Patent Grant
9253349
The present invention relates to digital video capture and digital video data processing, and more particularly to capturing and processing digital video data using a mobile device.
Modern mobile devices are well adapted to capturing images of a variety of objects, including documents, persons, automobiles, etc. Improvements to the mobile device camera capabilities and/or processing power make applications for capturing and/or processing digital image data using a mobile device increasingly attractive in an increasingly mobile-device-driven economy.
However, limitations of the mobile device hardware and practical limitations of capturing images using a mobile device present major challenges to efficient and effective digital image processing. For example, digital images captured using a mobile device are often of insufficient quality for subsequent processing due to one or more artifacts such as blur, uneven illumination, insufficient illumination, oversaturated illumination, insufficient resolution, projective effects, etc. Attempts to process digital images including such artifacts may fail completely or produce inadequate quality results for the desired application. At best, the user may be required to repeat the capture operation and attempt to improve the quality of the image, but in some cases recapturing the image may be impossible, resulting in lost opportunity for acquiring images of important but transient circumstances, such as the location or condition of a person or vehicle before, during, and/or after an automobile accident.
Accordingly, it would be beneficial to provide systems, methods, and/or computer program products capable of capturing and/or processing data other than still digital images in a manner that overcomes the challenges presented above and improve users' ability to capture and process data, especially using mobile devices.
In one embodiment, a method includes: capturing video data using a mobile device, the video data comprising a plurality of frames; determining whether one or more of the frames depict an object exhibiting one or more defining characteristics; determining whether one or more of the frame(s) determined to depict the object also satisfy one or more predetermined quality control criteria; and, in response to determining one or more of the frames depict the object and also satisfy the one or more predetermined quality control criteria, automatically capturing an image of the object.
In another embodiment, a system includes a processor and logic executable by the processor. The logic is configured to cause the processor to: capture video data using a mobile device, the video data comprising a plurality of frames; determine whether one or more of the frames depict an object exhibiting one or more defining characteristics; determine whether one or more of the frame(s) determined to depict the object also satisfy one or more predetermined quality control criteria; and in response to determining one or more of the frames depict the object and also satisfy the one or more predetermined quality control criteria, automatically capture an image of the object.
In yet another embodiment, a computer program product, includes a computer readable storage medium having embodied therewith compute readable program code. The code is configured to cause a processor to: capture video data using a mobile device, the video data comprising a plurality of frames; determine whether one or more of the frames depict an object exhibiting one or more defining characteristics; determine whether one or more of the frame(s) determined to depict the object also satisfy one or more predetermined quality control criteria; and in response to determining one or more of the frames depict the object and also satisfy the one or more predetermined quality control criteria, automatically capture an image of the object.
Other features and aspects of the presently disclosed inventive concepts will become clear to those having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following descriptions, which set forth additional inventive embodiments beyond the summarized examples listed above.
The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the present invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular features described herein can be used in combination with other described features in each of the various possible combinations and permutations.
Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be given their broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied from the specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in the art and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.
It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless otherwise specified.
The present application refers to image processing. In particular, the present application discloses systems, methods, and computer program products designed to augment current still-photo based methods and systems for capturing a digital image to leverage streaming video data to capture and process various types of information. As digital imaging technology continues to improve, video stream resolution usually lags available photo resolutions. As such, leveraging video streaming for document capture has been previously limited to smaller size objects because the available resolution did not always provide sufficient detail regarding larger objects to effectively process digital images depicting such objects. As video stream resolutions increase, this limitation has decreasingly impacted processing capabilities and suitability such that processing data from a video stream has become a viable alternative or even a preferred replacement to still-photo capture in various applications and/or implementations.
At a high level, an exemplary user experience for video stream capture may be loosely based on the following scenario.
A user invokes a video-stream capture interface from a native mobile application, via a software development kit (SDK) used to develop or modify a new or existing mobile application, via a built-in mobile operating system (OS) functionality, etc. Once invoked, the user is presented with an option to select video-based capture and perform a video-based capture operation. The capture application exposes a video capture interface that guides the user to ensure the physical object remains within the bounds of a bounding box superimposed on the mobile capture user interface. Once within the bounding box, the user clicks on the ‘Capture’ button to initiate the capture process. Once initiated, a mobile interface begins checking for stability of the mobile device using one or more hardware components of the mobile device such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, etc. Once stability has been achieved, an autofocus operation may be forced and the process of analyzing each of the (n) frames of the video stream begins.
The goal of frame analysis is to detect the existence of a target object within the vantage point provided by the video stream. Entities include but are not limited to page(s), barcode(s), buildings, motor vehicles, boats, persons, etc. The actual implementation of the real-time methodology and algorithms used to detect the existence of the target entity within the video frame will be discussed separately from this document.
Once the existence of the target object has been detected in one or more frames of the stream, either the frame is identified and processed by image perfection techniques, such as embodied in one exemplary scenario via electronic virtual rescan (EVRS) or for devices that support the necessary capability, the full resolution (photo) corresponding to the target video frame is identified and processed by EVRS. Alternatively, multiple low-resolution video frames could be combined to a single higher-resolution image.
From there, the mobile application may facilitate providing as much relevant entity metadata as possible with the lowest possible latency. Relevant metadata could include but not be limited to object type, object characteristics, field metadata, GPS information, page size, barcode value(s), car type, person height, boat length, etc.).
This capability would allow the user to capture multiple objects and object types simultaneously. Moreover, objects may be associated with a particular downstream process (e.g. a business process such as a loan application, insurance claim, financial transaction, etc.) quickly and easily with minimal user input other than simple click, point and capture functionality.
From one perspective, the overall capture and processing may generally follow a logical order similar to the flow diagram shown below.
It will be appreciated upon reading the present descriptions that the overall flow diagram shown below is a coarse conceptual example that should not be considered limiting in any way. The presently described capture and processing may, in various embodiments, include any number of additional and/or different operations, perform such operations in a different order, and/or omit certain operations depicted in the flow diagram.
Images (e.g. pictures, figures, graphical schematics, single frames of movies, videos, films, clips, etc.) are preferably digital images captured by cameras, especially cameras of mobile devices. As understood herein, a mobile device is any device capable of receiving data without having power supplied via a physical connection (e.g. wire, cord, cable, etc.) and capable of receiving data without a physical data connection (e.g. wire, cord, cable, etc.). Mobile devices within the scope of the present disclosures include exemplary devices such as a mobile telephone, smartphone, tablet, personal digital assistant, iPod®, iPad®, BLACKBERRY® device, etc.
However, as it will become apparent from the descriptions of various functionalities, the presently disclosed mobile image processing algorithms can be applied, sometimes with certain modifications, to images coming from scanners and multifunction peripherals (MFPs). Similarly, images processed using the presently disclosed processing algorithms may be further processed using conventional scanner processing algorithms, in some approaches.
Of course, the various embodiments set forth herein may be implemented utilizing hardware, software, or any desired combination thereof. For that matter, any type of logic may be utilized which is capable of implementing the various functionality set forth herein.
One benefit of using a mobile device is that with a data plan, image processing and information processing based on captured images can be done in a much more convenient, streamlined and integrated way than previous methods that relied on presence of a scanner. However, the use of mobile devices as document(s) capture and/or processing devices has heretofore been considered unfeasible for a variety of reasons.
In one approach, an image may be captured by a camera of a mobile device. The term “camera” should be broadly interpreted to include any type of device capable of capturing an image of a physical object external to the device, such as a piece of paper. The term “camera” does not encompass a peripheral scanner or multifunction device. Any type of camera may be used. Preferred embodiments may use cameras having a higher resolution, e.g. 8 MP or more, ideally 12 MP or more. The image may be captured in color, grayscale, black and white, or with any other known optical effect. The term “image” as referred to herein is meant to encompass any type of data corresponding to the output of the camera, including raw data, processed data, etc.
The description herein is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of particular applications of the invention and their requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
In particular, various embodiments of the invention discussed herein are implemented using the Internet as a means of communicating among a plurality of computer systems. One skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to the use of the Internet as a communication medium and that alternative methods of the invention may accommodate the use of a private intranet, a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN) or other means of communication. In addition, various combinations of wired, wireless (e.g., radio frequency) and optical communication links may be utilized.
The program environment in which one embodiment of the invention may be executed illustratively incorporates one or more general-purpose computers or special-purpose devices such hand-held computers. Details of such devices (e.g., processor, memory, data storage, input and output devices) are well known and are omitted for the sake of clarity.
It should also be understood that the techniques of the present invention might be implemented using a variety of technologies. For example, the methods described herein may be implemented in software running on a computer system, or implemented in hardware utilizing one or more processors and logic (hardware and/or software) for performing operations of the method, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic devices such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and/or various combinations thereof. In one illustrative approach, methods described herein may be implemented by a series of computer-executable instructions residing on a storage medium such as a physical (e.g., non-transitory) computer-readable medium. In addition, although specific embodiments of the invention may employ object-oriented software programming concepts, the invention is not so limited and is easily adapted to employ other forms of directing the operation of a computer.
The invention can also be provided in the form of a computer program product comprising a computer readable storage or signal medium having computer code thereon, which may be executed by a computing device (e.g., a processor) and/or system. A computer readable storage medium can include any medium capable of storing computer code thereon for use by a computing device or system, including optical media such as read only and writeable CD and DVD, magnetic memory or medium (e.g., hard disk drive, tape), semiconductor memory (e.g., FLASH memory and other portable memory cards, etc.), firmware encoded in a chip, etc.
A computer readable signal medium is one that does not fit within the aforementioned storage medium class. For example, illustrative computer readable signal media communicate or otherwise transfer transitory signals within a system, between systems e.g., via a physical or virtual network, etc.
In use, the gateway 101 serves as an entrance point from the remote networks 102 to the proximate network 108. As such, the gateway 101 may function as a router, which is capable of directing a given packet of data that arrives at the gateway 101, and a switch, which furnishes the actual path in and out of the gateway 101 for a given packet.
Further included is at least one data server 114 coupled to the proximate network 108, and which is accessible from the remote networks 102 via the gateway 101. It should be noted that the data server(s) 114 may include any type of computing device/groupware. Coupled to each data server 114 is a plurality of user devices 116. Such user devices 116 may include a desktop computer, laptop computer, hand-held computer, printer or any other type of logic. It should be noted that a user device 111 may also be directly coupled to any of the networks, in one embodiment.
A peripheral 120 or series of peripherals 120, e.g. facsimile machines, printers, networked storage units, etc., may be coupled to one or more of the networks 104, 106, 108. It should be noted that databases, servers, and/or additional components may be utilized with, or integrated into, any type of network element coupled to the networks 104, 106, 108. In the context of the present description, a network element may refer to any component of a network.
According to some approaches, methods and systems described herein may be implemented with and/or on virtual systems and/or systems which emulate one or more other systems, such as a UNIX system which emulates a MAC OS environment, a UNLX system which virtually hosts a MICROSOFT WINDOWS environment, a MICROSOFT WINDOWS system which emulates a MAC OS environment, etc. This virtualization and/or emulation may be enhanced through the use of VMWARE software, in some embodiments.
In more approaches, one or more networks 104, 106, 108, may represent a cluster of systems commonly referred to as a “cloud.” In cloud computing, shared resources, such as processing power, peripherals, software, data processing and/or storage, servers, etc., are provided to any system in the cloud, preferably in an on-demand relationship, thereby allowing access and distribution of services across many computing systems. Cloud computing typically involves an Internet or other high speed connection (e.g., 4G LTE, fiber optic, etc.) between the systems operating in the cloud, but other techniques of connecting the systems may also be used.
In use, the gateway 101 serves as an entrance point from the remote networks 102 to the proximate network 108. As such, the gateway 101 may function as a router, which is capable of directing a given packet of data that arrives at the gateway 101, and a switch, which furnishes the actual path in and out of the gateway 101 for a given packet.
Further included is at least one data server 114 coupled to the proximate network 108, and which is accessible from the remote networks 102 via the gateway 101. It should be noted that the data server(s) 114 may include any type of computing device/groupware. Coupled to each data server 114 is a plurality of user devices 116. Such user devices 116 may include a desktop computer, lap-top computer, hand-held computer, printer or any other type of logic. It should be noted that a user device 111 may also be directly coupled to any of the networks, in one embodiment.
A peripheral 120 or series of peripherals 120, e.g., facsimile machines, printers, networked and/or local storage units or systems, etc., may be coupled to one or more of the networks 104, 106, 108. It should be noted that databases and/or additional components may be utilized with, or integrated into, any type of network element coupled to the networks 104, 106, 108. In the context of the present description, a network element may refer to any component of a network.
According to some approaches, methods and systems described herein may be implemented with and/or on virtual systems and/or systems which emulate one or more other systems, such as a UNIX system which emulates a MAC OS environment, a UNIX system which virtually hosts a MICROSOFT WINDOWS environment, a MICROSOFT WINDOWS system which emulates a MAC OS environment, etc. This virtualization and/or emulation may be enhanced through the use of VMWARE software, in some embodiments.
In more approaches, one or more networks 104, 106, 108, may represent a cluster of systems commonly referred to as a “cloud.” In cloud computing, shared resources, such as processing power, peripherals, software, data processing and/or storage, servers, etc., are provided to any system in the cloud, preferably in an on-demand relationship, thereby allowing access and distribution of services across many computing systems. Cloud computing typically involves an Internet or other high speed connection (e.g., 4G LTE, fiber optic, etc.) between the systems operating in the cloud, but other techniques of connecting the systems may also be used.
The workstation shown in
The workstation may have resident thereon an operating system such as the Microsoft Windows® Operating System (OS), a MAC OS, a UNIX OS, etc. It will be appreciated that a preferred embodiment may also be implemented on platforms and operating systems other than those mentioned. A preferred embodiment may be written using JAVA, XML, C, and/or C++ language, or other programming languages, along with an object oriented programming methodology. Object oriented programming (OOP), which has become increasingly used to develop complex applications, may be used.
An application may be installed on the mobile device, e.g., stored in a nonvolatile memory of the device. In one approach, the application includes instructions to perform processing of an image on the mobile device. In another approach, the application includes instructions to send the image to a remote server such as a network server. In yet another approach, the application may include instructions to decide whether to perform some or all processing on the mobile device and/or send the image to the remote site.
In various embodiments, the presently disclosed methods, systems and/or computer program products may utilize and/or include any of the functionalities disclosed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/740,123, filed Jan. 11, 2013. For example, digital images suitable for processing in whole or in part using the presently disclosed methodologies, systems, etc. may be subjected to any image processing operations disclosed in the aforementioned patent application, such as page detection, rectangularization, detection of uneven illumination, illumination normalization, resolution estimation, blur detection, etc.
In various embodiments, the presently disclosed methods, systems and/or computer program products may utilize and/or include any of the functionalities disclosed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/802,226, filed Mar. 13, 2013 and Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 61/780,747, filed Mar. 13, 2013. For example, digital images suitable for processing in whole or in part using the presently disclosed methodologies, systems, etc. may be subjected to any classification and/or data extraction operations disclosed in the aforementioned patent applications, including for instance classifying objects depicted in a digital image according to type based at least in part on characteristics of the object, performing custom-tailored image processing using information about the object characteristics and/or object class, building and/or using feature vectors to perform classification, building and/or using feature vectors to develop a data extraction model for the object and/or object class(es), using data extraction models to extract data from digital images, etc.
In some embodiments, and entirely separate from the “extraction” operations and techniques disclosed herein, it may be useful to perform the image capture, analysis and processing as described, and subsequently analyze the resulting image with a targeted optical character recognition (OCR) operation. For example, a user may define a portion of a processed image upon which to perform the OCR, and may hover a window over that portion of the processed image. Then, the user may receive OCR results either pursuant to a request submitted by the user (e.g. to OCR the windowed region of the image) or automatically in near- or real-time in response to the window position (e.g. a constantly-active OCR process is performed on the image portion(s) falling within the OCR window, and any recognized characters may be displayed in real-time on the mobile device.
Preferably, the windowed OCR approach may be utilized to determine, verify (e.g. confirm an observed value obtained via OCR by comparing to a reference value), and/or validate (e.g. as mentioned above and further described in related U.S. Pat. No. 8,345,981 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/175,999 (filed Feb. 7, 2014); Ser. No. 14/176,606 (filed Feb. 7, 2014) and/or Ser. No. 14/078,402 (filed Nov. 12, 2013)) text characters depicted in the depicted object. Even more preferably, the windowed OCR approach may be utilized to specifically determine “identifying information,” e.g. as defined and described in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/220,016 (filed Mar. 19, 2014).
For example, in one approach classification may include determining whether a depicted object belongs to one or more predetermined classes, and if not, requesting user input defining a new class. This approach may be augmented in some embodiments by automatically determining defining characteristics for the new class based on the user input, the object depicted in the image(s), a combination thereof, and/or any other relevant descriptive information as would be appreciated by skilled artisans. In this manner, it is possible for the present systems to be extended to unknown object types based on minimal input from the user and defining characteristics determined based on user input, image data, and/or a combination thereof.
In more approaches, the presently disclosed methods, systems, and/or computer program products may be utilized with, implemented in, and/or include one or more user interfaces configured to facilitate performing any functionality disclosed herein and/or in the aforementioned related patent application, such as an image processing mobile application, a case management application, and/or a classification application, in multiple embodiments.
In still more approaches, the presently disclosed systems, methods and/or computer program products may be advantageously applied to one or more of the use methodologies and/or scenarios disclosed in the aforementioned related patent application, among others that would be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading these descriptions.
It will further be appreciated that embodiments presented herein may be provided in the form of a service deployed on behalf of a customer to offer service on demand.
Video Capture and Discovery
In some embodiments, via a mobile application a user may capture video, analyze video and then store a full still photo resolution frame or frames. To facilitate computational efficiency, it is possible to use video data with a lower resolution than the full still photo resolution frame(s) for discovering objects depicted in the frame(s). Upon discovering a target object, various embodiments may use one or more high resolution photo frame for further processing.
For example, low-resolution video capture and processing of small documents like drivers licenses or business cards or checks is possible at least in part because some embodiments of capture may zoom in so close that even the low resolution video feed produces sufficient resolution for discovering the small document in the object.
In one approach, a capture component of a mobile application within the scope of the present disclosure may facilitate a user invoking a mobile device camera in a video capture mode. The user may provide input instructing the capture component to initiate capturing video data. The application, in response to receiving the “begin capture” instruction, in response to displaying a prompt to the user instructing the user to prepare for capturing data, etc. may query an on-device hardware such as an accelerometer and/or gyroscope for stability information. Upon detecting conditions from the on-device hardware that correspond to a stability condition, the application may force an autofocus, capture frames, and then spawn a background process to invoke and/or conduct image processing.
Moreover, the captured frames may be characterized by a resolution higher than a resolution of the video stream (and corresponding data) displayed to the user while performing the stability determination, focus, object discovery, etc. In some embodiments, a user reviewing a video stream may be simultaneously presented with a corresponding high-resolution frame of image data to review and/or provide feedback and user input relating to capture and/or processing using the mobile device/application.
In more embodiments, the capture component may be further improved to classify objects by type and selectively invoke the capture operation. For example, capture may be invoked only upon determining the capture field encompasses an object of interest, such as a document, an animal, a vehicle, a person, a particular type of document, animal, vehicle, etc.
In still more embodiments, the capture component may be further improved to determine classification of objects and/or detect characteristics of objects, and selectively invoke the capture operation in response to detecting an expected type of characteristic in the object. For example, a video stream of a capture field encompassing a document may be utilized to classify the type of document, and based on the document classification, the video stream may be utilized to determine whether the document contains particular characteristics, such as particular content (e.g. particular text such as a name, address, account number, a particular symbol such as a barcode, logo, a photograph, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions).
By providing additional classification capability in this vein, the mobile application may avoid undesirably capturing video data upon receiving information indicative of a stability condition, but where the capture field is focused on an object of no interest for subsequent processing (e.g. the mobile application would be capable of selectively avoiding capturing video of a dog as part of an overall document-processing workflow). Preferably, the classifying operation comprises a high-speed initial analysis to detect the existence of the object of interest in the video frame. However, classification may include any functionality discussed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/802,226.
In various approaches, upon determining a stability exists, achieving focus, and determining the capture field encompasses a desired capture target, the mobile application may invoke one or more processing operations. As input to the processing operations, the mobile application may provide either the video stream, frames from the video stream, and/or high resolution equivalents thereof.
Additional embodiments may include providing functionality to determine a minimum resolution necessary to perform object discovery, image processing, or any of a variety of downstream processing operations so that a mobile application may facilitate a user capturing the requisite data for subsequent processing in the most computationally efficient manner possible. For example, a user may invoke a training component of the mobile application, and directed to capture video data corresponding to a particular object or object type; the user may be directed to perform the capture operation for a plurality of repetitions, and with or without the user's knowledge, each repetition may capture video data at a different resolution so as to provide a diverse array of video data representing the object in a range of resolutions.
The mobile application may transparently perform object discovery, image processing, etc. using one or more of the plurality of different-resolution video data samples. Some of the samples may produce acceptable results, while others may not. The application may utilize information regarding the results achieved using various input samples to determine a resolution for subsequent use when capturing and/or performing various processing operations for objects corresponding to the particular object or object type for which training was performed.
In one approach, a resolution sufficient for object discovery is any resolution that enables detection of contrast between the foreground of the image, e.g. regions of the image corresponding to the object, and the background of the image, e.g. regions of the image not corresponding to the object. Detecting contrast includes detecting the existence of a subregion of the image containing a potential or “candidate” object boundary. For certain objects, a resolution in a range from about 25 dots per inch (DPI) to about 50 DPI may be sufficient to detect contrast and therefore object boundaries. Initial processing such as object discovery may be performed using these relatively low-resolution images to process data in a highly efficient manner. Additional processing may be performed utilizing the low-resolution image or a corresponding high-resolution image according to the requirements and/or desired result of the process.
In some approaches, upon detecting an object from the video stream data, a corresponding high resolution image may be captured and cropped to remove some or all background from the image.
In further embodiments, user feedback may be requested, obtained, and/or used to facilitate capturing and/or processing of video data as described herein. For example, upon performing object discovery on video data, various frames of the video data in which an object was reportedly discovered may be presented to the user. The user may confirm, modify or negate the discovery result determination. Based on the user input, the discovery algorithm may be modified. In another example, based on the user input a minimum capture resolution may be determined, where the various frames correspond to different capture resolutions, as discussed above in regard to training the capture component.
Super-Resolution
In further approaches, it may be advantageous to utilize data from multiple frames of image and/or video data to generate a single, superior composite image for processing. For example, a higher resolution image may be composed from multiple relatively low-resolution frames of video data. Alternatively, multiple high-resolution images may be synthesized into an even higher-resolution image. Further still, a relatively low-resolution region of an otherwise high-resolution image, or a blurred region (for example as may be caused by unstable capture conditions) of an otherwise clear image may be improved by synthesizing data from multiple image and/or video frames to resample the low-resolution or blurred region and generate a high-quality (i.e. high resolution/clarity) composite image. In some embodiments, the frames may represent binary image data (i.e. corresponding to two-tone or “bitonal” images), which may be compared, merged, and/or utilized to extract data from the image, such as text characters on a document.
Metadata
Retrieving, receiving, and providing metadata, as well as associating metadata with digital image data is another advantageous functionality within the scope of the presently described mobile application. Preferably, the mobile application facilitates obtaining and associating all available metadata with the corresponding image data. For example, in one scenario a user captures a video stream and/or image data corresponding to a document. The document may be detected within the image data and classified as a particular document type. Based on the classification, metadata may be retrieved from a knowledge base comprising a plurality of document classes and associated metadata. The retrieved metadata may then be associated with the document image data and/or video data in any suitable manner.
Metadata may include any information that is relevant to an object, an image of an object, etc. With continuing reference to the exemplary scenario involving a document as the object, illustrative metadata may include the document type, text content in the document, context of the text (e.g. positional location, font type, color, size, etc.) page size, page resolution, color bit depth, etc. In other embodiments, the metadata may correspond to instructions for subsequent processing of the data, such as particular parameters for manipulating image size, color profile, etc., particular parameters for extracting data from the image, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions.
Image Authentication
In some embodiments, various types of data, including raw and/or processed image data, metadata associated with image data, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art reading the present descriptions can include and/or be associated with authentication data. Authentication data may be utilized to very quickly and efficiently determine a status of data, such as whether a particular file has been altered from a previous state (e.g. by adding or removing metadata to an image file, by editing metadata associated with an image file, by processing or re-processing image data with different parameters, etc.).
In one embodiment, image authentication may include creating one or more authentication strings from a buffer in memory. The string may be any length, but is preferably a 127-byte string in at least some approaches. More particularly, authentication may involve compressing an image (which may include image data and/or associated metadata) to a memory buffer and creating the authentication string or strings for/from one or more portions of the buffer. Creating the authentication string(s) may include encoding data in the portions of the buffer into the authentication string, in one embodiment. Any form of encoding may be employed.
For example, authentication may generate an authentication string for only the image, for only the metadata, for the image and the associated metadata, etc. The authentication strings may be inserted into, appended to, or associated with the buffer in various approaches, and are preferably added to the buffer as one or more tags, at which point the buffer is dumped to physical memory (e.g. to disk) as a file. Notably, these authentication approaches may be equally applied to any format of image and/or metadata, including any compression format allowing metadata tags, such as JPEG or TIFF formats.
Additionally and/or alternatively, the authentication string may be embedded into the image itself, for example using a steganographic approach.
Data having authentication strings as described above can be subsequently authenticated to determine whether the data has been altered since the authentication strings were created. In particular, the file having the authentication tags may be read from physical memory into a memory buffer, and the encoded authentication strings may be extracted from the corresponding tags. These strings may be decoded and compared to the corresponding portion(s) of the buffer from which the encoded authentication string was generated. If the decoded authentication string and the portion of the buffer used to generate the authentication string match, the portion of the buffer used to generate the authentication string has not been altered, indicating that the entire file is unlikely to have been altered either. By utilizing multiple authentication strings (multiple portions of the buffer), determining whether a file has been altered may be performed with higher confidence, albeit at the cost of computational efficiency.
In one exemplary approach, video capture and processing may be performed in a manner substantially similar to the flow diagram shown below. As noted with regard to other flow diagrams presented above, this illustrative example is in no way limiting, but rather provided to facilitate better understanding of the inventive concepts presented herein.
Video Capture User Interface
In still more embodiments, the presently described systems, methods, and computer program products may be implemented via one or more user interfaces configured to facilitate capturing and processing information using video data.
The user interfaces may further enable a user to easily perform capture and processing operations using video data, as well as review the results of such capture and/or processing operations in real-time or near real-time. For example, each time that image and/or video data is captured and/or processed, a thumbnail corresponding to the image and/or video data may be produced and presented to a user. Generating the thumbnail may be a process that is performed asynchronously in the background, in some approaches. Via the thumbnail, a user may review the results of what was captured and/or processed. If the user is dissatisfied with the result, or the result is otherwise determined to be unacceptable, e.g. according to one or more predefined quality assurance metrics, a user interface may facilitate re-capturing and/or augmenting the originally captured data.
In addition, user interfaces may be provided to enable and/or facilitate user review of capture and/or processing results, for example at the end of a capture-and-process session. For instance, in one approach a user, upon completion of a capture and/or processing workflow (e.g. video and/or image data have been captured and at least one processing operation performed on the data), the user may be presented with an opportunity to review the result of the workflow.
In another approach, user review may be enabled during the video capture operation. For example, a user initiates the video capture functionality of a mobile application, and begins capturing video data. As described above, the capture operation includes preprocessing such as stability determination and/or object discovery. In the course of capturing the video data, an object in the capture field is detected and an indication of the discovery is presented to the user (for example the appearance of a bounding box within the capture field changing color from red to green). A high-resolution image, thumbnail, etc. is optionally captured upon discovering the object and determining the existence of a stability condition, and the image may be presented to the user for immediate review within the video capture user interface. Upon reviewing the image, thumbnail, etc., the user may indicate the acceptability of the captured image, generated thumbnail, etc. If the user indicates the image, thumbnail, etc. is acceptable, then the video capture user interface may automatically terminate the capture operation, or optionally may direct the user to terminate the capture operation. In this manner, user review may be utilized to minimize the occurrence of unnecessary capture and/or processing operations, such as may be caused by a user continuing to perform a capture operation after a suitable high-resolution image has been captured and/or processed in a manner that satisfies requirements for downstream processing, such as image quality, image format, etc.
Tracking
In various approaches, the presently disclosed techniques benefit from the advantage of real-time (or near-real time) latency. In other words, as a user interacting with a mobile device conducts a capture operation, an analysis, etc. as disclosed herein, the underlying processes conducted to accomplish each operation may be performed in parallel, i.e. for multiple objects simultaneously, and in a near-real time manner. The computational cost has been reduced to an extent necessary to provide real-time information regarding object(s) depicted in a mobile device viewfinder, and represents a major advantage to the user when compared to existing techniques that require discrete capture, analysis, and submission techniques.
As a result, one of the advantageous embodiments of real-time capture, processing, analysis, and etc. is the ability to “track” objects throughout the course of performing the presently disclosed techniques. By “tracking” it should be understood that an object within a mobile device field of view may be identified and/or analyzed, and the identification/analysis may remain valid and/or present in a series of discrete frames of image and/or video data because the methodology is capable of monitoring the position of objects upon detecting those objects, and continuously analyzing the detected objects to provide useful information.
From the user perspective, tracking typically is embodied in the form of a bounding border (e.g. box, as described herein) being maintained with respect to a detected object, even as the mobile device is moved in three-dimensional space during the capture operation (causing the detected object to apparently move from the perspective of the mobile device's reference point), and/or even as multiple objects are present in the field of view. Indeed, tracking is capable of monitoring any number of objects that may be defined according to characteristics such as set forth herein.
As will be appreciated by a skilled artisan upon reading the present disclosures, any of the raw and/or processed data, such as image data, video data, etc., may be associated with various metadata, may be associated with other raw or processed data, etc. Moreover, any of the presently disclosed functionalities may be applied to image capture and processing, video capture and processing, etc.
In a preferred approach, for example, tracking comprises one or more of: repositioning or redefining the bounding border to surround the periphery of the object in each of the frames where the tracked object is depicted within the viewfinder; and repositioning or redisplaying the indication that the object depicted in the viewfinder exhibits the one or more defining characteristics.
Optionally, the tracking further comprises receiving real-time feedback from the mobile device. The real-time feedback is based at least in part, and ideally based entirely, on one or more measurements performed using mobile device hardware components, for example any one or more of: a camera, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a clock.
According to some techniques, the real-time feedback may include stability feedback including an angle of orientation of the mobile device being within a predetermined orientation range; and a motion vector of the mobile device having a magnitude less than a predetermined threshold.
In another approach, the motion vector of the mobile device is determined based on real-time feedback received from the camera, and not determined based on feedback from the mobile device accelerometer. In short, the tracking techniques are capable of calculating a magnitude and direction of a velocity with which a camera is being moved through three-dimensional space independent of any change in acceleration. As a result, the device is freed from reliance on an accelerometer to determine motion vectors (such as would be the case with a constant velocity).
Yet another advantage conferred by use of video data with the present inventive techniques is the capacity to generate composite images from a plurality of frames. In one context, this advantage is leveraged as discussed below with respect to super-resolution, which may be used to clarify blurred or grainy regions of an otherwise high-quality image, for example.
In the additionally advantageous technique, composite image synthesis may be leveraged to effectively image an object that is otherwise too large to capture with sufficient detail for the desired application using image data alone. For example, consider the case of a long document such as a receipt or legal form. The document depicts a plethora of informative text, albeit in a relatively small size. In order to capture the entire document in a single image, a user would have to distance the document so far from the camera that the quality of the informative text would be so degraded that subsequent extraction and use of the information would be impractical or impossible.
Accordingly, it is an additional aspect of the presently disclosed inventive techniques that a long document may be captured using video data, and the various frames of the video data may be “stitched” together to form a composite image depicting the entire object that was too large to fit in a single shot with sufficient clarity. Particularly preferred are embodiments where the composite image retains the high level of specificity and detail otherwise achievable only by zooming in on the object to an extent that capturing the entire object in a single image is impossible.
Put another way, in one approach the composite image is characterized by a height and a width. The composite image height is greater than or equal to a height of any single frame of the video data, and the composite image width is greater than or equal to a width of any single frame of the video data. Each of the synthesized frames of the video data depicts a portion of the object, and the composite image depicts the entire object.
Moreover still, synthesizing the composite image includes detecting a first feature (e.g. top border of a page) of the object depicted in the viewfinder; automatically initiating a capture operation in response to detecting the first border of the object; capturing one or more of high-resolution image data and low-resolution video data via the automatically initiated capture operation; detecting a second feature (e.g. bottom border of a page) of the object depicted in the viewfinder; capturing one or more of high-resolution image data and low-resolution video data via the automatically initiated capture operation; and automatically terminating the capture operation in response to detecting the second feature of the object.
According to the foregoing approach, for example, a user may initiate the stitching operation by capturing a long document using a slow pan from top to bottom. As discussed in further detail above, windowed OCR may be particularly advantageous to utilize in combination with a stitching-based approach to capture, determine, analyze, etc. textual information depicted in a long document or other large object incapable of being captured with a desired level of detail or resolution in a single image or video frame. For example, in some approaches since a user will capture various partial images from which to form the composite image, and this capture process generally (but not necessarily) involves a relatively smooth, slow panning of the mobile device camera with respect to the object being imaged, it will be possible for the user to simultaneously capture the large object and perform some real-time (or near-real-time) windowed OCR in unison. The windowed OCR results may be utilized independently or in conjunction with any other defining characteristics of the object to determine characteristics of the object. For example, in one approach an object classification or pertinent information from the object may be determined contemporaneous to capturing the video and/or image data for subsequent use in generating the composite image.
In various approaches, a suspected object classification could be determined based on the defining characteristics of the object, and validated using windowed OCR results, e.g. presence of a feature, value or string known to be present in objects belonging to a particular classification. Similarly, an object classification could be determined solely based on windowed OCR results rather than using defining characteristics from the object as described above. Moreover still, in some embodiments both the defining characteristics of the object and the windowed OCR results may be taken into consideration when determining a classification of the object.
For example, in one approach an object classification may be determined independently based on (1) windowed OCR results and (2) the defining characteristics of the object. The independently determined results may be assigned a relative weight, confidence value, etc., and analyzed further in order to make an overall determination with respect to the object classification.
For instance, various object types may be more readily classified according to either textual information depicted on the object, or from defining characteristics of the object itself. Documents may, for example, be more readily or accurately classified based on textual information that may be determined using a windowed OCR approach, while objects depicting an identifying mark such as a logo, emblem, barcode, seal, etc. may be more readily or accurately classified based on defining characteristics such as object shape, contour, dimensions, color profile, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions.
Nonetheless, it may be useful to utilize multiple types of information in determining a classification of a particular object, even if it is known a priori that the object is more readily or accurately classified based on one specific type of information. In such cases, the form or forms of information that are known to produce facile, accurate, reliable classification of a particular object may be utilized to predict an object classification, and assigned a relative weight (e.g. defining characteristics as defined herein may be utilized and assigned a weight of 0.75 on a 0-to-1 scale).
Similarly, other form(s) of information helpful in determining object classifications, but perhaps to a lesser degree than the preferred information type, may be utilized to predict the object classification, and assigned relatively low weights compared to the preferred information type (e.g. textual information determined by windowed OCR may be used to predict the object classification, and the prediction assigned a weight of 0.25 on a 0-to-1 scale).
Returning now to the concept of composite image synthesis, in order to determine whether and precisely how two images should be stitched to form the composite image, in one approach the synthesizing comprises: performing at least one homography transformation on two or more of the frames of the video data, and aligning at least portions of the two or more frames of the video data based at least in part on the homography transformations.
Several exemplary methods commensurate in scope with the present disclosures will now be discussed with particular reference to
Referring now to
In operation 302, digital video data captured by a mobile device is received.
Operations 304-308 may be performed using a processor, which in various embodiments may be a processor of the mobile device, a processor of a remote device such as a server or another mobile device, a processor of one or more resources of a cloud computing environment, etc. Operations 304-308 may be performed using any combination of such device(s) and/or processors thereof, in various embodiments.
In operation 304 a plurality of frames of the digital video data are analyzed.
In operation 306, one or more frames are identified based on the analysis, the identified frames satisfying one or more predefined quality control criteria.
In operation 308, at least one frame satisfying one or more of the predefined quality control criteria is processed.
In some approaches, predefined quality control criteria may include a minimum illumination level, e.g. an average illumination above a certain threshold; a maximum illumination level, e.g. an average illumination below a certain threshold; a minimum illumination evenness. e.g. an illumination deviation from some predefined value, from an average illumination, etc. being below a certain threshold; a minimum resolution; a minimum sharpness, e.g. an amount of blur below a certain threshold; and a minimum projection, i.e. the impact of projective effects such as angle of camera orientation, fish-bowling, etc. is below a certain threshold, which may be determined based on metadata collected during the capture operation or characteristics of the image.
Quality control criteria may further include, for example, a threshold visibility criterion or any other suitable indication of whether the document is wholly or partially visible), as may be embodied in a threshold number of expected edges, corners, or other defining features are discernable within the viewfinder region and/or are sufficiently within the viewfinder region (e.g. first embodiment is a binary yes/no, second embodiment is a further test to see if there is sufficient space around each edge of the object, etc. Further still, quality control criteria may in various approaches include a presence of glare; and an object classification.
For example, as a representation of a truly rectangular document may be analyzed to determine the rectangular “character” of the depicted document, which may appear trapezoidal due to imperfect capture angle. Images depicting a document whose appearance deviates too much from “rectangular” may be ignored. Determining whether a shape is substantially rectangular, such as a shape whose sides correspond to edges of a document, may be accomplished using any known means in the art, and in one embodiment may involve performing one or more transformations.
In more approaches, the method may additionally and/or alternatively include: determining whether the one or more frames satisfying the one or more predefined control criteria correspond to a high-resolution image stored on the mobile device; processing the high-resolution image upon determining the one or more frames satisfying the one or more predefined control criteria correspond to the high-resolution image. In other words, if a mobile device has a high resolution image of a document stored in memory, and a video stream captures a relatively low-resolution but otherwise acceptable frame or frames of the document, it may be preferable to utilize the high-resolution image in subsequent processing, but more computationally efficient to capture, analyze and/or pre-process the relatively low-resolution frame(s) corresponding to the high resolution image.
In various embodiments particularly directed to document processing, the digital video data comprises a digital representation of a document. In this scenario, the method may also include capturing the digital video data using a camera of the mobile device and detecting the digital representation of the document.
Some approaches including super-resolution capabilities as described herein may involve synthesizing at least a portion of two or more frames of the digital video data; and generating a composite image based on the synthesizing. At least a portion of the composite image is preferably characterized by a relatively higher resolution than a resolution of any of the two or more frames of the digital video data from which the composite image was synthesized. The composite image may be utilized to perform document detection (or object discovery in the case of objects other than documents).
Selective Auto-Capture
Also within the scope of the present disclosure is selective auto-capture functionality, which in one embodiment may be implemented in whole or in part as a method, such as method 400, shown in
In operation 402, a mobile application is invoked using a processor of a mobile device. The mobile application may be invoked in any suitable manner, such as by interacting with a user interface of the mobile device, issuing a voice command, pressing a button, etc.
In operation 404, a video capture interface of the mobile application is invoked. The video capture interface may be invoked expressly by a user, for example by interacting with a button or user interface displayed on the mobile device screen. Alternatively, the video capture interface may be invoked automatically, either as part of a predetermined routine, in response to a precondition being satisfied (such as a prior process completing execution), etc., in various approaches.
In operation 406, user input is received via the capture interface. The user input may preferably direct the mobile application to invoke a capture operation, for example using a capture component of a mobile device.
In operation 408, real-time feedback is requested via the mobile device. The real-time feedback may relate to any relevant portion of video capture and/or processing, and in one preferred embodiment real-time feedback relates to invoking the capture operation, such as one or more characteristics of data captured via the capture operation, parameters for performing the capture operation, characteristics of a capture component to be used in performing a capture operation, such as an orientation and/or acceleration of a mobile device (which may be determined using integrated hardware components such as a gyroscope, an accelerometer, etc.), information regarding the result of a capture operation, suitability of captured data for subsequent processing, etc.
In one particular embodiment, operation 408 includes requesting stability information from one or more hardware components integrated into the mobile device. The capture interface transparently requests mobile device acceleration data from an integrated accelerometer in response to receiving the user input directing the capture interface to invoke the capture operation. The capture interface may also transparently request mobile device orientation data from an integrated gyroscope in response to receiving the user input directing the capture interface to invoke the capture operation. Upon receiving the requested acceleration data and orientation data, the data are compared to predefined stability-threshold criteria previously determined to correspond to a stability condition, i.e. conditions that typically result in capturing image and/or video data of sufficient quality for downstream processing. The comparison result may be utilized to determine whether the stability condition exists, and data may be captured only upon determining the stability condition exists to maximize the probability that any image captured via the capture interface is suitable for the desired downstream processing.
In operation 410, real-time feedback is received. As described in further detail below, the real-time feedback may be utilized to facilitate capturing video and/or image data under conditions likely to result in the video and/or image data being of sufficient quality for downstream processing. For example, real-time feedback may be utilized to ensure adequate illumination during capture, to minimize blur, glare, streaking, etc. to ensure the video and/or image data captures an appropriate object or object type, etc.
In operation 412, a capture operation is invoked via the capture interface upon determining the real-time feedback meets one or more predetermined criteria.
Real-time feedback is preferably based at least in part on one or more measurements performed using one or more integrated hardware components of the mobile device. Exemplary integrated hardware components include one or more of a camera, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a clock, but may include any hardware component integrated into a mobile device. Moreover, the real-time feedback may be in whole or in part an indication that a document is in a field of view of the camera integrated into the mobile device.
In a particularly preferred approach, the real-time feedback comprises stability feedback, such as an angle of orientation of the mobile device; an acceleration vector of the mobile device (e.g. a magnitude and a direction of acceleration per unit time of the mobile device), illumination of a field of view of the camera, illumination of a target object in the field of view of the camera, presence of glare in a field of view of the camera, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions. In one embodiment, illumination may be indicated by and/or derived from a minimum, maximum, average, or other statistical information regarding video stream and/or image intensity, brightness, etc., which may be obtained from the camera directly and/or with minimal preprocessing during the video stream capture, in various approaches. Similarly, glare may be indicated by one or more regions of the field of view being oversaturated. Oversaturation may be determined substantially as disclosed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/740,123.
Various implementations may utilize predetermined criteria such as the angle of orientation of the mobile device being within a predetermined orientation range; and the acceleration vector of the mobile device having a magnitude less than a predetermined threshold.
In one approach, invoking the capture operation includes invoking an autofocus operation using a camera of the mobile device; invoking an autoflash operation using the camera; and invoking a data acquisition operation using the camera.
In further approaches, data acquisition may include capturing data comprising one or more of a still image and digital video. The data may be or comprise a digital representation of a document, or a digital representation of a plurality of documents.
Still more embodiments within the scope of this disclosure may additionally and/or alternatively include determining whether the one or more predefined criteria are satisfied; and determining whether the capture operation captured data corresponding to the one or more predefined criteria being satisfied in response to determining the one or more predefined criteria are satisfied. For example, one embodiment may include determining that the mobile device captured data under conditions where the predefined criteria were satisfied, such as a minimum stability, proper angle of orientation, minimum movement in a particular direction, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions.
Exemplary methods within the scope of the instant descriptions may further encompass outputting an indication to the user via a display of the mobile device in response to determining the capture operation captured data corresponding to the one or more predefined criteria being satisfied. The indication preferably indicates the capture operation captured data corresponding to the one or more predefined criteria being satisfied. In one embodiment, the mobile device may display a bounding border, box or other overlaying shape around an object depicted in the mobile device camera's field of view.
The bounding box may change color upon determining that the capture operation has completed and captured data under conditions where the predefined criteria were satisfied. In one approach, the mobile device displays a white bounding box before detecting the object in the camera's field of view, a yellow bounding box upon detecting the object but before completing the capture operation under the desired conditions, and a green bounding box upon completing the capture operation under the desired conditions or a red bounding box upon failing to complete the capture operation under the desired conditions.
In this manner the user may be advantageously informed when to cease attempting to capture data via the capture interface of the mobile application and/or whether it will be necessary to repeat the capture operation for any object in the camera's field of view. Of course, in other embodiments where multiple documents are within the camera's field of view, the display may display several bounding boxes.
In another embodiment, the one or more bounding boxes may change in color in response to determining whether one or more of multiple documents within the camera's field of view have been recently captured and/or processed. For example, in one approach where a camera's field of view encompasses several objects such as documents, desirable capture conditions for each object may be achieved at a different point in time or several different points in time. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to determine when an object in the field of view has been captured according to desirable capture conditions, and cease attempting to capture that object while continuing to attempt capturing other object not yet captured under the desired capture conditions. Similarly, once all objects have been captured under the desired capture conditions, it may be useful to provide feedback indicating that all objects depicted in the field of view have been captured according to the desired capture conditions and the capture operation may be ceased.
In still another embodiment, where a camera's field of view encompasses several objects such as documents it may be advantageous to exclude or ignore objects in the course of the capture operation, for example if the object has been previously captured under suitable conditions or if the object has been previously processed by and/or according to processing intended to be performed using the data currently being captured.
An exemplary use case scenario will now be described, according to several embodiments. Those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate upon reading these descriptions that the exemplary use case is provided for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting in any way. Other use cases are fully within the scope of the present descriptions, and may include utilizing any combination of features disclosed herein in any manner.
According to the exemplary use case scenario, the presently disclosed inventive concepts are embodied in a methodology substantially as represented by method 500 as shown in
As shown in
Method 500 also includes operation 504, where a plurality of captured video data frames are analyzed to determine (1) whether an object exhibiting predetermined defining characteristics is wholly or partially depicted in the viewfinder region, and (2) whether the object satisfies quality control criteria. Defining characteristics and quality control criteria may include any feature as described herein, preferably those characteristics discussed above and in the related applications incorporated by reference with respect to image or object classification. Feature vectors represent data particularly suitable for use as “defining characteristics.”
According to method 500, and depending on whether the object exhibits the defining characteristics and satisfies quality control criteria, one or more responsive actions are taken in operation 506.
If the aforementioned criteria are met (object detected, quality acceptable), then an indication of this detection and/or quality status may be displayed to the user, e.g. via the device display. Preferably, these indications are displayed in real- or near-real time as the image analysis and/or processing are conducted.
On the other hand, if an object is not detected, or does not satisfy the quality control criteria, an indication of the failure(s) may similarly be displayed via the mobile device.
Further still, one or more images may be captured at a resolution higher than the resolution of the video data frames (to provide more and/or better raw data) and processed or stored. Similarly, those frames of video in which the object was depicted in the viewfinder and satisfies the quality control criteria may be archived, flagged, preserved stored to memory, etc. as would be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions.
The method 500 may also feature one or more additional and/or alternative operations, in several approaches. For example, in one approach the captured image(s) and/or video frame(s) may be further processed. For example, processing may include classifying object(s) depicted in the image(s) and/or frame(s), extracting data from those object(s), tracking objects depicted in a video stream in real-time, displaying pertinent information to a user, etc.
Moreover, in particularly preferred embodiments, the presently disclosed techniques are fully capable of simultaneously performing any of the disclosed processing operations in near-real time as a video stream is captured, and furthermore capable of simultaneously performing the capture, analysis, and/or processing techniques disclosed herein in real-time or near-real time for multiple objects depicted within a single video stream (or image). This parallel, real-time functionality should be understood to apply equally to the operations discussed above with reference to
In another use case illustration, a user starts a mobile application on their mobile device. The user is presented the option to invoke an optional module such as an “auto-assist” module or a “Mobile Capture Wizard” to assist the user in capturing high quality image data for subsequent processing. The user may interact with a button displayed on the mobile device display to invoke the optional “auto-assist” module or “Mobile Capture Wizard.” for example. Alternatively, the module may be programatically invoked or preset by the user, for example in a “settings” interface of the mobile capture application. In this use case, the user invokes the Mobile Capture Wizard.
Upon invoking the Mobile Capture Wizard, the user is presented with an interface via the mobile device display, the interface including several buttons which permit the user to selectively capture either in a “Photo” mode or a “Video” mode. The user interacts with the “Video” button indicating to the mobile application that the user wishes to capture a video stream. Alternatively, the capture mode may be programatically invoked or preset by the user, for example in a “settings” interface of the mobile capture application.
After indicating the desire to capture a video stream, the user may interact with a camera button. In response, the Mobile Capture Wizard queries the device accelerometer and/or gyroscope to determine device orientation, and if the device is not oriented substantially as desired, (e.g. parallel to a flat, horizontal surface such as a desk, the ground, etc. for a document, or parallel to a vertical surface such as a poster, automobile surface depicting a Vehicle Identification Number, etc.), user feedback may be presented to the user via the mobile device display, e.g. in the form of a transparent screen, the feedback indicating improper device orientation. The user feedback may overlay the capture interface viewport so that the user cannot capture an image until proper device orientation is achieved. Proper device orientation may be programatically determined and/or preset by a user to include any device orientation (e.g. as an angle) in a settings interface.
As the user moves the orientation of the device to a “desired orientation.” the mobile application periodically queries the device accelerometer and/or gyroscope to determine the actual orientation of the device. During this operation an on-screen user feedback is displayed indicating to the user how the orientation of the device should be adjusted for optimal capture orientation.
Once the orientation falls within a predetermined tolerance range for aspect ratio correction and normalization, the transparent overlay screen disappears and the mobile application begins analyzing, in real-time, video data gathered from the mobile device camera to detect page boundaries.
Upon detecting page boundaries, the mobile device optionally again periodically checks for device stability, and upon determining that the device is sufficiently stable according to predetermined tolerance thresholds, additional user feedback is provided indicating suitable conditions exist for capturing the detected page. For example, user feedback may be provided in the form of a yellow bounding box displayed around the detected page boundaries.
Whether or not the optional second orientation and/or stability detection operation is performed, upon determining that the device is stable, properly oriented, and a page has been detected, user feedback is displayed via the mobile device display to indicate conditions suitable for capturing high-quality image data exist. The mobile application then proceeds automatically to capturing the image of the document depicted in the capture interface viewport.
The mobile application capture then forces an auto-focus operation using the device camera, and captures the video frame containing the detected page, which may be a high resolution version, if available, of the original video frame containing the detected page. Alternatively, one or more video frames, including the relatively low-resolution original video frame in which the page was detected may be captured. The mobile application displays the captured image in real-time, either directly in the capture interface or in another interface displayed on the mobile device display after completing the high-resolution capture operation.
Full image processing (which may include any or all of the image processing operations disclosed in the related U.S. patent applications referenced above) is initiated by the mobile application as a background, asynchronous thread. In addition, a quality control process module is simultaneously initiated and an on screen indication is given as feedback regarding document illumination and/or blur. Once the asynchronous background processing is complete, the displayed image is refreshed (e.g. top to bottom on the mobile device display) with the processed image. Notably, the image processing may be performed using a processor of the mobile device, a processor of a remote device such as a server, or any combination thereof.
The mobile application may either automatically save the original and processed image, or prompt a user for instructions regarding whether to save the original and/or processed image, and save the images indicated by the user accordingly. The data may be synchronized with a host cloud or on-premises system for storage, further processing and/or subsequent re-use.
In various embodiments, saving the image, whether the original image, processed image, or any variations thereof, may include saving a file combined with any image-related metadata, such as classification results, extraction results, or any environmental metadata such as geo-position tagging, date/time stamping. etc. all within one single file (e.g. a printable document format (PDF) e-form). This type of save operation may be optionally invoked by the user in real-time or in a settings interface. Alternatively, the image data may be saved as-is without being associated with metadata.
Various embodiments may additionally and/or alternatively include displaying a capture result preview via a display of the mobile device; and receiving user input in response to the capture preview. Moreover, in at least one embodiment the preview depicts at least one object captured via the capture operation.
The inventive concepts disclosed herein have been presented by way of example to illustrate the myriad features thereof in a plurality of illustrative scenarios, embodiments, and/or implementations. It should be appreciated that the concepts generally disclosed are to be considered as modular, and may be implemented in any combination, permutation, or synthesis thereof. In addition, any modification, alteration, or equivalent of the presently disclosed features, functions, and concepts that would be appreciated by a person having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the instant descriptions should also be considered within the scope of this disclosure.
For example, in myriad illustrative approaches, a method, a system configured to execute logic and perform a method, and/or a computer program product comprising computer readable instructions configured to cause a processor to perform a method may include any one or more of the following features. Similarly, various embodiments may exclude some or all of the features set forth below. In general, the following features may be combined in any suitable manner that would be appreciated by one having ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present descriptions.
Again, a method, system, and/or computer program product may include any combination of: invoking an image capture interface via a mobile device, the capture interface comprising a viewfinder represented on a display of the mobile device; and analyzing a plurality of frames of video data captured via the capture interface. The analyzing may include determining: whether an object exhibiting one or more defining characteristics is depicted within the viewfinder; and if so, whether the object depicted within the viewfinder satisfies one or more predetermined quality control criteria. In response to determining a frame fails one or more of the predetermined quality control criteria, the method/system/computer program may include displaying an indication of the failure on the mobile device display. The failure indication preferably identifies the one or more quality control criteria not satisfied by the frame(s), and optionally includes a bounding border substantially surrounding a periphery of the object within the viewfinder. In response to determining the object depicted within the viewfinder satisfies the one or more predetermined quality control criteria, the method/system/computer program may include one or more of: displaying an indication that the object depicted in the viewfinder exhibits the one or more defining characteristics; automatically capturing an image of the object, wherein the image is characterized by a resolution higher than a resolution of the video data; and automatically storing to a memory one or more of the frames in which the object satisfying the predetermined quality control criteria is depicted in the viewfinder. Preferably, the success indicator specifically identifies object classification, and optionally includes a bounding border substantially surrounding a periphery of the object within the viewfinder. In some approaches, the object comprises a document having one or more pages, or multiple documents each having one or more pages. The method/system/computer program may include processing at least one of the automatically captured image and the automatically stored frame(s) at least in part using a processor of the mobile device. The processing includes tracking the object depicted within the viewfinder in real-time or near-real-time; classifying the object depicted within the viewfinder, and/or extracting data from the object depicted in the viewfinder. Processing is optionally performed with respect to at least two of the multiple documents or multiple pages, when present; e.g. tracking, classifying and/or extracting may be performed simultaneously with respect to one another and/or multiple documents or pages of a single document. The simultaneous processing may preferably be conducted across multiple frames of the video data. Classifying may more specifically include: determining one or more defining characteristics of the object depicted within the viewfinder; and comparing the one or more determined defining characteristics to defining characteristics of each of a plurality of object classifications. In some situations, the method/system/computer program includes either determining an object classification based at least in part on the comparison; or determining the object does not correspond to any of the plurality of object classifications based at least in part on the comparison. In response to determining the object does not correspond to any of the plurality of object classifications the method/system/computer program includes: requesting user input relating to the object: receiving the user input; defining a new object classification based at least in part on the user input; and assigning the object to the new object classification. Similarly, tracking may include one or more of: repositioning or redefining the bounding border to surround the periphery of the object in each of the frames where the object is depicted within the viewfinder; repositioning or redisplaying the indication that the object depicted in the viewfinder exhibits the one or more defining characteristics; and receiving real-time feedback from the mobile device, the real-time feedback being based at least in part on one or more measurements performed using one or more mobile device components selected from: a camera, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a clock. Preferably, the real-time feedback includes stability feedback including an angle of orientation of the mobile device being within a predetermined orientation range; and a motion vector of the mobile device having a magnitude less than a predetermined threshold. The motion vector, in some approaches is determined based on real-time feedback received from the camera, and is not determined based on feedback from an accelerometer. In some approaches, particularly those involving tracking or processing of long/large objects, the method/system/computer program also includes synthesizing at least a portion of two or more frames of the video data; and generating a composite image based on the synthesis. The composite image is optionally characterized by a height and a width, and the composite image height is greater than or equal to a height of any single frame of the video data, and/or the composite image width is similarly greater than or equal to a width of any single frame of the video data. Each of the synthesized frames of the video data ideally depicts a portion of the object, while the composite image depicts an entirety of the object. Synthesizing the composite image from the various video data frames preferably includes: detecting a first feature of the object depicted in the viewfinder; automatically initiating a capture operation in response to detecting the first border of the object; capturing one or more of high-resolution image data and low-resolution video data via the automatically initiated capture operation; detecting a second feature of the object depicted in the viewfinder; capturing one or more of high-resolution image data and low-resolution video data via the automatically initiated capture operation; and automatically terminating the capture operation in response to detecting the second feature of the object. Synthesizing may also, or instead, include performing at least one homography transformation on two or more of the frames of the video data, and aligning at least portions of the two or more frames of the video data based at least in part on the homography transformations. The object imaged using the aforementioned synthesizing techniques to form a composite is preferably a document characterized by at least one dimension thereof being too large to encompass the entire document within the viewfinder, and simultaneously preserve a desired minimum resolution of the document, e.g. a resolution sufficient to resolve textual information depicted in the document. Moreover still, at least a portion of the composite image may be characterized by a higher resolution than a resolution of any of the two or more frames of the digital video data. This result may be accomplished, in some embodiments, using a “super-resolution” technique as described herein, and may further include detecting the object in the composite image based at least in part on the portion of the composite image characterized by the higher resolution. Determining whether the one or more frames satisfying the one or more predefined control criteria correspond to a high-resolution image stored on the mobile device is another useful feature; and may be used to retrieve previously captured and stored high-resolution images, as well as process the stored high-resolution image(s). It may be useful in some scenarios to associate metadata with stored image and/or video data. In preferred approaches, predetermined quality control criteria may include any one or more of: a minimum illumination level; a maximum illumination level; a minimum illumination evenness; a minimum resolution; a minimum sharpness; a minimum projection angle; a maximum projection angle; a threshold visibility criterion; a presence of glare; and an object classification.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of an embodiment of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/268,876, filed May 2, 2014, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/819,463, filed May 3, 2013. Each of the foregoing applications are herein incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 8,749,839, granted Jun. 10, 2014 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/329,999, filed Jan. 11, 2006) U.S. Pat. No. 6,370,277, granted Apr. 9, 2002 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/206,753, filed Dec. 7, 1998) as well as copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/740,123, filed Jan. 11, 2013; Ser. No. 13/802,226, filed Mar. 13, 2013; Ser. No. 14/209,825, filed Mar. 13, 2014; Ser. No. 14/259,866 filed Apr. 23, 2014; Ser. No. 14/177,136, filed Feb. 10, 2014; Ser. No. 14/175,999, filed Feb. 7, 2014; Ser. No. 14/220,016, filed Mar. 19, 2014; Ser. No. 14/220,023, filed Mar. 19, 2014 and Ser. No. 14/220,029, filed Mar. 19, 2014; and Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 61/883,865, filed Sep. 27, 2013, and 61/905,063, filed Nov. 15, 2013.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3069654 | Hough | Dec 1962 | A |
| 4656665 | Pennebaker | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4836026 | P'an et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4903312 | Sato | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4992863 | Moriya | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5020112 | Chou | May 1991 | A |
| 5063604 | Weiman | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5124810 | Seto | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5159667 | Borrey et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5181260 | Kurosu et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5202934 | Miyakawa et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5220621 | Saitoh | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5268967 | Jang et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5282055 | Suzuki | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5313527 | Guberman et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5317646 | Sang, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5344132 | LeBrun et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5353673 | Lynch | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355547 | Fitjer | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5375197 | Kang | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5430810 | Saeki | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5467407 | Guberman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5473742 | Polyakov et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5546474 | Zuniga | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5563723 | Beaulieu et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563966 | Ise et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5602964 | Barrett | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5629989 | Osada | May 1997 | A |
| 5652663 | Zelten | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5668890 | Winkelman | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5696611 | Nishimura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699244 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5717794 | Koga et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721940 | Luther et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5757963 | Ozaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5781665 | Cullen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5822454 | Rangarajan | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825915 | Michimoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832138 | Nakanishi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839019 | Ito | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848184 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867264 | Hinnrichs | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5937084 | Crabtree et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5953388 | Walnut et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5987172 | Michael | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005958 | Farmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009191 | Julier | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009196 | Mahoney et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011595 | Henderson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016361 | Hongu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6038348 | Carley | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6055968 | Sasaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067385 | Cullen et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6072916 | Suzuki | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073148 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6098065 | Skillen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104830 | Schistad | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118544 | Rao | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6118552 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6154217 | Aldrich | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6192360 | Dumais et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6219158 | Dawe | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219773 | Garibay, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223223 | Kumpf et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6229625 | Nakatsuka | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233059 | Kodaira et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6263122 | Simske et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6292168 | Venable et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6327581 | Platt | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337925 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347152 | Shinagawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6347162 | Suzuki | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356647 | Bober et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370277 | Borrey et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385346 | Gillihan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393147 | Danneels et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6408094 | Mirzaoff et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408105 | Maruo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6424742 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6456738 | Tsukasa | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6463430 | Brady et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469801 | Telle | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473198 | Matama | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473535 | Takaoka | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480304 | Os et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480624 | Horie et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6501855 | Zelinski | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6512848 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6522791 | Nagarajan | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6525840 | Haraguchi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6563531 | Matama | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6601026 | Appelt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6614930 | Agnihotri et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6621595 | Fan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628416 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633857 | Tipping | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643413 | Shum et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6646765 | Barker et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658147 | Gorbatov et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665425 | Sampath et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6667774 | Berman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6675159 | Lin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6701009 | Makoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704441 | Inagaki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6724916 | Shyu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6732046 | Joshi | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6748109 | Yamaguchi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751349 | Matama | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757081 | Fan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757427 | Hongu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6763515 | Vazquez et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6765685 | Yu | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6781375 | Miyazaki et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788830 | Morikawa | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6789069 | Barnhill et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801658 | Morita et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6826311 | Wilt | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6839466 | Venable | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850653 | Abe | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6873721 | Beyerer et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6882983 | Furphy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6898601 | Amado et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6901170 | Terada et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6917438 | Yoda et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6917709 | Zelinski | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6921220 | Aiyama | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6950555 | Filatov et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6987534 | Seta | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6989914 | Iwaki | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7016549 | Utagawa | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7017108 | Wan | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020320 | Filatov | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7023447 | Luo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027181 | Takamori | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7038713 | Matama | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7042603 | Masao et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043080 | Dolan | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7054036 | Hirayama | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7081975 | Yoda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082426 | Musgrove et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7123387 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130471 | Bossut et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7145699 | Dolan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7168614 | Kotovich et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7173732 | Matama | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174043 | Lossev et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177049 | Karidi | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181082 | Feng | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184929 | Goodman | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7194471 | Nagatsuka et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197158 | Camara et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7201323 | Kotovich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209599 | Simske et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7228314 | Kawamoto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7249717 | Kotovich et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7251777 | Valtchev et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7253836 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263221 | Moriwaki | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7266768 | Ferlitsch et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7317828 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7337389 | Woolf et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7339585 | Verstraelen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7340376 | Goodman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349888 | Heidenreich et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7365881 | Burns et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366705 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7382921 | Lossev et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386527 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7392426 | Wolfe et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7403008 | Blank et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403313 | Kuo | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406183 | Emerson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7409092 | Srinivasa | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7409633 | Lerner et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7416131 | Fortune et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7426293 | Chien et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7430059 | Rodrigues et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7430066 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7430310 | Kotovich et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7447377 | Takahira | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7464066 | Zelinski et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7478332 | Büttner et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487438 | Withers | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7492478 | Une | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492943 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7515313 | Cheng | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7515772 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528883 | Hsu | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7545529 | Borrey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7553095 | Kimura | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7562060 | Sindhwani et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7580557 | Zavadsky et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7639387 | Hull et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643665 | Zavadsky et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7651286 | Tischler | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7655685 | McElroy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657091 | Postnikov et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7665061 | Kothari et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7673799 | Hart et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7738730 | Hawley | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739127 | Hall | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7761391 | Schmidtler et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7778457 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7787695 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7937345 | Schmidtler et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949167 | Krishnan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949176 | Nepomniachtchi | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949660 | Green et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953268 | Nepomniachtchi | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958067 | Schmidtler et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7978900 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7999961 | Wanda | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8000514 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8064710 | Mizoguchi | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8073263 | Hull et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8078958 | Cottrille et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8094976 | Berard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8135656 | Evanitsky | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8194965 | Lossev et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8239335 | Schmidtler et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8244031 | Cho et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8279465 | Couchman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8311296 | Filatov et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8326015 | Nepomniachtchi | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8345981 | Schmidtler et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8354981 | Kawasaki et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8374977 | Schmidtler et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8379914 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8385647 | Hawley et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8406480 | Grigsby et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8452098 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8483473 | Roach et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8503797 | Turkelson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8515163 | Cho et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8515208 | Minerich | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8526739 | Schmidtler et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8532419 | Coleman | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8559766 | Tilt et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8577118 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8582862 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8620058 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8639621 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8677249 | Buttner et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8693043 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8705836 | Gorski et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8719197 | Schmidtler et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8749839 | Borrey et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8774516 | Amtrup et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8823991 | Borrey et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855375 | Macciola et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8855425 | Schmidtler et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8885229 | Amtrup | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 20010027420 | Boublik et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020030831 | Kinjo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054693 | Elmenhurst | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069218 | Sull et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122071 | Camara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126313 | Namizuka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165717 | Solmer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002068 | Constantin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026479 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044012 | Eden | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046445 | Witt et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101161 | Ferguson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120653 | Brady et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142328 | McDaniel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156201 | Zhang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210428 | Bevlin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223615 | Keaton et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040021909 | Kikuoka | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022437 | Beardsley | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083119 | Schunder et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090458 | Yu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093119 | Gunnarsson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102989 | Jang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111453 | Harris et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143796 | Lerner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169873 | Nagarajan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169889 | Sawada | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040175033 | Matama | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181482 | Yap | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190019 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261084 | Rosenbloom et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263639 | Sadovsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021360 | Miller et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030602 | Gregson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046887 | Shibata et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050060 | Damm et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054342 | Otsuka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060162 | Mohit et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063585 | Matsuura | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065903 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080844 | Dathathraya et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100209 | Lewis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131780 | Princen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134935 | Schmidtler et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141777 | Kuwata | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050151990 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160065 | Seeman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180628 | Curry et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193325 | Epstein | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204058 | Philbrick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216426 | Weston et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228591 | Hur et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234955 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246262 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265618 | Jebara | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271265 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023271 | Boay et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031344 | Mishima et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048046 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074821 | Cristianini | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089907 | Kohlmaier et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093208 | Li et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095373 | Venkatasubramanian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095374 | Lo et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098899 | King et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112340 | Mohr et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060114488 | Motamed | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115153 | Bhattacharjya | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120609 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159364 | Poon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161646 | Chene et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195491 | Nieland et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206628 | Erez | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212413 | Rujan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215231 | Borrey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219773 | Richardson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222239 | Bargeron et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235732 | Miller et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235812 | Rifkin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236304 | Luo et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242180 | Graf et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256392 | Van Hoof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060263134 | Beppu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265640 | Albornoz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268356 | Shih et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268369 | Kuo | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279798 | Rudolph et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282442 | Lennon et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282463 | Rudolph et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282762 | Diamond et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288015 | Schirripa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002348 | Hagiwara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070003155 | Miller et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005341 | Burges et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016848 | Rosenoff et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030540 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035780 | Kanno | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046957 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046982 | Hull et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047782 | Hull et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065033 | Hernandez et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086667 | Dai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109590 | Hagiwara | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118794 | Hollander et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128899 | Mayer | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133862 | Gold et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165801 | Devolites et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239642 | Sindhwani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250416 | Beach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070252907 | Hsu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260588 | Biazetti et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005678 | Buttner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082352 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086432 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086433 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097936 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130992 | Fujii | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133388 | Alekseev et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080137971 | King et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144881 | Fortune et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147561 | Euchner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175476 | Ohk et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177643 | Matthews et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183576 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212115 | Konishi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215489 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219543 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235766 | Wallos et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080253647 | Cho et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294737 | Kim | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015687 | Shinkai et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089078 | Bursey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175537 | Tribelhorn et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214112 | Borrey et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228499 | Schmidtler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100060910 | Fechter | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060915 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169250 | Schmidtler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202698 | Schmidtler et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202701 | Basri et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232706 | Forutanpour | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280859 | Frederick, II et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110013039 | Aisaka et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110116716 | Kwon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145178 | Schmidtler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110196870 | Schmidtler et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246076 | Su et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249905 | Singh et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120114249 | Conwell | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120116957 | Zanzot et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120162527 | Baker | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120194692 | Mers et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272192 | Grossman et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284122 | Brandis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130022231 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060596 | Gu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073459 | Zacarias et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130088757 | Schmidtler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130090969 | Rivere | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117175 | Hanson | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130121610 | Chen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124414 | Roach et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130152176 | Courtney et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182002 | Macciola et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182128 | Amtrup et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182292 | Thrasher et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182951 | Shustorovich et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182959 | Thrasher et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182970 | Shustorovich et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182973 | Macciola et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185618 | Macciola et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230246 | Nuggehalli | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268378 | Yovin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268430 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287265 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287284 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297353 | Strange et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308832 | Schmidtler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140006129 | Heath | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140006198 | Daly et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140012754 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140079294 | Amtrup et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108456 | Ramachandrula et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153787 | Schmidtler et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153830 | Amtrup et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164914 | Schmidtler et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201612 | Buttner et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207717 | Schmidtler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140233068 | Borrey et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254887 | Amtrup et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270349 | Amtrup et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270536 | Amtrup et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0549329 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0767578 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 0936804 | Aug 1999 | EP |
| 1128659 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1317133 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1422920 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1956518 | Aug 2008 | EP |
| 1959363 | Aug 2008 | EP |
| 1976259 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 9116720 | May 1997 | JP |
| 09062826 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 2000067065 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2000103628 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000354144 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001309128 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002024258 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002519766 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002312385 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003091521 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003196357 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003234888 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2003303315 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2005018678 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005173730 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006209588 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2008134683 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 401553 | Aug 2000 | TW |
| 9604749 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| 9847098 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| 9967731 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 02063812 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 2004053630 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2006104627 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2008008142 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2010030056 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/740,134, dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,866, dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,558, dated Sep. 10, 2014. |
| “AutoMatch,” www.ucoa.com/products/automatch, retrieved Jan. 22, 2009. |
| “The American Heritage College Dictionary; Fourth Edition,” Definition of “relationship,” 2004. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
| Allwein et al., “Reducing Multiclass to Binary: A Unifying Approach for Margin Classifiers,” Journal of Machine Learning Research vol. 1, 2000, pp. 113-141. |
| Angulo et al., “A multi-class Support Vector Machine,” ECML, Barcelona, Spain, 2000, pp. 34-35. |
| Ayat et al., “Empirical Error based Optimization of SVM Kernels: Application to Digit Image Recognition,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, IEEE, 2002, pp. 1-6. |
| Bennett et al., “A Support Vector Machine Approach to Decision Trees,” IEEE, 1998, pp. 2396-2401. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press. Inc., p. 27. |
| Bishop, C M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., pp. 230-247. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press. Inc., pp. 295-300 |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., pp. 343-345 |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., pp. 77-85. |
| Brauer et al., “Robust recognition of complex entities in text exploiting enterprise data and NLP-techniques,” 2008 IEEE, Third International Conference on Digital information Management, Nov. 13, 2008, pp. 551-558. |
| Bredensteiner et al., “Multicategory Classification by Support Vector Machines,” Computational Optimization and Aoolications, 1999, pp. 1-30. |
| Campbell et al., “Machine Learning Strategies for Complex Tasks,” Proceedings of First IEEE-RAS international Conference on Humanoid Robots, Springer Verlag, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 1-13. |
| Chen et al., “Learning with Progressive Transductive Support Vector Machine,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, 2003, pp. 1845-1855. |
| Collins-Thompson et al., “A Clustering-Based Algorithm for Automatic Document Separation,” ACM Special Interest Group in Information Retrieval SIGIR, 2002, 6 pages. |
| Cover et al., “Elements of Information Theory, Second Edition,” A Johnson Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication, Jul. 2006, 774 pages. |
| Cristianini et al., “An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods,” pp. 8-11, 26-41, 92-101, 124-129, 2000. |
| Davy et al., “Improved Optimization of Time-Frequency-Based Signal Classifiers,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 8, No. 2, Feb. 2001, pp. 52-57. |
| Decision on Rejection from Chinese Application No. 200780001197.9 issued Mar. 22, 2013. |
| Decision on Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2005-508441, dated Sep. 14, 2010. |
| Dietterich et al., “Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2, 1995, pp. 263-286. |
| Domingos, “MetaCost: A General Method for Making Classifiers Cost-Sensitive,” Fifth International Conferences on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portugal, 1999, pp. 155-164. |
| Drucker et al., “Support Vector Machines for Spain Categorization,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, No. 5, Sep. 1999, pp. 1048-1054. |
| Duda et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures,” Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1972, pp. 11-15. |
| Dumais et al., “Inductive Learning Algorithms and Representations for Text Categorization,” In Proceedings of the ACM-CIKM98, Nov. 1998, pp. 148-155. |
| European Decision to Grant from European Application No. 04250855.6, dated Dec. 4, 2008. |
| European Office Communication and Exam Report from European Application No. 09770507.3, dated Dec. 3, 2013. |
| European Office Communication and Exam Report from European Application No. 10741580.4, dated Jan. 6, 2014. |
| European Office Communication and Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 09770507.3, dated Oct. 26, 2011. |
| European Office Communication and Supplementary Partial Search Report from European Application No. 03768631.8, dated Feb. 9, 2007. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 03768631.8, dated Apr. 2, 2009. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 03768631.8, dated Apr. 10, 2008. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 03768631.8, dated Jun. 25, 2007. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 04250855.6, dated Jan. 17, 2007. |
| European Office Communication from European European Applications No. 04250855.6, dated May 23, 2007. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 04250855.6, dated Nov. 6, 2007. |
| European Office Communication from European Application No. 06721118.5, dated Jul. 22, 2009. |
| European Supplementary European Search Report from European Application No. 10741580.4, dated Sep. 26, 2012. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Feb. 18, 2011. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Jan. 6, 2011. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Oct. 17. 2013. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,822, dated Aug. 3, 2012. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,594, dated Jul. 26, 2012. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,594, dated Mar. 16, 2012. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,163, dated Feb. 27, 2007. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Apr. 14, 2009. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Jun. 10, 2010. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Jun. 21, 2010. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,673, dated Jun. 3, 2010. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Sep. 3, 2010. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Sep. 12, 2013. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,719, dated May 28, 2010. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/102,419, dated Jan. 3, 2012. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,822, dated Dec. 15, 2011. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,594, dated May 27, 2011. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/331,875, dated Jun. 19, 2012. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/090,216, dated Aug. 30, 2013. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,407, dated Jan. 13, 2014. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,006, dated Sep. 3, 2014. |
| Fragoudis et al., “Integrating Feature and Instance Selection for Text Classification,” SIGKDD'02, ACM, Jul. 2002, pp. 501-506. |
| Gllavata, et al., “Finding Text in Images Via Local Thresholding,” International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology, Dec. 2003, pp. 539-542. |
| Guermeur et al., “A new multi-class SVM based on a uniform convergence result,” IJCNN, Como, Italy, 2000, 6 pages. |
| Guo et al., “Face recognition by Support Vector Machines,” Proc. of the International Conferences on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2000, pp. 196-201. |
| Hearst et al., “Trends and Controversies—Support Vector Machines,” IEEE Intelligent Systems vol. 13 No. 4, 1998, pp. 18-28. |
| Hersh et al., “OHSUMED: An Interactive Retrieval Evaluation and New Large Test Collection for Research,” In SIGIR'94, Springer London, Jan. 1994, pp. 192-201. |
| Hsu et al., “A Comparison of Methods for Multi-class Support Vector Machines,” Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation vol. 4, No. 2, 2000, 26 pages. |
| IBM, “Morphological Techniques for Determining Bounding Rectangles and Octagons,” Technical Disclosure Bulletin, TDB-ACC-No. NB9306177, vol. 1, Issue 6B, Jun. 1, 1993, pp. 177-182. |
| International Preliminary Exam Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US06/07150, dated Dec. 3, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Exam Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US06/07150, dated Feb. 4, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/013484, dated Jan. 22, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US07/013484, dated Oct. 1, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US09/02621, dated Jun. 12, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US10/023224, dated Apr. 5, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US14/26569, dated Aug. 12, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/007150, dated Jun. 30, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/023224, dated Aug. 25, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/021336, dated Jan. 12, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/036673, dated Aug. 28, 2014. |
| International Search Report from European Application No. 03768631.8, dated Mar. 26, 2007. |
| International Search Report from international Application No. PCT/US03/35117, dated Aug. 26, 2005. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/35117, dated Aug. 26, 2009. |
| International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/007150, dated Apr. 7, 2006. |
| International Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/007150, dated Jul. 4, 2006. |
| Intsig Information Co., Ltd., “CamScanner,” www.intsig.com/en/camscanner.html, retrieved Oct. 25, 2012. |
| Intsig Information Co., Ltd., “Product Descriptions,” www.intsig.com/en/product.html, retrieved Oct. 25, 2012. |
| Jaakkola et al., “Maximum entropy discrimination,” MIT Lab, 1999, pp. 1-26. |
| Jebara et al., “Feature Selection and Dualities in Maximum Entropy Discrimination,” 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2000, Jul. 2000, pp. 1-10. |
| Jebara, T. “Discriminative, Generative and Imitative Learning,” Doctoral Thesis, School of Architecture and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Feb. 2002, pp. 1-212. |
| Joachims, “Estimating the generalization performance of a SVM efficiently,” Proceedings of ICML-00, 17th international Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US, 2000, pp. 431-438. |
| Joachims, “Making Large Scale SVM Learning Practical” Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning, MIT Press, Jun. 1998, pp. 1-13. |
| Joachims, “Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features,” 1997, pp. 1-14. |
| Joachims, T., “Transductive Inference for Text Classification using Support Vector Machines,” ICML, vol. 99, 1999, pp. 1-10. |
| Joachims, T., “Transductive Learning via Spectral Graph Partitioning,” Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2003), Washington DC, 2003, pp. 1-8. |
| Keerthi et al., “Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design,” 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Neural Computation, vol. 13, pp. 637-649. |
| Kindermann et al., “Error Correcting Codes with Optimized Kullback-Leibler Distances for Text Categorization,” PKDD 2001, Springer-Verlag, pp. 266-276. |
| Kolcz et al., “Summarization as Feature Selection for Text Categorization,” CIKM'01, Nov. 2001, pp. 365-370. |
| Krinsky, “The Supreme Court, Stare Decisis, and the Role of Judicial Deference in Patent Claim Construction Appeals,” bepress Legal Series, paper 1206, 2006, pp. 1-34. |
| Lai, “Conversational News Agent” Thesis, The University of New South Wales, Nov. 2002, pp. 1-95. |
| Lee et al, “Multicategory Support Vector Machines, Theory, and Application to the Classification of Microarray Data and Satellite Radiance Data,” Technical report No. 1064, University of Wisconsin, Sep. 2002, pp. 1-36. |
| Liu et al., “Boosting to Correct Inductive Bias in Text Classification,” CIKM'02, ACM, Nov. 4-9, 2002, pp. 348-355. |
| Matalas et al., “An Edge Detection Technique Using the Facet Model and Parameterized Relaxation Labeling,” IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence vol. 19 Issue 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 328-341. |
| Matsuyama, “Expert Systems for Image Processing: Knowledge-based Composition of Image Analysis Processes,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 48, Issue 1, Oct. 1989, pp. 22-49, Abstract Only. |
| Mayoraz et al., “Support Vector Machines for Multi-class Classification,” IDIAP Research Report 98-06, May 1998, pp. 1-7. |
| Mohri, M., “Finite-State Transducers in Language and Speech Processing,” Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 23, 1997, pp. 1-42. |
| Moreira et al., “Improved Pairwise Coupling Classification with Correcting Classifiers,” IDIAP—Research Report 97-09, Oct. 1997, pp. 1-11. |
| Morik et al., “Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach—A case study in intensive care monitoring,” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 1999, pp. 268-277. |
| Nazif et al., “Low Level Image Segmentation: An Expert System,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, vol. PAMI-6, Issue 5, Sep. 1984, pp. 555-577, Abstract Only. |
| Nigam, K.P., “Using Unlabeled Data to Improve Text Classification,” Doctoral Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001, pp. 1-128. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,163, dated Aug. 29, 2006. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,163, dated Oct. 25, 2007. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Mar. 27, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Nov. 27, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Oct. 15, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,753, dated Apr. 30, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,753, dated Nov. 5, 2008. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,753, dated Sep. 12, 2007. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Feb. 3, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Jul. 20, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Oct. 27, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,673, dated Dec. 31, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Apr. 25, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Feb. 24. 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,691, dated Jul. 13, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,719, dated Nov. 30, 2009. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,822, dated May 26, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,594, dated Dec. 10, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/331,875, dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/331,875, dated Dec. 22, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/368,685, dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,277, dated Apr. 15, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,277, dated Nov. 15, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/436,854, dated Jun. 8, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,393, dated Mar. 30, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,536, dated Dec. 27, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/090,216, dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/090,216, dated Aug. 23, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/544,830, dated Jan. 14, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/691,610, dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,407, dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/948,046, dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/078,402, dated Jan. 30, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/175,999, dated Apr. 3, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,006, dated Apr. 7, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,016, dated May 22, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,023, dated May 5, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,029, dated May 14, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,876, dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/740,139, dated Aug. 25, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,876, dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from Japanese Application No. 2004-047112, dated Apr. 10, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance from Japanese Application No. 2008-503002, dated Apr. 24, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from Japanese Application No. 2011-549266, dated Dec. 18, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance nce from Japanese Application No. No. 2001-377498, dated Jul. 28, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance from Taiwanese Application No. 096118505, dated Nov. 9, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,163, dated Mar. 25, 2008. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Nov. 15, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,753, dated Mar. 13, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Jan. 31, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,634, dated Dec. 31, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,673, dated Jan. 24, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/752,719, dated Dec. 28, 2010. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,857, dated Sep. 10, 2008. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/050,096, dated Mar. 24, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/102,419, dated Apr. 9, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/331,875, dated Oct. 25, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/368,685, dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,277, dated Oct. 13, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/436,854, dated Oct. 19, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/721,393, dated Oct. 10, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,536, dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,163, dated May 1, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/090,216, dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/544,830, dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/691,610, dated Jun. 24, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/740,123, dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,407, dated Apr. 23, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/948,046, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/078,402, dated Feb. 26, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/175,999, dated Aug. 8, 2014. |
| Notice of Final Rejection from Japanese Application No. 2001-377498, dated Sep. 4, 2007. |
| Notice of Final Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2008-503002, dated Dec. 27, 2011. |
| Notice of Ground of Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2001-377498, dated Jul. 18, 2006. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection from Japanese Application No. 2009-519439, dated Sep. 7, 2012. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2004-047112, dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2005-508441, dated Jan. 19, 2010. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2008-503002, dated Oct. 21, 2009. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2008-503002, dated Sep. 30, 2010. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection Translation from Japanese Application No. 2011-549266, dated Sep. 4, 2013. |
| Office Action from Taiwanese Application No. 096118505, dated Sep. 7, 2011. |
| Office Action Summary from Chinese Application No. 200780001197.9, dated Jun. 9, 2010. |
| Office Action Summary from Chinese Application No. 200780001197.9, received Jul. 8, 2011. |
| Pan et al., “An Improved Constant-Time Algorithm for Computing the Radon and Hough Transforms on a Reconfigurable Mesh,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 29, No. 4, Jul. 1999, pp. 417-421. |
| Patent Board Decision on Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 10/742,131, dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
| Pavel et al., “Efficient Algorithms for the Hough Transform on Arrays with Reconfigurable Optical Buses*,” Department of Computing and Information Science, 1996, pp. 1-19. |
| Platt et al., “Large Margin DAGs for Multiclass Classification,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 12, 2000, pp. 547-553. |
| Platt, “Probabilistic outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods,” Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, MIT Press, 1999, pp. 61-73. |
| Platt, J.C., “Fast Training of Support Vector Machines Using Sequential Minimal Optimization,” Advances in Kernel Methods—Support Vector Learning, 1999, pp. 41-65. |
| Platt, J.C., “Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods,” Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, MIT Press, Mar. 26, 1999, pp. 1-11. |
| Press et al., “Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition,” Cambridge University, 2002, pp. 413-417. |
| Price et al., “Pairwise Neural Network Classifiers with Probabilistic Outputs,” Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, 1994, 8 pages. |
| Rainardi, V., “Building a Data Warehouse: With Examples in SQL Server,” Chapter 15: Other Data Warehouse Usage, Apress, Dec. 27, 2007, pp. 471-474. |
| Rennie et al., “Improving Multiclass Text Classification with the Support Vector Machine,” MIT Lab, Oct. 2001, pp. 1-14. |
| Replacement Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 11/329,999, dated Jan. 31, 2011. |
| Requirement for Restriction from U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,136, dated Aug. 15, 2014. |
| Requirement for Restriction from U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,136, dated May 19, 2014. |
| Requirement for Restriction from U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,866, dated Jul. 11, 2014. |
| Richard et al., “Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a-posteriori Probabilities,” Neural Computation Vol, 3 No. 4, 1991, pp. 461-483. |
| Russell et al., “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995, pp. 531-544. |
| Russell et al., “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995, pp. 70-84. |
| Russell et al., “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach—Second Edition,” Pearson Education, Inc., 2003, pp. 749-752. |
| Scholkopf, B., “The Kernel Trick for Distances,” Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-51, Microsoft Research, May 2000, pp. 1-9. |
| Schutz et al, “A Comparison of Classifiers and Document Representations for the Routing Problem,” Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 1995, 9 pages. |
| Shevade et at., “Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 11, No. 5, Sep. 2000, pp. 1188-1193. |
| Shustorovich et al., “A Subspace Projection Approach to Feature Extraction: The Two-Dimensional Gabor Transform for Character Recognition,” Neural Networks, vol. 7, Issue 8, 1994, pp. 1295-1301, Abstract Only. |
| Shustorovich et al., “Neural Network Positioning and Classification of Handwritten Characters,” Neural Networks, vol. 9, Issue 4, Jun. 1996, pp. 685-693, Abstract Only. |
| Sollich, P., “Bayesian methods for Support Vector Machines: Evidence and Predictive Class Probabilities,” Machine Learning, vol. 46, Jan. 2002, pp. 21-52. |
| Sollich, P., “Probabilistic methods for Support Vector Machines,” MIT Press, 2000, 7 pages. |
| Souafi-Benasfi et al., “Bayesian Networks Classifiers applied to Documents,” Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, Aug. 2002, pp. 483-486. |
| Szummer, “Learning from Partially Labeled Data,” Doctorate Thesis, Chapter Land Chapter 4, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (USA) Sep. 2002, pp. 1-81. |
| Thonnat et al., “An Expert System for the Automatic Classification and Description of Zooplanktons from Monocular Images,” IEEE 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Nov. 14-17, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 114-118, Abstract Only. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,226, filed Mar. 13, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,825, filed Mar. 13, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,156, filed May 20, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,558, filed Jul. 17, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,460, filed Jul. 24, 2014. |
| Vapnik, “The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory: Second Edition,” Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2000, pp. 138-142. |
| Vapnik, V., “Statistics for Engineering and Information Science,” Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2000, pp. 190-191. |
| Wang et at., “On Transductive Support Vector Machines,” An American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
| Weston et al., “Support Vector Machines for Multi-Class Pattern Recognition,” Proceedings of the Seventh European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, 1999, pp. 1-6. |
| Weston et al., “Multi-class Support Vector Machines,” CSD-TR-98-04, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK, May 20, 1998, pp. 1-9. |
| Wikipedia, “Eight-point algorithm,” downloaded from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-point—algorithm, Last Modified on Apr. 18, 2014, pp. 1-7. |
| Zadrozny et al., “Transforming Classifier Scores into Accurate Multiclass Probability Estimates,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'02), 2002, pp. 694-699. |
| Zadrozny, B., “Reducing Multiclass to Binary by Coupling Probability Estimates,” Neural information Processing Systems, 2001, pp. 1-8. |
| Zunino, et al., “Vector Quantization for License-Plate Location and Image Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, Issue 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 159-167. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995, p. 27. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 77-85. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 230-247. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 295-300. |
| Bishop, C.M., “Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995, pp. 343-345. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,023, dated Sep. 18, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US14/35176, dated Sep. 18, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US14/26597, dated Sep. 19, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,901, filed Sep. 19, 2014. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/220,029, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/740,145, dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US14/36851, dated Sep. 25, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/176,006, dated Oct. 1, 2014. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140368890 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61819463 | May 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14268876 | May 2014 | US |
| Child | 14473950 | US |
