Systems and methods for enhancing dimensioning

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/799,762 for Systems and Methods for Enhancing Dimensioning, For Example Volume Dimensioning filed Mar. 13, 2013 (and published Sep. 18, 2014 as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0267609), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,080,856. Each of the foregoing patent application, patent publication, and patent is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY

This disclosure generally relates to non-contact dimensioning systems and methods for determining dimensions and/or volume of objects.

BACKGROUND

Dimensioning systems are useful for providing dimensional and volumetric data related to three-dimensional objects disposed within a field-of-view of the dimensioning system. Such dimensional and volumetric information is useful for example, in providing consumers with accurate shipping rates based on the actual size and volume of the object being shipped. Additionally, the dimensioning system's ability to transmit parcel data immediately to a carrier can assist the carrier in selecting and scheduling appropriately sized vehicles based on measured cargo volume and dimensions. Finally, the ready availability of dimensional and volumetric information for all the objects within a carrier's network assists the carrier in ensuring optimal use of available space in the many different vehicles, containers, and/or warehouses used in local, interstate, and international commerce.

A wide variety of computing devices are used within the shipping industry. For example, personal computers used as multi-tasking terminals in small storefront packing and shipping establishments. Also, for example, dedicated self-service shipping kiosks found in many post offices. As a further example, dedicated handheld scanners are frequently used as mobile terminals by many international shipping corporations. The wide variety of form factors found in the shipping industry are quite diverse, yet all rely upon providing accurate information, such as parcel dimensions and volume, to both the user in order to provide accurate shipping rates and to the carrier in order to accurately forecast shipping volumes.

A number of volume dimensioning systems rely upon the use of structured light. By projecting a structured light pattern into a three-dimensional space containing at least one object, the shift in position (i.e., parallax) of the structured light within the three-dimensional space may be used to determine one or more dimensions of the object. The comparison between the structured light pattern present in the acquired image containing the object and a reference image to determine the parallax shift and consequently the volume dimensions of the object is performed graphically, often by comparing portions of the acquired image to portions of the entire reference image to determine a pattern “match.” Such image intensive processing requires significant computing resources and speed to provide response times expected for use in commerce and industry.

Structured light patterns can take many forms, including an outwardly apparent random pattern of elements (e.g., visible or invisible electromagnetic radiation in the form of “dots” or “spots”) which is, to the contrary, highly structured. The arrangement of elements within the pattern is such that any group including a defined number of elements (e.g., three or more) is unique among all other groups containing an identical number of elements within in the pattern. Thus in some element patterns, any group of seven elements is unique among all groups of seven elements appearing in the pattern.

Projecting such a pattern of elements into a three-dimensional space that includes an object for volume dimensioning permits the determination of the volume dimension of the object based on the parallax shift that occurs in at least a portion of the elements in the pattern when the acquired image data is compared to reference data of the three-dimensional space without the object. Determination of parallax shift between the acquired image of the three-dimensional space with an object and containing the pattern of elements and a reference image containing the pattern of elements is a two step process in which corresponding elements in the acquired image and the reference image are identified. After corresponding elements in the reference image and the acquired image are identified, the parallax shift between the elements can be calculated, and dimensional information of the object obtained.

The identification of corresponding elements in the reference image and the acquired image may be performed graphically using a processor-based device to sequentially compare a portion of the acquired image with portions of the reference image until a “match” between the patterns is detected by the processor. Such graphical comparisons are generally computationally intensive, requiring the use of either high speed processors or multiple processors to reduce the time required to match the pattern in the acquired image with the pattern in the reference image to a level acceptable for use in industry and commerce.

SUMMARY

It has been advantageously found that if element location data is extracted from the acquired image and compiled as numerical data into a coordinate data list, such a list of numerical element location data may be more expeditiously compared to numerical reference element location data in a similar reference data list. Such comparisons of numerical lists are well within the capabilities of lower speed processors such as those found in many portable electronic devices. Thus, the use of a coordinate data list including numerical data indicative of element locations in an element pattern obtained from an acquired image of a three-dimensional space containing an object and a reference data list including numerical data indicative of reference element locations in a reference element pattern can speed the volume dimensioning process and advantageously permit the use of portable electronic devices to provide highly accurate volume dimensioning data.

Additional enhancements in speed and efficiency of pattern matching are obtained by sorting the coordinate data list and/or the reference data list. Another enhancement to the speed and efficiency of pattern matching is obtained by comparing a limited number of groups of pattern elements, each group including a sufficient number of elements to form a unique set of elements within the acquired image to the reference data list. Such a comparison between coordinate data associated with element locations in a group including a limited number of elements and the coordinate data of reference elements in the reference data list can be performed using patterned searches. For example, a search focusing only on coordinate locations of reference elements within the reference data list that are proximate a reference element matching an element included in a group of elements may beneficially take advantage of the fact that elements included in the group of elements are often found to match reference elements in close proximity within the reference data list.

Another enhancement in speed and efficiency of pattern matching is obtained by converting the coordinate locations of acquired elements included in a particular group into a locally referenced locations in which the locations of all of the elements included in the particular group are locally referenced to a single element included in the respective group. For example, an angle and a distance may be used to reference the location of each of the elements included in a group to a single element in the respective group. The coordinate data of the reference elements included in the reference data list may be converted to a similar locally-referenced coordinate system. The unique angle and distance data for each group can then be compared with reference angle and distance data for the reference elements included in the reference data list. In such an instance, determining the correspondence between the reference element in the group (i.e., the “origin,” for the locally referenced coordinate system) and a reference element in the reference data list effective matches every element in the group with a corresponding reference element in the reference data list.

An enhancement in dimensional accuracy may be obtained by more precisely determining the center of intensity of each element appearing in the pattern in the acquired image data prior to determining the coordinates of the respective element. Such a center of intensity may be determined by analyzing the grayscale intensity distribution of each element in the acquired image data to identify a “center of intensity” of the element and associating the coordinate location of the element with the identified center of intensity of the respective element.

A portable structured light dimensioning system to determine a volume dimension of an object may be summarized as including an image acquisition device to acquire image data representative of at least an element pattern projected into a three dimensional space that includes at least one object; at least one processor communicably coupled to the image acquisition device; and at least one nontransitory storage medium communicably coupled to the at least one processor and having stored therein at least one set of machine executable instructions that when executed by the at least one processor cause the at least one processor to: determine coordinate data associated with each element location in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data; generate a number of coordinate data lists, each including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data; for each coordinate data list: compare the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list including reference coordinate data associated with reference element locations in a reference element pattern; and select for each of the at least three element locations, a corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern; and determine a spatial shift between the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data and the coordinate data associated with the respective corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: for each coordinate data list, compare the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list by performing for the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations, at least one of: a top-to-bottom search, or, a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with the respective element location with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the processor to: for each coordinate data list, sort the coordinate data using a defined sort pattern to provide a respective ordered coordinate data list.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list perform at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list; and for coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, perform at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding element location.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list perform at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of an ordered reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the ordered reference data list; and for coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, perform at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the ordered reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding remaining element location.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the processor to: generate an ordered coordinate data list about each of a number of points of interest in the acquired image data to provide the number of ordered coordinate data lists, each ordered coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with each of at least three element locations about each respective point of interest.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: accept a number of user inputs, each of the user inputs corresponding to one of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: autonomously determine each of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list, convert the coordinate data associated with the at least three element locations in the acquired image data to a second, locally-referenced coordinate system that relates the coordinate data associated a first of the at least three elements included the respective ordered coordinate data list to the coordinate data associated with each of the other of the at least three elements included in the respective ordered coordinate data list to provide a respective ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: for each ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list perform at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of a locally-referenced, reference data list in which the coordinate data associated with each reference element is related to coordinate data associated with a number of neighboring reference elements in the reference pattern, to compare the locally-referenced coordinate data associated with the first of the at least three elements in the ordered, locally-referenced, coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the locally-referenced, reference data list.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data; and determine coordinate data corresponding to the determined center of intensity of the element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data using grayscale values associated with each of the respective element locations.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: determine a respective distance between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in at least a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the at least one object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

The machine executable instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, may further cause the at least one processor to: determine a respective volume dimension associated with the at least one object using the determined respective distances between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in at least a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the at least one object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

A structured light dimensioning method to determine a volume dimension of an object may be summarized as including determining by at least one processor coordinate data corresponding to element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in acquired image data provided by at least one communicably coupled image capture device; generating by the at least one processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data; storing each of the number of coordinate data lists in at least one nontransitory storage media communicably coupled to the at least one processor; for each coordinate data list: comparing by the at least one processor the coordinate data associated each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list stored in at least one nontransitory storage media communicably coupled to the at least one processor, the reference data list including reference coordinate data associated with reference element locations in a reference element pattern; selecting by the at least one processor, for each of the at least three element locations, a corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern; and determining by the at least one processor a spatial shift between the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data and the coordinate data associated with the respective corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern.

Comparing by the at least one processor the coordinate data associated each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list may include comparing by the at least one processor the coordinate data associated each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list by performing for the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations, at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with the respective element location with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list.

The method may further include for each coordinate data list, sorting by the at least one processor the coordinate data using a defined sort pattern to provide a respective ordered coordinate data list.

The method may further include for each ordered coordinate data list, performing by the at least one processor at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list; and for coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, performing by the at least one processor at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding element location.

The method may further include for each ordered coordinate data list, performing by the at least one processor at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of an ordered reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the ordered reference data list; and for coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, performing by the at least one processor at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the ordered reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding remaining element location.

Generating by the at least one processor a number of coordinate data lists may include generating by the at least one processor, an ordered coordinate data list proximate each of a number of points of interest in the acquired image data to provide the number of ordered coordinate data lists, each ordered coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with each of at least three element locations about each respective point of interest.

The method may further include accepting by the at least one processor, a number of user inputs provided via at least one user interface communicably coupled to the at least one processor, each of the user inputs corresponding to one of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.

The method may further include autonomously determining by the at least one processor, each of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.

The method may further include for each ordered coordinate data list, converting by the at least one processor, the coordinate data associated with the at least three element locations in the acquired image data to a second, locally-referenced coordinate system that relates the coordinate data associated a first of the at least three elements included the respective ordered coordinate data list to the coordinate data associated with each of the other of the at least three elements included in the respective ordered coordinate data list to provide a respective ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list.

Comparing by the at least one processor the coordinate data associated each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with the reference data list stored in at least one nontransitory storage media communicably coupled to the at least one processor may include for each ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list performing by the at least one processor at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of a locally-referenced, reference data list in which the coordinate data associated with each reference element is related to coordinate data associated with a number of neighboring reference elements in the reference pattern, to compare the locally-referenced coordinate data associated with the first of the at least three elements in the ordered, locally-referenced, coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the locally-referenced, reference data list.

The method may further include determining by the at least one processor a center of intensity of element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data.

Generating by the at least one processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data may include generating by the at least one processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data corresponding to the determined center of intensity of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data.

Determining by the at least one processor a center of intensity of element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data may include determining by the at least one processor the center of intensity of element locations in at least a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data using a number of grayscale values associated with each of the respective element locations.

The method may further include determining by the at least one processor a respective distance between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in at least a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the at least one object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

The method may further include determining by the at least one processor a respective volume dimension associated with the at least one object using the determined respective distances between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in at least a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the at least one object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.

FIG. 1A is a perspective view of an example dimensioning system using a structured light pattern including a number of elements projected into a three-dimensional space, according to one illustrative embodiment.

FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram of an example element pattern projected into the three-dimensional space which includes an object and an associated Cartesian coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with the location each element in the pattern of elements, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 1C is a schematic diagram of an example reference element pattern projected into a three-dimensional space and an associated reference data list including Cartesian coordinate data associated with the location of each reference element, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of a portion of an example pattern of elements including two element groups, each containing a number of elements having a unique spatial relationship among the pattern of elements, and an ordered coordinate data list associated with each of the two client groups, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 2B is a front elevational view of a portion of an example pattern of elements projected onto an object in a three-dimensional space and including two groups of elements, each containing a number of elements having a unique spatial arrangement among the pattern of elements about two identified points of interest, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 2C is a perspective view of a portion of the example pattern of elements in FIG. 2B projected onto the object in the three-dimensional space and including two groups of elements, each containing a number of elements having a unique spatial arrangement among the pattern of elements about the two identified points of interest, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 3A is an enlarged view of a portion of an example pattern of elements projected into a three-dimensional space including Cartesian coordinate data associated with element locations in a group including a number of elements, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 3B is an image of a portion of the example pattern of elements shown in FIG. 3A projected into a three-dimensional space including locally-referenced coordinate data, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative element in an element pattern in which the element is formed using a number of pixels in the image acquisition device, each of the pixels having an associated grayscale value used to calculate the center of intensity of the element, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a high-level flow diagram of an example method of determining locations of each element in a pattern of elements included in an acquired image with locations of corresponding reference elements in the pattern of elements included in a reference image by numerically comparing a list of acquired element coordinate data with a list of reference element coordinate data, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a high-level flow diagram of an example method of determining locations of a number of groups of elements, each group including a number of elements in a pattern of elements included in an acquired image with locations of corresponding reference elements in the pattern of elements included in a reference image by numerically comparing a list of acquired element coordinate data associated with the elements included in each group with a list of reference element coordinate data, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a high-level flow diagram of an example method of determining locations of a number of groups of elements, each group including a number of elements in a pattern of elements included in an acquired image with locations of corresponding reference elements in the pattern of elements included in a reference image by numerically comparing a list of locally-referenced acquired element coordinate data associated with the elements included in each group with a list of locally-referenced reference element coordinate data, according to one illustrated embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a high-level flow diagram of an example method of determining locations of each element in a pattern of elements included in an acquired image with locations of corresponding reference elements in the pattern of elements included in a reference image by numerically comparing a list of acquired element center of intensity coordinate data with a list of reference element coordinate data, according to one illustrated embodiment, according to one illustrated embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with sources of electromagnetic energy, operative details concerning image sensors, cameras, structured light, and detailed architecture and operation of the imaging system have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.

Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is, as “including, but not limited to.”

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.

The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.

As used herein, the term “element” refers to any projected sensible (e.g., visible light) or detectable (e g, infrared) or otherwise discernible electromagnetic radiation forming at least a portion of a larger pattern. Elements can have any shape or geometry including shapes and geometries that are altered or varied in one or more dimensions as a function of distance from the projection device providing the electromagnetic radiation. In at least some instances, such elements may be variously referred to as “dots,” “points,” or “spots.”

As used herein, the term “pattern of elements” and “reference pattern of elements” refers to a pattern of elements appearing outwardly random, yet is highly structured and reproducible such that any group of a defined number of elements in the pattern provides a unique spatial geometry that is not reproduced elsewhere in the overall pattern by any other grouping of a same number of elements. In some instances, the number of elements forming the unique spatial geometry may number three or more. A “reference pattern of elements” or a “reference element pattern” refers to the case where the pattern of elements is projected into a baseline three-dimensional space having a known spatial geometry to provide a pattern of elements having a known distance between the projection device and each of the elements forming the reference pattern of elements. A common element pattern is used to provide both the reference element pattern and the pattern of elements projected on the object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

FIG. 1A shows a volume dimensioning system 100 including an image acquisition device 102 having a field-of-view, at least one processor communicably coupled to the image acquisition device, at least one non-transitory storage medium 106, and at least one projection device 108 to project an element pattern 130 into a three-dimensional space 120, according to one illustrated embodiment. FIG. 1B shows an image of an object 150 disposed in the three-dimensional space 120 with at least a portion of an element pattern 130 projected on the object 150 and the remainder of the element pattern 130 projected into the three-dimensional space 120 falling within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102 and a number of coordinate data lists 170 each including numerical data corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates 172a-172n (collectively “Cartesian coordinates 172”) of each of the reference elements included in the respective coordinate list 170, according to one illustrated embodiment. FIG. 1C shows an image of the element pattern 130 projected into the three-dimensional space 120 without an object 150 present, to provide a reference element pattern 140 and a reference data list 160 including numerical data corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates 162a-162n (collectively “Cartesian coordinates 162”) of each of the reference elements included in the reference element pattern 140, according to an illustrated embodiment.

The volume dimensioning system may optionally include one or more output devices 112 and one or more input devices 114 communicably coupled to the at least one processor 104. The image acquisition device 102 can acquire image data representative of the three-dimensional space 120 and any objects 150 placed therein that lie within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102. The image data acquired by the image acquisition device 102 can include at least a portion of the element pattern 130 projected into the three-dimensional space 120.

The volume dimensioning system 100 determines the distance to objects placed within the three-dimensional space 120 by comparing the element pattern 130 in the acquired image with the element pattern 130 in the reference element pattern 140. By aligning the elements included in the element pattern 130 in the acquired image data with corresponding elements in the reference element pattern 140, shifts in coordinate locations of corresponding elements in the acquired image data and the reference image data can be used to determine a distance between the projection device 108 and each of the respective elements in the element pattern 130.

The image acquisition device 102 can include any number or combination of systems or devices suitable for providing data indicative of the three-dimensional space 120 and any objects placed therein. The image acquisition device 102 is used to acquire image data representative of a scene in the field-of-view of the image acquisition device. When the projection device 108 projects the element pattern 130 into the three-dimensional space 120, the image data acquired by the image acquisition device includes data indicative of the location and optionally the intensity of the elements included in the element pattern 130. Such image data may be generated using an image acquisition device 102 sensitive to incident electromagnetic radiation in the visible electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., wavelengths between about 360 nanometers (“nm”) and about 700 nm) when the element pattern 130 is projected in the visible electromagnetic spectrum. Such image data may be generated using an image acquisition device 102 sensitive to incident, invisible, portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as the infrared or near-infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., wavelengths between about 700 nm and about 1000 nm) when the element pattern 130 is projected in an invisible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

In some implementations, the image acquisition device 102 may operate in at least a portion of the visible electromagnetic spectrum and in at least a portion of the invisible electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., a charge-coupled device or “CCD” sensor having an operating sensitivity that falls within portions of both the visible and invisible electromagnetic spectrum at wavelengths of from about 360 nm to about 800 nm). Such an image capture device advantageously permits the capture of an element pattern 130 projected in an invisible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., near-infrared) while contemporaneously capturing image data in the visible spectrum representative of the field-of-view of the image acquisition device.

In at least some implementations, the image acquisition device 102 may include one or more systems or devices for enhancing or otherwise altering the acquired image data. For example, the image acquisition device 102 may include one or more filters or signal processors to remove or otherwise separate image data representative of the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum from image data representative of the invisible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum in at least a portion of the acquired image data.

All or a portion of the acquired image data provided by the image acquisition device 102 can be communicated from the image acquisition device 102 to the at least one processor 104 or the at least one non-transitory storage medium 106. One or more machine executable instruction sets can cause the at least one processor 106 to extract or otherwise separate the portion of the acquired image data corresponding to each of the elements in the element pattern 130. In at least some instances, the machine executable instructions may further cause the at least one processor 104 to determine coordinate data (e.g., Cartesian coordinate data) associated with each element location in at least a portion of the element pattern 130 present in the acquired image data.

In at least some instances, the machine executable instructions may further cause the at least one processor 104 to organize or form the Cartesian coordinates 172 associated with the location of each of the elements in the acquired image data into a number of coordinate data lists 170. Each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 can include a single-dimensional or a two-dimensional array containing numerical data corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates 172 for each of the elements included in the respective coordinate data list 170. In some implementations, the machine executable instructions may further cause the at least one processor 104 to organize or form the Cartesian coordinates 172 corresponding to the locations all of the elements in the acquired image data into a single coordinate data list 170. The at least one processor 104 may store or otherwise retain the number of coordinate data lists 170 in a non-transitory storage media partially or completely within the at least one processor 104, in the at least one non-transitory storage medium 106, or any combination thereof.

One or more sets of machine executable instructions cause the at least one processor 104 to perform a comparison of the numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 with the numerical data representative of the reference element locations in the reference data list 160. The comparison can be performed by the at least one processor 104 as a search of the reference data list 160 for corresponding points appearing in each of the number of coordinate data lists. Advantageously, by performing a numerical comparison of the reference data list 160 with each of the number of coordinate data lists 170, the need for computation resource intensive graphical comparison of acquired image data is eliminated, thereby permitting the comparison using a less powerful, slower processor 106 such as those found in many portable or handheld electronic devices.

For example, a low resolution image acquisition device 102 may provide an acquired image having 1 to 3 megapixels of data. Such an image generates an image data file of at least 1 to 3 megabytes. In contrast, the element pattern 130 includes about 11,000 elements in the acquired image data. By extracting only coordinate data corresponding to the locations of the elements in the element pattern 130 in the acquired image data, the file size may be reduced by up to 100 times. Comparing a coordinate data list containing numerical data corresponding to the coordinate locations of 11,000 elements in the element pattern 130 with a reference data list containing a comparable quantity of numerical data corresponding to the coordinate locations of 11,000 elements in the reference element pattern 140 significantly reduces the necessary computing resources, particularly when compared to a graphical search routine using a 1 to 3 megapixel image.

The at least one processor 104 can compare numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 is against numerical data representative of the reference element location in a reference data list 160. The at least one processor 104 can then identify reference elements in the reference data list 160 corresponding to each of the elements included in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170. Based on the identified correspondence between elements in the element pattern 130 and reference elements in the reference element pattern 140, the at least one processor 104 can determine the spatial shift between every acquired element and the corresponding reference element.

The search of the reference data list can be performed using any search strategy including a “top-down” search strategy in which numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 is sequentially compared top-to-bottom to numerical data representative of the reference element locations in a reference data list 160. The search of the reference data list 160 can be performed using a “bottom-up” search strategy in which numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 is sequentially compared bottom-to-top to numerical data representative of the reference element locations in a reference data list 160. Those of ordinary skill in the computer programming arts will readily appreciate the wide variety of alternative search strategies which may also be used to compare numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 is against numerical data representative of the reference element locations in a reference data list 160.

The dimensioning system sensor(s) 114 can take a large variety of forms (e.g., digital, analog, still image, molding images) and can be formed from or contain any number of image capture or collection elements, for example picture elements or “pixels.” For example, the dimensioning system sensor(s) 114 can have between 1,000,000 pixels (1 MP) and 100,000,000 pixels (100 MP). The dimensioning system sensor(s) 114 can include any number of current or future developed image sensing devices, collectors, or systems that include, but are not limited to, one or more complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”) image sensors or one or more charge-coupled device (“CCD”) image sensors.

Data is communicated from the image acquisition device 102 to the at least one processor 104 and the at least one non-transitory storage media 106 via a number of serial or parallel data buses (not shown in FIG. 1A). The non-transitory storage media 106 can be any form of data storage device including, but not limited to, optical data storage, electrostatic data storage, electroresistive data storage, magnetic data storage, and/or molecular data storage devices. All or a portion of the non-transitory storage media 106 may be disposed within the at least one processor 104, for example in the form of a cache, registers, or similar non-transitory memory structure capable of storing data or machine-readable instructions executable by the at least one processor 104.

The at least one non-transitory storage media 106 can have any data storage capacity from about 1 megabyte (1 MB) to about 3 terabytes (3 TB). Two or more storage devices may be used to provide all or a portion of the non-transitory storage media 106. For example, in some embodiments, the non-transitory storage media 106 can include a non-removable portion including a non-transitory, electrostatic, volatile storage medium and a removable portion such as a Secure Digital (SD) card, a compact flash (CF) card, a Memory Stick, or a universal serial bus (“USB”) storage device.

The at least one processor 104 can execute one or more machine readable instruction sets that are stored in whole or in part in the at least one non-transitory storage media 106. The machine executable instruction set(s) can include instructions related to basic functional aspects of the at least one processor 104, for example data transmission and storage protocols, communication protocols, input/output (“I/O”) protocols, USB protocols, and the like. Machine executable instruction sets related to all or a portion of the dimensioning functionality of the volume dimensioning system 100 and intended for execution by the at least one processor 104 while in calibration or pre-run time mode, in run time mode, or combinations thereof may also be stored within the at least one non-transitory storage media 106, the at least one processor 104, or any combination thereof. Additional volume dimensioning system 100 functionality may also be stored in the form of machine executable instruction set(s) in the at least one non-transitory storage media 106. Such functionality may include system security settings, system configuration settings, language preferences, dimension and volume preferences, and the like.

Data is transferred between the at least one non-transitory storage media 106 and the at least one processor 104 via serial or parallel bi-directional data buses (not shown in FIG. 1A). The at least one processor 104 can include any device comprising one or more cores or independent central processing units that are capable of executing one or more machine executable instruction sets. The at least one processor 104 can, in some embodiments, include a general purpose processor such as a central processing unit (“CPU”) including, but not limited to, an Intel® Atom® processor, an Intel® Pentium®, Celeron®, or Core 2® processor, and the like. In other embodiments the at least one processor 104 can include a system-on-chip (“SoC”) architecture, including, but not limited to, the Intel® Atom® System on Chip (“Atom SoC”) and the like. In other embodiments, at least one processor 104 can include a dedicated processor such as an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”), a programmable gate array (“PGA” or “FPGA”), a digital signal processor (“DSP”), or a reduced instruction set computer (“RISC”) based processor. Where the volume dimensioning system 100 is a battery-powered portable system, the at least one processor 104 can include low power consumption processor(s), for example Intel® Pentium M®, or Celeron M® mobile system processors or the like, to extend the system battery life.

FIG. 2A shows two element groups 202 and 204, each including seven (7) elements having a spatial geometry that is unique among all groups of seven elements in the element pattern 130, according to an illustrated embodiment. FIGS. 2B and 2C show the two element groups 202 and 204 disposed about points of interest associated with an object 150 in the three-dimensional space 120, according to an illustrated embodiment.

Numerical data representative of the Cartesian coordinates 213 corresponding to element locations in element group 202 is included in coordinate data list 212. Numerical data representative of the Cartesian coordinates 215 corresponding to element locations in element group 204 is included in coordinate data list 214.

Recall, the spatial geometry between the elements included in each of element groups 202 and 204 is unique in that no group of seven elements elsewhere in the element pattern 130 will have a similar spatial geometry. Thus, the numerical data representative of the element locations of the elements included in element group 202 and the numerical data representative of the element locations of the elements included in element group 204 will be unique within the element pattern 130. Identifying reference elements having coordinate data indicative of a spatial arrangement in the reference element pattern 140 corresponding to the numerical data representative of the element locations of the elements included in element group 202 or the numerical data representative of the element locations of the elements included in element group 204 is therefore sufficient to find corresponding coordinate location data for every element included in the acquired image data of the element pattern 130.

The elements included in element groups 202 and 204 may be manually selected by the system user or automatically selected by the at least one processor 104. In at least some instances, the volume dimensioning system user can manually select one or more element groups using the input device 114, such as by providing a touch input on a touchscreen input device 114. In other instances, the at least one processor 104 can select the elements included in each of the groups of elements. As shown in FIGS. 2B and 2C, at times, the element groups may include a number of points of interest 220 that are either manually identified by the system user or autonomously identified by the at least one processor 104. Such points of interest 220 may include surface features present on the object 150, such as corners of a cubic object 150 as depicted in FIGS. 2B and 2C.

After a number of element groups are either manually or autonomously identified, the machine executable instruction set can cause the at least one processor 104 to identify those elements within each of the respective element groups 202, 204 and extract the data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate 213, 215 locations of each of the elements within each of the respective element groups 202, 204 from the acquired image data provided by the image acquisition device 102. The at least one processor 104 can generate or otherwise form a number of coordinate data lists 212, 214, each containing numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 213, 215 of the elements included in each of the respective element groups 202, 204. In at least some instances the at least one processor 104 can sort the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations of the elements included in each of the respective coordinate data lists 212, 214.

The reference data list 160 can be searched against each of the respective coordinate data lists 212, 214 by the at least one processor to identify reference elements having locations corresponding to the locations of the elements included in each group. In at least some instances, the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of the reference elements in the reference element pattern 140 may be sorted by the at least one processor prior to performing the search against each of the coordinate data lists 212, 214.

The search performed by the at least one processor 104 can be performed using a top-down or bottom-up search strategy where the numerical data corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates 213, 215 of the elements included in each of the coordinate data lists 212, 214 are compared to the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of the reference elements in the reference element pattern 140.

In some instances, the search performed by the at least one processor 104 can be further streamlined by taking advantage of the fact that the elements included in each of the groups 202, 204 are in close geometric proximity. Since the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of the reference elements in the reference element pattern 140 is sorted, numerical data for those reference elements in close geometric proximity is usually found clumped or otherwise grouped within a smaller portion of the overall reference data list 160. By focusing the search for numerical data indicative of Cartesian coordinates 162 of reference elements corresponding to numerical data indicative of Cartesian coordinate locations 213, 215 of acquired elements included in each of the coordinate data lists 212, 214 on only portion of the reference data list 160, the overall burden on computing resources may be further reduced. For example, the numerical data indicative of Cartesian coordinate locations 213 of acquired elements included in coordinate data lists 212 can be used to initially search the reference data list 160 using a top-down or bottom-up search. However, once the Cartesian coordinates 162 of the first corresponding reference element are identified in the reference data list 160, the search continues not from the top or bottom of the reference data list 160, but instead from the identified corresponding reference element in the reference data list 162. The search can be performed upwardly, downwardly, or alternating upward and downward in the reference data list 160 from the identified corresponding reference element. For each subsequently identified reference element corresponding to an acquired element included in the coordinate data list 212, the at least one processor 104 can begin the search using an upward, downward or alternating upward and downward search of the reference data list 160 about the respective identified corresponding reference element.

FIG. 3A shows an element group 310 that includes seven elements 312a-312g (collectively “acquired elements 312”) in an acquired element pattern 130 where each of the elements 312 is identified using absolute coordinates in a system such as a Cartesian coordinate system, according to an illustrated embodiment. FIG. 3B shows the same element group 310 including the seven elements 312 in the acquired element pattern 130 where one of the elements (312a) is used to locally reference each of the other elements 312b-312g in the group using relative coordinates such as polar coordinates, according to an illustrated embodiment. Although a seven element group 310 is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, it should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that each element group 310 may contain a lesser or greater number of elements.

In some instances, the search performed by the at least one processor 104 can be further streamlined by converting the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates of the elements included in the element group 310 to a locally referenced coordinate system such as a polar coordinate system where a first element 312a in the group 310 is used to reference all of the other elements 312b-312g in group 310. In such instances, instead of including numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates of the reference elements included in the reference element pattern 140 is converted to a reference data list 320 including locally-referenced numerical data 322a-322n (collectively “locally-referenced numerical data 322”) indicative of the angle and distance to each of the “m” (where m=the number of elements included in each group−1) nearest reference element neighbors of a particular reference element. In some instances, the locally-referenced numerical data 322 may be included as a configuration parameter of the volume dimensioning system 100 at the time of manufacture, at the time of installation, at the time of start up, or periodically throughout the lifetime of the volume dimensioning system 100. In other instances, the numerical data included in a Cartesian coordinate based reference data list 160 may be numerically converted by the at least one processor 104 to locally-referenced numerical data 322 to provide the reference data list 320.

By converting the number of elements included in each group to a single string of locally-referenced coordinate data, the at least one processor 104 can search the reference data list 320 one time to find the reference element location corresponding to the location of the first element 312a used to reference all of the other elements in the group. However, since all of the other elements are locally-referenced in both the group 310 and in the reference data list 320, identifying the first element 312a also identifies every other element in the group 310. Thus, advantageously only a single search is performed to identify the seven reference elements corresponding to the seven elements included in the group 310.

FIG. 4 shows a single element 404 detected by the image acquisition device 102 where the single element 404 provides a grayscale image covering a number of pixels 402 with varying degrees of intensity 406, 408, and 410, according to an illustrated embodiment. In at least some instances, determining a numerical value indicative of a “center of intensity” 410 of each element 404 included in the acquired element pattern 130 can improve the overall accuracy of dimensional and volumetric information determined by the volume dimensioning system 100 to a level well within established accuracy limits for trade and commerce. In at least some instances, prior to determining the coordinate location of each of the elements 404 in the acquired element pattern 130, the machine executable instructions can cause the at least one processor 106 to analyze each element 404 in the acquired element pattern 130 to determine a “center of intensity” for each of the elements. The determined “center of intensity” 410 can then be used by the at least one processor 104 to determine the numerical data indicative of the coordinate location for the respective element 404 with an enhanced level of accuracy. The numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 172 of the “center of intensity” for each element 404 in the acquired element pattern 130 may then be used by the at least one processor 104 to generate the coordinate data list 170.

In at least some implementations, the center of intensity may be numerically determined by the at least one processor 104 using any color, grayscale, or numerical averaging algorithm. One such numerical averaging algorithm is:

$Xc = \frac{Σ_{i} w_{i} X_{i}}{Σ_{i} w_{i}}$

$Yc = \frac{Σ_{i} w_{i} Y_{i}}{Σ_{i} w_{i}}$

Where:

- X_c=Center of intensity in X direction of element
- Y_c=Center of intensity in Y direction of element
- X_i=X location of pixel forming element
- Y_i=Y location of pixel forming element
- w_i=Numerical grayscale weight of pixel

FIG. 5 shows a high level method 500 of determining a spatial shift between an element pattern 130 and a reference element pattern 140 to enable the determination of a distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements forming the acquired element pattern 130, according to an illustrated embodiment. The method 500 extracts numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinate 172 locations for each of the elements in the element pattern 130 from an acquired image of a three-dimensional space 120 containing at least one object 150 to generate a coordinate data list 170. In some implementations, the numerical values in the coordinate data list 170 may optionally be sorted by the at least one processor 104 to provide an ordered coordinate data list 170. The numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 is compared against numerical data representative of the reference element location in a reference data list 160. The spatial shift between the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140 may be used to determine a distance from the projection device 108 generating the element pattern 130 to each of the respective elements. The determined distance to each element in the element pattern can be used to determine the volume dimension of objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120. The comparison of numerical data representative of the element locations in each of the coordinate data lists 170 against numerical data representative of the reference element location in a reference data list 160 reduces the computing overhead requirements when compared to graphical search techniques, advantageously permitting the use of the volume dimensioning system 100 on portable electronic devices having limited computing resources. The method commences at 502.

At 504, responsive to receiving image data from the image acquisition device 102, the at least one processor 104 can extract data representative of each element in at least a portion of the element pattern 130 from the image data. The at least one processor 104 can further determine numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates of each element in the element pattern 130 from the data representative of each element extracted from the acquired image data. The at least one processor 104 can further generate a number of coordinate data lists 170. Each of the coordinate data lists 170 can include numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations corresponding to at least three elements in the element pattern 130 as determined by the at least one processor 104 using the acquired image data obtained from the image acquisition device 102.

At 506, the at least one processor 104 can store each of the generated coordinate data lists 170 in a non-transitory storage medium. The non-transitory storage medium can include a non-transitory storage medium located in whole or in part within the at least one processor 104 or a dedicated non-transitory storage medium such as the non-transitory storage medium 106.

At 508, the at least one processor 104 can compare the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 172 of each of the elements included in each of the coordinate data lists 170 with stored numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of each of the reference elements included in a reference element pattern 140. The comparison between the numerical data in each of the coordinate data lists 170 and the numerical data in the reference data list 160 may be performed using a top-down, bottom-up, or similar search technique.

At 510, the at least one processor 104 can identify for each element included in each coordinate data list 170 a corresponding reference element included in the reference data list 160. In at least some instances, such identification may be based at least in part on the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 172 of each of the elements and the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 162 of each of the reference elements.

At 512, using the element correspondence determined at 510, the at least one processor can determine the spatial shift between each of the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140. The determined spatial shift between the acquired and corresponding reference elements may be used to subsequently determine the distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements in the element pattern 130 as a preparatory step in volume dimensioning objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120 within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102. The method concludes at 514.

FIG. 6 shows a high level method 600 of determining a spatial shift between an element pattern 130 and a reference element pattern 140 to enable the determination of a distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements forming the acquired element pattern 130 using a number of sorted coordinate data lists 170, according to an illustrated embodiment. The method 600 extracts numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinate 172 locations for each of the elements in the element pattern 130 from an acquired image of a three-dimensional space 120 containing at least one object 150 to generate a number of coordinate data lists 170. The numerical values in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 are sorted by the at least one processor 104 to provide a number of ordered coordinate data lists 170. Each of the number of ordered coordinate data lists 170 is compared against a reference data list 160 containing numerical values for the Cartesian coordinate locations 162 for each of the elements in a reference element pattern 140. In at least some instances, the numerical data contained in the reference data list 160 may also be sorted. The sorted coordinate data lists 170 and sorted reference data list 160 advantageously further reduce the search requirement since element groups often appear in close proximity within the reference data list 160. The spatial shift between the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140 may be used to determine a distance from the projection device 108 generating the element pattern 130 to each of the respective elements. The determined distance to each element in the element pattern can be used to determine the volume dimension of objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120. The comparison of numerical data in the coordinate data list 170 with numerical data in the reference data list 160 reduces the computing overhead requirements when compared to graphical search techniques, advantageously permitting the use of the volume dimensioning system 100 on portable electronic devices having limited computing resources. The method commences at 602.

At 604, responsive to receiving image data from the image acquisition device 102, the at least one processor 104 can extract data representative of each element in at least a portion of the element pattern 130 from the image data. The at least one processor 104 can further determine numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates of each element in the element pattern 130 from the data representative of each element extracted from the acquired image data.

At 606, the at least one processor 104 generates a number of coordinate data lists 170. Each of the coordinate data lists 170 can include numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations corresponding to an element group including at least three elements in the element pattern 130. The elements included in each element group may be manually determined by the system user or autonomously determined by the at least one processor 104. In at least some instances, some or all of the element groups may correspond to manually or autonomously identified points of interest within the acquired image data.

At 608, the at least one processor 104 can sort the numerical data included in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 to provide a number of ordered coordinate data lists 170.

At 610, the at least one processor 104 can store each of the ordered coordinate data lists 170 in a non-transitory storage medium. The non-transitory storage medium can include a non-transitory storage medium located in whole or in part within the at least one processor 104 or a dedicated non-transitory storage medium such as the non-transitory storage medium 106.

At 612, the at least one processor 104 can compare the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 172 of each of the elements included in each of the ordered coordinate data lists 170 with stored numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of each of the reference elements included in a reference element pattern 140. The comparison between the numerical data corresponding to a first element in each of the coordinate data lists 170 and the numerical data in the reference data list 160 may be performed using a top-down, bottom-up, or similar search technique. In searches for subsequent elements included in each of the coordinate data lists 170, the at least one processor 104 can begin searching upward, downward, or alternating upward and downward from the reference element corresponding to the immediately previous element in the coordinate data list. For example, the at least one processor 104 may start at the bottom or the top of the reference data list 160 to perform the initial search of the reference data list 160 to identify a reference element corresponding to the first element in a coordinate data list 170. After the reference element corresponding to the first element in the coordinate data list 170 is identified, the at least one processor will begin the search of the reference data list 160 to identify a reference element corresponding to a second element in the coordinate data list 170 at the reference element corresponding to the first element in the coordinate data list 170. The search for the reference element corresponding to the second element in the coordinate data list 170 can be performed upwardly in the reference data list 160, downwardly in the reference data list 160, or alternating between upward and downward in the reference data list 160.

At 614, the at least one processor 104 can identify for each element included in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 a corresponding reference element included in the reference data list 160. In at least some instances, such identification may be based at least in part on the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 172 of each of the elements and the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 162 of each of the reference elements.

At 616, using the element correspondence determined at 614, the at least one processor can determine the spatial shift between each of the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140. The determined spatial shift between the acquired and corresponding reference elements may be used to subsequently determine the distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements in the element pattern 130 as a preparatory step in volume dimensioning objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120 within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102. The method concludes at 618.

FIG. 7 shows a high level method 700 of determining a spatial shift between an element pattern 130 and a reference element pattern 140 to enable the determination of a distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements forming the acquired element pattern 130 using a number of sorted, locally-referenced, coordinate data lists 170, according to an illustrated embodiment. The method 700 extracts numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinate 172 locations for each of the elements in the element pattern 130 from an acquired image of a three-dimensional space 120 containing at least one object 150. Element groups including at least three elements are manually or autonomously identified and numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates for each of the at least three elements included in each of the number of element groups are formed into a coordinate data list for the respective element group.

The numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates for the at least three elements in each element group are then converted by the at least one processor 104 to numerical data indicative of a locally-referenced coordinate system where a first element in each element group is locally referenced to every other element included in the element group. Each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 is thus transformed into locally-referenced coordinate data list.

The numerical values in each of the number of locally-referenced coordinate data lists may be optionally sorted by the at least one processor 104 to provide a number of ordered, locally-referenced, coordinate data lists. Each of the number of locally referenced coordinate data lists is compared against a locally referenced reference data list 320. In at least some instances, the numerical data contained in the locally-referenced reference data list 320 may also be sorted. The locally-referenced coordinate data lists and locally-referenced reference data list 320 advantageously further reduce the search requirement since only a single search is needed to identify reference elements corresponding to all of the elements in an element group. The spatial shift between the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140 may be used to determine a distance from the projection device 108 generating the element pattern 130 to each of the respective elements. The determined distance to each element in the element pattern can be used to determine the volume dimension of objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120. The comparison of numerical data in the locally-referenced coordinate data list with numerical data in the locally-referenced reference data list 320 further reduces the computing overhead requirements when compared to graphical search techniques, advantageously permitting the use of the volume dimensioning system 100 on portable electronic devices having limited computing resources. The method commences at 702.

At 704, responsive to receiving image data from the image acquisition device 102, the at least one processor 104 can extract data representative of each element in at least a portion of the element pattern 130 from the image data. The at least one processor 104 can further determine numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates of each element in the element pattern 130 from the data representative of each element extracted from the acquired image data.

At 706, the at least one processor 104 generates a number of coordinate data lists 170. Each of the coordinate data lists 170 can include numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations corresponding to an element group including at least three elements in the element pattern 130. The elements included in each element group may be manually determined by the system user or autonomously determined by the at least one processor 104. In at least some instances, some or all of the element groups may correspond to manually or autonomously identified points of interest within the acquired image data.

At 708, the at least one processor 104 can convert the numerical data indicative of Cartesian coordinate locations for each of the elements included in the coordinate data list 170 associated with each element group to numerical data indicative of a locally-referenced coordinates for each of the elements included in the coordinate data list 170 associated with each element group. In at least one instance, a first element in each element group may be identified by the at least one processor 104 and each subsequent element included in the element group may be locally referenced to the identified first element using Polar coordinates (e.g., an angle and distance between the elements).

At 710, the at least one processor 104 may optionally sort the numerical data included in each of the number of locally-referenced coordinate data lists to provide a number of ordered, locally-referenced, coordinate data lists.

At 712, the at least one processor 104 can store each of the locally-referenced coordinate data lists in a non-transitory storage medium. The non-transitory storage medium can include a non-transitory storage medium located in whole or in part within the at least one processor 104 or a dedicated non-transitory storage medium such as the non-transitory storage medium 106.

At 714, the at least one processor 104 can compare the numerical data indicative of the locally-referenced coordinates of each of the elements included in each of the locally-referenced coordinate data lists with stored numerical data indicative of the locally-referenced coordinates 322 of each of the reference elements included in a locally-referenced reference data list 320. The comparison between the numerical data indicative of the locally-referenced coordinates of each of the elements included in each of the locally-referenced coordinate data lists and the locally-referenced reference data list 320 may be performed using a top-down, bottom-up, or similar search technique

At 716, the at least one processor 104 can identify for each element included in each of the number of locally-referenced coordinate data lists a corresponding reference element included in the locally-referenced reference data list 320. In at least some instances, such identification may be based at least in part on the numerical data indicative of the locally-referenced coordinates of each of the elements included in the element group and the numerical data indicative of the locally-referenced coordinate locations 322 of each of the reference elements.

At 718, using the element correspondence determined at 716, the at least one processor can determine the spatial shift between each of the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140. The determined spatial shift between the acquired and corresponding reference elements may be used to subsequently determine the distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements in the element pattern 130 as a preparatory step in volume dimensioning objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120 within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102. The method concludes at 720.

FIG. 8 shows a high level method 800 of determining with enhanced accuracy a spatial shift between an element pattern 130 and a reference element pattern 140 to enable the determination of a distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements forming the acquired element pattern 130, according to an illustrated embodiment. The at least one processor 104 first determines a “center of intensity” 410 for each element included in the acquired element pattern 130. The determined center of intensity 410 is then used by the at least one processor 104 to extract numerical values of the Cartesian coordinate 172 locations for each of the elements in the element pattern 130 from an acquired image of a three-dimensional space 120 containing at least one object 150 to generate a coordinate data list 170. In some implementations, the numerical values in the coordinate data list 170 can be sorted by the at least one processor 104 to provide an ordered coordinate data list 170. The coordinate data list is compared against a reference data list 160 containing numerical values for the Cartesian coordinate locations 162 for each of the elements in a reference element pattern 140. The spatial shift between the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140 may be used to determine a distance from the projection device 108 generating the element pattern 130 to each of the respective elements. The determined distance to each element in the element pattern can be used to determine the volume dimension of objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120. The comparison of numerical data in the coordinate data list 170 with numerical data in the reference data list 160 reduces the computing overhead requirements when compared to graphical search techniques, advantageously permitting the use of the volume dimensioning system 100 on portable electronic devices having limited computing resources. The method commences at 802.

At 804, responsive to receiving image data from the image acquisition device 102, the at least one processor 104 extract data representative of each element in at least a portion of the element pattern 130 from the acquired image data provided by an image acquisition device 102. The at least one processor 104 then determines a “center of intensity” 410 for each of the extracted elements. The at least one processor 104 can then determine numerical values corresponding to the Cartesian coordinates of the determined “center of intensity” 410 for each element in the element pattern 130 from the data representative of each element extracted from the acquired image data.

At 806, the at least one processor 104 generates a number of coordinate data lists 170. Each of the coordinate data lists 170 can include numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations corresponding to at least three elements in the element pattern 130 as determined by the at least one processor 104 using the acquired image data obtained from the image acquisition device 102.

At 808, the at least one processor 104 can optionally sort the numerical data included in each of the number of coordinate data lists 170 to provide a number of ordered coordinate data lists 170.

At 810, the at least one processor 104 can store each of the ordered coordinate data lists 170 in a non-transitory storage medium. The non-transitory storage medium can include a non-transitory storage medium located in whole or in part within the at least one processor 104 or a dedicated non-transitory storage medium such as the non-transitory storage medium 106.

At 812, the at least one processor 104 can compare the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 172 of each of the elements included in each of the ordered coordinate data lists 170 with stored numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinates 162 of each of the reference elements included in a reference element pattern 140. The comparison between the numerical data in each of the ordered coordinate data lists 170 and the numerical data in the reference data list 160 may be performed using a top-down, bottom-up, or similar search technique.

At 814, the at least one processor 104 can identify for each element included in each ordered coordinate data list 170 a corresponding reference element included in the reference data list 160. In at least some instances, such identification may be based at least in part on the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 172 of each of the elements and the numerical data indicative of the Cartesian coordinate locations 162 of each of the reference elements.

At 816, using the element correspondence determined at 510, the at least one processor can determine the spatial shift between each of the elements in the acquired element pattern 130 and the reference element pattern 140. The determined spatial shift between the acquired and corresponding reference elements may be used to subsequently determine the distance between the projection device 108 and each of the elements in the element pattern 130 as a preparatory step in volume dimensioning objects 150 placed in the three-dimensional space 120 within the field-of-view of the image acquisition device 102. The method concludes at 818.

The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, schematics, and examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, schematics, and examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the present subject matter may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) or programmable gate arrays. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in standard integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more controllers (e.g., microcontrollers) as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art in light of this disclosure.

Various methods and/or algorithms have been described. Some or all of those methods and/or algorithms may omit some of the described acts or steps, include additional acts or steps, combine acts or steps, and/or may perform some acts or steps in a different order than described. Some of the method or algorithms may be implemented in software routines. Some of the software routines may be called from other software routines. Software routines may execute sequentially or concurrently, and may employ a multi-threaded approach.

In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms taught herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing non-transitory media used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of non-transitory signal bearing media include, but are not limited to, the following: recordable type media such as portable disks and memory, hard disk drives, CD/DVD ROMs, digital tape, computer memory, and other non-transitory computer-readable storage media.

While discussed in terms of projection of dots, many of the techniques described herein could be employed in dimensioning systems that capture image data from objects which bear element patterns, for instance printed or otherwise inscribed on or in at least one surface of the object.

These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.

Claims

1. A portable structured light dimensioning system to determine a volume dimension of an object, comprising: an image acquisition device to acquire image data representative of an element pattern projected into a three-dimensional space that includes an object;a processor communicably coupled to the image acquisition device; anda non-transitory storage medium communicably coupled to the processor and having stored therein machine executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to: determine coordinate data associated with element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data;generate a number of coordinate data lists, each including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data;for each coordinate data list: compare the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list including reference coordinate data associated with reference element locations in a reference element pattern; andselect for each of the at least three element locations, a corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern;determine a spatial shift between the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data and the coordinate data associated with the respective corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern; andsort the coordinate data using a defined sort pattern to provide a respective ordered coordinate data list;generate an ordered coordinate data list about each of a number of points of interest in the acquired image data to provide the number of ordered coordinate data lists, each ordered coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with each of at least three element locations about each respective point of interest; andaccept a number of user inputs, each of the user inputs corresponding to one of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: for each coordinate data list, compare the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list by performing for the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations, at least one of: a top-to-bottom search, or, a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with the respective element location with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list, convert the coordinate data associated with the at least three element locations in the acquired image data to a second, locally-referenced coordinate system that relates the coordinate data associated a first of the at least three elements included the respective ordered coordinate data list to the coordinate data associated with each of the other of the at least three elements included in the respective ordered coordinate data list to provide a respective ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data; anddetermine coordinate data corresponding to the determined center of intensity of the element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data using grayscale values associated with each of the respective element locations.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a respective distance between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space; anddetermine a respective volume dimension associated with the object using the determined respective distances between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space.
7. A portable structured light dimensioning system to determine a volume dimension of an object, comprising: an image acquisition device to acquire image data representative of an element pattern projected into a three-dimensional space that includes an object;a processor communicably coupled to the image acquisition device; anda non-transitory storage medium communicably coupled to the processor and having stored therein machine executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to: determine coordinate data associated with element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data;generate a number of coordinate data lists, each including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data;for each coordinate data list: compare the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list including reference coordinate data associated with reference element locations in a reference element pattern; andselect for each of the at least three element locations, a corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern;determine a spatial shift between the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data and the coordinate data associated with the respective corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern; andsort the coordinate data using a defined sort pattern to provide a respective ordered coordinate data list;generate an ordered coordinate data list about each of a number of points of interest in the acquired image data to provide the number of ordered coordinate data lists, each ordered coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with each of at least three element locations about each respective point of interest; andautonomously determine each of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list perform at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list; andfor coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, perform at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding element location.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: for each ordered coordinate data list, convert the coordinate data associated with the at least three element locations in the acquired image data to a second, locally-referenced coordinate system that relates the coordinate data associated a first of the at least three elements included the respective ordered coordinate data list to the coordinate data associated with each of the other of the at least three elements included in the respective ordered coordinate data list to provide a respective ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list; andfor each ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list perform at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of a locally-referenced, reference data list in which the coordinate data associated with each reference element is related to coordinate data associated with a number of neighboring reference elements in the reference pattern, to compare the locally-referenced coordinate data associated with the first of the at least three elements in the ordered, locally-referenced, coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the locally-referenced, reference data list.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data; anddetermine coordinate data corresponding to the determined center of intensity of the element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data using grayscale values associated with each of the respective element locations.
12. The system of claim 7, wherein the machine executable instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: determine a respective distance between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space; anddetermine a respective volume dimension associated with the object using the determined respective distances between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space.
13. A structured light dimensioning method to determine a volume dimension of an object, comprising: determining with a processor coordinate data corresponding to element locations in a portion of an element pattern present in acquired image data provided by an image capture device communicably coupled to the processor;generating with the processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data;storing each of the number of coordinate data lists in a non-transitory storage media communicably coupled to the processor;for each coordinate data list: comparing with the processor the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list stored in a non-transitory storage media communicably coupled to the processor, the reference data list including reference coordinate data associated with reference element locations in a reference element pattern;selecting with the processor, for each of the at least three element locations, a corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern;determining with the processor a spatial shift between the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data and the coordinate data associated with the respective corresponding reference element location in the reference element pattern; andsorting with the processor the coordinate data using a defined sort pattern to provide a respective ordered coordinate data list;generating with the processor an ordered coordinate data list proximate each of a number of points of interest in the acquired image data to provide the number of ordered coordinate data lists, each ordered coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with each of at least three element locations about each respective point of interest; andaccepting with the processor a number of user inputs provided via a user interface communicably coupled to the processor, each of the user inputs corresponding to one of the number of points of interest in the acquired image data.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein comparing with the processor the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list comprises: comparing with the processor the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data with a reference data list by performing for the coordinate data associated with each of the at least three element locations, at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with the respective element location with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list.
15. The method of claim 13, comprising: for each ordered coordinate data list, performing with the processor at least one of a top-to-bottom search or a bottom-to-top search of the reference data list to compare the coordinate data associated with a first element location in the ordered coordinate data list with coordinate data associated with each reference element location in the reference data list; andfor coordinate data in the ordered coordinate data list associated with each remaining element location, performing with the processor at least one of an upward search, a downward search, or an alternating upward/downward search about coordinate data associated with a reference element in the reference data list corresponding to coordinate data associated with an immediately preceding element location.
16. The method of claim 13, comprising, for each ordered coordinate data list, converting with the processor, the coordinate data associated with the at least three element locations in the acquired image data to a second, locally-referenced coordinate system that relates the coordinate data associated a first of the at least three elements included the respective ordered coordinate data list to the coordinate data associated with each of the other of the at least three elements included in the respective ordered coordinate data list to provide a respective ordered, locally referenced, coordinate data list.
17. The method of claim 13, comprising determining with the processor a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein generating with the processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data associated with at least three element locations in the acquired image data comprises: generating with the processor a number of coordinate data lists, each coordinate data list including coordinate data corresponding to the determined center of intensity of the at least three element locations in the acquired image data.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein determining with the processor a center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data comprises: determining with the processor the center of intensity of element locations in a portion of the element pattern present in the acquired image data using a number of grayscale values associated with each of the respective element locations.
20. The method of claim 13, comprising: determining with the processor a respective distance between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space; anddetermining with the processor a respective volume dimension associated with the object using the determined respective distances between the image acquisition device and each of the elements in a portion of the pattern of elements incident upon the object positioned in the three-dimensional space.

US Referenced Citations (762)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3971065	Bayer	Jul 1976	A
4279328	Ahlbom	Jul 1981	A
4398811	Nishioka et al.	Aug 1983	A
4495559	Gelatt, Jr.	Jan 1985	A
4730190	Win et al.	Mar 1988	A
4803639	Steele et al.	Feb 1989	A
5220536	Stringer et al.	Jun 1993	A
5331118	Jensen	Jul 1994	A
5359185	Hanson	Oct 1994	A
5384901	Glassner et al.	Jan 1995	A
5548707	LoNegro et al.	Aug 1996	A
5555090	Schmutz	Sep 1996	A
5590060	Granville et al.	Dec 1996	A
5606534	Stringer et al.	Feb 1997	A
5619245	Kessler et al.	Apr 1997	A
5655095	LoNegro et al.	Aug 1997	A
5661561	Wurz et al.	Aug 1997	A
5699161	Woodworth	Dec 1997	A
5729750	Ishida	Mar 1998	A
5730252	Herbinet	Mar 1998	A
5732147	Tao	Mar 1998	A
5734476	Dlugos	Mar 1998	A
5737074	Haga et al.	Apr 1998	A
5767962	Suzuki et al.	Jun 1998	A
5831737	Stringer et al.	Nov 1998	A
5850370	Stringer et al.	Dec 1998	A
5850490	Johnson	Dec 1998	A
5869827	Rando	Feb 1999	A
5870220	Migdal et al.	Feb 1999	A
5900611	Hecht	May 1999	A
5923428	Woodworth	Jul 1999	A
5929856	LoNegro et al.	Jul 1999	A
5938710	Lanza et al.	Aug 1999	A
5959568	Woolley	Sep 1999	A
5960098	Tao	Sep 1999	A
5969823	Wurz et al.	Oct 1999	A
5978512	Kim et al.	Nov 1999	A
5979760	Freyman et al.	Nov 1999	A
5988862	Kacyra et al.	Nov 1999	A
5991041	Woodworth	Nov 1999	A
6009189	Schaack	Dec 1999	A
6025847	Marks	Feb 2000	A
6049386	Stringer et al.	Apr 2000	A
6053409	Brobst et al.	Apr 2000	A
6064759	Buckley et al.	May 2000	A
6067110	Nonaka et al.	May 2000	A
6069696	McQueen et al.	May 2000	A
6137577	Woodworth	Oct 2000	A
6177999	Wurz et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6232597	Kley	May 2001	B1
6236403	Chaki	May 2001	B1
6246468	Dimsdale	Jun 2001	B1
6333749	Reinhardt et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6336587	He et al.	Jan 2002	B1
6369401	Lee	Apr 2002	B1
6373579	Ober et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6429803	Kumar	Aug 2002	B1
6457642	Good et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6507406	Yagi et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6517004	Good et al.	Feb 2003	B2
6519550	D'Hooge et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6674904	McQueen	Jan 2004	B1
6705526	Zhu et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6781621	Gobush et al.	Aug 2004	B1
6824058	Patel et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6832725	Gardiner et al.	Dec 2004	B2
6858857	Pease et al.	Feb 2005	B2
6922632	Foxlin	Jul 2005	B2
6971580	Zhu et al.	Dec 2005	B2
6995762	Pavlidis et al.	Feb 2006	B1
7057632	Yamawaki et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7085409	Sawhney et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7086162	Tyroler	Aug 2006	B2
7104453	Zhu et al.	Sep 2006	B1
7128266	Zhu et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7137556	Bonner et al.	Nov 2006	B1
7159783	Walczyk et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7161688	Bonner et al.	Jan 2007	B1
7214954	Schopp	May 2007	B2
7277187	Smith et al.	Oct 2007	B2
7307653	Dutta	Dec 2007	B2
7310431	Gokturk et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7413127	Ehrhart et al.	Aug 2008	B2
7527205	Zhu	May 2009	B2
7586049	Wurz	Sep 2009	B2
7602404	Reinhardt et al.	Oct 2009	B1
7639722	Paxton et al.	Dec 2009	B1
7726575	Wang et al.	Jun 2010	B2
7780084	Zhang et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7788883	Buckley et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7974025	Topliss	Jul 2011	B2
8027096	Feng et al.	Sep 2011	B2
8028501	Buckley et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8050461	Shpunt et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8055061	Katano	Nov 2011	B2
8072581	Breiholz	Dec 2011	B1
8102395	Kondo et al.	Jan 2012	B2
8132728	Dwinell et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8134717	Pangrazio et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8149224	Kuo et al.	Apr 2012	B1
8194097	Xiao et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8212889	Chanas et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8228510	Pangrazio et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8230367	Bell et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8294969	Plesko	Oct 2012	B2
8305458	Hara	Nov 2012	B2
8310656	Zalewski	Nov 2012	B2
8313380	Zalewski et al.	Nov 2012	B2
8317105	Kotlarsky et al.	Nov 2012	B2
8322622	Liu	Dec 2012	B2
8339462	Stec et al.	Dec 2012	B2
8350959	Topliss et al.	Jan 2013	B2
8351670	Ijiri et al.	Jan 2013	B2
8366005	Kotlarsky et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8371507	Haggerty et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8376233	Van Horn et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8381976	Mohideen et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8381979	Franz	Feb 2013	B2
8390909	Plesko	Mar 2013	B2
8408464	Zhu et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8408468	Horn et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8408469	Good	Apr 2013	B2
8424768	Rueblinger et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8437539	Komatsu et al.	May 2013	B2
8441749	Brown et al.	May 2013	B2
8448863	Xian et al.	May 2013	B2
8457013	Essinger et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8459557	Havens et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8463079	Ackley et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8469272	Kearney	Jun 2013	B2
8474712	Kearney et al.	Jul 2013	B2
8479992	Kotlarsky et al.	Jul 2013	B2
8490877	Kearney	Jul 2013	B2
8517271	Kotlarsky et al.	Aug 2013	B2
8523076	Good	Sep 2013	B2
8528818	Ehrhart et al.	Sep 2013	B2
8544737	Gomez et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8548420	Grunow et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8550335	Samek et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8550354	Gannon et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8550357	Kearney	Oct 2013	B2
8556174	Kosecki et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8556176	Van Horn et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8556177	Hussey et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8559767	Barber et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8561895	Gomez et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8561903	Sauerwein	Oct 2013	B2
8561905	Edmonds et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8565107	Pease et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8570343	Halstead	Oct 2013	B2
8571307	Li et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8576390	Nunnink	Nov 2013	B1
8579200	Samek et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8583924	Caballero et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8584945	Wang et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8587595	Wang	Nov 2013	B2
8587697	Hussey et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8588869	Sauerwein et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8590789	Nahill et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8596539	Havens et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8596542	Havens et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8596543	Havens et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8599271	Havens et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8599957	Peake et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8600158	Li et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8600167	Showering	Dec 2013	B2
8602309	Longacre et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8608053	Meier et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8608071	Liu et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8611309	Wang et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8615487	Gomez et al.	Dec 2013	B2
8621123	Caballero	Dec 2013	B2
8622303	Meier et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8628013	Ding	Jan 2014	B2
8628015	Wang et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8628016	Winegar	Jan 2014	B2
8629926	Wang	Jan 2014	B2
8630491	Longacre et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8635309	Berthiaume et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8636200	Kearney	Jan 2014	B2
8636212	Nahill et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8636215	Ding et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8636224	Wang	Jan 2014	B2
8638806	Wang et al.	Jan 2014	B2
8640958	Lu et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8640960	Wang et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8643717	Li et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8646692	Meier et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8646694	Wang et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8657200	Ren et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8659397	Vargo et al.	Feb 2014	B2
8668149	Good	Mar 2014	B2
8678285	Kearney	Mar 2014	B2
8678286	Smith et al.	Mar 2014	B2
8682077	Longacre	Mar 2014	B1
D702237	Oberpriller et al.	Apr 2014	S
8687282	Feng et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8692927	Pease et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8695880	Bremer et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8698949	Grunow et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8702000	Barber et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8717494	Gannon	May 2014	B2
8720783	Biss et al.	May 2014	B2
8723804	Fletcher et al.	May 2014	B2
8723904	Marty et al.	May 2014	B2
8727223	Wang	May 2014	B2
8740082	Wilz	Jun 2014	B2
8740085	Furlong et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8746563	Hennick et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8750445	Peake et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8752766	Xian et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8756059	Braho et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8757495	Qu et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8760563	Koziol et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8763909	Reed et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8777108	Coyle	Jul 2014	B2
8777109	Oberpriller et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8779898	Havens et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8781520	Payne et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8783573	Havens et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8789757	Barten	Jul 2014	B2
8789758	Hawley et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8789759	Xian et al.	Jul 2014	B2
8792688	Unsworth	Jul 2014	B2
8794520	Wang et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8794522	Ehrhart	Aug 2014	B2
8794525	Amundsen et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8794526	Wang et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8798367	Ellis	Aug 2014	B2
8807431	Wang et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8807432	Van Horn et al.	Aug 2014	B2
8810779	Hilde	Aug 2014	B1
8820630	Qu et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8822848	Meagher	Sep 2014	B2
8824692	Sheerin et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8824696	Braho	Sep 2014	B2
8842849	Wahl et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8844822	Kotlarsky et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8844823	Fritz et al.	Sep 2014	B2
8849019	Li et al.	Sep 2014	B2
D716285	Chaney et al.	Oct 2014	S
8851383	Yeakley et al.	Oct 2014	B2
8854633	Laffargue	Oct 2014	B2
8866963	Grunow et al.	Oct 2014	B2
8868421	Braho et al.	Oct 2014	B2
8868519	Maloy et al.	Oct 2014	B2
8868802	Barten	Oct 2014	B2
8868803	Caballero	Oct 2014	B2
8870074	Gannon	Oct 2014	B1
8879639	Sauerwein	Nov 2014	B2
8880426	Smith	Nov 2014	B2
8881983	Havens et al.	Nov 2014	B2
8881987	Wang	Nov 2014	B2
8897596	Passmore et al.	Nov 2014	B1
8903172	Smith	Dec 2014	B2
8908995	Benos et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8910870	Li et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8910875	Ren et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8914290	Hendrickson et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8914788	Pettinelli et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8915439	Feng et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8915444	Havens et al.	Dec 2014	B2
8916789	Woodburn	Dec 2014	B2
8918250	Hollifield	Dec 2014	B2
8918564	Caballero	Dec 2014	B2
8925818	Kosecki et al.	Jan 2015	B2
8939374	Jovanovski et al.	Jan 2015	B2
8942480	Ellis	Jan 2015	B2
8944313	Williams et al.	Feb 2015	B2
8944327	Meier et al.	Feb 2015	B2
8944332	Harding et al.	Feb 2015	B2
8950678	Germaine et al.	Feb 2015	B2
D723560	Zhou et al.	Mar 2015	S
8967468	Gomez et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8971346	Sevier	Mar 2015	B2
8976030	Cunningham et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8976368	Akel et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8978981	Guan	Mar 2015	B2
8978983	Bremer et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8978984	Hennick et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8985456	Zhu et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8985457	Soule et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8985459	Kearney et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8985461	Gelay et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8988578	Showering	Mar 2015	B2
8988590	Gillet et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8991704	Hopper et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8996194	Davis et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8996384	Funyak et al.	Mar 2015	B2
8998091	Edmonds et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9002641	Showering	Apr 2015	B2
9007368	Laffargue et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9010641	Qu et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9014441	Truyen et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9015513	Murawski et al.	Apr 2015	B2
9016576	Brady et al.	Apr 2015	B2
D730357	Fitch et al.	May 2015	S
9022288	Nahill et al.	May 2015	B2
9030964	Essinger et al.	May 2015	B2
9033240	Smith et al.	May 2015	B2
9033242	Gillet et al.	May 2015	B2
9036054	Koziol et al.	May 2015	B2
9037344	Chamberlin	May 2015	B2
9038911	Xian et al.	May 2015	B2
9038915	Smith	May 2015	B2
D730901	Oberpriller et al.	Jun 2015	S
D730902	Fitch et al.	Jun 2015	S
D733112	Chaney et al.	Jun 2015	S
9047098	Barten	Jun 2015	B2
9047359	Caballero et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9047420	Caballero	Jun 2015	B2
9047525	Barber et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9047531	Showering et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9049640	Wang et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9053055	Caballero	Jun 2015	B2
9053378	Hou et al.	Jun 2015	B1
9053380	Xian et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9057641	Amundsen et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9058526	Powilleit	Jun 2015	B2
9064165	Havens et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9064167	Xian et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9064168	Todeschini et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9064254	Todeschini et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9066032	Wang	Jun 2015	B2
9070032	Corcoran	Jun 2015	B2
D734339	Zhou et al.	Jul 2015	S
D734751	Oberpriller et al.	Jul 2015	S
9082023	Feng et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9082195	Holeva et al.	Jul 2015	B2
9142035	Rotman	Sep 2015	B1
9233470	Bradski et al.	Jan 2016	B1
9299013	Curlander et al.	Mar 2016	B1
9424749	Reed et al.	Aug 2016	B1
9486921	Straszheim et al.	Nov 2016	B1
20010027995	Patel et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010032879	He et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20020054289	Thibault et al.	May 2002	A1
20020067855	Chiu et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020109835	Goetz	Aug 2002	A1
20020118874	Chung et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020158873	Williamson	Oct 2002	A1
20020167677	Okada et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020179708	Zhu et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20020196534	Lizotte et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030038179	Tsikos et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030053513	Vatan et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030063086	Baumberg	Apr 2003	A1
20030091227	Chang et al.	May 2003	A1
20030156756	Gokturk et al.	Aug 2003	A1
20030197138	Pease et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030225712	Cooper et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030235331	Kawaike et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040008259	Gokturk et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040024754	Mane et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040066329	Zeitfuss et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040073359	Ichijo et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040083025	Yamanouchi et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040089482	Ramsden et al.	May 2004	A1
20040098146	Katae et al.	May 2004	A1
20040105580	Hager et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040118928	Patel et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040122779	Stickler et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040155975	Hart et al.	Aug 2004	A1
20040165090	Ning	Aug 2004	A1
20040184041	Schopp	Sep 2004	A1
20040211836	Patel et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040214623	Takahashi et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040233461	Armstrong et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040258353	Gluckstad et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050006477	Patel	Jan 2005	A1
20050117215	Lange	Jun 2005	A1
20050128196	Popescu et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050168488	Montague	Aug 2005	A1
20050211782	Martin	Sep 2005	A1
20050264867	Cho et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060047704	Gopalakrishnan	Mar 2006	A1
20060078226	Zhou	Apr 2006	A1
20060108266	Bowers et al.	May 2006	A1
20060112023	Horhann	May 2006	A1
20060151604	Zhu et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060159307	Anderson et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060159344	Shao et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060232681	Okada	Oct 2006	A1
20060255150	Longacre	Nov 2006	A1
20060269165	Viswanathan	Nov 2006	A1
20060291719	Ikeda et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070003154	Sun et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070025612	Iwasaki et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070031064	Zhao et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070063048	Havens et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070116357	Dewaele	May 2007	A1
20070127022	Cohen et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070143082	Degnan	Jun 2007	A1
20070153293	Gruhlke et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070171220	Kriveshko	Jul 2007	A1
20070177011	Lewin et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070181685	Zhu et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070237356	Dwinell et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070291031	Konev et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070299338	Stevick et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080013793	Hillis et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080035390	Wurz	Feb 2008	A1
20080056536	Hildreth et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080062164	Bassi et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080077265	Boyden	Mar 2008	A1
20080164074	Wurz	Jul 2008	A1
20080204476	Montague	Aug 2008	A1
20080212168	Olmstead et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080247635	Davis et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080273191	Kim et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080273210	Hilde	Nov 2008	A1
20080278790	Boesser et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20090059004	Bochicchio	Mar 2009	A1
20090095047	Patel et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090134221	Zhu et al.	May 2009	A1
20090195790	Zhu et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090225333	Bendall et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090237411	Gossweiler et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090268023	Hsieh	Oct 2009	A1
20090272724	Gubler	Nov 2009	A1
20090273770	Bauhahn et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090313948	Buckley et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090318815	Barnes et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090323084	Dunn et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090323121	Valkenburg	Dec 2009	A1
20100035637	Varanasi et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100060604	Zwart et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100091104	Sprigle	Apr 2010	A1
20100118200	Gelman et al.	May 2010	A1
20100128109	Banks	May 2010	A1
20100161170	Siris	Jun 2010	A1
20100171740	Andersen et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100172567	Prokoski	Jul 2010	A1
20100177076	Essinger et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100177080	Essinger et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100177707	Essinger et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100177749	Essinger et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100202702	Benos et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100208039	Stettner	Aug 2010	A1
20100211355	Horst et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100217678	Goncalves	Aug 2010	A1
20100220849	Colbert et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100220894	Ackley et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100223276	Al-Shameri et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100245850	Lee et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100254611	Arnz	Oct 2010	A1
20100303336	Abraham	Dec 2010	A1
20100315413	Izadi et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20100321482	Cleveland	Dec 2010	A1
20110019155	Daniel et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110040192	Brenner et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110043609	Choi et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110099474	Grossman et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20110169999	Grunow et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110188054	Petronius et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110188741	Sones et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110202554	Powilleit et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110234389	Mellin	Sep 2011	A1
20110235854	Berger et al.	Sep 2011	A1
20110249864	Venkatesan et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110254840	Halstead	Oct 2011	A1
20110279916	Brown et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110286007	Pangrazio et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110286628	Goncalves et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110288818	Thierman	Nov 2011	A1
20110301994	Tieman	Dec 2011	A1
20110303748	Lemma et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110310227	Konertz et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120024952	Chen	Feb 2012	A1
20120056982	Katz et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20120057345	Kuchibhotla	Mar 2012	A1
20120067955	Rowe	Mar 2012	A1
20120074227	Ferren et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20120081714	Pangrazio et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120111946	Golant	May 2012	A1
20120113223	Hilliges et al.	May 2012	A1
20120113250	Farlotti et al.	May 2012	A1
20120126000	Kunzig et al.	May 2012	A1
20120140300	Freeman	Jun 2012	A1
20120168512	Kotlarsky et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120179665	Baarman et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120185094	Rosenstein et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120190386	Anderson	Jul 2012	A1
20120193423	Samek	Aug 2012	A1
20120197464	Wang et al.	Aug 2012	A1
20120203647	Smith	Aug 2012	A1
20120218389	Nowak	Aug 2012	A1
20120218436	Rodriguez et al.	Aug 2012	A1
20120223141	Good et al.	Sep 2012	A1
20120224026	Bayer et al.	Sep 2012	A1
20120236288	Stanley	Sep 2012	A1
20120242852	Hayward et al.	Sep 2012	A1
20120256901	Bendall	Oct 2012	A1
20120262558	Boger et al.	Oct 2012	A1
20120280908	Rhoads et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120282905	Owen	Nov 2012	A1
20120282911	Davis et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120284012	Rodriguez et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120284122	Brandis	Nov 2012	A1
20120284339	Rodriguez	Nov 2012	A1
20120284593	Rodriguez	Nov 2012	A1
20120293610	Doepke et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120294549	Doepke	Nov 2012	A1
20120299961	Ramkumar et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20120300991	Mikio	Nov 2012	A1
20120313848	Galor et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20120314030	Datta	Dec 2012	A1
20120314058	Bendall et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20120316820	Nakazato	Dec 2012	A1
20130038881	Pesach et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130038941	Pesach et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130043312	Van Horn	Feb 2013	A1
20130050426	Sarmast et al.	Feb 2013	A1
20130075168	Amundsen et al.	Mar 2013	A1
20130094069	Lee et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130101158	Lloyd et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130156267	Muraoka et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130175341	Kearney et al.	Jul 2013	A1
20130175343	Good	Jul 2013	A1
20130200150	Reynolds et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130201288	Billerbeck et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130208164	Cazier et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130211790	Loveland et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130223673	Davis et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130257744	Daghigh et al.	Oct 2013	A1
20130257759	Daghigh	Oct 2013	A1
20130270346	Xian et al.	Oct 2013	A1
20130287258	Kearney	Oct 2013	A1
20130291998	Konnerth	Nov 2013	A1
20130292475	Kotlarsky et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130292477	Hennick et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130293539	Hunt et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130293540	Laffargue et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130306728	Thuries et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130306731	Pedrao	Nov 2013	A1
20130307964	Bremer	Nov 2013	A1
20130308013	Li et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130308625	Park et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130313324	Koziol et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130313325	Wilz et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130329012	Bartos	Dec 2013	A1
20130329013	Metois et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130342343	Harring et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130342717	Havens et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20140001267	Giordano et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140002828	Laffargue et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140008439	Wang	Jan 2014	A1
20140009586	McNamer et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140021259	Moed et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140025584	Liu et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140031665	Pinto et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140034731	Gao et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140034734	Sauerwein	Feb 2014	A1
20140036848	Pease et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140039693	Havens et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140042814	Kather et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140049120	Kohtz et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140049635	Laffargue et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140058612	Wong et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140061306	Wu et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140063289	Hussey et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140066136	Sauerwein et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140067104	Osterhout	Mar 2014	A1
20140067692	Ye et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140070005	Nahill et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140071430	Hansen et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140071840	Venancio	Mar 2014	A1
20140074746	Wang	Mar 2014	A1
20140076974	Havens et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140078292	Boutboul	Mar 2014	A1
20140078341	Havens et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140078342	Li et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140078345	Showering	Mar 2014	A1
20140091147	Evans et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140097238	Ghazizadeh	Apr 2014	A1
20140098091	Hori	Apr 2014	A1
20140098792	Wang et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140100774	Showering	Apr 2014	A1
20140100813	Showering	Apr 2014	A1
20140103115	Meier et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140104413	McCloskey	Apr 2014	A1
20140104414	McCloskey et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140104416	Giordano et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140104451	Todeschini et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140104664	Lee	Apr 2014	A1
20140106594	Skvoretz	Apr 2014	A1
20140106725	Sauerwein	Apr 2014	A1
20140108010	Maltseff et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140108402	Gomez et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140108682	Caballero	Apr 2014	A1
20140110485	Toa et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140114530	Fitch et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140121438	Long et al.	May 2014	A1
20140124577	Wang et al.	May 2014	A1
20140124579	Ding	May 2014	A1
20140125842	Winegar	May 2014	A1
20140125853	Wang	May 2014	A1
20140125999	Longacre et al.	May 2014	A1
20140129378	Richardson	May 2014	A1
20140131441	Nahill et al.	May 2014	A1
20140131443	Smith	May 2014	A1
20140131444	Wang	May 2014	A1
20140131445	Ding et al.	May 2014	A1
20140131448	Xian et al.	May 2014	A1
20140133379	Wang et al.	May 2014	A1
20140135984	Hirata	May 2014	A1
20140136208	Maltseff et al.	May 2014	A1
20140139654	Takahashi	May 2014	A1
20140140585	Wang	May 2014	A1
20140151453	Meier et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140152882	Samek et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140152975	Ko	Jun 2014	A1
20140158468	Adami	Jun 2014	A1
20140158770	Sevier et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140159869	Zumsteg et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140166755	Liu et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140166757	Smith	Jun 2014	A1
20140166759	Liu et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140168380	Heidemann et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140168787	Wang et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140175165	Havens et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140175172	Jovanovski et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140191644	Chaney	Jul 2014	A1
20140191913	Ge et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140192187	Atwell et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140192551	Masaki	Jul 2014	A1
20140197238	Liu et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140197239	Havens et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140197304	Feng et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140203087	Smith et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140204268	Grunow et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140205150	Ogawa	Jul 2014	A1
20140214631	Hansen	Jul 2014	A1
20140217166	Berthiaume et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140217180	Liu	Aug 2014	A1
20140225918	Mittal et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140225985	Klusza et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140231500	Ehrhart et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140232930	Anderson	Aug 2014	A1
20140240464	Lee	Aug 2014	A1
20140247279	Nicholas et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140247280	Nicholas et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140247315	Marty et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140263493	Amurgis et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140263645	Smith et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140267609	Laffargue	Sep 2014	A1
20140268093	Tohme et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140270196	Braho et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140270229	Braho	Sep 2014	A1
20140270361	Amma et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140278387	DiGregorio	Sep 2014	A1
20140282210	Bianconi	Sep 2014	A1
20140284384	Lu et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140288933	Braho et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140297058	Barker et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140299665	Barber et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140306833	Ricci	Oct 2014	A1
20140307855	Withagen et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140312121	Lu et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140313527	Askan	Oct 2014	A1
20140319219	Liu et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140319220	Coyle	Oct 2014	A1
20140319221	Oberpriller et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140320408	Zagorsek et al.	Oct 2014	A1
20140326787	Barten	Nov 2014	A1
20140332590	Wang et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140344943	Todeschini et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140346233	Liu et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140347553	Ovsiannikov et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140350710	Gopalkrishnan et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140351317	Smith et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140353373	Van Horn et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140361073	Qu et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140361082	Xian et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140362184	Jovanovski et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140363015	Braho	Dec 2014	A1
20140369511	Sheerin et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140374483	Lu	Dec 2014	A1
20140374485	Xian et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20140379613	Nishitani et al.	Dec 2014	A1
20150001301	Ouyang	Jan 2015	A1
20150001304	Todeschini	Jan 2015	A1
20150003673	Fletcher	Jan 2015	A1
20150009100	Haneda et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150009301	Ribnick et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150009338	Laffargue et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150009610	London et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150014416	Kotlarsky et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150021397	Rueblinger et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150028102	Ren et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150028103	Jiang	Jan 2015	A1
20150028104	Ma et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150029002	Yeakley et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150032709	Maloy et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150036876	Marrion et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150039309	Braho et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150040378	Saber et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150048168	Fritz et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150049347	Laffargue et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150051992	Smith	Feb 2015	A1
20150053766	Havens et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150053768	Wang et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150053769	Thuries et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150062366	Liu et al.	Mar 2015	A1
20150062369	Gehring et al.	Mar 2015	A1
20150063215	Wang	Mar 2015	A1
20150063676	Lloyd et al.	Mar 2015	A1
20150069130	Gannon	Mar 2015	A1
20150071819	Todeschini	Mar 2015	A1
20150083800	Li et al.	Mar 2015	A1
20150086114	Todeschini	Mar 2015	A1
20150088522	Hendrickson et al.	Mar 2015	A1
20150096872	Woodburn	Apr 2015	A1
20150099557	Pettinelli et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150100196	Hollifield	Apr 2015	A1
20150102109	Huck	Apr 2015	A1
20150115035	Meier et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150116498	Vartiainen et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150127791	Kosecki et al.	May 2015	A1
20150128116	Chen et al.	May 2015	A1
20150129659	Feng et al.	May 2015	A1
20150133047	Smith et al.	May 2015	A1
20150134470	Hejl et al.	May 2015	A1
20150136851	Harding et al.	May 2015	A1
20150136854	Lu et al.	May 2015	A1
20150142492	Kumar	May 2015	A1
20150144692	Hejl	May 2015	A1
20150144698	Teng et al.	May 2015	A1
20150144701	Xian et al.	May 2015	A1
20150149946	Benos et al.	May 2015	A1
20150161429	Xian	Jun 2015	A1
20150163474	You	Jun 2015	A1
20150169925	Chen et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150169929	Williams et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150186703	Chen et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150193644	Kearney et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150193645	Colavito et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150199957	Funyak et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150204662	Kobayashi et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150204671	Showering	Jul 2015	A1
20150213647	Laffargue et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150229838	Hakim et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150269403	Lei et al.	Sep 2015	A1
20150276379	Ni et al.	Oct 2015	A1
20150301181	Herschbach	Oct 2015	A1
20150308816	Laffargue	Oct 2015	A1
20150325036	Lee	Nov 2015	A1
20150355470	Herschbach	Dec 2015	A1
20160048725	Holz et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160063429	Varley et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160090283	Svensson et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160090284	Svensson et al.	Mar 2016	A1
20160138247	Conway et al.	May 2016	A1
20160138248	Conway et al.	May 2016	A1
20160138249	Conway et al.	May 2016	A1
20160169665	Deschenes et al.	Jun 2016	A1
20160187186	Coleman et al.	Jun 2016	A1
20160187210	Coleman et al.	Jun 2016	A1
20160191801	Sivan	Jun 2016	A1
20160202478	Masson et al.	Jul 2016	A1
20170115490	Hsieh et al.	Apr 2017	A1
20170182942	Hardy et al.	Jun 2017	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (46)

Number	Date	Country
2004212587	Apr 2005	AU
3335760	Apr 1985	DE
10210813	Oct 2003	DE
102007037282	Mar 2008	DE
1111435	Jun 2001	EP
1443312	Aug 2004	EP
2286932	Feb 2011	EP
2381421	Oct 2011	EP
2533009	Dec 2012	EP
2722656	Apr 2014	EP
2779027	Sep 2014	EP
2833323	Feb 2015	EP
2843590	Mar 2015	EP
2845170	Mar 2015	EP
2503978	Jan 2014	GB
2525053	Oct 2015	GB
H04129902	Apr 1992	JP
200696457	Apr 2006	JP
200784162	Apr 2007	JP
2008210276	Sep 2008	JP
2014210646	Nov 2014	JP
2015174705	Oct 2015	JP
20110013200	Feb 2011	KR
20110117020	Oct 2011	KR
20120028109	Mar 2012	KR
9640452	Dec 1996	WO
0077726	Dec 2000	WO
0114836	Mar 2001	WO
2006095110	Sep 2006	WO
2007015059	Feb 2007	WO
2011017241	Feb 2011	WO
2012175731	Dec 2012	WO
2013021157	Feb 2013	WO
2013033442	Mar 2013	WO
2013163789	Nov 2013	WO
2013166368	Nov 2013	WO
2013173985	Nov 2013	WO
2013184340	Dec 2013	WO
2014019130	Feb 2014	WO
2014102341	Jul 2014	WO
2014110495	Jul 2014	WO
2014149702	Sep 2014	WO
2014151746	Sep 2014	WO
2015006865	Jan 2015	WO
2016020038	Feb 2016	WO
2016061699	Apr 2016	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (174)

Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,801 for Mobile Computing Device With Data Cognition Software, filed Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,757 for System and Method for Detecting Barcode Printing Errors, filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley); 41 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/277,337 for Multipurpose Optical Reader, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.); 59 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications, filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/662,922 for Multifunction Point of Sale System, filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.); 41 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/446,391 for Multifunction Point of Sale Apparatus With Optical Signature Capture, filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.); 37 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,165 for In-Counter Barcode Scanner, filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,890 for Mobile Computer Housing, filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 61 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,796 for Cargo Apportionment Techniques, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.); 56 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/516,892 for Table Computer, filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/523,098 for Handle for a Tablet Computer, filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.); 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,627 for Safety System and Method, filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 32 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,022 for Dynamic Diagnostic Indicator Generation, filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith); 43 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,857 for Barcode Reader With Security Features, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.); 32 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211 for System and Method for Dimensioning, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 33 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233 for Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.); 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/533,319 for Barcode Scanning System Using Wearable Device With Embedded Camera, filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/748,446 for Cordless Indicia Reader With a Multifunction Coil for Wireless Charging and EAS Deactivation, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.); 34 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/528,590 for Electronic Device, filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249 for Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.); 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/519,017 for Scanner, filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 11 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,542 for Portable Electronic Devices Having a Separate Location Trigger Unit for Use in Controlling an Application Unit, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.); 22 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/405,278 for Design Pattern for Secure Store, filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.); 23 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,024 for Shelving and Package Locating Systems for Delivery Vehicles, filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne); 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/568,305 for Auto-Contrast Viewfinder for an Indicia Reader, filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini); 29 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/526,918 for Charging Base, filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/580,262 for Media Gate for Thermal Transfer Printers, filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles); 36 pages.
European Search Report for Related EP Application No. 15189214.8, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 9 pages.
Office Action in counterpart European Application No. 13186043.9 dated Sep. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7.
Lloyd et al., “System for Monitoring the Condition of Packages Throughout Transit”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,575, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 59 pages, not yet published.
James Chamberlin, “System and Method for Picking Validation”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,797, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published.
Jovanovski et al., “Image-Stitching for Dimensioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,488, filed Sep. 30, 2015, 45 pages, not yet published.
Todeschini et al.; “Depth Sensor Based Auto-Focus System for an Indicia Scanner,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,176, filed Oct. 1, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published.
Wikipedia, “3D projection” Downloaded on Nov. 25, 2015 from www.wikipedia.com, 4 pages.
McCloskey et al., “Methods for Improving the Accuracy of Dimensioning-System Measurements,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/873,613, filed Sep. 2, 2015, 47 pages, not yet published.
Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 15182675.7, Dated Dec. 4, 2015, 10 pages.
McCloskey et al., “Image Transformation for Indicia Reading,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/982,032, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 48 pages, not yet published.
Search Report and Opinion in related GB Application No. 1517112.7, Dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 Pages.
Lloyd, Ryan and Scott McCloskey, “Recognition of 3D Package Shapes for Singe Camera Metrology” IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of computer Visiona, IEEE, Mar. 24, 2014, pp. 99-106, {retrieved on Jun. 16, 2014}, Authors are employees of common Applicant.
Peter Clarke, Actuator Developer Claims Anti-Shake Breakthrough for Smartphone Cams, Electronic Engineering Times, p. 24, May 16, 2011.
Spiller, Jonathan; Object Localization Using Deformable Templates, Master's Dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007; 74 pages.
Leotta, Matthew J.; Joseph L. Mundy; Predicting High Resolution Image Edges with a Generic, Adaptive, 3-D Vehicle Model; IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009; 8 pages.
European Search Report for application No. EP13186043 dated Feb. 26, 2014 (now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)); Total pp. 7.
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/039438 (WO2013166368), Oct. 1, 2013, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019, not yet published, filed Aug. 6, 2014, Hand Held Products Inc., Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment: 31 pages.
European Office Action for application EP 13186043, dated Jun. 12, 2014(now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)), Total of 6 pages.
Zhang, Zhaoxiang; Tieniu Tan, Kaiqi Huang, Yunhong Wang; Three-Dimensional Deformable-Model-based Localization and Recognition of Road Vehicles; IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2012, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,023, Tyler Doomenbal et al., filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Adjusting Dimensioning Results Using Augmented Reality, 39 pages.
Wikipedia, YUV description and definition, downloaded from http://www.wikipeida.org/wiki/YUV on Jun. 29, 2012, 10 pages.
YUV Pixel Format, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/yuv.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 13 pages.
YUV to RGB Conversion, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/fccyvrgb.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 5 pages.
Benos et al., “Semi-Automatic Dimensioning with Imager of a Portable Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/149,912, filed Feb. 4, 2009 (now expired), 56 pages.
Dimensional Weight—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional—weight, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 2 pages.
Dimensioning—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensioning, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 1 page.
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jul. 16, 2014, 5 pages.
European Patent Search Report for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jun. 30, 2014, 6 pages.
Caulier, Yannick et al., “A New Type of Color-Coded Light Structures for an Adapted and Rapid Determination of Point Correspondences for 3D Reconstruction.” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8082 808232-3; 2011; 8 pages.
Kazantsev, Aleksei et al. “Robust Pseudo-Random Coded Colored STructured Light Techniques for 3D Object Model Recovery”; ROSE 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (Oct. 17-18, 2008) , 6 pages.
Mouaddib E et al. “Recent Progress in Structured Light in order to Solve the Correspondence Problem in Stereo Vision” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1997; 7 pages.
Proesmans, Marc et al. “Active Acquisition of 3D Shape for Moving Objects” 0-7803-3258-X/96 1996 IEEE; 4 pages.
Salvi, Joaquim et al. “Pattern Codification Strategies in Structured Light Systems” published in Pattern Recognition; The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society,; Accepted Oct. 2, 2003; 23 pages.
EP Search and Written Opinion Report in related matter EP Application No. 14181437.6, Dated Mar. 26, 2015, 7 pages.
Hetzel, Gunter et al.; “3D Object Recognition from Range Images using Local Feature Histograms,”, Proceedings 2OO1 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001. Kauai, Hawaii, Dec. 8-14, 2001; pp. 394-399, XP010584149, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1272-3.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179, Serge Thuries et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation; 40 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioning System With Measurement-Conformance Feedback; 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioner With Data-Quality Indication; 34 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, System and Method for Dimensioning; not published yet. 33 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. Handheld Dimensioning System With Feedback; 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,757 , Eric Todeschini, filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Dimensioning and Maging Items, 80 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197, Serge Thuries et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Optical Pattern Projector; 33 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490, Brian L. Jovanovski et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner; 40 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916, H. Sprague Ackley, filed May 19, 2015, not published yet, Evaluating Image Values; 54 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/793,149, H. Sprague Ackley, filed Jul. 7, 2015, not published yet, Mobile Dimensioner Apparatus for Use in Commerce; 57 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Jun. 16, 2015, not published yet, Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner; 63 pages.
Intention to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Apr. 14, 2015, pp. 1-8.
Decision to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Aug. 6, 2015, pp. 1-2.
Leotta, Matthew, Generic, Deformable Models for 3-D Vehicle Surveillance, May 2010, Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University, Providence RI, 248 pages.
Ward, Benjamin, Interactive 3D Reconstruction from Video, Aug. 2012, Doctoral Thesis, Univesity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 157 pages.
Hood, Frederick W.; William A. Hoff, Robert King, Evaluation of an Interactive Technique for Creating Site Models from Range Data, Apr. 27-May 1, 1997 Proceedings of the ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics & Remote Systems, Augusta GA, 9 pages.
Gupta, Alok; Range Image Segmentation for 3-D Objects Recognition, May 1988, Technical Reports (CIS), Paper 736, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science, retrieved from Http://repository.upenn.edu/cis—reports/736, Accessed May 31, 2015, 157 pages.
Reisner-Kollmann, Irene; Anton L. Fuhrmann, Werner Purgathofer, Interactive Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Using Parametric Models, May 2010, Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference of Computer Graphics SCCG ''10, 8 pages.
Drummond, Tom; Roberto Cipolla, Real-Time Visual Tracking of Complex Structures, Jul. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattem Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 7; 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179 for Dimensioning System With Multipath Interference Mitigation, filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.); 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers, filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.); 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019 for Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.); 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,697 for Interactive Indicia Reader, filed Aug. 6, 2014, (Todeschini); 32 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering, filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916 for Evaluating Image Values, filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley); 60 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,808 for Identifying Inventory Items in a Storage Facility, filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Singel et al.); 51 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,056 for Variable Depth of Field Barcode Scanner, filed Sep. 10, 2014 (McCloskey et al.); 29 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,154 for Directing an Inspector Through an Inspection, filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.); 53 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/525,068 for Tablet Computer With Removable Scanning Device, filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.); 19 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,627 for an Axially Reinforced Flexible Scan Element, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Reublinger et al.); 41 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,327 for Device Management Proxy for Secure Devices, filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.); 50 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication, filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering); 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,827 for a Mobile-Phone Adapter for Electronic Transactions, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl); 25 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,934 for a System and Method for Indicia Verification, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl); 38 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,600 for Cyclone, filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al); 16 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/707,123 for Application Independent DEX/UCS Interface, filed May 8, 2015 (Pape); 47 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,282 for Terminal Having Illumination and Focus Control, filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.); 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,093 for Methods for Training a Speech Recognition System, filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari); 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/524,186 for Scanner, filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,407 for Method and System to Protect Software-Based Network-Connected Devices From Advanced Persistent Threat, filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.); 42 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,706 for Device for Supporting an Electronic Tool on a User's Hand, filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.); 33 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,708 for Device, System, and Method for Determining the Status of Checkout Lanes, filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,050 for Intermediate Linear Positioning, filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.); 60 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,563 for Adaptable Interface for a Mobile Computing Device, filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.); 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,012 for Hands-Free Human Machine Interface Responsive to a Driver of a Vehicle, filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.); 44 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,672 for Augumented Reality Enabled Hazard Display, filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.); 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,364 for Medication Management System, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.); 44 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/664,063 for Method and Application for Scanning a Barcode With a Smart Device While Continuously Running and Displaying an Application on the Smart Device Display, filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini); 37 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/735,717 for Indicia-Reading Systems Having an Interface With a User's Nervous System, filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini); 39 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,191 for Method and System for Recognizing Speech Using Wildcards in an Expected Response, filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.); 45 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,110 for System and Method for Regulating Barcode Data Injection Into a Running Application on a Smart Device, filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.); 38 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,764 for Concatenated Expected Responses for Speech Recognition, filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Braho et al.); 51 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,289 for System for Communication Via a Peripheral Hub, filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.); 37 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197 for Optical Pattern Projector, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.); 33 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/674,329 for Aimer for Barcode Scanning, filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell); 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,979 for Tracking Battery Conditions, filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.); 70 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 29/529,441 for Indicia Reading Device, filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.); 14 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490 for Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner, filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); 40 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,320 for Tactile Switch for a Mobile Electronic Device, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Barndringa); 38 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,923 for Secure Unattended Network Authentication, filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.); 52 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373 for Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner, filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.); 63 pages.
Search Report and Opinion in Related EP Application 15176943.7, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 8 pages.
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Mar. 8, 2016, 8 pages.
United Kingdom Search Report in related application GB1517842.9, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages.
Great Britain Search Report for related Application On. GB1517843.7, dated Feb. 23, 2016; 8 pages.
European Partial Search Report for related EP Application No. 15190306.9, dated May 6, 2016, 8 pages.
Mike Stensvold, “get the Most Out of Variable Aperture Lenses”, published on www.OutdoorPhotogrpaher.com; dated Dec. 7, 2010; 4 pages, [As noted on search report retrieved from URL: http;//www.outdoorphotogapher.com/gear/lenses/get-the-most-out-ofvariable-aperture-lenses.html on Feb. 9, 2016].
M.Zahid Gurbuz, Selim Akyokus, Ibrahim Emiroglu, Aysun Guran, An Efficient Algorithm for 3D Rectangular Box Packing, 2009, Applied Automatic Systems: Proceedings of Selected AAS 2009 Papers, pp. 131-134.
European extended Search report in related EP Application 13785171.3, dated Sep. 19, 2016, 8 pages.
El-Hakim et al, “Multicamera vision-based approach to flexible feature measurement for inspection and reverse engineering”, published in Optical Engineering, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1993, 15 pages.
El-Hakim et al., “A Knowledge-based Edge/Object Measurement Technique”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sabry—E1-Hakim/publication/44075058—A—Knowledge—Based—EdgeObject—Measurement—Technique/links/00b4953b5faa7d3304000000.pdf [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2016] dated Jan. 1, 1993, 9 pages.
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810685.6, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages, no references.
European Search Report in related EP Application No. 15190315.0, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages.
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 2015220810562.2, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references].
European Search Report for related Application EP 15190249.1, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages.
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references].
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated May 24, 2016, 8 pages.
European Extended search report in related EP Application No. 15190306.9, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 15 pages.
Collings et al., “The Applications and Technology of Phase-Only Liquid Crystal on Silicon Devices”, Journal of Display Technology, IEEE Service Center, New, York, NY, US, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2011 (Mar. 1, 2011), pp. 112-119.
Padzensky, Ron; “Augmera; Gesture Control”, Dated Apr. 18, 2015, 15 pages.
Grabowski, Ralph; “New Commands in AutoCADS 2010: Part 11 Smoothing 3D Mesh Objects” Dated 2011, 6 pages.
Theodoropoulos, Gabriel; “Using Gesture Recognizers to Handle Pinch, Rotate, Pan, Swipe, and Tap Gestures” dated Aug. 25, 2014, 34 pages.
Extended European Search Report in related EP Application No. 16175410.0, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 5 pages.
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16190017.0, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 6 pages.
European Extended Search Report in Related EP Application No. 16172995.9, dated Aug. 22, 2016, 11 pages.
European Search Report from related EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages.
United Kingdom combined Search and Examination Report in related GB Application No. 1607394.2, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 pages.
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16173429.8, dated Dec. 1, 2016, 8 pages.
European Examination report in related EP Application No. 14181437.6, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 5 pages.
Wikipedia, “Microlens”, Downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microlens, pp. 3.
Fukaya et al., “Characteristics of Speckle Random Pattern and Its Applications”, pp. 317-327, Nouv. Rev. Optique, t.6, n.6. (1975).
European extended search report in related EP Application 16190833.0, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 8 pages.
United Kingdom Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application No. GB1620676.5, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 6 pages.
European Exam Report in related , EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 5 pages.
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15176943.7, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 6 pages.
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 4 pages.
Ralph Grabowski, “Smothing 3D Mesh Objects,” New Commands in AutoCAD 2010: Part 11, Examiner Cited art in related matter Non Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017; 6 pages.
Chinese Notice of Reexamination in related Chinese Application 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 14, 2017, English Computer Translation provided, 7 pages.
Extended European search report in related EP Application 16199707.7, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 15 pages.
Ulusoy et al., One-Shot Scanning using De Bruijn Spaced Grids, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 7 pages [Cited in EP Extended search report dated Apr. 10, 2017].
Thorlabs, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup—id=6430, 4 pages.
Eksma Optics, Examinder Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from http://eksmaoptics.com/optical-systems/f-theta-lenses/f-theta-lens-for-1064-nm/, 2 pages.
Sill Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, http://www.silloptics.de/1/products/sill-encyclopedia/laser-optics/f-theta-lenses/, 4 pages.
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 4 pages.
European Exam Report in related EP Applciation 16172995.9, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 9 pages.
United Kingdon Search Report in related Application No. GB1700338.5, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 5 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20150308816 A1	Oct 2015	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	13799762	Mar 2013	US
Child	14795332		US

Systems and methods for enhancing dimensioning

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications