The present specification is related generally to the field of neurophysiological stimulation. More specifically the present specification is related to a stimulation module that enables user-preferred selection of one or any combination of a plurality of low current stimulation outputs or channels.
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is directed towards identifying, mapping and monitoring neural structures in accordance with their functions with a goal of preserving the structural integrity of these neural structures during physically invasive procedures such as surgery.
In some methods, identifying, mapping and monitoring neural structures comprises applying electrical stimulation at or near an area where the target neural structures are believed to be located. Application of the electrical stimulation is transmitted through the nervous system structures to excite or depress the associated response(s) or function(s). For example, an electrical impulse is generated in the muscle(s), as a result of the excitation, that can be sensed using recording electrodes, thereby indicating presence and functionality of a neural structure to a surgeon. For example, cortical stimulation mapping (CSM) is a type of electrocorticography that involves a physically invasive procedure and aims to localize the function of specific brain regions through direct electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex.
Prior art nerve integrity monitoring systems pose limitations when used across varied surgical procedures and accompanied neuro-stimulation scenarios. As an example, a critical limitation of majority of prior art nerve integrity monitoring systems is the availability of a limited number of low current outputs or channels for delivering stimulation to a plurality of neural regions thereby limiting the ability to simultaneously stimulate multiple nerves or multiple branches of single nerves. For example, the ES-IX stimulator, from Cadwell Industries Inc., also the Applicant of the present specification, has a maximum of one low current stimulation output. Such limitation necessitates frequent manual intervention, such as having to move the connections of stimulation components (for example, electrodes and probes) to change the location of the delivered stimulus on a patient's anatomy.
Another drawback of prior art nerve integrity monitoring systems is that these are not designed to provide electrical stimulation of sufficient amplitude to elicit excitation activity of the muscles. Another limitation is a lack of integration of the stimulators with a multi-modality monitoring system. For example, the Nicolet® Cortical Stimulator supports recording of only electroencephalography and connection of a single probe (bipolar). The Inomed® stimulator also supports connection of a single probe.
As a result of these limitations, prior art nerve integrity monitoring systems are associated with various disadvantages including the need for additional operational steps which increase the duration of the surgical procedures to the detriment of patients and medical personnel, increased complexity and confusion associated with intraoperative neural monitoring, a need for greater human and/or mechanical intervention and an inability to efficiently integrate multiple neural stimulation and monitoring modalities.
Thus, there is a need for systems and methods that enable a user to select all or any combination of multiple stimulation modalities available to the user. There is also a need to enable the user to stimulate the neurological system with minimal, less frequent and more streamlined manual or electromechanical intervention.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, and not limiting in scope. The present application discloses numerous embodiments.
The present specification discloses a method of using cortical stimulation to identify and assess neural structures during a surgical procedure, the method comprising: providing an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) system comprising at least one probe, at least one reference electrode, at least one strip electrode or grid electrode, at least one sensing electrode, and a stimulation module; placing the at least one reference electrode in a perimeter of a surgical field of a patient; positioning the at least one probe and/or the at least one strip electrode or grid electrode at target locations on the anatomy of said patient; preparing for recordation of said patient's responses to stimulation by positioning said at least one sensing electrode on said patient's anatomy; initiating a stimulation protocol; adjusting stimulation parameters of the stimulation protocol to determine a threshold response; and identifying or assessing the neural structures based on said threshold response, wherein assessing comprises determining if the patient's anatomy is functioning in a manner indicative of an underlying disease or, alternatively, is functioning in a non-pathological manner.
Optionally, the stimulation protocol is a motor cortex stimulation protocol, a speech stimulation protocol, or a language stimulation protocol.
Optionally, said stimulation module comprises a first plurality of output connectors and a second plurality of probe ports. Optionally, the first plurality of output connectors comprise at least 12 output connectors. Optionally, the first plurality of output connectors are configured to enable connection to the at least one strip electrode or grid electrode, wherein the at least one strip electrode or grid electrode has a plurality of contacts and wherein a total number of the plurality of contacts does not exceed a total number of the first plurality of output connectors. Optionally, the second plurality of probe ports comprises a first probe port and a second probe port, wherein each of the first probe port and the second probe port is configured to connect to the at least one probe, wherein the at least one probe comprises passive probes, and wherein the passive probes comprise at least one of a monopolar probe or a bipolar probe. Optionally, each of the plurality of output connectors are configurable as either an anode or a cathode through a user interface in data communication with the IONM system. Optionally, the method further comprises providing a user interface in data communication with the IONM system, receiving, via the user interface, user-defined stimuli, and delivering signals representative of the user-defined stimuli to pairs of the plurality of output connectors, each of the plurality of output connectors being configurable as either an anode or a cathode through the user interface. Optionally, the second plurality of probe ports comprises a probe port adapted to connect the at least one probe, wherein the at least one probe comprises an anode and a cathode and wherein the probe port comprises first and second outputs for connection of to the anode and the cathode of the at least one probe, a first pair of connection ports adapted to connect to a power supply and a second pair of connection ports adapted to connect to a communication module.
Optionally, the at least one sensing electrode comprises an electromyography needle electrode.
Optionally, the stimulation protocol comprises a multi-pulse train having 2 to 10 pulses wherein each of the pulses is defined by a pulse width in a range of 50 μsec to 1000 μsec, an inter-stimulus interval in a range of 0.5 to 10 milliseconds and a pulse amplitude in a range of 0.01 mA to 20 mA.
The present specification also discloses a method of using direct nerve stimulation to identify nerve fibers and nerve pathways during a surgical procedure, the method comprising: providing an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) system comprising at least one probe, at least one sensing electrode, and a stimulation module, wherein the stimulation module comprises at least twelve output connectors and a plurality of probe ports; positioning the at least one probe at a first target location on the patient; positioning the at least one sensing electrode at a second target location in the patient; initiating a direct nerve stimulation protocol; adjusting stimulation parameters of the direct nerve stimulation protocol to determine a threshold motor response; and identifying the nerve fibers and nerve pathways based on the threshold motor response.
Optionally, the IONM system further comprises at least one strip electrode or grid electrode having a total number of contacts not exceeding a total number of the at least twelve output connectors, wherein the at least twelve output connectors are adapted to connect to the at least one strip electrode or grid electrode.
Optionally, the plurality of probe ports comprises a first probe port and a second probe port and is configured to connect to the at least one probe, wherein the at least one probe comprises at least one passive monopolar probe or passive bipolar probe.
Optionally, each of the at least twelve output connectors are configurable as either an anode or a cathode.
Optionally, the method further comprises providing a user interface in data communication with the IONM system, receiving, via the user interface, user-defined stimuli, and delivering signals representative of the user-defined stimuli to pairs of the plurality of output connectors, each of the plurality of output connectors being configurable as either an anode or a cathode through the user interface.
Optionally, the plurality of probe ports comprises a probe port configured to connect to the at least one probe, wherein the at least one probe comprises an anode connection and a cathode connection, and wherein the probe port comprises first and second outputs adapted to connect to the anode and the cathode of the probe port, a first pair of connection ports adapted to connect to a power supply and a second pair of connection ports adapted to connect to a transceiver.
Optionally, the at least one sensing electrode comprises an electromyography needle electrode.
Optionally, the direct nerve stimulation protocol comprises a single pulse stimulation, wherein the single pulse has a frequency of 0.05 Hz to 90 Hz, a pulse width of 50 μsec to 1000 μsec, an interval between pulses of 0.5 millisecond to 10 milliseconds and a pulse amplitude in a range of 0.01 mA to 20 mA, with 2 mA or less for cranial nerves and 5 mA or less for peripheral nerves.
Optionally, the IONM system further comprises a handle having a proximal end configured to connect to the stimulation module and a distal end configured to attach to the at least one probe. Optionally, the handle comprises a first visual indicator, a second visual indicator, and an actuator configured to manually or automatically switch the stimulation module between a first mode of operation and a second mode operation depending upon a type of the at least one probe. Optionally, first visual indicator is configured to indicate at least one of the first mode of operation, the second mode of operation, a connection state of the at least one probe or what part of the at least one probe is active. Optionally, the second visual indicator provides a first indication signifying that a site of stimulation is at a first distance from a nerve and a second indication signifying that the site of stimulation is at a second distance from the nerve, wherein the first distance is less than the second distance.
The present specification also discloses a method of using cortical stimulation to identify neural structures during a surgical procedure, the method comprising: providing an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) system comprising at least one probe, at least one reference electrode, at least one strip or grid electrode, at least one sensing electrode, and a stimulation module; placing said at least one reference electrode in a perimeter of a surgical field of a patient; positioning said at least one probe and said at least ones strip or grid electrode at target locations on the anatomy of said patient; preparing for recordation of said patient's responses to stimulation by positioning said at least one sensing electrode on said patient's anatomy; initiating a stimulation protocol; adjusting stimulation parameters of said stimulation protocol to determine a threshold response; and identifying said neural structures based on said threshold response.
Optionally, the stimulation protocol is a motor cortex stimulation protocol, a speech stimulation protocol, or a language stimulation protocol.
Optionally, said stimulation module comprises a first plurality of twelve output connectors and a second plurality of probe ports.
Optionally, said twelve output connectors enable connection to said at least one strip or grid electrode having multiple contacts not exceeding said twelve output connectors.
Optionally, said plurality of probe ports comprises a first probe port and a second probe port and enables connection to said at least one probe, wherein said at least one probe comprises passive and smart probes, and wherein said passive probes include monopolar and bipolar probes.
Optionally, each of the twelve output connectors are configurable as either an anode or a cathode allowing user-defined stimuli to be delivered to arbitrary anode and cathode pairs.
Optionally, said second plurality of probe ports further comprises a third probe port, said third probe port configured for connecting a smart probe and comprising a pair of outputs for connection of an anode and a cathode of said smart probe and a first connection port for power and a second connection port for communications.
Optionally, said at least one sensing electrode includes an EMG needle electrode.
Optionally, said stimulation protocol comprises a multi-pulse train of 3 to 5 pulses, a pulse width of 500 μsec, an inter-stimulus interval of 2 to 4 milliseconds and a pulse amplitude of up to 20 mA.
The present specification also discloses a method of using direct nerve stimulation to identify nerve fibers and pathways during a surgical procedure, the method comprising: providing an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) system comprising at least one probe, at least one sensing electrode, and a stimulation module; positioning said at least one probe at a target location on the anatomy of said patient; preparing for recordation of said patient's responses to stimulation by positioning said at least one sensing electrode on said patient's anatomy; initiating a direct nerve stimulation protocol; adjusting stimulation parameters of said stimulation protocol to determine a threshold motor response; and identifying said nerve fibers and pathways based on said threshold motor response.
Optionally, said stimulation module comprises a first plurality of twelve output connectors and a second plurality of probe ports.
Optionally, said twelve output connectors enable connection to at least one strip or grid electrode having multiple contacts not exceeding said twelve output connectors.
Optionally, said plurality of probe ports comprises a first probe port and a second probe port and enables connection to said at least one probe, wherein said at least one probe comprises passive and smart probes, and wherein said passive probes include monopolar and bipolar probes.
Optionally, each of the twelve output connectors are configurable as either an anode or a cathode allowing user-defined stimuli to be delivered to arbitrary anode and cathode pairs.
Optionally, said second plurality of probe ports further comprises a third probe port, said third probe port configured for connecting a smart probe and comprising a pair of outputs for connection of an anode and a cathode of said smart probe and a first connection port for power and a second connection port for communications.
Optionally, said at least one sensing electrode includes an EMG needle electrode.
Optionally, said direct nerve stimulation protocol comprises single pulse stimulation, wherein each stimulation has a frequency of 2 to 3 Hz, a pulse width of 200 μsec, an inter-stimulus interval of 1 millisecond and a pulse amplitude of 0.01 mA to 20 mA, with 2 mA or less for cranial nerves and 5 mA or less for peripheral nerves.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
A “computing device” is at least one of a cellular phone, PDA, smart phone, tablet computing device, patient monitor, custom kiosk, or other computing device capable of executing programmatic instructions. It should further be appreciated that each device and monitoring system may have wireless and wired receivers and transmitters capable of sending and transmitting data. Each “computing device” may be coupled to at least one display, which displays information about the patient parameters and the functioning of the system, by means of a GUI. The GUI also presents various menus that allow users to configure settings according to their requirements. The system further comprises at least one processor (not shown) to control the operation of the entire system and its components. It should further be appreciated that the at least one processor is capable of processing programmatic instructions, has a memory capable of storing programmatic instructions, and employs software comprised of a plurality of programmatic instructions for performing the processes described herein. In one embodiment, the at least one processor is a computing device capable of receiving, executing, and transmitting a plurality of programmatic instructions stored on a volatile or non-volatile computer readable medium. In addition, the software comprised of a plurality of programmatic instructions for performing the processes described herein may be implemented by a computer processor capable of processing programmatic instructions and a memory capable of storing programmatic instructions.
The term ‘user’ is used interchangeably to refer to a surgeon, neuro-physician, neuro-surgeon, neuro-physiologist, technician or operator of the IONM system and/or other patient-care personnel or staff.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated. It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
As used herein, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” mean “at least one” or “one or more” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
An Intraoperative Neuro-Monitoring (IONM) System
In various embodiments, the computing device 105 comprises at least one processor, at least one non-transitory memory, one or more input devices (such as, but not limited to, keyboard, mouse, touch-screen, camera and combinations thereof) and one or more output devices (such as, but not limited to, display screens, printers, speakers and combinations thereof) all of which may be stand-alone, integrated into a single unit, partially or completely network-based or cloud-based, and not necessarily located in a single physical location. The computing device 105 is in data communication with one or more databases 140 that may be co-located with the computing device 105 or located remotely.
The IONM software application or engine 110 implements a plurality of instructions to: deliver a plurality of stimulation protocols or schedules (stored in the one or more databases 140) through any one, any combination or all of the plurality of stimulation components 135, generate a plurality of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) rendered on one or more display screens (that are coupled to the computing device 105) to display a plurality of EMG activity waveforms sensed by the EMG electrodes 125 and extract a plurality of parameters related thereto and enable user-interaction with the system 100 to perform a plurality of functions such as, but not limited to, selecting and activating/initiating one or more stimulation protocols and modulating one or more stimulation parameters of the protocols. The IONM software application or engine 110 is configured to apply one or more stimulation protocols to one or more nerve structures 145 of a patient 150 through the plurality of stimulation components 135 and acquire and record correspondingly evoked EMG activity through the plurality of EMG electrodes 125 positioned within a plurality of muscle sites or locations 148 of the patient 150.
The systems and methods of the embodiments of the present specification are used for mapping and locating anatomical structures and also for assessing these structures, wherein assessing is defined as determining if these structures are functioning in a manner indicative of an underlying disease or, alternatively, are functioning in a non-pathological manner. The functions include, but are not limited to, cognitive functions such as speech and language and motor functions (movement). A neural structure is determined to be functioning based on the presence or absence of a non-pathological response when stimulated. In some embodiments, for a motor response, a non-pathological response is defined as movement or non-movement of a muscle group. In some embodiments, for a cognitive response, a non-pathological response is defined as a patient properly reading a sentence aloud correctly naming a pictured object. It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that, although described herein with reference to cortical stimulation and direct nerve stimulation during cerebrospinal surgical procedures, the system 100 and related methods or use cases of the present specification have application in a plurality of surgical procedures during which tissue having critical neural structures must be approached, retracted, and/or impinged upon and consequently requiring that such physically invasive procedures be planned and executed while preserving critical neural structures or bundles. It should also be appreciated that, although embodiments have been described herein with reference to EMG activity, the system 100 and related methods or use cases of the present specification may, in various alternate embodiments, use a plurality of different types of neural monitoring modalities such as, for example, triggered electromyography, spontaneous electromyography, mechanomyography, somatosensory evoked potential, motor evoked potentials, nerve conduction velocity and/or train of fours.
The Multi-Modality Stimulation Module
In embodiments, the module 120 comprises a first plurality of connectors 160 and a second plurality of separate probe ports 165 (that is, ports 165a, 165b and 165c). In accordance with an embodiment, the first plurality of connectors 160 comprises twelve anode/cathode ports or connectors (160a, 160b, 160c, 160d, 160e, 160f, 160g, 160h, 160i, 160j, 160k, 160l) while the second plurality of separate probe ports 165 comprises a first probe port 165a, a second probe port 165b, and a third probe port 165c. In embodiments, the first probe port 165a and the second probe port 165b are used to connect either a monopolar probe or a bipolar probe and the third probe port 165c is used to connect a smart probe. The first probe port 165a comprises a first output 166 and a second output 168 for connection of an anode and a cathode of a first probe. The second probe port 165b comprises a third output 167 and a fourth output 169 for connection of an anode and a cathode of a second probe. The third probe port 165c comprises a fifth output 171 and a sixth output 173 for connection of an anode and a cathode of a smart probe and a first pair of connection port 175 for power and a second pair of connection port 177 for communications for the smart probe.
The first probe port 165a and the second probe port 165b are both configured to receive either a monopolar probe or a bipolar probe. Therefore, the first probe port 165a and the second probe port 165b allow both a monopolar probe and a bipolar probe to be simultaneously attached to the multi-modality stimulation module 120. A user may perform a procedure on a patient without having to unplug and re-plug monopolar and bipolar probes to switch back and forth between the probes. In various embodiments, the system 100 includes a switching circuit configured to switch each of the twelve ports or connectors 160a-l and each of the outputs 166, 167, 168, 169, 171, 173 such that each connector or output can function as either a cathode output or an anode output.
In embodiments, the twelve ports 160a-160l enable connection to one or more strips, each of which has multiple contacts, not exceeding the twelve ports or channels. In accordance with an embodiment, any of the twelve ports 160a-160l can be configured and flexibly chosen as either an anode or a cathode, thereby allowing user-defined stimuli to be delivered to arbitrary anode and cathode pairs. In one embodiment, a strip or grid electrode, which includes a reference electrode as part of the collection of electrodes contained therein, is connected to the required number of output ports from the available twelve ports 160a-160l.
In embodiments, the second plurality of separate probe ports 165 (that is, ports 165a, 165b and 165c) enables connection to passive and smart probes. In various embodiments, the passive stimulation probes are monopolar and bipolar probes. The smart probe dynamically switches between stimulation functions and provides visual and/or auditory feedback to the user about one or more characteristics (such as, but not limited to, amplitude, latency, location of response, similarity to prior and/or baseline response) of a sensed/detected response. The smart probe (that is available in either a monopolar or a bipolar version) enables the user to control stimulation parameters whereas the passive monopolar and bipolar probes require dependency on another user to adjust parameters using the IONM software engine 110.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, the handle 185 has an actuator 186, such as a toggle button, to enable manual switching between monopolar and bipolar modes depending upon the type or subtype of probe tip attached to the handle 185 or a sensing switch configured to enable an automatic switching between modes depending upon the type or subtype of probe tip attached to the handle 185. In some embodiments, the handle 185 also has a visual (light) indicator 187 that indicates monopolar or bipolar modes depending upon the type of probe tip 182 attached to the handle 185, an active or inactive connection state or status of the probe tip 182 attached to the handle 185 and/or which part (monopolar or bipolar) of the prong probe type is active when a monopolar/bipolar prong probe is attached to the handle 185. In some embodiments, the handle 185 further has a visual (light) proximity indicator 188 to provide visual feedback indicative of whether a nerve is far or near from a site where stimulation is being applied. It should be appreciated that the indicator 188 eliminates the need for the user to repeatedly look at a display screen of the IONM system 100. In some embodiments, the proximity indicator 188 is configured to generate or provide at least two indications—a first visual indication (such as, for example, green) signifying that a high stimulation intensity (that is, a stimulation intensity above a predefined threshold stimulation intensity) is required to elicit an evoked response thereby meaning that the site of stimulation is ‘far’ from the nerve, and a second visual indication (such as, for example, red) signifying that a relatively low stimulation intensity (that is, a stimulation intensity below a predefined threshold stimulation intensity) is required to elicit an evoked response thereby meaning that the site of stimulation is ‘near’ or ‘close’ to the nerve.
In embodiments, the power port pair 175 provides power to the handle 185 and probe tip 182 through the connector 180 and cable 181. In embodiments, the communication port pair 177 enables the proximity indicator 188, recordation of the type of stimulator being used and a type of mode (i.e. monopolar and/or bipolar) in clinical data of the IONM system 100, and connection state (i.e. connected or disconnected) of the handle 185 and probe tip 182 type, via the connector 180 and cable 181. The communication port pair 177 may be in data communication with a transceiver to enable the transfer of data.
Referring back to
Because an optimal stimulation paradigm may differ across patients and surgical procedure types, the multi-modality stimulation module 120 allows the user to easily prepare a varied neuro-stimulation setup, without having to physically move electrodes and/or probes and/or adjust the stimulus paradigm via dials and switches on a device at the computing device or near the OR (operating room) table.
Stimulation Parameters, Protocols or Schedules
The IONM software application of the present specification implements a plurality of stimulation protocols or schedules, comprising a plurality of stimulation parameters, that are available to the user for automatic delivery or application to a patient depending at least upon a combination of the stimulation modalities configured at the stimulation module 120 of
In various embodiments, stimulation protocols or schedules comprise driving a plurality of stimulation parameters such as, but not limited to, duration of the stimulation; time or moment of application of the stimulation sessions; intensity of stimulations, stimulation pulse shape, frequency, width and amplitude; stimulation duty cycle; stimulation continuity profile. Following are exemplary standard setting ranges for some of the stimulation parameters, including for motor cortex, speech, and language stimulation protocols and a direct nerve stimulation protocol:
In various embodiments, the IONM software application implements a plurality of sub-sets of the aforementioned stimulation parameters and protocols depending at least upon the type of neurostimulation being delivered—such as, but not limited to, cortical stimulation or direct nerve stimulation.
Use Case Illustrations
In accordance with various aspects of the present specification, the IONM system of the present specification enables the user to apply a plurality of stimulation protocols, patterns or schedules to the patient using at least one or any combination of the three stimulation modalities of the stimulation module with none and/or minimal physical or electromechanical intervention, monitoring and management from the user.
The IONM system of the present specification has application in a plurality of neurostimulation and neuromonitoring scenarios such as, but not limited to, cortical stimulation whereby the motor cortex is stimulated using a strip and/or probe(s) to determine functionality of the cortical structure(s) and direct nerve stimulation whereby a structure is stimulated to determine proximity to nervous system structures and wherein use of one or more types of stimulation probes may be advantageous to create stimulation fields of varying size/depth.
Referring now to
At step 620, the monopolar, bipolar probes, strip and/or grid electrodes are positioned at appropriate locations on the patient's anatomy to stimulate, identify, and assess functional areas related to motor, speech and language. In an embodiment, the monopolar probe is used for motor cortex stimulation and the bipolar probe is used for motor cortex and/or speech/language stimulation.
Referring back to
In some embodiments, a plurality of recording or sensing electrodes are positioned at a plurality of muscle sites of the patient to record responses due to neurostimulation of the patient's motor cortex area. In an embodiment, the recording or sensing electrodes comprise pairs of EMG needle electrodes 125 of
At step 630, the user initiates a motor cortex stimulation protocol, using a graphical user interface of the IONM software application. It should be appreciated that the motor cortex stimulation protocol is one of a plurality of stimulation protocols pre-stored in a database associated with the IONM system. In some embodiments, the motor cortex stimulation protocol comprises of the following exemplary parameters and values/ranges:
At step 635, the user iteratively adjusts the stimulation parameters, using at least one graphical user interface generated by the IONM software application or engine, to find threshold motor response using monopolar probe, bipolar probe and/or strip/grid electrodes and consequently identify or map functional areas of the motor cortex that need to be preserved during resection. The probes and/or strip/grid electrodes are utilized depending on whether sensitivity or specificity of stimulation is desired.
As an illustration, in one embodiment, the monopolar probe is applied to the patient's motor cortex area for stimulation and the pulse amplitude is modulated in a gradual stepped manner. In some embodiments, the pulse amplitude is modulated automatically by the IONM software engine. For example, the stimulation is initiated with 2 mA and stepped up, say by increments of 2 mA for example, to 10 mA till a muscle response is detected. Suppose that at 10 mA, a 200 μV EMG response is detected at deltoid, biceps, flexor carpi ulnaris. The pulse amplitude is now reduced to 9 mA and a 100 μV EMG response is detected at biceps, flexor carpi ulnaris. The pulse amplitude is now reduced to 8.5 mA that does not produce any EMG response from the muscles. Thus, the pulse amplitude of 9 mA is determined to be the threshold amplitude corresponding to the threshold EMG response. Consequently, the stimulated area is mapped or identified as corresponding to cerebral cortex representing biceps and flexor carpi ulnaris.
Now the bipolar probe is applied to the patient's motor cortex area for stimulation at the first threshold amplitude of 9 mA. However, in an embodiment, a stimulation at 9 mA using the bipolar probe may elicit a response only at the biceps. Consequently, the iterative stimulation process of determining the threshold amplitude and response (as done, earlier, using the monopolar probe) is repeated for the monopolar and bipolar probes at another site on the motor cortex. Let us assume that, at the other site, the threshold amplitude is determined to be 10 mA for orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris using the monopolar probe and orbicularis oculi only using the bipolar probe.
Next, a strip electrode, such as the electrode 405 of
At step 640, resection of portions of the epileptogenic region or tumor is planned and performed with intent to preserve the neural structures identified and associated with the identified contacts 410b, 410d which elicit response from all muscles. During resection, the monopolar probe is used to stimulate corticospinal tracts (CST) subcortically. An iterative stimulation process, such as one described above using the monopolar probe is used to estimate distance from CST. After completion of the monopolar probe stimulation, stimulation through the four contact strip electrode commences during the resection.
At step 645, the user initiates a speech/language stimulation protocol, using a graphical user interface of the IONM software application. It should be appreciated that the speech/language stimulation protocol is one of a plurality of stimulation protocols pre-stored in the database associated with the IONM system. In some embodiments, the speech/language stimulation protocol comprises of the following exemplary parameters and values/ranges:
At step 650, the bipolar probe is used to stimulate and map or identify the patient's speech/language areas. The patient is administered with speech/language tasks and the patient's verbal responses are documented while stimulation is delivered to tissues of the speech/language areas. 0Speech arrest and aphasia are examples of patient responses that are indicative that the stimulated tissue corresponds to speech/language functionality.
At step 655, resection of additional portions of the epileptogenic region or tumor is planned and performed with intent to preserve the identified eloquent tissue. Speech/language tasks continue to be administered to the patient throughout resection.
Referring now to
At step 715, the monopolar and bipolar probes are positioned at appropriate target locations on the patient's anatomy for stimulation and the reference electrode is placed in a perimeter of the surgical field. In an embodiment, the target locations are associated with direct nerve stimulation of peripheral nerves comprising the brachial plexus. At step 720, necessary preparations are made to enable recordation of the patient's musculature responses as a result of direct nerve stimulation of peripheral nerves. In some embodiments, a plurality of recording or sensing electrodes are positioned at a plurality of muscle sites of the patient to record responses due to neurostimulation of the patient's peripheral nerves comprising the brachial plexus. In an embodiment, the recording or sensing electrodes comprise a plurality of pairs of EMG needle electrodes placed in, for example, muscles of the face, arm trunk and/or leg depending on the nerve(s) to be stimulated. Example muscles include trapezius, deltoid, biceps, triceps, flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor carpi radialis, abductor pollicis brevis, and abductor digiti minimi.
At step 725, the user initiates a direct nerve stimulation protocol, using a graphical user interface of the IONM software application. It should be appreciated that the direct nerve stimulation protocol is one of a plurality of stimulation protocols pre-stored in a database associated with the IONM system. In some embodiments, the direct nerve stimulation protocol comprises of the following exemplary parameters and values/ranges:
Inter-stimulus interval: 1 millisecond
At step 730, the user iteratively adjusts the stimulation parameters to find threshold response using monopolar probe and/or bipolar probe and consequently map or identify target nerve fibers and pathways that need to be preserved during resection or repair procedures. The probes are utilized depending on whether sensitivity or specificity of stimulation is desired.
As an illustration, in one embodiment, the monopolar probe is applied to the patient's target nerve bundle for stimulation and the pulse amplitude is modulated in a gradual stepped manner. In some embodiments, the pulse amplitude is modulated automatically by the IONM software engine. For example, the stimulation is initiated with 0.5 mA and stepped up, say by increments of 0.5 mA for example, to 2.5 mA till a muscle response is detected. Suppose that at 2.5 mA, a 200 μV EMG response is detected at deltoid, biceps, and triceps. The pulse amplitude is now reduced to 2.2 mA and a 100 μV EMG response is detected at biceps and triceps. The pulse amplitude is now further reduced to 2.1 mA that does not produce any EMG response from the muscles. Thus, the pulse amplitude of 2.2 mA is determined to be the threshold amplitude corresponding to the threshold EMG response of the nerve or nerve fibers that innervate the biceps and triceps. Consequently, the stimulated nerve or nerve fibers are mapped or identified as corresponding to cerebral cortex representing biceps and triceps.
Now the bipolar probe is applied to the patient's target nerve bundle for stimulation at the threshold amplitude of 2.2 mA. However, in an embodiment, the stimulation at 2.2 mA using the bipolar probe may elicit a response only at the biceps. Thus, the pulse amplitude of 2.2 mA is determined to be the threshold amplitude corresponding to the threshold EMG response of the nerve or nerve fibers that innervate the biceps. Consequently, the stimulated nerve or nerve fibers are mapped or identified as corresponding to cerebral cortex representing biceps.
Stimulation of the target nerve bundles is iteratively repeated at different sites of the patient's anatomy and musculature responses are recorded in order to map or identify nerve fibers and pathways that are critical to various motor functions and, therefore, need to be preserved.
At step 735, a procedure comprising tumor resection, nerve repair and/or decompression is planned and performed with intent to preserve the identified nerve fibers and pathways.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system and method of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present specification have been described herein, it should be understood that the present specification might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the specification. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the specification may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/666,959, entitled “Systems and Methods for Neurophysiological Stimulation” and filed on May 4, 2018, for priority, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
751475 | De Vilbiss | Feb 1904 | A |
972983 | Arthur | Oct 1910 | A |
1328624 | Graham | Jan 1920 | A |
1477527 | Raettig | Dec 1923 | A |
1548184 | Cameron | Aug 1925 | A |
1717480 | Wappler | Jun 1929 | A |
1842323 | Lorand | Jan 1932 | A |
2110735 | Marton | Mar 1938 | A |
2320709 | Arnesen | Jun 1943 | A |
2516882 | Kalom | Aug 1950 | A |
2704064 | Fizzell | Mar 1955 | A |
2736002 | Oriel | Feb 1956 | A |
2807259 | Guerriero | Sep 1957 | A |
2808826 | Reiner | Oct 1957 | A |
2994324 | Lemos | Aug 1961 | A |
3035580 | Guiorguiev | May 1962 | A |
3057356 | Greatbatch | Oct 1962 | A |
3060923 | Reiner | Oct 1962 | A |
3087486 | Kilpatrick | Apr 1963 | A |
3147750 | Fry | Sep 1964 | A |
3188605 | Slenker | Jun 1965 | A |
3212496 | Preston | Oct 1965 | A |
3219029 | Richards | Nov 1965 | A |
3313293 | Chesebrough | Apr 1967 | A |
3364929 | Ide | Jan 1968 | A |
3580242 | La Croix | May 1971 | A |
3611262 | Marley | Oct 1971 | A |
3617616 | O'Loughlin | Nov 1971 | A |
3641993 | Gaarder | Feb 1972 | A |
3646500 | Wessely | Feb 1972 | A |
3651812 | Samuels | Mar 1972 | A |
3662744 | Richardson | May 1972 | A |
3664329 | Naylor | May 1972 | A |
3682162 | Colyer | Aug 1972 | A |
3703900 | Holznagel | Nov 1972 | A |
3718132 | Holt | Feb 1973 | A |
3733574 | Scoville | May 1973 | A |
3785368 | McCarthy | Jan 1974 | A |
3830226 | Staub | Aug 1974 | A |
3857398 | Rubin | Dec 1974 | A |
3880144 | Coursin | Apr 1975 | A |
3933157 | Bjurwill | Jan 1976 | A |
3957036 | Normann | May 1976 | A |
3960141 | Bolduc | Jun 1976 | A |
3985125 | Rose | Oct 1976 | A |
4062365 | Kameny | Dec 1977 | A |
4088141 | Niemi | May 1978 | A |
4099519 | Warren | Jul 1978 | A |
4127312 | Fleischhacker | Nov 1978 | A |
4141365 | Fischell | Feb 1979 | A |
4155353 | Rea | May 1979 | A |
4164214 | Pelzner | Aug 1979 | A |
4175551 | D Haenens | Nov 1979 | A |
4177799 | Masreliez | Dec 1979 | A |
4184492 | Fastenmeier | Jan 1980 | A |
4200104 | Harris | Apr 1980 | A |
4204545 | Yamakoshi | May 1980 | A |
4207897 | Evatt | Jun 1980 | A |
4224949 | Scott | Sep 1980 | A |
4226228 | Shin | Oct 1980 | A |
4232680 | Hudleson | Nov 1980 | A |
4233987 | Feingold | Nov 1980 | A |
4235242 | Heule | Nov 1980 | A |
4263899 | Burgin | Apr 1981 | A |
4265237 | Schwanbom | May 1981 | A |
4285347 | Hess | Aug 1981 | A |
4291705 | Severinghaus | Sep 1981 | A |
4294245 | Bussey | Oct 1981 | A |
4295703 | Osborne | Oct 1981 | A |
4299230 | Kubota | Nov 1981 | A |
4308012 | Tamler | Dec 1981 | A |
4331157 | Keller, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4372319 | Ichinomiya | Feb 1983 | A |
4373531 | Wittkampf | Feb 1983 | A |
4374517 | Hagiwara | Feb 1983 | A |
4402323 | White | Sep 1983 | A |
4444187 | Perlin | Apr 1984 | A |
4461300 | Christensen | Jul 1984 | A |
4469098 | Davi | Sep 1984 | A |
4483338 | Bloom | Nov 1984 | A |
4485823 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1984 | A |
4487489 | Takamatsu | Dec 1984 | A |
4503842 | Takayama | Mar 1985 | A |
4503863 | Katims | Mar 1985 | A |
4510939 | Brenman | Apr 1985 | A |
4515168 | Chester | May 1985 | A |
4517976 | Murakoshi | May 1985 | A |
4517983 | Toyosu | May 1985 | A |
4519403 | Dickhudt | May 1985 | A |
4537198 | Corbett | Aug 1985 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4557273 | Stoller | Dec 1985 | A |
4558703 | Mark | Dec 1985 | A |
4561445 | Berke | Dec 1985 | A |
4562832 | Wilder | Jan 1986 | A |
4565200 | Cosman | Jan 1986 | A |
4570640 | Barsa | Feb 1986 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4573449 | Warnke | Mar 1986 | A |
4576178 | Johnson | Mar 1986 | A |
4582063 | Mickiewicz | Apr 1986 | A |
4592369 | Davis | Jun 1986 | A |
4595018 | Rantala | Jun 1986 | A |
4616635 | Caspar | Oct 1986 | A |
4616660 | Johns | Oct 1986 | A |
4622973 | Agarwala | Nov 1986 | A |
4633889 | Talalla | Jan 1987 | A |
4641661 | Kalarickal | Feb 1987 | A |
4643507 | Coldren | Feb 1987 | A |
4658835 | Pohndorf | Apr 1987 | A |
4667676 | Guinta | May 1987 | A |
4697598 | Bernard | Oct 1987 | A |
4697599 | Woodley | Oct 1987 | A |
4705049 | John | Nov 1987 | A |
4716901 | Jackson | Jan 1988 | A |
4739772 | Hokanson | Apr 1988 | A |
4744371 | Harris | May 1988 | A |
4759377 | Dykstra | Jul 1988 | A |
4763666 | Strian | Aug 1988 | A |
4765311 | Kulik | Aug 1988 | A |
4784150 | Voorhies | Nov 1988 | A |
4785812 | Pihl | Nov 1988 | A |
4795998 | Dunbar | Jan 1989 | A |
4807642 | Brown | Feb 1989 | A |
4807643 | Rosier | Feb 1989 | A |
4817587 | Janese | Apr 1989 | A |
4817628 | Zealear | Apr 1989 | A |
4827935 | Geddes | May 1989 | A |
4841973 | Stecker | Jun 1989 | A |
4844091 | Bellak | Jul 1989 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4892105 | Prass | Jan 1990 | A |
4895152 | Callaghan | Jan 1990 | A |
4920968 | Takase | May 1990 | A |
4926865 | Oman | May 1990 | A |
4926880 | Claude | May 1990 | A |
4934377 | Bova | Jun 1990 | A |
4934378 | Perry, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934957 | Bellusci | Jun 1990 | A |
4962766 | Herzon | Oct 1990 | A |
4964411 | Johnson | Oct 1990 | A |
4964811 | Hayes, Sr. | Oct 1990 | A |
4984578 | Keppel | Jan 1991 | A |
4998796 | Bonanni | Mar 1991 | A |
5007902 | Witt | Apr 1991 | A |
5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
5018526 | Gaston-Johansson | May 1991 | A |
5020542 | Rossmann | Jun 1991 | A |
5024228 | Goldstone | Jun 1991 | A |
5058602 | Brody | Oct 1991 | A |
5080606 | Burkard | Jan 1992 | A |
5081990 | Deletis | Jan 1992 | A |
5085226 | Deluca | Feb 1992 | A |
5092344 | Lee | Mar 1992 | A |
5095905 | Klepinski | Mar 1992 | A |
5125406 | Goldstone | Jun 1992 | A |
5127403 | Brownlee | Jul 1992 | A |
5131389 | Giordani | Jul 1992 | A |
5143081 | Young | Sep 1992 | A |
5146920 | Yuuchi | Sep 1992 | A |
5161533 | Prass | Nov 1992 | A |
5163328 | Holland | Nov 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5190048 | Wilkinson | Mar 1993 | A |
5191896 | Gafni | Mar 1993 | A |
5195530 | Shindel | Mar 1993 | A |
5195532 | Schumacher | Mar 1993 | A |
5196015 | Neubardt | Mar 1993 | A |
5199899 | Ittah | Apr 1993 | A |
5201325 | McEwen | Apr 1993 | A |
5215100 | Spitz | Jun 1993 | A |
RE34390 | Culver | Sep 1993 | E |
5253656 | Rincoe | Oct 1993 | A |
5255691 | Otten | Oct 1993 | A |
5277197 | Church | Jan 1994 | A |
5282468 | Klepinski | Feb 1994 | A |
5284153 | Raymond | Feb 1994 | A |
5284154 | Raymond | Feb 1994 | A |
5292309 | Van Tassel | Mar 1994 | A |
5299563 | Seton | Apr 1994 | A |
5306236 | Blumenfeld | Apr 1994 | A |
5312417 | Wilk | May 1994 | A |
5313956 | Knutsson | May 1994 | A |
5313962 | Obenchain | May 1994 | A |
5327902 | Lemmen | Jul 1994 | A |
5333618 | Lekhtman | Aug 1994 | A |
5343871 | Bittman | Sep 1994 | A |
5347989 | Monroe | Sep 1994 | A |
5358423 | Burkhard | Oct 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman | Oct 1994 | A |
5368043 | Sunouchi | Nov 1994 | A |
5373317 | Salvati | Dec 1994 | A |
5375067 | Berchin | Dec 1994 | A |
5377667 | Patton | Jan 1995 | A |
5381805 | Tuckett | Jan 1995 | A |
5383876 | Nardella | Jan 1995 | A |
5389069 | Weaver | Feb 1995 | A |
5405365 | Hoegnelid | Apr 1995 | A |
5413111 | Wilkinson | May 1995 | A |
5454365 | Bonutti | Oct 1995 | A |
5470349 | Kleditsch | Nov 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati | Dec 1995 | A |
5474558 | Neubardt | Dec 1995 | A |
5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
5482038 | Ruff | Jan 1996 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5485852 | Johnson | Jan 1996 | A |
5491299 | Naylor | Feb 1996 | A |
5514005 | Jaycox | May 1996 | A |
5514165 | Malaugh | May 1996 | A |
5522386 | Lerner | Jun 1996 | A |
5540235 | Wilson | Jul 1996 | A |
5549656 | Reiss | Aug 1996 | A |
5560372 | Cory | Oct 1996 | A |
5565779 | Arakawa | Oct 1996 | A |
5566678 | Cadwell | Oct 1996 | A |
5569248 | Mathews | Oct 1996 | A |
5575284 | Athan | Nov 1996 | A |
5579781 | Cooke | Dec 1996 | A |
5591216 | Testerman | Jan 1997 | A |
5593429 | Ruff | Jan 1997 | A |
5599279 | Slotman | Feb 1997 | A |
5601608 | Mouchawar | Feb 1997 | A |
5618208 | Crouse | Apr 1997 | A |
5620483 | Minogue | Apr 1997 | A |
5622515 | Hotea | Apr 1997 | A |
5630813 | Kieturakis | May 1997 | A |
5634472 | Raghuprasad | Jun 1997 | A |
5671752 | Sinderby | Sep 1997 | A |
5681265 | Maeda | Oct 1997 | A |
5687080 | Hoyt | Nov 1997 | A |
5707359 | Bufalini | Jan 1998 | A |
5711307 | Smits | Jan 1998 | A |
5725514 | Grinblat | Mar 1998 | A |
5728046 | Mayer | Mar 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz | Apr 1998 | A |
5759159 | Masreliez | Jun 1998 | A |
5769781 | Chappuis | Jun 1998 | A |
5772597 | Goldberger | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775331 | Raymond | Jul 1998 | A |
5776144 | Leysieffer | Jul 1998 | A |
5779642 | Nightengale | Jul 1998 | A |
5785648 | Min | Jul 1998 | A |
5785658 | Benaron | Jul 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley | Aug 1998 | A |
5795291 | Koros | Aug 1998 | A |
5797854 | Hedgecock | Aug 1998 | A |
5806522 | Katims | Sep 1998 | A |
5814073 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
5830150 | Palmer | Nov 1998 | A |
5830151 | Hadzic | Nov 1998 | A |
5833714 | Loeb | Nov 1998 | A |
5836880 | Pratt | Nov 1998 | A |
5851191 | Gozani | Dec 1998 | A |
5853373 | Griffith | Dec 1998 | A |
5857986 | Moriyasu | Jan 1999 | A |
5860829 | Hower | Jan 1999 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5862314 | Jeddeloh | Jan 1999 | A |
5868668 | Weiss | Feb 1999 | A |
5872314 | Clinton | Feb 1999 | A |
5885210 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5885219 | Nightengale | Mar 1999 | A |
5888196 | Bonutti | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz | Apr 1999 | A |
5895298 | Faupel | Apr 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley | May 1999 | A |
5924984 | Rao | Jul 1999 | A |
5928030 | Daoud | Jul 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros | Jul 1999 | A |
5928158 | Aristides | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros | Aug 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley | Sep 1999 | A |
5954716 | Sharkey | Sep 1999 | A |
5993385 | Johnston | Nov 1999 | A |
5993434 | Dev | Nov 1999 | A |
6004262 | Putz | Dec 1999 | A |
6004312 | Finneran | Dec 1999 | A |
6004341 | Zhu | Dec 1999 | A |
6009347 | Hofmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6011985 | Athan | Jan 2000 | A |
6027456 | Feler | Feb 2000 | A |
6029090 | Herbst | Feb 2000 | A |
6038469 | Karlsson | Mar 2000 | A |
6038477 | Kayyali | Mar 2000 | A |
6042540 | Johnston | Mar 2000 | A |
6050992 | Nichols | Apr 2000 | A |
6074343 | Nathanson | Jun 2000 | A |
6077237 | Campbell | Jun 2000 | A |
6095987 | Shmulewitz | Aug 2000 | A |
6104957 | Alo | Aug 2000 | A |
6104960 | Duysens | Aug 2000 | A |
6119068 | Kannonji | Sep 2000 | A |
6120503 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6126660 | Dietz | Oct 2000 | A |
6128576 | Nishimoto | Oct 2000 | A |
6132386 | Gozani | Oct 2000 | A |
6132387 | Gozani | Oct 2000 | A |
6135965 | Tumer | Oct 2000 | A |
6139493 | Koros | Oct 2000 | A |
6139545 | Utley | Oct 2000 | A |
6146334 | Laserow | Nov 2000 | A |
6146335 | Gozani | Nov 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley | Nov 2000 | A |
6161047 | King | Dec 2000 | A |
6181961 | Prass | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196969 | Bester | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210324 | Reno | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214035 | Streeter | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224545 | Cocchia | May 2001 | B1 |
6224549 | Drongelen | May 2001 | B1 |
6234953 | Thomas | May 2001 | B1 |
6249706 | Sobota | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259945 | Epstein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266558 | Gozani | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273905 | Streeter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287322 | Zhu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292701 | Prass | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298256 | Meyer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302842 | Auerbach | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306100 | Prass | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309349 | Bertolero | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312392 | Herzon | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314324 | Lattner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325764 | Griffith | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334068 | Hacker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346078 | Ellman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366813 | DiLorenzo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391005 | Lum | May 2002 | B1 |
6393325 | Mann | May 2002 | B1 |
6425859 | Foley | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425901 | Zhu | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441747 | Khair | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450952 | Rioux | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451015 | Rittman, III | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461352 | Morgan | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466817 | Kaula | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487446 | Hill | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500128 | Marino | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500173 | Underwood | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500180 | Foley | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500210 | Sabolich | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507755 | Gozani | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511427 | Sliwa, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535759 | Epstein | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543299 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546271 | Reisfeld | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564078 | Marino | May 2003 | B1 |
6568961 | Liburdi | May 2003 | B1 |
6572545 | Knobbe | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577236 | Harman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579244 | Goodwin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582441 | He | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585638 | Yamamoto | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609018 | Cory | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618626 | West, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623500 | Cook | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638101 | Botelho | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6692258 | Kurzweil | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712795 | Cohen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719692 | Kleffner | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730021 | Vassiliades, Jr. | May 2004 | B2 |
6770074 | Michelson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805668 | Cadwell | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819956 | DiLorenzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839594 | Cohen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847849 | Mamo | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851430 | Tsou | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855105 | Jackson, III | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870109 | Villarreal | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6901928 | Loubser | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902569 | Parmer | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916294 | Ayad | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6916330 | Simonson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926728 | Zucherman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929606 | Ritland | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932816 | Phan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945933 | Branch | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7024247 | Gliner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072521 | Cadwell | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7079883 | Marino | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089059 | Pless | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7104965 | Jiang | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7129836 | Lawson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153279 | Ayad | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156686 | Sekela | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7177677 | Kaula | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214197 | Prass | May 2007 | B2 |
7216001 | Hacker | May 2007 | B2 |
7230688 | Villarreal | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236822 | Dobak, III | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7258688 | Shah | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7261688 | Smith | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294127 | Leung | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306563 | Huang | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310546 | Prass | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7353068 | Tanaka | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363079 | Thacker | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7374448 | Jepsen | May 2008 | B2 |
D574955 | Lash | Aug 2008 | S |
7470236 | Kelleher | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496407 | Odderson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7522953 | Kaula | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546993 | Walker | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7605738 | Kuramochi | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7664544 | Miles | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7689292 | Hadzic | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7713210 | Byrd | May 2010 | B2 |
D621041 | Mao | Aug 2010 | S |
7775974 | Buckner | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789695 | Radle | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7789833 | Urbano | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801601 | Maschino | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824410 | Simonson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869881 | Libbus | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878981 | Strother | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914350 | Bozich | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7963927 | Kelleher | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974702 | Fain | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7983761 | Giuntoli | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987001 | Teichman | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988688 | Webb | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993269 | Donofrio | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002770 | Swanson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8061014 | Smith | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068910 | Gerber | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8126736 | Anderson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137284 | Miles | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147421 | Farquhar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160694 | Salmon | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8192437 | Simonson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8255045 | Gharib | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295933 | Gerber | Oct 2012 | B2 |
D670656 | Jepsen | Nov 2012 | S |
8311791 | Avisar | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8323208 | Davis | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343079 | Bartol | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374673 | Adcox | Feb 2013 | B2 |
RE44049 | Herzon | Mar 2013 | E |
8419758 | Smith | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428733 | Carlson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8457734 | Libbus | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498717 | Lee | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515520 | Brunnett | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568312 | Cusimano Reaston | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568317 | Gharib | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8594779 | Denison | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8647124 | Bardsley | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8670830 | Carlson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680986 | Costantino | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688237 | Stanislaus | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695957 | Quintania | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8740783 | Gharib | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8753333 | Johnson | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764654 | Chmiel | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805527 | Mumford | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8876813 | Min | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886280 | Kartush | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892259 | Bartol | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8926509 | Magar | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8942797 | Bartol | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8956418 | Wasielewski | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958869 | Kelleher | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971983 | Gilmore | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986301 | Wolf | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989855 | Murphy | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031658 | Chiao | May 2015 | B2 |
9037226 | Hacker | May 2015 | B2 |
9078671 | Beale | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084550 | Bartol | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9084551 | Brunnett | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9119533 | Ghaffari | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9121423 | Sharpe | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149188 | Eng | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155503 | Cadwell | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9204830 | Zand | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9247952 | Bleich | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9295401 | Cadwell | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295461 | Bojarski | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339332 | Srivastava | May 2016 | B2 |
9352153 | Van Dijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9370654 | Scheiner | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9579503 | Mckinney | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9616233 | Shi | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9622684 | Wybo | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9714350 | Hwang | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9730634 | Cadwell | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9788905 | Avisar | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9820768 | Gee | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9855431 | Ternes | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9913594 | Li | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9935395 | Jepsen | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9999719 | Kitchen | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10022090 | Whitman | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10039461 | Cadwell | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10039915 | Mcfarlin | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10092349 | Engeberg | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10154792 | Sakai | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10292883 | Jepsen | May 2019 | B2 |
10342452 | Sterrantino | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10349862 | Sterrantino | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10398369 | Brown | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10418750 | Jepsen | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10631912 | Mcfarlin | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10783801 | Beaubien | Sep 2020 | B1 |
11189379 | Giataganas | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20010031916 | Bennett | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039949 | Loubser | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049524 | Morgan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056280 | Underwood | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001995 | Lin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020001996 | Seki | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007129 | Marino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007188 | Arambula | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055295 | Itai | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065481 | Cory | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072686 | Hoey | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095080 | Cory | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020149384 | Reasoner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161415 | Cohen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183647 | Gozani | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193779 | Yamazaki | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193843 | Hill | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194934 | Taylor | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032966 | Foley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045808 | Kaula | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078618 | Fey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088185 | Prass | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105503 | Marino | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171747 | Kanehira | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199191 | Ward | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212335 | Huang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019370 | Gliner | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034340 | Biscup | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068203 | Gellman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040135528 | Yasohara | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172114 | Hadzic | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199084 | Kelleher | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204628 | Rovegno | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225228 | Ferree | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229495 | Negishi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230131 | Kassab | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260358 | Vaughan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004623 | Miles | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075067 | Lawson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075578 | Gharib | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080418 | Simonson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085743 | Hacker | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119660 | Bourlion | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149143 | Libbus | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159659 | Sawan | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182454 | Gharib | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182456 | Ziobro | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050215993 | Phan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256582 | Ferree | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261559 | Mumford | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004424 | Loeb | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009754 | Boese | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025702 | Sterrantino | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025703 | Miles | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052828 | Kim | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069315 | Miles | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085048 | Cory | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085049 | Cory | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122514 | Byrd | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173383 | Esteve | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200023 | Melkent | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241725 | Libbus | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258951 | Bleich | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264777 | Drew | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276702 | McGinnis | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292919 | Kruss | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016097 | Farquhar | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021682 | Gharib | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032841 | Urmey | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049962 | Marino | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097719 | Parramon | May 2007 | A1 |
20070184422 | Takahashi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070270918 | De Bel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282217 | McGinnis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015612 | Urmey | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027507 | Bijelic | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039914 | Cory | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058606 | Miles | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064976 | Kelleher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065144 | Marino | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065178 | Kelleher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071191 | Kelleher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077198 | Webb | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082136 | Gaudiani | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097164 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080167574 | Farquhar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183915 | Iima | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194970 | Steers | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214903 | Orbach | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218393 | Kuramochi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254672 | Dennes | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269777 | Appenrodt | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281313 | Fagin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300650 | Gerber | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306348 | Kuo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018399 | Martinelli | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090088660 | McMorrow | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105604 | Bertagnoli | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090143797 | Smith | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177112 | Gharib | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182322 | D Amelio | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197476 | Wallace | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204016 | Gharib | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209879 | Kaula | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221153 | Santangelo | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240117 | Chmiel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259108 | Miles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279767 | Kukuk | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281595 | King | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299439 | Mire | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004949 | O'Brien | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036280 | Ballegaard | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036384 | Gorek | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049188 | Nelson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106011 | Byrd | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152604 | Kaula | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152811 | Flaherty | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152812 | Flaherty | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160731 | Giovannini | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168561 | Anderson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191311 | Scheiner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100286554 | Davis | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317989 | Gharib | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004207 | Wallace | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028860 | Chenaux | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071418 | Stellar | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082383 | Cory | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160731 | Bleich | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184308 | Kaula | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110230734 | Fain | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230782 | Bartol | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245647 | Stanislaus | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270120 | Mcfarlin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270121 | Johnson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295579 | Tang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313530 | Gharib | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004516 | Eng | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120071784 | Melkent | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109000 | Kaula | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109004 | Cadwell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120220891 | Kaula | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238893 | Farquhar | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245439 | Andre | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120277780 | Smith | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296230 | Davis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130027186 | Cinbis | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030257 | Nakata | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130090641 | Mckinney | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130245722 | Ternes | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261422 | Gilmore | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267874 | Marcotte | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140058284 | Bartol | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140073985 | Sakai | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074084 | Engeberg | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088463 | Wolf | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121555 | Scott | May 2014 | A1 |
20140275914 | Li | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275926 | Scott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288389 | Gharib | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303452 | Ghaffari | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150012066 | Underwood | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150088029 | Wybo | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088030 | Taylor | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150112325 | Whitman | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150202395 | Fromentin | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150238260 | Nau, Jr. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150250423 | Hacker | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150311607 | Ding | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150380511 | Irsigler | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000382 | Jain | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160015299 | Chan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160038072 | Brown | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038073 | Brown | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038074 | Brown | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160135834 | Bleich | May 2016 | A1 |
20160174861 | Cadwell | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199659 | Jiang | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160235999 | Nuta | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160262699 | Goldstone | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160270679 | Mahon | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287112 | Mcfarlin | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287861 | Mcfarlin | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160317053 | Srivastava | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160339241 | Hargrove | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170056643 | Herb | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170231508 | Edwards | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170273592 | Sterrantino | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180345004 | Mcfarlin | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190180637 | Mealer | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190350485 | Sterrantino | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
607977 | Mar 1991 | AU |
2005269287 | Feb 2006 | AU |
2006217448 | Aug 2006 | AU |
2003232111 | Oct 2008 | AU |
2004263152 | Aug 2009 | AU |
2005269287 | May 2011 | AU |
2008236665 | Aug 2013 | AU |
2012318436 | Apr 2014 | AU |
2016244152 | Nov 2017 | AU |
2016244152 | Dec 2018 | AU |
2019201702 | Apr 2019 | AU |
9604655 | Dec 1999 | BR |
0609144 | Feb 2010 | BR |
2144211 | May 2005 | CA |
2229391 | Sep 2005 | CA |
2574845 | Feb 2006 | CA |
2551185 | Oct 2007 | CA |
2662474 | Mar 2008 | CA |
2850784 | Apr 2013 | CA |
2769658 | Jan 2016 | CA |
2981635 | Oct 2016 | CA |
101018585 | Aug 2007 | CN |
100571811 | Dec 2009 | CN |
104066396 | Sep 2014 | CN |
103052424 | Dec 2015 | CN |
104080509 | Sep 2017 | CN |
104717996 | Jan 2018 | CN |
107666939 | Feb 2018 | CN |
111419179 | Jul 2020 | CN |
2753109 | Jun 1979 | DE |
2831313 | Feb 1980 | DE |
8803153 | Jun 1988 | DE |
3821219 | Aug 1989 | DE |
29510204 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19530869 | Feb 1997 | DE |
29908259 | Jul 1999 | DE |
19921279 | Nov 2000 | DE |
19618945 | Feb 2003 | DE |
0161895 | Nov 1985 | EP |
298268 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0719113 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0759307 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0836514 | Apr 1998 | EP |
890341 | Jan 1999 | EP |
972538 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1656883 | May 2006 | EP |
1115338 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1804911 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1804911 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1534130 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1441530 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1804911 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2481338 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2763616 | Aug 2014 | EP |
1385417 | Apr 2016 | EP |
1680177 | Apr 2017 | EP |
3277366 | Dec 2021 | EP |
2725489 | Sep 2019 | ES |
73878 | Dec 1987 | FI |
2624373 | Jun 1989 | FR |
2624748 | Oct 1995 | FR |
2796846 | Feb 2001 | FR |
2795624 | Sep 2001 | FR |
2835732 | Nov 2004 | FR |
1534162 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2049431 | Dec 1980 | GB |
2052994 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2452158 | Feb 2009 | GB |
2519302 | Apr 2016 | GB |
1221615 | Jul 1990 | IT |
H0723964 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2000028717 | Jan 2000 | JP |
3188437 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2000590531 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003524452 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004522497 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2008508049 | Mar 2008 | JP |
4295086 | Jul 2009 | JP |
4773377 | Sep 2011 | JP |
4854900 | Jan 2012 | JP |
4987709 | Jul 2012 | JP |
5132310 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2014117328 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2014533135 | Dec 2014 | JP |
6145916 | Jun 2017 | JP |
2018514258 | Jun 2018 | JP |
6749338 | Sep 2020 | JP |
100632980 | Oct 2006 | KR |
1020070106675 | Nov 2007 | KR |
100877229 | Jan 2009 | KR |
20140074973 | Jun 2014 | KR |
1020170133499 | Dec 2017 | KR |
102092583 | Mar 2020 | KR |
1020200033979 | Mar 2020 | KR |
541889 | Apr 2010 | NZ |
467561 | Aug 1992 | SE |
508357 | Sep 1998 | SE |
1999037359 | Jul 1999 | WO |
2000038574 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2000066217 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2001037728 | May 2001 | WO |
2001078831 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2001087154 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2001093748 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2002082982 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2003005887 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003034922 | May 2003 | WO |
2003094744 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004064632 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005030318 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006015069 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006026482 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006042241 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006113394 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2008002917 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008005843 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008097407 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009051965 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2010090835 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011014598 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011150502 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2013019757 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013052815 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013151770 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2015069962 | May 2015 | WO |
2016160477 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Review of section 510(k) premarket notification for “K013215: NuVasive NeuroVision JJB System”, Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Oct. 16, 2001. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/026692, dated Nov. 16, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2016/023903, dated Sep. 6, 2016. |
Cadwell et al. “Electrophysiologic Equipment and Electrical Safety” Chapter 2, Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, Fourth Edition; Churchill Livingstone, p. 15, 30-31; 1999. |
Ott, “Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic Systems” Second Edition; John Wiley & Sons, p. 62, 1988. |
Stecker et al. “Strategies for minimizing 60 Hz pickup during evoked potential recording”, Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 100 (1996) 370-373. |
Wood et al. “Comparative analysis of power-line interference between two- or three-electrode biopotential amplifiers” Biomedical Engineering, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput., 1995, 33, 63-68. |
Clements, et al., “Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement”, 21 (5):600-604 (1996). |
Danesh-Clough, et al., “The Use of Evoked EMG in Detecting Misplaced Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screws”, 26(12):1313-1316 (2001). |
Dezawa et al., “Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A New Approach, Technique, and Clinical Trial”, Journal of Spinal Disorders 13(2):138-143 (2000). |
Dickman, et al., “Techniques in Neurosurgery”, National Library of Medicine, 3 (4) 301-307 (1997). |
Epstein, et al., “Evaluation of Intraoperative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring During 100 Cervical Operations”, 18(6):737-747 (1993), J.B. Lippincott Company. |
Glassman, et al., “A Prospective Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement with Computed Tomographic Scan Confirmation”, 20(12):1375-1379. |
Goldstein, et al., “Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery of the Lumbar Spine”, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 7 (1):27-35 (1997). |
Greenblatt, et al., “Needle Nerve Stimulator-Locator”, 41 (5):599-602 (1962). |
H.M. Mayer, “Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, A Surgical Manual”, Chapter 12, pp. 117-131 (2000). |
Hinrichs, et al., “A trend-detection algorithm for intraoperative EEG monitoring”, Med. Eng. Phys. 18 (8):626-631 (1996). |
Bergey et al., “Endoscopic Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine”, SPINE 29 (15):1681-1688 (2004). |
Holland, “Spine Update, Intraoperative Electromyography During Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery”, 23 (17):1915-1922 (1998). |
Holland, et al., “Continuous Electromyographic Monitoring to Detect Nerve Root Injury During Thoracolumbar Scoliosis Surgery”, 22 (21):2547-2550 (1997), Lippincott-Raven Publishers. |
Hovey, A Guide to Motor Nerve Monitoring, pp. 1-31 Mar. 20, 1998, The Magstim Company Limited. |
Kevin T. Foley, et al., “Microendoscipic Discectomy” Techniques in Neurosurgery, 3:(4):301-307, © 1997 Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia. |
Kossmann et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine”, 10:396-402 (2001). |
Kossmann, et. al., “Minimally Invasive Vertebral Replacement with Cages in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine”, European Journal of Trauma, 2001, No. 6, pp. 292-300. |
Lenke, et. al., “Triggered Electromyographic Threshold for Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement, An Animal Model and Clinical Correlation”, 20 (14):1585-1591 (1995). |
Lomanto et al., “7th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery” Singapore, Jun. 1-4, 2000 Monduzzi Editore S.p.A.; email: monduzzi@monduzzi.com, pp. 97-103 and 105-111. |
MaGuire, et. al., “Evaluation of Intrapedicular Screw Position Using Intraoperative Evoked Electromyography”, 20 (9):1068-1074 (1995). |
Mathews et al., “Laparoscopic Discectomy With Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, A Preliminary Review”, 20 (16):1797-1802, (1995), Lippincott-Raven Publishers. |
Bertagnoli, et. al., “The AnteroLateral transPsoatic Approach (ALPA), A New Technique for Implanting Prosthetic Disc-Nucleus Devices”, 16 (4):398-404 (2003). |
Michael R. Isley, et. al., “Recent Advances in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Spinal Cord Function: Pedicle Screw Stimulation Techniques”, Am. J. End Technol. 37:93-126 (1997). |
Minahan, et. al., “The Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Pedicle Screw Stimulation Thresholds” 25(19):2526-2530 (2000). |
Pimenta et. al., “Implante de prótese de núcleo pulposo: análise inicial”, J Bras Neurocirurg 12(2):93-96, (2001). |
Raymond J. Gardocki, MD, “Tubular diskectomy minimizes collateral damage”, AAOS Now, Sep. 2009 Issue, http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/sep09/clinical12.asp. |
Raymond, et. al., “The NerveSeeker: A System for Automated Nerve Localization”, Regional Anesthesia 17:151-162 (1992). |
Reidy, et. al., “Evaluation of electromyographic monitoring during insertion of thoracic pedicle screws”, British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 83 (7):1009-1014, (2001). |
Rose et al., “Persistently Electrified Pedicle Stimulation Instruments in Spinal Instrumentation: Technique and Protocol Development”, Spine: 22(3): 334-343 (1997). |
Teresa Riordan “Patents; A businessman invents a device to give laparoscopic surgeons a better view of their work”, New York Times www.nytimes.com/2004/29/business/patents-businessman-invents-device-give-la (Mar. 2004). |
Toleikis, et. al., “The usefulness of Electrical Stimulation for Assessing Pedicle Screw Placements”, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 13 (4):283-289 (2000). |
U.Schick, et. al., “Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study”, pp. 20-26, Published online: Jul. 31, 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001. |
Bose, et. al., “Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Spinal Nerve Root Function During Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery”, 27 (13):1440-1450 (2002). |
Vaccaro, et. al., “Principles and Practice of Spine Surgery”, Mosby, Inc. © 2003, Chapter 21, pp. 275-281. |
Vincent C. Traynelis, “Spinal arthroplasty”, Neurosurg Focus 13 (2):1-7. Article 10, (2002). |
Welch, et. al., “Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study”, J Neurosurg 87:397-402, (1997). |
Zouridakis, et. al., “A Concise Guide to Intraoperative Monitoring”, Library of Congress card No. 00-046750, Chapter 3, p. 21, chapter 4, p. 58 and chapter 7 pp. 119-120. |
Medtronic, “Nerve Integrity Monitor, Intraoperative EMG Monitor, User's Guide”, Medtronic Xomed U.K. Ltd., Unit 5, West Point Row, Great Park Road, Almondsbury, Bristol B5324QG, England, pp. 1-39. |
Chapter 9, “Root Finding and Nonlinear Sets of Equations”, Chapter 9:350-354, http://www.nr.com. |
Digitimer LTD., 37 Hydeway, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire. AL7 3BE England, email:sales@digitimer.com, website: www.digitimer.com, “Constant Current High Voltage Stimulator, Model DS7A, for Percutaneous Stimulation of Nerve and Muscle Tissue”. |
Ford et al, Electrical characteristics of peripheral nerve stimulators, implications for nerve localization, Dept. of Anesthesia, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, pp. 73-77. |
Deletis et al., “The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord”, Correspondence Address: Hyman Newman Institute for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, 170 East End Ave., Room 311, NY 10128. |
Butterworth et. al., “Effects of Halothane and Enflurane on Firing Threshold of Frog Myelinated Axon”, Journal of Physiology 411:493-516, (1989) From the Anesthesia Research Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, jp.physoc.org. |
Calancie, et. al., “Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring” J Neurosurg 88:457-470 (1998). |
Calancie, et. al., “Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction”, J. Neurosurg 95:161-168 (2001). |
Calancie, et. al., Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation, Initial Clinical Results, 19 (24):2780-2786 (1994). |
Carl T. Brighton, “Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research”, Clinical Orthopaedics and related research No. 384, pp. 82-100 (2001). |
Aage R. Møller, “Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring”, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine Pennsylvania, © 1995 by Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH. |
Urmey “Using the nerve stimulator for peripheral or plexus nerve blocks” Minerva Anesthesiology 2006; 72:467-71. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190336073 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62666959 | May 2018 | US |