The present invention relates to digital signal synthesis with variable sample rate digital-to-analog converters (DACs).
Modern electronic systems process and store information digitally. However, due to the analog nature of the world, conversions between analog and digital domains are needed and performed by data converters. Digital-to-analog converters (DACs) can be used to convert digital codewords into analog signals (e.g., voltage, current, among others).
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention provide for digital signal synthesis using variable sample rate DACs. One embodiment includes a digital frequency generator that includes: a direct digital frequency synthesizer (DDFS); a digital-to-analog converter (DAC); a frequency/phase estimation circuit; a stable reference clock (REF CLK); a variable frequency sample clock; a frequency control word (FCW); where the DAC is sampled by the variable frequency sample clock; where the DDFS is clocked by the variable frequency sample clock; where the frequency/phase estimation circuit receives as inputs the stable REF CLK and the variable frequency sample clock and estimates a FCW frequency error and adjusts the FCW to the DDFS; where the DDFS receives the FCW and outputs a digital sine codeword at the variable frequency sample clock to the DAC, where the FCW to the DDFS is continuously adjusted to track the variable frequency sample clock; and where the DAC converts the sine codeword to an analog waveform.
In a further embodiment, the variable frequency sample clock is at least one variable frequency sample clock selected from the group consisting of a frequency ramp generator, a pseudo random (PN) modulated frequency source, and a frequency modulation source.
In a further embodiment again, the frequency/phase estimation circuit estimates a frequency error by comparing edges of the REF CLK and the variable frequency sample clock, where the frequency error is filtered with a loop filter to generate the FCW for the DDFS.
In yet a further embodiment, the FCW is a ratio of a desired frequency (fc) and the variable frequency sample clock (fsj) wherein j denotes an index of the sample frequency.
An embodiment includes a broadband modulator including: a stable symbol clock (CLK); a variable frequency sample clock; an OFDM modulator circuit that operates at the stable symbol CLK to generate OFDM symbols; a frequency/phase estimation circuit that receives as inputs the stable symbol CLK and the variable frequency sample clock and estimates a frequency error and a phase error; a variable interpolator/decimator (VID) circuit that uses the frequency error and the phase error to generate a codeword; a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) that receives the codeword from the VID and generates an analog output.
In a further embodiment, the analog output is filtered by a filter to provide a filtered analog output.
In a further embodiment, the VID circuit converts a modulated signal from the stable symbol CLK domain to the variable frequency sample clock domain, where the VID circuit generates a corrected codeword that is provided to the DAC.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for digital signal synthesis with variable sample rate digital-to-analog converters (DACs) in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are illustrated. Systems in accordance with many embodiments can provide for digital frequency synthesis using a variable sample rate DAC. In many embodiments, a DAC can be sampled by a variable frequency source. In many embodiments, a variable frequency source can be a frequency ramp generator, pseudo random (PN) modulated frequency source, and/or frequency modulation source among others. In many embodiments, a direct digital frequency synthesizer (DDFS) can also be clocked by the same variable frequency source. In many embodiments, given that a sample frequency can be variable, a frequency control word (FCW) to the DDFS may be adjusted continuously to track the variable sample frequency. A frequency/phase estimation circuit can be used to estimate FCW frequency error. The frequency/phase estimation circuit can take both a stable reference clock and a variable sample clock as inputs. Described now are details regarding DAC operation in accordance with several embodiments of the invention.
DAC Operation
A DAC can be a device that converts a fine-precision digital-format number (typically a finite-length binary format number) to an analog electrical quantity (such a voltage, current and/or electric charge). Two basic types of DAC output formats can be used to construct an analog signal, including non-return-to-zero (NRZ) and return-to-zero (RZ).
DAC Output Spectrum
An architecture of a digital frequency generator using direct digital frequency synthesis (DDFS) and a DAC in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
A raw DAC output (e.g., NRZ and RZ) can have many harmonics other than a desired output frequency.
n*fs+fc and n*fs−fc where n is an integer from −∞ to ∞ (1)
These harmonics may be away from a desired frequency fc if fs is chosen properly (e.g., fc has been less than fs/2). In many embodiments, a low pass filter can be used to suppress harmonics.
In many embodiments, if there is a non-linear device (e.g., an amplifier and/or driver) before the low pass filter (as shown in
IM Product Suppression with Variable Sample Frequency
Systems in accordance with many embodiments can, instead of using a fixed sample frequency fs, use multiple sample frequencies fsj, where j denotes an index of the sample frequency. In many embodiments, a digital frequency control word (FCW) can be adjusted according to the sample frequency fsj, and thus a DAC output can still have a desired frequency. Accordingly, harmonics can be spread into multiple frequency components with lower power.
For example, a desired output frequency is 1000 Hz and 2 sample frequencies 5000 and 5050 can be used. For fs=5000 Hz, FCW=1000/5000=0.2 can be used and the image frequency is at 4000 Hz. For fs=5050 Hz, FCW=1000/5050=0.198 can be used and the image frequency is at 4050 Hz.
An example DAC output spectrum with 2 sample frequencies in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
With lower harmonic power, IM products of these harmonics can be lowered with a same non-linear device. An example of variable sampled DAC output spectrum with IM products added in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Digital Frequency Synthesis Architectures with Variable Sample Rate DACs
A circuit architecture for digital frequency synthesis with a variable sample rate DAC in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
A frequency/phase estimation circuit architecture in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
A process for frequency generation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated
Digital Broadband Modulator Architectures with Variable Sample Rate DACs
Variable sample rate DAC architectures in accordance with many embodiments may not be limited to a single frequency generation. Systems in accordance with many embodiments can be used for broad-band signal generation. A circuit architecture of a broadband modulator (OFDM modulator) with a variable sample rate DAC in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
A process for broad-band signal generation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Mathematical Operations
A DAC operation can be modeled by 3 mathematical operations:
1) Normalized frequency scaling. A digital normalized frequency can be scaled by the actual DAC sample frequency to generate the output frequency.
2) Frequency multiplication with multiple tones. The band-limited digital signal can be mixed by multiple tones that are integer multiply of the sample frequency.
3) The broad-band signal can be convolved with a rectangular pulse. For NRZ DAC, the rectangular pulse width can be the same as the sample period. For RZ DAC, the rectangular pulse width can be less than the sample period. For both cases, this convolution can be the same as low pass filtering by a sinc( ) function in frequency domain. The frequency response of the low-pass filter can be determined by the pulse width and the sample frequency.
Given a digital signal x(n)=sin(2π·0.1*n), n=1, 2, . . . and a DAC sampled at 100 MHz can be used to convert this digital signal into analog. The output analog signal has frequencies fop (0.1*100=10 MHZ) and fon (−0.1*100=−10 MHZ) and their frequency multiplication products with integer multiples of the sample frequency 100 MHz.
fop(k)=k*100+10 MHZ, k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
fon(k)=k*100−10 MHz, k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
Each frequency component is weighted by the sinc( ) filter and the filter weight h(f) is given as follows:
Tp is the pulse width. For NRZ DAC, Tp=Ts. For RZ DAC, Tp<Ts.
Given a digital signal with normalized frequency component at fnc and a DAC with sample frequency at fs, the DAC output can include many frequencies fop (k) and fcn(k)
fcp(k)=k*fs+fnc*fs,k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
fcn(k)=k*fs−fnc*fs,k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
Each frequency component is weighted by wcp(k) and wcn(k)
For an ideal DAC with perfect linearity and fnc<0.5, it can be shown that frequency components within {−fs/2, fs/2} are fcp(0) and fcn(0). A low-pass filter with pass band {−fs/2, fs/2} can filter out all other frequencies. The filtered output is a sinewave with frequency at fnc*fs.
However, if there is non-linearity in the DAC, intermodulation (IM) products would show up at the DAC output and these IM products can fall within
band. These in-band IM products cannot be filtered out by the low-pass filter. They become spurs and degrade quality of the generated signal. The general expression of IM products of p-th order (k-th frequency) and q-th order (l-th frequency) is as follows:
[fcp(k)]p*[fcp(l)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs+(p+q)(fnc*fs)
[fcn(k)]p*[fcn(l)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs−(p+q)(fnc*fs)
[fcp(k)]p*[fcn(l)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs+(p−q)(fnc*fs)
Their associated weights are:
α(p,q)*[wcp(k)]p*[wcp(l)]q
α(p,q)*[wcp(k)]p*[wcn(l)]q
α(p,q)*[wcn(k)]p*[wcn(l)]q
Any IM products with non-zero (k*p+l*q) term may not be desirable since they can be spur right next to the desired frequency. On the other hand, IM products with (k*p+l*q)=0 is an integer harmonic of the desired frequency and the frequency spacing is at least (fnc*fs).
Given a digital signal with fnc=0.199 and fs=100 MHZ, the desired frequency is 19.9 MHz. With k=1, p=3, l=−2, and q=1, IM products [fcn(k)]p*[fcn(l)]q has output frequency at 20.4 MHz which is 0.4 MHz away from the desired frequency. This close-in spur may not be desirable and should be reduced as much as possible to improve signal quality. In many embodiments, a way to suppress this spur can be to improve the DAC linearity which means more power and area. In certain embodiments, another way can be to sample the DAC with variable sample frequency fs(t). fs(t) can be a random variable that takes value between {fs_min, fs_max}. If the difference between fs_min and fs_max is small compared to
can the above DAC analysis can extend from fixed frequency sampling to variable frequency sampling.
Given a digital signal with normalized frequency component at fnc (t) and a DAC with variable sample frequency at fs(t), fnc (t) tracks the change of fs(t) such that fnc (t)*fs(t)=fc. The DAC output can include many frequencies fcp(k, t) and fcn(k, t)
fcp(k,t)=k*fs(t)+fc,k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
fcn(k,t)=k*fs(t)−fc,k=−∞, . . . ,−1,0,1, . . . ,∞
Each frequency component is weighted by wcp(k, t) and wcn(k, t)
Added non-linearity, IM products of p-th order (k-th frequency) and q-th order (l-th frequency) is as follows:
[fcp(k,t)]p*[fcp(l,t)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs(t)+(p+q)fc
[fcn(k,t)]p*[fcn(l,t)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs(t)−(p+q)fc
[fcp(k,t)]p*[fcn(l,t)]q=(k*p+l*q)fs(t)+(p−q)fc
Their associated weights are:
α(p,q)*[wcp(k,t)]p+[wcp(l,t)]q
α(p,q)*[wcp(k,t)]p+[wcn(l,t)]q
α(p,q)*[wcn(k,t)]p*[wcn(l,t)]q
Note that any IM products with non-zero (k*p+l*q) term is no longer a single tone. Its frequency spreads over a wide range depending on {fs_min, fs_max}, k, p, l, and q.
To generate a frequency with 19.9 MHz with a variable sample frequency fs(t) and {fs_min=99.9 MHZ, fs_max=100.1 MHz}, the normalized frequency fnc (t) should be between 0.1988 and 0.1992 tracking fs(t). With k=1, p=3, l=−2, and q=1, IM products [fcn(k)]p*[fcn(l)]q has output frequencies range from 19.9 to 20.9 MHz. Since the IM product is spread over a wide range (1 MHZ), each individual tone in the frequency range is reduced (1/1,000,000 in this case).
While the above descriptions and associated figures have digital signal synthesis with variable sample rate digital-to-analog converters, it should be clear that any of a variety of configurations for digital signal synthesis with variable sample rate digital-to-analog converters can be implemented in accordance with embodiments of the invention. More generally, although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/268,457, entitled “Digital Signal Synthesis with DAC Sampled by Variable Frequency”, filed Feb. 24, 2022 by Yu et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety as if set forth herewith.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5682161 | Ribner et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5889443 | Joergensen | Mar 1999 | A |
5914933 | Cimini et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6414455 | Watson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6724249 | Nilsson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7176820 | Fuller et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
8294605 | Pagnanelli | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8949699 | Gustlin | Feb 2015 | B1 |
10020818 | Yu et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10090845 | Midha | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10367522 | Yu et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10530372 | Yu et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10812087 | Yu et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10840939 | Yu et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11258448 | Yu et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11933919 | Yu et al. | Mar 2024 | B2 |
20010022555 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020053986 | Brooks et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057214 | Brooks et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061086 | Adachi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020093442 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030128143 | Yap et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137359 | Patana et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174080 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179121 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227401 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040032355 | Melanson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066321 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081266 | Adachi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108947 | Yang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040228416 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233084 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233085 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252038 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001750 | Lo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012649 | Adams et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030212 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057385 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062627 | Jelonnek et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063505 | Dubash et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088327 | Yokoyama et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093726 | Hezar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116850 | Hezar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128111 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156767 | Melanson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156768 | Melanson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156771 | Melanson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162222 | Hezar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050207480 | Norsworthy et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237119 | Irie | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266805 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050285685 | Frey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028364 | Rivoir et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038708 | Luh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044057 | Hezar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060109153 | Gupta et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115036 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164276 | Luh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060290549 | Laroia et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001776 | Li et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013566 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018866 | Melanson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035425 | Hinrichs et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070080843 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070126618 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152865 | Melanson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165708 | Darabi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070279034 | Roh et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080062022 | Melanson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062024 | Maeda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080100486 | Lin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080180166 | Gustat et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080191713 | Hauer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198050 | Akizuki et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211588 | Frey et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272945 | Melanson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080272946 | Melanson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090083567 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096649 | Ferri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090220219 | Mcleod et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090309774 | Hamashita et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020910 | Bhagavatheeswaran et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045498 | Liu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052960 | Lakdawala et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074368 | Karthaus et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100164773 | Clement et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214143 | Nakamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219999 | Oliaei et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225517 | Aiba et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100283648 | Niwa et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295715 | Sornin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006936 | Lin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110050472 | Melanson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110149155 | Lin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110299642 | Norsworthy et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120063519 | Oliaei et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120161864 | Lee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194369 | Galton et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200437 | Moue et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242521 | Kinyua et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120275493 | Fortier et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280843 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286982 | Kajita et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130068019 | Takase et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130099949 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130169460 | Obata et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130259103 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140028374 | Zare-Hoseini et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035769 | Rajaee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140070969 | Shu | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140113575 | Mitani et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140139293 | Tsangaropoulos et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140286467 | Norsworthy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140307825 | Ostrovskyy et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320325 | Muthers et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140368365 | Quiquempoix et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002325 | Lin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009054 | Ono et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036766 | Elsayed et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150061907 | Miglani | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150084797 | Singh et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150109157 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116138 | Li et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150146773 | Ma et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150171887 | Okuda | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150341159 | Norsworthy et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349794 | Lin | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013805 | Maehata | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160049947 | Adachi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050382 | Rizk et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160065236 | Ahmed et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160127119 | Anantharaman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149586 | Roh et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160336946 | Ho et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344404 | Miglani et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160359499 | Bandyopadhyay | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373125 | Pagnanelli et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170033801 | Lo et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041019 | Miglani et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170045403 | Zanbaghi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170093407 | Kim et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102248 | Maurer et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134055 | Ebrahimi et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170163295 | Talty et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170170839 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170170840 | Zhao | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170184645 | Sawataishi | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170222652 | Adachi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170222658 | Miglani et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250662 | Cope et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170276484 | Marx et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170288693 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180145700 | Yu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190356329 | Yu et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200106448 | Yu et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20210175889 | Yu et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20230266448 | Yu et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
110168930 | Aug 2019 | CN |
3542461 | Sep 2019 | EP |
2016063038 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016063038 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2018094380 | May 2018 | WO |
2023163792 | Aug 2023 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17872454.8, Search completed May 25, 2020, Mailed Jun. 4, 2020, 15 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2017/062744, Report issued May 21, 2019, Mailed May 31, 2019, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/062744, Search completed Jan. 17, 2018, Mailed Feb. 5, 2018, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/070817 Search completed Apr. 13, 2022, Mailed Jun. 16, 2022, 20 pgs. |
Aigner et al., “Advancement of MEMS into RF-Filter Applications”, International Electron Devices Meetings, IEDM '02, Dec. 8-11, 2002, pp. 897-900, doi: 10.1109/iedm.2002.1175981. |
Grudkowski et al., “Fundamental-mode VHF/UHF miniature acoustic resonators and filters on silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 37, No. 11, Dec. 1, 1980, pp. 993-995, doi: 10.1063/1.91745. |
Lakin et al., “Thin Film Resonators and Filters”, 1982 Ultrasonics Symposium, Oct. 27-29, 1982, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 466-475, doi: 10.1109/ultsym.1982.197870. |
Lam, “A Review of the Recent Development of MEMS and Crystal Oscillators and Their Impacts on the Frequency Control Products Industry”, Invited Paper, 2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Beijing, Nov. 2-5, 2008, pp. 694-704, doi: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0167. |
Majd et al., “Bandwidth Enhancement in Delta Sigma Modulator Transmitter Using Low Complexity Time-Interleaved Parallel Delta Sigma Modulator”, AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 69, No. 7, Apr. 11, 2015, pp. 1032-1038, doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2015.04.001. |
Piazza et al., “Piezoelectric Aluminum Nitride Vibrating Contour-Mode MEMS Resonators”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 15, No. 6, Dec. 2006, pp. 1406-1418, doi: 10.1109/jmems.2006.886012. |
Rai et al., “A Digitally Compensated 1.5 GHz CMOS/FBAR Frequency Reference”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, No. 3, Mar. 4, 2010, pp. 552-561, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2010.1447. |
Ruby et al., “PCS 1900 MHz Duplexer Using Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (FBARs)”, Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 10, May 13, 1999, pp. 794-795, doi: 10.1049/el:19990559. |
Schreier et al., “Understanding delta-sigma data converters”, IEEE Press, 2005, 455 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63268457 | Feb 2022 | US |