Systems and method relating generally to data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for fragmenting a data set and recovering the fragmented data set.
Data transfer devices often packetize data prior to sending the data across a transfer medium. This transfer medium may be, for example, a data transmission medium or a storage medium. Once the packetized data is received, it is reassembled to yield the original data. In some cases, errors are introduced through the reassembly process.
Hence, for at least the aforementioned reasons, there exists a need in the art for advanced systems and methods for data processing.
Systems and method relating generally to data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for fragmenting a data set and recovering the fragmented data set.
Some embodiments of the present invention provide data processing systems that include: a fragmenting circuit, a transfer packer formation circuit, and a data transfer circuit. The fragmenting circuit is operable to separate a data set into at least a first fragment and a second fragment. The transfer packet formation circuit operable to: append identification information to the front of the first fragment, and at least the first M+N bits of the second fragment to the end of the first fragment to yield a first transfer fragment; and aggregate the first transfer fragment with other transfer fragments to yield an aggregate output. The data transfer circuit operable to transfer the aggregate output via a transfer medium.
This summary provides only a general outline of some embodiments of the invention. The phrases “in one embodiment,” “according to one embodiment,” “in various embodiments”, “in one or more embodiments”, “in particular embodiments” and the like generally mean the particular feature, structure, or characteristic following the phrase is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, and may be included in more than one embodiment of the present invention. Importantly, such phases do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. Many other embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
A further understanding of the various embodiments of the present invention may be realized by reference to the figures which are described in remaining portions of the specification. In the figures, like reference numerals are used throughout several figures to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sub-label consisting of a lower case letter is associated with a reference numeral to denote one of multiple similar components. When reference is made to a reference numeral without specification to an existing sub-label, it is intended to refer to all such multiple similar components.
Systems and method relating generally to data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for fragmenting a data set and recovering the fragmented data set.
Some embodiments of the present invention provide hard disk drives that include: a disk platter, a data write circuit, a head assembly, and a data reading circuit. The data write circuit includes a fragmenting circuit, a transfer packet formation circuit, and a data transfer circuit. The fragmenting circuit is operable to separate a data set into at least a first fragment and a second fragment. The transfer packet formation circuit is operable to: append identification information to the front of the first fragment, and at least the first M+N bits of the second fragment to the end of the first fragment to yield a first transfer fragment; aggregate the first transfer fragment with other transfer fragments to yield an aggregate output. The data transfer circuit is operable to store the aggregate output to the disk platter as a stored information. The head assembly is disposed in relation to the disk platter and operable to sense the stored information on the disk platter, and to provide a signal corresponding to the sensed information. A data reading circuit includes: an analog to digital converter circuit operable to convert the sensed information to a series of digital samples; an equalizer circuit operable to equalize the digital samples to yield an equalized output, wherein the equalized output includes a first fragment of data and a second fragment of data; a stitching circuit, and a data recovery circuit. The stitching circuit is operable to: receive the stored information including at least a first fragment and a second fragment, where the first M-bits of the second fragment are received both as the first M-bits after the end of the first fragment and as the first M-bits of the second fragment; generating a modified second fragment based on the second fragment from the data set, wherein the first M-bits of the second fragment are derived from the first M-bits after the end of the first fragment; and aggregate the modified second fragment with other modified fragments to yield a codeword. The data recovery circuit is operable to process the codeword to yield an original data set. In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data recovery circuit includes: a data detector circuit operable to apply a data detection algorithm to the codeword to yield a detected output; and a data decoder circuit operable to apply a data decoding algorithm to a decoder input to yield a decoded output, wherein the decoder input is derived from the detected output.
Other embodiments of the present invention provide data processing systems that include: a fragmenting circuit, a transfer packer formation circuit, and a data transfer circuit. The fragmenting circuit is operable to separate a data set into at least a first fragment and a second fragment. The transfer packet formation circuit operable to: append identification information to the front of the first fragment, and at least the first M+N bits of the second fragment to the end of the first fragment to yield a first transfer fragment; and aggregate the first transfer fragment with other transfer fragments to yield an aggregate output. The data transfer circuit operable to transfer the aggregate output via a transfer medium.
In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, at least one of the value of M and the value of N is programmable. In various instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the identification information includes a preamble pattern and synchronization data. In one or more instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing system is implemented as part of a storage device, and the medium is a storage medium. In other instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing system is implemented as part of a communication device, and the medium is a communication medium. In particular cases, the communication medium is a wireless communication medium. In yet other instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing system is implemented as part of an integrated circuit. Yet other instances of the aforementioned embodiments include a data encoding circuit operable to apply a data encoding algorithm to an input to yield the data set. In some cases, the data encoding algorithm is a low density parity check algorithm.
Yet other embodiments of the present invention provide data processing systems that include: a stitching circuit, and a data recovery circuit. The stitching circuit operable to: receive a data set including at least a first fragment and a second fragment, where the first M-bits of the second fragment are received both as the first M-bits after the end of the first fragment and as the first M-bits of the second fragment; generate a modified second fragment based on the second fragment from the data set, where the first M-bits of the second fragment are derived from the first M-bits after the end of the first fragment; and aggregate the modified second fragment with other modified fragments to yield a codeword. The data recovery circuit is operable to process the codeword to yield an original data set.
In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data set includes a postamble including the first M-bits of the second fragment at the end of the first fragment, and the data set includes identification information between the postamble and the second fragment. In some cases, the identification information includes a preamble pattern and synchronization data. In various instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the value of M is programmable. In one or more instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing system may be implemented as, but is not limited to, a storage device, or a communication device. In some instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data processing system is implemented as part of an integrated circuit. In various instances of the aforementioned embodiments, the data recovery circuit includes: a data detector circuit operable to apply a data detection algorithm to the codeword to yield a detected output; and a data decoder circuit operable to apply a data decoding algorithm to a decoder input to yield a decoded output, where the decoder input is derived from the detected output.
Turning to
In a typical read operation, read/write head 176 is accurately positioned by motor controller 168 over a desired data track on disk platter 178. Motor controller 168 both positions read/write head 176 in relation to disk platter 178 and drives spindle motor 172 by moving read/write head assembly 176 to the proper data track on disk platter 178 under the direction of hard disk controller 166. Spindle motor 172 spins disk platter 178 at a determined spin rate (RPMs). Once read/write head 176 is positioned adjacent the proper data track, magnetic signals representing data on disk platter 178 are sensed by read/write head 176 as disk platter 178 is rotated by spindle motor 172. The sensed magnetic signals are provided as a continuous, minute analog signal representative of the magnetic data on disk platter 178. This minute analog signal is transferred from read/write head 176 to read channel circuit 110 via preamplifier 170. Preamplifier 170 is operable to amplify the minute analog signals accessed from disk platter 178. In turn, read channel circuit 110 decodes and digitizes the received analog signal to recreate the information originally written to disk platter 178. This data is provided as read data 103 to a receiving circuit. A write operation is substantially the opposite of the preceding read operation with write data 101 being provided to read channel circuit 110. This data is then encoded and written to disk platter 178.
In operation, data written to disk platter 178 is split into fragments or portions, and the fragments are augmented with synchronization information to yield a modified fragment. In addition, data from the beginning of the next fragment is appended to the end of the modified fragment as part of a postamble. Multiple modified fragments covering all of the fragments into which the data was originally split are concatenated and transferred via to disk platter 178. The transferred data is then read back from disk platter 178, disaggregated, and the individual fragments re-assembled to yield a de-fragmented data set. This defragmenting includes adding data from the postamble to individual fragments in a stitching operation that reduces the effects of discontinuity between fragments on the backend processing. The fragmenting and de-fragmenting may be done using a circuit similar to that discussed below in relation to
It should be noted that storage system 100 may be integrated into a larger storage system such as, for example, a RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks or redundant array of independent disks) based storage system. Such a RAID storage system increases stability and reliability through redundancy, combining multiple disks as a logical unit. Data may be spread across a number of disks included in the RAID storage system according to a variety of algorithms and accessed by an operating system as if it were a single disk. For example, data may be mirrored to multiple disks in the RAID storage system, or may be sliced and distributed across multiple disks in a number of techniques. If a small number of disks in the RAID storage system fail or become unavailable, error correction techniques may be used to recreate the missing data based on the remaining portions of the data from the other disks in the RAID storage system. The disks in the RAID storage system may be, but are not limited to, individual storage systems such as storage system 100, and may be located in close proximity to each other or distributed more widely for increased security. In a write operation, write data is provided to a controller, which stores the write data across the disks, for example by mirroring or by striping the write data. In a read operation, the controller retrieves the data from the disks. The controller then yields the resulting read data as if the RAID storage system were a single disk.
A data decoder circuit used in relation to read channel circuit 110 may be, but is not limited to, a low density parity check (LDPC) decoder circuit as are known in the art. Such low density parity check technology is applicable to transmission of information over virtually any channel or storage of information on virtually any media. Transmission applications include, but are not limited to, optical fiber, radio frequency channels, wired or wireless local area networks, digital subscriber line technologies, wireless cellular, Ethernet over any medium such as copper or optical fiber, cable channels such as cable television, and Earth-satellite communications. Storage applications include, but are not limited to, hard disk drives, compact disks, digital video disks, magnetic tapes and memory devices such as DRAM, NAND flash, NOR flash, other non-volatile memories and solid state drives.
In addition, it should be noted that storage system 100 may be modified to include solid state memory that is used to store data in addition to the storage offered by disk platter 178. This solid state memory may be used in parallel to disk platter 178 to provide additional storage. In such a case, the solid state memory receives and provides information directly to read channel circuit 110. Alternatively, the solid state memory may be used as a cache where it offers faster access time than that offered by disk platted 178. In such a case, the solid state memory may be disposed between interface controller 120 and read channel circuit 110 where it operates as a pass through to disk platter 178 when requested data is not available in the solid state memory or when the solid state memory does not have sufficient storage to hold a newly written data set. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of storage systems including both disk platter 178 and a solid state memory.
Turning to
During operation, data sent via transfer medium 230 is split into fragments or portions by transmitter 210, and the fragments are augmented with synchronization information to yield a modified fragment. In addition, data from the beginning of the next fragment is appended to the end of the modified fragment as part of a postamble. Multiple modified fragments covering all of the fragments into which the data was originally split are concatenated and transferred via transfer medium 230. The transferred data is received by receiver 220 and disaggregated and the individual fragments re-assembled to yield a de-fragmented data set. This defragmenting includes adding data from the postamble to individual fragments in a stitching operation that reduces the effects of discontinuity between fragments on the backend processing. The fragmenting and de-fragmenting may be done using a circuit similar to that discussed below in relation to
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
Referring again to
Referring again to
Data output 462 is received by an analog front end circuit 415 from medium 470 as a read input 472. Analog front end circuit 415 processes read input 472 to yield a processed analog signal 417 that is provided to an analog to digital converter circuit 425. Analog front end circuit 415 may include, but is not limited to, an analog filter and an amplifier circuit as are known in the art. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of circuitry that may be included as part of analog front end circuit 415. Analog to digital converter circuit 425 converts processed analog signal 417 into a corresponding series of digital samples 427. Analog to digital converter circuit 425 may be any circuit known in the art that is capable of producing digital samples corresponding to an analog input signal. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of analog to digital converter circuits that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. Digital samples 427 are provided to an equalizer circuit 435. Equalizer circuit 435 applies an equalization algorithm to digital samples 427 to yield an equalized output 437. In some embodiments of the present invention, equalizer circuit 435 is a digital finite impulse response filter circuit as are known in the art.
Equalized output 437 is provided to fragment reassembly and stitching circuit 445. Fragment reassembly and stitching circuit 445 is operable to separate the data fragments from the preamble, synchronization and postamble data. Then replaces the first M-bits of each data fragment with the first M-bits of the preceding postamble. As the first M+N bits of the preceding postamble are the first M+N bits of the data fragment prior to transfer, this results in substantially the same M+N bits at the beginning of each data fragment, and provides a continuous transition between the last bits of the preceding data fragment and the first M-bits of the current data fragment, and a reasonably continuous transition between the first M-bits of the current data fragment and the next N-bits of the current data fragment. In addition, fragment reassembly and stitching circuit 445 adds warm up bits prior to the first data fragment to allow for adjustment to the transition to the first part of the data fragment. In some cases, these warm up bits are the first bit of the first fragment replicated a number of times. The result is a stitched codeword similar to encoded output 432 plus any noise introduced during processing and transfer via medium 470. Turning to
Count value 612 is provided to a stitch overrun circuit 620 that includes M-bits from the postamble of the preceding fragment to be maintained as the first M-bits of the next data fragment indicated by count value 612. A resulting stitched codeword 622 (including the first M-bits of the preceding postamble replacing the first M-bits of the next data fragment) is provided to a multi-fragment combining circuit 660. Multi-fragment combining circuit 660 combines multiple fragments together to yield stitched codeword 447.
Stitched codeword 447 is stored to a data buffer 448 where it awaits backend processing through a data detecting circuit 455 and a data decoding circuit 465. In particular, a detector input 449 from data buffer 448 is provided to data detecting circuit 455. Data detecting circuit 455 may be any circuit known in the art that is capable of apply a data detection algorithm to a data set to yield a detected output. As some examples, data detecting circuit 455 may be, but is not limited to, a Viterbi algorithm detector circuit or a maximum a posteriori detector circuit as are known in the art. Of note, the general phrases “Viterbi data detection algorithm” or “Viterbi algorithm data detector circuit” are used in their broadest sense to mean any Viterbi detection algorithm or Viterbi algorithm detector circuit or variations thereof including, but not limited to, bi-direction Viterbi detection algorithm or bi-direction Viterbi algorithm detector circuit. Also, the general phrases “maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm” or “maximum a posteriori data detector circuit” are used in their broadest sense to mean any maximum a posteriori detection algorithm or detector circuit or variations thereof including, but not limited to, simplified maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm and a max-log maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm, or corresponding detector circuits. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of data detecting circuits that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. Detected output 457 may include both hard decisions and soft decisions. The terms “hard decisions” and “soft decisions” are used in their broadest sense. In particular, “hard decisions” are outputs indicating an expected original input value (e.g., a binary ‘1’ or ‘0’, or a non-binary digital value), and the “soft decisions” indicate a likelihood that corresponding hard decisions are correct. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of hard decisions and soft decisions that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention.
Detected output 457 is provided to data decoding circuit 465 that applies a data decoding algorithm to the received input to yield a decoded output 467. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, data decoding circuit 465 is operable to apply a low density parity check decoded circuit. Where decoded output 467 fails to converge (i.e., fails to reflect the original data), it is provided as a feedback 468 to data detecting circuit 455 to apply another iteration of the combination of data detecting circuit 455 and data decoding circuit 465. Alternatively, where decoded output 467 does converge (i.e., reflects the original data), it is provided to a hard decision output circuit 475 that provides the resulting hard decisions as user read data 477.
Turning to
A first fragment from the fragmented data set is selected as a current fragment (block 708). A synchronization mark and a preamble are appended to the beginning of the current fragment to yield a modified fragment (block 710). In addition, the first M+N bits of the next fragment are used to replace the first M+N bits of a defined postamble to yield a modified postamble (block 712). The modified postamble is then appended to the end of the modified fragment to yield a transfer fragment (block 714).
It is then determined whether another fragment remains to be converted to a transfer fragment (block 716). Where another fragment remains to be converted (block 716), the next fragment is selected as the current fragment (block 718). Then, the processes of blocks 710-718 are repeated for the next fragment. Alternatively, where no additional fragments remain to be converted (block 716), all of the recently prepared transfer fragments are aggregated to yield an aggregate output (block 720).
The aggregated output may be transferred via a medium (block 722). The medium may be, but is not limited to, a storage medium, a wireless communication medium, or a wired communication medium. Such a storage medium may be, but is not limited to, an optical storage medium, a magnetic storage medium, or a solid state storage medium. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize different mediums that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention.
Turning to
The preamble and synchronization data is used to synchronize to the received data (block 802). Based upon the finding of a preamble followed by the synchronization data the beginning of a fragment can be determined. It is determined whether the start of a fragment is indicated (block 804). Where the start of a fragment is indicated (block 804), the instances of the fragment are counted after the first M-bits (block 806) plus an additional M-bits (block 808), and the fragment plus M-bits is stored as a fragment portion (block 810). Doing such results in the first M-bits of the postamble being included as the first M-bits of the next fragment.
It is determined whether another fragment remains to be processed (block 812). Where another fragment remains to be processed (block 812), the processes beginning at block 802 are performed to process the next segment. Alternatively, where no additional fragments remain to be processed (block 812), all of the fragment portions are assembled into a codeword (block 814). An example of a portion of such a codeword is shown in
A data detection algorithm is applied to the codeword to yield a detected output (block 816). Where available, application of the data detection algorithm is guided by a previous decoded output. The data detection algorithm may be any data detection algorithm known in the art including, but not limited to, a Viterbi data detection algorithm or a maximum a posteriori data detection algorithm. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of data detection algorithms that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention.
A data decoding algorithm is applied to the detected output to yield a decoded output (block 818). The data decoding algorithm may be, for example, a low density parity check decoding algorithm as are known in the art. Based upon the disclosure provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of data decoding algorithms that may be used in relation to different embodiments of the present invention. It is determined whether application of the data decoding algorithm converged (block 820). Where the algorithm converged (no errors remain) (block 820), the decoded output is provided as a data output (block 822). Otherwise, where the algorithm failed to converge (errors remain) (block 820), it is determined whether another iteration applying the data detection algorithm and the data decoding algorithm is desired (block 824). Where another iteration is desired (block 824), the processes of blocks 816-822 are repeated. Alternatively, where no additional iterations are desired (block 824), an error is indicated (block 826).
It should be noted that the various blocks discussed in the above application may be implemented in integrated circuits along with other functionality. Such integrated circuits may include all of the functions of a given block, system or circuit, or a subset of the block, system or circuit. Further, elements of the blocks, systems or circuits may be implemented across multiple integrated circuits. Such integrated circuits may be any type of integrated circuit known in the art including, but are not limited to, a monolithic integrated circuit, a flip chip integrated circuit, a multichip module integrated circuit, and/or a mixed signal integrated circuit. It should also be noted that various functions of the blocks, systems or circuits discussed herein may be implemented in either software or firmware. In some such cases, the entire system, block or circuit may be implemented using its software or firmware equivalent. In other cases, the one part of a given system, block or circuit may be implemented in software or firmware, while other parts are implemented in hardware.
In conclusion, the invention provides novel systems, devices, methods and arrangements for data processing. While detailed descriptions of one or more embodiments of the invention have been given above, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents will be apparent to those skilled in the art without varying from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to (is a non-provisional of) U.S. Pat. App. No. 61/878,678 entitled “Systems and Methods for Recovered Data Stitching”, and filed Sep. 17, 2013 by Yang et al., and from U.S. Pat. App. No. 61/885,314 entitled “Systems and Methods for Fragmented Data Recovery”, and filed Oct. 1, 2013 by Xia et al. The entirety of the aforementioned provisional patent applications is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4553221 | Hyatt | Nov 1985 | A |
4805174 | Kubot | Feb 1989 | A |
5278703 | Rub et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5278846 | Okayama | Jan 1994 | A |
5317472 | Schweitzer, III | May 1994 | A |
5325402 | Ushirokawa | Jun 1994 | A |
5351274 | Chennakeshu | Sep 1994 | A |
5392299 | Rhines | Feb 1995 | A |
5406593 | Chennakeshu | Apr 1995 | A |
5417500 | Martinie | May 1995 | A |
5450253 | Seki | Sep 1995 | A |
5513192 | Janku | Apr 1996 | A |
5523903 | Hetzler | Jun 1996 | A |
5550810 | Monogioudis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550870 | Blaker | Aug 1996 | A |
5612964 | Haraszti | Mar 1997 | A |
5696504 | Oliveros | Dec 1997 | A |
5710784 | Kindred | Jan 1998 | A |
5717706 | Ikeda | Feb 1998 | A |
5719871 | Helm | Feb 1998 | A |
5802118 | Bliss | Sep 1998 | A |
5818806 | Wong et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844945 | Nam | Dec 1998 | A |
5898710 | Amrany | Apr 1999 | A |
5923713 | Hatakeyama | Jul 1999 | A |
5978414 | Nara | Nov 1999 | A |
5983383 | Wolf | Nov 1999 | A |
6005897 | Mccalissister | Dec 1999 | A |
6023783 | Divsalar | Feb 2000 | A |
6029264 | Kobayashi | Feb 2000 | A |
6065149 | Yamanaka | May 2000 | A |
6097764 | McCallister | Aug 2000 | A |
6145110 | Khayrallah | Nov 2000 | A |
6175588 | Visotsky | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216249 | Bliss | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216251 | McGinn | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266795 | Wei | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317472 | Choi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351832 | Wei | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6377610 | Hagenauer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381726 | Weng | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393074 | Mandyam | May 2002 | B1 |
6412088 | Patapoutian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473878 | Wei | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6532128 | Bui et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535553 | Limberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6625775 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643814 | Cideciyan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690524 | Wakefield et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697441 | Bottomley | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6747827 | Bassett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748034 | Hattori | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757862 | Marianetti, II | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785863 | Blankenship | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807238 | Rhee | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810502 | Eidson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6839774 | Ahn et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6948113 | Shaver | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6970511 | Barnette | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975692 | Razzell | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986098 | Poeppelman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035327 | Nakajima et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047474 | Rhee | May 2006 | B2 |
7058853 | Kavanappillil et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058873 | Song | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073118 | Greenberg | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093179 | Shea | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117427 | Ophir | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133228 | Fung | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136244 | Rothberg | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7184486 | Wu | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191378 | Eroz | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203887 | Eroz | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230550 | Mittal | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7237181 | Richardson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7272687 | Balasubramanian | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7308061 | Huang | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7310768 | Eidson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313750 | Feng | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7370258 | Iancu | May 2008 | B2 |
7415651 | Argon | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7502189 | Sawaguchi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523375 | Spencer | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7587657 | Haratsch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590168 | Raghavan | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596196 | Liu et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7646829 | Ashley | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702986 | Bjerke | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7738202 | Zheng | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7752523 | Chaichanavong | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7779325 | Song | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802172 | Vila Casado et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7952824 | Dziak | May 2011 | B2 |
7957251 | Ratnakar | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958425 | Chugg | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7996746 | Livshitz | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018360 | Nayak | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8020069 | Feng | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8020078 | Richarson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8161361 | Song et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8201051 | Tan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225168 | Yu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8237597 | Liu | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255765 | Yeo | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261171 | Annampedu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291284 | Savin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291299 | li | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295001 | Liu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296637 | Varnica | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8370711 | Alrod | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381069 | Liu | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8413032 | Song | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429498 | Anholt | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8443267 | Zhong et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8458555 | Gunnam | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464142 | Gunnam | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8495462 | Liu | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516339 | Lesea | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8527849 | Jakab | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8699164 | Ying et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20010010089 | Gueguen | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016114 | Van Gestel et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020021519 | Rae | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020067780 | Razzell | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129192 | Spiegel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168033 | Suzuki | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030031236 | Dahlman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030123364 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126527 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138102 | Kohn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147168 | Galbraith et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161422 | Bi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030188252 | Kim | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040042436 | Terry et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040194007 | Hocevar | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228021 | Yamazaki | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255024 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264284 | Priborsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047514 | Bolinth | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050149842 | Kyung | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050210367 | Ashikhmin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243456 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002689 | Yang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060159355 | Mizuno | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195730 | Kageyama | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070185902 | Messinger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070234178 | Richardson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297496 | Park et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037676 | Kyun et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069148 | Wu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069373 | Jiang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140686 | Hong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080304558 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003301 | Reial | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090092174 | Wang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106633 | Fujiwara | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125780 | Taylor | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132893 | Miyazaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150745 | Langner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177852 | Chen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185643 | Fitzpatrick | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216942 | Yen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273492 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100077276 | Okamura et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088575 | Sharon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150252 | Camp | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172046 | Liu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241921 | Gunnam | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268996 | Yang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100322048 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325511 | Oh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110041040 | Su | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043938 | Mathew | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066768 | Brittner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110167227 | Yang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110258508 | Ivkovic | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264987 | Li | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307760 | Pisek | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320902 | Gunnam | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120020402 | Ibing | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120038998 | Mathew | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120060072 | Simitci et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063023 | Mathew | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079353 | Liikanen | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106413 | Huang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124118 | Ivkovic | May 2012 | A1 |
20120182643 | Zhang | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185744 | Varnica | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203986 | Strasser et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207201 | Xia | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212849 | Xu | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236428 | Xia | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120262814 | Li | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265488 | Sun | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120317462 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016724 | Thaler | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024740 | Xia | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031440 | Sharon | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130120169 | Li | May 2013 | A1 |
20130194955 | Chang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198580 | Chen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238955 | D'Abreu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254616 | Yang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254619 | Zhang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140281818 | Dziak et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001319433 | Nov 2001 | JP |
WO 2010059264 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010126482 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,714, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Shaohua Yang. |
Casado et al., Multiple-rate low-density parity-check codes with constant blocklength, IEEE Transations on communications, Jan. 2009, vol. 57, pp. 75-83. |
Cui et al., “High-Throughput Layered LDPC Decoding Architecture”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 17, No. 4 (Apr. 2009). |
Fan et al., “Constrained coding techniques for soft iterative decoders” Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf., vol. 1b, pp. 631-637 (1999). |
Fossorier, Marc P.C. “Quasi-Cyclic Low-Density Parity-Check Codes From Circulant Permutation Maricies” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 8 Aug. 8, 2004. |
Gross, “Stochastic Decoding of LDPC Codes over GF(q)”, HDPCC Workshop, Tel Aviv (Mar. 2, 2010). |
Gunnam et al., “VLSI Architectures for Layered Decoding for Irregular LDPC Codes of WiMax”, IEEE ICC Proceedings (2007). |
Hagenauer, J. et al A Viterbi Algorithm with Soft-Decision Outputs and its Applications in Proc. IEEE Globecom, pp. 47. 11-47 Dallas, TX Nov. 1989. |
Han and Ryan, “Pinning Techniques for Low-Floor Detection/Decoding of LDPC-Coded Partial Response Channels”, 5th Intemational Symposium on Turbo Codes &Related Topics, 2008. |
Kautz, “Fibonacci Codes for Synchronization Control”, IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 284-292 (Apr. 1965). |
Kschischang et al., “Factor Graphs and the Sum-Product Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 47, No. 2 (Feb. 2001). |
Leduc-Primeau et al., “A Relaxed Half-Stochastic Iterative Decoder for LDPC Codes”, IEEE Communications Society, IEEE Globecom proceedings (2009). |
Lee et al., “Partial Zero-Forcing Adaptive MMSE Receiver for DS-CDMA Uplink in Multicell Environments” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Tech. vol. 51, No. 5, Sep. 2002. |
Li et al “Efficient Encoding of Quasi-Cyclic Low-Density Parity Check Codes” IEEE Transactions on Communications on 53 (11) 1973-1973, 2005. |
Lim et al. “Convergence Analysis of Constrained Joint Adaptation in Recording Channels” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing vol. 54, No. 1 Jan. 2006. |
Lin et al “An efficient VLSI Architecture for non binary LDPC decoders”—IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems II vol. 57, Issue 1 (Jan. 2010) pp. 51-55. |
Moon et al, “Pattern-dependent noise prediction in signal-dependent Noise,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 19, No. 4 pp. 730-743, Apr. 2001. |
Moon et al., “Maximum transition run codes for data storage systems”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 3992-3994 (Sep. 1996). |
Patapoutian et al “Improving Re-Read Strategies by Waveform Averaging” IEEE Transactions on Mag. vol. 37 No. 6, Nov. 2001. |
Richardson, T “Error Floors of LDPC Codes” Flarion Technologies Bedminster NJ 07921, tjr@flarion.com (not dated). |
Shokrollahi “LDPC Codes: An Introduction”, Digital Fountain, Inc. (Apr. 2, 2003). |
Spagnol et al, “Hardware Implementation of GF(2^m) LDPC Decoders”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems{hacek over (s)}i: Regular Papers, vol. 56, No. 12 (Dec. 2009). |
Tehrani et al., “Fully Parallel Stochastic LDPC Decoders”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, No. 11 (Nov. 2008). |
Todd et al., “Enforcing maximum-transition-run code constraints and low-density parity check decoding”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 3566-3571 (Nov. 2004). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,119, filed Nov. 22, 2011, Lei Chen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,683, filed Sep. 22, 2011, Changyou Xu, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,234, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Haitao Xia, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/213,751, filed Aug. 19, 2011, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/025,104, filed Sep. 12, 2013, Bruce Wilson, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,279, filed Dec. 15, 2011, Wei Feng, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/445,848, filed Apr. 12, 2012, Bruce Wilson, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,951, filed Dec. 30, 2011, Lei Chen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,468, filed Feb. 9, 2012, Zongwang Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,549, filed Oct. 27, 2011, Wu Chang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,615, filed Jun. 29, 2011, Bradley D. Seago, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/300,078, filed Nov. 18, 2011, Chung-Li Wang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/305,510, filed Nov. 28, 2011, Lei Chen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,416, filed Sep. 7, 2011, Lei Chen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/305,551, filed Nov. 28, 2011, Yang Han, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/296,022, filed Nov. 14, 2011, Victor Krachkovsky, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/445,878, filed Apr. 12, 2012, Yu Liao, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,537, filed Jun. 30, 2011, Anantha Raman Krishnan, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/174,453, filed Jun. 30, 2011, Johnson Yen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,544, filed Sep. 8, 2011, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/545,833, filed Jul. 10, 2012, Zhi Bin Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/180,495, filed Jul. 11, 2011, Chung-Li Wang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,777, filed Jul. 18, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,407, filed Dec. 5, 2012, Lingyan Sun, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/483,100, filed May 30, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,832, filed Oct. 10, 2011, Haitao Xia, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,693, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,974, filed Dec. 30, 2011, Dan Liu, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/652,012, filed Oct. 15, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,301, filed Jan. 21, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/766,911, filed Feb. 14, 2013, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/766,891, filed Feb. 14, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/415,326, filed Mar. 8, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,787, filed Jul. 18, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/483,105, filed May 30, 2012, Xuebin Wu, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/944,966, filed Jul. 18, 2013, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,779, filed Apr. 23, 2013, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,711, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,510, filed Jun. 14, 2013, Shu Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,008, filed Feb. 19, 2013, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,059, filed Jun. 6, 2013, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/954,573, filed Jul. 30, 2013, Kaitlyn T. Nguyen, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,722, filed Sep. 13, 2013, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/875,357, filed May 2, 2013, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/295,150, filed Nov. 14, 2011, Zongwang Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,986, filed Mar. 16, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/474,660, filed May 17, 2012, Zongwang Li, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,693, filed Mar. 29, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/596,819, filed Aug. 28, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,714, filed Mar. 22, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,520, filed Mar. 5, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/415,430, filed Mar. 8, 2012, Nayak Ratnakar Aravind, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,409, filed Jan. 31, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,580, filed Feb. 14, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,730, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,741, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Yang Han, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/596,947, filed Aug. 28, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/596,978, filed Aug. 28, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/597,001, filed Aug. 28, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,907, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,341, filed Sep. 17, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/989,583, filed Oct. 15, 2012, Shaohua Yang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,852, filed Oct. 10, 2011, Haitao Xia, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,219, filed May 23, 2011, Yang Han, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,767, filed Oct. 28, 2011, Fan Zhang, Unpublished. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,858, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Zongwang Li, Unpublished. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Girth-Eight Codes on Rectangular Integer Lattices”, IEEE Trans. Communications, vol. 52, Aug. 2004, pp. 1248-1252. |
Vasic, B., “High-Rate Low-Density Parity-Check Codes Based on Anti-Pasch Affine Geometries,” Proc ICC 2002, pp. 1332-1336. |
Weon-Cheol Lee et al., “Vitierbi Decoding Method Using Channel State Info. in COFDM System” IEEE Trans. on Consumer Elect., IEEE Service Center, NY, NY vol. 45, No. 3 Aug. 1999. |
Xiao, et al “Nested Codes With Multiple Interpretations” retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.ece.nmsu.edu/˜jkliewer/paper/XFKC—CISS06 (retrieved on Dec. 5, 2012). |
Yeo et al., “VLSI Architecture for Iterative Decoders in Magnetic Storage Channels”, Mar. 2001, pp. 748-755, IEEE trans. Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 2. |
Zhang et al., “Analysis of Verification-Based Decoding on the q-ary Symmetric Channel for Large q”, IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol. 57, No. 10 (Oct. 2011). |
Zhong et al., “Design of VLSI Implementation-Oriented LDPC Codes”, IEEE, pp. 670-673, 2003. |
Zhong et al., “High-Rate Quasi-Cyclic LDPC Codes for Magnetic Recording Channel with Low Error Floor”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 3546-3549, May 2006. |
Zhong et al., “Joint Code-Encoder Design for LDPC Coding System VLSI Implementation”, ISCAS, IEEE pp. 389-392, May 2004. |
Zhong et al., “Quasi Cyclic LDPC Codes for the Magnetic Recording Channel: Code Design and VSLI Implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, v. 43, pp. 1118-1123, Mar. 7. |
Zhong, “Block-LDPC: A Practical LDPC Coding System Design Approach”, IEEE Trans. on Circuits, Regular Papers, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 766-775, Apr. 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150082115 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61878678 | Sep 2013 | US | |
61885314 | Oct 2013 | US |