Systems and methods for distributed electronic signature documents

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9634975
  • Patent Number
    9,634,975
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 12, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 25, 2017
    8 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for providing a report describing the status of an electronic envelope. The electronic envelope includes a first electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature and an electronic signing template defining a set of at least one task that must be performed by an executor of the first electronic document to complete the electronic signature. The first electronic document is subject to a workflow including a plurality of events. The method includes receiving from a monitoring entity a selection of an identifier of an event of the plurality. The progress of the first electronic document through the workflow is monitored. That the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document is determined. In response to determining that the at least one event has occurred, the monitoring entity is notified of such.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Email is a popular way of transferring contract documents in the marketplace. Currently, there does not exist an effective system or method for a person to email a document or file to another person and have them fill-in and sign the document in such a way as to enforce a legally binding electronic signature process.


In order to create a legally binding document, the signer must be authenticated, the document may not be modified and the sequence of signing must be controlled. Standard email systems lack the control over any of these processes. One current method is emailing a PKI signed document. A PKI signed document can be cumbersome because it requires the document to be signed by the sender before it is distributed, then again by the signer when they sign the document, and further requires all parties to have special software and certificates to execute the process. This requirement that all parties pre-establish proper technology in order execute a transaction adds extra burden and cost on both parties to the transaction, which severely limits acceptance of PKI in the marketplace.


Advanced electronic signature services such as DocuSign® enable contracts to be signed with an ESIGN-compliant signature process. However, this service lacks the ability to simply email the source document to a person to sign; it requires the signer to visit and authenticate before they sign the document. It further requires the sender to register each document with the service prior to sending it for signature.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Systems and methods for providing a report describing the status of an electronic envelope are disclosed. The electronic envelope includes a first electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature and an electronic signing template defining a set of at least one task that must be performed by an executor of the first electronic document to complete the electronic signature. The first electronic document is subject to a workflow including a plurality of events. The method includes receiving from a monitoring entity a selection of an identifier of an event of the plurality. The progress of the first electronic document through the workflow is monitored. That the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document is determined. In response to determining that the at least one event has occurred, the monitoring entity is notified of such.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred and alternative examples of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:



FIG. 1 shows an example system for creation, processing and execution of distributed electronic signature documents;



FIG. 2 shows a preferred method for distributed electronic signature documents;



FIG. 3 shows a user interface for customizing status reports according to an embodiment;



FIG. 4 shows a first status report according to an embodiment; and



FIG. 5 shows a second status report according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Systems and methods for distributed electronic signature documents are disclosed herein. One embodiment of the present invention acts like a “Self Addressed Stamped Envelope” and allows a document to be sent for signature via email. Once the signer receives the document, he/she may fill in necessary fields prior to signing. When the signer is ready to sign, a control embedded in the document enables the signing process to be initiated by the signer and the signing managed by a web service. The web service authenticates the signer and ensures that the content of the contract can/cannot be modified (determined by the creator of the document). The service preferably enforces the workflow and sequencing of the document and adds any fields to the document that the signer added during review and execution. This approach allows any document to be distributed freely for signature via any means along with the ability to be electronically signed without the need for special software or certificates, and there is no requirement for the sender to take specific actions for each document, but rather allows the document to be distributed freely. In a preferred embodiment, the same signable document may be sent to hundreds of recipients via email, each of which may sign their copy, with the result being that all signed copies and all the data provided by the signed copies is securely captured and available to the sender.


Embodiments of the invention may incorporate concepts described in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/038,728 entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT TAGGING TEMPLATES,” which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.



FIG. 1 shows an example system 100 for creation, processing and execution of distributed electronic signature documents. The system 100 includes a single computer 101, or includes a computer 101 in communication with pluralities of other computers 103. The computer 101 is connected with a web signing service 104 and an electronic signature service 106 over a network such as the Internet. In one embodiment, a bank of servers, a wireless device, a cellular telephone and/or other data capture/entry device can be used in place of the computer 101. An application program, such as a source-client application, is run by the computer 101, which then creates a signing template 120 and/or a signable document 122. The computer 101 can include an application program that allows the signing template 120 and/or the signable document 122 to be sent for signature via email.


The signing template 120 is a file that preferably contains information about the signing process, locations, sequence and authentication. It contains links to any form fields in the signable document that will be used to fully execute the signing template. It may also contain information about the account holder and any limitations on the signing process. It may identify other parties that will also sign, as well as any authentication requirements for any of the signers. The signable document 122 is a document file that preferably contains text and/or graphics along with a customizable control or link (e.g., tag) back to the signing template for execution. The web signing server 104 is a web server on the Internet that preferably hosts the application logic to correlate data transmitted by the embedded control in the signable document 122 with signing template 120 rule sets. An electronic signature service 106, such as the existing DocuSign service, executes the signing template instructions through the web signing server.



FIG. 2 shows a method for distributed electronic signature documents 200 in one embodiment. At block 202 a document originator creates a signing template file that contains information about how a signable document is to be signed. A document originator may be a user, a party to a transaction, an agency or any entity interested in creating a signable document. The signing template file may include but is not limited to the location of signatures and initials for one or more signers; linkage between form fields in the actual document; information to be used to notify or authenticate the signer; information that may be used by decision systems to decide on different signature execution processes based on what is entered into the document during the signing process; the number of times the signable document can be executed; who will pay for the signature process; information governing whether the signable document content is modifiable by the signer; and other controlling information that may be changed or modified at any time by the sender who has access to it on the web server connected to the Internet. The signing template is preferably stored on a web signing server that is connected to the Internet.


In one embodiment, at block 204, the document originator may create a signable document that is to be distributed to recipients for signing or viewing. The creation of the signing template and signable document preferably occurs in the same application, but may also occur in a different sequence and in different applications. The core signable document preferably includes an embedded control that provides information about the companion signing template. This information is similar to a secure hyperlink that enables the signer to click a button (“SDButton”) or a link in the signable document that contains information about how to connect over the Internet to the signing template for processing. The signable document is preferably paired with a signing template; however, there may be multiple signable documents relating back to one or more Signable Templates.


The document originator, at block 206, transmits electronically the signing template and signable document to the signer. In an alternative embodiment, the signing template may be distributed via a simple hyperlink back to the signable document stored on a web server available to the Internet. When the signer is ready and when the SDButton is activated, at block 208, a message is sent to the signing template on the web signing server, which invokes a signing process. This signing process preferably launches a procedure that validates the transaction and uploads the data provided by any form fields in the signable document to the web signing server and invokes a signing process that spawns a local web browser on the signer's computer and begins a signing process as defined by the signing template.


After the signer has been authenticated by the system by any means defined in the signing template, at block 210 a version of the signable document that is created from the server is presented in the browser window. The signing process uses the current method of signing found in the DocuSign service, but may accommodate alternative methods of signing found in similar services. At block 212, the signer signs the document.


Preferably only the form field data from the signer is uploaded to the server and merged into the signing template (which contains the signable document copy). In this embodiment, the signers are not able to modify the underlying documents because this data is not used when the contract is presented to them during the signing process.


In an alternative embodiment, if the sender allows the content to be modified prior to submitting to the web signing server for signing, the entire signable document rather than only the field information is uploaded to the web signing server for handling through the signing process. In this embodiment, the modified document is displayed for the signer to sign in the web signing server.


In another embodiment, the sender does not allow the content to be modified and the entire document is posted to the web signing server for the signing process. Next, a document integrity validation occurs on the posted document to ensure that the underlying content has not been changed.


Once a signable document/signing template pairing has been created, the signable document can be used in many different ways to enable businesses to easily allow electronic signatures to be collected. The following provide non-limiting examples of alternative embodiments as may be desired or dictated by application requirements.


In one example, a business creates a signable document for the company 401k signing sheet and emails it to multiple employees. Each employee opens the file and fills in the form, clicking a button that may say “Sign.” The web signing server responds by presenting a web interface that authenticates and presents the document for signature for each employee and collects the signature and any data provided.


In another example, a business creates a signable document for a sales order form and creates the companion signing template, which requests that after the original signer has signed the document must be countersigned internally by two other people before being completed. To execute a sales transaction, the sales representative opens the document, enters in the data required for the sale, and sends the file to the signer for signature. The signer merely clicks the “Sign” button. The web signing server responds by presenting a web interface that authenticates and provides the document for signature to the first signer. Once the first signer has signed, the document is routed to the other two signers for signatures before it is completed.


A business creates a signable document that is unlocked (i.e. the content is changeable) for the company consulting agreement, and a signing template with instructions about the signing process, which ensures the company signer signs second. This contract is edited by both the company and consultant several times before it is deemed to be the final copy. Once the final copy is reached, either party may click the “Submit for Signature” link or button and the web signing server manages the signing process.


A company has an “Account Setup Form” that currently prospects download, print and fill out manually, and faxing the form back to the company for account setup. Using the systems and methods described herein, the sender company creates the form as a signable document linked to a signing template that defines the signing process for opening an account. When the user clicks on a hyperlink on a webpage that says “Open Account,” the form is displayed in the browser window, and the user fills out the form using all form fields defined in the signable document (for example a PDF form). When the user clicks “Sign” the web signing server executes the signing process for the document.


Embodiments of the invention include methods and systems for providing a report describing the status of an electronic envelope including one or more electronic documents distributed for electronic signature. Elements of the system 100 may include one or more computer-readable media having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more elements of system 100, enable such elements to implement the described embodiments. For purposes of the present discussion, an envelope may be considered to be a grouping of pre-tagged documents and/or standalone documents, along with associated templates, if any. As such, the electronic envelope may further include an electronic signing template defining one or more tasks that must be performed by an executor of the one or more electronic documents to complete the electronic signature. As discussed herein above, the one or more electronic documents may be subject to a document-execution workflow that includes a plurality of events, which may include the one or more tasks associated with the template.


In an embodiment, a user desiring to monitor the status of electronically signable documents distributed in association with a particular account (e.g., documents distributed by a particular company or individual) may use computer 101, for example, to access information associated with such account, which may be maintained by the administrator of web signing server 104 and/or electronic signature service 106. For example, the user may access a website maintained by such administrator and provide authentication information to access the account in a conventional manner.


Upon accessing the account, and as illustrated in FIG. 3, the administrator may provide to the computer 101 a webpage 300 providing a graphical user interface allowing the user to customize document-monitoring reports. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the page 300 includes a field 310 allowing the user to select from among a number of workflow events (e.g., envelope delivered, envelope signed, etc.) pertaining to all, or a user-selectable set, of the envelopes/documents distributed in association with the account. As such, if, for example, the user selected only the “Envelope Sent” and “Envelope Signed” identifiers in field 310, the user would receive progress reports only upon the occasion of an envelope having been sent and upon the occasion of the envelope having been digitally signed.


As further illustrated in FIG. 3, the page 300 includes a field 320 allowing the user to select from among a number of workflow events (e.g., recipient delivered, recipient signed, etc.) pertaining to all, or a user-selectable set, of the recipients to whom envelopes/documents have been distributed in association with the account. As such, if, for example, the user selected only the “Recipient Sent” and “Recipient Signed” identifiers in field 320, the user would receive progress reports only upon the occasion of an envelope having been sent to a particular recipient or set of recipients and upon the occasion of the envelope having been digitally signed by a particular recipient or set of recipients.


As further illustrated in FIG. 3, the page 300 includes a field 330 allowing the user to select from among a number of individuals associated with the account who have distributed envelopes/documents. As such, by selecting identifiers of particular individuals in field 330, the user would receive progress reports only upon the occasion of events selected in fields 310, 320 occurring with regard to documents distributed by the selected individuals.


As further illustrated in FIG. 3, the page 300 includes a field set 340 allowing the user to select from among a number of predetermined destinations, or to designate a desired destination, to which status reports may be published or sent.


After the user has made and saved his selections using page 300, the web signing server 104 functions to monitor the progress of each electronic envelope/document as it passes through the workflow. For example, using techniques described elsewhere herein, elements of the system 100 are operable to determine when a tab or other activatable control within a document has been activated (e.g., a document has been electronically signed and/or initialed). Upon determining that a selected event has occurred with respect to an electronic document, the web signing server 104 prepares and publishes a report of the event to the destination designated by the user in field 340 of page 300. FIG. 4 illustrates a webpage 400 associated with the designated report destination listing the envelopes for which selected events have occurred, and providing several types of exemplar information including the status of the envelope, the name of the person who has signed or will be signing the associated document(s), dates of sending and execution of the document(s), and the time elapsed between sending and execution, or delivery and execution) of the document(s). The user can select a link from “EnvelopeID” field 410 to view a more detailed status report pertaining to an associated envelope/document, as illustrated in FIG. 5. In the case of an electronic envelope containing more than one document, such status reports are operable to inform the user of the status of each individual document (e.g., that one document has been signed, while the other has not, and an identification of the signed document).


The report shown in FIG. 5 is in the form of a webpage 500 and provides, among other information, descriptions 510 of the tabbed fields present in the document, the status (e.g., signed, unsigned, not otherwise executed, etc.) 520 of each tabbed field, and identifications 530 of the values assigned by the signer to each tabbed field.


While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment, but to the invention as described above and illustrated in the exemplars shown below.


While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing a report describing a status of an electronic envelope including a first electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature, the first electronic document being subject to a document-execution workflow comprising a plurality of events, the method comprising: generating, for display on a display device coupled to a client device, a graphical user interlace enabling selection of reporting events from a plurality of events, the graphical user interlace including selectable identifiers of the plurality of events including envelope sent, envelope delivered, and envelope signed;receiving, via user input received through the graphical user interface, an electronic selection of an identifier, of the selectable identifiers, of at least one event of the plurality of events monitoring progress of the first electronic document through the workflow;determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document; andin response to determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document, updating a reporting graphical user interface to reflect that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document, wherein the reporting graphical user interface includes information on the electronic envelope, a signer, a sender, and a status.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first electronic document includes an embedded activatable control, and wherein determining that the at least one event has occurred includes receiving an indication that the embedded activatable control has been activated.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein receiving the indication that the embedded activatable control has been activated includes receiving an indication that a user has clicked a button in the first electronic document.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the electronic envelope includes a second electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature, and further comprising: monitoring the progress of the second electronic document through the workflow;determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document; andin response to determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document, updating the reporting graphical user interlace to reflect that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating the graphical user interface to a display device, wherein the graphical user interface is further configured to receive a selection of one or more users to notify when it is determined that the at least one event has occurred.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one event comprises completion of the electronic signature of the first electronic document.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed by a signing service that is configured to facilitate transactions.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising receiving from the signing service a selection of a first destination of a plurality of destinations to be notified that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document.
  • 9. A system, comprising: an electronic envelope including a first electronic document to be distributed over a network for electronic signature, the first electronic document being subject to a document-execution work flow comp rising a plurality of events including the at least one task; anda signing service computer that is configured to: generate, for display on a client device, a graphical user interlace enabling selection of reporting events from a plurality of events, the graphical user interface including selectable identifiers of the plurality of events including envelope sent, envelope delivered, and envelope signed;receive, via user input received through the graphical user interlace, an electronic selection of an identifier, of the selectable identifiers, of at least one event of the plurality of events monitor, over a network, progress of the first electronic document through the workflow;determine that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document; andin response to determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document, updating a reporting graphical user interlace to reflect that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document, wherein the reporting graphical user interlace includes information on the electronic envelope, a signer, a sender, and a status.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, further comprising a client device that is configured to display the graphical user interface and display the updated reporting graphical user interface reflecting that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein: the client device is further configured to embed into the first document an activatable control; andthe signing service computer is further configured to determine that the event has occurred in response to receiving an indication that activated user has clicked a button in the first electronic document.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the electronic envelope includes a second electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature, and the signing service computer is further configured to: monitor the progress of the second electronic document through the workflow;determine that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document; andin response to determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document, update a reporting graphical user interlace to reflect that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the second electronic document.
  • 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the signing service computer is further configured to generate the graphical user interface to a display device associated with the client device, wherein the identifier selection is provided by a user of the client device via the graphical user interface.
  • 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the at least one event comprises completion of the electronic signature of the first electronic document.
  • 15. The system of claim 9, wherein the signing service computer is further configured to receive a selection of a first destination of a plurality of destinations to be notified that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document.
  • 16. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions that, when executed by a computer, enable the computer to perform steps for providing a report describing a status of an electronic envelope including a first electronic document to be distributed for electronic signature, the first electronic document being subject to a document-execution workflow comprising a plurality of events including the at least one task, the steps comprising: generating, for display on a display device coupled to a client device, a graphical user interlace enabling selection of reporting events from a plurality of events, the graphical user interlace including selectable identifiers of the plurality of events including envelope sent, envelope delivered, and envelope signed;receiving from a monitoring entity an electronic selection of an identifier of at least one event of the plurality of events, wherein the electronic selection of the identifier is provided via the graphical user interface;monitoring, over a network, progress of the first electronic document through the workflow;determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document; andin response to determining that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document, updating a reporting graphical user interlace to reflect that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein determining that the at least one event has occurred includes receiving the indication that a user has clicked a control embedded within the first electronic document.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the graphical user interface is further configured to display identifiers of the plurality of events including envelope completed, envelope declined, and envelope voided.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the graphical user interlace is further configured to receive an indication of a destination to which to publish a status report regarding the electronic envelope, wherein the indication of the destination is a uniform resource locator that identifies a Web service, and wherein the updating the reporting graphical user interface comprise publishing the status report to the destination when it is determined that the at least one event has occurred with respect to the first electronic document.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the first electronic document is distributed via email for electronic signature and is associated with an electronic signing template defining a set of at least one task that must be performed by an executor of the first electronic document to complete the electronic signature.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/490,602 filed Jun. 24, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/176,265 filed Jul. 18, 2008, which claims priority to and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/950,563 filed Jul. 18, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (207)
Number Name Date Kind
5040142 Mori et al. Aug 1991 A
5220675 Padawer et al. Jun 1993 A
5222138 Balabon et al. Jun 1993 A
5337360 Fischer Aug 1994 A
5390247 Fischer Feb 1995 A
5465299 Matsumoto et al. Nov 1995 A
5544255 Smithies et al. Aug 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5615268 Bisbee et al. Mar 1997 A
5629982 Micali May 1997 A
5689567 Miyauchi Nov 1997 A
5748738 Bisbee et al. May 1998 A
5813009 Johnson et al. Sep 1998 A
5832499 Gustman Nov 1998 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5898156 Wilfong Apr 1999 A
6021202 Anderson et al. Feb 2000 A
6067531 Hoyt et al. May 2000 A
6085322 Romney et al. Jul 2000 A
6092080 Gustman Jul 2000 A
6119229 Martinez et al. Sep 2000 A
6128740 Curry et al. Oct 2000 A
6161139 Win et al. Dec 2000 A
6185587 Bernardo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185683 Ginter et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199052 Mitty et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210276 Mullins Apr 2001 B1
6237096 Bisbee et al. May 2001 B1
6289460 Hajmiragha Sep 2001 B1
6321333 Murray Nov 2001 B1
6327656 Zabetian Dec 2001 B2
6367010 Venkatram et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367013 Bisbee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6446115 Powers Sep 2002 B2
6470448 Kuroda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6584466 Serbinis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6615348 Gibbs Sep 2003 B1
6658403 Kuroda et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671805 Brown et al. Dec 2003 B1
6728762 Estrada et al. Apr 2004 B1
6751632 Petrogiannis Jun 2004 B1
6754829 Butt et al. Jun 2004 B1
6796489 Slater et al. Sep 2004 B2
6807633 Pavlik Oct 2004 B1
6829635 Townshend Dec 2004 B1
6912660 Petrogiannis Jun 2005 B1
6931420 Silvester et al. Aug 2005 B1
6938157 Kaplan Aug 2005 B2
6944648 Cochran et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947911 Moritsu et al. Sep 2005 B1
6959382 Kinnis et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961854 Serret-Avila et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973569 Anderson et al. Dec 2005 B1
6990684 Futamura et al. Jan 2006 B2
7039805 Messing May 2006 B1
7059516 Matsuyama et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069443 Berringer et al. Jun 2006 B2
7093130 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2006 B1
7100045 Yamada et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103778 Kon et al. Sep 2006 B2
7162635 Bisbee et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167844 Leong et al. Jan 2007 B1
7197644 Brewington Mar 2007 B2
7237114 Rosenberg Jun 2007 B1
7340608 Laurie et al. Mar 2008 B2
7360079 Wall Apr 2008 B2
7395436 Nemovicher Jul 2008 B1
7424543 Rice, III Sep 2008 B2
