The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for displaying wind characteristics and effects within a broadcast. In exemplary embodiments, the present disclosure relates to improved methods for measuring wind characteristics at a venue or systematically analyzing a broadcast and displaying wind effects within that broadcast.
While general identification of objects within a broadcast has been known, there is room in the field for improvement, for example by displaying wind characteristics within a broadcast, as is described herein.
Accordingly, the following disclosure describes display of wind characteristics within a broadcast, either by sampling wind via at least one sampling point or by analyzing a broadcast to determine wind characteristics therein.
The present disclosure presents an improved system and method for displaying wind characteristics and effects in a broadcast. The disclosure also relates to tracking and tagging of any kind of objects, inclusive of highlighting of objects and overlays of information, such as distance, projected trajectories, and environmental conditions, such as wind, heat and terrain.
Exemplary embodiments provide a system and method for displaying wind characteristics and effects in a broadcast, comprising: utilizing a camera to record a broadcast; determining wind characteristics relative to the broadcast; and rendering graphics in a broadcast displaying said wind. In exemplary embodiments, wind is sampled via at least one sampling point in a venue and wind characteristics are displayed in the broadcast.
In other exemplary embodiments, wind characteristics are determined from analyzation of said broadcast. In other exemplary embodiments wind is analyzed relative to environmental conditions, such as ground or atmospheric effects of wind.
In other exemplary embodiments, wind effects on objects in the broadcast are displayed, such as effects on a ball, a vehicle and a player, with overlaying a graphic on said broadcast indicative of wind effects.
In exemplary embodiments, one or more objects within a broadcast are tracked (tracking includes locating or identifying) and tagged with information, e.g., information relevant to a play or to performance of an athlete on a field of play.
The above discussed and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like elements are numbered alike in the following FIGURES:
As was noted above, the present disclosure relates to an improved system and method for displaying wind characteristics and effects in a broadcast. The following disclosure relates generally to tracking and tagging of any kind of objects, but also specifically addresses display of wind.
Tracking and Tagging Objects in General
In exemplary embodiments, one or more objects within a broadcast are tracked and tagged with information, e.g., information relevant to a play or to performance of an athlete on a field of play.
An automated system might track one, a plurality or all players on a field, such that an operator may easily select one or more players during a broadcast. Such selection may permit an operator to supply, or may present one or more pre-selected options, e.g., statistics in general or relevant to a given play (e.g., number of successful completions for a receiver in general or given a particular circumstance), statistics relevant to a given player.
Other exemplary embodiments provide for video overlay of such statistics during (or after) a broadcast of information, e.g., statistics, name, etc., relevant to a player. Such video may be static or dynamic, fully or partially displayed (e.g., when a player moves off the broadcasted display), solid, faded, phased in or out, colored, etc.
It should be noted that partial display of information relates to the idea that tagging need not be specifically related to a displayed broadcast image, but rather to the recorded images, whether selectively displayed or not during a broadcast. Tracking and tagging can be larger than the displayed portion during broadcast, and can wander in and out of the broadcast image itself, as desired or not. Further, delayed tracking, or delayed broadcast is contemplated, to allow an operator or an animator to tag a player of interest, if real time is not sufficient for either or any party. Such tagging may be via linked terminals or via wireless devices, such as tablets, which are either generally associated with the network or specifically identified to the network (e.g., assigned to a specific animator, operator, etc.).
Exemplary embodiments also provide for tracking of one or plural players across a field, wherein the video information perfectly or imperfectly follows a player during play motion. Imperfect follow may be desired in certain circumstances, e.g., to enhance the perceived motion of the player, e.g., during breaking of a tackle, a particular cut or breakout move. Further, rise or fade of a statistic graphic can be strategically orchestrated to prevent distraction from a play but also to provide unobtrusive secondary information to a viewer of broadcast content. The various attached FIGURES illustrate the point, e.g., partial entry of Andrew Hawkins (this is a simulated overlay on an established game) for a kickoff return.
For example,
A similar example is proved at
The presently described systems and methods advantageously provide tracking of objects (e.g., players) of any number. One embodiment provides tracking of five players on each side of an event (e.g., basketball). Others provide tracking of the five for each, plus the “sixth man,” i.e., certain or all of the fans, or commentator, (e.g., Dick Vitale), such that interesting events outside the actual field can be either automatically or manually recognized as potentially valuable to broadcast. An automatic identification can be related to prior recognized statistics or importance (e.g., game, series, etc. statistics, social media relevance, celebrity status, etc.).
Advantageously, exemplary present systems and methods provide for plural replay functions, e.g., name identifier 108, highlight circle 126 (replay halos, which may be done post production), player trail and speed 128, as is illustrated in
Other exemplary embodiments are described in the context of an exemplary golf application. For example, players, golf balls, golf holes, terrain, etc., may be tracked or tagged. Such items may be highlighted or otherwise emphasized for better broadcast visibility and tracking of play.
Additionally, information overlays, such as rangefinder information, terrain grades or other environmental conditions, such as wind or temperature information may be provided.
With regard to distances, in exemplary embodiments, an on-air broadcast camera can be calibrated to show distances from a golfer (or other point of interest) to regions of interest on a golf course. These distances can be pre-set or chosen live on-air to highlight something specific.
In other exemplary embodiments, alternate views, such as ball path or trajectory views may also be shown or artificially generated and overlaid or substituted for primary feeds, or provided as second screen views. Exemplary views include virtual flyovers, with or without player shots, which may be dynamically or manually plotted. Tracking may be assisted with GPS, radar, plural cameras (including elevated cameras, drones, high contrast cameras, etc.), and/or references tied to or associated with particular courses or course portions, among others.
Displaying Wind
With respect to thermography,
Additionally, multiple sampling points may be integrated into the analysis, or an image may be analyzed relative to ground or atmospheric effects of wind (or other environmental conditions), e.g., dust, heat waves and its motion relative to waves, etc.
Additionally, such information can reveal effects on the broadcast itself, or as an overlay on objects within the broadcast, e.g., effects on a race car, effects on a ball in play, etc. With regard to thermography (utilizing cameras or other sensors detecting heat), hot spots or cold spots may be detected and displayed, e.g., indicative of exertion or injury of a player, heat of a vehicle or surface, etc. Such thermography is useful in various broadcasts, e.g., sailing, baseball or cricket (heat indicative of a bat hitting the ball), soccer, football, racing, boxing or UFC. As noted above, thermographic, IR, etc. cameras may be used alongside broadcast cameras to detect heat.
Exemplary embodiments also provide for improved edit software, including, without limitation: “fly” between cameras, virtual camera angles, stop motion action, enhanced telestration and visual analysis, etc. The present disclosure may also be used for pre-produced packages, live-in-studio, and large scale events.
As we have noted, in exemplary embodiments, terrain, golf holes, etc. may be tracked and tagged. Further, tracking may include references tied to or associated with particular courses and course portions. Additionally, we have noted that overlay information may be generated from specific animators, operators, coaches, players, etc.
In exemplary embodiments, an expert's input (e.g., a golf professional) is provided as a graphical overlay on a golf course indicating desirable and/or undesirable portions of terrain (e.g., portions of a fairway, green, etc.). For example, such a golf professional may identify on a given golf course hole good and/or bad spots to land a ball from a tee shot, taking into account objective and optionally subjective factors (including e.g., places that might leave a golfer in an adverse position in considering a following shot). In exemplary embodiments, “good” and “bad” places could be shown as a graphical overlay, e.g., with green and red zones, respectively.
For example,
In
Referring again to
The above also indicates that representations, maps, etc. of any golf course, hole, green, etc., may be acquired in any number of ways or pulled from any number of sources. In one exemplary embodiment, a golf professional would look over the mapped terrain and assign such “good” and “bad” places (e.g., on a hole by hole basis, among others). These assigned places could be any size or shape, as desired, in order to take into account varying factors such as length of the preceding shot, anticipated conditions of the terrain, time of day, lighting, wind conditions, physical capabilities of players, contestant skill sets, etc. Further, these places may be updated based upon change to any factors, such as condition of the terrain, characteristics of any given player, environmental conditions, unanticipated hazards, etc.
In exemplary embodiments, indications of such places may be entered by the professional using a user interface, e.g., a tablet or other mobile device, or by another editor or operator. In exemplary embodiments, a user inputs such data on a 3D rendering of a course from a course map. Further exemplary embodiments, provide a 3D rendering of a course from specific pre-determined camera shots (from the vantage points of those cameras), with the information overlaid relative thereto.
In other exemplary embodiments, a lidar scan of a golf course is utilized to provide data (in exemplary embodiments, exact data) for topography, distance, scale, etc. Such data may be incorporated with camera calibration and/or pixel tracking data, with mapping of graphics to the course, including hole highlights, yard markers, player identifiers, etc. Other exemplary embodiments provide for insertion of three dimensional objects, such as virtual leaderboards, advertisements, etc.
With regard to the above example describing highlighting of a golf hole, using lidar or otherwise, or any examples presented herein, such methods and systems are also applicable to other broadcasts where highlighting of an object might be desirable, including without limitation, tennis, baseball, football, skiing, etc.
Referring now to
As above, such mechanisms may employ manually or automatically. If automatically, a system may determine that a level of shading would be desirable, e.g., by comparing levels of shading or color on a green surface.
Also, as above, a lidar scan of a golf course may be utilized to provide such data for a green. Matching a three dimensional model of the course from the lidar scan and marrying it to the live video, the system can control the relative intensity of the gradation effect, as well as direction of the virtual light source on the green.
With regard to the above example describing acquiring topography of a golf course, using lidar or otherwise, or any examples presented herein, such methods and systems are also applicable to other broadcasts where highlighting of an object might be desirable, including without limitation, tennis, baseball, football, skiing, etc.
User Interfaces
Further, it should not be ignored that various implementations, including those described below, may use touchscreens as interfacing for controlling any of the various described functions.
In an exemplary embodiment, Network Connectivity vs. Systems Closed Network include Cat5 to camera, Fiber to Camera or Fiber to truck, with an unobstructed view of field, a monitor showing previews of all renders, a program monitor, and a PL station with Iso to TopFont Operator (e.g., with a 2 Channel beltpack or a KP Panel). Two or more single mode fibers may be used for the monitoring feed, potentially a 3rd to put on a RVON KP panel.
In exemplary embodiments, optical tracking tracks moving objects on a field of play. This includes any type of tracking, be it image recognition, motion sensitive indication of possible tracking, etc.
An exemplary system is proposed below as Example 1:
This procedure applies to \ “A” Crew, but could be applied in general to any originated broadcast for which TracAB is desired.
This will apply to the operations on site. It is assumed that all the under the hood workings between affiliates are working.
TracAB Operator—Primarily responsible for performing field alignment of TracAB cameras and tagging players during the event. Communicates with TopFont Operator with regards to the status of the objects currently being tracked. Located in the stadium in a location that allows for an unobstructed view of the field. Works with department with regards to obtaining available fiber in the building. Works with Sports Audio department with regards to setting up Intercom at operating position. Troubleshoot TracAB system as needed. Relays to Tech Manager any issues with setup or operation of equipment in a timely fashion.
TopFont Operator—Primarily responsible for inserting TopFonts during broadcast using company provided touchscreen interface. Communicates with Producer, Director, Stats, Graphics BA in identifying what graphics are needed when. Also works with Tape Room for enhancements on replays. Communicates with TracAB Operator regarding key players that need to be tagged for each series. Troubleshoot TopFont system as needed. Relays any issues with setup or operation of equipment to Tech Manager in a timely fashion.
First and 10 Operator—Builds provided tripods and panheads for 4 camera locations. Calibrates those panheads and cameras for use for both the First and 10 system and the TopFont System. Verifies connectivity to the TopFont System. Operates First and 10 system during game. Troubleshoots First and 10 system, Pan, Tilt, Zoom data as needed. Relays any issues with setup or operation of equipment to Tech Manager, Technical Director and EIC in a timely fashion.
EVS Operators—Verify that all machines are setup to record and playback RP-188 Timecode properly. Performs test with Technical Director and TopFont Operator on set day to verify. Relays any issues with operation of Equipment to Tech Manager and EIC in a timely fashion.
Mobile Unit Engineers—Works to integrate systems into the broadcast both from a video standpoint and a networking standpoint. Verify all signals are present and acceptable. Assist TracAB Operator, TopFont Operator, First and 10 Operator with troubleshooting as able.
TracAB—Optical tracking system consisting of 2 camera arrays, a processing computer and a tracking computer. In this instance, it will be used to provide positioning information of objects (players) in a 3D space for the use of inserting informational graphics. These devices will be networked together using gigabit Ethernet switches on their own closed network. The processing computer will be connected via a second NIC to the graphics network.
TopFont—TopFonts to be delivered as a composited HD-SDI version of one of 4 cameras through 4 separate renderers. The system consists of a User Interface computer with a touch screen and 4 rendering computers. Each of these 5 computers will be networked together using gigabit Ethernet switches to the graphics network.
First and 10—The system which currently inserts the down and distance (“yellow line”).
Media Converter—An optical-electrical converter. In this case, it is used for the purpose of converting Ethernet to fiber in the stadium, and then fiber back to Ethernet at the truck location.
BDN—Fox's Broadcast Data Network used as the graphics network on the NFL Games.
Fiber Optic Cable—In this document any Fiber optic cable will be referring to single mode fiber unless otherwise specified.
GBE Switch—A managed switch capable of transmissions of 1 gbps between ports.
Identify space for 4 RU of processing computers. Install Processing computers in racks. Install GBE switch for closed network. Connect NIC 1 from each processing computer to the GBE Switch for closed network. Set IP Address information on NIC 2 of systems provided processing computers using IP information for the graphics network.
HD-SDI input and output need to be connected to each renderer and made available in production switcher and routing switcher. Preview output of each TopFont Render will be provided by a scan-converted output. This needs to be made available in the routing switcher.
First and 10 System is installed as normal. The First and 10 system is not included in the 20 RU count.
Set IP address information on each of the provided computers (rendering engines, user interface computers) using IP information for the graphics network. (Hopefully the IP Address information can be provided before the machines ship, but this may not be the case).
Connect each of the provided computers to the gigabit Ethernet switch that contains the graphics network. Connect Top Font Operator User Interface position. Turn on all computers and verify network connectivity between all devices in the truck.
TracAB mounting locations are verified with stadium personnel and Tech Manager. TracAB cameras unloaded out of C-Unit and transported into Stadium. TracAB camera arrays are mounted.
Take Reference picture from alongside each TracAB camera array. Power is needed at each TracAB array. Ethernet Cable is used to connect from one TracAB array to the other.
If the distance is too great for GBE signals to pass, or it is not physically possible to run a CAT-5 Cable between the cameras, a set of GBE Capable media converters may be used between the cameras. One TracAB array is connected to the closed Hego Systems network in the truck via a Gigabit capable media converter. The other TracAB array is connected to the TracAB operators laptop by Ethernet cable. If the distance is too great for GBE signals to pass, or it is not physically possible to run a CAT-5 Cable between the camera and the operating position, a set of GBE Capable media converters may be used between the camera and the operating position or the truck and the operating position.
TracAB Operator sets up operating position consisting of video monitor, laptop computer and intercom. TracAB Operator calibrates arrays and verifies everything with regards to the TracAB system is functioning properly. TracAB Operator reports to Tech Manager when system is fully operational.
An exemplary user Interface (UI) that may be used to tag the players is described immediately below:
Exemplary cameras track the players and send the information to a computer. An operator on the computer either: manually tags the players; views an automatic tag; or confirms an automatic tag. This data is passed onto a computer where an operator can now render the appropriate graphic to air.
Optical tracking tracks moving objects on a field of play, which can be a relatively manual process of assigning the proper player to the right moving object. However, additional exemplary embodiments may work as follows:
Exemplary processes and workflow allow tagging of players quickly. This can include moving the physical tagging process to the truck, instead of at stands or by the cameras. The present disclosure also suggests various strategies to tag players using game cameras, e.g., routing appropriate game cameras to the operator for more efficient tagging.
The present disclosure also describes a wholly different way to track players, such as a method of having the graphics operator be able to tag players from his user interface, by potentially using his touchscreen.
The present disclosure also contemplates a reverse tagging method, to relate a player on the screen on the field and ask the tagging computer which player is closest to the place on the field which was touched on the other computer. It may then tag the appropriate player with the object that is closest on the field.
Further, this technology may be used for advantage with greater than HD technology, particularly in area of interest highlight. For example, the greater than HD technology described herein may be utilized in combination with player tracking, etc. Exemplary embodiments also contemplate, in addition to that described below, a preset and controlled extraction window that pans, scans and/or zooms utilizing tracking data (i.e., controlling an extraction window utilizing tracking data).
An exemplary process is so:
Start with full raster greater than HD video, e.g., 4k video.
A graphical box or cursor, representing the area to which we are interested may appear.
The view then zooms to fill the box.
Exemplary embodiments of greater than HD systems and methods follow: a first image or video is captured at a first resolution, which resolution is greater than high definition and higher than a predetermined broadcast display resolution. A desired portion of the first image or video is then displayed at a second, lower resolution, which resolution is less than and closer to the predetermined broadcast display resolution. Accordingly, a selected portion of the captured image may be displayed at or near the predetermined broadcast display resolution (i.e., minimizing or eliminating loss of image detail relative to the predetermined broadcast display resolution).
An example of this is illustrated at
Also, while one extraction window is illustrated in
In further exemplary embodiments, the selectable extraction window (12 in
Referring now to
An image recorder 24 records the captured images, e.g., as a data stream on a server, and is configured to allow an operator to go back in time relative to the recording and examine selected portions of the captured image as described above. Such control is provided to an operator via the GUI 14 through a processor 26 interfacing with the GUI 14 and recorder 24. In exemplary embodiments, the recorder, processor and GUI are configured to allow the operator to go back instantaneously or near-instantaneously to select portions of the recorded image for presentation.
For example, with regard to
Referring again to
In another embodiment, at least one GUI is accessed by a tablet controller as a navigation tool for the system. Such tablet controller may be wireless and portable to allow for flexible a primary or supplemental navigation tool.
In other exemplary embodiments, multiple cameras may be positioned to capture images from different points of view, and extraction windows may be provided relative to the multiple image captures in a system for selectively displaying portions of native images from different points of view.
Further exemplary embodiments provide real time or near real time tracking of subjects of interest (e.g., identified, selected or pre-tagged players of interest or automatic tracking of a ball in a game). Additional exemplary embodiments also provide virtual directing of operated and automatically tracked subjects of interest for cutting into a full live broadcast, utilizing backend software and tracking technology to provide a virtual viewfinder that operates in manners similar to otherwise human camera operators. Such processes may also use artificial technology for simple tracking, e.g., of a single identified object, or for more complex operations approximating motions utilized by human camera operators, e.g., pan, tilt and zoom of the extraction window in a manner similar to human operators. For those examples using 4K (or the like) capture, camera capture could utilize a specifically designed 4K camera. A camera may also use wider lensing to capture more of the subject, with possible reconstituting or flattening in post production. Also, different lensing can be used specific to different applications.
Such processes may use the above-described multiple cameras and/or multiple extraction windows, or may run with specific regard to one camera and/or one extraction window. In such a way, an artificial intelligence can automatically capture, extract and display material for broadcast, utilizing the extraction window(s) as virtual viewfinders.
Additional exemplary embodiments also provide for virtual 3D extraction, e.g. via s single camera at 4K or 8K with a two window output.
In other exemplary embodiments, an increased image capture frame rates relative to a broadcast frame rate along with or in lieu of an increased image capture resolution, as has been discussed above.
In such embodiments, a first video is captured at a first frame rate, which frame rate is higher than a predetermined broadcast frame rate. A desired portion of the first video is then displayed at a second, lower frame rate, which frame rate is less than and closer to the predetermined broadcast frame rate. The desired portion of the first video is captured by an extraction window that extracts frames across the native captured video. In such a way, the extracted video provides smooth and clear video, without edgy or blurred frames. Such captured first video may be at any frame rate that is above the predetermined broadcast frame rate.
In further exemplary embodiments, the first video is captured at a first frame rate that is in super motion or hyper motion. In traditional video, this equates to approximately 180 (“supermotion”) frames per second or above (“hypermotion” or “ultramotion”) in a progressive frame rate. In exemplary embodiments, hypermotion is recorded in discrete times sufficient to capture a triggered instance of an action of camera subject for playback. In other exemplary embodiments, the present system performs a full time record of a camera in hypermotion, e.g., of sufficient length for replay playback archiving, such as more than fifteen minutes, more than thirty minutes, more than an hour, more than an hour and a half, or more than two hours, among others.
In other exemplary embodiments, raw data from at least one camera is manipulated to adjust the image quality (make it “paintable”) to broadcast specifications. In exemplary embodiments, broadcast “handles” may be integrated into the system to affect the raw data in a manner that is more germane to broadcast color temperatures, hues and gamma variables.
The present disclosure thus advantageously provides systems and methods for selective capture of and presentation of native image portions, for broadcast production or other applications. By providing exemplary embodiments using a selectable extraction window through a GUI, an operator has complete control over portions within the native images that the operator desires for presentation. Also, by providing exemplary embodiments with image capture greater than high definition (e.g., 4K), desired portions of the image selected by an operator may be presented at or relatively near high definition quality (i.e., without relative degradation of image quality). Further, by providing exemplary embodiments with image capture frame rates greater than that of a predetermined broadcast frame rate, extracted video therefrom provides smooth and clear video, without edgy or blurred frames. Finally, various exemplary embodiments utilizing enhanced GUI features, such as automatic tracking of subjects of interests, plural GUIs or extraction windows for one or plural (for different points of view) captured images provide advantageous production flexibilities and advantages.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, while exemplary embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and variations can be made to the invention disclosed herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Also, the exemplary implementations described above should be read in a non-limiting fashion, both with regard to construction and methodology. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the various embodiments have been described by way of illustration and not limitation.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/091,502, filed Dec. 13, 2014, and is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/804,637 filed Jul. 21, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/065477 | 12/14/2015 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/094895 | 6/16/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4184270 | Presbrey | Jan 1980 | A |
4679068 | Lillquist et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4975770 | Troxell | Dec 1990 | A |
5342051 | Rankin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5413345 | Nauck | May 1995 | A |
5489099 | Rankin et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5517236 | Sergeant et al. | May 1996 | A |
5729471 | Jain et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5789519 | Vock et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5865624 | Hayashigawa | Feb 1999 | A |
5892554 | Dicicco et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5938545 | Cooper et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953056 | Tucker | Sep 1999 | A |
6100925 | Rosser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144375 | Jain et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154250 | Honey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6201554 | Lands | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224492 | Grimes | May 2001 | B1 |
6233007 | Carlbom et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236940 | Rudow et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6449010 | Tucker | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6520864 | Wilk | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525690 | Rudow et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6750919 | Rosser | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6774932 | Ewing | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6958772 | Sugimori | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7158676 | Rainsford | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7250952 | Johnson | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7315631 | Corcoran et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7356082 | Kuhn | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7380259 | Schroeder | May 2008 | B1 |
7450758 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7529298 | Yasuda | May 2009 | B2 |
7693679 | Warnke et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7839926 | Metzger et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843510 | Ayer et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7873910 | Chaudhri et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7996771 | Girgensohn et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8077917 | Forsgren | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8381259 | Khosla | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8495697 | Goldfeder et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8648857 | Williams | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682417 | Huff | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8702504 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8743219 | Bledsoe | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756641 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8949889 | Erdmann | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9094615 | Aman et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9137558 | Gibbon et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138652 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9288545 | Hill et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9535879 | Allen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020019258 | Kim et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020057217 | Milnes et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082122 | Pippin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090217 | Limor et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020118875 | Wilensky | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168006 | Yasuda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009270 | Breed | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021445 | Larice et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033602 | Gibbs et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030103648 | Ito et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151835 | Su et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030210329 | Aagaard et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040136592 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040218099 | Washington | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258154 | Liu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261127 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040710 | Ahn | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052533 | Ito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050137958 | Huber et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147278 | Rui et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050237385 | Kosaka et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050255914 | McHale et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003825 | Iwasaki | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044410 | Shinkai et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078047 | Shu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078329 | Ohnishi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060197839 | Senior et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060197843 | Yoshimatsu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060197849 | Wernersson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070018952 | Arseneau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024706 | Brannon, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076957 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070139562 | Miyake | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198939 | Gold | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080019299 | Lekutai et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021651 | Seeley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080129825 | Deangelis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080129844 | Cusack et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080175441 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192116 | Tamir et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199043 | Forsgren | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080261711 | Tuxen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277486 | Seem et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080311983 | Koempel et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003599 | Hart et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009605 | Ortiz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021583 | Salgar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028440 | Elangovan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031382 | Cope | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037605 | Li | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090040308 | Temovskiy | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046152 | Aman | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090066782 | Choi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067670 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082139 | Hart | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090136226 | Wu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140976 | Bae et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147025 | Grigsby | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160735 | Mack | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090225845 | Veremeev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245571 | Chien et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262137 | Walker | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271821 | Zalewski | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284601 | Eledath et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290848 | Brown | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100077435 | Kandekar et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091017 | Kmiecik et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095345 | Tran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141772 | Inaguma et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179005 | Meadows | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192088 | Iwano | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208082 | Buchner et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100265125 | Kelly | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265344 | Velarde et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100289904 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289913 | Fujiwara | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321389 | Gay et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110013087 | House et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013836 | Gefen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016497 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110067065 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110149094 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149103 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157370 | Livesey | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169959 | Deangelis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181728 | Tieman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191023 | Engstrom | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110205022 | Cavallaro et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110292030 | Jiang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304843 | Rogers | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060101 | Vonog et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090010 | Dace et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120154145 | Anson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154593 | Anderson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120277036 | Lee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295679 | Izkovsky et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316843 | Beno et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331387 | Lemmey et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016099 | Rinard et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033605 | Davies et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041755 | Ivanov | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130211774 | Bentley et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227596 | Pettis et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140005929 | Gale et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140229996 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236331 | Lehmann et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240500 | Davies | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245367 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266160 | Coza | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140344839 | Woods et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150057108 | Regimbal et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062339 | Ostrom | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094883 | Peeters et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150149250 | Fein et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149837 | Alonso et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150226828 | Davies et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150234454 | Kurz | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150318020 | Pribula | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150370818 | Des Jardins et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382076 | Davisson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160173958 | Ryu et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160198228 | Hill et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160203694 | Hogsten et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217345 | Appel et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170201779 | Publicover et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170280199 | Davies et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170366867 | Davies et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190213720 | Urashita | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200107075 | Davies et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20210306598 | Davies et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2213485 | Feb 1995 | CA |
101090472 | Dec 2007 | CN |
2575079 | Apr 2013 | EP |
H06105231 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H07141022 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H08164896 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H0952555 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2001268562 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2003125414 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003162213 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003242517 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004048116 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004056473 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004354236 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004354256 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005073218 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005159385 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005 144003 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006081696 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006340108 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008005110 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008035006 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008199370 | Aug 2008 | JP |
20080199370 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009188976 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009194234 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010005267 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010152556 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010194074 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010245821 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011108165 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011130112 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011183138 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011527527 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012034365 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012095914 | May 2012 | JP |
2013020308 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013118712 | Jun 2013 | JP |
20060134702 | Dec 2006 | KR |
1020090056047 | Jun 2009 | KR |
20130086814 | Aug 2013 | KR |
20140023136 | Feb 2014 | KR |
9728856 | Aug 1997 | WO |
0114021 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0228093 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2005027516 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2008057285 | May 2008 | WO |
2010019024 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010140858 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2012051054 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2014036363 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mike—More homers? Blame the seats; Published Apr. 20, 2009 (Year: 2009). |
Newton—Autodesk wind simulation to enhance Fox Sports Super Bowl coverage; Published Jan. 31, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
JP Patent Application No. 2014-525086 English Translation of Trial Decision issued Apr. 3, 2018, 17 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2016-501836 Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated May 18, 2018, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,632 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2018, 44 pages. |
Australian Patent Application No. 2012294568 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016, 3 pages. |
Austrialian Application No. 2014244374 Examination Report No. 1, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 3 pages. |
China Application No. 201280044974.9 Second Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2016, 10 pages. |
CN Application No. 201280044974.9 First Office Action and Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2015, 14 pages. |
EP Application No. 12822586.9 Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 5, 2015, 6 pages. |
EP Application No. 12822586.9 Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
EP Application No. 13832174.0 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 13832174.0 Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2017, 4 pages. |
EP Application No. 14776040.9 Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 7, 2016, 8 pages. |
EP Application No. 15156533 Office Action dated May 15, 2017, 4 pages. |
EP Application No. 15156533.0 Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2013/057450 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 27, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2014/025362 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2014, 15 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2015/065472 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 5, 2016, 14 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2015/065474 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2015/065477 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2015/065481 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2014-525086 Decision of Rejection dated Nov. 8, 2016, 4 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2014-525086 Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated May 10, 2016, 5 pages. |
New Zealand Application No. 620992 First Examination Report dated Jul. 15, 2014, 2 pages. |
New Zealand Patent Application No. 620992 Further Examination Report dated Feb. 1, 2016, 3 pages. |
New Zealand Patent Application No. 715962 First Examination Report dated Feb. 1, 2016, 2 pages. |
New Zealand Patent Application No. 719619 First Examination Report dated May 19, 2016, 3 pages. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/049707 Written Opinion and International Search Report dated Jan. 7, 2013, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2015, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2016, 35 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Non-Final Office Action dated May 30, 2017, 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2015, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2016, 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,998 Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,998 Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2015, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,998 Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2017, 46 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,632 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015, 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,637 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2015, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/068,819 Non-Final Office Action dated May 6, 2016, 21 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867985 Supplementary EP Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2018, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868450 Supplementary EP Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2018, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868581 Supplementary EP Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2018, 8 pages. |
First Examination Report for New Zealand IP No. 734221, dated Aug. 28, 2017 (2 pp.). |
Further Examination Report for New Zealand IP No. 719619, dated Oct. 16, 2017 (1 pp.). |
Further Examination Report for New Zealand IP No. 719619, dated Sep. 20, 2017 (2 pp.). |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-530081, dated Oct. 10, 2017 (10 pp.). |
Rodrigues, Pedro. “A Field, Tracking and Video Editor Tool for a Football Resource Planner”, IEEE Conference Publications, US, 2013 (6 pp.). |
EP Application No. 14776040.9 Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2017, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Final Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2018, 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/207,998 Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2018, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/621,126 Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017, 34 pages. |
Australian Application No. 151189D1AU Examination Report No. 1 dated Nov. 27, 2018, 3 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2018/035007 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2018, 10 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/535,257 Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018, 51 pages. |
Australian Application No. 2017219030 Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2019, 4 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2016-501836 Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Jan. 15, 2019, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,632 Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pages. |
NZ Application No. 751181 First Examination Report dated Mar. 21, 2019, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/535,257 Final Office Action dated May 6, 2019, 31 pages. |
Golf Relay Broadcast, Proceedings of Workshop of the Institute of Television Engineers of Japan and Institute of Television Engineers of Japan Using Multimedia PC besides Katori, Nov. 26, 1993, vol. 17. No. 74, p. 23-27. |
JP Patent Application No. 2017-531612 Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Jul. 30, 2019, 6 pages. |
Relay watch in the “synchronization World Cup 2006” besides ** Group work, broadcast technology, * 6 hall publication incorporated company, Jan. 1, 2007, volume [60th ] No. 1 (716th volume of the set), p. 19-29. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,323 Final Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2019, 60 pages. |
AU Application No. 2015360249 Examination Report No. 1 dated May 9, 2019, 4 pages. |
AU Application No. 2015360250 Examination Report No. 1 dated May 23, 2019, 5 pages. |
AU Application No. 2015360251 Examination Report No. 1 dated May 17, 2019, 5 pages. |
AU Application No. 2015360252 Examination Report No. 1 dated May 8, 2019, 4 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867249.3 Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2019, 8 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867985.2 Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2019, 8 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868450.6 Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2019, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868581.8 Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2019, 7 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2017-531609 Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Jun. 18, 2019, 3 pages. |
JP Patent Application No. 2017-531610 Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Jun. 18, 2019, 3 pages. |
Au Application No. 2019271924 Examination Report No. 1 dated Nov. 17, 2020, 5 pages. |
EP Application No, 15867249.3 Oral Proceedings Summons dated Aug. 25, 2020, 10 pages. |
EP Application No, 18809839.6 Extended EP Search Report dated Sep. 11, 2020, 7 pages. |
NZ IP No. 768143; First Examination Report; dated Sep. 28, 2020, 2 pages. |
AU Application No. 2019271924 Notice of Acceptance for Patent Application dated Nov. 19, 2021, 3 pages. |
AU Application No. 2020201003 First Examination Report dated Feb. 26, 2021, 5 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867249.3 Decision to Refuse dated Mar. 12, 2021, 13 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867249.3 Provisional Opinion re Oral Proceedings issued Feb. 18, 2021, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867985.2 Decision to Refuse dated Mar. 12, 2021, 9 pages. |
EP Application No. 15867985.2 Provisional Opinion re Oral Proceedings issued Feb. 18, 2021, 6 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868450.6 2 Provisional Opinion re Oral Proceedings issued Feb. 18, 2021, 7 pages. |
EP Application No. 15868450.6 Decision to Refuse dated Mar. 15, 2021, 12 pages. |
EPP Application No. 18 809 839.6-1209 of May 30, 2018; Communication; dated Feb. 4, 2022; 5 pages. |
First Examination Report for NZ Application No. 786618; dated Mar. 30, 2022; 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/535,257; filed Jun. 12, 2017; dated Dec. 13, 2021, 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/535,257, filed Jun. 12, 2017; Final Office Action, dated Jul. 1, 2022, 18 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170366866 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62091502 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14804637 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15535243 | US |