The present invention generally relates to encoding and playback of video content and more specifically to the use of metadata to enable playback of media at different frame rates.
Media distributed by content providers to content consumers can be encoded using a variety of video compression standards that facilitate the distribution of the content across a distribution channel. Well know compression standards include H.264/MPEG-4, published by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) together with the ISO/IEC JTC1 Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG), and the newer High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard, MPEG-H Part 2, developed by MPEG and VCEG, both of which are herein incorporated by reference. Video compression or video encoding involves compressing the amount of information used to describe the frames of video in a video sequence in order to reduce the consumption of network resources that are utilized when distributing content via a network. The reduced size also facilitates the distribution of content on non-volatile storage mediums such as CD-ROMs and flash-drives.
Media playback devices can utilize video decoders to decode encoded video for playback. Video can be encoded using predetermined encoding profiles. Typically, playback devices utilize decoders that are capable of playing back video encoded using one or more profiles. A particular profile may specify parameters and limits for various video settings, including picture resolution (e.g., 720p, 1080p, 4k etc.), frame rate (i.e., 24, 30, 48, 60 frames per second, etc.), and bitrate (e.g., 12 Mbps, 40 Mbps, etc.).
Encoded media is typically stored in one or more container files. The most commonly used media container formats are the MP4 container format specified in MPEG-4 Part 14 (i.e., ISO/IEC Standard 14496-14) and the MPEG transport stream (TS) container specified in MPEG-2 Part 1 (i.e., ISO/IEC Standard 13818-1). The Matroska container is a media container developed as an open standard project by the Matroska non-profit organization of Aussonne, France. The Matroska container is based upon Extensible Binary Markup Language (EBML), which is a binary derivative of the Extensible Markup Language (XML). Decoding of the Matroska container is supported by many consumer electronics (CE) devices. The DivX Plus file format developed by DivX, LLC of San Diego, Calif. utilizes an extension of the Matroska container format (i.e., is based upon the Matroska container format, but includes elements that are not specified within the Matroska format).
Furthermore, encoded video can be distributed to devices through different mechanisms, including downloading from a server for storage and future playback on the device, streaming the encoded video during playback on the device, and retrieving the encoded video from one or more files stored on a CD-ROM, flash drive, or other non-volatile storage medium, and various other storage and distribution mechanisms. Streaming solutions typically utilize either Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), published by the Internet Engineering Task Force and the World Wide Web Consortium as RFC 2615, or Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), published by the Internet Engineering Task Force as RFC 2326, to stream media between a server and a playback device. HTTP is a stateless protocol that enables a playback device to request a byte range within a file. HTTP is described as stateless, because the server is not required to record information concerning the state of the playback device requesting information or the byte ranges requested by the playback device in order to respond to requests received from the playback device. RTSP is a network control protocol used to control streaming media servers. Playback devices issue control commands, such as “play” and “pause”, to the server streaming the media to control the playback of media files. When RTSP is utilized, the media server records the state of each client device and determines the media to stream based upon the instructions received from the client devices and the client's state. Thus, content providers utilize different distribution protocols for each of the different mechanisms (i.e., download vs. streaming) for distributing video files to different devices.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of this invention encode and play back video at different frame rates using enhancement layers. In an embodiment of the invention, a non-transitory machine readable medium containing processor instructions, where execution of the instructions by a processor causes the processor to perform a process that includes receiving video having several access units and encoding the video into a set of layers that includes a base layer and at least one enhancement layer, where the encoding includes: (i) using a temporal identifier of each access unit to determine the particular layer associated with the access unit and (ii) retaining an order of the temporal identifiers of the several access units of the video.
In another embodiment, the temporal identifier of an access unit is stored in an initial set of bits of the access unit.
In yet another embodiment, a process inserts a temporal identifier for a set of access units of the several access units of the video.
In still another embodiment, a process inserts a metadata tag providing information regarding the layers available and the frame rate of each layer.
In still yet another embodiment, a process receives a request for streaming of the video, determines playback capabilities of a device requesting the video, and streams different sets of layers of the video based on the playback capabilities of the device, where (i) the base layer is streamed to a playback device capable of playing back the base layer and (ii) the base layer and at least one enhancement layer is streamed to a playback device capable of streaming the plurality of layers.
In a further embodiment, streaming the different sets of layers includes merging the different layers using the retained order of the temporal identifiers of the plurality of access units of the video.
In another embodiment, a process receives a request for downloading of the video from a playback device and provides the encoded video to the playback device.
In another embodiment again, a frame rate of at least one enhancement layer is an integer multiple of the base layer.
In yet another embodiment again, a process stores each layer as a separate stream.
In still yet another embodiment again, a process stores each layer in a separate container file.
In an embodiment of the invention provides a source encoder that includes a processor configured by a source encoder application to receive video having several access units and encode the video into a set of layers that includes a base layer and at least one enhancement layer, where the encoding includes: (i) using a temporal identifier of each access unit to determine the particular layer associated with the access unit and (ii) retaining an order of the temporal identifiers of the plurality of access units of the video;
In another embodiment, a temporal identifier of an access unit is stored in a header of the access unit.
In yet another embodiment, a source encoder inserts a temporal identifier for a set of access units of the several access units of the video.
In still a further embodiment, a source encoder inserts a metadata tag providing information regarding the layers available and the frame rate of each layer.
An embodiment of the invention includes a playback device configured to playback video that includes a processor configured to communicate with a memory, where the memory contains a client application, where the client application configures the processor to receive video that includes several access units, playback the video, where the playback device plays back the video (i) using a base layer when the playback device has a first set of playback capabilities and (ii) using the base layer and at least one enhancement layer when the playback device has a second set of playback capabilities.
In another embodiment, a client application further configures the processor to identify an order of temporal identifiers of the several access units of the video and merge the access units of the base layer and the access units of at least one enhancement layer using the order of temporal identifies of the several access units of the video.
In yet another embodiment, a client application further configures the processor to request streaming of the video to a playback server and provide information regarding playback capabilities of the playback device to the playback server and receive a first stream that includes the base layer of the video and a second stream that includes the at least one enhancement layer of the video.
In still yet another embodiment, a client application further configures the processor to request downloading of the video to a content distribution server and provide playback capabilities of the playback device to the content distribution server, receive the video from the content distribution server, where a first device receives video that includes the base layer when the first device is capable of playing back the video at a first frame rate and a second device receives video that includes the base layer and at least one enhancement layer when the second device is capable of playing back the video at a second frame rate.
In yet another embodiment again, a client application further configures the processor to retrieve a metadata tag from the video identifying the layers available and the frame rate of each layer; and determine a set of layers to playback based on the information in the metadata tag.
In a further embodiment again, a client application further configures the processor to identify the temporal identifier of an access unit by parsing an initial set of bytes of the access unit.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for encoding and playing back video at different frame rates using enhancement layers in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. In a number of embodiments, video is encoded using temporal scalability involving the creation of a base layer at a first frame rate and an enhancement layer including additional frames enabling playback at a second higher frame rate. The second higher frame rate can also be referred to as an enhanced frame rate. In a number of embodiments, the base and enhancement layers are stored in one or more container files that contain metadata describing the enhancement layer. Based on the capabilities of a playback device, it can select the particular frame rate at which to playback encoded video. For example, for a single media file containing video encoded with temporal scalability that provides both a base frame rate (e.g., 30 fps) and an enhanced frame rate (e.g., 60 fps), a first device may only be able to play back the encoded video at the base frame rate while a different device may be able to playback encoded video at the enhanced frame rate. Thus, video content can be played back at different frame rates on different devices.
In several embodiments, encoded video can be distributed to playback devices using a variety of distribution mechanisms, including downloading of one or more files containing the encoded video or streaming the encoded video to the playback device for progressive playback and/or as part of an adaptive bitrate streaming system. However, in order to avoid wasting network resources when streaming encoded video that includes temporal scalability to a device that is not capable of handling the decoding of the enhancement layer(s), in some embodiments the different video layers are separated and streamed on an “as needed” basis to the playback device. For example, for a file containing encoded video that has both a base video layer that provides a base frame rate of 30 fps and an enhancement layer that provides a frame rate of 60 fps, a first device with only the capacity to playback video at a frame rate of 30 fps can request a stream of only the base layer of the encoded video while a second device that has the capacity to playback the video at a frame rate of 60 fps can request streams containing both the base video layer and the enhancement layer.
When streaming multiple separate video layers to a user's device, the streams can be combined at the playback device into a single stream in order to allow for the playback of the encoded video on the device at the enhanced frame rate. Due to dependencies that can exist between encoded frames of video (specifically bi-directionally encoded frames of video), the frames of video in the base layer and/or the enhancement layer may not be received by the playback device in the order in which they are to be played back. In several embodiments, the frames of video in the base and/or enhancement layers are received in “decode order”, which is an order that causes the decoder to have fully decoded all frames on which a given frame depends prior to decoding the given frame. In order to determine the particular decode order, in some embodiments, one or more of the enhancement layers include metadata that specifies a sequential order for selecting frames of video from the different layers to merge the frames into a single stream for decoding and playback at the enhanced frame rate.
Some embodiments utilize an adaptive streaming mechanism that detects the present streaming conditions (e.g., the user's network bandwidth and CPU capacity) in real time and adjusts the frame rate of the streamed video accordingly. When a playback device has the capability to play back the video file at an enhanced frame rate, the playback device can stream both the base and enhancement layers when the network bandwidth is sufficient to satisfy that bitrate necessary for transmission and/or the CPU has capacity to process the encoded video at the enhanced rate. The playback device may likewise stream the encoded video at the base rate when a change in the streaming conditions is detected indicative of insufficient bandwidth for the enhanced frame rate and/or the CPU no longer has capacity to process the encoded video at the enhanced frame rate.
In several embodiments, the base layer includes a sequence of frames encoded at a first frame rate in such a way that the frames in the base layer are only dependent upon other frames in the base layer. In a number of embodiments, the enhancement layer includes additional frames that, when merged with the sequence of frames in the base layer, form a sequence of frames encoded at a second frame rate. In certain embodiments, the frames in the enhancement layer are encoded so that they are only dependent upon frames in the base layer. In a number of embodiments, the frames in the enhancement layer are further constrained so that the enhancement layer does not include any I-frames (i.e., frames that can be decoded without reference to other frames). In other embodiments, the enhancement layer can include frames that incorporate dependencies upon other frames in the enhancement layer and/or I-frames.
In some embodiments, the source video is encoded and decoded using codecs implemented in accordance with the HEVC standard. In order to signal the availability of temporal scalability (i.e., the existence of at least one enhancement layer), the files containing the encoded video can include a metadata tag that provides information regarding the available layers within the media file and the frame rate of each layer. In several embodiments, at least one enhancement layer includes metadata in the form of an ordered set of Access Unit Delimiters (AUDs) that specify a sequential order for selecting access units from different layers. In particular, each AUD identifies the specific layer containing the video data of the Access Unit and this information can be used to determine the manner in which the Access Units from the different layers are combined into a single video stream. In some embodiments, the multiple streams are combined on the user's playback device prior to being provided to the decoder on the device. In other embodiments, the separate streams are combined into a single stream by the content provider prior to their streaming to the user's device.
System and methods for encoding and playing back video at different frame rates using enhancement layers in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
System Architecture for Encoding and Playing Back Video at Different Frame Rates Using Enhancement Layers
A system for encoding and playing back video at different frame rates using enhancement layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
As is discussed further below, in many embodiments, the source encoder is able to encode a video with temporal scalability by creating a base layer of video frames that allow playback at a base frame rate and one or more enhancement layers of video frames that allow playback at a higher enhanced frame rate. In many embodiments, the source encoder stores the encoded video in one or more container files. In some embodiments, the encoded video is then uploaded to distribution server 104. In many embodiments, source encoder uploads the encoded video as a single file containing multiple temporal layers. In several embodiments, the encoded video is uploaded as one or more separate streams, with each stream corresponding to a particular temporal layer of the encoded video. In many embodiments, each stream can be stored in a separate container file (e.g., Matroska container file) while in other embodiments the streams are stored in the same container file. A device 105-107 may then request either to (i) download the entire file, or (ii) receive a streamed video for progressive playback. In some embodiments, the streamed video provides either the base layer of video data when the requested stream is at the base frame rate or the base layer and one or more enhancement layers when the requested stream is at a higher enhanced frame rate.
In many embodiments, the encoded video is stored in Matroska container files. As is discussed further below, the encoded video can be stored within the Matroska container file in a way that facilitates the embedding of metadata within a file containing encoded video that describes any enhancement layers that may be available to achieve playback of the content at an enhanced frame rate. In many embodiments, the Matroska container files are specialized Matroska container files that include enhancements (i.e., elements that do not form part of the Matroska file format specification) that facilitate the retrieval of the video at different frame rates via HTTP or RTSP during the streaming of the video. The enhancements to the Matroska container file can also include storing metadata that provides information regarding the temporal layers that are available for the encoded video and the frame rate of each layer.
In many embodiments, the distribution server receives and processes download requests from a variety of playback devices 105-107 that seek to download the encoded video. When the distribution server receives a download request from a playback device, it can provide the playback device with the encoded video for storage. A downloaded video file may include a header that contains metadata describing temporal layers within the video file and the video data stored within the various temporal layers. In some embodiments, the temporal layers provided to a playback device may include only the base layer when the device requests the encoded video at the base frame rate or both the base layer and one or more enhancement layers when the device requests the encoded video at the enhanced frame rate.
In some embodiments, the distribution server receives stream requests from a variety of playback devices and subsequently streams the encoded video to the playback devices for progressive playback and/or as part of an adaptive bitrate streaming system. In several embodiments, the variety of playback devices can use HTTP or another appropriate stateless protocol to request streams via a network 108 such as the Internet. In several embodiments, a variety of playback devices can use RTSP whereby the distribution server records the state of each playback device and determines the video to stream based upon instructions received from the playback devices and stored data describing the state of the playback device.
Playback devices with different playback capacities may request different streams from the distribution server. For example, for a particular video that has been encoded with temporal scalability, a device with only the capacity to playback the encoded video at a base frame rate can request a stream from the distribution server that contains only the base layer. The distribution server would then stream only the base layer of the encoded video to the playback device. Likewise, a device with the capacity to playback video at the enhanced frame rate can request the distribution server to provide streams that contain both the base layer and the one or more enhancement layers whereby the distribution server would stream both layers to the playback device. By allowing a device to request only the particular layers that the device is capable of decoding, the system is able to avoid wasting network resources that would otherwise be needed to provide all layers to every device, including those without the capacity to handle the enhancement layers.
As described above, in order to enable playback of the video, the separate streams can be merged according to the decode order of the video frames. Thus, in many embodiments, when a device requests a stream at the enhanced frame rate, the distribution server first merges the separate temporal streams and sends a single ordered stream of video to the device. In other embodiments, the playback device is responsible for merging the separate streams into the single ordered stream prior to providing the stream to a decoder on the playback device for play back of the video stream.
In the illustrated embodiment, playback devices include personal computers 105-106 and mobile phones 107. In other embodiments, playback devices can include consumer electronics devices such as DVD players, Blu-ray players, televisions, set top boxes, video game consoles, tablets, and other devices that are capable of connecting to a server via HTTP and playing back encoded video. Although a specific architecture is shown in
The basic architecture of a playback device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Stream Selection of Video Encoded with Temporal Scalability
As described above, different classes of devices may request different streams from the distribution server in order to play back a video at different frame rates. Streams generated by a source encoder and/or stored on a distribution server for streaming to playback devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated in
In many embodiments, each Matroska container file contains a single stream that corresponds to a particular temporal layer of the encoded video. For example, a first stream could contain video frames for a base layer of the encoded video and a second stream could contain the video frames for one or more enhancement layers. In some embodiments, each stream includes only the video data for the particular layer. Thus, in many embodiments, in order to play back the video at an enhanced rate, the video data from the different layers can be combined into a single stream prior to being sent to the decoder. As can readily be appreciated, the combination of streams can occur at the server and/or at the playback device. In several embodiments, at least one enhancement layer includes metadata in the form of an ordered set of Access Unit Delimiters (AUDs) that provide the order for selecting access units from different layers (or streams). In particular, each AUD identifies the particular layer containing the video data of the Access Unit and this information can be used to determine the manner in which the Access Units from the different layers are combined into a single video stream.
