Systems and methods for frequency modulation adjustment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7920033
  • Patent Number
    7,920,033
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 28, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 5, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for providing, among other things, wideband phase modulation is described. Several embodiments include a scaling network for scaling an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generating a scaled modulation signal that is applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of a phase-locked loop. A sensing network may also be included for detecting changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator. A calibration adjustment network may additionally be included for adjusting the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to phase/frequency modulators, and more particularly, to an architecture for direct phase/frequency modulation of a phase-locked loop.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Phase modulation schemes are very effective and are therefore widely used in communication systems. A simple example of a phase modulation scheme is quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK). FIG. 1 shows a constellation diagram that illustrates how QPSK maps two-bit digital data to one of four phase offsets. FIG. 2 shows a typical QPSK (or in-phase (I)/quadrature (Q)) modulator used to generate a phase-modulated signal. This technique relies on orthogonal signal vectors to realize the phase offsets—an inherently linear technique, since it depends solely on the matching of these orthogonal signals.


The I/Q modulator provides a straightforward approach to generating phase-modulated signals that is also suitable for more complex schemes such as wideband Code-Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) systems. It is also possible to generate the phase-modulated signals using a phase-locked loop (PLL). This approach offers reduced circuitry and lower power consumption and, as a result, finds widespread use in narrowband systems. A variation of this approach, known as two-point modulation, introduces direct modulation of the VCO to support wideband phase modulation, which unfortunately requires an accurate VCO gain. This requirement is a difficult task since the VCO gain depends on multiple factors. It would therefore be advantageous to accurately set the gain of the VCO.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A very efficient system for wideband phase modulation is provided. The system includes circuitry for periodically adjusting the gain of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) used in a phase-locked loop (PLL) to synthesize the radio frequency modulated signal.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the embodiments described herein will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a constellation diagram that illustrates how QPSK maps two-bit digital data to one of four offsets;



FIG. 2 shows a diagram of a typical I/Q modulator;



FIG. 3 shows a PLL that is used to synthesize a radio frequency carrier signal;



FIG. 4 shows a mathematical model of the PLL shown in FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 shows an integration filter;



FIG. 6 shows one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL using a ΔΣ modulator;



FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL that supports direct frequency or phase modulation;



FIG. 8
a shows a detailed view of a voltage-controlled oscillator;



FIG. 8
b shows one embodiment of a VCO tank circuit that includes an auxiliary port to support linear phase/frequency modulation;



FIG. 9 shows the capacitance-voltage relationship for an accumulation-mode MOSFET device;



FIG. 10 shows the linear capacitance-voltage response from back to back MOSFET devices;



FIG. 11 shows the capacitance-voltage relationship for an accumulation-mode MOSFET device at different temperatures;



FIG. 12 illustrates a phase/frequency modulator with an adjustable VCO gain KFM;



FIG. 13 shows a system for measuring the VCO gain KFM;



FIG. 14 illustrates a phase/frequency modulator with accurate and constant VCO gain KFM in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 15
a shows circuitry associated with a peak detector circuit;\



FIG. 15
b shows circuitry associated with a peak detector circuit that minimizes temperature effects;



FIG. 15
c shows an output signal used by a peak detector circuit;



FIG. 16 shows a circuit for measuring the swept capacitance of the accumulation-mode MOSFET in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 17
a details the control logic used in the VCO gain KFM adjustment system of FIG. 14 in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 17
b shows a timing diagram for the control logic of FIG. 14 in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 3 depicts a phase-locked loop (PLL) 305. The PLL 305 includes a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) 310, a feedback counter 320, a phase/frequency detector (P/FD) 330, a charge pump (CP) 340, and an integration filter (LPF) 350. Elements of the PLL 305 of FIG. 3 are described by the mathematical model shown in FIG. 4.


The PLL 305 uses feedback to minimize the phase difference between a very accurate reference signal and its output (RF) signal. As such, it produces an output signal at a frequency given by

fVCO=NfREF

where fvco is the frequency of the VCO 310 output signal, N is the value of the feedback counter 320, and fREF is the frequency of the reference signal.


