This invention relates to managing delivery of multimedia assets to a user, before a status of these assets in a multimedia delivery system changes. More particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods for notifying a user of a status change of an asset and/or locally recording the asset before the status of the asset changes or the asset becomes unavailable from a provider of the asset.
Content delivery networks (e.g., cable, satellite, Internet) have been developed that can deliver various multimedia assets from a remote source to a user's equipment for viewing or interaction. Multimedia assets include live broadcast programs, web casts, Pay-per-View (PPV) events, and/or VOD content. Sometimes, a user may select multimedia assets to be recorded locally on the user's equipment, for example, on a VCR or digital video recorder (DVR). A live broadcast is typically viewed and/or recorded at the scheduled time set by the broadcast station, whereas VOD content can be viewed and recorded at any user-specified time prior to the expiration time of the VOD content. PPV programs also have expiration dates and may be viewed and/or recorded before the expiration times/dates of the asset from the source server.
Recording a multimedia asset requires a tuner associated with the user equipment to be tuned to the channel in which the multimedia asset is available. Recording an additional multimedia asset at the same time on the same device could require an additional tuner. If the device does not have an additional tuner, the user may have to forgo recording the additional multimedia asset.
The status of multimedia assets may change from time to time. For example, broadcast programs may migrate to VOD or web casts, or PPV content may migrate to VOD. For example, HBO may remove an asset from their regular scheduled broadcast lineup, but continue to make the content available on VOD for an additional amount of time. Another status change may be a change in the expiration time/date of an asset. Expiration date/time for an asset is typically listed in an interactive multimedia guidance application, such as an interactive program guide (IPG). The user may not always be aware of a status change that may prevent the user from viewing and/or recording the asset. Present systems, however, lack an integrated approach to monitor the status of a multimedia asset and to timely notify users of a status change that may impact them.
Problems in the prior art are addressed, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, by a method and apparatus in a video-on-demand (VOD) system for determining when the status of a selected multimedia asset changes.
In one embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus for notifying a user of a status change of a multimedia asset. The invention involves selecting a multimedia asset and monitoring the status of the asset during a notification period which can be set by the user. The user may be notified if the status changes before a notification period expires.
In one embodiment, the multimedia asset may be locally recorded before a status change. Recording may be initiated by the user or automatically scheduled by the system. In one or more of these embodiments, the status change may be monitored automatically by an interactive multimedia guidance application, which may also prompt the apparatus to automatically record the asset. The user may also be notified by a message displayed on a television monitor, a computer monitor, a mobile phone, a PDA, or the like.
In some of the above embodiments, the asset may become available from a different source. The asset may then not need to be locally recorded, but the user may still be notified of the change.
In some embodiments, the user may have already viewed at least a portion of the selected multimedia asset before being notified of a status change, in which case only a remaining portion of the selected asset may be locally recorded before the status change.
In some of the above embodiments, the recording capacity of the local recording device may be checked before a multimedia asset is recorded. Only if the recording capacity is sufficient for recording the multimedia asset will the asset be recorded. If sufficient recording capacity is not available, deletion criterion may be applied to identify stored content that may be deleted from the local recording device.
Other aspect of the invention are directed to a method and apparatus for reconciling scheduling conflicts when locally recording a plurality of multimedia assets on a local recording device.
The above and other features of the present invention, its nature and various advantages will be more apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The disclosed systems and methods are directed to taking action when the status of a multimedia asset is scheduled to change, and to optionally locally record the multimedia asset before the status change takes effect. The status may be monitored by an interactive multimedia guidance application, such as an interactive program guide (IPG).
Multimedia sources 120a, 120b, 120c may be any suitable media source such as, for example, a cable system headend, a satellite multimedia distribution facility, a multimedia broadcast facility, a pay-per-view (PPV) server, a game service provider (e.g., for online gaming), or any other suitable facility or system for originating or distributing content. Multimedia source 120c is depicted as an on-demand server (e.g., VOD server). Multimedia sources 120a, 120b, 120c may be configured to transmit signals over any suitable communications path 122 including, for example, a satellite path, a fiber-optic path, a cable path, an Internet path, or any other suitable wired or wireless path. The signals may carry any suitable content such as, for example, television programs, games, music, news, web services, or any other suitable content. In some embodiments, multimedia sources 120a, 120b, 120c may include control circuitry for executing the instructions of an interactive multimedia guidance application such as, for example, the server side instructions of a client/server or online interactive multimedia guidance application.
User equipment 110 may include any equipment suitable for providing an interactive multimedia experience. User equipment 110 may include television equipment such as a television, set-top box, recording device, video player, user input device (e.g., remote control, keyboard, mouse, touch pad, touch screen and/or voice recognition interface), or any other device suitable for providing an interactive multimedia experience. For example, user equipment 110 may include a DCT 2000, 2500, 5100, 6208 or 6412 set-top box provided by Motorola, Inc. In some embodiments, user equipment 110 may include computer equipment, such as a personal computer with a television card (PCTV). In some embodiments, user equipment 110 may include a gaming system, a portable electronic device, such as a portable DVD player, a portable gaming device, a cellular telephone, a PDA, a music player (e.g., MP3 player), or any other suitable portable or fixed. device.
In the example of
Display device 112 may be any suitable device such as, for example, a television monitor, a computer monitor, or a display incorporated in user equipment 110 (e.g., a cellular telephone or music player display). Display device 112 may also be configured to provide for the output of audio.
Control circuitry 118 is adapted to receive user input from input device 116 and execute the instructions of the interactive multimedia guidance application. Control circuitry 118 may include one or more tuners (e.g., analog or digital tuners), encoders and decoders, processors (e.g., Motorola 68000 family processors), memory (e.g., RAM and hard disks), communications circuitry (e.g., cable modem circuitry), input/output circuitry (e.g., graphics circuitry), connections to the various devices of user equipment 110, and any other suitable component for providing analog or digital multimedia programming, program recording, and interactive multimedia guidance features. In some embodiments, control circuitry 118 may be included as part of one of the devices of user equipment 110 such as, for example, part of display 112 or any other device (e.g., a set-top box, television and video player).
In some embodiments, the interactive multimedia guidance application may provide features to the user with a client/server approach. There may be one server for each instance of user equipment 110, one for multiple instances of user equipment 110, or a single server may serve as a proxy for each instance of user equipment 110.
Any suitable number of users may have equipment, such as user equipment 110, connected to multimedia sources 120a, 120b, 120c and one or more data sources 124a, 124b. But for the clarity of the figure, the equipment of only a single user is shown. The equipment of the plurality of users may be connected to media sources 120a, 120b, 120c, web content 121, and data sources 124a, 124b using a cable television network, a local area network (LAN), a wireless network, or any other suitable means, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the equipment of the plurality of users may be connected to each other using any suitable means.
User equipment 110 may receive interactive multimedia guidance application data from one or more data sources 124a, 124b. Data sources 124a, 124b may provide data for a particular type of content or for a particular application. For example, one data source 124a may provide data for non-on-demand assets (e.g., non-pay and pay-per-view programs), and another data source 124b may provide data for on-demand assets (e.g., VOD programs). Or, for example, a single data source may provide both of these types of data. For example, one of the data sources 124b or an additional data source (not shown) may also provide data for an interactive program guide (IPG). Another of the data sources 124a, 124b or a separate data source (not shown) may provide, for example, data for another interactive application (e.g., a home shopping application). In some embodiments, data sources 124a, 124b or additional data source (not shown) may provide data to the interactive multimedia guidance application using a client/server approach. There may be one server per data source, one for all sources or, in some embodiments, a single server may communicate as a proxy between user equipment 110 and various data sources 124a, 124b. In some embodiments, data sources 124a, 124b may provide data as an online interactive multimedia guidance application. In such embodiments, data sources 124a, 124b may include control circuitry for executing the instructions of the online multimedia guidance application.
In one embodiment, the interactive multimedia guidance application may be a stand-alone application implemented in a set-top box which may be part of user equipment 110. An interactive program guide may be downloaded periodically, for example, every day or once a week, from a data source, such as data source 124a, 124b and the application operates based on the downloaded programming information until the next update.
In another embodiment, the interactive multimedia guidance application may be a client/server application, with the server represented, for example, by a server on the cable headend, and the client by the user equipment 110, a personal computer, a mobile telephone, a PDA, and the like. In this scenario, the client polls the server for updates of programming information.
The interactive multimedia guidance application can also be implemented as a web browser capable of accessing a web site containing programming information and possibly multimedia assets.
For the purposes of clarity, the following discussion may sometimes describe an embodiment in which the interactive multimedia guidance application is an interactive program guide (IPG). It will be understood, however, that the following discussion and the features discussed may be applied to any interactive multimedia guidance application. The following discussion may occasionally also describe certain embodiments as being responsive to an expiration date. However, it should be understood that the embodiments may react to any change in status of the multimedia asset, such as a change in the media source providing the multimedia asset, a change in an availability time window of the multimedia asset, a change in a format of the multimedia asset, and the like.
The following flow charts serve to illustrate methods implemented in some embodiments of this invention. Though the examples focus on content that is alternatively available via a VOD server delivery mechanism, the invention is equivalently applicable to content that is alternatively available via PPV channels or Internet delivery mechanisms. Though the invention applies broadly to multimedia assets, as described earlier to include video/audio programs, interactive content, games, and applications; the following example is provided with respect to video/audio assets for clarity.
At step 206, the interactive multimedia guidance application will check a status of the multimedia asset at the source server, such as a time window during which the asset remains available for viewing. At step 206, the interactive multimedia guidance application may determine, for example, a time when the asset will become available as VOD content. The user may select viewing/recording options on a graphic user interface (GUI). In one embodiment, the user may view the multimedia asset immediately, and process 200 moves to step 216. Alternatively, if the user schedules viewing and/or recording the multimedia asset for a later time, process 200 may move to step 208.
At step 216, if the user views the VOD content immediately, the system monitors at step 218 if the user views the entire content. If the system determines at step 218 that the user has finished viewing the multimedia asset, the system then determines, at step 220, if the user has further interest in the asset, for example, if the user has listed the asset under “Favorites.” If at step 220 no further interest from the user is detected, then process 200 ends at step 228. The asset will still be accessible to the user unless a status change takes effect that makes in the asset inaccessible. However, the system may stop monitoring the status of the asset at the source server. On the other hand, if the system determines at step 218 that the user has not finished viewing the multimedia asset, at step 210, process 200 will move to step 206, where the system continues to monitor the status of the asset at the source server.
If at step 220, it is determined that the user has continued interest in the multimedia asset, process 200 moves to step 210 to check if a change in the status of the multimedia asset is impending. Likewise, the process moves from step 208, where the user had scheduled the multimedia asset for future viewing/recording, to step 210 to check for an impending status change. If no change in the status is detected at step 210, process 200 will move to step 206 and continue to determine the status of the multimedia asset. Conversely, at step 210, if a change in the status is detected indicating, for example, that the asset will be moved to another channel or source, or will have an earlier expiration date at the source than the original expiration date, then process 200 moves to step 214 to check if the asset has already been locally recorded. If a local copy of the asset is available, no further action is taken, and process 200 ends at step 228.
Conversely, at step 214, if it is determined that the asset has not been locally recorded, process 200 moves to step 226 and/or step 222 (depending on the implementation) to automatically alert the user of an impending change in status, for example, by displaying a “Last Chance Notification” (LCN) and/or to automatically record the multimedia asset locally before the status change takes effect. The LCN would thus enable a user to view and/or record an asset or at least a part of the asset ahead of the status change. Local recording may be subject to availability of sufficient storage capacity on recording device 114 and the resolution of scheduling conflicts with other scheduled recordings. A different alert notification “Now available on VOD” or the like could be displayed if the asset becomes available from another source; so that local recording of the asset may not be necessary or may at least be postponed.
Note that in various embodiments, notification 302 might be a notification that this is the “last chance” in the next 3 months to see a particular episode of a series (e.g. “Please note that this is the last time Movie X is going to be broadcast, or going to be on a premium channel, for the next 3 months”). This is relevant in a world where not everything is available on-demand on a server. In order to make this happen, in one implementation, the interactive media guidance application might first search a local-listings database to see when the program might air in the future. Such local databases are typically limited to two or three weeks of future program listings data. Therefore, in other implementations, the application may interact with more extensive remote databases that contained listings and schedules for further out in the future (e.g. the next 3 months).
Additionally, other notification types and other options associated with notifications are possible in addition to the one illustrated by
Other variants and options for the last chance notification include marketing tie-ins for program related purchases, such as a recipe book from Barnes and Nobel, whose recipes were featured on a food channel program that is about to expire, or peer-to-peer tie-ins such as a hot button to jump off to a discussion group related to the soon to expire program.
Conversely, at step 506 if it is determined that the recording capacity is insufficient to record the asset, process 500 will check, at step 510, if other stored assets can be deleted. Criteria for deleting stored assets may include dynamic factors. Some examples of factors that are considered (whether dynamic or not) and criteria with respect to those factors include designation of stored assets as “archived” (which assets would be less likely to be deleted), when the assets were last viewed, direct and indirect input from the user with regard to the assets, and/or how frequently the user has accessed the stored assets. Assets targeted for deletion may include stored VOD assets or other recorded assets (e.g., pay-per-view or broadcast recorded assets). A recorded asset may also be deleted if the interactive multimedia guidance application indicates that the recorded asset will be available from an alternative source in the future.
At step 512, if the system determines that recording space can be made available by removing obsolete or deprioritized assets, process 500 moves to step 516 and deletes one or more identified obsolete assets and records the selected multimedia asset. Conversely, at step 512, if sufficient recording space can not be provided, process 500 moves to step 514 to notify the user that the selected multimedia asset cannot be recorded, unless the user manually deletes one or more stored assets to make recording space available. Process 500 ends at step 518.
Conversely, at step 604, if it is determined that other multimedia assets are scheduled for local recording, process 600 moves to step 608 and checks the scheduled recording times/dates for the other assets. At step 610, if it is determined that the scheduled recording time for the various multimedia assets are not in conflict with each other, process 600 moves to step 614 and the multimedia assets are recorded at their scheduled times. Conversely, at step 610, if it is determined that a scheduling conflict exists, then process 600 moves to step 612 to attempt to change the recording time(s) so as to eliminate the conflict. If the system is able to resolve the conflict, the multimedia assets are recorded at the changed time(s) at step 614. Process 600 ends at step 616. If the conflict cannot be resolved, the user may be notified and asked to intervene.
Note that the multimedia assets may be distribution controlled, in which case recording and copying of the multimedia assets may be restricted. For example, a “broadcast” flag may be set in the asset to indicate that the content can not be copied. Alternatively, a “never copy” flag may be set, or a “play once” flag may be reset in digital rights management protocols such as IEEE 1394 5C. More information on IEEE 1394 5C can be found in “Digital Transmission Content Protection Specification Revision 1.4 (Informational Version),” Feb. 28, 2005, available from Digital Transmission Licensing Administrator (DTLA), 225 B Cochrane Circle, Morgan Hill, Calif. 95037 (USA), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. It should be understood that certain embodiments of the present invention will include steps of checking and considering, in various implementation algorithms, the implications of such distribution and copy protections as well as security, encryption, and access control considerations.
The above described embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims which follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/324,201, filed Dec. 29, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,214,869, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4264924 | Freeman | Apr 1981 | A |
4264925 | Freeman et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4488179 | Kruger | Dec 1984 | A |
4573072 | Freeman | Feb 1986 | A |
4706121 | Young | Nov 1987 | A |
4750036 | Martinez | Jun 1988 | A |
4751578 | Reiter et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4841132 | Kajitani et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847696 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4879611 | Fukui et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4908707 | Kinghorn | Mar 1990 | A |
4908713 | Levine | Mar 1990 | A |
4945563 | Horton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4977455 | Young | Dec 1990 | A |
5012409 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5038211 | Hallenbeck | Aug 1991 | A |
5047867 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5068733 | Bennett | Nov 1991 | A |
5151789 | Young | Sep 1992 | A |
5187589 | Kono et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195134 | Inoue | Mar 1993 | A |
5210611 | Yee et al. | May 1993 | A |
5223924 | Strubbe | Jun 1993 | A |
RE34340 | Freeman | Aug 1993 | E |
5253066 | Vogel | Oct 1993 | A |
5285284 | Takashima et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293357 | Hallenbeck | Mar 1994 | A |
5296931 | Na | Mar 1994 | A |
5323234 | Kawasaki | Jun 1994 | A |
5335277 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351075 | Herz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357276 | Banker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5382983 | Kwoh et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5410344 | Graves et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416508 | Sakuma et al. | May 1995 | A |
5479268 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485219 | Woo | Jan 1996 | A |
5523796 | Marshall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532754 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534911 | Levitan | Jul 1996 | A |
5539822 | Lett | Jul 1996 | A |
5550576 | Klosterman | Aug 1996 | A |
5568272 | Levine | Oct 1996 | A |
5576755 | Davis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583560 | Florin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585858 | Harper et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594509 | Florin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596361 | Martinez | Jan 1997 | A |
5596373 | White et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
5629733 | Youman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631995 | Weissensteiner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632007 | Freeman | May 1997 | A |
5635978 | Alten et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635989 | Rothmuller | Jun 1997 | A |
5640484 | Mankovitz | Jun 1997 | A |
5657414 | Lett et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5684525 | Klosterman | Nov 1997 | A |
5694381 | Sako | Dec 1997 | A |
5699107 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721829 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724091 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727060 | Young | Mar 1998 | A |
5751282 | Girard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5790198 | Roop et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798785 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801787 | Schein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808608 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809204 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812123 | Rowe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812205 | Milnes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812763 | Teng | Sep 1998 | A |
5812937 | Takahisa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828945 | Klosterman | Oct 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880768 | Lemmons et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883677 | Hofmann | Mar 1999 | A |
5903723 | Beck et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920700 | Gordon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940572 | Balaban et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949954 | Young et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959688 | Schein et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969748 | Casement et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974222 | Yuen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995155 | Schindler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020930 | Legrand | Feb 2000 | A |
6058242 | Kim | May 2000 | A |
6061056 | Menard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081291 | Ludwig, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091883 | Artigalas et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6141488 | Knudson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154771 | Rangan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157413 | Hanafee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163316 | Killian | Dec 2000 | A |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185360 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208799 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233389 | Barton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243865 | Wei et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247176 | Schein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275648 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285685 | Bum | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323911 | Schein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324338 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327418 | Barton et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341374 | Schein et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6347400 | Ohkura et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348932 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6388714 | Schein et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6442332 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473559 | Knudson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505348 | Knowles et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6564005 | Berstis | May 2003 | B1 |
6611958 | Shintani et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6630954 | Okada | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6681396 | Bates et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6701527 | Schein et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6756997 | Ward, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760538 | Bumgardner et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771886 | Mendelsohn | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6850693 | Young et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6973663 | Brown et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7047549 | Schein et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7088910 | Potrebic et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7162729 | Schein et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7330693 | Goss | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7543320 | Schein et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7765235 | Day | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774816 | Bumgardner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7992163 | Jerding et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8214869 | Day | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010028782 | Ohno et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020040475 | Yap et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057893 | Wood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059621 | Thomas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020116712 | Schein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144279 | Zhou | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169712 | Ginzboorg et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174430 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174433 | Baumgartner et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009766 | Marolda | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033601 | Sakata et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067554 | Klarfeld et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118323 | Ismail et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126607 | Phillips et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167471 | Roth et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198462 | Bumgardner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206719 | Bumgardner et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208763 | McElhatten et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217057 | Kuroiwa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049794 | Shao et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091217 | Nawae et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103434 | Ellis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111756 | Stuckman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117831 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117845 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125779 | Kelton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154040 | Ellis | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156614 | Bumgardner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181814 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187150 | Gonder et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210932 | Mori et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050015804 | LaJoie et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050218 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055715 | Minnick et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066353 | Fransdnk | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089022 | Muhonen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105528 | Kobayashi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138305 | Zellner | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160461 | Baumgartner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193015 | Logston et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204388 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213938 | Ozawa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234992 | Haberman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235323 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238168 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240968 | Knudson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271363 | Tanikawa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271364 | Collar | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271365 | Hisatomi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271366 | Wiinter et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273819 | Knudson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060111038 | Tatsumi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140584 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143665 | Meek et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060174270 | Westberg et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070071399 | Ellis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104456 | Craner | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107010 | Jolna et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080066016 | Dowdy et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077957 | Schein et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092168 | Logan et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100175090 | Cordray | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 682 452 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0721253 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 753 964 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 836 320 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 854 645 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 187 467 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 292 137 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 355 489 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 473 934 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1667455 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2 210 526 | Jun 1989 | GB |
2 229 595 | Sep 1990 | GB |
63-054884 | Mar 1988 | JP |
63141467 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-289619 | Nov 1988 | JP |
1212986 | Aug 1989 | JP |
01307944 | Dec 1989 | JP |
60-61935 | Apr 1994 | JP |
07-231437 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-018882 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08-116495 | May 1996 | JP |
8-314979 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10-174037 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10247344 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11-136615 | May 1999 | JP |
11-313280 | Nov 1999 | JP |
01209399 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-335463 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-189267 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-304503 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-339000 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-07592 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-23326 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-120038 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-193920 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-320608 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-343520 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-175519 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-094175 | Jul 2005 | JP |
1078328 | May 2009 | JP |
2011-083034 | Apr 2011 | JP |
WO 8903085 | Apr 1989 | WO |
WO 9204801 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO 9222983 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 9323957 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO-9504431 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9532583 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9609721 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9617473 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9626605 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9636172 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9637075 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9641478 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9713368 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9730546 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9731306 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9748230 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9749242 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9806219 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9848566 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9952279 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 9966725 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0004706 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0007368 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008852 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0016548 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0040026 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0058833 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0058967 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0059214 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0059223 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0067475 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0122729 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0169929 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0176239 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0198920 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-02069636 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03041410 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03043321 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03060157 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004002156 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004019602 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004040906 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2004068841 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004091217 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002214 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003921 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-20050022913 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005101188 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006060157 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007078739 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Electronic Program Guide Via Internet”, Anonymous, Research Disclosure Bulletin, No. 385:276, May 1996, p. 276. |
Hofmann, J., “The Consumer Electronic Bus: An Integrated Multi-Media LAN for the Home,” International Journal of Digital and Analog Communication Systems, vol. 4, No. 2, 1991, pp. 77-86. |
“IS-60.3 Physical Layer and Medium Specifications. Part 3-CS Physical Layer & Medium Specification,” CX Specification, Revised Mar. 19, 1992, Table of Contents (2 pp.) and pp. 1-41. |
O'Brien, Jr., T.E., “Physical and Media Specifications of the CXBus,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 37, No. 3, Aug. 1991, pp. 357-366. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/047423 dated Jun. 21, 2007. |
Sheth, A., C. Bertram and K. Shah (1999). “VideoAnywhere: A System for Searching and Managing Distributed Video Assets” SIGMOD Record 28(1): 104-109. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Response dated Dec. 3, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Examiner Interview Summary Record dated Apr. 22, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Response dated May 21, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,2021. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Response dated Nov. 3, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Final Office Action issued dated Feb. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Request for Continued Examiner dated Apr. 19, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/324,201. |
Davidson, Ken, “CEBus: A New Standard in Home Automation” Circuit Cellar Ink, pp. 40-52 (1989). |
Goldberg, “A 35-inch Zenith TV premieres StarSight's onscreeen guide,” Video (Apr. 1995) pp. 41. |
Partial European Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2012 in EP Application No. EP 10 16 8916.4. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 9, 2012 in EP Application No. 10 16 8916 dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
“Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); DVB specification for data broadcasting”, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, Draft EN 301 192 V1.2.1 (Feb. 1999). |
Declaration of Rosetta Rogers Under 37 CFR 1.131 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/393,955. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120240145 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11324201 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 13487518 | US |