The present teachings relate to systems and methods for extracting database dimensions as a database modeling object, and more particularly to platforms and techniques for dedicated modeling of technical, medical, financial, and other systems which are configured to extract one or more dimensions out of a database structure and encapsulate that data as a model object capable of being programmatically imported and exported objects to external mainframe platforms, and other resources.
A spectrum of modeling platforms and options exist today for engineers, managers, developers and other professionals. In the case of engineering, medical, technical, financial, and other advanced modeling resources, a range of platforms are available for users interested in setting up, running and maintaining financial modeling systems. For example, organizations interested in relatively sophisticated modeling applications, such as geophysical models for detecting oil reserves or other geologic features or equity market analysis based on Black-Sholes option pricing models, a company or other organization may choose to install advanced modeling software on mainframe-class computers to run those classes of models and obtain various projections, reports, and other results. Such mainframe-level or other large-scale installations, however, can involve costs on the order of millions of dollars or more, and may require the full time attention of highly skilled professionals, including programmers and managers with advanced training. As a consequence, putting a mainframe-based modeling operation into place may not be practical or possible for many organizations or users.
On the other end of the spectrum, managers, engineers and others may employ widely available entry-level applications to capture operational data and attempt to develop predictive models for engineering, financial, medial, and other applications. That class of applications can include, for example, consumer or business-level spreadsheet, database, or data visualization programs for technical, financial, and other purposes. For instance, a manager of a manufacturing facility may use a commercially available spreadsheet application to enter production numbers, schedules, and other details of that site. However, attempting to extract useful modeling outputs from those classes of applications can be difficult or impossible. For one, spreadsheet, database, and other widely available applications are typically built to produce reports based on already existing data, but not to generate modeling outputs or objects that represent predictive outputs or scenarios. For another, existing spreadsheet, database, and other applications typically involve limitations on cell size, number of dimensions, overall storage capacity, and other program parameters which, in the case of large-scale modeling operations, may be insufficient to operate on the data sets necessary to produce and run meaningful models.
For another, the data structures and outputs of existing spreadsheet, database and other entry-level or commonly available applications are typically arranged in proprietary format, rather than a widely interoperable object-based or other universal format. As still another drawback, the cells, rows, columns, and other data elements within commonly available spreadsheets, databases, and other entry-level programs can not be extracted as separate units and exported to other modeling or analytic tools. In short, the use of spreadsheet, database, and other consumer or business-level applications to conduct modeling operations involves significant shortcomings, due in part to the fact that those classes of platforms are not designed to reliable handle modeling functionality. At present, therefore, a manager, developer, engineer, or other professional or user with modeling requirements is faced with a choice between installing a large and expensive mainframe-based solution with its attendant infrastructure, a spreadsheet or database-based entry level solution with its attendant limitations on power and data handling, or a combination of those two types of platforms. It may be desirable to provide object-based or object-compatible modeling platforms capable of generating modeling objects which encapsulate various modeling features, which are exportable to other external modeling tools, and which can be readily extracted from existing database sources.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present teachings and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present teachings. In the figures:
Embodiments of the present teachings relate to systems and methods for extracting database dimensions as a database modeling object. More particularly, embodiments relate to platforms and techniques that can access, extract, and generate modeling objects in a native object-based or object-compatible format from a multi-dimensional or other database source. The modeling objects produced via a modeling client or other modeling tool according to the present teachings can encapsulate both source data describing a physical, medical, technical, financial, or other process or phenomena, and modeling attributes that relate the source data to predictive scenarios, specific models, and other features. In embodiments, the modeling objects can be extracted or “lifted” from data sources such as database programs or others, and stored to local storage of a local modeling client. The model objects can be made visible or available via the desktop or other user interface of the modeling client. These and other embodiments described herein address the various noted shortcomings in known modeling technology, and provide a user or operator with enhanced modeling power on a desktop or other client, allowing direct extraction and manipulation of database dimensions as independent object-based entities. Systems and methods according to the present teachings also allowing seamless generation, local storage, and communication of model objects to backend mainframe platforms or data centers, middleware servers, other modeling clients, and/or other local or remote modeling, storage, or data processing resources.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the present teachings, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Where possible the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Mainframe platform 202 can include modules, logic, and functionality to perform an array of computation and data storage tasks, including data warehousing, data mining, statistical analyses, financial planning, inventory management, customer resource management, engineering design, and other applications. In implementations as shown, mainframe platform 202 can host or communicate with a variety or resources including, merely illustratively, an mainframe data store 206, and logic or applications including an analytic module 204. Mainframe platform 202 can contain, host, support, or interface to other data processing hardware, software, and other resources. In embodiments, modeling client 102 can likewise communicate with other local or remote resources, such as a middleware server 208 hosting or interfacing to a set of data stores for online analytical processing (OLAP) or other functions. Modeling client 102 can also communicate or interface with other local or remote servers, services, data stores, or other resources.
In embodiments as shown, modeling client 102 can operate under an operating system 118, such as a distribution of the Linux™, Unix™, or other open source or proprietary operating system. Modeling client 102 can present a user interface 130, such as a graphical user interface or command line interface, operating under operating system 118 to receive commands and inputs from a user, and operate modeling client 102. Modeling client 102 can communicate with storage resources including a modeling store 104, such as a local or remote database or data store. Modeling store 104 can store a set of modeling objects 106, in which data, functions, procedures, attributes, and/or other information related to one or more modeling object 110 can be encapsulated and stored. In embodiments, modeling object 110 can be encoded in extensible markup language (XML) format. In embodiments, modeling object 110 can be encoded in other object-based or object-compatible formats or data structures. Modeling client 102 can communicate with mainframe platform 202 via a modeling application programming interface (API) 108. Modeling application programming interface (API) 108 can include, for instance, defined function calls or calls to other routines, calculations, or features, as well as data structures and parameters associated with modeling operations. For example, modeling application programming interface (API) 108 can include a function call to invoke a Monte Carlo simulation model based on a set of supplied data, such as an identified set of dimensions extracted from a spreadsheet or database. Other functions, routines, resources, and features can be called, invoked, or instantiated via modeling application programming interface (API) 108. According to embodiments in various regards, one or more local or remote modeling packages, modules, or other supporting applications can be instantiated via modeling module 120 and modeling application programming interface (API) 108 to manipulate source data and resulting one or more modeling object 110.
In embodiments, a user of modeling client 102 can access, modify, or add data modeling objects to a set of data modeling object 106 via a modeling module 120 hosted in modeling client 102. Set of data modeling objects 106 can include data objects that the user of modeling client 102 has directly entered, or, in aspects, which the user of modeling client has imported or extracted from sources such as consumer or business-level spreadsheet, database, and/or other applications or platforms. Modeling module 120 can itself be or include applications, software modules or hardware modules, or other logic or resources to operate on set of modeling objects 106. Modeling module 120 can, merely illustratively, include or access logic or modules for invoking and manipulating a variety of scientific, technical, engineering, medical, financial, manufacturing, or other modeling operations. For instance, modeling module 120 can be or include applications or logic for performing Monte Carlo simulations, finite element analyses, Black-Scholes option pricing or other market analyses, epidemiological projections, geophysical models or simulations, or other simulations, models, trend mappings, projections, or other predictive processes. In embodiments in one regard, after invoking modeling module 120 and performing any modeling task, the user of modeling client 102 can locally store and/or export one or more modeling object 110 to external platforms or resources.
In embodiments as shown, the user of modeling client 102 can for instance export or communicate one or more modeling object 110 to mainframe platform 202 via modeling application programming interface (API) 108, for storage and use at a local or remote location from within that platform. In aspects, mainframe platform 202 can receive modeling object 110 directly, without a necessity for translation, re-formatting, or invoking any spreadsheet, database, or other application from which data encapsulated in one or mode modeling object 110 originated. In aspects, mainframe platform 202 can operate on one or more modeling object 110, and transmit or return that data or other results to modeling client 102 via modeling application programming interface (API) 108. Thus, according to aspects of the present teachings, modeling objects can be exchanged directly and programmatically between modeling client 102, mainframe platform 202 or other larger-scale or remote platforms, including for instance middleware server 208 or other comparatively large-scale or higher-capacity modeling or analytic tools.
In terms of operating on source data and generating one or more modeling object 110 for local storage and/or exchange with mainframe platform 202 or other platforms, and as shown for instance in
In 412, modeling application programming interface (API) 108 can be invoked by modeling module 120, by mainframe platform 202, or other resources to transfer one or mode modeling object 110 to mainframe platform 202. In embodiments, one or more modeling object 110 can for instance be communicated to mainframe platform 202 via a secure connection or channel, such as a secure socket layer (SSL) connection, via a channel encrypted using a public/private key infrastructure, or other channel or connection. In 414, one or more model object 110 can be received in modeling module 120 from mainframe platform 202 or other resource, as appropriate. For example, an updated version of one or more model object 110 reflecting new data, new modeling results, or other information can be received in modeling module 120. In 416, the resulting new, updated, or modified one or more model object 110 can be stored to set of modeling objects 106 in model store 104, as appropriate. In embodiments, one or more model objects 110 can in addition or instead be stored to mainframe data store 206, to middleware server 208, to another modeling client or other client, or other site or destination. In 418, modeling module 120 can convert one or more model objects 110 to spreadsheet, database, or other format, and export any converted data as a set of cell-formatted information, or data encoded in other formats. For instance, modeling module 120 can convert or translate one or more model objects to cell data values or database entries, and export that data to client-level applications on modeling client 102 or other local or remote devices or storage. In 420, processing can repeat, return to a prior processing point, jump to a further processing point, or end.
According to various embodiments of the present teachings, and as for example generally illustrated in
The foregoing description is illustrative, and variations in configuration and implementation may occur to persons skilled in the art. For example, while embodiments have been described wherein one or more model object 110 is accessed and manipulated via one modeling client 102, in embodiments, one or more users can use multiple modeling clients, or networks including modeling clients or other resources, to operate on model object data. For further example, while embodiments have been described in which modeling client 102 may interact with one mainframe platform 202 and/or one middleware server 208, in embodiments, one or more modeling client 102 can interact with multiple mainframe, data center, enterprise platforms, middleware servers, and/or other resources, in various combinations. Yet further, while embodiments have been described in which a modeling client 102 interacts with a mainframe platform 202 and/or middleware server 208, in embodiments, rather than interact with large-scale enterprise platforms or middleware servers, modeling client 102 can interact with other local or remote modeling clients, networks of those clients, or, in embodiments, can operate to perform modeling operations on a stand-alone basis, without necessarily communicating with other modeling platforms. Other resources described as singular or integrated can in embodiments be plural or distributed, and resources described as multiple or distributed can in embodiments be combined. The scope of the present teachings is accordingly intended to be limited only by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5890167 | Bridge, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5978796 | Malloy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6035300 | Cason et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6360188 | Freidman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366922 | Althoff | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6434435 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434544 | Bakalash et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6594672 | Lampson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6609123 | Cazemier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6735590 | Shoup et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6931418 | Barnes | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7039871 | Cronk | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7093194 | Nelson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7139766 | Thomson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7152062 | Draper et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7177329 | Kobayashi | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7240067 | Timmons | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7299241 | Reed et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7660822 | Pfleger | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7716257 | Thomson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 20010049678 | Yaginuma | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020029207 | Bakalash et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035562 | Roller et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083034 | Orbanes et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087516 | Cras et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169658 | Adler | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030114950 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115194 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115207 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120372 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126114 | Tedesco | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030184585 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225736 | Bakalash et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039736 | Kilmer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133552 | Greenfield et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139061 | Colossi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205617 | Light | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252136 | Bhatt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004904 | Keamey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010566 | Cushing et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015220 | Ramchandi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060252 | Doddington | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060382 | Spector et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004833 | Trivedi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024653 | Battagin et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036707 | Singh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136462 | Campos et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173906 | Chu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190844 | Binder et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262145 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070022093 | Wyatt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027904 | Chow et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088757 | Mullins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094236 | Otter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150820 | Salvo | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208721 | Zaman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211056 | Chakraborty et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080140696 | Mathuria | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172405 | Feng et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243778 | Behnen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294596 | Xiong | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320023 | Fong | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090006992 | Gilboa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172042 | Bracha et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193039 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222470 | Kemp et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100057700 | Williamson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057777 | Williamson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131456 | Williamson | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169299 | Pollara | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305922 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306254 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306255 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306272 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306281 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306340 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306682 | Williamson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110050728 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054854 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055680 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055761 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055850 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078199 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078200 | Williamson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131176 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131220 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158106 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161282 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161374 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161378 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,439 mailed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,439 mailed Nov. 10, 2010. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,458 mailed Jul. 5, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,459 mailed Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,460 mailed Aug. 15, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,452 mailed Aug. 12, 2011. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,458 mailed Nov. 25, 2011. |
| Using OLAP and Multi-Dimensional data for decision making, Hasan et al. IEEE 2001. |
| A new OLAP aggregation based on the AHC technique, Massaoud et al, DOLAP'04 Nov. 12-13, 2004. |
| Interactive hierarchical dimension ordering, spacing and filtering for exploration of high dimension datasets, Yang et al. IEEE symposium on information visualization 2003. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Interpolating Conformal Input Sets Based on a Target Output”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,779, filed Aug. 31, 2010. |
| Williamson. “Systems and Methods for Interpolating Alternative Input Sets Based on User-Weighted Variables”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,881, filed Nov. 22. 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Tracking Differential Changes in Conformal Data Input Sets”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,937, filed Nov. 22, 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Training a Self-Learning Network Using Interpolated Input Sets Based on a Target Output”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,935, filed Aug. 31, 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Embedding Interpolated Data Object in Application Data File”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,717, filed Nov. 29, 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Generating Interpolated Input Data Sets Using Reduced Input Source Objects”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,768, filed Nov. 29, 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Filtering Interpolated Input Data Based on User-Supplied or Other Approximation Constraints”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,790, filed Nov. 29, 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Binding Multiple Interpolated Data Objects”. U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,811, filed Nov. 29. 2010. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Generating Portable Interpolated Data Using Object Based Encodig of Interpolated Results”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,322, filed Feb. 28, 2011. |
| Wiliiamson, “Systems and Methods for Generating Interpolation Data Template to Normalize Analytic Runs”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,332, filed Feb. 28, 2011. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Generating Interpolation Data Sets Converging to Optimized Results Using Iterative Overlapping Inputs”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,341, filed Feb. 28, 2011. |
| Williamson, “Systems and Methods for Validating Interpolation Results Using Monte Carlo Simulations on Interpolated Data Inputs”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,344, filed Feb. 28, 2011. |
| ASPFAQ.com, “What are the valid styles for converting datetime to string?”, (2006) http://database.aspfaq.com/database/what-are-the-valid-styles-for-converting-datetime-to-string.html. |
| Answering Joint Queries from Multiple Aggregate OLAP Databases, Pourabbas et al, LNCS 2737, pp. 24-34, 2003. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,459 mailed Feb. 28, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,460 mailed Apr. 19, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,419 mailed Feb. 22, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,458 mailed Mar. 9, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/475,452 mailed May 16, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,428 mailed Mar. 30, 2012. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,393 mailed Dec. 27, 2011. |
| USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,330 mailed Dec. 7, 2011. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100306281 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |