This invention relates to management and viewing of medical images and, more particularly, to systems and methods of comparing related medical images in order to detect differences in the compared images.
Medical imaging is increasingly moving into the digital realm. This includes imaging techniques that were traditionally analog, such as mammography, x-ray imaging, angiography, endoscopy, and pathology, where information can now be acquired directly using digital sensors, or by digitizing information that was acquired in analog form. In addition, many imaging modalities are inherently digital, such as MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, and ultrasound. Increasingly these digital images are viewed, manipulated, and interpreted using computers and related computer equipment. Accordingly, there is a need for improved systems and methods of viewing and manipulating these digital images.
When comparison of related images is required, subtle differences between images may be difficult to detect. For example, if a lung radiograph from two months previous, and a current lung radiograph are to be compared in order to determine if any changes have occurred in the lungs over the previous two months, the viewer or reader typically views the two x-rays side by side. For example, the viewer or reader may have two monitors placed side by side, wherein each of the monitors displays a chest radiographic image. Alternatively, the viewer may view the two images side by side on a single monitor. However, as those of skill in the art will recognize, identifying differences in related images in this manner is often tedious and difficult. Some imaging modalities, such as CT and MRI, produce a large number of images, hundreds to even thousands of images per exam. In many cases, comparison of different series of images within the exam is required. For example, comparison of pre and post contrast images to detect areas of enhancement or comparison of PET and CT images for localization of activity is often necessary. Further, these often large exams may need to be compared to multiple prior exams to detect subtle, progressive changes over time, for example to detect a small, growing tumor. Current imaging software does not provide a satisfactory method for comparing images contained in two or more image series. Accordingly, systems and methods for comparison of images of multiple image series so that differences in the images may be more easily distinguishable are desired.
In one embodiment, a method of viewing medical images from two or more image series on a display device coupled to a computing device comprises the steps of selecting a first image series comprising two or more medical images, selecting at least one comparison image series, each of the comparison image series comprising two or more medical images, interleaving images of the first image series and the comparison image series in order to form an interleaved image series, and sequentially displaying the images of the interleaved image series at a single location on the display device.
In another embodiment, a method of viewing a series of medical images on a display device coupled to a computing device comprises the steps of (a) selecting a first image series for viewing, the first image series comprising a plurality X of medical images, (b) selecting a second image series for viewing, the second image series comprising a plurality Y of medical images, (c) displaying at a predetermined location on the display device a Nth image of the first image series, (d) replacing the Nth image of the first image series with a Mth image of the second image series at the predetermined location, (e) incrementing N and M, and (f) repeating steps (c) to (f).
In another embodiment, a system for enhancing a viewer's ability to detect differences between medical images in two or more sets of medial images comprises a display device, a graphical user interface displayed on the display device and comprising an image pane configured to display a single medical image at a time, an image selection module to select two or more sets of medical images, each of the sets of medical images comprising two or more medical images, and a user interface to receive commands from a user, wherein in response to receiving a first command from the user, the image pane sequentially displays a first medical image from each of the image sets and, after displaying the first medical image from each image set, the image pane sequentially displays a second medical image from each image set. This process of displaying images from images series alternatively continues through subsequent images in the image series.
In another embodiment, a system of viewing medical images from two or more image series on a display device coupled to a computing device comprises means for selecting a first image series comprising two or more medical images, means for selecting at least one comparison image series, each of the comparison image series comprising two or more medical images, means for interleaving images of the first image series and the comparison image series in order to form an interleaved image series, and means for sequentially displaying the images of the interleaved image series at a single location on the display device.
In another embodiment, a method of forming an interleaved image series comprises selecting N groups of images, each of the groups of images comprising two or more images, determining a starting image of each of the groups of images, creating an interleaved image series comprising images from each of the selected N groups of images, wherein the images of the interleaved image series are ordered so that an image from each of the N groups of images is included in each sequential Nth group of images, and providing the interleaved image series to a user interface for sequential display in a predetermined location of a display device.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein like numerals refer to like elements throughout. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner, simply because it is being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may include several novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or which is essential to practicing the inventions herein described.
The computing system 100 includes, for example, a personal computer that is IBM, Macintosh, or Linux/Unix compatible. In one embodiment, the exemplary computing system 100 includes a central processing unit (“CPU”) 105, which may include a conventional microprocessor, an application module 145 that comprises one or more various applications that may be executed by the CPU 105. The application module 145 may include, by way of example, components, such as software components, object-oriented software components, class components and task components, processes, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, databases, data structures, tables, arrays, and variables.
The computing system 100 further includes a memory 130, such as random access memory (“RAM”) for temporary storage of information and a read only memory (“ROM”) for permanent storage of information, and a mass storage device 120, such as a hard drive, diskette, or optical media storage device. Typically, the modules of the computing system 100 are connected to the computer using a standards-based bus system. In different embodiments of the present invention, the standards based bus system could be Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), Microchannel, SCSI, Industrial Standard Architecture (ISA) and Extended ISA (EISA) architectures, for example.
The computing system 100 is generally controlled and coordinated by operating system software, such as the Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP or other compatible operating systems. In Macintosh systems, the operating system may be any available operating system, such as MAC OS X. In other embodiments, the computing system 100 may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, and I/O services, and provide a user interface, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things.
The exemplary computing system 100 includes one or more of commonly available input/output (I/O) devices and interfaces 110, such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, and printer. In one embodiment, the I/O devices and interfaces 110 include one or more display devices, such as a monitor, that allows the visual presentation of data to a user. More particularly, display devices provide for the presentation of GUIs, application software data, and multimedia presentations, for example. In one embodiment, a GUI includes one or more image panes in which medical images may be displayed. As described in further detail below, a GUI may provide a comparison pane on a display device in which images from multiple image series are sequentially displayed. According to the systems and methods described below, medical images may be stored on the computing system 100 or another device that is local or remote, displayed on a display device, and manipulated by the application module 145. The computing system 100 may also include one or more multimedia devices 140, such as speakers, video cards, graphics accelerators, and microphones, for example.
In the embodiment of
The imaging devices 170 may be any type of device that is capable of acquiring medical images, such as a MRI, x-ray, mammography, or CT scan systems. The image server 180 includes a data store 182 that is configured to store images and data associated with images. In one embodiment, the imaging devices 170 communicate with the image server via the network 160 and image information is transmitted to the image server 160 and stored in the data store 182. In one embodiment, the image data is stored in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (“DICOM”) format. The complete DICOM specifications may be found on the National Electrical Manufactures Association Website at <medical.nema.org>. Also, NEMA PS 3—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, 2004 ed., Global Engineering Documents, Englewood Colo., 2004, provides an overview of the DICOM standard. Each of the above-cited references is hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. In one embodiment, the data store 182 also stores the user-defined display parameters associated with one or more of the images stored on the data store 182. As discussed in further detail below, the user-defined display parameters may vary depending of the type of image, area imaged, clinical indication, source of image, display device, user, or other factors. Accordingly, any type of user-defined display parameter is expressly contemplated for use in conjunction with the systems and methods described herein.
The exemplary image server 180 is configured to store images from multiple sources and in multiple formats. For example, the image server 180 may be configured to receive medical images in the DICOM format from multiple sources, store these images in the data store 182, and selectively transmit medical images to requesting computing devices.
The medical facility 190 may be a hospital, clinic, doctor's office, or any other medical facility. The medical facility 190 may include one or more imaging devices and may share medical images with the image server 180 or other authorized computing devices. In one embodiment, multiple computing systems, such as the computing system 100 may be housed at a medical facility, such as medical facility 190.
“Medical image” is defined to include an image of an organism. It may include but is not limited to a radiograph, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Ultrasound (US), mammogram, positron emission tomography scan (PET), nuclear scan (NM), pathology, endoscopy, ophthalmology, or many other types of medical images. While this description is directed to viewing and tracking of medical images, the methods and systems described herein may also be used in conjunction with non-medical images, such as, images of circuit boards, airplane wings, and satellite images, for example.
“Modality” is defined as a medical imaging device (a patient who undergoes an MRI is said to have been scanned with the MRI modality).
“Image series” refers to two or more images that are related. For example, an image series may comprise two or more images of a particular patient that are acquired on a particular date, e.g., different x-ray projections of the chest. A series of contiguous 3 mm axial CT scans of the chest would be another example of an image series. A brain MRI scan might include the following series: sagittal T1 weighted images, axial T1 weighted images, axial FLAIR images, axial T2 weighted images, as well as post contrast axial, sagittal and coronal T1 weighted series. An image series may be limited to images of a certain modality or may comprise images of multiple modalities.
“Patient” refers to an individual who undergoes a medical imaging examination.
“Display parameters” are defined to include methods of display of an image or exam. Display parameters may include, for example, a pixel window level and width (similar to brightness and contrast), a certain color map that renders different pixel intensities as different colors, or opacity map.
“Interleaving,” is defined to include the process of arranging images from multiple image series by regularly alternating between images of the multiple image series in order to create a resultant “interleaved” image series. In one embodiment, an interleaved image series comprises images from multiple image series ordered so that the interleaved image series alternates between the images of the original series. For example, when image series A comprising images A1, A2, . . . An, image series B comprising images B1, B2, . . . Bn, and image series C comprising images C1, C2, . . . Cn are interleaved, the resultant interleaved image series is ordered: A1, B1, C1, A2, B2, C2, . . . An, Bn, Cn. Images from multiple image series may be interleaved in various patterns and multiple interleaved image series may be generated from two or more image series.
In the embodiment of
In certain embodiments, such as where the series A and B images are related, e.g., series A comprises mammogram images of a patient taken on a first date and series B comprises the mammogram images of the same patient taking on a later date, it may be advantageous to identify differences between the images of Series A and Series B. However, as described above, it is difficult to distinguish minor or small differences between images using currently available image comparison techniques. Using current image comparison systems, if a lung radiograph from two months previous, and a current lung radiograph are to be compared in order to determine if any changes have occurred in the lungs over the previous two months, the viewer or reader typically views the two x-rays side by side, such as in image panes 212, 214 illustrated in
In embodiments with more than two series, the interleaved images may be ordered according to various schemes. For example images from four image series may be ordered as follows: first image of first image series, first image of second image series, first image of third image series, first image of fourth image series, second image of first image series, and so forth. In other embodiments, however, the interleaved images may be ordered differently. For example, images from four image series may also be ordered as follows: first image of first image series; first image of second image series; first image of first image series; first image of third image series; first image of first image series; and first image of fourth image series. Any other ordering of images from multiple image series falls within the scope of “interleaving” as used herein.
In one embodiment, the computing system 100 that is coupled to the display 210 may store settings for displaying images of particular image series, such as, for example, time for displaying each image, resolution of each image, cropping to be applied to each image, and any other setting that maybe appropriate. In one embodiment, the time for displaying an image may be determined real time by the user. For example, the user may press a designated key on a keyboard or mouse in order to indicate that the current image should be replaced with an adjacent image in the interleaved image series. In another embodiment, the user selects settings for display of the images. For example, the user may select an appropriate zoom level of an image series that should be applied to each image in the image series.
Thus, the images of series A may be magnified more or less than the images of series B. In addition, the user may adjust any other visualization settings for individual images, an entire image series, or two or more image series.
With the first image of series B displayed in the comparison pane 410 (step 404), the user may initiate viewing of an adjacent image in the interleaved image series by pressing a certain key on a keyboard or mouse, for example. In one embodiment, a first input from a mouse indicates that a next image, e.g. image 2 of series A (step 406) should be displayed in the comparison pane 410 and a second input from the mouse indicates that a previous image, e.g. image 1 of series A (step 402) should again be displayed in the comparison pane 410. In one embodiment, the first input is entered by the user moving a scroll button on the mouse in a first direction and the second input is entered by the user moving the scroll button on the mouse in an opposite direction. Thus, the user may change the content of the comparison pane 410 to either a next or a previous image in the interleaved image series. For example, at step 404, if the user wishes to again view the first image of series A, e.g., in order to locate difference in the first images of series A and B, the user may provide an input to the computing device 100 indicating movement to a previous image. Alternatively, at step 404, if the user wishes to view a next image in the interleaved image series, the user may provide an input to the computing device 100 indicating movement to a next image.
At step 406, the second image of series A is displayed in the comparison pane 410, replacing the first image of series B (step 404). At step 406, the user may provide inputs to the computing device 100 indicating that the comparison pane 410 should be updated with a previous image, e.g. step 404, or a subsequent image, e.g., step 408.
At step 408, the second image of series B is displayed in the comparison pane 410, replacing the second image of series B (step 406). At step 406, the user may provide inputs to the computing device 100 indicating that the comparison pane 410 should be updated with a previous image, e.g. step 404, or a subsequent image. In one embodiment, each of the image series A and B include more than two images, such as 3 or more images, and the images of series A and B are displayed in the manner described above with respect to
In one embodiment, the images of each of the image series are automatically modified so that characteristics of the images are similar. For example, images may be adjusted by changing their size, rotation, and location. If the images are of substantially the same anatomical structure, when the images of the interleaved image series are displayed in the comparison pane, differences between adjacent images may be more easily detected. In one embodiment, selected images are morphed in order to achieve a common size of the anatomical structure of interest in each of the images. In one embodiment, photographic filters may be applied to all images of one or more image series, or to selected images of one or more image series, to further enhance the viewer's ability to distinguish differences in the images.
In one embodiment, information regarding the image currently displayed in the comparison pane 410 is displayed on the display device 210 and updated as the images in the comparison pane 410 are changed. For example, information regarding the images series and image number within the series may be displayed for each image. In addition, the exam date and time may also be displayed and updated as the images of the interleaved image series are displayed in the comparison pane 410. In one embodiment, an indicator of whether the current display is of an interleaved image series or a single image series is displayed on the display device. For example, “interleaved” may be displayed at the top of the display device when an interleaved image series is displayed in a comparison pane. In some embodiment, the user chooses what information related to the images of the interleaved image series should be displayed. The user may also be provided the ability to turn the display of information on and off, such as by pressing a particular key or key combination on the keyboard.
In
As illustrated in
In a block 610, a first image series is selected. As noted above, an image series is a group of two or more images that are in some way related. For example, a first image series may comprise multiple chest x-rays of a patient that are taken on a given date.
In a block 620, one or more comparison image series are selected. These image series also each comprise two or more images that are in some way related, such as having been taken at a common exam. The comparison image series should be related to the first image series so that when the first image series and the comparison image series are compared, meaningful distinctions between the image series may be detected.
In one embodiment, the first image series and the comparison image series are selected by the user clicking on a button indicating that image interleaving is desired. In one embodiment, a user right-clicks with a mouse on an image of a first image series in order to initiate display of an “interleave menu” listing options for selecting image series for interleaving and viewing the interleaved image series. In one embodiment, the interleave menu includes an option, such as “interleave adjacent,” indicating that the user may select one of the other image series displayed on the display for interleaving. In certain embodiments, any number of image panes may be simultaneously displayed on the display device 210. For example, in
When the interleave adjacent option is selected, the user may select one or more comparison series by moving the pointer to a border between the adjacent series and clicking the mouse button. In one embodiment, the cursor icon changes when it is positioned in a border indicating that the adjacent image series may be selected for comparison by clicking the mouse button. With reference to
In one embodiment, the interleave menu also includes an option that allows the user to select an adjacent image series for interleaving and, after selection of the first and comparison image series, displays images of the interleaved images series in a comparison pane that covers the entire display area, or substantially all of the display area, of the display device. In this way, the images of the selected image series may be viewed at a higher magnification level and, accordingly, differences in the images may be more easily detectable. Thus, in an embodiment that displays four image panes on the display device (e.g.,
In one embodiment, the interleave menu includes an option that initiates automatic selection of one or more comparison image series based upon characteristics of the selected first image series. For example, image series with the same or similar names may be selected as comparison image series. In addition, image series may be selected automatically based upon any other criteria, such as one or more information items contained in the DICOM headers of images. In one embodiment, when this option is chosen from the interleave menu, a list of image series that have the same series name, or other criteria that may be user defined, may be displayed. The user may then select one or more of the displayed series as comparison image series.
The interleave menu advantageously allows the user to select image series for interleaving and automatically display the generated interleaved image series with minimal input from the user. For example, after selecting “interleave adjacent” on the interleave menu, a single click of a mouse, for example, on a border between the images to be interleaved causes the computing system 100 to generate an interleaved image series and display a first image of the interleaved image series in a comparison pane on the display device.
Returning to the diagram of
In an advantageous embodiment, the starting image in each of the series should be related so that meaningful differences between the images of the image series are detectable. In one embodiment, the user may adjust display characteristics of each image in an image series by adjusting the display characteristics of the image currently displayed from the desired image series. For example, if the first image series is at a higher zoom level than the comparison image series, the zoom level of each image in the first image series may be adjusted by adjusting the zoom level of the currently display image of the first image series.
After selecting the first image series and the comparison image series, and selecting the display characteristics of one or more of the images which are then applied to the other images in the series to which it belongs, the image series are interleaved so that an interleaved image series is created, as illustrated in
In a block 640, images from the interleaved image series are displayed in a comparison pane displayed on the display device. In one embodiment, the comparison pane fills substantially the entire display area of a display device. In another embodiment, the comparison pane is smaller than a total display area of the display device. In one embodiment, a user input determines when a current image displayed in the comparison pane is updated with an adjacent image, by moving a scroll wheel on a mouse while pressing a mouse button, for example. In one embodiment, when the user has completed viewing the interleaved image series, the previous layout on the display device may be restored by the user performing a specific action, such as releasing the mouse button that is depressed while viewing interleaved images.
In another embodiment, interleaving of image series produces two or more interleaved image series. In one embodiment, the first image of each image series may be interleaved and alternatively displayed in a first comparison pane of the display device, while the second image of each image series may be interleaved and alternatively displayed in a second comparison pane of the display device, and so on. For example, if the image series to be interleaved are series A comprising images A1, A2, and series B comprising images B1, B2, the system may generate a first interleaved series ordered A1, B1, and a second interleaved image series ordered A2, B2. In one embodiment, images from each from each of the first and second interleaved image series are concurrently displayed on a display device in separate comparison panes. In one embodiment, an option on the interleave menu, discussed above, may be selected in order to initiate generation of multiple interleaved image series and concurrent display of multiple comparison panes on the display device. In one embodiment, more than two images of image series may be interleaved in the above-described manner and more than two comparison panes may be displayed concurrently on a display device for viewing the generated interleaved image series.
The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the invention can be practiced in many ways. As is also stated above, it should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to including any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. The scope of the invention should therefore be construed in accordance with the appended claims and any equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/254,627, filed on Sep. 1, 2016 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERLEAVING SERIES OF MEDICAL IMAGES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/502,055, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,471,210, filed on Sep. 30, 2014 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERLEAVING SERIES OF MEDICAL IMAGES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/857,915, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,879,807, filed on Aug. 17, 2010 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERLEAVING SERIES OF MEDICAL IMAGES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/268,261, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,885,440, filed on Nov. 3, 2005 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERLEAVING SERIES OF MEDICAL IMAGES,” which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/625,690, filed on Nov. 4, 2004, each of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4672683 | Matsueda | Jun 1987 | A |
5123056 | Wilson | Jun 1992 | A |
5172419 | Manian | Dec 1992 | A |
5179651 | Taaffe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5431161 | Ryals et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452416 | Hilton et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5515375 | DeClerck | May 1996 | A |
5542003 | Wofford | Jul 1996 | A |
5734915 | Roewer | Mar 1998 | A |
5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779634 | Ema et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807256 | Taguchi | Sep 1998 | A |
5835030 | Tsutsui et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852646 | Klotz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857030 | Gaborski | Jan 1999 | A |
5926568 | Chaney et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954650 | Saito et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5976088 | Urbano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987345 | Engelmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995644 | Lai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008813 | Lauer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6115486 | Cantoni | Sep 2000 | A |
6128002 | Leiper | Oct 2000 | A |
6130671 | Argiro | Oct 2000 | A |
6151581 | Kraftson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175643 | Lai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177937 | Stockham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185320 | Bick et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211884 | Knittel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219061 | Lauer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243095 | Shile et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243098 | Lauer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262740 | Lauer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266733 | Knittel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269379 | Hiyama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297799 | Knittel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304667 | Reitano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310620 | Lauer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313841 | Ogata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342885 | Knittel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347329 | Evans | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351547 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356265 | Knittel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369816 | Knittel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383135 | Chikovani et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388687 | Brackett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404429 | Knittel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407737 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411296 | Knittel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421057 | Lauer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424346 | Correll et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424996 | Killcommons et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426749 | Knittel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427022 | Craine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438533 | Spackman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463169 | Ino et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476810 | Sirnha et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6512517 | Knittel et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532299 | Sachdeva et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532311 | Pritt | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556695 | Packer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556724 | Chang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563950 | Wiskott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574629 | Cooke, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577753 | Ogawa | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603494 | Banks et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606171 | Renk et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614447 | Bhatia et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618060 | Brackett | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621918 | Hu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630937 | Kallergi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650766 | Rogers | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654012 | Lauer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678764 | Parvelescu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680735 | Seiler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683933 | Saito et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6697067 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697506 | Oian et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6734880 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760755 | Brackett | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775402 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778689 | Aksit et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820093 | de la Huerga | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820100 | Funahashi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826297 | Saito et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829377 | Milioto | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6864794 | Betz | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886133 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891920 | Minyard et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6894707 | Nemoto | May 2005 | B2 |
6909436 | Pianykh et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909795 | Tecotzky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917696 | Soenksen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6988075 | Hacker | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996205 | Capolunghi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016952 | Mullen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022073 | Fan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027633 | Foran et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031504 | Argiro et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031846 | Kaushikkar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039723 | Hu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043474 | Mojsilovic | May 2006 | B2 |
7050620 | Heckman | May 2006 | B2 |
7054473 | Roehrig et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058901 | Hafey et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7092572 | Huang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103205 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7106479 | Roy et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110616 | Ditt et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113186 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7136064 | Zuiderveld | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139416 | Vuylsteke | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149334 | Dehmeshki | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155043 | Daw | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162623 | Yngvesson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170532 | Sako | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174054 | Manber et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209149 | Jogo | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209578 | Saito et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212661 | Samara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218763 | Belykh et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224352 | Lipton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236558 | Saito et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7260249 | Smith | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263710 | Hummell et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7272610 | Torres | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7346199 | Pfaff | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7366992 | Thomas, III | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379578 | Soussaline et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7412111 | Battle et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450747 | Jabri et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7492970 | Saito et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505782 | Chu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516417 | Amador et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7525554 | Morita et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526114 | Xia et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526132 | Koenig | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7545965 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574029 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583861 | Hanna et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590272 | Brejl et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613335 | McLennan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634121 | Novatzky et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636413 | Toth | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639879 | Goto et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656543 | Atkins | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660438 | Reicher et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660481 | Schaap et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668352 | Tecotzky et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683909 | Takekoshi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693152 | Reid | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716277 | Yamatake | May 2010 | B2 |
7787672 | Reicher et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7834891 | Yarger et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835560 | Vining et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7885440 | Fram et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885828 | Glaser-Seidnitzer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899514 | Kirkland | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7920152 | Fram et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7953614 | Reicher | May 2011 | B1 |
7970188 | Mahesh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970625 | Reicher | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991210 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992100 | Lundstrom et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019138 | Reicher | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8046044 | Stazzone et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050938 | Green, Jr. et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065166 | Maresh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073225 | Hagen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8094901 | Reicher | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8150708 | Kotula et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8214756 | Salazar-Ferrer et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217966 | Fram et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244014 | Reicher | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249687 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262572 | Chono | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8292811 | Relkuntwar et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8370293 | Iwase et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379051 | Brown | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380533 | Reicher et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391643 | Melbourne et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406491 | Gee et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8457990 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8554576 | Reicher et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8560050 | Martin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8610746 | Fram et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626527 | Reicher | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8693757 | Gundel | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712120 | Reicher et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8731259 | Reicher | May 2014 | B2 |
8751268 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8797350 | Fram | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8879807 | Fram et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8913808 | Reicher | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9042617 | Reicher et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9075899 | Reicher | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9092551 | Reicher | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9092727 | Reicher | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9324188 | Fram et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9386084 | Reicher | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9471210 | Fram | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9495604 | Fram | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9501617 | Reicher | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9501627 | Reicher | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9501863 | Fram | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536324 | Fram | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9542082 | Reicher | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9672477 | Reicher | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9684762 | Reicher | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9727938 | Reicher | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9734576 | Fram et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9754074 | Reicher | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9836202 | Reicher | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9892341 | Reicher | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9934568 | Reicher | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010016822 | Bessette | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010042124 | Barron | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016718 | Rothschild et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021828 | Papier et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039034 | Yamaguchi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020044696 | Sirohey et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020070970 | Wood et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073429 | Beane et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090118 | Olschewski | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090119 | Saito et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090124 | Soubelet et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091659 | Beaulieu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103673 | Atwood | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103827 | Sesek | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110285 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144697 | Betz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172408 | Saito et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172409 | Saito et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180883 | Tomizawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186820 | Saito et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190984 | Seiler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005464 | Gropper et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013951 | Stefanescu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016850 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028402 | Ulrich et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034973 | Zuiderveld | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037054 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055896 | Hu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065613 | Smith | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071829 | Bodicker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101291 | Mussack et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115083 | Masarie et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120516 | Perednia | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130973 | Sumner, II et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140141 | Mullen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156745 | Saito et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160095 | Segal | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164860 | Shen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184778 | Chiba | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187689 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190062 | Noro et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204420 | Wilkes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215122 | Tanaka | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015703 | Madison et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024303 | Banks et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068170 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086163 | Moriyama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088192 | Schmidt et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105030 | Yamane | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040105574 | Pfaff | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114714 | Minyard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122705 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141661 | Hanna et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143582 | Vu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161164 | Dewaele | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165791 | Kaltanji | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172306 | Wohl et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174429 | Chu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190780 | Shiibashi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202387 | Yngvesson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243435 | Williams | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252871 | Tecotzky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254816 | Myers | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255252 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010531 | Kushalnagar et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027569 | Gollogly et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027570 | Maier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043970 | Hsieh | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063575 | Ma et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065424 | Shah et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074150 | Bruss | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050074157 | Thomas, III | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075544 | Shapiro et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088534 | Shen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107689 | Sasano | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108058 | Weidner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110791 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111733 | Fors et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114178 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114179 | Brackett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114283 | Pearson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143654 | Zuiderveld et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171818 | McLaughlin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184988 | Yanof et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197860 | Joffe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238218 | Nakamura | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244041 | Tecotzky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251013 | Krishnan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254729 | Saito et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259118 | Mojaver | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273009 | Deischinger et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008181 | Takekoshi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031097 | Lipscher et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050152 | Rai et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058603 | Dave et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061570 | Cheryauka et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060093207 | Reicher | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095423 | Reicher | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095426 | Takachio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111941 | Blom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122482 | Mariotti et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060171574 | DelMonego et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181548 | Hafey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188134 | Quist | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230072 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241979 | Sato et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267976 | Saito et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274145 | Reiner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276708 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277075 | Salwan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282408 | Wisely et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070009078 | Saito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021977 | Elsholz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050701 | El Emam et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055550 | Courtney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064984 | Vassa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067124 | Kimpe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073556 | Lau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106535 | Matsunaga | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106633 | Reiner | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109299 | Peterson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109402 | Niwa | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110294 | Schaap et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116345 | Peterson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116346 | Peterson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122016 | Brejl et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124541 | Lang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140536 | Sehnert | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159962 | Mathavu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162308 | Peters | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165917 | Cao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174079 | Kraus | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192138 | Saito et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192140 | Gropper | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237380 | Iwase et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239481 | DiSilvestro et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080016111 | Keen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021877 | Saito et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059245 | Sakaida et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080100612 | Dastmalchi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103828 | Squilla et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125846 | Battle et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126982 | Sadikali et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136838 | Goede et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080275913 | van Arragon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279439 | Minyard et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300484 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005668 | West | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022375 | Fidrich | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028410 | Shimazaki | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080719 | Watt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091566 | Turney | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123052 | Ruth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129643 | Natanzon et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132586 | Napora et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150481 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182577 | Squilla et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193514 | Rhodes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213034 | Wu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248442 | Pacheco et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268986 | Holstein et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090326373 | Boese | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100053353 | Hunter et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086182 | Luo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131887 | Salazar-Ferrer et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100198608 | Kaboff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201714 | Reicher | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211409 | Kotula et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100246981 | Hu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100299157 | Fram et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110110572 | Guehring et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110293162 | Pajeau | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316873 | Reicher | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120070048 | Van Den Brink | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120130729 | Raizada et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136794 | Kushalnagar et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120163684 | Natanzon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194540 | Reicher | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120284657 | Hafey et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130070998 | Shibata | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076681 | Sirpal et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083023 | Fram | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130159019 | Reicher | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169661 | Reicher | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130297331 | Zuehlsdorff et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140022194 | Ito | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140142983 | Backhaus et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150101066 | Fram | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150160848 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160034110 | Edwards | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160335395 | Wu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170038951 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039321 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039322 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039350 | Reicher et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039705 | Fram | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046014 | Fram | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046483 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046485 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046495 | Fram | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170046870 | Fram | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053404 | Reicher | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170200064 | Reicher | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170200269 | Reicher | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170200270 | Reicher | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206324 | Reicher | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170293720 | Reicher | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170308647 | Reicher et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180059918 | Reicher | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007131157 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 7,801,341, 09/2010, Fram et al. (withdrawn) |
US 8,208,705, 06/2012, Reicher et al. (withdrawn) |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,830, Systems and Methods for Viewing Medical Images, filed Nov. 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,627, Systems and Methods for Interleaving Series of Medican Images, filed Sep. 1, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123, Systems and Methods for Retrieval of Medical Data, filed Dec. 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,006, Systems and Methods for Viewing Medical 3D Imaging Volumes, filed Oct. 12, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/346,560, Systems and Methods for Matching, Naming, and Displaying Medical Images, filed Nov. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806, Smart Placement Rules, filed Jun. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687, Smart Forms, filed Nov. 19, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165, Automated Document Filings, filed Oct. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/475,930, Exam Scheduling With Customer Configured Notifications, filed Mar. 31, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,014, System and Method of Providing Dynamic and Customizable Medical Examination for, filed Oct. 12, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,342, Rules-Based Rendering of Medical Images, filed Mar. 24, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,281, Rules-Based Processing and Presentation of Medical Images, filed Mar. 24, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,296, filed Computer-Aided Analysis and Rendering of Medical Images, filed Mar. 24, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/792,210, Dynamic Montage Reconstruction, filed Jul. 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/188,872, Intelligent Management of Computerized Advanced Processing, filed Jun. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/188,819, Intelligent Management of Computerized Advanced Processing, filed Jun. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/140,346, Database Systems and Interactive User Interfaces for Dynamic Interaction With, and Sorting of, Digital Medical Image Data, filed Apr. 27, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/140,363, Database Systems and Interactive User Interfaces for Dynamic Interation With, and Comparison of, Digital Medical Image Data, filed Apr. 27, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/140,351, Database Systems and Interactive User Interfaces for Dynamic Interaction With, and Review of, Digital Medical Image Data, filed Apr. 27, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/140,348, Database Systems and Interactive User Interfaces for Dynamic Interaction With, and Indications of, Digital Medical Image Data, filed Apr. 27, 2016 |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 1, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Interview Summary dated May 31, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/702,976. |
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 6, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,349. |
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,853. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 14, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,853. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,853. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 15, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,853. |
Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,830. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 24, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,830. |
Final Office Action dated May 15, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,830. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 2, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Interview Summary dated Jan. 25, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Interview Summary dated May 14, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 6, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,261. |
Office Action dated May 16, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Interview Summary dated Sep. 6, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Interview Summary dated Feb. 4, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 3, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
“Corrected” Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 15, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Interview Summary dated Apr. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Notice of Corrected Allowability dated Jul. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Notice of Corrected Allowability dated Sep. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,627. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 3, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,627. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 13, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 4, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 26, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979. |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Interview Summary dated Jul. 31, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 4, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081. |
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Interview Summary dated May 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Interview Summary dated Aug. 27, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 30, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,123. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 24, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated May 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 25, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/268,262. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,597. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/079,597. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,758. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,758. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,055. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,225. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 2, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,225. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,225. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,978. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,645. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 31, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,606. |
Interview Summary dated Aug. 15, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,606. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 9, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,606. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,431. |
Interview Summary dated Jun. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,431. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,431. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,431. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Interview Summary dated Jul. 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,674. |
Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Interview Summary, dated Feb. 17, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 13, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 6, 2013 in U.S Appl. No. 13/118,085. |
Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,128. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,128. |
Interview Summary dated Nov. 22, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,128. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 31, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,128. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 29, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Interview Summary, dated Mar. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Final Office Action, dated Jun. 17, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 16, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Final Office Action, dated Jul. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 12, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,806. |
Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 13, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No, 11/942,687. |
Interview Summary, dated Jun. 17, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Final Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Interview Summary, dated Mar. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
PTAB Examiner's Answer, dated Feb. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/942,687. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Interview Summary dated May 13, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Interview Summary dated Mar. 31, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Interview Summary dated Jun. 28, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,027. |
Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Interview Summary dated Dec. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Appeal Brief dated Jul. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Examiner's Answer dated Nov. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/043,165. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Interview Summary dated Jun. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Appeal Brief dated Mar. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Examiner's Answer dated Jun. 26, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Board Decision dated Mar. 23, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Office Action, dated Jul. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000. |
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Interview Summary dated May 8, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 15, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,404. |
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,765. |
Interview Summary dated Jun. 11, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,765. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,765. |
Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,765. |
Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 28, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,765. |
Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543. |
Interview Summary dated Apr. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 14, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,328. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,328. |
Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,853. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 25, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,853. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/687,853. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 11, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,600. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,600. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 12, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,023. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 11, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,023. |
Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,397. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,397. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2015, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,397. |
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,547. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,547. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 10, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,547. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance, dated May 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,547. |
Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,552. |
Interview Summary dated Sep. 3, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,552. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,552. |
Interview Summary dated Apr. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,552. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,552. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jul. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,068. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 11, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,068. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/139,068. |
AGFA HealthCare, color brochure “IMPAX 6: Digital Image and Information Management,” © 2012 Agfa HealthCare N.V. Downloaded from http://www.agfahealthcare.com/global/en/he/library/libraryopen?ID=32882925. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
AGFA HealthCare, IMPAX 6.5 Datasheet (US)2012, © 2012 Agfa HealthCare N.V. Downloaded from http://www.agfahealthcare.com/global/en/he/library/libraryopen?ID=37459801. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
AMD Technologies, Inc., Catella PACS 5.0 Viewer User Manual (112 pgs), © 2010, AMD Technologies, Inc. (Doc. 340-3-503 Rev. 01). Downloaded from http://www.amdtechnologies.com/lit/cat5viewer.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
ASPYRA's Imaging Solutions, 3 page color print out. Accessed at http://www.aspyra.com/imaging-solutions. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Avreo, interWorks—RIS/PACS package, 2 page color brochure, © 2014, Avreo, Inc. (Document MR-5032 Rev, 4). Downloaded from http://www.avreo.com/ProductBrochures/MR-5032Rev.%204interWORKS%20RISPACSPackage.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
BRIT Systems, BRIT PACS View Viewer, 2 page color brochure, (BPB-BPV-0001). Downloaded from http://www.brit.com/pdfs/britpacsview.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
BRIT Systems, Roentgen Works—100% Browers-based VNA (Vendor Neutral Archive/PACS), © 2010 BRIT Systems, 1 page color sheet. Accessed at http://www.roentgenworks.com/PACS. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
BRIT Systems, Vision Multi-modality Viewer—with 3D, 2 page color brochure, (BPB-BVV-0001 REVC). Downloaded from http://wwm.brit.com/pdfs/BPB-BVV-0001REVC_BRIT_Vision_Viewer.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
CANDELiS, ImageGrid™: Image Management Appliance, 6 page color brochure. (AD-012 Rev. F Nov. 2012), © 2012 Candelis, Inc. Downloaded from http://www.candelis.com/images/pdf/Canidelis_ImageGrid_Appliance_20111121.pdf. Accessed on Feb, 9, 2015. |
Carestream, Cardiology PACS, 8 page color brochure. (CAT 866 6075 Jun. 2012). © Carestream Health, Inc., 2012. Downloaded from http://www.carestream.com/cardioPACS_brochure_M1-877.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Carestream, Vue PACS, 8 page color brochure. (CAT 300 1035 May 2014). © Carestream Health, Inc., 2014. Downloaded from http://www.carestream.com/csPACS_brochure_M1-876,pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Cemer, Radiology—Streamline image management, 2 page color brochure, (fl03_332_10_v3). Downloaded from http://www.cerner.com/uploadedFiles/Clinical_Imaging.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
CoActiv, Exam-PACS, 2 page color brochure, © 2014 CoActiv, LLC. Downloaded from http://coactiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EXAM-PACS-BROCHURE-final-web.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Crowley, Rebecca et al., Development of Visual Diagnostic Expertise in Pathology: an Information-processing Study, Jan. 2003, Journal of the American medical informatics Association, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 39-51. |
DR Systems, Dominator™ Guide for Reading Physicians, Release 8.2, 546 pages, (TCP-000260-A), © 1997-2009, DR Systems, Inc. Downloaded from https://resources.dominator.com/004/6999.pdf. Document accessed Feb. 9, 2015. |
DR Systems, DR Scheduler User Guide, Release 8.2, 410 pages, (TCP-000115-A), © 1997-2009, DR Systems, Inc, Downloaded from https://resources.dominator.com/assets/003/6850,pdf, Document accessed Feb. 9, 2015. |
Erickson, et al.: “Effect of Automated Image Registration on Radiologist Interpretation,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 20, No. 2 Jun. 2007; pp. 105-113. |
Erickson, et al.: “Image Registration Improves Confidence and Accuracy of Image Interpretation,” Special Issue-Imaging Informatics, Cancer Informatics 2007: 1 19-24. |
FUJIFilmMedical Systems, SYNAPSE® Product Data, Synapse Release Version 3.2.1, Foundation Technologies, 4 page color brochure, (XBUSSY084) Aug. 2008. Downloaded from http://www.fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/foundation.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
FUJIFilm Medical Systems, SYNAPSE® Product Data, Synapse Release Version 3.2.1, Server Modules and Interfaces, 4 page color brochure, (XBUSSY085) Aug. 2008, Downloaded from http://www.fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/server-interface.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
FUJIFilm Medical Systems, Synapse® Product Data, Synapse Release Version 3.2.1, Workstation Software, 4 page color brochure, (XBUSSY082) Aug. 2008. Downloaded from http://www.fujifilmusa.com/shared/bin/workstation.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
GE Healthcare, Centricity PACS, in 8 page printout. Accessed at http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/products/categories/healthcare_it/medical_imaging_informatics_-_ris-pacs-cvis/centricity_pacs. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Handylife.com—Overview of Handy Patients Enterprise, in 2 page printout. Accessed from http://www.handylife.com/en/software/overview.html. Accessed on Feb. 18, 2015. |
Handylife.com—Features of Handy Patients Enterprise, in 4 page printout. Accessed from http://www.handylife.com/en/software/features.html. Accessed on Feb. 18, 2015. |
Handylife.com—Screenshots of Handy Patients Enterprise, in 2 page printout. Accessed from http://www.handylife.com/en/software/screenshots.html. Accessed on Feb. 18, 2015. |
ICRco, I See the Future, in 2 pages, color brochure, (BR080809AUS), © iCRco.ClarityPACS. Downloaded from http://www.claritypacs.com/pdf/ISeeFuture_26_Web.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Imageanalysis, dynamika, 2 page color brochure. Downloaded from http://www.imageanalysis.org.uk/what-we-do. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Imageanalysis, MRI Software, in 5 page printout. Accessed at http://www.imageanalysis.org.uk/mri-software. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
IMIS, Integrated Modular Systems, Inc., Hosted / Cloud PACS in one page printout. Accessed at http://www.imsimed.com/#lproducts-services/ctnu. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Infinitt, PACS, RIS, Mammo PACS, Cardiology suite and 3D/Advanced Visualization | Infinittna, 2 page printout. Accessed at http://www.infinittna.com/products/radiology-pacs. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Intelerad, IntelePACS, 2 page color brochure, © 2014 Intelerad Medical Systems Incorporated. Downloaded http://www.intelerad.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/08/IntelePACS-brochure.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Intelerad, InteleViewer, 2 page color brochure, © Intelerad Medical Systems Incoprorated. Downloaded from http://www.intelerad.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/09/InteleViewer-brochure.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Intuitive Imaging Informatics, ImageQube, 1 page in color. Downloaded from http://www.intuitiveimaging.com/2013/pdf/ImageQube%20one-sheet.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Imaging Technology News, itnonline.com, Comparison Chart PACS, May 2012, pp. 24-27. Downloaded from http://www.merge.corn/MergeHealthcare/media/company/In%20The%20News/merge-pacs-comparison.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Kuhl, Helen: Comparison Chart/PACS, Customers Are Happy, But Looking for More, (color) Imaging Techology News, itnonline.com, May 2012, pp. 24-27. Downloaded from http://www.merge.com/MergeHealthcare/media/company/In%20The%20News/merge-pacs-comparison.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
LUMEDX CardioPACS 5.0 Web Viewer, Cardiopacs Module, 2 page color brochue, (506-10011 Rev A). Downloaded from http://cdn.medicexchange.com/images/whitepaper/cardiopacs_web_viewer.pdf?1295436926. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
LUMEDX Cardiovascular Information System, CardioPACS, one page in color printout. Accessed at http://www.lumedx..com/pacs.aspx. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
McKesson Enterprise Medical imagining and PACS | McKesson, 1 page (color) printout. Accessed at http://www.mckesson.com/providers/health-systems/diagnostic-imaging/enterprise-medical-imaging. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Medweb Radiology Workflow Solutions, Radiology Workflow Solutions, Complete Workflow & Flexible Turnkey Solutions, Web RIS/PACS with Advanced Viewer, 3 page color brochure, © 2006-2014 Medweb. Downloaded from http://www.medweb.com/docs/rispacs_brochure_2014.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Mendelson, et al., “Informatics in Radiology—Image Exchange: IHE and the Evolution of Image Sharing,” RadioGraphics, Nov.-Dec. 2008, vol. 28, No. 7. |
Merge Radiology Solutions, Merge PACS, A real-time picture archiving communication system, (PAX-21990 rev 2.0), 2 page color brochure. Downloaded from http://www.merge.com/MergeHealthcare/media/documents/brochures/Merge_PACS-web.pdf, Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
NOVARAD Enterprise Imaging Solutions, NOVAPACS, 2 page (color) printout. Accessed at http://ww1.novarad.net/novapacs. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
PACSPLUS, PACSPLUS Server, 1 page (color) printout. Accessed at http://www.pacsplus.com/01_products/products_01.html. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
PACSPLUS, PACSPLUS Workstation, 3 page (color) printout. Accessed at http://www.pacsplus.com/01_products/products_01.html. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Philips, IntelliSpace PACS, in 2 color page printout. Accessed at https://www.healthcare.phillips.com/main/products/healthcare_informatics/products/enterprise_imaging_informatics/isite_pacs. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Philips, IntelliSpace: Multi-modality tumor tracking application versus manual PACS methods, a time study for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). 2012, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., in four pages. |
Radcliffe, et al., “Comparison of Stereo Disc Photographs and Alternation Flicker Using a Novel Matching Technology for Detecting Glaucoma Progression”, Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging, Jun. 9, 2010. |
RamSoft, RIS PACS Teleradiology, PowerServer PACS, Lite PACS, XU PACS Compare RamSoft PACS Products, 2 color page printout, Accessed at http://www.ramsoft.com/products/powerserver-pacs-overview. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Rosset et al.: “OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images,” Journal of digital Imaging, Sep. 2004, pp. 205-216. |
Sage Intergy PACS | Product Summary. Enhancing Your Workflow by Delivering Web-based Diagnostic Images When and Where You Need Them, in 2 color pages. (IRV-SS-INTPACS-PSS-031309). © 2009 Sage Software Healcare, Inc. Downloaded from http://www.greenwayhealth.com/solutions/intergy/, Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Sandberg, et al., “Automatic detection and notification of “wrong paitent-wrong location” errors in the operating room” Surgical Innovation, vol. 12, No. 3, Sep. 2005, pp. 253-260. |
Schellingerhout, Dawid, MD, et al.: “Coregistration of Head CT Comparison Studies: Assessment of Clinical Utility,” Acad Radiol 2003; 10:242-248. |
ScImage, Cardiology PACS, in 8 color page printout. Accessed at http://www.scimage.com/solutions/clinical-solutions/cardiology, Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Sectra RIS PACS, in 2 color page printout. Accessed at https://www.sectra.com/medical/diagnostic_imaging/solutions/ris-pacs/, Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Siemens syngo.plaza, Features and Benefits, in 2 color page printout. Accessed at http://www.healthcare.siemens.com/medical-imaging-it/imaging-it-radiology-image-management-pacs/syngoplaza/features, Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Simms | RIS and PACS Medical Imaging Software, in 2 color page printout. http://www.mysimms.com/ris-pacs.php. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Sprawls, “Image Characteristics and Quality,” Physical Principles of Medical Imaging, http://www.sprawls.org/resources pp. 1-14. |
Stryker, Imaging—OfficePACS Power Digital Imaging, in one color page printout. Accessed from http://www.stryker.com/emea/Solutions/Imaging/OfficePACSPowerDigitalImaging/index.htm. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Stryker, OfficePACS Power—Digital Imaging, 8 page color brochure, (MPP-022 Rev 4 BC/MP 300 Jan. 2007). © 2007 Stryker. Downloaded from http://www.stryker.com/emea/Solutions/Imaging/OfficePACSPowerDigitalImaging/ssLINK/emea/1557/022268. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Syed, et al., “Detection of Progressive Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Automated Alternation Flicker With Stereophotography,” Research Letter, Arch Ophthalmol., published online Dec. 13, 2010. 2010 American Medical Association. |
Syed, et al.. “Automated alternation flicker for the detection of optic disc haemorrhages”, ACTA Ophthalmologica 2011, accepted for publication on Nov. 26, 2010. |
Tay, et al., “Assessing Signal Intensity Change on Well-registered Images: Comparing Subtraction, Color-encoded Subtraction, and Parallel Display Formats”, Original Research:Computer Applications. Radiology, vol. 260: No. 2—Aug. 2011. |
TeraRecon iNtuition pamphlet in 20 page, retrieved on Nov. 8, 2013, available at http://int.terarecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/brochure_english2013.pdf. |
TeraRecon iNtuition—Workflow. <www.terarecon.com/wordpress/our-solutions/intuition-workflow> Last accessed Nov. 8, 2013. 2 pages. |
UltraRAD—ultra Vision, 1 page (color), Downloaded from http://www.ultraradcorp.com/pdf/UltraVISION.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
VanderBeek, et al., “Comparing the detection and agreement of parapapillary atrophy progression using digital optic disk photographs and alternation flicker”, Glaucoma, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2010) 248:1313-1317, Apr. 15, 2010. |
VioStream for VitreaView, 2 color pages printout. Accessed at http://www.vitalimages.com/solutions/universal-viewing/viostream-for-vitreaview. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Visage Imaging Visage 7, 3 color page printout. Accessed at http://www.visageimaging.com/visage-7. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
VIZTEK Radiology PACS Software Vixtek Opal-RAD, 4 color page printout. Accessed at http://viztek.net/products/opal-rad. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Voyager Imaging—Voyager PACS Radiologist Workstation, 2 page color brochure. Downloaded from http://www.intellirad.com.au/assets/Uploads/Voyager-PacsWorkstations.pdf?. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Voyager Imaging—Voyager PACS, 3 page color brochure. Downloaded from http://www.intellirad.com.au/index.php/assets/Uploads/Voyager-Pacs3.pdf. Accessed on Feb. 9, 2015. |
Ivetic, D., and Dragan, D., Medical Image on the Go!, 2009, J Med Syst, vol. 35. pp. 499-516. |
Tahmoush, D. and Samet, H., A New Database for Medical Images and Information, 2007, Medical Imaging 2007; PACS and Imaging Informatics, vol. 6516. pp. 1-9. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/346,530 dated Mar. 26, 2018 (40 pages). |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/799,657 dated Mar. 8, 2018 (25 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,627 dated Jul. 13, 2017 (4 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,830 dated Aug. 15, 2017 (9 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/346,530 dated Mar. 26, 2018 (12 pages). |
Examiner Interview Summary from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384 dated Sep. 24, 2008 (4 pages). |
Examiner Interview Summary from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,384 dated Feb. 18, 2009 (2 pages). |
Examiner Interview Summary from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,645 dated Jun. 10, 2011 (2 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/799,657 dated Mar. 8, 2018 (25 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000 dated Oct. 5, 2012 (11 pages). |
Examiner Interview Summary from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/944,000 dated Feb. 4, 2011 (3 pages). |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,328 dated Dec. 11, 2014 (3 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,296 dated Jun. 27, 2017 (58 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,281 dated Jun. 26, 2017 (51 pages). |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,281 dated Jan. 11, 2018 (60 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,281 dated Apr. 2, 2018 (59 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,915 dated Jul. 3, 2014 (20 pages). |
Notice of Allowability from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,627 dated Jul. 13, 2017 (4 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,979 dated May 13, 2011 (14 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,081 dated Sep. 4, 2013 (12 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,645 dated Sep. 13, 2011 (8 pages). |
Notice of Allowability from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,645 dated Dec. 7, 2011 (4 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/891,543 dated Nov. 14, 2013 (14 pages). |
Notice of Allowability from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,600 dated Sep. 14, 2016 (6 pages). |
Notice of Allowability from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,397 dated Sep. 29, 2015 (2 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,296 dated Jan. 22, 2018 (11 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/475,930 dated Jan. 10, 2018 (11 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,342 dated Jun. 27, 2017 (62 pages). |
Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/469,342 dated Nov. 30, 2017 (12 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,006 dated May 9, 2018 (17 pages). |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 15/475,930 dated Jun. 1, 2018 (17 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170301090 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60625690 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15254627 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 15631313 | US | |
Parent | 14502055 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15254627 | US | |
Parent | 12857915 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 14502055 | US | |
Parent | 11268261 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 12857915 | US |