Embedded systems may be bundled with statically and dynamically linked libraries. These libraries may optionally be open source. The libraries may also contain vulnerabilities. The vulnerable libraries may be exploited by malicious actors to take control of end-user systems. For example, Internet-of-Things botnets may take advantage of multiple different vulnerabilities that affect Internet-of-Things device firmware to exploit and take over devices. As a result, for many of these botnets the choice of exploiting a particular device solely depends upon the presence of vulnerabilities affecting this device.
The identification of vulnerable linked libraries becomes even more critical with the rise of consumer off-the-shelf Internet-of-Things devices as instances of firmware shipped with these devices often share many libraries to perform different tasks. These tasks may optionally include web applications, image processing, kernel drivers, etc. With the tendency of manufacturers to reuse the same firmware images, with perhaps only minor changes at the application layer, across multiple device types, and with the tendency to take development shortcuts, once one of these libraries is deemed vulnerable it can potentially impact a large number of device types and brands. The present disclosure, therefore, identifies and addresses a need for systems and methods for identifying software vulnerabilities in embedded device firmware.
As will be described in greater detail below, the present disclosure describes various systems and methods for identifying software vulnerabilities in embedded device firmware. In one example, a computer-implemented method for protecting users may include (i) collecting a firmware image for an Internet-of-Things device, (ii) extracting library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device, (iii) identifying a true version of a library specified in the firmware image by checking a ground truth database that records confirmed values for true versions for previously encountered libraries, and (iv) performing a security action to protect a user from a security risk based on identifying the true version of the library specified in the firmware image.
In one embodiment, the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device is collected from a vendor website. In one embodiment, the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device is collected from the vendor website using a screen scraping component. In one embodiment, the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device is collected from the vendor website by a web crawler using the screen scraping component.
In some examples, extracting the library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device may include extracting the library dependencies from entries within a program file header. In one embodiment, the entries within the program file header identify libraries requested by a corresponding program file. In one embodiment, the ground truth database is generated at least in part by collecting from public repositories binary distributions of libraries that are labeled with true versions. In one embodiment, the ground truth database is generated at least in part by collecting source code distributions.
In some examples, identifying the true version of the library specified in the firmware image by checking the ground truth database may include: (i) extracting a set of exported symbols for the library specified in the firmware image, (ii) checking the extracted set of exported symbols against a list of sets of symbols produced for the previously encountered libraries, respectively, according to the ground truth database, and (iii) identifying a match between the set of exported symbols for the library specified in the firmware image and an entry in the list of sets of symbols produced for the previously encountered libraries. In one embodiment, the security action may include comparing a release date for the firmware image against a release date for the true version of the library specified in the firmware image to give an indication of how well-maintained the Internet-of-Things device is.
In one embodiment, a system for implementing the above-described method may include (i) a collection module, stored in memory, that collects a firmware image for an Internet-of-Things device, (ii) an extraction module, stored in memory, that extracts library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device, (iii) an identification module, stored in memory, that identifies a true version of a library specified in the firmware image by checking a ground truth database that records confirmed values for true versions for previously encountered libraries, (iv) a performance module, stored in memory, that performs a security action to protect a user from a security risk based on identifying the true version of the library specified in the firmware image, and (v) at least one physical processor configured to execute the collection module, the extraction module, the identification module, and the performance module.
In some examples, the above-described method may be encoded as computer-readable instructions on a non-transitory computer-readable medium. For example, a computer-readable medium may include one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, may cause the computing device to (i) collect a firmware image for an Internet-of-Things device, (ii) extract library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device, (iii) identify a true version of a library specified in the firmware image by checking a ground truth database that records confirmed values for true versions for previously encountered libraries, and (iv) perform a security action to protect a user from a security risk based on identifying the true version of the library specified in the firmware image.
Features from any of the embodiments described herein may be used in combination with one another in accordance with the general principles described herein. These and other embodiments, features, and advantages will be more fully understood upon reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
The accompanying drawings illustrate a number of example embodiments and are a part of the specification. Together with the following description, these drawings demonstrate and explain various principles of the present disclosure.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference characters and descriptions indicate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements. While the example embodiments described herein are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, the example embodiments described herein are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the present disclosure covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present disclosure is generally directed to systems and methods for identifying software vulnerabilities in embedded device firmware. Generally speaking, the disclosed subject matter may improve upon related systems by improving the accuracy or efficiency of identifying version numbers for corresponding libraries within Internet-of-Things devices and corresponding firmware. Accurately and efficiently identifying the version numbers may enable a corresponding security system to protect the user from vulnerabilities that are associated with specific versions of these libraries. Accurately and efficiently identifying the version numbers may also enable the security system to gauge or measure how well-maintained the Internet-of-Things device is from a security perspective.
The following will provide, with reference to
In certain embodiments, one or more of modules 102 in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Example system 100 in
Computing device 202 generally represents any type or form of computing device capable of reading computer-executable instructions. In some examples, computing device 202 may correspond to any computing device that may successfully perform method 300 of
Server 206 generally represents any type or form of computing device that is capable of facilitating the performance of method 300 in coordination with computing device 202. Additional examples of server 206 include, without limitation, security servers, application servers, web servers, storage servers, and/or database servers configured to run certain software applications and/or provide various security, web, storage, and/or database services. Although illustrated as a single entity in
Network 204 generally represents any medium or architecture capable of facilitating communication or data transfer. In one example, network 204 may facilitate communication between computing device 202 and server 206. In this example, network 204 may facilitate communication or data transfer using wireless and/or wired connections. Examples of network 204 include, without limitation, an intranet, a Wide Area Network (WAN), a Local Area Network (LAN), a Personal Area Network (PAN), the Internet, Power Line Communications (PLC), a cellular network (e.g., a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network), portions of one or more of the same, variations or combinations of one or more of the same, and/or any other suitable network.
As illustrated in
Collection module 104 may collect the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device in a variety of ways. In some examples, collection module 104 may collect the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device as part of a batch process for collecting a multitude of firmware images for multiple different respective Internet-of-Things devices.
In one embodiment, the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device is collected from a vendor website. In further examples, collection module 104 may collect the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device from the vendor website using a screen scraping component. Additionally, or alternatively, collection module 104 may, as part of a web crawler or in coordination with a web crawler, collect the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device from the vendor website at least in part by crawling to the vendor website. One illustrative example of such a screen scraping component may include SCRAPY.
In some examples, when using a screen scraping component, collection module 104 may also optionally apply one or more vendor-specific plug-ins. The vendor-specific plug-ins may enable collection module 104 to parse, and successfully extract, the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device. For example, the vendor-specific plug-in may provide collection module 104 with information indicating to collection module 104 how to successfully read, and download firmware images from, a corresponding vendor website.
In some examples, the collection of firmware images collected by collection module 104 may include raw firmware images and/or additional metadata. The additional metadata may optionally specify values of information such as a release date and/or such as version numbers.
Collection module 104 may also optionally engage in a pre-processing stage with respect to the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device. Collection module 104 may perform the pre-processing stage at least in part by unpacking the firmware image by extracting one or more binary files. The unpacking procedure may be based on a software tool that enables one to search a given binary image for embedded files and/or executable code. One illustrative example of such a software tool may include BINWALK, which enables one to successfully read, browse, parse, and/or extract information from a binary image. In addition to applying the software tool, such as BINWALK, collection module 104 may also optionally apply one or more additional patches, which may improve an overall success rate.
As a concluding part of the pre-processing stage, collection module 104 may optionally identify one or more binary files in the unpacked firmware image. Collection module 104 may identify the binary files by checking one or more of the corresponding magic numbers against an ELF signature (EXECUTABLE AND LINKABLE FORMAT signature).
At step 304, one or more of the systems described herein may extract library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device. For example, extraction module 106 may, as part of computing device 202 in
Extraction module 106 may perform step 304 in a variety of ways. For example, extraction module 106 may optionally extract the library dependencies from the firmware image for the Internet-of-Things device by extracting the library dependencies from entries within a program file header.
Optionally, extraction module 106 may, after one or more binary files have been identified, extract static and/or dynamically linked library dependencies. Extraction module 106 may extract these dependencies from header information. For example, in the context of dynamically linked libraries, corresponding entries within a header may include DT_NEEDED entries. Such entries may specify that one or more library files is requested or required to successfully compile or execute the corresponding program file.
In some examples, the unpacking procedure performed by collection module 104 and/or extraction module 106 may fail to restore an exact file system structure. For example, collection module 104 may unpack the firmware image and fail to restore the exact file system structure due to missing mount information. To overcome this deficiency, or otherwise compensate for this deficiency, extraction module 106 may optionally identify names that are specified within header entries, such as DT_NEEDED entries. Extraction module 106 may also optionally search over the entire unpacked firmware package for one or more detected instances of these names that were specified within the header entries. Similarly, any symbolic links that may have been encountered during library identification may be resolved by extraction module 106 in a parallel manner to that described above regarding the header entries.
At step 306, one or more of the systems described herein may identify a true version of a library specified in the firmware image by checking a ground truth database that records confirmed values for true versions for previously encountered libraries. For example, identification module 108 may, as part of computing device 202 in
Identification module 108 may identify the true value for the version of the library specified in the firmware image in a variety of ways. In particular, to pinpoint the true version of the library identified in the firmware image, identification module 108 may first obtain, or access, a ground truth database. In some examples, identification module 108 may obtain or access the ground truth database at least in part by generating the ground truth database.
Generally speaking, identification module 108 may optionally leverage the ground truth database to build, access, or reference a symbol database. In some examples, the ground truth database may include the symbol database. The symbol database may optionally list the sets of symbols of each and every library version previously encountered and recorded within the corresponding database. When identifying the true version of a newly encountered library, or unknown library, a set of exported symbols for the newly encountered library may be extracted in a parallel manner. Accordingly, identification module 108 may compare the newly extracted set of exported symbols for the version of the unknown library and then compare the newly extracted set to the symbol database in an attempt to ascertain and identify a match.
In some examples, identification module 108 may detect a match by calculating a measurement of Jaccard similarity, such as a Jaccard index or Jaccard distance. In these examples, identification module 108 may optionally compare the measurement of similarity against a corresponding threshold that specifies a level of similarity over which a newly encountered library is considered a match for one of the previously encountered libraries recorded within the corresponding database.
In one embodiment, the ground truth database is generated at least in part by collecting from public repositories binary distributions of libraries that are labeled with true versions. Additionally, or alternatively, the ground truth database is generated at least in part by collecting source code distributions. In further examples, identification module 108 may optionally generate part or all of the ground truth database, including optionally the symbol database.
In more general terms, identification module 108 may identify the true version of the library specified in the firmware image by performing a series of steps with respect to the ground truth database. First, identification module 108 may optionally extract a set of exported symbols for the library specified in the firmware image. Second, identification module 108 may optionally check the extracted set of exported symbols against a list of sets of symbols produced for the previously encountered libraries, respectively, according to the ground truth database. Lastly, identification module 108 may also optionally identify a match between the set of exported symbols for the library specified in the firmware image and an entry in the list of sets of symbols produced for the previously encountered libraries.
As used herein, the term “symbol” may generally refer to an alphanumeric or other character string that uniquely identifies a function that is made accessible through a corresponding library. Generally speaking, the list of symbols produced by a corresponding library may map, in a one-to-one mapping, with each and all of the functions made accessible through the library. In other words, each symbol may uniquely identify a corresponding function. In some examples, each symbol may correspond to, or include, an ordinal value in the context of library and executable files.
In contrast, ground truth database 250 may include data identifying previously encountered versions of libraries, including information indicating the identity or name of each library, the value for the version of each instance of each library (e.g., a confirmed or verified version value), and/or a corresponding set of exported symbols produced by each respective version of the library recorded within the ground truth database (e.g., for each library-version pair there is a corresponding set of exported symbols). In the example of
At step 308, one or more of the systems described herein may perform a security action to protect a user from a security risk based on identifying the true version of the library specified in the firmware image. For example, performance module 110 may, as part of computing device 202 in
Performance module 110 may perform the security action in a variety of ways. In some examples, the security action may include comparing a release date for the firmware image against a release date for the true version of the library specified in the firmware image to give an indication of how well-maintained the Internet-of-Things device is. In these examples, performance module 110 may thereby obtain a measurement of how well-maintained the corresponding product is. Accordingly, performance module 110 may also optionally inform a user or administrator, such as a user 260 shown in
Additionally, or alternatively, performance module 110 may also optionally perform the security action at least in part by checking the true version for the library against one or more vulnerability databases. Such vulnerability databases may specify known vulnerabilities for corresponding versions of libraries. Accordingly, performance module 110 may check, and confirm, that the true version of the library has at least one known vulnerability that was previously recorded within a corresponding vulnerability database. In this manner, the user or administrator associated with the Internet-of-Things device may be informed about a security risk and potentially perform one or more remedial actions to protect himself or herself from this risk.
The above discussion provided a general overview of the disclosed systems and methods in the context of method 300 shown in
Internet-of-Things devices may often be bundled with libraries, including open source libraries, that contain vulnerabilities. Most Internet-of-Things botnets are packaged with exploits. Packaging the botnets with exploits may generate multitudes of vulnerabilities. The botnets may also be updated as new vulnerabilities are discovered. This updating procedure may provide the primary Internet-of-Things device infection mechanism that poses a security threat today.
In some examples, vulnerable libraries may be reused across a wide range of devices. Such a range of devices may include open-source libraries, software development kits, white-label brands, etc. Reusing the vulnerable libraries across a wide range of devices may increase the impact of these vulnerabilities and corresponding exploits.
One approach to address related problems is based on dynamic analysis. In this approach, real Internet-of-Things device/firmware emulation is performed. Additionally, fuzzing of values is also performed. Unfortunately, this approach generally involves or requires executing or operating corresponding Internet-of-Things devices.
A second approach to address related problems is based on static analysis. In this approach, static analysis and/or symbolic execution is performed on candidate code that is being evaluated. Importantly, this second approach is tedious, prone to false positives, and also potentially involves or requires access to corresponding source code.
Similarly, within the second approach, a security analyst may search for vulnerable code inside of the firmware image by performing a binary DIFF operation. Unfortunately, this variant of the second approach may be limited to one or two libraries due to the amount of manual work that would be involved. In particular, the second approach in this aspect may involve compiling libraries with all possible compilation parameters, etc.
To improve upon such approaches, this application discloses systems and methods that may extract static and/or dynamically linked libraries. The subject matter of this application may also identify true versions for these libraries. The subject matter of this application may use a symbol-based version identification procedure, as further discussed above. Use of the symbol-based version identification may avoid costly binary DIFF operations, which may preferably be reserved as a last resort. Use of the symbol-based version identification may also increase accuracy, and enable scaling to hundreds of libraries. Use of the symbol-based version identification may also only involve one binary per library version. This approach may also enable a security vendor to focus on libraries that are actually used with real Internet-of-Things device firmware.
One approach disclosed within this application may begin with firmware collection and unpacking. In this example, an Internet-of-Things device vendor website may be scraped by a program such as a web crawler using a screen scraping component. Accordingly, the program may extract annotated firmware images, which may specify optionally metadata including a product, version, release date, etc. This approach may proceed with an enhanced version of BINWALK-based unpacking. In some examples, this improved approach to identifying versions of libraries may focus on LINUX-based firmware.
After successfully collecting firmware images, the subject matter of this application may extract libraries within the firmware images. Dynamically linked libraries may be identified through corresponding header entries, such as DT-ENTRIES. The disclosed systems and methods may leverage these header entries to identify and/or download corresponding library binaries.
Additionally, or alternatively, libraries that are identified through static linking may be extracted using heuristic-based user-code or library boundary identification. In other words, the disclosed subject matter may search for instances of known libraries in statically linked binaries and thereby successfully infer corresponding boundaries.
Subsequently, the disclosed subject matter may identify the true version of the newly encountered library. To set this up, the disclosed subject matter may collect binary distributions of libraries or source code. In these examples, one binary per version may be sufficient to successfully identify the true versions of newly encountered libraries. From this collected data, the disclosed subject matter may generate a ground truth database of symbols exported by each library (e.g., by each library-version instance). In particular, the disclosed subject matter may compute a Jaccard distance between libraries in firmware images and the ground truth database, and the disclosed subject matter may evaluate perfect or sufficient matches, as further discussed above.
Lastly, as a security action to protect a corresponding user, administrator, or customer, the disclosed subject matter may correlate extracted libraries with a database of known vulnerabilities in previously encountered library version instances. Additionally, or alternatively, the disclosed subject matter may enable a user or security analyst to successfully study an Internet-of-Things device vendor's development/maintenance practices, where slower or less secure maintenance may be brought to the attention of a potential user or customer to protect them from corresponding security risks.
Computing system 510 broadly represents any single or multi-processor computing device or system capable of executing computer-readable instructions. Examples of computing system 510 include, without limitation, workstations, laptops, client-side terminals, servers, distributed computing systems, handheld devices, or any other computing system or device. In its most basic configuration, computing system 510 may include at least one processor 514 and a system memory 516.
Processor 514 generally represents any type or form of physical processing unit (e.g., a hardware-implemented central processing unit) capable of processing data or interpreting and executing instructions. In certain embodiments, processor 514 may receive instructions from a software application or module. These instructions may cause processor 514 to perform the functions of one or more of the example embodiments described and/or illustrated herein.
System memory 516 generally represents any type or form of volatile or non-volatile storage device or medium capable of storing data and/or other computer-readable instructions. Examples of system memory 516 include, without limitation, Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), flash memory, or any other suitable memory device. Although not required, in certain embodiments computing system 510 may include both a volatile memory unit (such as, for example, system memory 516) and a non-volatile storage device (such as, for example, primary storage device 532, as described in detail below). In one example, one or more of modules 102 from
In some examples, system memory 516 may store and/or load an operating system 540 for execution by processor 514. In one example, operating system 540 may include and/or represent software that manages computer hardware and software resources and/or provides common services to computer programs and/or applications on computing system 510. Examples of operating system 540 include, without limitation, LINUX, JUNOS, MICROSOFT WINDOWS, WINDOWS MOBILE, MAC OS, APPLE'S 10S, UNIX, GOOGLE CHROME OS, GOOGLE'S ANDROID, SOLARIS, variations of one or more of the same, and/or any other suitable operating system.
In certain embodiments, example computing system 510 may also include one or more components or elements in addition to processor 514 and system memory 516. For example, as illustrated in
Memory controller 518 generally represents any type or form of device capable of handling memory or data or controlling communication between one or more components of computing system 510. For example, in certain embodiments memory controller 518 may control communication between processor 514, system memory 516, and I/O controller 520 via communication infrastructure 512.
I/O controller 520 generally represents any type or form of module capable of coordinating and/or controlling the input and output functions of a computing device. For example, in certain embodiments I/O controller 520 may control or facilitate transfer of data between one or more elements of computing system 510, such as processor 514, system memory 516, communication interface 522, display adapter 526, input interface 530, and storage interface 534.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Additionally or alternatively, example computing system 510 may include additional I/O devices. For example, example computing system 510 may include I/O device 536. In this example, I/O device 536 may include and/or represent a user interface that facilitates human interaction with computing system 510. Examples of I/O device 536 include, without limitation, a computer mouse, a keyboard, a monitor, a printer, a modem, a camera, a scanner, a microphone, a touchscreen device, variations or combinations of one or more of the same, and/or any other I/O device.
Communication interface 522 broadly represents any type or form of communication device or adapter capable of facilitating communication between example computing system 510 and one or more additional devices. For example, in certain embodiments communication interface 522 may facilitate communication between computing system 510 and a private or public network including additional computing systems. Examples of communication interface 522 include, without limitation, a wired network interface (such as a network interface card), a wireless network interface (such as a wireless network interface card), a modem, and any other suitable interface. In at least one embodiment, communication interface 522 may provide a direct connection to a remote server via a direct link to a network, such as the Internet. Communication interface 522 may also indirectly provide such a connection through, for example, a local area network (such as an Ethernet network), a personal area network, a telephone or cable network, a cellular telephone connection, a satellite data connection, or any other suitable connection.
In certain embodiments, communication interface 522 may also represent a host adapter configured to facilitate communication between computing system 510 and one or more additional network or storage devices via an external bus or communications channel. Examples of host adapters include, without limitation, Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) host adapters, Universal Serial Bus (USB) host adapters, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1394 host adapters, Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA), Parallel ATA (PATA), Serial ATA (SATA), and External SATA (eSATA) host adapters, Fibre Channel interface adapters, Ethernet adapters, or the like. Communication interface 522 may also allow computing system 510 to engage in distributed or remote computing. For example, communication interface 522 may receive instructions from a remote device or send instructions to a remote device for execution.
In some examples, system memory 516 may store and/or load a network communication program 538 for execution by processor 514. In one example, network communication program 538 may include and/or represent software that enables computing system 510 to establish a network connection 542 with another computing system (not illustrated in
Although not illustrated in this way in
As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, storage devices 532 and 533 may be configured to read from and/or write to a removable storage unit configured to store computer software, data, or other computer-readable information. Examples of suitable removable storage units include, without limitation, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, an optical disk, a flash memory device, or the like. Storage devices 532 and 533 may also include other similar structures or devices for allowing computer software, data, or other computer-readable instructions to be loaded into computing system 510. For example, storage devices 532 and 533 may be configured to read and write software, data, or other computer-readable information. Storage devices 532 and 533 may also be a part of computing system 510 or may be a separate device accessed through other interface systems.
Many other devices or subsystems may be connected to computing system 510. Conversely, all of the components and devices illustrated in
The computer-readable medium containing the computer program may be loaded into computing system 510. All or a portion of the computer program stored on the computer-readable medium may then be stored in system memory 516 and/or various portions of storage devices 532 and 533. When executed by processor 514, a computer program loaded into computing system 510 may cause processor 514 to perform and/or be a means for performing the functions of one or more of the example embodiments described and/or illustrated herein. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the example embodiments described and/or illustrated herein may be implemented in firmware and/or hardware. For example, computing system 510 may be configured as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) adapted to implement one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein.
Client systems 610, 620, and 630 generally represent any type or form of computing device or system, such as example computing system 510 in
As illustrated in
Servers 640 and 645 may also be connected to a Storage Area Network (SAN) fabric 680. SAN fabric 680 generally represents any type or form of computer network or architecture capable of facilitating communication between a plurality of storage devices. SAN fabric 680 may facilitate communication between servers 640 and 645 and a plurality of storage devices 690(1)-(N) and/or an intelligent storage array 695. SAN fabric 680 may also facilitate, via network 650 and servers 640 and 645, communication between client systems 610, 620, and 630 and storage devices 690(1)-(N) and/or intelligent storage array 695 in such a manner that devices 690(1)-(N) and array 695 appear as locally attached devices to client systems 610, 620, and 630. As with storage devices 660(1)-(N) and storage devices 670(1)-(N), storage devices 690(1)-(N) and intelligent storage array 695 generally represent any type or form of storage device or medium capable of storing data and/or other computer-readable instructions.
In certain embodiments, and with reference to example computing system 510 of
In at least one embodiment, all or a portion of one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein may be encoded as a computer program and loaded onto and executed by server 640, server 645, storage devices 660(1)-(N), storage devices 670(1)-(N), storage devices 690(1)-(N), intelligent storage array 695, or any combination thereof. All or a portion of one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein may also be encoded as a computer program, stored in server 640, run by server 645, and distributed to client systems 610, 620, and 630 over network 650.
As detailed above, computing system 510 and/or one or more components of network architecture 600 may perform and/or be a means for performing, either alone or in combination with other elements, one or more steps of an example method for identifying software vulnerabilities in embedded device firmware.
While the foregoing disclosure sets forth various embodiments using specific block diagrams, flowcharts, and examples, each block diagram component, flowchart step, operation, and/or component described and/or illustrated herein may be implemented, individually and/or collectively, using a wide range of hardware, software, or firmware (or any combination thereof) configurations. In addition, any disclosure of components contained within other components should be considered example in nature since many other architectures can be implemented to achieve the same functionality.
In some examples, all or a portion of example system 100 in
In various embodiments, all or a portion of example system 100 in
According to various embodiments, all or a portion of example system 100 in
In some examples, all or a portion of example system 100 in
In addition, all or a portion of example system 100 in
In some embodiments, all or a portion of example system 100 in
According to some examples, all or a portion of example system 100 in
The process parameters and sequence of steps described and/or illustrated herein are given by way of example only and can be varied as desired. For example, while the steps illustrated and/or described herein may be shown or discussed in a particular order, these steps do not necessarily need to be performed in the order illustrated or discussed. The various example methods described and/or illustrated herein may also omit one or more of the steps described or illustrated herein or include additional steps in addition to those disclosed.
While various embodiments have been described and/or illustrated herein in the context of fully functional computing systems, one or more of these example embodiments may be distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, regardless of the particular type of computer-readable media used to actually carry out the distribution. The embodiments disclosed herein may also be implemented using software modules that perform certain tasks. These software modules may include script, batch, or other executable files that may be stored on a computer-readable storage medium or in a computing system. In some embodiments, these software modules may configure a computing system to perform one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein.
In addition, one or more of the modules described herein may transform data, physical devices, and/or representations of physical devices from one form to another. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the modules recited herein may transform a processor, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, and/or any other portion of a physical computing device from one form to another by executing on the computing device, storing data on the computing device, and/or otherwise interacting with the computing device.
The preceding description has been provided to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize various aspects of the example embodiments disclosed herein. This example description is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The embodiments disclosed herein should be considered in all respects illustrative and not restrictive. Reference should be made to the appended claims and their equivalents in determining the scope of the present disclosure.
Unless otherwise noted, the terms “connected to” and “coupled to” (and their derivatives), as used in the specification and claims, are to be construed as permitting both direct and indirect (i.e., via other elements or components) connection. In addition, the terms “a” or “an,” as used in the specification and claims, are to be construed as meaning “at least one of.” Finally, for ease of use, the terms “including” and “having” (and their derivatives), as used in the specification and claims, are interchangeable with and have the same meaning as the word “comprising.”