The present invention relates to systems and methods for capturing light fields and more specifically to the efficient representation of captured light fields using compressed light field representation data.
Imaging devices, such as cameras, can be used to capture images of portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as the visible light spectrum, incident upon an image sensor. For ease of discussion, the term light is generically used to cover radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. In a typical imaging device, light enters through an opening (aperture) at one end of the imaging device and is directed to an image sensor by one or more optical elements such as lenses. The image sensor includes pixels or sensor elements that generate signals upon receiving light via the optical element. Commonly used image sensors include charge-coupled device (CCDs) sensors and complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensors.
Image sensors are devices capable of converting an image into a digital signal. Image sensors utilized in digital cameras are typically made up of an array of pixels. Each pixel in an image sensor is capable of capturing light and converting the captured light into electrical signals. In order to separate the colors of light and capture a color image, a Bayer filter is often placed over the image sensor, filtering the incoming light into its red, blue, and green (RGB) components that are then captured by the image sensor. The RGB signal captured by the image sensor using a Bayer filter can then be processed and a color image can be created.
Systems and methods for the generating compressed light field representation data using captured light fields in accordance embodiments of the invention are disclosed. In one embodiment, an array camera includes a processor and a memory connected to the processor and configured to store an image processing application, wherein the image processing application configures the processor to obtain image data, wherein the image data includes a set of images including a reference image and at least one alternate view image and each image in the set of images includes a set of pixels, generate a depth map based on the image data, where the depth map describes the distance from the viewpoint of the reference image with respect to objects imaged by pixels within the reference image, determine at least one prediction image based on the reference image and the depth map, where the prediction images correspond to at least one alternate view image, compute prediction error data based on the at least one prediction image and the at least one alternate view image, where a portion of prediction error data describes the difference in photometric information between a pixel in a prediction image and a pixel in at least one alternate view image corresponding to the prediction image, and generate compressed light field representation data based on the reference image, the prediction error data, and the depth map.
In an additional embodiment of the invention, the array camera further includes an array camera module including an imager array having multiple focal planes and an optics array configured to form images through separate apertures on each of the focal planes, wherein the array camera module is configured to communicate with the processor and wherein the obtained image data includes images captured by the imager array.
In another embodiment of the invention, the reference image corresponds to an image captured using one of the focal planes within the image array.
In yet another additional embodiment of the invention, the at least one alternate view image corresponds to the image data captured using the focal planes within the image array separate from the focal planes associated with the reference image.
In still another additional embodiment of the invention, the reference image corresponds to a virtual image formed based on the images in the array.
In another embodiment of the invention, the depth map describes the geometrical linkage between the pixels in the reference image and the pixels in the other images in the image array.
In yet still another additional embodiment of the invention, the image processing application configures the processor to perform a parallax detection process to generate the depth map, where the parallax detection process identifies variations in the position of objects within the image data along epipolar lines between the reference image and the at least one alternate view image.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the image processing application further configures the processor to compress the generated compressed light field representation data.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the generated compressed light field representation data is compressed using JPEG-DX.
In yet still another embodiment of the invention, the image processing application configures the processor to determine prediction error data by identifying at least one pixel in the at least one alternative view image corresponding to a reference pixel in the reference image, determining fractional pixel locations within the identified at least one pixel, where a fractional pixel location maps to a plurality of pixels in at least one alternative view image, and mapping fractional pixel locations to a specific pixel location within the alternate view image having a determined fractional pixel location.
In yet another additional embodiment of the invention, the mapping fractional pixel locations is determined as the pixel being nearest neighbor within the alternative view image.
In still another additional embodiment of the invention, the image processing application configures the processor to map the fractional pixel locations based on the depth map, where the pixel in the alternate view image is likely to be similar based on its proximity to the corresponding pixel location determined using the depth map of the reference image.
In yet still another additional embodiment of the invention, the image processing application further configures the processor to identify areas of low confidence within the computed prediction images based on the at least one alternate view image, the reference image, and the depth map and an area of low confidence indicate areas where the information stored in a determined prediction image indicate areas in the reference viewpoint where the pixels in the determined prediction image may not photometrically correspond to the corresponding pixels in the alternate view image.
In another embodiment of the invention, the depth map further comprises a confidence map describing areas of low confidence within the depth map.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the image processing application further configures the processor to disregard identified areas of low confidence.
In still another embodiment of the invention, the image processing application further configures the processor to identify at least one additional reference image within the image data, where the at least one additional reference image is separate from the reference image, determine at least one supplemental prediction image based on the reference image, the at least one additional reference image, and the depth map, and compute the supplemental prediction error data based on the at least one alternate additional reference image and the at least one supplemental prediction image, and the generated compressed light field representation data further includes the supplemental prediction error data.
In yet still another embodiment of the invention, the generated compressed light field representation data further includes the at least one additional reference image.
In yet another additional embodiment of the invention, the image processing application configures the processor to identify the at least one additional reference image by generating an initial additional reference image based on the reference image and the depth map, where the initial additional reference image includes pixels projected from the viewpoint of the reference image based on the depth map and forming the additional reference image based on the initial additional reference image and the prediction error data, where the additional reference image comprises pixels based on interpolations of pixels propagated from the reference image and the prediction error data.
In another embodiment of the invention, the prediction error data is decoded based on the reference image prior to the formation of the additional reference image.
Still another embodiment of the invention includes a method for generating compressed light field representation data including obtaining image data using an array camera, where the image data includes a set of images including a reference image and at least one alternate view image and the images in the set of images include a set of pixels, generating a depth map based on the image data using the array camera, where the depth map describes the distance from the viewpoint of the reference image with respect to objects imaged by pixels within the reference image based on the alternate view images, determining a set of prediction images based on the reference image and the depth map using the array camera, where a prediction image in the set of prediction images is a representation of a corresponding alternate view image in the at least one alternate view image, computing prediction error data by calculating the difference between a prediction image in the set of prediction images and the corresponding alternate view image that describes the difference in photometric information between a pixel in the reference image and a pixel in an alternate view image using the array camera, and generating compressed light field representation data based on the reference image, the prediction error data, and the depth map using the array camera.
In yet another additional embodiment of the invention, the reference image is a virtual image interpolated from a virtual viewpoint within the image data.
In still another additional embodiment of the invention, determining the set of predicted images further includes identifying at least one pixel in the at least one alternative view image corresponding to a reference pixel in the reference image using the array camera, determining fractional pixel locations within the identified at least one pixel using the array camera, where a fractional pixel location maps to a plurality of pixels in at least one alternative view image, and mapping fractional pixel locations to a specific pixel location within the alternate view image having a determined fractional pixel location using the array camera.
In yet still another embodiment of the invention, the method further includes identifying areas of low confidence within the computed prediction images based on the at least one alternate view image, the reference image, and the depth map using the array camera, where an area of low confidence indicate areas where the information stored in a determined prediction image indicate areas in the reference viewpoint where the pixels in the determined prediction image may not photometrically correspond to the corresponding pixels in the alternate view image.
In yet another additional embodiment of the invention, the method further includes identifying at least one additional reference image within the image data using the array camera, where the at least one additional reference image is separate from the reference image, determining at least one supplemental prediction image based on the reference image, the at least one additional reference image, and the depth map using the array camera, and computing the supplemental prediction error data based on the at least one alternate additional reference image and the at least one supplemental prediction image using the array camera, where the generated compressed light field representation data further includes the supplemental prediction error data.
In still another additional embodiment of the invention, identifying the at least one additional reference image includes generating an initial additional reference image based on the reference image and the depth map using the array camera, where the initial additional reference image includes pixels projected from the viewpoint of the reference image based on the depth map and forming the additional reference image based on the initial additional reference image and the prediction error data using the array camera, where the additional reference image comprises pixels based on interpolations of pixels propagated from the reference image and the prediction error data.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for generating compressed light field representation data using captured light fields in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. Array cameras, such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504, entitled “Capturing and Processing of Images using Monolithic Camera Array with Heterogeneous Imagers” to Venkataraman et al., can be utilized to capture light fields and store the captured light fields. Captured light fields contain image data from an array of images of a scene captured from multiple points of view so that each image samples the light field of the same region within the scene (as opposed to a mosaic of images that sample partially overlapping regions of a scene). It should be noted that any configuration of images, including two-dimensional arrays, non-rectangular arrays, sparse arrays, and subsets of arrays of images could be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. In a variety of embodiments, image data for a specific image that forms part of a captured light field describes a two-dimensional array of pixels. Storing all of the image data for the images in a captured light field can consume a disproportionate amount of storage space, limiting the number of light field images that can be stored within a fixed capacity storage device and increasing the amount of data transfer involved in transmitting a captured light field. Array cameras in accordance with many embodiments of the invention are configured to process captured light fields and generate data describing correlations between the images in the captured light field. Based on the image correlation data, some or all of the image data in the captured light field can be discarded, affording more efficient storage of the captured light fields as compressed light field representation data. Additionally, this process can be decoupled from the capturing of light fields to enable the efficient use of the hardware resources present in the array camera.
In many embodiments, each image in a captured light field is from a different viewpoint. Due to the different viewpoint of each of the images, parallax results in variations in the position of objects within the images of the scene. The disparity between corresponding pixels in images in a captured light field can be utilized to determine the distance to an object imaged by the corresponding pixels. Conversely, distance can be used to estimate the location of a corresponding pixel in another image. Processes that can be utilized to detect parallax and generate depth maps in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881 entitled “Systems and Methods for Parallax Detection and Correction in Images Captured Using Array Cameras that Contain Occlusions using Subsets of Images to Perform Depth Estimation” to Venkataraman et al. In many embodiments, a depth map is metadata describing the distance from the viewpoint from which an image is captured (or, in the case of super-resolution processing, synthesized) with respect to objects imaged by pixels within the image. Additionally, the depth map can also describe the geometrical linkage between pixels in the reference image and pixels in all other images in the array.
Array cameras in accordance with several embodiments of the invention are configured to process the images in a captured light field using a reference image selected from the captured array of images. In a variety of embodiments, the reference image is a synthetic image generated from the captured images, such as a synthetic viewpoint generated from a focal plane (e.g. a camera) that does not physically exist in the imager array. The remaining images can be considered to be images of alternate views of the scene relative to the viewpoint of the reference image. Using the reference image, array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention can generate a depth map using processes similar to those described above in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881 and the depth map can be used to generate a set of prediction images describing the pixel positions within one or more of the alternate view images that correspond to specific pixels within the reference image. The relative locations of pixels in the alternate view images can be predicted along epipolar lines projected based on the configuration of the cameras (e.g. the calibration of the physical properties of the imager array in the array camera and their relationship to the reference viewpoint of the array camera) that captured the images. The predicted location of the pixels along the epipolar lines is a function of the distance from the reference viewpoint to the object imaged by the corresponding pixel in the reference image. In a number of embodiments, the predicted location is additionally a function of any calibration parameters intrinsic to or extrinsic to the physical imager array. The prediction images exploit the correlation between the images in the captured light field by describing the differences between the value of a pixel in the reference image and pixels adjacent to corresponding disparity-shifted pixel locations in the other alternate view images in the captured light field. The disparity-shifted pixel positions are often determined with fractional pixel precision (e.g. an integer position in the reference image is mapped to a fractional position in the alternate view image) based on a depth map of the reference image in the alternate view images. Significant compression of the image data forming the images of a captured light field can be achieved by selecting one reference image, generating prediction images with respect to the reference image using the depth map information relating the reference and alternate view images, generating prediction error data describing the differences between the predicted images and the alternate view images, and discarding the alternate view images. In a variety of embodiments, multiple reference images are utilized to generate prediction error data that describes the photometric differences between pixels in alternate view images adjacent to corresponding disparity-shifted pixel locations and pixels in one or more of the reference images.
It should also be noted that that while, in a variety of embodiments, the reference image corresponds to an image in the captured array of images, virtual (e.g. synthetic) images corresponding to a virtual viewpoint within the captured light field can also be utilized as the reference image in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For example, a virtual red image, a virtual green image, and/or a virtual blue image can be used to form a reference image for each respective color channel and used as a starting point for forming predicted images for the alternate view images of each respective color channel. In many embodiments, a color channel includes a set of images within the image array corresponding to a particular color, potentially as captured by the focal planes within the imager array. However, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, the reference image for a particular color channel can be taken from a different color channel; for example, an infrared image can be used as the reference image for the green channel within the captured light field.
The reference image(s) and the set of prediction error data stored by an array camera can be referred to as compressed light field representation data. The compressed light field representation data can also include the depth map utilized to generate the prediction error data and/or any other metadata related to the creation of the compressed light field representation data and/or the captured light field. The prediction error data can be compressed using any compression technique, such as discrete cosine transform (DCT) techniques, as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. The compressed light field representation data can be compressed and stored in a variety of formats. One such file format is the JPEG-DX extension to ISO/IEC 10918-1 described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/631,731, titled “Systems and Methods for Encoding Light Field Image Files” to Venkataraman et al. As can readily be appreciated, the prediction error data can be stored in a similar manner to a depth map as compressed or uncompressed layers and/or metadata within an image file. In a variety of embodiments, array cameras are configured to capture light fields separate from the generation of the compressed light field representation data. For example, the compressed light field representation data can be generated when the array camera is no longer capturing light fields or in the background as the array camera captures additional light fields. Any variety of decoupled processing techniques can be utilized in accordance with the requirements of embodiments of the invention. Many array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are capable of performing a variety of processes that utilize the information contained in the captured light field using the compressed light field representation data.
In many instances, a captured light field contains image data from an array of images of a scene that sample an object space within the scene in such a way as to provide sampling diversity that can be utilized to synthesize higher resolution images of the object space using super-resolution processes. Systems and methods for performing super-resolution processing on image data captured by an array camera in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 entitled “System and Methods for Synthesizing High Resolution Images Using Super-Resolution Processes” to Lelescu et al. Synthesized high resolution images are representations of the scene captured in the captured light field. In many instances, the process of synthesizing a high resolution image may result in a single image, a stereoscopic pair of images that can be used to display three dimensional (3D) information via an appropriate 3D display, and/or a variety of images from different viewpoints. The process of synthesizing high resolution images from lower resolution image data captured by an array camera module in an array camera typically involves performing parallax detection and correction to reduce the effects of disparity between the images captured by each of the cameras in the array camera module. By using the reference image(s), the set of prediction error data, and/or the depth map contained in compressed light field representation data, high resolution images can be synthesized separately from the parallax detection and correction process, thereby alleviating the need to store and process the captured light field until the super-resolution process can be performed. Additionally, the parallax detection process can be optimized to improve speed or efficiency of compression. Once the compressed data is decoded, a parallax process can be re-run at a different (i.e. higher) precision using the reconstructed images. In this way, an initial super-resolution process can be performed in an efficient manner (such as on an array camera, where the processing power of the device limits the ability to perform a high precision parallax process in real-time) and, at a later time, a higher resolution parallax process can be performed to generate any of a variety of data, including a second set of compressed light field representation data and/or other captured light field image data, or perform any processing that relies on the captured light field. Later times include, but are not limited to, times when the array camera is not capturing light fields and/or when the compressed light field representation data has been transmitted to a separate image processing device with more advanced processing capabilities.
The disclosures of each of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/935,504, 12/967,807, 13/631,731, and 13/972,881 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Although the systems and methods described are with respect to array cameras configured to both capture and process captured light fields, devices that are configured to obtain captured light fields captured using a different device and process the received data can be utilized in accordance with the requirements of a variety of embodiments of the invention. Additionally, any of the various systems and processes described herein can be performed in sequence, in alternative sequences, and/or in parallel (e.g. on different computing devices) in order to achieve similar results in a manner that is more appropriate to the requirements of a specific application of the invention. Systems and methods for capturing light fields and generating compressed light field representation data using the captured light fields in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described below.
Array Camera Architectures
As described above, array cameras are capable of capturing and processing light fields and can be configured to generate compressed light field representation data using captured light fields in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. An array camera including an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the focal planes are configured in a 5×5 array. In other embodiments, any of a variety of array configurations can be utilized including linear arrays, non-rectangular arrays, and subsets of an array as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. Each focal plane 104 of the imager array is capable of capturing image data from an image of the scene formed through a distinct aperture. Typically, each focal plane includes a plurality of rows of pixels that also forms a plurality of columns of pixels, and each focal plane is contained within a region of the imager that does not contain pixels from another focal plane. The pixels or sensor elements utilized in the focal planes can be individual light sensing elements such as, but not limited to, traditional CIS (CMOS Image Sensor) pixels, CCD (charge-coupled device) pixels, high dynamic range sensor elements, multispectral sensor elements, and/or any other structure configured to generate an electrical signal indicative of light incident on the structure. In many embodiments, the sensor elements of each focal plane have similar physical properties and receive light via the same optical channel and color filter (where present). In other embodiments, the sensor elements have different characteristics and, in many instances, the characteristics of the sensor elements are related to the color filter applied to each sensor element. In a variety of embodiments, a Bayer filter pattern of light filters can be applied to one or more of the focal planes 104. In a number of embodiments, the sensor elements are optimized to respond to light at a particular wavelength without utilizing a color filter. It should be noted that any optical channel, including those in non-visible portions of the electromagnetic spectrum (such as infrared) can be sensed by the focal planes as appropriate to the requirements of particular embodiments of the invention.
In several embodiments, information captured by one or more focal planes 104 is read out of the imager array 102 as packets of image data. In many embodiments, a packet of image data contains one or more pixels from a row of pixels captured from each of one or more of the focal planes 104. Packets of image data may contain other groupings of captured pixels, such as one or more pixels captured from a column of pixels in each of one or more focal planes 104 and/or a random sampling of pixels. Systems and methods for reading out image data from array cameras that can be utilized in array cameras configured in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,305,456, entitled “Systems and Methods for Transmitting and Receiving Array Camera Image Data” to McMahon, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. In several embodiments, the packets of image data are used to create a two-dimensional array of images representing the light field as captured from the one or more focal planes 104. In many embodiments, one or more of the images in the array of images are associated with a particular color; this color can be the same color associated with the focal plane 104 corresponding to the viewpoint of the image or a different color. The processor 108 can be configured to immediately process the captured light field from the one or more focal planes and/or the processor 108 can store the captured light field and later process the captured light field. In a number of embodiments, the processor 108 is configured to offload the captured light fields to an external device for processing.
The processing of captured light fields includes determining correspondences between pixels in the captured light field. In several embodiments, the pixels in the packets of image data are geometrically correlated based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the characteristics of one or more of the focal planes 104. The calibration of imager arrays to determine the characteristics of focal planes are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 incorporated by reference above. In several embodiments, processor 108 is configured (such as by an image processing application) to perform parallax detection on the captured light field to determine corresponding pixel locations along epipolar lines between a reference image and alternate view images within the captured light field. The process of performing parallax detection also involves generating a depth map with respect to the reference image (e.g. a reference viewpoint that may include synthesized ‘virtual’ viewpoints where a physical camera in the array does not exist). In a variety of embodiments, the captured packets of image data are associated with image packet timestamps and geometric calibration and/or photometric calibration between pixels in the packets of image data utilize the associated image packet timestamps. Corresponding pixel locations and differences between pixels in the reference image and the alternate view image(s) can be utilized by processor 108 to determine a prediction for at least some of the pixels of the alternate view image(s). In many embodiments, the corresponding pixel locations are determined with sub-pixel precision.
The prediction image can be formed by propagating pixels from the reference image(s) to the corresponding pixel locations in the alternate view grid. In many embodiments, the corresponding pixel locations in the alternate view grid are fractional positions (e.g. sub-pixel positions). Once the pixels from the reference image(s) are propagated to the corresponding positions in the alternate view grid, a predicted image (from the same perspective as the alternate view image) is formed by calculating prediction values for the integer grid points in the alternate view grid based on propagated pixel values from the reference image. The predicted image values in the integer grid of the alternate view image can be determined by interpolating from multiple pixels propagated from the reference image in the neighborhood of the integer pixel grid position in the predicted image. In many embodiments, the predicted image values on the integer grid points of the alternate view image are interpolated through an iterative interpolation schemes (e.g. a combination of linear or non-linear interpolations) that progressively fill in ‘holes’ or missing data at integer positions in the predicted alternate view image grid. In a variety of embodiments, integer grid locations in the predicted image can be filled using set selection criteria. In several embodiments, pixels propagated from the reference image within a particular radius of the integer pixel position can form a set, and the pixel in the set closest to the mean of the distribution of pixels in the region can be selected as the predictor. In a number of embodiments, within the same set, the pixel that lands nearest to the integer grid point may be used as the predictor (i.e. nearest neighbor interpolation). In another embodiment, an average of the N nearest neighbors may be used as the predicted image value at the integer grid point. However, it should be noted that the predicted value can be any function (linear or non-linear) that interpolates or inpaints values in the predicted image based on reference pixel values in some relationship of the integer grid position in the predicted image.
The prediction error data itself can be determined by performing a photometric comparison of the pixel values from the predicted image (e.g. the predicted alternate view image based on the reference image and the depth map) and the corresponding alternate view image. The prediction error data represents the difference between the predicted alternate view image based on the reference image and the depth map, and the actual alternate view image that must be later reproduced in the decoding process.
Due to variations in the optics and the pixels used to capture the image data, sampling diversity, and/or aliasing, the processor 108 is configured to anticipate photometric differences between corresponding pixels. These photometric differences may be further increased in the compared pixels because the nearest neighbor does not directly correspond to the pixel in the reference image. In many embodiments, the compression is lossless and the full captured light field can be reconstructed using the reference image, the depth map, and the prediction error data. In other embodiments, a lossy compression is used and an approximation of the full captured light field can be reconstructed. In this way, the pixel values of the alternate view images are available for use in super-resolution processing, enabling the super-resolution processes to exploit the sampling diversity and/or aliasing that may be reflected in the alternate view images. In a number of embodiments, the prediction images are sparse images. In several embodiments, sparse images contain predictions for some subset of points (e.g. pixels) in the space of the alternate view images. Processor 108 is further configured to generate compressed light field representation data using prediction error data, the reference image, and the depth map. Other data, such as one or more image packet timestamps, can be included as metadata associated with the compressed light field representation data as appropriate to the requirements of specific array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In several embodiments, the prediction error data and the reference image are compressed via lossless and/or lossy image compression techniques. In a variety of embodiments, an image processing application configures processor 108 to perform a variety of operations using the compressed light field representation data, including, but not limited to, synthesizing high resolution images using a super-resolution process. Other operations can be performed using the compressed light field representation data in accordance with a variety of embodiments of the invention.
Although a specific array camera configured to capture light fields and generate compressed light field representation data is illustrated in
Processing and Interacting with Captured Light Fields
A captured light field, as an array of images, can consume a significant amount of storage space. Generating compressed light field representation data using the captured light field while reducing the storage space utilized can be a processor-intensive task. A variety of array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention lack the processing power to simultaneously capture and process light fields while maintaining adequate performance for one or both of the operations. Array cameras in accordance with several embodiments of the invention are configured to separately obtain a captured light field and generate compressed light field representation data using the captured light field, allowing the array camera to quickly capture light fields and efficiently process those light fields as the processing power becomes available and/or the compressed light field representation data is needed. A process for processing and interacting with captured light fields in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, a captured light field is obtained (210) using an imager array and a processor in the array camera generating (212) the compressed light field representation data. In a number of embodiments, a captured light field is obtained (210) from a separate device. In several embodiments, the captured light field is obtained (210) and compressed light field representation data is generated (212) as part of a single capture operation. In a variety of embodiments, obtaining (210) the captured light field and generating (212) the compressed light field representation data occurs at disparate times.
Generating (212) the compressed light field representation data includes normalizing the obtained (210) captured light field and generating a depth map for the obtained (210) captured light field using geometric calibration data and photometric calibration data. In many embodiments, parallax detection processes, such as those disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881, are utilized to generate a depth map and prediction error data describing correlation between pixels in the captured light field from the perspective of one or more reference images. Processes other than those disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881 can be utilized in accordance with many embodiments of the invention. The generated (212) compressed light field representation data includes the prediction error data, the reference images, and the depth map. Additional metadata, such as timestamps, location information, and sensor information, can be included in the generated (212) compressed light field representation data as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In many embodiments, the generated (212) compressed light field representation data is compressed using lossy and/or non-lossy compression techniques. The generated (212) compressed light field representation data can be stored in a variety of formats, such as the JPEG-DX standard. In several embodiments, the alternate view images in the obtained (210) captured light field are not stored in the generated (212) compressed light field representation data.
