Patent Grant
10217532
The embodiments described herein relate generally to pulsed plasma systems and, more particularly, to systems and methods that facilitate merging and compressing compact tori with superior stability as well as significantly reduced losses and increased efficiency.
The Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) belongs to the class of magnetic plasma confinement topologies known as compact toroids. It exhibits predominantly poloidal magnetic fields and possesses zero or small self-generated toroidal fields (see M. Tuszewski, Nucl. Fusion 28, 2033 (1988)). The attractions of such a configuration are its simple geometry for ease of construction and maintenance, a natural unrestricted divertor for facilitating energy extraction and ash removal, and very high average (or external) β (β is the ratio of the average plasma pressure to the average magnetic field pressure inside the FRC), i.e., high power density. The β metric is also a very good measure of magnetic efficiency. A high average β value, e.g. close to 1, represents efficient use of the deployed magnetic energy and is henceforth essential for the most economic operation. High average β is also critically enabling the use of aneutronic fuels such as D-He3 and p-B11.
The traditional method of forming an FRC uses the field-reversed θ-pinch technology, producing hot, high-density plasmas (see A. L. Hoffman and J. T. Slough, Nucl. Fusion 33, 27 (1993)). A variation on this is the translation-trapping method in which the plasma created in a theta-pinch “source” is more-or-less immediately ejected out of the formation region and into a confinement chamber. The translating plasmoid is then trapped between two strong mirrors at the ends of the confinement chamber (see, for instance, H. Himura, S. Okada, S. Sugimoto, and S. Goto, Phys. Plasmas 2, 191 (1995)). Once in the confinement chamber, various heating and current drive methods may be applied such as beam injection (neutral or neutralized), rotating magnetic fields, RF or ohmic heating, etc. This separation of source and confinement functions offers key engineering advantages for potential future fusion reactors. FRCs have proved to be extremely robust, resilient to dynamic formation, translation, and violent capture events. Moreover, they show a tendency to assume a preferred plasma state (see e.g. H. Y. Guo, A. L. Hoffman, K. E. Miller, and L. C. Steinhauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 245001 (2004)). Significant progress has been made in the last decade developing other FRC formation methods: merging spheromaks with oppositely-directed helicities (see e.g. Y. Ono, M. Inomoto, Y. Ueda, T. Matsuyama, and T. Okazaki, Nucl. Fusion 39, 2001 (1999)) and by driving current with rotating magnetic fields (RMF) (see e.g. I. R. Jones, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1950 (1999)), which also provides additional stability.
FRCs consist of a torus of closed field lines inside a separatrix, and of an annular edge layer on the open field lines just outside the separatrix. The edge layer coalesces into jets beyond the FRC length, providing a natural divertor. The FRC topology coincides with that of a Field-Reversed-Mirror plasma. However, a significant difference is that the FRC plasma can have an internal β of about 10. The inherent low internal magnetic field provides for a certain indigenous kinetic particle population, i.e. particles with large larmor radii, comparable to the FRC minor radius. It is these strong kinetic effects that appear to at least partially contribute to the gross stability of past and present FRCs, such as those produced in the recent collision-merging experiments.
The collision-merging technique, proposed long ago (see e.g. D. R. Wells, Phys. Fluids 9, 1010 (1966)) has been significantly developed further: two separate theta-pinches at opposite ends of a confinement chamber simultaneously generate two plasmoids (e.g., two compact tori) and accelerate the plasmoids toward each other at high speed; they then collide at the center of the confinement chamber and merge to form a compound FRC. In the construction and successful operation of one of the largest FRC experiments to date, the conventional collision-merging method was shown to produce stable, long-lived, high-flux, high temperature FRCs (see e.g. M. Binderbauer, H. Y. Guo, M. Tuszewski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 045003 (2010), which is incorporated herein by reference). In a related experiment, the same team of researchers combined the collision-merging technique with simultaneous axial acceleration and radial compression to produce a high density transient plasma in a central compression chamber (see V. Bystritskii, M. Anderson, M. Binderbauer et al., Paper P1-1, IEEE PPPS 2013, San Francisco, Calif. (hereinafter “Bystritskii”), which is incorporated herein by reference). This latter experiment reported in Bystritskii utilized a multitude of acceleration and compression stages before final collisional merging and represents a precursor concept to the system subject to this patent application.
In contrast to the embodiments described here, the precursor system described in Bystritskii featured simultaneous compression and acceleration of compact tori within the same stage by using active fast magnetic coils. Five such stages were deployed on either side of a central compression chamber before magnetically compressing the merged compact tori. While the precursor experiment achieved respectable performance, it exhibited the following deficiencies: (1) Simultaneous compression and acceleration led to inefficient use of driver energy deployed for magnetic compression due to a timing mismatch; (2) Temperature and density decreased as plasma expanded during transit between sections; (3) Abrupt transitions between adjacent sections led to large losses due to plasma-wall contact and generation of shockwaves.
Aside from the fundamental challenge of stability, pulsed fusion concepts in the medium density regime will have to address adequate transport timescales, efficient drivers, rep-rate capability and appropriate final target conditions. While the precursor system has successfully achieved stable single discharges at encouraging target conditions, the collective losses between formation and final target parameters (presently about 90% of the energy, flux, and particles) as well as the coupling efficiency between driver and plasma (at present around 10-15%) need to be substantially improved.
In light of the foregoing, it is, therefore, desirable to provide improved systems and methods for pulsed fusion concepts that facilitate a significant reduction of translation and compression losses and an increase in driver efficiency.
The present embodiments provided herein are directed to systems and methods that facilitate merging and compressing compact tori with superior stability as well as a significant reduction of translation and compression losses and an increase in coupling efficiency between drivers and plasma. Such systems and methods provide a pathway to a whole variety of applications including compact neutron sources (for medical isotope production, nuclear waste remediation, materials research, neutron radiography and tomography), compact photon sources (for chemical production and processing), mass separation and enrichment systems, and reactor cores for fusion for the future generation of energy and for fusion propulsion systems.
The systems and methods described herein are based on the application of successive, axially symmetric acceleration and adiabatic compression stages to accelerate and heat two compact tori towards each other and ultimately collide and fast magnetically compress the compact tori within a central compression chamber.
In certain embodiments, a system for merging and compressing compact tori comprises a staged symmetric sequence of compact tori formation, axial acceleration by fast active magnetic coils, passive adiabatic compression by way of a conically constricting flux conserver, and ultimately merging of the compact tori and final fast magnetic compression in a central compression chamber. The intermediate steps of sufficient axial acceleration followed by adiabatic compression can be repeated multiple times to achieve adequate target conditions before merging and final compression. In this way, a reactor can be realized by adding further sections to the system.
The formation and accelerations stages or sections and the central compression chamber are preferably cylindrically shaped with walls formed of non-conducting or insulating material such as, e.g., a ceramic. The compressions stages or sections are preferably trunco-conically shaped with walls formed from conducting material such as, e.g., a metal.
Aside from a magnetic bias field (DC guide field) supplied by slow coils, the formation sections, the acceleration sections, and the compression chamber include modular pulsed power systems that drive fast active magnetic coils. The pulsed power systems enable compact tori to be formed in-situ within the formation sections and accelerated and injected (=static formation) into the first compression sections, accelerated in the acceleration sections and injected into the next compression sections, and so on, and then be magnetically compressed in the compression chamber. The slow or DC magnetic coil systems located throughout and along the axis of the system provide an axial magnetic guide field to center the compact tori appropriately as it translates through the section toward the mid-plane of the central compression chamber.
Alternatively, the modular pulsed power systems of the formation sections can also drive the fast active magnetic coils in a way such that compact tori are formed and accelerated simultaneously (=dynamic formation).
The systems and methods described herein deploy FRCs, amongst the highest beta plasmas known in magnetic confinement, to provide the starting configuration. Further passive and active compression builds on this highly efficient magnetic topology. The process of using axial acceleration via active fast magnet sections followed by adiabatic compression in simple flux conserving conic sections provides for the most efficient transfer of energy with the least complex pulsed power circuitry. Furthermore, these basic building blocks can be sequenced to take additional advantage of the inherently favorable compressional scaling, i.e. Δp∝R4.
In another embodiment, the system is configured to deploy spheromaks instead of FRC starter plasmas.
In another embodiment, the system comprises a staged asymmetric sequence from a single side of the central compression chamber comprising compact tori formation, axial acceleration by fast active magnetic coils, passive adiabatic compression by way of a conically constricting flux conserver, and ultimately merging of the compact tori and final fast magnetic compression in the central compression chamber. Such an asymmetric system would include a mirror or bounce cone positioned adjacent the other side of the central compression.
In yet another embodiment, the system comprises a thin cylindrical shell or liner comprised of conductive material such as, e.g., a metal, for fast liner compression within the central compression chamber.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the example embodiments will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description.
The accompanying drawings, which are included as part of the present specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiment and, together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiment given below, serve to explain and teach the principles of the present invention.
It should be noted that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale and that elements of similar structures or functions are generally represented by like reference numerals for illustrative purposes throughout the figures. It also should be noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of the various embodiments described herein. The figures do not necessarily describe every aspect of the teachings disclosed herein and do not limit the scope of the claims.
The present embodiments provided herein are directed to systems and methods that facilitate merging and compressing compact tori with superior stability as well as a significant reduction of translation and compression losses and an increase in coupling efficiency between drivers and plasma. Such systems and methods provide a pathway to a whole variety of applications including compact neutron sources (for medical isotope production, nuclear waste remediation, materials research, neutron radiography and tomography), compact photon sources (for chemical production and processing), mass separation and enrichment systems, and reactor cores for fusion for the future generation of energy and for fusion propulsion systems.
The systems and methods described herein are based on the application of successive, axially symmetric acceleration and adiabatic compression stages to accelerate and heat two compact tori towards each other and ultimately collide and fast magnetically compress the compact tori within a central compression chamber.
As depicted, the system comprises a staged symmetric sequence of compact tori formation in formation sections 12N and 12S, axial acceleration through sections 12N, 12S, 16N and 16S by fast active magnetic coils 32N, 32S, 36N and 36S, passive adiabatic compression by way of a conically constricting flux conserver in sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S, and ultimately merging of the compact tori and final fast magnetic compression in a central compression chamber 20 by fast active magnetic coils 40. As illustrated, the intermediate steps of sufficient axial acceleration followed by adiabatic compression can be repeated multiple times to achieve adequate target conditions before merging and final compression. In this way, a reactor can be realized by adding further sections to the depicted system.
As depicted the formation and accelerations stages or sections 12N, 12S, 16N and 16S and the central compression chamber 20 are preferably cylindrically shaped with walls formed of non-conducting or insulating material such as, e.g., a ceramic. The compressions stages or sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S are preferably trunco-conically shaped with walls formed from conducting material such as, e.g., a metal.
Aside from a magnetic bias field (DC guide field) supplied by slow passive coils 30, the formation sections 12N and 12S, the acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and the compression chamber 20 include modular pulsed power systems that drive fast active magnetic coils 32N, 32S, 36N, 36S and 40. The pulsed power systems enable compact tori to be formed in-situ within the formation sections 12N and 12S and accelerated and injected (=static formation) into the first compression sections 14N and 14S, accelerated in the acceleration sections 16N and 16S and injected into the next compression sections 18N and 18S, and so on, and then be magnetically compressed in the compression chamber 20. The slow passive magnetic coil systems 30 located throughout and along the axis of the system provide an axial magnetic guide field to center the compact tori appropriately.
Alternatively, the modular pulsed power systems of the formation sections can also drive the fast magnetic coils in a way such that compact tori are formed and accelerated simultaneously (=dynamic formation).
The systems and methods described herein deploy FRCs, amongst the highest beta plasmas known in magnetic confinement, to provide the starting configuration. Further passive and active compression builds on this highly efficient magnetic topology. The process of using axial acceleration via active fast magnet sections followed by adiabatic compression in simple flux conserving conic sections provides for the most efficient transfer of energy with the least complex pulsed power circuitry. Furthermore, these basic building blocks can be sequenced to take additional advantage of the inherently favorable compressional scaling, i.e. Δp∝R4.
Based on experimental and theoretical research to date, a precursor experiment as describe by Bystritskii, using FRC starter plasmas has achieved densities of about 1017 cm−3 at 1 keV. The embodiments proposed herein are estimated to reach densities of about 1018 cm−3 at 1 keV, while adding further stages and appropriate upgrades to the central chamber and fast magnetic coils can yield ultimate densities of about 1018 cm−3 at full Lawson conditions.
In another embodiment, the system is configured to deploy spheromaks instead of FRC starter plasmas.
In another embodiment, the system comprises a staged asymmetric sequence from a single side of the central compression chamber comprising compact tori formation, axial acceleration by fast active magnetic coils, passive adiabatic compression by way of a conically constricting flux conserver, and ultimately merging of the compact tori and final fast magnetic compression in the central compression chamber. Such an asymmetric system would include a mirror or bounce cone.
In yet another embodiment, the system comprising a thin cylindrical shell or liner comprised of conductive material such as, e.g., a metal, for fast liner compression within the central compression chamber.
Fusion concepts today are focused on either steady state or ultra-short pulsed regimes. Both approaches require large capital investment: in steady state magnetic fusion, high expense arises from large superconducting magnets and auxiliary heating/current drive technologies; inertial regimes are dominated by high driver cost due to large energy delivery over nanosecond timescales. The embodiments advanced herein are characterized by compact size and sub-millisecond time scales. This leads to a regime that has relaxed peak power requirements and attractive intermediate time scales.
Turning in detail to the drawings, as depicted in
As depicted, the system 10 further includes a first pair of north and south diametrically opposed compression sections 14N and 14S coupled on a first end to an exit end of the north and south formation sections 12N and 12S. The north and south compression sections 14N and 14S being configured to adiabatically compress the compact tori as the compact tori traverse the north and south compression sections 14N and 14S towards the mid-plane of the compression chamber 20.
As depicted, the system 10 further includes a pair of north and south diametrically opposed acceleration sections 16N and 16S coupled on a first end to a second end of the first pair of north and south compression sections 14N and 14S. The north and south acceleration section 16N and 16S include modularized acceleration systems (discussed below with regard to
As further depicted, the system 10 further includes a second pair of north and south diametrically opposed compression sections 18N and 18S coupled on a first end to a second end of the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S and on a second end to first and second diametrically opposed ends of the compression chamber, the second pair of north and south compression sections 18N and 18S being configured to adiabatically compress the compact tori as the compact tori traverse the second pair of north and south compression sections 18N and 18S towards the mid-plane of the compression chamber 20.
The compression chamber includes a modularized compression systems configured to magnetically compress the compact tori upon collision and merger thereof.
As depicted the north and south formation sections 12N and 12S, the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S and the compression chamber 20 are cylindrically shaped. The diameter of the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S is smaller than the diameter of the north and south formation sections 12N and 12S, while the diameter of the compression chamber 20 is than the diameter of the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S.
The first and second pairs of north and south compression sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S are truncated conically shaped with their diameter being larger on a first end than on a second end enabling a transition in the overall diameter of the system 10 from the formation sections 12N and 12S to the acceleration sections 16N and 16S to the compression chamber 20. As depicted, the north and south formation sections 12N and 12S, the first pair of north and south compression sections 14N and 14S, the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and the second pair of north and south compression sections 18N and 18S are axially symmetric.
As depicted, first and second sets of a plurality of active magnetic coils 32N and 32 are disposed about and axially along the north and south formation sections 12N and 12S, third and fourth sets of a plurality of active magnetic coils 36N and 36S are disposed about and axially along the north and south acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and a fifth set of a plurality of active magnetic coils 40 are disposed about and axially along the compression chamber 20.
The compression sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S are preferably formed from conducting material such as, e.g., a metal, while the central compression chamber 20 and the formation and acceleration sections are 12N, 12S, 16N and 16S are preferably formed from non-conducting or insulating material such as, e.g., a ceramic.
As depicted, a plurality of DC magnetic coils 30 are disposed about and axially along the central compression chamber 20 and the formation, compression and acceleration sections 12N, 12S, 14N, 14S, 16N, 16S, 18N and 18S to form a bias or DC guide field within and extending axially through the central compression chamber and the formation, compression and acceleration sections.
Triggering control and switch systems 120, shown in
Turning to
In operation, a DC guide field is generated by the passive coils 30 within and axially extending through the compression chamber 20, the formation sections 12N and 12S, the acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and the compression sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S. Compact tori are then formed and accelerated in a staged symmetric sequence within the formation sections 12N and 12S and the acceleration sections 16N and 16S towards a mid-plane of the central chamber 20, passively adiabatically compressed within the compression sections 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S, and merged and magnetically compressed within the central chamber 20. These steps of forming, accelerating and compressing compact tori results in the compact tori colliding and merging within the central chamber 20.
The compact tori are formed and accelerated by powering active magnetic coils 32N and 32S extending about and axially along the formation sections 12N and 12S, further accelerated by powering active magnetic coils 35N and 36S extending about and axially along the acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and compressed by powering active magnetic coils 40 extending about and axially along the compression chamber 20. The steps of forming, accelerating and compressing the compact tori further comprises synchronously firing diametrically opposed pairs of active magnetic coils 32N and 32S, and 36N and 36S positioned about and along the formation 12N and 12S and acceleration sections 16N and 16S, and a set of active magnetic coils 40 positioned about and along the compression chamber 20.
As the compact tori are accelerated towards the mid-plane of the compression chamber 20, the compact tori are compressed as the compact tori translate through the conically constricting flux conservers of the compression stages 14N, 14S, 18N and 18S.
Turning to
In operation, a first compact toroid is formed and accelerated in a staged sequence within the formation section 12S and then accelerated in one or more acceleration stages 16S towards a mid-plane of the central chamber 20 to collide and merge with a second compact toroid. The first compact toroid is passively adiabatically compressed within one or more compression stages 14S and 18S, and then magnetically compressed as a merged compact toroid with the second compact toroid within the central chamber 20.
The second compact toroid in formed and accelerated in a staged sequence within the formation section 12S and the one or more acceleration stages 16S towards a mid-plane of the central chamber 20, passively adiabatically compressed within the one or more compression stages, and then biased back toward the mid-plane of the central chamber 20 as it passes through the central chamber 20 with a mirror or bounce cone 50 positioned adjacent an end of the central chamber 20.
Turning to
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications, and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
In the description above, for purposes of explanation only, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required to practice the teachings of the present disclosure.
The various features of the representative examples and the dependent claims may be combined in ways that are not specifically and explicitly enumerated in order to provide additional useful embodiments of the present teachings. It is also expressly noted that all value ranges or indications of groups of entities disclose every possible intermediate value or intermediate entity for the purpose of original disclosure, as well as for the purpose of restricting the claimed subject matter.
Systems and methods for merging and compressing compact tori have been disclosed. It is understood that the embodiments described herein are for the purpose of elucidation and should not be considered limiting the subject matter of the disclosure. Various modifications, uses, substitutions, combinations, improvements, methods of productions without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention would be evident to a person skilled in the art. For example, the reader is to understand that the specific ordering and combination of process actions described herein is merely illustrative, unless otherwise stated, and the invention can be performed using different or additional process actions, or a different combination or ordering of process actions. As another example, each feature of one embodiment can be mixed and matched with other features shown in other embodiments. Features and processes known to those of ordinary skill may similarly be incorporated as desired. Additionally and obviously, features may be added or subtracted as desired. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
The subject application is a continuation of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US15/55172, filed Oct. 12, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/064,346, filed on Oct. 15, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/063,382, filed on Oct. 13, 2014, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3015618 | Stix | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3036963 | Christofilos | May 1962 | A |
| 3052617 | Post | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3071525 | Christofilos | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3120470 | Imhoff et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3132996 | Baker et al. | May 1964 | A |
| 3170841 | Post | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3182213 | Rosa | May 1965 | A |
| 3258402 | Farnsworth | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3386883 | Farnsworth | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3527977 | Ruark | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3530036 | Hirsch | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3530497 | Hirsch et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3577317 | Woods | May 1971 | A |
| 3621310 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3663362 | Stix | May 1972 | A |
| 3664921 | Christofilos | May 1972 | A |
| 3668065 | Moir | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3859164 | Nowak | Jan 1975 | A |
| 4010396 | Ress et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4054846 | Smith et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4057462 | Jassby et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4065351 | Jassby et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4098643 | Brown | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4166760 | Fowler et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4182650 | Fischer | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4189346 | Jarnagin | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4202725 | Jarnagin | May 1980 | A |
| 4233537 | Limpaecher | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4246067 | Linlor | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4267488 | Wells | May 1981 | A |
| 4274919 | Jensen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4303467 | Scornavacca et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4314879 | Hartman et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4317057 | Bazarov et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4347621 | Dow | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4350927 | Maschke | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4371808 | Urano et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4390494 | Salisbury | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4397810 | Salisbury | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4416845 | Salisbury | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4434130 | Salisbury | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4483737 | Mantei | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4543231 | Ohkawa | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4543465 | Sakudo et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4548782 | Manheimer et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4560528 | Ohkawa | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4584160 | Kageyama | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4584473 | Hashimoto et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4601871 | Turner | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4615755 | Tracy et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4618470 | Salisbury | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4630939 | Mayes | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4639348 | Jarnagin | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4650631 | Knorr | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4687616 | Moeller | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4826646 | Bussard | May 1989 | A |
| 4853173 | Stenbacka | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4894199 | Rostoker | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4904441 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5015432 | Koloc | May 1991 | A |
| 5041760 | Koloc | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5122662 | Chen et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5160694 | Steudtner | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5160695 | Bussard | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5206516 | Keller et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207760 | Dailey et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5339336 | Sudan | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5355399 | Golovanivsky et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5420425 | Bier et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5422481 | Louvet | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5473165 | Stinnett et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483077 | Glavish | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5502354 | Correa et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5537005 | Goebel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5557172 | Tanaka | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5656519 | Mogami | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5677597 | Tanaka | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5747800 | Yano et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764715 | Maenchen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5811201 | Skowronski | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5846329 | Hori et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848110 | Maenchen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5923716 | Meacham | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6000360 | Koshimizu | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6084356 | Seki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6245190 | Masuda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248251 | Sill | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255648 | Littlejohn et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271529 | Farley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6322706 | Ohkawa | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6335535 | Miyake et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345537 | Salamitou | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6390019 | Grimbergen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396213 | Koloc | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6408052 | McGeoch | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6452168 | McLuckey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6477216 | Koloc | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6488807 | Collins et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6593539 | Miley et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6593570 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6611106 | Monkhorst et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6628740 | Monkhorst et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6632324 | Chan | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6664740 | Rostoker et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6712927 | Grimbergen et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6755086 | Salamitou et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6850011 | Monkhorst et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6852942 | Monkhorst et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6888907 | Monkhorst et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891911 | Rostoker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6894446 | Monkhorst et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6995515 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7002148 | Monkhorst et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7015646 | Rostoker et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7026763 | Rostoker et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7115887 | Hassanein et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7119491 | Rostoker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126284 | Rostoker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7129656 | Rostoker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7180242 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7232985 | Monkhorst et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7391160 | Monkhorst et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7439678 | Rostoker et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7459654 | Monkhorst et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7477718 | Rostoker et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7569995 | Rostoker et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7613271 | Rostoker et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7719199 | Monkhorst et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 8031824 | Bystriskii et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8461762 | Rostoker et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 9025717 | Freeze | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9082516 | Slough | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9265137 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9370086 | Rostoker et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9386676 | Rostoker et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9412474 | Freeze | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9424955 | Laberge | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9524802 | Slough | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9591740 | Belchenko et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9596745 | Laberge | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9672943 | Rostoker et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9741457 | Slough | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 20010006093 | Tabuchi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20030197129 | Murrell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230240 | Rostoker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030230241 | Rostoker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040213368 | Rostoker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20060198485 | Binderbauer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070026161 | Madocks | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20080226011 | Barnes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20110026657 | Laberge | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142185 | Woodruff | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293056 | Slough | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120155591 | Freeze | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20150187443 | Tuszewski | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216028 | Laberge et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160098058 | Morehouse et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160276044 | Tuszewski et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170135194 | Belchenko et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170236599 | Bystriskii et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170359886 | Binderbauer et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101320599 | Dec 2008 | CN |
| 2389048 | Nov 2011 | EP |
| 2 270 733 | Dec 1975 | FR |
| 1387098 | Mar 1975 | GB |
| 2056649 | Mar 1996 | RU |
| WO 2014114986 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Guo, H. Y., et al., “Formation of a long-lived hot field reversed configuration by dynamically merging two colliding high-β compact toroids”, Physics of Plasmas, 2011, vol. 18, pp. 056110-1-056110-10. |
| Raman, R., “Fuelling Requirements for Advanced Tokamak operation”, 32nd EPS Conference on Plasma Phys. Tarragona, 2005, pp. 1-4. |
| Tuszewski, M., et al. “Combined FRC and mirror plasma studies in the C-2 device”, Fusion Science and Technology, 2011, vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 23-26. |
| Watanabe, T., et al., “Computation of Neutral Gas Flow Generation From a CT Neutralization Fuel-Injector”, Plasma and Fusion Research: Regular Articles, 2012, vol. 7, pp. 2405042-1-2405042-4. |
| SG, 11201702830U Written Opinion, dated May 28, 2018. |
| Nagata, M., et al., “Behavior of Compact Toroid Injected into the External Magnetic Field”, Nuclear Fusion, 2001, vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1687-1694. |
| EP, 15851349.9 Extended Search Report, dated May 2, 2018. |
| Cohen, S.A., et al., “Ion Heating in the Field-Reversed Configuration by Rotating Magnetic Fields near the Ion-Cyclotron Resonance”, Physical Review Letters, 2000, vol. 85, No. 24, pp. 5114-5117. |
| Howard, S., et al., “Development of Merged Compact Toroids for Use as a Magnetized Target Fusion Plasma”, J. Fusion Energ., 2009, vol. 28, pp. 156-161. |
| Woodruff, S., et al., “Adiabatic Compression of a Doublet Field Reversed Configuration (FRC)”, J. Fusion Energ., 2008, vol. 27, pp. 128-133. |
| WO, PCT/US2015/55172 ISR and Written Opinion, dated May 6, 2016. |
| WO, PCT/US2015/055172, Third Pary Observation, dated May 16, 2016. |
| Anderson, M., et al., “Plasma and Ion Beam Injection into an FRC”, Plasma Physics Reports, 2005, vol. 31, No. 10, pp. 809-817. |
| Arsenin, V.V., et al., “Suppression of plasma instabilities by the feedback method”, Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 1977, vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 736-745. |
| Artsimovich, L.A., “Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions”, English Edition, 1964, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp. 1-9. |
| Asai, T., et al., “End Loss Measurement of Neutral-Beam-Injected Field-Reversed Configuration Plasma”, J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES, vol. 5, 2002, pp. 220-224. |
| Avanzini, P.G., “Feasibility of Fusion Power Generation by Accelerated Ion Beams”, ICENES, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 1986, Geneva, Italy, pp. 305-309. |
| Becker, H.W., et al., “Low-Energy Cross Sections for 11B(p,3α)”, Z. Physics A—Atomic Nuclei, 1987, vol. 217, No. 3, pp. 341-355. |
| Binderbauer, M.W., et al., “Turbulent transport in magnetic confinement: how to avoid it”, Journal of Plasma Physics, 1996, vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 451-465. |
| Binderbauer, M.W., et al., “Dynamic Formation of a Hot Field Reversed Configuration with Improved Confinement by Supersonic Merging of Two Colliding High-β Compact Toroids”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2010, vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 045003-1-045003-4. |
| Bohm, D., “Quantum Theory”, 1951, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, Chapter 12—Applications to Simple Systems, The Classical Limit and the WKB Approximation, pp. 277-283. |
| Bystritskii, V., et al., “Generation and Transport of a Low-Energy Intense Ion Beam”, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2004, vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1986-1992. |
| Bystritskii, V., et al., “Study of Dense FRCs Formation and Their Transport With Multistage Compression”, IEEE 2013 IEEE Pulsed Power and Plasma Science Conference (PPPS 2013)—San Francisco, CA, USA, Jun. 2013, 1 page. |
| Carlson, A., “Re: Boron/Proton colliding beam reactor?”, 1997, retrieved from http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rostok...opuo.fsf%40s4awc.aug.ipp-garching.mpg.de, pp. 1-3. |
| Carlson, A., “Fundamental Limitations on Plasma Fusion Systems Not in Thermodynamic Equilibrium”, 1997 , retrieved from http://www.ipp.mpg.de/˜Arthur.Carlson/rider.html, pp. 1-3. |
| Carlson, A., “Annotated Bibliography of p-B11 Fusion”, 1998, retrieved from http://www.ipp.mpg.de/˜Arthur.carlson/p-B11-bib.html, pp. 1-4. |
| Carlson, A., “Home Page of Dr. A. Carlson”, 2000, retrieved from http://www/rzg/mpg.de/˜awc/home.html, pp. 1-2. |
| Carlson, A., “Re: Lithium Fission—why not?,” 2000, retrieved from http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rostok...v35u.fsi%40suawc.aug.ipp-garching.mpg.de, pp. 1-2. |
| Chao, A.W., et al., Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, 2nd Printing, 1998, World Scientific, Chapter 2, pp. 53, 119-120. |
| Cohen, S.A., et al., “Formation of Collisionless High-β Plasmas by Odd-Parity Rotating Magnetic Fields”, Physical Review Letters, 2007, vol. 98, pp. 125002-1-145002-4. |
| Cohen, S.A., et al., “RMFo-Formed Collisionless High-β Plasmas: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1154, 2009, pp. 165-166. |
| Cox, JR., L/T., et al., “Thermonuclear Reaction Listing With Cross-Section Data for Four Advanced Reactions”, Fusion Technology, 1990, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 325-339. |
| Davis, H.A., et al., “Generation of Field-Reversing E Layers with Millisecond Lifetimes”, Physical Review Letters, 1976, vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 542-545. |
| Dawson, J.M., “Advanced Fuels for CTR”, Four Workshops in Alternate Concepts in Controlled Fusion, EPRI ER-429-SR, Special Report, Part B: Extended Summaries, 1977, pp. 143-147. |
| Dawson, J.M., “Alternate Concepts in Controlled Fusion”, EPRI ER-429-SR, Special Report, Part C: CTR Using the p-11 B Reaction, 1977, pp. ii-30. |
| Dobrott, D., “Alternate Fuels in Fusion Reactors”, Nuclear Technology/Fusion, 1983, vol. 4, pp. 339-347. |
| Dolan, T.J, “Fusion Research”, 1982, vol. II—Experiments, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 277-309. |
| Feldbacher, R., et al., “Basic Cross Section Data for Aneutronic Reactor”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A271, 1988, pp. 55-64. |
| Finn, J.M., et al., “Field-Reversed Configurations With a Component of Energetic Particles”, Nuclear Fusion, 1982, vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 1443-1518. |
| Goldston, R.J., et al., “Fusion Alternatives”, Science, 1997, vol. 278, No. 5346, pp. 2031-2037. |
| Gota, H., et al., A Well-Confined Field-Reversed Configuration Plasma Formed by Dynamic Merging of Two Colliding Compact Toroids in C-2″, ICC and CT Workshops, Aug. 16, 2011, retrieved from http://www.iccworkshops.org/icc2011/uploads/241/icc2011_gota_talk_8_16_11.pdf, pp. 1-19. |
| Guo, H. Y., et al., “Flux Conversion and Evidence of Relaxation in a High-β Plasma Formed by High-Speed Injection into a Mirror Confinement Structure”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, vol. 92, No. 24, pp. 245001-1-245001-4. |
| Heidbrink, W.W., et al., “Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Fast Ion Slowing-Down Times in DIII-D”, Nuclear Fusion, 1988, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1897-1901. |
| Heidbrink, W.W., “Measurements of classical deceleration of beam ions in the DIII-D tokamak”, Phys. Fluids B. 1990, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 4-5. |
| Heidbrink, W.W., et al., “The diffusion of fast ions in Ohmic TFTR discharges”, Phys. Fluids B, 1991, vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 3167-3170. |
| Heidbrink, W.W., et al., “The Behaviour of Fast Ions in Tokamak Experiments”, Nuclear Fusion, 1994, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 535-618. |
| Himura, H., et al., “Rethermalization of a field-reversed configuration plasma in translation experiments”, Phys. Plasmas, 1995, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 191-197. |
| Hoffman, A.L., et al., “Field Reversed Configuration Lifetime Scaling Based on Measurements From the Large s Experiment”, Nucl. Fusion, 1993, vol. 33. No. 1. pp. 27-38. |
| Iwanenko, D., et al., “On the Maximal Energy Attainable in a Betatron”, Physical Review, 1944, vol. 65, Nos. 11 and 12, p. 343. |
| Jeffries, C.D., “A Direct Determination of the Magnetic Moment of the Protons in Units of the Nuclear Magneton”, Physical Review, 1951, vol. 81, No. 6, pp. 1040-1055. |
| Jones, I. R., “A review of rotating magnetic field current drive and the operation of the rotamak as a field-reversed configuration (Rotamak-FRC) and a spherical tokamak (Rotamak-ST)”, Physics of Plasmas, 1999, vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1950-1957. |
| Kalinowsky, H., “Deceleration of antiprotons from MeV to keV energies”, Hyperfine Interactions, 1993, vol. 76, pp. 73-80. |
| Lampe, M., et al., “Comments on the Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor Proposed by Rostoker, Binderbauer and Monkhorst for Use with the p-11 B Fusion Reaction”, Naval Research Lab., Plasma Physics Division, Oct. 30, 1998, pp. 1-37. |
| “Laval nozzle”, 1992, Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology, retrieved from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/3122475/. |
| Lawson, J.D., “Some Criteria for a Power Producing Thermonuclear Reactor”, Proc. Phys. Soc. B70, 1957, pp. 6-10. |
| Lifschitz, A.F., et al., “Calculations of tangential neutral beam injection current drive efficiency for present moderate flux FRCs”, Nucl. Fusion, 2004, vol. 44, pp. 1015-1026. |
| Majeski, R., et al., “Enhanced Energy Confinement and Performance in a Low-Recycling Tokamak”, Physical Review Letters, 2006, vol. 97, pp. 075002-1-075002-4. |
| Miley, G.H., et al., “A possible route to small, flexible fusion units”, Energy, vol. 4, pp. 163-170. |
| Miley, G.H., et al., “On design and development issues for the FRC and related alternate confinement concepts”, Fusion Engineering and Design, 2000, vol. 48, pp. 327-337. |
| Naitou, H., et al., “Kinetic Effects on the Convective Plasma Diffusion and the Heat Transport”, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1979, vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 258-264. |
| Nevins, W.M., “Feasibility of a Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor”, Science, 1998, vol. 281, No. 5375, p. 307. |
| Okada, S., et al., “Experiments on additional heating of FRC plasmas”, Nucl. Fusion, 2001, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 625-629. |
| Ono, Y., et al., “New relaxation of merging spheromaks to a field reversed configuration”, Nucl. Fusion, 1999, vol. 39, No. 11Y, pp. 2001-2008. |
| Phelps, D.A., et al., “Observations of the stable equilibrium and classical diffusion of field reversing relativistic electron coils”, The Physics of Fluids, 1974, vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 2226-2235. |
| “Summary”, Plasma Science—Advancing Knowledge in the National Interest, National Research Counsel of the National Academies, 2007, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-5. |
| Post, R.F., “Nuclear Fusion”, McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, 6th Edition, 1987, pp. 142-153. |
| Rider, T.H., “A general critique of inertial-electrostatic confinement fusion systems”, Physics Plasmas, 1995, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 1853-1872. |
| Rider, T.H., “Fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium”, Physics Plasmas, 1997, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1039-1046. |
| Robinson, JR., C.A., “Army Pushes New Weapons Effort”, Aviation Week & Space Technology, 1978, vol. 109, pp. 42-53. |
| Rosenbluth, M.N., et al., “Fokker-Planck Equation for an Inverse-Square Force”, The Physical Review, 1957, vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 1-6. |
| Rostoker, N., “Large Orbit Magnetic Confinement Systems for Advanced Fusion Fuels”, Final Technical Report, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Apr. 1, 1990-Feb. 29, 1992, pp. i-80. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Self-Colliding Systems for Aneutronic Fusion”, Comments on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 1992, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 105-120. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Large Orbit Confinement for Aneutronic Systems”, Non-Linear and Relativistic Effects in Plasmids, editor V. Stefan, 1992, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 116-135. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Magnetic Fusion with High Energy Self-Colliding Ion Beams”, Physical Review Letters, 1993, vol. 70, No. 12, pp. 1818-1821. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Self-Colliding Beams as an Alternative Fusion System”, 10th International Conference on High Power Particle Beams, San Diego, CA, Jun. 20-24, 1994, pp. 195-201. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Classical Scattering in a High Beta Self-Collider/FRC”, AIP Conference Proceedings 311, 1994, Physics of High Energy Particles in Toroidal Systems, Irvine, CA 1993, pp. 168-185. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Self-Colliding Beams as an Alternative Fusion System for D-He3 Reactors”, Current Trends in International Fusion Research, edited by Panarella, Plenum Press, New York, 1997, Chapter 4, pp. 33-41. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Alternative Fusion Concepts”, Current Trends in International Fusion Research, edited by Panarella, Plenum Press, New York, 1997, Chapter 32, pp. 489-495. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Fusion Reactors Based on Colliding Beams in a Field Reversed Configuration Plasma”, Comments on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 1997, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 11-23. |
| Rostoker, N., “Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor”, 12th International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams, Proceedings—vol. 1, Jun. 7-12, 1997, Haifa, Israel. |
| Rostoker, N., et al., “Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor”, Science, 1997, vol. 278, No. 5342, pp. 1419-1422. |
| Rostoker, N., “Advanced Fusion Energy and Future Energy Mix Scenarios”, Abstracts with Programs, 1999 Annual Meeting & Exposition, Oct. 25-28, 1999, Denver, CO. |
| Ruggiero, A.G., “Proton-Boron Colliding Beams for Nuclear Fusion”, Proceedings of ICONE 8, 8th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Apr. 2-6, 2000, Baltimore, MD, pp. 1-11. |
| Shishlov, A.V., et al., “Long time implosion experiments with double gas puffs”, Physics of Plasmas, 2000, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1252-1262. |
| Smirnov, A., et al., “Neutral Beam Dump Utilizing Cathodic ARC Titanium Evaporation”, Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 59, No. 1, 2010, pp. 271-273. |
| Smirnov, A., et al., “Neutral beam dump with cathodic arc titanium gettering”, Rev. Sci. Instr., 2011, vol. 82, pp. 033509-1-033509-6. |
| Song, Y., et al., “Electron trapping and acceleration in a modified elongated betatron”, Phys. Fluids B, 1992, vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 3771-3780. |
| Speth, E., et al., “Overview of RF Source Development at IPP”, CCNB-Meeting at Padua, Jun. 5-6, 2003, pp. 1-29. |
| Steinhauer, L.C., et al., “FRC 2001: A White Paper on FRC Development in the Next Five Years”, Fusion Technology, 1996, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 116-127. |
| Tandem Energy Corporation Presentation, Dec. 12, 1997, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-47. |
| Tomita, Y., et al., “Direct Energy Conversion System for D-3He Fusion”, 7th International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems, ICENES '93, 1994, pp. 522.526. |
| Tuszewski, M., “Field Reversed Configurations”, Nuclear Fusion, 1988, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 2033-2092. |
| Tuszewski, M., “Status of the Field-Reversed Configuration as an Alternate Confinement Concept”, Fusion Technology, 1989, vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 1148-1153. |
| Vinyar, I., et al., “Pellett Injectors Developed at PELIN for JET, TAE, and HL-2A”, Fusion Engineering and Design, 2011, vol. 86, pp. 2208-2211. |
| Ware, A.A., et al., “Electrostatic Plugging of Open-Ended Magnetic Containment Systems”, Nuclear Fusion, 1969, vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 353-361. |
| Weaver, T., et al., “Exotic CTR Fuels for Direct Conversion-Utilizing Fusion Reactors”, Talk before the AEC CTR Staff, Mar. 16, 1973, AEC/Germantown. |
| Weaver, T., et al., “Fusion Microexplosions, Exotic Fusion Fuels, Direct Conversion: Advanced Technology Options for CTR”, Annual Meeting of the Committee on Advance Development and the Fusion Task Force of the Edison Electric Institute, Apr. 27, 1973, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, CA. |
| Weaver, T., et al., “Exotic CTR Fuels: Non-Thermal Effects and Laser Fusion Applications”, 1973 Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics, Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 1973, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1-12. |
| “Welcome to Colliding Beam Fusion”, retrieved from http://fusion.ps.uci.edu/beam/introb.html on Oct. 11, 2000, pp. 1-3. |
| Wells, D. R., “Injection and Trapping of Plasma Vortex Structures”, Phys. Fluids, 1966, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 1010-1021. |
| Wessel, F.J., et al., “D-T Beam Fusion Reactor”, Journal of Fusion Energy, 1998, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 209-211. |
| Wessel, F.J., et al., “Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor Space Propulsion System”, AIP Conference Proceedings 504, 2000, pp. 1425-1430. |
| “A White Paper on FRC Development”, Apr. 1998, retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/rppl/programs/wpr98.pdf, pp. 1-26. |
| Wong, H.V., et al., “Stability of annular equilibrium of energetic large orbit ion beam”, Phys. Fluids B, 1991, vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 2973-2986. |
| Zweben, S.J., et al., “Radial Diffusion Coefficient for Counter-Passing MeV Ions in the TFTR Tokamak”, Nuclear Fusion, 1991, vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 2219-2245. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170337991 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62064346 | Oct 2014 | US | |
| 62063382 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2015/055175 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15483984 | US |
