Email is a popular way of transferring contract documents in the marketplace. Currently, there does not exist an effective system or method for a person to email a document or file to another person and have them fill-in and sign the document in such a way as to enforce a legally binding electronic signature process.
In order to create a legally binding document, the signer must be authenticated, the document may not be modified and the sequence of signing must be controlled. Standard email systems lack the control over any of these processes. One current method is emailing a PKI signed document. A PKI signed document can be cumbersome because it requires the document to be signed by the sender before it is distributed, then again by the signer when they sign the document, and further requires all parties to have special software and certificates to execute the process. This requirement that all parties pre-establish proper technology in order execute a transaction adds extra burden and cost on both parties to the transaction, which severely limits acceptance of PKI in the marketplace.
Advanced electronic signature services such as DocuSign enable contracts to be signed with an esign-compliant signature process. However, this service lacks the ability to simply email the source document to a person to sign; it requires the signer to visit and authenticate before they sign the document. It further requires the sender to register each document with the service prior to sending it for signature.
A system and method for distributed electronic signature documents includes creating a signing template that contains information about how a signable document is to be signed, where the signatures are to be placed, who is to sign, and all activities that will be required to complete the transaction. A signable document is created and is then distributed by any means to a signer for signing. The signer opens the signable document, provides any data being requested should the document have form fields, and initiates the signing process. When initiated, a secure message is sent to a web signing server to invoke the signing process. This process preferably validates the request for a signing and then, if valid, executes the signing process as defined by the signing template.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
Systems and methods for distributed electronic signature documents are disclosed herein. One embodiment of the present invention acts like a “Self Addressed Stamped Envelope” and allows a document to be sent for signature via email. Once the signer receives the document, he/she may fill in necessary fields prior to signing. When the signer is ready to sign, a control embedded in the document enables the signing process to be initiated and the signing managed by a web service. The web service authenticates the signer and ensures that the content of the contract can/cannot be modified (determined by the creator of the document). The service preferably enforces the workflow and sequencing of the document and adds any fields to the document that the signer added during review and execution. This approach allows any document to be distributed freely for signature via any means along with the ability to be electronically signed without the need for special software or certificates, and there is no requirement for the sender to take specific actions for each document, but rather allow the document to be distributed freely. In a preferred embodiment, the same signable document may be sent to hundreds of recipients via email, each of which may sign their copy, with the result being that all signed copies and all the data provided by the signed copies is securely captured and available to the sender.
The signing template 120 is a file that preferably contains information about the signing process, locations, sequence and authentication. It contains linkages to any form fields in the signable document that will be used to fully execute the signing template. It may also contain information about the account holder and any limitations on the signing process. It may identify other parties that will also sign, as well as any authentication requirements for any of the signers. The signable document 122 is a document file that preferably contains text and/or graphics along with a customizable control or link back to the signing template for execution. The web signing server 104 is a web server on the Internet that preferably hosts the application logic to correlate data transmitted by the embedded control in the signable document 122 with signing template 120 rule sets. An electronic signature service 106, such as the existing DocuSign service, executes the signing template instructions through the web signing server.
In one embodiment, at block 204, the document originator may create a signable document that is to be distributed to recipients for signing or viewing. The creation of the signing template and signable document preferably occurs in the same application, but may also occur in a different sequence and in different applications. The core signable document preferably includes an embedded control that provides information about the companion signing template. This information is similar to a secure hyperlink that enables the signer to click a button (“SDButton”) or a link in the signable document that contains information about how to connect over the Internet to the signing template for processing. The signable document is preferably paired with a signing template; however, there may be multiple signable documents relating back to one or more Signable Templates.
The document originator, at block 206, transmits electronically the signing template and signable document to the signer. In an alternative embodiment, the signing template may be distributed via a simple hyperlink back to the signable document stored on a web server available to the Internet. When the signer is ready and when the SDButton is activated, at block 208, a message is sent to the signing template on the web signing server, which invokes a signing process. This signing process preferably launches a procedure that validates the transaction and uploads the data provided by any form fields in the signable document to the web signing server and invokes a signing process that spawns a local web browser on the signer's computer and begins a signing process as defined by the signing template.
After the signer has been authenticated by the system by any means defined in the signing template, at block 210 a version of the signable document that is created from the server is presented in the browser window. The signing process uses the current method of signing found in the DocuSign service, but may accommodate alternative methods of signing found in similar services. At block 212, the signer signs the document.
Preferably only the form field data from the signer is uploaded to the server and merged into the signing template (which contains the signable document copy). In this embodiment, the signers are not able to modify the underlying documents because this data is not used when the contract is presented to them during the signing process.
In an alternative embodiment, if the sender allows the content to be modified prior to submitting to the web signing server for signing, the entire signable document rather than only the field information is uploaded to the web signing server for handling through the signing process. In this embodiment, the modified document is displayed for the signer to sign in the web signing server.
In another embodiment, the sender does not allow the content to be modified and the entire document is posted to the web signing server for the signing process. Next, a document integrity validation occurs on the posted document to ensure that the underlying content has not been changed.
Once a signable document/signing template pairing has been created, the signable document can be used in many different ways to enable businesses to easily allow electronic signatures to be collected. The following provide non-limiting examples of alternative embodiments as may be desired or dictated by application requirements.
In one example, a business creates a signable document for the company 401k signing sheet and emails it to multiple employees. Each employee opens the file and fills in the form, clicking a button that may say “Sign.” The web signing server responds by presenting a web interface that authenticates and presents the document for signature for each employee and collects the signature and any data provided.
In another example, a business creates a signable document for a sales order form and creates the companion signing template, which requests that after the original signer has signed the document must be countersigned internally by two other people before being completed. To execute a sales transaction, the sales representative opens the document, enters in the data required for the sale, and sends the file to the signer for signature. The signer merely clicks the “Sign” button. The web signing server responds by presenting a web interface that authenticates and provides the document for signature to the first signer. Once the first signer has signed, the document is routed to the other two signers for signatures before it is completed.
A business creates a signable document that is unlocked (i.e. the content is changeable) for the company consulting agreement, and a signing template with instructions about the signing process, which ensures the company signer signs second. This contract is edited by both the company and consultant several times before it is deemed to be the final copy. Once the final copy is reached, either party may click the “Submit for Signature” link or button and the web signing server manages the signing process.
A company has an “Account Setup Form” that currently prospects download, print and fill out manually, and faxing the form back to the company for account setup. Using the systems and methods described herein, the sender company creates the form as a signable document linked to a signing template that defines the signing process for opening an account. When the user clicks on a hyperlink on a web page that says “Open Account,” the form is displayed in the browser window, and the user fills out the form using all form fields defined in the signable document (for example a PDF form). When the user clicks “Sign” the web signing server executes the signing process for the document.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment, but to the invention as described above and illustrated in the exemplars shown below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/176,265 filed on Jul. 18, 2008 and claims priority to and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/950,563 filed on Jul. 18, 2007, the contents of which are incorporated by reference.This application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 10,198,418, issued Feb. 5, 2019, filed as U.S. application Ser. No. 14/537,713 on Nov. 10, 2014, which application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 12/176,265, filed Jul. 18, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,949,706, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/950,563, filed Jul. 18, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5040142 | Mori et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5220675 | Padawer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222138 | Balabon et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5337360 | Fischer | Aug 1994 | A |
5390247 | Fischer | Feb 1995 | A |
5465299 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5544255 | Smithies et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5615268 | Bisbee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
5689567 | Miyauchi | Nov 1997 | A |
5748738 | Bisbee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832499 | Gustman | Nov 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898156 | Wilfong | Apr 1999 | A |
6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067531 | Hoyt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085322 | Romney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092080 | Gustman | Jul 2000 | A |
6119229 | Martinez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128740 | Curry et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161139 | Win et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185587 | Bernardo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199052 | Mitty et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210276 | Mullins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237096 | Bisbee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289460 | Hajmiragha | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321333 | Murray | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327656 | Zabetian | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6367010 | Venkatram et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367013 | Bisbee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446115 | Powers | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6470448 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615348 | Gibbs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658403 | Kuroda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671805 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6728762 | Estrada et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751632 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754829 | Butt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6796489 | Slater et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807633 | Pavlik | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829635 | Townshend | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6912660 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931420 | Silvester et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938157 | Kaplan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944648 | Cochran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947911 | Moritsu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6959382 | Kinnis et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961854 | Serret-Avila et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973569 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990684 | Futamura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7039805 | Messing | May 2006 | B1 |
7059516 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069443 | Berringer et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093130 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100045 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103778 | Kon et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7162635 | Bisbee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167844 | Leong et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7197644 | Brewington | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7237114 | Rosenberg | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7340608 | Laurie et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360079 | Wall | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7395436 | Nemovicher | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424543 | Rice, III | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437421 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7523315 | Hougaard et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533268 | Catorcini et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7554576 | Erol | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562053 | Twining et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568101 | Catorcini et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568104 | Berryman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7581105 | Dietl | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7636500 | Arant | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657832 | Lin | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7660863 | De Boursetty et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7788259 | Patterson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7934098 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7953977 | Maruyama et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8103867 | Spitz | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132013 | Meier | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8286071 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8588483 | Hicks et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8612349 | Ledder et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8650038 | Peirson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655961 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8949706 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9634975 | McCabe et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10198418 | McCabe et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20010018739 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034739 | Anecki et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034835 | Smith | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004800 | Kikuta et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019937 | Edstrom et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026427 | Kon et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026582 | Futamura et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040431 | Kato et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069179 | Slater et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069358 | Silvester | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099733 | Teruuchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020129056 | Conant et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138445 | Laage et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143711 | Nassiri | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162000 | Benzler | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178187 | Rasmussen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184485 | Dray, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194219 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196478 | Struble | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030048301 | Menninger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051016 | Miyoshi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056100 | Beatson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078880 | Alley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120553 | Williams | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120930 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131073 | Lucovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140252 | Lafon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030217275 | Bentley et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006594 | Boyer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054606 | Broerman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078337 | King et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107352 | Yui et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117627 | Brewington | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133493 | Ford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181756 | Berringer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225884 | Lorenzini et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230891 | Pravetz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250070 | Wong | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255114 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255127 | Arnouse | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004885 | Pandian | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033811 | Bhogal et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049903 | Raja | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076215 | Dryer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091143 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120217 | Fifield et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165626 | Karpf | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182684 | Dawson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182956 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192908 | Jorimann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231738 | Huff et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060047600 | Bodenheim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060161780 | Berryman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161781 | Rice et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174199 | Soltis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205476 | Jubinville | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259440 | Leake et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261545 | Rogers | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294152 | Kawabe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026927 | Yaldoo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079139 | Kim | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088958 | Qa'Im-maqami | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118732 | Whitmore | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130186 | Ramsey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136361 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143085 | Kimmel | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165865 | Talvitie | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198533 | Foygel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208944 | Pavlicic | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220260 | King | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070271592 | Noda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289022 | Wittkotter | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016357 | Suarez | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034213 | Boemker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097777 | Rielo | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127307 | Fukuta | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141033 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209313 | Gonser | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209516 | Nassiri | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216147 | Duffy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235577 | Veluchamy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260287 | Berryman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080313723 | Naono et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024912 | Mccabe et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025087 | Peirson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044019 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099881 | Hanna et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132351 | Gibson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138558 | Benoit et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138730 | Cook et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144552 | Fort | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145958 | Stoutenburg et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185241 | Nepomniachtchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268903 | Bojinov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292786 | Mccabe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100088364 | Carter et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122094 | Shima | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153011 | Obrea et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100217987 | Shevade | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235727 | Ashton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274863 | Foygel et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100287260 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293094 | Kolkowitz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110093769 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119165 | Zee | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126022 | Sieberer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110238510 | Rowen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264907 | Betz et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314371 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120180135 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209970 | Scipioni et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271882 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120304265 | Richter et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019156 | Gonser | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019289 | Gonser et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130050512 | Gonser et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067243 | Tamayo-rios et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130159720 | Gonser et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179676 | Hamid | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130254111 | Gonser et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263283 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140019761 | Shapiro | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140164542 | McCabe et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140325324 | Trimble, Jr. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010264441 | Oct 2015 | AU |
2731116 | Jul 2016 | CA |
2766745 | Jan 2018 | CA |
1159238 | Sep 1997 | CN |
1308803 | Aug 2001 | CN |
1719371 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101299256 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101346983 | Jan 2009 | CN |
104205122 | Dec 2014 | CN |
1238321 | Sep 2002 | EP |
2000048072 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003271529 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005267438 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008117258 | May 2008 | JP |
2008225527 | Sep 2008 | JP |
20000049674 | Aug 2000 | KR |
1020020092595 | Dec 2002 | KR |
1020070059931 | Jun 2007 | KR |
100929488 | Dec 2009 | KR |
20090122657 | Dec 2009 | KR |
2291491 | Jan 2007 | RU |
2300844 | Jun 2007 | RU |
2400811 | Sep 2010 | RU |
2400811 | Dec 2011 | RU |
WO-9607156 | Mar 1996 | WO |
2003091834 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-03091834 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO-2007075235 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008124627 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009012478 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009012478 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2010105262 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010151630 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2010151630 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Borozdin et al., “DocuSign Connect Service Guide”, DocuSign, Inc, 2008, 9 pp. |
Brown et al., “Digital Signatures: Can They Be Accepted As Legal Signatures in EID?”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security, Dec. 1, 1993, pp. 86-92. |
Elynx et al., “elynx Adds Workflow Management to Electronic Document Platform—new Workflow Capabilities Provide for Enhanced Electronic Loan Processing”, Jan. 2009, 2 pp., URL: http://www.elynx.com/news/view/82. |
Harold, “XML Bible”, IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Mar. 1, 2004, pp. 191-192. |
Herzberg et al., “Surf ‘N’Sign: Client Signatures on Web Documents”, vol. 37, No. 1, 1998, pp. 61-71, URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/0af8fadc8acbb44389aebeab903cf84c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=35072. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2008/070566 dated Feb. 19, 2010, 5 pp. |
International Search Report of International Application No. PCT/US2008/070566 dated Feb. 19, 2009, 2 pp. |
Kamara et al., “Cryptographic Cloud Storage”, Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jan. 25, 2010, pp. 136-149. |
Kwok et al., “An Automatic Electronic Contract Document Signing System in a Secure Environment”, Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology, Jul. 19, 2005, pp. 497-502. |
Laurens Leurs et al., “The history of PDF”, Feb. 14, 2010, 12 pp. |
Office Action from counterpart Canadian Application No. 2731116 dated Nov. 27, 2014, 3 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,949,706, dated Sep. 7, 2011 through Dec. 16, 2014, 157 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,713, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 10,198,418, dated Jan. 30, 2015 through Sep. 14, 2018, 97 pp. |
Response to Office Action dated May 27, 2015, from counterpart Canadian Application No. 2731116 filed Nov. 27, 2014, 30 pp. |
Su et al., “Signature-In-Signature Verification Via a Secure Simple Network Protocol”, 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, IEEE, Dec. 10, 2010, 4 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/229,126, filed Dec. 21, 2018, naming inventors McCabe et al. |
Wheeler et al., “DocuSign Unveils new Scalable Product and Support Offerings of Electronic Signature and Electronic Contract Execution”, DocuSign The fastest way to get a signature, Jan. 2008, 2 pp. |
Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2008/070566 dated Feb. 19, 2009, 4 pp. |
Zefferer et al., “An Electronic-Signature Based Circular Resolution Database System”, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Mar. 22, 2010, pp. 1840-1845. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 9, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2014”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2013”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 24, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 16, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Feb. 26, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed May 24, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Jul. 15, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“Application U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Jul. 17, 2012 to Advisory Action mailed Jul. 9, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“Application U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Oct. 6, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“Application U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,265, Response filed Dec. 7, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 9, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Response filed Jul. 1, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,602, Response filed Oct. 29, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 6, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010264441, First Examiner Report mailed Sep. 25, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,731,116, Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,731,116, Response filed May 27, 2015 to Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014”, 30 pgs. |
“eLynx Adds Workflow Management to Electronic Document Platform—new Workflow Capabilities Provide for Enhanced Electronic Loan Processing”, eLynx, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.elynx.com/news/view/82>, (Jan. 2009), 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 107926404, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Apr. 8, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 107926404, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 16, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 107926404, Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Response filed Mar. 12, 2014 to Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 16, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10792640.4, Response filed Aug. 18, 2014 to Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Apr. 8, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 19, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, International Search Report mailed Feb. 19, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/070566, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 19, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 12, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, International Search Report mailed Feb. 23, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/039768, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 23, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Notification of Reasons of Refusal mailed Jan. 14, 2014”, with English translation of claims, 5 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Response filed Jun. 12, 2014”, 12 pgs. |
Borozdin, “DocuSign Connect Service Guide”, DocuSign, Inc, (2008), 1-9. |
Harold, Elliotte Rusty, “XML Bible”, IDG Books Worldwide, Inc.,, (1999), 191-192. |
Herzberg, et al., “Surf‘N’Sign: Client Signatures on Web Documents”, IEEE, vol. 37 Issue 1,, (1998), 61-71. |
Kamara, et al., “Cryptographic Cloud Storage”, Published in “Financial Cryptography and Data Security” Springer,, (2010), 136-149. |
Laurens, Leurs, “The history of PDF”, Prepressure.com, (Feb. 14, 2010), 1-12. |
Su, et al., “Signature-In-Signature Verification via a Secure Simple Network Protocol”, IEEE, (2010), 1-4. |
Wheeler, et al., “DocuSign Unveils new Scalable Product and Support Offerings of Electronic Signature and Electronic Contract Execution”, DocuSign the Fastest Way to Get a Signature, (Jan. 2008), 1 pg. |
Zefferer, et al., “An Electronic-Signature Based Circular Resolution Database System”, ACM, (Mar. 2010), 1840-1845. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 19, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Response filed Jun. 13, 2016 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,507, Response filed Nov. 22, 2016 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010264441, Response filed Sep. 1, 2015 to Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2014”, 38 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010264441, Response filed Sep. 29, 2015 to Subsequent Examiner Report mailed Sep. 3, 2015”, 36 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2010264441, Subsequent Examiners Report mailed Sep. 3, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,766,745, Office Action mailed Jun. 2, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,766,745, Response filed Nov. 30, 2016 to Office Action mailed Jun. 2, 2016”, 22 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201080035470.1, Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2016”, w/English Translation, 24 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201080035470.1, Response filed Oct. 19, 2016 to Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2016”, w/English Claims, 13 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Office Action mailed Oct. 28, 2014”, w/English Translation, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2012-517717, Response filed Nov. 6, 2014 to Office Action mailed Oct. 28, 2014”, w/English Translation, 10 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 10201403551T, Response filed Mar. 24, 2016 to Written Opinion mailed Oct. 28, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 10201403551T, Written Opinion mailed Oct. 28, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60950563 | Jul 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12176265 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 17077551 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14537713 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 17077551 | US |