Traffic collision-avoidance systems (TCAS) use two antennas, one on the top and one on the bottom of an aircraft, each of which is used to estimate the relative bearing between one's own aircraft and an intruder. Each traditional TCAS antenna has four elements, which are placed orthogonally on the same plane, as shown in
A bearing calculated from a single reply, squitter, or their combination, might be corrupted at the point of reception by interference (multipath, reflection from airframe or nearby obstacles). Even under stationary settings, such corrupted raw bearings vary to the extent that, on display (if not heavily filtered), it looks like a moving target. However, such movements do not look natural and may decrease confidence in the system.
The present invention provides systems and methods for improving bearing initialization for a pair of two-element antennas. An exemplary system includes two-element antennas mounted on the bottom and top of an aircraft fuselage, an output device, and a processing device. The processing device receives phase-difference information based on the phase of signals received at each element of a first of the two-element antennas, determines if the received phase-difference information is within a predefined low-confidence region, and initializes bearing if the phase-difference information is not within the low-confidence region or the phase-difference information from a predefined number of consecutively received signals meets a predefined consistency requirement.
The algorithm evaluates the phase from the low-confidence region and it also estimates bearings using the phase from this low-confidence region and evaluates the stability of these bearings as well. When it initializes bearing it requires phase measurements from all four elements—two on the top and two on the bottom.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below, with reference to the following drawings:
As shown in
There are other methods for determining consistency, including but not limited to the following methods:
Any of the above checking techniques may be used with the low-confidence region method.
To Initialize Bearing—there must be at least one bearing with both the top phase measurement and bottom phase measurement. However, while on the ground (or with landing gear extended), the phase measurements from the bottom, when combined with phase measurements from the top antenna, can result in inaccurate bearing—especially in some low-confidence regions. The present invention allows initialization of bearing even when the phase measurements are coming from the bottom antenna in a region where the system cannot rely on one measurement/estimate (low-confidence regions). In these regions—in order to initialize or determine bearing, multiple top/bottom phase measurements are required. If the bottom phase measurements are consistent and the resulting bearing estimates (using the top and bottom phase measurements) are consistent, then the bearing can be initialized (through standard filtering or averaging techniques).
As shown in
Phase difference vs. bearing graph and chart (
Interference complicates the bearing-filter initialization, especially in the dull regions 110, 112. In actual application, the interference differently impacts top and bottom antennas, with the bottom antenna being impacted to a greater degree. The following explanation is for a case in which the bottom antenna 26 is the SineComp antenna. However, a case in which the bottom antenna is the CosineComp antenna is approached in the same way.
Low-confidence regions 110, 112 for a SineComp antenna chart,
The low-confidence regions for a SineComp signal are centered about the “dull” regions. Two low-confidence regions 110, 112 are shown. One region is bounded by a bearing of −90 to 0 degrees with a corresponding phase difference of 100 to 140 degrees. The other region is bounded by a bearing of 90 to 180 degrees and a phase difference of −140 to −100 degrees. Other factors can be used to determine the extent of the low confidence regions (e.g., aircraft location and empirical data collection on aircraft).
Although the low-confidence region can be statically set for all aircraft or a certain aircraft type—it can also be determined dynamically by the system and stored in a table and adjusted over time. In one embodiment, a default low-confidence region is defined and then the system changes the default to be more customized for the own aircraft. For example, “truth bearing” derived from own ship latitude and longitude and heading together with the intruder's ADS-B/ADS-R/TIS-B reported latitude and longitude can be used to refine the location and extent of the low confidence region. Alternatively, the low confidence region could be defined as part of an installation procedure using test equipment.
Under ideal conditions (no interference), in the low-confidence region 110, bearing (clockwise) is between −90 and 0 degrees (zero being aircraft nose), while its corresponding SineComp antenna-phase difference is between 100 and 140 degrees. For the low-confidence region 112, bearing (clockwise) is between 90 and 180 degrees, while its corresponding SineComp antenna-phase difference is between −100 and −140 degrees. If a raw bearing (calculated from received phase information (a reply or squitter signal)) is within the low-confidence region 110 or 112 and the corresponding phase difference is within a phase-difference range for the same region, then the raw bearing is considered as a high-confidence raw bearing.
In the low-confidence region—the phase has certain limits and so does the bearing. The phase and/or bearing are examined.
The bearing filter is initialized when a consistent sequence of high-confidence raw bearings from low confidence region (or bearings from high confidence region) is received. The sequence is consistent when all bearings are within the same low-confidence region 110 or 112. The sequence length is bounded on the low end by the possibility of incorrect filter initialization and on the high end by the total time required to collect the needed number of signals for initialization. Allowed misses may be used during bearing filter initialization. The miss is a case in which a reply or squitter is received but raw bearing or phase difference information is not available.
Bearing initialization occurs when the sequence of raw bearings is outside of the low-confidence regions 110 or 112. This is because confidence is high that the raw bearing is accurate, for the reasons described above.
Once the bearing filter is initialized, it is used to smooth raw bearings and to predict target bearing. Under the interference condition, when the bottom antenna-phase difference is distorted, the bottom antenna-phase difference or raw bearing is not used for bearing tracking. Instead, filter prediction and phase difference from the top antenna 24 are used without any information from the lower antenna 26.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4855748 | Brandao et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5235336 | Sturm et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5552788 | Ryan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5677693 | Frankot et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6169519 | Holecek et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6223123 | Ryan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7583223 | Brandao et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20050156777 | King et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080068250 | Brandao et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120032 | Brandao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080204310 | Blessing et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284637 | Blessing et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100117886 | Brandao et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110267216 | Smith | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1901087 | Mar 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,029, by Zeng et al., filed Oct. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,064, by Brandao, Sr. et al., filed Oct. 26, 2012. |
Response to Examination Report dated Feb. 20, 2014, from counterpart European Application No. 13186968.7, dated Jun. 23, 2014, 13 pp. |
Search Report from counterpart EPC Patent Application No. 13186968.7, dated Feb. 7, 2014, 3 pp. |
Examination Report from counterpart EPC Patent Application No. 13186968.7, dated Feb. 20, 2014, 5 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140118192 A1 | May 2014 | US |