Patent Application
20180373827
The present invention relates generally to computer modeling and management of systems and, more particularly, to computer simulation techniques with real-time system monitoring of electrical system health and performance.
Computer models of complex systems enable improved system design, development, and implementation through techniques for off-line simulation of system operation. That is, system models can be created on computers and then “operated” in a virtual environment to assist in the determination of system design parameters. All manner of systems can be modeled, designed, and operated in this way, including machinery, factories, electrical power and distribution systems, processing plants, devices, chemical processes, biological systems, and the like. Such simulation techniques have resulted in reduced development costs and superior operation.
Design and production processes have benefited greatly from such computer simulation techniques, and such techniques are relatively well developed, but they have not been applied in real-time, e.g., for real-time operational monitoring and management. In addition, predictive failure analysis techniques do not generally use real-time data that reflect actual system operation. Greater efforts at real-time operational monitoring and management would provide more accurate and timely suggestions for operational decisions, and such techniques applied to failure analysis would provide improved predictions of system problems before they occur.
That is, an electrical network model that can age and synchronize itself in real-time with the actual facility's operating conditions is critical to obtaining predictions that are reflective of the system's reliability, availability, health and performance in relation to the life cycle of the system. Static systems simply cannot adjust to the many daily changes to the electrical system that occur at a facility (e.g., motors and pumps switching on or off, changes to on-site generation status, changes to utility electrical feed . . . etc.) nor can they age with the facility to accurately predict the required indices. Without a synchronization or aging ability, reliability indices and predictions are of little value as they are not reflective of the actual operational status of the facility and may lead to false conclusions. With such improved techniques, operational costs and risks can be greatly reduced.
For example, mission critical electrical systems, e.g., for data centers or nuclear power facilities, must be designed to ensure that power is always available. Thus, the systems must be as failure proof as possible, and many layers of redundancy must be designed in to ensure that there is always a backup in case of a failure. It will be understood that such systems are highly complex, a complexity made even greater as a result of the required redundancy. Computer design and modeling programs allow for the design of such systems by allowing a designer to model the system and simulate its operation. Thus, the designer can ensure that the system will operate as intended before the facility is constructed.
As with all analytical tools, predictive or otherwise, the manner in which data and results are communicated to the user is often as important as the choice of analytical tool itself. Ideally, the data and results are communicated in a fashion that is simple to understand while also painting a comprehensive and accurate picture for the user. For example, current technology often overburdens users with thousands of pieces of information per second from sensory data points that are distributed throughout the monitored electrical power system facility. Therefore, it is nearly impossible for facility operators, managers and technicians to digest and understand all the sensory data to formulate an accurate understanding of their relevance to the overall status and health of their mission critical power system operations.
Currently, no solution exists for intelligent filtering of real-time power system sensory data into an easy to comprehend visual presentation to help facility operators, managers and technicians quickly understand the current health of their power systems.
Moreover, no solution exists for real-time modeling and forecasting of power generation for non-traditional power generation systems, such as photo-voltaic power generators.
Systems and methods for filtering and interpreting real-time sensory data from an electrical system comprising a non-traditional power generator are disclosed.
In an embodiment, a system for predicting power output from a photo-voltaic power generator is disclosed. The system comprises at least one hardware processor; and one or more software modules that are configured to, when executed by the at least one hardware processor, receive real-time data from one or more sensors of an electrical system comprising a photo-voltaic power generator, generate predicted data based on a virtual model of the electrical system that replicates operation of the one or more sensors, continuously and automatically synchronize the virtual model with the electrical system based on a difference between the real-time data and the predicted data, receive solar irradiance forecast data, and forecast a power output of the photo-voltaic power generator based on the virtual model and the solar irradiance forecast data.
In another embodiment, a method for predicting power output from a photo-voltaic power generator is disclosed. The method comprises using at least one hardware processor to: receive real-time data from one or more sensors of an electrical system comprising a photo-voltaic power generator, generate predicted data based on a virtual model of the electrical system that replicates operation of the one or more sensors, continuously and automatically synchronize the virtual model with the electrical system based on a difference between the real-time data and the predicted data, receive solar irradiance forecast data, and forecast a power output of the photo-voltaic power generator based on the virtual model and the solar irradiance forecast data.
These and other features, aspects, and embodiments of the invention are described below in the section entitled “Detailed Description.”
For a more complete understanding of the principles disclosed herein, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Systems and methods for filtering and interpreting real-time sensory data from an electrical system are disclosed. It will be clear, however, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
As used herein, a system denotes a set of components, real or abstract, comprising a whole where each component interacts with or is related to at least one other component within the whole. Examples of systems include machinery, factories, electrical systems, processing plants, devices, chemical processes, biological systems, data centers, aircraft carriers, and the like. An electrical system can designate a power generation and/or distribution system that is widely dispersed (i.e., power generation, transformers, and/or electrical distribution components distributed geographically throughout a large region) or bounded within a particular location (e.g., a power plant within a production facility, a bounded geographic area, on board a ship, etc.).
A network application is any application that is stored on an application server connected to a network (e.g., local area network, wide area network, etc.) in accordance with any contemporary client/server architecture model and can be accessed via the network. In this arrangement, the network application programming interface (API) resides on the application server separate from the client machine. The client interface would typically be a web browser (e.g. INTERNET EXPLORER™, FIREFOX™, NETSCAPE™, etc.) that is in communication with the network application server via a network connection (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS, RSS, etc.).
The sensors are configured to provide output values for system parameters that indicate the operational status and/or “health” of the monitored system 102. For example, in an electrical power generation system, the current output or voltage readings for the various components that comprise the power generation system is indicative of the overall health and/or operational condition of the system. In one embodiment, the sensors are configured to also measure additional data that can affect system operation. For example, for an electrical power distribution system, the sensor output can include environmental information, e.g., temperature, humidity, etc., which can impact electrical power demand and can also affect the operation and efficiency of the power distribution system itself.
Continuing with
The sensors can be configured to capture output data at split-second intervals to effectuate “real time” data capture. For example, in one embodiment, the sensors can be configured to generate hundreds of thousands of data readings per second. It should be appreciated, however, that the number of data output readings taken by a sensor may be set to any value as long as the operational limits of the sensor and the data processing capabilities of the data acquisition hub 112 are not exceeded.
Still with
The data acquisition hub 112 is configured to communicate “real-time” data from the monitored system 102 to the analytics server 116 using a network connection 114. In one embodiment, the network connection 114 is a “hardwired” physical connection. For example, the data acquisition hub 112 may be communicatively connected (via Category 5 (CAT5), fiber optic or equivalent cabling) to a data server (not shown) that is communicatively connected (via CAT5, fiber optic or equivalent cabling) through the Internet and to the analytics server 116. The analytics server 116 being also communicatively connected with the Internet (via CAT5, fiber optic, or equivalent cabling). In another embodiment, the network connection 114 is a wireless network connection (e.g., Wi-Fi, WLAN, etc.). For example, utilizing an 802.11 b/g or equivalent transmission format. In practice, the network connection utilized is dependent upon the particular requirements of the monitored system 102.
Data acquisition hub 112 can also be configured to supply warning and alarm signals as well as control signals to monitored system 102 and/or sensors 104, 106, and 108 as described in more detail below.
As shown in
The real-time data from hub 204 can be passed to a comparison engine 210, which can form part of analytics engine 118. Comparison engine 210 can be configured to continuously compare the real-time data with predicted values generated by simulation engine 208. Based on the comparison, comparison engine 210 can be further configured to determine whether deviations between the real-time and the expected values exists, and if so to classify the deviation, e.g., high, marginal, low, etc. The deviation level can then be communicated to decision engine 212, which can also comprise part of analytics engine 118.
Decision engine 212 can be configured to look for significant deviations between the predicted values and real-time values as received from the comparison engine 210. If significant deviations are detected, decision engine 212 can also be configured to determine whether an alarm condition exists, activate the alarm and communicate the alarm to Human-Machine Interface (HMI) 214 for display in real-time via, e.g., thin client 128. Decision engine 212 can also be configured to perform root cause analysis for significant deviations in order to determine the interdependencies and identify the parent-child failure relationships that may be occurring. In this manner, parent alarm conditions are not drowned out by multiple children alarm conditions, allowing the user/operator to focus on the main problem, at least at first.
Thus, in one embodiment, an alarm condition for the parent can be displayed via HMI 214 along with an indication that processes and equipment dependent on the parent process or equipment are also in alarm condition. This also means that server 116 can maintain a parent-child logical relationship between processes and equipment comprising facility 102. Further, the processes can be classified as critical, essential, non-essential, etc.
Decision engine 212 can also be configured to determine health and performance levels and indicate these levels for the various processes and equipment via HMI 214. All of which, when combined with the analytic capabilities of analytics engine 118 allows the operator to minimize the risk of catastrophic equipment failure by predicting future failures and providing prompt, informative information concerning potential/predicted failures before they occur. Avoiding catastrophic failures reduces risk and cost, and maximizes facility performance and up time.
Simulation engine 208 operates on complex logical models 206 of facility 102. These models are continuously and automatically synchronized with the actual facility status based on the real-time data provided by hub 204. In other words, the models are updated based on current switch status, breaker status, e.g., open-closed, equipment on/off status, etc. Thus, the models are automatically updated based on such status, which allows simulation engine to produce predicted data based on the current facility status. This in turn, allows accurate and meaningful comparisons of the real-time data to the predicted data.
Example models 206 that can be maintained and used by server 116 include power flow models used to calculate expected kW, kVAR, power factor values, etc., short circuit models used to calculate maximum and minimum available fault currents, protection models used to determine proper protection schemes and ensure selective coordination of protective devices, power quality models used to determine voltage and current distortions at any point in the network, to name just a few. It will be understood that different models can be used depending on the system being modeled.
In certain embodiments, hub 204 is configured to supply equipment identification associated with the real-time data. This identification can be cross referenced with identifications provided in the models.
In one embodiment, if the comparison performed by comparison engine 210 indicates that the differential between the real-time sensor output value and the expected value exceeds a Defined Difference Tolerance (DDT) value (i.e., the “real-time” output values of the sensor output do not indicate an alarm condition) but below an alarm condition (i.e., alarm threshold value), a calibration request is generated by the analytics engine 118. If the differential exceeds the alarm condition, an alarm or notification message is generated by the analytics engine 118. If the differential is below the DDT value, the analytics engine does nothing and continues to monitor the real-time data and expected data.
In one embodiment, the alarm or notification message is sent directly to the client (i.e., user) 128, e.g., via HMI 214, for display in real-time on a web browser, pop-up message box, e-mail, or equivalent on the client 128 display panel. In another embodiment, the alarm or notification message is sent to a wireless mobile device (e.g., BLACKBERRY™, laptop, pager, etc.) to be displayed for the user by way of a wireless router or equivalent device interfaced with the analytics server 116. In still another embodiment, the alarm or notification message is sent to both the client 128 display and the wireless mobile device. The alarm can be indicative of a need for a repair event or maintenance to be done on the monitored system. It should be noted, however, that calibration requests should not be allowed if an alarm condition exists to prevent the models from being calibrated to an abnormal state.
Once the calibration is generated by the analytics engine 118, the various operating parameters or conditions of model(s) 206 can be updated or adjusted to reflect the actual facility configuration. This can include, but is not limited to, modifying the predicted data output from the simulation engine 208, adjusting the logic/processing parameters utilized by the model(s) 206, adding/subtracting functional elements from model(s) 206, etc. It should be understood that any operational parameter of models 206 can be modified as long as the resulting modifications can be processed and registered by simulation engine 208.
Referring back to
All of models 206 can be referred to as a virtual system model. Thus, virtual system model database can be configured to store the virtual system model. A duplicate, but synchronized copy of the virtual system model can be stored in a virtual simulation model database 130. This duplicate model can be used for what-if simulations. In other words, this model can be used to allow a system designer to make hypothetical changes to the facility and test the resulting effect, without taking down the facility or costly and time-consuming analysis. Such hypothetical changes can be used to learn failure patterns and signatures as well as to test proposed modifications, upgrades, additions, etc., for the facility. The real-time data, as well as trending produced by analytics engine 118 can be stored in a real-time data acquisition database 132.
