In a vertical situation display (VSD) based on flight plan trajectory there is a case in which the displayed data are incomplete. This occurs when a segment has “no computed trajectory” (NCT) see
The present invention provides systems and methods for alerting or assisting a flight crew when the vertical situation display (VSD) may be providing incomplete information due to the presence of a non-computed trajectory segment in the flight plan. An exemplary system located on an aircraft includes a surveillance system, a flight management system, one or more position measuring systems, and a processing device. The processing device is in signal communication with the surveillance system, the flight management system, and the positioning system. The processing device receives a flight plan from the flight management system and determines if the flight plan includes any non-computed trajectory segments. Then the processing device receives aircraft speed and position information and determines at least one of time or distance to a beginning of a next determined non-computed trajectory segment, based on the received aircraft speed and position information. If the at least one of time or distance to the beginning of the next determined non-computed trajectory segment is less than a threshold value, the processing device generates a signal that information displayed on a vertical situation display may be incomplete. An alert or automatic reversionary display may be triggered based on the generated signal.
In one aspect of the invention, the system includes a vertical situation display. The processing device automatically switches the vertical situation display to a trajectory viewing mode, if at least one of the time or distance to the beginning of the next determined non-computed trajectory segment is less than the threshold value. The generated alert includes at least one of a visual or audible indication that the vertical situation display has been switched to the trajectory viewing mode.
In another aspect of the invention, the processing device assigns an end of the flight plan as a beginning of a non-computed trajectory segment.
Preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
As shown in
In a bare minimum system the processor 38 generates an input that is sent to the surveillance system 42 or the processor generated input is sent to the flight crew in parallel with data from the surveillance system 42. This bare minimum system would need to know current position and ground speed of the aircraft.
The processor 38 receives as input the flight plan (intended path). The processor 38 separates the flight plan into manageable chunks (segments). If the processor 38 determines that a special case segment (such as a non-computed trajectory (NCT) segment) exists in the flight plan, the cumulative length of the segments (or partial/remaining segments) is determined for the segments (or partial/remaining segments) starting at the aircraft's current position using position information received from the positioning system 48 (e.g., global positioning system (GPS) or inertial reference system (IRS)) and terminating at the beginning of the first special case or nondisplayable segment (or at the end of the flight plan, whichever comes first).
The processor 38 then divides cumulative length by the current aircraft ground speed received from the position measurement system (e.g. GPS, IRS, or FMS) 48 to obtain an estimate of the look-ahead time (or distance). If available, the intended speed during each segment can be multiplied by the segment length to obtain a more accurate estimate. The estimated look-ahead time is then compared to a predetermined limit (or limit table) to determine if “sufficient” look-ahead time exists. The look-up table can be indexed by aircraft height above the ground, current height compared to the minimum safe altitude for the sector, or by phase of flight. Close to the ground or in an approach phase, a constant limit, perhaps two minutes, might prove sufficient. In cruise phase, where the dominant hazard is severe weather rather than terrain, a longer look-ahead, such as 10 to 20 minutes, might be more advisable. If the processor 38 determines that sufficient look-ahead time does not exist, the processor 38 switches from displaying hazards along the flight plan to displaying hazards along the aircraft's current track and/or outputs an alert (visually, audibly, or tactilely) that indicates the pending condition.
If the processor 38 switches the mode of the display (the output device 44) an indication of display mode (“Along Flight Plan” or “Along Track”) is provided to the flight crew. This could be done with text, with distinctive coloring, line-typing (e.g., dashes) or other graphical indicia. If type of line were used, then part of the display could be along the flight path and the remainder along an extension vector (i.e., current track). If automatic mode switching of the display is not enabled, then an alternative would be to output an alert, such as a “no data” indication (“purple haze” or other distinctive graphical element), or by text that says essentially “switch to track”, or perhaps a flashing mode indicator. Other alerting options may be used.
At a block 100, the processor 38 optionally automatically switches the VSD to a trajectory mode. In the trajectory mode, the VSD presents data from the weather and terrain databases or any other hazard information (e.g., traffic) based on current aircraft trajectory. If an automatic switch of modes of the VSD has occurred, then the alert indicates a mode switch of the VSD has occurred, due to data truncation in flight plan mode.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8046119 | Bitar et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8145365 | Flotte et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8412392 | Jayathirtha et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20060129285 | Gremmert | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080046171 | Bitar et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090105943 | Ferro et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100004801 | Flotte et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110208374 | Jayathirtha et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110301842 | Krupansky et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120319872 | Gremmert et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006065782 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2009035757 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from counterpart EPC Application No. 12170373.0, dated Dec. 12, 2012. 3 pp. |
Intention to Grant from counterpart EPC Application No. 12170373.0, dated Jan. 8, 2014. 20 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120319872 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |