The invention pertains to digital data processing and, more particularly, by way of non-limiting example, to immersive interaction with actual and simulated environments. The invention has application, for example, in operation, maintenance and emergency response training for plants and other facilities utilizing process, environmental control, or other industrial and/or non-industrial control.
Facilities dependent on process, environmental, industrial and other control technologies are becoming increasingly complex. This includes multi-acre product assembly plants, pharmaceuticals factories, oil refineries, power plants and other large industrial operations. It also includes sky scrapers and other building complexes with intricate power, climate control, people-mover and other infra-structure “plants.” These are among the facilities that rely on “control” or “control systems” to monitor their characteristics and, thereby, to insure that output, processing, quality and/or efficiency remain within desired limits over the course of time.
Those systems may include many components, from field devices and controllers to workstations and other, more powerful digital data processing apparatus, the functions of which may overlap. Field devices include temperature, flow and other sensors that measure characteristics of the subject device, process or system. They also include valves and other actuators that mechanically, electrically, magnetically, or otherwise effect the desired control. Controllers generate settings for the control devices based on measurements from sensor-type field devices. Controller operation is typically based on a “control algorithm” that maintains a controlled system at a desired level, or drives it to that level, by minimizing differences between the values measured by the sensors and, for example, a set-point defined by the operator. Workstations, control stations and the like are typically used to configure and monitor the process as a whole. They are often also used to execute higher-levels of process control, e.g., coordinating groups of controllers and responding to alarm conditions occurring within them.
One or more of these control system components may include software and/or hardware logic to monitor characteristics of the facilities that they control and to automatically adjust their operational parameters to insure these limits are achieved. Others display alarms or other indicia of the characteristics, leaving responsibility for adjustment to plant operators or other personnel.
In a petroleum refinery, for example, thousands of controllers physically distributed over acres of the plant may monitor and actuate tens of thousands sensors, actuators and other field devices to transport raw incoming crude for processing. The controllers are, in turn, coordinated by workstations and larger digital data processing equipment to move desired quantities of the crude at desired rates to available boilers and distillate columns. Field devices in and around those boilers and columns monitor the processing parameters to maximize distillate production and to move to the resultant gasoline, diesel fuel and other co-products for downstream processing. Plant personnel monitor and control these operations from workstations in a central control room and strategically disposed control stations. They also perform continual walk-throughs of the refinery for on-hand inspection, adjustment, and maintenance of the equipment. In the event of emergency, emergency response crews execute manual and machine overrides while, at the same time, rescuing those in harm's way.
Whether for a petroleum refinery, an assembly plant, or other complex facility, training personnel for operation and maintenance tasks can be very expensive, especially, given the intricacies introduced and imposed by the underlying process, environmental, industrial and other control technologies. These expenses are compounded when training emergency responders, some of who may have little or no day-to-day familiarity with the facility, are taken into account. In addition to training, there is considerable added expense for putting personnel in on the “floor” to conduct walk-throughs for routine monitoring, maintenance and the like.
An object of the invention is to provide improved systems and methods for digital data processing.
A related object is to provide such systems and methods for immersive interaction with actual and simulated environments.
A still further related object is to provide such systems and methods for use in the operation, maintenance and emergency response.
Another such related object is to provide such systems and methods as can be used training personnel for operation, maintenance and emergency response.
Yet a still further related object is to provide such systems and methods as can be used in facilities utilizing process, environmental control, or other industrial and/or non-industrial control.
Still yet a further object is to provide such systems and methods as reduce costs associated with operation, maintenance and emergency response and/or training personnel therefore.
The foregoing are among the objects attained by the invention, which provides in some aspects systems for interaction with a control environment that includes controlled equipment along with control devices that monitor and control that controlled equipment. According to some of those aspects, such a system includes first functionality that generates output representing an operational status of the controlled equipment, as well as second functionality that generates output representing an operational of one or more of the control devices. An engine coordinates the first functionality and to the second functionality to generate an operational status of the control environment.
A virtual reality environment generates, as a function of that operational status and one or more physical aspects of the control environment, a three-dimensional (“3D”) display of the control environment. The virtual reality environment is responsive to user interaction with one or more input devices to generate the 3D display so as to permit the user to interact with at least one of the control devices and the controlled equipment at least as represented by the 3D display of the control environment. The engine applies to at least one of the first and second functionality indicia of those interactions to discern resulting changes in the operational status of the control environment. It applies indicia of those changes to the virtual reality environment to effect corresponding variation in the 3D display of the control environment—i.e., variation indicative of the resulting change in the control environment.
The virtual reality environment, according to aspects of the invention, displays the control environment as the participant would see it in actuality, i.e., as if he/she were really there. As a result, systems according to the invention a user to experience, via the 3D display of the control environment, interaction with and travel through (e.g., a “walk-through”) the control environment—which maybe actual or simulated. They can be used to monitor and control operational parameters of the environment and to support training of plant or other of personnel, e.g., first responders or other safety personnel.
Further aspects of the invention provide systems, for example, as described above, in which physical aspects of the control environment are reflected in a CAD/CAM database and/or a three-dimensional laser scan of at least a portion of the control environment, i.e., of one or more of the controlled equipment and/or control devices. In related aspects of the invention, those physical aspects may be reflected in a plurality of two-dimensional images of at least a portion of the control environment. This may be, for example, a database containing hundreds or thousands of images of a plant that includes the controlled equipment and/or control devices, and functionality is provided in some aspects of the invention for generating a three-dimensional representation of the control environment from those images.
Still other aspects of the invention provide systems as described above in which the virtual reality environment augments the 3D display of the control environment by (i) superimposing graphics on representations of one or more controlled equipment and/or one or more control devices, and/or (ii) altering the representational displays of controlled equipment, control devices and/or other objects to give the user the impression of seeing into, through and/or around them.
The superimposed graphics, which can include, for example, graphs, equations and other visual aids, can be based on simulated and/or actual operational data for the controlled equipment and/or control devices. The superimposed graphics can also include still and/or video images taken by fixed or mobile cameras (including, by way of non-limiting example, still or video cameras included in mobile phones, personal digital assistants, or PDAs and other such devices that maybe carried by personnel in or around the control environment.
The altered representational displays can, likewise, be based on such simulated and/or actual operational data, e.g., representing the inner workings and/or “behind the scenes” operation of the control devices, the controlled equipment (and the materials they process).
Benefits of system according to foregoing (and other) aspects of the invention are their ability to generate 3D displays of the control environment that not only represent the behavior of the controlled equipment and/or control devices, but do so in a manner that is in agreement with the actual or simulated condition of the control environment.
In still other aspects, the invention provides systems as described above in which the first and/or second functionalities are coupled to any of configuration and a modeling database (“configuration” database), an application database and a runtime database. Such a configuration database can include, for example, one or more control strategies for one or more of the controlled equipment and/or control devices. The application and/or runtime databases can include, for example, simulated and/or actual current operational data for the controlled equipment and/or control devices. Those database(s) may include, instead or in addition, simulated and/or actual historical operational data for the devices and/or equipment.
Yet, in still other aspects, the first functionality includes dynamic simulation software or other functionality that simulates operation of one or more of the controlled equipment. That simulation software may be, for example, a solver or other system for solving mathematical systems of equations.
In related aspects of the invention, the second functionality comprises software or other functionality that simulates operation of one or more of the control devices.
Still further aspects of the invention provide a systems as described above that additionally include a control room workstation or other digital data processor that monitors and/or controls user interaction with the control devices and/or controlled equipment as represented in the 3D display of the control environment. Such a workstation can be used, for example, by a supervisor, training instructor, co-traninee or other person. To that end, the control room digital data processor can be adapted to enable its users to witness effects of interaction between users of the virtual reality environment with respect to at least one of the control devices and the controlled equipment, e.g., as represented by the 3D display. Likewise, the virtual reality environment can be adapted to enable its users to witness effects of actions by users of the control room digital data processor, again, for example, with respect to at least one of the control devices and the controlled equipment, e.g., as represented by the 3D display.
Still further aspects of the invention provide methods for operating and using systems as described above.
These and other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the description that follows.
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which
That facility is represented, here, by processing stations 20a-20d, etc., of the type used in a pharmaceuticals factory, though, in other embodiments, the facility may be an assembly plant, oil refinery, power plant or other industrial or non-industrial operation (such as, by way of non-limiting example, a building complex) that relies on control to monitor characteristics of the controlled equipment, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, itself, to insure that output, processing, quality and/or efficiency remain within desired limits over the course of time.
Returning to the drawing, illustrative station 20a of the illustrative pharmaceuticals factory includes mixing chamber 22, fluid inlets 24, 26, fluid outlet 28, paddle 30, cooler 32, and cooler inlet 34. The other processing stations, of which there may be zero or more, may be similarly configured or otherwise.
Illustrated system 10 includes networked control devices that monitor and controlled equipment 22-32, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, itself, as discussed above. The control devices of illustrated system 10 perform such monitoring and control in accord with process control techniques of the type known in the art. In other embodiments, the control devices may instead or in addition exercise environmental control, or other industrial and/or non-industrial control technologies.
The illustrated control devices include actuator-type field devices (“actuators”), such as the valves depicted as controlling inlets and outlets 24-28 and 34. A further actuator is shown controlling paddle 30. These and other actuators utilized by the control system are constructed and operated in the conventional manner, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. The actuators of the illustrated embodiment operate under control of respective field device controllers, labeled CTL, that are also constructed and operated in the conventional manner to provide initialization, signal conditioning and communications functions.
Rather than using separate controllers CTL, the actuators can be of the intelligent variety and can include integral microprocessors or other digital data processing apparatus for control, initialization, signal conditioning, communications and other control-related functions. For sake of convenience, the label CTL is used regardless of whether the control-related functionality is integral to the actuators (e.g., as in the case of intelligent actuators) or otherwise.
The Illustrated control devices include sensor-type field devices (“sensors”), such as temperature sensor 29 that monitors a temperature, level or other characteristic of fluid in chamber 22. The sensor 29, as well as other sensors and sensing apparatus utilized by the system, are constructed and operated in the conventional manner known in the art, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. They can be coupled to the control network via a transmitter or other interface device INT that, too, is constructed and operated in the conventional manner, as modified in accord the teachings hereof. The interface devices facilitate initialization, signal conditioning and communications between the sensors and the control system. As above, one or more sensors can be of the intelligent variety, incorporating integral microprocessors or other digital data processing capabilities for initialization, signal conditioning, communications and other control-related functions. Here, too, the label INT is used in reference to the control-related functionality, regardless of whether embodied in an intelligent transmitter or otherwise.
The networked control devices include one or more controllers 36 that monitor and control respective aspects of the hypothetical pharmaceuticals plant in the conventional manner, as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. The controllers can comprise mainframe computers, workstations, personal computers, special-purpose hardware or other digital data processing apparatus capable of performing such monitoring and control functions, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof. Preferred controllers are constructed and operated in the manner of the CP control processors commercially available from the assignee hereof, as modified in accord with the teachings herein.
The control system 10 includes a variety of devices that serve as user interfaces and that provide configuration and/or control functions, all in the conventional manner as modified in accord with the teachings hereof. Illustrated for these purposes are workstation 40, laptop computer 42 and handheld computer 44. These devices can provide configuration and control functions directly, as in the case of workstation 40, or in cooperation with server devices, e.g., as in the case of handheld computer 44 and server 46. Apparatus 40-44 can couple with the control network directly, e.g., via bus or network connection, or indirectly, e.g., via satellite, wireless connection or modem connection.
Illustrative control devices 36-46, CTL and INT are coupled for communications via a medium that permits at least selected ones of the devices to communicate with one another. To this end, in the illustrated embodiment those devices are coupled via one or more networks 48 that are, preferably, IP-based such as, by way non-limiting example, Ethernets (e.g., local area networks, wide area networks, metropolitan area networks, and the like, by way of non-limiting example). The network(s) can include, as indicated in the drawing, multiple segments such as various wide and local area networks. They may also include high and/or low bandwidth components, such as phone lines, and low and/or high latency components, such as geosynchronous satellites networks. One or more of the control devices 36-46 and/or networks 48 can be further coupled to the Internet 50 or other networks via internetwork server 47, or otherwise.
Control system 10, including illustrative devices 36-48, may be of the type known in the art and commercially available, by way of non-limiting example, from the assignee hereof. One such control system is described, again, by way of non-limiting example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,788,980, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
As per convention in the art, one or more databases contain model(s) of the control system 10 and apparatus at the facility controlled by it and, more particularly, by way of example, models of controlled equipment 22-32, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46—including the control strategy executed by them. Thus, for example, such a model enumerates field devices, control devices, controllers and other apparatus that perform control, specifying their interrelationships and the information transferred between and among them, as well as detailing the calculations and methodology they apply for purposes of control.
Such models can be generated by configurators of the type known in the art (e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,096,465, entitled “Process Control Configuration System with Parameterized Objects,” and 6,788,980, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Control Using Control Devices That Provide a Virtual Machine Environment and That Communicate Via an IP Network,” the teachings of both which are incorporated herein by reference), or otherwise. These models can be stored in central databases and/or distributed among control devices 36-46, e.g., as disclosed in aforementioned, incorporated-by-reference U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,096,465 and 6,788,980, as well as in PCT Application WO03/89,995, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Process, Factory-Floor, Environmental, Computer Aided Manufacturing-Based or Other Control System With Real-Time Data Distribution,” the teachings of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
In addition to configuration or modeling database(s), the system can include one or more application databases and/or runtime databases, e.g., of the type disclosed in aforementioned, incorporated-by-reference PCT Application WO03/89,995, to maintain inter alia current and/or historical operational or other information regarding the control system 10 and apparatus at the facility controlled by it and, more particularly, by way of example, controlled equipment 22-32, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46—including the control strategy for executed by them.
The foregoing configuration/modeling, application and/or runtime databases are represented for illustrative purposes only by elements 52a-52e in the drawings. Though shown distributed among only several of the control devices 36-46 in the drawing, in practice these may be consolidated in fewer or distributed among more such devices or otherwise, all in the conventional manner known in the art.
As noted above, all or parts of the environment illustrated in
By way of further non-limiting example, processing stations 20a-20d, control devices 36-46, and configuration/modeling database may be actual, yet, their operation may be simulated. Such is the case, for example, in a pre-operational factory or other environment. In such a case, application and/or runtime databases, e.g., 52a-52e, contain at least some simulated current and/or historical operational information. Simulation of the operation an actual environment of the type illustratively depicted in
By way of still further non-limiting example, processing stations 20a-20d, control devices 36-46, and configuration/modeling database may be simulated, as may their operation. Such is the case, for example, in a factory or other environment that is under design. Simulation of processing stations and/or control devices may be performed using computer aided design and manufacturing packages of the type known in the art, while simulation of the operation of such stations and devices may be performed using software packages of the type discussed above, all as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof.
Illustrated system 54 includes a control room 56 with operator console(s) 56A, dynamic simulation software 58 and workstation 58A, control device simulation software 60, a simulation engine 62, a virtual reality environment (including a VR engine) 64, coupled for communication via one or more networks 66 or otherwise. Other embodiments may include lesser or more elements and may be configured other than as shown here.
Illustrated control room 56 represents a conventional control room of the type used in connection with process control and other control technologies. In the illustrated embodiment, this can be used to monitor and control operational parameters of the simulated environment 5, e.g., in the same manner with which such a control room monitors and controls operational parameters of an actual environment 5. In this regard, control room 56 can be used to support training of personnel in virtual reality environment 64 and/or it itself (the control room) can be provide an environment for training (e.g., of control room personnel).
Dynamic simulation software 58 generates output representing the operational status of the plant and or other environment and more particularly, by way of non-limiting example, of the (one or more pieces of) controlled equipment 22-32 that make up the plant/environment. That software 58 represents dynamic simulation software of the type commercially available in the marketplace, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof, though other simulation packages known in the art can be used, as well or instead (again, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof). In addition to supporting activities of a training instructor (e.g., setting up training exercises for trainees in the virtual reality environment 64) via a supervisory workstation, the simulation software 58 includes “solver” and other simulation support tools to simulate operation of an actual plant or other environment. To this end, the simulation software 58 can include or otherwise be coupled to a configuration/modeling database 70 of the type described above that models, for example, the control system 10 and apparatus at the facility controlled by, as well as the materials or other things processed by them. Software 58 may execute on the aforesaid supervisory workstation and/or on other suitable digital data processing apparatus of the type known in the marketplace (including, by way of non-limiting example, the aforesaid control room workstations).
Control device simulation software 60 generates output representing the operational status of the control devices (e.g., 36-46, CTL and INT) used to monitor and/or control controlled equipment (e.g., 22-32). That software 58 simulates operation of controllers and other control devices of a simulated environment 5. The software 60 represents control simulation software of the type commercially available in the marketplace, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof, though other simulation packages known in the art can be used, as well or instead (again, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof). The simulation software 60 can include or otherwise be coupled to a configuration/modeling database (not shown) of the type described above that models, for example, control strategies executed by the simulated control devices. Software 60 may execute on a dedicated workstation of the type shown in the drawing and/or on other suitable digital data processing apparatus (including, by way of non-limiting example, the aforesaid supervisory workstation and/or control room workstations).
Simulation engine 62 works with and coordinates activities of the simulation software 58, 60 and control room workstations to simulate operation of an environment 5 of the type described above for incorporation into an immersive display of that environment (e.g., an immersive display of the physical layout of that environment) in virtual reality environment 64. In the illustrated embodiment, simulation engine represents a software package commercially available from the assignee hereof under the trade name SIM4ME, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof—though other simulation engines available in the marketplace can be used, as well or instead (again, as adapted in accord with the teachings hereof).
Virtual reality environment 64 provides a three-dimensional or other immersive display of the environment 5, including not only the physical layout of that environment but also a reproduction of the operation of the control system 10 and apparatus at the facility controlled by it and, more particularly, by way of example, controlled equipment 22-32, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46. Simply put, in some embodiments, the virtual reality environment 64 provides an immersive display of the environment 5 that permits the trainee and/or other user (e.g., maintenance personnel, emergency first responders, and so forth) to experience walkthroughs and other interactions with the environment as if he/she were really there.
That display can be conveyed to participants 72—particularly, for example, trainees—via stereoscopic headgear of the type used for VR displays. Alternatively, or in addition, it can be displayed via projections on walls of a VR “room.” In addition to display of the simulated environment 5, virtual reality environment 64 can provide sounds and other audible queues associated with that environment. Moreover, it can support trainee interaction with the simulated environment 5 via haptic devices, gaming devices (e.g., Nintendo Wii™ controllers), joysticks, wands, mice, keyboards and the like, all as represented in the drawings by input and output elements 74. Such devices can facilitate navigation and/or interactive manipulation of the simulated environment.
Virtual reality environment 64 accepts input from simulation engine 62 representing the status of the environment 5, including, of processing stations 20a-20d, controlled equipment 22-32, the materials or other things processed by them, the processes by which they are processed, and/or the elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46. The input may reflect that status for all aspect of the environment or portions thereof, e.g., the status of equipment, materials, control devices, etc., in a vicinity of the participant in the virtual “world” being displayed within VR environment 64.
In order to display the physical layout of the environment 5 to the participant, virtual reality environment 64 includes or is coupled with one or more databases that can include, by way of example, (i) a CAD/CAM representation of the processing stations 20a-20d, controlled equipment 22-32, and/or elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46 (or a portion/subset of one or more of the foregoing), (ii) a 3D laser scan-representation of the processing stations 20a-20d, controlled equipment 22-32, and/or elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46 (or a portion/subset of one or more of the foregoing), and/or (iii) 2D photographs of an actual or simulated environment 5 showing the processing stations 20a-20d, controlled equipment 22-32, and/or elements of the control system 10, including, for example, control devices 36-46 (or a portion/subset of one or more of the foregoing).
Virtual reality environment 64 can utilize one or more of those databases to construct immersive displays of the environment 5 and, thereby, to allow the participant to navigate through it and interact, for example, with the controlled equipment and control devices in it. Thus, for example, virtual reality environment 64 can utilize a database of thousands of actual (or simulated) photographs of a plant to display 3D “reconstructions” of it with sufficient realism to make the participant feel as if he/she is really there. Software for performing such reconstruction—or, more precisely, for generating a 3D virtual reality display from 2D images—is available in the marketplace under the trade name Studio Max™, although, other technologies providing such capabilities can be used instead or in addition.
Coupled with input from the simulation engine 62, this permits the participant not only to passively “walk through” the environment, but also to actively participate with it. Thus, actions (such as operating controlled equipment and/or control devices) by the participant in the virtual environment displayed to him/her are conveyed by the simulation engine 62 to software 58, 60 to discern how those actions effect changes in the simulated environment 5 (e.g., changes in levels in tanks, variables on display, etc.) which changes are, in turn, fed back by the simulation engine 62 to the virtual reality environment to generate variations in the VR display of the environment—thus, providing action-reaction feedback to the participant.
By way of non-limiting example, then, a trainee who uses a mouse or other input device to simulate opening a valve in the simulated environment displayed by the virtual reality environment 64 can see (and, with sound effects, hear) the results of that action, e.g., as reflected by VR-simulated displays of gauges on a downstream storage tank displayed in environment 64. Likewise, by way of further non-limiting example, a trainee and/or other user (e.g., maintenance personnel, emergency first responders, and so forth) who fails to react properly to an alarm signaled in the VR environment can witness, in the safety of the VR environment, the simulated rupture of a piece of equipment and resultant flood fire.
In some embodiments, the virtual reality environment 64 displays the simulated environment 5 not only as the participant would see it in actuality (i.e., as if he/she were really there), but also augments that display. This can include superimposing graphs, equations and other visual aids on controlled equipment and/or control devices (e.g., and particularly, for example, on those equipment/devices affected by the participants actions).
This can also include superimposing still and/or video images taken concurrently (e.g., in “real time”) or at a prior time by fixed or mobile cameras, including, by way of non-limiting example, still or video cameras 90 (
An illustration showing one type of augmented display of the type described above is provided, by way of non-limiting example, in
Augmented displays generated by the virtual reality environment can also include, by way of non-limiting example, altered the display of controlled equipment and/or control devices (or other aspects of the environment 5) to allow the participant to “see” into, through or around objects—something the participant would not be able to do in actuality. Returning to a preceding example, this “augmented” reality can be used, for example, to permit a trainee and/or other user (e.g., maintenance personnel, emergency first responders, and so forth) who uses a mouse or other input device to simulate opening a valve in the simulated environment to see through the walls of downstream storage tank as it fills with liquid.
The augmentation, whether in the form of superimposed graphics and/or see-through (or other altered-display) equipment, can be based on simulated and/or actual operational data for the controlled equipment and/or control devices (as well, as noted above, on still and/or video images acquired concurrently and/or at a prior time by cameras in or around the environment 5). This results in displays of the simulated environment that not only represent the behavior of the controlled equipment and/or control devices, but do so in a manner that is in agreement with actual or simulated conditions of the environment. Continuing the immediately preceding example, such augmented-reality displays generated by the virtual reality environment 64 permit a trainee and/or other user (e.g., maintenance personnel, emergency first responders, and so forth), for example, to see “through” the walls of the storage tank not only to see how opening a valve in the simulated environment causes a downstream storage tank to fill with liquid, but also to see how the rate-of-flow and viscosity of that liquid are affected temperatures, pressures and/or other actual (or simulated) conditions within the upstream and downstream equipment. This is similarly true, by way of example, in regard to the graph 82 shown in
In preferred embodiments, these experiences by participants in the virtual reality environment 64 can be connected with those of personnel in the control room 56. Thus, for example, the effects of actions taken by personnel in the control room can be witnessed by participants in the virtual reality environment 64, and vice versa. This can be utilized to improve the training, awareness and/or cooperation of all involved.
Further advantages of the systems and methods described above are that they provide for improved training and/or awareness by merging simulation, e.g., provided by software 58-62, and control room emulation, e.g., provided by control room 56, with 3D visualization, e.g, provided by virtual reality environment 64, based on real time computation, e.g., provided by software 58-62 to support bi-directional feedback between the participant and the simulated environment—or “action/reaction” mode interactions.
Such systems and methods can be used not only in support of training plant personnel, but also emergency responders, and others. In addition, they can be used on connection with maintenance and/or asset management functions of environment 5—particularly, where it is an actual (and not a simulated) environment. Thus, for example, personnel who are readying for a maintenance “run” through a plant can, first, take a simulated run in the virtual reality environment 64 representing it and, thereby, better familiarize and ready themselves for the actual maintenance run to follow. Such simulated runs can include not only VR displays of equipment to be maintained, upgrade and/or removed, but can also provide for simulated manipulation (e.g., removal) of that equipment using mice, game controllers or other input devices supplied with the environment 64.
The aforesaid utilization of system 54 in support of maintenance and/or asset management is supplemented, in some embodiments, by providing coupling the simulation engine 62 and/or VR environment 64 with “back office” asset and maintenance databases 70. The engine 62 and/or environment 62 can utilize information from those databases to highlight for plant personnel taking simulated run-throughs equipment to be worked or otherwise acted upon.
System 54 can, moreover, be coupled to SIMNET and/or other wireless (or wired networks) to facilitate identification of equipment in need of maintenance, upgrading and so forth. Thus, for example, by coupling the simulation engine 62 and/or VR environment 64 with SIMNET-generated data, the engine 62 and/or environment 62 can generate a VR display for plant personnel highlighting equipment requiring action.
System 54 can, still further, be utilized for people-tracking, e.g, in support of regular maintenance features as well as in support of emergency procedures. Thus, for example, by coupling the simulation engine 62 and/or VR environment 64 to a data stream indicating the location of personnel in the environment 5 (e.g., an actual plant), the engine 62 and/or environment 64 can generate a VR display for highlighting the location of personnel equipment requiring action. Such a data stream can be generated, by way of non-limiting example, based on GPS-, wireless-, RFID-, walkie-talkie-, or other technologies known in the art.
System 54 can be utilized both for team and individual training. Thus, as noted above, it can be used to coordinate the actions and communications of personnel in the virtual reality training environment 64 and control room 56. It can also be used to coordinate the actions and communications of multiple personnel in the virtual reality training environment 64. Conversely, it can be used to simultaneously training multiple such personnel in the virtual reality training environment 64, with any of their individual actions affecting the VR simulations displayed to the others.
Investigation and/or Analysis (e.g. VR Crisis Control Room)
As noted above, the virtual reality environment 64 can augment the display of the simulated environment 5, e.g., by superimposing graphics (including still and/or video images) on representations of the controlled equipment and/or control devices and/or by altering its presentation of that equipment and/or devices to allow the participant to “see” into, through or around them. In accord with the discussion of
Augmented displays which show comparative operation of the environment and, more particularly, for example of the controlled equipment and/or control devices therein, can be used for the foregoing purposes and other purposes, as well. More particularly, by way of non-limiting example, augmented displays that allow the user to compare actual operation of the environment 5 with simulated operation of that environment 5—and, more particularly, by way of non-limiting example, to compare actual and simulated operation of one or more of the controlled equipment and/or control devices—can facilitate investigation and/or analysis of environment operation, e.g., for crisis control and other purposes. As above, such actual and/or simulated operation can be discerned from, for example, operational data maintained in application and/or runtime databases 52a-52 and/or from the configuration database 52a-52e and/or from cameras in or around the environment 5.
An example of an augmented display showing comparative operation, e.g., of actual and simulated operation of environment 5, is presented in
The foregoing is by way of example. As noted, comparative operation can be used for other purposes, as well, e.g., training, planning (e.g., plant design), and so forth. Moreover, it will be appreciated that comparative operation may be shown in other ways, e.g., by other superimposed graphics, by see-through (or other altered-display) equipment/devices, and so forth. Thus, continuing the example of
A more complete understanding of the system 54 may be attained by reference to the discussion below, in which system 54 as practiced in one embodiment of the invention is alternatively referred to as “the System”.
The System delivers a high-fidelity, unit-specific Immersive Training Simulator suitable for operating at operator-selected speeds (e.g., real-time or faster) and capable of training operators on start-up, shutdown, normal and/or faulted operations. The System includes one complete model of the reference plant including process and controls, a full set of instructor functions as well as the virtual plant environment. The System consists of the plant simulation, the control simulations, the Virtual Plant Environment (a/k/a virtual reality environment, simulation computer hardware, trainee hardware stations and the Instructor Station, as described in more detail below.
General
The System includes a Graphical User Interface (GUI) necessary to operate, and maintain a complete and fully functional the Immersive Training Simulator without the needs to recompile code when new module connections are made. Mathematical models with 3D graphical models of the system in object form determine the simulated behavior resembling reality so that complete control room operators and filed operators interactions are always possible. Simulated malfunctions are realistic “in nature” representing the result of defined equipment failures or other specifically defined causes.
The System is capable of performing the following:
Plant Simulation
The simulator (a/k/a simulation engine 62) is capable of reproducing all modeled aspects of the reference plant. The mathematical models are based on first principles and generate all data and variables required for output to external devices or needed by other simulation systems. The simulator realistically responds to control room operator action during start-up, shutdown, or any normal and abnormal operation and malfunction condition, within the scope of the simulation.
Virtual Plant—VR ENGINE (a/k/a Virtual Reality Environment)
The purpose of the VR Engine is “to run” an environment that is photorealistic and richly detailed, with realistic “look and feel” objects and illuminations, but running in synchronism with the simulation engine 62 and, thus, for example, it can create the virtual (or simulated) environment at the operator-selected speeds (e.g., real-time or faster). A real time program gives the possibility to let the user move and interact freely within the environment, without being bound to prefixed paths or animations as it happens with a more conventional non-real time rendering. Graphics are adopted both to produce and to visualize 3D real time contents. Such technology permits the environment to be rendered 60 times per second, while a classic non-real time rendering approach can take one hour just to process/render one single frame of the environment. Collision geometry, interactive actions/reactions, trends popup or transparent equipments are available.
Control System Simulation
Control system simulation provides an identical representation and functionality of the distributed control system (DCS) configuration, logic and graphics as they are implemented in the real plant.
Instructor Station
A graphic-based instructor station provides the following control and monitoring features:
Performance—Steady State Fidelity
Steady state fidelity for the simulator relates to matching the model-predicted performance with reference plant data under full production values and turndown conditions. For the training simulator, the reference data is comprised of a steady state simulation of the plant using a steady state simulator for critical parameters. Plant measurement or equipment design data for non-critical parameters are used when not available from the steady state simulation.
Performance—Transient Fidelity
The system accurately simulates instructor-initiated transients such that an operator is not able to notice significant differences from the real plant, subject to the modeling scope defined herein. The critical and non-critical computed values correspond to the actual plant parameters in direction to those expected and will not violate the physical laws of nature.
Performance—System Accuracy
The dynamic precision and immersive “touch” of the ITS Models responses are such that operators and process engineers gain quantitative as well as qualitative process knowledge.
The System provides the trainees with a very realistic representation of the actual process units, in such a manner that there is no significant difference between operating on the System or the real plant.
Typically details on objects are available with accuracy as per “human view” at a distance of 25 cm.
Performance—Malfunctions
The System supports a wide range of malfunctions as standard. Malfunctions could impact control room operators, field operators or both. Typically, approximately up to five custom malfunctions can be selected for validation, since malfunction validation can be highly time-consuming for complex process.
Performance—Plant Design & Operating Limits
Events, which progress beyond plant design and operation limits, may be possible with the System In order to avoid ‘negative’ training that would result from operation during such events, indications are provided to alert the instructor when the certain parameters go outside design and operating limits.
Advantages the systems and methods as described above include the following
1. Increase production
2. Control material costs
3. Control energy costs
4. Maintain plant safety and security
5. Ensure environmental and regulatory accountability
6. Lower training costs and start-up time
7. Decrease environmental impact of use of actual or simulated environments, e.g., by decreasing the risks associated with unplanned releases into the atmosphere and other environmental contaminations.
Described above are systems and methods meeting the foregoing objects. It will be appreciated that the embodiment illustrated and described herein are merely examples of the invention and other embodiments incorporating changes thereto fall within the scope thereof. Thus, by way of non-limiting example, it will be appreciated that the augmented displays that include still and/or video images acquired by fixed and/or mobile cameras can be supplemented with or supplanted by sounds acquired by such cameras or audio acquisition equipment. In view thereof, what we claim is:
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/074,472, filed Jun. 20, 2008, entitled “Immersive Training Simulator,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/155,160, filed Feb. 25, 2009, entitled “Systems and Methods for Immersive Interaction with Actual and/or Simulated Facilities for Process, Environmental and Industrial Control.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
3665172 | Spaargaren et al. | May 1972 | A |
3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
3802590 | Culver | Apr 1974 | A |
3810119 | Zieve et al. | May 1974 | A |
3825905 | Allen, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
3959772 | Wakasa et al. | May 1976 | A |
4006464 | Landell | Feb 1977 | A |
RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4096566 | Borie et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4276593 | Hansen | Jun 1981 | A |
4302820 | Struger et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4312068 | Goss et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4323966 | Whiteside et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4347563 | Paredes et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4351023 | Richer | Sep 1982 | A |
4377000 | Staab | Mar 1983 | A |
4410942 | Milligan et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4413314 | Slater et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4423486 | Berner | Dec 1983 | A |
4428044 | Liron | Jan 1984 | A |
4435762 | Milligan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4443861 | Slater | Apr 1984 | A |
4456997 | Spitza | Jun 1984 | A |
4466098 | Southard | Aug 1984 | A |
4471457 | Videki, II | Sep 1984 | A |
4488226 | Wagner, Jr. et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4493027 | Katz et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4609995 | Hasebe | Sep 1986 | A |
4612620 | Davis et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4615001 | Hudgins, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4628437 | Poschmann et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4633217 | Akano | Dec 1986 | A |
4639852 | Motomiya | Jan 1987 | A |
4641269 | Japenga et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4641276 | Dunki-Jacobs | Feb 1987 | A |
4648064 | Morley | Mar 1987 | A |
4649479 | Advani et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4663704 | Jones et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672530 | Schuss | Jun 1987 | A |
4675812 | Capowski et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4682158 | Ito et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682304 | Tierney | Jul 1987 | A |
4683530 | Quatse | Jul 1987 | A |
4692859 | Ott | Sep 1987 | A |
4692918 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4703421 | Abrant et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4704676 | Flanagan et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4709325 | Yajima | Nov 1987 | A |
4719593 | Threewitt et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727477 | Gavril | Feb 1988 | A |
4733366 | Deyesso et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740955 | Litterer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742349 | Miesterfeld et al. | May 1988 | A |
4750109 | Kita | Jun 1988 | A |
4770841 | Haley et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4790762 | Harms et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800512 | Busch | Jan 1989 | A |
4805107 | Kieckhafer et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4806905 | McGowan, III et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816996 | Hill et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817094 | Lebizay et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4839854 | Sakami et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4872106 | Slater | Oct 1989 | A |
4885707 | Nichol et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4896290 | Rhodes et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897777 | Janke et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
RE33162 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1990 | E |
4910658 | Dudash et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910691 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
4918690 | Markkula, Jr. et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4924462 | Sojka | May 1990 | A |
4926158 | Zeigler | May 1990 | A |
4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
4940974 | Sojka | Jul 1990 | A |
4958277 | Hill et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959774 | Davis | Sep 1990 | A |
4965717 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4965742 | Skeirik | Oct 1990 | A |
4965880 | Petitjean | Oct 1990 | A |
4991076 | Zifferer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4991170 | Kem | Feb 1991 | A |
5008805 | Fiebig et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5050165 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5068778 | Kosem et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5089927 | Bulan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089974 | Demeyer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5109692 | Fitzgerald | May 1992 | A |
5121318 | Lipner et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122948 | Zapolin | Jun 1992 | A |
5124908 | Broadbent | Jun 1992 | A |
5129087 | Will | Jul 1992 | A |
5131092 | Sackmann et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136704 | Danielsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5138708 | Vosbury | Aug 1992 | A |
5140677 | Fleming et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146589 | Peet, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
5151930 | Hagl | Sep 1992 | A |
5151978 | Bronikowski et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151981 | Westcott et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159673 | Sackmann et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162986 | Graber et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163055 | Lee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164894 | Cunningham-Reid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166685 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167009 | Skeirik | Nov 1992 | A |
5168276 | Huston et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5168441 | Onarheim et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170340 | Prokop et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175698 | Barbanell | Dec 1992 | A |
5175829 | Stumpf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181978 | Ochiai | Jan 1993 | A |
5193175 | Cutts, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197114 | Skeirik | Mar 1993 | A |
5202961 | Mills et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212784 | Sparks | May 1993 | A |
5218187 | Koenck et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224203 | Skeirik | Jun 1993 | A |
5233615 | Goetz | Aug 1993 | A |
5245704 | Weber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249274 | Sztipanovits et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251125 | Karnowski et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255367 | Bruckert et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257208 | Brown et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258999 | Wernimont et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271013 | Gleeson | Dec 1993 | A |
5276901 | Howell et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283729 | Lloyd | Feb 1994 | A |
5289365 | Caldwell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291390 | Satou | Mar 1994 | A |
5295258 | Jewett et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295263 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297143 | Fridrich et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301346 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5302952 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303227 | Herold et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303375 | Collins et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303392 | Carney et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307346 | Fieldhouse | Apr 1994 | A |
5307372 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307463 | Hyatt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309556 | Sismilich | May 1994 | A |
5310998 | Okuno | May 1994 | A |
5317726 | Horst | May 1994 | A |
5325339 | Yost et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327144 | Stilp et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335186 | Tarrant | Aug 1994 | A |
5335221 | Snowbarger et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339362 | Harris | Aug 1994 | A |
5339680 | Bronkal et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347181 | Ashby et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349343 | Oliver | Sep 1994 | A |
5349678 | Morris et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352033 | Gresham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353217 | Berghs et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359721 | Kempf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361198 | Harmon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367640 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371895 | Bristol | Dec 1994 | A |
5377315 | Leggett | Dec 1994 | A |
5381529 | Matsushima | Jan 1995 | A |
5384910 | Torres | Jan 1995 | A |
5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386417 | Daugherty et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390321 | Proesel | Feb 1995 | A |
5392280 | Zheng | Feb 1995 | A |
5392389 | Fleming | Feb 1995 | A |
5394522 | Sanchez-Frank et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5398331 | Huang et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400140 | Johnston | Mar 1995 | A |
5405779 | McCabe et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408603 | Van de Lavoir et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410141 | Koenck et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410492 | Gross et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410717 | Floro | Apr 1995 | A |
5420977 | Sztipanovits et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421017 | Scholz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422816 | Sprague et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426732 | Boies et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428734 | Haynes et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428769 | Glaser et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428781 | Duault et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432705 | Severt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432711 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434952 | Yen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434997 | Landry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437007 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440237 | Brown et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442791 | Wrabetz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444851 | Woest | Aug 1995 | A |
5444861 | Adamec et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450403 | Ichii et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450425 | Gunn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450764 | Johnston | Sep 1995 | A |
5451923 | Seberger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451939 | Price | Sep 1995 | A |
5452201 | Pieronek et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453933 | Wright et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457797 | Butterworth et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459825 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459839 | Swarts et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461611 | Drake, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461710 | Bloomfield et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463735 | Pascucci et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467264 | Rauch et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469150 | Sitte | Nov 1995 | A |
5469570 | Shibata | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5481715 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481718 | Ryu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481741 | McKaskle et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483660 | Yishay et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485617 | Stutz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485620 | Sadre et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490276 | Doli, Jr. et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491625 | Pressnall et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491791 | Glowny et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493534 | Mok | Feb 1996 | A |
5499023 | Goldschmidt | Mar 1996 | A |
5499365 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499371 | Henninger et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500934 | Austin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501608 | Scheer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504672 | Hardiman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504895 | Kurosawa et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504902 | McGrath et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509811 | Homic | Apr 1996 | A |
5513095 | Pajonk | Apr 1996 | A |
5513192 | Janku et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513354 | Dwork et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517645 | Stutz et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517655 | Collins et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519605 | Cawlfield | May 1996 | A |
5519701 | Colmant et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522044 | Pascucci et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526287 | French | Jun 1996 | A |
5526353 | Henley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530377 | Walls | Jun 1996 | A |
5530643 | Hodorowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5530868 | Record et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531328 | Rochelo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534912 | Kostreski | Jul 1996 | A |
5535425 | Watanabe | Jul 1996 | A |
5537548 | Fin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539909 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541810 | Donhauser et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542039 | Brinson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544008 | Dimmick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544073 | Piety et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544321 | Theimer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549137 | Lenz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550980 | Pascucci et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551047 | Mori et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555213 | DeLong | Sep 1996 | A |
5555416 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555437 | Packer | Sep 1996 | A |
5555510 | Verseput et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557559 | Rhodes | Sep 1996 | A |
5559691 | Monta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559963 | Gregg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561770 | de Bruijn et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563400 | Le Roux | Oct 1996 | A |
5564055 | Asnaashari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566320 | Hubert | Oct 1996 | A |
5568378 | Wojsznis | Oct 1996 | A |
5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
5572673 | Shurts | Nov 1996 | A |
5576946 | Bender et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579220 | Barthel et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579487 | Meyerson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581760 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586066 | White et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586112 | Tabata | Dec 1996 | A |
5586156 | Gaubatz | Dec 1996 | A |
5586329 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586330 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587899 | Ho et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594858 | Blevins | Jan 1997 | A |
5594899 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596331 | Bonaffini et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596752 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598536 | Slaughter, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598566 | Pascucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600845 | Gilson | Feb 1997 | A |
5602749 | Vosburgh | Feb 1997 | A |
5604737 | Iwami et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604871 | Pecone | Feb 1997 | A |
5608607 | Dittmer | Mar 1997 | A |
5608608 | Flint et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611057 | Pecone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613148 | Bezviner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613164 | DiAngelo et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613190 | Hylton | Mar 1997 | A |
5617540 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621871 | Jaremko et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621890 | Notarianni et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623592 | Carlson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623670 | Bohannon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627979 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629872 | Gross et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629949 | Zook | May 1997 | A |
5630056 | Horvath et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630152 | DeLuca et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633811 | Canada et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642259 | Ma | Jun 1997 | A |
5642511 | Chow et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5648768 | Bouve | Jul 1997 | A |
5649121 | Budman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655092 | Ojala | Aug 1997 | A |
5659680 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659727 | Velissaropoulos et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664101 | Picache | Sep 1997 | A |
5664168 | Yishay et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671374 | Postman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671436 | Morris et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673401 | Volk et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676141 | Hollub | Oct 1997 | A |
5680404 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5680409 | Qin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682476 | Tapperson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687316 | Graziano et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691897 | Brown et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
5701414 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701484 | Artsy | Dec 1997 | A |
5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708709 | Rose | Jan 1998 | A |
5708779 | Graziano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713045 | Berdahl | Jan 1998 | A |
5715178 | Scarola et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716221 | Kantner | Feb 1998 | A |
5717880 | Imai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717925 | Harper et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719761 | Gatti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724025 | Tavori | Mar 1998 | A |
5726911 | Canada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726912 | Krall, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727128 | Morrison | Mar 1998 | A |
5732074 | Spaur et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732218 | Bland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734902 | Atkins et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737529 | Dolin, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740429 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740441 | Yellin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742596 | Baratz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742762 | Scholl et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745049 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748467 | Qin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748896 | Daly et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748912 | Lee | May 1998 | A |
5751574 | Loebig | May 1998 | A |
5752007 | Morrison | May 1998 | A |
5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
5752246 | Rogers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754189 | Doi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754772 | Leaf | May 1998 | A |
5754830 | Butts et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757925 | Faybishenko | May 1998 | A |
5758073 | Liang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758075 | Graziano et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761033 | Wilhelm | Jun 1998 | A |
5761090 | Gross et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761405 | Tadamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761421 | van Hoff et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761477 | Wahbe et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761499 | Sonderegger | Jun 1998 | A |
5761518 | Boehling et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764906 | Edelstein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768119 | Havekost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768510 | Gish | Jun 1998 | A |
5774378 | Yang | Jun 1998 | A |
5774670 | Montulli | Jun 1998 | A |
5777874 | Flood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778368 | Hogan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784557 | Oprescu | Jul 1998 | A |
5786119 | Sorriero et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787247 | Norin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787272 | Gupta et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787280 | Joseph et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790791 | Chong et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793963 | Tapperson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794071 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796602 | Wellan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797038 | Crawford et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801770 | Paff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801942 | Nixon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802389 | McNutt | Sep 1998 | A |
5805153 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805889 | Van De Vanter | Sep 1998 | A |
5805922 | Sim et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809247 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812394 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815152 | Collier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815659 | Umetsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815710 | Martin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822220 | Baines | Oct 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828851 | Nixon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828882 | Hinckley | Oct 1998 | A |
5831669 | Adrain | Nov 1998 | A |
5832268 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832418 | Meyer | Nov 1998 | A |
5835704 | Li et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835712 | DuFresne | Nov 1998 | A |
5835724 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
5835789 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838563 | Dove et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838910 | Domenikos et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838920 | Rosborough | Nov 1998 | A |
5838969 | Jacklin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839094 | French | Nov 1998 | A |
5841360 | Binder | Nov 1998 | A |
5841654 | Verissimo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841963 | Nakamikawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841991 | Russell | Nov 1998 | A |
5844601 | McPheely et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844796 | Araki | Dec 1998 | A |
5844804 | Schussler | Dec 1998 | A |
5845078 | Tezuka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845230 | Lamberson | Dec 1998 | A |
5847957 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848274 | Hamby et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848393 | Goodridge et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854750 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854944 | Catherwood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859966 | Hayman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862052 | Nixon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864773 | Barna et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867704 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872992 | Tietjen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873089 | Regache | Feb 1999 | A |
5874990 | Kato | Feb 1999 | A |
5875430 | Koether | Feb 1999 | A |
5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
5878415 | Olds | Mar 1999 | A |
5880775 | Ross | Mar 1999 | A |
5884014 | Huttenlocher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903455 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903894 | Reneris | May 1999 | A |
5905248 | Russell et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905963 | Lysejko | May 1999 | A |
5907675 | Aahlad | May 1999 | A |
5909586 | Anderson | Jun 1999 | A |
5917822 | Lyles et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917840 | Cheney et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920479 | Sojoodi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922050 | Madany | Jul 1999 | A |
5927398 | Maciulewicz | Jul 1999 | A |
5928345 | Tetzlaff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930768 | Hooban | Jul 1999 | A |
5935242 | Madany et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935249 | Stern et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940294 | Dove | Aug 1999 | A |
5940839 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946487 | Dangelo | Aug 1999 | A |
5950006 | Crater et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956487 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959487 | Kawamura | Sep 1999 | A |
5960205 | Mao et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960214 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966304 | Cook et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969967 | Aahlad et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974497 | Teshome | Oct 1999 | A |
5975737 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978578 | Azarya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978933 | Wyld et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980078 | Krivoshein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980090 | Royal, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982362 | Crater et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982762 | Anzai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987506 | Carter | Nov 1999 | A |
5988852 | Nakanishi | Nov 1999 | A |
5994998 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995916 | Nixon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
6006164 | McCarty et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006171 | Vines et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008985 | Lake et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009103 | Woundy | Dec 1999 | A |
6014591 | Ikeda | Jan 2000 | A |
6014612 | Larson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016515 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018627 | Iyengar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018816 | Tateyama | Jan 2000 | A |
6026336 | Sakurai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032151 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032208 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
H1845 | Kelly | Mar 2000 | H |
6033257 | Lake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035264 | Donaldson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038271 | Olaker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038486 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044305 | Larson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049578 | Senechal et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049775 | Gertner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052629 | Leatherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055633 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061603 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070186 | Nishio | May 2000 | A |
6070250 | Yeager et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073109 | Flores et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075863 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076124 | Korowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078320 | Dove et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078848 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080207 | Kroening et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085120 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088665 | Burns et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094655 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094684 | Pallmann | Jul 2000 | A |
6095674 | Verissimo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097761 | Buhring et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6098116 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104391 | Johnston, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104875 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105132 | Fritch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108662 | Hoskins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112020 | Wright | Aug 2000 | A |
6112246 | Horbal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115468 | De Nicolo | Sep 2000 | A |
6115744 | Robins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129449 | McCain et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129724 | Fleischman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131067 | Girerd et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133914 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134559 | Brumme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138140 | Yokote | Oct 2000 | A |
6138174 | Keeley | Oct 2000 | A |
6139177 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140911 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141794 | Dice et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148346 | Hanson | Nov 2000 | A |
6148391 | Petrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6151625 | Swales et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154875 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157864 | Schwenke et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160484 | Spahl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167253 | Farris et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167464 | Kretschmann | Dec 2000 | A |
6170007 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173414 | Zumkehr et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175556 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176421 | Royal, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183289 | Lake et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185611 | Waldo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195694 | Chen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195774 | Jacobson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199068 | Carpenter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199195 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201996 | Crater et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212440 | Suzuki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212575 | Cleron et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212608 | Bak | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216158 | Luo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218930 | Katzenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219708 | Martenson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226783 | Limondin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236909 | Colson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246748 | Yano | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260187 | Cirne | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266716 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266724 | Harari et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268789 | Diamant et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269473 | Freed et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272529 | Lum | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272556 | Gish | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282454 | Papadopoulos et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282455 | Engdahl | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285966 | Brown et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289299 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295356 | De Nicolo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295513 | Thackston | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308317 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311101 | Kastner | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314448 | Conner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314464 | Murata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317701 | Pyotsia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324607 | Korowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327511 | Naismith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334161 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336142 | Kato et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345295 | Beardsley et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345382 | Hughes | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348874 | Cole et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349274 | Kay et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349287 | Hayashi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353859 | McKeehan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353860 | Hare et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360091 | Schellinger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366300 | Ohara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370448 | Eryurek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370573 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373841 | Goh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377543 | Grover et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382226 | Larson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393050 | Liu | May 2002 | B1 |
6405099 | Nagai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405210 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412070 | Van Dyke et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418499 | Korowitz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424883 | Hosokawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429885 | Saib et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430564 | Judge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434594 | Wesemann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438182 | Olaker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442442 | Weinhofer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445962 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449624 | Hammack et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449715 | Krivoshein | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480903 | Voutaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480955 | DeKoning et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487214 | Bachar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487558 | Hitchcock | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493405 | Olaker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496892 | Lake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499048 | Williams | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501995 | Kinney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510352 | Badavas et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515688 | Berry et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526455 | Kamimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526516 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532531 | O'Connor et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557056 | Lanteigne et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563420 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574515 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574694 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594692 | Reisman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598224 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609147 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612022 | Gale et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618754 | Gosling | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622147 | Smiga et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636900 | Abdelnur | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640308 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647495 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654353 | Tokura et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671763 | Korowitz et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675193 | Slavin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687698 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700869 | Falco et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701284 | Huntley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718215 | Friedrich et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718533 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734884 | Berry et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738388 | Stevenson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754885 | Dardinski et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760687 | Apel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763370 | Schmeidler et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772017 | Dove et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775707 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788980 | Johnson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6789054 | Makhlouf | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792321 | Sepe, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799148 | Ling et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799185 | Wallman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799195 | Thibault et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806847 | Nixon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807558 | Hassett et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826590 | Glanzer et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832223 | Scheifler et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850973 | Larson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6853867 | Klindt et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868538 | Nixon et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874082 | Tateyama et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888541 | Morse | May 2005 | B2 |
6895409 | Uluakar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6928396 | Thackston | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959356 | Packwood et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978194 | McIlhany et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983227 | Thalhammer-Reyero | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7020532 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024282 | Coogan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032045 | Kostadinov | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054793 | Moritz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7080366 | Kramskoy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086009 | Resnick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089530 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096465 | Dardinski et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7110835 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123974 | Hamilton | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130704 | McKelvey | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142322 | Lee | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146231 | Schleiss et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146408 | Crater et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158513 | Wada et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162510 | Jammes | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177052 | Lapstun et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199784 | Mathiowetz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245271 | Nixon et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249330 | Roesner et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272815 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7275062 | Deitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7337256 | Korowitz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356588 | Stineman, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7502656 | Thibault et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7574693 | Kemink | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7610354 | Adams et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7664574 | Imhof et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676356 | Carmel et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720944 | Thibault et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739361 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7817150 | Reichard et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7882197 | Thibault et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890927 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899070 | Thibault et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949295 | Kumar et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20010007133 | Moriconi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010007183 | Weder | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010025307 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034777 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034778 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034779 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034780 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034781 | Venkatraman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037489 | Stripf et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044836 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052109 | Nagashima et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013629 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020049865 | Charnell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020093980 | Trebes | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133636 | Venkatraman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150156 | Calvin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165848 | Rautenbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194393 | Hrischuk et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198920 | Resnick et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009250 | Resnick et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051068 | Eldridge | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030115238 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030167269 | Gupta | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200351 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200369 | Musumeci | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208558 | Venkatraman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040103165 | Nixon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117534 | Parry et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040221289 | D'Souza et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050138226 | Tateyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149893 | Roesner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160263 | Naizhen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172258 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050283730 | Uyttendaele et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060129724 | Kostadinov | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060206860 | Dardinski et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206866 | Eldrige et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212146 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070006149 | Resnick et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019560 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061786 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083552 | Allen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110835 | Maes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118805 | Kraus et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070244571 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265089 | Robarts et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080040477 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046598 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052386 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080119951 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120367 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126500 | Thibault et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133700 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134215 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148170 | Thibault et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080216169 | Naizhen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222276 | Thibault et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090094326 | Thibault et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118845 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090118846 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125128 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125129 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125130 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125131 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132996 | Eldridge et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164031 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090193347 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241086 | Saito et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259751 | Thibault et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319058 | Rovaglio et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005425 | Kodosky et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011311 | Kodosky et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100076604 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121999 | Isenmann et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131084 | Van Camp | May 2010 | A1 |
20100222902 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223593 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305720 | Doll et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305721 | Kostadinov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040390 | Blevins et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093098 | Kostadinov et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0411869 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0592921 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0640905 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0660231 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0906595 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1006691 | Jun 2000 | EP |
02159526 | Jun 1990 | JP |
09033647 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10019655 | Jan 1998 | JP |
11143511 | May 1999 | JP |
WO-9114324 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO-9504314 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO-9623377 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO-9631047 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9707486 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9726587 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9820649 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-9829804 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9836518 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9854843 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-0077592 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-03039098 | May 2003 | WO |
2010138412 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 09/721,409, filed Nov. 21, 2000, Venkatraman et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,859, filed Oct. 28, 2005, Keyghobad et al. |
“1995 World Batch Forum: Meeting of the Minds [Agenda],” (May 22-24, 1995) Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, (2 pages). |
“A sensation in supervisory control,” Manufacturing Systems (Windows NT in manufacturing Supplement), Oct. 1996, pp. 12A-24A. |
“AC I/O Modules Available for Low-Cost Automation Controller,” New Release, Control Technology Corporation, Jun. 28, 1989 (DialogWeb search result) (1 page). |
“Agenda,” ISA/SP50—1988-180, ISA Draft, May 3-5, 1988. |
“Agenda,” World Batch Forum 1994 (Mar. 6-9, 1994), Tempe, AZ, (9 pages). |
“Apacs Control System,” Power vol. 139, No. 6 (Jun. 1995) p. 81 (Dialog print-out). |
“Application of PRIAM Model to Safety Systems on Offshore Oil/Gas Platforms,” Silvertech Ltd., Jan. 9, 1995. |
“At Interop, Will ToasterNet Be on the Hot List?” Data Communications, vol. 19, No. 13, Oct. 1990, p. 214. |
“Automation Controller accepts Customization,” News Release, Control Technology, Jul. 12, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Automation Controller features fast 80186 Processor, Integrated Software,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Apr. 22, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Automation Programming Environment runs on IBM (R)-PC,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Mar. 29, 1988, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Automation System Monitors, Controls Fab HVAC, Other Systems,” Microcontamination (Aug. 1994). |
“Background Info on Mercury Project,” (no date available). |
“Breaking News for Invensys Software Systems Employees: iBaan and FactorySuite 2000 Integration Announced,” internal e-mail dated Mar. 23, 2001. |
“Briefs,” Network World, May 29, 1995, p. 19. |
“bsy's List of Internet Accessible Coke Machines,” web page print-out (Feb. 12, 1999) from http://www-cse.ucsd.edu/users/bsy/coke.html (1 page). |
“CAD/CAM Software creates Automation ‘Programming Environment’,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Oct. 3, 1988, (DialogWeb search result). |
“CMU SCS Coke Machine: Current Status,” web page print-out (Feb. 12, 1999) from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/.about.coke/ (1 page). |
“Compact System Combines Motion Control, Machine Control,” News Release, Control Technology, May 28, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Company Profiles: What Users Need,” Power vol. 139 No. 6 (Jun. 1995) p. 81. |
“Control System Features Plug-and-Play Technology, Scalability,” Chemical Processing (May 1996), p. 33. |
“Control system,” Power vol. 139, No. 4 (Apr. 1995) p. 114 (Dialog print-out). |
“ControlShell Version 5.1 User's Manual,” Real-Time Innovations, Jun. 1996, whole manual. |
“ControlShell Version 6.0 User's Manual,” Real-Time Innovations, Jan. 1999, whole manual. |
“DeltaV(tm) System: We Do Smart Plants.” Brochure issued by Fisher-Rosemount Systems (1998). |
“DeltaV.TM. System Overview: Do More.” Brochure issued by Fisher-Rosemount Systems (1998). |
“Disk Drive with Embedded Hyper-Text Markup Language Server,” IBM TDB, vol. 38, n. 12, Dec. 1995, pp. 479-480. |
“Dual-Axis Servo Module for Small Controller,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Sep. 11, 1990, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Editors' Product Picks,” Chemical Processing (May 1996), p. 34. |
“Embedded Systems Conference Addresses the Increasing Complexity of Electronic Systems Design; Technical Program and Exhibits Help Embedded Systems Design Professionals Keep Pace with Rapid Change,” PR Newswire, Dec. 27, 1995. |
“ErgoTech upgrades ErgoCim; first ‘plug and play’ component software for manufacturing,” Business Wire, Feb. 15, 1996. |
“Fisher-Rosemount Is: Managing the Process Better,” Fisher Controls International, Inc. and Rosemount Inc. 1993, (19 pages). |
“Gensym Announces Its Initiative for Leveraging Intelligent Systems with Internet/Intranet Technology,” Business Wire, Oct. 7, 1997. |
“Gensym introduces G2 WebMiner for accessing and reasoning about data from the World Wide Web,” Business Wire, May 15, 1996. |
“Gensym introduces Internet connectivity for its G2 family of intelligent real-time software,” Business Wire, Mar. 18, 1996. |
“I/A Series Model 51 FoxRemote II Installation and Configuration Guide,” Apr. 8, 1998 (Preliminary), pp. i-iv, 1-2. |
“Industries Fashion NASA Products Into Commercial Work”, Anne Eisele, Space News, v9, n14, p. 14, Apr. 6, 1998, 1 page. |
“Industry's top embedded operating software supports Java; pSOSystem enables Embedded Internet applications and Low-cost Internet appliances,” Business Wire, Feb. 1, 1996. |
“Inexpensive Automation Controller features Message Display Capability,” News Release, Control Technology (US), May 19, 1989, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Information technology in manufacturing,” Manufacturing Systems, vol. 14, No. 12, Dec. 1996, pp. 54-78. |
“Innovative Small Controller Family offers Full Integration,” News Release, Control Technology, Aug. 17, 1989, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Integrated Systems; Industry's top embedded operating software supports Java,” M2 Presswire, Mar. 4, 1996. |
“Intel, SunDisk offerings narrow flash focus,” Electronic Engineering Times, p. 10, Oct. 24, 1994. |
“Internet windows to the world,” New Media Age, Oct. 26, 1995, p. 4. |
“Introducing Bailey Evolution 90TM. . . . The sound investment strategy for process automation,” Bailey 1990 (brochure). |
“Jim Henry's 1996 ASEE Paper,” web page print-out from http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Documents/ASEE-96-full.html (5 pages). |
“Linear Actuators offer Plug-Compatibility with Controller,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Nov. 21, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Low-Cost Automation Controller features Motion Control, Communications,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Mar. 7, 1988, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Make Your Automation Plan a Reality: MAX1000,” Leeds & Northrup Technical Overview, (approximately 1990). |
“Mitsubishi licenses Sun's Java tool,” Electronic Engineering Times (Dec. 11, 1995) p. 29. |
“Modular Valve Assemblies Connect to Controller with Ribbon Cable,” New Product Release, Control Technology (US), Jan. 8, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Multi-Tasking Controller provides High-level Instructions for Motion Control, Sequencing,” News Release, Control Technology Corporation, Aug. 22, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“NCR Fieldbus Slave Controller Advance Information,” ISA-SP50-1988-161, ISA Draft. |
“New at IPC/92! Ethernet link provides Global PLC Registers,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Nov. 20, 1992, (DialogWeb search result). |
“NEW at IPC/92! High-Capacity Integrated Motion Controller,” News Release, Control Technology (US) Nov. 20, 1992, (DialogWeb search result). |
“New Equipment/Literature,” Control System vol. 139, No. 4 (Apr. 1995), p. 114. |
“New Open Architecture Group Works on Control Standards,” Control Engineering Online (Aug. 1997). |
“New Products Provide Interactive Graphics Over Web Using Netscape Plug-Ins and Java,” PR Newswire, May 20, 1996. |
“New Small Automation Controller features Precision Analog I/O Modules,” News Release, Control Technology (US), May 30, 1989, (DialogWeb search result). |
“New State-Logic Microcontroller,” News Release, Control Technology Corp., Jun. 1, 1996 (DialogWeb search result). |
“New Telemecanique Programmable Controllers Feature Multiple Programming Languages,” (Feb. 11, 1985). |
“On-Line Vending Machine and Catalog Product Icons,” IBM TDB, v. 38, n. 4 (Apr. 1995), pp. 113-116. |
“Operator's Console creates ‘Friendly’ Machines,” News Release, Control Technology (US), May 19, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Operator's Console for Automated Machines,” News Release, Control Technology, Aug. 15, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Peter Beebee's Home Page,” web page print-out (Feb. 12, 1999) from http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/htbin/ptbbgate/jwz/?fetch+personal%2Fmain.text.html (2 pages). |
“Pipeline: Announced,” InfoWorld, May 29, 1995, p. 45. |
“Plant Operations Framework,” AMR Report (May/Jun. 1995), (6 pages). |
“Plug-Compatible Controls and Actuators Speed System Development,” News Release, Control Technology (US), Jan. 13, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Policy Manual,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (15 pages). |
“Process Manager Specification and Technical Data,” UC03-300 Sep. 1991 Honeywell, copyright 1990 (43 pages). |
“Programmable Controller offers control of Stepping and Servo Motors,” News Release, Control Technology, May 31, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Radio Field Bus,” ISA/SP50—1988-184, ISA Draft. |
“Real-Time Innovations Email NewsLetter,” Apr. 1998, http://www.rti.com/corporate/newsletter04-98, 2 pages. |
“Ricoh to sell world's first multimedia still camera,” Japan Economic Newswire, Feb. 21, 1995. |
“RTI Announces Major New Component-Based Programming System for Building Complex Electromechanical Systems”, PR Newswire, Mar. 16, 1998, 3 pages. |
“SDRD Using 1553B Data Link Services,” ISA/SP50-1988-243 (1988). |
“SECS-11 Communication Board Plugs into Automation Controller,” News Release, Control Technology, Aug. 26, 1985, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Signal Conditioners Designed for Fisher-Rosemount System Delta V,” issued by M-Systems Co., Ltd. (Dec. 1997). |
“Small Multi-Tasking Controller for Cost-sensitive Aplications,” News Release, Control Technology US, Nov. 8, 1988, (DialogWeb search result). |
“SP88 Mes Task-Force Europe Position Document,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (pp. 1-30). |
“Special Topic: PC-Based Control,” A Supplement to Software Strategies, pp. 3-5, 7-8, 10-15, 20-21 (no date available). |
“Suggested Outline for Application Sub-committee Document: Fieldbus Architecture Subcommittee Document,” ISA/SP50—1988-175, ISA Draft. (1988). |
“Sun announces availability of Javatm Embedded Server 1.0,” Press Release dated Oct. 1, 1998, downloaded from java.sun.com website. |
“System Provides Stepping Motor Control in Workcell Environment,” News Release, Control Technology Corp., Dec. 5, 1986, (DialogWeb search result). |
“Systems and Design; Technical Program and Exhibits Help Embedded Systems Design Professionals Keep Pace with Rapid Changes,” PR Newswire, Dec. 27, 1995 (2 pages). |
“TDC 3000 Overview,” Honeywell, (approximately 1992). |
“TDC 3000 Process Manager.TM.: Process Connected Solutions for the Advanced Controls Requirements of the 1990s,” Honeywell, (approximately 1992). |
“The ‘Only’ Coke Machine on the Internet,” web page print-out (Feb. 12, 1999) from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/.about.coke/history—long.txt (3 pages). |
“The Object Primer”, Scott Ambler, pp. 1-248. Jan. 4, 1996. |
“The Switzerland Coke Machine Credits,” web page print-out (Feb. 12, 1999) from http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/htbin/coke/ (1 page). |
“Toshiba Integrated Control System,” Technical Manual Third Edition (Nov. 1990). |
“Tour an actual TribeLink via WebManage,” web page print-out from http://www.tribe.com/products/webmanage/quick—view.htm (printed on Jul. 12, 1999) (1 page). |
“Tribe Announces Revolutionary Use of the Internet; Launches Innovative Remote Management Solution; New WebManage Technology Provides Network Management via World Wide Web,” Business Wire, May 22, 1995. |
“Tribe Computer Works' Net Products Can be Managed via World Wide Web,” IAC (SM) Newsletter Database.TM., DataTrends Publications, Inc., No. 11, vol. 7, May 30, 1995. |
“Tribe Launches First Networking Device Capable of Being Managed via Internet Web Browser; TribeLink2 Enables Remote Computing and Internet Access,” Business Wire, May 22, 1995. |
“Tribe Launches Innovative Remote Management Solution; New WebManage Technology Provides Network Management Via the World Wide Web,” web page print-out (Jul. 12, 1999) from http://www.tribe.com/products/webmanage/wm—pr. (1 page). |
“TribeRoute,” web page print-out (Jul. 12, 1999) from http://www.tribe.com/products/tr/index. (3 pages). |
“TribeStar,” web page print-out from http://www.tribe.com/products/tribestar/index.htm (3 pages) (copyright 1996). |
“UDC 6000 Process Controller: From Stand-alone Control to Full System Integration Honeywell Has a Solution for You,” Honeywell, (Aug. 1992). |
“User Layer Structure,” SP-50 Technical Report (Jul. 25, 1990). |
“User Layer Technical Report,” ISA/SP—50 1990-389C, ISA Draft. |
“Wide-range, Fully Compatible Family of Process Automation & Management Systems,” Copyright 1993 by Elsag Bailey Group as an Unpublished Work, (24 pages). |
“Wizards wheel over SCADA systems; Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition,” Control and Instrumentation, No. 12, vol. 28, Dec. 1996, p. 23. |
“WWWF'94: Papers Received,” web page print-out (Apr. 7, 2000) from http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/Agenda/Papers-received.html (8 pages). |
Adler, David J. et al. “Does a Manufacturing Execution System Reduce the Cost of Production for Bulk Pharmaceuticals?” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (13 pages). |
Andrews, “15 MB in a Matchbook” (Jan. 1995) http://www.byte.com/art/9501/sec4/art5.htm. |
ANSI/ASME PTC 19.1-1985, “Part 1—Measurement Uncertainty”, Apr. 30, 1986, entire document. |
Ash, Raymond H. et al. “Strategic Needs in Batch Manufacturing,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (8 pages). |
Bader, F. P. “Building a Better Batch Control Foundation with IEC 1131-3 Control Languages,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (23 pages). |
Batch Control. Part I: Models and Terminology. (Approved Feb. 28, 1995) ISA-S88.01 1995, pp. 1-128. |
Baxter, Richard V., Jr. “Implementing Open Networking in a Motor Drive,” The Imbedded Internet Workshop Real World Applications Session (Oct. 1, 1999) San Jose, CA. |
Beestermoller, H.J., et al. “An Online and offline programmable Multi-Loop Controller for Distributed Systems,” IEEE (1994), pp. 15-20. |
Benkhallat, Yazid, et al. “Interoperability of sensors and distributed systems,” Sensors and Actuators A vol. 37-38 (1993), 247-254. |
Benner, Stephen J. “MES in Batch Process Manufacturing. A MES Vendor view” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (8 pages). |
Berge, Jonas, “Using Ethernet is a no-brainer,” In Tech: The International Journal for Measurement and Control, pp. 36-39, Jul. 2000. |
Bernard, Viki, “Remote-access ware emerge: Shiva, Nortel, and Tribe leading list of innovators,” PCWeek, No. 21, vol. 12, May 29, 1995, p. 47. |
Berre, A., “Sharing of Objects in an Object-Oriented Language,” Proceedings on the 1986 International Workshop on Object-Oriented Database Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1986. |
Bishop, Brian. “Realtime System-Design Tool Models Electromechanical Systems”, , Personal Eng & Instrumentation News, v15, n4, p. 21, Apr. 1998. |
Bristol, E H., “Not a Batch Language; A Control Language!” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (14 pages). |
Brown, Jerry et al. “Meeting the Challenge of Automation Technology,” 1996 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (11 pages). |
Brown, Jerry et al. “Trends and Opportunities in Batch Control System Architectures,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (pp. 1-12). |
Browne, Malcolme W. “South Pole Ready for Internet Revolution,” The New York Times, Section C, col. 1, p. 1, Jan. 10, 1995. |
Brunn, P. “Collision Avoidance for Two Robots Sharing a Common Workspace,” (1995) The Institution of Electrical Engineers. |
Bullotta, Rick. “Designing Effective User Interfaces for Batch Processes,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (pp. 1-19). |
Burton, P.I. “A personal history of batch control,” Measurement + Control vol. 27 (Apr. 1994), pp. 69-73. |
Burton, P.I., et al. “Field Bus Based on MIL-STD-1553B: Proposal to ISA-SP-50” ERA Technology Ltd. (Apr. 6, 1988) ISA/SP50-1988-148. |
Capetta, L., et al. “From Current Actuators and Transmitters Towards Intelligent Actuation and Measurement: PRIAM Approach,” BIAS 93, Milan, Italy 1993. |
Caro, Richard H. “Field Bus Applications,” ISA (1989) Paper #89-0569, pp. 989-994. |
Caro, Richard H. “The Fifth Generation Process Control Architecture,” ISA Transactions vol. 28 No. 4 (1989), pp. 23-28. |
Chettle, Tim. “Multiplexing techniques optimise data collection,” Electrotechnology (Oct./Nov. 1995). |
Choi, K.J. et al., “A Modeling Method of Software Configuration Change Control,” 1997, IEEE Online, “htttp:/ieeexplorer.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=619990&userType=inst”. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Secure Wireless Plant: Security and Quality of Service for Industrial Environments,” Copyright 1992-2008. |
Coleman, Vernon. “National Electrical Manufacturers Association Field Bus Report to ISA SP50,” (Oct. 1988) ISA/SP50-1988-234. |
Computer Products “Unbundling the DCS” (approximately 1992). |
Conradi, R. et al., “Version Models for Software Configuration Management,” Jun. 1998, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 30, No. 2. |
Control Technology Corp. News Releases, pp. 1-23, No Date Available. |
Cox, Mark J. and Baruch, Dr. John E. F. “Robotic Telescopes: An Interactive Exhibit on the World-Wide Web,” web page print-out from http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/Proceedings/Museum/cox/markcox.html (11 pages), 1994. |
Craig, Lynn W. “SP-88 Defines Batch Control,” INTECH Mar. 1994, pp. 34-37. |
Crowder, R. S. “A Communication Architecture for Automation & Control,” ISA, pp. 669-673. (No date available). |
Crowder, R. S. “Generic Data Link Transactions for Simple Devices,” Proposal to ISA SP 50 & IEC/SC65C/WG6 (Oct. 15, 1988) ISA Document. |
Crowley-Milling, et al, eds. “Proceedings,” 1995 International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, Chicago, IL Oct. 30-Nov. 3, 1995, [cover pages]. |
Delahostria. Communication Model Application Layer. (Oct. 14, 1988) ISA/SP50-1988 247, ISA Draft. |
Delfino, B. and Pinceti, P. “Fieldbus Applications for Electrical Industrial Systems,” IEEE (1993), pp. 2084-2090. |
Demetratekes, Pam. “Go with the info flow; state-of-the-art automation in the food industry; includes related article on computer software for food processors,” Food Processing, vol. 57, No. 7, Jul. 1996, p. 47. |
Distributed Engineering, Institute of Computer-Aided Circuit Design—Test and Test Systems Division, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany, web page print-out (8 pages) (Oct. 1994). |
Dryden, Patrick, “Tribes WebManage Enables Remote Fixes,” ComputerWorld, May 22, 1995, p. 14. |
Duffey, C.K., et al. “High-Level Control Language Customizes Application Programs,” IEEE Computer Applications in Power (1991), pp. 15-18. |
Editing Committee Draft Application Layer, Version 12, Oct. 1991. |
Editing Committee Draft Application Layer, Version 6, Dec. 1990. |
Editing Committee Draft Application Layer, Version 8, May 1991. |
Elmer-Dewitt, Philip, “Snowballs in Cyberspace; With a modem and a soldering iron, you too can build an Internet site that is really cool and totally useless,” Time, Jan. 16, 1995, p. 57. |
ElRakabawy, et al., “Peer-to—Peer File Transfer in Wireless Mesh Networks,” University of Leipzig, Copyright 2007 (incl. English Abstract). |
Elsag Bailey, “Elsag Bailey Automation,” (in Italian) (approximately 1993). |
Esprit Project 6188, “PRIAM Dictionary: Major Terms and Definitions Used in the PRIAM Project,” Prenormative Requirements for Intelligent Actuation and Measurement, May 1995. |
Esprit Project 8244, “User Requirements for Intelligent Transmitters and Actuators,” European Intelligent Actuation and Measurement User Group, Nov. 24, 1995. |
European Office Action, EP Application No. 97305187.3, dated Sep. 22, 2010. |
Excerpt from the website of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME)-CyberCut: A World Wide Web Based Design-to-Fabrication Tool, dated Sep. 16, 2010. |
Feiler, P., “Software Process Support Through Software Configuration Management,” Oct. 1990, Proceedings of the 5th International Software Process Workshop on Experience with Software Process Models, IEEE Computer Society Press. |
Ferraiolo et al., A Role-Based Access Control Model and Reference Implementation Whinin a Corporate Intranet, ACM, Feb. 1999. |
Fieldbus Inc. “The Foundationä fieldbus Primer,” Revision 1.1, Released Jun. 24, 2001, 36 pages. |
Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems. Part 2: Physical Layer Specification and Service Definition. (1992) ANSI/ISA-S50.02. |
Fisher, Thomas G P.E. “SP88 Update—Now and the Future,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (59 pages). |
Foster, Kirsten. “surf's up; lights, camera, but no action; Steve is a Tech-Nomad. He wanders the streets with a camera on his head. And he wants you to join him,” The Independent (London), Aug. 13, 1995, p. 10. |
Foxboro Fieldbus Proposal (Presented to ISA SP-50 Committee Feb. 24, 1988) ISA/SP50-1988-123B, ISA Draft. |
Foxboro, “I/A Series A2TM Software-FoxCTS-Change Tracking Software-Product Specifications,” 1997-2003, pp. 1-8. |
Foxboro, “I/A Series Software FoxDraw,” 1996 (8 pages). |
Foxboro, “I/A Series Software-FoxCTSTM—Change Tracking Software-Product Specifications,” 1997-2006, pp. 1-12. |
Foxboro, “I/A Series—Object Manager Calls—Oct. 31, 1995,” pp. 1-124. |
Foxboro, “Intelligent Automation Series Human Interface Software”, 20 pgs., 1997. |
Friscia, Anthony et al. “MES: Manufacturing's Missing Link is a Tool for Change,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (8 pages). |
Fuhr et al., “Wireless Technology Review: Radios, Frequencies, and Implications for Industry,” Wireless Technology Review, Feb. 2010. |
Fulcher, Jim and Dilger, Karen Abramic, “Soft control, Internet spark ISA/96,” Manufacturing Systems, vol. 14, No. 12, Dec. 1996, pp. 40-46. |
Furness, Harry. “Fieldbus: The Differences Start From the Bottom Up,” Control Engineering (Mar. 1994), pp. 75-77. |
Gaines, B.R. et al. “Mediator: an Intelligent Information System Supporting the Virtual Manufacturing Enterprise,” IEEE .RTM. 1995 (XP 000586326) pp. 964-969. |
George J. Thaler, et al., “Automatic Control Systems,” pp. 1-60, 1989. |
Gertz, Matthew, et al. “A Human-Machine Interface for Distributed Virtual Laboratories,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine Dec. 1, 1994 No. 4 (New York) pp. 5-13. |
Gillespie, David P., Ph.D. “Comprehensive Information Management: EPA, OSHA, and Beyond,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (14 pages). |
Gleick, James. “Fast Forward: Really Remote Control,” The New York Times, Section 6, col. 3, p. 42, Dec. 3, 1995. |
Goldberg, Ken et al. “Desktop Teleoperation via the World Wide Web,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 654-659 (1995). |
Goldberg, Ken, et al. “Beyond the Web: Excavating the Real World Via Mosaic,” (Conference Paper) The Mercury Project (Oct. 17-21, 1994). |
Goldberg, Ken, et al. “Beyond the Web: manipulating the real world,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28 (1995) pp. 209-219. |
Goldstein, Ira and Hardin, Joseph, “Guest editorial,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28 (1995) p. 1. |
Goodstein, L.P. et al., “Representation of Process State Structure and Control,” Apr. 1987, Riso National Laboratory. |
Grant, Dr. R. Peter, “The Impact of Reengineering on the Batch Manufacturing Workplace,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (5 pages). |
Greene, Tim. “Sahara puts Java to Management Test,” Network World vol. 13, No. 7 (Feb. 12, 1996). |
Gutierrez, Jose, “WirelessHART™: The Industrial Wireless Standard,” Measurement and Testing, Wireless Technology Focus, Jun./Jul. 2008. |
Gyorki, John R. “PLCs drive standard buses,” Machine Design (May 11, 1995), pp. 83-90. |
HART Communication Foundation Tech Note, “Peer to Peer Communication with WirelessHART,” HCF—LIT-129 Rev. 1.0, Sep. 5, 2008. |
HART Communication Foundation Tech Note, “Peer to Peer Communication with WirelessHART,” HCF—LIT-129 Rev. 1.1, Mar. 5, 2010. |
HART Communication Foundation Tech Note, “System Redundancy with WirelessHART,” HCF—LIT-128 Rev. 1.1, Mar. 5, 2010. |
HART Communication Foundation, “Wireless Hart Overview,” Copyright 2009, available at: http://www.hartcomm.org/protocol/wihart/wireless-overview.html. |
Hashemian, et al., “In-Situ Response Time Testing of Thermocouples”, ISA 1989, Paper #89-0056, pp. 587-593. |
Helson, Ron, Hart Field Communications Protocol, “Hart Tutorial: The Benefits of HART Protocol Communication in Smart Instrumentation Systems,” (no date available). |
Henry, “A Fault-Tolerant Interface for Self-Validating Sensors”, Oxford University, Digest No. 1990/145 (Nov. 1990). |
Henry, “A New Approach to Sensor Validation”, IMC, Mar. 17, 1992. |
Henry, “Intelligent Behaviour for Self-Validating Sensors”, Advances in Measurement, pp. 1-7, May 1990. |
Henry, et al., “A Standard Interface for Self-Validating Sensors”, Tech. Rep. 1884/91, OUEL, University of Oxford, Sep. 1991. |
Henry, et al., “Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation,” Tech. Rep. 1912/92, OUEL, University of Oxford, Apr. 1992. |
Henry, et al., “Signal Processing, Data Handling and Communications: The Case for Measurement Validation,” Tech. Rep. 1912/92, OUEL, University of Oxford, Mar. 1992. |
Henry, Jim, Ph.D., P.E. “Implementation of Practical Control Systems: Problems and Solutions,” web page print-out from http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Documents/MACSCITECH/MACSCITECHpaper1.html (printed on Apr. 10, 2001) (22 pages). |
Henry, Jim, Ph.D., P.E. “LabVIEW Applications in Engineering Labs: Controls, Chemical, Environmental,” ASEE Conference, Anaheim, CA, Jun. 25-28, 1995, web page print-out from http://chem.engr.utc.edu/Documents/ASEE-95-full.html (22 pages). |
Hoek, A., Heimbigner, D., and Wolf, A.L.,“A Generic, Peer-to-Peer Repository for Distributed Configuration Management”, May 1996, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering Publisher, IEEE Computer Society. |
Hohenstein, David. “Between the host and device . . . ,” Intech (Jul. 2000), (6 pages). |
Holding, David and Wood, Graham. “Communications in microprocessor industrial implementation,” Microprocessors and Microsystems vol. 3 No. 10 (Dec. 1979), pp. 443-451. |
ICCard Design Sep./Oct. 1995. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US09/47901, Mailed Jun. 19, 2009 (11 pages). |
Invensys Operations Management, “The Trident's Main Processor and Communication Module Support Modbus, Ethernet, Peer-to-Peerr, and TriStation Protocols,” Trident Communication Capabilities, (no date available). |
Invensys, “FoxDraw Display Builder and Configurator”, 8 pgs., 2004. |
IRD Mechanalysis, Inc., “Model 816 Machinery Maintenance Data Collector,” 1983, 2 pages. |
IRD Mechanalysis, Inc., “Model 817 Machinery Maintenance Data Collector,” 1984, 4 pages. |
IRD Mechanalysis, Inc., “Model 818 Machinery Maintenance Data Collector,” 1985, 6 pages. |
Johnson, Dick. “Pressure Sensing Advances: Are They in Your Process' Future?” Control Engineering (Apr. 1995), pp. 67-72. |
Johnsson, et al., “High-Level Grafcet and Batch Control”, Nov. 1994, Symposium ADPM. |
Kelly, D. Mark. “Digital fieldbus cluster cuts plant's wiring costs up to 20%,” Intech (Apr. 1995), pp. 62-64. |
Kissling, Jeffrey L. “Flexible Software Structure and Change Management,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (16 pages). |
Kline, “The Purposes of Uncertainty Analysis”, vol. 107, Journal of Fluids Engineering, pp. 153-160 (Jun. 1985). |
Ko, Diffu, “Trobe defines net management role for Web browser software,” Network World, May 22, 1995, p. 14. |
Kohler H. J., et al.,“Integrating UML Diagrams for Production Control Systems,” ACM p. 241-251, 2000. |
Kostas, et al., “Real-Time Voice Over Packet-Switched Networks”, pp. 18-27, IEEE Network (Jan./Feb. 1988). |
Koth, H. and Oeder, K. “The Advantages of Intelligent Field Modules for Nuclear Power Plant Operation and Maintenance,” Kemtechnik 60 (1996) 5-6, pp. 215-219. |
Lenhart, Gerald W. “A Field Bus Approach to Local Control Networks,” ISA, Paper #93-281 1993. |
Lenhart, Gerald W. “Fieldbus-Based Local Control Networks,” INTECH (Aug. 1994), p. 31-34. |
Leon, Mark, “Tektronix to add Web software on new printers,” InfoWorld, Dec. 4, 1995, p. 6. |
Loos, Peter. “Production Management—Linking Business Applications to Process Control,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (pp. 1-16). |
Loose, Graham. “Fieldbus—the user's perspective,” Measurement + Control vol. 27 (Mar. 1994), pp. 47-51. |
Loupos, Konstantinos et al., “VR, HF and Rule-Based Technologies Applied and Combined for Improving Industrial Safety,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4555, Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Ambient Interaction, pp. 676-680 (2007). |
Lu, S. et al., “An Object-Oriented Power Plant Adaptive Control System Design Tool,” Sep. 1995, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 10, No. 3. |
Magnusson, B., Asklund, U., and Minor, S., “Fine-Grained Revision Control for Collaborative Software Development”, Dec. 1993, Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, ACM. |
Martin, “Design and Strategy for Distributed Data Processing”, Chptrs. 19 & 20, pp. 272-305 (1981). |
Maser, K. et al., “Development of a Wireless Global Bridge Evaluation and Monitoring System (WGBEMS),” Building of International Community of Structural Engineers, vol. 2, Proceedings of Structures Congress XIV Apr. 15-18, 1986, American Society of Civil Engineers, Chicago IL, 8 pages. |
Meeting Minutes, Ad Hoc Function Block Meeting, Jun. 14, 1990, Chapel Hill, NC (pp. 1-60). |
Meeting Minutes, Process Control Working Group of SP50.4, Jan. 21-23, 1991, Atlanta, GA (8 pages). |
Meeting Minutes, SP50, International Electrotechnical Commission, Technical Committee No. 65: Industrial-Process Measurement and Control, Sub-Committee 65C: Digital Data Communications for Measurement and Control and Working Group 6: Field BusStandard for Use in Industrial Control Systems, Feb. 28-Mar. 4, 1988, Scottsdale, Arizona (143 pages). |
Meeting Minutes, SP50, Signal Compatibility of Electrical Instruments, Dec. 5-7, 1990, Orlando, FL (64 pages). |
Meeting Minutes, SP50.4 Application Layer, Oct. 19-21, 1988, Houston, TX (96 pages). |
Meeting Minutes, Windows Working Group of Application Subcommittee, Mar. 1-3, 1989, New Orleans, LA (pp. 1-8). |
Mirabella, Orazio. “A Short Presentation of IEC Fieldbus Application Layer,” Informatics and Communication Institute, Engineering Faculty, University of Catania, Italy, Feb. 14, 1995. |
Miyoshi et al., “A Real-Time Java Server for Real-Time Match”, 1997, IEEE, pp. 319-325. |
Momal, F. and Pinto-Pereira, C. “Using World-Wide-Web for Control Systems,” from Proceedings 1995 International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, Chicago, IL, Oct. 30-Nov. 3, 1995. |
Morel, G., et al. “Discrete Event Automation Engineering: Outline of the PRIAM Project.” BIAS '93, vol. 1, pp. 105-116, MILAN, Nov. 23-25, 1993. |
Mori, et al., “The PCMCIA Developer's Guide, Second Edition,” Sycard Technology 1994. |
Niagara Framework, http://www.tridium.com/products/niagara.asp, Feb. 10, 2005, 2 pages. |
NOAH: Network Oriented Application Harmonisation based on General Purpose Field Communication System. Project description rev. 1.0, Oct. 25, 1995. P-NET, PROFIBUS, WorldFIP. |
Nobuhiko, Tsuji, et al. “An Advanced Optical Fieldbus Instrumentation System Using 16×16 Reflection Type Optical Star Coupler and Low Powered Transmitter,” pp. 755-764, (1995). |
Notte, Angelo J. “Multitasking Capability Simplifies Process Control Design” Reliance Electric Company, approximately late 1980s. |
Object-Oriented Information Systems Planning and Implementation, David A. Taylor, Wiley Professional Computing, published Apr. 10, 1992, pp. 1-357. |
Ochoa, David. “Effects of Alliances and Acquisitions on the Batch Automation User,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (43 pages). |
Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2002, U.S. Appl. No. 09/379,074. |
Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/765,006. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2002, U.S. Appl. No. 09/379,074. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/765,006. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 09/379,074. |
Output to Valve, Revision No. 1.4, Jan. 18, 1991, (Draft Document), Instrument Society of America. |
Owen, S., et al. “A modular reconfigurable approach to the creation of flexible manufacturing cells for educational purposes,” Fast Reconfiguration of Robotic and Automation Resources (Colloquium) Oct. 20, 1995, The Institution of ElectricalEngineers. |
Pace, Hugh W. “Valve Actuators Ready for Fieldbus,” Control Engineer (Oct. 1995), pp. 65-73. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Apr. 1999, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Dec. 1997, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Dec. 1998, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Jan. 1997, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Mar. 2000, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from Aspentech.com website as of Oct. 1996, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from SL.com website as of Apr. 1999, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from SL.com website as of Dec. 1998, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from SL.com website as of Feb. 1997, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pages from SL.com website as of May 2000, retrieved from Internet archive http://web.archive.org. |
Pappalardo, Denise, “Digi Introduces IP/IPX Router,” InternetWeek, Apr. 24, 1995, p. 15. |
Pappalardo, Denise, “Router Can Be Managed via Net,” InternetWeek, May 22, 1995, p. 6. |
Peshek, Clifford J., et al. “Recent Developments and Future Trends in PLC Programming Languages and Programming Tools for Real-Time Control,” IEEE Cement Industry Technical Conference (May 1993) Toronto, Canada, pp. 219-230. |
Petti, Thomas F. and Dhurjati, Prasad S. “A Coupled Knowledge Based System Using Fuzzy Optimization for Advisory Control,” IChE Journal vol. 38 (Sep. 1992) No. 9, pp. 1369-1378. |
Pfeifer T. and Fussel B. “Sensorbetriebssystem fur messtechnische Problemstellungen in der Produktionstechnik,” Technisches Messen vol. 58 (1991) Nos. 7/8. |
Phinney, Thomas L. “An Analysis of Contending Proposals in ISA SP-50 for an ISA/IEC Field Instrument Bus,” ISA (1988) Paper #88-1489. |
Pinto, Jim. “The Great Fieldbus Debate—is Over,” Action Instruments (www.actionio.com) (originally published in Industrial Controls Intelligence, Nov. 1999). |
Preface: Field Bus Process Control User Layer Technical Support, Feb. 28, 1991. |
Press Release from Real-Time Innovation announcing ControlShell version 6.0 for sale/for use, Apr. 1998, 2 pages. |
Product Specification, I/A Series.RTM. RBATCH II, Aug. 31, 1994 (Revised Apr. 1995). |
Product Specifications, I/A Series(R) Software FoxGuard(TM) Manager for Triconex(TM) Safety Systems, Copyright 2000-2006, Invensys Systems, Inc. |
PROWAY-LAN Industrial Data Highway. (Approved Feb. 3, 1986) ISA—S72.01-1985. |
Redman, Jun, et al. “Intranet and the internal Web server: A standard user interface for integrating manufacturing applicaitons,” Proceedings of the Industrial Comuting conference, vol. 6, No. 1 (1996). |
Reklaitis, G. V. “Scheduling Approaches for the Batch Process Industries,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (17 pages). |
Renu Electronics Pvt. Ltd., “GWY-800 (HART Gateway) User Manual,” Rev. 0, Jul. 13, 2006. |
Report from IEC TC65 Working Group 6 Function Blocks, May 1, 1995. |
Robinson, D. et al., “Modelling and Synthesis of Configuration Controllers for Dynamically Reconfigurable Logic Systems Using the DCS CAD Framework,” 1999, Field-Programmable Logic and Applications, FPL '99, pp. 41-50. |
Rodriguez, Karen, “Tribe sets software,” Interactive Age, vol. 2, No. 15, May 22, 1995, p. 25. |
Rosenof, Howard P. “Dynamic Scheduling for a Brewery,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (6 pages). |
Scharf, Ronald, et al, “Using Mosaic for Remote Test System Control Supports Distributed Engineering,” Institute of Computer-Aided Circuit Design—Test and Testsystems Division, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany, web page print-out fromhttp://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/Proceedings/CSCW/scharf/scharf.html (8 pages), 1994. |
Schreiber Philip et al. “Process Automation Using SP88,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (7 pages). |
Schuur, C. “Comments on ‘Analysis and Suggestions for ISA-SP50’ as submitted to the SP50 Committee by Honeywell Inc.” (Mar. 11, 1988) ISA-SP50—1988-155, ISA Draft. |
Schuur, Chris and Warrior, Jay. “Phillips Token Passing Field Bus Controller Timed Token Mode,” ISA/SP50—1988-186, ISA Draft. (1988). |
Silverman, Dwight. “‘Attaboy’ for the best software and hardware of 1994,” The Houston Chronicle, Dec. 25, 1994, p. 2. |
Skabowski, E. L. “Recommendations for Consideration at Oct. 1988 Application Layer Subcommittee Meeting,” (Oct. 3, 1988). |
Slater, A. F. “Controlled by the Web,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27 (1994) pp. 289-295. |
Smith, Chris. “Tektronix Pushes Ease-of-Use and Low Cost of Operation With Its New Phaser.RTM. Color Laser Printer,” comp.newprod forum (Jan. 11, 1996). |
Smith, S. et al., “Cyber Cut: A world wide web based design-to fabrication tool”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 15/No. 6, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 432-442. |
SNAP Foundation Template “Using the SNAP Development Environment,” Version 8.0, Chapters 1-4, 1997. |
Solvie, Michael J. “Configuration of Distributed Time-Critical Fieldbus Systems,” IEEE (1994), p. 211. |
Song, Jianping et al., “Challenges of Wireless Control in Process Industry,” Workshop on Research Directions for Security and Networking in Critical Real-Time and Embedded Systems, Apr. 4, 2006, San Jose, CA, USA; available at http://moss.csc.ncsu.edu/˜mueller/crtes06. |
Soreide, N. N., et al. “Mosaic access to real-time data from the TOGA-TAO array of moored buoys,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28 (1995), pp. 189-197. |
Stapleton, Nick. “802.3 Working Group DTE Power via MDI Call for interest,” 3Com (Jul. 1999), (15 pages). |
Stein, R. et al. “Development of a Commercially Successful Wearable Data Collection System,” University of CA San Diego, Downloaded Jan. 12, 2009, 7 pages. |
Stevens, et al. “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1. The Protocols,” TCP/IP Illustrated vol. 1, XP-002106390, pp. 85-96. (1994). |
Strack, Bob. “The HAWK is Soaring,” Chemical Processing (May 1996) p. 11. |
Strobhar, David A. “Evolution of Operator Decision Making,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (6 pages). |
Strothman, Jim and Ham, John. “Alliances, Fieldbus, Windows Stir ISA/94 Anaheim Pot,” INTECH (Dec. 1994), pp. 32-35. |
Strothman, Jim and Ham, John. “ISA/95 New Orleans: ‘Open’, NT winds (not Opal) blow strong,” INTECH (Nov. 1995), pp. 45-48. |
Table of Contents, Automation & Technology Department, 1993. |
Table of Contents, Automation & Technology Department, 1995. |
Table of Contents, Industrial Computing Society Conference ICS/95, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 1-6, 1995. |
Table of Contents, ISA '88 International Conference and Exhibit, Houston, TX, Oct. 16-21, 1988. |
Table of Contents, ISA '89 International Conference and Exhibit, Philadelphia, PA, Oct. 23, 1989. |
Table of Contents, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Industrial Electronics Control and Instrumentation, vols. 1-3, Sep. 5-9, 1994, Bologna, Italy. |
Table of Contents, Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, vol. 1, Apr. 12-14, 1994, Antalya, Turkey. |
Table of Contents, Proceedings of the Industrial Computing Conference, vol. 3, Sep. 19-24, 1993, Chicago, IL. Industrial Computing Society. |
Taylor, Ken and Trevelyan, James, “A Telerobot on the World Wide Web,” printed from http://telerobot.mech.uwa.edu.au/ROBOT/telerobo.htm (14 pages) (1995). |
The Foxboro Company, “FoxCMS Change Management System Software,” 48 pgs., Aug. 14, 1996. |
Tinham, “Networks & surprises at C&I and ISA shows; Control and Instrumentation Exhibition and Conference; Instrument Society of America; includes related articles,” vol. 26; No. 6, p. 43; ISSN: 0010-8022 (Jun. 1994). |
Tinham, Brian, “Getting SCADA by web browsner? Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition,” Control and Instrumentation, No. 12, vol. 28, Dec. 1996, p. 5. |
Tobin, David. “Southeast Paper Installs Largest Foxboro Distributed Control System.” (No date available). |
Toner, Mike. “Web's view of world far and wide,” The Houston Chronicle, Nov. 5, 1995, p. 6. |
Tweney, “Java on Your Mobile Phone?”, http://www.business2.com (Mar. 14, 2002). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/573,151, filed May 17, 2000, Linscott, Richard L. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/354,586, mailed Aug. 4, 2009. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/354,586, mailed Jul. 1, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,216, mailed Jan. 8, 2009. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,218, mailed Jan. 28, 2009. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,219, mailed Nov. 14, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/354,586, mailed Jan. 8, 2009. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/354,586, mailed Mar. 6, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/354,586, mailed Nov. 1, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,216, mailed Aug. 7, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,219, mailed Jul. 14, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,816, mailed Apr. 9, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,816, mailed Jan. 10, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,816, mailed. Jul. 3, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,816, mailed Oct. 4, 2006. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,816, mailed Sep. 19, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,218, mailed Sep. 15, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/781,219, mailed Jul. 21, 2009. |
Van de Pol. “OmniChem: Real Time Production scheduling in a batch oriented environment,” 1994 World Batch Forum (Mar. 6-9, 1994), (23 pages). |
Vardy, Joel M. “Integrating Manufacturing Into the Corporate Reengineering Effort for the Batch Industries,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (23 pages). |
Wang, Lithui et al. “Agent-based Intelligent Control System Design for Real-time Distributed Manufacturing Environments”. Agent-basedManufacturing Workshop, Autonomous Agents '98. Minneapolis/St. Paul, May 9-13, 1998, pp. 152-159. |
Webb, Marcus. “Computer System Implementation, Batch Standards and Validation,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (11 pages). |
Weinert, A., et al. “RR/OS—realtime programming and application environment for the COSY control system,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A vol. 352 (1994), pp. 277-279. |
Welch, Nathalie, “Tribe to manage via Web; Tribe Computer Works Inc.'s TribeLink2 Product Announcement,” MacWEEK, vol. 9, No. 21, May 22, 1995, p. 18. |
WG1 List of Criteria (Appendix 1), (Oct. 21, 1988) ISA/SP50-1988-242, ISA Draft. |
Wilder, Clinton, “Network Management: Russing Nets Via the Web—Trib's WebManage uses popular interface,” InformationWeek, May 29, 1995, p. 62. |
Williams, Gary, “Wireless Plant and Backhaul in the Industrial Environment,” Invensys Operations Management, (no date available). |
Wolfe, Alexander, “Strong Brew,” Electronic Engineering Times, Apr. 8, 1996, p. 73. |
Wood, G. G. “Current Fieldbus activities,” computer communications vol. 11 (Jun. 1988) No. 3, pp. 118-123. |
Wood, G. G. “Evolution of communication standards for the process industry,” Measurement + Control vol. 19 (Jul./Aug. 1986), pp. 183-188. |
Wood, G. G. “Survey of LANs and Standards,” Computer Standards & Interfaces vol. 6 (1987), pp. 27-36. |
Wood, G. G. “The Argus Consul System for On-Line Computer Control,” Electrical Engineering Transactions (Mar. 1969), pp. 114-118. |
Wood, G. G. “The Challenge of Standards for Plant Communication,” IFAC Distributed Computer Control Systems (1982), pp. 191-192. |
Wood, G. G. “Towards digital information control,” Measurement + Control vol. 21 (Jul./Aug. 1988), pp. 179-180. |
Wood, Graeme G. “Data Transmission, Processing and Presentation,” pp. 46-54 (no date available). |
Wood, Graeme, G. “Standardisation Work for Communication Among Distributed Industrial Computer Control Systems—A Status Report,” INRIA (1984), pp. 67-69. |
Wood, Graeme. “Fieldbus Status 1995,” Computing & Control Engineering Journal (Dec. 1995), pp. 251-253. |
Wood, Graeme. “Generic Link Transactions for Simple Devices in Fieldbus.” ISA/SP50—1988—240 (Sep. 20, 1988). |
Young, Stephen L. “Technology . . . The Enabler for Tommorrow's Agile Enterprise,” 1995 World Batch Forum (May 22-24, 1995), (10 pages). |
Zeff, Joe. “Maui Sunset in Real Time (Modems not Optional),” The New York Times, Nov. 27, 1995, Section D, col. 2, p. 5. |
Zeller, A. and Snelting, G., “Unified Versioning Through Feature Logic,” Oct. 1997, Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 6, Issue 4, ACM. |
Hiertz, Guido et al., “IEEE 802.11s: The WLAN Mesh Standard,” IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 104-111, Feb. 2011. |
User Guide for IntelaTrac 2000: Automated Field Data Collection Solutions, Rev. 1.0, Nov. 30, 1999. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US09/47901, Mailed Jun. 19, 2009, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090319058 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61074472 | Jun 2008 | US | |
61155160 | Feb 2009 | US |