This invention relates to systems and methods for satellite communications.
Operating satellite communications on-the-move (“COTM”) terminals in a frequency band that is shared by both satellite communications services and terrestrial radio relay links may lead to interference between the two services. An example of such an interference problem is illustrated in
In addition, persons who block the line-of-sight between a COTM transmitter and a target satellite can be subjected to hazardous radiation.
There is, therefore, increasing but unmet demand for a method and system to prevent COTM transmissions from causing harmful interference to radio relay links, and radiation to persons.
Embodiments of systems and methods of the various aspects of the present invention mitigate (i.e., prevent, minimize, or otherwise diminish) data corruption and interference that may result when a COTM transmission is blocked by a radio relay link antenna transmitting on a shared frequency band. Another potential advantage of certain embodiments of the invention is that they tend to minimize or otherwise diminish radiation that could harm persons blocking the line-of-sight of a COTM transmission.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, if a building or other obstruction blocks the line-of-sight between a COTM antenna and a target satellite, the transmission will automatically cease, preventing or minimizing any potential interference that can occur, such as the interference to a radio relay link antenna operating atop a building. Similarly, any persons who may have been in the line-of-sight will not be subjected to harmful radiation. According to another embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, COTM transmission remains offline until free line-of-sight is re-established.
An obstruction blocking the line-of-sight between a COTM antenna and a target terminal may be detected by a variety of mechanisms in accordance with the present invention, including without limitation (i) measuring a loss in a received signal, (ii) measuring a loss in a beacon signal, (iii) measuring an increase in standing wave ratio, and/or (iv) optical detection.
In an embodiment of another aspect of the present invention, potential blockages of the line-of-sight between a COTM antenna and a target terminal are predicted in advance. Such predictions may be implemented using a software program, running on a computer, that processes a combination of data that includes, but is not necessarily limited to, (i) COTM vehicle velocity (i.e., vehicle speed and vehicle direction), (ii) COTM vehicle location, and (iii) 3-dimensional map information. In one embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the software program calculates the risk for a blockage to appear within a preselected period of time and may transmit this information to a COTM vehicle operator. According to another of its embodiments, the software program can be used as a route planner to mitigate the blockage during COTM transportation from one location to another.
In another primary aspect, systems and methods according to the present invention comprise communication equipment to collect a variety of data to be used to assess whether an obstruction is blocking the line-of-sight between a COTM antenna and a target terminal. In one embodiment, systems and methods utilize an antenna for transmitting uplink signals and receiving downlink signals, and a connection and control board (“CCB”) that is coupled to a computer and the communication equipment. The computer processes data collected by the communication equipment to send instructions to either stop or start transmission of an uplink signal to the CCB, which in turn instructs the communication equipment (e.g., via modem or amplifier) to carry out the instructions.
In yet a further embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, after an uplink transmission is initiated from an antenna, calculations are made to determine whether a line-of-sight from the antenna to a target satellite is blocked. According to one embodiment, the uplink transmission is stopped if blockage is detected. Otherwise, calculations are used to determine whether the line-of-sight will be blocked within a preselected timeframe.
Various aspects of the systems and methods according to the present invention are described in the figures identified below and in the detailed description that follows.
This description, including the figures, describes embodiments that illustrate various aspects of the present invention. These embodiments are not intended to, and do not, limit the scope of the invention to particular details.
Commonly assigned and copending U.S. patent applications, identified by application Ser. Nos. 11/623,799; 11/623,821; 11/623,877; 11/623,902; and 11/623,986, all filed on Jan. 17, 2007, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The various entities identified in the Figures and described herein may each utilize one or more computer processors, and the computer processors of each entity may be configured to communicate with the computer processors of one or more of the other entities in order to carry out the methods of the present invention.
In another embodiment, the communication equipment 204, via a communication receiver and/or beacon receiver (not shown), measures a received signal. This data is then transmitted to the CCB 206, which in turn transmits the data to the computer 208. The software 210, residing in a suitable storage medium in or accessible to the computer 208, is configured to calculate any relative loss in the received signal, thereby determining whether the line-of-sight is blocked.
In yet another embodiment, the communication equipment 204, via one or more optical sensors, detects whether an obstruction is within the line-of-sight. The optical sensor 204 then transmits the data to the CCB 206, which in turn transmits the data to the computer 208. The software 210 is configured to interpret the optical sensor data to determine whether the line-of-sight is blocked.
According to another embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, one or more sensors 2021 . . . 202N may comprise an optical sensor(s) that is distinct from the communication equipment 204 and is coupled to the CCB 206 in order to transmit data directly to the CCB 206.
In yet another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the optical sensor(s) may comprise a camera aligned in the direction of the antenna such that at least part of the optical window covers the line-of-sight. It is also necessary to be able to transmit commands to the sensor(s) via the connection and control board from the computer (for example, commands to direct the optical sensor, e.g. camera, in the direction of the antenna line-of-sight).
In a further embodiment of this aspect, the connection and control board may be configured to transmit commands to one or more sensors 2021 . . . 202N, which may comprise an optical sensor(s), to direct the sensors 2021 . . . 202N in the direction of the antenna line-of-sight, for example.
In yet another embodiment, the system 200 can simultaneously execute any combination of the above means to determine whether the line-of-sight is blocked. Comparing the results of multiple tests may enable greater accuracy in detecting blockages.
If the software 210 determines that the line-of-sight is blocked, this data is used to generate commands for the CCB 206 to stop transmission. The computer 208 sends the commands to the CCB 206, which in turn directs the communication equipment 204 to stop transmitting the uplink signal (e.g., via modem or amplifier).
After the COTM transmission has been stopped, the communication equipment 204 continues to process data, as explained above, to enable the system 200 to determine whether the line-of-sight remains blocked. Once the software 210 determines the line-of-sight is free, this data is used to generate commands for the CCB 206 to resume transmission. The computer 208 sends the commands to the CCB 206, which in turn directs the communication equipment 204 to restart the uplink signal transmission (e.g., via modem or amplifier).
According to an embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, the system 200 is equipped with a buffer (not shown) to temporarily store transmission data while the signal transmission is temporarily stopped. In one embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the buffer may be of a capacity to hold data associated with a transmission interruption of preselected duration, whereby a greater capacity would enable more data to be stored while transmission is suspended.
Potential blockages of COTM transmissions are predicted according to another aspect of the present invention. In one embodiment, the communication equipment 204, via a vehicle sensor(s), monitors the COTM vehicle's velocity and position. This data is then transmitted to the CCB 206, which in turn transmits the data to the computer 208.
According to another embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, one or more sensors 2021 . . . 202N may comprise a vehicle sensor(s) that is distinct from the communication equipment 204 and is coupled to the CCB 206 in order to transmit data directly to the CCB 206. In one embodiment of this aspect, the vehicle sensor(s) may be a customized or off-the-shelf Global Positioning System (“GPS”).
According to another embodiment, the computer 208 may comprise at least one database 212 to store 3-dimensional terrestrial maps, as are known in the art or may yet be developed, and which may include building information, and/or locations with microwave links. These maps, for example, may include information regarding the location and dimensions of various buildings in an urban area. The software 210 running on the computer 208 may be configured to determine, according to known methods, from the COTM vehicle's velocity, position, and the corresponding terrestrial data from the map, whether the line-of-sight will be blocked and within what timeframe such blockage will occur.
According to one embodiment, if the computer 208, running software 210, determines the line-of-sight will be blocked within a preselected timeframe, commands to stop uplink signal transmission is sent to the CCB 206, which in turn directs the communication equipment 204 to stop transmission (e.g., via modem or amplifier).
Using updated COTM vehicle velocity and position data, the computer 208, running software 204, in one embodiment uses the 3-dimensional terrestrial maps to determine when the line-of-sight is free. According to yet another embodiment, the computer 208, running software 204, determines when the line-of-sight is free by calculating actual blockages from (i) reflected wave data, (ii) received signal measurements, and/or (iii) optical sensor data, as detailed above.
Once the software 210 determines the line-of-sight is free, this data is used to generate commands for the CCB 206 to resume transmission. The computer 208 sends the commands to the CCB 206, which in turn directs the communication equipment 204 to restart the uplink signal transmission (e.g., via modem or amplifier). As explained above, according to an embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, the system 200 is equipped with a buffer to temporarily store transmission data while the signal transmission is temporarily stopped.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, if the computer 208, running on software 210, determines the line-of-sight will be blocked within a preselected timeframe, the computer 208, running software 210, uses the 3-dimensional map data to transmit information about the predetermined blockage and possible routes to avoid this predetermined blockage to a COTM vehicle operator. If the COTM vehicle route is changed, the system 200 predicts other potential blockages as detailed above.
According to yet another embodiment of an aspect of the present invention, the computer 208, running software 210, is configured to generate route plans for the COTM vehicle by using the 3-dimensional terrestrial maps located in one or more databases 212 and beginning and ending coordinates. This could minimize or eliminate the line-of-sight blockage during COTM transportation from one location to another.
An embodiment of a method according to the present invention is illustrated in
Other objects, advantages and embodiments of the various aspects of the present invention will be apparent to those who are skilled in the field of the invention and are within the scope of the description and the accompanying figures. For example, but without limitation, structural or functional elements might be rearranged, or method steps reordered, consistent with the present invention. Similarly, sensors may comprise a single instance or a plurality of devices, such plurality possibly encompassing multiple sensor types. The sensor types described in various embodiments are not meant to limit the possible types of sensors that may be used in embodiments of aspects of the present invention, and other types of sensors that may accomplish similar tasks may be implemented as well. Similarly, processors or databases may comprise a single instance or a plurality of devices coupled by network, database or other information path. Similarly, principles according to the present invention, and systems and methods that embody them, could be applied to other examples, which, even if not specifically described here in detail, would nevertheless be within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4345256 | Rainwater | Aug 1982 | A |
4796032 | Sakurai et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5506780 | Montenbruck et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5566354 | Sehloemer | Oct 1996 | A |
5590395 | Diekelman | Dec 1996 | A |
5678174 | Tayloe | Oct 1997 | A |
5736959 | Patterson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765098 | Bella | Jun 1998 | A |
5805067 | Bradley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819185 | Umezawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5894590 | Vatt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896558 | Wiedeman | Apr 1999 | A |
5925092 | Swan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5995841 | King et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018659 | Ayyagari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021309 | Sherman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023606 | Monte et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032041 | Wainfan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067442 | Wiedeman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072768 | Wiedeman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088572 | Vatt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097957 | Bonta et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101385 | Monte et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125261 | Anselmo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128487 | Wiedeman | Oct 2000 | A |
6147640 | Wachs | Nov 2000 | A |
6160994 | Wiedeman | Dec 2000 | A |
6169881 | Astrom et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188896 | Perahia et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198907 | Torkington et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222499 | Goetz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236834 | Poskett et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246874 | Voce | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275677 | Tandler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6324381 | Anselmo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339707 | Wainfan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6400927 | Daniel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408178 | Wickstrom et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442480 | Takahashi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459898 | Yegenoglu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463279 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6538612 | King | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570859 | Cable et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574794 | Sarraf | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594469 | Serri et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594706 | DeCoursey et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6678520 | Wang | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704543 | Sharon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708029 | Wesel | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6731909 | McLain et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735440 | Wiedeman et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6791960 | Song | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804514 | Wiedeman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6859652 | Karabinis et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866231 | Higgins | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879829 | Dutta et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7110880 | Breed et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7136620 | Wang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7271737 | Hoffberg | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7295925 | Breed et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7298289 | Hoffberg | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7313404 | Anderson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7418346 | Breed et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426437 | Breed et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7450901 | Parkman | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460830 | Moore, III | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466218 | Oesterling | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7526249 | Waltman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7577400 | Karabinis et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7627284 | Wang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7629899 | Breed | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660652 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711375 | Liu | May 2010 | B2 |
7962134 | Wahlberg et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010045494 | Higgins | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030017803 | Rubin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054760 | Karabinis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030207684 | Wesel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040038644 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040157554 | Wesel | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203444 | Jarett | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050085186 | Sandrin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050197060 | Hedinger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070167132 | Wahlberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168675 | Wahlberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178833 | Wahlberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070178834 | Wahlberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080045146 | Wahlberg et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090021424 | Wahlberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022088 | Wahlberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100309042 | Colley et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
858176 | Aug 1998 | EP |
915529 | May 1999 | EP |
1065806 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1117198 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1223691 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1014598 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2313743 | Dec 1997 | GB |
2341762 | Mar 2000 | GB |
62-084604 | Apr 1987 | JP |
09-153718 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-178313 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2001-007637 | Jan 2001 | JP |
WO-9631016 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9725785 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9820634 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-0028678 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0126251 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0137588 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0227975 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-0227976 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-03026328 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-2005093967 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2007000794 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007064094 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007067016 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007082719 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007082720 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007082721 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007082722 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007090506 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2009010253 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009010254 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009039998 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090021424 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |