Systems and Methods for Discriminating Control Solution from a Physiological Sample

Abstract

Described herein are systems and methods for distinguishing between a control solution and a blood sample. In one aspect, the methods include using a test strip in which multiple current transients are measured by a meter electrically connected to an electrochemical test strip. The current transients are used to determine if a sample is a blood sample or a control solution based on at least two characteristics. Further described herein are methods for calculating a discrimination criteria based upon at least two characteristics. Still further described herein are system for distinguishing between blood samples and control solutions.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1A is a perspective view of an exemplary assembled test strip for use in method described herein;

FIG. 1B is an exploded perspective view of the test strip of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 1C is an expanded perspective view of a proximal portion of the test strip of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view of the test strip of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 3 is a side plan view of the test strip of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 4A is a top plan view of the test strip of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 4B is an expanded partial side view of the proximal portion of the test strip consistent with arrows 4A-4A of FIG. 4A;

FIG. 5 is a simplified schematic showing a test meter electrically interfacing with portions of the test strip;

FIG. 6 shows an example of a potential waveform in which the test meter applies a series of open-circuit potentials and test potentials for prescribed time intervals;

FIG. 7 shows a current transient generated by the test meter that is testing the test strip with the potential waveform of FIG. 6 with a control solution sample (CS, dotted line) and a blood sample (BL, solid line);

FIG. 8 shows the summation of current values at 02. and 0.5 seconds for a control solution, plasma, a blood sample with 48% hematocrit, and a blood sample is 77% when a potential of 20 mV was applied;

FIG. 9 is an expanded view of FIG. 7 showing a first test current transient and second test current transient for control solution (CS) and blood (BL);

FIG. 10 is a chart showing a non-linear relationship between the % of substrate consumed and the residual reaction index for blood samples having various hematocrit levels and for control solution (diamonds=25% hematocrit blood, squares=42% blood, triangles=60% hematocrit blood, x=control solution; and

FIG. 11 is a chart showing a relationship between an interferent index and a residual reaction index for a plurality of blood samples (diamonds) and control solution samples (squares).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The subject systems and methods are suitable for use in the determination of a wide variety of analytes in a wide variety of samples, and are particularly suited for use in the determination of analytes in whole blood or derivatives thereof, where an analyte of particular interest is glucose. In one embodiment, the subject invention provides methods for a test meter to determine whether control solution or blood has been applied to a test strip. In one aspect, at least two characteristics are used to distinguish between a blood sample and a control solution. Described herein are structures of an exemplary test strip embodiment which can be used with the methods and systems disclosed herein. Yet further described herein are methods for calculating a discrimination criterion based upon at least two characteristics. Further, described herein are systems for distinguishing between a blood sample and a control solution.

The subject methods may be used, in principle, with any type of electrochemical cell having spaced apart first and second electrodes and a reagent layer. For example, an electrochemical cell can be in the form of a test strip. In one aspect, the test strip includes two opposing electrodes separated by a thin spacer layer, where these components define a sample reaction chamber or zone in which is located a reagent layer. One skilled in the art will appreciate that other types of test strips, including, for example, test strips with co-planar electrodes could also be used with the methods described herein.

FIGS. 1A to 4B show various views of an exemplary test strip 62 suitable for use with the methods described herein. Test strip 62 can include an elongate body extending from a proximal end 80 to a distal end 82, and having lateral edges 56, 58. The proximal portion of body 59 can include a reaction chamber 61 having electrodes and a reagent, while the distal portion of test strip body 59 can include features adapted for electrically communicating with a test meter. Physiological fluid or control solution can be delivered to reaction chamber 61 and electrochemically analyzed.

In the illustrative embodiment, test strip 62 comprises a first electrode layer 66 and a second electrode layer 64, with a spacer layer 60 positioned therebetween. The first electrode layer 66 can provide a first electrode 166 and a first connection track 76 for electrically connecting the first electrode 166 to a first electrical contact 67. Similarly, second electrode layer 64 can provide a second electrode 164 and a second connection track for electrically connecting the second electrode 164 with a second electrical contact 63.

In one embodiment, sample reaction chamber 61 is defined by first electrode 166, second electrode 164, and spacer 60 as shown in FIGS. 1A to 4B. Specifically, first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 define, respectively, the bottom and top of sample reaction chamber 61. A cutout area 68 of spacer 60 can define the side walls of sample reaction chamber 61. In one aspect, reaction chamber 61 can further include ports 70 that provide a sample inlet and/or a vent. For example, one of the ports can provide a fluid sample ingress and the other port can act as a vent.

Reaction chamber 61 can have a small volume. In one embodiment, the volume ranges from about 0.1 microliters to 5 microliters, preferably about 0.2 microliters to about 3 microliters, and more preferably about 0.3 microliters to about 1 microliter. To provide the small sample volume cutout 68 can have an area ranging from about 0.01 cm² to about 0.2 cm², preferably about 0.02 cm to about 0.15 cm², and more preferably about 0.03 cm² to about 0.08 cm². In addition, first and second electrode 166, 164 can be spaced in the range of about 1 micron to 500 microns, preferably between about 10 microns and 400 microns, and more preferably between about 40 microns and 200 microns. The close spacing of the electrodes can also allow redox cycling to occur, where oxidized mediator generated at first electrode 166, can diffuse to second electrode 164 to become reduced, and subsequently diffuse back to first electrode 166 to become oxidized again.

At the distal end of test strip body 59, first electrical contact 67 can be used to establish an electrical connection to a test meter. Second electrical contact 63 can be accessed by the test meter through U-shaped notch 65 as illustrated in FIG. 2. One skilled in the art will appreciate that test strip 62 can include a variety of alternative electrical contact configured for electrically connecting to a test meter. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,513 discloses an electrochemical cell connection means, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In one embodiment, first electrode layer 66 and/or second electrode layer 64 can be a conductive material formed from materials such as gold, palladium, carbon, silver, platinum, tin oxide, iridium, indium, and combinations thereof (e.g., indium doped tin oxide). In addition, the electrodes can be formed by disposing a conductive material onto an insulating sheet (not shown) by a sputtering, electroless plating, or a screen printing process. In one exemplary embodiment, second electrode layer 64 can be a sputtered gold electrode and first electrode layer 66 can be a sputtered palladium electrode. Suitable materials that can be employed as spacing layer 60 include the variety of insulating materials, such as, for example, plastics (e.g., PET, PETG, polyimide, polycarbonate, polystyrene), silicon, ceramic, glass, adhesives, and combinations thereof.

Reagent layer 72 can be disposed within reaction chamber 61 using a process such as slot coating, dispensing from the end of a tube, ink jetting, and screen printing. Such processes are described, for example, in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,749,887; 6,869,411; 6,676,995; and 6,830,934, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. In one embodiment, reagent layer 72 includes at least a mediator and an enzyme and is deposited onto first electrode 166. Examples of suitable mediators include ferricyanide, ferrocene, ferrocene derivatives, osmium bipyridyl complexes, and quinone derivatives. Examples of suitable enzymes include glucose oxidase, glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) based on pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) co-factor, GDH based on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide co-factor, and FAD-based GDH [E.C.1.1.99.10]. One exemplary reagent formulation, which would be suitable for making reagent layer 72, is described in pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/242,951, entitled, Method of Manufacturing a Sterilized and Calibrated Biosensor-Based Medical Device, published as U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2004/0120848, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Either first electrode 166 or second electrode 164 can perform the function of a working electrode which oxidizes or reduces a limiting amount of mediator depending on the polarity of the applied test potential of the test meter. For example, if the current limiting species is a reduced mediator, then it can be oxidized at first electrode 166 as long as a sufficiently positive potential was applied with respect to second electrode 164. In such a situation, first electrode 166 performs the function of the working electrode and second electrode 164 performs the function of a counter/reference electrode. It should be noted that unless otherwise stated for test strip 62, all potentials applied by test meter 100 will hereinafter be stated with respect to second electrode 164.

Similarly, if a sufficiently negative potential is applied with respect to second electrode 164, then the reduced mediator can be oxidized at second electrode 164. In such a situation, second electrode 164 performs the function of the working electrode and first electrode 166 performs the function of the counter/reference electrode.

A first step in the subject methods can include introducing a quantity of the fluid sample of interest into test strip 62 which includes first electrode 166, second electrode 164 and a reagent layer 72. The fluid sample can be whole blood or a derivative or fraction thereof, or control solution. The fluid sample, e.g., blood, is dosed into sample reaction chamber 61 via port 70. In one aspect, port 70 and /or reaction chamber 61 are adapted such that capillary action causes the fluid sample to fill sample reaction chamber 61.

FIG. 5 provides a simplified schematic showing a test meter 100 interfacing with first electrical contact 67 and second electrical contact 63, which are in electrical communication with first electrode 166 and second electrode 164, respectively, of test strip 62. Test meter 100 is adapted to electrically connect to first electrode 166 and second electrode 164, via first electrical contact 67 and second electrical contact 63, respectively (as shown in FIGS. 2 and 5). The variety of known test meters can be used with the method described herein. However, in one embodiment the test meter includes at least a processor for performing calculations related to discriminating between blood and a control sample and data storage.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, electrical contact 67 can include two prongs denoted as 67a and 67b. In one exemplary embodiment, test meter 100 separately connects to prongs 67a and 67b, such that when test meter 100 interfaces with test strip 62 a circuit is completed. Test meter 100 can measure the resistance or electrical continuity between prongs 67a and 67b to determine whether test strip 62 is electrically connected to test meter 100. One skilled in the art will appreciate that test meter 100 can use a variety of sensors and circuits to determine when test strip 62 is properly positioned with respect to test meter 100.

In one embodiment, test meter 100 can apply a test potential and/or a current between first electrical contact 67 and second electrical contact 63. Once test meter 100 recognizes that strip 62 has been inserted, test meter 100 turns on and initiates a fluid detection mode. In one embodiment, the fluid detection mode causes test meter 100 to apply a constant current of 1 microampere between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164. Because test strip 62 is initially dry, test meter 100 measures a maximum voltage, which is limited by the hardware within test meter 100. However, once a user doses a fluid sample onto inlet 70, this causes sample reaction chamber 61 to become filled. When the fluid sample bridges the gap between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164, test meter 100 will measure a decrease in measured voltage (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,193,873) which is below a predetermined threshold causing test meter 100 to automatically initiate the glucose test.

It should be noted that the measured voltage may decrease below a pre-determined threshold when only a fraction of sample reaction chamber 61 has been filled. A method of automatically recognizing that a fluid was applied does not necessarily indicate that sample reaction chamber 61 has been completely filled, but can only confirm a presence of some fluid in sample reaction chamber 61. Once test meter 100 determines that a fluid has been applied to test strip 62, a short, but finite amount of time may still be required to allow the fluid to completely fill sample reaction chamber 61.

In one embodiment, once test meter 100 has determined that a fluid has been dosed onto test strip 62, test meter 100 can perform a glucose test by applying a plurality of open-circuit potentials and a plurality of test potentials to the test strip 62 for prescribed intervals as shown in FIG. 6. A glucose test time interval T_G represents an amount of time to perform the glucose test (but not necessarily all the calculations associated with the glucose test) where glucose test time interval T_G can include a first open-circuit time interval T_OC1, a first test potential time interval T₁, a second open-circuit time interval T_OC2, a second test potential time interval T₂, and a third test potential time interval T₃. Glucose test time interval T_G can range from about 1 second to about 5 seconds. While two open-circuit time intervals and three test potential time intervals are described, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the glucose test time interval can comprise different numbers of open-circuit and test potential time intervals. For example, the glucose test time interval could include a single open-circuit time interval and/or only two test potential time intervals.

Once the glucose assay has been initiated, test meter 100 switches to a first open-circuit for a first open-circuit potential time interval T_OC1, which in the illustrated embodiment is about 0.2 seconds. In another embodiment, first open-circuit time interval T_OC1 can be in the range of about 0.05 seconds to about 2 seconds and preferably between about 0.1 seconds to about 1.0 seconds, and most preferably between about 0.15 seconds to about 0.6 seconds.

One of the reasons for implementing the first open-circuit is to allow sufficient time for the sample reaction chamber 61 to fill or partially fill with sample. Typically, at ambient temperature (i.e. 22° C.), sample reaction chamber 61 takes about 0.1 seconds to about 0.5 seconds to completely fill with blood. Conversely, at ambient temperature (i.e. 22° C.), sample reaction chamber 61 takes about 0.2 seconds or less to completely fill with control solution, where the control solution is formulated to have a viscosity of about 1 to about 3 centipoise.

While control solutions are composed of known components and are generally uniform, blood samples can vary in their make-up and/or composition. For example, high hematocrit blood samples are more viscous than low hematocrit blood samples, therefore higher hematocrit blood samples require additional time to fill compared with lower hematocrit blood samples. Thus, depending on a variety of factors, blood sample filling time can vary.

After applying the first open-circuit potential, test meter 100 applies a first test potential E₁ between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 (e.g., −0.3 Volts in FIG. 6), for a first test potential time interval T₁ (e.g., 0.15 seconds in FIG. 6). Test meter 100 measures the resulting first current transient, which can be referred to as i_a(t) as shown in FIG. 7. In one embodiment, first test potential time interval T₁ can be in the range of about 0.05 seconds to about 1.0 second and preferably between about 0.1 seconds to about 0.5 seconds, and most preferably between about 0.1 seconds to about 0.2 seconds.

As discussed below, a portion or all of the first current transient can be used in the methods described herein to determine whether control solution or blood was applied to test strip 62. The magnitude of the first transient current is effected by the presence of easily oxidizable substances in the sample. Blood usually contains endogenous and exogenous compounds that are easily oxidized at second electrode 164. Conversely, control solution can be formulated such that it does not contain oxidizable compounds. However, blood sample composition can vary and the magnitude of the first current transient for high viscosity blood samples will be smaller than low viscosity samples (in some cases even less than control solution samples) because sample reaction chamber 61 may be not be completely filled after 0.2 seconds. An incomplete fill will cause the effective area of first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 to decrease which in turn causes the first current transient to decrease. Thus the presence of oxidizable substances in a sample, by itself, is not always a sufficient discriminatory factor because of variations in blood samples.

After test meter 100 stops applying first test potential E₁, it switches to a second open-circuit for a second open-circuit time interval T_OC2, which in this case is about 0.65 seconds, as shown in FIG. 6. In another embodiment, second open-circuit time interval T_OC2 can be in the range of about 0.1 seconds to about 2.0 seconds and preferably between about 0.3 seconds to about 1.5 seconds, and most preferably between about 0.5 seconds to about 1.0 seconds.

One of the reasons for implementing the second open-circuit is to provide sufficient time for sample reaction chamber 61 to completely fill, to allow reagent layer 72 to dissolve, and to allow reduced mediator and oxidized mediator to re-equilibrate at the respective first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 from the perturbation caused by first test potential E₁. Although sample reaction chamber 61 fills rapidly, second open-circuit time interval T_OC2 can be sufficiently long to account for conditions which can cause fill times to increase such as low ambient temperature (e.g., about 5° C.) and high hematocrit (e.g., >60% hematocrit).

During first test potential E₁, reduced mediator was depleted at second electrode 164 and generated at first electrode 166 to form a concentration gradient. Second open-circuit potential provides time for the reduced mediator concentration profile to become closer to the state immediately before first test potential E₁ was applied. As will be described below, a sufficiently long second open-circuit potential is useful because it can allow for glucose concentration to be calculated in the presence of interferents.

An alternative embodiment test potential E₁′ can be applied between the electrodes for a duration between when the meter detects that the strip is filling with sample and before a second test potential E₂ is applied. In one aspect, test potential E₁′ is small. For example, the potential can be between about 1 to 100 mV, preferably between about 5 mV and 50 mV and most preferably between about 10 mV and 30 mV. The smaller potential perturbs the reduced mediator concentration gradient to a lesser extent compared to applying a larger potential difference, but is still sufficient to obtain a measure of the oxidizable substances in the sample. The potential E₁′ can be applied for a portion of the time between detection of fill and when E₂ is applied or can be applied for the whole of that time period. If E₁′ is to be used for a portion of the time then an open-circuit could be applied for the remaining portion of the time. The combination of number of open-circuit and small voltage potential applications, their order and times applied is not critical in this embodiment, as long as the total period for which the small potential E₁′ is applied is sufficient to obtain a current measurement indicative of the presence and/or quantity of oxidizable substances present in the sample. In a preferred embodiment the small potential E₁′ is applied for the entire period between when fill is detected and when E₂ is applied.

Once second open-circuit time interval T_OC2 or an equivalent time in the small potential E₁′ embodiment has elapsed, test meter 100 applies a second test potential E₂ between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 for a second test potential time interval T₂. During second test potential time interval T₂, test meter 100 can measure a second current transient which may be referred to as i_b(t). After second potential time interval T₂ has elapsed, test meter 100 can apply a third test potential E₃ between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164 for a third test potential time interval T₃, which may be referred to as i_c(t). Second test potential time interval T₂ and third test potential time interval T₃ can each range from about 0.1 seconds to 4 seconds. For the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, second test potential time interval T₂ was 3 seconds and third test potential time interval T₃ was 1 second. As mentioned above, in one aspect, an open circuit potential time period can be allowed to elapse between the second test potential E₂ and the third test potential E₃. Alternatively, the third test potential E₃ can be applied immediately following the application of the second test potential E₂. Note that a portion of the first, second, or third current transient may be generally referred to as a cell current or a current value.

In one embodiment, first test potential E₁ and second test potential E₂ both have a first polarity, and that third test potential E₃ has a second polarity which is opposite to the first polarity. However, one skilled in the art will appreciate the polarity of the first, second, and third test potentials can be chosen depending on the manner in which analyte concentration is determined and/or depending on the manner in which test samples and control solutions are distinguished.

First test potential E₁ and second test potential E₂ can be sufficiently negative in magnitude with respect to second electrode 164 such that second electrode 164 functions as a working electrode in which a limiting oxidation current is measured. Conversely, third test potential E₃ can be sufficiently positive in magnitude with respect to second electrode 164 such that first electrode 166 functions as a working electrode in which a limiting oxidation current is measured. A limiting oxidation occurs when all oxidizable species have been locally depleted at the working electrode surface such that the measured oxidation current is proportional to the flux of oxidizable species diffusing from the bulk solution towards the working electrode surface. The term bulk solution refers to a portion of the solution sufficiently far away from the working electrode where the oxidizable species was not located within the depletion zone. First test potential E₁, second test potential E₂, and third test potential E₃ can range from about −0.6 Volts to about +0.6 Volts (with respect to second electrode 164) when using either a sputtered gold or palladium working electrode and a ferricyanide mediator.

FIG. 7 shows a first, second, and third current transients generated by test meter 100 and test strip 62 using either a control solution sample (dotted line) or a blood sample (solid line). The control solution sample contained a 525 mg/dL glucose concentration and the blood sample contained a 530 mg/dL glucose concentration with a 25% hematocrit. FIG. 8 shows an expanded view of first and second current transients in FIG. 7. FIGS. 7 and 8 show the resulting current transients when applying the potential waveform shown in FIG. 6. The description below details how the current transients can be converted into an accurate glucose measurement for the test solution or control solution.

Assuming that a test strip has an opposing face or facing arrangement as shown in FIGS. 1A to 4B, and that a potential waveform is applied to the test strip as shown in FIG. 6, a glucose concentration can be calculated using a glucose algorithm as shown in Equation (Eq.) 1.

$\begin{array}{cc}\left[G\right]={\left(\frac{i_2}{i_3}\right)}^p\times \left(a\times i_1-Z\right)& \mathrm{Eq}.1\end{array}$

In Eq. 1, [G] is the glucose concentration, i₁ is a first current value, i₂ is a second current value, and i₃ is a third current value, and the terms p, Z, and a are empirically derived calibration constants. A derivation of Eq. 1 can be found in a pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/240,797 (Attorney Docket No. 104978-265; LFS-5073) which was filed on Sep. 30, 2005 and entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RAPID ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS”, which is hereby incorporated by reference. First current value i₁ and second current value i₂ are calculated from the third current transient and i₃ is calculated from the second current transient. One skilled in the art will appreciate that names “first,” “second,” and “third” are chosen for convenience and do not necessarily reflect the order in which the current values are calculated. In addition, all current values (e.g., i₁, i₂, and i₃) stated in Eq. 1 use the absolute value of the current.

In another embodiment of this invention, the term i₁ can be defined to include peak current values from the second and third current transients to allow for more accurate glucose concentrations in the presence of interferents as shown in Eq. 2.

$\begin{array}{cc}{i}_1=i_2\left\{\frac{i_{\mathrm{pc}}-2i_{\mathrm{pb}}+i_{\mathrm{ss}}}{i_{\mathrm{pc}}+i_{\mathrm{ss}}}\right\}& \mathrm{Eq}.2\end{array}$

The term i_pb represents a peak current value for second test potential time interval T₂ and the term i_pc represents a peak current value for third test potential time interval T₃. The term i_ss is the steady-state current which occurs after the application of third test potential E₃. Where Eq. 2 is used, second open-circuit potential time interval T_OC2 is preferably sufficiently long so as to allow Eq. 2 to compensate for the presence of interferents. When second open-circuit potential time interval T_OC2 is too short, second peak current value i_pb can become distorted and can reduce the effectiveness of the interterent correction calculations. The use of peak current values to account for interferents in a physiological sample are described in an application entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Analyzing a Sample in the Presence of Interferents” (Attorney Docket No. 104978-323; LFS-5109) which was filed on the same day as this application, and which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In one embodiment of this invention, Eq.'s 1 and 2 can be used together to calculate a glucose concentration for either blood or control solution. In another embodiment of this invention, the algorithm of Eq.'s 1 and 2 can be used for blood with a first set of calibration factors (i.e. a, p, and Z) and a second set of calibration factors can be used for the control solution. When using two different sets of calibration factors, the methods described herein for discriminating between a test fluid and a control solution can improve the effectiveness of the analyte concentration calculations.

In addition, if the test meter determines that the sample type is control solution, the test meter can store the resulting glucose concentration of the control sample such that a user can review test sample concentration data separately from control solution data. For example, the glucose concentrations for control solutions can be stored in a separate database, can be flagged, and/or discarded (i.e., not stored or stored for a short period of time).

Another advantage of being able to recognize control solutions is that a test meter can be programmed to automatically compare the results (e.g., glucose concentration) of the test of the control solution with the expected glucose concentration of the control solution. For example, the test meter can be pre-programmed with the expected glucose level(s) for the control solution(s). Alternatively, a user could input the expected glucose concentration for the control solution. When the test meter recognizes a control solution, the test meter can compare the measured control solution glucose concentration with the expected glucose concentration to determine if the meter is functioning properly. If the measured glucose concentration is out of the expected range, the test meter can output a warning message to alert the user.

In one embodiment, the method described herein uses the presence of redox species to distinguish a control solution from a blood sample. The method can include the step of applying a first test potential E₁′ and using one or more current values measured during the test potential as a discriminator. In one aspect, two current values from the first test potential E₁′ are summed and used as the discriminator. FIG. 8 shows data for a control solution, plasma, a blood sample with 48% hematocrit, and a blood sample is 77% hematocrit. A potential of 20 mV was applied for the first 1 second and current values at 0.2 to 0.5 seconds were summed. As show in FIG. 8, the summed current values were sufficient to distinguish between a control solution (that was substantially devoid of interferents) and blood samples.

In another embodiment, two characteristics of control solution are used to distinguish control solutions from blood—the presence and/or concentration of redox species in the sample and reaction kinetics. The method disclosed herein can include the step of calculating a first reference value that is representative of the redox concentration in the sample and a second reference value that is representative of the rate of reaction of the sample with the reagent. In one embodiment, the first reference value is an interferent oxidation current and the second reference value is a reaction completion percentage.

In regard to redox species in the sample, blood usually contains various endogenous redox species or “interferents” such as ascorbic acid and uric acid, as well as exogenously derived interferents such as gentisic acid (gentisic acid is a metabolite of aspirin). Endogenous interferents are chemical species that can be easily oxidized at an electrode and are usually present in blood within a physiological range for healthy individuals. Exogenously derived interferents are also a chemical species that can be easily oxidized at an electrode, but are not usually present in blood unless they are inputted into the body via consumption, injection, absorption, and the like.

Control solution can be formulated to be either essentially free of antioxidants or to have a relatively high interferent concentration compared to the interferent concentration in a blood sample. For the case in which control solution is essentially free of antioxidants, the magnitude of the first current transient should be smaller for control solution than for a blood sample as shown in FIG. 9. For the case in which control solution has a relatively high concentration of interferents, the magnitude of the first current transient should be larger for control solution than for a blood sample (data not shown).

An interferent index can be calculated based on the current values within first current transient. In one embodiment, the interferent index can include a summation of current values at two points in time during the first current transient. In one example, the current values at 0.3 and 0.35 seconds can be used. In another embodiment when a small potential E₁′ is applied for the entire period between when fill is detected and E₂, the interferent index is preferably obtained by summing two values over a longer period, for example 0.2 seconds to 0.5 seconds.

In general, the interferent index will be proportional to the interferent concentration and should not substantially depend on the glucose concentration. Therefore, in theory, the test meter should be able to distinguish whether the sample is blood or control solution based on the interferent index. However, in practice, using only the interferent index did not always sufficiently discriminate between blood and control solution. Although blood typically has a much higher interferent concentration, there arc certain conditions in which the first current transient for blood may be attenuated such that it is comparable to control solution. These conditions include high glucose concentration, high hematocrit, low temperature, and incomplete filling of sample reaction chamber 61. Thus, in one embodiment, an additional factor was implemented to enable the test meter to sufficiently discriminate between blood and control solution.

The additional factor used for helping discriminate between blood and control solution can be a residual reaction index which is a function of the percent of remaining substrate which would have reacted if given enough time. The residual reaction index relates to the reaction rate in that a high reaction rate can cause the substrate to be depleted by the reaction. However, the residual reaction index will also depend on the initial magnitude of the substrate concentration.

Reagent layer 72 can include glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) based on the PQQ co-factor and ferricyanide. When blood or control solution is dosed into sample reaction chamber 61, glucose is oxidized by GDH_(ox) and in the process converts GDH_(ox) to GDH_(red), as shown in Eq.3. Note that GDH_(ox) refers to the oxidized state of GDH, and GDH_(red) refers to the reduced state of GDH.

D-Glucose+GDH_(ox)→Gluconic acid+GDH_(red)   Eq. 3

Next, GDH_(red) is regenerated back to its active oxidized state by ferricyanide (i.e. oxidized mediator or Fe(CN)₆³⁻) as shown in Eq. 4. In the process of regenerating GDH_(ox), ferrocyanide (i.e. reduced mediator or Fe(CN)₆⁴⁻) is generated from the reaction as shown in Eq. 4.

GDH_(red)+2 Fe(CN)₆³⁻→GDH_(ox)+2 Fe(CN)₆⁴⁻  Eq. 4

In general, the rate of glucose consumption based on Eq.'s 3 and 4 is faster for control solution than blood. Typically, control solution is less viscous than blood causing the reaction rate of Eq. 3 and 4 to be faster for control solution. Further, the reaction rate is faster for control solution because a portion of the glucose present in the blood sample must diffuse out of the red blood cells to participate in Eq. 3. This extra step of glucose diffusion out of the red blood cells slows down the reaction rate to some measurable degree. FIG. 9 shows that the reaction rate for blood is slower than for control solution as evidenced by the fact that the general absolute slope value (e.g., between 1.2 and 4 seconds) for the second current transient is less for the blood sample. Because of the faster reaction rates in control solution compared to blood, the residual reaction index for control solution will generally be lower than for blood.

The residual reaction index is a number which is related to the percent of glucose which has not been consumed. A relatively low residual reaction index will indicate that the reactions of Eq.'s 3 and 4 are close to completion. In contrast, a relatively high residual reaction index will indicate that the reaction is not close to completion. In one embodiment, the residual reaction index can be an absolute ratio of a current value of third current transient divided by a current value of the second current transient, as shown in Eq. 5.

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{abs}\left(\frac{i\left(4.15\right)}{i\left(3.8\right)}\right)& \mathrm{Eq}.5\end{array}$

For the denominator of Eq. 5, the current value at 3.8 seconds for the second current transient is used. The time of 3.8 seconds was chosen empirically, however, one skilled in the art will appreciate that other current values can be used. In one embodiment, a current value towards the end of the second current transient is chosen. During the second current transient time interval T₂, reduced mediator is oxidized at second electrode 164. The current values measured during second current transient time interval T₂ were ascribed to ferrocyanide generated by reagent layer 72 at first electrode 166 which then diffused to second electrode 164 and became oxidized. It is assumed that reagent layer 72 remains close to first electrode 166 after it dissolves in blood causing most of the ferrocyanide generated by reagent layer 72 to also be close to first electrode 166. A portion of this generated ferrocyanide can diffuse to second electrode 164.

For the numerator of Eq. 5, the current value at 4.15 seconds was used. Other current values from the third current transient can be chosen, however current value towards the beginning of the third current transient are preferred. During the third current transient time interval T₃, reduced mediator is oxidized at first electrode 166. The current values measured during second current transient time interval T₂ were ascribed to ferrocyanide generated by reagent layer 72 at first electrode 166. Therefore, the current values for the third current transient will be larger than the second current transient because most of the ferrocyanide will be close to first electrode 166 because first electrode 166 was coated with reagent layer 72. In addition, third current transient will also be larger than second current transient because it occurs later in the glucose test allowing for more ferrocyanide to be generated. Thus, the absolute ratio as shown in Eq. 5 will be larger if the glucose reaction is still far from completion at the time of the measurement.

FIG. 10 is a chart showing a non-linear relationship between the % of substrate consumed and the residual reaction index for blood samples having various hematocrit levels and for control solution (diamonds=25% hematocrit blood, squares=42% blood, triangles=60% hematocrit blood, x=control solution). This chart shows that the residual reaction index is relatively high when the % of substrate consumed is low and that the residual reaction index is relatively low when the % of substrate consumed is high for a given sample type/hematocrit value. The % of substrate consumed is derived from a ratio

$\frac{C_o}{YSI},$

where C_o is the substrate concentration at the electrode surface and YSI is the substrate concentration using a standard reference technique. The term C_o is derived using the following Eq. 6,

$\begin{array}{cc}{C}_o=\frac{i_{\mathrm{ss}}L}{2FAD}& \mathrm{Eq}.6\end{array}$

where L is the distance between first electrode 166 and second electrode 164, F is Faraday's constant, A is the area of first electrode 166, and D is the diffusion coefficient.

FIG. 11 is a chart showing a relationship between an interferent index and a residual reaction index for a plurality of blood samples and control solution samples. By plotting the interferent index on the X-axis and the residual reaction index on the Y-axis, a segregation between blood and control solution can be observed. A discrimination line can be drawn to determine if the sample is either control solution or blood. In this embodiment, the interferent index is i(0.3)+i(0.35) and the residual reaction index is

$\mathrm{abs}\left(\frac{i\left(4.15\right)}{i\left(3.8\right)}\right).$

It should be noted that the times (e.g., 4.15, 3.8) at which the current values where selected for the residual reaction index, were found empirically. A large number of current ratios were evaluated for their ability to discriminate between blood and control solution samples. The ratio shown in Eq. 5 was selected because it was found to produce significant separation between blood and control solution samples.

A discrimination line was derived to allow the test meter to determine whether the sample was control solution or blood. For all of the control solution samples tested, the interferent index was plotted versus the residual reaction index. Next, a line was calculated using linear regression for control solution samples. After calculating an equation for the line, the perpendicular bias between each data point and the line was calculated. The perpendicular bias represents the shortest distance between the data point and the line as opposed to a vertical bias which is commonly calculated. A standard deviation was determined for all of the perpendicular biases (SD_perp). Lastly, the line is shifted 3*SD_perp units towards the data points for the blood group. The reason for this approach is that the data for the control solution group show very little scatter and therefore the “99% confidence limit” of the control solution group is well-defined.

In the method described herein, the information obtained from this statistical analysis of the residual reaction index and the interferent index can be used by the test meter to distinguish control solutions from blood samples. The test meter can calculate the interferent index and residual reaction index and use these values in association with the derived discrimination line (or an equation representing the discrimination line) to distinguish control solutions from blood samples.

EXAMPLE 1

Preparation of control fluid is disclosed below. The prepared control fluid was used in the experiments which produced the data illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 11.

Citraconic acid Buffer Component 0.0833 g

Dipotassium citraconate Buffer Component 1.931 g

Methyl Paraben Preservative 0.050 g

Germal II Preservative 0.400 g

Dextran T-500 Viscosity Modifier 3.000 g

Pluronic 25R2 Wicking Agent 0.050 g

1-[(6-methoxy-4-sulfo-m-tolyl)azo]-2-naphthol-6-sulfonic acid disodium salt Dye (FD&C Blue No. 1) 0.100 g

D-Glucose Analyte 50, 120, or 525 mg

Deionized Water Solvent 100 g

First citraconic buffer pH 6.5±0.1 was prepared by dissolving required quantities of citraconic acid and dipotassium citraconate in deionized water. Next, Methyl Paraben was added and the solution was stirred until the preservative was fully dissolved. Subsequently Dextran T-500, Germal 11, Pluronic 25R2 and 1-[(6-methoxy-4-sulfo-m-tolyl)azo]-2-naphthol-6-sulfonic acid disodium salt were added sequentially, following complete dissolution of the previously added chemical. At this point, the pH of the control fluid was verified, followed by addition of the requisite quantity of glucose to obtain a low, normal or high glucose level of control fluid. After the glucose was dissolved completely, the control fluid was left at room temperature overnight. Finally, the glucose concentration was verified using a Model 2700 Select Biochemistry Analyzer manufactured by Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Inc. The dye used in this control solution has a blue color which reduces the possibility of a user confusing control solution with blood, which is normally red.

One skilled in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Claims

1. A method for distinguishing between a blood sample and a control solution sample, the method comprising the steps of: (a) introducing a sample into an electrochemical cell, the electrochemical cell comprising: (i) two electrodes in a spaced apart relationship; and(ii) a reagent;(b) applying a first test potential, having a first polarity, between the electrodes, and measuring a first current transient;(d) applying a second test potential, having a first polarity, between electrodes, and measuring a second current transient;(e) applying a third test potential, having a second polarity, between the electrodes, and measuring a third current transient;(c) calculating, based on the first current transient, a first reference value related to the quantity of redox species in the sample(f) calculating, based on the second and third current transients, a second reference value related to reaction kinetics(g) determining, based on the first and second reference values, whether the sample is a control solution or blood sample.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first reference value is proportional to a concentration of an interferent in the sample.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first reference value is an interferent index calculated based upon at least one current value from the first current transient.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the second reference value is a function of a percent completion of a chemical reaction.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the second reference value is a residual reaction index calculated based upon at least one current value from the second current transient and at least one current value from the third current transient.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the residual reaction index is calculated based upon a ratio of a second current value and a third current value.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of measuring a concentration of an analyte.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein if the sample is found to be a control solution the analyte concentration associated with the control sample is flagged.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the second polarity is opposite the first polarity.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein step (g) further comprises using statistical classification to determine if the sample is a control solution or a blood sample.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein an equation representing a discrimination line is used in step (g) to evaluate the first and second reference values.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of applying a first open-circuit potential to the electrochemical cell before the step of applying the first test potential.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of applying a second open-circuit potential to the electrochemical cell after the step of applying the first test potential.

14. A system for distinguishing between a blood sample and a control solution sample, the system comprising: A. a test strip including electrical contacts for mating with a test meter and an electrochemical cell comprising, (i) a first electrode and a second electrode in a spaced apart relationship,(ii) a reagent, and;B. a test meter including a processor adapted to receive current data from the test strip, and data storage containing discrimination criteria for distinguishing a blood sample from a control sample based on antioxidant concentration and reaction kinetics.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the discrimination criteria is derived from an interferent index that is representative of antioxidant concentration and a residual reaction index that is representative of reaction kinetics.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the discrimination criteria includes an empirically derived discrimination line.

17. The system of claim 14, further comprising a control solution that is substantially devoid of redox species.

18. A method for calculating a discrimination criteria for programming into a test meter for distinguishing between a blood sample and a control solution sample, the method comprising the steps of: (a) calculating an interferent index and a residual reaction index for a plurality of control solution samples; and(b) calculating a discrimination criteria based on a regression of the interferent index and the residual reaction index for the plurality of control solution samples.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the discrimination criteria is discrimination line.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the method further comprises the step of: plotting an interferent index and a residual reaction index for a plurality of blood samples and shifting the discrimination line towards the plurality of blood samples.

21. A method for distinguishing between a blood sample and a control solution sample, the method comprising the steps of: (a) introducing a sample into an electrochemical cell, the electrochemical cell comprising: (i) two electrodes in a spaced apart relationship; and(ii) a reagent;(b) applying a first test potential, having a first polarity, between the electrodes, and measuring cell current;(c) summing at least two current values measured during the first test potential to generate an interferent index;(d) using the interferent index to distinguish between a blood sample and a control solution sample.

22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the first potential is in the range of about 1 mV and 100 mV.