In a number of embodiments, synthesizing (214) a high resolution image utilizes the reference image(s), the prediction error data, and the depth map in the generated (212) compressed light field representation data. In a variety of embodiments, the reference images, the prediction error data, and the depth map are utilized to reconstruct the array of images (or an approximation of the images) to synthesize (214) a high resolution image using a super-resolution process. A high resolution image can be synthesized (214) using the array of images representing the captured light field reconstructed based on the compressed light field representation data (212). However, in a number of embodiments synthesizing (214) a high resolution image using the generated (212) compressed light field representation data includes reconstructing (e.g. decoding) the array of images using the compressed light field representation data once the captured light field is to be viewed, such as in an image viewing application running on an array camera or other device. Techniques for decoding compressed light field representation data that can be utilized in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described in more detail below. In several embodiments, high resolution images are synthesized (214) at a variety of resolutions to support different devices and/or varying performance requirements. In a number of embodiments, the synthesis (214) of a number of high resolution images is part of an image fusion process such as the processes described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference above.
Many operations can be performed while interacting (216) with synthesized high resolution images, such as, but not limited to, modifying the depth of field of the synthesized high resolution image, changing the focal plane of the synthesized high resolution image, recoloring the synthesized high resolution image, and detecting objects within the synthesized high resolution image. Systems and methods for interacting (216) with compressed light field representation data and synthesized high resolution images that can be utilized in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/773,284 to McMahon et al., the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Although a specific process processing and interacting with captured light fields in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is described above with respect to
Generating Compressed Light Field Representation Data
A process for generating compressed light field representation data in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In a variety of embodiments, the array of images is obtained (310) from a captured light field. In several embodiments, the obtained (310) array of images is packets of image data captured using an imager array. In many embodiments, the determined (312) reference image corresponds to the reference viewpoint of the array of images. Furthermore, the determined (312) reference image can be an arbitrary image (or synthetic image) in the obtained (310) array of images. In a number of embodiments, each image in the obtained (310) array of images is associated with a particular color channel, such as, but not limited to, green, red, and blue. Other colors and/or portions of the electromagnetic spectrum can be associated with each image in the array of images in accordance with a variety of embodiments of the invention. In several embodiments, the determined (312) reference image is a green image in the array of images. Parallax detection is performed (314) with respect to the viewpoint of the determined (312) reference image to locate pixels corresponding to pixels in a reference image by searching along epipolar lines in the alternate view images in the array of images. In a number of embodiments, the parallax detection uses correspondences between cameras that are not co-located with the viewpoint of the reference image(s). In many embodiments, the search area need not be directly along an epipolar line, but rather a region surrounding the epipolar line; this area can be utilized to account for inaccuracies in determining imager calibration parameters and/or the epipolar lines. In several embodiments, parallax detection can be performed (314) with a fixed and/or dynamically determined level of precision; this level of precision can be based on performance requirements and/or desired compression efficiency, the array of images, and/or on the desired level of precision in the result of the performed (314) parallax detection. Additional techniques for performing parallax processes with varying levels of precision are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/780,974, filed Mar. 13, 2013, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Disparity Information from a Single Reference Image
Turning now to
In a variety of embodiments, performing (314) parallax detection includes generating a depth map describing depth information in the array of images. In many embodiments, the depth map is metadata describing the distance from the reference camera (i.e. viewpoint) to the portion of the scene captured in the pixels (or a subset of the pixels) of an image determined using the corresponding pixels in some or all of the alternate view images. In several embodiments, candidate corresponding pixels are those pixels in alternate view images that appear along epipolar lines from pixels in the reference image. In a number of embodiments, a depth map is generated using only images in the array of images that are associated with the same color (for example, green) as the reference image. In several embodiments, the depth map is generated using images of the same color but a different color than the reference camera. For example, with a green reference image, a depth map can be generated using only the images associated with the color red (or blue) in the array of images. In many embodiments, depth information is determined with respect to multiple colors and combined to generate a depth map; e.g. depth information is determined separately for the subsets of green, red, and blue images in the array of images and a final depth map is generated using a combination of the green depth information, the red depth information, and the blue depth information. In a variety of embodiments, the depth map is generated using information from any set of cameras in the array. In a variety of embodiments, the depth map is generated without respect to colors associated with the images and/or with a combination of colors associated with the images. In several embodiments, performing (314) parallax detection can be performed utilizing techniques similar to those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881, incorporated by reference above. Additionally, non-color images (such as infrared images) can be utilized to generate the depth map as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention.
Although a specific example of a 4×4 array of images that can be utilized to determine disparity information and a depth map from a reference image in the 4×4 array of images is described above with respect to
Returning now to
In a variety of embodiments, virtual red, virtual green, and/or virtual blue reference images can be utilized as a reference image. For example, a depth map can be determined for a particular reference viewpoint that may not correspond to the location of a physical camera in the array. This depth map can be utilized to form a virtual red image, virtual green, and/or virtual blue image from the captured light field. These virtual red, virtual green, and and/or virtual blue images can then be utilized as the reference image(s) from which to create the prediction images for the alternate view(s) utilized in the processes described above. By way of a second example, one or more virtual red, virtual green, and/or virtual blue images and/or physical red, green, and/or blue images within the array of images can be used as reference images. When forming the prediction error, the depth map can be utilized to form a prediction image from virtual and/or actual reference image(s) and calculate the prediction error with respect to the corresponding alternate view images.
Turning now to
Returning now to
Prediction error data for the alternate view is computed (318) using the determined (312) reference image, the determined (316) prediction images, and depth map. For the reference image pref and alternate view images pk,l where k,l represents the location of the alternate view image in the array of images p, the depth information provides a subset of images pk,l where
pref(x,y):=pk,l(i,j)
where (x,y) is the location of a pixel in pref and (i,j) is the location of a pixel at a fractional location in pk,l corresponding to a pixel in pref(x,y) based on the depth information. Using these mappings of subsets of pixels to the alternate viewpoint pk,l a prediction image is calculated from the reference pixels mapping to pk,l. (316). The prediction error data Ek,l can be computed (318) between pref and the prediction image for viewpoint pk,l described above. In a variety of embodiments, the determined (316) prediction images include sparse images. The missing values for the sparsely populated images can be interpolated using populated values within a neighborhood of the missing pixel value. For example, a kernel regression may be applied to the populated values to fill in the missing prediction values. In these cases, the prediction error data Ek,l is a representation of the error induced by the interpolation of the missing values.
In many embodiments, the determined (316) initial prediction image is a sparsely populated grid of fractionally-positioned points from the reference frame pref that includes “holes” that are locations or regions on the alternate view integer grid that are not occupied by any of the pixels mapped from the reference frame pref. The presence of “holes” can be particularly prevalent in occluded areas but may occur in non-occlusion regions due to non-idealities in the depth map or due to the fact that many pixels in the reference camera correspond to fractional positions in the alternate view image. In several embodiments, holes in the prediction error data can be filled using the absolute value of the pixel location in the alternate view image pk,l. This is similar to filling the predicted image with a value of zero (i.e. any null value or default value) to ensure that the coded error is equal to the value of the pixel in the alternate view image at that position. In a variety of embodiments, “holes” in a predicted image can be filled using interpolation with predicted values from neighboring pixels to create additional predictions for the holes based on the pixels from the predicted image. As can be readily appreciated, any interpolator can be utilized to create interpolated predicted image pixels from pixels propagated from the reference image. The details of the interpolation scheme used is a parameter of the encoding and decoding process and should be applied in both the encoder and decoder to ensure lossless output. In a variety of embodiments, residuals can provide more efficient compression than encoding holes with absolute values. In several embodiments, the pixels from the reference image pref do not map to exact grid locations within the prediction image and a mapping that assigns a single pixel value to multiple adjacent pixel locations on the integer grid of the prediction image is used. In this way, there is a possibility that multiple pixels from the reference image pref may map to the same integer grid location in the prediction image. In this case, pixel stacking rules can be utilized to generate multiple prediction images in which different stacked pixels are used in each image. In many embodiments, if N pixels exist in a pixel stack, then the resulting predicted value could be the mean of the N pixel values in the stack. However, any number of prediction images can be computed and/or any other techniques for determining prediction images where multiple pixels map to the same location (e.g. a pixel stack exists) as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. In a variety of embodiments, holes can remain within the predicted images after the initial interpolation; additional interpolation processes can be performed until every location on the integer grid of the predicted image (or a predetermined number of locations) is assigned a pixel value. Any interpolation technique, such as kernel regression or inpainting, can be used to fill the remaining holes as described. In other embodiments, a variety of techniques can be utilized to achieve compression of raw data that involve creating multiple prediction images and/or pieces of prediction error data. Furthermore, any variety of interpolation techniques known to those skilled in the art can be utilized to fill holes in a prediction image as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Prediction Error Data from Multiple Reference Images
In a variety of embodiments, performing (314) parallax detection does not return accurate disparity information for pixels in alternate view images that are occluded, appear in featureless (e.g. textureless) areas relative to the reference image, or where the depth map exhibits other non-idealities such as photometric mismatch. Using the determined (316) prediction error data and/or the depth map and/or a confidence map describing areas of low confidence in the depth map, areas of low confidence can be identified (320). Areas of low confidence indicate areas in the reference viewpoint where the depth measurement may be inaccurate or the pixels may otherwise not photometrically correspond (for example due to defects in the reference image), leading to potential inefficiencies in compression and/or performance. Low confidence can be determined in a variety of ways, such as identifying areas having a parallax cost function exceeding a threshold value. For example, if the parallax cost function indicates a low cost (e.g. low mismatch), this indicates that the focal planes agree on a particular depth and the pixels appear to correspond. Similarly, a high cost indicates that not all focal planes agree with respect to the depth, and therefore the computed depth is unlikely correctly represent the locations of objects within the captured light field. However, any of a variety of techniques for identifying areas of low confidence can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention, such as those disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,881, incorporated by reference above. In many embodiments, these potential inefficiencies are disregarded and no additional action is taken with respect to the identified (320) areas of low confidence. In several embodiments, potential inefficiencies are disregarded by simply encoding the pixels from the alternate view images rather than computing the prediction error. In a number of embodiments, if an area of low confidence (e.g. correspondence mismatch) is identified (320), one or more additional reference images are selected and supplemental prediction images (or portions of supplemental prediction image(s)) are computed (322) from the additional reference images. In several embodiments, additional reference images or portions of additional reference images are utilized when detected objects in the array of images for areas where the determined (316) prediction error data would be large using a single reference image; for example, in an occlusion zone). A large prediction error rate can be predicted when objects in a captured light field are close to the imager array, although any situation where a large prediction error rate is (316) determined can be the basis for selecting additional reference images in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Turning now to
In several embodiments, the alternate view images that are utilized in performing (314) parallax detection are clustered around the respective reference image that is utilized in performing (314) parallax detection. In a variety of embodiments, the images are clustered in a way to reduce the disparity and/or improve pixel correspondence between the clustered images, thereby reducing the number of pixels from the alternate view images that are occluded from the viewpoints of both the reference image and the secondary reference image. In many embodiments, the alternate view images are clustered to the primary reference image 460, the secondary reference image 466, and/or together based on the color associated with the images. For example, if reference image 460 and secondary reference image 466 are green, only the green alternate view images 462 are associated with the reference image 460 and/or the secondary reference image 466. Likewise, the red alternate view images 461 (or the blue alternate view images 463) are associated with each other for the purposes of computing (322) supplemental prediction images and/or performing (314) parallax detection.
In many embodiments, particularly those embodiments employing lossless compression techniques, the secondary reference image 466 is predicted using the reference image 460 and the baseline 468 that describes the distance between the optical centers of the reference image and the secondary reference image. In several embodiments, the secondary reference image 466 is selected to reduce the size of the occlusion zones (and thus predictability of pixels); that is, parallax detection is performed and error data is determined as described above using the secondary reference image 466. In many embodiments, the secondary reference image 466 is associated with the same color channel as the reference image 460. A specific example of a two-dimensional array of images with two reference images that can be utilized to compute (322) supplemental prediction images is conceptually illustrated in
In a variety of embodiments, particularly those utilizing lossy compression techniques, a variety of coding techniques can be utilized to account for the effects of lossy compression in the reference images when predicting an alternate view image. In several embodiments, before the prediction image and prediction error data for the alternate view image are formed, the reference image is compressed using a lossy compression algorithm. The compressed reference image is then decompressed to form a lossy reference image. The lossy reference image represents the reference image that the decoder will have in the initial stages of decoding. The lossy reference image is used along with the depth map to form a lossy predicted image for the alternate view image. The prediction error data for the alternate view image is then calculated by comparing the lossy reference image with the alternate view image (e.g. by taking the signed difference of the two images). In this way, when using lossy compression, the prediction error data will take into account the lossy nature of the encoding of the reference image when forming the prediction error data.
In a variety of embodiments, the alternative reference images are based on the reference image. In several embodiments, the reference image used to predict the viewpoint of the alternate reference image undergoes a lossy compression. A lossy compression is applied to the prediction error data for the alternate reference image. The reference image is then decompressed to generate a lossy reference image. A lossy predicted image is generated from the decompressed reference image for the alternate reference image. The compressed prediction error data is decompressed to form the lossy prediction error data. The lossy prediction error data is added to the lossy predicted image to form the lossy predicted alternate reference image. The prediction image and prediction error data for any subsequent alternate view image that depends on the alternate reference image will be formed using the lossy predicted alternate reference image. In a number of embodiments, this forms the alternate view image that can be reconstructed utilizing lossy reconstruction techniques as described below. This process can be repeated for each alternate view image as necessary. In this way, prediction error data can be accurately computed (relative to the uncompressed light field data) using the lossy compressed image data.
Returning now to
In a variety of embodiments, supplemental depth information is incorporated into the depth map and/or as metadata associated with the compressed light field representation data. In a number of embodiments, supplemental depth information is encoded with the additional reference viewpoint(s). In many embodiments, the depth information used for each reference viewpoint is calculated using any sets of cameras during the encoding process that may be similar or may be different depending on the viewpoint. In many embodiments, depth for an alternate reference viewpoint is calculated for only sub-regions of the alternate reference viewpoint so that an entire depth map does not need to be encoded for each viewpoint. In many embodiments, a depth map for the alternate reference viewpoint is formed by propagating pixels from the depth map from a primary reference viewpoint. If there are holes in the depth map propagated to the alternate reference viewpoint they can be filled by interpolating from nearby propagated pixels in the depth map, or through direct detection from the alternate viewpoint. In many embodiments, the depth map from the alternate reference viewpoint can be formed by a combination of propagating depth values from another reference viewpoint, interpolating for missing depth values in the alternate reference viewpoint, or directly detecting regions of particular depth values in the alternative reference viewpoint. In this way, the depth map created by performing (314) parallax detection above can be augmented with depth information generated from alternate reference images.
A specific process for generating compressed light field representation data in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is described above with respect to
Decoding Compressed Light Field Representation Data
As described above, compressed light field representation data can be utilized to efficiently store captured light fields. However, in order to utilize the compressed light field representation data to perform additional processed on the captured light field (such as parallax processes), the compressed light field representation data need be decoded to retrieve the original (or an approximation of the) captured light field. A process for decoding compressed light field representation data is conceptually illustrated in
In a variety of embodiments, decompressing (611) the captured light field representation data includes decompressing the reference image, depth map, and/or prediction error data compressed utilizing techniques described above. In several embodiments, the reference image (612) corresponds to a viewpoint (e.g. a focal plane in an imager array) image in the compressed light field representation data; however, it should be noted that reference images from virtual viewpoints (e.g. viewpoints that do not correspond to a focal plane in the imager array) can also be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. In a number of embodiments, the alternate view images are formed (614) by computing prediction images using the determined (612) reference image and the depth map, then applying the prediction error data to the computed prediction images. However, any technique for forming (614) the alternate view images, including directly forming the alternate view images using the determined (612) reference image and the prediction error data, can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. Additionally, metadata describing the interpolation techniques utilized in the creation of the compressed light field representation data can be utilized in computing the prediction images. In this way, the decoding process results in prediction images that, once the prediction error data is applied to the prediction images, correct (or an approximation to correct) alternate view images are formed (614). This allows for multiple interpolation techniques to be utilized in the encoding of compressed light field representation data, e.g. adaptive interpolation techniques can be utilized based on the requirements of specific embodiments of the invention. The captured light field is reconstructed (620) using the alternative view images and the reference image. In many embodiments, the captured light field also includes the depth map, the prediction error data, and/or any other metadata included in the compressed light field representation data.
In a variety of embodiments, multiple reference images (e.g. a primary reference image and one or more secondary reference images) exist within the compressed light field representation data. The alternate reference images can be directly included in the compressed light field representation data and/or formed utilizing techniques similar to those described above. Using (618) an alternative reference image further includes recursively (and/or iteratively) forming alternate view images from the viewpoint of each reference image utilizing techniques described above. In this way, the alternative view images are mapped back to the viewpoint of the (primary) reference image and allowing the captured light field to be reconstructed (620).
In those embodiments utilizing lossy compression techniques, information critical to determining (612) the reference image and/or an alternative reference image can be lost. However, this loss can be compensated for by storing the lost information as metadata within the compressed light field representation data and/or as part of the prediction error data. Then, when determining (612) the reference image and/or the alternate reference image, the metadata and/or prediction error data can be applied to the compressed image in order to reconstruct the original, uncompressed image. Using the uncompressed reference image, the decoding of the compressed captured light field representation data can proceed utilizing techniques similar to those described above to reconstruct (320) the captured light field. In a variety of embodiments, predicting the alternative reference image from the reference image, if lossy compression is used, includes reconstructing the alternate reference image by coding and decoding (losslessly) the prediction error data then adding the decoded prediction error to the reference image. In this way, the original alternate reference image can be reconstructed and used to predict specific alternate views as described above.
A specific process for decoding compressed light field representation data in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is described above with respect to
Although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention can be practiced otherwise than specifically described without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
The current application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/253,605, entitled “Systems and Methods for Generating Compressed Light Field Representation Data using Captured Light Fields, Array Geometry, and Parallax Information” to Venkataraman et al., filed on Aug. 31, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/186,871, entitled “Systems and Methods for Generating Compressed Light Field Representation Data using Captured Light Fields, Array Geometry, and Parallax Information” to Venkataraman et al., filed on Feb. 21, 2014 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,462,164, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/767,520, filed Feb. 21, 2013, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/786,976, filed Mar. 15, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4124798 | Thompson | Nov 1978 | A |
4198646 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4323925 | Abell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4460449 | Montalbano | Jul 1984 | A |
4467365 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4652909 | Glenn | Mar 1987 | A |
4899060 | Lischke | Feb 1990 | A |
5005083 | Grage | Apr 1991 | A |
5070414 | Tsutsumi | Dec 1991 | A |
5144448 | Hornbaker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5157499 | Oguma et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5325449 | Burt | Jun 1994 | A |
5327125 | Iwase et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5488674 | Burt | Jan 1996 | A |
5629524 | Stettner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5793900 | Nourbakhsh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801919 | Griencewic et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808350 | Jack et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832312 | Rieger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880691 | Fossum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911008 | Niikura et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5933190 | Dierickx et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973844 | Burger | Oct 1999 | A |
6002743 | Telymonde | Dec 1999 | A |
6005607 | Uomori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6069351 | Mack | May 2000 | A |
6069365 | Chow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124974 | Burger | Sep 2000 | A |
6130786 | Osawa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137535 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6141048 | Meyers | Oct 2000 | A |
6160909 | Melen | Dec 2000 | A |
6163414 | Kikuchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172352 | Liu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175379 | Uomori et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205241 | Melen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239909 | Hayashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6292713 | Jouppi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6340994 | Margulis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358862 | Ireland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6443579 | Myers | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477260 | Shimomura | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502097 | Chan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525302 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6563537 | Kawamura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571466 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603513 | Berezin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611289 | Yu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627896 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628330 | Lin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635941 | Suda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639596 | Shum et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647142 | Beardsley | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657218 | Noda | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671399 | Berestov | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674892 | Melen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6750904 | Lambert | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765617 | Tangen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771833 | Edgar | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774941 | Boisvert et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788338 | Dinev | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795253 | Shinohara | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801653 | Wu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819328 | Moriwaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6819358 | Kagle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6879735 | Portniaguine et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6897454 | Sasaki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903770 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909121 | Nishikawa | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958862 | Joseph | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7085409 | Sawhney | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7161614 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7199348 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206449 | Raskar et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235785 | Hornback et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262799 | Suda | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292735 | Blake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295697 | Satoh | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7333651 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7369165 | Bosco et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391572 | Jacobowitz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408725 | Sato | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425984 | Chen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7496293 | Shamir et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564019 | Olsen | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7599547 | Sun et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606484 | Richards et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7620265 | Wolff | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633511 | Shum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639435 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646549 | Zalevsky et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657090 | Omatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667824 | Moran | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7675080 | Boettiger | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675681 | Tomikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706634 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738013 | Galambos et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741620 | Doering et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7782364 | Smith | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7826153 | Hong | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840067 | Shen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7912673 | Hébert et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7965314 | Miller et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7973834 | Yang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986018 | Rennie | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990447 | Honda et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000498 | Shih et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027531 | Wilburn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8044994 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077245 | Adamo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098297 | Crisan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098304 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106949 | Tan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126279 | Marcellin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130120 | Kawabata et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131097 | Lelescu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149323 | Li | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164629 | Zhang | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8169486 | Corcoran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180145 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189065 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev | May 2012 | B1 |
8194296 | Compton | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212914 | Chiu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213711 | Tam | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231814 | Duparre | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8242426 | Ward et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244027 | Takahashi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244058 | Intwala et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8254668 | Mashitani et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280194 | Wong et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284240 | Tubic et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289409 | Chang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289440 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294099 | Blackwell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294754 | Jung et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300085 | Yang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305456 | McMahon | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8360574 | Ishak et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8400555 | Georgiev | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8406562 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8411146 | Twede | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8446492 | Nakano et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456517 | Mor et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8493496 | Freedman et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8514291 | Chang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514491 | Duparre | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8541730 | Inuiya | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553093 | Wong et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559756 | Georgiev et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565547 | Strandemar | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576302 | Yoshikawa | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8577183 | Robinson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8581995 | Lin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8648918 | Kauker et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655052 | Spooner et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682107 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687087 | Pertsel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692893 | McMahon | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8754941 | Sarwari et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8773536 | Zhang | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8780113 | Ciurea et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8804255 | Duparre | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830375 | Ludwig | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831367 | Venkataraman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842201 | Tajiri | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8854462 | Herbin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861089 | Duparre | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866912 | Mullis | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866920 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866951 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878950 | Lelescu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885059 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8885922 | Ito et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896594 | Xiong et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896719 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8902321 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928793 | McMahon | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8977038 | Tian et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001226 | Ng et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9019426 | Han et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025894 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9025895 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9030528 | Pesach et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9031335 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9031342 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9031343 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9036928 | Venkataraman | May 2015 | B2 |
9036931 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041823 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041824 | Lelescu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041829 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9042667 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9049367 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055233 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060124 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9077893 | Venkataraman et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9094661 | Venkataraman et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9123117 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9123118 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124815 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124831 | Mullis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9124864 | Mullis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9128228 | Duparre | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129183 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129377 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9143711 | McMahon | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147254 | Florian et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9185276 | Rodda et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188765 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191580 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197821 | McMahon | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9210392 | Nisenzon et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9214013 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9235898 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9235900 | Ciurea et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9240049 | Ciurea et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253380 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9256974 | Hines | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9264592 | Rodda et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9264610 | Duparre | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9361662 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9374512 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9412206 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9413953 | Maeda | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9426343 | Rodda et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9426361 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9438888 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9445003 | Lelescu et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9456134 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456196 | Kim et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9462164 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9485496 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9497370 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9497429 | Mullis et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9516222 | Duparre et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9519972 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9521319 | Rodda et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9521416 | McMahon et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9536166 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9576369 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9578237 | Duparre et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9578259 | Molina | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9602805 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9661310 | Deng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9811753 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9864921 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010005225 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010019621 | Hanna et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010028038 | Hamaguchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038387 | Tomooka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012056 | Trevino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015536 | Warren | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027608 | Johnson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020028014 | Ono et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039438 | Mori et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057845 | Fossum | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063807 | Margulis | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075450 | Aratani | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087403 | Meyers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089596 | Yasuo | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094027 | Sato et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101528 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113867 | Takigawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113888 | Sonoda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120634 | Min et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122113 | Foote et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020163054 | Suda | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167537 | Trajkovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177054 | Saitoh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190991 | Efran et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195548 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025227 | Daniell | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086079 | Barth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030124763 | Fan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140347 | Varsa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179418 | Wengender et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188659 | Merry et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190072 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198377 | Ng et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211405 | Venkataraman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003409 | Berstis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008271 | Hagimori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027358 | Nakao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047274 | Amanai | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050104 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056966 | Schechner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061787 | Liu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066454 | Otani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071367 | Irani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075654 | Hsiao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096119 | Williams | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100570 | Shizukuishi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105021 | Hu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114807 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141659 | Zhang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151401 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169617 | Yelton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040170340 | Tipping et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174439 | Upton | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179008 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179834 | Szajewski | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207836 | Chhibber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213449 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218809 | Blake et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234873 | Venkataraman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239885 | Jaynes et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040240052 | Minefuji et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251509 | Choi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264806 | Herley | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007461 | Chou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009313 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010621 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012035 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050036778 | DeMonte | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047678 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048690 | Yamamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068436 | Fraenkel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128509 | Tokkonen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128595 | Shimizu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132098 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134698 | Schroeder | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134699 | Nagashima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134712 | Gruhlke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147277 | Higaki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151759 | Gonzalez-Banos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168924 | Wu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175257 | Kuroki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185711 | Pfister et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205785 | Hornback et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219363 | Kohler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050224843 | Boemler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225654 | Feldman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265633 | Piacentino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275946 | Choo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286612 | Takanashi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286756 | Hong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002635 | Nestares et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060007331 | Izumi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018509 | Miyoshi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023197 | Joel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023314 | Boettiger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028476 | Sobel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029270 | Berestov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029271 | Miyoshi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033005 | Jerdev et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034003 | Zalevsky | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034531 | Poon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035415 | Wood | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038891 | Okutomi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039611 | Rother | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046204 | Ono et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049930 | Zruya et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054780 | Garrood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054782 | Olsen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055811 | Frtiz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069478 | Iwama | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072029 | Miyatake et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087747 | Ohzawa et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098888 | Morishita | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103754 | Wenstrand et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060125936 | Gruhike et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138322 | Costello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152803 | Provitola | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157640 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159369 | Young | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176566 | Boettiger et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187338 | May et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197937 | Bamji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203100 | Ajito et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203113 | Wada et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210146 | Gu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210186 | Berkner | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214085 | Olsen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221250 | Rossbach et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239549 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243889 | Farnworth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251410 | Trutna | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274174 | Tewinkle | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278948 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279648 | Senba et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289772 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002159 | Olsen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008575 | Yu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009150 | Suwa | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024614 | Tam | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030356 | Yea et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035707 | Margulis | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036427 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040828 | Zalevsky et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040922 | McKee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041391 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052825 | Cho | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083114 | Yang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085917 | Kobayashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092245 | Bazakos et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102622 | Olsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126898 | Feldman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127831 | Venkataraman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139333 | Sato et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140685 | Wu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146503 | Shiraki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146511 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153335 | Hosaka | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158427 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159541 | Sparks et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160310 | Tanida et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165931 | Higaki | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171290 | Kroger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177004 | Kolehmainen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182843 | Shimamura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201859 | Sarrat et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206241 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211164 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216765 | Wong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228256 | Mentzer | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070236595 | Pan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247517 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257184 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258006 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258706 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263113 | Baek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263114 | Gurevich et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268374 | Robinson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296832 | Ota et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296835 | Olsen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296847 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297696 | Hamza | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006859 | Mionetto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019611 | Larkin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024683 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025649 | Liu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030592 | Border et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080030597 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043095 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043096 | Vetro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054518 | Ra et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080056302 | Erdal et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079805 | Takagi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080080028 | Bakin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084486 | Enge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080088793 | Sverdrup et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095523 | Schilling-Benz et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099804 | Venezia et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080106620 | Sawachi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112059 | Choi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112635 | Kondo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117289 | Schowengerdt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118241 | Tekolste et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131019 | Ng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080131107 | Ueno | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151097 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152296 | Oh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156991 | Hu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158259 | Kempf et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158375 | Kakkori et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158698 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165257 | Boettiger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174670 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211737 | Kim et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218610 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218611 | Parulski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218612 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218613 | Janson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219654 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239116 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240598 | Hasegawa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247638 | Tanida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247653 | Moussavi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272416 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273751 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278591 | Barna et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278610 | Boettiger et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284880 | Numata | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291295 | Kato et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298674 | Baker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310501 | Ward et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027543 | Kanehiro et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050946 | Duparre et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052743 | Techmer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060281 | Tanida et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086074 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091645 | Trimeche et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091806 | Inuiya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096050 | Park | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109306 | Shan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090127430 | Hirasawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128644 | Camp et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128833 | Yahav | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129667 | Ho et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140131 | Utagawa et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090141933 | Wagg | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147919 | Goto et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090152664 | Klem et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167922 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090167934 | Gupta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179142 | Duparre et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180021 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200622 | Tai et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201371 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207235 | Francini et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090219435 | Yuan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225203 | Tanida et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237520 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245573 | Saptharishi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256947 | Ciurea et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263017 | Tanbakuchi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268192 | Koenck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268970 | Babacan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268983 | Stone | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274387 | Jin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279800 | Uetani | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284651 | Srinivasan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090297056 | Lelescu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302205 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2009 | A9 |
20090317061 | Jung et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322876 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323195 | Hembree et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323206 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324118 | Maslov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002126 | Wenstrand et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002313 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002314 | Duparre | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007714 | Kim et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013927 | Nixon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100044815 | Chang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053342 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100053600 | Tanida | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060746 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2010 | A9 |
20100073463 | Momonoi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074532 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085425 | Tan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086227 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091389 | Henriksen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097491 | Farina et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103175 | Okutomi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103259 | Tanida et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103308 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111444 | Coffman | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118127 | Nam | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128145 | Pitts et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133230 | Henriksen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133418 | Sargent et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141802 | Knight | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142828 | Chang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157073 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165152 | Lim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100166410 | Chang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171866 | Brady et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177411 | Hegde et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182406 | Benitez et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194860 | Mentz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194901 | van Hoorebeke et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195716 | Gunnewiek et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201834 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202054 | Niederer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202683 | Robinson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208100 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2010 | A9 |
20100220212 | Perlman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223237 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225740 | Jung et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231285 | Boomer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238327 | Griffith et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244165 | Lake et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254627 | Panahpour Tehrani et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259610 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265346 | Iizuka | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265381 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281070 | Chan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289941 | Ito et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290483 | Park et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302423 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309292 | Ho et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309368 | Choi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321595 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321640 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329556 | Mitarai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001037 | Tewinkle | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018973 | Takayama | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019048 | Raynor et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019243 | Constant, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031381 | Tay et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032370 | Ludwig | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033129 | Robinson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110038536 | Gong | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043661 | Podoleanu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043665 | Ogasahara | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043668 | McKinnon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044502 | Liu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051255 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055729 | Mason et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064327 | Dagher et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069189 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080487 | Venkataraman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085028 | Samadani et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090217 | Mashitani et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110108708 | Olsen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115886 | Nguyen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121421 | Charbon | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122308 | Duparre | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128393 | Tavi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110128412 | Milnes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110129165 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141309 | Nagashima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142138 | Tian et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149408 | Hahgholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149409 | Haugholt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153248 | Gu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157321 | Nakajima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157451 | Chang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169994 | DiFrancesco et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176020 | Chang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181797 | Galstian et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193944 | Lian et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206291 | Kashani | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110207074 | Hall-Holt et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211824 | Georgiev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221599 | Högasten | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221658 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221939 | Jerdev | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221950 | Oostra | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222757 | Yeatman, Jr. et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228142 | Brueckner | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228144 | Tian et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110234841 | Akeley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241234 | Duparre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242342 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242355 | Goma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242356 | Aleksic et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243428 | Das Gupta et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255592 | Sung | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255745 | Hodder et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261993 | Weiming et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267264 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110267348 | Lin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273531 | Ito et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274366 | Tardif | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279705 | Kuang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279721 | McMahon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285701 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285866 | Bhrugumalla et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285910 | Bamji et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292216 | Fergus et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298917 | Yanagita | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300929 | Tardif et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310980 | Mathew | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317766 | Lim, II et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012748 | Pain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014456 | Martinez Bauza et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019530 | Baker | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019700 | Gaber | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023456 | Sun et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026297 | Sato | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120026342 | Yu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120026366 | Golan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120026451 | Nystrom | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039525 | Tian et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044249 | Mashitani et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044372 | Côté et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051624 | Ando et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056982 | Katz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057040 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062697 | Treado et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062702 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062756 | Tian | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069235 | Imai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081519 | Goma | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086803 | Malzbender et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105691 | Waqas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113232 | Joblove et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113318 | Galstian et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113413 | Miahczylowicz-Wolski et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127275 | Von Zitzewitz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147139 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153153 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154551 | Inoue | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155830 | Sasaki | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163672 | McKinnon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169433 | Mullins | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120170134 | Bolis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176479 | Mayhew et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176481 | Lukk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188235 | Wu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188341 | Klein Gunnewiek et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188389 | Lin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188420 | Black et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188634 | Kubala et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198677 | Duparre | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200669 | Lai | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200726 | Bugnariu | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120200734 | Tang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206582 | DiCarlo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219236 | Ali et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224083 | Jovanovski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229602 | Chen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229628 | Ishiyama et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120237114 | Park et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249750 | Izzat et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249836 | Ali et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249853 | Krolczyk et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262601 | Choi et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262607 | Shimura et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268574 | Gidon et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274626 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287291 | McMahon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290257 | Hodge et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293489 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293624 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293695 | Tanaka | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307093 | Miyoshi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120307099 | Yahata et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314033 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314937 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002828 | Ding et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003184 | Duparre | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010073 | Do | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016885 | Tsujimoto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022111 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027580 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033579 | Wajs | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130033585 | Li et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130038696 | Ding et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050504 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050526 | Keelan | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057710 | McMahon | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076967 | Brunner et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077859 | Stauder et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077882 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083172 | Baba | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088489 | Schmeitz et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088637 | Duparre | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093842 | Yahata | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107061 | Kumar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113899 | Morohoshi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113939 | Strandemar | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121559 | Hu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128068 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128069 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128121 | Agarwala et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135315 | Bares | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147979 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176394 | Tian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130208138 | Li | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215231 | Hiramoto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222556 | Shimada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223759 | Nishiyama et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229540 | Farina et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130230237 | Schlosser et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250123 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250150 | Malone | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258067 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130259317 | Gaddy | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265459 | Duparre et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274596 | Azizian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274923 | By et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293760 | Nisenzon et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140002674 | Duparre et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009586 | McNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013273 | Ng et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037137 | Broaddus et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140037140 | Benhimane et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140043507 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140076336 | Clayton et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078333 | Miao | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140079336 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092281 | Nisenzon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098267 | Tian et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140118493 | Sali et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118584 | Lee et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132810 | McMahon | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146201 | Knight et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140186045 | Poddar et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192154 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192253 | Laroia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198188 | Izawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204183 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218546 | McMahon | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232822 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240528 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240529 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253738 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267286 | Duparre | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267633 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267762 | Mullis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267890 | Lelescu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285675 | Mullis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140313315 | Shoham et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321712 | Ciurea et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333731 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333764 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140333787 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340539 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347509 | Venkataraman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347748 | Duparre | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354773 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354843 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354844 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354853 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354854 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354855 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140355870 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368662 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368683 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368684 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368685 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368686 | Duparre | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369612 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369615 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376825 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376826 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002734 | Lee | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003752 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003753 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009353 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009354 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009362 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150015669 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035992 | Mullis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036014 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036015 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042766 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042767 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150042833 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049915 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049916 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049917 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055884 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150085174 | Shabtay et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091900 | Yang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104101 | Bryant et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150122411 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124113 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124151 | Rodda et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150146029 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150146030 | Venkataraman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150199793 | Lelescu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199841 | Venkataraman et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243480 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248744 | Hayasaka et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150254868 | Srikanth et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150296137 | Duparre et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312455 | Venkataraman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326852 | Duparre et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150373261 | Rodda et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160037097 | Duparre | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044252 | Molina | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044257 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057332 | Ciurea et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160165106 | Duparre | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165134 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165147 | Nisenzon et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165212 | Mullis | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160195733 | Lelescu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160227195 | Venkataraman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160249001 | McMahon | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160255333 | Nisenzon et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160266284 | Duparre et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160267665 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160267672 | Ciurea et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269626 | McMahon | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269627 | McMahon | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269650 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269651 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160316140 | Nayar et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170006233 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170048468 | Pain et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053382 | Lelescu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054901 | Venkataraman et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070672 | Rodda et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170085845 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094243 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099465 | Mullis et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170163862 | Molina | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170178363 | Venkataraman et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187933 | Duparre | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170365104 | McMahon et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180007284 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1669332 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1839394 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101010619 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101064780 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101102388 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101147392 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101427372 | May 2009 | CN |
101606086 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101883291 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102037717 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102375199 | Mar 2012 | CN |
104081414 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104081414 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107230236 | Oct 2017 | CN |
0677821 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0840502 | May 1998 | EP |
1201407 | May 2002 | EP |
1355274 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1734766 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2026563 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2104334 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2244484 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2336816 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2381418 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2761534 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2482022 | Jan 2012 | GB |
2708CHENP2014 | Aug 2015 | IN |
59-025483 | Feb 1984 | JP |
64-037177 | Feb 1989 | JP |
02-285772 | Nov 1990 | JP |
07-15457 | Jan 1995 | JP |
09181913 | Jul 1997 | JP |
11142609 | May 1999 | JP |
11223708 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000209503 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001008235 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001194114 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001264033 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001277260 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001337263 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002195910 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002205310 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002252338 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003094445 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003139910 | May 2003 | JP |
2003163938 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003298920 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004221585 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005116022 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005181460 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005295381 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005303694 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005354124 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006033228 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006033493 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006047944 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006258930 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007520107 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007259136 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008039852 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008055908 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008507874 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008258885 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009132010 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009300268 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2011017764 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011030184 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011109484 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011523538 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2013526801 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014521117 | Aug 2014 | JP |
2014535191 | Dec 2014 | JP |
6140709 | May 2017 | JP |
2017163587 | Sep 2017 | JP |
20110097647 | Aug 2011 | KR |
200828994 | Jul 2008 | TW |
200939739 | Sep 2009 | TW |
2005057922 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006039906 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006039906 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007013250 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007083579 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007134137 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008045198 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008050904 | May 2008 | WO |
2008108271 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008108926 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008150817 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009073950 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009151903 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009157273 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011008443 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011055655 | May 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | May 2011 | WO |
2011105814 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011116203 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011063347 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011143501 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012057619 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057621 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057622 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057623 | May 2012 | WO |
2012057620 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012074361 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012078126 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012082904 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012155119 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013003276 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013043751 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013043761 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013049699 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013055960 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013119706 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013126578 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014052974 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014032020 | May 2014 | WO |
2014078443 | May 2014 | WO |
2014130849 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014133974 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138695 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014138697 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014144157 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014145856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014149403 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014149902 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014150856 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014159721 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014159779 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014160142 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164550 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014164909 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014165244 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014133974 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015048694 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015070105 | May 2015 | WO |
2015074078 | May 2015 | WO |
2015081279 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 13810429.4, Completed Jan. 7, 2016, dated Jan. 15, 2016, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12782935.6, completed Aug. 28, 2014, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 7 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12804266.0, Report Completed Jan. 27, 2015, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12835041.0, Report Completed Jan. 28, 2015, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 7 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP13751714.0, completed Aug. 5, 2015, dated Aug. 18, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application EP13810229.8, Report Completed Apr. 14, 2016, dated Apr. 21, 2016, 7 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13830945.5, Search completed Jun. 28, 2016, dated Jul. 7, 2016, 14 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13841613.6, Search completed Jul. 18, 2016, dated Jul. 26, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14763087.5, Search completed Dec. 7, 2016, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14860103.2, Search completed Feb. 23, 2017, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 7 Pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application No. 13831768.0, Search completed May 18, 2016, dated May 30, 2016, 13 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 11781313.9, Completed Oct. 1, 2013, dated Oct. 8, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/058093, dated Sep. 18, 2013, Mailed Oct. 22, 2013, 40 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/059813, dated Apr. 15, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/059991, dated Mar. 17, 2015, Mailed Mar. 26, 2015, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/056065, dated Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/062720, dated Mar. 31, 2015, Mailed Apr. 9, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/024987, dated Aug. 12, 2014, Mailed Aug. 12, 2014, 13 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/027146, completed Aug. 26, 2014, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
Joshi et al., “Synthetic Aperture Tracking: Tracking Through Occlusions”, I CCV IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision; Publication [online]. Oct. 2007 [retrieved Jul. 28, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:I/ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4409032&isnumber=4408819>; pp. 1-8. |
Kang et al., “Handling Occlusions in Dense Multi-view Stereo”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 1, pp. I-103-I-110. |
Kim et al., “Scene reconstruction from high spatio-angular resolution light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—SIGGRAPH 2013 Conference Proceedings, vol. 32, Issue 4, Article 73, Jul. 21, 2013, 11 pages. |
Kitamura et al., “Reconstruction of a high-resolution image on a compound-eye image-capturing system”, Applied Optics, Mar. 10, 2004, vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1719-1727. |
Konolige, “Projected Texture Stereo”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 3-7, 2010, p. 148-155. |
Krishnamurthy et al., “Compression and Transmission of Depth Maps for Image-Based Rendering”, Image Processing, 2001, pp. 828-831. |
Kubota et al., “Reconstructing Dense Light Field From Array of Multifocus Images for Novel View Synthesis”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 269-279. |
Kutulakos et al., “Occluding Contour Detection Using Affine Invariants and Purposive Viewpoint Control”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Proceedings CVPR 94, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 21-23, 1994, 8 pgs. |
Lai et al., “A Large-Scale Hierarchical Multi-View RGB-D Object Dataset”, Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Conference Date May 9-13, 2011, 8 pgs., DOI:10.1109/ICRA.201135980382. |
Lane et al., “A Survey of Mobile Phone Sensing”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, Issue 9, Sep. 2010, pp. 140-150. |
Lee et al., “Electroactive Polymer Actuator for Lens-Drive Unit in Auto-Focus Compact Camera Module”, ETRI Journal, vol. 31, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 695-702. |
Lee et al., “Nonlocal matting”, CVPR 2011, Jun. 20-25, 2011, pp. 2193-2200. |
Lensvector, “How LensVector Autofocus Works”, 2010, printed Nov. 2, 2012 from http://www.lensvector.com/overview.html, 1 pg. |
Levin et al., “A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting”, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Dec. 18, 2007, vol. 30, Issue 2, 8 pgs. |
Levin et al., “Spectral Matting”, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 17-22, 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 1-8. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging”, IEEE Computer Society, Sep. 1, 2006, vol. 39, Issue No. 8, pp. 46-55. |
Levoy et al., “Light Field Rendering”, Proc. ADM SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 1-12. |
Li et al., “A Hybrid Camera for Motion Deblurring and Depth Map Super-Resolution”, Jun. 23-28, 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8 pgs. Retrieved from www.eecis.udel.edu/˜jye/lab_research/08/deblur-feng.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014. |
Li et al., “Fusing Images With Different Focuses Using Support Vector Machines”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 15, No. 6, Nov. 8, 2004, pp. 1555-1561. |
Lim, “Optimized Projection Pattern Supplementing Stereo Systems”, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 12-17, 2009, pp. 2823-2829. |
Liu et al., “Virtual View Reconstruction Using Temporal Information”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2012, pp. 115-120. |
Lo et al., “Stereoscopic 3D Copy & Paste”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, No. 6, Article 147, Dec. 2010, pp. 147:1-147:10. |
Martinez et al., “Simple Telemedicine for Developing Regions: Camera Phones and Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices for Real-Time, Off-Site Diagnosis”, Analytical Chemistry (American Chemical Society), vol. 80, No. 10, May 15, 2008, pp. 3699-3707. |
McGuire et al., “Defocus video matting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, Issue 3, Jul. 2005, pp. 567-576. |
Merkle et al., “Adaptation and optimization of coding algorithms for mobile 3DTV”, Mobile3DTV Project No. 216503, Nov. 2008, 55 pgs. |
Mitra et al., “Light Field Denoising, Light Field Superresolution and Stereo Camera Based Refocussing using a GMM Light Field Patch Prior”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Jun. 16-21, 2012, pp. 22-28. |
Moreno-Noguer et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2007, vol. 26, Issue 3, Jul. 2007, 10 pages. |
Muehlebach, “Camera Auto Exposure Control for VSLAM Applications”, Studies on Mechatronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Autumn Term 2010 course, 67 pgs. |
Nayar, “Computational Cameras: Redefining the Image”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 14, 2006, pp. 30-38. |
Ng, “Digital Light Field Photography”, Thesis, Jul. 2006, 203 pgs. |
Ng et al., “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera”, Stanford Tech Report CTSR Feb. 2005, Apr. 20, 2005, pp. 1-11. |
Ng et al., “Super-Resolution Image Restoration from Blurred Low-Resolution Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2005, vol. 23, pp. 367-378. |
Nguyen et al., “Error Analysis for Image-Based Rendering with Depth Information”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, Issue 4, Apr. 2009, pp. 703-716. |
Nguyen et al., “Image-Based Rendering with Depth Information Using the Propagation Algorithm”, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005, vol. 5, Mar. 23-23, 2005, pp. II-589-II-592. |
Nishihara, “PRISM: A Practical Real-Time Imaging Stereo Matcher”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, A.I. Memo 780, May 1984, 32 pgs. |
Nitta et al., “Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative backprojection method”, Applied Optics, May 1, 2006, vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2893-2900. |
Nomura et al., “Scene Collages and Flexible Camera Arrays”, Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, Jun. 2007, 12 pgs. |
Park et al., “Multispectral Imaging Using Multiplexed Illumination”, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, Oct. 14-21, 2007, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 1-8. |
Park et al., “Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 2003, pp. 21-36. |
Parkkinen et al., “Characteristic Spectra of Munsell Colors”, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 6, Issue 2, Feb. 1989, pp. 318-322. |
Perwass et al., “Single Lens 3D-Camera with Extended Depth-of-Field”, printed from www.raytrix.de, Jan. 22, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Pham et al., “Robust Super-Resolution without Regularization”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 124, Jul. 2008, pp. 1-19. |
Philips 3D Solutions, “3D Interface Specifications, White Paper”, Feb. 15, 2008, 2005-2008 Philips Electronics Nederland B.V., Philips 3D Solutions retrieved from www.philips.com/3dsolutions, 29 pgs., Feb. 15, 2008. |
Polight, “Designing Imaging Products Using Reflowable Autofocus Lenses”, printed Nov. 2, 2012 from http://www.polight.no/tunable-polymer-autofocus-lens-html--11.html, 1 pg. |
Pouydebasque et al., “Varifocal liquid lenses with integrated actuator, high focusing power and low operating voltage fabricated on 200 mm wafers”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 172, Issue 1, Dec. 2011, pp. 280-286. |
Protter et al., “Generalizing the Nonlocal-Means to Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2, 2008, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 36-51. |
Radtke et al., “Laser lithographic fabrication and characterization of a spherical artificial compound eye”, Optics Express, Mar. 19, 2007, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 3067-3077. |
Rajan et al., “Simultaneous Estimation of Super Resolved Scene and Depth Map from Low Resolution Defocused Observations”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 8, 2003, pp. 1-16. |
Rander et al., “Virtualized Reality: Constructing Time-Varying Virtual Worlds From Real World Events”, Proc. of IEEE Visualization '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Oct. 19-24, 1997, pp. 277-283, 552. |
Rhemann et al, “A perceptually motivated online benchmark for image matting”, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 20-25, 2009, Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1826-1833. |
Rhemann et al, “Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 2013, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 504-511. |
Robertson et al., “Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures”, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1999, 5 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/039155, completed Nov. 4, 2014, dated Nov. 13, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/046002, dated Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/048772, dated Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/056502, dated Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/069932, dated May 19, 2015, Mailed May 28, 2015, 12 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/017766, dated Aug. 25, 2015, Mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/018084, dated Aug. 25, 2015, Mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 11 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/018116, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 12 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/021439, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022118, dated Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, dated Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022774, dated Sep. 22, 2015, Mailed Oct. 1, 2015, 5 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/023762, dated Mar. 2, 2015, Mailed Mar. 9, 2015, 10 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024407, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 8 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024903, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 12 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024947, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 7 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/025100, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 4 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/025904, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 5 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/028447, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 7 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, dated Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 6 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/064693, dated May 10, 2016, Mailed May 19, 2016, 14 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/066229, dated May 24, 2016, Mailed Jun. 6, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/067740, dated May 31, 2016, Mailed Jun. 9, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/019529, dated Sep. 13, 2016, Mailed Sep. 22, 2016, 9 Pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, dated May 22, 2012, mailed May 31, 2012, 10 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2011/036349, dated Nov. 13, 2012, Mailed Nov. 22, 2012, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/046002, completed Nov. 13, 2013, dated Nov. 29, 2013, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056065, Completed Nov. 25, 2013, dated Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/059991, Completed Feb. 6, 2014, dated Feb. 26, 2014, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/064921, Completed Feb. 25, 2011, dated Mar. 6, 2012, 17 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Completed Mar. 27, 2013, dated Apr. 15, 2013, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, completed Apr. 2, 2013, dated Apr. 19, 2013, 11 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/039155, completed Jul. 1, 2013, dated Jul. 11, 2013, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/048772, Completed Oct. 21, 2013, dated Nov. 8, 2013, 6 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Completed Feb. 18, 2014, dated Mar. 19, 2014, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, Completed Mar. 14, 2014, dated Apr. 14, 2014, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/019529, completed May 5, 2015, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 11 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/036349, completed Aug. 11, 2011, dated Aug. 22, 2011, 11 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2013/062720, completed Mar. 25, 2014, dated Apr. 21, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/017766, completed May 28, 2014, dated Jun. 18, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/018084, completed May 23, 2014, dated Jun. 10, 2014, 12 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/018116, completed May 13, 2014, dated Jun. 2, 2014, 12 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/021439, completed Jun. 5, 2014, dated Jun. 20, 2014, 10 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022118, completed Jun. 9, 2014, dated Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022774 report completed Jun. 9, 2014, dated Jul. 14, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/024407, report completed Jun. 11, 2014, dated Jul. 8, 2014, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/025100, report completed Jul. 7, 2014, dated Aug. 7, 2014, 5 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/025904 report completed Jun. 10, 2014, dated Jul. 10, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2009/044687, completed Jan. 5, 2010, dated Jan. 13, 2010, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, completed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Mar. 17, 2011, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/037670, Completed Jul. 5, 2012, dated Jul. 18, 2012, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/044014, completed Oct. 12, 2012, dated Oct. 26, 2012, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/056151, completed Nov. 14, 2012, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 10 pgs. |
Robertson et al., “Estimation-theoretic approach to dynamic range enhancement using multiple exposures”, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Apr. 2003, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 219-228. |
Roy et al., “Non-Uniform Hierarchical Pyramid Stereo for Large Images”, Computer and Robot Vision, 2002, pp. 208-215. |
Sauer et al., “Parallel Computation of Sequential Pixel Updates in Statistical Tomographic Reconstruction”, ICIP 1995 Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Image Processing, Date of Conference: Oct. 23-26, 1995, pp. 93-96. |
Seitz et al., “Plenoptic Image Editing”, International Journal of Computer Vision 48, Conference Date Jan. 7, 1998, 29 pgs., DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710696. |
Shotton et al., “Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images”, CVPR 2011, Jun. 20-25, 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, pp. 1297-1304. |
Shum et al., “Pop-Up Light Field: An Interactive Image-Based Modeling and Rendering System”, Apr. 2004, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143-162. Retrieved from http://131.107.65.14/en-us/um/people/jiansun/papers/PopupLightField_TOG.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014. |
Silberman et al., “Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD images”, ECCV'12 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Computer Vision, vol. Part V, Oct. 7-13, 2012, Florence, Italy, pp. 746-760. |
Stober, “Stanford researchers developing 3-D camera with 12,616 lenses”, Stanford Report, Mar. 19, 2008, Retrieved from: http://news.stanford.edu/news/2008/march19/camera-031908.html, 5 pgs. |
Stollberg et al., “The Gabor superlens as an alternative wafer-level camera approach inspired by superposition compound eyes of nocturnal insects”, Optics Express, Aug. 31, 2009, vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 15747-15759. |
Sun et al., “Image Super-Resolution Using Gradient Profile Prior”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23-28, 2008, 8 pgs.; DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587659. |
Taguchi et al., “Rendering-Oriented Decoding for a Distributed Multiview Coding System Using a Coset Code”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2009, Article ID 251081, Online: Apr. 22, 2009, 12 pages. |
Takeda et al., “Super-resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, Sep. 2009, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1958-1975. |
Tallon et al., “Upsampling and Denoising of Depth Maps Via Joint-Segmentation”, 20th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 27-31, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Tanida et al., “Color imaging with an integrated compound imaging system”, Optics Express, Sep. 8, 2003, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2109-2117. |
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification”, Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2001, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1806-1813. |
Tao et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, ICCV '13 Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Dec. 1, 2013, pp. 673-680. |
Taylor, “Virtual camera movement: The way of the future?”, American Cinematographer vol. 77, No. 9, Sep. 1996, 93-100. |
Tseng et al., “Automatic 3-D depth recovery from a single urban-scene image”, 2012 Visual Communications and Image Processing, Nov. 27-30, 2012, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 1-6. |
Vaish et al., “Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces Using Synthetic Apertures: Stereo, Focus and Robust Measures”, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06), vol. 2, Jun. 17-22, 2006, pp. 2331-2338. |
Vaish et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform”, IEEE Workshop on A3DISS, CVPR, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Vaish et al., “Using Plane + Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, 8 pgs. |
Veilleux, “CCD Gain Lab: The Theory”, University of Maryland, College Park—Observational Astronomy (ASTR 310), Oct. 19, 2006, pp. 1-5 (online], [retrieved on May 13, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.astro.umd.edu/˜veilleux/ASTR310/fall06/ccd_theory.pdf, 5 pgs. |
Venkataraman et al., “PiCam: An Ultra-Thin High Performance Monolithic Camera Array”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), ACM, US, vol. 32, No. 6, Nov. 1, 2013, pp. 1-13. |
Vetro et al., “Coding Approaches for End-To-End 3D TV Systems”, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc., TR2004-137, Dec. 2004, 6 pgs. |
Viola et al., “Robust Real-time Object Detection”, Cambridge Research Laboratory, Technical Report Series, Compaq, CRL 2001/01, Feb. 2001, Printed from: http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/Compaq-DEC/CRL-2001-1.pdf, 30 pgs. |
Vuong et al., “A New Auto Exposure and Auto White-Balance Algorithm to Detect High Dynamic Range Conditions Using CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2008, WCECS 2008, Oct. 22-24, 2008, 5 pages. |
Wang et al., “Automatic Natural Video Matting with Depth”, 15th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, PG '07, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, Maui, HI, USA, pp. 469-472. |
Wang, “Calculation of Image Position, Size and Orientation Using First Order Properties”, Dec. 29, 2010, OPTI521 Tutorial, 10 pgs. |
Wang et al., “Soft scissors: an interactive tool for realtime high quality matting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2007, vol. 26, Issue 3, Article 9, Jul. 2007, 6 pages, published Aug. 5, 2007. |
Wetzstein et al., “Computational Plenoptic Imaging”, Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2397-2426. |
Wheeler et al., “Super-Resolution Image Synthesis Using Projections Onto Convex Sets in the Frequency Domain”, Proc. SPIE, Mar. 11, 2005, vol. 5674, 12 pgs. |
Wieringa et al., “Remote Non-invasive Stereoscopic Imaging of Blood Vessels: First In-vivo Results of a New Multispectral Contrast Enhancement Technology”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 34, No. 12, Dec. 2006, pp. 1870-1878, Published online Oct. 12, 2006. |
Wikipedia, “Polarizing Filter (Photography)”, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizing_filter_(photography) on Dec. 12, 2012, last modified on Sep. 26, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Wilburn, “High Performance Imaging Using Arrays of Inexpensive Cameras”, Thesis of Bennett Wilburn, Dec. 2004, 128 pgs. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging Using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Jul. 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1-12. |
Wilburn et al., “High-Speed Videography Using a Dense Camera Array”, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004., vol. 2, Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004, pp. 294-301. |
Wilburn et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002, SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2002, 8 pgs. |
Wippermann et al., “Design and fabrication of a chirped array of refractive ellipsoidal micro-lenses for an apposition eye camera objective”, Proceedings of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, Oct. 15, 2005, 59622C-1-59622C-11. |
Wu et al., “A virtual view synthesis algorithm based on image inpainting”, 2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing, Hangzhou, China, Oct. 21-24, 2012, pp. 153-156. |
Xu, “Real-Time Realistic Rendering and High Dynamic Range Image Display and Compression”, Dissertation, School of Computer Science in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, Fall Term 2005, 192 pgs. |
Yang et al., “A Real-Time Distributed Light Field Camera”, Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (2002), published Jul. 26, 2002, pp. 1-10. |
Yang et al., “Superresolution Using Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method”, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Jul. 2002, 8 pgs. |
Yokochi et al., “Extrinsic Camera Parameter Estimation Based-on Feature Tracking and GPS Data”, 2006, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Information Science, LNCS 3851, pp. 369-378. |
Zhang et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Camera Array”, Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, published Aug. 8, 2004, 12 pgs. |
Zhang et al., “Depth estimation, spatially variant image registration, and super-resolution using a multi-lenslet camera”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7705, Apr. 23, 2010, pp. 770505-770505-8, XP055113797 ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI: 10.1117/12.852171. |
Zheng et al., “Balloon Motion Estimation Using Two Frames”, Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, IEEE, Comp. Soc. Press, US, vol. 2 of 02, Nov. 4, 1991, pp. 1057-1061. |
Zhu et al., “Fusion of Time-of-Flight Depth and Stereo for High Accuracy Depth Maps”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23-28, 2008, Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 1-8. |
Zomet et al., “Robust Super-Resolution”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
Debevec et al., “Recovering High Dynamic Range Radiance Maps from Photographs”, Computer Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH Proceedings), Aug. 16, 1997, 10 pgs. |
Do, “Immersive Visual Communication with Depth”, Presented at Microsoft Research, Jun. 15, 2011, Retrieved from: http://minhdo.ece.illinois.edu/talks/ImmersiveComm.pdf, 42 pgs. |
Do et al., “Immersive Visual Communication”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2011, DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2010.939075, Retrieved from: http://minhdo.ece.illinois.edu/publications/ImmerComm_SPM.pdf, pp. 58-66. |
Drouin et al., “Fast Multiple-Baseline Stereo with Occlusion”, Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM'05), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Jun. 13-16, 2005, pp. 540-547. |
Drouin et al., “Geo-Consistency for Wide Multi-Camera Stereo”, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), vol. 1, Jun. 20-25, 2005, pp. 351-358. |
Drouin et al., “Improving Border Localization of Multi-Baseline Stereo Using Border-Cut”, International Journal of Computer Vision, Jul. 5, 2006, vol. 83, Issue 3, 8 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial apposition compound eye fabricated by micro-optics technology”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 2004, vol. 43, No. 22, pp. 4303-4310. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eye zoom camera”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, Nov. 21, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. |
Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eyes—different concepts and their application to ultra flat image acquisition sensors”, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems IV, Proc. SPIE 5346, Jan. 24, 2004, pp. 89-100. |
Duparre et al., “Chirped arrays of refractive ellipsoidal microlenses for aberration correction under oblique incidence”, Optics Express, Dec. 26, 2005, vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 10539-10551. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optical artificial compound eyes”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, Apr. 6, 2006, vol. 1, pp. R1-R16. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical artificial compound eyes—from design to experimental verification of two different concepts”, Proc. of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, vol. 5962, Oct. 17, 2005, pp. 59622A-1-59622A-12. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical Artificial Compound Eyes—Two Different Concepts for Compact Imaging Systems”, 11th Microoptics Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Duparre et al., “Microoptical telescope compound eye”, Optics Express, Feb. 7, 2005, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 889-903. |
Duparre et al., “Micro-optically fabricated artificial apposition compound eye”, Electronic Imaging—Science and Technology, Prod. SPIE 5301, Jan. 2004, pp. 25-33. |
Duparre et al., “Novel Optics/Micro-Optics for Miniature Imaging Systems”, Proc. of SPIE, Apr. 21, 2006, vol. 6196, pp. 619607-1-619607-15. |
Duparre et al., “Theoretical analysis of an artificial superposition compound eye for application in ultra flat digital image acquisition devices”, Optical Systems Design, Proc. SPIE 5249, Sep. 2003, pp. 408-418. |
Duparre et al., “Thin compound-eye camera”, Applied Optics, May 20, 2005, vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 2949-2956. |
Duparre et al., “Ultra-Thin Camera Based on Artificial Apposition Compound Eyes”, 10th Microoptics Conference, Sep. 1-3, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Eng, Wei Yong et al., “Gaze correction for 3D tele-immersive communication system”, IVMSP Workshop, 2013 IEEE 11th. IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013. |
Fanaswala, “Regularized Super-Resolution of Multi-View Images”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012 (Oct. 11, 2012). Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/-edubois/theses/Fanaswala_thesis.pdf>, Aug. 2009, 163 pgs. |
Fang et al., “Volume Morphing Methods for Landmark Based 3D Image Deformation”, SPIE vol. 2710, Proc. 1996 SPIE Intl Symposium on Medical Imaging, Newport Beach, CA, Feb. 10, 1996, pp. 404-415. |
Farrell et al., “Resolution and Light Sensitivity Tradeoff with Pixel Size”, Proceedings of the SPIE Electronic Imaging 2006 Conference, Feb. 2, 2006, vol. 6069, 8 pgs. |
Farsiu et al., “Advances and Challenges in Super-Resolution”, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, Aug. 12, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 47-57. |
Farsiu et al., “Fast and Robust Multiframe Super Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 2004, published Sep. 3, 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1327-1344. |
Farsiu et al., “Multiframe Demosaicing and Super-Resolution of Color Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2006, vol. 15, No. 1, date of publication Dec. 12, 2005, pp. 141-159. |
Fecker et al., “Depth Map Compression for Unstructured Lumigraph Rendering”, Proc. SPIE 6077, Proceedings Visual Communications and Image Processing 2006, Jan. 18, 2006, pp. 60770B-1-60770B-8. |
Feris et al., “Multi-Flash Stereopsis: Depth Edge Preserving Stereo with Small Baseline Illumination”, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 2006, 31 pgs. |
Fife et al., “A 3D Multi-Aperture Image Sensor Architecture”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, pp. 281-284. |
Fife et al., “A 3MPixel Multi-Aperture Image Sensor with 0.7Mu Pixels in 0.11Mu CMOS”, ISSCC 2008, Session 2, Image Sensors & Technology, 2008, pp. 48-50. |
Fischer et al., “Optical System Design”, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, Feb. 14, 2008, pp. 191-198. |
Fischer et al., “Optical System Design”, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, Feb. 14, 2008, pp. 49-58. |
Gastal et al., “Shared Sampling for Real-Time Alpha Matting”, Computer Graphics Forum, EUROGRAPHICS 2010, vol. 29, Issue 2, May 2010, pp. 575-584. |
Georgeiv et al., “Light Field Camera Design for Integral View Photography”, Adobe Systems Incorporated, Adobe Technical Report, 2003, 13 pgs. |
Georgiev et al., “Light-Field Capture by Multiplexing in the Frequency Domain”, Adobe Systems Incorporated, Adobe Technical Report, 2003, 13 pgs. |
Goldman et al., “Video Object Annotation, Navigation, and Composition”, In Proceedings of UIST 2008, Oct. 19-22, 2008, Monterey CA, USA, pp. 3-12. |
Gortler et al., “The Lumigraph”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, published Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 43-54. |
Gupta et al., “Perceptual Organization and Recognition of Indoor Scenes from RGB-D Images”, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23-28, 2013, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 564-571. |
Hacohen et al., “Non-Rigid Dense Correspondence with Applications for Image Enhancement”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 30, No. 4, Aug. 7, 2011, pp. 70:1-70:10. |
Hamilton, “JPEG File Interchange Format, Version 1.02”, Sep. 1, 1992, 9 pgs. |
Hardie, “A Fast Image Super-Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2007, published Nov. 19, 2007, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 2953-2964. |
Hasinoff et al., “Search-and-Replace Editing for Personal Photo Collections”, 2010 International Conference: Computational Photography (ICCP) Mar. 2010, pp. 1-8. |
Hernandez-Lopez et al., “Detecting objects using color and depth segmentation with Kinect sensor”, Procedia Technology, vol. 3, Jan. 1, 2012, pp. 196-204, XP055307680, ISSN: 2212-0173, DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.03.021. |
HOLOEYE Photonics AG, “Spatial Light Modulators”, Oct. 2, 2013, Brochure retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20131002061028/http://holoeye.com/wp-content/uploads/Spatial_Light_Modulators.pdf on Oct. 13, 2017, 4 pgs. |
HOLOEYE Photonics AG, “Spatial Light Modulators”, Sep. 18, 2013, retrieved from https://web. archive.org/web/20130918113140/http://holoeye.com/spatial-light-modulators/ on Oct. 13, 2017, 4 pages. |
Horisaki et al., “Irregular Lens Arrangement Design to Improve Imaging Performance of Compound-Eye Imaging Systems”, Applied Physics Express, Jan. 29, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 022501-1-022501-3. |
Horisaki et al., “Superposition Imaging for Three-Dimensionally Space-Invariant Point Spread Functions”, Applied Physics Express, Oct. 13, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 112501-1-112501-3. |
Horn et al., “LightShop: Interactive Light Field Manipulation and Rendering”, In Proceedings of I3D, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 121-128. |
Isaksen et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Janoch et al., “A category-level 3-D object dataset: Putting the Kinect to work”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), Nov. 6-13, 2011, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1168-1174. |
Jarabo et al., “Efficient Propagation of Light Field Edits”, In Proceedings of SIACG 2011, pp. 75-80. |
Jiang et al., “Panoramic 3D Reconstruction Using Rotational Stereo Camera with Simple Epipolar Constraints”, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06), vol. 1, Jun. 17-22, 2006, New York, NY, USA, pp. 371-378. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/058093, completed Nov. 15, 2012, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/059813, completed Dec. 17, 2012, dated Jan. 7, 2013, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, completed Jun. 9, 2014, dated Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/023762, Completed May 30, 2014, dated Jul. 3, 2014, 6 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/024903, completed Jun. 12, 2014, dated, Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/024947, Completed Jul. 8, 2014, dated Aug. 5, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/028447, completed Jun. 30, 2014, dated Jul. 21, 2014, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, completed Jul. 28, 2014, dated Aug. 27, 2014, 7 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/064693, Completed Mar. 7, 2015, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/066229, Completed Mar. 6, 2015, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 9 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/067740, Completed Jan. 29, 2015, dated Mar. 3, 2015, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,106, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 12 pgs. |
“Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras: Exif Version 2.2”, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, Prepared by Technical Standardization Committee on AV & IT Storage Systems and Equipment, JEITA CP-3451, Apr. 2002, Retrieved from: http://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.PDF, 154 pgs. |
“File Formats Version 6”, Alias Systems, 2004, 40 pgs. |
“Light fields and computational photography”, Stanford Computer Graphics Laboratory, Retrieved from: http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lightfield/, Earliest publication online: Feb. 10, 1997, 3 pgs. |
Aufderheide et al., “A MEMS-based Smart Sensor System for Estimation of Camera Pose for Computer Vision Applications”, Research and Innovation Conference 2011, Jul. 29, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
Baker et al., “Limits on Super-Resolution and How to Break Them”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2002, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1167-1183. |
Barron et al., “Intrinsic Scene Properties from a Single RGB-D Image”, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23-28, 2013, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 17-24. |
Bennett et al., “Multispectral Bilateral Video Fusion”, 2007 IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, No. 5, May 2007, published Apr. 16, 2007, pp. 1185-1194. |
Bennett et al., “Multispectral Video Fusion”, Computer Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH Proceedings), Jul. 25, 2006, published Jul. 30, 2006, 1 pg. |
Bertero et al., “Super-resolution in computational imaging”, Micron, Jan. 1, 2003, vol. 34, Issues 6-7, 17 pgs. |
Bishop et al., “Full-Resolution Depth Map Estimation from an Aliased Plenoptic Light Field”, ACCV Nov. 8, 2010, Part II, LNCS 6493, pp. 186-200. |
Bishop et al., “Light Field Superresolution”, Computational Photography (ICCP), 2009 IEEE International Conference, Conference Date Apr. 16-17, published Jan. 26, 2009, 9 pgs. |
Bishop et al., “The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, May 2012, vol. 34, No. 5, published Aug. 18, 2011, pp. 972-986. |
Borman, “Topics in Multiframe Superresolution Restoration”, Thesis of Sean Borman, Apr. 2004, 282 pgs. |
Borman et al, “Image Sequence Processing”, Dekker Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering, Oct. 14, 2002, 81 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Block-Matching Sub-Pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—An Empirical Performance Evaluation”, Proc SPIE, Dec. 28, 1998, vol. 3653, 10 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Image Resampling and Constraint Formulation for Multi-Frame Super-Resolution Restoration”, Proc. SPIE, published Jul. 1, 2003, vol. 5016, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Linear models for multi-frame super-resolution restoration under non-affine registration and spatially varying PSF”, Proc. SPIE, May 21, 2004, vol. 5299, 12 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Nonlinear Prediction Methods for Estimation of Clique Weighting Parameters in NonGaussian Image Models”, Proc. SPIE, Sep. 22, 1998, vol. 3459, 9 pgs. |
Borman et al., “Simultaneous Multi-Frame MAP Super-Resolution Video Enhancement Using Spatio-Temporal Priors”, Image Processing, 1999, ICIP 99 Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 469-473. |
Borman et al., “Super-Resolution from Image Sequences—A Review”, Circuits & Systems, 1998, pp. 374-378. |
Bose et al., “Superresolution and Noise Filtering Using Moving Least Squares”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Aug. 2006, vol. 15, Issue 8, published Jul. 17, 2006, pp. 2239-2248. |
Boye et al., “Comparison of Subpixel Image Registration Algorithms”, Proc. of SPIE—IS&T Electronic Imaging, Feb. 3, 2009, vol. 7246, pp. 72460X-1-72460X-9; doi: 10.1117/12.810369. |
Bruckner et al., “Artificial compound eye applying hyperacuity”, Optics Express, Dec. 11, 2006, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 12076-12084. |
Bruckner et al., “Driving microoptical imaging systems towards miniature camera applications”, Proc. SPIE, Micro-Optics, May 13, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Bruckner et al., “Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes”, Optics Express, Nov. 22, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24379-24394. |
Bryan et al., “Perspective Distortion from Interpersonal Distance is an Implicit Visual Cue for Social Judgments of Faces”, PLOS One, vol. 7, Issue 9, Sep. 26, 2012, e45301, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045301, 9 pages. |
Capel, “Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet at URL:<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.226.2643&rep=rep1 &type=pdf>, Trinity Term 2001, 269 pgs. |
Chan et al., “Extending the Depth of Field in a Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, Proceedings—International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Jan. 1, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 623-626. |
Chan et al., “Investigation of Computational Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE, ICASSP, Jun. 19, 2006, pp. 1177-1180. |
Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim Syst Sign Process, published online Feb. 23, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101. |
Chen et al., “Image Matting with Local and Nonlocal Smooth Priors”, CVPR '13 Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 23, 2013, pp. 1902-1907. |
Chen et al., “Interactive deformation of light fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH I3D, Apr. 3, 2005, pp. 139-146. |
Chen et al., “KNN Matting”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2013, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2175-2188. |
Cooper et al., “The perceptual basis of common photographic practice”, Journal of Vision, vol. 12, No. 5, Article 8, May 25, 2012, pp. 1-14. |
Crabb et al., “Real-time foreground segmentation via range and color imaging”, 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Anchorage, AK, USA, Jun. 23-28, 2008, pages 1-5a. |
Robert et al., “Dense Depth Map Reconstruction: A Minimization and Regularization Approach which Preserves Discontinuities”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 439-451, 1996. |
Van Der Wal et al., “The Acadia Vision Processor”, Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Computer Architectures for Machine Perception, Sep. 13, 2000, Padova, Italy, pp. 31-40. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170257562 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61786976 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61767520 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15253605 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 15599900 | US | |
Parent | 14186871 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15253605 | US |