Systems and methods for distraction

Abstract
A system for moving a portion of a patient's body including a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.
Description
BACKGROUND

Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.


Scoliosis is a general term for the sideways (lateral) curving of the spine, usually in the thoracic or thoracolumbar region. Scoliosis is commonly broken up into different treatment groups, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Early Onset Scoliosis and Adult Scoliosis.


Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) typically affects children between ages 10 and 16, and becomes most severe during growth spurts that occur as the body is developing. One to two percent of children between ages 10 and 16 have some amount of scoliosis. Of every 1000 children, two to five develop curves that are serious enough to require treatment. The degree of scoliosis is typically described by the Cobb angle, which is determined, usually from x-ray images, by taking the most tilted vertebrae above and below the apex of the curved portion and measuring the angle between intersecting lines drawn perpendicular to the top of the top vertebrae and the bottom of the bottom. The term idiopathic refers to the fact that the exact cause of this curvature is unknown. Some have speculated that scoliosis occurs when, during rapid growth phases, the ligamentum flavum of the spine is too tight and hinders symmetric growth of the spine. For example, as the anterior portion of the spine elongates faster than the posterior portion, the thoracic spine begins to straighten, until it curves laterally, often with an accompanying rotation. In more severe cases, this rotation may actually create a noticeable deformity, wherein one shoulder is lower than the other. Currently, many school districts perform external visual assessment of spines, for example in all fifth grade students. For those students in whom an “S” shape or “C” shape is identified, instead of an “I” shape, a recommendation is given to have the spine examined by a physician, and commonly followed-up with periodic spinal x-rays.


Typically, patients with a Cobb angle of 20° or less are not treated, but are continually monitored, often with subsequent x-rays. Patients with a Cobb angle of 40° or greater are frequently candidates for fusion surgery. It should be noted that many patients do not receive such a spinal assessment, for numerous possible reasons. Many school districts do not perform this simple assessment, and many children do not regularly visit a physician. Therefore, the curve often progresses rapidly and severely. There is a large population of grown adults with untreated scoliosis, some having extreme cases exhibiting Cobb angles of 90° or greater. Many adults having untreated scoliosis, though, do not have pain associated with their deformity and live relatively normal lives, though oftentimes with restricted mobility and motion. In AIS, the ratio of females to males having Cobb angles under 10° is about one to one. However, at Cobb angles above 30°, females outnumber males by as much as eight to one. Fusion surgery can be performed on the AIS patients or on adult scoliosis patients. In a typical posterior fusion surgery, an incision is made down the length of the back and Titanium or stainless steel straightening rods are placed along the curved portion. These rods are typically secured to the vertebral bodies, for example with hooks or bone screws, or more specifically pedicle screws, in a manner that allows the spine to be straightened. Usually, at the section selected for fusion, the intervertebral disks are removed and bone graft material is placed to create the fusion. If autologous graft material is used, the bone is generally harvested from a hip via a separate incision.


Alternatively, fusion surgery may be performed anteriorly. A lateral and anterior incision is made for access. Usually, one of the lungs is deflated in order to allow access to the spine from this anterior approach. In a less-invasive version of the anterior procedure, instead of the single long incision, approximately five incisions, each about three to four cm long are made in several of the intercostal spaces (between the ribs) on one side of the patient. In one version of this minimally invasive surgery, tethers and bone screws are placed and secured to the vertebra on the anterior convex portion of the curve. Currently, clinical trials are being performed in which staples are used instead of the tether/screw combination. One advantage of this surgery in comparison with the posterior approach is that scars resulting from the several smaller incisions are not as dramatic, though they are still located in a visible area, when a bathing suit, for example, is worn. Staple-based techniques have experienced some difficulty in clinical trials. The staples tend to pull out of the bone when a critical stress level is reached.


In some cases, after surgery, the patient will wear a protective brace for a few months as the fusing process occurs. Once the patient reaches spinal maturity, it may be difficult to remove the rods and associated hardware in a subsequent surgery because the fusion of the vertebra usually incorporates the rods themselves. Therefore, standard practice is to leave this implant in for life. With either of these two surgical methods, after fusion the patient's spine is rendered straight, but, depending on the number of vertebrae that were fused, limitations in the degree of flexibility, both in bending and twisting, are often observed. As fused patients mature, the fused section of the spine can impart significant stresses on the adjacent non-fused vertebrae, and often, other problems including pain can occur in these areas, sometimes necessitating further surgery. This tends to be in the lumbar portion of the spine that is prone to problems in aging patients. Many physicians are now interested in fusionless surgery for scoliosis, which may be able to eliminate, or at least reduce, one or more of the drawbacks of fusion.


One group of patients in which the spine is especially dynamic is the subset known as Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), which typically occurs in children before the age of five, and more often in boys than in girls. EOS is a more rare condition than AIS, occurring in only about one or two out of 10,000 children, but can be severe, sometimes affecting the normal development of organs. Because the spines of these children will generally grow a large amount after treatment, non-fusion distraction devices known as growing rods and a device known as the VEPTR—Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (“Titanium Rib”) have been developed. These devices are typically adjusted approximately every six months, or as required to match the child's growth, until the child is at least eight years old, and sometimes until they are 15 years old. Each adjustment requires a surgical incision to access the adjustable portion of the device. Because the patients may receive the device at an age as early as six months old, this treatment may require a large number of surgeries. Because of the multiple surgeries, these patients have a rather high incidence of infection.


Returning to the AIS patients, the treatment methodology for those with a Cobb angle between 20° and 40° is quite controversial. Many physicians prescribe a brace (for example, the Boston Brace) for a patient to wear on his body, under the clothes, 18 to 23 hours a day until the patient become skeletally mature (e.g., age 16). Because these patients are all passing through their socially demanding adolescent years, it is a quite serious prospect to choose between wearing a somewhat bulky brace that covers most of the upper body, having fusion surgery that may leave large scars and limit motion, and doing nothing and risking becoming disfigured and possibly disabled. It is common knowledge that many patients have, at times, hidden their braces, for example, in a bush outside of school, in order to escape embarrassment associated with the brace(s). The patient compliance with brace wearing has been so problematic that special braces have been constructed that sense the body of the patient and keep track of the amount of time per day that the brace is worn. Even such special braces have problems with patient compliance: patients have been known to place objects into unworn braces of this type in order to fool the sensor. Coupled with the inconsistent patient compliance with brace usage, is a feeling by many physicians that braces, even if used properly, are not at all effective at curing scoliosis. Physicians may agree that bracing can possibly slow down or even temporarily arrest curve (Cobb angle) progression, but they have noted that as soon as the treatment period ends and the brace is no longer worn, often the scoliosis progresses rapidly to a Cobb angle even more severe than it was at the beginning of treatment. Some say the reason for the supposed ineffectiveness of the brace is that it braces only on a portion of the torso, and not on the entire spine. Currently a prospective, randomized, 500-patient, clinical trial known as BrAIST (Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial) is enrolling patients, 50% of whom will be treated with the brace and 50% of who will simply be watched. Cobb angle data from these patients will be measured continually up until they reach skeletal maturity, or until a Cobb angle of 50° is reached, at which time the patient will likely undergo surgery. Many physicians feel that the BrAIST trial will show that braces are completely ineffective. If this is the case, the quandary about what to do with AIS patients who have a Cobb angle of between 20° and 40° will only become more pronounced. It should be noted that the patient population having a Cobb angle of 20-40° is as much as ten times larger than the population having a Cobb angle of 40° and greater.


Distraction osteogenesis, also known as distraction callotasis and osteodistraction has been used successfully to lengthen various bones of the body (e.g., long bones). Typically, the bone, if not already fractured, is purposely fractured by means of a corticotomy, and the resulting two segments of bone are gradually distracted apart, thereby allowing new bone to form in the gap. If the distraction rate is too high, there is a risk of nonunion. If the rate is too low, there is a risk that the two segments will prematurely, fuse to each other more than desired before the distraction period is complete. Once the desired length of the bone is achieved using this process, the bone is allowed to consolidate. Distraction osteogenesis applications are mainly focused on the growth of the femur or tibia, but may also include the humerus, the jaw bone (micrognathia), or other bones. There are many reasons for lengthening or growing bones which may be desirable. The applications including, but not limited to: post osteosarcoma bone cancer; cosmetic lengthening (both legs-femur and/or tibia) in short stature or dwarfism/achondroplasia; lengthening of one limb to match the other (congenital, post-trauma, post-skeletal disorder, prosthetic knee joint), nonunions.


Distraction osteogenesis using external fixators has been done for many years, but the external fixator can be unwieldy and painful for the patient. It can also subject the patient to the risk of pin track infections, joint stiffness, loss of appetite, depression, cartilage damage and other side effects. An external fixator, e.g., around the patient/patient's limb, can also delay the beginning of rehabilitation.


In response to the shortcomings of external fixator distraction, intramedullary distraction nails which may be contained entirely within the bone have been surgically implanted. Some such nails may be automatically lengthened via repeated rotation of the patient's limb, which can sometimes be painful to the patient, and can often proceed in an uncontrolled fashion. This therefore makes it difficult to follow the strict daily or weekly lengthening regime that avoids nonunion (if too fast) or early consolidation (if too slow). Lower limb distraction rates are generally on the order of about one mm per day. Other intramedullary nails which have an implanted motor and may be remotely controlled by an antenna have also been developed. These devices are designed to be lengthened or distracted in a controlled manner, but, due to their complexity, may not be manufacturable as an affordable product. Others have proposed intramedullary distractors containing an implanted magnet, which allows the distraction to be driven electromagnetically by an external stator. Because of the complexity and size of the external stator, this technology has not been reduced to a simple and/or cost-effective device, which can be taken home to allow patients to do daily lengthenings. Non-invasively adjustable implantable distraction devices, at least one embodiment of which is magnetically non-invasively adjustable, have been developed and used clinically in both scoliosis and limb lengthening patients.


Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease of the knee joint that affects a large number of patients, particularly over the age of 40. The prevalence of this disease has increased significantly over the last several decades, attributed partially, but not completely, to the rising age of the population as well as the increase in obesity. The increase may also be due to an increase in highly active people within the population. Knee osteoarthritis is caused mainly by long term stresses on the knee that degrade the cartilage covering the articulating surfaces of the bones in the knee joint. Oftentimes, the problem becomes worse after a particular trauma event, but it can also be a hereditary process. Symptoms include, but are not limited to, pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, swelling, deformity, and muscle weakness. Osteoarthritis may include one or more of the three compartments of the knee: the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint, the lateral compartment of the tibiofemoral joint, and the patellofemoral joint. In severe cases, partial or total replacement of the knee is performed in order to replace the diseased portions with new weight bearing surfaces for the knee, typically made from implant grade plastics or metals. These operations may involve significant post-operative pain and require substantial physical therapy. The recovery period may last weeks or months. Several potential complications of this surgery exist, including deep venous thrombosis, loss of motion, infection, and bone fracture. After recovery, surgical patients who have received uni-compartmental or total knee replacement must significantly reduce their activity, removing running and high energy sports completely from their lifestyle.


For these reasons, surgeons are attempting to intervene early in order to delay or even preclude knee replacement surgery. Osteotomy surgeries may be performed on the femur or tibia, in order to change the angle between the femur and tibia, and thus adjust the stresses on the different portions of the knee joint. In closed wedge or closing wedge osteotomy, an angled wedge of bone is removed, and the remaining surfaces are fused together, creating a new improved bone angle. In open wedge osteotomy, a cut is made in the bone and the edges of the cut are opened, creating a new angle. Bone graft is often used to fill in the newly-opened, wedge-shaped space, and, often, a plate is attached to the bone with bone screws. Obtaining the correct angle during either of these types of osteotomy is almost always difficult, and, even if the final result is close to what was desired, there can be a subsequent loss of the correction angle. Some other complications associated with this technique include nonunion and material failure.


Amputation of the arm or the leg can result in a residual limb, with a stump, having a shortened bone (e.g., a shortened femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius or ulna). A prosthetic limb or prosthetic limb attachment which may be attached to a residual limb may have problems fitting or functioning when attached to a residual limb having insufficient bone length. There may be poor energy transfer between the residual limb and the attached prosthesis, as short lever arms generate less torque for a given force. This functional deficit is compounded when the lever arm is encased in very compliant tissue, such as a residual femur that is surrounded by the soft tissues of the thigh. This may further impair prosthesis control. Individuals having short residual limbs may display gait asymmetries and gait changes. The wearer of a prosthetic limb who has a relatively short residual limb may exhibit compensatory changes that affect posture and cause discomfort or injury to the spine or other body structures. Amputation may occur or may be performed for several reasons including war-related injuries, motor vehicle accidents, including motorcycle accidents, other types of trauma or cancer of the bone or other adjacent tissue.


In addition to the many different types of implantable distraction devices that are configured to be non-invasively adjusted, implantable non-invasively adjustable non-distraction devices have also been envisioned, for example, adjustable restriction devices for gastrointestinal disorders such as GERD, obesity, or sphincter laxity (such as in fecal incontinence), or other disorders such as sphincter laxity in urinary incontinence. These devices, too, may incorporate magnets to enable non-invasive adjustment.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides for a system for moving a portion of a patient's body including a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the first cavity along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a second cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.


The present disclosure further provides for a method of modifying a residual limb of a patient including the steps of providing a distraction device having a housing extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and being configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod, attaching the housing to a first portion of a bone within the residual limb, attaching the second distraction rod to a second portion of the bone within the residual limb, decoupling the first portion of the bone from the second portion of the bone, and wherein the distraction device is actuatable such that the first distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the first distraction rod, to increase at least one of a force or a distance between the first portion of the bone and the second portion of the bone.


The present disclosure further provides for a system for moving a portion of a patient's body including a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.


In one embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity extending between the proximal end and the distal end, and being configured for telescopic displacement from within the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, and being configured for telescopic displacement from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod.


In one embodiment, a method of modifying a residual limb is provided. The method of modifying a residual limb of a patient includes the steps of: providing a distraction device comprising: a housing extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod; decoupling the first portion of the bone from the second portion of the bone; attaching the housing to a first portion of a bone within the residual limb; attaching the second distraction rod to a second portion of the bone within the residual limb, wherein the distraction device is actuatable such that the first distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the first distraction rod, to increase at least one of a force or a distance between the first portion of the bone and the second portion of the bone.


In another embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis; a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.


In still another embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity, wherein the first distraction rod is configured for telescopic displacement relative to the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, wherein the second distraction rod is configured for telescopic displacement from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod.


In one embodiment, a method of modifying a residual limb of a patient is provided. The method of modifying a residual limb includes the steps of: providing a distraction device comprising: a housing having a first cavity; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity, wherein the first distraction rod is telescopically displaceable relative to the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, wherein the second distraction rod is telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod with respect to the housing; then decoupling a first portion of a bone within the residual limb from a second portion of the bone; attaching the housing to one of the first portion and the second portion of the bone within the residual limb; and attaching the second distraction rod to the other of the first portion and the second portion of the bone within the residual limb, wherein the drive system is configured to be actuated so as to increase at least one of a force and a distance between the first portion and the second portion of the bone.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a distraction device.



FIG. 2 illustrates the distraction device of FIG. 1 in a partially distracted configuration.



FIG. 3 illustrates the distraction device of FIG. 1 in a fully distracted configuration.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exploded view of a distraction device.



FIG. 5 illustrates an elevation view of a distraction device.



FIG. 6 illustrates a sectional view of the distraction device of FIG. 5 taken along line 6-6.



FIG. 7 illustrates a residual limb.



FIG. 8 illustrates a distraction device inserted within a medullary canal of a bone of a residual limb.



FIG. 9 illustrates a distraction device secured within a medullary canal of a bone of a residual limb.



FIG. 10 illustrates an example external remote controller for wirelessly controlling and communicating with an implantable device.



FIG. 11 illustrates the internal components of a handpiece of the external remote controller of FIG. 10.



FIG. 12 illustrates a distraction device and residual limb after partial distraction.



FIG. 13 illustrates a distraction device and residual limb after full distraction.



FIG. 14 illustrates a distraction device as disclosed herein placed next to a distraction device already in the prior art.



FIG. 15 illustrates a sectional view of the distraction device of FIG. 14 taken along line 15-15.



FIG. 16 illustrates the distraction device of FIGS. 14 and 15 in a partially distracted configuration.



FIG. 17 illustrates a sectional view of the distraction device of FIG. 16 taken along line 17-17.



FIG. 18 illustrates the distraction device of FIGS. 14-17 in a fully distracted configuration.



FIG. 19 illustrates a sectional view of the distraction device of FIG. 18 taken along line 19-19.



FIGS. 20-23 schematically illustrate various alternate sources of a driving element of a non-invasively adjustable spinal implant.



FIG. 24 illustrates a kit containing instruments for use with distraction devices according to embodiments described herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the adjustable devices for implanting into the body disclosed herein are capable of achieving a large (e.g., greater than 40%, greater than, greater than 60%, greater than 80%, greater than 100% and even greater than 120%) total amount of adjustment length in comparison to the total length of the adjustable portion of the device. Adjustable devices may include distraction devices, for example distraction devices for orthopedic applications, including, but not limited to scoliosis, limb lengthening, bone transport, spinous process distraction, tibial wedge osteotomy adjustment, and spondylolisthesis. Maintaining a small size an adjustable (e.g., distraction and/or retraction) implant to fit into a small, short space within the body, and achieving large amounts of adjustable length have historically been conflicting design goals.



FIGS. 1-3 illustrate an embodiment of an implantable adjustable system 100 comprising a distraction device 110. The distraction device 110 comprises a housing 202, a first distraction rod 204 and a second distraction rod 206. The second distraction rod 206 and the housing 202 are each configured for coupling to a patient. The second distraction rod 206 contains one or more holes 208 for passing an anchor with which to secure the distraction device 110 to a patient. One of the one or more holes 208 may be located between about 3 mm and 15 mm, or approximately 5 mm, from the distal end of the second distraction rod 206. The housing 202 contains one or more holes 210 for passing an anchor with which to secure the distraction device 110 to the patient. One of the one or more holes 210 may be located between about 5 mm and about 20 mm, or approximately 10 mm, from the proximal end of the housing 202. The housing 202 may have a diameter of between about 8.5 mm and about 16 mm, or between about 10.5 mm and about 14.5 mm, or about 14 mm. In some embodiments, the anchor is a bone anchor, for example, a bone screw 224, 226 (FIG. 4). The bone screws 224, 226 may be between about 3 mm and about 6 mm in diameter. In some embodiments, bone screw 244 is 4 mm in diameter and bone screw 226 is 5 mm in diameter. The bone screws may be between about 18 mm and about 80 mm in length, or between about 20 mm and about 75 mm in length. However, other types of anchoring and/or connection are contemplated for coupling the second distraction rod 206 and the housing 202 to the bone of the patient. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the second distraction rod 206 may be configured to be telescopically displaceable with respect to the housing 202. As seen in FIG. 2, the second distraction rod 206 may be configured to also be telescopically displaceable with respect to the first distraction rod 204. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the first distraction rod 204 may be configured to be telescopically displaceable with respect to the housing 202. The first distraction rod 204 may be longitudinally displaceable from within a cavity 212 in the housing 202 that extends along longitudinal axis Z (FIG. 1). The first distraction rod 204 may be configured to be telescopically displaceable along the longitudinal axis Z. The first distraction rod 204 has a cavity 214, with the second distraction rod 206 configured to telescopically displace from the cavity 214 along the longitudinal axis Z. In some embodiments, the first distraction rod 204 may have a diameter of between about 8 mm and about 13 mm, or about 11.5 mm. In some embodiments, the second distraction rod 206 may have a diameter of between about 5 mm and about 11 mm, or about 9 mm. In some embodiments it may be desired that there be no rotational motion (about the longitudinal axis Z) between at least one of the housing 202, the first distraction rod 204, and the second distraction rod 206. In some embodiments, one or more first longitudinal grooves 216 extends along an exterior surface 218 of the first distraction rod 204 and is slidingly engaged by protrusions 209 (FIG. 4) which extend in an inward radial direction from the interior of a cap 215, which is coupled to the housing 202, thus allowing longitudinal displacement between the first distraction rod 204 and the housing 202, but not allowing rotation between them. External ribs 217 on the cap 215 insert into grooves 219 in the housing 202 during assembly. The cap 215 may be snapped into place on the housing 202 or otherwise secured by adhesive, welding, soldering, brazing or other methods. One or more second longitudinal grooves 220 extending along an exterior surface 222 of the second distraction rod 206 are slidingly engaged by protrusions 211 (FIG. 4) which extend from the interior of the cavity 214 of the first distraction rod 204 in an inward radial direction, thus allowing longitudinal displacement between the second distraction rod 206 and the first distraction rod 204, but not allowing rotation between them. If the distraction device 110 is used for the purpose of distracting two pieces of bone (e.g., move two bones or two pieces of a bone apart from each other), then the protrusions 209, 211 and longitudinal grooves 216, 220 make it possible to assure that there may be substantially no rotation between the two bone pieces. As seen in FIG. 3, the first longitudinal grooves 216 and the second longitudinal grooves 220 can be purposely configured to reside at different clock positions (in circumferential relation to the longitudinal axis Z (FIG. 1), in order to make enough room in the second distraction rod 206, the first distraction rod 204, and the housing 202, so that wall thickness, and thus strength and durability, are not compromised.


Turning to FIG. 4, bone screws 224, 226 are depicted having unicortical threads 228, 230 and unthreaded shafts 232, 234, however, any type of bone screw, for example a fully-threaded bone screw, may be used for placement through the holes 208, 210. The holes 208, 210 may be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis Z, or may be at various angles, depending upon the configuration through which they are to be coupled to the bone. With further reference to FIGS. 4-6, the distraction device 110 comprises a driving element 242 configured to be activated by a remotely applied source. A nut 236 may be secured within a cavity 238 in the second distraction rod 206. The nut 236 may have external threads 240, which are engaged or bonded into an internal thread 244 of the cavity 238. The nut 236 also contains an internal thread 246. A magnetic assembly 248 may be held between a radial bearing 250 and a thrust bearing 252 (FIG. 6), and comprises a radially-poled permanent magnet 338 which is rotationally coupled to one or more gear modules 256 (e.g., planetary gearing). The thrust bearing 252 and radial bearing 250 may be restrained at their longitudinal extents in relation to the housing 202, in order to maintain the magnetic assembly 248 within the housing 202, while allowing it and its components to rotate freely. In some embodiments, the permanent magnet 338 may be carried within one or more cylindrical housings or cups. The one or more gear modules 256 output (through the interior of the thrust bearing 252) to a coupler 258, which may be rotationally coupled to a first lead screw 260 via a pin 262, which passes through a hole 261 in the coupler 258 and a hole 263 at a proximal end 264 of the first lead screw 260. The first lead screw 260 also has an abutment 270 at its distal end 266, and comprises an external thread 268. In some embodiments, the gear modules 256 may provide a gear ratio of 4:1, 16:1, 64:1, 256:1 between the magnet 338 and the first lead screw 260, or another ratio. In some embodiments, the first lead screw 260 may be directly coupled to the magnet 338, and thus provide 1:1 rotation. The first lead screw 260 may be threadingly engaged with an internal thread 272 of a second lead screw 274. The majority of the length of the second lead screw 274 may be an internal bore 271 with a diameter that is equal to or greater than the major diameter of the internal thread 272. The internal thread 272 may be located only at the proximal end 275 of the second lead screw 274. In some embodiments, the length of the internal thread 272 along the longitudinal axis Z may be about 3 mm to about 7 mm, or about 5.5 mm. The external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 may be threadingly engaged with the internal thread 246 of the nut 236 which may be secured within the second distraction rod. An exemplary external thread specification for each of the lead screws 260, 274 may be 80 threads per inch.


The interior contents of the distraction device 110, including the interior portions of cavities 212, 214, 238, which contain the magnetic assembly 248 and the lead screws 260, 274, are protected from external fluids and materials by dynamic seals 278, 280. A first dynamic seal 278 includes an o-ring 282, which resides within a circumferential groove 284 at a proximal end 286 of the first distraction rod 204. The o-ring 282 seals along an inner cylindrical surface 288 of the housing 202, and maintains the dynamic seal 278 throughout the longitudinal displacement of the first distraction rod 204 with the housing 202. A second dynamic seal 280 includes an o-ring 290, which resides within a circumferential groove 292 at a proximal end 294 of the second distraction rod 206. The o-ring 290 seals along an inner cylindrical surface 296 of the first distraction rod 204, and maintains the dynamic seal 280 throughout the longitudinal displacement of the second distraction rod 206 with the first distraction rod 204.



FIG. 6 illustrates the distraction device 110 in a fully undistracted (or retracted) condition, wherein the distal end 287 of the first distraction rod 204 and the distal end 295 of the second distraction rod 206 are located near the distal end 203 of the housing 202. In use, when the magnet 338 is rotated (e.g., by an externally-applied moving magnetic field) (and caused to rotate in a first rotational direction) the first lead screw 260 may be turned (through the gear ratios of gear modules 256A, 256B, 256C). The turning of the external thread 268 of the first lead screw 260 in relation to the internal thread 272 of the second lead screw 274, thus causes both the second distraction rod 206 and the second lead screw 274 to longitudinally extend from the housing 202. As described, in at least some embodiments, the second distraction rod 206 is prevented from rotation with respect to the first distraction rod 204 and the housing 202. In some embodiments, the second lead screw 274 does not turn as it longitudinally extends with the second distraction rod 206, thus the first distraction rod 204 does not longitudinally extend in relation to the housing 202. FIG. 12, which will be referred to later when describing the procedure for lengthening a bone in a residual limb, shows the distraction rod 110 after the second distraction rod 206 has been longitudinally extended in relation to both the housing 202 and the first distraction rod 204. For this first stage of distraction to occur as described, the frictional torque between the external thread 268 of the first lead screw 260 and the internal thread 272 of the second lead screw 274 is less than the frictional torque between the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 and the internal thread 246 of the nut 236. This tends to be the case, however, other assembly steps and materials may additionally be provided in order to assure this. For example, in some embodiments, a silicone lubricant or a Krytox® lubricant may be applied to the external thread 268 of the first lead screw 260 and/or the internal thread 272 of the second lead screw 274, but not to the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 and the internal thread 246 of the nut 236. In some embodiments, the lubricant may be applied more liberally to the external thread 268 of the first lead screw 260 and/or the internal thread 272 of the second lead screw 274 than to the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 and/or the internal thread 246 of the nut 236. In some embodiments, a more lubricious lubricant may be applied to the external thread 268 of the first lead screw 260 and/or the internal thread 272 of the second lead screw 274 while a less lubricious lubricant is applied to the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 and/or the internal thread 246 of the nut 236.


The longitudinal length of distraction possible for the second distraction rod 206 on its own may be between about 20 mm and about 90 mm, or between about 40 mm and about 70 mm, or about 50 mm. When the second distraction rod 206 has been fully distracted in relation to the first distraction rod 204, the first lead screw 260 will rotationally engage with the second lead screw 274, and thus the rotation of the first lead screw 260 will begin to turn the second lead screw 274 (e.g., in a one-to-one manner). In some embodiments, this occurs when the abutment 270 at the distal end 266 of the first lead screw 260 contacts a ledge 273 adjacent the internal thread 272 at the proximal end 275 of the second lead screw 274. As the first lead screw 260 continues to turn the second lead screw 274, the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 turns inside the internal thread 246 of the nut 236 of the second distraction rod 206, causing the second distraction rod 206 to longitudinally extend further in relation to the housing 202, but now, while also dragging the first distraction rod 204 along with it. The longitudinal length of distraction possible for the first distraction rod 204, after full distraction of the second distraction rod 206, may be between about 20 mm and about 90 mm, or between about 40 mm and about 70 mm, or about 50 mm. FIG. 13 shows the distraction rod 110 after the first distraction rod 204 and the second distraction rod 206 have been longitudinally extended in this manner in relation to the housing 202. Using this two-stage approach to distraction, a total distraction length of 100 mm, or even greater than 100 mm, may be possible with a housing 202 having a cavity 212 length of only 97 mm; thus the distraction length provided can be 102% of the housing cavity length. In some embodiments, the length of the distraction device 110 is 130 mm in a fully retracted state and 230 mm in a fully distracted state. Prior art devices that use only a single distraction rod generally provide distraction lengths of only 40% to 50% of the housing cavity length. The distraction device 110 may be also capable of retracting, by applying a moving magnetic field in an opposite direction, and causing the components to turn in opposite directions.


In some embodiments, the distraction device 110 (FIG. 4) may include features to limit the extent of distraction of the second distraction rod 206 in relation to the first distraction rod 204, and in the first distraction rod 204 in relation to the housing 202. For example, an abutment 289, or stop, may be located at the end of the longitudinal groove 216, or at another location at the proximal end 286 of the first distraction rod 204. An abutment 291, or stop, may be located at a distal, internal portion of the housing 202, For example, wherein the abutment 291 is a protrusion carried on the internal wall of the housing 202, or wherein it is a one end of the protrusion 209 of the cap 215. The abutment 291 may be configured to abut/engage the abutment 289 at a maximum degree of extension of the first distraction rod 204 in relation to the housing 202. Furthermore, an abutment 293, or stop, may be located at the end of the longitudinal groove 220, or at another location at the proximal end 294 of the second distraction rod 206. An abutment 297, or stop, may be located at a distal, internal portion of the first distraction rod 204, for example, wherein the abutment 297 is a protrusion carried on the internal wall of the first distraction rod 204. The abutment 297 may be configured to abut/engage the abutment 293 at a maximum degree of extension of the second distraction rod 206 in relation to the first distraction rod 204. Each of the abutments 289, 291, 293, 297 may be configured so that the second distraction rod 206, the first distraction rod 204, and the housing 202 do not get stuck or jammed against each other when the longitudinal extents are reached, thus allowing for retraction or shortening of the distraction device 110, if desired. The shortening of the distraction device 110 may be desired in certain situations in which compression of bone pieces is needed. This includes situations in which it is desired to form, reform, or improve a callus for osteogenesis. In some embodiments, the protrusions 209, 211 themselves may serve as the abutments 291, 297.


The implantable adjustable system 100 incorporating a distraction device 110, as disclosed herein, may utilize an External Remote Controller (ERC). FIG. 10 illustrates an example of an External Remote Controller (ERC) 180 which may be used to non-invasively control the distraction device 110 by means of a magnetic coupling of torque. ERC 180 comprises a magnetic handpiece 178, a control box 176 (containing a processor) which may be integrated with the handpiece 178 and a power supply 174 such as a battery or external plug for connection to a standard power outlet. The control box 176 includes a control panel 182 having one or more controls (buttons, switches or tactile, motion, audio or light sensors) and a display 184. The display 184 may be visual, auditory, tactile, the like, or some combination of the aforementioned features, or any other display/UI described in this disclosure. The control box 176 may further contain a transceiver for communication with a transceiver in the implant and/or other external devices.



FIG. 11 illustrates an internal assembly 478 of the magnetic handpiece 178 configured for applying a moving magnetic field to allow for non-invasive adjustment of the distraction device 110 by turning the magnet 338 within the distraction device 110. The magnet 338 of the distraction device 110 includes a north pole 406 and a south pole 408. A motor 480 with a gear box 482 outputs to a motor gear 484. The motor gear 484 engages and turns a central (idler) gear 486, which has the appropriate number of teeth to turn first and second magnet gears 488, 490 at identical rotational speeds. First and second magnets 492, 494 turn in unison with the first and second magnet gears 488, 490, respectively. Each magnet 492, 494 may be held within a respective magnet cup 496 (shown partially). An exemplary rotational speed may be 60 RPM or less. This speed range may be desired in order to limit the amount of current density included in the body tissue and fluids, to meet international guidelines or standards. As seen in FIG. 11, the south pole 498 of the first magnet 492 may be oriented the same as the north pole 404 of the second magnet 494, and likewise, the first magnet 492 has its north pole 400 oriented the same and the south pole 402 of the second magnet 494. As these two magnets 492, 494 turn synchronously together, they apply a complementary and additive moving magnetic field to the radially-poled, magnet 338. Magnets having multiple north poles (for example, two) and multiple south poles (for example, two) are also contemplated in each of the devices. Alternatively, a single magnet (e.g., a magnet with a larger diameter) may be used in place of the two magnets. As the two magnets 492, 494 turn in a first rotational direction 410 (e.g., counter-clockwise), the magnetic coupling causes the magnet 338 to turn in a second, opposite rotational direction 412 (e.g., clockwise). The rotational direction of the motor 480 may be controlled by buttons 414, 416. One or more circuit boards 418 contain control circuitry for both sensing rotation of the magnets 492, 494 and controlling the rotation of the magnets 492, 494.



FIGS. 7-9 and 12-13 illustrate the implantable adjustable system 100 incorporating a distraction device 110 and an External Remote Controller (ERC) 180 being used in a surgery and subsequent adjustment procedures to increase the length of a bone 502 in a residual limb 500. In some cases, the residual limb is a femur of an above-the-knee amputee. As seen in FIG. 7, the bone 502 may have an amputated end 504, and the residual limb 500 may have a stump surface 506. A prosthetic limb or prosthetic limb attachment which may be attached to a residual limb 500 may have problems fitting or functioning when attached to a residual limb 500 having insufficient bone 502 length. The medullary canal 514 of the bone 502 may be drilled or reamed to a diameter about equal or slightly larger than that of the distraction device 110 to be utilized. The bone 502 may be divided into a first bone portion 508 and a second bone portion 510 by creating an osteotomy 512. In FIG. 8, the distraction device 110 may be placed within the medullary canal 514 so that the one or more holes 210 are within the first portion 508 and the one or more holes 208 are within the second portion 510. During pre-operative planning, members of the surgical team will often assess both the condition and the coverage of soft tissues. The stump surface 506 may be modified, by stretching the skin or tissue, or by adding skin graft material, or performing plastic surgery, in order to create enough future available room for the bone 502 to increase in length inside the residual limb 500 in the area adjacent the stump surface 506. In addition, infection prevention measures are commonly performed. During pre-operative planning, several other factors are determined including: the amount of limb length discrepancy, the diameter of the medullary canal, the required length of distraction device 110 to be used, or the location of the planned osteotomy. In some cases, the distraction device may be implanted in an antegrade manner and in some cases in a retrograde manner. When implanted in an antegrade manner the distraction device 110 may be implanted via piriformis fossa entry. A retrograde approach may instead be chosen, for example, in patients with a severely abducted hip. In FIG. 9, bone screws 226, 224 are secured to the bone 502 through the holes 210, 208 in order to secure the distraction device 110 to the first and second bone portions 508, 510. The patient may be allowed to recover and at a later time, for example, about two to about ten days or about five days, the first distraction procedure may be performed. The ERC 180 may be placed on the residual limb 500 at a location adjacent the magnet 338, and is operated to distract the first bone portion 508 and the second bone portion 510 apart. The procedure may be repeated several times and may be performed by medical personnel, or the patient's family and friends, or even the patient themself. Exemplary distraction protocol may include distraction of about 0.50 mm to about 1.50 mm in longitudinal distraction per day. In some cases, it may include distraction of about 0.75 mm to about 1.25 mm in longitudinal distraction per day. In some cases, the distraction may be about 1.00 mm per day. This may be broken up into several distraction procedures per day, for example, about 0.33 mm, three times a day.



FIG. 12 illustrates the distraction device 110 in the bone 502 after the second distraction rod 206 has approximately been fully distracted in relation to the first distraction rod 204. Over the several weeks and/or months that the distraction procedures take place, a new bone growth section 516 of bone begins to form between the first portion 508 and the second portion 510. FIG. 13 illustrates the distraction device 110 in the bone 502 after the first distraction rod 204 has approximately been fully distracted in relation to the housing 202. After the desired final distraction length is reached, distraction procedures are discontinued, and the new bone growth section 516 may be allowed time to fully consolidate. The distraction device 110 can continue to provide stability to the bone 502 of the residual limb 500 while the bone 502 is allowed to consolidate and after the bone has consolidated. After consolidation, the distraction device 110 may then be removed from the patient, though in some cases, the distraction device 110 may be left in place within the bone 502.



FIG. 14 illustrates one embodiment of a distraction device 600 placed next to a prior art distraction device 602. The distraction device 600 may be capable of distracting about 50 mm, as is the prior art distraction device 602, however the length L1 of the housing portion of the distraction device 600 is over 25% percent shorter than the length L2 of the housing portion of the prior art distraction device 602. The treatment of early onset scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is generally performed on small, thin patients having little space in their surgical sites to implant large device housings. Therefore, high efficiency adjustable distraction devices (total distraction length to housing length ratio) may allow more patients to be treated. Turning to FIG. 15, the distraction device 600 includes a housing 604 which may be connected to a rod 606 by welding or other bonding methods. In some embodiments, the rod 606 and the housing 604 may be formed from the same monolithic material. Within the housing 604, a driving element including a magnetic assembly 608 (containing a radially-poled magnet 630) may be held longitudinally stationary between a thrust bearing 610 and a radial bearing 612. Though gear modules may be incorporated, as in the embodiment of FIG. 1, in FIG. 15 the distraction device is depicted in an embodiment wherein the magnetic assembly 608 may be directly connected to a first lead screw 614 by a pin 616. In the distraction device 600 embodiment of FIG. 15, a first distraction rod 618 is telescopically carried on the outside of the housing 604, and is longitudinally displaceable along a longitudinal axis Z. A second distraction rod 620 may be telescopically carried within a cavity 622 within the housing 604, and is longitudinally displaceable along the longitudinal axis Z. The second distraction rod 620 has a cavity 632 which allows space for the first lead screw 614. A second lead screw 624 having an internal thread 626 at its proximal end 628 may be carried annularly between the first lead screw 614 and the second distraction rod 620. Rotation of the magnetic assembly 608 by a remotely-applied moving magnetic field causes the first lead screw 614 to rotate within the internal thread 626 of the second lead screw 624, thus causing the second lead screw 624 and the second distraction rod 620 to longitudinally displace in relation to the housing 604 and the first distraction rod 618. The distraction device 600 with the second distraction rod 620 fully displaced in relation to the first distraction rod 618 is illustrated in FIGS. 16-17. At this fully displaced condition, an abutment 634 at the distal end 636 of the first lead screw 614 abuts a ledge 638 at the proximal end 640 of the second lead screw 624. As the first lead screw 614 continues to turn, this causes the second lead screw 624 to turn in unison with the first lead screw 614, thus turning of the second lead screw 624 within an inner thread 642 within the cavity 632 of the second distraction rod 620. This causes the second distraction rod 620 to longitudinally displace further from the housing 604, dragging the first distraction rod 618 along with it. The distraction device 600 with the first distraction rod 618 fully displaced in relation to the housing 604 is illustrated in FIGS. 18-19. A first o-ring 644 held in a circumferential groove in the first distraction rod 618 forms a dynamic seal between the first distraction rod 618 and the housing 604. A second o-ring 646 held in a circumferential groove in the first distraction rod 618 forms a dynamic seal between the first distraction rod 618 and the second distraction rod 620. The distraction device 600 may be capable of retracting, by applying a moving magnetic field in an opposite direction, and causing the components to turn in opposite directions.


The distraction device 600 may comprise features to limit or stop rotation between the first distraction rod 618 and the housing 604, and/or between the second distraction rod 620 and the first distraction rod 618. For example, the longitudinal grooves, 216, 220 and protrusions 209, 211 of the embodiment of FIGS. 1-6 may be incorporated into the design of the distraction device 600, so that there may be substantially no rotation possible between the second distraction rod 620 and the housing 604. For example, if the second distraction rod 620 is rigidly coupled to a first vertebra (e.g., via a screw or hook) and the housing 604 (e.g., via rod 606) is coupled to a second vertebra (e.g., via a screw or hook), rotation may be substantially limited between the first vertebra and the second vertebra, so that no unwanted movement between them can occur. Furthermore, the abutments 289, 291, 293, 297 of the embodiment of FIGS. 1-6 may be incorporated into the design of the distraction device 600 in order to control the extent of lengthening of the first distraction rod 618 in relation to the housing 604, and/or the second distraction rod 620 in relation to the first distraction rod 618.



FIGS. 20-23 illustrate embodiments of alternate sources to the rotatable magnetic assembly as the driving element 242 of a non-invasively adjustable implant. FIG. 20 illustrates a non-invasively adjustable system 1300 comprising an implant 1306 having a first implant portion 1302 and a second implant portion 1304, the second implant portion 1304 non-invasively displaceable with relation to the first implant portion 1302. The first implant portion 1302 may be secured to a first bone portion 197 and the second implant portion 1304 may be secured to a second bone portion 199 within a patient 191. A motor 1308 may be operable to cause the first implant portion 1302 and the second implant portion 1304 to displace relative to one another. An external remote controller (ERC) 1310 has a control panel 1312 for input by an operator, a display 1314 and a transmitter 1316. The transmitter 1316 sends a control signal 1318 through the skin 195 of the patient 191 to an implanted receiver 1320. Implanted receiver 1320 communicates with the motor 1308 via a conductor 1322. The motor 1308 may be powered by an implantable battery, or may be powered or charged by inductive coupling.



FIG. 21 illustrates a non-invasively adjustable system 1400 comprising an implant 1406 having a first implant portion 1402 and a second implant portion 1404, the second implant portion 1404 non-invasively displaceable with relation to the first implant portion 1402. The first implant portion 1402 may be secured to a first bone portion 197 and the second implant portion 1404 may be secured to a second bone portion 199 within a patient 191. An ultrasonic motor 1408 may be operable to cause the first implant portion 1402 and the second implant portion 1404 to displace relative to one another. An external remote controller (ERC) 1410 has a control panel 1412 for input by an operator, a display 1414 and an ultrasonic transducer 1416, which may be coupled to the skin 195 of the patient 191. The ultrasonic transducer 1416 produces ultrasonic waves 1418 which pass through the skin 195 of the patient 191 and operate the ultrasonic motor 1408.



FIG. 22 illustrates a non-invasively adjustable system 1700 comprising an implant 1706 having a first implant portion 1702 and a second implant portion 1704, the second implant portion 1704 non-invasively displaceable with relation to the first implant portion 1702. The first implant portion 1702 may be secured to a first bone portion 197 and the second implant portion 1704 may be secured to a second bone portion 199 within a patient 191. A shape memory actuator 1708 may be operable to cause the first implant portion 1702 and the second implant portion 1704 to displace relative to one another. An external remote controller (ERC) 1710 has a control panel 1712 for input by an operator, a display 1714 and a transmitter 1716. The transmitter 1716 sends a control signal 1718 through the skin 195 of the patient 191 to an implanted receiver 1720. Implanted receiver 1720 communicates with the shape memory actuator 1708 via a conductor 1722. The shape memory actuator 1708 may be powered by an implantable battery, or may be powered or charged by inductive coupling.



FIG. 23 illustrates a non-invasively adjustable system 1800 comprising an implant 1806 having a first implant portion 1802 and a second implant portion 1804, the second implant portion 1804 non-invasively displaceable with relation to the first implant portion 1802. The first implant portion 1802 may be secured to a first bone portion 197 and the second implant portion 1804 may be secured to a second bone portion 199 within a patient 191. A hydraulic pump 1808 may be operable to cause the first implant portion 1802 and the second implant portion 1804 to displace relative to one another. An external remote controller (ERC) 1810 has a control panel 1812 for input by an operator, a display 1814 and a transmitter 1816. The transmitter 1816 sends a control signal 1818 through the skin 195 of the patient 191 to an implanted receiver 1820. Implanted receiver 1820 communicates with the hydraulic pump 1808 via a conductor 1822. The hydraulic pump 1808 may be powered by an implantable battery, or may be powered or charged by inductive coupling. The hydraulic pump 1808 may alternatively be replaced by a pneumatic pump.


Though not illustrated, another driving element 242 may include a magnetorestrictive element. A number of materials may be used to produce the components like the housing, first distraction rod, second distraction rod, first lead screw, and second lead screw, including but not limited to titanium, titanium alloys, titanium 6-4, cobalt-chromium alloys, and stainless steel.



FIG. 24 illustrates a sterilizable kit 700 of instruments for use with embodiments of the distraction device described herein. A sterilizable tray 702 includes holes 704 which may allow gas or steam to enter the tray 702 when the tray 702 is covered by a cover (not shown). One or more dividers 706 may be constructed of a pliable material (such as silicone) and provide cavities, holes or slits therebetween for securing the one or more instruments. A drill bushing 708 and a guide tube 710 may be used for guiding one or more drills or reamers, for example, while drilling holes within the medullary canal of a bone. Prior to this, a hole may be made in the skin, soft tissue, and/or bone using a piercing rod 730. Vent holes may be made in the bone prior to reaming in order to avoid high intramedullary pressures which may cause fat embolism, or other complications, The medullary canal may in some cases be reamed to a slightly larger diameter than the diameter of the distraction device 110, for example 0.5 mm larger, or may be reamed 1 mm larger or 2 mm larger. A guide arm 712 may be connected at a distal end 713 of its guide tube 725 to a the housing 202 of the distraction device 110 of FIG. 6, for example an engagement portion 213 at the proximal end 221 of the housing 202. The engagement portion 213 may include a cavity, for example, a threaded cavity, and may be engageable via a distal end 723 of a locking rod 722. The locking rod 722 may be inserted through the guide tube 725 of the guide arm 712. The locking rod 722 may be tightened (or untightened) by turning a handle 727, or by placing a tommy bar 718 through a transverse hole 729 at or near the handle 727 of the locking rod 722. The drill bushing 708 and a guide tube 710 may be placed through transverse holes 735 in the guide arm, or a guide extension 724 may be secured to the end 737 of the guide arm 712. One or more additional transverse holes 735 may be within the guide extension for placement of the drill bushing 708 and a guide tube 710. During the manipulation of the distraction device 110 with the instruments, soft tissue of the patient may be protected with a soft tissue protector 714. Some or all of the cylindrical instrument components may be rotated with increased torque by attaching a T-handle 716. If the distraction device 110 and the guide arm 712 need to be removed, for example from a reamed medullary canal in the bone, a mallet 720 may be placed so that a slit 731 in the head 733 of the mallet 720 is around the guide tube 725 of the guide arm 712. The mallet 720 may be then caused to impact against the handle 727 of the guide arm 712 to aid in the removal of the distraction device 110 and guide arm 712. After implantation of the distraction device 110 and its securement to the bone by one or more bone screws, the guide arm 112 may be removed, by unscrewing the locking rod 722 from the engagement portion 213 of the distraction device 110.


If the distraction device 110 is to be removed from the bone (for example after the bone has been lengthened and allowed to consolidate), after the bone screws are removed, an extractor 726 may be attached to the engagement portion 213 of the distraction device 110 and the distraction device may be pulled out of the medullary canal by hand, or may be hammered out using the mallet 731. The distal end of the extractor 726 may have a male or female thread that can be engaged with the proximal end 221 of the housing 202 of the distraction device 110. An additional removal rod 728 may be used. Further instruments that may be used include a locking key 732, a short impactor 734, a hexagon headed river 736 and a locking driver 738. Bone screws 740 may be secured with a screw capture rod 740. Other instruments and uses of instruments are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,449,543, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.


Similarly, this method of disclosure, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim require more features than are expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.

Claims
  • 1. An adjustable implant comprising: an actuator longitudinally restrained within a housing;a driver coupled to the actuator and configured to rotate at least partially within and relative to the housing upon actuation of the actuator, wherein the driver includes an external thread;a moveable member having an internal thread engaged with the external thread of the driver, wherein the movable member is configured to move in relation to the driver and the housing upon rotation of the driver,wherein at least a portion of the moveable member surrounds a portion of the housing such that, upon actuation of the actuator, the moveable member translates longitudinally along an exterior of the housing and the actuator is longitudinally fixed with respect to the housing.
  • 2. The adjustable implant of claim 1, wherein the driver is a lead screw.
  • 3. The adjustable implant of claim 1, wherein the actuator includes a magnet, a motor, a shape memory actuator, an ultrasonic motor, or a hydraulic pump.
  • 4. The adjustable implant of claim 3, wherein the actuator includes the motor.
  • 5. The adjustable implant of claim 3, wherein the actuator includes the shape memory actuator.
  • 6. The adjustable implant of claim 3, wherein the actuator includes the magnet,wherein the magnet includes a radially-poled permanent magnet, andwherein the actuator is held between a radial bearing and a thrust bearing, wherein the radial bearing and the thrust bearing are restrained at their respective longitudinal extents in relation to the housing.
  • 7. The adjustable implant of claim 1, wherein the moveable member is configured to move in a first direction about the housing such that a length of the adjustable implant increases and in a second direction about the housing such that the length of the adjustable implant decreases.
  • 8. The adjustable implant of claim 1, further comprising: a rod configured to move relative to the housing upon actuation of the actuator.
  • 9. The adjustable implant of claim 1, wherein the rod is at least partially disposed within the moveable member.
  • 10. An adjustable implant comprising: a first sleeve configured to be coupled to a first bone portion;a second sleeve configured to move in relation to the first sleeve to change a length of the adjustable implant;an actuator configured to be actuated by a remote control positioned external to the adjustable implant; anda driver coupled to the actuator and configured to rotate at least partially within and relative to the first sleeve upon actuation of the actuator thereby causing the second sleeve to move in relation to the first sleeve, wherein the driver includes an external thread,wherein the second sleeve includes an internal thread configured to engage with the external thread of the driver, and the second sleeve is configured to translate longitudinally along an exterior of the first sleeve upon actuation of the actuator, and wherein the actuator is longitudinally fixed with respect to the housing.
  • 11. The adjustable implant of claim 10, wherein the driver is a lead screw.
  • 12. The adjustable implant of claim 10, wherein the actuator includes a magnet, a motor, a shape memory actuator, an ultrasonic monitor, or a hydraulic pump.
  • 13. The adjustable implant of claim 12, wherein the actuator includes the motor.
  • 14. The adjustable implant of claim 12, wherein the actuator includes the shape memory actuator.
  • 15. The adjustable implant of claim 12, wherein the actuator includes the magnet,wherein the magnet includes a radially-poled permanent magnet, and
  • 16. The adjustable implant of claim 10, wherein the moveable member is configured to move in a first direction about the housing such that a length of the adjustable implant increases and in a second direction about the housing such that the length of the adjustable implant decreases.
  • 17. The adjustable implant of claim 10, further comprising: a rod configured to move relative to the housing upon actuation of the actuator,wherein the rod is at least partially disposed within the moveable member.
  • 18. A distraction and retraction device comprising: a housing having an actuator positioned therein;a driver coupled to the actuator and configured to rotate at least partially within and relative to the housing upon actuation of the actuator, wherein the driver includes an external thread;a moveable member having an internal thread configured to engage with the external thread of the driver; anda rod at least partially disposed within the moveable member,wherein actuation of the actuator in one direction causes the rod to translate longitudinally along an exterior of the housing such that an overall length of the device increases, and wherein actuation of the actuator in another, opposite direction causes the rod to translate along the exterior of the housing such that an overall length of the device decreases, and wherein the actuator is longitudinally fixed with respect to the housing.
  • 19. The distraction and retraction device of claim 18, wherein the actuator includes a magnet,wherein the magnet includes a radially-poled permanent magnet, and
  • 20. The distraction and retraction device of claim 18, wherein the moveable member is configured to move in a first direction about the housing such that a length of the distraction and retraction device increases and in a second direction about the housing such that the length of the distraction and retraction device decreases.
US Referenced Citations (529)
Number Name Date Kind
2391537 Anderson Sep 1943 A
2702031 Wenger Feb 1955 A
3111945 Solbrig Nov 1963 A
3372476 Peiffer Mar 1968 A
3377576 Langberg Apr 1968 A
3512901 Law May 1970 A
3597781 Eibes Aug 1971 A
3900025 Barnes, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3915151 Kraus Oct 1975 A
RE28907 Eibes et al. Jul 1976 E
3976060 Hildebrandt et al. Aug 1976 A
4010758 Rockland et al. Mar 1977 A
4056743 Clifford et al. Nov 1977 A
4068821 Morrison Jan 1978 A
4078559 Nissinen Mar 1978 A
4204541 Kapitanov May 1980 A
4357946 Dutcher et al. Nov 1982 A
4386603 Mayfield Jun 1983 A
4448191 Rodnyansky et al. May 1984 A
4486176 Tardieu et al. Dec 1984 A
4501266 McDaniel Feb 1985 A
4522501 Shannon Jun 1985 A
4537520 Ochiai et al. Aug 1985 A
4550279 Klein Oct 1985 A
4561798 Elcrin et al. Dec 1985 A
4573454 Hoffman Mar 1986 A
4592355 Antebi Jun 1986 A
4595007 Mericle Jun 1986 A
4642257 Chase Feb 1987 A
4658809 Ulrich et al. Apr 1987 A
4700091 Wuthrich Oct 1987 A
4747832 Buffet May 1988 A
4854304 Zielke Aug 1989 A
4904861 Epstein et al. Feb 1990 A
4931055 Bumpus et al. Jun 1990 A
4940467 Tronzo Jul 1990 A
4957495 Kluger Sep 1990 A
4973331 Pursley et al. Nov 1990 A
5010879 Moriya et al. Apr 1991 A
5030235 Campbell, Jr. Jul 1991 A
5041112 Mingozzi et al. Aug 1991 A
5064004 Lundell Nov 1991 A
5074882 Grammont et al. Dec 1991 A
5092889 Campbell, Jr. Mar 1992 A
5133716 Plaza Jul 1992 A
5142407 Varaprasad et al. Aug 1992 A
5156605 Pursley et al. Oct 1992 A
5263955 Baumgart et al. Nov 1993 A
5290289 Sanders et al. Mar 1994 A
5306275 Bryan Apr 1994 A
5330503 Yoon Jul 1994 A
5334202 Carter Aug 1994 A
5336223 Rogers Aug 1994 A
5356411 Spievack Oct 1994 A
5356424 Buzerak et al. Oct 1994 A
5364396 Robinson et al. Nov 1994 A
5403322 Herzenberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5429638 Muschler et al. Jul 1995 A
5437266 McPherson et al. Aug 1995 A
5466261 Richelsoph Nov 1995 A
5468030 Walling Nov 1995 A
5480437 Draenert Jan 1996 A
5509888 Miller Apr 1996 A
5516335 Kummer et al. May 1996 A
5527309 Shelton Jun 1996 A
5536269 Spievack Jul 1996 A
5549610 Russell et al. Aug 1996 A
5573012 McEwan Nov 1996 A
5575790 Chen et al. Nov 1996 A
5582616 Bolduc et al. Dec 1996 A
5620445 Brosnahan et al. Apr 1997 A
5620449 Faccioli et al. Apr 1997 A
5626579 Muschler et al. May 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5632744 Campbell, Jr. May 1997 A
5659217 Petersen Aug 1997 A
5662683 Kay Sep 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5672177 Seldin Sep 1997 A
5700263 Schendel Dec 1997 A
5704938 Staehlin et al. Jan 1998 A
5704939 Justin Jan 1998 A
5720746 Soubeiran Feb 1998 A
5743910 Bays et al. Apr 1998 A
5762599 Sohn Jun 1998 A
5771903 Jakobsson Jun 1998 A
5810815 Morales Sep 1998 A
5827286 Incavo et al. Oct 1998 A
5830221 Stein et al. Nov 1998 A
5879375 Larson, Jr. et al. Mar 1999 A
5902304 Walker et al. May 1999 A
5935127 Border Aug 1999 A
5945762 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5961553 Coty et al. Oct 1999 A
5976138 Baumgart et al. Nov 1999 A
5979456 Magovern Nov 1999 A
6022349 McLeod et al. Feb 2000 A
6033412 Losken et al. Mar 2000 A
6034296 Elvin et al. Mar 2000 A
6102922 Jakobsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6106525 Sachse Aug 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6126661 Faccioli et al. Oct 2000 A
6138681 Chen et al. Oct 2000 A
6139316 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6183476 Gerhardt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200317 Aalsma et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203548 Helland Mar 2001 B1
6234956 He et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6245075 Betz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6315784 Djurovic Nov 2001 B1
6319255 Grundei et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331744 Chen et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336929 Justin Jan 2002 B1
6343568 McClasky Feb 2002 B1
6358283 Hogfors et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6402753 Cole et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409175 Evans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416516 Stauch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6499907 Baur Dec 2002 B1
6500110 Davey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508820 Bales Jan 2003 B2
6510345 Van Bentem Jan 2003 B1
6537196 Creighton, IV et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554831 Rivard et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565573 Ferrante et al. May 2003 B1
6565576 Stauch et al. May 2003 B1
6582313 Perrow Jun 2003 B2
6583630 Mendes et al. Jun 2003 B2
6616669 Ogilvie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626917 Craig Sep 2003 B1
6656135 Zogbi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6656194 Gannoe et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667725 Simons et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673079 Kane Jan 2004 B1
6702816 Buhler Mar 2004 B2
6706042 Taylor Mar 2004 B2
6709293 Mori et al. Mar 2004 B2
6730087 Butsch May 2004 B1
6761503 Breese Jul 2004 B2
6769499 Cargill et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789442 Forch Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6802844 Ferree Oct 2004 B2
6809434 Duncan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6835207 Zacouto et al. Dec 2004 B2
6849076 Blunn et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852113 Nathanson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6918838 Schwarzler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918910 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921400 Sohngen Jul 2005 B2
6923951 Contag et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971143 Domroese Dec 2005 B2
7001346 White Feb 2006 B2
7008425 Phillips Mar 2006 B2
7011658 Young Mar 2006 B2
7029472 Fortin Apr 2006 B1
7029475 Panjabi Apr 2006 B2
7041105 Michelson May 2006 B2
7060080 Bachmann Jun 2006 B2
7063706 Wittenstein Jun 2006 B2
7105029 Doubler et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105968 Nissen Sep 2006 B2
7114501 Johnson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115129 Heggeness Oct 2006 B2
7135022 Kosashvili et al. Nov 2006 B2
7160312 Saadat Jan 2007 B2
7163538 Altarac et al. Jan 2007 B2
7189005 Ward Mar 2007 B2
7191007 Desai et al. Mar 2007 B2
7218232 DiSilvestro et al. May 2007 B2
7238191 Bachmann Jul 2007 B2
7241300 Sharkawy et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243719 Baron et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255682 Bartol, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7282023 Frering Oct 2007 B2
7285087 Moaddeb et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302015 Kim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302858 Walsh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314443 Jordan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333013 Berger Feb 2008 B2
7357037 Hnat et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357635 Belfor et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360542 Nelson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390007 Helms et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390294 Hassler, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7402134 Moaddeb et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402176 Malek Jul 2008 B2
7429259 Cadeddu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445010 Kugler et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458981 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485149 White Feb 2009 B1
7489495 Stevenson Feb 2009 B2
7530981 Kutsenko May 2009 B2
7531002 Sutton et al. May 2009 B2
7553298 Hunt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561916 Hunt et al. Jul 2009 B2
7611526 Carl et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618435 Opolski Nov 2009 B2
7658754 Zhang et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666184 Stauch Feb 2010 B2
7666210 Franck et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678136 Doubler et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678139 Garamszegi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7708737 Kraft et al. May 2010 B2
7708762 McCarthy et al. May 2010 B2
7727143 Birk et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753913 Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753915 Eksler Jul 2010 B1
7762998 Birk et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763080 Southworth Jul 2010 B2
7766855 Miethke Aug 2010 B2
7775215 Hassler, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776068 Ainsworth et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776075 Bruneau et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787958 Stevenson Aug 2010 B2
7794476 Wisnewski Sep 2010 B2
7811328 Molz, IV et al. Oct 2010 B2
7835779 Anderson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837691 Cordes et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862586 Malek Jan 2011 B2
7867235 Fell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875033 Richter et al. Jan 2011 B2
7901381 Birk et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909852 Boomer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918844 Byrum et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938841 Sharkawy et al. May 2011 B2
7985256 Grotz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7988709 Clark et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002809 Baynham Aug 2011 B2
8011308 Picchio Sep 2011 B2
8034080 Malandain et al. Oct 2011 B2
8043299 Conway Oct 2011 B2
8043338 Dant Oct 2011 B2
8057473 Orsak et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057513 Kohm et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083741 Morgan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092499 Roth Jan 2012 B1
8095317 Ekseth et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105360 Connor Jan 2012 B1
8114158 Carl et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123805 Makower et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133280 Voellmicke et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147549 Metcalf, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162897 Byrum Apr 2012 B2
8162979 Sachs et al. Apr 2012 B2
8177789 Magill et al. May 2012 B2
8197490 Pool et al. Jun 2012 B2
8211149 Justis Jul 2012 B2
8211151 Schwab et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221420 Keller Jul 2012 B2
8226690 Altarac et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236002 Fortin et al. Aug 2012 B2
8241331 Arnin Aug 2012 B2
8246630 Manzi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8252063 Stauch Aug 2012 B2
8267969 Altarac et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278941 Kroh et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282671 Connor Oct 2012 B2
8323290 Metzger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8357182 Seme Jan 2013 B2
8366628 Denker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372078 Collazo Feb 2013 B2
8386018 Stauch et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394124 Biyani Mar 2013 B2
8403958 Schwab Mar 2013 B2
8414584 Brigido Apr 2013 B2
8425608 Dewey et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435268 Thompson et al. May 2013 B2
8439926 Bojarski et al. May 2013 B2
8444693 Reiley May 2013 B2
8469908 Asfora Jun 2013 B2
8470004 Reiley Jun 2013 B2
8486070 Morgan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486076 Chavarria et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486147 De Villiers et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494805 Roche et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518062 Cole et al. Aug 2013 B2
8523866 Sidebotham et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529474 Gupta et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529606 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529607 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556901 Anthony et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556911 Mehta et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556975 Ciupik et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562653 Alamin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568457 Hunziker Oct 2013 B2
8617220 Skaggs Oct 2013 B2
8579979 Edie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585595 Heilman Nov 2013 B2
8585740 Ross et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591549 Lange Nov 2013 B2
8591553 Eisermann et al. Nov 2013 B2
8613758 Linares Dec 2013 B2
8623036 Harrison et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632544 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632548 Soubeiran Jan 2014 B2
8632563 Nagase et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636771 Butler et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636802 Serhan et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641719 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8641723 Connor Feb 2014 B2
8657856 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8663285 Dall et al. Mar 2014 B2
8663287 Butler et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668719 Alamin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8709090 Makower et al. Apr 2014 B2
8758347 Weiner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8758355 Fisher et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771272 LeCronier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777947 Zahrly et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777995 McClintock et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790343 McClellan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790409 Van den Heuvel et al. Jul 2014 B2
8828058 Elsebaie et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828087 Stone et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840651 Reiley Sep 2014 B2
8870881 Rezach et al. Oct 2014 B2
8870959 Arnin Oct 2014 B2
8915915 Harrison et al. Dec 2014 B2
8915917 Doherty et al. Dec 2014 B2
8920422 Homeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945188 Rezach et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961521 Keefer et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961567 Hunziker Feb 2015 B2
8968402 Myers et al. Mar 2015 B2
8992527 Guichet Mar 2015 B2
9022917 Kasic et al. May 2015 B2
9044218 Young Jun 2015 B2
9060810 Kercher et al. Jun 2015 B2
9078703 Arnin Jul 2015 B2
9693813 Walker et al. Jul 2017 B2
10271885 Quach Apr 2019 B2
20020050112 Koch et al. May 2002 A1
20020072758 Reo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020164905 Bryant Nov 2002 A1
20030040671 Somogyi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030144669 Robinson Jul 2003 A1
20030220643 Ferree Nov 2003 A1
20030220644 Thelen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040011137 Hnat et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011365 Govari et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019353 Freid et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023623 Stauch et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055610 Forsell Mar 2004 A1
20040133219 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040138725 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040193266 Meyer Sep 2004 A1
20050034705 McClendon Feb 2005 A1
20050049617 Chatlynne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065529 Liu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090823 Bartimus Apr 2005 A1
20050159754 Odrich Jul 2005 A1
20050234448 McCarthy Oct 2005 A1
20050234462 Hershberger Oct 2005 A1
20050246034 Soubeiran Nov 2005 A1
20050261779 Meyer Nov 2005 A1
20050272976 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004459 Hazebrouck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009767 Kiester Jan 2006 A1
20060036259 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036323 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036324 Sachs et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047282 Gordon Mar 2006 A1
20060058792 Hynes Mar 2006 A1
20060069447 DiSilvestro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074448 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079897 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142767 Green et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155279 Ogilvie Jul 2006 A1
20060195087 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195088 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200134 Freid et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204156 Takehara et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235299 Martinelli Oct 2006 A1
20060235424 Vitale et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241746 Shaoulian et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241767 Doty Oct 2006 A1
20060249914 Dulin Nov 2006 A1
20060271107 Harrison et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282073 Simanovsky Dec 2006 A1
20060293683 Stauch Dec 2006 A1
20070010814 Stauch Jan 2007 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021644 Woolson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031131 Griffitts Feb 2007 A1
20070043376 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050030 Kim Mar 2007 A1
20070118215 Moaddeb May 2007 A1
20070161984 Cresina et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173837 Chan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179493 Kim Aug 2007 A1
20070185374 Kick et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233098 Mastrorio et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239161 Giger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255088 Jacobson et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270803 Giger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276368 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276369 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276373 Malandain Nov 2007 A1
20070276378 Harrison et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276493 Malandain et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288024 Gollogly Dec 2007 A1
20070288183 Bulkes et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009792 Henniges et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015577 Loeb Jan 2008 A1
20080021454 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021455 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021456 Gupta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027436 Cournoyer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033431 Jung et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033436 Song et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051784 Gollogly Feb 2008 A1
20080082118 Edidin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086128 Lewis Apr 2008 A1
20080097487 Pool et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097496 Chang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108995 Conway et al. May 2008 A1
20080161933 Grotz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167685 Allard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172063 Taylor Jul 2008 A1
20080177319 Schwab Jul 2008 A1
20080177326 Thompson Jul 2008 A1
20080190237 Radinger et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228186 Gall et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255615 Vittur et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272928 Shuster Nov 2008 A1
20080275557 Makower et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090030462 Buttermann Jan 2009 A1
20090076597 Dahlgren et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082815 Zylber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088803 Justis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093820 Trieu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093890 Gelbart Apr 2009 A1
20090112263 Pool et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090163780 Tieu Jun 2009 A1
20090171356 Klett Jul 2009 A1
20090192514 Feinberg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198144 Phillips et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216113 Meier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090275984 Kim et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100004654 Schmitz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057127 McGuire et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094306 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100185 Trieu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106192 Barry Apr 2010 A1
20100114322 Clifford et al. May 2010 A1
20100130941 Conlon et al. May 2010 A1
20100137872 Kam et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145449 Makower et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145462 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168751 Anderson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249782 Durham Sep 2010 A1
20100256626 Muller et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262239 Boyden et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318129 Seme et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331883 Schmitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004076 Janna et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110057756 Marinescu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066188 Seme et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098748 Jangra Apr 2011 A1
20110152725 Demir et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196435 Forsell Aug 2011 A1
20110202138 Shenoy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110238126 Soubeiran Sep 2011 A1
20110257655 Copf, Jr. Oct 2011 A1
20110284014 Cadeddu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120019341 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019342 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120053633 Stauch Mar 2012 A1
20120088953 King Apr 2012 A1
20120109207 Trieu May 2012 A1
20120116535 Ratron et al. May 2012 A1
20120158061 Koch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172883 Sayago Jul 2012 A1
20120179215 Soubeiran Jul 2012 A1
20120209265 Pool Aug 2012 A1
20120221106 Makower et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271353 Barry Oct 2012 A1
20120296234 Wilhelm et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120329882 Messersmith et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013066 Landry et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130072932 Stauch Mar 2013 A1
20130123847 Anderson et al. May 2013 A1
20130138017 Jundt et al. May 2013 A1
20130138154 Reiley May 2013 A1
20130150863 Baumgartner Jun 2013 A1
20130150889 Fening et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130178903 Abdou Jul 2013 A1
20130211521 Shenoy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245692 Hayes et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253344 Griswold et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253587 Carls et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261672 Horvath Oct 2013 A1
20130296863 Globerman et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296864 Burley et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296940 Northcutt et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325006 Michelinie et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325071 Niemiec et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140005788 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025172 Lucas et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140031870 Chang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140052134 Orisek Feb 2014 A1
20140058392 Mueckter et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058450 Arlet Feb 2014 A1
20140066987 Hestad et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088715 Ciupik Mar 2014 A1
20140128920 Kantelhardt May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140236234 Kroll et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236311 Vicatos et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140257412 Patty et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277446 Clifford et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296918 Fening et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303538 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303539 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324047 Zahrly et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140350602 Seme et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140358150 Kaufman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150105782 D'Lima et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105824 Moskowitz et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
1697630 Nov 2005 CN
101040807 Sep 2007 CN
1541262 Jun 1969 DE
8515687 Dec 1985 DE
19626230 Jan 1998 DE
19745654 Apr 1999 DE
102005045070 Apr 2007 DE
0663184 Jul 1995 EP
1905388 Apr 2008 EP
2901991 Dec 2007 FR
2900563 Aug 2008 FR
2892617 Sep 2008 FR
2916622 Sep 2009 FR
2961386 Dec 2011 FR
1991000722 Jul 1991 JP
H0956736 Mar 1997 JP
2002500063 Jan 2002 JP
2011502003 Jan 2011 JP
1197658 Dec 1985 SU
WO1998044858 Oct 1998 WO
WO1999051160 Oct 1999 WO
WO2001024697 Apr 2001 WO
WO2001045485 Jun 2001 WO
WO2001045487 Jun 2001 WO
WO2001067973 Sep 2001 WO
WO2001078614 Oct 2001 WO
WO2007013059 Feb 2007 WO
WO2007015239 Feb 2007 WO
WO2011116158 Sep 2011 WO
WO2013119528 Aug 2013 WO
WO2014040013 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (104)
Entry
Machine Translation of USSR Soviet Union Application No. SU1197658A1, published Dec. 15, 1985, retrieved from: https://patents.google.com/patent/SU1197658A1/en?oq=SU1197658A on Jul. 5, 2022, 4 pages.
Machine Translation of Japanese Application No. JP1991000722U, published Jul. 1, 1991, 6 pages.
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7.
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4.
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3.
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™ System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7.
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198.
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8.
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1.
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5.
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324.
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9.
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5.
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123.
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1.
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3.
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005.
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp. S-D-129-S-D-139, 32.
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2.
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3.
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1.
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2.
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2.
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258.
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II.
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, 2010.
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2.
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7.
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80.
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3.
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. S105-S115, No. 355S.
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16.
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007.
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007.
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325.
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5.
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5.
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1.
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4.
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1.
Hofmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215.
Horbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™ system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4.
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB.
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2.
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2.
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5.
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6.
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7.
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1.
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4.
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8.
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3.
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11.
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering·General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24.
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3.
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185.
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010—2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197.
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2.
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3.
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1.
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work ?. ”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004.
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8.
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1.
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A.
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012.
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, SPINE, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20.
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4.
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4.
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6.
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6.
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306.
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html.
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6.
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7.
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4.
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages).
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013. Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society.
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement.”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2.
Synthes Spine, “Veptr II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 26 pgs.
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6.
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4.
Tello, “Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2.
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45.
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1.
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3.
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4.
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, SPINE, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3.
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3.
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15.
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6.
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118.
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6.
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5.
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210251674 A1 Aug 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62097005 Dec 2014 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16298339 Mar 2019 US
Child 17239564 US
Parent 14981762 Dec 2015 US
Child 16298339 US