar. 2005. |
Ditze M. et all “Resource Adaptation for Audio-Visual Devices in the UPnP QoS Architecture,” Advanced Networking and Applications, 2006; AINA, 2006; 20% H International conference on Vienna, Austria Apr. 18-20, 2006. |
Joonbok, Lee et al. “Compressed High Definition Television (HDTV) Over IPv6,” Applications and the Internet Workshops, 2006; Saint Workshops, 2006; International Symposium, Phoenix, AZ, USA, Jan. 23-27, 2006. |
Lowekamp, B. et al. “A Hierarchy of Network Performance Characteristics for Grid Applications and Services,” GGF Network Measurements Working Group, pp. 1-29, May 24, 2004. |
Meyer, Derrick “MyReplayTV™ Creates First-Ever Online Portal to Personal TI! Service; Gives Viewers Whole New Way to Interact With Programming,” http://web.archive.org/web/20000815052751/http://www.myreplayty.com/, Aug. 15, 2000. |
Srisuresh, P. et al. “Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT),” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, Jan. 2001. |
Asnis, Ilya et al. “Mediated Network address Translation Traversal” U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,039, filed Mar. 16, 2009. |
Bajpal, Parimal et al. “Method and Note for Employing Network connections Over a Connectinoless Transport Layer Protocol,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,062, filed Mar. 16, 2009. |
Bajpal, Parimal et al. “Method and Node for Transmitting Data Over a Communication Network using Negative Ackhowledgement,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/404,920, filed Mar. 16, 2009. |
Paul, John et al. “Systems and Methods for Remotely Controlling Media Server Via a Network,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870, filed Dec. 23, 2009. |
Rao, Padmanabha R. et al. “Methods and Apparatus for Establishing Network Connections Using an Inter-Mediating Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/642,368, filed Dec. 18, 2009. |
Dham, Vikram et al. “Systems and Methods for Establishing Network Connections Using Local Mediation Services,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/644,918, filed Dec. 22, 2009. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Official Action, mailed Jan. 23, 2014 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,803,796. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, mailed May 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/458,852. |
Australian Government, Notice of Acceptance, dated May 29, 2014 for Australian Patent Application No. 2011271358. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025911, mailed Jan. 3, 2007. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063599, mailed Dec. 12, 2007. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/076337, mailed Oct. 20, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025912, mailed Jul. 17, 2008. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/059613, mailed Jul. 21, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/080910, mailed Feb. 16, 2009. |
Wikipedia “Slingbox” [Online], Oct. 21, 2007, XP002512399; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slingbox&oldid=166080570>; retrieved on Jan. 28, 2009. |
Wikipedia “LocationFree Player” [Online], Sep. 22, 2007, XP002512400; retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LocationFree_Player&oldid=159683564>; retrieved on Jan. 28, 2009. |
Capable Networks LLC “Keyspan Remote Control—Controlling Your Computer With a Remote” [Online], Feb. 21, 2006, XP002512495; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.slingcommunity.com/article/11791/Keyspan-Remote-Control---Controlling-Your-Computer-With-a-Remote/?highlight=remote+control>; retrieved on Jan. 28, 2009. |
Sling Media Inc. “Slingbox User Guide” [Online] 2006, XP002512553; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www. slingmedia.hk/attach/en-US_Slingbox_User_Guide_v1.2.pdf>; retrieved on Jan. 29, 2009. |
Sony Corporation “LocationFree TV” [Online], 2004, SP002512410; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.docs.sony.com/release/LFX1_X5revision.pdf>; retrieved on Jan. 28, 2009 [note—document uploaded in two parts as file exceeds the 25MB size limit]. |
Sony Corporation “LocationFree Player Pak—LocationFree Base Station—LocationFree Player” [Online] 2005, XP002512401; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.docs.sony.com/release/LFPK1.pdf>; retrieved on Jan. 28, 2009. |
Japan Patent Office, “Decision of Rejection” mailed Jun. 3, 2014 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-506055. |
Japan Patent Office, “Decision of Dismissal of Amendment” mailed Jun. 3, 2014 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-506055. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance” mailed Jun. 9, 2014 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7001665. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action” mailed Jun. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,983. |
USPTO, Final Office Action, mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,024. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” mailed Mar. 30, 2010; International Application PCT/US2009/068468 filed Dec. 27, 2009. |
USPTO Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/111,265, filed Apr. 21, 2005. |
USPTO Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,711, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,664, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/620,707, filed Jan. 7, 2007. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 12/237,103, filed Sep. 24, 2008. |
Qiong, Liu et al. “Digital Rights Management for Content Distribution,” Proceedings of the Australasian Information Security Workshop Conference on ACSW Frontiers 2003, vol. 21, 2003, XP002571073, Adelaide, Australia, ISSN: 1445-1336, ISBN: 1-920682-00-7, sections 2 and 2.1.1. |
China State Intellectual Property Office “First Office Action,” issued Jan. 8, 2010, for Application No. 200810126554.0. |
USPTO Final Office action mailed Jan. 25, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,277, filed Apr. 12, 2007. |
Australian Government “Office Action,” Australian Patent Application No. 2006240518, mailed Nov. 12, 2009. |
Jain, Vikal Kumar “Systems and Methods for Coordinating Data Communication Between Two Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/699,280, filed Feb. 3, 2010. |
Gangotri, Arun L. et al. “Systems and Methods and Program Applications for Selectively Restructuring the Placeshiftnig of Copy Protected Digital Media Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/623,955, filed Nov. 23, 2009. |
Paul, John et al. “Systems and Methods for Searching Media Content,” U.S. Appl. No. 121648,024, filed Dec. 28, 2009. |
Newton's Telcom Dictionary, 20th ed., Mar. 2004. |
“The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms,” 7th ed. 2000. |
Gurzhi, Alexander et al. “Systems and Methods for Emulation Network-Enabled Media Components,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,830, filed Feb. 24, 2010. |
USPTO “Final Office Action” mailed Oct. 17, 2011; U.S. Appl. No. 12/426,103, filed Apr. 17, 2009. |
Lee, M. et al. “Video Frame Rate Control for Non-Guaranteed Network Services with Explicit Rate Feedback,” Globecom'00, 2000 IEEE Global Telecommunications conference, San Francisco, CA, Nov. 27-Dec. 1, 2000; [IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference], New York, NY; IEEE, US, vol. 1,Nov. 27, 2000, pp. 293-297, XP001195580; ISBN: 978-0-7803-6452-3, lines 15-20 of sec. II on p. 293, fig. 1. |
European Patent Office, International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed Jun. 4, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/IN2009/000728, filed Dec. 18, 2009. |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2010; U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,969, filed Nov. 1, 2007. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office “Official Notice of Preliminary Rejection,” issued Jun. 18, 2010; Korean Patent Application No. 10-2008-7021254. |
China State Intellectual Property Office “Office Action” issued Mar. 18, 2010 for Application No. 200680022520.6. |
China State Intellectual Property Office “Office Action” issued Apr. 13, 2010 for Application No. 200580026825.X. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office “Office Action” mailed Feb. 18, 2010 for Application No. 2569610. |
European Patent Office “European Search Report,” mailed May 7, 2010 for Application No. 06786174.0. |
Margulis, Neal “Apparatus and Method for Effectively Implementing a Wireless Television System,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,193, filed Apr. 12, 2010. |
Margulis, Neal “Apparatus and Method for Effectively Implementing a Wireless Television System,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,194, filed Apr. 12, 2010. |
Margulis, Neal “Apparatus and Method for Effectively Implementing a Wireless Television System,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,196, filed Apr. 12, 2010. |
Kirkorian, Jason Gary et al. “Personal Media Broadcasting System with Output Buffer,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,697, filed Apr. 9, 2010. |
Tarra, Raghuveer et al. “Firmware Update for Consumer Electronic Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/757,714, filed Apr. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Mar. 27, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 30, 2014 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,758,791. |
Australian Government, Notice of Acceptance, dated Jul. 16, 2014 for Australian Patent Application No. 2010236888. |
USPTO “Notice of Allowance” mailed Jan. 10, 2012; U.S. Appl. No. 12/426,103, filed Apr. 17, 2009. |
China State Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2014 for China Patent Application No. 201080016835.6. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, dated Dec. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870. |
Fielding et al., Hypertext Transfer Protocol—Http/1.1, W3C/MIT, Jun. 1999. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180030790.2 mailed Feb. 27, 2015. |
USPTO, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,024 mailed Mar. 12, 2015. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,803,796 mailed Feb. 26, 2015. |
USPTO, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,908 mailed Mar. 27, 2015. |
Israel Patent Office, Official Action for Israel Patent Application No. 215671 mailed Mar. 19, 2015. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/029062 mailed Oct. 18, 2011. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201080016835.6 mailed Apr. 27, 2015. |
Intellectual Property Office, Office Action for ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 100122066 mailed Apr. 29, 2015. |
Israel Patent Office, Official Action for Israel Patent Application No. 220481 mailed May 31, 2015. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/060797 mailed Jun. 26, 2012. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Official Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,784,956 mailed Apr. 30, 2015. |
Intellectual Property Office, Office Action in ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 099144605 mailed May 20, 2015. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,983 mailed Mar. 23, 2015. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,870 mailed Jul. 7, 2015. |
Japan Patent Office, Notice of Rejection Ground for Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-506055 mailed Jul. 14, 2015. |
Japan Patent Office, Decision to Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-516600 mailed Nov. 25, 2014. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/619,192 mailed Dec. 5, 2014. |
USPTO, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,983 mailed Dec. 15, 2014. |
USPTO, Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,198 mailed Dec. 18, 2014. |
Fielding et al. Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1 RFC 2616—Section 8 Connections. available Jan. 27, 2001. retrieved from <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec8.htmi> via Internet Archive on <May 25, 2014>>. |
IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2010333843 mailed Jul. 2, 2015. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Reexamination Notification in Chinese Patent Application No. 201080016835.6 mailed Dec. 30, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150215284 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12619192 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 14680717 | US |