The VCO 310 produces an output signal at a frequency set by the control voltage vctrl according to

vout(t)=A cos(ωot+Kvco∫vctrl(t)dt),

where ωo is the free-running frequency of the VCO 310 and Kvco is the gain of the VCO 310. The gain Kvco describes the relationship between the excess phase of the carrier Φout and the control voltage vctrl with










Φ
out



(
S
)




v
ctrl



(
S
)



=


K
vco

s


,





where Kvco is in rads/V. The VCO 310 drives the feedback counter 320, which simply divides the output phase Φout by N.


When the PLL 305 is locked, the phase detector 330 and charge pump 340 generate an output signal iCP that is proportional to the phase difference Δθ between the two signals applied to the phase detector 330. The output signal iCP can therefore be expressed as









i
CP



(
s
)


=


K
pd




Δ






θ


(
s
)




2





π




,





where Kpd is in A/radians and Δθ is in radians.



FIG. 5 depicts an integration filter 350 comprising a resistor R1 510 and capacitors C1 520 and C2 530. As shown, the integration filter 350 transforms the output signal iCP to the control voltage vctrl as follows









v
ctrl



(
s
)


=



i
out



(
s
)




(




sR
1



C
1


+
1




s
2



R
1



C
1



C
2


+

s


(


C
1

+

C
2


)




)



,





where a zero (e.g., at 1/R1C1) has been added to stabilize the second order system and the capacitor C2 530 has been included to reduce any ripple on the control voltage vctrl. Combining the above relations yields the closed-loop response of the system to an input signal








T
1



(
s
)


=




NK
PD



K
VCO



Z


(
s
)




sN
+


K
PD



K
VCO



Z


(
s
)





.





The value N of the feedback counter 320 sets the output frequency of the PLL 305. Its digital structure restricts N to integer numbers. As a result, the frequency resolution (or frequency step size) of the integer-N PLL 305 is nominally set by fREF. Fortunately, it's possible to dramatically decrease the effective frequency step by manipulating the value of N to yield a non-integer average value. This is the concept of a fractional-N PLL.



FIG. 6 depicts a fractional-N PLL 605 that uses a ΔΣ modulator 660 to develop non-integer values of N. The ΔΣ modulator 660 advantageously pushes spurious energy (created by the changing values of the feedback counter 620) to higher frequencies to be more effectively attenuated by the integration filter 650. It can be shown that the effective value of N is simply the average value described by







N
=





x
=
1

P







N


[
x
]



P


,





where N[x] is the sequence of values of the feedback counter 620. This expands to

N[x]=Nint+n[x],

where Nint is the integer part and n[x] is the fractional part of N[x]. The ΔΣ modulator 660 generates the sequence n[x], that satisfies












x
=
1

P







n


[
x
]



P

=

k
M


,




where k is the input to the ΔΣ modulator 660 with resolution M. In practice, the order of the ΔΣ modulator 660 dictates the range of n[x].


The ΔΣ modulator 660 introduces quantization noise that appears at the PLL 605 output. The pseudo-random sequence n[x] possessing a quantization error approximately equal to ±½ N or






Δ
=


1
N

.






It follows that the quantization noise spectral density for this error, assuming a uniform distribution, is expressed by








e
rms
2



(
f
)


=


1

6


N
2



f
REF



.






over the frequency range of dc to fREF/2. This quantization noise is advantageously shaped by an Lth order ΔΣ modulator 660 according to

DS(z)=(1−z−1)L.


In the PLL 605, the feedback counter 620 acts as a digital accumulator and reduces the effects of the ΔΣ modulator 660. That is, the output phase from the feedback counter 620 depends on its previous output phase. The transfer function for the feedback counter 620 is therefore







P


(
z
)


=

2

π




z

-
1



1
-

z

-
1




.







