Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates to the field of industrial lift trucks, and more specifically to systems and methods for maintaining lift trucks within defined bounds.
Lift trucks are designed in a variety of configurations to perform a variety of tasks. One problem with lift trucks is that they can oscillate or vibrate about any of the X-axis, Y-axis and Z-axis (see
Today's lift trucks are often performance limited in an effort to maintain acceptable dynamic behavior. These performance limitations are passive and are normally universally applied independent of the current operating condition. An example would be an algorithm to limit vehicle speed according to the elevated height. The algorithm, however, may not consider the load on the forks and therefore may be returning a sub-optimal travel speed for the lift truck, which may be quite limiting to the operator's productivity. Labor cost can be the largest component of operating costs for a lift truck.
One method for improving lift truck performance includes performing a static center-of-gravity (CG) analysis while the lift truck is at rest and limiting lift truck operating parameters accordingly (for example, maximum speed and steering angle). However, this static calibration does not dynamically account for lift truck motion, changing lift heights, or environmental factors such as the grade of a driving surface, for example.
Other methods for improving vehicle stability common in consumer automobiles include calculating vehicle CG during vehicle movement and employing an anti-lock braking system (ABS) to modify the cornering ability of the vehicle. These prior methods only consider two-dimensional vehicle movement (forward-reverse and turning) and do not account for three-dimensional CG changes of a lift truck due to load weights being lifted and lowered while the lift truck is in motion. In addition, these methods do not account for maintaining a lift truck within defined bounds and keeping the lift truck from deviating from its intended path.
If the vibrating motion of the lift truck can be mitigated or even cancelled, the lift truck would then be capable of traveling faster, providing a more comfortable ride for the operator and improving productivity.
What is needed is a lift truck configured to dynamically optimize lift truck performance by maintaining the lift truck within defined bounds and keeping the lift truck from generally deviating from its intended path.
Embodiments of the present invention overcome the drawbacks of previous methods by providing systems and methods for optimize lift truck performance by maintaining the lift truck within an allowable CG bound and maintaining the lift truck within an allowable deviation bound.
In one aspect, the present invention provides systems and methods for maintaining a lift truck within defined bounds. A sensor senses a dynamic lift truck property and provides a feedback signal corresponding to the sensed lift truck property. A controller receives the feedback signal and analyzes the feedback signal, and based on the analyzed feedback signal, the controller controls at least one lift truck performance parameter that maintains the lift truck within defined bounds. The defined bound include a three-dimensional parameter and a two-dimensional parameter.
In another aspect, the present invention provides systems and methods for controlling a lift truck behavior. A controller analyzes at least one of actual and predicted lift truck behavior, and based on the analyzed lift truck behavior, the controller controls at least one lift truck performance parameter. The performance parameter is controlled to maintain the lift truck center of gravity within a stability map, the stability map to define a three-dimensional range of center of gravity positions that maintain lift truck stability. The performance parameter is also controlled to maintain an intended path of the lift truck within an allowable deviation map, the allowable deviation map defining a two-dimensional envelope of allowable lift truck travel deviation from the intended path of the lift truck.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides systems and methods for controlling a lift truck performance parameter. An operator input device provides a command to control at least one of steering and acceleration. A controller receives the command to control the at least one of steering and acceleration, and the controller receives a signal of operating conditions, the controller analyzes the command and the signal, and based on the analyzed command and analyzed signal, the controller controls at least one lift truck performance parameter. The performance parameter is controlled to maintain the lift truck center of gravity within a stability map, the stability map to define a three-dimensional range of center of gravity positions that maintain lift truck stability. The performance parameter is also controlled to maintain an intended lift truck path within an allowable deviation map, the allowable deviation map defining an envelope of allowable travel deviation from the intended lift truck path.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will appear in the detailed description which follows. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments.
The invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims, rather than in the specific description preceding them. All embodiments that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.
The invention will now be described more specifically with reference to the following embodiments. It is to be noted that the following embodiments are presented herein for purpose of illustration and description only. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise form disclosed.
It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “connected” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass both direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings. As used herein, unless expressly stated otherwise, “connected” means that one element/feature is directly or indirectly connected to another element/feature, and not necessarily electrically or mechanically. Likewise, unless expressly stated otherwise, “coupled” means that one element/feature is directly or indirectly coupled to another element/feature, and not necessarily electrically or mechanically. Thus, although schematics shown in the figures depict example arrangements of processing elements, additional intervening elements, devices, features, or components may be present in an actual embodiment.
The various aspects of the invention will be described in connection with optimizing performance of industrial lift trucks. That is because the features and advantages that arise due to embodiments of the invention are well suited to this purpose. Still, it should be appreciated that the various aspects of the invention can be applied to other vehicles and to achieve other objectives as well.
While the description of embodiments of the invention and the accompanying drawings generally refer to a man-up order picker style lift truck, it is to be appreciated that embodiments of the invention can be applied in any lift truck configuration to maintain the lift truck within predefined boundaries. Other vehicles that can benefit from embodiments of the invention include a reach truck, a high-lift truck, a counterbalanced truck, and a swing-reach truck, as non-limiting examples.
Referring to
Embodiments of the invention optimize lift truck 20 performance by scrutinizing current operating conditions and dynamically determining an optimal set of lift truck performance parameters. Operating conditions can include the height of load 36, load on the forks 40, and weight of the lift truck 20, for example. The performance parameters can be those that have an impact on the dynamic behavior of the lift truck 20 and can include maximum travel speed, acceleration and deceleration rates, reach/retract speeds, reach/retract acceleration and deceleration rates, and lift speed, among others.
To arrive at the optimal lift truck performance, a controller 60 and associated control algorithm 62 can identify the current operating conditions using sensors 64 and 66, for example, and predict and/or measure the trajectory of the lift truck CG in response to an operator input. The controller 60 can then choose lift truck performance parameters that optimize performance and/or augment the operator input while maintaining the lift truck within defined bounds of the intended path. A variety of different sensors are contemplated for use with embodiments of the invention. For example, a variety of gyroscope configurations are available, such as a solid state Micro-electromechanical Systems (MEMS) gyroscope. There are also several other types of gyroscope sensors or combinations of sensors that can replace a true gyroscope. In other embodiments, differential accelerometers, such as two Z-axis accelerometers with one mounted at or near the top of the mast 126 and one at or near the base of the mast 128. Also, operating conditions can be measured by mechanical devices used as sensors. For example, compression or expansion of springs (not shown) at or near the top of the mast 126 and at or near the base of the mast 128 could be measured by any type of proximity sensor.
Referring to
Trends in measured dynamic vehicle properties, CG parameters, and wheel loads can be analyzed to predict future lift truck stability. This may be achieved, for example, by analyzing trends in the CG position 68 to determine its likelihood of entering the limited region 82 or by analyzing wheel loading trends to ensure that they remain within stable bounds. To adequately model future lift truck stability, it is contemplated that the CG parameters and wheel loads can be calculated approximately ten times per second, or more or less.
Embodiments of the invention further aim to minimize the relative displacement between the mast carriage 34 and the tractor frame 46 in the X-axis 52 (longitudinal), Y-axis 54 (lateral), and Z-axis (torsional or yaw), as seen in
Referring to
In some embodiments, the control algorithm 62 for the allowable deviation map 106 can also be applied in conditions where the operator 56 is commanding a steady-state steering input. If, during such an event, the sensors 64, 66 detect an undesirable relative torsional vibration, for example, between the carriage 34 and the tractor unit 30, the controller 60 can augment the steering input to induce a counter input 110 to damp or cancel the relative torsional vibration. The corrective counter input 110 to the steering can be small in magnitude such that it maintains the lift truck 20 within the allowable deviation map 106.
Referring to
The controller 60 can substantially constantly monitor the operator 56 inputs 120, e.g., steering and/or acceleration, and the current operating conditions 122. The controller 60 can determine the optimal lift truck performance parameters and provide commands 124 that satisfy the operator's request while substantially simultaneously avoiding undesirable dynamic behaviors, such as mast 32 oscillation, while simultaneously maintaining the CG 68 within the stability map 70 and maintaining the lift truck 20 within the allowable deviation map 106. The controller 60 can also receive feedback from the array of sensors 64, 66 distributed throughout the lift truck 20.
With the lift truck 20 equipped with a controller 60 and associated control algorithm 62, the lift truck performance can be optimized for each operating condition 122. The performance of today's lift trucks is generally limited by the worst case operating condition. Operating factors such as vehicle speed, braking rate, turning rate, etc. can be optimized according to the operating condition. This performance optimization can be done while still preserving the lift truck CG 68 within the stability map 70 and allowable deviation map 106. Undesirable mast 32 vibrations can also be addressed by the controller 60 through the use of existing actuators on the lift truck 20. As previously described, these actuators can include the traction motor 100, the steer motor 102, the lift motor 98, and other actuators such as hydraulic actuators 104.
As described above, embodiments of the invention can create a counter moment at the lift truck level to induce counter moments at or near the base of the mast 32 that can damp or cancel vibrations at or near the top of the mast 126. It is to be appreciated that there can be other ways of achieving counter moments that have not been described here but should still be considered within the scope of the invention. For example, one such alternate can be for lift trucks that have a moveable mast, in such lift trucks, the hydraulic actuators 104 that are used to move the mast can be used to induce a counter input by commanding the actuators independently of one another in such a way that a counter moment is created. The same is true for lift trucks that have a tiltable mast. The tilt actuators can be used to induce counter moments.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. For example, any of the various features described herein can be combined with some or all of the other features described herein according to alternate embodiments. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Finally, it is expressly contemplated that any of the processes or steps described herein may be combined, eliminated, or reordered. In other embodiments, instructions may reside in computer readable medium wherein those instructions are executed by a processor to perform one or more of processes or steps described herein. As such, it is expressly contemplated that any of the processes or steps described herein can be implemented as hardware, software, including program instructions executing on a computer, or a combination of hardware and software. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2982395 | Rados | May 1961 | A |
3031024 | Ulinski | Apr 1962 | A |
3067839 | Gibson | Dec 1962 | A |
3504889 | Wyrough | Apr 1970 | A |
3672634 | Chaffin | Jun 1972 | A |
3918597 | Lee | Nov 1975 | A |
4037739 | Lee | Jul 1977 | A |
4509127 | Yuki et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4530492 | Bork | Jul 1985 | A |
5020825 | Lizell | Jun 1991 | A |
5107969 | Klein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5269501 | Liegel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5289902 | Fujita | Mar 1994 | A |
5338015 | Liegel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5579859 | Quellhorst et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5628377 | Le Gloan | May 1997 | A |
5647600 | Booras | Jul 1997 | A |
5781873 | Sasaki | Jul 1998 | A |
5853181 | Booras | Dec 1998 | A |
5878851 | Carlson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5993358 | Gureghian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6226558 | Schneider et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236927 | Sherman | May 2001 | B1 |
6279199 | Plate | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290245 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6350100 | Naruse et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6499184 | Plate | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6517094 | Kincaid | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601825 | Bressner et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6688631 | Andre | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6847874 | Stiller | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7008166 | Grimes | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7017228 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7070028 | Reybrouck et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073643 | Schel | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121372 | Braud | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7243904 | Grimes | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7413062 | Vandewal | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7593797 | Izawa et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7770904 | Passeri | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7896358 | Hoff | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905555 | Huntimer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8140228 | McCabe et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010056544 | Walker | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20050090938 | Ranelli | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102081 | Patterson | May 2005 | A1 |
20060138733 | Clauson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060182578 | Morton | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070056141 | Armano et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070231113 | McGurn | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006494 | Vandewal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090082925 | Wijffels et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090166989 | Atsushi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090312875 | Lehtonen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100230913 | Peterson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110243699 | Kleeberger et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120101627 | Lert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2889874 | Apr 2007 | CN |
19641192 | Mar 1998 | DE |
102004048519 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102005053264 | May 2007 | DE |
102008020595 | Oct 2009 | DE |
1588979 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1975114 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2022749 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2081822 | Jul 2009 | EP |
57160708 | Oct 1982 | JP |
06263145 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07315518 | Dec 1995 | JP |
09086610 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9145552 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11301233 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000344005 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2004269236 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005254975 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008081261 | Apr 2008 | JP |
WO 2007081020 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008006928 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Active Sway Control cuts picking times down to size.” http://www.ethiopianreview.com/articles/120808. Dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
“Sway Control.” http://www.hsmsearch.com/stories/articles/-/handling—storing/warehouse—safety/sway—control/. Dated Jun. 1, 2011. |
“Rocla's new innovation brings more intelligence into warehouse trucks and improves user comfort.” http://www.rocla.com/news.asp?Section=405&Item=5309. Dated 2012. |
Zimmert, Nico et al. “Active Damping Control for Bending Oscillations of a Forklift Mast Using Flatness based Techniques.” Journal Article. Dated Jun. 2010. American Control Conference. pp. 1538-1543. |
Kullaa, Jyrki. “Active Control of a Mast Structure Using Support Excitation.” European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Dated Jul. 2004. pp. 1-14. |
Minav, T.A. et al. “Electric energy recovery system efficiency in a hydraulic forklift.” IEEE EUROCON, 2009: pp. 758-765. |
Guang-zhao Cui et al. “A robust autonomous mobile forklift pallet recognition.” 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR). vol. 3, 2010: pp. 28+. |
Keum-Shik Hong et al. “Navigation Function-Based Control of Multiple Wheeled Vehicles.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. vol. 58, Issue 5, 2011: pp. 1896-1906. |
Hoefinghoff, J.-F. et al. “Using 3D Field Simulation for Evaluating UHF RFID Systems on Forklift Trucks.” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. vol. 59, Issue 2, 2011: pp. 689-691. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140277871 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |