Today, there is no programmatic way to ensure the contract signing process happens in any particular controllable fashion. Contracts are printed out and physically distributed. Signers sign where they see fit, and may or may not complete the signing correctly. Contract pages may be lost or not returned to the proper person. Using electronic systems, contracts can be routed using workflow, but these systems are complicated, hard to setup and manage, and usually do not involve the end-user signing process. The existence of a variety of pre-established document formats requires dynamic evaluation and verification of documents for signature. In addition, there is no system to readily restrict access of documents for signature to only those parties that are authorized to review and execute.
The present invention provides systems and methods for dynamically rendering documents during a signing ceremony (instead of validating that signature tasks are placed appropriately on all documents). The invention establishes a visibility policy that governs how documents are rendered, based on the state of system Tabs (instructions) placed on the documents.
Preferred and alternative examples of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
The present invention provides enhanced document management systems and methods for evaluating and transforming portable document format (PDF) documents and security restrictions on electronic document review and execution.
PDF Document Transformation
The evaluation and transformation of PDF documents include both input and output transformations. For Static Extensible Markup Language (XML) Forms Architecture (XFA) forms and AcroForms (aka Acrobat Forms), the system 20 correlates the form fields from an input form to fields in a system template. The form field data and attributes are then reflected in a system signing ceremony in accordance with the rules defined in a system template (e.g., Editable vs. Read-Only, Required vs. Optional, Assignment to individual Recipients, placement on the signed document, etc.) One function that this process enables is for the system 20 to render data that was collected from a sender-provided input form to signing parties in an editable format. Without this transformation process, all form data from input forms is imposed on the documents in a non-editable format during the signing ceremony.
The following items are currently transferred from the input PDF into the system process:
The following items are currently specified in the template, but may alternatively be included as optional characteristics or extensions of the transform process:
The following items are currently transferred from the output PDF into the system process. The system provides the form data that is collected during the signing ceremony in the same (XML) structure that it came in. This allows the systems that consume system data (post-execution) to process the data as if it was extracted from the forms that they provided to the system.
Document Security Restrictions
Business rules currently enforced through validation by the system ensures the following behaviors:
The present invention dynamically renders the documents during a signing ceremony (instead of validating that signature tasks are placed appropriately on all documents). The invention establishes a visibility policy that governs how documents are rendered, based on the state of system Tabs (instructions) placed on the documents contained within the Envelope. Preferably, the system behavior is as follows:
The system preferably allows the following additional configuration options:
The invention methodology is better understood by reference to the following example. In this scenario, there are two signers, S1 and S2, and four documents subject to the system process, D1, D2, D3 and D4. S1 is asked to sign D1 and D2. S2 is asked to sign D1 and enter data on D4. The resulting behavior in this scenario, according to one embodiment of the present invention, is that S1 will see documents D1, D2 and D3, while S2 will see documents D1, D3 and D4.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/160,237 filed Mar. 13, 2009; contents of which are incorporated herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5220675 | Padawer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5222138 | Balabon et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5337360 | Fischer | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5390247 | Fischer | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5465299 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5544255 | Smithies et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5615268 | Bisbee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
| 5689567 | Miyauchi | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5748738 | Bisbee et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5898156 | Wilfong | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6085322 | Romney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6119229 | Martinez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128740 | Curry et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199052 | Mitty et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210276 | Mullins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6289460 | Hajmiragha | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6321333 | Murray | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327656 | Zabetian | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6367010 | Venkatram et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6367013 | Bisbee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6470448 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6615348 | Gibbs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6658403 | Kuroda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671805 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6751632 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6796489 | Slater et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6807633 | Pavlik | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6912660 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6931420 | Silvester et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6938157 | Kaplan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944648 | Cochran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947911 | Moritsu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6961854 | Serret-Avila et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7069443 | Berringer et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7100045 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7162635 | Bisbee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7237114 | Rosenberg | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7340608 | Laurie et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7360079 | Wall | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7395436 | Nemovicher | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7523315 | Hougaard et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7533268 | Catorcini et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7554576 | Erol et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7562053 | Twining et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568101 | Catorcini et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7568104 | Berryman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7581105 | Dietl | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 20020019937 | Edstrom et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20030078880 | Alley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040133493 | Ford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225884 | Lorenzini et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250070 | Wong | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20060205476 | Jubinville | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060261545 | Rogers | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070026927 | Yaldoo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20080034213 | Boemker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097777 | Rielo | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209313 | Gonser | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090024912 | McCabe et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090025087 | Peirson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292786 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100287260 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61160237 | Mar 2009 | US |