Combining these terms shows that the output noise of the feedback counter 620 is equal to

n2(f)=erms2(f)[DS(f)]2[P(f)]2,

which yields








n
2



(
f
)


=


2
3






π
2



N
2



f
REF





[

2


sin


(


π





f


f
REF


)



]



2


(

L
-
1

)








This noise seen at the output of the feedback counter 620 is in turn shaped by the transfer function T1(s) of the PLL 605 presented above.



FIG. 7 depicts a fractional-N PLL 705 configured for very efficient phase/frequency modulation. The signals applied to the input control of the ΔΣ modulator 760 modulate the frequency of the VCO 710 according to

fVCO=fc+Δf(t)=(Nintn[x])fREF,

where Δf(t) is the frequency modulation equal to








Δ






f


(
t
)



=



(


n


[
x
]


-

k
M


)



f
REF


=

FM






f
REF




,





and FM is the applied modulation signal. In practice, the modulation is shaped by the response of the PLL 705 described by transfer function T1(s) described above. The response generally limits the bandwidth of the PLL 705 so as to attenuate the quantization noise of the ΔΣ modulator 760. Consequently, this phase/frequency modulation approach supports only narrowband signals.


To overcome the narrow bandwidth limitation, a second high-frequency modulation path is added to the PLL 705 and the VCO 710. The resulting two-point frequency modulation system of FIG. 7 displays a second and complimentary transfer function given by









T
2



(
s
)


=



sNK
FM


sN
+


K
PD



K
VCO



Z


(
s
)







v
FM



,





where KFM is the gain of the FM port of the VCO 710 at which the vFM modulating signal is applied. Ideally, the T1(s) and T2(s) expressions combine to yield a constant response, which occurs when

FMfREF=KFMvFM.


The challenge with two-point modulation, and more-specifically direct VCO modulation, is that it requires near-exact control of both the frequency of the VCO 710 and consequently the product KFMvFM because frequency errors produce phase deviations that accumulate with time. Fortunately, the feedback of the PLL 705 reduces frequency errors because the output of the VCO 710 is driven by the feedback of the PLL 705 to

fvco=NfREF+FMfREF

which is also equal to

fVCO=KVCOvctrl+KFMvFM,

where vctrl is an error signal produced by the P/F D 730 and vFM is an FM signal applied to the VCO 710. The error signal vctrl compensates for any gain errors of the VCO 710 within the bandwidth of the integration filter 750. Outside the bandwidth of the PLL 705 the effect of the feedback decreases, which makes setting the gain KFM of the VCO 710 (“VCO gain KFM”) to its designed value a critical operation. Additionally, setting the gain KFM to its designed value ensures that a wider bandwidth can achieve better modulation accuracy. The VCO gain KFM depends heavily on the circuit structure of the VCO 710, which is described in more detail below.


A detailed view of the VCO 710 is shown in FIG. 8a. The VCO 710 oscillates at a frequency








f
osc

=

1

2

π




(


L
1

+

L
2


)



C
eq






,





which is set by the resonance of a VCO tank circuit shown in FIG. 8a, where Ceq is the equivalent shunt capacitance (comprised of capacitor C1 and varactors C2a−C2b plus any parasitic capacitance). The equivalent capacitance Ceq may also include coarse-tuning capacitors (not shown) to subdivide the tuning range. The varactor C2 (shown as C2a and C2b) allows the VCO 710, by way of the control signal vctrl, to be tuned to different radio frequencies.


A VCO tank circuit shown in FIG. 8b includes an auxiliary port to support linear phase/frequency modulation. The circuit uses the capacitance of accumulation-mode MOSFET devices to achieve linear behavior even though these devices display an abrupt response as illustrated in chart 900 of FIG. 9. The accumulation-mode MOSFET devices present a low capacitance Cmin at applied gate-to-bulk voltages VGB below the threshold voltage VT, and the MOSFET devices display a high capacitance Cmax at applied voltages above VT. Capacitors C4a and C4b block the dc level present at the output of the VCO 710. Resistors Z1-Z3 provide some isolation between the gates of MOSFET devices N3 and N4.


The gate-to-bulk voltage VGB applied to each MOSFET device depends on the output signal A sin ωt of the VCO 710, the FM signal vFM, and the common-mode voltage vcm. The symmetric structure of the VCO 710 provides that signals VLO+ and VLO− are differential with

VLO+=A sin ωt & VLO−=−A sin ωt,

where A is the peak signal of each sinusoidal output and ω is the oscillation frequency. It follows then that

VC3=A sin ωt+vFM−vcm & VC4=−A sin ωt+vFM−vcm,

which describe the gate-to-bulk voltages VGB applied to MOSFET devices N3 and N4. The two MOSFET devices N3 and N4 connect back-to-back in the VCO 710, so their individual capacitances behave oppositely.


The modulation signal vFM affects the MOSFET devices N3 and N4 as follows. The devices nominally present a capacitance equal to







C
mid

=



C
FM



(


v
FM

=
0

)


=




C
min



C
max




C
min

+

C
max



.







As the FM signal vFM moves positive, both MOSFET devices N3 and N4 reach their maximum capacitance values Cmax, so that for a period of time of approximately







t
=


1
ω




sin

-
1




(

-


v
FM

A


)




,





the VCO structure in FIG. 8b presents a capacitance equal to Cmax/2. A similar response occurs as the FM signal moves negative, which results in the VCO structure in FIG. 8b presenting a capacitance equal to Cmin/2. It is worth noting that the VCO structure in FIG. 8b linearizes the overall response of the accumulation-mode MOSFET devices N3 and N4 to yield the behavior shown in capacitance curve 1000 of FIG. 10.


The capacitance curve 1000 shifts with the amplitude of signal A of the VCO 710 because this signal dynamically biases each accumulation-mode MOSFET device N3 and N4 and sweeps each MOSFET device N3 and N4 through a range of capacitance values. As the amplitude of signal A increases, the sensitivity of the back-to-back MOSFET devices N3 and N4 (e.g., ΔC/ΔvFM) decreases.


In practice, the capacitance curve 1000 for each MOSFET device N3 and N4 shifts with temperature as shown in chart 1100 of FIG. 11. This affects Cmin and Cmax as well as the transition region between Cmin and Cmax. It follows that the effective capacitance and the sensitivity of the back-to-back MOSFET devices N3 and N4 (e.g., ΔC/ΔvFM) also changes.


Even if the sensitivity of the back-to-back MOSFET devices N3 and N4 remains constant, the VCO gain KFM may still change, as explained in the following. The VCO 710 oscillates at the resonant frequency of the VCO tank circuit shown in FIG. 8b. This resonant frequency is given by








f
osc

=


1

2

π




(


L
1

+

L
2


)



(


C
T

+

Δ





C


)





=


f
c

+

Δ





f




,





where CT is the total tank capacitance less the variable capacitance ΔC. The frequency step Δf due to a change in a MOSFET device capacitance ΔC is approximately equal to







Δ





f

=


f
C



[

1
-


1
2




Δ





C


C
T



+


3
8




(


Δ





C


C
T


)

2



]







for small values of ΔC. The frequency step Δf simplifies to








Δ





f

=


f
C



(


-

1
2





Δ





c


C
T



)



,





which can then be rewritten as

Δf=2π2LfC3ΔC,

showing that Δf changes as the third power of fC. Consequently, setting the VCO gain KFM accurately is a challenging task.



FIG. 12 depicts a phase/frequency modulator 1270 that can accurately set the VCO gain KFM. The system of FIG. 12 scales the FM signal vFM by α to compensate for variations in the VCO gain KFM and thereby stabilizes the KFMvFM product such that

FMfREF=αKFMvFM.


The value of α is calculated using a calibration system 1380 shown in FIG. 13. The gain KFM of the VCO 1310 is represented by the expression








K
FM

=


Δ






f
OUT



Δ






v
FM




,




where ΔfOUT is the difference between output frequencies fVCO1 and fVCO2 at two vFM inputs. Each of the output frequencies fVCO1 and fVCO2 is measured by








f
VCO

=


N
R



f
REF



,





where N is the number of cycles of the VCO 1310 during a fixed measurement period and R is the number of cycles of the reference signal. During operation of the calibration system 1380, a zero-phase restart signal initiates the R counter 1381 and N counter 1385 at the same time. Since the VCO 1310 operates independently of and at a higher frequency than the reference signal, the operation of the restart signal introduces an error in the frequency measurement of the output frequencies fVCO1 and fVCO2 equal to








Δ






f
VCO


=



Δ





N

R



f
REF



,





where ΔN represents an uncertainty associated with the N counter 1385 and the VCO 1310. The error ΔfVCO is also compounded by the read operation of the N counter 1385 at the end of the measurement period, because at least a portion of the N counter 1385 is integrated with the PLL 1305 and is therefore not designed to stop instantly, nor is it designed to transfer its contents readily. Consequently, the uncertainty ΔN and the measurement error ΔfVCO increases.


The accuracy of the above technique described with respect to FIG. 13 can be improved by increasing the length of the measurement period, which is accomplished by extending the measurement periods of the R counter 1381 and the N counter 1385 beyond the normal requirements of the PLL 1305. As a result of such an extension, it is possible to reduce the measurement error ΔfVCO to less than a few tenths of a percent.


The calibration approach described above operates off-line (e.g., with a transmitter powered off), and occurs regularly in half duplex systems, but occurs infrequently in full duplex systems. Consequently, another calibration approach is needed to measure KFM and adjust a accordingly.



FIG. 14 depicts a KFM adjustment system 1490 that is configured to adjust a in order to keep αKFMvFM constant. The adjustment system 1490 tracks key parameters to predict KFM changes, and adjusts α accordingly. The adjustment system 1490 includes both a peak detector 1491 that measures the amplitude of the output signal of the VCO 1410, and a novel swept capacitance circuit (SCC) 1493 that characterizes the capacitance curve of an accumulation-mode MOSFET capacitor. The adjustment system 1490 translates the measurements received from the peak detector 1491 and the SCC 1493 to a digital format using an A/D converter 1495, and processes the data (via a logic device 1497) to determine the appropriate α value using








α
2

=



α
1



(


A
2


A
1


)





(


f
1


f
2


)

3



(

β
+


V

C





1



V

C





2




)



,





where β is a scaling factor that depends on the measurement from the SCC 1493.



FIGS. 15
a-b depict circuitry associated with the peak detector 1491. The peak detector 1491 is associated with an RF detector circuit shown in FIG. 15a and a reference network shown in FIG. 15b that reduces temperature sensitivity. The output signal of the VCO 1410 (“VCO output signal”) couples to the detector input vIN, and drives transistor N1. Transistor N1 rectifies the input signal according to








i

D





1


=



μ






C
ox


2



W
L




(


v
IN

+

V
B

-

V
T

-

v
det


)

2



,





where iD1, μ, COX, W, L, and VT are all well-known parameters associated with the transistor N1, VB is the gate bias voltage, vdet is the output voltage developed across capacitor C1, and vIN has an amplitude κA, where κ is a fixed coupling factor.


The peak detector 1491 is configured to achieve equilibrium, where the average current flowing through transistor N1 is IB. Achieving equilibrium requires that the voltage held by capacitor C1 tracks the positive peaks of the coupled VCO output signal which is shown in the graph provided by FIG. 15c. As a result, the amplitude of the VCO output signal is held by capacitor C1. Transistor N2 replicates the dc operation of the RF detector and provides a temperature compensated reference VREF. The difference,

VOUT=vdet−VREF,

corresponds to κA and changes proportional to A.


In several embodiments, the peak detector 1491 can be eliminated if a feedback loop (not shown) exists to control the amplitude of the VCO output signal. Nevertheless, in several embodiments the VCO 1410 is designed to minimize amplitude changes of the VCO output signal.



FIG. 16 shows circuitry of the SCC 1493. As shown, the SCC 1493 forces a constant current IB through an accumulation-mode MOSFET device N5, thus charging the nonlinear capacitance of the MOSFET device N5. It follows that the developed voltage VC relates to the capacitance curve of the MOSFET device N5 since








V
C

=




T





I
B



C
MOS



(

V
C

)










t



+

V
initial



,





where T corresponds to the period of time that the constant bias current IB charges CMOS, the voltage-dependent capacitance of the MOSFET device, from an initial voltage Vinitial. As a result, the voltage developed across the MOSFET device sweeps from Vinitial to VC similar to the way the VCO signal develops across the MOSFET device in the VCO circuit shown in FIG. 8b. It follows that VC represents a swept capacitance of the MOSFET device N5. As such, with IB and T fixed, any differences in the MOSFET capacitance curve produce a new VC voltage.



FIG. 17 depicts logic circuitry of the KFM adjustment system 1490. As shown, the logic device 1797 strobes the A/D converter 1795 and samples the analog results from both the peak detector 1791 and the SCC 1793. The logic device 1797 includes a computing device 1798 that applies mathematical functions to determine the adjusted value of α. The logic device 1797 also includes a timing network 1799 to control the timing of the measurements from the peak detector 1791 and the SCC 1793, which occur based on the expected rate of change for KFM. For example, FIG. 17b illustrates a timing diagram representative of operation of the timing network 1798 in one embodiment of the invention.


The innovative system described herein addresses a critical issue associated with two-point phase/frequency modulation systems. It advantageously ensures that the gain of the direct VCO modulation path is set properly and constant.


Those skilled in the art can readily recognize that numerous variations and substitutions may be made in the invention, its use and its configuration to achieve substantially the same results as achieved by the embodiments described herein. Accordingly, there is no intention to limit the invention to the disclosed exemplary forms. Many variations, modifications and alternative constructions fall within the scope and spirit of the disclosed invention as expressed in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters, wherein the calibration adjustment network comprises: a peak detector circuit configured to measure an amplitude of an output signal of the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda swept capacitance circuit configured to release a control signal for adjusting the scaling parameter.
  • 2. The compensation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the scaling network includes a frequency modulation signal multiplier component having an output coupled to a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator, wherein the frequency modulation signal multiplier component multiplies a frequency modulation signal by the scaling parameter to achieve a modified frequency modulation signal, the modified frequency modulation signal being released by the output of the frequency modulation signal multiplier component and received by the frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 3. The compensation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more parameters include a product of the frequency gain and a frequency modulation signal received by a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 4. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters, wherein the calibration adjustment network comprises:a switch configured to release a constant current;a first transistor configured to receive the constant current, wherein the constant current charges the capacitance of the first transistor to a first series of capacitance levels that is related to a second series of capacitance levels associated with a second transistor belonging to the voltage-controlled oscillator; andan output port configured to release a control signal for adjusting the scaling parameter.
  • 5. The compensation apparatus of claim 1, wherein the scaling network includes a frequency modulation signal multiplier component having an output coupled to a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator, wherein the frequency modulation signal multiplier component multiplies a frequency modulation signal by the scaling parameter to achieve a modified frequency modulation signal, the modified frequency modulation signal being released by the output of the frequency modulation signal multiplier component and received by the frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 6. The compensation apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more parameters include a product of the frequency gain and a frequency modulation signal received by a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 7. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters, wherein the calibration adjustment network comprises: a detector component responsive to an input signal, the detector component including a transistor which rectifies the input signal so as to generate a detection signal;a reference component configured to provide a temperature-compensated reference signal; andan output port for providing a temperature-compensated output signal corresponding to a difference between the detection signal and the temperature compensated reference signal.
  • 8. The compensation apparatus of claim 7, wherein the scaling network includes a frequency modulation signal multiplier component having an output coupled to a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator, wherein the frequency modulation signal multiplier component multiplies a frequency modulation signal by the scaling parameter to achieve a modified frequency modulation signal, the modified frequency modulation signal being released by the output of the frequency modulation signal multiplier component and received by the frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 9. The compensation apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more parameters include a product of the frequency gain and a frequency modulation signal received by a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 10. A method for adjusting a frequency gain of a voltage-controlled oscillator of a phase-locked loop, the method comprising: scaling an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generating a scaled modulation signal;applying the scaled modulation signal to the voltage-controlled oscillator;detecting changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator;adjusting the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters; andreleasing a constant current that charges a capacitance of a first transistor to a first series of capacitance levels related to a second series of capacitance levels associated with a second transistor of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising: multiplying a frequency modulation signal by the scaling parameter to achieve a modified frequency modulation signal; andinputting the modified frequency modulation signal to a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the one or more parameters include a product of the frequency gain and a frequency modulation signal associated with the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 13. A method for adjusting a frequency gain of a voltage-controlled oscillator of a phase-locked loop, the method comprising: scaling an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generating a scaled modulation signal;applying the scaled modulation signal to the voltage-controlled oscillator;detecting changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; andadjusting the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters;generating a detection signal by rectifying an input signal;providing a temperature-compensated reference signal; andproviding a temperature-compensated output signal corresponding to a difference between the detection signal and the temperature-compensated reference signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: multiplying a frequency modulation signal by the scaling parameter to achieve a modified frequency modulation signal; andinputting the modified frequency modulation signal to a frequency modulation port of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the one or more parameters include a product of the frequency gain and a frequency modulation signal associated with the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 16. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parametersa peak detector circuit; anda swept capacitance circuit.
  • 17. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters, wherein the calibration adjustment network comprisesa first transistor configured to receive a constant current, wherein the constant current charges the capacitance of the first transistor to a first series of capacitance levels that is related to a second series of capacitance levels associated with a second transistor belonging to the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • 18. A compensation apparatus for use with a phase-locked loop, the compensation apparatus comprising: a scaling network configured to scale an input modulation signal in accordance with a scaling parameter and thereby generate a scaled modulation signal, the scaled modulation signal being applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator of the phase-locked loop;a sensing network configured to detect changes in one or more parameters characterizing the voltage-controlled oscillator; anda calibration adjustment network configured to adjust the scaling parameter in accordance with the changes in the one or more parameters, wherein the calibration adjustment network comprisesa detector component responsive to an input signal, the detector component including a transistor which rectifies the input signal so as to generate a detection signal.
PRIORITY

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. provisional application No. 60/848,604 entitled “Kfm Adjustment,” filed on Sep. 28, 2006. This application relates to and incorporates by reference U.S. Pat. No. 6,985,703, entitled, “Direct Synthesis Transmitter,” issued on Jan. 10, 2006, U.S. Pat. No. 6,774,740, entitled, “System for Highly Linear Phase Modulation,” issued on Aug. 10, 2004, U.S. Pat. No. 7,061,341, entitled, “System for Highly Linear Phase Modulation,” issued on Jun. 13, 2006, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/369,897, entitled, “Linear Wideband Phase Modulation System,” filed on Mar. 5, 2006, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/337,965 “System for Digital Calibration of Phase-Locked Loops,” filed on Jan. 23, 2006.

US Referenced Citations (118)
Number Name Date Kind
4263560 Ricker Apr 1981 A
4430627 Machida Feb 1984 A
4769588 Panther Sep 1988 A
4816772 Klotz Mar 1989 A
4926135 Voorman May 1990 A
4965531 Riley Oct 1990 A
5006818 Koyama et al. Apr 1991 A
5015968 Podell et al. May 1991 A
5030923 Arai Jul 1991 A
5289136 DeVeirman et al. Feb 1994 A
5331292 Worden et al. Jul 1994 A
5399990 Miyake Mar 1995 A
5491450 Helms et al. Feb 1996 A
5508660 Gersbach et al. Apr 1996 A
5548594 Nakamura Aug 1996 A
5561385 Choi Oct 1996 A
5581216 Ruetz Dec 1996 A
5625325 Rotzoll et al. Apr 1997 A
5631587 Co et al. May 1997 A
5648744 Prakash et al. Jul 1997 A
5677646 Entrikin Oct 1997 A
5739730 Rotzoll Apr 1998 A
5767748 Nakao Jun 1998 A
5818303 Oishi et al. Oct 1998 A
5834987 Dent Nov 1998 A
5862465 Ou Jan 1999 A
5878101 Aisaka Mar 1999 A
5880631 Sahota Mar 1999 A
5939922 Umeda Aug 1999 A
5945855 Momtaz Aug 1999 A
5949286 Jones Sep 1999 A
5990740 Groe Nov 1999 A
5994959 Ainsworth Nov 1999 A
5999056 Fong Dec 1999 A
6011437 Sutardja et al. Jan 2000 A
6018651 Bruckert et al. Jan 2000 A
6031425 Hasegawa Feb 2000 A
6044124 Monahan et al. Mar 2000 A
6052035 Nolan et al. Apr 2000 A
6057739 Crowley et al. May 2000 A
6060935 Shulman May 2000 A
6091307 Nelson Jul 2000 A
6100767 Sumi Aug 2000 A
6114920 Moon et al. Sep 2000 A
6163207 Kattner et al. Dec 2000 A
6173011 Rey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191956 Foreman Feb 2001 B1
6204728 Hageraats Mar 2001 B1
6211737 Fong Apr 2001 B1
6229374 Tammone, Jr. May 2001 B1
6246289 Pisati et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255889 Branson Jul 2001 B1
6259321 Song et al. Jul 2001 B1
6288609 Brueske et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298093 Genrich Oct 2001 B1
6333675 Saito Dec 2001 B1
6370372 Molnar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6404252 Wilsch Jun 2002 B1
6476660 Visocchi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6515553 Filiol et al. Feb 2003 B1
6559717 Lynn et al. May 2003 B1
6560448 Baldwin et al. May 2003 B1
6571083 Powell, II et al. May 2003 B1
6577190 Kim Jun 2003 B2
6583671 Chatwin Jun 2003 B2
6583675 Gomez Jun 2003 B2
6639474 Asikainen et al. Oct 2003 B2
6664865 Groe et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670861 Balboni Dec 2003 B1
6674331 McDowell Jan 2004 B2
6683509 Albon et al. Jan 2004 B2
6693977 Katayama et al. Feb 2004 B2
6703887 Groe Mar 2004 B2
6711391 Walker et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724235 Costa et al. Apr 2004 B2
6734736 Gharpurey May 2004 B2
6744319 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6751272 Burns et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753738 Baird Jun 2004 B1
6763228 Prentice et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774740 Groe Aug 2004 B1
6777999 Kanou et al. Aug 2004 B2
6781425 Si Aug 2004 B2
6795843 Groe Sep 2004 B1
6798290 Groe et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801089 Costa et al. Oct 2004 B2
6845139 Gibbons Jan 2005 B2
6856205 Groe Feb 2005 B1
6870411 Shibahara et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870430 Nakamura et al. Mar 2005 B2
6917791 Chadwick Jul 2005 B2
6940356 McDonald, II et al. Sep 2005 B2
6943600 Craninckx Sep 2005 B2
6975687 Jackson et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985703 Groe et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990327 Zheng et al. Jan 2006 B2
7062248 Kuiri Jun 2006 B2
7065334 Otaka et al. Jun 2006 B1
7088979 Shenoy et al. Aug 2006 B1
7123102 Uozumi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142062 Vaananen et al. Nov 2006 B2
7148764 Kasahara et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171170 Groe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7215215 Hirano et al. May 2007 B2
20020071497 Bengtsson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020135428 Gomez Sep 2002 A1
20020193009 Reed Dec 2002 A1
20030078016 Groe et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030092405 Groe et al. May 2003 A1
20030118143 Bellaouar et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030197564 Humphreys et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040017862 Redman-White Jan 2004 A1
20040051590 Perrott et al. Mar 2004 A1
20050073371 Brett et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093631 Groe May 2005 A1
20050099232 Groe et al. May 2005 A1
20060003720 Lee et al. Jan 2006 A1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60848604 Sep 2006 US