The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for the control of autonomic nerve function comprising delivery via permeabilization of targeted cell membranes a therapeutically effective amount of a portion or fragment of a neurotoxin such as botulinum toxin (BoNT), the active portion known as the light chain (LC), to cause a clinical benefit in various regions within the body.
First used for medical purposes over 20 years ago for treatment of blepharospasm and strabismus and other skeletal muscle abnormalities, certain neurotoxins have found widespread use in millions of patients worldwide for a variety of conditions.
Controlled injection of neurotoxins has become a common procedure to control skeletal muscle spasms. While the primary application of neurotoxins such as BOTOX®, commercially sold by Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, Calif.), has been focused on cosmetic applications, such as treatment of facial wrinkles, other uses for the compound are now common. Certain applications include treatment of cervical dystonia, tremor, headache (migraine), spasticity, torticollis, hemifacial spasm, blepharospasm, meige syndrome, spastic dysphonia, writers cramp, hyperhydrosis, hypersalivation, bladder dysfunction multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, cystic fibrosis, stroke paralysis, stuttering, and all types of pain.
Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) block the release of acetylcholine from peripheral cholinergic nerve endings thereby disabling the release of neurotransmitters from the cells (Bigalke, H. and Shoer, L. F. (1999) Clostridial Neurotoxins in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 45, 407-443). This mechanism of action is well defined. Seven immunologically distinct serotypes of neurotoxin, designated types A through G, have been identified as discussed by Simpson, L. L., Schmidt, J. J. and Middlebrook, J. L. (1988) in Methods Enzymol. 165, 76-85. There are general structural and functional similarities among the various types of neurotoxins, but they all have preferred recipients, for example some favor use in humans and other in non-human species.
A frequently used neurotoxin for many applications in the human body is Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT\A), a protein produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum and sold commercially by Allergan, inc., as BOTOX®. Botulinum toxin blocks the release of neurotransmitter from the nerves that control the contraction of the target muscles. When used in medical settings, small doses of the toxin are injected into the affected muscles and block the release of a chemical acetylcholine that signals the muscle to contract. The toxin thus paralyzes or weakens the injected muscle.
In addition, use of neurotoxin for control of the following conditions has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,063,768 to First, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,605 to Sanders, including: rhinorrhea, asthma, COPD, excessive stomach acid secretion, spastic colitis, otitus media, arthritis, tensoynovitis, lupus, connective tissue disease, inflammatory bowel disease, gout, tumors, musculo-skeletal abnormalities, reflex sympathetic dystrophies, tendonitis, bursitis, and peripheral neuropathy. Various other patents contemplate the use of a neurotoxin for additional applications such as, neuromuscular disorders (U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,397), essential tremor (U.S. Pat. No. 6,861,058), pancreatitis (U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998), muscle spasm (U.S. Pat. No. 6,841,156), sinus headache (U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,434), endocrine disorders (U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,931), priapism (U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,991), thyroiditis (U.S. Pat. No. 6,773,711), cardiovascular disease (U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,544), thyroid disorders (U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,321), hypocalcemia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,161), hypercalcemia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,785), tardive dyskenesia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,645,496), fibromyalgia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,623,742), Parkinson's Disease (U.S. Pat. No. 6,620,415) cerebral palsy (U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,231), inner ear disorders (U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,926), cancers (U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,845), otic disorders (U.S. Pat. No. 6,265,379), appetite reduction (US2004/0253274), compulsive disorders (US2004/0213814, US2004/0213813), uterine disorders (US2004/0175399), neuropsychiatric disorders (US2003/0211121), dermatological or transdermal applications (US2004/00091880), focal epilepsy (US2003/0202990) the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The patent authors have further detailed devices and methods for treating asthma with local delivery of the intact botulinum toxin in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/437,882, filed on May 13, 2003, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Due to their extreme toxicity, neurotoxins are highly controlled and can have disastrous consequences if not used and controlled properly, especially when used in vivo. In addition, due to their toxicity, the body tends to build up a resistance to their use, resulting in lower efficacy, the need for increased treatments, or the need to discontinue their use all together in certain patients.
In light of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide methods and apparatus for delivering neurotoxins such as botulinum toxins non-toxically.
It would also be desirable to provide methods and apparatus for treating various conditions with a neurotoxin such as botulinum toxin fragments via in vivo cell permeabilization.
In would also be desirable to provide a system of devices, including catheters, trocars, needles, endoscopes, inhalers, nebulizers and aerosolizers and other mechanisms to deliver fragmented neurotoxins non-toxically.
Further, it would be desirable to couple energy delivery devices with the delivery of fragmented neurotoxins to deliver active neurotoxins, non-toxically, including catheter based energy systems, and non-invasive energy systems.
All publications and patents or patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually so incorporated by reference.
According to the present invention, an active fragment (sometimes referred to as a catalytic portion) of a neurotoxin such as the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), preferably the light chain (LC) portion of BoNT, is delivered to target cells via cell membrane permeabilization. Such delivery provides a non-toxic delivery scheme for deriving a variety of clinical benefits. Although botulinum toxins are used broadly for a variety of clinical applications, the present invention provides enhanced methods of delivery and use of the isolated active fragments or portions of the toxin. Other neurotoxins which may be used in the methods and systems of the present invention include ricin and its active fragments, exotoxin A and its active fragments, diphtheria toxin and its active fragments, cholera toxin and its active fragments, tetanus toxin and its active fragments, and the like.
The present invention contemplates application to all of the conditions listed herein, collectively defined as “therapeutic target conditions”, and any other conditions for which BoNT and other neurotoxins are known to or can be shown to provide a therapeutic benefit. Certain examples have been detailed below for specific applications, but it is within the scope of the present invention that the methods and devices detailed herein have specific applications to many or all of the conditions wherein the intact neurotoxins have shown or proposed to show a therapeutic benefit or effect.
In one aspect of the present invention, BoNT-LC or other active neurotoxin fragment is delivered with the application of energy to achieve cell membrane permeabilization.
In another aspect of the present invention methods and apparatus are provided for altering autonomic nerve function by utilizing an electric field or ultrasonic energy generated by a pulse or pulses of a designated duration and amplitude to alter tissue at the cellular level via permeabilization of the cell membrane to facilitate the translocation of the BoNT-LC or other active neurotoxin fragment to the cell cytosol.
A further aspect of the invention is to provide methods and apparatus for treating or inhibiting a variety of diseases or syndromes that have an underlying neurogenic component, by disrupting the neurogenic activities of the promoters or mediators of the disease or syndrome. Such disruption is facilitated by delivering an active fragment of botulinum toxin, such as the light chain portion of botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT-LC/A), in the presence of an electric field or ultrasonic energy applied to permeabilize the wall of targeted cell under conditions which induce reversible poration of the cellular membrane and efficient passage of the BoNT-LC fragment to the cell cytosol, its catalytic environment.
In addition to the methods described thus far, the present invention further provides systems for delivering toxins to target cells in a mammalian host. The target cells may be in any of the target regions described above or in any other target region which may benefit from the specific and enhanced delivery of a neurotoxin to cells within the region. Systems comprise catheter or other structure adapted to introduce the toxin or toxin fragment to a region adjacent the target cells. The systems further comprise an energy applicator for applying energy to the target cells under condition which cause poration of the cell membranes to enhance delivery of the toxins and/or their active fragments. The systems still further comprise a source of the toxin or active fragments suitable for introduction from the catheter or other delivery structure.
The energy applicator will typically be adapted to selectively apply energy to target cells within the region where the toxin is to be introduced, e.g., by focusing energy distribution to the particular target cells or regions which are rich with the target cells. Alternatively, the energy applicator may be adapted to apply energy non-selectively within the target region where both target cells and other cell types may receive the energy.
In some instances, the toxin may comprise an intact toxin, but more usually will comprise an active toxin fragment as defined elsewhere in this application. In the exemplary embodiments, the active toxin fragment is the light chain fragment of the botulinum toxin (BoNT-LC). The light chain fragment may be derived from any one of at least botulinum toxins A, B, C, D, E, F, and G.
The energy applicators of the systems of the present invention may be adapted to apply electric energy, typically pulses between 1 V and 500 V to the targeted region. The electric energy may be radiofrequency (RF) energy, where the energy may be pulsed for durations between 5 microseconds to 100 milliseconds. Alternatively, the electrical energy can be direct current (DC), alternating current (AC), or combinations thereof.
‘In addition to electrical energy, the energy applicator may be adapted to deliver ultrasonic energy, X-ray beam energy, microwave energy, or any other energy type which can achieve a reversible poration of the target cell walls.
There are at least two general power categories of medical ultrasound waves which may be utilized in the present invention. One category of medical ultrasound wave is high acoustic pressure ultrasound. Another category of medical ultrasound wave is low acoustic pressure ultrasound. Acoustic power is expressed in a variety of ways by those skilled in the art. One method of estimating the acoustic power of an acoustic wave on tissue is the Mechanical Index. The Mechanical Index (MI) is a standard measure of the acoustic output in an ultrasound system. High acoustic pressure ultrasound systems generally have a M1 greater than 10. Low acoustic pressure systems generally have a MI lower than 5. For example, diagnostic ultrasound systems are limited by law to a Mechanical Index not to exceed 1.9. Another measurement used by those skilled in the art is the spatial peak, peak average intensity (Isppa). The intensity of an ultrasound beam is greater at the center of its cross section than at the periphery. Similarly, the intensity varies over a given pulse of ultrasound energy. Isppa is measured at the location where intensity is maximum averaged over the pulse duration. Isppa for high acoustic pressure or high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) applications ranges from approximately 1500 W/cm2 to 9000 W/cm2. Diagnostic ultrasound equipment, for instance, will generally have, and an Isppa less than 700 W/cm2. Yet another way in which ultrasound waves can be characterized is by the amplitude of their peak negative pressure. High acoustic pressure or HIFU applications employ waves with peak amplitudes in excess of 10 MPa. Low acoustic pressure ultrasound will generally have peak negative pressures in the range of 0.01 to 5.0 MPa. Diagnostic ultrasound equipment, for example, will generally have a peak amplitude less than 3.0 MPa. Both high and low acoustic pressure ultrasound systems generally operate within the frequency range of 20 KHz-10.0 MHz Interventional applications (such as in blood vessels) operate clinically up to about 50 MHz. Also opthalmologic applications up to about 15 MHz. Diagnostic imaging typically uses frequencies of about 3 to about 10 MHz. Physical therapy ultrasound systems generally operate at frequencies of either 1.0 MHz or 3.3 MHz. High acoustic pressure ultrasound or high intensity focused ultrasound has been used for tissue disruption, for example for direct tumor destruction. High intensity focused ultrasound using high acoustic pressure ultrasound is most commonly focused at a point in order to concentrate the energy from the generated acoustic waves in a relatively small focus of tissue.
Systems and methods for permeabilization of target tissue cell membranes according to the present invention may employ either high acoustic pressure or low acoustic pressure ultrasound. Some embodiments may preferably employ relatively low acoustic pressure, for example the systems described herein where the transducers are mounted on the delivery devices and operate inside the body. Other systems may operate at interim acoustic pressure ranges. For example, systems described herein which employ an external ultrasound generator and transducer and which conduct the ultrasound to the target tissues through the use of a wave guide. In these systems, losses due to transduction through the wave guide can be compensated for by increasing the input power to the wave guide until adequate power is delivered to the target tissue. Finally, some systems described herein may employ focused or partially focused higher pressure ultrasound, for example the systems which employ an external mask to conduct the ultrasonic power through the tissues to the target tissues. It should be appreciated that combinations of high and low acoustic pressure systems may also be employed.
The catheter or other structure may be adapted to introduce the toxin to the target cells in a variety of ways. For example, catheters may comprise a needle for injecting the toxin, optionally a needle which is deployable axially or radially from the catheter body. Alternatively or additionally, catheters may be provided with nozzles or other ports for aerosolizing the toxin, particularly within regions of the lung as described herein. Still further alternatively or additionally, the catheters may comprise balloons or other expandable elements for deflecting an end of the catheter to engage one or more ports on the catheter against the tissue where the toxin fragments are released through the port(s). In a specific embodiment, the ports may be in the balloon itself where the toxin fragments are released through the ports in the balloon as the balloon is inflated with the medium containing the fragments. With such balloon embodiments, the electrodes or other energy transducers will typically be located within the balloon for applying the poration energy to the target tissue. Further optionally, the energy applicators may be mounted directly on the catheters, for example in the form of acoustic transducers, RF or other electrical electrodes, or the like. Alternatively, the energy applicator may be provided separately from the toxin delivery catheter or other source, typically being an external source, such as an external high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) source or an external electrode array for delivering radiofrequency or other electroporation energy.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to provide methods and devices that utilize a non-toxic delivery mechanism to target cells to reduce the potential for an immunogenic response to the delivered toxin over time.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment and energy via a catheter.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment via an aerosolizer or nebulizer.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment via an inhaler.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment and membrane transport energy transdermally.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment via a catheter, or aerosolizer or inhaler, and the energy via a catheter placed in the vicinity of the targeted cell.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment and the membrane transport energy via an implantable generator and drug delivery pump.
In a further aspect of the invention, it may be desirable to deliver the therapeutic neurotoxin fragment via a catheter, or aerosolizer (nebulizer) or inhaler, and the energy via an external energy source adapted to target the applied energy in the vicinity of the targeted cell.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be more apparent from the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description, in which:
The present invention is directed to methods and apparatus for targeting the non toxic delivery of a fragment of a neurotoxin, while still maintaining the catalytic or toxic effect of the neurotoxin fragment once it is non-toxically delivered to its targeted cell. For purposes of this specification, the term “non-toxic”, “non-toxically” and the like refer to the state of the fragment molecule prior to delivery to a target location. In this description, the fragment neurotoxin is intended to retain its toxic effect once delivered to its catalytic environment; the intracellular matrix or cytosol of the targeted cell.
Devices and methods of the present invention may be directed to suitable “targeted regions” such as muscle cells in various regions of the body related to the various “therapeutic target conditions” or syndromes to be treated, as detailed in this specification above. Some particular examples include targeting mucosal and muscular lining of the lung, cholinergic cells in the region of tumors, myofacial regions, vascular smooth muscle cells, musculoskeletal regions and the like.
According to the present invention, energy fields (EF) may be applied to target regions in conjunction with the delivery of a fragmented neurotoxin such as BoNT-LC to facilitate the transfer of the neurotoxin fragment into the targeted cell, non-toxically via in vivo target cell permeabilization.
Use of Isolated Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxins
Generally, the BoNT molecule is synthesized as a single polypeptide chain of 150 kD molecular weight. The neurotoxin is then exposed to enzymes, either during cultivation of the Clostridium botulinum organism or subsequent to purification of the toxin, wherein specific peptide bonds are cleaved or “nicked” resulting in the formation of a dichain molecule referred to as BoNT. As shown in
Over the past several years, the separation and purification of the light chain and heavy chain of BoNT has seen significant development activity. In the case of the heavy chain (HC), researchers are interested in its ability to bond with a target cell and deliver certain molecules into that cell. For example, various drug delivery applications have been suggested, for example, using the HC to bind to tPA so that a patient could inhale the HC bound tPA allowing it to cross the membrane of the lungs and be transported into the bloodstream for anticoagulation. Of particular interest to the present invention are the efforts to isolate and purify the light chain (LC) of the botulinum molecule. In its isolated and purified form, all HC elements are removed, rendering the LC incapable of crossing the cell membrane without assistance. Thus, the LC is non-toxic until delivered to the target cell cytosol by the delivery protocols of the present invention.
Various groups have been active in the area of isolation and purification. For example, companies such as Metabiologics, a group affiliated with the University of Wisconsin, the Center for Applied Microbiology and Research (CAMR), a division of the UK Health Protection Agency, List Biological Laboratories, Inc. of California, and other research groups throughout the world. Many of these companies provide purified preparations of botulinum neurotoxins from Clostridium botulinum types A and B. List Laboratories in particular provides recombinantly produced light chains from both types A, B, C, D and E.
According to the present invention, the therapeutic use and delivery of the light chain only may significantly improve the safety profile of certain applications of therapies utilizing BoNT. BoNT are some of the most lethal toxins known to man. All concerns about migration of the neurotoxin into unintended regions, and harm or toxicity to the patient or physician are eliminated by storing, handling, injecting and metabolizing the light chain only. In the absence of a specific membrane binding technology, the LC is completely non-toxic. In certain applications, such as the treatment of asthma, this is of critical import. In using BoNT to treat asthma, a large quantity of the purified LC substance may be introduced directly into the lung, and then specifically transported to target cells in the exact location and only during the period of use of application of the membrane transport technology, such as cell membrane permeabilization by energy. Once the membrane transport technology has been removed, turned off or otherwise inactivated, the remaining LC which has not been transported into target cells can simply be removed from the body by standard biologic processes for expelling foreign materials, e.g. coughing, immune system or lymphatic system transport and the like.
In addition, therapeutic use of only the LC of the neurotoxin BoNT may reduce the likelihood of the body developing an immunogenic response to the therapy that is seen with delivery of the intact toxin. This could be a major advantage in light of the repetitive application or injection of the toxin that is required to maintain a therapeutic effect.
Non-Toxic Membrane Transport Mechanisms
To date, the main application of purified or isolated light chain has been the study of its mechanism of action. To further this research, literature has reported the use of certain detergent based permeabilization techniques to deliver fragment BoNT (Bittner M A, DasGupta B R, Holz R W. Isolated light chains of botulinum neurotoxins inhibit exocytosis. Studies in digitonin-permeabilized chromaffin cells. J Biol Chem 1989 Jun. 25; 264 (18):10354-10360.) Further reference to the mechanism of permeability of cell membranes to deliver botulinum toxin are mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 6,063,768 to First, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440 to Quinn, Chaddock, et al “Expression and Purification of Catalytically Active Non-Toxic Endopeptidase Derivatives of Clostridium botulinum toxin type A”, Protein Expression and Purification, 25 (2002) 219-228, contemplating the insertion of the light chain of BoNT into a target cell without the heavy chain for purposes of deriving vaccines or in bench top studies of cell mechanisms of action. The contents of these references are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety. None of the teachings contemplate a delivery of a fragment of neurotoxin using a clinically acceptable permeabilization technique in vivo for therapeutic uses as is contemplated by the present invention.
For purposes of this specification, the term “poration” includes various forms of electroporation, such as the use of pulsed electric fields (PEFs), nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs), ionophoreseis, electrophoresis, electropermeabilization, as well as other energy mediated permeabilization, including sonoporation (mediated by ultrasonic or other acoustic energy), and/or combinations thereof, to create temporary pores in a targeted cell membrane. Similarly, the term “electrode” or “energy source” used herein, encompasses the use of various types of energy producing devices, including x-ray, radiofrequency (RF), DC current, AC current, microwave, ultrasound, adapted and applied in ranges to produce membrane permeabilization in the targeted cell.
Reversible electroporation, first observed in the early 1970's, has been used extensively in medicine and biology to transfer chemicals, drugs, genes and other molecules into targeted cells for a variety of purposes such as electrochemotherapy, gene transfer, transdermal drug delivery, vaccines, and the like.
In general, electroporation may be achieved utilizing a device adapted to activate an electrode set or series of electrodes to produce an electric field. Such a field can be generated in a bipolar or monopolar electrode configuration. When applied to cells, depending on the duration and strength of the applied pulses, this field operates to increase the permeabilization of the cell membrane and reversibly open the cell membrane for a short period of time by causing pores to form in the cell lipid bilayer allowing entry of various therapeutic elements or molecules, after which, when energy application ceases, the pores spontaneously close without killing the cell after a certain time delay. As characterized by Weaver, Electroporation: A General Phenomenon for Manipulating Cells and Tissues Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 51:426-435 (1993), short (1-100 .mu.s) and longer (1-10 ms) pulses have induced electroporation in a variety of cell types. In a single cell model, most cells will exhibit electroporation in the range of 1-1.5V applied across the cell (membrane potential).
In addition, it is known in the art that macromolecules can be made to cross reversibly created pores at voltages of 120V or less applied to cells for durations of 20 microseconds to many milliseconds. For applications of electroporation to cell volumes, ranges of 10 V/cm to 10,000 V/cm and pulse durations ranging from 1 nanosecond to 0.1 seconds can be applied. In one example, a relatively narrow (pee) high voltage (200V) pulse can be followed by a longer (>msec) lower voltage pulse (<100V). The first pulse or series of pulses open the pores and the second pulse or series of pulses assist in the movement of the BoNT-LC across the cell membrane and into the cell.
Certain factors affect how a delivered electric field will affect a targeted cell, including cell size, cell shape, cell orientation with respect to the applied electric field, cell temperature, distance between cells (cell-cell separation), cell type, tissue heterogeneity, properties of the cellular membrane and the like.
Various waveforms or shapes of pulses may be applied to achieve electroporation, including sinusoidal AC pulses, DC pulses, square wave pulses, exponentially decaying waveforms or other pulse shapes such as combined AC/DC pulses, or DC shifted RF signals such as those described by Chang in Cell Potation and Cell Fusion using and Oscillating Electric Field, Biophysical Journal October 1989, Volume 56 pgs 641-652, depending on the pulse generator used or the effect desired. The parameters of applied energy may be varied, including all or some of the following: waveform shape, amplitude, pulse duration, interval between pulses, number of pulses, combination of waveforms and the like.
A schematic example of the methods of the present invention are shown in
Of particular interest for application in certain therapeutic target conditions is the developing field of sonoporation. Just as pulses of high voltage electricity can open transient pores in the cell membrane, ultrasonic energy can do the same. See for example Guzman et al. “Equilibrium Loading of Cells with Macromolecules by Ultrasound: Effects of Molecular Sizing and Acoustic Energy,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 91:7, 1693-1701, which examines the viability of ultrasound to deliver molecules of a variety of sizes into target cells. In addition, techniques for nebulizing fluids and aqueous drugs are well known in the art, and as such, devices of the present invention may be adapted to introduce a BoNT-LC solution to a target region, such as the lung and then effect selective membrane transport of the BoNT-LC into the cell using sonoporation.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,581 to Babaev, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes certain techniques for delivering therapeutic agents using ultrasound for pulmonary delivery via an aerosolizing technique. Further, Guzman, et al, depicts delivery of molecules from a low of 62 Da up to 464 kDa (a range of 0.6-18.5 nm radius). Since the LC of the botulinum toxin is in the 50 kDa range, the LC would be very susceptible to sonoporetic delivery. Furthermore, Guzman, et al also showed that for all size ranges tested, levels of macromolecule within the cell reached thermodynamic equilibrium with the extracellular environment, and the cell uptake also depended on the energy delivered, as expressed in J/cm2. As such, the sonoporetic delivery of LC to the targeted regions may be controlled by adjusting the concentration of the LC exposed to the target region (e.g. wall or membrane of the lung), the energy delivered to the target region, or both.
To achieve the goals of the present invention, it may be desirable to employ methods and apparatus for achieving cell membrane permeabilization via the application of an energy source, either from a catheter located directly in the vicinity of the targeted cells, or an externally focused energy system. For purposes of this specification, the term “catheter” may be used to refer to an elongate element, hollow or solid, flexible or rigid and capable of percutaneous introduction to a body (either by itself, or through a separately created incision or puncture), such as a sheath, a trocar, a needle, a lead. Further descriptions of certain electroporation catheters are described in U.S. Patent Application 60/701,747, filed on Jul. 22, 2005, the full disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
Further catheter device and electrode configurations are shown in
Since air is a very effective insulator against transmission of ultrasonic energy, the treatment area in the lung may be more precisely controlled by the concentration of the LC mist and the intensity of the ultrasonic energy. A fairly steep drop off in energy delivery would occur as mist concentration diffused, effectively protecting areas outside the predetermined radius surrounding the distal end of the delivery device. According to the present invention, since no functional neurotoxin exists without an effective membrane transport technology, terminating the energy application leaves a harmless mist that is then coughed up (if resident in the lungs) or otherwise metabolized and excreted by the body.
Any of the catheter devices described herein, or described in the contemporaneously filed U.S. Patent Application 60/701,747, previously incorporated by reference in its entirety, may be adapted to include an energy delivery element such as those described herein for purposes of providing a membrane transport system for delivery of a fragment of neurotoxin. In addition, certain catheter devices and methods such as those set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,964,223 and 6,526,976 to Baran may be adapted to include energy transmission elements capable of producing a porative effect at the cellular level, including electrodes, ultrasonic elements and the like, for treatment in the respiratory tract.
Furthermore, any of the foregoing systems may include electrodes or other monitoring systems either located on the treatment catheter, or external to the patient, to determine the degree of treatment to the region, including, thermocouple, ultrasound transducers, fiberoptics, sensing or stimulating electrodes. Further, it may be desirable to incorporate multiple pairs of electrodes that may be activated in pairs, in groups, or in a sequential manner in order to maximize the desired shape of the energy field (EF) while minimizing the field strength requirements.
Implantable Devices
Just as energy may be delivered to a targeted region to facilitate the delivery of fragmented neurotoxin via a catheter system, it is also within the scope of the present invention to deliver neurotoxins via an implantable system, including a pulse generator, lead and drug pump as depicted in
Examples of useful implantable devices of the present invention arc, devices such as those set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,589 to Torgerson et al, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference, the SynchroMed® programmable pump available from Medtronic, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minn.), and the neurostimulation units such as the RESTORE* or SynergyPlus® available from Medtronic, Inc., modified if necessary to deliver the desired voltage range for cell membrane permeabilization. Implantation of the neurostimulation device is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,849, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The non-toxic nature of the BoNT in the absence of applied energy makes it possible to contemplate placing a bolus of neurotoxin in the body of a patient in what might otherwise be a toxic amount. This is particularly advantageous, since the traditional treatment regime using neurotoxins, is typically repeat injections of the toxins every 3 to 6 months and sometimes more frequently depending on the application. Certainly in more chronic conditions such as chronic pain, tremor, spasm, palsy and the like, such a fully implantable system may be highly desirable.
It is within the scope of the invention to deliver either the energy or the therapeutic BoNT-LC non-invasively, or both. For example,
A combination of these non-invasive approaches may also be advantageous as shown in
In a further aspect of the present invention, the fragmented molecule BoNT-LC may be delivered intravenously to a patient to achieve a systemic affect. A non-invasive energy application device, such as those described above, may then be targeted at the area of interest to porate the target area, thereby locally delivering the BoNT-LC to the region sufficiently porated by the applied energy.
Cosmetic and Myofacial Applications. For some conditions, it may be desirable to apply the energy field from the surface of the skin to produce a porative effect, while injecting the BoNT-LC fragment into the targeted facial muscles as shown in
It may further be advantageous to position catheters of the present invention through vessels in the body to direct them to various regions to affect neurotransmitters in the cardiovascular system. Intraluminal catheters such as those shown in United States Patent Applications 2001/0044596 to Jaafar and 2002/0198512 to Seward, hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety, may be used in this application of the present invention.
In some applications of the present invention, it may be desirable to assess the appropriate location for the therapy prior to treatment, the therapeutic effect as it is delivered, and ultimately the resulting effect. To achieve this, once the treatment device is in place adjacent the tissue to be treated, the energy generator may be activated, causing an energized field to be generated in the target area. Prior to activation of therapeutic voltages and agent, stimulation using one or more electrodes may be used to elicit a nerve response or reflex. By observing the nerve response, a target treatment location can be confirmed. Similarly, once the therapy has been delivered, a similar stimulation response may be sought, to determine presence or lack of neurogenic response.
In operation, effects of electroporation and delivery of a therapeutic dose of BoNT LC may be selective due to the cellular structure and orientation of the targeted cells. For example, targeted cells may be preferentially affected due to size, avoiding smaller or cross-oriented tissue cells.
In a further aspect of the present invention, the method of delivering the LC fragment of the BoNT molecule may include the use of a media that contains microspheres or microbubbles, such as Optison™ sold by GE Healthcare (www.amershamhealth-us.com/optison/). Delivery of an ultrasound energy (or other form of energy, for example, laser, RF, thermal, energy) to the media causes the microspheres to rupture, which causes a release of energy toward the targeted region. Such a technique may assist in the desired porative effect by reducing the amount of applied energy required to create poration in the targeted cell membrane. Bioeffects Caused by Changes in Acoustic Cavitation Bubble Density and Cell Concentration: A Unified Explanation Based on Cell-to-Bubble Ratio and Blast Radius, Guzman, et al. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 1211-1222 (2003). In an alternative embodiment, the LC fragment may actually be contained or encapsulated within a microsphere to assist in delivery. Such enhancing elements may be delivered prior to energy application or during energy application.
In a further aspect of the present invention, it may be advantageous to heat the targeted cells or surrounding tissue by either applying thermal energy directly to the region, or directing a heated fluid, such as saline to the region through an injection element, to aid the cell poration process. Other substances may also be injected to aid in the transmission of the BoNT-LC into the intracellular membrane, such as amino acids, detergents or other agents that may facilitate the catalytic activity of the LC, in addition to the applied energy.
Referring now to
Referring now
Although various illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described above, it will be evident to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. It will also be apparent that various changes and modifications may be made herein without departing from the invention. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/036,381 filed Jul. 16, 2018, which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/358,187 filed Nov. 22, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,022,529 issued Jul. 17, 2018, which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/601,529 filed Jan. 21, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,283 issued Nov. 22, 2016, which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/660,629 filed Oct. 25, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,961,391 issued Feb. 24, 2015, which in turn which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/253,595 filed Oct. 5, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,338,164 issued Dec. 25, 2012, which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/559,278 filed Sep. 14, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,133,497 issued Mar. 13, 2012, which in turn is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/459,090 filed Jul. 21, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,275 issued Oct. 27, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/702,077 filed Jul. 22, 2005, each of which is hereby fully incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,275 also claims the benefit of, and incorporated by reference in its entirety U.S. Provisional Application No. and 60/747,771, filed on May 19, 2006, which is thereby also fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1695107 | Kahl | Dec 1928 | A |
3918449 | Pistor | Nov 1975 | A |
4658836 | Turner | Apr 1987 | A |
4767402 | Kost et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4976710 | Mackin | Dec 1990 | A |
5056529 | De Groot | Oct 1991 | A |
5139029 | Fishman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5158536 | Sekins et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5286254 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304120 | Crandell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5331947 | Shturman | Jul 1994 | A |
5336178 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5409483 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5432092 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5496304 | Chasan | Mar 1996 | A |
5562608 | Sekins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5766605 | Sanders et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5817073 | Krespi | Oct 1998 | A |
5820589 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843088 | Barra et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5902268 | Saab | May 1999 | A |
5957961 | Maguire et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964223 | Baran | Oct 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6033397 | Laufer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056744 | Edwards | May 2000 | A |
6063768 | First | May 2000 | A |
6139845 | Donovan | Oct 2000 | A |
6200333 | Laufer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216704 | Ingle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6265379 | Donovan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283989 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299633 | Laufer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302780 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306423 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358926 | Donovan | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6361554 | Brisken | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383509 | Donovan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411852 | Danek et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425887 | McGuckin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432092 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447785 | Donovan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448231 | Graham | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464680 | Brisken et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475160 | Sher | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488673 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506399 | Donovan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6526976 | Baran | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546932 | Nahon et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601581 | Babaev | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620415 | Donovan | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623742 | Voet | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632440 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634363 | Danek et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645496 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649161 | Donovan | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658279 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740321 | Donovan | May 2004 | B1 |
6767544 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6773711 | Voet et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776991 | Naumann | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827931 | Donovan | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6838434 | Voet | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841156 | Aoki et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843998 | Steward et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6846312 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847849 | Mamo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861058 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872397 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917834 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974578 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7027869 | Danek et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7184811 | Phan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7371231 | Rioux et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7462179 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7608275 | Deem et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628789 | Soltesz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7747324 | Errico et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7853331 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8007495 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8088127 | Mayse et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105817 | Deem et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8133497 | Deem et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8172827 | Deem et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8226638 | Mayse et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8338164 | Deem et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8483831 | Hlavka et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8489192 | Hlavka et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8660647 | Parnis et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8731672 | Hlavka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8740895 | Mayse et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8777943 | Mayse et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8808280 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821489 | Mayse et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8911439 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932289 | Mayse et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961391 | Deem et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961507 | Mayse et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961508 | Mayse et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9005195 | Mayse et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017324 | Mayse et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9125643 | Hlavka et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149328 | Dimmer et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9339618 | Deem et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9398933 | Mayse | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9498283 | Deem et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9539048 | Hlvaka et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10022529 | Deem et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10149714 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10201386 | Mayse et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10206735 | Kaveckis et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10252057 | Hlvaka et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10363091 | Dimmer et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10368937 | Kaveckis et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10575893 | Mayse | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10610283 | Mayse et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10610675 | Deem et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10729897 | Deem et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10869997 | Mayse | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10894011 | Deem et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
20010044596 | Jaafar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013581 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020082197 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087208 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111620 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143302 | Hinchliffe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198512 | Seward | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018344 | Kaji et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023287 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036755 | Ginn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050591 | Patrick McHale | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030118327 | Um et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030159700 | Laufer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030202990 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211121 | Donovan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009180 | Donovan | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010290 | Schroeppel et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028676 | Klein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086531 | Barron | May 2004 | A1 |
20040091880 | Wiebusch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040142005 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151741 | Borodic | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175399 | Schiffman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186435 | Seward | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213813 | Ackerman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213814 | Ackerman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220562 | Garabedian et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226556 | Deem et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248188 | Sanders | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253274 | Voet | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050019346 | Boulis | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065575 | Dobak | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074461 | Donovan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107853 | Krespi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152924 | Voet | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182393 | Abboud et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183732 | Edwards | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240147 | Makower et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245926 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060084966 | Maguire et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106361 | Muni et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153876 | Sanders | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060222667 | Deem et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060225742 | Deem et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254600 | Danek et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070021803 | Deem et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025919 | Deem et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043350 | Soltesz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083194 | Kunis et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100390 | Danaek et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106292 | Kaplan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118184 | Danek et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156185 | Swanson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070250050 | Lafontaine | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070267011 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270794 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021369 | Deem et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051839 | Libbus et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091379 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080161890 | Lafontaine | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080255642 | Zarins et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312725 | Penner | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018538 | Webster et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043301 | Jarrard et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090177192 | Rioux et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221997 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100003282 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100087775 | Deem et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110118725 | Mayse et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152855 | Mayse et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178569 | Parnis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110257647 | Mayse et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301587 | Deem et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016363 | Mayse et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016364 | Mayse et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029261 | Deem et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120158101 | Stone et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203216 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203222 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209261 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209296 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221087 | Parnis et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120302909 | Mayse et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310233 | Dimmer et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316552 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316559 | Mayse et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130123751 | Deem et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130289555 | Mayse et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289556 | Mayse et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303948 | Deem et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310822 | Mayse et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140186341 | Mayse | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140257271 | Mayse et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276792 | Kaveckis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140371809 | Parnis et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051597 | Mayse et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150141985 | Mayse et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150190193 | Mayse et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150366603 | Hlavka et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160022351 | Kaveckis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160038725 | Mayse et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160220851 | Mayse et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160310210 | Harshman et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170014571 | Deem et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20180028748 | Deem et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180199993 | Mayse et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190105102 | Mayse et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190142510 | Mayse et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190142511 | Wahr et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190151018 | Mayse et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200001081 | Hlvaka et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200060750 | Kaveckis et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200085495 | Dimmer et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200222114 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200268436 | Mayse | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2152002 | Dec 1995 | CA |
2002145784 | May 2002 | JP |
WO-9519805 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-9934831 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-0062699 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-2004006954 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004101028 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005032646 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005048988 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2004101028 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahnert-Hilger., et al., “Inlroduction of Macromolecules into Bovine Adrenal-Medullary Chromaffin Cells and Rat Pheochromocytoma Cells (PC12) by Permeabilization with Streptolysin O: Inhibitory Effect of Teanus Toxin on Catecholamine Secretion,” J. Neurochem, Jun. 1989, vol. 52 (6), pp. 1751-1758. |
“Anonymous: Neurotoxin (from Wikipedia),” Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neurotoxin&printable=yes, Apr. 2, 2015, 23 pages. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/459,090, filed Jul. 21, 2006, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/559,278, filed Sep. 14, 2009, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,595, filed Oct. 5, 2011, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,629, filed Oct. 25, 2012, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 14/601,529, filed Jan. 21, 2015, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/358,187, filed Nov. 22, 2016, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/036,381, filed Jul. 16, 2018, Inventors: Deem et al. |
Bigalke., et al., “Clostridial Neurotoxins,” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Aktories, K., and Just, I., eds), 2000, vol. 145, pp. 407-443. |
Bittner., et al., “Isolated Light Chains of Botulinum Neurotoxins Inhibit Exocytosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1989, vol. 264(18), pp. 10354-10360. |
Blindt., et al., “Development of a New Biodegradable Intravascular Polymer Stent with Simultaneous Incorporation of Bioactive Substances,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1999, vol. 22 (12), pp. 843-853. |
Buzzi., “Diphtheria Toxin Treatment of Human Advanced Cancer,” Cancer Research, 1982, vol. 42, pp. 2054-2058. |
Chaddock., et al., “Expression and Purification of Catalytically Active, Non-Toxic Endopeptidase Derivatives of Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A,” Protein Expression and Purification, Jul. 2002, vol. 25 (2), pp. 219-228. |
Chang., “Cell Poration and Cell Fusion Using an Oscillating Electric Field,” Biophys. J, 1989, vol. 56 (4), pp. 641-652. |
De Paiva., et al., “Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxin is Active in Mammalian Motor Nerve Terminals When Delivered Via Liposomes,” FEBS Lett, Dec. 1990, vol. 17:277(1-2), pp. 171-174. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP06788062, dated Jan. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
Guzman., et al., “Bioeffects Caused by Changes in Acoustic Cavitation Bubble Density and Cell Concentration: A Unified Explanation Based on Cell-to-Bubble Ratio and Blast Radius,” Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2003, vol. 29 (8), pp. 1211-1222. |
Guzman H.R, et al., “Equilibrium Loading of Cells with Macromolecules by Ultrasound: Effects of Molecular Size and Acoustic Energy,” J PharmSci., Jul. 2002, vol. 91 (7), pp. 1693-1701. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2006/028310, dated Jan. 22, 2008, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/028310, dated Aug. 8, 2007, 7 pages. |
Kistner., et al., “Reductive Cleavage of Tetanus Toxin and Botulinum Neurotoxin A by the Thioredoxin System from Brain,” Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacal, Feb. 1992, vol. 345 (2), pp. 227-234. |
Korpela., et al., “Comparison of Tissue Reactions in the Tracheal Mucosa Surrounding a Bioabsorbable and Silicone Airway Stents,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998, vol. 66, pp. 1772-1776. |
Kreitman., “Taming Ricin Toxin,” Nature Biotechnology, 2003, vol. 21, pp. 372-374. |
Office Action dated May 24, 2016 for Japanese Application No. JP2015-120827 filed Jun. 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2017 for Japanese Application No. 2016- 227703 filed Nov. 24, 2016, 4 pages. |
Raj., “Editorial,” Pain Practice, 2004, vol. 4 (1S), pp. S1-S3. |
Schmitt G.S., et al., “Indwelling Transbronchial Catheter Drainage of Pulmonary Abscess,” Ann Thorac Surg, Jan. 1988, vol. 45 (1), pp. 43-47. |
Shaari., et al., “Rhinorrhea is Decreased in Dogs After Nasal Application of Botulinum Toxin,” Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery, Apr. 1995, vol. 112 (4), pp. 566-571. |
Simpson., et al., “Isolation and Characterization of the botulinum Neurotoxins,” Methods Enzymol, 1988, vol. 165, pp. 76-85. |
Simpson L.L., “The Origin, Structure, and Pharmacological Activity of Botulinum Toxin,” Pharmacol Reviews, Sep. 1981, vol. 33 (3), pp. 155-188. |
Sundaram, et al., “An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Ultrasound-Induced Permeabilization of Cell Membranes,” Biophysical Journal, May 2003, vol. 84 (5), pp. 3087-3101. |
Tsuji., et al., “Biodegradable Stents as a Platform to Drug Loading,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions, 2003, vol. 5(1), pp. 13-16. |
Unal., et al., “Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Nasal Symptoms in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: A Double-blind, Placebo-conlrolled Clinical Trial,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Dec. 2003, vol. 123 (9), pp. 1060-1063. |
Weaver, “Electroporation: A General Phenomenon for Manipulating Cells and Tissues,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Apr. 1993, vol. 51(4), pp. 426-435. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200360677 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60702077 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11459090 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12559278 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16036381 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16984528 | US | |
Parent | 15358187 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16036381 | US | |
Parent | 14601529 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15358187 | US | |
Parent | 13660629 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14601529 | US | |
Parent | 13253595 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 13660629 | US | |
Parent | 12559278 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13253595 | US |