The present invention relates to systems and methods for metal plating. More particularly, the invention relates to techniques for controlling the structure and properties of electroplated and electroless plated metals.
Metal plating of articles or base substrates is a common industrial practice. A metal layer may be coated or plated onto the surface of an article, for example, for decoration, reflection of light, protection against corrosion, or increased wearing quality. Articles or base substrates, which are made of metal or non-metallic material, may be plated with suitable coating metals using techniques such as electroplating, electroless plating, metal spraying, hot dip galvanizing, vacuum metallization or other available processes. Plating by electrolysis, or electroplating, is a commonly used technique for metal plating because it permits the control of the thickness of the plating. Cadmium, zinc, silver, gold, tin, copper, nickel, and chromium are commonly used plating/coating metals. In immersion or electroless plating, some metals are directly precipitated, without the application of externally applied sources of electricity, from chemical solutions onto the surface of the substrates. The silvering of mirrors is a type of plating in which silver is precipitated chemically on glass. Any of the common metals and some nonmetals, e.g., plastics, with suitably prepared (e.g., etched) surfaces can be used as the article or base substrate material.
A coated or plated metal layer may have structural properties (e.g., grain size, grain orientation, density, porosity, etc.) that are different from other forms of the metal (e.g., bulk material or sprayed materials) because of their different manner of preparation. The structural properties of the coated or plated metal layer, depending on the method of preparation, can in some instances be advantageous or disadvantageous for certain applications. For example, porosity can be detrimental with respect to corrosion, machined finish, strength, macro hardness and wear characteristics. Conversely, porosity can be advantageous with respect to lubrication (porosity acts as reservoir for lubricants), increasing thermal barrier properties, reducing stress levels and increasing thickness limitations, increasing shock resisting properties, abradability in clearance control coatings, applications in nucleate boiling, etc. Thus, it is desirable to control the structural properties of a coated or plated metal layer according to the desired application properties of the metal layer.
Electro and electroless plating operations using gold and copper deposits have a wide range of applications, from PCBs (printed circuit boards) to automotives and jewelry. However, existing gold-plating technologies have several shortcomings, including higher than desired electrical resistivity, susceptibility to corrosion and significantly higher plating thicknesses of the gold deposit than is intrinsically required, which drives up the cost of the plating process.
Consideration is now being given to improving electro and electroless plating systems and methods. Attention is particularly being directed to techniques for controlling the structural properties of electroplated and electroless plated metals, with particular emphasis on reducing the porosity of the deposit. A principal feature of the present invention is the in-situ annealing of the deposit by controlled heating of the deposit during its growth.
Further features of the invention, its nature, and various advantages will be more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference characters represent like elements throughout, and in which:
The present invention provides “in-situ” annealing systems and methods for controlling the structural properties of metal plating layers, which are formed by electrolytic or electroless deposition on substrates from solution. Control of the structural properties is achieved by controlled annealing of the layers as they are being deposited or formed. Further, control of the structural properties is achieved by using slow growth phases for the metal plating layers in conjunction with their in-situ annealing. These systems and methods advantageously also enable controlled maskless plating of substrates.
The systems and methods involve directly heating the plating layer deposits during the slow growth of the deposits, either continuously or intermittently. Alternatively, for thin substrates, the systems and methods involve applying heat to the substrate face opposite to the growth face of the deposits to achieve simultaneous growth and annealing of the deposits. The substrates may be movably mounted or attached in thermal contact to a rail. The rail may be heated to conduct heat to the substrates. Alternatively, a laser may be used to heat the substrates attached to a moving rail from the back surface of the connectors. A large substrate may be immersed in solution, and a laser raster pattern scanned across the substrate to heat the entire surface sequentially while the plating layer is growing.
The inventive systems and methods have ready applications in improving common industrial metal coating processes. For example, standard gold electroplating of electronic device connectors generally results in gold layers with high porosity, which leads to a substantial increase in the gold thickness required to prevent corrosion. In turn, the increase in the gold thickness results in an increase in production costs, which could be avoided if the gold plating deposits could be made thinner and yet could effectively prevent corrosion. The inventive “in-situ” annealing systems and methods described herein overcome the porosity problem of such gold plating deposits by controlling their structures by annealing the substrate during the growth phase of the plating process. Gold films having desirable low porosity may be formed by suitable in-situ annealing during deposition. Thus, thinner films may be used as corrosion-resistant films on electronic device connectors with a large cost savings over conventional electroplating methods. In addition to reduced porosity and reduced susceptibility of the substrate to corrosion, the in-situ annealed deposits will exhibit improved adhesion and grain structure.
The known electroplating methods include bath plating and jet plating (with or without laser irradiation). Laser jet plating utilizes a jet of electrolyte which may also serve as an optical waveguide with the laser radiation trapped within the jet. As a result, both laser and jet are collinear and incident on the sample in the same location on the substrate simultaneously. This has been found to result in enhanced growth rates for gold layers and in improved morphology of the gold deposits. For copper, the laser does not affect the growth rate but improves the microstructure and lowers the electrical resistivity of the deposit. Gelshinski et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,497,692 (“Gelshinski et al.”) and R. J. von Gutfeld, J. Opt Soc. Am B/Vol 4, 272 (1987) (“von Gutfeld”), compare the grain structure of gold and copper spots jet-plated on substrates with and without accompanying laser irradiation. For their studies, a concentrated electrolyte jet was directed on substrate surfaces to form the spot deposits at high growth rates. Deposition rates for 0.05 cm diameter gold spots were on the order of 10 micrometers per second. For both gold and copper, micrographs of cross-sectioned deposits show that “with laser” jet-plated samples have superior grain morphology than “without laser” jet-plated samples. Further, the deposits prepared with the laser jet show a significantly lower electrical resistivity compared to those deposits prepared using the jet without the laser based on four point probe resistivity measurements of the samples. It is important to note that the above-referenced experiments all used high growth rates, whereas the present invention relies on slow growth rates (e.g., on the order of 1-10 nm/s) in conjunction with simultaneous thermal annealing to minimize structural defects, particularly in the form of pores residing within the deposited film.
The systems and methods described herein may be adapted for both patterned and maskless substrate plating operations. The systems may be suitably configured (e.g., for maskless plating of gold onto electronic connectors) with continuous feed material handling systems (e.g., reel-to-reel substrate supply systems).
It will be understood that the systems and methods described herein can be adapted for alloy plating. Pulse plating maybe used (especially for alloy plating in which two or more different chemically reduced ions constitute the deposited layer). The heat source for annealing the deposits in pulse plating also may be pulsed (e.g., in synchrony with the electroplating pulses from a potentiostat or the like) so that each deposited layer or sub-layer of the two or more different ions is annealed in a controlled manner.
As previously noted, the systems and methods achieve control of the structural properties by using slow growth phases for the metal plating layers in conjunction with simultaneous in-situ annealing during growth. Slow growth phases (e.g., with growth rates on the order of 1-10 nm/s) may be achieved by the use of a very dilute electrolyte. The desired slow growth is in contrast with the earlier laser jet system described by Gelshinski et al and von Gutfeld, which was configured for extremely high growth rates. According to the present invention, as the film growth progresses, there is intermittent or simultaneous heating of the deposit during the growth cycle. This manner of heating results in the annealing of incremental thin layers/sub-layers of deposit as they are growing, instead of the more commonly utilized annealing of a cumulative layer after the end of the growth period.
For in-situ annealing of the growing deposits, system 100 further includes laser 130, which is configured to irradiate and heat substrate 10 from behind as growth of plated metal is occurring on the front surface of substrate 10. Laser 130 may be a pulsed or CW laser. With a CW laser, pulsed irradiation may, for example, be obtained by using a mechanical chopper wheel 132 or a Pockel cell (not shown). The laser pulses incident on the back surface of substrate 10 may be continuous or suitably timed for controlled annealing of the gold or other metal deposits on the substrate. The laser pulses and jet 110 pulses (in pulsed growth mode) may be suitably synchronized for intermittent or concurrent annealing of layers/sub-layers in each growth cycle. The layers/sub-layers may, for example, be intermittently annealed every hundred or so Angstroms of growth.
In system 100 and like systems for in-situ annealing with their relatively slow growth rates, it is beneficial to have the electrolyte circulate, thereby promoting heating of the substrate without unduly heating the electrolyte above the temperature at which it normally operates. In general, for laser heating, a CW or pulsed laser may be selected with a wavelength not readily absorbed by the electrolyte but substantially absorbed by the substrate and the deposit. Where necessary, the electrolyte may utilize a refrigeration stage or temperature controller to maintain its desired temperature. With the proper control of the electrolyte flow velocity and laser power, overheating or boiling of the electrolyte is prevented.
Plating of large parts (substrates) can also be accomplished with in-situ heating during deposition by using a scanning laser that rapidly sweeps across the substrates' surfaces in two dimensions. This method can even be used where the substrate is not necessarily two-dimensional, since the laser can heat areas perpendicular to the planar surface of the substrate should the substrate not be completely planar.
It is expected that laser heating of the substrate from the back surface, i.e., opposite to that of the growth surface (as shown in
Further, maskless plating can be achieved in system 100 by suitable design of Be—Cu connector 200 to make electrical and/or thermal contact with selected substrate areas and to heat selected areas.
In the case of system 100 shown in
By suitable selection of the aforementioned parameters (e.g., spacing distance d, substrate movement rate, Joule heating current, chopper RPM, rate of growth, etc.), system 100 can be operated to obtain maskless plating in desired patterns, without lithography steps. This maskless plating procedure may advantageously provide cost savings in gold material and lithography, especially when the jet used for jet plating controls the area undergoing plating.
While there have been described what are believed to be the preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention, and it is intended to claim all such changes and modifications as fall within the true scope of the invention.
It will be understood that in accordance with the present invention, the techniques described herein may be implemented using any suitable combination of hardware and software. The software (i.e., instructions) for implementing and operating the aforementioned rate estimation and control techniques can be provided on computer-readable media, which can include, without limitation, firmware, memory, storage devices, microcontrollers, microprocessors, integrated circuits, ASICs, online downloadable media, and other available media.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/980,681, filed Oct. 17, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/767,461, filed Jun. 22, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/845,586, filed Sep. 19, 2006 and 60/815,790, filed Jun. 22, 2006 and is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US06/04329, filed Feb. 8, 2006, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/650,870, filed Feb. 8, 2005; 60/675,114, filed Apr. 25, 2005; and 60/700,877, filed Jul. 20, 2005, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2964453 | Garn et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
3582478 | Kelly et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3790738 | Laub et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4098655 | Ward et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4169770 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4217183 | Melcher et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4229264 | Graunke | Oct 1980 | A |
4283259 | Melcher et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4348263 | Draper et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4395320 | Kasashima et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4432855 | Romankiw et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4497692 | Gelchinski et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4629539 | Imai | Dec 1986 | A |
4895633 | Seto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904340 | Miracky et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4917774 | Fisher | Apr 1990 | A |
4919769 | Lin | Apr 1990 | A |
5057184 | Gupta et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5202291 | Charvat et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5245847 | Bando et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5279702 | Douglas | Jan 1994 | A |
5292418 | Morita et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296375 | Kricka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5338416 | Mlcak et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5364510 | Carpio | Nov 1994 | A |
5378343 | Kounaves et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5704493 | Fujikawa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5906723 | Mathies et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928880 | Wilding et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932799 | Moles | Aug 1999 | A |
6042712 | Mathieu | Mar 2000 | A |
6110354 | Saban et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159353 | West et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165630 | Gehlhaar et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6280602 | Robertson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319834 | Erb et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334980 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6391559 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423207 | Heidari et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6509085 | Kennedy | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521118 | Starvetsky et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532642 | Wingo | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6787012 | Stanbery | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6936167 | Hobbs et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7079760 | Hamelin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7192559 | Chow et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020046949 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020125142 | Sun et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020195345 | Bentsen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008473 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029722 | Erdosy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040166504 | Rossier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050173253 | Huang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224359 | Su et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241948 | Han et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003579 | Sir | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080142367 | Von Gutfeld et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245674 | von Gutfeld et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264801 | West et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080299780 | Elliott et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100084268 | Pierce et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100084286 | West | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110042201 | von Gutfeld et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110104396 | von Gutfeld et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1793434 | Jun 2006 | CN |
60-204899 | Oct 1985 | JP |
04-066679 | Mar 1992 | JP |
2011071700 | Apr 2011 | JP |
WO9510040 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO2006086407 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2006110437 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Nov. 30, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,591, Nov. 23, 2011 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,591, Nov. 10, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Dec. 22, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Jan. 26, 2012 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Feb. 21, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Apr. 27, 2012 Response to Non-Compliant. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Apr. 10, 2012 Notice of Non-Compliant. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,591, Apr. 23, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Oct. 19, 2011 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Aug. 24, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Mar. 24, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Oct. 10, 2011 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Oct. 4, 2011 Advisory Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Sep. 20, 2011 Response to Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Jun. 9, 2011 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Mar. 28, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Oct. 28, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767;461, Aug. 9, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,591, Aug. 10, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
T. Kikuchi et al., “Local surface modification of aluminum by laser irradation”, Electrochimica Acta, 2001: 225-234. |
Lowenheim, F., Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc.; Modem Electroplating; (3rd Edition); 194: 591-625. |
O. Mallory, Glenn; Hajdu, Juan B.; Fundamentals and Applications; American Electroplaters and Surface Finishers Society; 1990: 193-204. |
Ogden et al., “Cylic Voltaammetric Stripping Analysis of Copper Plating Baths”, Applications of Polarization Measurements in the Control of Metal Deposition, 1984: 229-240. |
Wills et al., “Laser micromachining of indium tin oxide films on polymer substrates by laser-induced delamination”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42 (2009) 045306 (8pp). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Aug. 21, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Oct. 3, 2012 Final Office Action. |
Darling, et al., “Integration of microelectrodes with etched microchannles for in-stream electrochemical analysis”, Micro Total Analysis Systems, pp. 105-108 (1998). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,591, Jul. 9, 2012 Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Jun. 28, 2012 Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Jul. 20, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Jul. 6, 2012 Advisory Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Jun. 26, 2012 Response to Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Dec. 11, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,378, Nov. 27, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Feb. 11, 2013 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, Feb. 7, 2013 Response to Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399, Jan. 28, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/940,703, dated Feb. 28, 2013 Non-Final Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,461, dated Mar. 6, 2013 Advisory Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/867,399 dated Mar. 11, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090081386 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60980681 | Oct 2007 | US | |
60845586 | Sep 2006 | US | |
60815790 | Jun 2006 | US | |
60650870 | Feb 2005 | US | |
60675114 | Apr 2005 | US | |
60700877 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11767461 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12208287 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2006/004329 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 11767461 | US |