This invention relates generally to the digestion of solid waste. More particularly, in certain embodiments, the invention relates to apparatus and methods for decomposing organic matter into biogas and compost.
The degradation of organic matter is a process that occurs aerobically and/or anaerobically in nature by the complex interaction of a multitude of microorganisms. Controlled more or less industrialized methods have been known for a long time and referred to as composting for aerobic processes and fermentation, bio-methanisation, or simply anaerobic digestion (AD), for the anaerobic processes. AD processes may be divided into two principle steps: hydrolysis and methanogenesis.
The two processes of composting and AD have been developing independently over the last many years. Composting as a way to produce compost for fertilization and soil improvement has been thoroughly described many places. Likewise, one-stage, two-stage, or multi-stage AD methods have been developed on the basis of the most varied developments. In addition to wet AD developed from liquid-manure and wastewater treatment, dry AD is also practiced.
The principle of the two-step, two-stage AD was described for the first time by Ghosh in 1978. In this process, wastes are percolated in an anaerobic reactor. The percolation water is subsequently fermented to biogas in a methane reactor. The method was further developed and patented by Rijkens and Hofank (U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,195) in the 1980s for organic wastes. The method was converted twice to practice, to the ANM method in Ganderkesee and to the Prethane-Rudad method in Breda. Tests were conducted by Wellinger and Suter in the 1980s with solid manure, and by Widmer with market and meatpacking wastes. In the latter case, the percolator was also driven in an aerobic environment.
The newest plants, which have been developed according to this method (for residual wastes) are the ISKA® percolation method in Sansenheck, and the BIOPERCOLAT® method (DE 198 46336 A1). Here, the waste is hydrolyzed in a percolator after a mechanical pretreatment (for example, sieving, metal separation). The percolator is therefore equipped with a stirring mechanism, so that the wastes are continually transported through the reactor. After a residence time of 2 to 3 days, the percolate is discharged free of water and ready for further treatment or depositing in a layer. The percolation water is fermented anaerobically to biogas in a methane reactor after separation of sand and fibers. The water that is cleaned in this way is directly used as percolation water or is used after another cleaning (e.g., for removing nitrogen).
Large amounts of organic solid wastes are produced in many towns and cities all over the world, and treatment methods are often limited by solids handling requirements for adequate sterilization of these large amounts of heavy, solid waste. Accordingly, there is a need for improved systems and methods for digestion and composting of solid wastes with limited solids handling requirements.
A system is presented for solid waste treatment that does not require moving the solid fraction of the waste between different stages of the process. Only initial loading of the waste and final unloading of the solids after sanitization is needed.
In one embodiment, organic waste is loaded into a chamber that resembles a garage. After filling, the door is closed and anaerobic conditions are created. Anaerobic methane extraction takes place for a period of time (e.g., from 1 to 4 weeks), after which an aerobic composting process begins in the same chamber. The organic waste remains in place and oxygen (e.g., in air) is forced into the chamber for an additional period of time (e.g., from 2 to 4 weeks). At the conclusion of the aerobic composting phase, the process yields a rough compost product that is stable and pathogen free. The rough compost can be further processed and blended to create high value engineered soils. There is no requirement to handle raw, post-methane extraction digestate prior to composting. The biogas produced has a high methane content, e.g., about 70% or more, compared to about 55-60% using other processes. The biogas also has lower concentrations of VOC's, siloxane, and other contaminants.
The system employs dry anaerobic digestion in which bacterial hydrolysis—that is, the leaching out of fatty acids from the organic solid waste—is physically separated from methane generation. A series of hydrolysis and methane generation (gasification) stages are conducted for a period of time (e.g., from 1 to 4 weeks) under anaerobic conditions with the solid waste in a waste processing tank operating at ambient (e.g., atmospheric) pressure. Percolate liquid is recirculated through a grating at or near the base of the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage. The percolate is pumped into a biogas reactor tank in which methane and/or other biogases are produced, then filtered, degassed percolate is pumped back to the waste processing tank. After hydrolysis and gasification is completed, the waste processing tank becomes a composter, such that air flows through the solid waste, through the grating at the base, then passes through a biofilter before being released into the atmosphere. After composting, the solid waste is sufficiently sanitary for removal and may be safely disposed or used as a byproduct.
During all three stages—hydrolysis, gasification, and composting—the waste processing tank remains closed. No solid waste is moved, and only fluids and air circulates between the process module and the gas reactor in a closed system. The system design insures that the processes of hydrolysis, percolation, methane generation, and composting are separate and occur rapidly and efficiently. There is no need for inoculation using earlier processed material to start fresh batches, thereby insuring full traceability of the waste. The process is self-sustaining and there is no need for heating to start the process, allowing for a high energy efficiency. A wide variety of organic waste types may be processed, for example, municipal waste; industrial, commercial, and institutional waste; garden waste; and sewage sludge.
Thus, in one aspect, the invention relates to a system for decomposition of organic matter into biogas and compost, the system including: a waste processing tank into which solid organic waste is loaded and in which hydrolysis and composting takes place at separate times, with composting of the solid organic waste taking place during a separate stage after hydrolysis is completed, wherein the waste processing tank comprises a drain at or near its base, the drain allowing flow of percolation liquid out of the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage, the drain also serving as a vent through which air flows into and/or out of the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the composting stage; a spraying system configured to spray percolate liquid onto the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage, wherein the percolate liquid comprises fatty acids leached from the solid organic waste and wherein the percolate liquid is recycled from the base of the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage; and a biogas reactor tank into which the percolate liquid from the waste processing tank is pumped for generation of biogas under anaerobic conditions during a gasification stage. In certain embodiments, the waste processing tank is configured to operate at ambient pressure during the hydrolysis stage, the composting stage, or both. In preferred embodiments, the waste processing tank is configured to operate under anaerobic conditions during the hydrolysis stage.
In certain embodiments, the system further includes a biofilter through which air from the waste processing tank passes prior to discharge to the atmosphere during the composting stage. In certain embodiments, the system further includes a filter configured to separate solids from the percolate liquid.
In certain embodiments, the system includes at least two waste processing tanks connected in parallel. In certain embodiments, the waste processing tank includes an acid-resistant lining or coating. The biogas reactor tank is preferably gas-tight. The system may also include a heater for heating the percolate liquid either in the biogas reactor tank or outside the biogas reactor tank (for later introduction back into the tank after heating). In certain embodiments, the biogas reactor tank includes a sump to separate sediment and/or particles from the percolate liquid.
In preferred embodiments, the system further includes a liquid process tank into which percolate liquid from either the biogas reactor tank, the waste processing tank, or both flows prior to being pumped to the spraying system for spraying onto the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage. In certain embodiments, there is one liquid process tank for every waste processing tank. In certain embodiments, there is at least five waste processing tanks (e.g., each with their own associated liquid process tank), for every biogas reactor tank (there may be one or more biogas reactor tanks in the system). In certain embodiments, percolate liquid from both the biogas reactor and the waste processing tank flows into the liquid process tank prior to being pumped to the spraying system for spraying onto the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the hydrolysis stage. The system may further include a filter tank configured to separate solids from the percolate liquid before the percolate liquid enters the liquid process tank.
Elements of other aspects of the invention can be applied to this aspect of the invention as well.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for decomposition of organic matter into biogas and compost, the method including the steps of: (a) loading solid organic waste into a waste processing tank; (b) during one or more series of hydrolysis and gasification stages: (i) spraying percolation liquid over the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during a first (and/or subsequent) hydrolysis stage in which bacterial hydrolysis takes place; (ii) optionally recirculating the percolation liquid after it passes through the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the first (and/or subsequent) hydrolysis stage; (iii) pumping percolation liquid into a biogas reactor tank for generation of biogas during a first (and/or subsequent) gasification stage; (iv) pumping percolate liquid out of the biogas reactor tank following the first (and/or subsequent) gasification stage, for spraying over the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during a second and/or subsequent hydrolysis stage; and (c) following all hydrolysis and gasification stages, ventilating the waste processing tank for composting of the solid organic waste under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the series of hydrolysis and gasification stages is carried out for a period of from 1 to 4 weeks (e.g., for about 21 days) before the composting stage begins. In certain embodiments, methanogenesis takes place in the biogas reactor tank during the gasification stage. In preferred embodiments, the hydrolysis and gasification stages take place under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments the one or more hydrolysis stages (and/or the gasification stage(s)) take place under atmospheric pressure. Hydrolysis generally takes place at the same time as gasification, but the processes occur in different tanks.
In certain embodiments, the percolation liquid is passed through a filter tank configured to separate solids from the percolate liquid, then the filtered liquid is transported into a liquid process tank where it mixes with liquid from the biogas reactor tank before being recirculated via spraying over the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank. In certain embodiments, the percolation liquid enters a process tank where it mixes with liquid from the biogas reactor tank before being recirculated via spraying over the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank.
In certain embodiments, the method comprises flooding the waste processing tank with percolation liquid at least once during the hydrolysis stage.
In certain embodiments, the temperature of the organic solid waste in the waste processing tank reaches at least 60° C. during at least part of the composting stage. In preferred embodiments, the method further includes the step of passing air through a biofilter after it has passed through the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank during the composting stage. In certain embodiments, the solid organic waste in the waste processing tank has been sanitized by the end of the composting stage.
The description of elements of the embodiments above can be applied to this aspect of the invention as well.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a dual-purpose drain assembly for transport of percolate from a process module during a digestion stage and for ventilation of the process module during a composting stage of a waste processing system, the drain assembly including one or more rails through which a plurality of conduits are drilled, wherein each of the conduits has (i) a first end facing the process module containing solid waste being processed and (ii) a second end facing a pipe through which liquid percolate flows out of the process module during hydrolysis and through which air flows into the process module during composting, wherein the first end has a width or diameter smaller than the second end's. In certain embodiments, the first end has a diameter (or width) no greater than 90% of that of the second end. In certain embodiments, the ratio of the diameter of the first end to the diameter of the second end is about 0.75.
In certain embodiments, each of the rails has a notch, and two or more of such notched rails form a shelf for supporting a removable plate (e.g., stainless steel plate) that prevents the solid waste in the waste processing module from entering the pipe. In certain embodiments, the pipe is a conduit formed in a concrete base below the process module.
Elements of other aspects of the invention can be applied to this aspect of the invention as well.
The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below, and the claims. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.
While the invention is particularly shown and described herein with reference to specific examples and specific embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
It is contemplated that apparatus, devices, systems, methods, and processes of the claimed invention encompass variations and adaptations developed using information from the embodiments described herein. Adaptation and/or modification of the devices, systems, methods, and processes described herein may be performed by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art.
Throughout the description, where apparatus, devices and systems are described as having, including, or comprising specific components, or where processes and methods are described as having, including, or comprising specific steps, it is contemplated that, additionally, there are apparatus, devices and systems of the present invention that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that there are processes and methods according to the present invention that consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited processing steps.
It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain actions is immaterial so long as the invention remains operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.
It is contemplated that methods, systems, and processes of the claimed invention encompass scale-ups, variations, and adaptations developed using information from the embodiments described herein. The processes and methods described herein may be performed using reactor equipment that is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, including, without limitation, for example, batch reactors, plug-flow reactors, continuously-stirred tank reactors, packed-bed reactors, slurry reactors, fluidized bed reactors, and columns. The processes described herein may be conducted in batch, semi-continuous, and/or continuous operation, or adapted therefor. It is also contemplated that methods, systems, and processes of the claimed invention may include pumps, heat exchangers, and gas-, liquid-, and/or solid-phase material handling equipment known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The mention herein of any publication, for example, in the Background section, is not an admission that the publication serves as prior art with respect to any of the claims presented herein. The Background section is presented for purposes of clarity and is not meant as a description of prior art with respect to any claim.
In certain embodiments, the invention relates to a method for converting organic matter into biogas and compost. The organic matter may be sorted and mixed with green structure, introduced in a process module, where percolate, recycled in a process tank, washes out nutrients (e.g., volatile fatty acids). Excess percolate may be pumped through a coarse filter to a reactor tank where the anaerobic digestion takes place. Biogas produced in the reactor tanks may be transported to utilization. Degassed percolate may then be returned to the process tank for washing out additional nutrients from the organic matter.
In another embodiment, after a period of time, and when the pH reaches a specified value, the percolation process is stopped, an air-intake is opened, and through the drain system, used for percolation, air is drawn through the organic matter to initiate the composting process. After compositing, the process modules are emptied, and the material is left in open bays for after maturation, until it is sorted and the final soil improvement products ready for market.
In certain embodiments, the two-stages (AD and composting) are combined with a time-dependent and physical split of the AD process in hydrolysis and methanogenesis. For example, in a first process cycle, percolation of dry organic matter causes hydrolytes (such as volatile fatty acids, etc.) to be extracted, and the percolate (the wet fraction) is delivered to a biogas reactor tank for methanogenesis. In one embodiment, the hydrolysis takes place under anaerobic conditions. Hydrolysis may be accomplished in the solid phase, followed by methanogenesis in the wet phase, followed by methanogenesis in the solid phase, and finally composting of the dry phase.
In certain embodiments, AD and composting are achieved using specialized process modules (PM) and a methane reactor (MR). In one embodiment, a mixture of structure and organic matter is loaded into the PMs, and one or more gates to the PMs are closed. Run off (i.e., percolate) containing hydrolytes from the PM may be delivered to a process tank (PT) prior to transfer to the MR.
In certain embodiments, degassed liquid from the MR is returned to the PT, from which it may be sprayed onto the organic matter in the PM. The percolate from the PM may be fed back to the process tank, through a drain in the bottom of the PM. In one embodiment, the process module is operated under anaerobic conditions during percolation. Excess percolation liquid, now containing hydrolytes, may be fed through a coarse filter, and introduced into the MR, where the methanogenesis takes place. Separation of fresh and degassed percolate may take place using a principle of leveling in the reactor tank. Percolate may be continuously taken out of the MR and heated in a heat exchanger.
When the pH of percolate coming out of the process module has reached a defined level, and the solid fraction in the PM has been inoculated by methanogenic bacteria, the methanogenesis may start in the PM. After a period of time, the methane production or accumulation in the PM is stopped. In one embodiment, for example, an air intake is opened and a fan starts to draw air (including oxygen) through the organic matter still contained and enclosed in the process modules. During this portion of the process, when composting takes place, the process module is operated under aerobic conditions. In another embodiment, the air is introduced or extracted through the same drain as that the percolation fluid passes through during percolation.
The introduction of air may start a composting process of the organic matter in the process modules. In certain embodiments, this causes the temperature to increase, and a sanitization process will take place. Further, water may evaporate from the organic matter, thereby reducing the moisture content. After leaving the organic matter, the air may be fed through a biofilter and an optional scrubber for elimination of odors.
In certain embodiments, when the temperature of the organic matter in the process module has reached a defined level, or the composting process has taken place for a specific period of time, the fan is stopped. At this point, a door or gate the process module may be opened, and the degassed and composted organic matter may be taken out of the process module. The organic matter may then be left outside in open bays for after maturation, before final screening and mixing for compost or soil improvement products.
In certain embodiments, a decomposing method for organic matter is provided in which an amount of biogas is formed according to need. An anaerobically driven process module may be loaded with a mixture of structure and organic matter. In one embodiment, a percolation liquid is sprayed onto the organic matter, led through the bottom of the process module to a process tank, from where is again sprayed on the organic matter. In another embodiment, excess percolation liquid is passed through a coarse filter into a reactor tank, where it is fermented to biogas. The degassed percolate may be fed back to the process tank.
The decomposing methods described herein are advantageously based on a simple and robust process. In this way, control of the biogas formed according to need is made possible, and a biogas requirement, for example, for conversion to electrical energy or production of heat at peak times or times of low demand, can be controlled accordingly. While control of biogas production may not be provided or may be provided only in constricted periods for adapting to consumption in known plants, a rapid adaptation to the current requirement can be provided with the decomposing method, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
All substances originating from living organisms may be considered to be biogenic materials, including, in particular, the following: bio-wastes, lawn cuttings, curbside clippings, garden clippings, bio-solids, industrial waste, food waste, household waste, agricultural waste, kitchen waste, renewable resources, and similar materials.
Since, in certain embodiments, hydrolysis and methanogenesis are physically and time-wise separated, the biogas contains low concentration of sulphur, and silicas, thus cleaning of H2S and SiOx is not necessary when applying the biogas for heat and power production in an IC engine.
In one embodiment of the invention, the construction of the bottom of the process module, used for percolate discharge and air exhaust, is performed in a manner so blocking does not occur. In this way, the design may ensure that percolate and air always have free passage during operation.
As mentioned, in certain embodiments, the atmosphere is anaerobic during percolation and aerobic during composting. It is further possible to insulate or even heat the PMs. For example, the temperature in the process module may be approximately 38° C. under percolation and 70° C. during composting.
In certain embodiments, all of the liquid in the system is pumped through one circuit. The percolation liquid leaving the reactor tank, as degassed percolate, may be discharged discontinuously and replaced with fresh, hydrolyte rich liquid. In this way, a concentration of foreign matter in the circuit may be avoided. In another embodiment, substances that sink and/or float are separated in the reactor tank in a sump, equipped with a pump that is able to remove sludge.
In certain embodiments, methanogenesis of the percolate to biogas is conducted by means of bacteria. In this case, the methanogenesis may be conducted with the participation of a bacterial matrix of several bacterial strains. The methane reactor can be heated; for example, it can be heated by taking out a slipstream of liquid and heating the liquid in a heat-exchanger before it is introduced again into the reactor tank. In this way, a constant temperature can be maintained in the biogas reactor. The temperature within the biogas reactor may be, for example, between about 38° C. or 55° C.
In addition, in certain embodiments, the an apparatus is provided that includes at least one process module, a process tank, a filter tank, and a reactor tank. The process module may be equipped with at least one pump and one fan. The methane reactor tank can be, for example, CSTR, UASB, or another type for AD. Compared previous systems, because the process step of methanogenesis occurs in the MR, overfeeding is much less likely to occur and it is easier to control and/or measure.
Preferably, in one embodiment, the biogas plant includes at least five parallel-connected process modules. In this case, the percolation liquid may be sprayed continuously or discontinuously over the organic matter. Spraying may be performed by a separate pump for each process module through a specially designed spraying system, depending on the material used. For example, a separately operable liquid circuit may be formed for each process module. A connection between one or more individual percolators may be used to inoculate the organic matter with specific species of bacteria.
The use of at least two percolators, in some embodiments, has the advantage that a loading and unloading of solid materials is possible at any given time. In addition, the substrate specific residence time in each process module can be controlled individually.
Due to acids that may be formed during the decomposition process, the process modules are preferably acid-resistant. In certain embodiments, the percolation liquid dissolves the acids and/or other materials that form, and/or the percolation liquid is enriched with hydrolytes that can be easily transformed to methane.
In one embodiment, the process modules have a special designed bottom. During percolation, the bottom of the process modules is used to perform a solid-liquid separation, where the separated percolation liquid collects under the drain and is sprayed continuously or discontinuously in the circuit over the organic matter by means of pumps. Excess percolation liquid may be pumped into the buffer tank with appropriate filling level, and from there into the biogas process reactor. During composting, the bottom of the process tanks may be used for air discharge, after the air has passed through the organic matter. The temperature in the process modules may be approximately 38° C. The process modules may be insulated and/or heated.
In certain embodiments, the AD is provided by means of added and/or immobilized bacteria, which are continuously prevailing and produced in the methane reactor. The methane reactor tank may be essentially gas-tight and/or may function according to a reactor principle that is common to wastewater technology. For example, the reactor tank may be an Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB-sludge bed), a solid bed reactor, and/or a Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR). A solid bed biogas reactor tank can be, for example, operated as a plug flow reactor, so that both the residence time in the process module as well as the residence time in the biogas reactor tank can be defined and controlled.
In certain embodiments, the biogas includes methane (CH4) [e.g., 50-85 vol. %], carbon dioxide (CO2) [e.g., 15-50 vol. %], as well as oxygen, nitrogen, and trace gases (including hydrogen sulfide). A biogas with a high methane fraction of between about 65 and about 80 vol. %, or more, may be produced with the decomposing method according to the invention.
Among other things, the biogas can be used directly for heating purposes or, by means of a block-type thermal power system (IC engine, Fuel Cell, Turbine), for the coupled production of electricity and heat, or it can be upgraded for introduction in pipeline systems or used for vehicle fuel. In various embodiments, the gas is produced by anaerobic digestion of organic matter.
To increase the biogas yield, co-materials (for example, renewable resources or wastes from the food industry) can be used. The AD and composted organic matter can subsequently be evaluated as high-value fertilizer for agricultural use.
In certain embodiments, during the methanogenesis, a slipstream of the percolate leaves the reactor tank, is heated in a heat exchanger or other heating device, before being reintroduced in the reactor tank. In this way, a constant temperature can be maintained in the biogas reactor tank. The temperature in the biogas reactor tank may be between about 38° C. and about 55° C. In certain embodiments, the temperature in the biogas reactor tank is about 38° C., or about 55° C.
An accumulation of the most varied substances in the percolate can be avoided, as a mechanism in the bottom of the reactor tank (e.g., a sump) allows particles to be continuously or frequently removed from the process.
Process modules 1 are constructed as a type of “garage” or container, with an acid-resistant lining. The process modules 1 are configured such that they are charged by the usual technological means (for example, with wheel loaders). A bottom of the process modules 1 includes a drain system 3 so that a solid-liquid separation can occur. The drain system 3 is designed and constructed to prevent blocking or clogging. The process modules 1 may operate at ambient pressure.
The percolation liquid is drained or percolated through organic matter and exits the process modules 1 through the draining system 3 at the bottom of the process modules 1. The percolate is collected in process tanks 5, from which it is pumped to a spraying system 2 in the process modules 1. The spraying system 2 continuously or discontinuously sprays the liquid over the organic matter in the process modules 1 by means of pumps 4.
During operation of the apparatus 20, the percolation liquid dissolves the acids, volatile fatty acids, and other substances from the solid organic waste bed. As a result, the percolation liquid is enriched with easily digestible substances.
From the process tanks 5, excess percolation liquid is pumped via pumps 8 into filter tanks 6 having an appropriate filling level. The filter tanks 6 are equipped with a coarse filter where bigger pieces (e.g., large solids) can be separated from the liquid stream.
From there, the percolation liquid is pumped in a gas-tight manner into a biogas reactor 9 by means of pumps 8. The biogas reactor 9 functions according to a reaction principle that is common for wastewater technology (e.g., UASB, CSTR, sludge bed, solid bed reactor). Inside the biogas reactor 9, the percolation liquid is digested rapidly into exiting biogas 13, containing mainly CH4 and CO2. The degassed percolation liquid is discharged from the biogas reactor 9 and returned to the process tanks 5 using pumps 7.
After the hydrolysis and methanogenesis stage depicted in
An example implementation of the system depicted in
The municipal waste is weighed and registered, after which it is unloaded in a reception area where the quality and pureness of the material is assessed. Surface fluid from the reception area is led through an oil separator and a sand collector to a receiving tank, then pumped to sewer.
The solid municipal waste is then handled and pre-treated using mobile equipment such as front loaders, feed mixers and drum screens. Non-organic components such as plastic, metal, and the like are separated out for incineration. The remaining waste is treated in a drum screen filter. The filtered-out fraction is transported to incineration while the ‘clean’ fraction is mixed with structure material such as wood branches and rough garden waste in a feed mixer. In this example, approximately 2 kg of structure material is used for every 10 kg of waste. The mixed material is front loaded into the process modules 1. When full, each module 1 is closed by bolting the gas tight door shut.
Biogas is produced in two phases—hydrolysis and methanogenesis. Hydrolysis takes place in the process modules 1, e.g., 600 m3 concrete boxes or vessels, where each module 1 is fitted with sprinklers 2 and ventilations systems 10. The organic waste in the closed process module is irrigated with percolate from the process tank 5. This percolation draws out the fatty acids from the waste and the acidic percolate is then used for gas production in the reactor tank 9. The hydrolysis in the process module 1 runs for a period from two to four weeks.
Methane is produced in a gas tight reactor tank 9 (e.g., 1,500 m3 membrane-covered concrete container), which is also used for gas storage. The fluids (percolate) from the hydrolysis in the process modules 1 are led to the reactor tank 9 where they feed the methanogenesis. Addition of percolate is controlled by the pH value in the reactor tank. The pH in the tank should be from about 7 to about 7.5 for good gas production. The process in the reactor tank 9 may take place without stirring, or with only light stirring. The reactor tank 9 design may simply be a modification of bio-gasification tanks used for livestock manure on farms.
The two processes—hydrolysis and methanogenesis—are thus handled in physically separate containers, and the interface between the two containers is a separate process tank 5 (e.g., a 6 m3 vessel). Process control is performed in the process tank 5 and all related installations, including valves, pumps, fans, and the like, can be established in or around the process tank. This allows there to be no electrical installations in the process modules 1 or the reactor tank 9. In preferred embodiments, there is one process tank 5 connected to each process module 1. A plant that employs this system may have, for example, twenty process modules 1, each with a corresponding process tank 5, placed next to or opposite each other, and two reactor tanks 9, thus, in this example, 5 process modules 1 for every biogas reactor tank 9.
From the reactor tank 9, the biogas can be led to a biogas motor that produces electricity supplied to the electricity grid and heat which is used internally in the system. The internal heating system can transfer heat from the biogas motor to the reactor 9, offices, etc. Alternatively, the biogas can be captured and upgraded to higher methane content and fed to a natural gas system. A gas control unit measures gas flow and quality in the gas pipes, expressed by methane content, CO2 content, and O2 content. In addition to methane, CO2 may be captured as well. The plant may be equipped with an emergency gas exploitation unit (e.g., gas flare) to exploit gas in the event of a biogas motor breakdown or during repair.
Once the hydrolysis is complete, pathogenic microorganisms are removed from the material in a sanitation step where the temperature in the process module is raised to a minimum of 70° C. and for a minimum of one hour. After purification, the waste in the process modules 1 can be converted to compost in the composting stage.
The composting process, depicted in
Composting will generally run for two to four weeks in the process module 1, after which the compost is stable and can be moved to open curing boxes for final composting without odor problems. The ventilation system transports air through the compost mass and sucks out process air to an air cleaning system 12. Process air cleaning is used to break down and clean odor components, such as ammonia. The air may be cleaned in a simple open surface biofilter or, if required, it can be wasted in a scrubber and subsequently cleaned in a biofilter. If the plant is equipped with a scrubber, then a water recycling system may be established to minimize water use.
Reference 208 is a side view of a rail 201 from the process module 1 side (side A), showing the narrow end 204 of the funnels 202. Reference 210 is a side view of the rail 201 from the pipe side (side B), showing the wide end 206 of the funnels 202. Reference 212 is a ground view of the rail 201 showing pre-fabricated shelves 214 which hold a steel plate 216, and reference 218 is a ground view of the rail 201 showing pre-fabricated screw holes 220 for screws 221 that bolt the rail 201 to the concrete 222.
Reference 224 is a top view of the rail 201. This view shows the pre-fabricated screw holes 220 for the screws 221 that bolt the rail 201 to the concrete 222, and the prefabricated shelf 214 that holds the steel plate 216. Dotted lines represent the funnels 202 described above.
Reference 230 is a ground view of the drainage system. Rails 201 are on either side of a pipe 204. The rail may be made from polyethylene PEHD LF 1000, for example. Funnels 202 are drilled through the rails 201 to allow liquid percolate to flow from the process module 1 to the pipe 204 during the hydrolysis stage, and to allow flow of air from the pipe 204 to the process module 1 during the composting stage. A screw 221 bolts the rail 201 directly into the concrete 222.
Percolate flows from the process module 1 into the pipe 204, and from there is transported to the filter tank 6, process tank 5, and then biogas reactor tank 9 during the hydrolysis/methanogenesis stage. Furthermore, during the composting stage, air flows through the pipe 204 and into the process module 1 via the funnels 202. A steel plate 216 (e.g., 6 mm-thick stainless steel) tops the pipe 204 and compost lies on top of the steel plate 216. The steel plate 216 prevents compost/waste in the process module 1 from falling directly into the pipe 204. The plate 216 is held in place by a shelf 214 fabricated into the rails 201. The shelf 214 allows the plate 216 to be easily removed for cleaning of the pipe 204 when composting is complete and the solid material has been removed from the process module 1.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/444,140, filed Apr. 11, 2012, which granted on Jul. 23, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,492,134, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/226,006, filed Sep. 6, 2011, which granted on Dec. 11, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,329,455, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/505,696, filed Jul. 8, 2011, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4400195 | Rijkens | Aug 1983 | A |
4652374 | Cohen | Mar 1987 | A |
4919815 | Copa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5207911 | Pellegrin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5269634 | Chynoweth et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5344630 | Brendley, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5377917 | Wiljan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387271 | Crawford et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5389258 | Smis et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403798 | Brendley, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5407817 | Lightsey et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5431819 | Hack et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5492624 | Rozich | Feb 1996 | A |
5500123 | Srivastava | Mar 1996 | A |
5506123 | Chieffalo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5529692 | Kubler | Jun 1996 | A |
5571703 | Chieffalo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601720 | Schmid | Feb 1997 | A |
5630942 | Steiner | May 1997 | A |
5670047 | Burke | Sep 1997 | A |
5672506 | Aoyagi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679568 | Imamura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700687 | Finn | Dec 1997 | A |
5746919 | Dague et al. | May 1998 | A |
5773283 | Pierce | Jun 1998 | A |
5773526 | Van Dijk et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782950 | Kanitz et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798043 | Khudenko | Aug 1998 | A |
5866754 | De Blangy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885460 | Dague et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5919696 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928859 | Nicklin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958756 | Reynell | Sep 1999 | A |
5962305 | Mihara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975439 | Chieffalo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004772 | Imamura et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017475 | Cantrell | Jan 2000 | A |
6017746 | Imamura et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6077548 | Lasseur et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084150 | Crawford et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6110727 | Widmer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6168642 | Valkanas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171499 | Bouchalat | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171844 | Numata et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194197 | Hyman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197081 | Schmidt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6255529 | Nagase et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267309 | Chieffalo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284522 | Wackett et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6342378 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6391202 | Knobloch et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6420594 | Farone et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6472198 | Semprini et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6521444 | Numata et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6551510 | Bakke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551815 | Nuttall et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592751 | Haridas | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596050 | Rihtamo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630517 | Nishida et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639098 | Farone et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6660516 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660518 | Maekawa | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663777 | Schimel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692642 | Josse et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699708 | Muller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719902 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737263 | Dragotta et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746179 | Kerkhoff | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6783679 | Rozich | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824686 | Smis et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6878212 | Pinatti et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6896804 | Haerther et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905600 | Lee, Jr. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921485 | Kilian et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939444 | Carlson, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6991931 | Dragotta et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995007 | Gunner et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015028 | Choate et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7153428 | Chynoweth et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160456 | Jarventie | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179379 | Appel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214509 | Schnoor et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226539 | Dong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238242 | Pinatti et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7301060 | Appel et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316921 | Choate et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351860 | Adami et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364387 | Kanitz et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7384555 | Yasui et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7442348 | Carlson, Jr. et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7476296 | Appel et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485230 | Magner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7560266 | Bramucci et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582467 | Jarventie | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7642079 | Cayouette et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7682815 | Guiot et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692050 | Adams et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7781191 | Dunson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833414 | Magner et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854840 | Busch et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8329455 | Christenson | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20020039778 | Wackett et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061584 | Farone et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020192132 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012710 | Nishida et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030057152 | Haridas | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030121851 | Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152554 | Gunner et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173291 | Schimel | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201224 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209489 | Haerther et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030211594 | Rosebrook | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213745 | Haerther et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040043005 | Gunner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040152151 | Dragotta et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164020 | De Baere et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172878 | Krylowicz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175819 | Kanitz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182779 | Kilian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188340 | Appel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191755 | Kemper et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192980 | Appel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192981 | Appel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219650 | Choate et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237859 | Hartmann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262220 | Binnig et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011829 | Dong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054030 | Schnoor et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113611 | Adams et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130290 | Choate et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155928 | Jarventie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161038 | Pinatti et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050201831 | Lee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238554 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245765 | Adami et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274668 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004237 | Appel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060524 | Chynoweth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060096163 | Dickinson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175252 | Upendrakumar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177930 | Bramucci et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178387 | Fujimoto-Ouchi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060259995 | Cayouette et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070029252 | Dunson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031918 | Dunson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031919 | Dunson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031953 | Dunson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070037259 | Hennessey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070122874 | Suthanthararajan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070158264 | Zhang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160524 | Yoshida | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070199613 | Bouldin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218540 | Guiot et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011034 | Hochrein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032382 | Schnoor et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038318 | Tuomasjukka et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080138885 | De Baere et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080193588 | Yamamoto | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193989 | Verser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199943 | Widmer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201805 | Krogh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206541 | Medoff | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223793 | Lee | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257108 | Leberfinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263956 | Kuebler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080314824 | Busch et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090004714 | Norholm et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032458 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050134 | Friend et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053770 | Hennessey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053800 | Friend et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090111164 | Schall et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090126274 | Vogel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130733 | Schmidt | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137015 | Skudder | May 2009 | A1 |
20090148578 | Kondoh et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162923 | Young et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090178671 | Ahring et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090205173 | Flaccomio Nardi Dei | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209025 | Goschl et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241623 | Matano et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090250401 | Kotelko et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263876 | Atsumi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090283397 | Kato et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294355 | Menke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305379 | Johnson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305390 | Cacho et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100028485 | Tuohy et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032369 | Bertolotto et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032370 | Allen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069691 | Morschbacker | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089822 | Terry | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112242 | Medoff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100162619 | Peus | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178677 | Dunson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2061873 | May 1993 | CA |
2587895 | May 2006 | CA |
2592059 | Jan 2008 | CA |
657604 | Sep 1986 | CH |
1115209 | Jan 1996 | CN |
1264969 | Aug 2000 | CN |
1431159 | Jul 2003 | CN |
1482105 | Mar 2004 | CN |
2714565 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1772403 | May 2006 | CN |
1903458 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101015832 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101058097 | Oct 2007 | CN |
201003055 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101585043 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101585044 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101612630 | Dec 2009 | CN |
19518234 | Mar 1996 | DE |
19719323 | Nov 1998 | DE |
102004053615 | May 2006 | DE |
102005012936 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102006005223 | Aug 2007 | DE |
112006001877 | Apr 2008 | DE |
0382340 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0474895 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0499302 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0672457 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0678085 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0730027 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0730031 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0755905 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0784039 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0795527 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0934998 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1273362 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1281753 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1428868 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1553058 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1681274 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2039775 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2209613 | Jun 2004 | ES |
2459881 | Nov 2009 | GB |
10108670 | Apr 1998 | JP |
WO-9411278 | May 1994 | WO |
WO-9419119 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO-9423857 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO-9503259 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO-9517517 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9611891 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO-9615081 | May 1996 | WO |
WO-9634841 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9732829 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-9734851 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO-9743432 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9947473 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-0039255 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0100341 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0136340 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0156715 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0156938 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0231104 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-0231175 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-02051561 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-03035560 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03059825 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03082747 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004020382 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2004076082 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO-2006039354 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006039355 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006102543 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007012328 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007047063 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007093398 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007139264 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007146922 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008025098 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008081407 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008081408 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008081409 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008081410 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2009012772 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009044076 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009063103 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2009072887 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2009103866 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2009108069 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009108761 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009135967 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2009150455 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010019935 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2010056940 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010082741 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2013009706 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/045960, mailed Jan. 23, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2012/045960, mailed Sep. 28, 2012, 13 pages. |
Blischke, J., Combining Anaerobic Digestion With Enclosed Tunnel Composting. BioCycle, 2004. 45(4): p. 49-68. |
La Brooy et al., “The UR-3R Facility: A Fully Integrated Approach to Municipal Solid Waste Management,” Proceedings for ORBIT 2003, pp. 47-56. |
Cecchi, F.; Traverso, P. G.; Mata-Alvarez, J.; Clancy, J.; Zaror, C., Biomass, State of the Art of R&D in the Anaerobic Digestion Process of Municipal Solid Waste in Europe, 1988, 16, 257-284. |
Chan et al., “Effects of leachate recirculation on biogas production from landfill co-disposal of municipal solid waste, sewage sludge and marine sediment,” Environmental Pollution 118 (2002) 393-399. |
Gallert et al., Bio- and Pyrotechnology of Solid Waste Treatment, Biotechnology Second, Completely Revised Edition, 2000. |
Legros, A.; Dujardin, E.; Collard, F.; Naveau, H.; Nyns, E. J.; Sironval, C.,Energy from biomass: 3rd E.C. Conference “An Integrated System: Mass Algae Culture in Polluted Luke-Warm Water for Production of Methane, High-Value Products and Animal Feed,” (International conference on biomass, Venice, 1985). |
Mata-Alvarez, J. (1999), Biomethanization of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes, London, 336-367 (Accessed: May 30, 2010). |
Nichols, C.E., Overview of anaerobic digestion technologies in Europe. BioCycle, 2004. 45(1): p. 47-53. |
Schalk, Combined Mechanical and Biological Treatment of Municip Solid Waste, Biotechnology Second, Completely Revised Edition, 2000. |
Vandevivere, De Baere, Verstraete, Types of anaerobic digesters for solid wastes, 2002. |
Viéitez and Ghosh, “Biogasification of solid wastes by two-phase anaerobic fermentation,” Biomass and Bioenergy 16 (1999) 299-309. |
Rapport et al., “Current Anaerobic Digestion Technologies Used for Treatment of Municipal Organic Solid Waste,” California Intergrated Waste Management Board, Mar. 2008, 90 pages. |
Biswas, R., Uellendahl, H., and Ahring, B.K. (2010). Increasing the biogas yield of manure by wet explosion of the digested fiber fraction—lab-scale optimization and large-scale implementation. Proceedings 12th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion, Oct. 31-Nov. 4, 2010, Guadalajara, Mexico. |
Hartmann, H., and Ahring, B.K. (2006). Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Science and Technology 53 (8), 7-22. |
Sørensen, A.H., Winther-Nielsen, M., and Ahring, B.K. (1991) Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge—the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB reactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34 (6), 823-827. |
Vukicevic. S., Meijer, J-E., Dahlén, L. and Lagerkvist, A. (2005).“Manual för plockanalys av hush{dot over (a)}llsavfall i kärl och säck”, RVF Utveckling 2005:19. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/045960, 9 pages (Sep. 28, 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130295658 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61505696 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13444140 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 13931405 | US | |
Parent | 13226006 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13444140 | US |