This application claims priority to other applications as set forth in the Application Data Sheet filed in this application. Each of the patents and/or applications listed on the ADS is hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to managing groups of computers and more particularly relates to managing policies for configuring hardware or software settings on groups of computers with a plurality of operating systems.
2. Description of the Related Art
A major concern of information technology management in corporations and other organizations has been balancing the complexity associated with managing large numbers of computers with the needs of individual users as they try to accomplish their tasks. A heterogeneous set of computer hardware, operating systems, and application software creates complexity and increased costs, but various combinations of hardware, operating systems, and software provide technical advantages when used as user workstations, departmental servers, corporate infrastructure equipment, and the like. User workstations are particularly difficult to manage when various needs and preferences of individual users are accommodated. For example, an engineer may require the use of a CAD system that runs only on the UNIX operating system, where other corporate users may be standardized on the MICROSOFT WINDOWS operating system and associated applications. Many similar compatibility issues exist among current computer systems.
One factor that adds to the complexity of managing various operating systems is that different operating systems employ different techniques for setting configuration information. For example, MICROSOFT WINDOWS and applications that run on Windows typically use a database, called the registry, to store configuration information. Computers running the UNIX operating system or derivatives thereof such as LINUX typically store configuration information in plain text files in particular locations in the file system directory. Information technology managers within an organization that uses heterogeneous operating systems typically institute separate sets of management procedures and standards for each operating system used in the organization.
One component of prior art solutions to the problem of managing large numbers of computers and users is the use of policies. Policies are used to set configurable options associated with an operating system or application program for a group of computer users. For example, a word processing program may have an option to select an American English dictionary or a British English dictionary. By creating one policy for its users in the United States and another policy for its users in England, an organization can set the appropriate option for all users without configuring each user's computer individually.
Another component of prior art solutions to the problem of managing groups of computers and users is the use of network directory services. Directory services provide an infrastructure to store and access information about network-based entities, such as applications, files, printers, and people. Directory services provide a consistent way to name, describe, locate access, manage, and secure information about these resources. The directories associated with directory services are typically hierarchical structures such as a tree with each node in the hierarchy capable of storing information in a unit often referred to as a container. Enterprises may use directory servers and directory services to centrally manage data that is accessed from geographically dispersed locations.
For example, corporations typically create network directory trees that mirror their corporate organizations. Information about individual employees, such as their employee number, telephone number, and hire date may be stored in a user object corresponding to each user in the directory tree. An organizational unit container representing each department may contain the user objects associated with each employee in the department. Organizational unit objects associated with each corporate division may contain the department organizational unit objects associated with each department in the division. Finally, an organization container representing the corporation as a whole may contain the company's division organizational unit objects.
Combining the use of policies and directory services facilitates management of groups of computers and users. Policies may be associated with the various containers in the directory services tree to store associated configuration information at the organization, division, or departmental level. For example, a policy may be associated with the Accounts Receivable container in a corporate organization to set options for the accounting program used in that department. Exceptions to the policy can be managed on an individual level, or by creating a group object and associating a policy with the group. Suppose, for example, that all employees in an organization use a software application with a particular set of configuration options, but department managers require a different set of options. A policy could be created with the basic set of options and associated with the organization container. A separate policy with the configuration options for managers could be created and assigned to a Managers user group object.
Using policies and directory services in combination has proven efficient in homogeneous operating system environments. Prior art computer management systems use policies targeted toward a specific operating system, referred to as the native operating system. From the point of view of prior art policy and policy management systems, other operating systems are considered to be foreign operating systems. However, the operating requirements of many organizations require information technology managers to manage multiple operating systems. The efficiencies associated with policies and directory services have not been realized in heterogeneous operating system environments. Since different operating systems use different approaches to setting configuration information, a policy associated with a directory services container may be applied to users of a native operating system that provided the policies, but there may not be a method for applying the policy for users of a foreign operating system.
From the foregoing discussion, it should be apparent that a need exists for an apparatus, system, and method that extend the use of policies to manage configuration information on computers having operating systems that are foreign to the policy creation and management environment. Beneficially, such an apparatus, system, and method would control cost and complexity associated with management of computers with heterogeneous operating systems within an organization. The benefits are multiplied when network directory services are used in conjunction with policies.
The present invention has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available policy management systems. Accordingly, the present invention provides an apparatus, system, and method for managing policies on a computer having a foreign operating system that overcome many or all of the above-discussed shortcomings in the art.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method for managing policies on a computer having a foreign operating system includes providing a policy on a first computer with a native operating system, receiving the policy on a second computer with a foreign operating system, and translating the policy to configuration information usable on the second computer. In one embodiment, the method includes receiving the policy on the second computer at workstation start-up. The method also may include updating the policy at user login. These embodiments facilitate obtaining the current policy at the time they are typically needed by operating systems.
In further embodiments, the method includes polling the first computer at periodic intervals for changes to the policy. In these embodiments, configuration information usable on the second computer is updated to reflect changes in policy on the first computer, to keep the configuration information and policy closely synchronized. The method may also con include applying configuration information associated with directory services containers and objects. For example, a policy associated with a directory services organization container may be translated to configuration information that may then be applied to all users in the organization container.
In another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus to manage policies on a computer having a foreign operating system includes a policy on a first computer having a native operating system, a policy translator that translates the policy to configuration information usable on a second computer having foreign operating system, and a translator manager that manages the association between the policy on the first computer and the translator on the second computer. The apparatus, in one embodiment, is configured to manage configuration information usable on a second computer having a foreign operating system by means of policies on a first computer having a native operating system. A translator manager manages the association between the policy on the first computer, and a policy translator on the second computer.
The apparatus is further configured, in one embodiment, to include policies associated with network directory services containers and objects. Policies may be associated, for example, with organization containers, organizational unit containers, and user objects, facilitating the configuration of hardware or software information for groups of computer users at a corporate, department, or individual level.
Various elements of the present invention may be combined into a system arranged to carry out the functions or steps presented above. In one embodiment, the system includes two computers, the first having a native operating system and the second having a foreign operating system. In particular, the system, in one embodiment, includes a directory services server and database, a communications network, a policy, a policy editor, a policy template, a translator manager, and a policy translator.
Reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention.
These features and advantages of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
Many of the functional units described in this specification have been labeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize their implementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.
Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.
Indeed, a module of executable code could be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of programming, software modules, user selections, network transactions, database queries, database structures, hardware modules, hardware circuits, hardware chips, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
Some of the servers 110 may be directory servers or domain servers which can function as a registry for resources and users of the networking environment 100. The network 120 may include routers, bridges, hubs, gateways, or the like which facilitate communications among the components of the networking environment 100. Some of the networked computers 130 may execute legacy applications and operating systems that are unable to integrate with the servers 110 that are directory servers.
Some of the networked computers 130 may be used to run utility applications to manage the servers 110 that are directory servers and features of the directory service that runs on the servers 110. These networked computers 130 that manage the directory service typically do not include functionality to manage foreign operating systems that may run on other networked computers 130.
An administrative user may use a policy template 210 and a policy editor 220 to control the operation of the policy manager 230a. The policy template 210 and the policy editor 220 may be located on the first computer 260 or may be on another computer. The policy manager 230a may use a policy-related file 240 and settings (i.e. information) in a configuration information database 250a to record the policy settings created by the administrative user.
As a means for efficiently managing a group of computers with like operating systems, a policy manager 230b in a second computer 270 may be configured to obtain policy settings by reading from the policy-related file 240 or the configuration information con database 250a on the first computer 260, as represented by the dashed lines 233 and 236 in
The policy may include configuration information that applies specifically to the second computer 270, or to a specific user or any of a group of users of the second computer 270. Configuration information may be associated with network directory services containers and objects. For example, by associating configuration information with an organizational unit container, the behavior of an application can be controlled for all users in a company department. Configuration information maybe assigned to containers and objects at various levels in a directory services hierarchy, facilitating management of hardware and software configuration information at various organizational, geographical, or individual levels. For example, application configuration information may be associated with an organization container, organizational unit container, and user object in a network directory services hierarchy, resulting in application configuration options being assigned at corporate, departmental, and individual levels in an organization.
An administrative user may use a policy template 322 and policy editor 324 to control the operation of the policy manager 230. The policy manager 230 may use a policy-related file 326 and settings or information in a configuration information database 250 to record the policy settings created by the administrative user. The translation manager 342 in the second computer 340 may be configured to obtain policy settings by reading from the policy-related file 326 and the configuration information database 250 on the first computer 320, as represented by the dashed lines 333 and 336 in
As with the embodiment depicted in
The following schematic flow chart diagrams that follow are generally set forth as logical flow chart diagrams. As such, the depicted order and labeled steps are indicative of one embodiment of the presented method. Other steps, methods, and orderings may be conceived that are equivalent in function, logic, or effect to one or more steps, or portions thereof, of the illustrated method.
The provide policy template step 520 provides a policy template such as the policy template 322 to be used in conjunction with the policy editor 324, or the like. As detailed in
The provide policy translator step 530 provides a translator 344 that translates configuration information from the first computer 320 having a native operating system to the second computer 340 having a foreign operating system. The provide policy translator step 530 may place the translator 344 in a file system directory known to the translator manager 342. In some embodiments, the provide policy translator step 530 may register the file system location of the translator 344 with the translator manager 342. Upon completion of the provide policy translator step 530, the provide translator method 500 ends 540.
The provide policy step 620 provides a policy on the first computer 320 having a native operating system. The provide policy step 620 may be performed by an administrative user using a policy template 322, policy editor 324, and/or policy manager 230. The policy may be contained in a policy-related file 326 and a configuration information database 250 on the first computer 320. In some embodiments, the policy may be contained in a policy-related file 413 and a configuration information database 416 on a server 410, such as a directory server.
The receive policy step 630 receives the policy on the second computer 340 having a foreign operating system. The receive policy step 630 may be performed by a translator manager 342 on the second computer 340. The translator manager 342 may copy the policy from a policy-related file 326 and a configuration information database 250 on the first computer 320. In other embodiments, the translator manager 342 may copy the policy from a policy-related file 413 and a configuration information database 416 on a server 410, such as a directory server. The translator manager 342 transmits the policy to a translator 344.
The translate policy step 640 translates configuration information from the first computer 320 having a native operating system to the second computer 340 having a foreign operating system. The translate policy step 740 may be performed by a translator 344 on the second computer 340. The translator 344 receives the policy from the translator manager 342 and translates the policy to foreign operating system configuration information used by the second computer 340.
The update configuration step 650 applies the configuration information translated by the translator 344. The update configuration step 650 may be performed by a translator 344 on the second computer 340 having a foreign operating system. After translating the policy to foreign operating system configuration information, the translator 344 applies the policy by saving the configuration information in a policy-related file 346. In some embodiments, configuration information may be saved in a plurality of policy-related files 346.
The update on start-up test 655 determines whether the policy is to be applied at workstation start-up. A policy may contain configuration information for all users of the second computer 340. Many operating systems apply configuration information at workstation start-up. Updating configuration information on the second computer 340 during workstation start-up makes the updated settings available for application during the workstation start-up process. If the policy is to be updated at workstation start-up, the policy translation method 600 continues with the wait for start-up step 660, otherwise the policy translation method 600 continues with the update on login test 665.
The wait for start-up step 660 waits for the second computer 340 to reach a point in the workstation start-up process where computer resources are available for the second computer 340 to receive the policy from the first computer 320. The wait for start-up step 660 includes setting a configuration setting that causes the policy translation method 600 to continue with the receive policy step 630 at workstation start-up. The wait for start-up step 660 facilitates receiving the current version of the policy so that configuration information may be applied to the second computer 340 at workstation start-up, when many operating systems typically read configuration information. Updating a policy at workstation start-up is particularly advantageous to workstation-specific configuration information.
The update on login test 665 determines whether the policy is to be applied at user login. A policy may contain configuration information that applies to a specific user or any of a group of users of the second computer 340. In some embodiments, configuration information may be associated with network directory services containers and objects. For example, by associating configuration information with an organizational unit container, the behavior of an application can be controlled for all users in a company department. Updating configuration information on the second computer 340 makes the current version of the settings available for application for the user logging in. If the policy is to be updated at user login, the policy translation method 600 continues with the wait for login method 670, otherwise the policy translation method 600 continues with the refresh time test 675.
The wait for login step 670 waits for a user to log in to the second computer 340 to receive the policy from the first computer 320. The wait for login step 670 includes setting a configuration setting that causes the policy translation method 700 to continue with the receive policy step 630 at user login. The wait for login step 670 facilitates receiving the current version of the policy so that configuration information may be applied to the second computer 340 at user login, when many operating systems typically read configuration information. Updating a policy at user login is particularly advantageous to user-specific configuration information.
The refresh time test 675 determines whether it is time to check for updates to the policy on the first computer 320. In some embodiments, the refresh time test 675 polls the first computer 320 at periodic intervals for changes to the policy. The polling interval may be configurable by the user or may itself be a setting configurable by a policy. In some embodiments, the refresh time test 675 may include a means for the first computer 320 to notify the second computer 340 that a change has been made to the policy, and that the policy should be refreshed on the second computer 340. If the refresh time has arrived, the policy translation method 600 continues with the receive policy step 630, otherwise it continues with the terminate test 685.
The terminate test 685 determines whether the refresh time test 675 should be repeated, or if the policy translation method 600 should terminate. In some embodiments, the policy translation method 600 may be terminated to facilitate deallocation of memory or other computer resources when the second computer 340 is shut down, or to allow for system maintenance. If the policy translation method is not to be terminated, it continues with the refresh time test 675, other wise it ends 690.
The policy template data 710 is one example of the policy template 322. The policy template 322 may reside on the first computer 320 having a native operating system or on a third computer, such as an administrative workstation. The policy template data 710 may comprise plain ASCII text used to constrain data input accepted by the policy editor 324 by identifying names of data objects that the policy editor 324 will allow the user to edit. Policy template data 710 may also contain the text of prompts or other fields that control the user interface presented by the policy editor 324. Using the policy template 322, the policy editor 324 may accept input from an administrative user and generate input data for the policy manager 230.
Policy manager input data 720 illustrates the format of data that may be generated by the policy editor 324. In various embodiments, in accordance with the provide policy step 620, the policy manager 230 may accept the policy manager input data 720 from a file created by the policy editor 324, from a file created by an administrative user, or communicated directly from the policy editor 324 to the policy manager 230 via interprocess communication. The policy manager 230 may alter the format or contents of the policy manager input data 720. In some embodiments, the policy manager creates a policy-related file 326 and enters the location of the policy-related file 326 in the configuration settings database 250.
The native policy-related file data 730 is a textual representation of binary data in one embodiment of the policy-related file 326. The native policy-related file data 730 is generated by the policy manager 230, and in preparation for the receive policy step 630, is stored in a format and location typically used with the native operating system in use on the first computer 320. In the depicted embodiment, the native policy-related file data 730 comprises mixed binary and UNICODE text delimited by square brackets.
The translated policy-related file data 740 is one example of the policy-related file 346. In accordance with the translate policy step 640, the translator 344 translates the policy data received from the translator manager 342 to data usable by the foreign operating system used by the second computer 340. The depicted translated policy-related file data 740 is one example of a configuration file that a translator 344 has converted from mixed binary and UNICODE format to plain ASCII text format, and filtered to include only data usable by the foreign operating system in use on the second computer 340. In the depicted example, the translated policy-related file data 740 comprises a list of user names that will be allowed to log in to the second computer 340.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109237 | Hill | Aug 1978 | A |
4370707 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4694397 | Grant | Sep 1987 | A |
5222018 | Sharpe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5267865 | Lee et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5310349 | Daniels et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313465 | Perlman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333302 | Hensley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339435 | Lubkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5367698 | Webber et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387104 | Corder | Feb 1995 | A |
5410703 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423032 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437027 | Bannon et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437555 | Ziv-El | Aug 1995 | A |
5440719 | Hanes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441415 | Lee et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5497486 | Stolfo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5497492 | Zbikowski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499379 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5530829 | Beardsley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550968 | Miller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550976 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553291 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5586304 | Stupek, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590360 | Edwards | Dec 1996 | A |
5600833 | Senn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608874 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608903 | Prasad et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613090 | Willems | Mar 1997 | A |
5623601 | Vu | Apr 1997 | A |
5630069 | Flores et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630131 | Palevich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5659735 | Parrish et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659736 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666502 | Capps et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671428 | Muranaga et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673386 | Batra | Sep 1997 | A |
5673387 | Chen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675782 | Montague et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677997 | Talatik | Oct 1997 | A |
5680586 | Elkins et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684950 | Dare et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692132 | Hogan | Nov 1997 | A |
5692902 | Aeby | Dec 1997 | A |
5694540 | Humelsine et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708812 | Van Dyke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708828 | Coleman | Jan 1998 | A |
5710884 | Dedrick | Jan 1998 | A |
5711671 | Geeslin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5727145 | Nessett et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727951 | Ho et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740427 | Stoller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743746 | Ho et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745113 | Jordan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745902 | Miller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752042 | Cole et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754173 | Hiura et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754938 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758062 | Mcmahon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758074 | Marlin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758344 | Prasad et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764897 | Khalidi | Jun 1998 | A |
5765140 | Knudson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768519 | Swift et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774551 | Wu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778169 | Reinhardt | Jul 1998 | A |
5784553 | Kolawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784643 | Shields | Jul 1998 | A |
5790801 | Funato | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | Macnaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806075 | Jain et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812669 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812865 | Theimer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815657 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819265 | Ravin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819281 | Cummins | Oct 1998 | A |
5819295 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822518 | Ooki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835911 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838918 | Prager et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844508 | Murashita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5859972 | Subramaniam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872928 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878432 | Misheski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889520 | Glaser | Mar 1999 | A |
5890161 | Helland et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890175 | Wong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892898 | Fujii et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893074 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893076 | Hafner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893916 | Dooley | Apr 1999 | A |
5930512 | Boden et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937165 | Schwaller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948064 | Bertram et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949419 | Domine et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956732 | Tsuchida | Sep 1999 | A |
5956736 | Hanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960200 | Eager et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968176 | Nessett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987247 | Lau | Nov 1999 | A |
5995114 | Wegman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002868 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003047 | Osmond et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014669 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014712 | Islam et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016495 | Mckeehan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016501 | Martin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021496 | Dutcher et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029178 | Martin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029195 | Herz | Feb 2000 | A |
6029247 | Ferguson | Feb 2000 | A |
6035323 | Narayen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041344 | Bodamer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044368 | Powers | Mar 2000 | A |
6044465 | Dutcher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049822 | Mittal | Apr 2000 | A |
6052512 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055538 | Kessenich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058260 | Brockel et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061643 | Walker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061650 | Malkin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067568 | Li et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070184 | Blount et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076166 | Moshfeghi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079020 | Liu | Jun 2000 | A |
6092199 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101481 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6101503 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108649 | Young et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108670 | Weida et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112228 | Earl et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112240 | Pogue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115040 | Bladow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6115544 | Mueller | Sep 2000 | A |
6134548 | Gottsman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138086 | Rose et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141006 | Knowlton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141010 | Hoyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6141647 | Meijer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151600 | Dedrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6151610 | Senn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161176 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167445 | Gai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167564 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170009 | Mandal et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182212 | Atkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182226 | Reid et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185625 | Tso et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195794 | Buxton | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199068 | Carpenter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199079 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205480 | Broadhurst et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208345 | Sheard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209000 | Klein et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209033 | Datta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222535 | Hurd, II | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223221 | Kunz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226649 | Bodamer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230160 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230309 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233584 | Purcell | May 2001 | B1 |
6237114 | Wookey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246410 | Bergeron et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249905 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256637 | Venkatesh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256659 | Mclain, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256678 | Traughber et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260068 | Zalewski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263352 | Cohen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266666 | Ireland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269405 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269406 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272673 | Dale et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272678 | Imachi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279030 | Britton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282576 | Lane | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282605 | Moore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286028 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286104 | Buhle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301601 | Helland et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304893 | Gish | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308164 | Nummelin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308188 | Bernardo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308273 | Goertzel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313835 | Gever et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314434 | Shigemi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327677 | Garg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330566 | Durham | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336118 | Hammond | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341287 | Siziklai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345239 | Bowman-amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349287 | Hayashi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363398 | Andersen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370573 | Bowman Amuah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370646 | Goodman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381579 | Gervais et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389589 | Mishra et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401085 | Gershman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401211 | Brezak et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405364 | Bowman-amuah | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430556 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438514 | Hill et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442620 | Thatte et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446096 | Holland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453317 | Lacost et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457130 | Hitz et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6466932 | Dennis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469713 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496847 | Bugnion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567818 | Frey et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587876 | Mahon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615258 | Barry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625622 | Henrickson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658625 | Allen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678714 | Olapurath et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6715128 | Hirashima et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728877 | Mackin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735691 | Capps et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757696 | Multer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760761 | Sciacca | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795835 | Ricart et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801946 | Child et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6817017 | Goodman | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839766 | Parnafes et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6880005 | Bell et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6925477 | Champagne et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938158 | Azuma | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941465 | Palekar et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944183 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950818 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950935 | Allavarpu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6968370 | Wu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973488 | Yavatkar et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7028079 | Mastrianni et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062781 | Shambroom | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080077 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089584 | Sharma | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117486 | Wong et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133984 | Dickensheets | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139973 | Kirkwood et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143095 | Barrett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162640 | Heath et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171458 | Brown et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185073 | Gai et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7209970 | Everson et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213266 | Maher et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216181 | Jannu et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7231460 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234157 | Childs et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243370 | Bobde et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7284043 | Feinleib et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299504 | Tiller et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7346766 | Mackin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356601 | Clymer et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356816 | Goodman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379996 | Papatla et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7418597 | Thornton et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421555 | Dorey | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426642 | Aupperle et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428583 | Lortz et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7440962 | Wong et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7444401 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7467141 | Steele et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478418 | Supramaniam et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483979 | Prager | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7487535 | Isaacson et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7519813 | Cox et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7584502 | Alkove et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591005 | Moore | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7617501 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650497 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653794 | Michael et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661027 | Langen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673323 | Moriconi | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7690025 | Grewal et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7765187 | Bergant et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7805721 | Feinleib et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7895332 | Vanyukhin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904949 | Bowers et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7987455 | Senner et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8024360 | Moore | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8086710 | Vanyukhin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087075 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8141138 | Bhatia et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8245242 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8346908 | Vanyukhin et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8429712 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8533744 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20010034733 | Prompt et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020055949 | Shiomi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078005 | Shi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112178 | Scherr | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129274 | Baskey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133723 | Tait | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138572 | Delany et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169986 | Lortz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169988 | Vandergeest et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174366 | Peterka et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178377 | Hemsath et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184536 | Flavin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009487 | Prabakaran et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018913 | Brezak et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023587 | Dennis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028611 | Kenny et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033535 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065940 | Brezak et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065942 | Lineman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110397 | Supramaniam et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115186 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115313 | Kanada et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115439 | Mahalingam et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149781 | Yared et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177388 | Botz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188036 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229783 | Hardt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010519 | Sinn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059953 | Purnell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078569 | Hotti | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088543 | Garg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098595 | Aupperle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098615 | Mowers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111515 | Manion et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111643 | Farmer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117382 | Houseknecht et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123146 | Himmel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128542 | Blakley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139050 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139081 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199795 | Grewal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226027 | Winter | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260565 | Zimniewicz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260651 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010547 | Carinci et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044409 | Betz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055357 | Campbell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060397 | Barthram et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086457 | Hohman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091068 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091213 | Schutz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091250 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091284 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091290 | Cameron et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108579 | Isaacson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114701 | Atkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125798 | Peterson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144463 | Rossebo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160423 | Bantz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193181 | Kaneda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198303 | Knauerhase et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204143 | Ellington | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223216 | Chan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246554 | Batson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267938 | Czeczulin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268309 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283443 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283614 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004794 | Pizzo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060005229 | Palekar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010445 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015353 | Reese | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021017 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026195 | Gu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034494 | Holloran | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085483 | Mooney et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116949 | Wehunt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130065 | Chin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161435 | Atef et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174350 | Roever et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184401 | DelGaudio et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200424 | Cameron et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200504 | Lo | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224611 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248099 | Barrett et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265740 | Clark et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282360 | Kahn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282461 | Marinescu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294151 | Wong et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011136 | Haskin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038596 | Pizzo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083917 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100980 | Kataoka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101415 | Masui | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143430 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143836 | Bowers et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150448 | Patnode | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156766 | Hoang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156767 | Hoang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180448 | Low et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180493 | Croft et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192843 | Peterson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255814 | Green et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288992 | Robinson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080104220 | Vanyukhin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104250 | Vanyukhin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133533 | Ganugapati et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162604 | Soulet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215867 | Mackin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090006537 | Palekar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090216975 | Halperin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100050232 | Peterson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110093570 | Mackin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110282977 | Peterson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283273 | Peterson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120192256 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215899 | Peterson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120297035 | Peterson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05728119.1 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 932 279 | Jun 2008 | JP |
WO 2006016900 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2007044613 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Description of Digital Certificates”, Jan. 23, 2007. |
“Directory Administrator”, p. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Innovation Report—Windows Group Policy Protocols”. Jul. 31, 2006. |
“Kerberos Module for Apache”. |
“LDAP Linux HOWTO”, p. 1-2. Mar. 5, 2004. |
“Lnux Authentication Against Active Directory”, p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“NegotiateAuth”, Jul. 8, 2010. |
“Optimization Techniques for Trusted Semantic Interoperation”, Final Technical Report, Air Force Research Laboratory. Published May 1998. |
“Project: AD4Unix: Summary”, p. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Replacing NIS with Kerberos and LDAP”, p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Sadma”, p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Sun Enterprise Authentication Mechanism Data Sheet”, pp. 1-4. Dec. 15, 2004. |
Vintela Extends the Reach of Microsoft Group Policy to Unix and Linux; Vintela Group Policy (VGP) Provides a Framework for Unix and Linux Policy-Based Management Through the Popular Windows Group Policy System., PR Newswire, Sep. 13, 2004. |
Nov. 18, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458—Office Action—Transmittal of Communications to Third Party Requester Inter Partes Reexamination, 52 pages. |
Nov. 18, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458—Patent Owner Comments Regarding Oct. 20, 2011 Action Closing Presecution, 14 pages. |
A. Leonard, “Embrace, extend, censor”, Originally published May 11, 2000 on salon.com. |
Accelerated Examination Support Document in U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,592, filed Aug. 4, 2011. |
Accelerated Examination Support Document in U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,629, filed Aug. 4, 2011. |
Aelita Software Domain Migration Wizard 6.0 User's Guide, Aug. 21, 2003. |
AIX 5L Differences Guide Version 5.2 Edition Published Dec. 24, 2002, Excerpt. |
Akhgar et al., Secure ICT Services for Mobile and Wireless Communications: A Federated Global Identity Management Framework, 2006 IEEE. |
Alan H. Harbitter et al., “Performance of Public-Key-Enabled Kerberos Authentication in Large Networks”, Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on Security and Privacy. 2001. |
Antti Tikkanen, “Active Directory and nss—idap for Linux: Centralized er Management,” printed from pp. 1-11, 2004. |
Apurva Kumar, “The OpenLDAP Proxy Cache,” IBM, India Research Lab, at least as early as May 2003. |
Authentication, from Pieces of the Puzzle, Chapter 2, p. 12. (Exhibit IV to U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination Renewed Petition (Third Party Requester to Response to Mar. 1, 2012 Office Action), dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
Buell, D.A. et al., “Identity management”, Internet Computing, IEEEvol. 7, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003 pp. 26-28. |
Centrify Corporation's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Centrify DirectControl Administrator's Guide Version 2.0, Aug. 15, 2005. |
Chapter 9 Authentication Protocols, Distributed System & Network Security Lab, Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, pp. 21-22. 1991. |
Complaint, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
COSuser—Identity management and user provisioning for Unix, Linux and Microsoft Windows® May 24, 2010. |
Damiani, E., et al, “Managing multiple and dependable identities” Internet Computing, IEEEvol. 7, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003 pp. 29-37. |
David “Del” Elson, “Active Directory and Linux,” printed from pp. 1-11, 2002. |
David F. Carr, “What's Federated Identity Management?”, eWeek, Nov. 10, 2003. |
Declaration of Ethan L. Miller, Ph.D. (Exh. I, to Inter Partes Reexam), dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
Declaration of Matthew Peterson in Support of Quest's Opposition to Centrify's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Dennis, Disconnect Login (Was: FC3 Bug Week—Help Wanted) (Sep. 24, 2004). |
Description of Digital Certificates, Jan. 23, 2007, available at. |
Designing Network Security Published May 7, 1999. Excerpt. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, Installation Guide. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, Installation Guide:—System Administrator's Guide:—UNIX User's Guide. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, System Administrator's Guide. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, UNIX User's Guide. |
European Office Action, Application No. 05728119.8-1243 dated Apr. 9, 2009. |
European Patent Office Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 9, 2009. |
Fabini et al., “IMS in a Bottle: Initial Experiences from an OpenSER-based Prototype Implementation of the 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem” Mobile Business, 2006. ICMB '06. International Conference on Publication Date: 2006; On pp. 13-13. |
Garman, “Kerberos—The Definitive Guide,” Aug. 2003, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. |
Get to One Options for moving from multiple, Unix identities to a single, AD-based authentication infrastructure with Vintela Authentication Services May 24, 2010. |
Hank Simon, “SAML:The Secret to Centralized Identity Management”, Dec. 2004. |
IBM SecureWay Policy Director, 1999. (4 pages). |
IBM z/OS V1R1.0-V1R12.0 DCE Application Development Reference: dce—ace—is—cient—authorized API call: URL: Copyright IBM Corporation 1990,2010, (2 pages). |
Identity Management for UNIX Aug. 22, 2005. |
Implementing Registry-Based Group Policy for Applications, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server. White Paper. 2000. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/039302, mailed on Apr. 2, 2009, in 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2009/038394, mailed Oct. 6, 2009, in 13 pages. |
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2006/039302, mailed on Jul. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report PCT/US2005/008342 , mailed on Nov. 9, 2006. |
Introduction to Group Policy in Windows Server 2003, Microsoft Corporation, Published Apr. 2003. |
J. Barr, “The Gates of Hades: Microsoft attempts to co-opt Kerberos”, Published Apr. 2000 as verified by the Internet Archive. |
J. Brezak, “HTTP Authentication: SPNEGO Access Authentication as Implemented in Microsoft Windows 2000,” pp. 1-6. 2002. |
J. Kohl et al. “RFC 1510: The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)”, Published Sep. 1993. |
Jan De Clercq, “Win.NET Server Kerberos”, Sep. 17, 2002. |
John Brezak, “Interoperability with Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory and Kerberos Services,” printed from pp. 1-4, 2000. |
Kerberos, PACs, and Microsoft's Dirty Tricks Originally posted to slashdot.org on May 2, 2000. |
Langella, S. et al., “Dorian: Grid Service Infrastructure for Identity Management and Federation”, Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2006. CBMS 2006. 19th IEEE International Symposium on Jun. 22-23, 2006 pp. 756-761. |
Li, M., et al., “Identity management in vertical handovers for UMTS-WLAN networks”, Mobile Business, 2005. ICMB 2005. International Conference on Jul. 11-13, 2005 pp. 479-484. |
Likewise Software, Inc.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
LinuX® and Windows® Interoperability Guide, Published Dec. 14, 2001, Excerpt. |
Lowe-Norris, Alistair G., Windows 2000 Active Directory, Chapters 8 and 9, pp. 177-245, Jan. 2000. |
Matsunaga et al, “Secure Authentication System for Public WLAN Roaming, Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots,” San Diego, CA, A, Year of Publication: 2003, p. 113-121. |
Matthew Hur, “Session Code: ARC241 architecture & infrastructure”, Microsoft Corporation. Oct. 26, 2003. |
MCSE in a Nutshell: The Windows 2000 Exams Published Feb. 2001. Excerpt. |
Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Defendant Centrify Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue and Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Memorandum in Support of Centrify's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Microsoft Corp., Implementing Registry-Based Group Policy for Applications, 2000. |
Microsoft Corp., Introduction to Group Policy in Windows Server 2003, 2003. |
Microsoft: CATIA Migration from UNIX to Windows, Overview, Jul. 18, 2003. (3 pages). |
Microsoft: CATIA Migration from UNIX to Windows, Overview, Jul. 18, 2003, Microsoft, Chapter 8, Windows-Unix Interoperability and Data Sharing. (21 pages). |
Mikkonen, H. et al., “Federated Identity Management for Grids” Networking and Services, 2006. ICNS '06. International conference on Jul. 16-18, 2006 pp. 69-69. |
Mont, M.C. et al., “Towards accountable management of identity and privacy: sticky policies and enforceable tracing services”, Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings. 14th International Workshop on Sep. 1-5, 2003 pp. 377-382. |
NCSA Introduction to Kerberos 5, All right reserved Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Page last updated May 21, 2002. |
Neuman et al., “RFC 4120—The Kerberos Network Authentication Service V5,” Network Working Group, Jul. 2005. |
Neuman, et al.: “Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 32, Issue 9, Pub. Date Sep. 1994, relevant pp. 33-38. |
O'Reily publications “Unix & Internet Security”, Apr. 1996. (3 pages). |
PADL Software Pty Ltd., pp. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
PADL Software Pty Ltd., Pam—ccreds readme, (Apr. 11, 2004) (pan—crreds). |
Phiri, J. et al., “Modelling and Information Fusion in Digital Identity Management Systems” Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, 2006. ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006. International Conference on Apr. 23-29, 2006 pp. 181-181. |
Quest Software, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion to Stay, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Quest Software; “UNIX Identity Migration Wizard User Guide”, 2006. |
Quest Vintela Authentication Services Administrator's Guide Version 3.1, Sep. 2006. |
Radeke, E., et al. “Framework for object migration in federated database systems”, Cooperation Univ. of Paderborn, Germany, Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, 1994., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Publication Date: Sep. 28-30, 1994, on pp. 187-194. |
Record of Oral Hearing in Reexamination Control No. 95/001,458 of United States Patent No. 7,617,501, Argued Aug. 15, 2013. |
Reply Memorandum in Support of Centrify's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Request for Withdrawal of the European Application No. 05728119.8 on Feb. 19, 2010. |
Response to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EOC filed Sep. 9, 2009 in EP 05728119.8. |
RFC 4120—“The Kerberos Network Authentication Service V5,” Neuman et al., Network Working Group, Jul. 2005. |
Sandrasegaran, Hsang, Identity Management in Vertical Handovers for UMTS-WLAN Networks, 2005 IEEE. |
Schroeder, SDSC's Installation and Development of Kerberos, San Diego Supercomputer Center, San Diego, CA, Sep. 20, 1995, p. 1-11. |
Search Security, “Search Security.com Definitions”, Jun. 4, 2007. |
Shim, S.S.Y et al., “Federated identity management” Computer; vol. 38, Issue 12, Dec. 2005 pp. 120-122. |
Shin, D. et al., “Ensuring information assurance in federated identity management”, Performance, Computing, and Communications, 2004 IEEE International Conference on 2004 pp. 821-826. |
Siddiqi, J. et al., “Secure ICT Services for Mobile and Wireless Communications: A Federated Global Identity Management Framework”, Information Technology: New Generations, 2006. ITNG 2006. Third International Conference on Apr. 10-12, 2006 pp. 351-357. |
Sixto Ortiz, Jr., “One-Time Password Technology”, vol. 29, Issue 15, Apr. 13, 2007. |
Stipulated Judgment and Entry of Permanent Injunction against Likewise Software, Inc., Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Subject 2.15. What do I need to do to setup cross-realm authentication?, Jul. 8, 2010. |
The SLAPD and SLURPD Administrator's Guide, University of Michigan Release 3.3 Apr. 30, 1996, available at. |
Transcript of Jul. 22, 2011 deposition of Michael W. Dennis in Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2: 10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Turbo Fredriksson, “LDAPv3.” printed from pp. 2-65, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/612,569, Inter Partes Reexamination Request dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Action Closing Prosecution dated Oct. 10, 2011 |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Appellant's Brief filed Mar. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Examiner's Answer mailed Sep. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Notice of Appeal filed Jan. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Notice of Defective Paper in Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Jul. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Notice of Hearing mailed May 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Order dated Nov. 24, 2010 Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Patent Owner Comments filed Nov. 18, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Rebuttal Brief filed Oct. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Respondent's Brief filed Apr. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Response to Office Action filed Mar. 21, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Right of Appeal Notice mailed Dec. 16, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Shortened Response to Office Action filed Aug. 4, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Apr. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Aug. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Nov. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action, dated Jan. 21, 2011 of co-owned U.S. Patent No. 7,617,501. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination, Request for Oral Hearing, dated Nov. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Decision dated Oct. 11, 2012 Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Exhibit T submitted Dec. 10, 2012 with Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Exhibits A-K to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination filed Aug. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Patent Owner's Statement in Inter Partes Reexamination, filed Dec. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Reexamination Action Closing Prosecution dated Feb. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Reexamination Exhibits L-S submitted Dec. 10, 2012 with both Patent Owner's Statement and Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Reexamination Notice of Appeal of Patent Owner, filed May 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Reexamination Right of Appeal Notice dated Apr. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Response to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination, filed Dec. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination Request of co-owned U.S. Patent No. 7,617,501. |
Ventuneac et al., A policy-based security framework for Web-enabled applications, Proceeding ISICT '03, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 487-492. |
Vintela Group Policy Technology Preview, “Extending the Power of Group Policy and Windonws Active Directory to configuration of Unix and Linux users and systems”, Version 0.1, May 2004. |
Wedgetail Communications; “Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)”, 2004. |
Weitzner, D.J., “In Search of Manageable Identity Systems”, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 10, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006 pp. 84-86. |
Windows 2000 Kerberos Authentication White Paper, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, pp. 1-5 and 41-42. Jul. 12, 2010. |
Withers, Integrating Windows 2000 and UNIX Using Kerberos, The Journal for UNIX Systems Administrators, vol. 10, No. 12, Dec. 2001. |
Oct. 15, 2013 Related Applications. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,814, filed Aug. 28, 2008, Eyes et al. |
Dec. 6, 2013 Re-Exam Decision on Appeal—QSOFT.363X. |
Jan. 6, 2014 Request for Rehearing by Third Party Requester in Inter PartesReexamination—QSOFT.363X. |
Feb. 5, 2014 Comments on Request for Rehearing—QSOFT.363X. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140012964 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13563490 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14021852 | US | |
Parent | 12612569 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13563490 | US | |
Parent | 10888845 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 12612569 | US |