A spheromak can be defined as a toroidal shaped arrangement of plasma consisting of electrons and ions. Traditional spheromaks contain large internal electrical currents and their associated magnetic fields are arranged so the forces within the spheromak are nearly balanced, resulting in confinement times of about a few microseconds without any external fields.
Spheromaks can be generated using a “gun” type device that ejects spheromaks off the end of an electrode into a holding area called a flux conserver. This has made them useful in the laboratory setting for analysis, and spheromak guns are relatively common in astrophysics laboratories. Spheromaks have also been observed to occur in nature as a variety of astrophysical events, like coronal loops and filaments, relativistic jets and plasmoids.
Spheromaks have been proposed as a magnetic fusion energy concept due to their confinement times, on the order of a few microseconds, which was on the same order as the best
Tokamaks when they were first being studied in the mid-twentieth century. Though they had some successes, these small and lower-energy devices had limited performance.
It has been demonstrated that hotter spheromaks have better confinement times, and this has led to a second wave of spheromak machines. Spheromaks have also been used as a mean of injecting plasma into a bigger magnetic confinement experiment like a Tokamak. However, there remains a significant need for improvements in the generation of stable toroidal shaped particle assemblies for a variety of applications.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for generating electron toroids. This is formed in partial or full atmosphere where it is observed to remain stable for hundreds of milliseconds with no external magnetic field for confinement. The charged particles in this spheromak produce a strong internal magnetic field. A spiraling path for the electrons in the surface of the spheromak produces a large internal magnetic field, hence the name of this type of spheromak: the Electron Spiral Toroid Spheromak (ESTS).
A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a moving electrode system to initiate an ESTS. One or more electrodes can undergo controlled translation using a programmable control system. A computer can be programmed using software configured to control a data processor or microcontroller to transmit control signals to an actuator that enables motion of the electrodes and to adjust parameters used to form the toroid. The initiating voltage and the current across the arc formed between the electrodes are parameters selectable by the user to control formation and movement. A camera and system sensors can be used to provide feedback control of toroid formation.
This spheromak, the ESTS, is formed using a high current electric arc. The arc is preferably formed in partial atmosphere, and the ESTS is formed around the arc. Instead of forming spheromaks in high vacuum, preferred embodiments of the present invention form them in partial to full atmosphere. The ESTS formed in this manner is observed to remain in place around the arc for the duration of the arc, which has been observed for hundreds of milliseconds.
ESTSs have also been observed to pass through the arc and leave it entirely. When an ESTS leaves the arc, it passes through the magnetic fields of the arc while maintaining ESTS stability and shape. It is observed to remain stable after it is removed from the arc, with no external magnetic field for confinement, and spins at a high rate. High speed cameras have demonstrated that the shape is that of a spheromak by capturing images at a very fast shutter speed, fast enough to capture the ESTS image in mid spin. Also, in cases where the ESTS is removed from the arc, it is observed to endure for hundreds of milliseconds, for example, and can be moved by applying a directed magnetic field.
In a preferred embodiment of the ESTS, the invention provides a class of spheromak that is formed in partial atmosphere in contrast to formation in a high vacuum. This class of spheromak is formed around an electric arc. The spheromak is observed to endure for many milliseconds, a longer time than the tens of microseconds of traditional spheromaks when no external confining magnetic field is used.
In addition to describing the ESTS, described herein is a system for accelerating the ESTS once it has been formed. This enables a user to add energy to the ESTS. The accelerated ESTS has several applications including x-ray generation, particle beam accelerator, or an improved colliding spheromak energy generator.
A spheromak is a toroidal shaped arrangement of plasma consisting of electrons and ions. A typical spheromak has a toroid shape in a three-dimensional configuration. Additional details regarding prior systems for producing electron toroids can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,247, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Shown in
The methods for forming an electric arc suitable for formation of an ESTS require stability and duration. The arc must be stable for a period of time, compared to arcs that are often unstable in the sense that they change arc paths rapidly and often.
The arc current value is also important. For arcs of approximately five to eight centimeters of arc length, for example, the current is found to range from 200 to 600 amperes. At this value, the arc has an essentially uniform external magnetic field. As electrons leave the arc, they are acted on by the arc magnetic field which causes them to assume a toroidal orbit around the arc. When enough electrons have left the arc, they produce the ESTS. It is important to note that the arc channel itself must be narrower than the path of the electrons around the arc such that the electrons leave the arc that do not collide with the particles remaining in the arc itself.
Positively charged ions from around the arc are trapped within or around the ESTS surface during formation. These ions serve to electrically neutralize the toroid within the housing. As shown in
There is a critical point in toroid formation at which the electron velocity within the arc is sufficient and the arc current decreases when field conditions enable toroid formation. With a capacitor system power supply, the voltage across the arc can drop as the arc draws power which results in a decrease in the current. This is coordinated with the increasing distance between the electrodes which increases the resistance between the electrodes. Because the current decreases faster than the decrease in electron velocity, for example, this can enable toroid formation. More specifically, when the electrodes are employed for initiation in which they are initially touching, the circuit resistance is at its lowest value. At this time, the capacitor power supply can provide a maximum voltage and current when fully charged and can potentially damage the electrodes, for example. To mitigate or eliminate this possibility, a variable resistor or other voltage control device can be used to adjust the initial voltage and current to control the arc and further control initiation of one or more toroids with the arc. In a preferred method, the initial voltage at contact is increased for a first time period upon electrode separation for about 100 milliseconds, for example. However, as the electrode separation increases and more gas particles enter the electrode gap, the resistance in the gap increases causing a reduction in the voltage (and current) across the gap, assuming that the voltage is not increased further by the voltage controller. The exact voltage and current for toroid formation will vary as a function of system resistance, electrode materials, gas pressure, arc gap length and power supply characteristics. In a preferred method, the invention includes a process for generating a plurality of toroids using a single arc sequence. In this embodiment, after formation of a first toroid as described above, the voltage/current across the arc can be reduced to a level that allows the first toroid to be released from the arc. However, the residual arc ions remain in place long enough, even if the arc is temporarily disrupted, for up to a few hundred milliseconds. This enables the system to then increase the voltage/current and reestablish the arc to enable repetitive formation of a plurality of toroids in sequence.
Note that the ESTS has an essentially uniform geometry, that is, the charged particle orbits within the ESTS are nearly the same at all points of the ESTS. This occurs when enough electrons leave the arc and form the essential toroid shape that they in turn create their own magnetic field internal to the ESTS. When this state is reached, then the internal fields in the ESTS ensure that the radius of each orbit is essentially the same for all orbits. At this point the ESTS is stable and is self-organized (that is, confined without an external magnetic field) as described by Chen, C., Pakter, R., Seward, C. in “Equilibrium and Stability Properties of Self-Organized Electron Spiral Toroids,” Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 8, No. 10, 2001, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference. It is also observed to endure in partial atmosphere for hundreds of milliseconds, and as the energy level of the toroid increase, the toroid can endure for minutes. Ions from around the arc are trapped within ESTS surface during formation when the electrons leave the arc and move into the toroid shape, positively charged ions are entrained with the toroid surface.
The electric arc used is formed with electrodes 13 and 14. The arc is formed by first placing the electrodes together then applying voltage enough to maintain the arc across the gap as it is drawn. The electrodes are then drawn apart using the moving frame 16 until the full arc gap is opened, with just the anode on the moving frame, while the cathode is on the fixed frame 19. A motor 17 is used to pull apart the electrodes using a series of simple pulleys 18 and a cable. The fixed frame 19 holds in place the motor, pulleys, and cathode. During the arc drawing process, the arc current can be increased to higher levels which might be harmful to the electrodes when they are touching, but act to increase the arc current later in the process.
Initially, exploding wires were used to generate the arcs. However, the exploding wire needs to be replaced after each event, making difficult ESTS applications which utilize many ESTSs formed in rapid fashion, while the drawn arc approach described herein uses the same electrodes for many arc events. The exploding wires leave a residue which needs to be cleaned and removed after each arc event. Thus the drawn arc system is more useful and efficient for repeated arc formation.
The voltage required across the arc gap is dependent on the gap length, the background gas pressure, and the material used in the electrodes. For a gap length of 8.5 cm, for example, voltages of 110 VDC to 125 VDC have been shown to produce ESTSs in various pressures. Lower background gas pressures require lower voltages since it is easier to maintain an arc across a gap at lower pressures. Higher voltages have been used also, and there is no upper voltage limit, but as a rule, the voltage has to be low enough to allow electrons to escape the arc.
An electron gun can be used in place of electrodes, except that current electron guns used to produce electron beams do not have the current capability of arcs. Electron guns from Kimball Physics, for example, normally provide maximum currents in the tens of milliamperes range, well below the range needed for ESTS formation. The arcs used in this invention range from a few tens of amperes to thousands of amperes.
For the preferred embodiment, the pressure used is preferably about ⅛th atmosphere. The pressure can vary greatly and ESTSs have been observed from 0.10% atmosphere to 36% atmosphere with adjustment of system parameters. The lower limit is the density of the background gas as there must be enough gas molecules to form sufficient ions to neutralize the electron charge.
For a preferred embodiment, the background gas is normally nitrogen since it is easy to obtain and will not react with the electrodes as they become heated during arc formation. Other inert gases can be used, and argon and helium have been used, for example. Air can be utilized, although it can be harmful to the electrodes since the oxygen can rapidly react with the heated electrodes. Hydrogen can be used, but care must be taken to provide for safety by ensuring that oxygen is not mixed with the hydrogen.
Referring again to
There is a limit to how fast an arc can be drawn. If drawn too fast, the arc will extinguish because it will not maintain the arc path. It is desirable to draw fast enough that the ESTS initiates before the capacitor supply discharges enough energy to drop below an output voltage that maintains the arc. Preferably, a draw of 8.5 cm in 0.45 seconds, or about 19 cm/second can be used, however, this value can vary range from 10-50 cm/second.
In one embodiment, the ESTS remains in place as long as the arc remains, which is controlled by the control circuit. In a second embodiment, the ESTS is observed to become self-stable independent of the arc. As the ESTS remains in place, under the right conditions it is observed to increase in density with time. When the ESTS becomes dense enough it is observed to move through the arc and become self-stable in the partial atmosphere. The necessary condition for this to happen is for the internal magnetic field of the ESTS to be greater than the arc magnetic field itself such that the ESTS can cross the magnetic field lines while maintaining its toroidal shape. To calculate the magnetic field of the arc and the ESTS internal magnetic field, the arc magnetic field is Ba=μ*Ia/2π*Ra, where Ia is the arc current, and Ra is the arc radius. For a typical experiment, with Ia=330 amperes, and Ra=0.0069m, Ba=0.0097 Tesla.
The ESTS is observed to pass through this field while remaining stable and to do so the ESTS internal magnetic field must be greater than the field of the arc by an approximate order of magnitude (ten times). The ESTS internal magnetic field Bt=Ns*μ*It/2π*Rt, where Ns is the number of electron shells in the ESTS surface, It is the toroidal current in a shell, and Rt is the ESTS radius. For a typical measurement where the ESTS is observed to cross the magnetic field lines of the arc, it is estimated that Ns=25, Is=10,400 A; Rt=0.0137 m resulting in Bt=3.8Tesla, which is greater than the arc magnetic field.
With this level of detail visible it is important to point out that during the initiation of the ESTS as shown in
Further measurements demonstrated that these small ESTSs can be accelerated using magnetic coils.
The basic equations for a solenoid magnetic field accelerator of an electron spiral toroid spheromak using an applied magnetic field pulse are presented here. Measurements have shown that when a static magnetic field is applied, accelerations of the ESTSs up 6000 m/s2 have been observed. The theory of self-organized ESTSs has been developed to describe the confinement and stability of self-organized EST's.
Consider the magnetic coil ESTS accelerator shown schematically in
(a) The power supply is characterized by its capacitance C and inductance L.
(b) The solenoid wires are perfect conductors.
(c) The ESTS internal magnetic (self-magnetic) field is much greater than and orthogonal to the applied magnetic field produced by the solenoid.
(d) The EST has such a high conductivity that it shorts the circuit.
Under these assumptions, the entire system can be treated as a circuit consisting of the power supply and the solenoid shorted by the ESTS. The circuit equation for the system is
where LT (z) is the total inductance of the system, and I is the current flowing down the solenoid. Let dL0/dz be the inductance of the solenoid per unit axial length, and then the total inductance can be expressed as
where we have assumed that the solenoid starts at z=0 and z is the axial position of the center of the ESTS. The equation of center-of-mass motion of the ESTS can be derived from magnetohydrodymanics (MHD) (Schmidt, 1979). To summarize, the self-consistent equations governing the ESTS acceleration are
where M is the ESTS mass. These coupled equations can be solved simultaneously to predict the trajectory of the ESTS. It should be noted that equations (3)-(5) have the same form as those obtained and verified (Hammer, et al., 1988) for the compact toroid accelerator reported by (Hammer, et al., 1988; Degnan, et al., 1993; Kiuttu, et al., 1994).
Illustrated in
The present application claims priority to U.S. application No. 61/631,733 filed Jan. 10, 2012 and also claims priority to U.S. application No. 61/710,417 filed on Oct. 5, 2012, the entire contents of these applications being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61710417 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61631733 | Jan 2012 | US |