The invention generally relates to automated sortation and other processing systems, and relates in certain embodiments to programmable motion control, e.g., robotic, systems for processing, e.g., sorting, objects such as parcels, packages, articles, goods etc.
Current distribution center sorting systems, for example, generally assume an inflexible sequence of operations whereby a disorganized stream of input objects is first singulated by human workers into a single stream of isolated objects presented one at a time to a human worker with a scanner that identifies the object. The objects are then loaded onto one or more conveyors that lead to diverters, and the conveyor(s) then transport the objects to the desired destinations, which may be bins, chutes, bags or destination conveyors.
Such a system has inherent inefficiencies as well as inflexibilities since the desired goal is to match incoming objects to assigned collection bins. Such systems may require a large number of collection bins (and therefore a large amount of physical space, large capital costs, and large operating costs) in part, because sorting all objects in unison is not always most efficient.
Current state of the art sortation systems rely on human labor. Most solutions rely on a worker that is performing sortation, by scanning an object from an induction area (chute, table, etc.) and placing the object in a staging location, or collection bin. When a bin is full or the controlling software system decides that it needs to be emptied, another worker empties the bin into a bag, box, or other container, and sends that container on to the next processing step. Such a system has limits on throughput (i.e., how fast can human workers sort to or empty bins in this fashion) and on number of diverts (i.e., for a given bin size, only so many bins may be arranged to be within efficient reach of human workers).
Partially automated means of solving this problem are lacking in key areas. Such approaches typically involve tilt-tray or bomb-bay style recirculating conveyors. These conveyors have discrete trays that can be loaded with an object. The trays and objects then pass through scan tunnels that scan the object and associate it with the tray in which it is riding; when the tray passes the correct bin, a trigger mechanism causes the tray to dump the object into the bin. A drawback of such systems is that every divert requires an actuator, which increases the mechanical complexity and the cost per divert can be very high. For applications requiring hundreds of diverts, the large cost of such a system does not achieve a good return on investment.
An alternative is to use human labor to increase the number of diverts, or collection bins, available in the system. This decreases system installation costs, but increases the operating costs. Manual sortation cells are staffed by a team of workers, which avoids the large cost per divert. Multiple cells can then work in parallel, effectively multiplying throughput linearly while keeping the number of expensive automated diverts at a minimum (equal to the number of parallel sortation cells, not the total number of system bins needed). This approach involves objects for sortation being supplied to each cell, which can be done manually but is easily done via means of a conveyor with sweep arms or other dumb diverts to each work cell. Such diverts do not identify an object and cannot divert it to a particular spot; rather they work with beam breaks or other simple sensors to seek to make sure that indiscriminate bunches of objects get diverted to each cell. The lower cost of the unsophisticated diverts coupled with the low number of diverts keeps the overall system divert cost low.
Unfortunately however, these systems don't address the limitations of total number of system bins. The system is simply diverting an equal share of the total objects to each parallel manual cell. Each parallel sortation cell must therefore have all the same collection bins designations; otherwise an object might be delivered to a cell that does not have a bin to which that object is mapped. There remains a need for a more efficient and more cost effective object sortation system that processes (e.g., sorts) objects into appropriate collection bins, yet is more efficient in operation.
In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a box handling system for use in an object processing system. The box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box, and the recessed area includes a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box that contains objects to be processed.
In accordance with another embodiment, the invention provides a box handling system for use in an object processing system, wherein the box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box, the recessed area including a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box that contains objects to be processed. The box handling system also includes identifying indicia on at least one of the box and the box tray, the identifying indicia uniquely identifying the box tray handling system.
In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention provides a box handling system for use in an object processing system, where the box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box, the recessed area including a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving a box that contains objects to be processed. The box tray includes outer width and length dimensions that provide that a plurality of such box trays when adjacently aligned provides at least one of a total width and total length of the plurality of such box trays that at least one of the total width or total length the plurality of such box trays provides a defined position of each of the plurality of such box trays within the box handling system.
In accordance with yet a further embodiment, the invention provides a box handling system for use in an object processing system, where the box handling system includes a box tray assembly including a tray for receiving a box, the tray including a recessed area for receiving the box, wherein the recessed area includes a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box, and a box cover for placement over an open box such that outer flaps of the box may be maintained in an open position, and wherein the box cover includes an open top portion that permits access to the box.
The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.
In accordance with various embodiments, the invention provides a box handling system for use in an object processing system. The box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box. The recessed area includes a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box that contains objects to be processed. In accordance with another embodiment, the box handling system includes a box tray including a recessed area for receiving a box, and the recessed area includes a plurality of floor and edge portions for receiving the box that contains objects to be processed. The box handling system also includes identifying indicia on at least one of the box tray and the box, and the identifying indicia uniquely identifies the box tray. In accordance with another embodiment, the box tray also includes outer width and length dimensions that provide that a plurality of such box trays when adjacently aligned provides at least one of a total width and total length of the plurality of such box trays that at least one of the total width or total length the plurality of such box trays provides a defined position and location of each of the plurality of such box trays within the box handling system. In accordance with a further embodiment, the box tray also includes a box cover for placement over an open box such that outer flaps of the box may be maintained in an open position, and wherein the box cover includes an open top portion that permits access to the box.
Responsive to such box assignment by the perception data, a processing system 30 directs the programmable motion device to move contents in box tray assemblies on one conveyor to box tray assemblies 20 on the other conveyor. Any number of programmable motion devices 12 may be provided between adjacent rows of box tray assemblies 20 for further scaling the automated processing. In an embodiment, the system knows what is in boxes associated with each identifying indicia (e.g., 26), and the system knows which items are to be moved from one conveyor 16 to box tray assemblies on another conveyor 18. Because each of the box tray assemblies is provided known distances from stops 17, the system knows where each box is positioned on conveyors 16, 18 because each of the box trays has the same known width, and because the box tray assemblies are urged toward to the stop, either by a gravity fed conveyor or by having the conveyor continue to urge the box tray assemblies in the direction toward the stop 17.
With further reference to
This provides the system 10 with significant uniformity that greatly assists in the automated processing of the objects. The stops 17 may be actuated for a limited time for processing of objects thus contained near a programmable motion device 12, and then released to permit the box tray assemblies 20 to pass, and to permit a new set of box tray assemblies (and associated new objects) and or a new set of destination box tray assemblies to be presented near the programmable motion device. As also shown in
With reference to
In each of the above systems, a controller 30 (e.g., one or more computer processors) may be employed (either wirelessly or wired) to monitor the location and position of each of the box tray assemblies on the conveyors, to control the processing of objects with a programmable motion device, and to maintain status information regarding the processing stages of each of the boxes in the box tray assemblies.
As shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/291,506 filed Mar. 4, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,198,532, issued Dec. 14, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/638,724 filed Mar. 5, 2018, the disclosures of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3221971 | Reny | Dec 1965 | A |
3592326 | Zimmerle et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
4678390 | Bonneton et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4722653 | Williams et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4759439 | Hartlepp | Jul 1988 | A |
4846335 | Hartlepp | Jul 1989 | A |
4895242 | Michel | Jan 1990 | A |
5076436 | Bortolani et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5190162 | Hartlepp | Mar 1993 | A |
5352081 | Tanaka | Oct 1994 | A |
5532044 | Jen | Jul 1996 | A |
5738216 | Warner | Apr 1998 | A |
5783810 | Kelly, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5839566 | Bonnet | Nov 1998 | A |
6073761 | Jones | Jun 2000 | A |
6505093 | Thatcher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6579053 | Grams et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6685031 | Takizawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6762382 | Danelski | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6897395 | Shiibashi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
8776694 | Rosenwinkel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9102336 | Rosenwinkel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9272845 | Honkanen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315344 | Lehmann | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9481518 | Neiser | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9687982 | Jules et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9751693 | Battles et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9926138 | Brazeau et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
10007827 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10029865 | McCalib, Jr. et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10843333 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
20010030102 | Woltjer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038784 | Peltomaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020087231 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092801 | Dominguez | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020157919 | Sherwin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020179502 | Cerutti et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038065 | Pippin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040091078 | Ambrefe, Jr. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050155887 | Bazany | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070051585 | Scott et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070132580 | Ambrefe, Jr. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185613 | Feldenzer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209976 | Worth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080181753 | Bastian et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090000912 | Battles et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100122942 | Harres et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100318216 | Faivre et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110061995 | Huff et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110144798 | Freudelsperger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110238207 | Bastian II et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243707 | Dumas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120118699 | Buuchmann et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120177465 | Koholka | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130110280 | Folk | May 2013 | A1 |
20130166062 | Casey et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140244026 | Neiser | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140291112 | Lyon et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364998 | Neiser et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150098775 | Razumov | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104286 | Hansl et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150114799 | Hansl et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150164252 | Sloat et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150232238 | Wu | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150375880 | Ford et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379494 | Hiroi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160007737 | Clark et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160221187 | Bradski et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160221762 | Schroader | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244262 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160355337 | Lert et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170043953 | Battles et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170076251 | Simske et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080566 | Stubbs et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080571 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170106532 | Wellman | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170121113 | Wagner et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170136632 | Wagner et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170157648 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170225330 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170320625 | Eckert et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322561 | Stiernagle | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170349385 | Moroni et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170369244 | Battles et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180085788 | Engel et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180130015 | Jones et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180244473 | Mathi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180265311 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273295 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273296 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273297 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273298 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180282065 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282066 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180312336 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180327198 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190022702 | Vegh et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190185267 | Mattern et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190270537 | Amend, Jr. et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190361672 | Odhner et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200031593 | Usami et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200223058 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20220135347 | Cohen et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299790 | Jun 1972 | AT |
2006204622 | Mar 2007 | AU |
3029834 | Jan 2018 | CA |
432368 | Mar 1967 | CH |
1081963 | Feb 1994 | CN |
1203559 | Dec 1998 | CN |
101282884 | Oct 2008 | CN |
201520176 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101823626 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102112688 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102131718 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102357057 | Feb 2012 | CN |
202147556 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102390701 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202918665 | May 2013 | CN |
104010953 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104246801 | Dec 2014 | CN |
104379460 | Feb 2015 | CN |
104470822 | Mar 2015 | CN |
105346829 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105853219 | Aug 2016 | CN |
106041517 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106395225 | Feb 2017 | CN |
206456936 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107250004 | Oct 2017 | CN |
107264376 | Oct 2017 | CN |
107430719 | Dec 2017 | CN |
107708940 | Feb 2018 | CN |
108778636 | Nov 2018 | CN |
109641677 | Apr 2019 | CN |
110001318 | Jul 2019 | CN |
4127933 | Feb 1993 | DE |
102005061309 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102006057658 | Jun 2008 | DE |
102007023909 | Nov 2008 | DE |
102007038834 | Feb 2009 | DE |
102010002317 | Aug 2011 | DE |
0235488 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1995192 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2650237 | Nov 2014 | EP |
3112295 | Jan 2017 | EP |
1069298 | Mar 2009 | ES |
2832654 | May 2003 | FR |
54131278 | Oct 1979 | JP |
S59149204 | Aug 1984 | JP |
S63310406 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H0395001 | Apr 1991 | JP |
H03187816 | Aug 1991 | JP |
2000238906 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2007182286 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008037567 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2014141313 | Aug 2014 | JP |
100836285 | Jun 2008 | KR |
03074201 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2006012074 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007009136 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008091733 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010017872 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2011038442 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2013178431 | May 2013 | WO |
20130178431 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014166650 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015035300 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015118171 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2017036780 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018175466 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018176033 | Sep 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/039313 dated Nov. 13, 2020, 18 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2020/039313 dated Jan. 6, 2022, 12 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 20739547.6 dated Feb. 1, 2022, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/910,613 dated Sep. 14, 2022, 9 pages. |
Cipolla et al., Visually guided grasping in unstructured environments, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 19.3-4 (1997): 337-346.sping in Unstructured Environments, Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems (Invited Paper), 20 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 18807485.0 dated Oct. 16, 2020, 3 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC issued by the European Patent Office in related European Patent Application No. 19716256.3 dated Oct. 13, 2020, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,090,647 dated Sep. 22, 2021, 4 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,090,819 dated Sep. 22, 2021, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2019/020530 dated Sep. 8, 2020, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued by the International Bureau of WIPO in related International Application No. PCT/US2018/058193 dated Sep. 8, 2020, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/058193 dated Feb. 13, 2019, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/020530 dated Aug. 12, 2019, 17 pages. |
Klingbeil et al., Grasping with Application to an Autonomous Checkout Robot, ResearchGate, Conference Paper in Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation—Jun. 2011, IEEE Xplore, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/001,630 dated Dec. 3, 2019, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/291,506 dated Jun. 23, 2021, 16 pages. |
Notice on First Office Action and First Office Action (along with its English translation) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880090771.0 dated May 24, 2021, 26 pages. |
Notice on First Office Action and First Office Action (along with its English translation) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201980017008.X dated May 31, 2021, 15 pages. |
Rembold et al., Object Turning for Barcode Search, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1267-1272. |
Supplementary Search Report, along with its English translation, issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201980017008.X dated Jan. 6, 2022, 5 pages. |
Zhang et al., A multi-channel fully automated flux box system for measuring CO-2 exchange fluxes between terrestrial ecoystems and the atmosphere, Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 27, No. 4, Apr. 2007. |
Lian et al., Design and application of radiopharmaceutical delivery box, Journal of Nurses Training, Issue 15, Apr. 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/065,042 dated Jan. 9, 2023, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in related U.S. Appl. No. 17/509,589 dated Jan. 30, 2023, 26 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued by the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) in related Canadian Patent Application No. 3,145,402 dated Feb. 13, 2023, 6 pages. |
Notice on the First Office Action issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration in related Chinese Patent Application No. 202210315249.6 dated Mar. 25, 2023, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220041320 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62638724 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16291506 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17509584 | US |