This present disclosure relates generally to turbomachines, and more particularly, to systems and methods for predicting a turbomachine engine safe start clearance after a shutdown of the turbomachine engine.
Following a shutdown of a turbomachine, e.g., a Gas Turbine (GT) engine, a bowing of one or more components, e.g., the turbine casing, may result, which increases the risk of other components, e.g., the turbine blade tips, rubbing upon restarting the GT. To reduce the rubbing risks, e.g., Direct Air Injection Systems (DAIS) have focused on controlling the top half casing temperature for the mid-frame shell (and all TVC cavities) with good results, provided the DAIS system is operational across the shutdown. An example of this type of DAIS system is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,893,510 and 8,820,091, both disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for describing the DAIS systems.
However, engine operational disturbances during shutdown do occur, e.g., equipment failures and operational limits resulting in engine trips, which impacts the DAIS operation, and therefore, may increase rubbing risks. Due in part to these disturbances, the DAIS system enforces a time based engine start lockout period, e.g., of approximately 30-50 hours, which limits the ability to restart the GT prior to it achieving a fully cooled condition. This restriction period generally continues until natural convention effects start to diminish and a clearance of any rubbing risks is achieved, resulting in the GT being safe to restart. Consequently, during this restart restriction period, the GT is unavailable for an extended period of time, as the full duration of the restriction period must be achieved, regardless of whether any rubbing risks exist at any point during the lockout restriction period.
Therefore, a need exists for an improved system and method for determining rubbing risks within the GT for safely starting the GT, and independent of the DAIS and any disturbances.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method for predicting/determining rubbing risks of one or more components within a turbomachine engine for safely starting the turbomachine engine following a shutdown of the turbomachine engine is provided. The method includes: monitoring one or more parameters of the turbomachine engine, via a plurality of temperature detecting means selectively arranged about an upper and corresponding lower part of the turbomachine, during a cool down cycle of the GT operating on Turning Gear.
The method further includes: determining whether the monitored parameters identifies that one or more components of the turbomachine, e.g., turbine blade tips, are above a minimum clearance value, and restarting the turbomachine based upon the monitored parameters and upon identifying that the components are above the minimum clearance required.
In yet a further exemplary embodiment, a system for restarting a turbomachine engine is provided. The system includes: a controller operatively connected to a plurality of temperature detecting means. The plurality of temperature detecting means may be selectively arranged at an upper and corresponding lower part of a casing of the turbomachine for detecting one or more parameters of the turbomachine engine. At least one of the temperature detecting means may be operably configured to transmit the detected parameters to the controller for processing by a control application of the controller. The controller is operably configured to receive the parameters from the temperature detecting means, and to determine, via the control application, whether any components of the turbomachine, e.g., turbine tips, are above a minimum clearance value. Upon determining that the components are above the minimum required clearance, the controller may be configured to transmit or display the clearance information, e.g., to a user, for restarting the turbomachine based at least in part of the detected parameters.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like numbers designate like objects, and in which:
The components and materials described hereinafter as making up the various embodiments are intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. Many suitable components and materials that would perform the same or a similar function as the materials described herein are intended to be embraced within the scope of embodiments of the present invention.
In general, the computing systems and devices described herein may be assembled by a number of computing components and circuitry such as, for example, one or more processors (e.g., Intel®, AMD®, Samsung®) in communication with memory or other storage medium. The memory may be Random Access Memory (RAM), flashable or non-flashable Read Only Memory (ROM), hard disk drives, flash drives, or any other types of memory known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and having storing capabilities. The computing systems and devices may also utilize cloud computing technologies, via the internet, to facilitate several functions, e.g., storage capabilities, executing program instructions, etc., as described in further detail below. The computing systems and devices may further include one or more communication components such as, for example, one or more network interface cards (NIC) or circuitry having analogous functionality, one or more one way or multi-directional ports (e.g., bi-directional auxiliary port, universal serial bus (USB) port, etc.), in addition to other hardware and software necessary to implement wired communication with other devices. The communication components may further include wireless transmitters, a receiver (or an integrated transceiver) that may be coupled or connected to broadcasting hardware of the sorts to implement wireless communication within the system, for example, an infrared transceiver, Bluetooth transceiver, or any other wireless communication know to persons of ordinary skill in the art and useful for facilitating the transfer of information. Additionally, a power supply/pack (e.g., hard wired, battery, etc.) may be included in any of the computing devices described herein. These power supplies may also include some form of redundancy or a backup power means known to persons of ordinary skill and for maintaining the functionality of the computing devices and/or components described herein.
Referring now to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating embodiments of the subject matter herein only and not for limiting the same,
The system 100 provides a risk assessment means for predicting the clearance of one or more components of the GT 1, e.g., turbine blade tips, in both a normal and disturbed DAIS operation, to enable restarting the GT 1 at any time during the turning gear operation, e.g., and as soon as it is determined that the components are above a minimum clearance value, i.e., are cleared, versus waiting for a complete cool down of the engine as determined by an engine start lockout period and/or temperature based lockout period.
With reference to
As shown in
In the embodiment of
As illustrated in the embodiments of
With continued reference to the figures, upon measuring the casing temperatures at the TDC of area A4 and the BDC of area A5, the TDM 300 may be configured to transmit the measured temperatures, via one or more control signals, to the controller 200 for monitoring of the casing 10 temperatures at A4 and A5, e.g., in real-time, to determine, via the control application, whether the measured temperatures are indicative of the turbine blade tips being above a minimum clearance value required for a safe restart of the GT 1, e.g., while on Turning Gear Operation.
In one exemplary embodiment, to determine a safe to start condition for the GT 1, the controller 200, under the control of the control application, applies the temperatures values from the TDC and BDC in the following formula:
STCLR1Bot=A+B·Top+C·Top2+D·Bot+E·Bot2+F·Top·Bot−Min
STCLR1Top=A+B·Top+C·Top2+D·Bot+E·Bot2+F·Top·Bot−Min
In this embodiment, the two formulas assist in predicting the row one turbine blade clearances at the engine top and bottom, which may also be referred to as the Effective DAIS Zone. The formulas may be second order polynomial functions in two variables, with the two variables, Top and Bot, being representative of the casing 10 temperatures from the TDM 300 at the TDC and BDC, respectively. It should be appreciated that the above constants (A, B, C, D, E, F, and Min) depend on the GT 1 type, the blade clearance location (top and/or bottom), and the cold build clearance. Upon applying the TDM 300 provided values (casing temperatures) and the constants to the above formulas, a determination that the GT 1 is safe to start is achieved once the resultants of the formulas return positive values, which may be represented by: CalcStoSR1_Min=Min (STCLR1Bot, STCLR1Top)>0 Safe to start (Effective DAIS Zone).
It should further be appreciated that the values of the constants A through F may be determined through best-fit methods for a particular frame, casing half, operating and shutdown process for a particular GT 1. As previously indicated, these constants may be representative of the values that minimize the error in estimating, under appropriate restrictions and weighting, the actual clearance by a quadratic (or 2nd order polynomial) function in two variables, Top and Bot (temperatures). The values of these constants may not directly correspond to any physical quantity, but rather, provides, e.g., via the above formulas, best estimates of clearances. The Min constant may be representative of an acceptable lower limit on the clearance estimation which allows for a restart of the GT 1.
With reference now to
In this embodiment, a first TDM 300 of the plurality of TDMs 300 arranged at the upper part of the casing 10 may function as a primary upper TDM 300, with the remaining TDM's 300 at the upper part of the casing functioning as backup or redundant TDMs 300. Similarly, a first TDM 300 of the plurality of TDMs 300 may be arranged at the lower part of the casing 10 and may function as a primary lower TDM 300, with the remaining TDM's 300 at the lower part of the casing functioning as backup or redundant TDMs 300. The upper and/or lower backup TDMs 300 may be configured to provide additional information to supplement any detected information provided by the primary TDMs 300, e.g., further component temperatures, and/or to provide redundancy, e.g., should any of the TDMs 300 go offline. It should be appreciated that the additional TDMs 300 may be similarly configured to the primary TDMs 300 for detecting and transmitting the GT 1 casing temperatures to the controller 200, or in a further embodiment, configured to transmit the detected parameters to another device or TDM 300 in operable communication with the controller 200, should the primary TDM 300 go offline or be unable to transmit any information needed to predict a safe start clearance.
In yet a further embodiment, the control application may include instructions for identifying that the GT 1 is safe to start, and additionally or alternatively instructions for restarting the GT 1. For example, upon determining that no rubbing risks exists, i.e., the blade tips are above the minimum clearance required, the control application may generate a message (visual or audible) indicative of the achieved clearance, which may be played or displayed, e.g., on a display (not shown) operatively connected to the controller, for notifying an operator of the system that the GT 1 may be safely restarted. The operator may then manually restart the GT 1 engine, or in a further embodiment, the control of the control application may include instructions which may cause the controller to automatically begin restarting the GT 1, e.g., without further operator intervention. It should be appreciated that, as disclosed herein, restarting the GT 1 may be generally independent of any recommended restart periods based on time and/or temperature.
Alternatively or additionally, the system 100 may include one or more cooling valves operatively connected to the controller 200 or other device of the system for further minimizing any rubbing risks of the interior components by cooling the components during the turning gear operation, which, e.g., may assist in reducing bowing within the GT 1. In this embodiment, operation of the cooling valves may be dependent on the parameters transmitted to the controller 200 from the TDM 300. For example, upon receiving the measured temperatures and identifying that a rubbing risk exists, the controller 200, under the control of the control application, may cause one or more of cooling values operably connected thereto to activate, resulting in the cooling valves dispersing a cooling medium or air for cooling the internal components to reduce the rubbing risks and also the period of time between shutdown and restarting the GT 1.
With reference now to
In step 1010, the method 1000 includes the step of monitoring one or more parameters of the GT 1, e.g., casing 10 temperatures, via one or more TDM 300. It should be appreciated that the monitoring of the casing temperatures may begin at anytime once the TDM 300 is attached to the GT 1. For example, the TDM 300 may begin to detect and transmit the monitored temperatures upon initiating a shutdown of the GT 1, or shortly thereafter, or immediately upon a disturbance occurring during the DAIS operation. In step 1020, the method 100 includes the step of determining whether the detected/monitored temperatures identifies that one or more components, e.g., row 1 blade tips, are above a minimum clearance value. In this step, the TDM 300 may transmit and/or stream the detected parameters to the controller 200 so that the controller 200, under the control of the control application, may begin to process the parameters to determine the clearance of the blade tips. Upon determining that the components are above the minimum clearance required, in step 1030, the method 1000 includes the step of restarting the GT 1. The GT 1 may be restarted manually by an operator upon receiving an indication that the minimum clearance is achieved, or automatically, via the controller 200, upon determining that no rubbing risk exists.
It should be appreciated that any restriction period (time or temperature) may be delayed while implanting the method 1000 or while utilizing the system 100. That is, any period that may be typically imposed, may remain passive until a safe to start condition is determine. In delaying the start of restriction period, operators are now able to restart the GT 1 upon achieving actual clearance versus being forced to wait for a predetermined amount of time.
It should be further appreciated, that the controller 200, under the control of the control application, may initiate or enforce a temperature based restriction period upon delaying the time based restriction. That is, the control application may include instructions to restrict starting the GT 1 based on the monitored temperatures. In this embodiment, the temperature based restriction may remain in place until it is determined that the components of the GT 1 have achieved the minimum clearance required.
For example, additionally or alternatively, upon the restart restriction period being started, the controller 200, under the control of the control application, may continue to monitor the parameters at TDC and BDC to determine the condition of, e.g., the row 1 blade tips, i.e., to determine whether or not the blade tips have achieved the minimum clearance required for restarting the GT 1. Upon determining that the blade tips have achieved the minimum clearance required, the imposed restart restriction period may be terminated, e.g., via the controller 200, and the operator may be notified that the GT 1 is ready to be restarted. Additionally or alternatively, upon determining that the minimum clearance is achieved, the controller 200, via the control application, may automatically begin to restart the GT 1.
While specific embodiments have been described in detail, those with ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternative to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. For example, elements described in association with different embodiments may be combined. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims or disclosure, which are to be given the full breadth of the appended claims, and any and all equivalents thereof. It should be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having”, are open-ended and does not exclude other elements or steps and the use of articles “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. Additionally, the steps of various methods disclosed herein are not required to be performed in the particular order recited, unless otherwise expressly stated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4856272 | Putman | Aug 1989 | A |
5005352 | Schwarz | Apr 1991 | A |
5127793 | Walker | Jul 1992 | A |
5211534 | Catlow | May 1993 | A |
5388960 | Suzuki | Feb 1995 | A |
6401460 | Xia | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7798767 | Kondo et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8820091 | Tham et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8893510 | Tham et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9212625 | Shelley | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9784215 | Lu | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818242 | Volponi | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20040079070 | Macchia | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20080092516 | Lockwood | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080310949 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20120266601 | Miller | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120297781 | Manchikanti | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130084162 | Sano | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140156165 | Ewens | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140331637 | Laurello | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150159572 | Knudsen | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150267621 | Garcia-Crespo | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150354465 | Suciu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150354822 | Suciu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160177772 | Smith | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170236064 | Kirschnick | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180030903 | Asti | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1892510 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2548990 | Jan 2013 | EP |
3012415 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2389174 | Dec 2003 | GB |
2007272529 | Oct 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority dated Nov. 9, 2017 corresponding to PCT International Application No. PCT/US2017/029045 filed Apr. 24, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170335714 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |