The present invention relates to gripping devices and drills in micro gravity environments or on walls and ceilings when gravity is present. More in particular, it relates to systems and methods for gravity-independent gripping and drilling.
The main background literature relevant to this invention is in the field of climbing robots. Several robots have defied gravity by climbing up the walls of buildings using specialty gripping feet. For example, the RiSE robot and the spinybot robot use microspines to climb rough manmade walls like brick, stucco, and concrete. Both of these robots, and subsequent perching airplanes, human climbing paddles, and other wall-climbing robots use linear microspines as the gripping mechanism, which is patented. Other climbing robots use dactyls, which are single rigid claws that only work on penetrable surfaces like carpet and cork, and gecko-like adhesives that only work on smooth surfaces like glass.
However, none of these robots is truly gravity-independent because they only work to counter gravity, and would fail in microgravity or in other orientations where the gravity vector is in a different direction (for example climbing on the ceiling).
There is a large field of work in robotic grasping that is tangentially relevant to this work, and is reviewed here. However, this work focuses almost entirely on grasping for manipulation tasks, like gripping objects or using tools in a dexterous manner.
Similarly, there is a very well established state of the art in drilling, even for extraterrestrial robots that is only tangentially relevant to this invention as the drill itself is irrelevant to our invention of a new method of drilling in a gravity-independent manner that is applicable to all drills.
A state of the art for asteroid and comet sampling also exist, but are all single use solutions like darts and other forms of “Touch-and-Go” samplers that do not remain in contact with the surface, but rather bounce off of it and acquire sample during the collision. Other landers that have been proposed for asteroids and comets are in fact gravity dependent like the Rosetta lander and the Hayabusa rover, even though that gravity field is small.
According to a first aspect, a gripping device is described, the gripping device comprising: a center housing; an array of hooks circumferentially distributed around the center housing, the array of hooks adapted to grip a surface on which the array of hooks rest; and one or more actuators connected with the center housing and the array of hooks, the one or more actuators operative to cause the array of hooks to grip or release the surface.
According to a second aspect, a device is described, the device comprising: a substantially ring-shaped mechanism surrounding a gripping device, the substantially ring-shaped mechanism operative to freely spin around the gripping device about an axis normal to a surface upon which the gripping device grips during operation of the gripping device, the substantially ring-shaped mechanism being an interface between the gripping device and a robotic system.
According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, the method includes a) using a multi-directional gripper assembly to anchor an object upon a surface, b) initiating contact between a sub-assembly of the object and the surface, the contact characterized in part by the generation of a reactive force that pushes the object away from the surface, and c) countering the reactive force by using the multi-directional gripper assembly to provide a gravity-independent grip upon the surface at a plurality of locations surrounding the object.
According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a method includes retracting towards a central housing of an object, a plurality of radially-oriented grabber assemblies, the retracting action directed at allowing the plurality of radially-oriented grabber assemblies to opportunistically grab on to irregularities in a surface.
Further aspects of the disclosure are shown in the specification, drawings and claims of the present application.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the description of a few example embodiments, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the disclosure. The components in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed upon clearly illustrating various principles. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Throughout this description, embodiments and variations are described for the purpose of illustrating uses and implementations of the inventive concept. The illustrative description should be understood as presenting examples of the inventive concept, rather than as limiting the scope of the concept as disclosed herein.
One of the greatest challenges in a surface mission in microgravity environments (e.g., on a comet or an asteroid) is anchoring a spacecraft once it has made contact with the surface. This can be especially difficult for small Near Earth Objects (NEOs) where there is virtually no gravity. A recent analysis of NEO targets for a potential Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD) mission indicated that the largest NEOs that were reachable by a spacecraft within a few months were all less than 150 m in equivalent diameter. An object this size has approximately 0.0003% of earth's gravity (e.g., calculated using Itokawa's known density) and an escape velocity of less than 0.5 miles per hour. Any surface mission to an object of this size must anchor to the object to avoid floating away. Further, the anchor must establish its grip without exerting any force on the body that would push the lander, probe, or rover back into outer space.
It can be difficult, if not impossible to slowly drill an anchor into the body as a rock climber might drill a bolt into a cliff wall. The gripper could also be used as an end effector for a long arm that reaches out from a nearby spacecraft for a touch and go type of mission. The gripper would stabilize the arm and allow samples to be collected and in situ science to be done from a fixed platform. In the long term, this style of gripper could even be used as handholds for astronauts trying to move about on and/or near small asteroids.
Drilling a core sample on a body with no gravity can also be a significant challenge. Even drills that are designed to require small preloads like the European Space Agency's drill on the Rossetta mission, SD2, and the Low-Force Sample Acquisition System (LSAS) built by Alliance Spacesystems still need a minimum force of at least 60 N on the coring bit to be effective. On Mars or the moon, these forces are easily opposed by the weight of a rover or lander, but this force must be created by an anchoring mechanism on a NEO. Some embodiments can already grip with a 180 N gripping force, and improvements continue to be made. The gripping mechanism can be useful not only for low gravity bodies, but for steep surfaces on Mars and the moon. The strata of exposed rocky cliff on Mars contain a timeline of geological events in the rock, but are inaccessible by the class of rovers that have flown to date. To access these highly desirable targets requires the ability to anchor to and climb natural rock faces. The clawed toes used in the gripping mechanism were originally developed for climbing rough surfaces like brick and tree bark, but have been expanded in this work to attach to natural rock surfaces. Using an opposed gripping mechanism provides the maximum stability for this type of system, where reliability is critical. In a similar application on Earth, these grippers allow the exploration of cliff faces, cave ceilings, glacial ice features, and underwater reefs and sea floor, or even climbing buildings having, for example, brick walls with improved security (e.g., grip) using the same technology. This gripper can also be used as an under actuated robotic hand for grasping, manipulating, and probing rocks on the surface of a planetary body like Mars or the Moon.
A concern for operations occurring on a near-Earth asteroid are due to the differences in size and mass compared to planetary and lunar missions. Due to their low mass, commonly millions of times less than that of Earth, the gravitational field observed on these bodies is extremely weak, a condition known as microgravity. In microgravity environments, the escape velocity of an object can reach below 10 cm/s, in which case even small forces can be enough to send a robot hurtling into space. Consequently, robots, equipment and even astronauts need a method of anchoring to the asteroid surface to prevent this from occurring.
A fundamental component of what has been referred to as microspine technology is the microspine toe, which will be described in detailed later. The microspine toes can be described as identical planar mechanisms consisting of a rigid frame with elastic flexures or springs that allow them to stretch, acting as suspensions. By embedding sharp steel hook(s) in the toes, a toe can be dragged along a porous surface in an attempt to allow the microspines to opportunistically engage with surface asperities, thereby bearing the load placed on the toe. By way of example and not of limitation, asperities can be defined as pits, ledges, holes, rough spots, and/or slopes on the surface. The elasticity, or compliance, provided by the flexures or springs in each toe allows them to stretch independently of one another so that when hundreds, or potentially thousands, of such hooks engage a surface, there is an increased probability of more microspines anchoring onto asperities, and therefore an increase in the maximum probable load an anchor can support.
The gripper that will be described according to some embodiments of the present disclosure comprises several (e.g., hundreds) microspine toes that each have an independent suspension system which allows the microspine toes to conform to a textured surface (e.g., rock) and find a suitable asperity to grip. Each microspine toe consists of a steel hook embedded in a rigid frame with a compliant suspension system. By arraying tens, hundreds, or thousands, of the microspine toes, large loads can be supported and shared between many attachment points. The hooks can attach to both convex and concave asperities like, for example, pits, protrusions, or even sloped rock faces.
A plurality of microspine toes can be configured adjacent to one another (e.g., arrays of 20-40 microspine toes in a row) such that the plurality of microspine toes are in an opposing configuration so as to grip the surface from all directions, thus resisting, for example the forces of gravity.
However, a single row of a plurality of microspine toes can only grip the surface in one direction. In some embodiments an omni-directional anchor can be implemented using several sets of the plurality of microspine toes (e.g., eight sets of 30 toes each), each set attached to a substantially circular shaped (e.g., octagonal) center housing. Although an octagonal shaped center housing is described in the present embodiment, the person skilled in the art would understand that other shapes and configurations are possible to achieve substantially similar results. Each set of the plurality of microspine toes can be held in place by a leg that acts as a lever with the pivot point at an outer rim of the housing. The center of the housing can be hollow, providing an accessible location for mounting the anchor to the leg of a robot or placing a sampling tool like a coring drill. In some embodiments, additional macro-scale compliance elements can be implemented between each set of toes and the central housing. A latching mechanism can be included to allow the anchor to grip in a zero-power ON state.
The row of microspine toes shown in
As described earlier, in some embodiments, the plurality of microspine toes can be placed within the carriage 102, shown up close in
Turning back to
In some embodiments, the actuator for the gripper 100 can be a hand operated actuator 501 (e.g., manual hand grip), as shown in
In some embodiments, the gripping device 600 can be implemented as shown in
In some embodiments, the gripping device can be part of an overall system, for example, a robot having one or more gripping devices and actuation mechanisms to robotically engage and disengage the gripper, such as the Lemur IIB robot 710 shown in
While the gripper 100 can support large loads normal to the surface and in plane to the surface, the gripper can support less torques or moments. Applying torque to the gripper tends to twist the toes and the array housings causing the hooks to disengage with the surface. Therefore, in order to minimize the chance of this occurring while a robot attempts to use the grippers, an ankle 711 can be implemented with the gripper such that torques are not realized by the gripper. In other words, the ankle 711 distributes the forces caused by the system (e.g., robot) to the gripping elements (e.g., microspine toes, hooks, etc.) in a way that does not cause torques or moments on the gripper. Moreover, the ankle can be configured to spin freely about the axis normal to the wall. For example, when the robot takes a step using a gripping foot, the robot will attach to the rock surface and then rotate its arm, pushing itself up. However, the gripper will remain at a fixed orientation with respect to the wall while the ankle and limb rotate upwards. Therefore, the gripper spins within the ankle 711 while imparting minimal torque on the microspine toes.
In order to improve a success rate of the toes of the gripper engaging with a surface, many hundreds of toes are implemented in the gripper device according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. An ankle mechanism that can allow the gripper device conform to the macroscale orientation of the rock can increase the probability that microspines toes will find suitable asperities in the surface. Additionally, passive compliance is desirable since the orientation of the rock surface directly beneath the gripper can be unknown. Passive compliance to the surface will allow the system (e.g., robot) to climb rock faces without having to visually analyze the topography of the climbing surface. In addition, the ankle can comprise elastic components to bring the gripper back to a neutral position between steps.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure
Springs 702 can be mounted at the top of the housing of the ankle in a radial configuration to bring the gripper back to a neutral position. They are mounted at an upwards angle so that their line of action roughly intersects the axes of both gimbals to ensures that no matter which direction the gripper rotates, the springs always extend rather than compress. The springs 702 can be chosen to have a low spring constant (e.g., 0.78 lbs/in) to avoid inducing large torques on the microspine toes. The springs have sufficient stiffness to be able to keep the gripper substantially horizontal when the ankle is horizontal.
In some embodiments, a linear actuator (e.g., Firgelli L12) can be mounted at the top of the ankle to disengage the microspine from the surface. The linear actuator pulls on wires mounted to each individual microspine array to pull them up and away from the wall. By way of example and not of limitation, a force of approximately 5 pounds can be applied over a 2 inch distance in order to disengage the microspines from a rock surface. Moreover, more than one motor (e.g., linear actuator) can be used in parallel on the gripper so as to allow greater force to be applied to the wires pulling the microspine array.
In some embodiments, a braking mechanism can be implemented in the engagement motor to prevent the motor from rotating when the wires are fully tensioned, thus preventing the motors from backdriving.
In some embodiments, a sliding ring 705 that is adapted to provide rotation about the normal axis to the surface can be mounted exterior of the outer housing as shown in
Differently from the ankles shown in
In the example embodiments shown in
Drilling device 800 includes a drill bit 810 and a reciprocating shaft 815 that can move back and forth in a hollow casing 835 that is a part of a central housing 820. As is known, a minimum force referred to a weight-on-bit (WOB) is required for a drill bit to penetrate a surface. The WOB force is normally countered by gravity when the drilling surface is located in a positive gravity environment such as earth or the moon. However, the WOB force cannot be countered in a zero gravity environment and as a result, drilling device 800 is pushed away from the drilling surface. Multi-dimensional gripper assembly 100 is used to counter the reactive force that is generated when drilling device 800 is operated in a zero gravity environment (as well as in certain low gravity environments).
However, the use of multi-dimensional gripper assembly 100 is not limited to zero gravity or low gravity environments. To elaborate upon this statement, as can be understood, there are many situations in a positive gravity environment, such as on earth, where the positive effects of gravity cannot be exploited to counter the reactive force generated when a prior art drilling device is used to drill a hole in a surface.
As one example of such a situation, when a prior art drilling device is used to drill a hole in a ceiling of a building on earth, gravity tends to make the drilling device fall away from the ceiling rather than helping the drill bit grip the ceiling and advantageously assist the drill bit enter the ceiling. In other words, earth's gravity supplements the WOB force rather than countering it. Similarly, when a prior art drilling device is used to drill a hole in a vertical wall (or at certain other angles) in the building, gravity tends to supplement the WOB force, which in combination with the weight of the device, tends to make the device fall towards the ground rather than help grip the surface.
In contrast, multi-dimensional gripper assembly 100 provides a gripping action irrespective of the presence of gravity. This advantageous feature of multi-dimensional gripper assembly 100 is referred to herein as a “gravity-independent” grip because the gripping action permits drilling operation to be carried out in a variety of gravity environments (positive, low, or zero gravity for example) and also at a variety of penetration angles.
The relationship between the various reactive forces can be defined by the following set of equations, which are applicable to the two leg assemblies shown in
Rdrill=Ry1+Ry2 (1)
Rx1=Rx2 (2)
However, it will be understood that a more universal equation that is applicable to multiple (“n”) leg assemblies (rather than merely the two leg assemblies shown in the cross-sectional view of
Rdrill=Ry1+Ry2+Ryn (3)
Equation (2) above, which is applied to the single pair of leg assemblies shown in
A cable (not shown) with a series elastic element is used to load each of the array of microspines 830 contained in carriage 825. Carriage 825 is attached to a dowel pin 845 that is free to slide within a sleeve bearing 850. A conical spring 855 returns carriage 825 to a fully extended position between each application. By applying tension to the cable, the microspines are dragged along surface 805 thereby providing opportunities to catch on to irregularities (small pits, bumps, and slopes on surface 805). This tension also creates a moment about a pivot point (not shown) where leg assembly 840 is connected to central housing 820, thereby pushing the microspines into the rock surface during engagement. A torsion spring around this pivot point biases the carriages into irregularities in surface 805, such that the microspines retain anchor even in zero gravity or suspended configurations. By varying the length of the dowel pin and the angle at which the cable pulls on carriage 825, the magnitude of these two effects can be traded against one another. The relationship is described by:
ΣM+=Mk+T*d3−Rx*d2−Ry*d1 (4)
where T is the tension in the cable, Mk is the moment created by the torsion spring, Rx and Ry are the reaction forces of the rock acting on the hook, and d1, d2, and d3 are the lengths of relevant moment arms.
In block 15, contact is initiated between a sub-assembly of the object and the surface. One example of a sub-assembly is drill bit 810 described above. As further described above, this contact is characterized in part by the generation of a reactive force that pushes the object away from the surface.
In block 20, the reactive force is countered by using the multi-directional gripper assembly to provide a gravity-independent grip upon surface 805 at a plurality of locations surrounding the object. The nature of this gripping action at a plurality of points (in a substantially circular manner around the central housing 820) coupled with this action taking place in a gravity-independent manner differentiates this method from prior art methods wherein one or more gripping points are used to compensate for the effects of gravity.
Specifically, for example, in the case of a prior art robot (or human) climbing up a wall, the gripping action is typically enabled only above the prior art robot (or human) so as to prevent the prior art robot (or human) from falling off the wall. Anchoring is not needed on the wall below the prior art robot (or human) because gravity provides assistance in climbing the wall. However, as can be understood, this top-anchor only approach would not be effective in a zero gravity environment and the prior art robot (or human) would float away from the wall whenever a part of the climbing robot (or human) pushes against the wall in a horizontal or angular direction.
In contrast, a robot in accordance with the disclosure provides a gripping action on multiple locations not just above the robot but below the robot as well. The use of these multiple gripping points allows the robot to provide a gripping action irrespective of the presence or absence of gravity and irrespective of the angle of force applied against the surface.
Furthermore, unlike in the zero gravity case, a prior art robot climbing up a wall is not subjected to a reactive force that pushes the robot away from the wall to any significant extent. In contrast, a prior art robot operating on Mars would be pushed off the Martian surface in a variety of directions opposing any force that is applied by the prior art robot on any type of surface (horizontal, vertical, inverted, or angular).
The examples set forth above are provided to give those of ordinary skill in the art a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the embodiments of the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their disclosure. Modifications of the above-described modes for carrying out the disclosure may be used by persons of skill in the art, and are intended to be within the scope of the following claims. All patents and publications mentioned in the specification may be indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the disclosure pertains. All references cited in this disclosure are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference had been incorporated by reference in its entirety individually.
It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to particular methods or systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The term “plurality” includes two or more referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
A number of embodiments of the disclosure have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/536,417, filed on Sep. 19, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/539,377, filed on Sep. 26, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/599,549, filed on Feb. 16, 2012, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The invention described herein was made in the performance of work under a NASA contract, and is subject to the provisions of Public Law 96-517 (35 USC 202) in which the Contractor has elected to retain title.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4172610 | Johnson | Oct 1979 | A |
4345658 | Danel et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4705314 | Moore | Nov 1987 | A |
4729253 | Rosheim | Mar 1988 | A |
4790718 | Vickers | Dec 1988 | A |
4975020 | Kaasa | Dec 1990 | A |
5356187 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5551525 | Pack et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
7762362 | Cutkosky et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20070034957 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080164080 | Asbeck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Parness, A., Anchoring Foot Mechanisms for Sampling and Mobility in Microgravity, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2011. |
Abe, S. et al. Mass and Local Topography Measurements of Itokawa by Hayabusa, Science, vol. 312. No. 5778, 2006, 1344-1347. |
Arvidson, R. et al. “Overview of the spirit mars exploration rover mission to gusev crater: Landing site to backstay rock in the columbia hills.” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 111, 2006. |
Asbeck, A. et al. “Climbing walls with microspines,” IEEE ICRA, 2006. |
Asbeck, A. et al., “Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays,” Int J Robot Res, vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1165-1179, 2006. |
Augustine, N. et al. Seeking a Human Spaceflight Program Worthy of a Great Nation, NASA, Washington, DC, 2009. |
Backes, P. et al. “Experimental results of rover-based coring and caching,” IEEE Aerospace, 2011. |
Bar-Cohen, Y. et al. “Ultrasonic/sonic driller/corer (USDC) as a sampler for planetary exploration,” Aerospace Conference, 2001, IEEE Proceedings. , vol. 1, No., pp. 1/263-1/271 vol. 1, 2001. |
“Biomimetics & Dexterous Manipulation Laboratory”, http://bdml.stanford.edu retrieved on Apr. 9, 2013. |
Bretl, T. et al., “Free-climbing with a multi-use robot,” Experimental Robotics IX, vol. 21, pp. 449-458, 2006. |
Cham, J. G., Bailey, S. A., Clark, J. E., Full, R. J. and Cutkosky, M. R., “Fast and Robust: Hexapedal Robots via Shape Deposition Manufacturing,” The International Journal of Robotics Research. vol. 21 Issue 10—Publication Date: Oct. 1, 2002. |
Cushing, G. et al. “Caves on mars: Candidate sites for astrobiological exploration,” Astrobiology Science Conference, 2010. |
Cushing, G. et al. “Themis observes possible cave skylights on mars,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 34, 2007. |
Cutkosky, M. R. and Kim, S., “Design and fabrication of multi-material structures for bioinspired robots,” The Royal Society. 2011. |
Desbiens, A. et al. “Landing, perching and taking off from vertical surfaces,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011. |
Desbiens, A. L. et al. “Hybrid aerial and scansorial robotics,” IEEE ICRA, 2010. |
Des Marais, D. et al. The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap, Astrobiology, vol. 8, No. 4, 2008. |
Finzi, A. et al., SD2—How to Sample a Comet, Space Science Reviews, vol. 128, 2007, 281-299. |
Fujiwara A. et al., The Rubble-Pile Asteroid Itokawa as Observed by Hayabusa, Science, vol. 312, No. 5778, 2006, 1330-1334. |
Gripper Demo.MOV from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v4QRRP5rjE posted on Dec. 17, 2010 and retrieved on May 9, 2013. |
Huntsberger, T. et al. “Tressa: Teamed robots for exploration and science on steep areas,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 24, pp. 1015-1031, 2007. |
Kennedy, B. et al. “Lemur Ilb: A robotic system for steep terrain access,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 33, pp. 265-269, 2006. |
Kim, S. et al. “Design and fabrication of multi-material structures for bio-insired robots,” Journal of the Royal Society, p. 18, 2008. |
Kim, S. et al. “Spinybot II: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines,” Advanced Robotics, 2005. ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 601-606, Jun. 2005. |
Landis, R. et al. A Piloted Orion Flight to a Near-Earth Object: A Feasibility Study, AIAA Space Ops, 2009. |
Lauretta, D. Astrobiology Research Priorities for Primitive Asteroids, posted on NAI website 2009. |
Leveille, R. et al. “Lava tubes and basaltic caves as astrobiological targets on earth and mars: A review,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 58, pp. 592-598, 2010. |
McEwen, A. et al., “Seasonal flows on warm martian slopes,” Science, vol. 333, pp. 740-743, 2011. |
Merz, R. et al. Shape Deposition Manufacturing Proceedings, of the 1994 Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1994. |
Nesnas, I. et al. “Axel mobility platform for steep terrain excursions and sampling on planetary surfaces,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2008. |
Chang, K., Obama vows renewed space program, The New York Times, Apr. 15, 2010. |
Okon, A. et al. “Mars science laboratory drill,” 40th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, 2010. |
Saito, J. et al. “Detailed images of asteroid 25143 itokawa from hayabusa,” Science, vol. 312, pp. 1341-1344, 2006. |
Sharma, I. et al. “Dynamical passage to approximate equilibrium shapes for spinning, gravitating rubble asteroids,” Icarus, vol. 200, pp. 304-322, 2009. |
Spenko, M. et al. “Foot design and integration for bioinspired climbing robots,” Proceedings of SPIE, 2006. |
Spenko, M. et al. Biologically Inspired Climbing with a Hexapedal Robot, J. of Field Robotics, vol. 25, No. 4-5, 2008, 223-242. |
Squires, S. et al. “Vision and voyages for planetary science in the decade 2013-2022,” National Research Council Publications, 2011. |
Squyres, S. et al. “Exploration of victoria crater by the mars rover opportunity,” Science, vol. 324, pp. 1058-1061, 2009. |
Veverka, J. et al. “The landing of the near-shoemaker spacecraft on on asteroid 433 eros,” Nature, vol. 413, pp. 390-393, 2001. |
Yano, H. et al., Touchdown of the Hayabusa Spacecraft at the Muses Sea on Itokawa, Science, vol. 312, No. 5778, 2006 , 1350-1353. |
Younse, P. et al. “A sample handling, encapsulation, and containerization subsystem concept for mars sample caching missions,” International Planetary Probe Workshop, 2010. |
Zacny, K. et al. Drilling Systems for Extraterrestrial Subsurface Exploration Astrobiology, vol. 8, No. 3, 2008. |
Parness, A. et al. Microgravity Coring: A Self-Contained Anchor and Drill for Consolidated Rock. IEEEAC Paper #1335, Version 1, Updated Sep. 14, 2011. |
Parness, A. et al. Gravity-Independent Mobility and Drilling on Natural Rock Using Microspines. Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International. May 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130068527 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61536417 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61539377 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61599549 | Feb 2012 | US |