As is discussed further below, in many embodiments the Matroska container files are specialized files. The encoding of the video and the manner in which the video is stored within elements within the Matroska container file can be subject to constraints designed to enhance the performance of a streaming system for playing video encoded with temporal sub-layers. In addition, the Matroska container file can include index elements that facilitate the location and downloading of frames of video (i.e., Access Units) from the various Matroska container files during the streaming of the media. Specialized Matroska container files that can be used in adaptive bitrate streaming systems are proposed by DivX, LLC in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/221,682, entitled “Systems and Methods for Adaptive Bitrate Streaming of Media Stored in Matroska Container Files Using Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, filed Aug. 30, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Matroska container files that can be used in streaming systems that distribute video encoded with temporal layers in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
Storing Encoded Video with Temporal Layers in Matroska Files
A Matroska container file used to store encoded video in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In addition to the above standard elements, the Segment element 412 also includes a modified version of the standard Tracks element 415. As is discussed further below, the Tracks element includes a standard Codec Private element 420. The Codec Private element includes a specialized Profile Message element 421 (e.g., the DivX™ HEVC Profile Tag specified by DivX, LLC of San Diego, Calif.) that is used to (i) signal the availability of temporal scalability for the encoded video and (ii) provide information regarding the temporal layers that are available and corresponding frame rates of each available layer. In some embodiments, the temporal scalability of encoded video can be quickly detected based on the presence of this tag within the container file and/or the presence of similar information within a top level index file.
The Payload element 425 includes an Asset element 426, Layers L[0] through L[ . . . ] 427, and Frame Rate Per Seconds “FPS” elements FPS[0] through FPS[ . . . ] 428. The Asset element 426 includes the UUID identifying the video file encoded with temporal scalability. As described above, the encoded video can be separated into several temporal layers, with each layer having frames of video that can be merged with a base layer to achieve a particular enhanced frame rate. Each separated layer has the same UUID, which is used to verify and track the different layers. Layers L[0] through L[ . . . ] provide a numerical value (i.e., 0 or 1) that can be used to determine whether the particular layer is available. The FPS[0] through FPS[ . . . ] provide the frame rate (i.e., frames per second) of each corresponding layer. In some embodiments, the frame rate of each layer is fixed and can be an integer multiple of the base layer. Although
As described, the encoded video can be inserted within individual Cluster elements of the MKV container. A standard (i.e., none enhanced) Clusters element of a Matroska container file containing encoded video in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
An example of separate container files storing different temporal layers is illustrated in
In order to separate the temporal layers into separate streams, many embodiments can store within a particular container file only those video frames that have a Temporal ID identifying the particular temporal layer. As illustrated in this example, Cluster 601 includes Blocks and Reference Blocks which all have a Temporal ID of 0, which indicates that the encoded video frame within these Blocks correspond to the base temporal layer. In the illustrated embodiment, these Blocks do not include AUDs. In other embodiments, the Blocks in the container file containing the base layer can include AUDs. Likewise, Cluster 602 includes Blocks (and ReferenceBlocks) which all have a Temporal ID of 1, which indicates that the encoded video frames within these Blocks belong to an enhancement layer with and ID of 1. As noted above, the container file containing the clusters that include the enhancement layer(s) can also include Blocks containing AUDs indicating the decode order of the merged layers (see discussion below). In many embodiments, storing the temporal layers in separate containers allows for the individual streaming of particular temporal layers, as requested by different devices with different playback capabilities. Although the above describes inserting information concerning the various temporal layers, and metadata identifying the frames belonging to the enhancement layers, similar techniques can be utilized to stored encoded video incorporating enhancement layers in any of a variety of different container files in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Generating a Container File for Video Encoded with Temporal Layers
In order to facilitate the playback of encoded video with temporal scalability, metadata describing the temporal layers of the encoded video may be embedded that facilitates the playback of the encoded video at different frame rates. The metadata may be embedded in either the container file or within the encoded video data. In many embodiments, the video is encoded in accordance with the HEVC standard and an encoder can embed certain additional information during the encoding process that facilitates the video playback. A process for embedding information describing video encoded with temporal scalability in a container file in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The process 700 commences by initializing (705) source video for encoding with temporal scalability. The resulting encoded video may contain multiple video layers, including a base layer containing frames of video for playback at a base frame rate and one or more enhancement layers containing frames of video for playback at a higher enhanced frame rate. In some embodiments, the same process will be utilized for encoding a video without temporal scalability (i.e., no multiple temporal layers). In this situation, the process may provide an indication that the enhancement layers are unavailable.
The process inserts (710) metadata into the container file indicating the presence of one or more enhancement layers within the file and the frame rate of the enhancement layer. In the case of a Matroska container file, a Profile Message can be inserted into the file header that includes information regarding the temporal layers and the corresponding frame rate of each layer. In many embodiments, the Profile Message is the DivX HEVC Profile Message specified by DivX, LLC of San Diego, Calif. In other embodiments, any of a variety of metadata describing an enhancement layer can be stored in a container file as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application.
The process 700 encodes (715) the video with temporal scalability. As described above, in many embodiments the process utilizes the HEVC compression standard for encoding the video. During the encoding process, the process may store portions of the encoded video within Matroska container files. As described above, in some embodiments, the process may also embed an Access Unit Delimiter (AUD) within each frame of video that provides the corresponding temporal layer associated with the video frame. In some embodiments, the AUD is contained within the Block (or Reference Block) element of the MKV container, with each Block containing the encoded video frame data for a particular video frame. In other embodiments, the process may not embed the AUD into the Block, but can use a different mechanism in order to provide an indication of the temporal layer associated with a particular frame of video. For example, in many embodiments that store the temporal layers in different containers, the process may provide null values to indicate that Blocks in different containers corresponding to different temporal layers will contain the video data for certain frames.
The process 700 determines (720) whether to store the encoded video as one or more files, such as a single MKV file. The file may then be stored on a non-volatile storage medium such as a CD-ROM, flash-drive, or other storage medium. The file may also be stored and distributed to a user by allowing the user to download the file from a distribution server. If the process determines that the encoded video is to be stored as a file, the process can store (725) the file containing the encoded video on a storage medium (i.e., Distribution Server or CD-ROM, flash-drive, or other non-volatile storage etc.). In many embodiments, the encoded video is stored as a single file with multiple temporal layers of video that can be decoded by a decoder implemented on the playback device. In several other embodiments, each temporal layer of the encoded video is stored as a separate file in order to allow a playback device to obtain only the encoded video that the device is capable of playing back.
The process 700 determines (730) whether to store the encoded video in a manner suitable for streaming to playback devices. When the process determines (730) not to store streams of the encoded video, the process is complete.
When the process 700 determines (730) that the encoded video should be stored for streaming, the process generates and stores (735) separate streams of frames of video, with each stream corresponding to a temporal layer of the encoded video. In many embodiments, in order to generate the separate streams, the process analyzes a Temporal I.D. associated with each frame of video in the single video stream. In several embodiments, the video stream will include many different video frames with the frames ordered based on the decoding order.
In a number of embodiments, the Temporal I.D. may be stored within the AUD of a Block element within a Matroska container. Based on the Temporal I.D. of the frames of video, the process may separate out different frames of video to different streams. Thus each separate stream may contain only the video data for frames of video within the particular stream. For example, the base layer may contain only the video data for frames that are to be played back at the base frame rate. Thus, if a video has a base frame rate of 30 f.p.s, the base layer will contain 30 frames for one second of encoded video. Continuing with the example, the one or more enhancement layers can contain the video data for the frames that are to be played back at the higher enhanced frame rate. Thus, if a video is to be played back at an enhanced frame rate of 60 f.p.s. and has a base frame rate of 30 f.p.s., the enhancement layer of this encoded video will contain 30 additional video frames that can be combined with the 30 frames in the base layer to generate an output of 60 f.p.s. As described below, the combined frames may be provided to the decoder in a particular decode order, which is an order that causes the decoder to have fully decoded all frames on which a given frame depends prior to decoding the given frame. In order to know how the frames are to be merged, the process also retains (735) the AUD order of frames within at least one of the layers. In many embodiments, metadata describing the ordering of frames is stored in at least one of the enhancement layers. For example, prior to separating the frames to the different streams, the process can retain the order of the layers of the frames within the single stream. During the merging of the frames, the process can then identify the corresponding layer that contains the frame that should be retrieved for the encoded video. After generating and storing the separate streams, the process is complete. Although specific processes for embedding information describing video encoded with temporal scalability are described above, any of a variety of processes may be utilized for embedding information describing video encoded with temporal scalability as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Playback of Encoded Video at Different Frame Rates
Playback of encoded video with temporal scalability can allow the encoded video to be played back at different frame rates. A process for playing back an encoded video including temporal layers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Metadata is obtained (810) from the header, which describes the various tracks within the encoded video. The metadata can be parsed (815) to retrieve information regarding the particular codec (i.e., compression/decompression standard) that was used to encode the video. In embodiments where the encoded video data is contained within a Matroska container file, the metadata is contained within a Codec Private element contained within a Tracks element. In many embodiments, the codec may be a codec provided by DivX, LLC of San Diego, Calif.
The metadata within the header of the container file may contain metadata that describes the temporal layers of the encoded video. If the process does not detect (820) metadata that describes temporal layers of the encoded video, the process plays back (835) the encoded video using a standard normal playback process. This would occur for a video that has been encoded without temporal scalability (i.e., there is only a single base layer of video frames). In many embodiments, the standard playback process decodes the video frames within a single track of video data contained in the container file.
If the process detects (820) metadata that describes the temporal layers of the encoded video, the metadata can be parsed (825) in order to obtain information that can be used to facilitate the playback of the encoded video at an enhanced frame rate. The obtained information can indicate whether or not the video is encoded with temporal scalability (i.e., there are multiple layers of video data). In particular, the metadata can describe the layers that are available in the encoded video and the particular frame rate of each layer. In a streaming environment, the metadata may also describe other temporal scalability streams contained within different container files. In embodiments where the encoded video data is contained within a Matroska container file, the metadata that describes the temporal layers of the encoded video can be contained within a Profile Message element within a Codec Private element. In other embodiments, metadata describing the temporal layers of the encoded video can be inserted in any of a variety of locations and/or data formats within a container file and/or other file type including (but not limited to) top level index files and/or metadata files as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications.
When the process (830) does not detect temporal scalability (i.e., the process does not detect the existence of multiple layers in the encoded video), the process plays (835) the encoded video using standard playback. When the process detects (830) temporal scalability (i.e., multiple available temporal layers), the process can play back (840) the encoded video with temporal scalability. In particular, the process plays back the encoded video either the full frame rate (e.g., 60 fps) or only at the base frame rate (e.g., 30 fps). Furthermore, for a file-based playback, the device on which the process will play back the encoded video can quickly determine which frames can be decoded by the device based on the temporal I.D. of each frame. Likewise, as described in detail below, during a streaming playback session involving separate streams for different temporal layers, the process can merge the separate streams corresponding to the different temporal layers into a single stream of encoded video prior to providing the stream to a decoding process. Various mechanisms for separating and merging streams of video data to achieve temporal scalability in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described in detail further below.
Playback of Encoded Video with Separate Streams
As described above, in many embodiments the video is encoded with one or more temporal layers, with each layer stored in a separate stream. In a distribution channel that streams the encoded video to playback devices, the separate streams allow different playback devices the ability to request only those streams that the particular playback device is capable of decoding and playing back. An example of a process for streaming encoded video utilizing separate streams in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The process 900 initially detects (905) the presence of metadata within a header of the container file containing information about the temporal scalability of the encoded video. In embodiments that utilize a Matroska container file, the metadata can take the form of a Profile Message element similar to the various Profile Messages described above with respect to
Based on the playback capabilities of the device (i.e., the device's video profile), the process requests (915) streams for one or more of the temporal layers from a distribution server. In some embodiments, when the process requests only the base layer of the encoded video for playback at the base frame rate, the distribution server streams only the base layer. When the process requests the base layer and or more enhancement layers, the distribution server also streams each different temporal layer of the encoded video.
Based on whether the process has requested (i) only the base layer or (ii) the base layer and one or more enhancement layers, the process may need to merge 920 (optional) the streams of temporal layers into a single stream of frames in decode order (as opposed to playback order). In several embodiments, at least one of the layers includes metadata indicating the decode order of the frames in the base layer and the one or more enhancement layers. In embodiments in which the video is encoded in accordance with the HEVC standard, the metadata indicating decode order is a sequence of AUDs that indicate the temporal layer from which to retrieve encoded video data. The separate streams can then be merged 720 based on the AUD order contained within the one (or more) layers described above. In certain embodiments, the sequence of AUDs is contained in at least one of the enhancement layers. In other embodiments, decode order can be indicated in any of a variety of ways appropriate to the requirements of specific applications including (but not limited) by specifying the decode order of access units within metadata accompanying the access units in the container file and/or inserting null or empty access units in the container file of one of the layers.
When the process only requests a single temporal layer, the process can skip the optional merge (920) and playback (925) the encoded video. Furthermore, in many embodiments, the distribution server can merge the separate streams into a single stream prior to distributing the encoded video to a playback device. In this situation, the process may also playback (925) the encoded video without executing the optional merge (920) in the process. After playback, the process is complete. The process of merging the separate streams containing the different temporal layers may be performed by either (i) the playback device after it receives the separate streams from the distribution server or (ii) the distribution server prior to sending a single stream containing the multiple temporal layers to the playback device. Although specific processes for playback of an encoded video containing separate streams are described above, any of a variety of processes may be utilized for playback of an encoded video containing separate streams as appropriate to the requirements of specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. An example of a process of many embodiments for merging separate streams is described below.
Combining Separate Streams Based on AUD Order
As described above, in a streaming context, each temporal layer of the encoded video may be stored as a separate stream and different streams may be provided to different playback devices to reduce wasteful network consumption. An example of a process for merging separate streams of an encoded video in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The process 1000 requests (1005) streaming of a particular set of temporal layers from a distribution server. In some embodiments, the process requests the set of streams based on the playback capabilities of the playback device. In particular, when a playback device does not have the playback capability to handle the enhancement layer(s), the process requests (1005) only the encoded video within the base layer, receives (1015) a stream containing video data from only the base layer of the encoded video, and plays back (1035) the encoded video.
When (1010) the playback device has the ability to decode and playback one or more of the enhancement layers, the process requests both the base layer and enhancement layer(s). The process then receives (1020) separate streams containing the base layer and the one or more enhancement layers. The process then may need to combine the separate streams into a single stream prior to providing the stream to the decoder on the playback device. In order to combine the streams, the process identifies (1025) an AUD order for the video frames (i.e., Access Units), and determines the temporal layer associated with each frame of video. In many embodiments, the AUD order may be obtained from at least one of the layers. The AUD order identifies the order of video frames and the particular temporal layer that contains the video frame. In particular, each frame (e.g., Matroska Block described above) can be embedded with an AUD containing a Temporal I.D. that identifies a particular layer for the frame. The order that these frames are separated into separate streams may be retained within one of the temporal layers. For example, an AUD order may simply be a series of 1's and 0's, such as “001101 . . . ”, which would indicate that the order of frames (prior to being separated into separate streams) is: “base layer, base layer, enhancement layer, enhancement layer, base layer, enhancement layer, . . . ” etc.
Thus each separate layer can be recombined by selecting frames from the different temporal layers based on the AUD. In particular, an AUD with Temporal I.D. of 0 means that the process needs to merge the next frame of the base layer stream and an AUD with Temporal ID of 1 means that the process needs to merge the next frame of the particular enhancement layer stream with Temporal ID of 1. By retaining the original Temporal ID order of the video frames, the process is able to easily re-combine (1030) the base layer video data with the enhancement layer video data into a single stream of encoded video.
Having combined the separate streams, the process plays back (1035) the encoded video. After playback, the process is complete. Although specific processes for merging separate streams of an encoded video are described above, any of a variety of processes may be utilized for merging separate streams of an encoded video as appropriate to the requirements of specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Several additional examples are provided below that illustrate the merging of separate streams of an encoded video.
Decoding Order of Frames
As described above, in order for a decoder to decode a given video frame, in some embodiments, the decoder of a playback device needs to have fully decoded all frames on which the given frame depends prior to decoding the given frame.
As illustrated, the arrows between the various frames 1110 indicate the other frames on which the particular frame is dependent. As illustrated, POC 0 does not have any outward arrows, since this is an I-frame and thus is not dependent on any other frames for its decoding. The next POC 1 is dependent on frames POC 0 and POC 2. Thus, in order for a decoder of a playback device of some embodiments to be able to decode POC 1 video frame, the decoder should have already decoded POC 0 and POC 2. Likewise, POC 2 is dependent on POC 0 and POC 4; POC 3 is dependent on POC 2 and POC 0; POC 4 is dependent on POC 0 and POC 8; and these dependencies continue for each B or P frame in the particular portion of encoded video. Thus in order to decode these video frames within the particular portion of the encoded video, the frames are provided to the decoder in an order that guarantees that for a given frame, the decoder has already decoded all frames on which the given frame depends prior to decoding the given frame. Thus the decode order for these frames is not the same as the POC order (i.e., 0, 1, 2, 3, etc.) of the frames.
Furthermore, the Temporal ID associated with each frame of an encoded video can be used to quickly separate the temporal layers into different streams. An example of separating an encoded video into separate streams in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
An example of merging of different temporal streams in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In particular, the AUD Temporal ID order in this example is: 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1. As such, this AUD Temporal ID order indicates that the first AUD has a Temporal ID of 0, and thus the combined video stream needs to retrieve and merge the video data of the 1st frame (i.e., POC 0) from the base layer stream 1305. The next AUD Temporal ID is again 0, and thus again, the combined stream is able to retrieve and merge the video data of the next frame from the base layer (i.e., POC 8). This continues through the entire AUD Temporal ID series, and thus the stream is combined as a combined stream using the following order of POCs: 0, 8, 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 6, 5 and 7. Note that the POC order is now back to the same order that it was prior to the separation of the layers into the separate streams illustrated in
The combined stream can now be provided to a decoder of the playback device for decoding of the video frames. Although the example in
Furthermore, providing separate streams for the different temporal layers allows the system to stream the individual layers that are needed for a particular device. As described above, the different streams may be requested by a playback device using HTTP, which is a stateless protocol that enables a playback device to request a byte range within a file, or RTSP which is a network control protocol used to control streaming media servers whereby playback devices issue control commands, such as “play” and “pause”, to the server streaming the media to control the playback of media files. When RTSP is utilized, the media server records the state of each client device and determines the media to stream based upon the instructions received from the client devices and the client's state. Examples of such streaming media servers are described below.
Streaming Server
Playback devices may request different temporal layers of an encoded video with temporal scalability based on the particular playback capacities of the device. A process for streaming different temporal layers of an encoded video for playback on a playback device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The process 1400 receives a request (1405) for streaming of an encoded video. In some embodiments, the request may be received from a playback device and include a particular video profile of the device. For example, the video profile may provide the frame rate at which the device is able to playback an encoded video.
The process determines (1410) whether to stream the video at a base frame rate. For example, if the playback device is only capable of decoding the base layer of the encoded video, the process streams only the base layer. In an adaptive bitrate context, the process may decide to stream at the base rate based on the given streaming conditions of the network such as the bandwidth available or the CPU capacity of the device for processing the video frames.
When the process determines (1410) to stream the encoded video at the base frame rate, the process streams (1420) only the stream containing the base layer of video frames. In some embodiments, the process maintains the state of the streaming being provided to the playback device. For example, the process may use RTSP to establish and control the video streams to the playback device. Likewise, the playback device can issue commands, such as play, pause, and stop, to enable the real-time control of playback of the streaming video. In other embodiments, the process is a stateless process such as HTTP.
When the process determines (1410) not to stream the video at the base frame rate, the process determines (1415) whether to stream the video at a higher enhanced frame rate. For example, if the profile of the playback device indicates that the device is able to playback video at the enhanced frame rate, the process streams (1425) both the stream for the base layer and the one or more streams for the enhancement layer. As described above, in several embodiments, the process may merge the separate streams and stream a single stream to the playback device while in other embodiments, the process may stream the streams as separate streams. In some embodiments, the playback device can merge the separate streams into the proper decode order for decoding by a decoder implemented on the playback device. After merging, the process is complete. If the process determines (1415) not to stream the video at the enhanced frame rate, the process is complete.
A specific process for streaming different temporal layers of an encoded video for playback on a playback device is described above, however, any variety of processes may be utilized for streaming different temporal layers of an encoded video for playback on a playback device in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/863,456 entitled “Systems and Methods for Encoding and Playing Back Video at Different Frame Rates Using Enhancement Layers” to van der Schaar et al., filed Jan. 5, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/679,469 entitled “Systems and Methods for Encoding and Playing Back Video at Different Frame Rates Using Enhancement Layers” to van der Schaar et al., filed Apr. 6, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/975,789 entitled “Systems and Methods for Encoding and Playing Back Video at Different Frame Rates Using Enhancement Layers” to van der Schaar et al., filed Apr. 5, 2014, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5400401 | Wasilewski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5574785 | Ueno et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600721 | Kitazato | Feb 1997 | A |
5621794 | Matsuda et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642338 | Fukushima et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5813010 | Kurano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5854873 | Mori et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5907658 | Murase et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923869 | Kashiwagi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970147 | Davis | Oct 1999 | A |
6002834 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009237 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016381 | Taira et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6057832 | Lev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6266483 | Okada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282320 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320905 | Konstantinides | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351538 | Uz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373803 | Ando et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6415031 | Colligan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441754 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445877 | Okada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453116 | Ando et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504873 | Vehvilaeinen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512883 | Shim et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6532262 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594699 | Sahai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6654933 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690838 | Zhou | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6724944 | Kalevo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751623 | Basso et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6813437 | Ando et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6871006 | Oguz et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912513 | Candelore | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931531 | Takahashi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957350 | Demos | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970564 | Kubota et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983079 | Kim | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006757 | Ando et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020287 | Unger | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7103906 | Katz et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7188183 | Paul et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7206940 | Evans et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212726 | Zetts | May 2007 | B2 |
7243346 | Seth et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7274861 | Yahata et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295673 | Grab et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7352956 | Winter et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7382879 | Miller | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7397853 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400679 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418132 | Hoshuyama | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7454780 | Katsube et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457415 | Reitmeier et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7499930 | Naka et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515710 | Russell et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546641 | Robert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7639921 | Seo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7711052 | Hannuksela et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7761892 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788271 | Soma et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7853980 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864186 | Robotham et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882034 | Hug et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7945143 | Yahata et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949703 | Matsuzaki et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8082442 | Keljo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8131875 | Chen | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8169916 | Pai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8195714 | Mckibben et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8243924 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8275871 | Ram et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286213 | Seo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312079 | Newsome et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8325800 | Holcomb et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341715 | Sherkin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8369421 | Kadono et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396114 | Gu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407753 | Kuo | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423889 | Zagorie et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8527645 | Proffit et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8656183 | Russell et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677428 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683066 | Hurst et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8689267 | Hunt | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8767825 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782268 | Pyle et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8819116 | Tomay et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8832434 | Apostolopoulos et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849950 | Stockhammer et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856218 | Inskip | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8918535 | Ma et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948249 | Sun et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9038116 | Knox et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9060207 | Scherkus et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9098335 | Muthiah et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9125073 | Oyman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9203816 | Brueck et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9215466 | Zhai et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9253178 | Blom et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9294531 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9344721 | Dikvall | May 2016 | B2 |
9479805 | Rothschild et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9485546 | Chen et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9571827 | Su et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9584557 | Panje et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9584847 | Ma et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9621522 | Kiefer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9706259 | Chan et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9798863 | Grab et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9813740 | Panje et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9906785 | Naletov et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9967189 | Patel et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9967305 | Braness | May 2018 | B2 |
10225299 | van der Schaar et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10321168 | van der Schaar et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10368096 | Braness et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10382785 | Braness et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010021276 | Zhou | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052077 | Fung et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052127 | Seo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020048450 | Zetts | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020067432 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020135607 | Kato et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141503 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154779 | Asano et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159528 | Graziani et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159598 | Rubinstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164024 | Arakawa et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169971 | Asano et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184515 | Oho et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002577 | Pinder | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044080 | Frishman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053541 | Sun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063675 | Kang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077071 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030135742 | Evans | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142594 | Tsumagari et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030206717 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210821 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040001594 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022391 | Obrien | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028227 | Yu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037421 | Truman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047592 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047607 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076237 | Kadono et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093494 | Nishimoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107356 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040184616 | Morten et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050004875 | Kontio et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013494 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050063541 | Candelore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076232 | Kawaguchi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114534 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144468 | Northcutt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177741 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050243912 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265555 | Pippuri | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013568 | Rodriguez | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015580 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026302 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060165163 | Burazerovic et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173887 | Breitfeld et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179239 | Fluhr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181965 | Collart | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235880 | Qian | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245727 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259588 | Lerman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263056 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267986 | Bae | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274835 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294164 | Armangau et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005333 | Setiohardjo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070031110 | Rijckaert | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044010 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047645 | Takashima | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047901 | Ando et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053513 | Hoffberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058928 | Naito et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067472 | Maertens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083467 | Lindahl et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083617 | Chakrabarti et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086528 | Mauchly et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100757 | Rhoads | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133603 | Weaver | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136817 | Nguyen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140647 | Kusunoki et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154165 | Hemmeryckz-Deleersnijder et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168541 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168542 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178933 | Nelson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180051 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180125 | Knowles et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185982 | Nakanowatari et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192810 | Pritchett et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217339 | Zhao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217759 | Dodd | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234391 | Hunter et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239839 | Buday et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255940 | Ueno | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271317 | Carmel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271385 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274679 | Yahata et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277219 | Toebes et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277234 | Bessonov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280298 | Hearn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288745 | Kwan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292107 | Yahata et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297422 | Matsuo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005175 | Bourke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008455 | De Lange et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043832 | Barkley et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046718 | Grab et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066181 | Haveson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077592 | Brodie et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086456 | Rasanen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086570 | Dey et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101466 | Swenson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080101718 | Yang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104633 | Noblecourt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120342 | Reed et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120389 | Bassali et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126248 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131078 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137541 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137736 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137847 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151817 | Fitchett | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172441 | Speicher et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187283 | Takahashi | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080192818 | DiPietro et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195664 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195744 | Bowra et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201705 | Wookey | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205860 | Holtman | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209534 | Keronen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240144 | Kruse et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256105 | Nogawa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263354 | Beuque et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271102 | Kienzle et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279535 | Haque et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294453 | Baird-Smith et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298358 | John et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310454 | Bellwood et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310496 | Fang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010622 | Yahata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013195 | Ochi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031220 | Tranchant et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037959 | Suh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048852 | Burns et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055546 | Jung et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060452 | Chaudhri | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064341 | Hartung et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066839 | Jung et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077143 | Macy, Jr. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097644 | Haruki | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106082 | Senti et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132599 | Soroushian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132721 | Soroushian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132824 | Terada et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136216 | Soroushian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150557 | Wormley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165148 | Frey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168795 | Segel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090169181 | Priyadarshi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172201 | Carmel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178090 | Oztaskent | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196139 | Bates et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201988 | Gazier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217317 | White et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226148 | Nesvadba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228395 | Wegner et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249081 | Zayas | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265737 | Issa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276636 | Grab et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282162 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290706 | Amini et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290708 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293116 | DeMello | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303241 | Priyadarshi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307258 | Priyadarshi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307267 | Chen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310819 | Hatano | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310933 | Lee | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313544 | Wood et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313564 | Rottler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316783 | Au et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328124 | Khouzam et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328228 | Schnell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040351 | Toma et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057928 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058405 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074324 | Qian et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074333 | Au et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100083322 | Rouse | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094969 | Zuckerman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095121 | Shetty et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106968 | Mori et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107260 | Orrell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111192 | Graves | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138903 | Medvinsky | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142915 | Mcdermott et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142917 | Isaji | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158109 | Dahlby et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161825 | Ronca et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166060 | Ezure et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186092 | Takechi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189183 | Gu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100218208 | Holden | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228795 | Hahn | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235472 | Sood et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250532 | Soroushian et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290761 | Drake et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299522 | Khambete et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306249 | Hill et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313225 | Cholas et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313226 | Cholas et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319014 | Lockett et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319017 | Cook | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332595 | Fullagar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002381 | Yang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010466 | Fan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016225 | Park et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110047209 | Lindholm et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055585 | Lee | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058675 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060808 | Martin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066673 | Outlaw | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067057 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078440 | Feng et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080940 | Bocharov | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082924 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096828 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103374 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107379 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116772 | Kwon et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126191 | Hughes et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129011 | Cilli et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110135090 | Chan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138018 | Raveendran et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142415 | Rhyu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145726 | Wei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145858 | Philpott et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149753 | Bapst et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150100 | Abadir | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153785 | Minborg et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153835 | Rimac et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173345 | Knox et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179185 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184738 | Kalisky et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191439 | Dazzi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191803 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197237 | Turner | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197261 | Dong et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197267 | Gravel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213827 | Kaspar et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222786 | Carmel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225302 | Park et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225315 | Wexler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225417 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239078 | Luby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246657 | Glow | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246659 | Bouazizi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246661 | Manzari et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252118 | Pantos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296048 | Knox et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314130 | Strasman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005312 | Mcgowan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017282 | Kang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120042090 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047542 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120110120 | Willig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167132 | Mathews et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120257678 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311174 | Bichot et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331167 | Hunt | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013803 | Bichot et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130080267 | McGowan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130124859 | Pestoni et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130170561 | Hannuksela | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179589 | Mccarthy et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140019593 | Reznik et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140096171 | Shivadas et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140096269 | Amidei et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140140253 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149557 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140247869 | Su | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150288530 | Oyman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150288996 | Van Der Schaar et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160112382 | Kiefer et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170214947 | Kiefer et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170280203 | Chan et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180060543 | Grab et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180131980 | Van Der Schaar et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180220153 | Braness et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180262757 | Naletov et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180332094 | Braness | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190045219 | Braness et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190045220 | Braness et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190158553 | Van Der Schaar et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190356928 | Braness et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010203605 | May 2015 | AU |
2237293 | Jul 1997 | CA |
2823829 | Jan 2019 | CA |
0818111 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1187483 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1453319 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1283640 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2180664 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2360923 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2616991 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2661696 | May 2020 | EP |
1125765 | Aug 2009 | HK |
2001209726 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002164880 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003179597 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004304767 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004328218 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006155500 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006521035 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2009530917 | Aug 2009 | JP |
5200204 | Jun 2013 | JP |
5723888 | May 2015 | JP |
6078574 | Feb 2017 | JP |
2018160923 | Oct 2018 | JP |
6453291 | Jan 2019 | JP |
6657313 | Feb 2020 | JP |
2020080551 | May 2020 | JP |
20040039852 | May 2004 | KR |
20060106250 | Oct 2006 | KR |
20070005699 | Jan 2007 | KR |
20100106418 | Oct 2010 | KR |
101874907 | Jul 2018 | KR |
101917763 | Nov 2018 | KR |
102072839 | Jan 2020 | KR |
102122189 | Jun 2020 | KR |
2328040 | Jun 2008 | RU |
146026 | Dec 2010 | SG |
2000049762 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2000049763 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2001004892 | Jan 2001 | WO |
2003030000 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003047262 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003096136 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004012378 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004100158 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005008385 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005015935 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005109224 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2009006302 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009070770 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009109976 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010108053 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010111261 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011087449 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011101371 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012035533 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP11774529 Supplementary European Search Report, completed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pgs. |
Final draft ETSI ES 202 109, V1.1.1, ETSI Standard, Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA); Security; Synchronization mechanism for end-to-end encryption, Oct. 2002, 17 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950, Report Completed Dec. 18, 2009, 3 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/56733, dated Jun. 5, 2012, 5 pgs. |
International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.233, Line Transmission of Non-Telephone Signals, Confidentiality System for Audiovisual Services, ITU-T Recommendation H.233, Mar. 1993, 18 pgs. |
Open DML AVI-M-JPEG File Format Subcommittee, “Open DML AVI File Format Extensions”, Version 1.02, Feb. 28, 1996, 29 pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 07758499.3, Report Completed Jan. 25, 2013, 8 pgs. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950 filed Mar. 14, 2007, report completed Mar. 1, 2008; report dated Mar. 19, 2008, 6 pgs. |
3GPP TS 26.247, V1.3.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects Transparent end-to-end Packet-switches Streaming Services (PSS);, Progressive Download and Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (3GP-DASH) (Release 10), Mar. 2011, 72 pgs. |
“Draft CR: Trick Mode for HTTP Streaming”, 3GPP TSG-SA4 Meeting #58, Apr. 26-30, 2010, Vancouver, Canada, S4-100237, 3 pgs. |
“DVD-Mpeg differences”, printed on Jul. 2, 2009, http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/dvdmpeg.html, 1 pg. |
“Information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 17: Streaming text”, International Organisation for Standardisation, Feb. 2004, 22 pgs. |
“Information—Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 13818-1, Draft 1209, Apr. 25, 1995, 151 pages. |
“MPEG-4 File Format, Version 2”, Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections, Retrieved from: https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000155.shtml, Last updated Feb. 21, 2017, 8 pgs. |
Adams et al, “Will http adaptive streaming become the dominant mode of video delivery in cable networks?”, https://www.nctatechnicalpapers.com/Paper/2011/2011-will-http-adaptive-streaming-become-the-dominant-mode-of-video-delivery-in-cable-networks-, 10 pgs. |
Adhikari et al., “Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery”, 2012 Proceedings IEEE InfoCom, Mar. 25-30, 2012, Orlando, Florida, 9 pgs. |
Adzic et al, “Optimized Adaptive HTTP Streaming for Mobile Devices”, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIV, vol. 8135, Sep. 2011, p. 81350T-1-81350T-10. |
Bloom et al., “Copy Protection for DVD Video”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1267-1276. |
Concolato et al., “Live HTTP Streaming of Video and Subtitles within a Browser”, MMSys 2013, Feb. 26-Mar. 1, 2013, Oslo, Norway, 5 pgs. |
De Cock et al., “Complexity-Based Consistent-Quality Encoding in the Cloud”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Date of Conference Sep. 25-28, 2016, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 1484-1488. |
Eskicioglu et al., “An Integrated Approach to Encrypting Scalable Video”, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Aug. 26-29, 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs. |
Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Internet Citation, Jan. 25, 2010, pp. 1-37. |
Hartung et al., “DRM Protected Dynamic Adaptive HTTP Streaming”, MMSys 2011 Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems, San Jose, California, Feb. 23-25, 2011, pp. 277-282. |
Hurtado Guzman, Juan Esteban “Development and Implementation of an Adaptive HTTP Streaming Framework for H264/MVC Coded Media”, Politecnico di Torino, Nov. 2010, 108 pgs. |
Hwang et al., “Efficient and User Friendly Inter-domain Device Authentication/Access control for Home Networks”, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 1-4, 2006, pp. 131-140. |
Li et al, “Content-Aware Playout and Packet Scheduling for Video Streaming Over Wireless Links”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 5, Aug. 2008, pp. 885-895. |
Lian et al., “Efficient video encryption scheme based on advanced video coding”, Multimed. Tools Appl. vol. 38, 2008, pp. 75-89. |
Lin et al., “Multipass Encoding for Reducing Pulsing Artifacts in Cloud Based Video Transcoding”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Date of Conference Sep. 27, 30, 2015, Quebec City, QC, Canada, pp. 907-911. |
Liu et al., “A Formal Framework for Component Deployment”, OOPSLA 2006, Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Language, and Applications, Portland, Oregon, Oct. 22-26, 2006, pp. 325-344. |
Miras, “On Quality Aware Adaptation of Internet Video”, University of London, PhD dissertation, May 2004, 181 pgs. |
Moscoso, Pedro Gomes “Interactive Internet TV Architecture Based on Scalable Video Coding”, Instituto Superior Techico, Universidad Technica de Lisboa, May 2011, 103 pgs. |
Oyman et al, “Quality of Experience for HTTP Adaptive Streaming Services”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 2012, vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 20-27, DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6178830. |
Ozer, Jan “Adaptive Streaming in the Field”, Streaming Media, Dec. 2010-Jan. 2011, pp. 36-47. |
Padiadpu, Rashmi “Towards Mobile Learning: A SCORM Player for the Google Android Platform”, Master Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 2008, 66 pgs. |
Peek, David “Consumer Distributed File Systems”, Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, 2009, 118 pgs. |
Rosenberg et al., “Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)”, Network Working Group, RFC 3840, Aug. 2004, 36 pgs. |
Tripathi et al, “Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling”, Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/computerscience-pubs/96, 2001, 17 pgs. |
Unknown, “MPEG-4 Video Encoder: Based on International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-2”, Patni Computer Systems, Ltd., publication date unknown, 15 pgs. |
Venkatramani et al., “Securing Media for Adaptive Streaming”, Multimedia 2003 Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Berkeley, California, 4 pgs. |
Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies—Part 7: Common Encryption in ISO Base Media File Format Files (ISO/IEC 23001-7), Apr. 2015, 24 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12 Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 12: ISO base media file format, Feb. 2004 (“MPEG-4 Part 12 Standard”), 62 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008(E) Informational Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Part 12: ISO Base Media File Format, Oct. 2008, 120 pgs. |
ISO/IEC FCD 23001-6 MPEG systems technologies Part 6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Jan. 28, 2011, 86 pgs. |
Microsoft Corporation, Advanced Systems Format (ASF) Specification, Revision 01.20.03, Dec. 2004, 121 pgs. |
MPEG-DASH presentation at Streaming Media West 2011, Nov. 2011, 14 pgs. |
Pomelo, LLC Tech Memo, Analysis of Netflix's Security Framework for ‘Watch Instantly’ Service, Mar.-Apr. 2009, 18 pgs. |
Server-Side Stream Repackaging (Streaming Video Technologies Panorama, Part 2), Jul. 2011, 15 pgs. |
Text of ISO/IEC 23001-6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Oct. 2010, 71 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), ETSI TS 126 233 V9.1.0 (Jun. 2011) 3GPP TS 26.233 version 9.1.0 Release 9, 18 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); ETSI TS 126 244 V9.4.0 (May 2011) 3GPP TS 26.244 version 9.4.0 Release 9, 58 pgs. |
“Apple HTTP Live Streaming specification”, Aug. 2017, 60 pgs. |
“Data Encryption Decryption using AES Algorithm, Key and Salt with Java Cryptography Extension”, Available at https://www.digizol.com/2009/10/java-encrypt-decrypt-jce-salt.html, Oct. 200, 6 pgs. |
“Delivering Live and On-Demand Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, 2009, 28 pgs. |
“HTTP Based Adaptive Streaming over HSPA”, Apr. 2011, 73 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Mar. 2011, 24 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Sep. 2011, 33 pgs. |
“Java Cryptography Architecture API Specification & Reference”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html, Jul. 25, 2004, 68 pgs. |
“Java Cryptography Extension, javax.crypto.Cipher class”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/crypto/Cipher.html, 2004, 24 pgs. |
“JCE Encryption—Data Encryption Standard (DES) Tutorial”, Available at https://mkyong.com/java/jce-encryption-data-encryption-standard-des-tutorial/, Feb. 25, 2009, 2 pgs. |
“Live and On-Demand Video with Silverlight and IIS Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, Windows Server Internet Information Services 7.0, Feb. 2010, 15 pgs. |
“Microsoft Smooth Streaming specification”, Jul. 22, 2013, 56 pgs. |
“Single-Encode Streaming for Multiple Screen Delivery”, Telestream Wowza Media Systems, 2009, 6 pgs. |
“The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, 7 pgs. |
“Windows Media Player 9”, Microsoft, Mar. 23, 2017, 3 pgs. |
Abomhara et al., “Enhancing Selective Encryption for H.264/AVC Using Advanced Encryption Standard”, International Journal of computer Theory and Engineering, Apr. 2010, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-229. |
Alattar et al., “Improved selective encryption techniques for secure transmission of MPEG video bit-streams”, In Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348), vol. 4, IEEE, 1999, pp. 256-260. |
Antoniou et al., “Adaptive Methods for the Transmission of Video Streams in Wireless Networks”, 2015, 50 pgs. |
Apostolopoulos et al., “Secure Media Streaming and Secure Transcoding”, Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management, 2006, 33 pgs. |
Asai et al., “Essential Factors for Full-Interactive VOD Server: Video File System, Disk Scheduling, Network”, Proceedings of Globecom '95, Nov. 14-16, 1995, 6 pgs. |
Beker et al., “Cipher Systems, The Protection of Communications”, 1982, 40 pgs. |
Bocharov et al, “Portable Encoding of Audio-Video Objects, The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF)”, Microsoft Corporation, First Edition Sep. 8, 2009, 30 pgs. |
Bulterman et al., “Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0)”, W3C Recommendation, Dec. 1, 2008, https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SMIL3-20081201/, 321 pgs. (presented in five parts). |
Cahill et al., “Locally Adaptive Deblocking Filter for Low Bit Rate Video”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs. |
Candelore, U.S. Appl. No. 60/372,901, filed Apr. 16, 2002, 5 pgs. |
Chaddha et al., “A Frame-work for Live Multicast of Video Streams over the Internet”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs. |
Cheng, “Partial Encryption for Image and Video Communication”, Thesis, Fall 1998, 95 pgs. |
Cheng et al., “Partial encryption of compressed images and videos”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 33 pgs. |
Cheung et al., “On the Use of Destination Set Grouping to Improve Fairness in Multicast Video Distribution”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, IEEE, 1996, 23 pgs. |
Collet, “Delivering Protected Content, An Approach for Next Generation Mobile Technologies”, Thesis, 2010, 84 pgs. |
Diamantis et al., “Real Time Video Distribution using Publication through a Database”, Proceedings SIBGRAPI'98. International Symposium on Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision (Cat. No. 98EX237), Oct. 1990, 8 pgs. |
Dworkin, “Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods and Techniques”, NIST Special Publication 800-38A, 2001, 66 pgs. |
Fang et al., “Real-time deblocking filter for MPEG-4 systems”, Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Oct. 28-31, 2002, Bail, Indonesia, 4 pgs. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP1.1”, Network Working Group, RFC 2616, Jun. 1999, 114 pgs. |
Fukuda et al., “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts by Adaptive DCT Coefficient Estimation in Block-Based Video Coding”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs. |
Huang, U.S. Pat. No. 7,729,426, U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,794, filed Sep. 20, 2005, 143 pgs. |
Huang et al., “Adaptive MLP post-processing for block-based coded images”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 463-473. |
Huang et al., “Architecture Design for Deblocking Filter in H.264/JVT/AVC”, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo., Jul. 6-9, 2003, Baltimore, MD, 4 pgs. |
Jain et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/522,623, filed Aug. 11, 2011, 44 pgs. |
Jung et al., “Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Personal Video Recorder for DTV”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Nov. 2001, 6 pgs. |
Kalva, Hari, “Delivering MPEG-4 Based Audio-Visual Services”, 2001, 113 pgs. |
Kang et al., “Access Emulation and Buffering Techniques for Steaming of Non-Stream Format Video Files”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 43, No. 3, Aug. 2001, 7 pgs. |
Kim et al, “A Deblocking Filter with Two Separate Modes in Block-based Video Coding”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 9, No. 1, 1999, pp. 156-160. |
Kim et al., “Tree-Based Group Key Agreement”, Feb. 2004, 37 pgs. |
Laukens, “Adaptive Streaming—A Brief Tutorial”, EBU Technical Review, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Legault et al., “Professional Video Under 32-bit Windows Operating Systems”, SMPTE Journal, vol. 105, No. 12, Dec. 1996, 10 pgs. |
Li et al., “Layered Video Multicast with Retransmission (LVMR): Evaluation of Hierarchical Rate Control”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century, Cat. No. 98, vol. 3, 1998, 26 pgs. |
List et al., “Adaptive deblocking filter”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 614-619. |
Massoudi et al., “Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video: Challenges and Perspectives”, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, Nov. 2008, 18 pgs. |
McCanne et al., “Receiver-driven Layered Multicast”, Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, Aug. 1996, 14 pgs. |
Meier, “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in Image and Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 3, Apr. 1999, pp. 490-500. |
Newton et al., “Preserving Privacy by De-identifying Facial Images”, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, Technical Report, CMU-CS-03-119, Mar. 2003, 26 pgs. |
O'Brien, U.S. Appl. No. 60/399,846, filed Jul. 30, 2002, 27 pgs. |
O'Rourke, “Improved Image Decompression for Reduced Transform Coding Artifacts”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 5, No. 6, Dec. 1995, pp. 490-499. |
Park et al., “A postprocessing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 161-171. |
Richardson, “H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression”, Wiley, 2003, 306 pgs. (presented in 2 parts). |
Sima et al., “An Efficient Architecture for Adaptive Deblocking Filter of H.264 AVC Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 292-296. |
Spanos et al., “Performance Study of a Selective Encryption Scheme for the Security of Networked, Real-Time Video”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, IC3N'95, Sep. 20-23, 1995, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 2-10. |
Srinivasan et al., “Windows Media Video 9: overview and applications”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2004, 25 pgs. |
Stockhammer, “Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP—Standards and Design Principles”, Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia, Feb. 2011, pp. 133-145. |
Timmerer et al., “HTTP Streaming of MPEG Media”, Proceedings of Streaming Day, 2010, 4 pgs. |
Tiphaigne et al., “A Video Package for Torch”, Jun. 2004, 46 pgs. |
Trappe et al., “Key Management and Distribution for Secure Multimedia Multicast”, IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 2003, pp. 544-557. |
Van Deursen et al., “On Media Delivery Protocols in the Web”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Jul. 19-23, 2010, 6 pgs. |
Ventura, Guillermo Albaida, “Streaming of Multimedia Learning Objects”, AG Integrated Communication System, Mar. 2003, 101 pgs. |
Waggoner, “Compression for Great Digital Video”, 2002, 184 pgs. |
Watanabem et al., “MPEG-2 decoder enables DTV trick plays”, esearcher System LSI Development Lab, Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan, Jun. 2001, 2 pgs. |
Wiegand, “Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG”, Jan. 2002, 70 pgs. |
Willig et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/409,285, filed Nov. 2, 2010, 43 pgs. |
Yang et al., “Projection-Based Spatially Adaptive Reconstruction of Block-Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 896-908. |
Yang et al., “Regularized Reconstruction to Reduce Blocking Artifacts of Block Discrete Cosine Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 6, Dec. 1993, pp. 421-432. |
Yu et al., “Video deblocking with fine-grained scalable complexity for embedded mobile computing”, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2004, pp. 1173-1178. |
Zakhor, “Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1992, pp. 91-95. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20172313.7 Search completed Aug. 19, 2020, dated Aug. 27, 2020, 11 Pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190297364 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61975789 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15863456 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16436429 | US | |
Parent | 14679469 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15863456 | US |