Hand washing is an important practice for limiting the spread of disease and infection within hospitals. Most hospitals have a “wash-in, wash-out” policy in which hospital staff members, such as doctors and nurses, are required to wash their hands both before entering a patient's room and after leaving it. Unfortunately, compliance with such policies is typically only in the 50 to 60% range.
Because of the low compliance with wash-in, wash-out policies, several hospitals have installed sophisticated hygiene compliance systems that automatically track staff members and their hand washing habits. In such systems, each staff member wears an identification badge that is automatically scanned by the system when the staff member enters or exits a patient room. The system detects whether or not soap was dispensed to the staff member and then logs whether or not the staff member washed his or her hands.
While such hygiene compliance systems can be effective, they have several inherent drawbacks. As a first matter, these systems are relatively complex and are, therefore, relatively expensive to purchase and install. In addition, some staff members do not appreciate being individually monitored by the system and feel as though it is too intrusive. Furthermore, these systems only work for individuals who are wearing a badge. Therefore, they are ineffective in relation to staff members who are not wearing their badge or members of the general public, such as patient family members.
In view of the above discussion, it can be appreciated that it would be desirable to have an alternative system and method for encouraging individuals to wash their hands in hospital settings.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
As described above, it would be desirable to have an alternative system and method for encouraging individuals to wash their hands in hospital settings. Disclosed herein are simple and inexpensive hand washing compliance systems and methods that are configured to encourage all individuals, and not just hospital staff members, to at least wash their hands prior to entering a hospital room. In some embodiments, a hand washing compliance system comprises a primary soap dispenser that is located near the entrance of the room and one or more secondary soap dispensers that are located within the room. The primary and secondary soap dispensers comprise electronics including motion sensors, soap dispensation sensors, and communication devices that enable the dispensers to communicate with each other and share information.
The compliance system can be configured to operate in various ways. In some embodiments, the primary soap dispenser is configured to detect when any individual enters the room and, if the individual had not already dispensed soap from the primary soap dispenser, signal the one or more secondary soap dispensers in the room to notify them of this fact. If, the individual does not dispense soap from one of the soap dispensers after a predetermined period of time, a visual and/or audible alert is emitted. When the alert is emitted, the individual is reminded to wash his or her hands and the others in the room are notified that the individual (e.g., a hospital staff member) is not in compliance with hospital policy. Accordingly, not only is the individual reminded to wash, the individual is further encouraged to wash to appease others in the room. If the individual then dispenses soap from any of the soap dispensers, the alert is canceled. If, on the other hand, the individual does not dispense soap after a further predetermined period of time, the alert can escalate in intensity to further encourage the individual to wash his or her hands. In some embodiments, a similar process can be performed by the system when any individual exits the room.
In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
Mounted to an inside wall 24 within the room 10 is a first secondary soap dispenser 26. Like the primary soap dispenser 18, the secondary soap dispenser 26 is configured to store and dispense soap as well as to detect dispensation of soap from the soap dispenser. In the embodiment of
The doorway sensor 34 is configured to detect passage of an individual through a doorway or other entrance of a hospital room. In some embodiments, the doorway sensor 34 comprises a motion detector, such as a passive or active infrared (IR) sensor that is tripped when an individual passes through the doorway. Notably, in cases in which each soap dispenser comprises the same electronic system 30, the doorway sensor 34 can be disabled when the system is applied to one of the secondary soap dispensers 26.
The soap dispensation sensor 36 is a sensor that is configured to detect a soap dispensation event. For example, the dispensation sensor 36 can be the existing motion detector of the soap dispenser that detects the presence of an individual's hand below the soap dispenser, which prompts automatic, touch-free dispensation of soap. In other embodiments, the soap dispensation sensor can be a separate sensor that detects activation of a dispensing mechanism of the soap dispenser. In either case, activation of the sensor is indicative of an individual receiving soap and using it to wash his or her hands.
The power source 38 is used to supply power (voltage) to the microcontroller 32 and the other components of the electronic system 30. In some embodiments, the power source 38 comprises one or more conventional or rechargeable batteries. In other embodiments, power can be provided by an external power source, such as that supplied by the building in which the room is located.
The communication device 40 enables the various soap dispensers to communicate with each other to share information. In some embodiments, the communication devices 40 comprise wireless transceivers that implement an appropriate local area wireless protocol, such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. As described below, the information that is communicated between the soap dispensers can include detection of entry of an individual into the room and/or detection of dispensation of soap.
The warning indicators 42 are the components with which the hand washing compliance of an individual who has entered or exited a room can be conveyed. In some embodiments, the indicators 42 comprise one or both of one or more lights (e.g. light emitting diodes (LEDs)) that can be used to generate visual alerts and a speaker that can be used to generate audible alerts.
Beginning with block 80 of
With further reference to decision block 84, if a recent previous soap dispensation was detected, it can be assumed that the individual who entered the room is the one who dispensed the soap and that he or she is in compliance with hospital hand washing (“wash-in”) policy. In such a case, there is no need for further action and flow can return to block 80 at which the continuous monitoring continues. If, on the other hand, a recent previous soap dispensation was not detected, it can be assumed that the individual entering the room did not wash his or her hands prior to entry and is, therefore, not in compliance with hospital hand washing policy. The individual can, however, still comply with the policy by obtaining soap from one of the secondary soap dispensers within the room. Therefore, flow continues to block 86 at which the primary soap dispenser initiates a first timer to provide the individual with a first compliance time period with which to wash his or her hands in the room. By way of example, this first compliance time period can be in the range of 15 to 20 seconds.
Referring next to decision block 88, the primary soap dispenser determines whether or not a secondary soap dispenser has dispensed soap within the first compliance time period. In some embodiments, this determination is made by monitoring for signals transmitted to the primary soap dispenser from the secondary soap dispensers. When soap is dispensed from one of the secondary soap dispensers in the room, the secondary soap dispenser senses this dispensation and transmits a confirmation message to the primary soap dispenser. If such message is received within the first compliance time period, the individual who entered the room has complied with the hand washing policy. Accordingly, no further action is required and flow returns to block 80 at which the continuous monitoring continues.
If, on the other hand, none of the secondary soap dispensers detects soap dispensation within the first compliance time period, flow continues to block 90 at which the primary soap dispenser transmits a command to the secondary soap dispensers instructing them to activate a visual alert, and initiates a second timer to provide the individual with a second compliance time period with which to wash his or her hands in the room. By way of example, the second compliance time period can also be in the range of 15 to 20 seconds. In response to receiving the command from the primary soap dispenser, the secondary soap dispensers each activate a visual warning indicator, as indicated in block 92 of
Flow next continues to decision block 94 at which the primary soap dispenser determines whether or not a secondary soap dispenser has dispensed soap within the second compliance time period. Again, this determination can be made by monitoring for signals transmitted to the primary soap dispenser from the secondary soap dispensers. If soap dispensation occurred within that time period, the individual who entered the room will have complied with the hand washing policy. In such a case, flow continues to block 96 the primary soap dispenser transmits a command to the secondary soap dispensers instructing them to cancel their visual alerts. In response to receiving this command, the secondary soap dispensers deactivate their visual warning indicators, as indicated in block 98, and flow can then again return to block 80 of
With reference back to decision block 94, if none of the secondary soap dispensers detects soap dispensation within the second compliance time period, flow continues to block 100 at which the primary soap dispenser transmits a command to the secondary soap dispensers instructing them to activate an audible alert, and initiates a third timer to provide the individual with a third compliance time period with which to wash his or her hands in the room. By way of example, the third compliance time period can also be in the range of 15 to 20 seconds. In response to receiving the command from the primary soap dispenser, the secondary soap dispensers each activate an audible warning indicator, as indicated in block 102.
Flow next continues to decision block 104 of
With reference back to decision block 104, if none of the secondary soap dispensers detects soap dispensation within the third predetermined time period, it is unlikely that hand washing policy compliance will be achieved. Accordingly, the system can simply be reset. In such a case, flow continues to block 110 at which the primary soap dispenser transmits a reset command to the secondary soap dispensers and, as indicated in block 108, the secondary soap dispensers deactivate their audible and visual warning indicators. Once again, flow returns to block 80 of
The above flow diagram describes just one example of operation of the hand washing compliance system. Many alternatives are possible. For instance, while the primary soap dispenser was described as controlling the secondary soap dispensers, each soap dispenser can operate independently. For instance, in some embodiments, each secondary soap dispenser can activate and deactivate its alerts on its own without waiting for a command from the primary soap dispenser.
In another alternative, the system can automatically reset in situations in which there are multiple consecutive passages through the room entrance detected. Such a circumstance may be indicative of an emergency situation in which multiple hospital staff members are rushing to the aid of a patient. In such a case, hand washing compliance may not be a top priority and a visual and/or audible alert may be a distraction.
In a further alternative, the system can be programmable so that it is deactivated for particular periods of time. For example, the system can be deactivated for night-time hours when the patient is likely sleeping.
In yet another alternative, the alerts can take other forms. For instance, an alert can comprise a recorded message that requests that the individual entering the room to wash his or her hands. As another example, an alert can comprise a playful recorded message, such as a sound clip from a movie or television show, which may come across as less officious.
To reduce the likelihood of false positive detections of room entry, one or more of the secondary soap dispensers can also comprise a motion detector that can detect the presence of the individual who has entered the room. In such a case, detected motion by the secondary soap dispenser soon after detection of an individual passing through the doorway provides a form of confirmation that the passage through the room entrance detected by the primary soap dispenser was in fact a room entry, while the absence of detected motion by the secondary soap dispenser provides an indication that the passage detected by the primary soap dispenser was actually a room exit, in which case there is no wash-in policy with which to comply.
In another embodiment, the primary soap dispenser can be configured to distinguish between room entry and room exit. By way of example, the primary soap dispenser doorway sensor can comprise two independent motion sensors that are activated by movement at different positions within the room entrance. In such a case, room entry can be distinguished from room exit by the order in which the sensors are activated. For instance, when a first sensor positioned or directed near the outside of the room entrance is tripped prior to a second sensor positioned or directed near the inside of the room entrance is tripped, it can be assumed that the individual has entered the room. If the sensors are activated in the reverse order, it can be assumed that the individual has exited the room.
While the systems disclosed above have been described as encouraging wash-in compliance, i.e., hand washing when entering a room, the system can also be configured to encourage wash-out compliance, i.e., hand washing when exiting a room. In cases in which the system encourages both forms of washing, wash-in can be encouraged with alerts issued by one or more soap dispensers within the room while wash-out can be encouraged with alerts issued by one or more soap dispensers, or other alerting devices, outside of the room.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/157,745, filed May 6, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4896144 | Bogstad | Jan 1990 | A |
6975231 | Lane | Dec 2005 | B2 |
8344893 | Drammeh | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8482406 | Snodgrass | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8558660 | Nix et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564431 | Snodgrass | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8744623 | Drake et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9030325 | Tanesff | May 2015 | B2 |
9047755 | Bonner | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060655 | Iseri et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9123233 | Hermann | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9159216 | Limbert et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20020000449 | Armstrong | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20090224907 | Sinha | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100164728 | Plost | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110234407 | Harris et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120062382 | Taneff | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120112906 | Borke | May 2012 | A1 |
20120212582 | Deutsch | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120303159 | Drake et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002571 | Skinner | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027199 | Bonner | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130229276 | Hunter | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140074285 | Wegelin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140225732 | Limbert et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266692 | Freedman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279603 | Ortiz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150194043 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150228181 | Himmelmann et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235549 | Debmed | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150313422 | Ophardt | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160042635 | Rosebraugh | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202677403 | Jan 2013 | CN |
WO2013058821 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013070888 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO2013151933 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO2014060726 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014145400 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2015109022 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO2015117112 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160328948 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62157745 | May 2015 | US |