The present invention relates generally to communications systems and in particular to methods and systems for distributing media using, e.g., unicast and multicast transmissions.
As the level of technology increases, the options for communications have become more varied. For example, in the last 30 years in the telecommunications industry, personal communications have evolved from a home having a single rotary dial telephone, to a home having multiple telephone, cable and/or fiber optic lines that accommodate both voice and data. Additionally cellular phones and Wi-Fi have added a mobile element to communications. Similarly, in the entertainment industry, 30 years ago there was only one format for television and this format was transmitted over the air and received via antennas located at homes. This has evolved into both different standards of picture quality such as, standard definition television (SDTV), enhanced definition TV (EDTV) and high definition TV (HDTV), and more systems for delivery of these different television display formats such as cable and satellite. Additionally, services have grown to become overlapping between these two industries. As these systems continue to evolve in both industries, the service offerings will continue to merge and new services can be expected to be available for a consumer. Also these services will be based on the technical capability to process and output more information, for example as seen in the improvements in the picture quality of programs viewed on televisions, and therefore it is expected that service delivery requirements will continue to rely on more bandwidth being available through the network including the “last mile” to the end user.
Another related technology that impacts both the communications and entertainment industries is the Internet. The physical structure of the Internet and associated communication streams have also evolved to handle an increased flow of data. Servers have more memory than ever before, communications links exist that have a higher bandwidth than in the past, processors are faster and more capable and protocols exist to take advantage of these elements. As consumers' usage of the Internet grows, service companies have turned to the Internet (and other IP networks) as a mechanism for providing traditional services. These multimedia services include Internet Protocol television (IPTV, referring to systems or services that deliver television programs over a network using IP data packets), Internet radio, video, live events, voice over IP (VoIP), and other web related services received singly or bundled together.
One area of particular interest is the distribution of live events, e.g., sporting events, concerts and the like. These live events can be distributed as a live stream via cable, satellite and over the Internet. Typically when a live stream is distributed from a content provider over the Internet, it is transmitted as a unicast stream, e.g., one stream per end user from the content provider. Since the live broadcast generates one unicast stream per user viewing the event, a lot of bandwidth from the content provider's server infrastructure, as well as bandwidth in an operator's network connecting the content provider to the end user, could be expected to be used if enough people want to view that particular program. It may even be the case that, at some point, the number of viewers receiving a unicast version of the live program would need to be restricted based on the physical bandwidth capabilities available to provide unicast feeds of the program. Therefore it would be useful to optimize bandwidth usage when, for example, streaming the broadcast of a live event to lower the cost of distribution, allow for more end users to receive the broadcast and/or for improving the quality of the streamed media.
Accordingly the exemplary embodiments described herein provide systems and methods for optimizing the distribution of media content for multiple end users over Internet protocol (IP) networks, such as the Internet.
Systems and methods according to the present invention address this need and others by providing systems and methods for optimizing the distribution of media content for multiple end users over Internet protocol (IP) networks, such as the Internet, for example, by reducing the amount of bandwidth used.
According to one exemplary embodiment a method for switching from a unicast transmission of a program to a multicast transmission of the program includes: requesting, by a client device, the program; receiving, at the client device, the unicast transmission of the program; receiving, at the client device, the multicast transmission of the program; and switching, by the client device, from the unicast transmission of the program to the multicast transmission of the program.
According to another exemplary embodiment a method for coordinating unicast and multicast transmissions of a program includes: transmitting, from a media server, a plurality of unicast streams associated with the program; determining, at the media server, to begin a multicast transmission of the program; and transmitting, from the media server, the multicast transmission of the program.
According to another exemplary embodiment a client device includes: a processor for requesting a program; a communications interface for receiving a unicast transmission of the program, wherein the communications interface at a later time receives a multicast transmission of the program; and a software application in conjunction with the processor for switching from the unicast transmission of the program to the multicast transmission of the program.
According to another exemplary embodiment a media server includes: a communications interface for transmitting a unicast transmission of the program, wherein the communications interface at a later time transmits a multicast transmission of the program; a processor for deciding when to switch from the unicast transmission to the multicast transmission of said program; and a software application in conjunction with the processor for switching from the unicast transmission of the program to the multicast transmission of the program.
The accompanying drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments, wherein:
a)-3(e) illustrate changing from a unicast transmission of a program to a multicast transmission of the same program according to exemplary embodiments;
The following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
As mentioned above, it is desirable to provide systems and methods for optimizing the distribution of content for multiple end users who receive that content over an Internet protocol (IP) network, such as the Internet. In order to provide some context for this discussion, an exemplary communications framework is shown in
Using the exemplary communications framework shown in
In this example, for each end user desiring to view the event, a different 5 Mbps unicast stream is created. It can be seen from
Initially, as described above with respect to
This multicast traffic can be distributed over a multicast enabled peering/transit network or tunneled from the content provider to the operator network. Once the decision is made by the media server 4 to switch from a plurality of unicast streams to a single, multicast stream in support of the distribution of a particular program, the media server 4 transmits messages to the various client devices (2a-2l) instructing the client devices (2a-2l) to change from their current unicast stream to a multicast stream of the event. The various client devices (2a-2l) will then selectively join the multicast stream as instructed by the media server 4 and as possibly modified by their respective operator networks. Comparing
As shown in the exemplary flow diagram of
Upon completion of IGMP messaging to join the multicast stream 308, the client device 2a is receiving both the multicast stream 308 of the transmission as well as the unicast stream 304 of the transmission. After the unicast and multicast streams are synchronized, the client device 2a transmits a message 312 to the media server 4 to cancel the unicast stream 304 as shown in
The exemplary embodiments described above, can use a predetermined number, e.g., ten or more, end users or unicast streams associated with the same program from the same operator network as being the trigger for media server 4 for deciding to switch from unicast streams to a multicast stream. The decision threshold may be fixed or variable. However, according to other exemplary embodiments, other factors can be used to determine when to switch over from plural unicast streams to a multicast stream. Many different factors can be used, either alone or in combination, for deciding when to switch from plural unicast streams to a multicast stream for the same broadcast, program or media content. For example, this decision could be dependent upon the type of program being viewed, e.g., a program requiring a higher bandwidth could switch to a multicast stream after five or more viewers have requested that program. Alternatively, the decision could be based upon both the number of viewers and the bandwidth availability in different operator networks. Other potential factors can include, without limitation, pre-determined arrangements with an operator network, cost factors, changes in available bandwidth during the broadcast and received requests from operator networks during the broadcast.
Regarding the decision making node, according to exemplary embodiments, alternatives to the media server 4 as a physical location for making the switching decision are also possible. For example, the decision making node could be in an operator network that requests a multicast stream when the number of end users in its network exceeds a number, e.g., 2. The decision making node could also be an integrated part of the media server or a node in the content provider's domain that is in communication with, but separate from, the media server 4.
The exemplary embodiments described above describe a client device 2a initially receiving a unicast transmission of a live Internet TV transmission and then switching to a multicast transmission of the same program. If, however, a live Internet TV broadcast is already, e.g., at the time that an end user selects a channel associated with that program, being transmitted as a multicast transmission which the end user can access, then the end user would join into the multicast instead of receiving a unicast transmission and then switching to the multicast channel. According to another exemplary embodiment, when the media server 4 instructs the client device 2a to join the multicast stream, the media server can also distribute decryption keys to decrypt an encrypted multicast stream as desired or required.
According to exemplary embodiments described above, media server 4 can interact with operator networks (8, 20 and 22) that are themselves capable of interacting with multicast streams. At some point in time, to implement the unicast to multicast switching described above a multicast channel for each of the operator networks (8, 20 and 22) needs to be defined or established for a live event. Additionally, other information can be transmitted between media server 4 and the operator networks (8, 20 and 22) and used to aid in determining when to switch from plural unicast streams to a single multicast stream, such as available bandwidth, quality of service information as well as specific information regarding the operator to end user relationship. For example, the operator may not allow some end user's in their network to receive multicast transmissions, some end user's in their network may only desire to receive unicast transmissions or the end user's video output capabilities may be different from the offering on the multicast stream. This information can impact which end users are allowed by the operator networks (8, 20 and 22) to join certain multicast channels, e.g., channels in standard definition television (SDTV) and high definition television (HDTV). This information from the operator networks (8, 20 and 22) can be sent to the content provider as needed, or in some cases it is pre-determined. Depending upon the method used in distributing the multicast stream, other information can be exchanged between the operator network (8, 20 or 22) and the content provider. For example, when tunneling is used there should be an agreement between the content provider and the operator network (8, 20 or 22) in order to terminate the tunnel when appropriate. In the case of the operator network (8, 20 or 22) supporting a multicast over the Internet, there may be an agreement when supporting multicast but no specific agreement is required.
The exemplary embodiments described above, illustrate methods and systems for switching a device which is viewing a unicast transmission to join a multicast transmission of the same program. An exemplary communications node 400, representing a client device 2a capable of receiving media content over the Internet and/or a media server capable of transmitting media content over the Internet, will now be described with respect to
Utilizing the above-described exemplary systems according to exemplary embodiments, a method for switching from a unicast transmission of a program to a multicast transmission of the same program by a client device is shown in the flowchart of
Utilizing the above-described exemplary systems according to exemplary embodiments, a method for switching from a unicast transmission of a program to a multicast transmission of the same program by a media server is shown in the flowchart of
The foregoing exemplary embodiments describe software, methods, systems and devices for media distribution involving the switching between a plurality of unicast streams and a multicast stream. In particular, this switching involves unicast streams and multicast streams associated with the same “chunk” of media content, referred to herein as a “program”. It will be understood that the term “program” as used herein is intended to be generic to all types, formats and sizes of media content regardless of origin or distribution mechanism, e.g., including television, video, music, gaming, or other multimedia chunks.
The above-described exemplary embodiments are intended to be illustrative in all respects, rather than restrictive, of the present invention. All such variations and modifications are considered to be within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims. For example, media server 4 could include instructions for initiating a multicast transmission of a live event even though fewer than 10 end users in an operators' network are viewing the event. No element, act, or instruction used in the description of the present application should be construed as critical or essential to the invention unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended to include one or more items.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2008/051596 | 4/24/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/30/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/130541 | 10/29/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6973081 | Patel | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20050259682 | Yosef et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060047845 | Whited et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060126667 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060200576 | Pickens et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242311 | Mai et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070165633 | Ikegami et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168523 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070217436 | Markley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070283397 | Scholl | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080109557 | Joshi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109853 | Einarsson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090031392 | VerSteeg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059832 | Jhamnani et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094639 | Haberman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090147718 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165043 | Ou et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100017463 | Horn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110164614 | Begeja | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/IB2008/051596 dated Dec. 4, 2008. |
Written Opinion for PCT/IB2008/051596 dated Dec. 4, 2008. |
European Office Action for European Application No. 08 751 102.8-2416 dated Oct. 16, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110134808 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |