Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to laser-welding systems and, more particularly, to systems and methods for welding tubular components using a laser beam and a single, fixed optical reflector having multiple optically reflecting surfaces.
Most medication delivery devices incorporate plastic tubing that connects different parts of the device and those through which the medicine is delivered to the patient. A joint between various tubular components, such as tube-to-port, or tube-to-tube type is one of the most common sub-assembly and can be found in most medication delivery devices.
A laser-welding process is currently the most advanced assembly technique, and has a number of proven benefits for a high-volume manufacturing. However, utilizing a laser-welding process for joining tubular components between themselves and to other parts presents a technical challenge, as it requires a 360° circumferential weld around the mating surfaces. Because rotating the laser source around the assembly, or spinning the assembly (which may have a container or other components attached to it) under a stationary laser head are not always feasible for a manufacturing process, a number of methods have been proposed to address this challenge.
For example, a tubular workpiece can be disposed longitudinally at a center of a concave circular mirror surrounding the workpiece. Then, the laser beam is swiveled or circled around the mirror above the workpiece, directing the laser beam around the entire circumferential outer surface of the workpiece. This conventional technique is not suitable in a manufacturing environment because manipulation of the workpiece through the center of the circular mirror is very difficult and burdensome particularly in a high-production setting.
By way of another example, a complex set of optical reflectors are used to redirect the laser beam onto an opposite side of the workpiece. A combination of multiple concave and flat mirrors, such as conical, spherical, and plane mirrors, is used for deflecting the laser beam toward the opposite and lateral sides of the workpiece during welding. However, such intricate and convoluted optical systems are very expensive and difficult to repair during maintenance.
Another conventional approach is proposed in US Patent Application Publication No. 20170182592A1, which describes a pair of adjustable optical reflectors positioned under the tubular assembly, whose angles, as well as lateral and vertical positions can be adjusted, so the beam reflected from these reflectors could cover both sides of the bottom part of the assembly, while the upper part of the assembly is being exposed to the direct beam, which scans the assembly in lateral direction. The stated aim of this method is to deliver a “simpler, more space-saving technique.” However, in order for the reflected beam to heat uniformly the whole bottom part of the assembly, and generate an even melting of the material, this method requires a time-consuming adjustment of each of the reflector pairs to find the correct angle and lateral and vertical position of the two reflectors in relation to the assembly.
If the angle between the two reflectors, or their lateral or vertical position are not correct, this error would result in uneven heating of different portions of the bottom part (workpiece). For example, a wider angle between the reflectors or a larger distance in the Z-axis (vertical relative to ground) between the two reflectors' base and the position of the assembly would lead to overheating of the very bottom of the workpiece part and under-heating of its sides. A larger lateral distance between the reflectors, a smaller angle, or a shorter Z axis separation, would result in excessive heating of the sides of the bottom part of the assembly, and under-heating of the center of the bottom (the lowest portion), which would cause an inadequate heating and potential leak path at that location. In order to heat both sides of the bottom part of the workpiece in the assembly uniformly, the angle between the Z axis (vertical) and the surface of both reflectors needs to be exactly the same, and while adjusting the angular position of one reflector is easy, measuring the angle between the reflectors in the fixture is very awkward, time-consuming, and challenging. As this adjustment needs to be iterated a number of times to find the correct angle corresponding to a specific position of the assembly, and to ensure that the position of both reflectors is identical. This need for a precise angular alignment of both reflectors relative to one another significantly contributes to the difficulty of the setup.
In other words, the approach proposed in US Patent Application Publication No. 20170182592A1 provides too many opportunities for setup error or a prolonged setup time because of the numerous adjustment combinations that have to be made to multiple operating components of the assembly for each workpiece part.
Another need exists for an arrangement in which the laser can reach areas of a workpiece that are not in the direct path of the laser. For example, the area of a workpiece directly behind a laser cannot be accessed by the energy unless the workpiece is turned or the laser is moved, which requires careful calibration and movement coordination and a bulky setup that would be difficult to apply to multiple workpiece types and form factors.
Therefore, what is needed are systems and methods for more accurately laser-welding tubular components that yields more consistent and higher quality weld results without requiring extensive, error-prone, or time-consuming pre-adjustment or calibration of the assembly prior to welding in a high-production manufacturing setting.
Aspects of the present invention reflect improvements to the disclosure set forth in US Patent Application Publication No. 20170182592A1. A key difference is that instead of using a pair of optical reflectors, the present disclosure proposes to use a single, unitary, fixed optical reflector having multiple optically reflecting side surfaces (configured to reflect a laser beam) that are angled at an obtuse angle (greater than 90 degrees and less than 180 degrees) relative to each other. Another key difference is that the only pre-welding setup required for the welding assembly is a Z-axis adjustment (vertical direction) of the workpiece relative to the optical reflector before initiating the laser weld. No adjustment of the respective lateral positions or angles of the reflecting surfaces relative to one another is required relative to the workpiece. Indeed, because the optical reflector of the present disclosure is a fixed, unitary piece, no such adjustment is even possible. Thus, the optical reflector remains fixed at all times, both pre-weld during setup of the equipment, and during welding itself in which laser energy is imparted to the workpiece. Furthermore, the laser source does not need to be rotated around the workpiece during welding, but rather remains at a stationary distance relative to the workpiece both pre-weld during setup and during the weld. These aspects produce a consistently high quality 360-degree circumferential weld with high repeatability and very low variability, and very minimal setup time and effort (only adjustment of the vertical distance between the workpiece and the bottom or center of the optical reflector), in a high-production setting where setup time needs to be minimized, but the weld must be consistent and of high quality from part to part without requiring micro-adjustments to the setup while the same parts are being welded during a manufacturing process. The present disclosure promotes a “set it and forget it” configuration of a laser-welding setup for circumferential welding of tubular parts (workpieces), with only one adjustment needed during setup before welding is initiated for the same parts without requiring any further adjustments for the same part in a high-production setting. Not only is weld quality overall improved and remarkably consistent from part to part, but throughput is significantly increased due to the quick setup time (vertical adjustment of one part of the assembly) and elimination of any adjustments needed once the setup has been completed.
A laser welding system for welding around all or most of a circumference of a workpiece is provided. The system includes a laser beam source configured to direct a laser beam; and an assembly including a first angled reflector and an optical reflector assembly, the first angled reflector being arranged at a fixed angle to change a direction of the laser beam so that the laser beam irradiates a front area of the workpiece, the optical reflector assembly having at least two angled mirrors positioned to direct the laser beam passing around the workpiece to reach areas of the workpiece that are not directly in the path of the laser beam. The first angled reflector can be angled relative to the laser beam at 45 degrees such that the laser beam changes direction orthogonally relative to its direction emanating from the laser beam source. The at least two angled mirrors can include a first mirror and a second mirror. The first mirror and the second mirror can be arranged on a curved surface of the optical reflector assembly such that they change a direction of the laser beam by 45 degrees, thereby allowing the laser beam to reach the areas of the workpiece that are not directly in the path of the laser beam. The laser beam source can be fixed, and the workpiece can be fixed relative to the assembly as the laser beam is presented to the workpiece. The workpiece can have a generally cylindrical cross section at an area where a weld is to be created. The laser beam can reach an entire circumference of the workpiece in response to its direction being changed by the first angled reflector and the optical reflector assembly. The optical reflector assembly can include a third mirror positioned to change a direction of at least a portion of the laser beam toward an area of the workpiece that is not directly in the path of the laser beam after being reflected by the first angled reflector.
The invention will be better understood from the following description of preferred embodiments together with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A laser assembly 200 shown in
Based on the experimentation it has been established that using a single, unitary V- or U-shaped reflector 260 having two flat side surfaces 262a, 262b fixed at approximately 110-135 degrees (e.g., plus or minus 15%) to each other and a continuous reflecting surface from end-to-end 264a, 264b, allows the setup for a tubular workpiece 110 placed equidistant to the sides 262a, 262b of the optical reflector 260 to be greatly simplified compared to conventional approaches, and limits the required setup effort to only the vertical adjustment (Z-axis) of the part position. Moving the workpiece 110 and the optical reflector 260 closer together (decreasing distance D labeled in
The optical reflecting surface(s) 262a, 262b of the optical reflector 260 can be a gold-plated mirror, which is configured to reflect laser energy 120 received. The angle of the surfaces 262a, 262b direct the laser energy 120 into surfaces of the workpiece 110 that are not directly accessible to the laser beam 120, which is fixed above the workpiece 110. Those of ordinary skill in the welding art will appreciate that the entire surface 262a, 262b does not have to be coated with an optically reflecting material. As a practical matter, it is convenient to plate the entire surface of the optical reflector 260 with gold or other optically reflecting material, but of course only the surface portions of the optical reflector 260 where the laser beam 120 will be directed need to have an optically reflecting material. The other portions do not have to optically reflecting, such as the bottom or lowest portion 270 (best seen in
The first 262a and second 262b side surfaces of the fixed optical reflector 260 are arranged at a fixed obtuse angle α relative to each other. By fixed it is meant that the angle α is unchanged even during setup before the laser weld is initiated. The assembly 250 has a height adjustment mechanism (not shown) that is configured to adjust a vertical distance D between the lowest point 270 of the optical reflector 260 and the underside of the workpiece 110 along a Z-axis that is transverse to a longitudinal axis (e.g., Y-axis) of the workpiece 110. Preferably, the workpiece 110 is the adjustable part of the assembly 250, such that the workpiece 110 is moved up or down relative to the optical reflector 260 to change the vertical distance D (shown in
The first and second side surfaces 262a, 262b define a curve that is transverse to the longitudinal axis (e.g., Y-axis), and this curve forms the V- or U-shape of the optical reflector 260. Note that this portion does not have to be strictly curved, because no laser energy will be directed to this portion, so its shape plays no role and therefore has no impact on optical reflection. Rather, it can be relatively flat or notched, depending on the design parameters and the angle of the reflecting surfaces 262a, 262b. It also does not have to be coated with an optically reflecting material, but for ease of manufacturability, coating the entire surface of the optical reflector 260 is desirable from that standpoint.
While in one aspect the reflecting surface on the optical reflector 260 can be continuous, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the portion of the optical reflector 260 that sits directly underneath or below (relative to the incoming laser beam 120) the workpiece 110 does not directly receive the laser beam 120, and thus it is not necessary to render that part of the surface optically reflecting. While it is easier to manufacture a continuous surface, the present disclosure is not limited to a continuous surface. The flat side surfaces 262a, 262b of the optical reflector 260 can receive a reflective optical coating, whereas the portion 270 of the optical reflector 260 that sits directly beneath the workpiece 110 can lack a reflective optical coating. Moreover, while a single, unitary optical reflector 260 is also described, in other aspects, the optical reflector 260 can be composed of multiple parts, but all such parts being fixed and stationary to one another so that their angle α cannot be adjusted during setup of the assembly 250. The point is that there are at least two reflecting surfaces 262a, 262b that are fixed and stationary during the setup of the assembly 250, such that only a vertical adjustment of the distance D between the workpiece 110 and those reflecting surfaces 262a, 262b is necessary during setup. This differs from conventional approaches that allowed too much freedom of adjustment of the lateral distance and angular displacement of the reflectors and distance between workpiece and the reflectors, but this freedom leads to longer setup times and more complex setup parameters, iterative adjustments of the setup parameters, and other problems indicated above.
The main advantage of the extra conversion is the ability to redirect the laser beam to be perpendicular to the weld while the laser source remains (preferably in a fixed position) above the workpiece 610. This gives the ability to reach an otherwise inaccessible weld surface when the workpiece 610 is constrained to a vertical orientation.
In the illustrated assembly 600, the mirror design is a basic example having a first mirror 608a angled at 45 degrees to project the beam onto the next mirror 608b (and optionally additional mirrors, not shown), which is also angled at 45 degrees to reach the back side 614 of the workpiece 610, which in this example has a generally cylindrical shape. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mirror angles do not necessarily have to be constrained to 45 degrees; rather the angles can be tailored specifically to the needs to the application to deliver the beam precisely to an otherwise inaccessible weld surface, without requiring turning, moving, or rotation of the workpiece 610. The workpiece 610 can remain fixed relative to the workpiece assembly 600, and the laser source can also remain fixed. There can also be additional mirrors besides 608a, 608b to gain the ability to reach the weld area to accommodate space or clearance constraints.
This concept would also work for workpiece parts having a shape other than cylindrical. Odd-shaped parts can also be welded as long as the sides are similar in length and space allows for the mirror design. Likewise, the angle of the first angled reflector 602, which is shown as 45 degrees, can also be modified to direct the laser energy in a direction to directly reach a weld surface of the workpiece part 610. The angle of the first angled reflector 602 will determine where the laser energy directly reaches the front part 612 of the workpiece 610, whereas the mirrors 608a, 608b and their respective angles will determine where the laser energy reaches the inaccessible areas 614 (i.e., inaccessible to direct irradiation by the laser beam) of the workpiece 610. Odd-shaped workpieces are particularly well-suited for this application, and any workpiece where the weld needs to be reach all or substantially all of a circumferential area of a part.
Although the inventions and other aspects will be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments or examples, it will be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those particular embodiments or examples. On the contrary, the present disclosure is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalent arrangements as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/352,104, filed on Mar. 13, 2019, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/801,269, titled “Systems and Methods for Laser-Welding Tubular Components Using a Single, Fixed Optical Reflector with Multiple Reflecting Surfaces,” filed Feb. 5, 2019, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3835912 | Kristensen | Sep 1974 | A |
3943324 | Haggerty | Mar 1976 | A |
3989778 | Osborne | Nov 1976 | A |
4266667 | Ishigaki | May 1981 | A |
4350867 | Kinoshita | Sep 1982 | A |
4429211 | Carstens | Jan 1984 | A |
4572941 | Sciaky | Feb 1986 | A |
4577087 | Chadwick | Mar 1986 | A |
4794231 | Banas | Dec 1988 | A |
5011282 | Rearm | Apr 1991 | A |
5049720 | Fang | Sep 1991 | A |
5052414 | Aindow | Oct 1991 | A |
5126872 | Birkle | Jun 1992 | A |
5449879 | Lawson | Sep 1995 | A |
5478983 | Rancourt | Dec 1995 | A |
5508490 | Klose | Apr 1996 | A |
5601676 | Zimmerman | Feb 1997 | A |
6335508 | Nam | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6465757 | Chen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476345 | Sator | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6705727 | Bentley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7282665 | Chen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7368381 | Mikhailov | May 2008 | B2 |
7564006 | Schwob | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8404994 | Spennemann | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8505604 | Stauffer | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9393738 | Kugelmann | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010028567 | Akiyama | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030102289 | Nissels | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030196750 | Sakai | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050103763 | Momose | May 2005 | A1 |
20050121137 | Kirkland | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167407 | Chen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060134994 | Yasuda | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070045250 | Moor | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080023453 | Zhang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077173 | Flanagan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080272521 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090002694 | Paavola | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090127238 | Corrigan | May 2009 | A1 |
20110058230 | Soeda | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110200802 | Li | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120061878 | Hofmann | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120218652 | Stone | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130320276 | Farrell | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140069921 | Kristal | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140313605 | Bessler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150083302 | Sawada | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20170182592 | Sakitski et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170252859 | Kumkar et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101681015 | Mar 2010 | CN |
104400996 | Mar 2015 | CN |
106536121 | Mar 2017 | CN |
107003531 | Aug 2017 | CN |
4122093 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4122093 | Jan 1993 | DE |
202007001346 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102008042343 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009021448 | Jul 2010 | DE |
102010025375 | Dec 2011 | DE |
102011007792 | Oct 2012 | DE |
102014108894 | Dec 2015 | DE |
102015119324 | May 2017 | DE |
102015119324 | May 2017 | DE |
2813347 | Dec 2014 | EP |
S5641091 | Apr 1981 | JP |
S59193779 | Nov 1984 | JP |
4143092 | May 1992 | JP |
H05205839 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H08255708 | Oct 1996 | JP |
11245064 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001-239381 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002067164 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004063332 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2007230051 | Sep 2007 | JP |
100562984 | Mar 2006 | KR |
WO 2012143181 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2018003133 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of DE 4122093 A1, Jun. 2023 (Year: 2023). |
Machine translation of DE 102015119324 A1, Jun. 2023 (Year: 2023). |
Indian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report in Application No. 202147038464, dated Jan. 30, 2023 (6 pages). |
Indian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report in Application No. 202244008430, dated Sep. 1, 2022 (7 pages). |
“Plastic Racing Into the Future” Indianapolis ANTEC '96—vol. 1—Processing 1996,; The Society of Plastics Engineers; May 1996 (9 pages). |
“Infrared Welding Of Thermoplastics, Colored Pigments and Carbon Black Levels On Transmission of Infrared Radiation”, by Robert A. Grimm and Hong Yeh—Edison Welding Institute; Mar. 31, 1998 (7 pages). |
“Application With Infrared Welding Of Thermoplastics”, by David A. Grewell, Branson Ultrasonics Corporation; Apr. 29, 1999 (5 pages). |
“Three Approaches In Utilizing High Power Diode Laser To Join Thermoplastics”, by Steven A. Kocheny—Lester Technologies, LLC., and Jerry Zybko—Lester Technologies, LLC; May 2002 (5 pages). |
“Comparative Investigations On Quasi-Simultaneous Welding On The Basis Of The Materials Peek and PC”, by H. Potente, G. Fiegler, F. Becker and J. Korte—University Of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; May 2002 (5 pages). |
“Forward To Better Understanding Of Optical Characterization And Development Of Colored Polyamides For The Infra-Red/Laser Welding: Part I—Efficiency Of Polyamides For Infra-Red Welding”, by Val Kagan, Robert Bray and A1 Chambers—Honeywell International, Engineered Applications & Solutions, Morristown, NJ 07962-2332, USA; Apr. 2003 (7 pages). |
“3D-Laser Transmission Welding”, by H. Haberstroh, R. Luetzeler—Institut für Kunststoffverarbeitung, Aachen, Germany; May 2004 (6 pages). |
Renner, T. et al., “Laser-adopted construction for plastic welding”, retrieved on Jan. 15, 2007 from http://www.rofin.com/deutsch/anwendunen/laser-mikro-micro/data/E_PlastEurope02-04_Laser_adapted_Construction.pdf (p. 6, col. 1). |
Olowinsky, Dr. Alexander, “Vortrag Technologie Seminar 2008 Verfahrenstechnik und Anforderungen an die Produktkonstruktion fur das Kunstsoffschweiben mit Laserstrahlung”, ERW, Sep. 24, 2008, pp. 1-56, retrieved on Jul. 16, 2015 at http://www.wolf-produktionssysteme.de/de/veroeffentlicht/technologieseminar/technologieseminar2008/vortrag1.pdf (pp. 50-54). |
Klein, R. et al.; “Schreiben und schweissen in einem Additive”; Kunststoffe, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, Germany; No. 1, pp. 16-19; Jan. 1, 2011; XP009147617 (4 pages). |
Brunnecker, F. et al. .; “ClearJoining-Laserschweissen ohne Additive”; Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, Germany; vol. 103, No. 10, pp. 252-255; Jan. 1, 2013; XP001526380 (4 pages). |
IPG Photonics; “Mid-IR Microwelder Pulsed/ CW Materials Processing Station”; retrieved from the Internet from: www.ipgphotonics.com/midir_microwelder.htm; May 2013 (2 pages). |
Kunststoffe; “Klare Sicht mit neuem Licht”; pp. 26-29; Jun. 1, 2015; XP055199510 (4 pages). |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2015/026180, dated Sep. 21, 2015 (4 pages). |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2015/026180, dated Sep. 21, 2015 (5 pages). |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2014/040791, dated Jul. 2, 2017 (1 page). |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2014/040791, dated Jul. 13, 2017 (5 pages). |
Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580020173.2, dated Oct. 18, 2017, with English machine translation. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2017/051734, dated Dec. 6, 2017 (12 pages). |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2017/054684, dated Jan. 16, 2018 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2017/054684, dated Jan. 16, 2018 (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2020/016618, dated Apr. 30, 2020 (10 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210170525 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62801269 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16352104 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17182055 | US |