Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
Scoliosis is a general term for the sideways (lateral) curving of the spine, usually in the thoracic or thoracolumbar region. Scoliosis is commonly broken up into different treatment groups, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Early Onset Scoliosis and Adult Scoliosis.
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) typically affects children between ages 10 and 16, and becomes most severe during growth spurts that occur as the body is developing. One to two percent of children between ages 10 and 16 have some amount of scoliosis. Of every 1000 children, two to five develop curves that are serious enough to require treatment. The degree of scoliosis is typically described by the Cobb angle, which is determined, usually from x-ray images, by taking the most tilted vertebrae above and below the apex of the curved portion and measuring the angle between intersecting lines drawn perpendicular to the top of the top vertebrae and the bottom of the bottom. The term idiopathic refers to the fact that the exact cause of this curvature is unknown. Some have speculated that scoliosis occurs when, during rapid growth phases, the ligamentum flavum of the spine is too tight and hinders symmetric growth of the spine. For example, as the anterior portion of the spine elongates faster than the posterior portion, the thoracic spine begins to straighten, until it curves laterally, often with an accompanying rotation. In more severe cases, this rotation may actually create a noticeable deformity, wherein one shoulder is lower than the other. Currently, many school districts perform external visual assessment of spines, for example in all fifth grade students. For those students in whom an “S” shape or “C” shape is identified, instead of an “I” shape, a recommendation is given to have the spine examined by a physician, and commonly followed-up with periodic spinal x-rays.
Typically, patients with a Cobb angle of 20° or less are not treated, but are continually monitored, often with subsequent x-rays. Patients with a Cobb angle of 40° or greater are frequently candidates for fusion surgery. It should be noted that many patients do not receive such a spinal assessment, for numerous possible reasons. Many school districts do not perform this simple assessment, and many children do not regularly visit a physician. Therefore, the curve often progresses rapidly and severely. There is a large population of grown adults with untreated scoliosis, some having extreme cases exhibiting Cobb angles of 90° or greater. Many adults having untreated scoliosis, though, do not have pain associated with their deformity and live relatively normal lives, though oftentimes with restricted mobility and motion. In AIS, the ratio of females to males having Cobb angles under 10° is about one to one. However, at Cobb angles above 30°, females outnumber males by as much as eight to one. Fusion surgery can be performed on the AIS patients or on adult scoliosis patients. In a typical posterior fusion surgery, an incision is made down the length of the back and Titanium or stainless steel straightening rods are placed along the curved portion. These rods are typically secured to the vertebral bodies, for example with hooks or bone screws, or more specifically pedicle screws, in a manner that allows the spine to be straightened. Usually, at the section selected for fusion, the intervertebral disks are removed and bone graft material is placed to create the fusion. If autologous graft material is used, the bone is generally harvested from a hip via a separate incision.
Alternatively, fusion surgery may be performed anteriorly. A lateral d anterior incision is made for access. Usually, one of the lungs is deflated in order to allow access to the spine from this anterior approach. In a less-invasive version of the anterior procedure, instead of the single long incision, approximately five incisions, each about three to four cm long are made in several of the intercostal spaces (between the ribs) on one side of the patient. In one version of this minimally invasive surgery, tethers and bone screws are placed and secured to the vertebra on the anterior convex portion of the curve. Currently, clinical trials are being performed in which staples are used instead of the tether/screw combination. One advantage of this surgery in comparison with the posterior approach is that scars resulting from the several smaller incisions are not as dramatic, though they are still located in a visible area, when a bathing suit, for example, is worn. Staple-based techniques have experienced some difficulty in clinical trials. The staples tend to pull out of the bone when a critical stress level is reached.
In some cases, after surgery, the patient will wear a protective brace for a few months as the fusing process occurs. Once the patient reaches spinal maturity, it may be difficult to remove the rods and associated hardware in a subsequent surgery because the fusion of the vertebra usually incorporates the rods themselves. Therefore, standard practice is to leave this implant in for life. With either of these two surgical methods, after fusion the patient's spine is rendered straight, but, depending on the number of vertebrae that were fused, limitations in the degree of flexibility, both in bending and twisting, are often observed. As fused patients mature, the fused section of the spine can impart significant stresses on the adjacent non-fused vertebrae, and often, other problems including pain can occur in these areas, sometimes necessitating further surgery. This tends to be in the lumbar portion of the spine that is prone to problems in aging patients. Many physicians are now interested in fusionless surgery for scoliosis, which may be able to eliminate, or at least reduce, one or more of the drawbacks of fusion.
One group of patients in which the spine is especially dynamic is the subset known as Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), which typically occurs in children before the age of five, and more often in boys than in girls. EOS is a more rare condition than AIS, occurring in only about one or two out of 10,000 children, but can be severe, sometimes affecting the normal development of organs. Because the spines of these children will generally grow a large amount after treatment, non-fusion distraction devices known as growing rods and a device known as the VEPTR—Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (“Titanium Rib”) have been developed. These devices are typically adjusted approximately every six months, or as required to match the child's growth, until the child is at least eight years old, and sometimes until they are 15 years old. Each adjustment requires a surgical incision to access the adjustable portion of the device. Because the patients may receive the device at an age as early as six months old, this treatment may require a large number of surgeries. Because of the multiple surgeries, these patients have a rather high incidence of infection.
Returning to the AIS patients, the treatment methodology for those with a Cobb angle between 20° and 40° is quite controversial. Many physicians prescribe a brace (for example, the Boston Brace) for a patient to wear on his body, under the clothes, 18 to 23 hours a day until the patient become skeletally mature age 16). Because these patients are all passing through their socially demanding adolescent years, it is a quite serious prospect to choose between wearing a somewhat bulky brace that covers most of the upper body, having fusion surgery that may leave large scars and limit motion, and doing nothing and risking becoming disfigured and possibly disabled. It is common knowledge that many patients have, at times, hidden their braces, for example, in a bush outside of school, in order to escape embarrassment associated with the brace(s). The patient compliance with brace wearing has been so problematic that special braces have been constructed that sense the body of the patient and keep track of the amount of time per day that the brace is worn. Even such special braces have problems with patient compliance: patients have been known to place objects into unworn braces of this type in order to tool the sensor. Coupled with the inconsistent patient compliance with brace usage, is a feeling by many physicians that braces, even if used properly, are not at all effective at curing scoliosis. Physicians may agree that bracing can possibly slow down or even temporarily arrest curve (Cobb angle) progression, but they have noted that as soon as the treatment period ends and the brace is no longer worn, often the scoliosis progresses rapidly to a Cobb angle even more severe than it was at the beginning of treatment. Some say the reason for the supposed ineffectiveness of the brace is that it braces only on a portion of the torso, and not on the entire spine. Currently a prospective, randomized, 500-patient, clinical trial known as BrAIST (Bracing in Adolescent idiopathic Scoliosis Trial) is enrolling patients, 50% of whom will be treated with the brace and 50% of who will simply be watched. Cobb angle data from these patients will be measured continually up until they reach skeletal maturity, or until a Cobb angle of 50° is reached, at which time the patient will likely undergo surgery. Many physicians feel that the BrAIST trial will show that braces are completely ineffective. If this is the case, the quandary about what to do with AIS patients who have a. Cobb angle of between 20° and 40° will only become more pronounced. It should be noted that the patient population having a Cobb angle of 20-40° is as much as ten times larger than the population having a Cobb angle of 40° and greater.
Distraction osteogenesis, also known as distraction callotasis and osteodistraction has been used successfully to lengthen various bones of the body (e.g., long bones). Typically, the bone, if not already fractured, is purposely fractured by means of a corticotomy, and the resulting two segments of bone are gradually distracted apart, thereby allowing new bone to form in the gap. If the distraction rate is too high, there is a risk of nonunion. If the rate is too low, there is a risk that the two segments will prematurely, fuse to each other more than desired before the distraction period is complete. Once the desired length of the bone is achieved using this process, the bone is allowed to consolidate. Distraction osteogenesis applications are mainly focused on the growth of the femur or tibia, but may also include the humerus, the jaw bone (micrognathia), or other bones. There are many reasons for lengthening or growing bones which may be desirable. The applications including, but not limited to: post osteosarcoma bone cancer; cosmetic lengthening (both legs-femur and/or tibia) in short stature or dwarfism/achondroplasia; lengthening of one limb to match the other (congenital, post-trauma, post-skeletal disorder, prosthetic knee joint), nonunions.
Distraction osteogenesis using external fixators has been done for many, years, but the external fixator can be unwieldy and painful for the patient. It can also subject the patient to the risk of pin track infections, joint stiffness, loss of appetite, depression, cartilage damage and other side effects. An external fixator, e.g., around the patient/patient's limb, can also delay the beginning of rehabilitation.
In response to the shortcomings of external fixator distraction, intramedullary distraction nails which may be contained entirely within the bone have, been surgically implanted. Some such nails may be automatically lengthened via repeated rotation of the patient's limb, which can sometimes be painful to the patient, and can often proceed in an uncontrolled fashion. This therefore makes it difficult to follow the strict daily or weekly, lengthening regime that avoids nonunion (if too fast) or early consolidation (if too slow). Lower limb distraction rates are generally on the order of about one mm per day. Other intramedullary nails which have an implanted motor and may be remotely controlled by an antenna have also been developed. These devices are designed to be lengthened or distracted in a controlled manner, but, due to their complexity, may not be manufacturable as an affordable product. Others have proposed intramedullary distracters containing an implanted magnet, which allows the distraction to be driven electromagnetically by an external stator. Because of the complexity and size of the external stator, this technology has not been reduced to a simple and/or cost-effective device, which can be taken home to allow patients to do daily lengthenings. Non-invasively adjustable implantable distraction devices, at least one embodiment of which is magnetically non-invasively adjustable, have been developed and used clinically in both scoliosis and limb lengthening patients.
Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease of the knee joint that affects a large number of patients, particularly over the age of 40. The prevalence of this disease has increased significantly over the last several decades, attributed partially, but not completely, to the rising age of the population as well as the increase in obesity. The increase may also be due to an increase in highly active people within the population. Knee osteoarthritis is caused mainly by long term stresses on the knee that degrade the cartilage covering the articulating surfaces of the bones in the knee joint. Oftentimes, the problem becomes worse after a particular trauma event, but it can also be a hereditary process. Symptoms include, but are not limited to, pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, swelling, deformity, and muscle weakness. Osteoarthritis may include one or more of the three compartments of the knee: the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint, the lateral compartment of the tibiofemoral joint, and the patellofemoral joint. In severe cases, partial or total replacement of the knee is performed in order to replace the diseased portions with new weight bearing surfaces for the knee, typically made from implant grade plastics or metals. These operations may involve significant post-operative pain and require substantial physical therapy. The recovery period may last weeks or months. Several potential complications of this surgery exist, including deep venous thrombosis, loss of motion, infection, and bone fracture. After recovery, surgical patients who have received uni-compartmental or total knee replacement, must significantly reduce their activity, removing running and high energy sports completely from their lifestyle.
For these reasons, surgeons are attempting to intervene early in order to delay or even preclude knee replacement surgery. Osteotomy surgeries may be performed on the femur or tibia, in order to change the angle between the femur and tibia, and thus adjust the stresses on the different portions of the knee joint. In closed wedge or closing wedge osteotomy, an angled wedge of bone is removed, and the remaining surfaces are fused together, creating a new improved bone angle. In open wedge osteotomy, a cut is made in the bone and the edges of the cut are opened, creating a new angle. Bone graft is often used to fill in the newly-opened, wedge-shaped space, and, often, a plate is attached to the bone with bone screws. Obtaining the correct angle during either of these types of osteotomy is almost always difficult, and, even if the final result is close to what was desired, there can be a subsequent loss of the correction angle. Some other complications associated with this technique include nonunion and material failure.
Amputation of the arm or the leg can result in a residual limb, with a stump, having a shortened bone (e.g., a shortened femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius or ulna). A prosthetic limb or prosthetic limb attachment which may be attached to a residual limb may have problems fitting or functioning when attached to a residual limb having insufficient bone length. There may be poor energy transfer between the residual limb and the attached prosthesis, as short lever arms generate less torque for a given force. This functional deficit is compounded when the lever arm is encased in very compliant tissue, such as a residual femur that is surrounded by the soft tissues of the thigh. This may further impair prosthesis control. Individuals having short residual limbs may display gait asymmetries and gait changes. The wearer of a prosthetic limb who has a relatively short residual limb may exhibit compensatory changes that affect posture and cause discomfort or injury to the spine or other body structures. Amputation may occur or may be performed for several reasons including war-related injuries, motor vehicle accidents, including motorcycle accidents, other types of trauma or cancer of the bone or other adjacent tissue.
In addition to the many different types of implantable distraction devices that are configured to be non-invasively adjusted, implantable non-invasively adjustable non-distraction devices have also been envisioned, for example, adjustable restriction devices for gastrointestinal disorders such as GERD, obesity, or sphincter laxity (such as in fecal incontinence), or other disorders such as sphincter laxity in urinary incontinence. These devices, too, may incorporate magnets to enable non-invasive adjustment.
The present disclosure provides for a system for moving a portion of a patient's body including a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the first cavity along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a second cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.
The present disclosure further provides for a method of modifying a residual limb of a patient including the steps of providing a distraction device having a housing extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and being configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod, attaching the housing to a first portion of a bone within the residual limb, attaching the second distraction rod to a second portion of the bone within the residual limbo decoupling the first portion of the bone from the second portion of the bone, and wherein the distraction device is actuatable such that the first distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the first distraction rod, to increase at least one of a force or a distance between the first portion of the bone and the second portion of the bone.
The present disclosure further provides for a system for moving a portion of a patient's body including a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis, a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis, and a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.
In one embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity extending between the proximal end and the distal end, and being configured for telescopic displacement from within the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, and being configured for telescopic displacement from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod.
In one embodiment, a method of modifying a residual limb is provided. The method of modifying a residual limb of a patient includes the steps of: providing a distraction device comprising: a housing extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other, the first distraction rod having a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod; decoupling the first portion of the bone from the second portion of the bone; attaching the housing to a first portion of a bone within the residual limb; attaching the second distraction rod to a second portion of the bone within the residual limb, wherein the distraction device is actuatable such that the first distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the housing and the second distraction rod is caused to move in relation to the first distraction rod, to increase at least one of a force or a distance between the first portion of the bone and the second portion of the bone.
In another embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity extending along a longitudinal axis; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a cavity extending along the longitudinal axis, the first distraction rod and the housing being telescopically displaceable with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, and configured to be telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity along the longitudinal axis; a drive system configured to move the first distraction rod in relation to the housing and to move the second distraction rod in relation to the first distraction rod.
In still another embodiment, a system for moving a portion of a patient's body is provided. The system for moving a portion of a patient's body includes: a housing having a first cavity; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity, wherein the first distraction rod is configured for telescopic displacement relative to the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, wherein the second distraction rod is configured for telescopic displacement from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod.
In one embodiment, a method of modifying a residual limb of a patient is provided. The method of modifying a residual limb includes the steps of: providing a distraction device comprising: a housing having a first cavity; a first distraction rod having a proximal end, a distal end, and a second cavity, wherein the first distraction rod is telescopically displaceable relative to the first cavity; a second distraction rod having a proximal end and a distal end, wherein the second distraction rod is telescopically displaceable from within the second cavity; and a drive system configured to move at least one of the first distraction rod and the second distraction rod with respect to the housing; then decoupling a first portion of a bone within the residual limb from a second portion of the bone; attaching the housing to one of the first portion and the second portion of the bone within the residual limb; and attaching the second distraction rod to the other of the first portion and the second portion of the bone within the residual limb, wherein the drive system is configured to be actuated so as to increase at least one of a force and a distance between the first portion and the second portion of the bone.
Embodiments of the adjustable devices for implanting into the body disclosed herein are capable of achieving a large (e.g., greater than 40%, greater than, greater than 60%, greater than 80%, greater than 100% and even greater than 120%) total amount of adjustment length in comparison to the total length of the adjustable portion of the device. Adjustable devices may include distraction devices, for example distraction devices for orthopedic applications, including, but not limited to scoliosis, limb lengthening, bone transport, spinous process distraction, tibial wedge osteotomy adjustment, and spondylolisthesis. Maintaining a small size an adjustable (e.g., distraction and/or retraction) implant to fit into a small, short space within the body, and achieving large amounts of adjustable length have historically been conflicting design goals.
Turning to
The interior contents of the distraction device 110, including the interior portions of cavities 212, 214, 238, which contain the magnetic assembly 248 and the lead screws 260, 274, are protected from external fluids and materials by dynamic seals 278, 280. A first dynamic seal 278 includes an o-ring 282, which resides within a circumferential groove 284 at a proximal end 286 of the first distraction rod 204. The o-ring 282 seals along an inner cylindrical surface 288 of the housing 202, and maintains the dynamic seal 278 throughout the longitudinal displacement of the first distraction rod 204 with the housing 202. A second dynamic seal 280 includes an o-ring 290, which resides within a circumferential groove 292 at a proximal end 294 of the second distraction rod 206. The o-ring 290 seals along an inner cylindrical surface 296 of the first distraction rod 204, and maintains the dynamic seal 280 throughout the longitudinal displacement of the second distraction rod 206 with the first distraction rod 204.
The longitudinal length of distraction possible for the second distraction rod 206 on its own may be between about 20 mm and about 90 mm, or between about 40 mm and about 70 mm, or about 50 mm. When the second distraction rod 206 has been fully distracted in relation to the first distraction rod 204, the first lead screw 260 will rotationally engage with the second lead screw 274, and thus the rotation of the first lead screw 260 will begin to turn the second lead screw 274 (e.g., in a one-to-one manner). In some embodiments, this occurs when the abutment 270 at the distal end 266 of the first lead screw 260 contacts a ledge 273 adjacent the internal thread 272 at the proximal end 275 of the second lead screw 274. As the first lead screw 260 continues to turn the second lead screw 274, the external thread 276 of the second lead screw 274 turns inside the internal thread 246 of the nut 236 of the second distraction rod 206, causing the second distraction rod 206 to longitudinally extend further in relation to the housing 202, but now, while also dragging the first distraction rod 204 along with it. The longitudinal length of distraction possible for the first distraction rod 204, after full distraction of the second distraction rod 206, may be between about 20 mm and about 90 mm, or between about 40 mm and about 70 mm, or about 50 mm.
In some embodiments, the distraction device 110 (
The implantable adjustable system 100 incorporating a distraction device 110, as disclosed herein, may utilize an External Remote Controller (ERC).
The distraction device 600 may comprise features to limit or stop rotation between the first distraction rod 618 and the housing 604, and/or between the second distraction rod 620 and the first distraction rod 618. For example, the longitudinal grooves, 216, 220 and protrusions 209, 211 of the embodiment of
Though not illustrated, another driving element 242 may include a magnetorestrictive element. A number of materials may be used to produce the components like the housing, first distraction rod, second distraction rod, first lead screw, and second lead screw, including but not limited to titanium, titanium alloys, titanium 6-4, cobalt-chromium alloys, and stainless steel.
If the distraction device 110 is to be removed from the bone (for example after the bone has been lengthened and allowed to consolidate), after the bone screws are removed, an extractor 726 may be attached to the engagement portion 213 of the distraction device 110 and the distraction device may be pulled out of the medullary canal by hand, or may be hammered out using the mallet 731. The distal end of the extractor 726 may have a male or female thread that can be engaged with the proximal end 221 of the housing 202 of the distraction device 110. An additional removal rod 728 may be used. Further instruments that may be used include a locking key 732, a short impactor 734, a hexagon headed river 736 and a locking driver 738. Bone screws 740 may be secured with a screw capture rod 740. Other instruments and uses of instruments are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,449,543, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Similarly, this method of disclosure, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim require more features than are expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2391537 | Anderson | Sep 1943 | A |
2702031 | Wenger | Feb 1955 | A |
3111945 | Von Solbrig | Nov 1963 | A |
3372476 | Peiffer | Mar 1968 | A |
3377576 | Langberg | Apr 1968 | A |
3512901 | Law | May 1970 | A |
3597781 | Eibes | Aug 1971 | A |
3900025 | Barnes, Jr. | Aug 1975 | A |
3915151 | Kraus | Oct 1975 | A |
RE28907 | Eibes et al. | Jul 1976 | E |
3976060 | Hildebrandt et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4010758 | Rockland et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4056743 | Clifford et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4068821 | Morrison | Jan 1978 | A |
4078559 | Nissinen | Mar 1978 | A |
4204541 | Kapitanov | May 1980 | A |
4357946 | Dutcher et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4386603 | Mayfield | Jun 1983 | A |
4448191 | Rodnyansky et al. | May 1984 | A |
4486176 | Tardieu et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
4522501 | Shannon | Jun 1985 | A |
4537520 | Ochiai et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4550279 | Klein | Oct 1985 | A |
4561798 | Elcrin et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4573454 | Hoffman | Mar 1986 | A |
4592355 | Antebi | Jun 1986 | A |
4595007 | Mericle | Jun 1986 | A |
4642257 | Chase | Feb 1987 | A |
4658809 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4700091 | Wuthrich | Oct 1987 | A |
4747832 | Buffet | May 1988 | A |
4854304 | Zielke | Aug 1989 | A |
4904861 | Epstein et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4931055 | Bumpus et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
4957495 | Kluger | Sep 1990 | A |
4973331 | Pursley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5010879 | Moriya et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030235 | Campbell, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041112 | Mingozzi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5064004 | Lundell | Nov 1991 | A |
5074882 | Grammont et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5092889 | Campbell, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133716 | Plaza | Jul 1992 | A |
5142407 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156605 | Pursley et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5263955 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290289 | Sanders et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306275 | Bryan | Apr 1994 | A |
5330503 | Yoon | Jul 1994 | A |
5334202 | Carter | Aug 1994 | A |
5336223 | Rogers | Aug 1994 | A |
5356411 | Spievack | Oct 1994 | A |
5356424 | Buzerak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364396 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403322 | Herzenberg et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429638 | Muschler et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437266 | McPherson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5466261 | Richelsoph | Nov 1995 | A |
5468030 | Walling | Nov 1995 | A |
5480437 | Draenert | Jan 1996 | A |
5509888 | Miller | Apr 1996 | A |
5516335 | Kummer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527309 | Shelton | Jun 1996 | A |
5536269 | Spievack | Jul 1996 | A |
5549610 | Russell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573012 | McEwan | Nov 1996 | A |
5575790 | Chen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620445 | Brosnahan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620449 | Faccioli et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626579 | Muschler et al. | May 1997 | A |
5626613 | Schmieding | May 1997 | A |
5632744 | Campbell, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
5659217 | Petersen | Aug 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5672177 | Seldin | Sep 1997 | A |
5700263 | Schendel | Dec 1997 | A |
5704938 | Staehlin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704939 | Justin | Jan 1998 | A |
5720746 | Soubeiran | Feb 1998 | A |
5743910 | Bays et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
5771903 | Jakobsson | Jun 1998 | A |
5810815 | Morales | Sep 1998 | A |
5827286 | Incavo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830221 | Stein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5879375 | Larson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902304 | Walker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935127 | Border | Aug 1999 | A |
5945762 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961553 | Coty et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976138 | Baumgart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979456 | Magovern | Nov 1999 | A |
6022349 | McLeod et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033412 | Losken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034296 | Elvin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102922 | Jakobsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106525 | Sachse | Aug 2000 | A |
6126660 | Dietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6126661 | Faccioli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139316 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162223 | Orsak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183476 | Gerhardt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200317 | Aalsma et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203548 | Helland | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234956 | He et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245075 | Betz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315784 | Djurovic | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319255 | Grundei et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331744 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336929 | Justin | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343568 | McClasky | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358283 | Hogfors et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389187 | Greenaway et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402753 | Cole et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409175 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416516 | Stauch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6499907 | Baur | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500110 | Davey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508820 | Bales | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510345 | Van Bentem | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6537196 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554831 | Rivard et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565573 | Ferrante et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565576 | Stauch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582313 | Perrow | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583630 | Mendes et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6616669 | Ogilvie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626917 | Craig | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656135 | Zogbi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656194 | Gannoe et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667725 | Simons et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673079 | Kane | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702816 | Buhler | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706042 | Taylor | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709293 | Mori et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730087 | Butsch | May 2004 | B1 |
6761503 | Breese | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769499 | Cargill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789442 | Forch | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796984 | Soubeiran | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809434 | Duncan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849076 | Blunn et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852113 | Nathanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6918838 | Schwarzler et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918910 | Smith et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921400 | Sohngen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923951 | Contag et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6971143 | Domroese | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7001346 | White | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008425 | Phillips | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011658 | Young | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029472 | Fortin | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7029475 | Panjabi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041105 | Michelson | May 2006 | B2 |
7060080 | Bachmann | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7063706 | Wittenstein | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7105029 | Doubler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105968 | Nissen | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114501 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115129 | Heggeness | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135022 | Kosashvili et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160312 | Saadat | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163538 | Altarac et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189005 | Ward | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191007 | Desai et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7218232 | DiSilvestro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238191 | Bachmann | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241300 | Sharkawy et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243719 | Baron et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255682 | Bartol, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7282023 | Frering | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285087 | Moaddeb et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302015 | Kim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302858 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314443 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333013 | Berger | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357037 | Hnat et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357635 | Belfor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360542 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7390007 | Helms et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390294 | Hassler, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402134 | Moaddeb et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402176 | Malek | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7429259 | Cadeddu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445010 | Kugler et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458981 | Fielding et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485149 | White | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7489495 | Stevenson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7530981 | Kutsenko | May 2009 | B2 |
7531002 | Sutton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553298 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561916 | Hunt et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7611526 | Carl et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618435 | Opolski | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7658754 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666184 | Stauch | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666210 | Franck et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678136 | Doubler et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678139 | Garamszegi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708737 | Kraft et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7708762 | McCarthy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727143 | Birk et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753913 | Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753915 | Eksler | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7762998 | Birk et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763080 | Southworth | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766855 | Miethke | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775215 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776068 | Ainsworth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776075 | Bruneau et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787958 | Stevenson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794476 | Wisnewski | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811328 | Molz, IV et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835779 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837691 | Cordes et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862586 | Malek | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867235 | Fell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875033 | Richter et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901381 | Birk et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909852 | Boomer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918844 | Byrum et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938841 | Sharkawy et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988709 | Clark et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002809 | Baynham | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011308 | Picchio | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034080 | Malandain et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043299 | Conway | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043338 | Dant | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057473 | Orsak et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057513 | Kohm et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083741 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092499 | Roth | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8095317 | Ekseth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105360 | Connor | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8114158 | Carl et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123805 | Makower et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133280 | Voellmicke et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147549 | Metcalf, Jr. et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162897 | Byrum | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162979 | Sachs et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8177789 | Magill et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197490 | Pool et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8211149 | Justis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8211151 | Schwab et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221420 | Keller | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226690 | Altarac et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236002 | Fortin et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241331 | Arnin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246630 | Manzi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252063 | Stauch | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8267969 | Altarac et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278941 | Kroh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282671 | Connor | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8323290 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8357182 | Seme | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366628 | Denker et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372078 | Collazo | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386018 | Stauch et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394124 | Biyani | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403958 | Schwab | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414584 | Brigido | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425608 | Dewey et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435268 | Thompson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8439926 | Bojarski et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8444693 | Reiley | May 2013 | B2 |
8469908 | Asfora | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470004 | Reiley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8486070 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486076 | Chavarria et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486147 | De Villiers et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494805 | Roche et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496662 | Novak et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8518062 | Cole et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523866 | Sidebotham et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529474 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529606 | Alamin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529607 | Alamin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556901 | Anthony et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556911 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556975 | Ciupik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562653 | Alamin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568457 | Hunziker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8617220 | Skaggs | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579979 | Edie et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585595 | Heilman | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585740 | Ross et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8591549 | Lange | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591553 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8613758 | Linares | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623036 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632544 | Haaja et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632548 | Soubeiran | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632563 | Nagase et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636771 | Butler et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636802 | Serhan et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641719 | Gephart et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8641723 | Connor | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657856 | Gephart et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663285 | Dall et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663287 | Butler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668719 | Alamin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8709090 | Makower et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8758347 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758355 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771272 | LeCronier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777947 | Zahrly et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777995 | McClintock et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790343 | McClellan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790409 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8828058 | Elsebaie et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828087 | Stone et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840651 | Reiley | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870881 | Rezach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870959 | Arnin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8915915 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8915917 | Doherty et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920422 | Homeier et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8945188 | Rezach et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961521 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961567 | Hunziker | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968402 | Myers et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992527 | Guichet | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9022917 | Kasic et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044218 | Young | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060810 | Kercher et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078703 | Arnin | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9693813 | Walker et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10271885 | Quach | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20020050112 | Koch et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072758 | Reo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020164905 | Bryant | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030040671 | Somogyi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030144669 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030220643 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220644 | Thelen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040011137 | Hnat et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011365 | Govari et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019353 | Freid et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023623 | Stauch et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055610 | Forsell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040133219 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138725 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193266 | Meyer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050034705 | McClendon | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049617 | Chatlynne et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065529 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090823 | Bartimus | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050159754 | Odrich | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234448 | McCarthy | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234462 | Hershberger | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246034 | Soubeiran | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261779 | Meyer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272976 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004459 | Hazebrouck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009767 | Kiester | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036259 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036323 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036324 | Sachs et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047282 | Gordon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058792 | Hynes | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069447 | DiSilvestro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074448 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079897 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136062 | DiNello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142767 | Green et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155279 | Ogilvie | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195087 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195088 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200134 | Freid et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060204156 | Takehara et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235299 | Martinelli | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235424 | Vitale et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241746 | Shaoulian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241767 | Doty | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249914 | Dulin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271107 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282073 | Simanovsky | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293683 | Stauch | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010814 | Stauch | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010887 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021644 | Woolson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070031131 | Griffitts | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043376 | Leatherbury et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050030 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118215 | Moaddeb | May 2007 | A1 |
20070161984 | Cresina et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173837 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179493 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185374 | Kick et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233098 | Mastrorio et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239159 | Altarac et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239161 | Giger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255088 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270803 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276368 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276369 | Allard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276373 | Malandain | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276378 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276493 | Malandain et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288024 | Gollogly | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288183 | Bulkes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009792 | Henniges et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015577 | Loeb | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021454 | Chao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021455 | Chao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021456 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027436 | Cournoyer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033431 | Jung et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033436 | Song et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051784 | Gollogly | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082118 | Edidin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086128 | Lewis | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097487 | Pool et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097496 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108995 | Conway et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161933 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167685 | Allard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172063 | Taylor | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177319 | Schwab | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177326 | Thompson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190237 | Radinger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228186 | Gall et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255615 | Vittur et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272928 | Shuster | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275557 | Makower et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090030462 | Buttermann | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076597 | Dahlgren et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082815 | Zylber et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088803 | Justis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093820 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093890 | Gelbart | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112263 | Pool et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090163780 | Tieu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171356 | Klett | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192514 | Feinberg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198144 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216113 | Meier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090275984 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004654 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057127 | McGuire et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094306 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100185 | Trieu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106192 | Barry | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114322 | Clifford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130941 | Conlon et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137872 | Kam et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145449 | Makower et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145462 | Ainsworth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168751 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249782 | Durham | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256626 | Muller et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262239 | Boyden et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100318129 | Seme et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331883 | Schmitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004076 | Janna et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110057756 | Marinescu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066188 | Seme et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098748 | Jangra | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110152725 | Demir et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110196435 | Forsell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202138 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238126 | Soubeiran | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257655 | Copf, Jr. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110284014 | Cadeddu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120019341 | Gabay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019342 | Gabay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120053633 | Stauch | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088953 | King | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109207 | Trieu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116535 | Ratron et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158061 | Koch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172883 | Sayago | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179215 | Soubeiran | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209265 | Pool | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221106 | Makower et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271353 | Barry | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296234 | Wilhelm et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329882 | Messersmith et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013066 | Landry et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130072932 | Stauch | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123847 | Anderson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138017 | Jundt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138154 | Reiley | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150863 | Baumgartner | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150889 | Fening et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130178903 | Abdou | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211521 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245692 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253344 | Griswold et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253587 | Carls et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261672 | Horvath | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296863 | Globerman et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296864 | Burley et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296940 | Northcutt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325006 | Michelinie et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325071 | Niemiec et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005788 | Haaja et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025172 | Lucas et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031870 | Chang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052134 | Orisek | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058392 | Mueckter et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058450 | Arlet | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066987 | Hestad et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088715 | Ciupik | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128920 | Kantelhardt | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140236234 | Kroll et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236311 | Vicatos et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257412 | Patty et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277446 | Clifford et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296918 | Fening et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303538 | Baym et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303539 | Baym et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324047 | Zahrly et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140350602 | Seme et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358150 | Kaufman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150105782 | D'Lima et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150105824 | Moskowitz et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1697630 | Nov 2005 | CN |
101040807 | Sep 2007 | CN |
1541262 | Jun 1969 | DE |
8515687 | Dec 1985 | DE |
19626230 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19745654 | Apr 1999 | DE |
102005045070 | Apr 2007 | DE |
0663184 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1905388 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2901991 | Dec 2007 | FR |
2900563 | Aug 2008 | FR |
2892617 | Sep 2008 | FR |
2916622 | Sep 2009 | FR |
2961386 | Dec 2011 | FR |
1991000722 | Jul 1991 | JP |
H0956736 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2002500063 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2011502003 | Jan 2011 | JP |
1197658 | Dec 1985 | SU |
WO1998044858 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO1999051160 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO2001024697 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2001045485 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2001045487 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2001067973 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO2001078614 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2007013059 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007015239 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2011116158 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO2013119528 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2014040013 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of Japanese Application No. JP1991000722U, published Jul. 1, 1991, 6 pages. |
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7. |
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHZ). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. ”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4. |
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3. |
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™ System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7. |
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198. |
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8. |
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1. |
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5. |
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324. |
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9. |
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5. |
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123. |
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1. |
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3. |
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005. |
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp. S-D-129-S-D-139, 32. |
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2. |
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3. |
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1. |
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2. |
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2. |
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258. |
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II. |
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, dated 2010. |
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2. |
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7. |
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80. |
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages). |
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3. |
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. SI05-SII5, No. 355S. |
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16. |
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007. |
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007. |
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325. |
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5. |
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5. |
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1. |
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4. |
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1. |
Hofmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215. |
Horbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™ system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4. |
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325. |
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4. |
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB. |
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2. |
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2. |
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5. |
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6. |
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7. |
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1. |
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7. |
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7. |
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4. |
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8. |
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3. |
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11. |
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering⋅General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24. |
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3. |
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185. |
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010—2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197. |
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2. |
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3. |
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1. |
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work ?.”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004. |
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8. |
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1. |
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A. |
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012. |
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, SPINE, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20. |
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4. |
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4. |
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6. |
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4. |
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6. |
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306. |
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html. |
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6. |
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7. |
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4. |
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages). |
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages). |
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013. Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society. |
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement.”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2. |
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs. |
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 26 pgs. |
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6. |
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4. |
Tello, “Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2. |
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45. |
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1. |
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3. |
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4. |
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, SPINE, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3. |
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2. |
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2. |
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3. |
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15. |
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6. |
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118. |
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6. |
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5. |
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2. |
Machine Translation of USSR Soviet Union Application No. SU1197658A1, published Dec. 15, 1985, retrieved from: https://patents.google.com/patent/SU1197658A1/en?oq=SU1197658A on Jul. 5, 2022, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210251675 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62097005 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16298339 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17239565 | US | |
Parent | 14981762 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 16298339 | US |