This application is a 371 of International Application PCT/AU2010/000247 filed Mar. 4, 2010.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for managing video data. Embodiments of the invention have been particularly developed for managing access to live and/or recorded video data between distributed Digital Video Management (DVM) systems. While some embodiments will be described herein with particular reference to that application, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to such a field of use, and is applicable in broader contexts.
Any discussion of the background art throughout the specification should in no way be considered as an admission that such art is widely known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field.
Digital Video Management (DVM) systems are widely used. In overview, a plurality of cameras are assigned to a plurality camera servers, with each camera server being configured to make available (for live viewing or recording purposes) video data from an assigned one or more cameras. The camera servers are all centrally managed by a DVM database server. In general terms, a client wishing to view live video data from a given one of the cameras provides a request to the DVM database server, and is informed which camera server makes available video data for that camera. The client then opens a connection with that camera server, and streams the live video data for local viewing.
There is an inherent limitation on the number of cameras that can be supported by a single DVM system. This leads to complications in terms of scalability. Furthermore, various situations arise where geographically dispersed sites require local autonomy but also central monitoring. Bandwidth between such sites presents a limiting factor to constrain the manner in which video data and/or other data is shared.
There is a need in the art for improved systems and methods for managing video data.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.
One embodiment provides a DVM system including:
one or more local cameras,
one or more local camera servers, each having a respective one or more assigned local cameras, the local camera servers being configured to make available, to DVM clients, video data from their respective one or more assigned local cameras;
a local DVM database server that maintains data indicative of the local cameras and local camera servers, wherein the local DVM database server is in communication with a remote DVM database server for a remote DVM system, wherein the remote DVM system includes:
one or more remote cameras, and
one or more remote camera servers, each having a respective one or more assigned remote cameras, the remote camera servers being configured to make available, to DVM clients, video data from their respective one or more assigned remote cameras; and
a local client in communication with the local DVM database server, the local client being configured for displaying live video data to a user, wherein the local client is configured to communicate with a local camera server for displaying video data from one of its respective one or more assigned local cameras, and configured to communicate with a remote camera server for displaying video data from one of its respective one or more assigned remote cameras.
One embodiment provides a method for operating a client in a local DVM system, the method including the steps of:
receiving a user command to display live video data from a predetermined camera;
identifying, based on data maintained by the local DVM system, details for a camera server that is configured for providing live video data for the predetermined camera;
in the case that the camera server is part of a remote DVM system, providing to the camera server a request to view live video data from the predetermined camera, wherein the request is provided over a TCP/IP connection between the client and the camera server;
receiving from the camera server the live video data via the TCP/IP connection between the client and the camera server; and
displaying the live video data.
One embodiment provides a method for operating a local camera server in a local DVM system, the method including the steps of:
receiving, from a remote client in a remote DVM system, via a TCP/IP connection between the remote client and the local camera server, a request to display live video data from a predetermined camera;
identifying credentials for the client; and
in the case that the identified credentials match locally stored pre-approved credentials, providing the live video data to the client via the TCP/IP connection between the remote client and the local camera server.
One embodiment provides a computer program product for performing a method as described herein.
One embodiment provides a carrier medium for carrying computer executable code that, when executed on a processor, allows the processor to perform a method as described herein.
One embodiment provides a system configured for performing a method as described herein.
One embodiment provides a distributed DVM system including:
a first DVM system including one or more first-system cameras, one or more first-system camera servers, each having a respective one or more assigned first-system cameras, the first-system camera servers being configured to make available video data from their respective one or more assigned first-system cameras to DVM clients, a first-system DVM database server that maintains data indicative of the first-system cameras and first-system camera servers, and one or more first-system clients for displaying video data to users; and
a second DVM system including one or more second-system cameras, one or more second-system camera servers, each having a respective one or more assigned second-system cameras, the second-system camera servers being configured to make available video data from their respective one or more assigned second-system cameras to DVM clients, a second-system DVM database server that maintains data indicative of the second-system cameras and second-system camera servers, and one or more second-system clients for displaying video data to users.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “some embodiments” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in some embodiments” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, but may. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from this disclosure, in one or more embodiments.
As used herein, unless otherwise specified the use of the ordinal adjectives “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., to describe a common object, merely indicate that different instances of like objects are being referred to, and are not intended to imply that the objects so described must be in a given sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking, or in any other manner.
In the claims below and the description herein, any one of the terms comprising, comprised of or which comprises is an open term that means including at least the elements/features that follow, but not excluding others. Thus, the term comprising, when used in the claims, should not be interpreted as being limitative to the means or elements or steps listed thereafter. For example, the scope of the expression a device comprising A and B should not be limited to devices consisting only of elements A and B. Any one of the terms including or which includes or that includes as used herein is also an open term that also means including at least the elements/features that follow the term, but not excluding others. Thus, including is synonymous with and means comprising.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Described herein are systems and methods for managing video data. In overview, various embodiments provide software, hardware and methodologies associated with the management of video data. In overview, a distributed DVM system includes a plurality of discrete DVM systems, which may be geographically or notionally distributed. Each discrete DVM system includes a respective central DVM database server thereby to provide autonomy to the discrete system. This server supports one or more camera servers, these camera servers in turn each being configured to make available live video data from one or more cameras. Each system additionally includes one or more clients, which provide a user interface for displaying video data (such as video data from one of the cameras). The discrete DVM systems are primarily linked by way of a centralized database server/database server communications interface. However, the clients are configured to connect directly to camera servers belonging to their local DVM system or a remote DVM system in the distributed architecture.
System Level Overview—Single System
System 101 includes a plurality of cameras 102. Cameras 102 include conventional cameras 104 (including analogue video cameras), and IP streaming cameras 105. Cameras 102 stream video data, presently in the form of surveillance footage, on a TCP/IP network 106. This is readily achieved using IP streaming cameras 105, which are inherently adapted for such a task. However, in the case of other cameras 104 (such as conventional analogue cameras), a camera streamer 107 is required to convert a captured video signal into a format suitable for IP streaming. A plurality of cameras 104 can be connected to a single streamer 107, however it is preferable to have the streamer in close proximity to the camera, and as such multiple streamers are often used.
One or more camera servers 109 are also connected to network 106 (these may be either physical servers or virtual servers). Each camera server is enabled to have assigned to it one or more of cameras 102. This assignment is carried out using a software-based configuration tool, and it follows that camera assignment is virtual rather than physical. That is, the relationships are set by software configuration rather than hardware manipulation. In practice, each camera has a unique identifier. Data indicative of this identifier is included with surveillance footage being streamed by that camera such that components on the network are able to ascertain from which camera a given stream originates.
In the present embodiment, camera servers are responsible for making available both live and stored video data. In relation to the former, each camera server provides a live stream interface, which consists of socket connections between the camera manager and clients. Clients request live video through the camera server's COM interfaces and the camera server then pipes video and audio straight from the camera encoder to the client through TCP sockets. In relation to the latter, each camera server has access to a data store for recording video data. Although
Although, in the context of the present disclosure, there is discussion of one or more cameras being assigned to a common camera server, this is a conceptual notion, and is essentially no different from a camera server being assigned to one or more cameras.
Clients 110 execute on a plurality of client terminals, which in some embodiments include all computational platform on network 106 that are provided with appropriate permissions. Clients 110 provide a user interface (UI) that allows surveillance footage to be viewed in real time by an end-user. For example, one UI component is a render window, in which streamed video data is rendered for display to a user. In some cases this user interface is provided through an existing application (such as Microsoft Internet Explorer), whilst in other cases it is a standalone application. The user interface optionally provides the end-user with access to other system and camera functionalities, including mechanical, digital and optical camera controls, control over video storage, and other configuration and administrative functionalities (such as the assignment and reassignment of cameras to camera servers). Typically clients 110 are relatively “thin”, and commands provided via the relevant user interfaces are implemented at a remote server, typically a camera server. In some embodiments different clients have different levels of access rights. For example, in some embodiments there is a desire to limit the number of users with access to change configuration settings or mechanically control cameras.
System 101 also includes a DVM database server 115. Database server 115 is responsible for maintaining various information relating to configurations and operational characteristics of system 101, and for managing events within the system. In terms of events, the general notion is that an action in the system (such as the modification of data in the database, or the reservation of a camera, as discusses below) causes an event to be “fired” (i.e. published), this having follow-on effects depending on the nature of the event.
In the present example, the system makes use of a preferred and redundant database server (115 and 116 respectively), the redundant server essentially operating as a backup for the preferred server. The relationship between these database servers is generally beyond the concern of the present disclosure.
Distributed System Architecture
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to distributed DVM systems, also referred to as “distributed system architecture” (DSA). In general terms, a distributed DVM system includes a plurality of (i.e. two or more) discrete DVM systems, such as system 101. These systems are discrete in the sense that they are in essence standalone systems, able to function autonomously without the other by way of their own DVM servers. They may be distributed geographically (for example in different buildings, cities or countries), or notionally (in a common geographic location, but split due to individual system constraints, for example camera server numbers, or simply to take advantage of benefits of a distributed architecture).
Various components (hardware and software) are configured to allow communications between the systems, for example via a network connection (including, but not limited to, an Intranet or Internet connection), or other communications interface. For the sake of the present embodiments, it is assumed that the inter-system communications occur by way of TCP/IP connections, and in this manner any communications channel supporting TCP/IP may be used.
System 200 includes a first DVM system 201A and a second DVM system 201B. These discrete systems are separated by a distributed system architecture (DSA) boundary 202. Boundary 202 is, to some extent, notional only. In the present embodiment, communication across boundary 202 is realized via a TCP/IP connection, although other system-system communications links are used to provide TCP/IP communications channels in other embodiments. In some embodiments the DVM systems are on a common domain, for example in the context of an Intranet arrangement. However, the present embodiments are not limited to any particular network arrangement, and are in some cases implemented over the Internet in a general sense.
System 201A includes a DVM database server 210A. Server 210A operates in conjunction with a DVM database 211A, which maintains data indicative of cameras and camera servers in both system 201A and system 201B. The manner by which inter-system information sharing is configured is discussed further below. An event service component 212A is responsible for publishing events in system 201A. For example, component 212A is informed of various activities, such as modifications to database records, and publishes events accordingly (for example in one embodiment various components in the system are configured to monitor such happenings and inform component 212A). Other components take action responsive to the publication of events. A DSA service component 213A is responsible for managing communications with system 201B, via a TCP/IP connection with a corresponding component in system 201B. A UI services component 214A is responsible for allowing a client to interface with DVM database 211A, for example in the context of an object oriented software architecture (for example using IIS Web Services in a .NET software framework). That is, UI services component 214A operates in conjunction with a repository of business objects which provide for various software functionalities, and allow for the construction and/or population of UI components in a client machine.
System 201A additionally includes a client 220A, being defined by a client machine such as a personal computer, or being defined by a software application executing on a client machine, depending on perspective. Client 220A provides a render window component 221A, which is configured for rendering and displaying video data. A DVM adapter component 222A is configured to obtain video data from a camera sever, based on the location of video data requested by a user, and information contained in database 211A, which reveals the location of the camera server that makes available the video data requested by the user. A camera control component 223A provides UI components for allowing a user to control a physical camera, for example in terms of pan, tilt and zoom.
System 201A additionally includes a camera server 230A, which is configured for making available live video data from one or more cameras (not shown), and optionally for making available stored video data from one or more storage locations in system 201A.
System 201B presently includes the same components as system 201A, and these are allocated corresponding reference numerals, with a “B” suffix rather than an “A” suffix. For example, system 201A includes a server 210A, whereas system 201B includes a server 210B, and so on. In later examples, system 201A is referred to as system A, and system 201B as system B.
By virtue of having their own respective database servers 210A and 210B, systems 201A and 201B are able to function autonomously. That is, they are discrete systems, and do not depend on one another to function. This is contrasted with a situation where a single database server manages geographically distributed camera servers, cameras and clients. That is simply a single system. The present embodiments, on the other hand, are two systems, and gain advantages stemming from that (for example support of a greater number of cameras, etc).
The connection between servers 210A and 210B is fundamental in implementing the present distributed architecture. In particular, it allows the two discrete systems to discover and connect to one another, share information via synchronization of various aspects of data in their respective databases (such as camera/camera server information), and additionally allows the passing of event information between the systems (for example allowing an event occurring in one system, such as detection of motion at a given camera, to have effect in the other system, for example by launching a view on a client in that system). Servers 210A and 210B communicate via one or more TCP sockets ports and/or one or more WCF ports.
It has been recognized by the present inventors that centralized communication between database servers, in itself, is not able to sustain an appropriate degree of inter-system communication to provide effective distributed system architecture. In this regard, a decision was made to configure client 220A to connect directly to camera server 230B for the purposes of obtaining live video data, and also for recorded video data. Likewise, client 220B is able to connect directly to camera server 230A (although this is not shown for the sake of simplicity). This allows for a substantially seamless integration of remote camera servers with a local system, as the mechanism by which a camera server is addressed (via TCP/IP communications) is generally the same for both local and remote variants. Furthermore, resource-intensive video data able to be shared directly between the client and camera server, rather than having to pass between the database servers across boundary 202. This is significant in reducing latency, and improving the effectiveness of the connection between the database servers (by reducing resource intensive traffic between those servers).
Various aspects and functionalities of the distributed system architectures are discussed in more detail further below by reference to specific embodiments.
DSA Initial Configuration
At step 401, one system discovers another system, via messaging between DSA services components. As part of this, the respective DSA services compare credentials to verify that a link is allowable, for example in the context of security considerations. In one embodiment the creation of a link is only allowable where the DVM systems have been installed to run under the same administrative account/password.
Although the term “discovery” is used, this should not be read to necessarily imply automated “discovery”, for instance in the sense of plug-and-play functionality or the like. In some embodiments discovery is a manual process based on system-system requests.
The results of the discovery process indicate to the requestor system (i.e. the system initiating discovery) the suitability of joining with the other system in a distributed system architecture. That is, if the other end of the link is in fact contactable (and if the remote system of an appropriate system version to allow communications, and security/credential requirements are satisfied) the link can be configured and saved.
At step 402 a user inputs various aspects of information about the nature of the link, if required. For example, this information may affect the data to be synchronized in the following step. Details of the link are then written to the local database, and a cache of links updated. Then, at step 403, synchronization occurs. In one embodiment, this includes obtaining a snapshot of required data from the remote system, updating the local database with information regarding remote cameras and servers, and updating the local event engine and monitor engine based on the new link.
Inter-System Event Management
At step 501, there is a local action in DVM system A, for example in terms of a camera reservation being made (as discussed further below), a modification to camera or system configuration settings, or the like. At step 502, a local event service is notified of this action and is responsible for firing a local event in the local system. The DSA service observes this local event at 503, and determines at 504 whether that event should be provided to the remote system (system B). For example, the DSA service is configured to recognize various events as being of interest to the remote system, which is in some cases due to manual user configuration of the distributed architecture. In the case that the event should be provided to the remote system, the DSA service converts the local (object model) event into a DSA transportable format, and transports it across the DSA boundary. The DSA service in system B receives the resulting data at 506, and assuming it recognizes it as requiring a local event (based on decision 507), takes action. In very general terms, this includes arranging for a local event to be raised. More specifically, in one embodiment the remote system receives the events in DSA-transportable format. It then unformats and parses the events, notifying the local event service of the particular events to be raised and the particular parameters with which those events are to be raised. The event service then converts this data and sends a message to each local DVM object model. Each local object model then processes and broadcasts an actual object model event to all its clients.
Examples of events that are transported across the DSA boundary include:
It will be appreciated that this is a small selection of events, provided for the sake of explanation only. Various other events are present in practical implementations.
Local Client to Remote Camera Server Interaction
As noted above, a local client wishing to view live video data from a remote camera server does so via direct communications with the remote camera server. An example of this is provided through method 600 of
At step 601, a client receives from a user data indicative of a request to view live video data from a specified camera. For the sake of the present example, it is assumed that the specified camera is provided within a DVM system remote of that in which the client operates. That is, in a distributed DVM architecture, the client is considered to be local as opposed to a remote camera server. Step 601 may come about, for instance, as a result of a user input, or as a result of an automated process.
At step 602, the client identifies the location of the specified camera. In the present embodiment this is achieved by submitting a request to the local DVM database server which, as noted above, maintains data indicative of remote cameras and camera servers. This data allows the client to contact the relevant camera server directly. The client then, at 603, invokes relevant UI components for viewing the relevant live video data. For example, following the example of
At step 604, the client provides a request, via the DVM adapter, to the remote camera server. This request is received in the remote camera server at 605. Step 606 includes determining client credentials, which in the present embodiment is achieved based on analyzing the context of the request to determine information about the client/user. That is, the client does not transmit explicit credential information for the present purposes (although that does occur in other embodiments). At 607, the camera server verifies the client credentials based on local (system B) data. In the present embodiment, this data is maintained at the camera server, and furthermore is indicative of Windows-based users and/or groups who have appropriate access rights for the present purposes. Other embodiments adopt different approaches, including the use of credential information stored maintained at the local database of system B.
Assuming credentials were verified successfully (and that there are no other bars to the client viewing live video data from the relevant camera, such as camera failure or the like), the camera server grants reservation to the relevant client at 608. This fires a local event, and in turn results in a remote event, with data indicative of the reservation filtering back to the client UI via the server-server link, such that the user is able to view information regarding the reservation (for example time remaining). However, independent of that process, the camera server provides directly to the client a “control cookie”, which is effectively a token that allows subsequent communications, at least within the scope of the reservation, to proceed without a need to repeatedly verify credentials. The control cookie is received at step 610. The method then progresses to steps 611 and 612, which respectively describe the process by which the client provides requests (for live video data and/or camera control) and the process by which the camera server receives and progresses those requests (and delivers live video data to the client and/or provides control instructions to the camera).
In terms of reservations, a client may still view live video data during another client's reservation; control functionality is however prevented. In some embodiments a prioritization protocol is implemented such that certain users are able to gain control in spite of other users' reservations, for example based on access permissions or scope of responsibility.
In the present embodiment, the client component of method 600 remains generally unchanged regardless of whether the camera server is local or remote. In this manner, the user experience is generally seamless regardless of whether cameras are located locally or remotely.
In spite of the generally seamless experience, it will be appreciated that the bandwidth of link between distributed systems might affect the quality of live video data from a remote system. Some embodiments make use of client side frame rate management for these purposes. In particular, when requesting live video data, the client specifies how that live video data should be delivered, for example in terms of frame skipping (e.g. “deliver only every second frame”), and the camera server delivers the data accordingly. In other embodiments throttling of data is managed centrally by a component that monitors bandwidth resources of the system-system link, and instructs for reduced bandwidth video transfers where predefined conditions are met.
In terms of recorded video data, in the present embodiments there is an additional preliminary step where the client requests to the local sever to identify the location of that recorded video data. If that data is remote, the local server communicates with the remote server (e.g. via a data engine described in relation to
Conclusions and Interpretation
It will be appreciated that the disclosure above provides various significant systems and methods for managing video data. For example, the present embodiments allow for a distributed system architecture in the context of DVM systems, and does so in a manner that efficiently manages concerns associated with the transfer of bandwidth intensive video data.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining”, analyzing” or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities into other data similarly represented as physical quantities.
In a similar manner, the term “processor” may refer to any device or portion of a device that processes electronic data, e.g., from registers and/or memory to transform that electronic data into other electronic data that, e.g., may be stored in registers and/or memory. A “computer” or a “computing machine” or a “computing platform” may include one or more processors.
The methodologies described herein are, in one embodiment, performable by one or more processors that accept computer-readable (also called machine-readable) code containing a set of instructions that when executed by one or more of the processors carry out at least one of the methods described herein. Any processor capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken are included. Thus, one example is a typical processing system that includes one or more processors. Each processor may include one or more of a CPU, a graphics processing unit, and a programmable DSP unit. The processing system further may include a memory subsystem including main RAM and/or a static RAM, and/or ROM. A bus subsystem may be included for communicating between the components. The processing system further may be a distributed processing system with processors coupled by a network. If the processing system requires a display, such a display may be included, e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT) display. If manual data entry is required, the processing system also includes an input device such as one or more of an alphanumeric input unit such as a keyboard, a pointing control device such as a mouse, and so forth. The term memory unit as used herein, if clear from the context and unless explicitly stated otherwise, also encompasses a storage system such as a disk drive unit. The processing system in some configurations may include a sound output device, and a network interface device. The memory subsystem thus includes a computer-readable carrier medium that carries computer-readable code (e.g., software) including a set of instructions to cause performing, when executed by one or more processors, one of more of the methods described herein. Note that when the method includes several elements, e.g., several steps, no ordering of such elements is implied, unless specifically stated. The software may reside in the hard disk, or may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the RAM and/or within the processor during execution thereof by the computer system. Thus, the memory and the processor also constitute computer-readable carrier medium carrying computer-readable code.
Furthermore, a computer-readable carrier medium may form, or be included in a computer program product.
In alternative embodiments, the one or more processors operate as a standalone device or may be connected, e.g., networked to other processor(s), in a networked deployment, the one or more processors may operate in the capacity of a server or a user machine in server-user network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer or distributed network environment. The one or more processors may form a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a set-top box (STB), a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
Note that while some diagrams only show a single processor and a single memory that carries the computer-readable code, those in the art will understand that many of the components described above are included, but not explicitly shown or described in order not to obscure the inventive aspect. For example, while only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.
Thus, one embodiment of each of the methods described herein is in the form of a computer-readable carrier medium carrying a set of instructions, e.g., a computer program that is for execution on one or more processors, e.g., one or more processors that are part of web server arrangement. Thus, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, embodiments of the present invention may be embodied as a method, an apparatus such as a special purpose apparatus, an apparatus such as a data processing system, or a computer-readable carrier medium, e.g., a computer program product. The computer-readable carrier medium carries computer readable code including a set of instructions that when executed on one or more processors cause the processor or processors to implement a method. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a method, an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of carrier medium (e.g., a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium) carrying computer-readable program code embodied in the medium.
The software may further be transmitted or received over a network via a network interface device. While the carrier medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “carrier medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “carrier medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by one or more of the processors and that cause the one or more processors to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. A carrier medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical, magnetic disks, and magneto-optical disks. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise a bus subsystem. Transmission media also may also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications. For example, the term “carrier medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, a computer product embodied in optical and magnetic media; a medium bearing a propagated signal detectable by at least one processor of one or more processors and representing a set of instructions that, when executed, implement a method; a carrier wave bearing a propagated signal detectable by at least one processor of the one or more processors and representing the set of instructions a propagated signal and representing the set of instructions; and a transmission medium in a network bearing a propagated signal detectable by at least one processor of the one or more processors and representing the set of instructions.
It will be understood that the steps of methods discussed are performed in one embodiment by an appropriate processor (or processors) of a processing (i.e., computer) system executing instructions (computer-readable code) stored in storage. It will also be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular implementation or programming technique and that the invention may be implemented using any appropriate techniques for implementing the functionality described herein. The invention is not limited to any particular programming language or operating system.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, but may. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from this disclosure, in one or more embodiments.
Similarly it should be appreciated that in the above description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, FIG., or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure and aiding in the understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects. This method of disclosure, however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
Furthermore, while some embodiments described herein include some but not other features included in other embodiments, combinations of features of different embodiments are meant to be within the scope of the invention, and form different embodiments, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. For example, in the following claims, any of the claimed embodiments can be used in any combination.
Furthermore, some of the embodiments are described herein as a method or combination of elements of a method that can be implemented by a processor of a computer system or by other means of carrying out the function. Thus, a processor with the necessary instructions for carrying out such a method or element of a method forms a means for carrying out the method or element of a method. Furthermore, an element described herein of an apparatus embodiment is an example of a means for carrying out the function performed by the element for the purpose of carrying out the invention.
In the description provided herein, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure an understanding of this description.
Similarly, it is to be noticed that the term coupled, when used in the claims, should not be interpreted as being limited to direct connections only. The terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Thus, the scope of the expression a device A coupled to a device B should not be limited to devices or systems wherein an output of device A is directly connected to an input of device B. It means that there exists a path between an output of A and an input of B which may be a path including other devices or means. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are either in direct physical or electrical contact, or that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other but yet still co-operate or interact with each other.
Thus, while there has been described what are believed to be the preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention, and it is intended to claim all such changes and modifications as falling within the scope of the invention. For example, any formulas given above are merely representative of procedures that may be used. Functionality may be added or deleted from the block diagrams and operations may be interchanged among functional blocks. Steps may be added or deleted to methods described within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009900943 | Mar 2009 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2010/000247 | 3/4/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/18/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/099575 | 9/10/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3753232 | Sporer | Aug 1973 | A |
3806911 | Pripusich | Apr 1974 | A |
3857018 | Stark et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3860911 | Hinman et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3866173 | Moorman et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3906447 | Crafton | Sep 1975 | A |
4095739 | Fox et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4146085 | Wills | Mar 1979 | A |
4148012 | Baump et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4161778 | Getson, Jr. et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4213118 | Genest et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4283710 | Genest et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4298946 | Hartsell et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4332852 | Korklan et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336902 | Neal | Jun 1982 | A |
4337893 | Flanders et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4353064 | Stamm | Oct 1982 | A |
4373664 | Barker et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4379483 | Farley | Apr 1983 | A |
4462028 | Ryan et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4525777 | Webster et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4538056 | Young et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4556169 | Zervos | Dec 1985 | A |
4628201 | Schmitt | Dec 1986 | A |
4646964 | Parker et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4685615 | Hart | Aug 1987 | A |
4821177 | Koegel et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4847839 | Hudson, Jr. et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5070468 | Niinomi et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5071065 | Aalto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5099420 | Barlow et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5172565 | Wruck et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5204663 | Lee | Apr 1993 | A |
5227122 | Scarola et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259553 | Shyu | Nov 1993 | A |
5271453 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5361982 | Liebl et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5404934 | Carlson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420927 | Micali | May 1995 | A |
5449112 | Heitman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5465082 | Chaco | Nov 1995 | A |
5479154 | Wolfram | Dec 1995 | A |
5481481 | Frey et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521841 | Arman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526871 | Musser et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5541585 | Duhame et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5591950 | Imedio-Ocana | Jan 1997 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5604804 | Micali | Feb 1997 | A |
5610982 | Micali | Mar 1997 | A |
5631825 | van Weele et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634008 | Gaffaney et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640151 | Reis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644302 | Hana et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663957 | Dent | Sep 1997 | A |
5666416 | Micali | Sep 1997 | A |
5708767 | Yeo et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717757 | Micali | Feb 1998 | A |
5717758 | Micali | Feb 1998 | A |
5717759 | Micali | Feb 1998 | A |
5732691 | Maiello et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751336 | Aggarwal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5778256 | Darbee | Jul 1998 | A |
5793868 | Micali | Aug 1998 | A |
5821945 | Yeo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828809 | Chang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5914875 | Monta et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915473 | Ganesh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927398 | Maciulewicz | Jul 1999 | A |
5930773 | Crooks et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960083 | Micali | Sep 1999 | A |
5969755 | Courtney | Oct 1999 | A |
5973613 | Reis et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974235 | Nunally et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018359 | Kermode et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6072402 | Kniffin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091821 | Buer | Jul 2000 | A |
6097811 | Micali | Aug 2000 | A |
6104963 | Cebasek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119125 | Gloudeman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141595 | Gloudeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149065 | White et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154681 | Drees et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167316 | Gloudeman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181867 | Kenner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6222532 | Ceccarelli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233954 | Mehaffey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241156 | Kline et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249755 | Yemini et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260765 | Natale et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292893 | Micali | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301659 | Micali | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318137 | Chaum | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324854 | Jayanth | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334121 | Primeaux et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347374 | Drake et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359647 | Sengupta et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366558 | Howes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369719 | Tracy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374356 | Daigneault et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393848 | Roh et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6394359 | Morgan | May 2002 | B1 |
6400890 | Nagasaka et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424068 | Nakagashi | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6424370 | Courtney | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445409 | Ito et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453426 | Gamache et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453687 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6483697 | Jenks et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487658 | Micali | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490610 | Rizvi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496575 | Vasell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516357 | Hamann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518953 | Armstrong | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546419 | Humpleman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556899 | Harvey et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570608 | Tserng | May 2003 | B1 |
6574537 | Kipersztok et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587637 | Nagasaka et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604023 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615594 | Jayanth et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628835 | Brill et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628997 | Fox et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643387 | Sethuraman et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647317 | Takai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647400 | Moran | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658373 | Rossi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663010 | Chene et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665669 | Han et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667690 | Durej et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6721454 | Qian et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724915 | Toklu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741915 | Poth | May 2004 | B2 |
6744968 | Imai et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754389 | Dimitrova et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758051 | Jayanth et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766450 | Micali | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779027 | Schunicht et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789739 | Rosen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6796494 | Gonzalo | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801849 | Szukala et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801907 | Zagami | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826454 | Sulfstede | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845357 | Shetty et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851621 | Wacker et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871193 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879709 | Tian et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886742 | Stoutenburg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895215 | Uhlmann | May 2005 | B2 |
6910135 | Grainger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940474 | Weitbruch et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940998 | Garoutte | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948082 | Gschwind et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6967612 | Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6969542 | Klasen-Memmer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970070 | Juels et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970640 | Green et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973410 | Seigel | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983889 | Alles | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989742 | Ueno et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004401 | Kallestad | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019614 | Lavelle et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020336 | Cohen-Solal et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032114 | Moran | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7046731 | Wu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055759 | Wacker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068842 | Liang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076102 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106885 | Osterweil et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110569 | Brodsky et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124943 | Quan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130719 | Ehlers et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159234 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7183894 | Yui et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194110 | Qian | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200266 | Ozer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203962 | Moran | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7205882 | Libin | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216007 | Johnson | May 2007 | B2 |
7216015 | Poth | May 2007 | B2 |
7218243 | Hayes et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222800 | Wruck | May 2007 | B2 |
7227569 | Maruya | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7228055 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233243 | Roche et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243001 | Janert et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245223 | Trela | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250853 | Flynn | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274676 | Cardei et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295673 | Grab et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313819 | Burnett et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321784 | Serceki et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337315 | Micali | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343265 | Andarawis et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346186 | Sharoni et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352952 | Herberger et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7353396 | Micali et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362210 | Bazakos et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376839 | Carta et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379997 | Ehlers et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380125 | Di Luoffo et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383158 | Krocker et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7397371 | Martin et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7469343 | Ray et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469363 | Meis et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7505914 | McCall | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7542867 | Steger et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7570867 | Barrett et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574734 | Fedronic et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586398 | Huang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600679 | Kshirsagar et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7661603 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7735145 | Kuehnel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7796536 | Roy et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7818026 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7853987 | Balasubramanian et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7907753 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937669 | Zhang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7983892 | Anne et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995526 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8045960 | Orakkan | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8095889 | DeBlaey et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010010541 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020011923 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022991 | Sharood et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046337 | Micali | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020107949 | Rawson, III | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118096 | Hoyos et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121961 | Huff | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165824 | Micali | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033230 | McCall | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051026 | Carter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053659 | Pavlidis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067387 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030123703 | Pavlidis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126293 | Bushey | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133614 | Robins et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156824 | Lu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174049 | Beigel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208689 | Garza | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233432 | Davis et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040062421 | Jakubowski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062525 | Hasegawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064453 | Ruiz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080615 | Klein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087362 | Beavers | May 2004 | A1 |
20040130620 | Buehler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040205350 | Waterhouse et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040252193 | Higgins | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263621 | Guo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008198 | Guo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046703 | Gutler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138380 | Fedronic et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060045185 | Kiryati et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059557 | Markham et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064731 | Kahle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060206748 | Li | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215752 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215753 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238616 | Curtner et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239645 | Curtner et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070109098 | Siemon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132550 | Avraham et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171862 | Tang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070268145 | Bazakos et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272744 | Bantwal et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080086758 | Chowdhury et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080087663 | Mansbery et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080173709 | Ghosh | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080272881 | Goel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090018900 | Waldron et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080443 | Dziadosz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086692 | Chen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121830 | Dziadosz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090167485 | Birchbauer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168695 | Johar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090258643 | McGuffin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266885 | Marcinowski et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292524 | Anne et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292995 | Anne et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292996 | Anne et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090328152 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328203 | Haas | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036511 | Dongare | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100148918 | Gerner et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164720 | Kore | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100269173 | Srinivasa et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110038278 | Bhandari et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071929 | Morrison | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110110643 | Chandra | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115602 | Bhandari et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133884 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153791 | Jones et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167488 | Roy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181414 | G et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120096131 | Bhandari et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106915 | Palmer | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121229 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133482 | Bhandari et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2240881 | Dec 1999 | CA |
1265762 | Sep 2000 | CN |
19945861 | Mar 2001 | DE |
0043270 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0122244 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0152678 | Aug 1985 | EP |
0629940 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0858702 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1259076 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1339028 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1403817 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1630639 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2251266 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2390705 | Jan 2004 | GB |
6019911 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2000276577 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2003074942 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003240318 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005295255 | Oct 2005 | JP |
20040073069 | Aug 2004 | KR |
WO 8402786 | Jul 1984 | WO |
WO 9419912 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9627858 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 0011592 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0076220 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0142598 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0157489 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0160024 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163576 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0232045 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02091311 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03090000 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004092514 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005038727 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006021047 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006126974 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007000637 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007043798 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008045918 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008092202 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008144803 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009158365 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010039598 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010106474 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011003131 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hampapur et al., “Smart Surveillance: Applications, Technologies and Implications”, Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2003 and the Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia, Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Conference of the Fourth International Conference, Dec. 15-18, 2003, pp. 1133-1138. |
International Search Report, PCT/AU2008/000107, Mar. 28, 2008. |
“Certificate Validation Choices,” CoreStreet, Inc., 8 pages, 2002. |
“CoreStreet Cuts the PKI Gordian Knot,” Digital ID World, pp. 22-25, Jun./Jul. 2004. |
“Distributed Certificate Validation,” CoreStreet, Ltd. 17 pages, 2006. |
“Identity Services Infrastructure,” CoreStreet Solutions—Whitepaper, 12 pages, 2006. |
“Important FIPS 201 Deployment Considerations,” Corestreet Ltd.—Whitepaper, 11 pages, 2005. |
“Introduction to Validation for Federated PKI,” Corestreet Ltd, 20 pages, 2006. |
“Keyfast Technical Overview”, Corestreet Ltd., 21 pages, 2004. |
“Manageable Secure Physical Access,” Corestreet Ltd, 3 pages, 2002. |
“MiniCRL Corestreet Technology Datasheet,” CoreStreet, 1 page, 2006. |
“Nonce Sense, Freshness and Security in OCSP Responses,” Corestreet Ltd, 2 pages, 2003. |
“Real Time Credential Validation, Secure, Efficient Permissions Management,” Corestreet Ltd, 5 pages, 2002. |
“The Role of Practical Validation for Homeland Security,” Corestreet Ltd, 3 pages, 2002. |
“The Roles of Authentication, Authorization & Cryptography in Expanding Security Industry Technology,” Security Industry Association (SIA), Quarterly Technical Update, 32 pages, Dec. 2005. |
“Vulnerability Analysis of Certificate Validation Systems,” Corestreet Ltd—Whitepaper, 14 pages, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,334, filed Jun. 26, 2012. |
Goldman et al., “Information Modeling for Intrusion Report Aggregation,” IEEE, Proceedings DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition II, pp. 329-342, 2001. |
Honeywell, “Excel Building Supervisor-Integrated R7044 and FS90 Ver. 2.0,” Operator Manual, 70 pages, Apr. 1995. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/superstats.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1009.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business 1 page, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1017a.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 1 page, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1017n.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 1 page, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1020nseries.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1020series.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1024.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1030series.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1033.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1035.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1041.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 1 page, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1050series.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1051.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://www.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1053.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
http://wwww.tcsbasys.com/products/sz1031.asp, TCS/Basys Controls: Where Buildings Connect With Business, 2 pages, printed Aug. 26, 2003. |
Trane, “System Programming, Tracer Summit Version 14, BMTW-SVP01D-EN,” 623 pages, 2002. |
Lipton et al., “Critical Asset Protection, Perimeter Monitoring, and Threat Detection Using Automated Video Surveillance,” Article on Objectvideo.com, 11 pages, printed Sep. 2004. |
Lipton, “ObjectVideo Forensics: Activity-Based Video Indexing and Retrieval for Physical Security Application,” Article on Objectvideo.com, 11 pages, printed Sep. 2004. |
Medioni et al., “Event Detection and Analysis from Video Streams,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 873-889, Aug. 2001. |
Mills et al., “A Magnifier Tool for Video Data,” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 93-98, May 3, 1992. |
Porikli et al., “Event Detection by Eigenvector Decomposition Using Object and Frame Features,” IEEE, 10 pages, 2004. |
Smoliar et al., “Content-Based Video Indexing and Retrieval,” IEEE MultiMedia No. 2, pp. 62-72, 1994. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120092510 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |