The present inventions are related to systems and methods for detecting and/or decoding information, and more particularly to systems and methods for performing variably scaled data processing.
Various data transfer systems have been developed including storage systems, cellular telephone systems, and radio transmission systems. In each of the systems data is transferred from a sender to a receiver via some medium. For example, in a storage system, data is sent from a sender (i.e., a write function) to a receiver (i.e., a read function) via a storage medium. The effectiveness of any transfer is impacted by any data losses caused by various factors. In some cases, an encoding/decoding process is used to enhance the ability to detect a data error and to correct such data errors. As an example, a simple data detection and decode may be performed, however, such a simple process often lacks the capability to converge on a corrected data stream.
To heighten the possibility of convergence, various existing processes utilize two or more detection and decode iterations. Turning to
Hence, for at least the aforementioned reasons, there exists a need in the art for advanced systems and methods for data processing.
The present inventions are related to systems and methods for detecting and/or decoding information, and more particularly to systems and methods for performing variably scaled data processing.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide data processing circuits that include a decoder circuit and a scalar circuit. The decoder circuit is operable to perform a data decoding algorithm by processing at least one decoder message, and the scalar circuit is operable to multiply the decoder message by a variable scalar value. In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the scalar circuit multiplies the decoder message by a first instance of the variable decoder value during a first decoding process and by a second instance of the variable scalar value during a second decoding process. In some cases, the first decoding process is performed as part of a first global iteration of the data processing circuit, and the second decoding process is performed as part of a second global iteration of the data processing circuit. In other cases, the first decoding process is performed as part of a first local iteration of the data processing circuit, and the second decoding process is performed as part of a second local iteration of the data processing circuit. In particular cases, the first value is larger than the second value. The first value is selected to encourage rapid convergence of the data decoding algorithm, and the second scalar is selected to provide enhanced information to the data decoding algorithm. In particular instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the decoder circuit is a low density parity check decoder. In some such instances, the low density parity check decoder includes at least one variable node and at least one check node, and the decoder message is passed from the variable node to the check node. In other such instances, the low density parity check decoder includes at least one variable node and at least one check node, and the decoder message is passed from the check node to the variable node.
Other embodiments of the present invention provide data processing systems that include a data detector circuit and a data decoder circuit. The data detector circuit is operable to receive a data input and to provide a detected output. The data decoder circuit is operable to perform one or more local iterations on the detected output and to provide a decoded output. The decoder circuit is operable to perform a data decoding algorithm by processing at least one decoder message, and the decoder circuit includes a scalar circuit operable to multiply the decoder message by a variable scalar value.
Yet other embodiments of the present invention provide methods for data processing that include, applying a data decoding algorithm to a data set including processing at least one decoder message corresponding to the data set; and multiplying the decoder message by a variable scalar value. In some cases, the variable scalar value includes a first scalar value and a second scalar value, the decoder message is a first decoder message, and multiplying the first decoder message by the variable scalar value includes multiplying the first decoder message by the first scalar value. Such methods further include applying the data decoding algorithm to a derivative of the data set including processing at least a second decoder message corresponding to the derivative of the data set; and multiplying the second decoder message by the second scalar value.
This summary provides only a general outline of some embodiments of the invention. Many other objects, features, advantages and other embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
A further understanding of the various embodiments of the present invention may be realized by reference to the figures which are described in remaining portions of the specification. In the figures, like reference numerals are used throughout several figures to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sub-label consisting of a lower case letter is associated with a reference numeral to denote one of multiple similar components. When reference is made to a reference numeral without specification to an existing sub-label, it is intended to refer to all such multiple similar components.
a depicts a data processing circuit that includes a decoder circuit with internal dynamic scaling in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention;
b depicts another data processing circuit that includes a decoder circuit having internal dynamic scaling and global dynamic scaling in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention;
a shows a queuing detection and decoding circuit including dynamic scaling of the decoder messages is shown in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention;
b depicts a queuing detection and decoding circuit including dynamic scaling of the decoder messages and dynamic scaling in the global loop in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention;
a is a flow diagram showing a method in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention for data processing using dynamic scaling of the decoder messages;
b is a flow diagram showing a method in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention for data processing using dynamic scaling of the decoder messages and dynamic scaling in the global processing loop
a-6d are four flow diagrams showing different approaches for dynamically calculating scaling factors in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention;
The present inventions are related to systems and methods for detecting and/or decoding information, and more particularly to systems and methods for performing variably scaled data processing.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide solutions for decoding suitable for read channel, wireless transmission and other applications. Such decoding/detection circuitry includes a soft decision decoder providing data to a data detector. The messages within the soft decision decoder are scaled using a local scaling value. Such an approach allows for speeding up convergence of codewords with a relatively small amount of noise through initial use of a relatively high local scalar value, while achieving better decoding performance for codewords that otherwise may not have converged through later use of a relatively low local scalar value.
Some embodiments of the present invention provide data processing circuits that include a decoder circuit and a scalar circuit. As used herein, the phrase “decoder circuit” is used in its broadest sense to mean any circuit that is operable to decode a previously encoded data set. Thus, as an example, a decoder circuit may be an LDPC decoder circuit. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of decoder circuits that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. As used herein, the phrase “scalar circuit” is used in its broadest sense to mean any circuit that is operable to scale a received input. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of scalar circuits that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. The decoder circuit is operable to perform a data decoding algorithm by processing at least one decoder message, and the scalar circuit is operable to multiply the decoder message by a variable scalar value. As used herein, the phrase “decoder message” is used in its broadest sense to mean any value passed internal to a decoder circuit. Thus, as an example, a decoder message may be a data set passed from a variable node to a check node within an LDPC decoder, or a data set passed from a check node to a variable node within an LDPC decoder. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of decoder messages that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention.
In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the scalar circuit multiplies the decoder message by a first instance (i.e., first value) of the variable decoder value during a first decoding process and by a second instance (i.e., second value) of the variable scalar value during a second decoding process. In some cases, the first decoding process is performed as part of a first global iteration of the data processing circuit, and the second decoding process is performed as part of a second global iteration of the data processing circuit. As used herein, the phrase “global iteration” is used in its broadest sense to mean a process whereby both a data detection algorithm and a data decoding algorithm is applied. Thus, as an example, a global iteration may include application of a data detection algorithm to a data set followed by one or more applications of a data decoding algorithm to the results of the data detection. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of global iterations that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. In other cases, the first decoding process is performed as part of a first local iteration of the data processing circuit, and the second decoding process is performed as part of a second local iteration of the data processing circuit. As used herein, the phrase “local iteration” is used in its broadest sense to mean a process whereby one of a data detection algorithm or a data decoding algorithm is applied. Thus, as an example, a local iteration may include application of a data decoding algorithm by a data detector circuit. Where only one application of the data decoding algorithm is applied during a global iteration, it is said that one local iteration occurred. On the other hand, where two or more applications of the data decoding algorithm are applied, it is said that two or more local iterations are applied. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of local iterations that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention.
Turning to
Channel detector 210 may be any channel detector known in the art including, but not limited to, a soft output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) detector or a maximum a posteriori (MAP) detector. Based on the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of channel detectors that may be used in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention. The output of channel detector 210 is provided to decoder circuit 295.
Decoder circuit 295 includes an LDPC decoder 215 and a variable scalar circuit 220. LDPC decoder 215 initially performs an LDPC decoding of the output received from channel detector 210. On this initial decoding pass (i.e., initial local iteration), LDPC decoder 215 multiplies the output of channel detector 210 by an initial scalar value provided as an output 290 from variable scalar circuit 220. Once the decoding process is completed, it is determined whether another pass (i.e., another local iteration) through LDPC decoder 215 is desired. This determination may be made based upon whether LDPC decoder 215 converged, and whether a failure to converge would be benefited by an additional pass through LDPC decoder 215. Any approach for determining a need for an additional local decoder loop that is known in the art may be used. Where an additional local iteration is to be performed, LDPC decoder 215 asserts a signal 299, and variable scalar circuit 220 dynamically modifies the scalar value provided as output 290. In addition, an output 297 of LDPC decoder 215 is fed back for re-processing. On the subsequent pass through LDPC decoder 215 the decoding process is applied to output 297 that is multiplied by the modified scalar value received as output 290. This process is repeated for each local iteration through LDPC decoder 215.
In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the initial scalar value provided as output 290 is 0.75, and on each successive local iteration through LDPC decoder 215, variable scalar circuit 220 reduces the scalar value provided as output 290 by a hardware friendly value of 1/32. Thus, on the second local iteration the scalar value is 0.7188; on the third local iteration the scalar value is 0.6875; on the fourth local iteration the scalar value is 0.6563; on the fifth local iteration the scalar value is 0.625; on the sixth local iteration the scalar value is 0.5938; on the seventh local iteration the scalar value is 0.5625; on the eighth local iteration the scalar value 0.5313; on the ninth local iteration the scalar value is 0.5. At some point, variable scalar circuit 220 discontinues modification of the scalar value provided as output 290, and maintains the scalar value constant. Thus, using the preceding example, on the tenth and later local iterations, variable scalar circuit 220 maintains the scalar value at 0.5. Once all of the local iterations are completed, LDPC decoder 215 provides a data output 225.
Turning to
Channel detector 211 may be any channel detector known in the art including, but not limited to, a soft output Viterbi algorithm detector (SOVA) or a maximum a posteriori (MAP) detector. Based on the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of channel detectors that may be used in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention. The output of channel detector 211 is provided to decoder circuit 296.
Decoder circuit 296 includes an LDPC decoder 216 and a variable scalar circuit 221. LDPC decoder 216 initially performs an LDPC decoding of the output received from channel detector 211. On this initial decoding pass (i.e., initial local iteration), LDPC decoder 216 multiplies the output of channel detector 211 by an initial scalar value provided as an output 294 from variable scalar circuit 221. Once the decoding process is completed, it is determined whether another pass through LDPC decoder 216 is desired. This determination may be made based upon whether LDPC decoder 216 converged, and whether a failure to converge would be benefited by an additional pass through LDPC decoder 216. Any approach for determining a need for an additional local decoder loop that is known in the art may be used. Where an additional local iteration is to be performed, LDPC decoder 216 asserts a signal 296, and variable scalar circuit 221 dynamically modifies the scalar value provided as output 294. In addition, an output 298 of LDPC decoder 216 is fed back for re-processing. On the subsequent pass through LDPC decoder 216 the decoding process is applied to output 298 that is multiplied by the modified scalar value received as output 294. This process is repeated for each local iteration through LDPC decoder 216.
In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the initial scalar value provided as output 294 is 0.75, and on each successive local iteration through LDPC decoder 216, variable scalar circuit 221 reduces the scalar value provided as output 294 by a hardware friendly value of 1/32. Thus, on the second local iteration the scalar value is 0.7188; on the third local iteration the scalar value is 0.6875; on the fourth local iteration the scalar value is 0.6563; on the fifth local iteration the scalar value is 0.625; on the sixth local iteration the scalar value is 0.5938; on the seventh local iteration the scalar value is 0.5625; on the eighth local iteration the scalar value 0.5313; on the ninth local iteration the scalar value is 0.5. At some point, variable scalar circuit 221 discontinues modification of the scalar value provided as output 294, and maintains the scalar value constant. Thus, using the preceding example, on the tenth and later local iterations, variable scalar circuit 221 maintains the scalar value at 0.5. Once all of the local iterations are completed, LDPC decoder 216 provides a data output 226.
In addition, multiple global iterations (i.e., processing through both channel detector 211 and decoder circuit 296) are possible. Where an additional global iteration is desired, data output 226 is fed back to channel detector 211 where it is reprocessed through both channel detector 211 and decoder circuit 296. A decision about whether to perform another global operation may be made done using any criteria known in the art.
Turning to
(Message from V to C)=(Local Scalar Value)(Message from V to C).
It should be noted that such scaling may be applied to LDPC decoders independent of any updating schedules, and it can be used in relation to layered decoders and decoders utilizing flooding schedules. In addition, it should be noted that while such internal scaling is discussed as being applied to the message transferred from a variable node to a check node, that in other embodiments of the present invention that the scaling may be applied to the message transferred from a check node to a variable node.
Turning to
Channel detector 409 may be any type of channel detector known in the art including, but not limited to, a soft output Viterbi algorithm detector (SOVA) or a maximum a posteriori (MAP) detector. Based on the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of channel detectors that may be used in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention. In addition, data input 405 is provided to a memory buffer 413 that is designed to hold a number of data sets received from data input 405. The size of memory buffer 413 may be selected to provide sufficient buffering such that a data set provided via data input 405 remains available at least until a first iteration processing of that same data set is complete and the processed data is available in a queue buffer 449 as more fully described below. Memory buffer 413 provides the data sets to a channel detector 417. Similar to channel detector 409, channel detector 417 may be any type of channel detector known in the art including, but not limited to, a SOVA detector or a MAP detector. Again, based on the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of channel detectors that may be used in accordance with different embodiments of the present invention.
An output 481 of channel detector 409 is provided to an interleaver circuit 494, and an output 483 of channel detector 417 is provided to a another interleaver circuit 492. Interleaver circuit 494 interleaves the output of channel detector 409 using a ping pong buffer 496, and interleaver circuit 492 interleaves the output of channel detector 417 using a ping pong buffer 498. One of the buffers in ping pong buffer 496 holds the result of a prior interleaving process of the output from channel detector 409 and is unloaded to an LDPC decoder 437 via a multiplexer 421, while the other buffer of ping pong buffer 496 holds a data set from channel detector 409 that is currently being interleaved. Similarly, one of the buffers in ping pong buffer 498 holds the result of a prior interleaving process of the output from channel detector 417 and is unloaded to LDPC decoder 437 via multiplexer 421, while the other buffer of ping pong buffer 498 holds a data set from channel detector 417 that is currently being interleaved. It should be noted that other soft decision data decoders may be used in place of LDPC decoder 437 in different embodiments of the present invention.
LDPC decoder 437 is capable of decoding one or more data sets simultaneously. As an example, LDPC decoder 437 may be designed to decode an interleaved data set from ping pong buffer 496, to decode an interleaved data set from ping pong buffer 498, or to decode interleaved data sets from ping pong buffer 496 and ping pong buffer 498 simultaneously. One or more passes through LDPC decoder 437 may be desired. Again, such passes are referred to herein as local iterations and involve re-processing the outputs of LDPC decoder 437 by the LDPC decoder again. In such cases, the internal messages of LDPC decoder 437 may be multiplied by a local dynamic scalar value that is generated by a local dynamic scalar circuit 439. This multiplication process may be implemented similar to that discussed above in relation to
In some embodiments of the present invention, local dynamic scalar circuit 439 provides an initial local scalar value that is used on a first global iteration (i.e., processing through channel detector 409 and LDPC decoder 437), and the same local scalar value is used for each successive local iteration that follows the particular global iteration. As each additional global iteration occurs (i.e., processing through channel detector 417 and LDPC decoder 437), the scalar value is reduced by a defined amount, and the reduced scalar value is used for the succeeding local iterations. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the initial scalar value is 0.75, and on each successive global iteration local dynamic scalar circuit 439 reduces the scalar value by a hardware friendly value of 1/32. Thus, on the second global iteration the scalar value is 0.7188; on the third global iteration the scalar value is 0.6875; on the fourth global iteration the scalar value is 0.6563; on the fifth global iteration the scalar value is 0.625; on the sixth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5938; on the seventh global iteration the scalar value is 0.5625; on the eighth global iteration the scalar value 0.5313; on the ninth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5. At some point, local dynamic scalar circuit 439 discontinues modification of the local scalar value, and maintains the local scalar value constant. Thus, using the preceding example, on the tenth and later global iterations, local dynamic scalar circuit 439 maintains the local scalar value at 0.5. Prior to performing the decoding process, LDPC decoder 437 multiplies a data output 487 from multiplexer 421 by the local scalar value from local dynamic scalar circuit 439. It should be noted that in other embodiments of the present invention that the value of the local scalar value may be modified after each local iteration in addition to, or in place of modification that occurs after each global iteration.
As a general rule, using a higher local scalar value results in increasing the rate of convergence by a decoder where there is low noise. In contrast, using a lower local scalar value results in reducing the rate of convergence while increasing the possibility of convergence where higher noise is exhibited in one or more of the bits in the data stream. The higher probability of convergence occurs because bits multiplied by a smaller scalar is less likely to saturate the decoder circuit and therefore more data is maintained for use in the decoding process. By using a variable local scalar value, some embodiments of the present invention provide for relatively fast convergence on various areas in a codeword that exhibit lower levels of noise. Later, the areas in a codeword that exhibit higher levels of noise are treated with progressively lower scalars that reduce the rate of convergence, but increase the range of data that may be used to achieve the convergence.
Once the desired local iterations are completed by LDPC decoder 437, the resulting decoded data is either provided as a hard decision output 441 or as an output 485 to a de-interleaver circuit 445 that uses queue buffer 449 to de-interleave the decoded data and to store the de-interleaved data until channel detector 417 is available for further processing.
One of the buffers in queue buffer 449 holding the result of a prior de-interleaving process and is unloaded to channel detector 417, while another buffer of queue buffer 449 holds a decoded data set currently being de-interleaved, and one or more other buffers in queue buffer 449 maintain other non-converged data waiting for processing by channel detector 417. Non-converged data from queue buffer 449 is de-interleaved by de-interleaver 445 and passed to channel detector 417 that has access to the corresponding data set in memory buffer 413. The data detection performed by channel detector 417 is similar to that performed by channel detector 409. Alternatively, where a data set converges in LDPC decoder 437, it is provide as hard decision output 441 to a de-interleaver circuit 457 that de-interleaves the received hard decision output 441 and stores the de-interleaved result in one of a number of memory buffers 461. Ultimately, de-interleaver circuit 457 provides the de-interleaved data stored in memory buffers 461 as an output 471.
Queuing detection/decoding circuit 400 allows for performance of a variable number of detection and decoding iterations depending upon the introduced data. Further, in some cases, considerable power savings may be achieved through use of queuing detection/decoding circuit 400. Yet further, in some cases, a faster LDPC decoder may be implemented allowing for an increased throughput where substantial first iteration data convergence exists as multiple iterations are not necessarily required. Yet further, by allowing results of LDPC decoder 437 to be reported out of order, upstream processing does not have to wait for the completion of downstream processing. Re-ordering of the out of order results may be done by queuing detection/decoding circuit 400 or by a downstream recipient of output 471. In addition, using a dynamic scalar within decoder 437 allows for resolving substantially noise free areas of a codeword quickly using a relatively high local scalar value, and to resolve more noisy areas of a codeword using a relatively small local scalar value. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of other advantages that may be achieved through implementation of one or more embodiments of the present invention.
Turning to
Output 481 of channel detector 409 is provided to interleaver circuit 494, and output 483 of channel detector 417 is provided to interleaver circuit 492. Interleaver circuit 494 interleaves the output of channel detector 409 using ping pong buffer 496, and interleaver circuit 492 interleaves the output of channel detector 417 using ping pong buffer 498. One of the buffers in ping pong buffer 496 holds the result of a prior interleaving process of the output from channel detector 409 and is unloaded to LDPC decoder 437 via multiplexer 421, while the other buffer of ping pong buffer 496 holds a data set from channel detector 409 that is currently being interleaved. Similarly, one of the buffers in ping pong buffer 498 holds the result of a prior interleaving process of the output from channel detector 417 and is unloaded to LDPC decoder 437 via multiplexer 421, while the other buffer of ping pong buffer 498 holds a data set from channel detector 417 that is currently being interleaved.
One or more passes (i.e., local iterations) through LDPC decoder 437 may be desired. In such cases, the internal messages of LDPC decoder 437 may be multiplied by a local dynamic scalar value that is generated by a local dynamic scalar circuit 439. This multiplication process may be implemented similar to that discussed above in relation to
In some embodiments of the present invention, local dynamic scalar circuit 439 provides an initial local scalar value that is used on a first global iteration (i.e., processing through channel detector 409 and LDPC decoder 437), and the same local scalar value is used for each successive local iteration that follows the particular global iteration. As each additional global iteration occurs (i.e., processing through channel detector 417 and LDPC decoder 437), the scalar value is reduced by a defined amount, and the reduced scalar value is used for the succeeding local iterations.
Once the desired local iterations are completed by LDPC decoder 437, the resulting decoded data is either provided as a hard decision output 441 or as an output 485 to a de-interleaver circuit 445 that uses queue buffer 449 to de-interleave the decoded data and to store the de-interleaved data until channel detector 417 is available for further processing.
One of the buffers in queue buffer 449 holding the result of a prior de-interleaving process and is unloaded to channel detector 417, while another buffer of queue buffer 449 holds a decoded data set currently being de-interleaved, and one or more other buffers in queue buffer 449 maintain other non-converged data waiting for processing by channel detector 417. Non-converged data from queue buffer 449 is de-interleaved by de-interleaver 445 and passed to channel detector 417 that has access to the corresponding data set in memory buffer 413. In particular, the de-interleaved data from de-interleaver 445 is multiplied by a dynamic scaling factor 407 (βx) using a multiplier circuit 427, and a product output of multiplier 429 is provided to channel detector 417. The data detection performed by channel detector 417 is similar to that performed by channel detector 409. Alternatively, where a data set converges in LDPC decoder 437, it is provide as hard decision output 441 to a de-interleaver circuit 457 that de-interleaves the received hard decision output 441 and stores the de-interleaved result in one of a number of memory buffers 461. Ultimately, de-interleaver circuit 457 provides the de-interleaved data stored in memory buffers 461 as an output 471.
Dynamic scaling factor 403 and dynamic scaling factor 407 are calculated for each codeword based upon a decoded output 485 corresponding to the respective codeword. Each buffer in queue buffer 449 includes an area 441 for storing decoded output 485 for a respective codeword, and another area 443 for storing dynamic scaling factor 403 and dynamic scaling factor 407 corresponding to the respective codeword. When the decoded output is pulled from a respective queue buffer for de-interleaving and processing by channel detector 417, the values for scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 are pulled from area 441 of the corresponding queue buffer and used for multiplication by multiplier 493.
A dynamic scalar calculation circuit 497 calculates the value for scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 for each respective codeword based upon decoded output 485 corresponding to the respective codeword. The calculated scaling factors are stored to the buffer in queue buffer 449 that the corresponding to decoded output 485 from which the scaling factors were calculated.
Using decoded output 485, dynamic scalar calculation circuit 497 first determines whether the values for scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 are to be updated. In particular, dynamic scalar computation circuit 497 receives an indication of the number of parity checks for the data set currently processed by LDPC decoder circuit 437 that remain violated. This number is referred to herein as the violation count. Further, dynamic scalar computation circuit 497 counts the number of bit periods in decoded output 485 that are saturated (i.e., have a value equal to the maximum achievable value). This value is referred to as the saturation count. Dynamic scalar computation circuit 497 compares the violation count with a threshold value 423 and compares the saturation count with another threshold value 425. In some embodiments, both threshold value 423 and threshold value 425 are programmable. The values of scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 are updated if either the violation count is less than threshold value 423 or if the saturation count is greater than threshold 425. The following pseudocode describes the update condition:
In an exemplary case, dynamic modification of scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 is only done whenever there is a significant number of saturated soft decisions.
Whenever an update is called for, updating scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 may be done in a variety of ways depending upon the particular implementation. For example, updating may be done by initially setting scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 equal to default values. The following pseudocode describes the initial condition:
Scaling Factor 407=βdefault; and
Scaling Factor 403=αdefault.
The default values, βdefault and αdefault may be hard coded at design time, or may be programmable allowing for update depending upon a particular deployment of queuing detection and decoding circuit 499. The default values, βdefault and αdefault may be selected to provide good performance with only minimal saturation. In one embodiment, upon a decision to update the value of scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407, scaling factor 403 and scaling factor 407 are modified to be minimum value scaling factors in accordance with the following pseudocode:
The values of βmaximum and αminimum are may be hard coded at design time, or may be programmable allowing for update depending upon a particular deployment. The default values, βmaximum and αminimum may be selected to provide good performance but with values set to avoid some saturation allowed by the default scaling factors.
Queuing detection/decoding circuit 499 allows for performance of a variable number of detection and decoding iterations depending upon the introduced data. Further, in some cases, considerable power savings may be achieved through use of queuing detection/decoding circuit 499. Yet further, in some cases, a faster LDPC decoder may be implemented allowing for an increased throughput where substantial first iteration data convergence exists as multiple iterations are not necessarily required. Yet further, by allowing results of LDPC decoder 437 to be reported out of order, upstream processing does not have to wait for the completion of downstream processing. Re-ordering of the out of order results may be done by queuing detection/decoding circuit 499 or by a downstream recipient of output 471. In addition, using a dynamic scalar within decoder 437 allows for resolving substantially noise free areas of a codeword quickly using a relatively high local scalar value, and to resolve more noisy areas of a codeword using a relatively small local scalar value. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of other advantages that may be achieved through implementation of one or more embodiments of the present invention.
Turning to
The interleaved data is decoded (block 565). It is then determined whether another local iteration (i.e., another pass through the decoder is desired) (block 592). This determination may be made based upon whether the decoder converged, and whether a failure to converge would be benefited by an additional pass through the decoder. Any approach for determining a need for an additional local decoder loop that is known in the art may be used. Where an additional local iteration (i.e., another pass through the decoding process) is desired (block 592), a local scalar is calculated (block 594). In some cases, this local scalar calculation involves selecting from one of a number of predetermined scalar values. In some embodiments of the present invention, an initial local scalar value is used on the first global iteration (i.e., performance of both data detection and data decoding), and the same local scalar value is used for each successive local iteration that follows the global iteration. As each additional global iteration occurs, the scalar value is reduced by a defined amount, and the reduced scalar value is used for the succeeding local iterations. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the initial scalar value is 0.75, and on each successive global iteration the scalar value is reduced by a hardware friendly value of 1/32. Thus, on the second global iteration the scalar value is 0.7188; on the third global iteration the scalar value is 0.6875; on the fourth global iteration the scalar value is 0.6563; on the fifth global iteration the scalar value is 0.625; on the sixth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5938; on the seventh global iteration the scalar value is 0.5625; on the eighth global iteration the scalar value 0.5313; on the ninth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5. At some point, the scalar value is not reduced and remains constant. Thus, using the preceding example, on the tenth and later global iterations, the scalar value is maintained at 0.5. It should be noted that in other embodiments of the present invention that the scalar value may be modified after each local iteration in addition to, or in place of modification that occurs after each global iteration. The internal values of the decoder circuits are multiplied by the local scalar value (block 596) and the decoder process is repeated (block 565). It is then determined whether another local iteration is desired (block 592).
As a general rule, using a higher local scalar value results in increasing the rate of convergence by a decoder where there is low noise. In contrast, using a lower local scalar value results in reducing the rate of convergence while increasing the possibility of convergence where higher noise is exhibited in one or more of the bits in the data stream. The higher probability of convergence occurs because bits multiplied by a smaller scalar is less likely to saturate the decoder circuit and therefore more data is maintained for use in the decoding process. By using a variable local scalar value, some embodiments of the present invention provide for relatively fast convergence on various areas in a codeword that exhibit lower levels of noise. Later, the areas in a codeword that exhibit higher levels of noise are treated with progressively lower scalars that reduce the rate of convergence, but increase the range of data that may be used to achieve the convergence.
Where it is determined that additional local iterations are not desired (block 592), it is determined whether the decoding process converged (block 545), and whether there is sufficient buffering available to reprocess the data (block 550). Where either the decoding process converged (block 545) or there is insufficient buffering available (block 550), the decoded data is de-interleaved (block 570) and stored in a buffer (block 575). The buffer includes various results that may have become available out of order, and as such the various results are reordered in the buffer to represent the order in which the corresponding data input was originally received (block 580). It is then determined if a complete time set is available in the buffer (block 585). A complete time set includes every result corresponding to received inputs over a given period of time. Thus, for example, where the first result is delayed while two later results are reported, the complete time set exists for the three results once the first result is finally available in the buffer. It should be noted that in some embodiments of the present invention that the results are reported out of order to a recipient. In such cases, there is no need to reorder results or to determine whether complete time sets are available. Where a complete time set is available (block 585) or where the results are to be reported as they are received without regard to order, the result(s) are output to a recipient (block 590).
Alternatively, where the decoding process failed to converge (block 545) and there is sufficient buffering available (block 550), another global iteration is performed. The global iteration includes de-interleaving the decoded data (block 505) and storing the de-interleaved decoded data to a buffer (block 510). The de-interleaved data is aligned with the corresponding sample of the data input (block 515) once the data detector is available. The de-interleaved data and the corresponding sample data input is provided to the data detector where a subsequent data detection is performed (block 530) on the originally stored sample of data input (block 525) using the soft input developed in the earlier processing of the same data input (blocks 555, 560, 565, 592, 594, 596, 545, 550, 505, 510, 515). The result of the data detection process is interleaved (block 535) and the interleaved data is decoded (block 565). At this point, the processes of blocks 592, 594, 596, 545, 550 are repeated.
Turning to
The interleaved data is decoded (block 566). It is then determined whether another local iteration (i.e., another pass through the decoder is desired) (block 593). This determination may be made based upon whether the decoder converged, and whether a failure to converge would be benefited by an additional pass through the decoder. Any approach for determining a need for an additional local decoder loop that is known in the art may be used. Where an additional local iteration (i.e., another pass through the decoding process) is desired (block 592), a local scalar is calculated (block 595). In some cases, this local scalar calculation involves selecting from one of a number of predetermined scalar values. In some embodiments of the present invention, an initial local scalar value is used on the first global iteration (i.e., performance of both data detection and data decoding), and the same local scalar value is used for each successive local iteration that follows the global iteration. As each additional global iteration occurs, the scalar value is reduced by a defined amount, and the reduced scalar value is used for the succeeding local iterations. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the initial scalar value is 0.75, and on each successive global iteration the scalar value is reduced by a hardware friendly value of 1/32. Thus, on the second global iteration the scalar value is 0.7188; on the third global iteration the scalar value is 0.6875; on the fourth global iteration the scalar value is 0.6563; on the fifth global iteration the scalar value is 0.625; on the sixth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5938; on the seventh global iteration the scalar value is 0.5625; on the eighth global iteration the scalar value 0.5313; on the ninth global iteration the scalar value is 0.5. At some point, the scalar value is not reduced and remains constant. Thus, using the preceding example, on the tenth and later global iterations, the scalar value is maintained at 0.5. It should be noted that in other embodiments of the present invention that the scalar value may be modified after each local iteration in addition to, or in place of modification that occurs after each global iteration. The internal values of the decoder circuits are multiplied by the local scalar value (block 597) and the decoder process is repeated (block 566). It is then determined whether another local iteration is desired (block 593).
As a general rule, using a higher local scalar value results in increasing the rate of convergence by a decoder where there is low noise. In contrast, using a lower local scalar value results in reducing the rate of convergence while increasing the possibility of convergence where higher noise is exhibited in one or more of the bits in the data stream. The higher probability of convergence occurs because bits multiplied by a smaller scalar is less likely to saturate the decoder circuit and therefore more data is maintained for use in the decoding process. By using a variable local scalar value, some embodiments of the present invention provide for relatively fast convergence on various areas in a codeword that exhibit lower levels of noise. Later, the areas in a codeword that exhibit higher levels of noise are treated with progressively lower scalars that reduce the rate of convergence, but increase the range of data that may be used to achieve the convergence.
Where it is determined that additional local iterations are not desired (block 593), it is determined whether the decoding process converged (block 546), and whether there is sufficient buffering available to reprocess the data (block 551). Where either the decoding process converged (block 546) or there is insufficient buffering available (block 551), the decoded data is de-interleaved (block 571) and stored in a buffer (block 576). The buffer includes various results that may have become available out of order, and as such the various results are reordered in the buffer to represent the order in which the corresponding data input was originally received (block 581). It is then determined if a complete time set is available in the buffer (block 586). A complete time set includes every result corresponding to received inputs over a given period of time. Thus, for example, where the first result is delayed while two later results are reported, the complete time set exists for the three results once the first result is finally available in the buffer. It should be noted that in some embodiments of the present invention that the results are reported out of order to a recipient. In such cases, there is no need to reorder results or to determine whether complete time sets are available. Where a complete time set is available (block 586) or where the results are to be reported as they are received without regard to order, the result(s) are output to a recipient (block 591).
Alternatively, where the decoding process failed to converge (block 546) and there is sufficient buffering available (block 551), another global iteration is performed. The global iteration includes calculating global scaling factors, βx and αx, based upon the decoded data (block 503). The scaling factors may be calculated using one of the approaches described below in relation to
Turning to
β Scaling Factor=βmaximum; and
α Scaling Factor=αminimum.
Otherwise, where an update is not called for (blocks 701, 703), scaling factors are set to default levels (block 705) in accordance with the following equations:
β Scaling Factor=βdefault; and
α Scaling Factor=αdefault.
Following flow diagram 710 of
β Scaling Factor=β(i); and
α Scaling Factor=α(i).
β(i+1) is greater than β(i) and α(i+1) is less than α(i). Otherwise, where an update is not called for (blocks 711, 713), the scaling factors are set to default levels (block 715) in accordance with the following equations:
β Scaling Factor=βdefault; and
α Scaling Factor=αdefault.
Following flow diagram 720 of
β Scaling Factor=β(index); and
α Scaling Factor=α(index).
β(i+1) is greater than β(i) and α(i+1) is less than α(i). Otherwise, where an update is not called for (blocks 721, 723), the scaling factors are set to default levels (block 725) in accordance with the following equations:
β Scaling Factor=βdefault; and
α Scaling Factor=αdefault.
Following flow diagram 820 of
β Scaling Factor=βdefault; and
α Scaling Factor=αdefault.
Turning to
Storage system 700 also includes a preamplifier 770, an interface controller 720, a hard disk controller 766, a motor controller 768, a spindle motor 772, a disk platter 778, and a read/write head assembly 776. Interface controller 720 controls addressing and timing of data to/from disk platter 778. The data on disk platter 778 consists of groups of magnetic signals that may be detected by read/write head assembly 776 when the assembly is properly positioned over disk platter 778. In one embodiment, disk platter 778 includes magnetic signals recorded in accordance with a perpendicular recording scheme. For example, the magnetic signals may be recorded as either longitudinal or perpendicular recorded signals.
In a typical read operation, read/write head assembly 776 is accurately positioned by motor controller 768 over a desired data track on disk platter 778. The appropriate data track is defined by an address received via interface controller 720. Motor controller 768 both positions read/write head assembly 776 in relation to disk platter 778 and drives spindle motor 772 by moving read/write head assembly to the proper data track on disk platter 778 under the direction of hard disk controller 766. Spindle motor 772 spins disk platter 778 at a determined spin rate (RPMs). Once read/write head assembly 778 is positioned adjacent the proper data track, magnetic signals representing data on disk platter 778 are sensed by read/write head assembly 776 as disk platter 778 is rotated by spindle motor 772. The sensed magnetic signals are provided as a continuous, minute analog signal representative of the magnetic data on disk platter 778. This minute analog signal is transferred from read/write head assembly 776 to read channel 710 via preamplifier 770. Preamplifier 770 is operable to amplify the minute analog signals accessed from disk platter 778. In turn, read channel module 710 decodes and digitizes the received analog signal to recreate the information originally written to disk platter 778. The decoding process may utilize local iterative loops where the output of the decoder circuit is dynamically scaled and provided as an input to the decoder circuit. This input is decoded again. The read data is provided as read data 703. A write operation is substantially the opposite of the preceding read operation with write data 701 being provided to read channel module 710. This data is then encoded and written to disk platter 778.
Turning to
In conclusion, the invention provides novel systems, devices, methods and arrangements for performing data decoding and/or detection. While detailed descriptions of one or more embodiments of the invention have been given above, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents will be apparent to those skilled in the art without varying from the spirit of the invention. For example, one or more embodiments of the present invention may be applied to various data storage systems and digital communication systems, such as, for example, tape recording systems, optical disk drives, wireless systems, and digital subscribe line systems. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5278846 | Okayama et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5317472 | Schweitzer, III | May 1994 | A |
5325402 | Ushirokawa | Jun 1994 | A |
5392299 | Rhines et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5471500 | Blaker et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5513192 | Janku et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5550870 | Blaker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5612964 | Haraszti | Mar 1997 | A |
5701314 | Armstrong et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710784 | Kindred et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712861 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717706 | Ikeda | Feb 1998 | A |
5802118 | Bliss et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844945 | Nam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5898710 | Amrany | Apr 1999 | A |
5923713 | Hatakeyama | Jul 1999 | A |
5978414 | Nara | Nov 1999 | A |
5983383 | Wolf | Nov 1999 | A |
6005897 | McCallister et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023783 | Divsalar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029264 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041432 | Ikeda | Mar 2000 | A |
6065149 | Yamanaka | May 2000 | A |
6097764 | McCallister et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6145110 | Khayrallah | Nov 2000 | A |
6216249 | Bliss et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216251 | McGinn | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229467 | Eklund et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266795 | Wei | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317472 | Choi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351832 | Wei | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377610 | Hagenauer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381726 | Weng | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438717 | Butler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473878 | Wei | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476989 | Chainer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6625775 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657803 | Ling et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671404 | Katawani et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748034 | Hattori et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757862 | Marianetti | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785863 | Blankenship et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788654 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810502 | Eidson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6980382 | Hirano et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986098 | Poeppelman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010051 | Murayama et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047474 | Rhee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058873 | Song et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068850 | Youn | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073118 | Greenberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093179 | Shea | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113356 | Wu | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7173783 | McEwen et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7178081 | Lee et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184486 | Wu et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191378 | Eroz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203015 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203887 | Eroz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7219288 | Dielissen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236757 | Raghaven et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257764 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7310768 | Eidson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313750 | Feng et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7370258 | Iancu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373581 | Okamura et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7403752 | Raghaven et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430256 | Zhidkov | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7502189 | Sawaguchi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505537 | Sutardja | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523375 | Spencer | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7587657 | Haratsch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590168 | Raghaven et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7676734 | Yamagishi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702989 | Graef et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712008 | Song et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7801200 | Tan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802163 | Tan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7827461 | Low et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7856593 | Xin | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7912147 | Liu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7941737 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7978773 | Lai et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8054904 | Hwang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8149964 | Sidi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190962 | Chen et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
20030063405 | Jin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081693 | Raghaven et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087634 | Raghaven et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112896 | Raghaven et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134607 | Raghaven et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040071206 | Takatsu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098659 | Bjerke et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050010855 | Lusky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050111540 | Modrie et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157780 | Werner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195749 | Elmasry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216819 | Chugg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273688 | Argon | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020872 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031737 | Chugg et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060123285 | De Araujo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140311 | Ashley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168493 | Song et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195772 | Graef et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060248435 | Haratsch | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256670 | Park et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011569 | Casado et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047635 | Stojanovic et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110200 | Mergen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070230407 | Petrie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286270 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297496 | Park et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049825 | Chen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055122 | Tan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065970 | Tan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069373 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080168330 | Graef et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080244359 | Li et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090199071 | Graef | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235116 | Tan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235146 | Tan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259915 | Livshitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273492 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274247 | Galbraith et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100002795 | Raghaven et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061492 | Noelder | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070837 | Xu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100164764 | Nayak | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169734 | Gamage et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185914 | Tan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0522578 | Jan 1993 | EP |
1814108 | Aug 2007 | EP |
WO 2006016751 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006134527 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007091797 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Selvarathinam, Anand “Low-Density Parity-Check Decoder Architecture for High Throughput Optical Fiber Channels” IEEE International Conference on Computer Design 2003. |
Shu Lin, Ryan “Channel Codes, Classical and Modern” 2009, Cambridge University Press. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,026, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,198, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/461,283, filed Jul. 31, 2006, Tan, Weijun. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/540,283, filed Aug. 12, 2009, Liu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,201, filed Jan. 5, 2010, Mathew, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,555, filed Jun. 2, 2101, Liu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,330, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Zhang, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,369, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Liu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/901,816, filed Oct. 11, 2010, Li et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,756, filed Nov. 2, 2010, Miladinovic et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,931, filed Nov. 17, 2010, Yang, Shaohua. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,947, filed Nov. 17, 2010, Ivkovic et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/972,942, filed Dec. 20, 2010, Liao et al. |
Casado et al., Multiple-rate low- denstiy parity-check codes with constant blocklength, IEEE Transations on communications, Jan. 2009, vol. 57, pp. 75-83. |
Collins and Hizlan, “Determinate State Convolutional Codes” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Dec. 1993. |
Eleftheriou, E. et al., “Low Density Parity-Check Codes for Digital Subscriber Lines”, Proc ICC 2002, pp. 1752-1757. |
Fisher, R et al., “Adaptive Thresholding”[online] 2003 [retrieved on May 28, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/adpthrsh.htm. |
Fossnorier, Marc P.C. “Quasi-Cyclic Low-Density Parity-Check Codes From Circulant Permutation Maricies” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 8 Aug. 8, 2004. |
Gunnam, K et al. “Tech. Note on Iterative LDPC Solutions for Turbo Equal.”, K. Gunnam, G. Choi and M. Yeary, TX A&M Tech. Note, Rpt. Dt: Jul. 2006 Avail. online dropzone.tamu.edu. |
K. Gunnam et al., “Next Generation iterative LDPC solutions for magnetic recording storage,” invited paper. The Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 2008. |
Han and Ryan, “Pinning Techniques for Low-Floor Detection/Decoding of LDPC-Coded Partial Response Channels”, 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes &Related Topics, 2008. |
Lee et al., “Partial Zero-Forcing Adaptive MMSE Receiver for DS-CDMA Uplink in Multicell Environments” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech. vol. 51, No. 5, Sep. 2002. |
Mohsenin et al., “Split Row: A Reduced Complexity, High Throughput LDPC Decoder Architecture”, pp. 1-6, printed from www.ece.ucdavis.edu on Jul. 9, 2007. |
Sari H et al., “Transmission Techniques for Digital Terrestrial TV Broadcasting” IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Service Center Ny, NY vol. 33, No. 2 Feb. 1995. |
Unk, “Auto threshold and Auto Local Threshold” [online] [retr. May 28, 2010] Retr. from the Internet www.dentristy.bham.ac.uk/landinig/software/autothreshold/autothreshold.html. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Low-Density Parity-Check Codes Based on Anti-Pasch Affine Geometries,” Proc ICC 2002, pp. 1332-1336. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Girth-Eight Codes on Rectangular Integer Lattices”, IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 52, Aug. 2004, pp. 1248-1252. |
Wang Y et al., “A Soft Decision Decoding Scheme for Wireless COFDM With App. to DVB-T” IEEE Transactions on Consumer elect., IEEE Service Center, NY,NY vo. 50, No. 1 Feb. 2004. |
Weon-Cheol L. et al., “Vitierbi Decoding Method Using Channel State Information in COFDM System” IEEE Trans. on Consumer Elect., IEEE Service Center, NY, NY vol. 45 No. 3 Aug. 1999. |
Yeo et al., “VLSI Architecture for Iterative Decoders in Magnetic Storage Channels”, Mar. 2001, pp. 748-755, IEEE trans. Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 2. |
Youn, “BER Perf. Due to Irreg. of Row-Weoght Distr. of the Parity-Check Matirx in Irregular LDPC Codes for 10-Gb/s Optical Signals” Journal of Lightwave Tech., vol. 23 Sep. 9, 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Area-Efficient Min-Sum Decoder VLSI Architecture for High-Rate QC-LDPC Codes in Magnetic Recording”, pp. 1-15, Submitted 2006, not yet published. |
Zhong, “Block-LDPC: A Practical LDPC Coding System Design Approach”, IEEE Trans. On Circuits, Regular Papers, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 766-775, Apr. 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Design of VLSI Implementation-Oriented LDPC Codes”, IEEE, pp. 670-673, 2003. |
Zhong et al., “High-Rate Quasi-Cyclic LDPC Codes for Magnetic Recording Channel with Low Error Floor”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 3546-3549, May 2006. |
Zhong et al., “Iterative MAX-LOG-MAP and LDPC Detector/Decoder Hardware Implementation for Magnetic Read Channel”, SRC Techron, pp. 1-4, Oct. 2005. |
Zhong et al., “Joint Code-Encoder Design for LDPC Coding System VLSI Implementation”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 389-392, May 2004. |
Zhong et al., “Quasi Cyclic LDPC Codes for the Magnetic Recording Channel: Code Design and VSLI Implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, v. 43, pp. 1118-1123, Mar. 2007. |
Zhong, “VLSI Architecture of LDPC Based Signal Detection and Coding System for Magnetic Recording Channel”, Thesis, RPI, Troy, NY, pp. 1-95, May 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110258508 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |