Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present disclosure relates to golf clubs, and more specifically to face insert assemblies for putter-type golf club heads.
Different types of golf clubs (e.g., irons, drivers, fairway woods, utility irons, hybrid irons/woods, putters, etc.) are used to effect different types of shots, based on a golfer's location and ball lie when playing a hole on a golf course. Each club has different overall structure, which is dependent upon the purpose of the club, but the club heads of all golf clubs comprise a face having a striking surface, which defines a striking profile that is commensurate with the underlying purpose of each respective club head. The striking surface of each club head is constructed based upon a number of factors, such as the intended contact speed with a golf ball, the desired acoustic and vibratory feedback for the golfer using the club head, and the required regulatory framework as set forth by various regulatory bodies, including the United States Golf Association (“USGA”), among other factors.
While irons, drivers, fairway woods, utility irons, and hybrid irons/woods are constructed with striking surfaces that depend upon varying considerations, the striking surfaces of putters are constructed to provide enhanced accuracy and precision at low striking speeds, so as to increase a golfer's chances of sinking a putt at any location from which a putt is an appropriate shot on a golf course. While striking surfaces of putters have an overall profile that is generally planar, golf balls are not perfectly spherical objects since they are covered in dimples, making the surface of golf balls substantially uneven. As a result, when striking the golf ball with a typical putter, the ball can bounce off at an unintended or unexpected angle. In the context of hitting a 10-foot or a 20-foot putt, if the resultant putt is off by one degree, the golfer is going to miss the hole completely. In general, golfers miss putts because of poor contact, because if the ball does not collide properly with the striking surface and align with the center of mass, the ball will very likely bounce off at an unexpected angle.
To visualize this concept, if a golf ball is dropped vertically onto a flat, horizontal surface, sometimes it will bounce vertically, but many times it will not bounce vertically, and will instead ricochet at an unexpected angle. During such an experiment, non-vertical bounces can be attributed to the uneven surface of the ball rather than any imperfections in the surface itself. A non-vertical bounce is expected, and even if the golf ball bounces within one degree of the vertical, as noted above, such an error in the context of a putt on a green can cause a significant mishit when longer putts are taken.
In addition to the end result of reducing mishits taken with a putter, other important considerations for putter striking faces include the tactile and acoustic feedback to the golfer. Successful prior art putter-type golf clubs provide a positive sensation or feel that the golf club is delivering for the golfer. Since many putter-type golf clubs include metal striking faces, a metallic feel can be associated with harsh sensation for off-center shots. While some solutions to reducing mishits have been provided, such as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,824,278, 8,083,611, and 9,776,051, these putter-type club heads suffer from a number of drawbacks that fail to solve the aforementioned problem in a repeatable, cost-effective, and easy to manufacture way. These prior art putter-type club heads further fail to provide a user with the tactile and auditory feedback that is desirable when using such a golf club, and can instead provide the undesirable effects of a pure metallic striking surface.
Therefore, a need exits for a striking surface of a putter that can reduce mishits, especially for longer putts, provide desirable auditory and vibratory feedback to a golfer, and be manufactured in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
The present disclosure is directed to face insert assemblies for putter-type golf club heads. In some embodiments, a putter-type golf club includes a body defining a toe portion, a medial portion, a heel portion, and an insert cavity, and a face insert assembly disposed within the insert cavity. The face insert assembly includes an outer plate comprising a plurality of apertures, and an inner insert comprising a plurality of protrusions. The plurality of protrusions extend entirely through the plurality of apertures.
In some embodiments, the outer plate comprises metal, and the inner insert comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the metal comprises steel, and the polymer comprises thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). In some embodiments, the plurality of protrusions each define a stem and a head, and the head includes a rounded portion at a distal end thereof. In some embodiments, the plurality of apertures comprises between 10 and 1,000 apertures, and the plurality of protrusions comprises between 10 and 1,000 protrusions. In some embodiments, a diameter of each of the apertures of the plurality of apertures is between about 0.50 millimeter and about 3.0 millimeters. In some embodiments, the insert assembly further comprises an adhesive applied to a rear face of the inner insert. In some embodiments, the plurality of apertures are disposed in a hexagonal configuration. In some embodiments, the plurality of protrusions each define a stem and a head, and an outermost point of the head extends from an outer face of the outer plate by a distance of between about 0.02 millimeters and about 1.00 millimeters. In some embodiments a lower end of the insert assembly comprises a lower thickness, the upper end of the insert assembly defines an upper thickness, and the lower thickness is different than the upper thickness.
In some embodiments, a face insert assembly for a putter-type golf club includes a metal outer plate comprising a plurality of apertures, and a polymeric inner insert comprising a plurality of protrusions. The plurality of protrusions extend entirely through the plurality of apertures, the plurality of protrusions each define a stem and a head, and an outermost point of the head extends from an outer face of the outer plate by a distance of between about 0.05 millimeters and about 0.50 millimeters.
In some embodiments, the metal comprises steel, and the polymer comprises thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). In some embodiments, the plurality of apertures are disposed in a hexagonal configuration. In some embodiments, the plurality of protrusions each define a stem and a head, and the head includes a rounded portion at a distal end thereof. In some embodiments, the plurality of apertures comprises between 100 and 1,000 apertures, and the plurality of protrusions comprises between 100 and 1,000 protrusions. In some embodiments, a diameter of each of the apertures of the plurality of apertures is between about 0.50 millimeter and about 3.00 millimeters. In some embodiments, the insert assembly further comprises an adhesive applied to a rear face of the inner insert.
In some embodiments, a method of assembling an insert assembly for a putter-type assembly includes the steps of die cutting a plurality of apertures into a metal plate, inserting the metal plate into a mold, and injection molding an inner insert having a plurality of protrusions with the metal plate such that the metal plate and the inner insert are molded together. The plurality of protrusions extend entirely through the plurality of apertures of the metal plate. In some embodiments, the plurality of protrusions each define a stem and a head, and an outermost point of the head extends from an outer face of the outer plate by a distance of between about 0.05 millimeters and about 0.50 millimeters.
The following discussion and accompanying figures disclose various embodiments or configurations of a golf club head having a face insert assembly that assists golfers with reducing mishits of shots taken with a putter-type golf club. The face insert assembly of the present disclosure further provides desirable acoustic and vibratory feedback to a golfer, which positively impacts a golfer's perception of hitting a golf ball with the same. As used herein, the terms “mass” and “weight” are used interchangeably, although it is understood that these terms refer to different properties in a strict physical sense. The term “about,” as used herein, refers to variations in the numerical quantity that may occur, for example, through typical measuring and manufacturing procedures used for articles of manufacture that may include embodiments of the disclosure herein. Throughout the disclosure, the terms “about” and “approximately” refer to a range of values ±5% of the numeric value that the term precedes.
The present disclosure is directed to putter-type golf club heads having a face insert assembly that includes an outer plate and an inner insert, which combine to define a striking surface with a plurality of peaks in the form of hemispherical protrusions. The face insert assembly of the present disclosure overcomes issues associated with “the bad bounce problem” associated with mishits using a putter-type golf club, which is more pronounced at low putting speeds. Typically, at low putting speeds, the speed of the golf ball moving in a sideways direction is a larger fraction of the desired linear or normal speed, which typically results in a situation where the ball comes off of the putter with a larger error in the launch angle. The hemispherical protrusions of the present disclosure are provided in rows and columns to account for the non-spherical nature of golf balls, and are provided to enhance the accuracy of golf balls that are hit with the putter of the present disclosure by stabilizing the point or points of contact of the striking profile with a golf ball.
As described in detail below, the protrusions may be provided in a variety of configurations, and may take alternate forms than as shown and described hereinafter below. In general, the protrusions enhance various performance characteristics of a golf club head that includes the face insert as described herein, which may be modified to achieve a desired face flex, distance variability, launch condition, or aesthetic appearance, among other characteristics. The golf club heads disclosed herein may be manufactured using one or more of a variety of manufacturing processes or techniques. For example, the golf club heads disclosed herein may be manufactured using one or more of the manufacturing techniques disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/852,327, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The face insert assembly as detailed herein is formed to counteract the non-spherical nature of golf ball geometry due to the dimples that are disposed along an outer surface of the golf ball, by including a plurality of positively-extending protrusions that protrude outward from the face, e.g., by about 0.20 millimeters (mm). The protrusions act as a multitude of singular points of contact that, during contact with a golf ball, maintain the position of the ball orientation at impact with the club head. As an example, in the context of a 10 foot putt, the hole has a radius of 5.40 cm and is 304.8 cm away from the ball before impact. From such a putting distance, and on a perfectly level surface, the ball has to be aimed within 1.0 degree of a line joining the center of the ball and a center of the hole to make the putt. To sink a 20 foot putt, the required angle drops to 0.5 degrees. The construction of the insert assembly as described herein reduces the variance beyond 1.0 degree, and provides a golfer with reduced likelihood of a mishit beyond these and other angle variances.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring to
Referring to
During assembly or manufacture of the face insert assembly 44, the inner insert 82 may be molded together with the outer plate 80. In one particular embodiment, the outer plate 80 may be die cut and placed into a mold, and the inner insert 82 may be injection molded into the mold such that the inner insert 82 and the outer plate 80 are molded together. In some embodiments, a rear surface 106 of the outer plate 80 may include a plurality of teeth, depressions, or projections (not shown), which may correspond with teeth, depressions, or projections along the inner insert 82, which may be provided to enhance coupling or fusion of the outer plate 80 with the inner insert 82. In some embodiments, the inner insert 82 may include a receiving cavity (not shown) defined by an outer flange that extends from the inner insert 82, and receives the outer plate 80 therein. In alternative embodiments, other coupling features may be provided along the rear surface 106 of the outer plate 80 to enhance coupling between the outer plate 80 and the inner insert 82.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
Still referring to
Further, while the present embodiment includes between 1 aperture 86 and 5 apertures 86 disposed along each of the vertical columns, more apertures 86 are contemplated. For example, the vertical columns of apertures 86 may include between 1 aperture 86 and 10 apertures 86, or between 2 apertures 86 and 9 apertures 86, or between 3 apertures 86 and 8 apertures 86, or between 4 apertures 86 and 7 apertures 86, or more than 2 apertures 86, or more than 3 apertures 86, or more than 4 apertures 86, or more than 5 apertures 86, or more than 6 apertures 86, or more than 7 apertures 86, or more than 8 apertures 86, or more than 9 apertures 86.
Still further, while the present embodiment includes between 3 apertures 86 and 10 apertures 86 disposed along each of the inclined columns, more apertures 86 are contemplated. For example, the inclined columns of apertures 86 may include between 3 apertures 86 and 20 apertures 86, or between 5 apertures 86 and 18 apertures 86, or between 7 apertures 86 and 16 apertures 86, or between 9 apertures 86 and 14 apertures 86, or between 10 apertures 86 and 12 apertures 86, or more than 5 apertures 86, or more than 7 apertures 86, or more than 9 apertures 86, or more than 11 apertures 86, or more than 13 apertures 86, or more than 15 apertures 86, or more than 17 apertures 86, or more than 19 apertures 86.
Still referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
During testing, 20 putts were taken with each of the different face insert assemblies using the same putter and a robotic arm to hit the balls approximately 3 feet at the same velocity each time. For each of the putts, the offline distance was measured at 13.6 inches, and the data was extrapolated to determine the horizontal distance that the ball would be off-center at 3 feet, 6 feet, and 12 feet. For the measurements of the putts taken at 3 feet, the offline distance, i.e., distance off-center, from the target was measured, and the data was extrapolated for the remaining distances. A perfectly flat green was assumed for the data, such that the putt would remain along a linear path in order to arrive at the offline amount at the putt distances shown. The putts used during testing were controlled to use the same striking speed for both the prior art face insert assembly and the face insert assembly 44. As noted above, for each putt, the average distance off-center was measured or extrapolated in inches, and is compiled into the table below.
Referring to Tables 1 and 2 below, the average distance off-center is provided in the first row of each Table. The second row includes the average distance off-center as a percentage of a standard golf hole diameter, which has a radius of 5.40 cm (2.13 in.) and a diameter of 10.80 cm (4.25 in). The third row includes the maximum measured distance off-center, and the fourth row includes the maximum distance off-center as a percentage of the golf hole diameter. Table 1 illustrates the foregoing data and comparisons for the prior art insert assembly that was tested, while Table 2 illustrates the foregoing data and comparisons for the insert assembly 44 as disclosed herein.
When further analyzing the data acquired through the testing of Tables 1 and 2, it is readily apparent that as the hole is farther away for a particular shot, the differences between the average distance off-center increases between the prior art insert assembly and the insert assembly 44 of the present disclosure. That is, as the distance between the initial position of the ball and the hole increases, the prior art insert assembly performs poorer than the insert assembly 44 of the present disclosure, having a larger average distance off-center. Table 3 is provided below to further illustrate the differences in both magnitude and percentage between the insert assemblies.
As noted above, and still referring to
To that end, and as shown in the graph of
While the above data, schematics, and graph highlight the differences in accuracy between the insert assembly 44 of the present disclosure and the prior art insert assembly at different putting distances, Table 4 below and the graph of
Importantly, all of the data derived from the testing of the prior art assembly and the insert assembly 44 of the present disclosure favored the insert assembly 44. The data collected from the testing is shown graphically in
Still referring to Table 4, the data is further buttressed by the ranges of the prior art insert assembly (1.40 cm) and the insert assembly 44 (1.20 cm) being separated by about 14.3%. As noted above with respect to the effective size of the hole for the different insert assemblies, such a percentage difference between the overall accuracy can be substantially impactful for a golfer, and can result in several strokes being added or subtracted to a score, solely because of differences between the striking profile of the putter face.
Any of the embodiments described herein may be modified to include any of the structures or methodologies disclosed in connection with different embodiments. Further, the present disclosure is not limited to club heads of the type specifically shown. Still further, aspects of the club heads of any of the embodiments disclosed herein may be modified to work with a variety of golf clubs.
As noted previously, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that while the disclosure has been described above in connection with particular embodiments and examples, the disclosure is not necessarily so limited, and that numerous other embodiments, examples, uses, modifications and departures from the embodiments, examples and uses are intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Numerous modifications to the present disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is presented for the purpose of enabling those skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The exclusive rights to all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims are reserved.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1968092 | Oldham | Jul 1934 | A |
1968626 | Young | Jul 1934 | A |
2429351 | Fetterolf | Oct 1947 | A |
4679792 | Straza | Jul 1987 | A |
5542675 | Micciche | Aug 1996 | A |
5766093 | Rohrer | Jun 1998 | A |
6089993 | Woodward | Jul 2000 | A |
6110057 | McKinnon | Aug 2000 | A |
6227986 | Fisher | May 2001 | B1 |
6257994 | Antonious | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6554721 | Woodward | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592467 | Gray | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6699140 | Sun | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6849004 | Lindsay | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7500923 | Tateno | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7794333 | Wallans | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824278 | Miyamichi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8083611 | Kuan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109841 | Miyamichi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8292754 | Snyder | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8371958 | Treadwell | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425342 | Snyder | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8622850 | Narita | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9265996 | Abbott | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9555300 | Abbott | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9566484 | Abbott | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9694260 | Abbott | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9776051 | Abbott | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9878221 | Abbott | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10905921 | Stubben | Feb 2021 | B1 |
11161018 | Stubben | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11161021 | Becktor | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11161022 | Willmott | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11207572 | Willmott et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
20030045372 | Vrska, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050020378 | Krumme | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070243949 | Solari | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080108452 | Chiang | May 2008 | A1 |
20100087269 | Snyder | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100234127 | Snyder | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100267466 | Stites | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120196700 | Rollinson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20150375069 | Abbott | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170136320 | Abbott | May 2017 | A1 |
20200038717 | Stubben | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210031078 | Willmott | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210113898 | Kroloff | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20220001253 | Müller | Jan 2022 | A1 |