I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to medical devices generally aimed at spinal surgery and, more particularly, to systems and methods for performing dynamic spinal stabilization.
II. Discussion of the Prior Art
The human spine is comprised of a plurality of components (e.g. vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, posterior bony structures) which collectively protect the spinal cord and enable the normal physiologic motions of flexion (bending forward), extension (bending backwards), lateral bending (bending side to side), and rotation (twisting). These normal physiologic motions may be impeded and/or pain generating when any of a number of conditions exists, including but not limited to disc degeneration, trauma, and deformity (e.g. scoliosis). Depending upon the condition, surgical intervention may be required to restore the normal physiologic function of the spine at the affected region. One form of surgical intervention involves fusing one or more levels within the spine. This is typically accomplished by performing a discectomy (removing part or all of an intervertebral disc), introducing a height-restoring implant into the disc space, and then immobilizing the adjacent vertebral bodies on either side of the intervertebral implant such that a bony bridge may form between the adjacent vertebral bodies to fuse that particular spinal segment. The step of immobilizing the vertebral bodies may be accomplished in may ways, including the use of pedicle screws (fixed axis or multi-axial) and rigid rods, wherein the pedicle screws are introduced into the pedicles associated with the respective vertebral bodies and the rigid rods are locked to each pedicle screw to prevent motion between the adjacent vertebral bodies.
Although generally effective, fusion procedures do have a number of potential drawbacks. One drawback stems from the fact the pedicle screws are introduced directly into the vertebra. This results in significant forces being loaded on the vertebra, which may ultimately result in the loosening of the pedicle screw. Another potential drawback to fusion is that while fusion generally results in a strengthened portion of the spine at the fusion level, it also results in increased loads being placed on adjacent spinal levels. This in turn may result in increased degeneration, hyper-mobility, and collapse of spinal motion segments adjacent to the fused segment, thereby reducing or even eliminating the ability of the adjacent spinal joints to support normal physiologic motions. A still further drawback stems from fusion itself, in that fusion limits the mobility of the patient and yet may fail to provide adequate pain relief for the patient.
Based on the shortcomings (real or perceived) of fusion, an increasing number of surgeons are performing, or wish to perform, so called “dynamic stabilization” of an affected spinal region. Dynamic stabilization involves coupling adjacent vertebra together using elastic materials and/or shapes capable of allowing the adjacent vertebrae to maintain a level of motion there between while still stabilizing the segment. Dynamic stabilization systems vary in type, including but limited to pedicle-based (using pedicle screws and flexible rods) and interspinous-based (using flexible implants between spinous processes). The general goal of these systems is to create, as much as possible, a more normal loading pattern between the vertebrae in one or more of flexion, extension, compression, distraction, side bending and torsion. For pedicle-based dynamic stabilization, an advantage is the reduction, if not elimination, of pedicle screw loosening found in pedicle-based fusion systems due to the reduction in forces applied to the pedicle screws over time.
One pedicle-based dynamic stabilization system is the Dynesys® system owned and marketed by Zimmer® Spine. The Dynesys system includes pedicle screws with side-loading housings, external spacers made of surgical polyurethane tubing cut intra-operatively to extend between adjacent pedicle screws, and a polyethylene cord that is intra-operatively threaded through the side-loading housing of the pedicle screws and through the polyurethane tubing before being tensioned and locked to the pedicle screws. Once assembled intra-operatively, the polyurethane tubing serves as a compression bumper between the pedicle screws and allows some (but not excessive) extension. The polyethylene cord, on the other hand, serves as a tension band between the pedicle screws and allows some (but not excessive) flexion.
Although generally effective at stabilizing a spinal segment, the Dynesys® system suffers from several significant drawbacks. One drawback is the need to intra-operatively assemble the dynamic aspects of the system, namely, the polyurethane tubing and the polyethylene cord. The polyurethane tubing is cut intra-operatively after the pedicle screws have been implanted and the appropriate size is determined by the surgeon based on the particular needs, anatomy, pathology, etc. . . . of the patient. The polyethylene cord is similarly cut intra-operatively after it has been threaded through the side loading pedicle screws and tensioned. This need to intra-operatively tailor the polyurethane tubing and polyethylene cord consumes precious operative time, which translates into higher costs to the hospital, and increases the risk to the patient due to the longer surgical time.
Another significant drawback to the Dynesys system is the “side-loading” nature of the pedicle screws and the need to thread the polyethylene cord through the side-loading housings and tension the cord intra-operatively during the assembly process. The need to thread the polyethylene cord through the side-loading housing and through the polyurethane tubing, as will be appreciated, increases the difficulty and “fiddle factor” of the system and hence increases the amount of time required to assemble the system. The need to tension the polyethylene cord intra-operatively not only adds time to the procedure, but also introduces variability into the surgery, as different surgeons may choose to tension the device more or less robustly than others. This may affect the outcome of each particular surgery, making some better and some worse, based on the variability in assembly. This cuts against the general surgical goal to provide “safe and reproducible” surgical outcomes.
The present invention is directed at addressing this need and eliminating, or at least reducing, the effects of the shortcomings of the prior art systems as described above.
The present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art by providing systems and methods for performing dynamic spinal stabilization which are easy-to-use with dynamic rod assemblies and top-loading pedicle screws (fixed axis and/or multi-axial). The dynamic rod assemblies may be provided sterile and ready for implantation. The dynamic stabilization system is provided, according to one embodiment, comprising a dynamic rod, pedicle screws capable of receiving the dynamic rod, and set screws for securing the dynamic rod to the pedicle screws. When secured to a spine segment, the dynamic rod effects (e.g. limits, resists, prevents, neutralizes) movements not generally occurring in a healthy spine.
According to one embodiment, the dynamic rod comprises a bumper assembly, a tension cord, and a pair of coupler assemblies. The bumper assembly includes a bumper sandwiched between two washers. The bumper may be made from a biocompatible material. In one embodiment the bumper may be composed of a polymer material such as, by way of example only, polycarbonate urethane (“PCU”) or poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) (“SIBS”). If the bumper material is radiolucent, radiopaque markers and/or radiopaque molecules or materials (e.g. Barium Sulphate) may be added to the bumper material so that the entire dynamic rod construct may be viewable under x-ray. The bumper has a bore extending longitudinally therethrough for receiving the tension cord. The tension cord, according to one embodiment, may be formed from a biocompatible elastic, textile, or fabric material, such as by way of example only a polymeric non-absorbable suture. In an untensioned state, the tension cord has a band like structure that is comprised of a number of loops formed with the suture. During assembly, the tension cord may be stretched, braided, woven, twisted, or embroidered into a state of tension. The coupler assemblies may be configured to mate with pedicle screws for attaching the dynamic rod to the vertebrae. The coupler assembly includes a body component and a pin component. The pin locks the tension cord within the body component of the coupler assembly. The body fixes to the bumper assembly at one end and cooperates with the pedicle screw at the other end. The body of the coupler assembly may include an at least partially spherical or bulbous end for engaging with various pedicle screws.
A method of assembling the components of the dynamic rod may be performed, by way of example only, as follows. First, one end of the tension cord is attached to a coupler assembly with a pin. The bumper assembly is then inserted over the free end of the tension cord. Next, a second coupler assembly is attached to the tension cord with another pin. To tension the tension cord, the coupler assemblies are rotated in opposite directions relative to each other. This imparts a series of twists to the tension cord. The twisting of the cord shortens the length and adds tension to the tension cord. As the tension cord length decreases, the coupler assemblies are drawn together with the bumper assembly. Once the desired tension level is reached, twisting is halted, the tension level is verified (optional), and the components are welded together (also optional). The assembled dynamic rod may be packaged, sterilized, and delivered to the operating room ready for implantation such that the surgeon need only retrieve the dynamic rod from the packaging and attach it to the pedicle screws anchored in the patient's spine.
By way of example only, to implant the spinal stabilization system of the present invention, the vertebra to be stabilized are accessed (e.g. via one of an open, mini open, and minimally invasive technique) and pedicle screws are anchored into the vertebrae. Thereafter, the dynamic rod is retrieved and the coupler assemblies are aligned over the pedicle screws to ensure the appropriate sized rod is used. The dynamic rod is reduced into receiving members of the pedicle screws and set screws are secured overtop of the coupler assembly, locking the dynamic rod in position.
A kit may be provided containing a plurality of dynamic rods having various length measurements. The kit may comprise an instrument tray or any number of other suitable packages. By way of example only, the kit may be provided as a simple box filled with individually packaged dynamic rods of various lengths. Significantly, according to one embodiment of the present invention, when providing dynamic rods of various lengths, the modulus of the dynamic rods may be varied so that the stiffness of the dynamic rod will remain the same (or relatively the same) no matter the length of the rod. One exemplary method of effecting the modulus change according to the present invention is to change the Styrene content of the SIBS polymer used to make one embodiment of the bumper.
According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention, a hybrid rod may be provided. The hybrid rod facilitates dynamic stabilization at one level of the spine and fusion or rigid fixation at another level. The rod differs from the dynamic rod previously described in that a rigid rod portion extends from one end of the bumper assembly.
According to yet another alternate embodiment of the present invention, a multi-level dynamic rod may be provided. The multi-level dynamic rod differs from the dynamic rod previously described in that a second bumper assembly is added to the rod. The multi-level rod facilitates dynamic stabilization across multiple spinal levels.
Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like elements and wherein:
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The dynamic stabilization systems disclosed herein boast a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.
A dynamic stabilization system 10, according to one embodiment of the present invention, is illustrated by way of example only in
The dynamic rod 16, an exploded view of which is shown, by way of example only, in
With reference to
The bumper 24 may be made from any biocompatible material with a stiffness that will allow the bumper 24 to resist but preferably not eliminate motion when it is subject to the bending and compressive loads it will encounter. In one embodiment, the bumper 24 may be composed of a polymer material such as, by way of example only, polycarbonate urethane (“PCU”) or poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) (“SIBS”). In embodiments where the bumper material used is radiolucent (i.e. not visible through x-ray) it is preferred, though not necessary, to add a raidopaque component to the bumper 24. This may be accomplished by positioning small metallic markers in strategic locations along the bumper 24 (not shown). Alternatively, a measure of radiopaqueness may be added to the radiolucent polymer by mixing radioopaque molecules or material into the polymer material. By way of example, a small amount of Barium Sulphate (BaSO4) may be added to PCU or SIBS prior to forming the bumper 24. Using this method, the bumper 24 will produce a “ghosting” effect under x-ray such that the bumper 24 may be seen but does not obstruct the view adjacent or nearby structures.
The washers 26, which cap the bumper ends 30 to form the bumper assembly 18, are shown in detail in
The manner in which bumper 24 and washers 26 cooperate to form bumper assembly 18 is best understood in conjunction with
Turning to
The coupler assembly 22 of dynamic rod 16 is illustrated, according to one embodiment and by way of example only, in
A first channel 72 traverses longitudinally through the body 62 of coupler assembly 22. A second channel 74 traverses the head 70 and intersects the first channel 72. To attach the coupler assembly 22 to the tension cord 20, the tension cord 20 is positioned into the first channel 72 such that a portion of the open center 60 of tension cord 20 is aligned with the second channel 74. The remainder of the tension cord 20 extends out of the body 60 through the shoulder 68. With the tension cord 20 positioned in the first channel 72, the pin 64 is inserted into the second channel 74, passing through the open center 60 and trapping an end of the tension cord 20 within the body 62 (best viewed in
According to one embodiment, set forth by way of example only, the pin 64 comprises a pin head 76, a pin body 78, and an optional breakaway extension 80. As illustrated in the cross-sectional view of
As best shown in
With reference once again to
A cylindrical cutout 94 may be situated in the shoulder face 92 and envelopes the opening of the first channel 72. When the shoulder 68 of coupler assembly 22 and washer 26 of bumper assembly 18 come together, the cutout 94 receives the distal end 48 of the cylindrical wall 44 extending from the outer surface 22 of the washer. Engaging the cylindrical wall 44 with the cutout 94 ensures that the washer 26 and shoulder 68 will be aligned properly.
By way of example only, a method of assembling the components of dynamic rod 16 is illustrated in
To accomplish the tensioning of the tension cord 20, the coupler assemblies 22 are rotated in opposite directions relative to each other (it will of course be appreciated that one coupler assembly 22 may be rotated while the other coupler assembly 22 is still) (
With reference to
In a preferred embodiment the dynamic stabilization system 10 will be secured bilaterally on the affected spinal segment(s), and while not shown, it will be appreciated that the implantation method just described may be performed (simultaneously or in succession) on the opposite side of the vertebra as well. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that various instruments and/or instrument systems may be utilized to carry out the general implantation steps described, and use of such instrumentation is contemplated within the scope of this invention. By way of example only, guide tubes, such as those shown and described in the above referenced, Intl App. No. PCT/US2005/032300, may be utilized to access the appropriate vertebrae and to guide the dynamic rod 16 into position.
Due to the variety in size of the patient population, it is preferable to provide the dynamic rod 16 of the present invention in a number of different sizes. To accommodate the differing needs of the surgeon based on the anatomy of a particular patient, a plurality of dynamic rods 16 may be provided having various length measurements.
While providing dynamic rods 16 of various lengths is necessary to compensate for the variety in the patient population, doing so may disadvantageously alter certain characteristics of the dynamic rod. For example, altering the length of the bumper 24 while keeping all other parameters the same will alter the stiffness of the bumper 24 construct. While the changing of the stiffness may not necessarily be a disadvantage in and of itself as a large range of stiffness values may be suitable for stabilizing a spinal segment, it may nevertheless be preferable to maintain uniformity of the effective properties across a single product line. Thus, it may be preferable to maintain a constant stiffness (or relatively constant stiffness) over the various dynamic rod lengths provided.
The stiffness of a construct under physiological loading is a function of the modulus of the bumper material at any given length. It stands therefore, that altering the modulus of the bumper material will allow the stiffness of the rod construct to remain relatively uniform regardless of the change in length. The present invention harnesses this principle to provide a plurality of dynamic stabilization rods with the same, or relatively the same, construct stiffness over a variety of rod lengths. Thus, in one embodiment, set forth by way of example only, dynamic rods 16 are produced according to the present invention with varying moduli to provide uniform (or relatively uniform) construct stiffness to all dynamic rods 16 within the kit 98 regardless of the rod length. In one exemplary embodiment, the modulus is altered by changing properties of the polymer material, such as by way of example only, varying the content of a specific material or materials of the polymer. It will be appreciated that any number of different alterations may be made to a polymer to adjust the modulus and therefore accomplish the goal of providing uniform (or nearly uniform) stiffness to the dynamic rods 16 without departing from the scope of the present invention.
To accomplish this goal of providing the dynamic rod 16 having a uniform (or nearly uniform) construct stiffness regardless of length, the bumper 24 may be constructed according to the following formulas regarding axial loading, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
Wherein k is the axial stiffness, P is the axial load, δ is the axial displacement, σ is stress, E is Young's modulus, E is strain, L is length, and A is the cross sectional area.
Thus, substituting the definition of stress (2) and strain (4) into Hooke's law (3)
Finally, by rearranging equation (5) and substituting in the definition of axial stiffness (1)
Thus, as is evident from equation (6), stiffness is directly proportional to both changes in length and modulus.
From the foregoing discussion it should be appreciated that parameters associated with the dynamic rod 16 of the present invention may vary as specific needs and/or goals to be achieved through any actual implementation arise. By way of example only, dynamic rods 16 may be provided according to the present invention having a length dimension ranging from 15 mm to 60 mm. By way of further example, according to a preferred embodiment, dynamic rods 16 may be provided having length dimensions ranging from 20 mm to 40 mm. The axial stiffness associated with the bumper 24 may range from, by way of example only, 50N/mm to 500N/mm. According to a preferred embodiment, again set forth by way of example only, the axial stiffness associated with the bumper 24 may be in the range of 150N/mm to 350N/mm. The axial tension applied to the tension cord 20 may also be varied and may fall within a range of 50N to 500N. According to a preferred embodiment, the axial tension applied to the tension cord 20 may be in the range of 150N to 350N, as set forth by way of example.
Referring now to
To form the hybrid rod 116, one of the coupler assembly bodies 62 is replaced with a rod body 118, illustrated by way of example only in
With reference now to
To form the multi-level dynamic rod 216, one of the coupler assembly bodies 62 on each of two dynamic rods 16 is replaced with a single connector 218. The connector 218 links the two dynamic rods 16 together to form the multi-level dynamic rod 218. The connector 218 is illustrated by way of example only in
To assemble the multi level dynamic rod 216, a coupler assembly 22 and a first tension cord 20 are fixed together and a bumper assembly 18 is inserted over the tension cord 20. The tension cord 20 is then inserted into the first channel 226 through the first shoulder 220 of connector 218. A pin 64 is then inserted through the second channel 228 to fix the tension cord 20 to the connector 218. Next, a second tension cord 20 is inserted into the first channel 226 through the second shoulder 222 of connector 218. A pin 64 is then inserted through the third channel 230 to lock the second tension cord 20 in place within the connector 218. A second bumper assembly 218 is inserted over the second tension cord 20. The second tension cord 20 is then inserted into and fixed to the final coupler assembly 22.
Once all the components of the multi-level dynamic rod 216 are coupled together, the first tension cord 20 is tensioned by twisting the first coupler assembly 22 relative to the connector 218. After tensioning of the first tension cord 20 is complete, the second tension cord 20 is tensioned by twisting the second coupler assembly 22 relative to the connector 218. Thereafter, the tension imparted on the tension cords 20 may be verified and the components welded together to finish the assembly. Multi-level rod 216 may be implanted according to the same methods described above for dynamic rod 16 with additional pedicle screws 12 being utilized for the additional level, as shown in
A further embodiment which is contemplated but not shown comprises a multi-level hybrid rod. The multi-level hybrid rod comprises at least two bumper assemblies as well as an elongated rod portion. The multi-level hybrid rod may be assembled in the same manner as the multi-level dynamic rod. The final coupler assembly 22 may be replaced by the rod body 118.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined herein.
This is an International Patent Application claiming the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) from the commonly owned and co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/833,236, entitled “System and Methods for Dynamic Stabilization” and filed on Jul. 24, 2006, the entire contents of which is expressly incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth in its entirety herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US07/16804 | 7/24/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/12/2010 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60833236 | Jul 2006 | US |