The field of the invention relates generally to railroad operation, and more specifically to determining the occupation of a section of railroad track.
Rail vehicle operators rely on information, such as whether upcoming sections of track are occupied, in order to safely and efficiently operate a rail vehicle. Currently, Direct Current (DC) track circuits and Alternating Current (AC) track circuits are used to detect the presence of rail vehicles within a defined section of track known as a track block. DC track circuits and AC track circuits use a transmitter positioned at a first boundary on a rail and a receiver positioned at a second boundary on the rail. The rail section between the first and second boundaries defines the outer limits of the track block. AC track circuits are further described as either Power Frequency (PF) or Audio Frequency (AF) track circuits based on the frequency of operation. AF track circuits operate at higher frequencies than PF track circuits. For the AF track circuit, a modulated carrier signal is transmitted into the rail at the first boundary and is received at the second boundary. If the modulated carrier signal reaches the second boundary with a signal strength that is above a predetermined level, the track block is determined to be unoccupied. In contrast, the track block is determined to be occupied when the strength of the signal received at the second boundary is below a predetermined level. For example, if a rail vehicle approaches the track block, the vehicle electrically shunts the rail, which reduces the strength of the signal received at the second boundary. A rail vehicle may be referred to as a rolling shunt because of a vehicle's effect on the track circuit.
Unlike DC track circuits, AC track circuits can be used in electrified territories. And unlike the DC and PF track circuits, the AF track circuits do not require the use of insulted rail joints at the track circuit boundaries. However, certain conditions, for example, varying electrical conductance through the ballast between the rails, and/or varying wheel/rail contact resistance, may create inconsistent signal levels at the receiver. Inconsistent signal levels at the receiver may result in an imprecise determination of the track circuit boundary location based on the energy level received from the transmitter. A fixed signal strength threshold is currently used to compensate for these limitations. The fixed signal strength threshold ensures the track circuit indicates the track block is occupied whenever a shunt is placed at either the first boundary, the second boundary, or any location between the two. For example, the fixed threshold may be set to be fifty percent (50%) of the maximum signal level. The maximum signal level occurs when the defined track block and both adjacent track blocks are not occupied. The fixed threshold approach may result in a track circuit signaling that a track block is occupied when no train is present within the track block boundaries. The perceived track circuit boundary definition may be as much as fifty feet or more beyond the physical boundaries of the track block. In other words, as a rail vehicle approaches the track block in question, the track circuit may falsely indicate it is occupied before the shunt actually enters the track block. Such a phenomenon is commonly referred to as pre-shunt phenomenon. The false indication of an occupied track block may also occur as a train is departing the track block in question. Such a phenomenon is referred to as post-shunt phenomenon.
Through technology, rails today provide information to operators through means that may be positioned along side of the rail structure, visible to the train operator (referred to as fixed wayside signals), and some that are delivered to the cab of a train for use by an operator (referred to as in-cab signals). Wayside and in-cab signals provide a train operator with information such as continue/stop instructions and suggested operating speeds. Information provided to the operator via such means are at least potentially based on whether an upcoming track block is occupied or unoccupied. If a rail vehicle approaching a track block creates a pre-shunt condition, the operator of the rail vehicle may be instructed to slow or stop the rail vehicle due to the false determination of track block occupancy. Pre-shunt and post-shunt conditions may reduce the efficiency of railroad operation.
In one embodiment, a method for determining whether a defined section of a transportation track is occupied is provided. The transportation track includes at least two rails. The method includes inducing an audio frequency signal at a first position on the transportation track and receiving the audio frequency signal at a second position on the transportation track. The defined section of the transportation track is located between the first position and the second position on the transportation track. The method further includes measuring a strength of the audio frequency signal received at the second position, and identifying an inflection point of the recorded/measured audio frequency signal strength. The inflection point indicates at least one of a rail vehicle entering the defined section of the transportation track and the rail vehicle exiting the defined section of the transportation track. The method further includes determining an occupancy of the defined section of the transportation track, based on the inflection point.
In another embodiment, a system for use in determining an occupation of a section of a transportation track having a first boundary and a second boundary is provided. The system includes a transmitter positioned at the first boundary, the transmitter configured to induce an audio frequency signal to the transportation track. The system also includes a receiver positioned at the second boundary, the receiver configured to measure a strength of the audio frequency signal detected at the second boundary as a function of time. The system further includes a processing device configured to analyze the signal measured at the second boundary to facilitate a determination of the occupation of the section of track between the first boundary and the second boundary by identifying an inflection point of the measured signal strength. The inflection point corresponds to at least one of the section of transportation track becoming occupied and the section of transportation track becoming unoccupied.
In yet another embodiment, an audio frequency track circuit is provided. The audio frequency track circuit includes at least one rail, a transmitter positioned at a first boundary on the at least one rail, a receiver positioned at a second boundary on the at least one rail, and a processing device configured to measure a level of a received signal induced to said at least one rail and to detect an inflection point of the received signal.
The following detailed description illustrates the disclosure by way of example and not by way of limitation. The description should enable one skilled in the art to make and use the disclosure, describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives, and uses of the disclosure, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the disclosure. The disclosure is described as applied to exemplary embodiments, namely, systems and methods for detecting the presence of a rail vehicle. However, it is contemplated that this disclosure has general application to vehicle control and detection systems in industrial, commercial, and residential applications.
A cab signal system 34 links the wayside (not shown) to a train control system 36. In particular, system 34 receives coded signals from a pair of rails 20 through track receivers (not shown) located on the front and rear of the locomotive. The information received is used to inform the locomotive operator of the speed limit and operating mode. A distributed power control system 38 enables remote control capability of multiple locomotive consists coupled in the train. System 38 also provides for control of tractive power in motoring and braking, as well as air brake control.
Locomotive 10 systems are monitored and/or controlled by a train control system 50. Train control system 50 generally includes at least one computer (not shown in
Transmitter 76 transmits a carrier signal (not shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, four received signals 110, 112, 116, and 118 are illustrated. Each signal 110, 112, 116, and 118 represents a track circuit that includes impedance bonds 94 and 96 at different shunting and rail-to-rail impedance values. More specifically, in the exemplary embodiments, first received signal 110 and second received signal 112 are received by receiver 80 included in a track circuit 74 that has impedance bonds 94 and 96 that have an ideal rail-to-rail impedance that approaches infinity ohms/one-thousand feet. Third received signal 116 and fourth received signal 118 are signals received by receiver 80 included in a track circuit 74 having impedance bonds 94 and 96 that have a rail-to-rail impedance of approximately five ohms/one-thousand feet. Environmental conditions of track circuit 74 may lower the rail-to-rail impedance from approaching infinity ohms/one-thousand feet to a lower rail-to-rail impedance. In
As rail vehicle 10 approaches track block 98, rail vehicle 10 electrically shunts rails 20 of track block 98. This electrical shunt reduces the strength of the signal received by receiver 80. In one embodiment, a track block is determined to be occupied by a rail vehicle when the signal strength received by receiver 80 is below a threshold value 130. However, the accuracy with which a set threshold value facilitates identifying when a rail vehicle enters or exits a track block may be limited due to pre-shunt conditions and post-shunt conditions.
A pre-shunt condition occurs when the presence of rail vehicle 10 reduces the signal strength received at receiver 80 to below a threshold value 130 before rail vehicle 10 passes either first track circuit boundary 78 or second track circuit boundary 82 to enter track block 98. When a pre-shunt condition occurs, track circuit 74 falsely indicates track block 98 is occupied, when no rail vehicle 10 is present within track block 98. An exemplary pre-shunt condition is shown in
Pre-shunt conditions may lead to undesirable operations. For example, when in-cab signals are employed, a brief loss of in-cab signal energy being received by a rail vehicle may be experienced around track circuit boundaries 78 and 82. The loss of in-cab signal energy may occur when a relatively slow moving rail vehicle approaches a track block boundary and pre-shunts the track block being approached. When this occurs, the cab signal energy being transmitted in the physically occupied block may be discontinued, resulting in a loss of in-cab signal energy being received by the rail vehicle.
Another example of an undesirable effect of pre-shunt conditions occurs when fixed wayside signals are used. If a single joint-less track circuit is used to define the location of a track circuit boundary (i.e., a track circuit that does not include insulated joints), and the wayside signal is positioned at the track circuit boundary, pre-shunt conditions may cause the wayside signal to falsely display an indication that the track block is occupied prior to a rail vehicle reaching the signal. In other words, a pre-shunt condition may cause a fixed wayside signal to indicate the track block is occupied, when in actuality, the approaching rail vehicle itself caused an empty track block to be indicated as being occupied. To compensate for this condition, current applications require the use of double impedance bonds separated by insulated joints at these boundary locations. However, such additional measures increase equipment and maintenance costs.
As described above, the received signal strength of first received signal 110, second received signal 112, third received signal 116, and fourth received signal 118 are plotted over a rail vehicle travel distance and are illustrated in
Points of inflection 150, 152, 154, and 156 are independent of the rail-to-rail conductance or of the shunt resistance. A rate of decrease of the signal level received increases as the rail vehicle approaches track circuit boundary 82. In mathematical terms, a second derivative of each plot 110, 112, 116, and 118 is negative as the rail vehicle approaches track block 98. At the track circuit boundary 82, the rate of decrease of the received signal level is constant, and, in mathematical terms, at the track circuit boundary 82, a second derivative of plot lines 110, 112, 116, and 118 is zero. Once the vehicle is past second track circuit boundary 82, such that the rail vehicle occupies track block 98, the rate of decrease of the received signal level decreases. In mathematical terms, when the rail vehicle occupies track block 98, a second derivative of plot lines 110, 112, 116, and 118 is positive.
In contrast to the threshold method of determining track block occupancy described above, where a rail vehicle corresponding to plot line 110 causes a pre-shunt condition when it is approximately twenty-five feet from second track circuit boundary 82, where a rail vehicle corresponding to plot line 112 causes a pre-shunt condition when approximately fifty-five feet from second track circuit boundary 82, and where rail vehicles corresponding to plot lines 116 and 118 cause a pre-shunt condition when more than two-hundred feet from second track circuit boundary 82, inflection points 150, 152, 154, and 156 all indicate that corresponding rail vehicles enter track block 98 at approximately the same distance. More specifically, points of inflection 150, 152, 154, and 156 correspond to the position of second track circuit boundary 82. In other words, rather than indicating a track block is occupied when a received signal strength is below a fixed threshold, an algorithm is used to detect an inflection point. Once the inflection is detected, the track circuit will indicate the track block is occupied. In the exemplary embodiment, this approach will allow for a reduction of the pre-shunt/post-shunt distance for an AF track circuit, such that the pre-shunt/post-shunt distance approaches zero feet.
Described herein are exemplary methods and systems for determining whether a defined section of a transportation track is occupied. More specifically, the method described herein can be utilized to determine the occupancy of a defined section of transportation track by inducing an audio frequency signal to the transportation track, receiving the signal at a receiver, recording/measuring the strength of the received signal as function of time, and identifying an inflection point of the recorded/measured signal strength. Determination of the occupancy of the defined section of transportation track is based on the identified inflection point.
The systems and methods described herein facilitate efficient and economical identification of transportation track occupancy. Facilitating a reduction in pre-shunt and/or post-shunt conditions may facilitate increased railroad operation efficiency. A technical effect of the methods and systems described herein includes facilitating improved identification of track block occupancy.
Although the systems and methods described and/or illustrated herein are described and/or illustrated with respect to railroads, practice of the systems and methods described and/or illustrated herein is not limited to railroads. Rather, the systems and methods described and/or illustrated herein are applicable to any rail vehicle.
Exemplary embodiments of systems and methods are described and/or illustrated herein in detail. The systems and methods are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of each system, as well as steps of each method, may be utilized independently and separately from other components and steps described herein. Each component, and each method step, can also be used in combination with other components and/or method steps.
When introducing elements/components/etc. of the assemblies and methods described and/or illustrated herein, the articles “a”, “an”, “the” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the element(s)/component(s)/etc. The terms “comprising”, “including” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional element(s)/component(s)/etc. other than the listed element(s)/component(s)/etc.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581700 | Farnham et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4641803 | Brown et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4878638 | Hoelscher et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5092544 | Petit et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5459663 | Franke | Oct 1995 | A |
5720454 | Bachetti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6498969 | Alacoque et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
7006012 | Taoka et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7165748 | Ebuchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7523893 | Francis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20030010872 | Lewin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060060724 | Francis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076461 | DeRose et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080142645 | Tomlinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090277998 | Kiss et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100025545 | Koval | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1493610 | Jan 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100025545 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |