The systems and methods disclosed herein are directed to systems and methods for robotic medical systems, and more particularly to detecting contact between a link and an external object.
Robotically-enabled medical system may be capable of performing a variety of medical procedures, including both minimally invasive, such as laparoscopy, and non-invasive, such as endoscopy, procedures. Among endoscopic procedures, the system may be capable of performing bronchoscopy, ureteroscopy, gastroscopy, etc.
Such robotic medical systems may include robotic arms configured to control the movement of medical tool(s) during a given medical procedure. In order to achieve a desired pose of a medical tool, a robotic arm may be placed into a pose that may cause the robotic arm to come into contact with another object in the environment. Unintended contact or collisions with such external objects can adversely impact the robotic medical system and/or the external object, and thus it is desirable to detect such collisions.
The systems, methods and devices of this disclosure each have several innovative aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for the desirable attributes disclosed herein.
In one aspect, there is provided a robotic system, comprising: a manipulatable link; a rigid shell configured to overlay the manipulatable link, and one or more sensors positioned between the rigid shell and the manipulatable link, the one or more sensors configured to detect contact between the rigid shell and an external object.
In certain implementations, the at least one of the one or more sensors can comprise a beam flexure.
In certain implementations, the beam flexure is configured to engage with an underlying force sensor.
In certain implementations, the manipulatable link comprises a link of a robotic arm.
In certain implementations, the manipulatable link comprises a first link or a second link of the robotic arm.
In certain implementations, at least two or more sensors are located along the proximal link or the distal link of the robotic arm for sensing contact with the respective link.
In certain implementations, the external object comprises a patient, clinician, or inanimate object.
In certain implementations, the rigid shell is suspended over the manipulatable link via the one or more sensors.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to detect a direction of the contact between the rigid shell and the external object.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a magnitude of a force resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the external object.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a first set of one or more sensors and a second set of one or more sensors, the first set of one or more sensor positioned between the rigid shell and the manipulatable link at a proximal end of the manipulatable link, and the second set of one or more sensor positioned between the rigid shell and the manipulatable link at a distal end of the manipulatable link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to detect a direction of the contact between the rigid shell and the one or more external objects.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a magnitude of a force resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the one or more external objects.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a torque resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the one or more external objects.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a direction of relative motion between the rigid shell and the link.
In another aspect, there is provided a sensor assembly for detecting contact with a manipulatable link of a robotic system, the sensor assembly comprising: a beam flexure; an underlying force sensor for detecting contact with the manipulatable link; and a circuit board.
In certain implementations, the beam flexure comprises a first end that is fixed and a second end coupled to the force sensor.
In certain implementations, the beam flexure is engaged with a rigid shell at a point between the first end and the second end.
In certain implementations, the force exerted on the sensor is proportional to the force applied to the point at which the shell engages the flexure.
In certain implementations, the beam flexure is engaged with a rigid shell at a fixed point along the beam flexure.
In certain implementations, a processor is configured to receive an output from the force sensor and generate a force value indicative of a force applied to the rigid shell.
In yet another aspect, there is provided a robotic system, comprising: a manipulatable link; a rigid shell configured to overlay the manipulatable link, and one or more sensors positioned between the rigid shell and the manipulatable link, the one or more sensors configured to detect contact between one or more external objects and the rigid shell in at least two or more directions.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to detect contact between the one or more external objects and the rigid shell in one or more rotational directions.
In certain implementations, at least one of the one or more sensors comprises a beam flexure.
In certain implementations, the beam flexure engages with an underlying micro-force sensor
In certain implementations, the manipulatable link comprises a link of a robotic arm.
In certain implementations, the manipulatable link comprises a proximal link or a distal link of the robotic arm.
In certain implementations, at least two or more sensors are located along the proximal link or the distal link of the robotic arm for sensing contact with the respective link.
In certain implementations, the external object comprises a patient, staff or, inanimate object.
In still yet another aspect, there is provided a method of detecting contact between a robotic manipulator and an external object, the method comprising: receiving a signal from one or more sensors positioned between a link of the robotic manipulator and a rigid shell configured to overlay the link, the received signal indicative of the degree of contact between the rigid shell and the one or more sensors; and determining that contact between the robotic manipulator and the external object has occurred in response to the received signal meeting or exceeding a threshold value.
In certain implementations, the method further comprises: detecting a direction of the contact between the rigid shell and the external object based on the signal received from the one or more sensors.
In certain implementations, the method further comprises: measuring a magnitude of a force resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the external object based on the signal received from the one or more sensors.
In certain implementations, the method further comprises: measuring a torque resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the external object based on the signal received from the one or more sensors.
In certain implementations, the method further comprises: measuring a direction of relative motion between the rigid shell and the link.
In another aspect, there is provided a robotic arm, comprising: a link; a rigid shell formed over the link; and one or more sensors configured to detect contact between an external object and the rigid shell.
In certain implementations, the external object comprises one or more of: a patient, a clinician, or an inanimate object.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are positioned in an interstitial space between the link and the rigid shell.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a magnitude of a force applied to the link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a direction of a force applied to the link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a torque applied to the link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of sensors positioned at different locations of the link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of circuit board mounted force sensors.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of strain gauges.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of force sensing resistors.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of capacitive sensors.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of sensors that support the rigid shell without being fixed to the rigid shell.
In certain implementations, a given sensor of the one or more sensors comprises a load concentrator configured to control a point at which the rigid shell applies a force to the given sensor.
In certain implementations, a given sensor of the one or more sensors comprises a flexure configured to scale a force applied to the given sensor and isolate the given sensor from shear forces.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a relative position of the rigid shell relative to the link.
In certain implementations, the robotic arm further comprises: a support configured to support, the rigid shell relative to the link.
In certain implementations, the support comprises one or more of: a spring, a flexure, or a suspension.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to measure a direction of relative motion between the rigid shell and the link.
In certain implementations, the one or more sensors are further configured to determine a direction of a force applied to the rigid shell.
The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements.
Aspects of the present disclosure may be integrated into a robotically-enabled medical system capable of performing a variety of medical procedures, including both minimally invasive, such as laparoscopy, and non-invasive, such as endoscopy, procedures. Among endoscopic procedures, the system may be capable of performing bronchoscopy, ureteroscopy, gastroscopy, etc.
In addition to performing the breadth of procedures, the system may provide additional benefits, such as enhanced imaging and guidance to assist the physician. Additionally, the system may provide the physician with the ability to perform the procedure from an ergonomic position without the need for awkward arm motions and positions. Still further, the system may provide the physician with the ability to perform the procedure with improved ease of use such that one or more of the instruments of the system can be controlled by a single user.
Various embodiments will be described below in conjunction with the drawings for purposes of illustration. It should be appreciated that many other implementations of the disclosed concepts are possible, and various advantages can be achieved with the disclosed implementations. Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating various sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described with respect thereto. Such concepts may have applicability throughout the entire specification.
The robotically-enabled medical system may be configured in a variety of ways depending on the particular procedure.
With continued reference to
The endoscope 13 may be directed down the patient's trachea and lungs after insertion using precise commands from the robotic system until reaching the target destination or operative site. In order to enhance navigation through the patient's lung network and/or reach the desired target, the endoscope 13 may be manipulated to telescopically extend the inner leader portion from the outer sheath portion to obtain enhanced articulation and greater bend radius. The use of separate instrument drivers 28 also allows the leader portion and sheath portion to be driven independently of each other.
For example, the endoscope 13 may be directed to deliver a biopsy needle to a target, such as, for example, a lesion or nodule within the lungs of a patient. The needle may be deployed down a working channel that runs the length of the endoscope to obtain a tissue sample to be analyzed by a pathologist. Depending on the pathology results, additional tools may be deployed down the working channel of the endoscope for additional biopsies. After identifying a nodule to be malignant, the endoscope 13 may endoscopically deliver tools to resect the potentially cancerous tissue. In some instances, diagnostic and therapeutic treatments can be delivered in separate procedures. In those circumstances, the endoscope 13 may also be used to deliver a fiducial to “mark” the location of the target nodule as well. In other instances, diagnostic and therapeutic treatments may be delivered during the same procedure.
The system 10 may also include a movable tower 30, which may be connected via support cables to the cart 11 to provide support for controls, electronics, fluidics, optics, sensors, and/or power to the cart 11. Placing such functionality in the tower 30 allows for a smaller form factor cart 11 that may be more easily adjusted and/or re-positioned by an operating physician and his/her staff. Additionally, the division of functionality between the cart/table and the support tower 30 reduces operating room clutter and facilitates improving clinical workflow. While the cart 11 may be positioned close to the patient, the tower 30 may be stowed in a remote location to stay out of the way during a procedure.
In support of the robotic systems described above, the tower 30 may include component(s) of a computer-based control system that stores computer program instructions, for example, within a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as a persistent magnetic storage drive, solid state drive, etc. The execution of those instructions, whether the execution occurs in the tower 30 or the cart 11, may control the entire system or sub-system(s) thereof. For example, when executed by a processor of the computer system, the instructions may cause the components of the robotics system to actuate the relevant carriages and arm mounts, actuate the robotics arms, and control the medical instruments. For example, in response to receiving the control signal, the motors in the joints of the robotics arms may position the arms into a certain posture.
The tower 30 may also include a pump, flow meter, valve control, and/or fluid access in order to provide controlled irrigation and aspiration capabilities to the system that may be deployed through the endoscope 13. These components may also be controlled using the computer system of the tower 30. In some embodiments, irrigation and aspiration capabilities may be delivered directly to the endoscope 13 through separate cable(s).
The tower 30 may include a voltage and surge protector designed to provide filtered and protected electrical power to the cart 11, thereby avoiding placement of a power transformer and other auxiliary power components in the cart 11, resulting in a smaller, more moveable cart 11.
The tower 30 may also include support equipment for the sensors deployed throughout the robotic system 10. For example, the tower 30 may include optoelectronics equipment for detecting, receiving, and processing data received from the optical sensors or cameras throughout the robotic system 10. In combination with the control system, such optoelectronics equipment may be used to generate real-time images for display in any number of consoles deployed throughout the system, including in the tower 30. Similarly, the tower 30 may also include an electronic subsystem for receiving and processing signals received from deployed electromagnetic (EM) sensors. The tower 30 may also be used to house and position an EM field generator for detection by EM sensors in or on the medical instrument.
The tower 30 may also include a console 31 in addition to other consoles available in the rest of the system, e.g., console mounted on top of the cart. The console 31 may include a user interface and a display screen, such as a touchscreen, for the physician operator. Consoles in the system 10 are generally designed to provide both robotic controls as well as preoperative and real-time information of the procedure, such as navigational and localization information of the endoscope 13. When the console 31 is not the only console available to the physician, it may be used by a second operator, such as a nurse, to monitor the health or vitals of the patient and the operation of the system 10, as well as to provide procedure-specific data, such as navigational and localization information. In other embodiments, the console 31 is housed in a body that is separate from the tower 30.
The tower 30 may be coupled to the can 11 and endoscope 13 through one or more cables or connections (not shown). In some embodiments, the support functionality from the tower 30 may be provided through a single cable to the can 11, simplifying and de-cluttering the operating room. In other embodiments, specific functionality may be coupled in separate cabling and connections. For example, while power may be provided through a single power cable to the cart 11, the support for controls, optics, fluidics, and/or navigation may be provided through a separate cable.
The carriage interface 19 is connected to the column 14 through slots, such as slot 20, that are positioned on opposite sides of the column 14 to guide the vertical translation of the carriage 17. The slot 20 contains a vertical translation interface to position and hold the carriage 17 at various vertical heights relative to the cart base 15. Vertical translation of the carriage 17 allows the cart 11 to adjust the reach of the robotic arms 12 to meet a variety of table heights, patient sizes, and physician preferences. Similarly, the individually configurable arm mounts on the carriage 17 allow the robotic arm base 21 of the robotic arms 12 to be angled in a variety of configurations.
In some embodiments, the slot 20 may be supplemented with slot covers that are flush and parallel to the slot surface to prevent dirt and fluid ingress into the internal chambers of the column 14 and the vertical translation interface as the carriage 17 vertically translates. The slot covers may be deployed through pairs of spring spools positioned near the vertical top and bottom of the slot 20. The covers are coiled within the spools until deployed to extend and retract from their coiled state as the carriage 17 vertically translates up and down. The spring-loading of the spools provides force to retract the cover into a spool when the carriage 17 translates towards the spool, while also maintaining a tight seal when the carriage 17 translates away from the spool. The covers may be connected to the carriage 17 using, for example, brackets in the carriage interface 19 to facilitate proper extension and retraction of the cover as the carriage 17 translates.
The column 14 may internally comprise mechanisms, such as gears and motors, that are designed to use a vertically aligned lead screw to translate the carriage 17 in a mechanized fashion in response to control signals generated in response to user inputs, e.g., inputs from the console 16.
The robotic arms 12 may generally comprise robotic arm bases 21 and end effectors 22, separated by a series of links 23 that are connected by a series of joints 24, each joint comprising an independent actuator, each actuator comprising an independently controllable motor. Each independently controllable joint represents an independent degree of freedom available to the robotic arm 12. Each of the robotic arms 12 may have seven joints, and thus provide seven degrees of freedom. A multitude of joints result in a multitude of degrees of freedom, allowing for “redundant” degrees of freedom. Having redundant degrees of freedom allows the robotic arms 12 to position their respective end effectors 22 at a specific position, orientation, and trajectory in space using different link positions and joint angles. This allows for the system to position and direct a medical instrument from a desired point in space while allowing the physician to move the arm joints into a clinically advantageous position away from the patient to create greater access, while avoiding arm collisions.
The cart base 15 balances the weight of the column 14, carriage 17, and robotic arms 12 over the floor. Accordingly, the cart base 15 houses heavier components, such as electronics, motors, power supply, as well as components that either enable movement and/or immobilize the cart 11. For example, the cart base 15 includes rollable wheel-shaped casters 25 that allow for the cart 11 to easily move around the room prior to a procedure. After reaching the appropriate position, the casters 25 may be immobilized using wheel locks to hold the cart 11 in place during the procedure.
Positioned at the vertical end of the column 14, the console 16 allows for both a user interface for receiving user input and a display screen (or a dual-purpose device such as, for example, a touchscreen 26) to provide the physician user with both preoperative and intraoperative data. Potential preoperative data on the touchscreen 26 may include preoperative plans, navigation and mapping data derived from preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans, and/or notes from preoperative patient interviews. Intraoperative data on display may include optical information provided from the tool, sensor and coordinate information from sensors, as well as vital patient statistics, such as respiration, heart rate, and/or pulse. The console 16 may be positioned and tilted to allow a physician to access the console 16 from the side of the column 14 opposite the carriage 17. From this position, the physician may view the console 16, robotic arms 12, and patient while operating the console 16 from behind the cart 11. As shown, the console 16 also includes a handle 27 to assist with maneuvering and stabilizing the cart 11.
After insertion into the urethra, using similar control techniques as in bronchoscopy, the ureteroscope 32 may be navigated into the bladder, ureters, and/or kidneys for diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications. For example, the ureteroscope 32 may be directed into the ureter and kidneys to break up kidney stone build up using a laser or ultrasonic lithotripsy device deployed down the working channel of the ureteroscope 32. After lithotripsy is complete, the resulting stone fragments may be removed using baskets deployed down the ureteroscope 32.
Embodiments of the robotically-enabled medical system may also incorporate the patient's table. Incorporation of the table reduces the amount of capital equipment within the operating room by removing the cart, which allows greater access to the patient.
The robotic arms 39 may be mounted on the carriages 43 through a set of arm mounts 45 comprising a series of joints that may individually rotate and/or telescopically extend to provide additional configurability to the robotic arms 39. Additionally, the arm mounts 45 may be positioned on the carriages 43 such that, when the carriages 43 are appropriately rotated, the arm mounts 45 may be positioned on either the same side of the table 38 (as shown in
The column 37 structurally provides support for the table 38, and a path for vertical translation of the carriages 43. Internally, the column 37 may be equipped with lead screws for guiding vertical translation of the carriages, and motors to mechanize the translation of the carriages 43 based the lead screws. The column 37 may also convey power and control signals to the carriages 43 and the robotic arms 39 mounted thereon.
The table base 46 serves a similar function as the cart base 15 in the cart 11 shown in
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, a table base may stow and store the robotic arms when not in use.
In a laparoscopic procedure, through small incision(s) in the patient's abdominal wall, minimally invasive instruments may be inserted into the patient's anatomy. In some embodiments, the minimally invasive instruments comprise an elongated rigid member, such as a shaft, which is used to access anatomy within the patient. After inflation of the patient's abdominal cavity, the instruments may be directed to perform surgical or medical tasks, such as grasping, cutting, ablating, suturing, etc. In some embodiments, the instruments can comprise a scope, such as a laparoscope.
To accommodate laparoscopic procedures, the robotically-enabled table system may also tilt the platform to a desired angle.
For example, pitch adjustments are particularly useful when trying to position the table in a Trendelenburg position, i.e., position the patient's lower abdomen at a higher position from the floor than the patient's upper abdomen, for lower abdominal surgery. The Trendelenburg position causes the patient's internal organs to slide towards his/her upper abdomen through the force of gravity, clearing out the abdominal cavity for minimally invasive tools to enter and perform lower abdominal surgical or medical procedures, such as laparoscopic prostatectomy.
The adjustable arm support 105 can provide several degrees of freedom, including lift, lateral translation, tilt, etc. In the illustrated embodiment of
The surgical robotics system 100 in
The adjustable arm support 105 can be mounted to the column 102. In other embodiments, the arm support 105 can be mounted to the table 101 or base 103. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a carriage 109, a bar or rail connector 111 and a bar or rail 107. In some embodiments, one or more robotic arms mounted to the rail 107 can translate and move relative to one another.
The carriage 109 can be attached to the column 102 by a first joint 113, which allows the carriage 109 to move relative to the column 102 (e.g., such as up and down a first or vertical axis 123). The first joint 113 can provide the first degree of freedom (Z-lift) to the adjustable arm support 105. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a second joint 115, which provides the second degree of freedom (tilt) for the adjustable arm support 105. The adjustable arm support 105 can include a third joint 117, which can provide the third degree of freedom (“pivot up”) for the adjustable arm support 105. An additional joint 119 (shown in
In some embodiments, one or more of the robotic arms 142A, 142B comprises an arm with seven or more degrees of freedom. In some embodiments, one or more of the robotic arms 142A, 142B can include eight degrees of freedom, including an insertion axis (1-degree of freedom including insertion), a wrist (3-degrees of freedom including wrist pitch, yaw and roll), an elbow (1-degree of freedom including elbow pitch), a shoulder (2-degrees of freedom including shoulder pitch and yaw), and base 144A, 144B (1-degree of freedom including translation). In some embodiments, the insertion degree of freedom can be provided by the robotic arm 142A, 142B, while in other embodiments, the instrument itself provides insertion via an instrument-based insertion architecture.
The end effectors of the system's robotic arms may comprise (i) an instrument driver (alternatively referred to as “instrument drive mechanism” or “instrument device manipulator”) that incorporates electro-mechanical means for actuating the medical instrument and (ii) a removable or detachable medical instrument, which may be devoid of any electro-mechanical components, such as motors. This dichotomy may be driven by the need to sterilize medical instruments used in medical procedures, and the inability to adequately sterilize expensive capital equipment due to their intricate mechanical assemblies and sensitive electronics. Accordingly, the medical instruments may be designed to be detached, removed, and interchanged from the instrument driver and thus the system) for individual sterilization or disposal by the physician or the physician's staff. In contrast, the instrument drivers need not be changed or sterilized, and may be draped for protection.
For procedures that require a sterile environment, the robotic system may incorporate a drive interface, such as a sterile adapter connected to a sterile drape, that sits between the instrument driver and the medical instrument. The chief purpose of the sterile adapter is to transfer angular motion from the drive shafts of the instrument driver to the drive inputs of the instrument while maintaining physical separation, and thus sterility, between the drive shafts and drive inputs. Accordingly, an example sterile adapter may comprise a series of rotational inputs and outputs intended to be mated with the drive shafts of the instrument driver and drive inputs on the instrument. Connected to the sterile adapter, the sterile drape, comprised of a thin, flexible material such as transparent or translucent plastic, is designed to cover the capital equipment, such as the instrument driver, robotic arm, and cart (in a cart-based system) or table (in a table-based system). Use of the drape would allow the capital equipment to be positioned proximate to the patient while still being located in an area not requiring sterilization (i.e., non-sterile field). On the other side of the sterile drape, the medical instrument may interface with the patient in an area requiring sterilization (i.e., sterile field).
The elongated shaft 71 is designed to be delivered through either an anatomical opening or lumen, e.g., as in endoscopy, or a minimally invasive incision, e.g., as in laparoscopy. The elongated shaft 71 may be either flexible (e.g., having properties similar to an endoscope) or rigid (e.g., having properties similar to a laparoscope) or contain a customized combination of both flexible and rigid portions. When designed for laparoscopy, the distal end of a rigid elongated shaft may be connected to an end effector extending from a jointed wrist formed from a clevis with at least one degree of freedom and a surgical tool or medical instrument, such as, for example, a grasper or scissors, that may be actuated based on force from the tendons as the drive inputs rotate in response to torque received from the drive outputs 74 of the instrument driver 75. When designed for endoscopy, the distal end of a flexible elongated shaft may include a steerable or controllable bending section that may be articulated and bent based on torque received from the drive outputs 74 of the instrument driver 75.
Torque from the instrument driver 75 is transmitted down the elongated shaft 71 using tendons along the elongated shaft 71. These individual tendons, such as pull wires, may be individually anchored to individual drive inputs 73 within the instrument handle 72. From the instrument handle 72, the tendons are directed down one or more pull lumens along the elongated shaft 71 and anchored at the distal portion of the elongated shaft 71, or in the wrist at the distal portion of the elongated shaft. During a surgical procedure, such as a laparoscopic, endoscopic or hybrid procedure, these tendons may be coupled to a distally mounted end effector, such as a wrist, grasper, or scissor. Under such an arrangement, torque exerted on drive inputs 73 would transfer tension to the tendon, thereby causing the end effector to actuate in some way. In some embodiments, during a surgical procedure, the tendon may cause a joint to rotate about an axis, thereby causing the end effector to move in one direction or another. Alternatively, the tendon may be connected to one or more jaws of a grasper at the distal end of the elongated shaft 71, where tension from the tendon causes the grasper to close.
In endoscopy, the tendons may be coupled to a bending or articulating section positioned along the elongated shaft 71 (e.g., at the distal end) via adhesive, control ring, or other mechanical fixation. When fixedly attached to the distal end of a bending section, torque exerted on the drive inputs 73 would be transmitted down the tendons, causing the softer, bending section (sometimes referred to as the articulable section or region) to bend or articulate. Along the non-bending sections, it may be advantageous to spiral or helix the individual pull lumens that direct the individual tendons along (or inside) the walls of the endoscope shaft to balance the radial forces that result from tension in the pull wires. The angle of the spiraling and/or spacing therebetween may be altered or engineered for specific purposes, wherein tighter spiraling exhibits lesser shaft compression under load forces, while lower amounts of spiraling results in greater shaft compression under load forces, but limits bending. On the other end of the spectrum, the pull lumens may be directed parallel to the longitudinal axis of the elongated shaft 71 to allow for controlled articulation in the desired bending or articulable sections.
In endoscopy, the elongated shaft 71 houses a number of components to assist with the robotic procedure. The shaft 71 may comprise a working channel for deploying surgical tools (or medical instruments), irrigation, and/or aspiration to the operative region at the distal end of the shaft 71. The shaft 71 may also accommodate wires and/or optical fibers to transfer signals to/from an optical assembly at the distal tip, which may include an optical camera. The shaft 71 may also accommodate optical fibers to carry light from proximally-located light sources, such as light emitting diodes, to the distal end of the shaft 71.
At the distal end of the instrument 70, the distal tip may also comprise the opening of a working channel for delivering tools for diagnostic and/or therapy, irrigation, and aspiration to an operative site. The distal tip may also include a port for a camera, such as a fiberscope or a digital camera, to capture images of an internal anatomical space. Relatedly, the distal tip may also include ports for light sources for illuminating the anatomical space when using the camera.
In the example of
Like earlier disclosed embodiments, an instrument 86 may comprise an elongated shaft portion 88 and an instrument base 87 (shown with a transparent external skin for discussion purposes) comprising a plurality of drive inputs 89 (such as receptacles, pulleys, and spools) that are configured to receive the drive outputs 81 in the instrument driver 80. Unlike prior disclosed embodiments, the instrument shaft 88 extends from the center of the instrument base 87 with an axis substantially parallel to the axes of the drive inputs 89, rather than orthogonal as in the design of
When coupled to the rotational assembly 83 of the instrument driver 80, the medical instrument 86, comprising instrument base 87 and instrument shaft 88, rotates in combination with the rotational assembly 83 about the instrument driver axis 85. Since the instrument shaft 88 is positioned at the center of instrument base 87, the instrument shaft 88 is coaxial with instrument driver axis 85 when attached. Thus, rotation of the rotational assembly 83 causes the instrument shaft 88 to rotate about its own longitudinal axis. Moreover, as the instrument base 87 rotates with the instrument shaft 88, any tendons connected to the drive inputs 89 in the instrument base 87 are not tangled during rotation. Accordingly, the parallelism of the axes of the drive outputs 81, drive inputs 89, and instrument shaft 88 allows for the shaft rotation without tangling any control tendons.
The instrument handle 170, which may also be referred to as an instrument base, may generally comprise an attachment interface 172 having one or more mechanical inputs 174, e.g., receptacles, pulleys or spools, that are designed to be reciprocally mated with one or more torque couplers on an attachment surface of an instrument driver.
In some embodiments, the instrument 150 comprises a series of pulleys or cables that enable the elongated shaft 152 to translate relative to the handle 170. In other words, the instrument 150 itself comprises an instrument-based insertion architecture that accommodates insertion of the instrument, thereby minimizing the reliance on a robot arm to provide insertion of the instrument 150. In other embodiments, a robotic arm can be largely responsible for instrument insertion.
Any of the robotic systems described herein can include an input device or controller for manipulating an instrument attached to a robotic arm. In some embodiments, the controller can be coupled (e.g., communicatively, electronically, electrically, wirelessly and/or mechanically) with an instrument such that manipulation of the controller causes a corresponding manipulation of the instrument e.g., via master slave control.
In the illustrated embodiment, the controller 182 is configured to allow manipulation of two medical instruments, and includes two handles 184. Each of the handles 184 is connected to a gimbal 186. Each gimbal 186 is connected to a positioning platform 188.
As shown in
In some embodiments, one or more load cells are positioned in the controller. For example, in some embodiments, a load cell (not shown) is positioned in the body of each of the gimbals 186. By providing a load cell, portions of the controller 182 are capable of operating under admittance control, thereby advantageously reducing the perceived inertia of the controller while in use. In some embodiments, the positioning platform 188 is configured for admittance control, while the gimbal 186 is configured for impedance control. In other embodiments, the gimbal 186 is configured for admittance control, while the positioning platform 188 is configured for impedance control. Accordingly, for some embodiments, the translational or positional degrees of freedom of the positioning platform 188 can rely on admittance control, while the rotational degrees of freedom of the gimbal 186 rely on impedance control.
Traditional endoscopy may involve the use of fluoroscopy (e.g., as may be delivered through a C-arm) and other forms of radiation-based imaging modalities to provide endoluminal guidance to an operator physician. In contrast, the robotic systems contemplated by this disclosure can provide for non-radiation-based navigational and localization means to reduce physician exposure to radiation and reduce the amount of equipment within the operating room. As used herein, the term “localization” may refer to determining and/or monitoring the position of objects in a reference coordinate system. Technologies such as preoperative mapping, computer vision, real-time EM tracking, and robot command data may be used individually or in combination to achieve a radiation-free operating environment. In other cases, where radiation-based imaging modalities are still used, the preoperative mapping, computer vision, real-time EM tracking, and robot command data may be used individually or in combination to improve upon the information obtained solely through radiation-based imaging modalities.
As shown in
The various input data 91-94 are now described in greater detail. Preoperative mapping may be used by the localization module 95 to generate model data 91. Preoperative mapping may be accomplished through the use of the collection of low dose CT scans. Preoperative CT scans are reconstructed into three-dimensional images, which are visualized, e.g. as “slices” of a cutaway view of the patient's internal anatomy. When analyzed in the aggregate, image-based models for anatomical cavities, spaces and structures of the patient's anatomy, such as a patient lung network, may be generated. Techniques such as center-line geometry may be determined and approximated from the CT images to develop a three-dimensional volume of the patient's anatomy, referred to as model data 91 (also referred to as “preoperative model data” when generated using only preoperative CT scans). The use of center-line geometry is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/523,760, the contents of which are herein incorporated in its entirety. Network topological models may also be derived from the CT-images, and are particularly appropriate for bronchoscopy.
In some embodiments, the instrument may be equipped with a camera to provide vision data (or image data) 92 to the localization module 95. The localization module 95 may process the vision data 92 to enable one or more vision-based (or image-based) location tracking modules or features. For example, the preoperative model data 91 may be used in conjunction with the vision data 92 to enable computer vision-based tracking of the medical instrument (e.g., an endoscope or an instrument advance through a working channel of the endoscope). For example, using the preoperative model data 91, the robotic system may generate a library of expected endoscopic images from the model based on the expected path of travel of the endoscope, each image linked to a location within the model. Intraoperatively, this library may be referenced by the robotic system in order to compare real-time images captured at the camera (e.g., a camera at a distal end of the endoscope) to those in the image library to assist localization.
Other computer vision-based tracking techniques use feature tracking to determine motion of the camera, and thus the endoscope. Some features of the localization module 95 may identify circular geometries in the preoperative model data 91 that correspond to anatomical lumens and track the change of those geometries to determine which anatomical lumen was selected, as well as the relative rotational and/or translational motion of the camera. Use of a topological map may further enhance vision-based algorithms or techniques.
Optical flow, another computer vision-based technique, may analyze the displacement and translation of image pixels in a video sequence in the vision data 92 to infer camera movement. Examples of optical flow techniques may include motion detection, object segmentation calculations, luminance, motion compensated encoding, stereo disparity measurement, etc. Through the comparison of multiple frames over multiple iterations, movement and location of the camera (and thus the endoscope) may be determined.
The localization module 95 may use real-time EM tracking and EM data 93 to generate a real-time location of the endoscope in a global coordinate system that may be registered to the patient's anatomy, represented by the preoperative model. In EM tracking, an EM sensor (or tracker) comprising one or more sensor coils embedded in one or more locations and orientations in a medical instrument (e.g., an endoscopic tool) measures the variation in the EM field created by one or more static EM field generators positioned at a known location. The location information detected by the EM sensors is stored as EM data 93. The EM field generator (or transmitter), may be placed close to the patient to create a low intensity magnetic field that the embedded sensor may detect. The magnetic field induces small currents in the sensor coils of the EM sensor, which may be analyzed to determine the distance and angle between the EM sensor and the EM field generator. These distances and orientations may be intraoperatively “registered” to the patient anatomy (e.g., the preoperative model) in order to determine the geometric transformation that aligns a single location in the coordinate system with a position in the preoperative model of the patient's anatomy. Once registered, an embedded EM tracker in one or more positions of the medical instrument (e.g., the distal tip of an endoscope) may provide real-time indications of the progression of the medical instrument through the patient's anatomy.
Robotic command and kinematics data 94 may also be used by the localization module 95 to provide location data 96 for the robotic system. Device pitch and yaw resulting from articulation commands may be determined during preoperative calibration. Intraoperatively, these calibration measurements may be used in combination with known insertion depth information to estimate the position of the instrument. Alternatively, these calculations may be analyzed in combination with EM, vision, and/or topological modeling to estimate the position of the medical instrument within the network.
As
The localization module 95 may use the input data 91-94 in combination(s). In some cases, such a combination may use a probabilistic approach where the localization module 95 assigns a confidence weight to the location determined from each of the input data 91-94. Thus, where the EM data may not be reliable (as may be the case where there is EM interference) the confidence of the location determined by the EM data 93 can be decrease and the localization module 95 may rely more heavily on the vision data 92 and/or the robotic command and kinematics data 94.
As discussed above, the robotic systems discussed herein may be designed to incorporate a combination of one or more of the technologies above. The robotic system's computer-based control system, based in the tower, bed and/or cart, may store computer program instructions, for example, within a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as a persistent magnetic storage drive, solid state drive, or the like, that, upon execution, cause the system to receive and analyze sensor data and user commands, generate control signals throughout the system, and display the navigational and localization data, such as the position of the instrument within the global coordinate system, anatomical map, etc.
Embodiments of the disclosure relate to systems and techniques for detecting contact between a robotic arm/manipulator and an external object. As described herein, robotic medical systems may include a plurality of robotic arms configured to control the movement of medical tool(s) during a given medical procedure. In order to achieve a desired pose of a medical tool, a robotic arm may be placed into a pose, which may cause the robotic arm to come into contact with an external object, such as, for example, a patient, bedside staff, or inanimate object(s) (e.g., accessories on the bed). If undetected, such contact (also referred to as a “collision”) can result in injury to the patient or beside staff and/or damage to the robotic arm or external object(s). By detecting contact between the robotic arm and the external object early enough (e.g., before the contact results in a force greater than a threshold value), injury and/or damage can be reduced or prevented.
One safety consideration relates to when a robotic link (e.g., a portion of robotic arm) comes into contact with an external object. For example, when the robotic arm comes into contact with a patient in an unplanned or accidental manner, harmful forces may be created and/or transferred to the patient. Thus, one challenge with robotic medical systems is detecting contact with surrounding objects and people (including the patient) to ensure that the robotic system can safely operate around people.
Aspects of this disclosure provide systems and techniques for detecting contact between or with links (e.g., of the robotic arms), which can involve the use of one or more sensors. Once contact is detected, the robotic system can take action to reduce further contact. For example, in some implementations the robotic arm can stop further movement upon detection of contact with an external object.
According to aspects of this disclosure, a robotic arm can comprise a plurality of robotic links connected via a series of joints providing a plurality of degrees-of-freedom of movement that enable the robotic arm to be positioned in a variety of different poses or states.
Aspects of this disclosure are directed to an arm component (e.g., one of the robotic links 205-211 or joints 213-219 of
In certain implementations, a shell can be suspended around a given link and the relative motion between the shell and inner components/members of the link can be detected using one or more sensors in order to detect contact with an external object.
The structural cover 303 can be attached to the structural link 301 to house components of the structural link 301 and form the internal structural connection between the first joint 305 and the second link 305. The shell 309 together with the shell cover 313 are suspended from and surround the structural link 301. As used herein, the shell 309 and shell cover 313 may collectively be referred to simply as the “shell” 309, while the structural link 301 and structural cover 303 may collectively be referred to simply as the structural link 301 or a manipulatable link, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
The shell 309 may be connected to the structural link 301 via a force-sensing connection. Because the shell 309 surrounds the structural link 301, when the link 300 contacts an external object, the object will come into contact with the shell 309. Thus, the force-sensing connection can detect contact between the shell 309 and the external object by measuring changes in the force between the shell 309 and the structural link 301 caused by the link 300 coming into contact with the external object. The shell 309 may also be sufficiently rigid such that, upon contact with an external object, the shell 309 engages the force-sensing connection. Advantageously, by using a rigid shell 309 the force and relative movement between the shell 309 and the structural link 301 can be sensed in all three directions.
The force-sensing connection may be implemented in a variety of different manners in accordance with aspects of this disclosure. For example, the force-sensing connection can include one or more of the following: traditional load cells, force sensing resistors, and/or any component capable of sensing force (or displacement, when combined with a spring).
In some embodiments, the sensors 321 are distributed throughout the link 300 in between the shell 309 and the structural link 301 For example, the shell 309 can be suspended over the structural link 301 via the sensors 321. Depending on the implementation, the link 300 can include one, two, three, four or more sensors 321 distributed along a robotic arm link.
Although
The processor may be included as a part of a system, including a robotic manipulator including a link, a rigid shell configured to overlay the link, and one or more sensors positioned between the rigid shell and the link. The one or more sensors are configured to detect contact between one or more external objects and the rigid shell in at least two or more directions. The system may further include at least one computer-readable memory in communication with the processor and having stored thereon computer-executable instructions to cause the set of processors to perform the method 500.
The method 500 may begin at block 501. At block 502, the processor may receive a signal from the one or more sensors positioned between the manipulatable link of the robotic manipulator and the rigid shell configured to overlay the link. The received signal is indicative of the degree of contact between the rigid shell and the one or more sensors.
At block 504, the processor may determine that contact between the robotic manipulator and the external object has occurred in response to the received signal meeting or exceeding a threshold value. In some implementations, the processor can also detect a direction of the contact between the rigid shell and the external object based on the received signal. The processor can also measure a magnitude of a force and/or torque resulting from the contact between the rigid shell and the external object based on information in the signal (e.g., data in the time or frequency domain) received from the one or more sensors. The processor may also be configured to measure a direction of relative motion between the rigid shell and the link based on the received signal.
In certain embodiments, the processor may also be configured to determine the location in space of the external object based on signal(s) from sensor(s) indicative of the detected contact and prevent movement of the robotic arm (or other robotic arms) to the location of the contact by updating a collision model to avoid future contact in the same area. Such information may include which sensors are activated by the contact and/or directional information detected by a given sensor. As used herein, a collision model may be a model of object(s) within the environment which may be at risk of a collision with the robotic arms. The robotic system can prevent movement of the robotic arms which would result in collisions with object(s) modeled in the collision model. The method 500 may end at block 506.
The one or more sensors 321 that are provided in the link 300, 401, or 411 can include: traditional load cells, force sensing resistors, strain gauges, and/or capacitive sensors, etc. In one implementation, the one or more sensors 321 comprise beam flexure type sensors 600 (also referred to a spring or diving board sensor).
The specific location of the contact point 705 between the first and second ends will affect the amount of leverage provided by contact of an external object with the shell 309 onto the force sensor 703. For example, when the contact point 705 is located closer to the second end with the force sensor 703, more of the force applied to the contact point 705 will be transmitted to the force sensor 703 than when the contact point 705 is located closer to the fixed first end. Thus, the location of the contact point 705 can be selected to map the range of forces expected to be received by the shell 309 onto the range of forces detectable by the force sensor 703. By reducing the forces using the beam flexure 701, the force sensor 703 can effectively measure greater forces applied to the shell 309 by reducing the received force onto the range of forces measurable by the force sensor 703.
Aspects of this disclosure provide a number of advantages for the detection of contact between a link and an external object. For example, aspects of this disclosure are advantageous over systems that measure torque (either directly with a torque sensor, or through current or control loop disturbances) as the sensitivity of implementation of this disclosure do not decrease as the applied force vector approaches the torque axis, as is the case in torque sensing systems. Similarly, systems that mount the entire robot on load cells (as is common in some industrial robots) may have similar drawbacks to torque-based measurement systems.
Additionally, by using a shell 309 to detect contact with an external object as described herein, the system can advantageously sense contact on the entire surface of the link. In contrast, implementations which employ a film to sense contact may not be able to sense or detect contact with an external object at locations where the film is not applied to the link(s).
Another advantage of aspects of this disclosure includes allowing for the system to sense the total amount of contact force over the entire surface of a given link, to allow a certain amount of light incidental contact without interrupting a medical procedure. This is advantageous over systems that are not able to distinguish between a small amount of incidental force and larger forces that risk injury and/or damage.
Yet another advantage of aspects of this disclosure is the compact form factor enabled by the shell compared to systems that surround the robot in pressure-sensitive gas-filled bladders.
In certain implementations, a coating or film of sensors can be adhered to a surface of a link (e.g., a robotic arm link).
In certain implementations, the film 803 may be attached to surfaces of the link 800 that are more likely to contact external objects (e.g., the regions 221 illustrated in
By applying such a film 803 to a robotic arm, the robotic system can detect contact between an external object and the robotic arm and prevent further movement in the direction of the contact with the external object. In addition, the robotic system can also determine the location in space of the external object based on the detected contact and prevent movement of the robotic arm (or other robotic arms) to the location of the contact by updating a collision model to avoid future contact in the same area. The robotic system can prevent movement of the robotic arms which would result in collisions with objects(s) modeled in the collision model.
The use of a force sensing film 803 in accordance with aspects of this disclosure allows for the maximization of a robot's collision free workspace by allowing the robot (e.g., a robotic arm) to move until it collides with an external object and then stop. This allows for a larger workspace than might otherwise be feasible with force sensing solutions that occupy a larger volume around the structural link (e.g., systems that surround the robot in pressure-sensitive gas-filled bladders).
In contrast to systems that use force or torque sensors positioned in robotic arm joints, aspects of this disclosure which employ force sensing films do not experience a decrease as the applied force vector approaches the torque axis, as is the case in torque sensing systems. Similarly, systems that mount the entire robot on load cells (as is common in some industrial robots) may have similar drawbacks to torque-based measurement systems.
The advantage of an increased collision-free workspace is also apparent compared to systems which artificially limiting a robot's workspace such that it can never contact the patient or accessories. Since such artificial limitations cannot precisely define the locations of external objects, implementations which use such artificial limitations can dramatically limit the workspace and cause user irritation due to unachievable movements and/or poses of the robotic arms. In related aspects, force sensing film 803 may be used in conjunction with one or more sensors 321 that are provided in a manipulatable link, wherein the one or more sensors can include: traditional load cells, force sensing resistors, strain gauges, and/or capacitive sensors, etc.
Implementations disclosed herein provide systems, methods and apparatus for detecting contact between a link and an external object.
It should be noted that the terms “couple,” “coupling,” “coupled” or other variations of the word couple as used herein may indicate either an indirect connection or a direct connection. For example, if a first component is “coupled” to a second component, the first component may be either indirectly connected to the second component via another component or directly connected to the second component.
The detection of contact between a link and an external object functions described herein may be stored as one or more instructions on a processor-readable or computer-readable medium. The term “computer-readable medium” refers to any available medium that can be accessed by a computer or processor. By way of example, and not limitation, such a medium may comprise random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. It should be noted that a computer-readable medium may be tangible and non-transitory. As used herein, the term “code” may refer to software, instructions, code or data that is/are executable by a computing device or processor.
The methods disclosed herein comprise one or more steps or actions for achieving the described method. The method steps and/or actions may be interchanged with one another without departing from the scope of the claims. In other words, unless a specific order of steps or actions is required for proper operation of the method that is being described, the order and/or use of specific steps and/or actions may be modified without departing from the scope of the claims.
As used herein, the term “plurality” denotes two or more. For example, a plurality of components indicates two or more components. The term “determining” encompasses a wide variety of actions and, therefore, “determining” can include calculating, computing, processing, deriving, investigating, looking up (e.g., looking up in a table, a database or another data structure), ascertaining and the like. Also, “determining” can include receiving (e.g., receiving information), accessing (e.g., accessing data in a memory) and the like. Also, “determining” can include resolving, selecting, choosing, establishing and the like.
The phrase “based on” does not mean “based only on,” unless expressly specified otherwise. In other words, the phrase “based on” describes both “based only on” and “based at least on.”
The previous description of the disclosed implementations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, it will be appreciated that one of ordinary skill in the art will be able to employ a number corresponding alternative and equivalent structural details, such as equivalent ways of fastening, mounting, coupling, or engaging tool components, equivalent mechanisms for producing particular actuation motions, and equivalent mechanisms for delivering electrical energy. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application claims the benefit of, and priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/045,351, filed on Jun. 29, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
4040413 | Ohshiro | Aug 1977 | A |
4198960 | Utsugi | Apr 1980 | A |
4470407 | Hussein | Sep 1984 | A |
4532935 | Wang et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4685458 | Leckrone | Aug 1987 | A |
4747405 | Leckrone | May 1988 | A |
4854301 | Nakajima | Aug 1989 | A |
4898574 | Uchiyama | Feb 1990 | A |
4983165 | Loiterman | Jan 1991 | A |
5029574 | Shimamura et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5085659 | Rydell | Feb 1992 | A |
5150452 | Pollack et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5196023 | Martin | Mar 1993 | A |
5199417 | Muller et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217465 | Steppe | Jun 1993 | A |
5308323 | Sogawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318589 | Lichtman | Jun 1994 | A |
5325848 | Adams et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342381 | Tidemand | Aug 1994 | A |
5344395 | Whalen et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353783 | Nakao et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370609 | Drasler et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372124 | Takayama et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5411016 | Kume et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431649 | Muller et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441485 | Peters | Aug 1995 | A |
5449356 | Walbrink et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450843 | Moll et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5496267 | Drasler | Mar 1996 | A |
5501667 | Verduin, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520684 | Imran | May 1996 | A |
5545170 | Hart | Aug 1996 | A |
5562239 | Boiarski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562648 | Peterson | Oct 1996 | A |
5562678 | Booker | Oct 1996 | A |
5572999 | Funda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573535 | Viklund | Nov 1996 | A |
5613973 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645083 | Essig et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653374 | Young et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658311 | Baden | Aug 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697949 | Giurtino et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710870 | Ohm | Jan 1998 | A |
5716325 | Bonutti | Feb 1998 | A |
5737500 | Seraji | Apr 1998 | A |
5788667 | Stoller | Aug 1998 | A |
5792165 | Klieman | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani | Aug 1998 | A |
5798627 | Gilliland | Aug 1998 | A |
5810770 | Chin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893869 | Barnhart | Apr 1999 | A |
5897491 | Kastenbauer et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5924175 | Lippitt | Jul 1999 | A |
5943056 | Sato | Aug 1999 | A |
5989230 | Frassica | Nov 1999 | A |
6071281 | Burnside et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093157 | Chandrasekaran | Jul 2000 | A |
6110171 | Rydell | Aug 2000 | A |
6120476 | Fung et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120498 | Jani et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6156030 | Neev | Dec 2000 | A |
6174318 | Bates et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183435 | Bumbalough et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236906 | Muller | May 2001 | B1 |
6322557 | Nikolaevich | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6375635 | Moutafis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405078 | Moaddeb et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440061 | Wenner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6508823 | Gonon | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522906 | Salisbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6577891 | Jaross et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6676668 | Mercereau et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706050 | Giannadakis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7282055 | Tsuruta | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7559934 | Teague et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7736356 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7963911 | Turliuc | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7987046 | Peterman | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8002713 | Heske | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004229 | Nowlin | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8021326 | Moll et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8038598 | Khachi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8092397 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8187173 | Miyoshi | May 2012 | B2 |
8257303 | Moll et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8480595 | Speeg | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8523762 | Miyamoto et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540748 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8541970 | Nowlin | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8652030 | Matsuura et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8749189 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8749190 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8786241 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8820603 | Shelton et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8821480 | Burbank | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823308 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8882660 | Phee et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8945163 | Voegele et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956280 | Eversull et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9179979 | Jinno | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9259282 | Azizian | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9296104 | Swarup et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9345456 | Tsonton et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345544 | Hourtash et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9375284 | Hourtash | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9415510 | Hourtash et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9460536 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480534 | Bowling | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9510911 | Hourtash | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9517106 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9566125 | Bowling | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9592042 | Titus | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9597152 | Schaeffer | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9668768 | Piron et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675422 | Hourtash et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9687310 | Nowlin et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717563 | Tognaccini | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9730757 | Brudniok | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9782229 | Crawford | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9918681 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9943962 | Sattler et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10029367 | Hourtash | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10071479 | Swarup et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10117713 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10123844 | Nowlin et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10130429 | Weir | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10136949 | Felder et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10136959 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10145747 | Lin et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10149720 | Romo | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10154822 | Henderson | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10159532 | Ummalaneni et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10159533 | Moll et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10169875 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10194998 | Nowlin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10219868 | Weir | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10219874 | Yu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231793 | Romo | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231867 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10244926 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10285574 | Landey et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10314463 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10314661 | Bowling | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10327855 | Hourtash et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10350017 | Bowling | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10350390 | Moll et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10383765 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10398518 | Yu et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10405939 | Romo et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10405940 | Romo | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10426559 | Graetzel et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10426661 | Kintz | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10434660 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10463440 | Bowling | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10464209 | Ho et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10470830 | Hill | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10482599 | Mintz et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10493241 | Jiang | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10500001 | Yu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10512514 | Nowlin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10517692 | Eyre et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524866 | Srinivasan | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10539478 | Lin | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10543048 | Noonan et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10555778 | Ummalaneni et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10631949 | Schuh et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10639108 | Romo et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10639109 | Bovay et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10639114 | Schuh | May 2020 | B2 |
10646291 | Turner | May 2020 | B2 |
10667871 | Romo et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10667875 | DeFonzo | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10682189 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10702348 | Moll et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10716461 | Jenkins | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10743751 | Landey et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10744035 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10751140 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10765303 | Graetzel et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10765487 | Ho | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10779898 | Hill | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10786329 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10786432 | Mintz et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10792464 | Romo et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10792466 | Landey et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10813539 | Graetzel et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10814101 | Jiang | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10820947 | Julian | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10820954 | Marsot et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10827913 | Ummalaneni et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10828118 | Schuh et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10835153 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10850013 | Hsu | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20020019644 | Hastings | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020082612 | Moll et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111608 | Baerveldt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111621 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030004455 | Kadziauskas | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040681 | Ng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065358 | Frecker | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100892 | Morley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109780 | Coste-Maniere | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109877 | Morley | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109889 | Mercereau | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158545 | Hovda et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181809 | Hall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208189 | Payman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040143253 | Vanney | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153093 | Donovan | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158261 | Vu | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176751 | Weitzner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186349 | Ewers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193146 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210116 | Nakao | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040253079 | Sanchez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033270 | Ramans et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054900 | Mawn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050159645 | Bertolero | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050240178 | Morley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261705 | Gist | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015133 | Grayzel | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058617 | Sano et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058813 | Teague | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116693 | Weisenburgh | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135963 | Kick | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156875 | McRury et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161137 | Orban et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178556 | Hasser et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189891 | Waxman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070016164 | Dudney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027443 | Rose | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027534 | Bergheim | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032906 | Sutherland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070106304 | Hammack | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123855 | Morley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070208375 | Nishizawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213668 | Spitz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239178 | Weitzner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250111 | Lu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070299427 | Yeung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015566 | Livneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021440 | Solomon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033467 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045981 | Margolin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065111 | Blumenkranz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065112 | Tovey et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080125698 | Gerg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147089 | Loh | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080187101 | Gertner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196533 | Bergamasco | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228104 | Uber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090005768 | Sharareh | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012507 | Culbertson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030446 | Measamer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036900 | Moll | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043305 | Brodbeck | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048611 | Funda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082634 | Kathrani et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105723 | Dillinger | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131885 | Akahoshi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090161827 | Gertner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192524 | Itkowitz | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227998 | Aljuri | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248041 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248043 | Tierney et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264878 | Carmel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270760 | Leimbach et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287188 | Golden et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299352 | Zerfas | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312773 | Cabrera et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326318 | Tognaccini | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004642 | Lumpkin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010504 | Simaan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011900 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011901 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016852 | Manzo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100081965 | Mugan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082017 | Zickler | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100045 | Pravongviengkham et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100179632 | Bruszewski et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204605 | Blakley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204646 | Plicchi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217235 | Thorstenson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225209 | Goldberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228249 | Mohr | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234857 | Itkowitz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268211 | Manwaring et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286712 | Won et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312141 | Keast et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331858 | Simaan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015483 | Barbagli | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028790 | Farr et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071541 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071543 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106146 | Jeong | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125165 | Simaan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152880 | Alvarez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160713 | Neuberger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160745 | Fielding | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167611 | Williams | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184558 | Jacob | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208211 | Whitfield et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213362 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224660 | Neuberger et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238064 | Williams | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257641 | Hastings et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264112 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276085 | Krzyzanowski | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313343 | Milutinovic et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048759 | Disch et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120138586 | Webster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120138660 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120209315 | Amat | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232342 | Reydel | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253277 | Tah et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253332 | Moll | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259320 | Loesel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296318 | Wellhofer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302869 | Koyrakh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006144 | Clancy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035537 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053877 | BenMaamer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130066136 | Palese et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085442 | Shtul et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085486 | Boutoussov et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096422 | Boctor | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096574 | Kang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110042 | Humphreys | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110107 | Smith et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116716 | Bahls et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144274 | Stefanchik et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144395 | Stefanchik | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190796 | Tilson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130225997 | Dillard et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226161 | Hickenbotham | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233908 | Knodel | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253267 | Collins | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130303876 | Gelfand et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310819 | Neuberger et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317519 | Romo et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130334281 | Williams | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345686 | Brown | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005681 | Gee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039517 | Bowling | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039681 | Bowling | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046308 | Bischoff | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051049 | Jarc | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051985 | Fan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058365 | Bille | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058404 | Hammack | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058428 | Christopher | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100445 | Stenzel | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163318 | Swanstrom | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140163736 | Azizian | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194859 | Ianchulev | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140194905 | Kappel | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222207 | Bowling | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243801 | Fanelli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243849 | Saglam et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246473 | Auld | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257333 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275956 | Fan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276723 | Parihar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276956 | Crainich | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309655 | Gal et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316203 | Carroux et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025549 | Kilroy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045675 | Chernomorsky | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150073439 | Dannaher | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150080879 | Trees | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088161 | Hata | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127045 | Prestel | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133960 | Lohmeier | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150635 | Kilroy et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164522 | Budiman | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150190204 | Popovi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201917 | Snow | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150202085 | Lemonis | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223832 | Swaney | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150297299 | Yeung | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305650 | Hunter | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150314110 | Park | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150366629 | Bowling | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374446 | Malackowski | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160022289 | Wan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022466 | Pedtke | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030073 | Lsakov | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045208 | Ciulla | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051318 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066935 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160158490 | Leeflang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183841 | Duindarn et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199984 | Lohmeier et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160235495 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160242858 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160249932 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160302871 | Gregerson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160303743 | Rockrohr | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160310146 | Levy et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331358 | Gordon | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160367324 | Sato et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170000577 | Bowling | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170020615 | Koenig et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049471 | Gaffney et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170055995 | Weier | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170056117 | Hourtash | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065227 | Marrs | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071456 | Ratnakar | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071584 | Suigetsu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086934 | Devengenzo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170095234 | Prisco et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170095295 | Overmyer | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170095299 | Hendrick | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170135706 | Frey | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135710 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135833 | Syed | May 2017 | A1 |
20170143442 | Tesar | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151416 | Kutikov | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165009 | Chaplin et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172553 | Chaplin | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172680 | Bowling | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170189118 | Chopra et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170189131 | Weir | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170252096 | Felder | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170258534 | Hourtash et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170265923 | Privitera | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170265954 | Burbank | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170319289 | Neff et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333145 | Griffiths | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333147 | Bernstein | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180000563 | Shanjani et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180049824 | Harris | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180079090 | Koenig | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180080841 | Cordoba | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098817 | Nichogi et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180140371 | Hares et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180161115 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180193049 | Heck et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180206931 | Scheib | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250085 | Simi | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180296285 | Simi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180325499 | Landey et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180338799 | Hladio et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180360435 | Romo | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180368920 | Ummalaneni | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190000559 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000560 | Berman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190000576 | Mintz et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190015166 | Mahoney | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190047154 | Itkowitz | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190054620 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190069962 | Tabandeh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190099231 | Bruehwiler | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190099232 | Soto et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190110839 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117320 | Shoham et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190117324 | Hibner | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151148 | Alvarez et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190167366 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190175009 | Mintz | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183585 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183587 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190192249 | Bowling | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190216548 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216550 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216576 | Eyre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190223974 | Romo | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190231460 | DiMaio | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190239890 | Stokes | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262086 | Connolly et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269468 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190274764 | Romo | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290109 | Aarawal et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190298460 | Al-Jadda | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298464 | Abbott | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298465 | Chin | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190298469 | Ramstad et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190314616 | Moll et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190336238 | Yu | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190365201 | Noonan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365209 | Ye et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365479 | Rafii-Tari | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190365486 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190375383 | Alvarez | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380787 | Ye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380797 | Yu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200000533 | Schuh | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200030046 | Bowling | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200038123 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200039086 | Meyer | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200046434 | Graetzel | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200060516 | Baez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200085516 | DeFonzo | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093549 | Chin et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200093554 | Schuh | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100855 | Leparmentier | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200107894 | Wallace | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200121502 | Kintz | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200138531 | Chaplin | May 2020 | A1 |
20200146769 | Eyre | May 2020 | A1 |
20200163726 | Tanner | May 2020 | A1 |
20200170720 | Ummalaneni | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200171660 | Ho | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200188043 | Yu | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197109 | Chaplin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197112 | Chin | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200206472 | Ma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200217733 | Lin | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200222134 | Schuh | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200237458 | DeFonzo | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200261172 | Romo | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200268459 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200268460 | Tse | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200281787 | Ruiz | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200297437 | Schuh | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200297444 | Camarillo | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200305983 | Yampolsky | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200305989 | Schuh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200305992 | Schuh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200315717 | Bovay | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200315723 | Hassan | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200323596 | Moll | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200330167 | Romo | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200345216 | Jenkins | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200352420 | Graetzel | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200360183 | Alvarez | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200367726 | Landey et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200367981 | Ho et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200375678 | Wallace | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101443069 | May 2009 | CN |
100515347 | Jul 2009 | CN |
103298414 | Sep 2013 | CN |
104619281 | May 2015 | CN |
205729413 | Nov 2016 | CN |
0347098 | Feb 1996 | EP |
1321106 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1849423 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2005270464 | Oct 2005 | JP |
10-2015-0039801 | Apr 2015 | KR |
WO-06124390 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2009123891 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-11161218 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-13107468 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-15153174 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO-16137612 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO-17048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-17114855 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-18069679 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO-18189722 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2019074669 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2020102776 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aghakhani et al., May 6, 2013, Task control with remote center of motion constraint for minimally invasive robotic surgery, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5807-5812. |
Darwiche, 2015, Operative technique and early experience for robotic assisted laparoscopic nephroueterectomy (RALNU) using da Vinci XI, SpingerPlus, 4:298. |
Hernansanz et al., A multi-robot cooperation strategy for dexterous task oriented teleoperation, 2015, Elsevier, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 68 (205), 156-172 (Year: 2015). |
Ramezanifard et al, A Novel Modeling Approach for Collision Avoidance in Robotic Surgery, 2007 Science Publications, American Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (9): 693-699 (Year: 2007). |
Sasaki, 2017, Laparoscopic hemicolectomy for a patient with situs inversus totalis: a case report, Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 41;93-96. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 7, 2022, issued in International Application No. PCT/IB2020/058715, 14 pages. |
Choi, et al., “A Force/Moment Direction Sensor and Its Application in Intuitive Robot Teaching Task,” ICASE: The Institute of Control, Automation and Systems Engineers, Korea, Dec. 2001, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 236-241. |
Whitney, “Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Jun. 1977, pp. 91-97. |
PCT International Search Report; PCT/IB2021/055496; dated Sep. 27, 2021; 6 pages. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/IB2021/055496; dated Sep. 27, 2021; 4 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability; PCT/IB2021/055496; dated Dec. 13, 2022; 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210402615 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63045351 | Jun 2020 | US |