Embodiments of the disclosure relate to web content management and delivery. More specifically, but not by way of limitation, the present technology is directed to systems and methods that create and utilize contextual vocabularies that describe the preferences or demographics of end users as well as the capabilities of the devices they utilize. The contextual vocabularies are built using a plurality of information sources, and may be used to service a plurality of target systems, allowing the target systems to customize web content for the end users and/or their device capabilities. Customer segmentation for categorizing consumers may also be utilized. The present technology may leverage both the contextual vocabularies and customer segmentations to customize web content for the consumer and their associated computing device(s).
Web content continues to grow and evolve in complexity and implementational diversity. Further, computing devices which access web content also continue to proliferate, creating diversity in device capabilities such as processing power and display attributes. For example, smartphones may be capable of rendering web content on a display that is much smaller than the display of a tablet. To effectively communicate with consumers that utilize various devices with vastly different capabilities, it is advantageous to tailor web content to the capabilities of various devices. Without such modifications, browser applications on many devices are required to display web content in a format that may not be desired by the web content authors.
According to some embodiments, the present technology may be directed to a method for dynamically delivering web content. The method comprises: (a) determining behavior analytics of an end user and device related information for a first computing device used by the end user; (b) comparing the behavior analytics of an end user and the device related information for the first computing device used by the end user to a contextual vocabulary that includes context segments that define contextual information of a plurality of end users and device related information for computing devices used by the plurality of end users; (c) generating a context segment path for an end user, the context segment path comprising a plurality of context segments that have been selected from the contextual vocabulary, the context segment path being indicative of preferences of the end user and capabilities of the first computing device of the end user; and (d) dynamically creating a web page for the end user and their first computing device, the web page comprising web content that is selected and formatted based upon the context segment path.
According to other embodiments, the present technology may be directed to a contextual analysis system, the system comprising: (a) a processor; and (b) a memory for storing logic that when executed by the processor causes the system to: (i) determine behavior analytics of an end user and device related information for a first computing device used by the end user; (ii) compare the behavior analytics of an end user and the device related information for the first computing device used by the end user to a contextual vocabulary that includes context segments that define contextual information of a plurality of end users and device related information for computing devices used by the plurality of end users; (iii) generate a context segment path for an end user, the context segment path comprising a plurality of context segments that have been selected from the contextual vocabulary, the context segment path being indicative of preferences of the end user and capabilities of the first computing device of the end user; and (iv) dynamically create a web page for the end user and their first computing device, the web page comprising web content that is selected and formatted based upon the context segment path.
According to some embodiments, the present technology may be directed to a method for dynamically delivering web content. The method comprises: (a) receiving a request for a web page from a first computing device and a second computing device; (b) determining contextual information of a first end user and device related information for a first computing device and contextual information of a second end user and device related information for a first computing device; (c) comparing the behavior analytics and the device related information for the first and second end users to a contextual vocabulary that includes context segments that defines contextual information of a plurality of end users and device related information for computing devices used by the plurality of end users; (d) generating a context segment path for both the first and second end users, the context segment path comprising a plurality of context segments that have been selected from a contextual vocabulary, the context segment path being indicative of preferences of an end user and capabilities of a computing device of the end user; (e) dynamically selecting web content for the web page for the first end user, wherein the web content is formatted based upon the context segment path of the first end user; and (f) dynamically selecting web content for the web page for the second end user, wherein the web content is formatted based upon the context segment path of the second end user, wherein at least one of the web content or formatting of the web content is different for the first and second end users relative to one another.
The accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed disclosure, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
The methods and systems disclosed herein have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structures and devices are shown at block diagram form only in order to avoid obscuring the disclosure.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or “according to one embodiment” (or other phrases having similar import) at various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. Furthermore, depending on the context of discussion herein, a singular term may include its plural forms and a plural term may include its singular form. Similarly, a hyphenated term (e.g., “on-demand”) may be occasionally interchangeably used with its non-hyphenated version (e.g., “on demand”), a capitalized entry (e.g., “Software”) may be interchangeably used with its non-capitalized version (e.g., “software”), a plural term may be indicated with or without an apostrophe (e.g., PE's or PEs), and an italicized term (e.g., “N+1”) may be interchangeably used with its non-italicized version (e.g., “N+1”). Such occasional interchangeable uses shall not be considered inconsistent with each other.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It is noted at the outset that the terms “coupled,” “connected”, “connecting,” “electrically connected,” etc., are used interchangeably herein to generally refer to the condition of being electrically/electronically connected. Similarly, a first entity is considered to be in “communication” with a second entity (or entities) when the first entity electrically sends and/or receives (whether through wireline or wireless means) information signals (whether containing data information or non-data/control information) to the second entity regardless of the type (analog or digital) of those signals. It is further noted that various figures (including component diagrams) shown and discussed herein are for illustrative purpose only, and are not drawn to scale.
For example, context resolver 105A may be associated with a consumer analytics information source 110A, while context resolver 105B may be associated with a device related information source 110B. It will be understood that the present technology may include many context resolvers and information sources. Further, a single context resolver may be used to obtain information or analytics from a plurality of information sources. While two context resolvers are illustrated, it will be understood that many context resolvers may be utilized in accordance with the present technology.
The context resolvers, such as 105A-B, may be included in a context analysis system 115, or may be separate nodes or agents that communicatively couple with the context analysis system 115 and the information sources over a network 120.
The context resolvers may be disposed between the context analysis system 115 and a website 140. Examples of a plurality of context resolvers that can be utilized include, but are not limited to, resolvers that resolve context properties (e.g., contextual information) from customer databases, transactional databases, contextual information sources, context repositories, device discovery, expressions (evaluating expressions based on other properties), defaults (sensible defaults such that a given context property can never be not set), and other similar information sources.
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may gather contextual information from ambient data sources that include ambient information. Ambient information is information that is observed from the continuous interactions between a plurality of users and a plurality of content and applications, along with a plurality of devices that the users use. This includes, but is not restricted to customer analytic information, content item properties consumed by users, and associated content metadata, contextual properties that are selected from a context repository (e.g. selection of relevant device properties from a device database), and information from users interactions with social networks—just to name a few.
According to some embodiments, contextual information obtained for the plurality of end users and the device related information obtained for the computing devices used by the plurality of end users may be stored by the context analysis system 115 in a context repository 150. Further, contextual segments and contextual segment paths, as described further herein, may also be stored in the context repository 150.
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may be implemented as a cloud-based computing environment, such as a virtual machine operating within a computing cloud. In other embodiments, context analysis system 115 may itself include a cloud-based computing environment, where the functionalities of context analysis system 115 are executed in a distributed fashion. Thus, context analysis system 115, when configured as a computing cloud, may include pluralities of computing devices in various forms, as will be described in greater detail below.
In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large grouping of processors (such as within web servers) and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large grouping of computer memories or storage devices. Systems that provide cloud-based resources may be utilized exclusively by their owners or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.
The cloud may be formed, for example, by a network of web servers that comprise a plurality of computing devices, such as the context analysis system 115, with each server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers may manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource customers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depends on the type of business associated with the user.
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may include a server or other similar computing device that comprises at least a processor 125 and a memory 130. The memory 130 includes logic (e.g., executable instructions) that when executed by the processor causes the context analysis system 115 to perform the methods or processes described herein, which include, but are not limited to the creation and use of contextual vocabularies and context segment paths.
In general, a context segment is any Boolean context property. A context segment path is an ordered list of segments that can be traversed to find the most appropriate resources. The path can be followed via a predetermined multiple fall-backs to find the first location where we find the desire resource. For the purpose of resource extension, where one resource may extend another, the path can be further followed to find the next relevant resource of the given name and so on.
Generally, a given segment can imply a plurality of other segments that are also automatically true, for example if a user is over 18 then they are also over 16, if a device is less than 320 pixels wide then it is also less than 640 pixels wide. This implies structure defines a multiple hierarchical structure that defines the order of the segment path that is traversed to find the most appropriate resources.
A serialized version of the context segment path is minimised by removing redundant inferred from the “implies” definition. For example “pc:640:320:128” can be minimised to “pc:640” since 640 implies 320 which implies 128. For a given vocabulary definition the serialized version of the context segment path provides a complete definition of the applicable context segments, with implied segments determinable from the context vocabulary definition.
Expressions that are implied from the “implies” definitions are not evaluated at runtime and are automatically set to true to minimise computational overhead at runtime.
A given segment can define a plurality of other segments that this given segment depends on such that this plurality of other segments must all be true before the given segment is evaluated. Segments may be defined as lazy such that are only evaluated on demand, and in the case of “depends” being defined, to minimise computational overhead at runtime, the segment is not evaluated if the plurality of segments that the given segment depends on are all set.
Generally, the context analysis system 115 may be configured to create and utilize contextual vocabularies that can be shared amongst web content creation and delivery systems. A contextual vocabulary can be created by the context analysis system 115 by obtaining contextual intelligence or information from a plurality of information sources using the context resolvers 105A-B. In some embodiments, the information sources may include consumer analytical information gathered from user profiles created by customers, which would include any number of types of information such as usernames or handles, location information, language preferences, and a whole host of additional types of information that are indicative of the end user (e.g., customer).
The context analysis system 115 may also gather consumer analytical information from transactional data, such as customer purchase history or browsing history. In other instances, consumer analytical information may be gathered from web browser information or by the collection of web analytics from websites that are visited by the end user. These examples of consumer analytical information sources are merely a few of a vast number of consumer analytical information sources that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
The present technology may also utilize device related information that is descriptive of the capabilities, properties, and/or attributes of a computing device used by an end user. Examples include, but are not limited to, processing attributes, software installed, input devices, hard drive size, memory size, display attributes, vendor & model, and as well as any other qualitative or quantitative attributes regard the computing device, battery life, and so forth. The device information may be gathered by context resolvers 105A-B from available databases or client-side discovery, by scraping content from websites or other similar information sources. Generally, the terms properties and capabilities with regard to a computing device may be used interchangeable herein.
Advantageously, the context analysis system 115 may obtain both consumer analytical information and device related information from a plurality of independent information sources. When considering information from a wide variety of sources, the context analysis system 115 may calculate a trust level for each of the information sources and selectively utilize only those information sources that are reputable. In some instances, the context analysis system 115 may aggregate information from a plurality of sources with or without the use of a trust level.
In some embodiments each context resolver 105A-B may apply trust levels to resolution on a per-property level (e.g., for each information source). Thus, a contextual vocabulary generated in light of these trust levels will reflect a property value with the highest trust levels for each named property. As used herein, the term “property” and “information source” may be used interchangeably.
Indeed, the context analysis system 115 may provide a trust-based distribution of context information that has been learned from and shared between multiple parties. Each piece of context information defines a provider of the information so that other nodes in the network can assign appropriate trust levels to the information provider, which is in turn imputed to the information obtained therefrom.
The contextual vocabulary is a collection of aspect definitions which in turn include a collection of property definitions that are defined or generated by the context analysis system 115. The contextual vocabulary may include aggregated contextual properties in accordance with the context vocabulary that are comprised of information sources that are obtained from a wide variety of information sources.
The contextual properties may be generated by the context analysis system 115 from the aforementioned information sources. In some instances, the context vocabulary may comprise context segments that represent categorical attributes of end users or computing devices. For example, a categorical attribute of a user may include “under 30” or “high net worth” whereas a categorical attribute of a computing device may include “smartphone” or “retina display”. In some instances, categorical attributes may be arranged hierarchically. For example, the “under 30” category is implicitly included in the category of “under 50”. Thus, in some embodiments a context segment path may be generated from a multiple hierarchical representation of ordered context segments. For example, if a user is under 30 then it can be implied that they are under 40.
The context analysis system 115 can leverage granularity within these categories, creating more specific categories. These categories can be used to target specific promotions and advertisements to highly specific or broad groups of end users.
Some categorical attributes may include numerous dependent attributes. For example, the “smartphone” category may include a plurality of smartphone types that are determined from an analysis of device related information data sources. Thus, as end users interact with a website via diverse types of computing devices, the present technology may learn new types of smartphones that can be added to the smartphone category.
In some instances, categorical attributes may be shared amongst many types of devices. For example, many devices may use the same process or have the same display size or resolution.
In some instances, the inheritance of contextual segment information from a pre-defined contextual segment to another is defined by semantic property identifiers, thus a strict name-based hierarchy may not be required. This allows inheritance of contextual information to occur if such a semantically described contextual segment is pre-defined, although it will be understood that this contextual information may still be valid if the parent contextual segment did not exist. In some embodiments inheritance of contextual segments may occur on a per-aspect level. By way of non-limiting example, a browser-type inheritance is independent from device-type inheritance. For example, a computing device may utilize web browser client, but that web browser client is not necessarily indicative of the type of device (e.g., many devices may be configured with the web browser client).
As mentioned above, information included in a context segment may be dynamically adjusted by provision of new and/or more trusted contextual information.
In some embodiments, context segments are ordered such that a context segment can be assigned a higher precedence than another. This ordering of context segments by the context analysis system 115 may allow for optimal resource discovery, as will be described in greater detail below, where resource discovery is a process of determining which types of web content are most appropriate for the end user and their associated device.
Also, the context analysis system 115 may be configured to create context segment paths for end users. A context segment path may include a unique set of attributes that define the end user and their computing device. For example, the unique set of attributes may correspond to the contextual segments of the contextual vocabulary.
An example of a context segment path may include consumer analytics such as “under 30”, “English language”, and “U. K. resident”, as well as a whole host of other analytics that may be determined from specific end user interactions with a website. For example, the end user may be browsing for travel related services for a specific date, or in connection with a particular event. This analytical knowledge may be combined with the more objective knowledge gained from, for example, a user profile or browser information.
The context analysis system 115 may calculate a context segment path for an end user by comparing the analytics of the end user (and their computing device) to the contextual vocabulary to determine applicable context segments for the end user. Again, the context segments are determined not only for the end user, but also the computing device used by the end user.
The context analysis system 115 may transmit the determined context segments that apply to the end user and their computing device to a website 140. The website 140 then tailors web content for a web page to the determined analytics. Web content may be tailored to the requirements of a plurality of users that utilize a plurality of computing devices 145A-B, where the web content that is provided to computing device 145A is different from the web content that is provided to computing device 145B. A detailed example of the delivery of tailored content is provided with respect to
The following describes an exemplary use case of the present technology. An end user from the United States interacts with a web page that is tailored to travel related services. As the end user interacts with the website, the context analysis system 115 obtains web analytic information from both a user profile for the user, as well as web history information collected as the end user utilizes the website. Further, device related information can be obtained from a web browser executing on a computing device used by the end user. Also, device characteristics such as user agent, cookies, IP address and geographic coordinates may be passed to the website when the computing device initiates a session with the webserver. Using one or more types of device related information, the context analysis system 115 may utilize context resolvers to obtain other types of computing device related information. For example, the system may determine a model number of a computing device. Using this model number, the system may use context resolvers to interrogate other sources of information relating to the computing device.
The context analysis system 115 may compute a context segment path for the end user and their device as described above. When the context segment path is computed, the context analysis system 115 may compare the context segment path to context segments of a contextual vocabulary. Again, the contextual vocabulary includes an aggregation of trusted information that defines both consumers and computing devices. It will be understood that the trusted information includes information gathered from the information sources that were determined to have high trust levels.
The context analysis system 115 may utilize the trusted information to determine not only what type of web content is provided to the end user based upon their preferences or consumer segments, but also how the web content should be formatted for the computing device. For example, if the computing device has a small display and cannot display certain types of media, the context analysis system 115 may choose web content that is suitably displayed on the computing device. Also, the computing device analytics may specify that the device cannot easily or be rotated into a landscape position or scrolled. These types of device related information may aid the context analysis system 115 in selecting or tailoring offerings that are optimally displayed on the computing device.
Further, the web content may be tailored to the preferences or consumer segments of the end user. For example, the context analysis system 115 may determine that the end user is an affluent purchaser in the “under 30” category and that the end user has searched for travel related services to a particular location. Using all the above-described information, the context analysis system 115 may generate an offering for the end user that emphasizes a travel deal to the searched location, as well as hotel suggestions that include high-end properties. These offerings may be provided as a list that is easily and completely displayed on the computing device without any need for the end user to scroll for pertinent information.
Thus, from a given context segment path it is possible for the context analysis system 115 to reliably identify the most appropriate resources for a given context (e.g., best image, most appropriate HTML rendering, most appropriate advert, and so forth).
In some embodiments, a context segment path is embodied as a string that uniquely defines the context segment allocation for a given context, such as a browser or query session of an end user. The context segment path (with implicit segment inheritance) may include a minimized string that can be effectively be used as a cache key and reliably and efficiently serialized and de-serialized.
In some embodiments, the webserver that serves a website 140 that is configured to use the present technology may utilize web pages with HTML that is enhanced with attributes which can used to drive contextual rendering and optimization. These attributes may be executed by the web browser of the client device transparently such that they produce no noticeable side effects such as latency or erroneous web page renderings.
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may utilize the contextual methods to optimize a web application delivery, for example optimization of images, rendering of most appropriate product recommendations, application of user customized themes, and so forth. The context analysis system 115 may choose at which stage the optimization can be applied. In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may optimize the web content when a request from an end user is received. In other instances, the context analysis system 115 may optimize the web content for the end user right before the webserver delivers the web content towards the browser. In other instances, the optimization may occur at the request of the computing device.
In some embodiments, context analysis system 115 can apply optimization based on an independent context expression evaluation (as well as that suggested by the content). For example, the context analysis system 115 may filter out new HTML functionality that is not supported for a given device, minimization of java script, or the use of a cached compilation of Less Cascade Style Sheets (CSS) or a software as a service (SaaS) implementation.
As mentioned above, the context analysis system 115 may allow for the tendering of web content based on context segmentation path. The context analysis system 115 may also provide an encapsulated rendering of web content in the form of a widget. For example, a map widget may include an encapsulation of context segments. When a computing device that is capable of using gestures requests use of the map widget, the map widget may provide a map UI that allows for gesture-based interactions. Conversely, when a computing device having limited capabilities requests use of the map widget, the map widget may provide a basic map UI that includes a legend or other descriptive information that would normally be obtained from interacting with the map using gestures or interactions.
The context analysis system 115 may encapsulate context rules within individual widgets in a way that is separate and distinct from how the web page that includes the widget is rendered. Thus, the rendering of one instance of web content for a web page does not directly affect how other web content or objects of the same web page are rendered, allowing for increased decoupling, increased reusability, and simpler quality control. Indeed, context-specific customization for individual widgets or objects can be modified with no regression risk to rendering for other contexts or end users.
In other instances, rendering for one context segment can extend the rendering for a fallback context segment. For example, a specific rendering for an iPhone can extend to a general smartphone context segment.
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may publish for wider consumption, a contextual vocabulary for a website 140, which may be included in a suite or group of websites. In some instances, the context analysis system 115 publishes the complete context vocabulary for all other sub-systems to view. Exemplary sub-systems may include other related websites, web content management systems, or web content distribution systems—just to name a few.
The computing device 205B is determined by the context analysis system 115 to belong to a contextual segment of 320 pixel display devices. The context analysis system 115 may tailor the menu of the web content 215B to include a resolution that is rendered optimally by a 320 pixel capable computing device.
The computing device 205C is determined by the context analysis system 115 to belong to a contextual segment of basic display devices, which may include devices with lower resolution displays or devices that have small display screens. The context analysis system 115 may generate a header, menu, and body that are of low resolution and limited complexity with regard to content type. Indeed, the context analysis system 115 may predominantly utilize textual content or a single image that includes textual content.
Regardless of how the web content is formatted in each of the above scenarios, the same informational content is displayed to each end user, albeit using different types of web content.
Conversely, while
In some embodiments, the context analysis system 115 may determine a customer segmentation for an end user based upon contextual information determined for the end user. In other embodiments the context analysis system 115 may also determine a customer segmentation of an end user based upon device related information determined from the computing device used by the end user. In yet other instances, the context analysis system 115 may determine a customer segmentation of an end user based upon both contextual information determined for the end user and device related information determined from the computing device used by the end user. It will be understood that while a contextual segment includes one or more parameters/attributes of an end user such as “under 30” or “college educated”, a customer segmentation may include a broader categorization of the end user. Indeed, a customer segmentation may include a collection of contextual segments that define a category such as “affluent consumer”, “technology aficionado”, “world traveler” or other similar categories. For example, an end user that searches for high priced travel services and is determined to use a brand new and costly smartphone may be assigned a customer segmentation of “affluent consumer”. In another example, it may be possible to infer a customer segmentation from only device related information for the end user. For example, if the end user is known to purchase a new laptop the same week a new laptop comes onto the market, the context analysis system 115 may assign the end user with a customer segmentation of “early technology adopter”. This knowledge may be gleaned from encounters by the context analysis system 115 with a variety of computing devices for a single end user over a period of time. If the context analysis system 115 determines that the end user makes requests for web content using a computing device that is a brand new type of computing device, and that this pattern occurs frequently, the context analysis system 115 may infer that the end user prefers to purchase a new laptop as soon as such devices come onto the market. Many other examples of customer segmentation would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
As mentioned above with the examples included in
Additionally, the context analysis system 115 may select or format web content that is tailored to the preferences, demographics, and/or other analytics that describe the end user. Further, both the preferences of the end user and the capabilities of their device may be considered when the context analysis system 115 generates web content. The term “web content” may be understood to include, for example, a web page that includes a plurality of elements such as images, videos, textual content, or other common web objects. The web page is often created in HTML or Flash format. Web pages may also depend on other objects such as cascading style sheets (CSS) that define how objects on a web page are formatted and displayed by a browser client.
In general, having multiple hierarchy grouping of UIs make it easy to target specialist capabilities of computing devices while reusing common standards. UI Inheritance is used to load resources, for example, to load the page rendering for a given device. New capabilities (e.g. AJAX in this example) can easily be handled by creating additional hierarchies allowing you to deliver to new capability without regression risk on existing UI rendering.
An exemplary method for delivering web content to an end user is illustrated in the flowchart of
Once these various types of data have been determined by the context analysis system 115, the method may then include the context analysis system 115 comparing 510 the customer analytics of an end user and the device related information for the first computing device used by the end user to a contextual vocabulary. Again, the contextual vocabulary includes context segments that define customer analytics of a plurality of end users and device related information for computing devices used by the plurality of end users. When the context analysis system 115 determines matches between the knowledge of the end user and various context segments in the contextual vocabulary, the context analysis system 115 may flag the context segments as being applicable. In some instances, the context analysis system 115 sets a Boolean flag when a context segment is applicable. Generally, all Boolean flags for context segments are set to off prior to the comparison.
The context analysis system 115 may then assemble the context segments for the end user into a context segment path. More specifically, the method includes the context analysis system 115 generating 515 a context segment path for an end user. As mentioned above, the context segment path comprising a plurality of context segments that have been selected from the contextual vocabulary. Further, the context segment path is indicative of preferences of the end user and capabilities of the first computing device of the end user.
Once the context segment path is generated, the method includes the context analysis system 115 dynamically creating 520 a web page for the end user and their first computing device. In some embodiments the web page includes web content that is selected and formatted based upon the context segment path.
It is noteworthy that without the knowledge gleaned from the various resources, the web server that generates the web page may display a generic or basic web page for all end users and devices. The present technology allows for not only specific and targeted formatting of web pages that may be displayed differently by laptops and mobile devices, but the dynamic formatting of the present technology allows for alteration of a web page in light of the wide ranging and discrepant capabilities of mobile devices. Thus, the web server need not keep two or more versions of the same web page and serve these different web pages to clients depending on the computing device that they utilize. Advantageously, the context analysis system 115 generates a unique web page with unique web content and unique formatting for each end user that requests a web page. The context analysis system 115 dynamically generates these web pages on the fly or in near-real time as the web pages are requested by the end user.
The method illustrated in the flowchart of
While behavior analytics include information that is similar to consumer analytics as described above, the behavior analytics are determined for an end user within the context of the delivery of content and are discussed separately for the purposes of clarity when describing a process of delivering content to an end user, as opposed to building a contextual vocabulary.
That is, consumer analytics include information that is used to build a contextual vocabulary. The consumer analytics are obtained from a plurality of end users for which relevant information can be obtained. The behavior analytics obtained from the end user during a process for dynamically generating content can be added to the contextual vocabulary such that the contextual vocabulary grows and evolves over time. Thus, behavior analytics can become consumer analytics that are eventually added to a contextual vocabulary.
The method includes receiving 605 a request for a web page from a first computing device and a second computing device. For example, the computing devices transmit to a web server a request for a website at www.domain.com. Rather than returning to the computing devices the same HTML version for the domain the context analysis system 115 may generate HTML code that is unique for each end user and device combination.
Thus, the method includes the context analysis system 115 determining 610 behavior analytics of a first end user and device related information for a first computing device and behavior analytics of a second end user and device related information for a first computing device. Once the relevant data is obtained, the method includes the context analysis system 115 comparing 615 the behavior analytics and the device related information for the first and second end users to a contextual vocabulary that includes context segments that defines customer analytics of a plurality of end users and device related information for computing devices used by the plurality of end users.
Also, the method includes generating a context segment path for both the first and second end users. Again, the context segment path comprises a plurality of context segments that have been selected from the contextual vocabulary. Further, the context segment path is indicative of preferences of an end user and capabilities of a computing device of the end user.
After the assembly of context segment paths, the method includes the context analysis system 115 dynamically selecting 620 web content for the web page for the first end user is such a way that the web content is formatted based upon the context segment path of the first end user. Also, the method includes dynamically selecting 625 web content for the web page for the second end user. It will be understood that the web content for the second end user is formatted based upon the context segment path of the second end user in such a way that at least one of the web content or formatting of the web content is different for the first and second end users relative to one another.
The components shown in
Mass storage device 30, which may be implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor 10. Mass storage device 30 can store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology for purposes of loading that software into main memory 20.
Portable storage device 40 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk or digital video disc, to input and output data and code to and from the computing system 1 of
Input devices 60 provide a portion of a user interface. Input devices 60 may include an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. Additionally, the system 1 as shown in
Display system 70 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Display system 70 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripherals 80 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computing system. Peripherals 80 may include a modem or a router.
The components contained in the computing system 1 of
Some of the above-described functions may be composed of instructions that are stored on storage media (e.g., computer-readable medium). The instructions may be retrieved and executed by the processor. Some examples of storage media are memory devices, tapes, disks, and the like. The instructions are operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to operate in accord with the technology. Those skilled in the art are familiar with instructions, processor(s), and storage media.
It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. The terms “computer-readable storage medium” and “computer-readable storage media” as used herein refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a CPU for execution. Such media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as a fixed disk. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as system RAM. Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, among others, including the wires that comprise one embodiment of a bus. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM disk, digital video disk (DVD), any other optical medium, any other physical medium with patterns of marks or holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, an EEPROM, a FLASHEPROM, any other memory chip or data exchange adapter, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a CPU for execution. A bus carries the data to system RAM, from which a CPU retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by system RAM can optionally be stored on a fixed disk either before or after execution by a CPU.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present technology may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Aspects of the present technology are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present technology. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the technology to the particular forms set forth herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that the above description is illustrative and not restrictive. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the technology should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
This U.S. Patent Application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/093,015, filed on Nov. 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,521,492, titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS THAT UTILZE CONTEXTUAL VOCABULARIES AND CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION TO DELIVER WEB CONTENT,” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, including all references cited therein. This U.S. Patent Application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 9,547,626, filed on Jan. 29, 2011, titled “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR MANAGING AMBIENT ADAPTABILITY OF WEB APPLICATIONS AND WEB SERVICES”, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, including all references cited therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4845658 | Gifford | Jul 1989 | A |
4916614 | Kaji | Apr 1990 | A |
4920499 | Skeirik | Apr 1990 | A |
5075850 | Asahioka et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5295068 | Nishino et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5351189 | Doi | Sep 1994 | A |
5418717 | Su et al. | May 1995 | A |
5477451 | Brown et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497319 | Chong et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5640575 | Maruyama | Jun 1997 | A |
5644775 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675802 | Allen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708780 | Levergood et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5751957 | Hiroya et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774868 | Cragun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812776 | Gifford | Sep 1998 | A |
5813007 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5873056 | Liddy | Feb 1999 | A |
5884097 | Li et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884246 | Boucher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894554 | Lowery et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895446 | Takeda et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909492 | Payne et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5966685 | Flanagan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974372 | Barnes | Oct 1999 | A |
5978828 | Greer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987401 | Trudeau | Nov 1999 | A |
5987402 | Murata et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026413 | Challenger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041333 | Bretschneider et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041360 | Himmel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044344 | Kanevsky | Mar 2000 | A |
6049785 | Gifford | Apr 2000 | A |
6085162 | Cherny | Jul 2000 | A |
6092035 | Kurachi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122666 | Beurket et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128652 | Toh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128655 | Fields et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161082 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163785 | Carbonell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195649 | Gifford | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199051 | Gifford | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205437 | Gifford | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212634 | Geer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216212 | Challenger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219818 | Freivald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256712 | Challenger et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263332 | Nasr et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278969 | King et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279112 | O'toole, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6330566 | Durham | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330598 | Beckwith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338033 | Bourbonnais et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347316 | Redpath | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356865 | Franz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356903 | Baxter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363337 | Amith | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401105 | Carlin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415257 | Junqua | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438540 | Nasr et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6449599 | Payne et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477524 | Taskiran | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477575 | Koeppel et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490358 | Geer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490563 | Hon | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6526426 | Lakritz | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6581061 | Graham | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6623529 | Lakritz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658627 | Gallup | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6725333 | Degenaro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748569 | Brooke et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6782384 | Sloan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6865528 | Huang | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6920419 | Kitamura | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6973656 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976207 | Rujan | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990439 | Xun | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013264 | Dolan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031908 | Huang | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7050964 | Menzes | May 2006 | B2 |
7089493 | Hatori et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111229 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124092 | O'toole, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7177792 | Knight | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191447 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7207005 | Laktritz | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209875 | Quirk | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7249013 | Al-Onaizan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249314 | Walker et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272639 | Levergood et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7295962 | Marcu | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295963 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302429 | Wanker | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7333927 | Lee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340388 | Soricut | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353165 | Zhou | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369984 | Fairweather | May 2008 | B2 |
7383320 | Silberstein et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389222 | Langmead | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389223 | Atkin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7448040 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454326 | Marcu | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464086 | Black | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7509313 | Colledge | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516062 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533013 | Marcu | May 2009 | B2 |
7606814 | Deily et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620538 | Marcu | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620549 | Di Cristo | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624005 | Koehn | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7668782 | Reistad et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7680647 | Moore | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698126 | Kohlmeier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716037 | Precoda | May 2010 | B2 |
7734459 | Menezes | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739102 | Bender | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739286 | Sethy | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7788087 | Corston-Oliver | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7813918 | Muslea | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836057 | Micaelian et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7865358 | Green | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7904595 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925493 | Watanabe | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945437 | Mount et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949633 | Shaver et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7958453 | Taing | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7983896 | Ross | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983897 | Chin | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8015222 | Abnous et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036929 | Reisman | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8078450 | Anisimovich et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8135575 | Dean | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8195447 | Anismovich | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214196 | Yamada | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239186 | Chin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239207 | Seligman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260846 | Lahav | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286185 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296127 | Marcu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296463 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8346585 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8352244 | Gao et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364463 | Miyamoto | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386234 | Uchimoto et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8413045 | Lemonik et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423346 | Seo et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442812 | Ehsani | May 2013 | B2 |
8453052 | Newman et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8489980 | Lakritz | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521506 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527260 | Best | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548794 | Koehn | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8554591 | Reistad et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594992 | Kuhn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600728 | Knight | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8606900 | Levergood et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8612203 | Foster | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615388 | Li | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635327 | Levergood et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8635539 | Young | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8666725 | Och | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8671214 | Lockhart et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676804 | Janos et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683329 | Tang et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688454 | Zheng | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8725496 | Zhao | May 2014 | B2 |
8768686 | Sarikaya et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775154 | Clinchant | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8799200 | Lahav | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8818790 | He et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8843359 | Lauder | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8862456 | Krack et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8898052 | Weibel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903707 | Zhao | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8909683 | Ledet | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930176 | Li | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935148 | Christ | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935149 | Zhang | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935150 | Christ | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8935706 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954539 | Lahav | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8972268 | Waibel | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9026425 | Nikoulina | May 2015 | B2 |
9053202 | Viswanadha | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9081762 | Wu | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9141606 | Marciano | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9176952 | Aikawa | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183192 | Ruby, Jr. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9183198 | Shen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201870 | Jurach | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208144 | Abdulnasyrov | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9317622 | Zuromski et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9336487 | Lahav | May 2016 | B2 |
9369489 | Kato | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396184 | Roy | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9396436 | Lahav | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9430449 | Leblond et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9465797 | Ji | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9471563 | Trese | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9471920 | Kolkowitz et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9519640 | Perez | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9519682 | Pujara et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9547626 | de Voogd | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9552355 | Dymetman | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9596188 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600473 | Leydon | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9613026 | Hodson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9773270 | Costa et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9781050 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9954794 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10007646 | Colborn et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10025776 | Sjoberg et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10061749 | Homer et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10452740 | Leblond et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10521492 | Homer et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10572928 | Costa et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10580015 | Erasmus et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10614167 | Bondarchuk et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10657540 | Martchenko et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10678866 | Ranganathan et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10990644 | Homer et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20010029507 | Nojima | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020007383 | Yoden et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010590 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023101 | Kurihara et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046018 | Marcu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065848 | Walker et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083103 | Ballance | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103698 | Cantrell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112013 | Walsh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120762 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124109 | Brown | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020178166 | Hsia | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178257 | Cerrato | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193983 | Tokieda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009320 | Furuta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023757 | Ishioka et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030158953 | Lal | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163346 | Tinti et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200094 | Gupta | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040010496 | Behrendt et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015723 | Pham et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019849 | Weng et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034520 | Langkilde-Geary | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039593 | Eskandari | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044517 | Palmquist | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044576 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040148409 | Davis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040187090 | Meacham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040255281 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050039116 | Slack-Smith | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086105 | McFadden et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050156714 | McCarthy et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171944 | Palmquist | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187774 | Vuong | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189415 | Fano et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203884 | Allen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228865 | Hirsch | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235351 | Seltzer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246283 | Gwiazda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060041558 | McCauley et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053367 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080257 | Vaughan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080265 | Hinds et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080397 | Chene et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095526 | Levergood et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060248442 | Rosenstein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282255 | Lu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016363 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022003 | Chao et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033104 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043553 | Dolan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047781 | Hull et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048714 | Plastina et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083425 | Cousineau et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112553 | Jacobson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118545 | Chandrasekharan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070192374 | Abnous et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208991 | Rider | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209005 | Shaver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070209080 | Ture et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226058 | Lorenzen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234213 | Krikorian et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080028300 | Krieger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080086298 | Anismovich | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109374 | Levergood et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120089 | Schurig | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120090 | Schurig | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120120 | Cirulli et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154577 | Kim | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195664 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201344 | Levergood et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209320 | Mawhinney et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080244053 | Sampson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256235 | Or Sim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270398 | Landau et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288240 | D'Agostini et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080316228 | Seljavaara | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090061764 | Lockhart et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094017 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099931 | Aaltonen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138458 | Wanker | May 2009 | A1 |
20090197580 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217196 | Neff et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217352 | Shen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234711 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240539 | Slawson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248801 | Then et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259684 | Knight et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090313005 | Jaquinta | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313245 | Weyl et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017704 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023475 | Lahav | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023581 | Lahav | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057439 | Ideuchi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057561 | Gifford | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070364 | Dugan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070843 | Duym | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070847 | Hampton et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121630 | Mende et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153404 | Ghosh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179803 | Sawaf | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211865 | Fanning et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217783 | Farver et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233996 | Herz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242069 | Jung et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257457 | De Goes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274661 | Aaltonen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281008 | Braunwarth | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305940 | Dendi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306402 | Russell et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312619 | Ala-Pietila et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010243 | Wilburn et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022381 | Gao et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110047468 | Ishizaka | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060998 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066469 | Kadosh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078626 | Bachman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110097693 | Crawford | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125783 | Whale et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110161312 | Wallman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191458 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264736 | Zuckerberg et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270975 | Troup | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313754 | Bastide et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016655 | Travieso et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022852 | Tregaskis | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023129 | Vedula et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120042006 | Kiley et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120096366 | Narla et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120131441 | Jitkoff et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136718 | Katti | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143816 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120185759 | Balinsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197718 | Martchenko et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197770 | Raheja et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197957 | de Voogd | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198351 | Lee et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203861 | Flack et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216108 | Yambal et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221319 | Trese | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221407 | Erasmus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226818 | Atas et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233665 | Ranganathan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120266076 | Lockhart et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120330644 | Giraudy et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330990 | Chen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130031470 | Daly, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036202 | Lahav | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054404 | Garcia | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067055 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091014 | Kellogg | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097488 | Coman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124185 | Sarr et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124987 | Lakritz | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144566 | De Biswas | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151940 | Bailor et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173247 | Hodson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130262986 | Leblond et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304607 | Costa et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325442 | Dahlmeier | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130326345 | Haggart et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019625 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140058718 | Kunchukuttan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140081775 | Leblond et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082032 | Leblond et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140087760 | Bennett | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114864 | Babich et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142917 | D'Penha | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142918 | Dotterer | May 2014 | A1 |
20140173414 | Chan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181013 | Micucci et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188993 | Klein et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229257 | Reistad et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236942 | Li | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250369 | Mitnick et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278342 | Shoshan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282977 | Madhu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297252 | Prasad et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297759 | Mody | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298483 | Kato | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303956 | Wilson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140304080 | Yilmaz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310229 | Lahav | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140351053 | Link, II | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358519 | Mirkin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140358524 | Papula | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365201 | Gao | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150040000 | Rice et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051896 | Simard | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052424 | Sikchi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150074518 | Rumsey et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150106390 | Fuchs | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127660 | Zilberberg et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149455 | Whitley, Jr. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149885 | Homer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149886 | Homer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150186362 | Li | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150188961 | Ricci | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213259 | Du et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213363 | Lahav | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150248484 | Yu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150254732 | Snyder | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150310504 | Potter | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160014088 | Maekawa | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019546 | Eisen | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160057195 | Jaskiewicz | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160155178 | Konaiyagarri et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160239496 | Motte et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160248785 | Petry et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160275057 | Dendi et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160283952 | Hall | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160371693 | Kolkowitz et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170124069 | Bondarchuk et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149683 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170235848 | Van Dusen et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170337614 | Costa et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180314674 | Homer et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190065514 | Siddiquee et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190158567 | Siddiquee et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190163459 | Sreenivasa et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200151740 | Martchenko et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200167529 | Bondarchuk et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5240198 | May 1998 | AU |
694367 | Jul 1998 | AU |
5202299 | Oct 1999 | AU |
2221506 | Dec 1996 | CA |
102193914 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102662935 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102902667 | Jan 2013 | CN |
69525374 | Aug 2002 | DE |
69431306 | May 2003 | DE |
69633564 | Nov 2005 | DE |
0830774 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1128301 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1128302 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1128303 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1170680 | Jan 2002 | EP |
0803103 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1235177 | Aug 2002 | EP |
0734556 | Sep 2002 | EP |
0830774 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1489523 | Dec 2004 | EP |
2299369 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2668599 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2668626 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2678814 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2896007 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2896008 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2896007 | Jul 2020 | EP |
2241359 | Aug 1991 | GB |
H10509543 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H11507752 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001117847 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001136583 | May 2001 | JP |
3190881 | Jul 2001 | JP |
3190882 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001188992 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001350790 | Dec 2001 | JP |
3260693 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002073677 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002132822 | May 2002 | JP |
3367675 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003032660 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003157402 | May 2003 | JP |
2003216608 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004538542 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005056080 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005174120 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005267535 | Sep 2005 | JP |
3762882 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006216073 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006260329 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007042127 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008027265 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009020845 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009518761 | May 2009 | JP |
2009301480 | Dec 2009 | JP |
4485548 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010152588 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2011002905 | Jan 2011 | JP |
4669373 | Apr 2011 | JP |
4669430 | Apr 2011 | JP |
5952307 | Jul 2016 | JP |
5952312 | Jul 2016 | JP |
6138054 | Jun 2017 | JP |
WO9516971 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO9613013 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9642041 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9715885 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9819224 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9952626 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO2002039318 | May 2002 | WO |
WO20030081441 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2007068123 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO20070118424 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO2010062540 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010062542 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2012101240 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012101243 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012113791 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2013144358 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO2013167734 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO2014041148 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2014041149 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adomavicius, G.; Mobasher, B.; Ricci, F.; Tuzhilin, A. Context-Aware Recommender Systems. AlMag 2011, 32, 67-80 (Year: 2011). |
“The GNU Make Manual”, Version 3.79, edition 0.55, Apr. 2000, Free Software Foundation, Inc, pp. 1-8, 118, 128. |
“Introduction to ClearCase”, Rational Software Corporation, Dec. 1999, Rational ClearCase, Release 4.0, pp. i-xiv, 1, 2, 30, 33, 37, 40, 59. |
“Administering ClearCase”, Rational Software Corporation, Rational ClearCase Release 4.0, 1999, pp. i-xxx, 1-6, 129-162, 255-260, 278, 281, 283, 345-348. |
Challenger et al., “A Scalable System for Consistently Caching Dynamic Web Data”, INFOCOM '99. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, Mar. 21-25, 1999, pp. 294-303, vol. 1, 10 pages. |
Challenger et al., “A Publishing System for Efficiently Creating Dynamic Web Content”, INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, Mar. 26-30, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 1-7, 10. |
Croll et al., “Content Management—The Users Requirements”, International Broadcasting Convention, Conference Publication No. 447, Sep. 12-16, 1997, 4 pages. |
Idiom, Inc. “WorldServer 2 White Paper”, 2000, 19 pages. |
“VerticalNet Selects Uniscape As Globalization Provider to Speed Global Expansion”, Market Wire, Jun. 2000, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200006/ai_mark01011558/print> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Personify Selects Uniscape to Enable Ebusiness Solutions for Global Markets”, PRNewsWire and NEWS desk, Aug. 30, 2000, <www.findwealth.com/personify-selects-uniscape-to-enable-180593pr.html> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Uniscape, Inc. Home Page”, Uniscape, Inc., publicly posted Feb. 20, 1999, <web.archive.org/web/19990220195249//http://www.uniscape-inc.com/> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Uniscape Introduces Pilot Program to Provide Multilingual Website Management Solutions,” Business Wire, Feb. 11, 1999, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_Feb_11/11/ai_53852378> accessed on May 9, 2011, 1 page. |
“Uniscape Announces New Solution for Automating Management of Software Localization Process,” Business Wire, Aug. 17, 1998, <www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_August_17/ai_21090247> accessed on Sep. 30, 2005, 2 pages. |
“Cephren Relies on Uniscape During Rapid Global eBusiness Expansion,” Market Wire, Oct. 18, 2000, <www.marketwire.com/mw/iwpr?id=18115&cat=te> accessed on Oct. 1, 2005, 2 pages. |
Anonymous; “MyYahoo!—RSS Headlines Module—Frequently Asked Questions,” Jan. 24, 2007, XP002508567, [retrieved on Dec. 17, 2008], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20040124175>, 4 pages. |
Krishnan, “Unmittelbare Ergenbnisse Noch Schneller: Google Vorschau—Der Google Produkt-Kompass,” Nov. 9, 2010, <http://web.archive.org/web/20101109154340/http://google-produkt-kompass.blogspot.com/2010/11/unmittelbare-ergebnisse-nochschneller.html> accessed on Apr. 4, 2012, 2 pages. |
“XML Convert,” Unidex, Inc., Aug. 4, 2007, <http://www.unidex.com/xflat.htm> accessed on Apr. 5, 2012, 1 page. |
“SOAP,” Wikipedia, Jan. 22, 2011, <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SOAP&oldid=409349976> accessed Apr. 4, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mutz et al., “User-Agent Display Attributes,” HTTP Working Group, Nov. 26, 1996, 6 pages. |
XP007905525, The Technical Aspects Identified in the Present Application (Art. 15 PCT) are considered part of common general knowledge. Due to their notoriety no documentary evidence is found to be required. Official Journal Nov. 2007, pp. 592-593. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2012/051284, dated Apr. 26, 2012, 8 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2012/052934, dated May 15, 2012, 6 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2012/051291, dated May 2, 2012, 11 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/056842, dated Oct. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/069078, dated Jan. 8, 2014, 6 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion”, Patent Cooperation Treaty application No. PCT/EP2013/069077, dated Jan. 8, 2014, 6 pages. |
Colligan et al.; Special Edition Using Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003; 2004; Que Publishing; pp. 50-91 and 323-326. |
“Highlight;” Microsoft Computer Dictionary; May 1, 2002; Microsoft Press; p. 320. |
“Office Action”, European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, dated Jun. 17, 2014, 5 pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings”, European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, Feb. 11, 2015, 7 pages. |
“Inheritance (object-oriented programming)”, archived Wikipedia on Sep. 4, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inheritance_(object-oriented_programming)&oldid=448382925, pp. 1-7. |
“Result of Consultation”, European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, May 28, 2015, 3 pages. |
“Office Action”, European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, dated Jun. 29, 2015, 30 pages. |
“Minutes of Oral Proceeding”, European Patent Convention application No. 12707723.8, Jun. 29, 2015, 8 pages. |
Preview; Feb. 26, 2011; Dictionary.com; 2 pages. |
Edgar; “Why Do Browsers Display My Site Differently?” Jun. 3, 2009 (updated Nov. 2010); matthewedgar.net; pp. 1-5. |
“Office Action”, Japanese Patent Application 2013-550887, dated Jan. 5, 2016, 10 pages [20 pages with translation]. |
“Office Action”, Japanese Patent Application 2013-550888, dated Dec. 22, 2015, 4 pages [8 pages with translation]. |
“Office Action”, Japanese Patent Application 2013-554869, dated Feb. 9, 2016, 2 pages [4 pages with translation]. |
“Notice of Allowance” Japanese Patent Application 2013-550888, dated May 24, 2016, 3 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, Japanese Patent Application 2013-554869, dated May 24, 2016, 3 pages. |
“Office Action,” Japan Patent Application No. 2013-550887, dated Oct. 4, 2016, 4 pages [8 pages including translation]. |
“Office Action,” European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, dated Sep. 6, 2016, 4 pages. |
“Serialization”; Wikipedia; Nov. 14, 2013; 10 pages; https://web.archive.org/web/20131114152415/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialization. |
Microsoft, MSDN; “Serialization .NET Framework 4.5”; Jan. 10, 2013; 2 pages; https://web.archive.org/web/20130110102559/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7ay27kt9(v=vs.110).aspx. |
“Office Action,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance,” Japan Patent Application No. 2013-550887, dated Apr. 11, 2017, 3 pages. |
Schafer, Ben J. et al., “Recommender Systems in E-Commerce,” Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (EC '99), ACM, New York, NY, 1999, pp. 158-166. |
Nepveu et al. “Adaptive Language and Translation Models for Interactive Machine Translation” Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Jul. 25, 2004, 8 pages. Retrieved from: http://www.cs.jhu.edu/˜yarowsky/sigdat.html. |
Ortiz-Martinez et al. “Online Learning for Interactive Statistical Machine Translation” Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Jun. 10, 2010, pp. 546-554. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220817231_Online_Learning_for_Interactive_Statistical_Machine_Translation. |
Callison-Burch et al. “Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation” [W12-3100] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 10-51. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
“Minutes of Oral Proceeding”, European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Jun. 19, 2018, 4 pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 10 pages. |
“Office Action,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 11 pages. |
“Decision to Refuse,” European Patent Application No. 12703482.5, dated Sep. 17, 2018, 4 pages. |
Leblond, Dominique, “Blueprinting of Multimedia Assets”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,591, filed Sep. 14, 2012, 40 pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, Jul. 2, 2019, 18 pages. |
Eckerson, Wayne, “Performance Management Strategies: How to Create and Deploy Effective Metrics,” TDWI Best Practices Report, First Quarter (2009), 35 pages. |
Padmanabhan et al., “Using Predictive Prefetching to Improve World Wide Web Latency,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 26.3, 1996, pp. 22-36. |
Hasegawa et al., “Multilingual Disaster Information System: Information Delivery Using Graphic Text for Mobile Phones,” Al & Soc 19, 2005, pp. 265-278. |
Wikipedia: “XML” [online], [retreived on Mar. 2, 2020], Retreived from the Internet: <https://www.wikipedia.com/XML>, 2 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance,” European Patent Application No. 13776975.8, dated Feb. 12, 2020, 7 pages. |
Lopez, Adam. “Putting Human Assessments of Machine Translation Systems in Order” [W12-3101] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 1-9. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Avramidis, Eleftherios. “Quality estimation for Machine Translation output using linguistic analysis and decoding features” [W12-3108] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 84-90. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Buck, Christian. “Black Box Features for the WMT 2012 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3109] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 91-95. Retrieved from: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Felice et al. “Linguistic Features for Quality Estimation” [W12-3110] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 96-103. Retrieved at: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Gonzalez-Rubio et al. “PRHLT Submission to the WMT12 Quality Estimation Task” [W12-3111] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 104-108. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Hardmeier et al. “Tree Kernels for Machine Translation Quality Estimation” [W12-3112] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation,Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 109-113. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Langlois et al. “LORIA System for the WMT12 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3113] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 114-119. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Moreau et al. “Quality Estimation: an experimental study using unsupervised similarity measures” [W12-3114] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 120-126. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Gonzalez et al. “The UPC Submission to the WMT 2012 Shared Task on Quality Estimation” [W12-3115] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 127-132. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Popovic, Maja. “Morpheme- and POS-based IBM1 and language model scores for translation quality estimation” Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 133-137. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Rubino et al. “DCU-Symantec Submission for the WMT 2012 Quality Estimation Task” [W12-3117] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 138-144. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Soricut et al. “The SDL Language Weaver Systems in the WMT12 Quality Estimation Shared Task” [W12-3118] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 145-151. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Wu et al. “Regression with Phrase Indicators for Estimating MT Quality” [W12-3119] Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 152-156. Retrieved from: http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-seventh-workshop-onstatistical-machine-translation. |
Wuebker et al. “Hierarchical Incremental Adaptation for Statistical Machine Translation” Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1059-1065, Lisbon, Portugal, Sep. 17-21, 2015. |
“Best Practices—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Mar. 6, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/best-practices>, 2 pages. |
“Data Security—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/security>, 1 pages. |
“Data Security and Confidentiality,” Lilt website [online], 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/security>, 7 pages. |
“Memories—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/memory>, 4 pages. |
“Memories (API)—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 2, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/memories>, 1 page. |
“Quoting—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/quoting>, 4 pages. |
“The Editor—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 15, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/editor>, 5 pages. |
“Training Lilt—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/troubleshooting/training-lilt>, 1 page. |
“What is Lilt_—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online],Dec. 15, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 19, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/what-is-lilt>, 1 page. |
“Getting Started—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Apr. 11, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/getting-started>, 2 pages. |
“The Lexicon—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/lexicon>, 4 pages. |
“Simple Translation—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 17, 2017 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/simple-translation>, 3 pages. |
“Split and Merge—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Oct. 14, 2016 [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/translators/split-merge>, 4 pages. |
“Lilt API _ API Reference,” Lilt website [online], retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/docs/api>, 53 pages. |
“Automatic Translation Quality—Knowledge Base”, Lilt website [online], Dec. 1, 2016, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/evaluation/evaluate-mt>, 4 pages. |
“Projects—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Jun. 7, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/project-managers/projects>, 3 pages. |
“Getting Started with lilt,” Lilt website [online], May 30, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/lilt-js>, 6 pages. |
“Interactive Translation—Knowledge Base,” Lilt website [online], Aug. 17, 2017, retrieved on Oct. 20, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet:<https://lilt.com/kb/api/interactive-translation>, 2 pages. |
Hildebrand et al., “Adaptation of the Translation Model for Statistical Machine Translation based on Information Retrieval,” EAMT 2005 Conference Proceedings, May 2005, pp. 133-142. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228634956_Adaptation_of_the_translation_model_for_statistical_machine_translation_based_on_information_retrieval. |
Och et al., “The Alignment Template Approach to Statistical Machine Translation Machine Translation,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 30. No. 4, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 417-442 (39 pages with citations). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1105589. |
Sethy et al., “Building Topic Specific Language Models Fromwebdata Using Competitive Models,” Interspeech 2005—Eurospeech, 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, Sep. 4-8, 2005, 4 pages. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221490916_Building_topic_specific_language_models_from_webdata_using_competitive_models. |
Dobrinkat, “Domain Adaptation in Statistical Machine Translation Systems via User Feedback,” Master's Thesis, University of Helsinki, Nov. 25, 2008, 103 pages. Retrieved from http://users.ics.aalto.fi/mdobrink/online-papers/dobrinkat08mt.pdf. |
Business Wire, “Language Weaver Introduces User-Managed Customization Tool,” Oct. 25, 2005, 3 pages. Retrieved from http: ProQuest. |
Winiwarter, W., “Learning Transfer Rules for Machine Translation from Parallel Corpora,” Journal of Digital Information Management, vol. 6 No. 4, Aug. 2008, pp. 285-293. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220608987_Learning_Transfer_Rules_for_Machine_Translation_from_Parallel_Corpora. |
Potet et al., “Preliminary Experiments on Using Users′ Post-Editions to Enhance a SMT System,” Proceedings of the European Association for Translation (EAMT), May 2011, pp. 161-168. Retreived from Retrieved at http://www.mt-archive.info/EAMT-2011-Potet.pdf. |
Ortiz-Martinez et al., “An Interactive Machine Translation System with Online Learning” Proceedings of the ACL-HLT 2011 System Demonstrations, Jun. 21, 2011, pp. 68-73. Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-4012. |
Lopez-Salcedo et al.,“Online Learning of Log-Linear Weights in Interactive Machine Translation,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 328, 2011, pp. 1-10. Retrieved from http://www.casmacat.eu/uploads/Main/iberspeech2.pdf. |
Blanchon et al., “A Web Service Enabling Gradable Post-edition of Pre-translations Pro duced by Existing Translation Tools: Practical Use to Provide High quality Translation of an Online Encyclopedia” Jan. 2009, 9 pages. Retrieved from http://www.mt-archive.info/MTS-2009-Blanchon.pdf. |
Levenberg et al.“Stream-based Translation Models for Statistical Machine Translation” Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Dec. 31, 2010, pp. 394-402. |
Lagarda et al. “Statistical Post-Editing of a Rule Based Machine Translation System” Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2009: Short Papers, Jun. 2009, pp. 217-220. |
Ehara, “Rule Based Machine Translation Combined with Statistical Post Editor for Japanese to English Patent Translation,” MT Summit XI, 2007, pp. 13-18. |
Bechara et al. “Statistical Post-Editing for a Statistical MT System” Proceedings of the 13th Machine Translation Summit, 2011, pp. 308-315. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, Nov. 30, 2017, 11 pages. |
“Web analytics,” Wikipedia [online], Jan. 27, 2001 [retrieved on Sep. 11, 2017], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_analytics&oldid=410384013>, 11 pages. |
“Examining Division Preliminary Opinion,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, dated Apr. 30, 2018, 9 pages. |
“Decision to Refuse,” European Patent Application No. 12703483.3, Jun. 19, 2018, 24 pages. |
“Serialization (C#)”, Microsoft, <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt656716.aspx>, Jan. 2, 2020, 4 pages. |
“What are object serialization and deserialization?” Stack Overflow, <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1360632/object-serialization-anddeserialization>, Sep. 1, 2009, 6 pages. |
“Java Serialization and Deserialization”, Studytonight, <http://www.studytonight.com/java/serialization-and-deserialization.php>, 2020, Accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
Upadhyay, Chirantan, “Serialization and Deserialization in ASP.NET with C#”, Code Project, <https://www.codeproject.com/kb/cs/seranddeserialization.aspx>, May 27, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Serialize”, PHP, <http://php.net/manual/en/function.serialize.php>, accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 28 pages. |
“Interface Serializable”, Oracle, <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/apl/java/lo/Serializable.html>, accessed Oct. 23, 2020, 3 pages. |
Sakai, Marie et al., “Building DITA-based CMS as integrated documentation environment”, The 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems, and The 13th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligence Systems, IEEE, 2012, 5 pages. |
“Oracle ATG Platform Programming Guide”; Oracle Corporation; retrieved on Jan. 19, 2021 from <URL:https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E35319_01/Platform.10-2/ATGPlatformProgGuide/html/s0101introduction01.html>, 2013, 2 pages. |
Christensson, Per. “HTML Definition.” TechTerms. Sharpened Productions, <URL:https://techterms.com/definition/html>, May 23, 2015, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200104343 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14093015 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 16703737 | US |