7437421 Bhogal et al. Oct 2008 B2
7523315 Hougaard et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533268 Catoricini et al. May 2009 B1
7554576 Erol et al. Jun 2009 B2
7562053 Twining et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568101 Catoricini et al. Jul 2009 B1
7568104 Berryman et al. Jul 2009 B2
7581105 Dietl Aug 2009 B2
7657832 Lin Feb 2010 B1
7660863 Boursetty et al. Feb 2010 B2
7788259 Patterson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7934098 Hahn et al. Apr 2011 B1
7953977 Maruyama et al. May 2011 B2
8103867 Spitz Jan 2012 B2
8132013 Meier Mar 2012 B2
8286071 Zimmerman et al. Oct 2012 B1
8588483 Hicks et al. Nov 2013 B2
8612349 Ledder et al. Dec 2013 B1
8650038 Peirson, Jr. Feb 2014 B2
8655961 McCabe Feb 2014 B2
8949706 McCabe Feb 2015 B2
20010018739 Anderson et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034739 Anecki et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034835 Smith Oct 2001 A1
20020004800 Kikuta et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019937 Edstrom et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026427 Kon et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026582 Futamura et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020040431 Kato et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020069179 Slater et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020069358 Silvester Jun 2002 A1
20020099733 Teruuchi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020129056 Conant et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138445 Laage et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143711 Nassiri Oct 2002 A1
20020162000 Bensler Oct 2002 A1
20020178187 Rasmussen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184485 Dray et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194219 Bradley et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196478 Struble Dec 2002 A1
20030048301 Menninger Mar 2003 A1
20030051016 Miyoshi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056100 Beatson Mar 2003 A1
20030078880 Alley Apr 2003 A1
20030120553 Williams Jun 2003 A1
20030120930 Simpson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131073 Lucovsky et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140252 Lafon et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030217275 Bentley et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040054606 Broerman Mar 2004 A1
20040078337 King et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107352 Yui et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117627 Brewington Jun 2004 A1
20040133493 Ford et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040181756 Berringer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040225884 Lorenzini et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230891 Pravetz et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040250070 Wong Dec 2004 A1
20040255114 Lee et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040255127 Arnouse Dec 2004 A1
20050033811 Bhogal et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049903 Raja Mar 2005 A1
20050076215 Dryer Apr 2005 A1
20050091143 Schmidt et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050120217 Fifield et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165626 Karpf Jul 2005 A1
20050182684 Dawson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182956 Ginter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192908 Jorimann et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050231738 Huff et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060047600 Bodenheim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060161780 Berryman et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161781 Rice et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060174199 Soltis et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205476 Jubinville Sep 2006 A1
20060259440 Leake et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060261545 Rogers Nov 2006 A1
20060294152 Kawabe et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070026927 Yaldoo et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070079139 Kim Apr 2007 A1
20070088958 Qa'Im-maqami Apr 2007 A1
20070118732 Whitmore May 2007 A1
20070130186 Ramsey et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136361 Lee et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070143085 Kimmel Jun 2007 A1
20070165865 Talvitie Jul 2007 A1
20070198533 Foygel et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208944 Pavlicic Sep 2007 A1
20070220260 King Sep 2007 A1
20070271592 Noda et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070289022 Wittkotter Dec 2007 A1
20080016357 Suarez Jan 2008 A1
20080034213 Boemker et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080097777 Rielo Apr 2008 A1
20080141033 Ginter et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080209313 Gonser Aug 2008 A1
20080209516 Nassiri Aug 2008 A1
20080216147 Duffy Sep 2008 A1
20080235577 Veluchamy et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080260287 Berryman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080313723 Naono et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090024912 McCabe et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090025087 Peirson, Jr. Jan 2009 A1
20090044019 Lee et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090099881 Hanna et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090132351 Gibson May 2009 A1
20090138730 Cook et al. May 2009 A1
20090145958 Stoutenburg et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090185241 Nepomniachtchi Jul 2009 A1
20090268903 Bojinov et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090292786 McCabe et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100088364 Carter et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100122094 Shima May 2010 A1
20100153011 Obrea et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100217987 Shevade Aug 2010 A1
20100235727 Ashton et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274863 Foygel et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287260 Peterson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100293094 Kolkowitz et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110093769 Dunn et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110119165 Zee May 2011 A1
20110126022 Sieberer May 2011 A1
20110238510 Rowen et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110264907 Betz et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110314371 Peterson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120180135 Hodges et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120209970 Scipioni et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271882 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120304265 Richter et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130019156 Gonser et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019289 Gonser et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130050512 Gonser et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067243 Tamayo-Rios et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130159720 Gonser et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130179676 Hamid Jul 2013 A1
20130254111 Gonser et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130263283 Peterson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140019761 Shapiro Jan 2014 A1
20150067464 McCabe et al. Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
101299256 Nov 2008 CN
1238321 Jun 2001 EP
2000048072 Feb 2000 JP
2003271529 Sep 2003 JP
2005267438 Sep 2005 JP
2008117258 May 2008 JP
2008225527 Sep 2008 JP
20000049674 Aug 2000 KR
1020020092595 Dec 2002 KR
1020070059931 Jun 2007 KR
100929488 Dec 2009 KR
20090122657 Dec 2009 KR
2400811 Nov 2005 RU
2291491 Oct 2007 RU
2300844 Jun 2010 RU
9607156 Mar 1996 WO
WO-9607156 Mar 1996 WO
03091834 Nov 2003 WO
WO-03091834 Nov 2003 WO
2007075235 Jul 2007 WO
2008124627 Oct 2008 WO
2009012478 Jan 2009 WO
WO-2009012478 Jan 2009 WO
2010105262 Sep 2010 WO
WO-2010151630 Dec 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (48)
Entry
Wheeler et al., “DocuSign Unveils new Scalable Product and Support Offerings of Electronic Signature and Electronic Contract Execution,” DocuSign The Fastest Way to Get a Signature, 2 pp., Jan. 2008.
Borozdin et al., “DocuSign Connect Service Guide,” DocuSign, Inc., pp. 1-9, 2008.
eLynx Adds Workflow Management to Electronic Document Platform—new Workflow Capabilities Provide for Enhanced Electronic Loan Processing, eLynx, 2 pp. Jan. 2009.
Laurens Leurs; The history of PDF; Feb. 14, 2010; pp. 1-12.
Brown, “Digital Signatures: Can They Be Accepted As Legal Signatures in EID?”, Dec. 1993, ACM, p. 86-92.
Herzberg et al., “Surf‘N’Sign: Client Signatures on Web Documents”, 1998, IEEE, vol. 37 Issue 1, p. 61-71.
Kwok et al., “An Automatic Electronic Contract Document Signing System in a Secure Environment”, 2005, IEEE, p. 497-502.
Su et al., “Signature-In-Signature Verification Via a Secure Simple Network Protocol”, 2010, IEEE, p. 1-4.
Zefferer et al., “An Electronic-Signature Based Circular Resolution Database System,” Mar. 2010, ACM, p. 1840-1845.
Kamara et al., “Cryptographic Cloud Storage”, 2010, Financial Cryptography and Data Security, p. 136-149.
Harold, Elliotte Rusty, XML Bible. IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1999, p. 191-192.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 19, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2014”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2011”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2013”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 24, 2014”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 16, 2014”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Feb. 26, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2013”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed May 24, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Jul. 15, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Jul. 17, 2012 to Advisory Action mailed Jul. 9, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Oct. 6, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Dec. 7, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 9, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Response filed Jul. 1, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Response filed Oct. 29, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,713, Preliminary Amendment filed Jan. 30, 2015”, 7 pgs.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010264441, First Examiner Report mailed Sep. 25, 2014”, 3 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,731,116, Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014”, 3 pgs.
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,731,116, Response filed May 27, 2015 to Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014”, 30 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Apr. 8, 2014”, 8 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 16, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2012”, 2 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Response filed Mar. 12, 2014 to Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 16, 2013”, 14 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Response filed Aug. 18, 2014 to Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Apr. 8, 2014”, 15 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 19, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, International Search Report mailed Feb. 19, 2009”, 2 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 19, 2009”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 12, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, International Search Report mailed Feb. 23, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 23, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Notification of Reasons of Refusal mailed Jan. 14, 2014”, with English translation of claims, 5 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Response filed Jun. 12, 2014”, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,713, filed Nov. 10, 2014, Systems and Methods for Distributed Electronic Signature Documents.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140164542 A1 Jun 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60950563 Jul 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12490602 Jun 2009 US
Child 14179507 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12176265 Jul 2008 US
Child 12490602 US