As discussed above, the virtual system model is periodically calibrated and synchronized with “real-time” sensor data outputs so that the virtual system model provides data output values that are consistent with the actual “real-time” values received from the sensor output signals. Unlike conventional systems that use virtual system models primarily for system design and implementation purposes (i.e., offline simulation and facility planning), the virtual system models described herein are updated and calibrated with the real-time system operational data to provide better predictive output values. A divergence between the real-time sensor output values and the predicted output values generate either an alarm condition for the values in question and/or a calibration request that is sent to the calibration engine 134.
Continuing with
This approach also presents a novel way to digest and comprehend alarms in a manageable and coherent way. The neocortical model could assist in uncovering the patterns and sequencing of alarms to help pinpoint the location of the (impending) failure, its context, and even the cause. Typically, responding to the alarms is done manually by experts who have gained familiarity with the system through years of experience. However, at times, the amount of information is so great that an individual cannot respond fast enough or does not have the necessary expertise. An “intelligent” system like the neocortical system that observes and recommends possible responses could improve the alarm management process by either supporting the existing operator, or even managing the system autonomously.
Current simulation approaches for maintaining transient stability involve traditional numerical techniques and typically do not test all possible scenarios. The problem is further complicated as the numbers of components and pathways increase. Through the application of the neocortical model, by observing simulations of circuits, and by comparing them to actual system responses, it may be possible to improve the simulation process, thereby improving the overall design of future circuits.
The virtual system model database 126, as well as databases 130 and 132, can be configured to store one or more virtual system models, virtual simulation models, and real-time data values, each customized to a particular system being monitored by the analytics server 118. Thus, the analytics server 118 can be utilized to monitor more than one system at a time. As depicted herein, the databases 126, 130, and 132 can be hosted on the analytics server 116 and communicatively interfaced with the analytics engine 118. In other embodiments, databases 126, 130, and 132 can be hosted on a separate database server (not shown) that is communicatively connected to the analytics server 116 in a manner that allows the virtual system modeling engine 124 and analytics engine 118 to access the databases as needed.
Therefore, in one embodiment, the client 128 can modify the virtual system model stored on the virtual system model database 126 by using a virtual system model development interface using well-known modeling tools that are separate from the other network interfaces. For example, dedicated software applications that run in conjunction with the network interface to allow a client 128 to create or modify the virtual system models.
The client 128 may utilize a variety of network interfaces (e.g., web browser, CITRIX™, WINDOWS TERMINAL SERVICES™, telnet, or other equivalent thin-client terminal applications, etc.) to access, configure, and modify the sensors (e.g., configuration files, etc.), analytics engine 118 (e.g., configuration files, analytics logic, etc.), calibration parameters (e.g., configuration files, calibration parameters, etc.), virtual system modeling engine 124 (e.g., configuration files, simulation parameters, etc.) and virtual system model of the system under management (e.g., virtual system model operating parameters and configuration files). Correspondingly, data from those various components of the monitored system 102 can be displayed on a client 128 display panel for viewing by a system administrator or equivalent.
As described above, server 116 is configured to synchronize the physical world with the virtual and report, e.g., via visual, real-time display, deviations between the two as well as system health, alarm conditions, predicted failures, etc. This is illustrated with the aid of
Each analytics server (i.e., analytics server A 414, analytics server B 416, analytics server n 418) is configured to monitor the sensor output data of its corresponding monitored system and feed that data to the central analytics server 422. Additionally, each of the analytics servers can function as a proxy agent of the central analytics server 422 during the modifying and/or adjusting of the operating parameters of the system sensors they monitor. For example, analytics server B 416 is configured to be utilized as a proxy to modify the operating parameters of the sensors interfaced with monitored system B 404.
Moreover, the central analytics server 422, which is communicatively connected to one or more analytics server(s) can be used to enhance the scalability. For example, a central analytics server 422 can be used to monitor multiple electrical power generation facilities (i.e., monitored system A 402 can be a power generation facility located in city A while monitored system B 404 is a power generation facility located in city B) on an electrical power grid. In this example, the number of electrical power generation facilities that can be monitored by central analytics server 422 is limited only by the data processing capacity of the central analytics server 422. The central analytics server 422 can be configured to enable a client 128 to modify and adjust the operational parameters of any of the analytics servers communicatively connected to the central analytics server 422. Furthermore, as discussed above, each of the analytics servers are configured to serve as proxies for the central analytics server 422 to enable a client 128 to modify and/or adjust the operating parameters of the sensors interfaced with the systems that they respectively monitor. For example, the client 128 can use the central analytics server 422, and vice versa, to modify and/or adjust the operating parameters of analytics server A 414 and utilize the same to modify and/or adjust the operating parameters of the sensors interfaced with monitored system A 402. Additionally, each of the analytics servers can be configured to allow a client 128 to modify the virtual system model through a virtual system model development interface using well-known modeling tools.
In one embodiment, the central analytics server 422 can function to monitor and control a monitored system when its corresponding analytics server is out of operation. For example, central analytics server 422 can take over the functionality of analytics server B 416 when the server 416 is out of operation. That is, the central analytics server 422 can monitor the data output from monitored system B 404 and modify and/or adjust the operating parameters of the sensors that are interfaced with the system 404.
In one embodiment, the network connection 114 is established through a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet. In another embodiment, the network connection is established through a local area network (LAN) such as the company intranet. In a separate embodiment, the network connection 114 is a “hardwired” physical connection. For example, the data acquisition hub 112 may be communicatively connected (via Category 5 (CAT5), fiber optic or equivalent cabling) to a data server that is communicatively connected (via CAT5, fiber optic or equivalent cabling) through the Internet and to the analytics server 116 server hosting the analytics engine 118. In another embodiment, the network connection 114 is a wireless network connection (e.g., Wi-Fi, WLAN, etc.). For example, utilizing an 802.11 b/g or equivalent transmission format.
In certain embodiments, regional analytics servers can be placed between local analytics servers 414, 416, . . . , 418 and central analytics server 422. Further, in certain embodiments a disaster recovery site can be included at the central analytics server 422 level.
The analytics server 116 includes a variety of components. In the
The analytics server 116 also includes an alarm engine 506 and messaging engine 504, for the aforementioned external communications. The alarm engine 506 is configured to work in conjunction with the messaging engine 504 to generate alarm or notification messages 502 (in the form of text messages, e-mails, paging, etc.) in response to the alarm conditions previously described. The analytics server 116 determines alarm conditions based on output data it receives from the various sensor systems 519 through a communications connection (e.g., wireless 516, TCP/IP 518, Serial 520, etc.) and simulated output data from a virtual system model 512, of the monitored system, processed by the analytics engines 118. In one embodiment, the virtual system model 512 is created by a user through interacting with an external communication entity 534 by specifying the components that comprise the monitored system and by specifying relationships between the components of the monitored system. In another embodiment, the virtual system model 512 is automatically generated by the analytics engines 118 as components of the monitored system are brought online and interfaced with the analytics server 508.
Continuing with
Thus, in operation, analytics server 116 can receive real-time data for various sensors, i.e., components, through data acquisition system 202. As can be seen, analytics server 116 can comprise various drivers configured to interface with the various types of sensors, etc., comprising data acquisition system 202. This data represents the real-time operational data for the various components. For example, the data may indicate that a certain component is operating at a certain voltage level and drawing certain amount of current. This information can then be fed to a modeling engine to generate a virtual system model 612 that is based on the actual real-time operational data.
Analytics engine 118 can be configured to compare predicted data based on the virtual system model 512 with real-time data received from data acquisition system 202 and to identify any differences. In some instances, analytics engine can be configured to identify these differences and then update, i.e., calibrate, the virtual system model 512 for use in future comparisons. In this manner, more accurate comparisons and warnings can be generated.
But in other instances, the differences will indicate a failure, or the potential for a failure. For example, when a component begins to fail, the operating parameters will begin to change. This change may be sudden or it may be a progressive change over time. Analytics engine 118 can detect such changes and issue warnings that can allow the changes to be detected before a failure occurs. The analytic engine 118 can be configured to generate warnings that can be communicated via interface 536.
For example, a user can access information from server 116 using thin client 534. For example, reports can be generated and served to thin client 534 via interface 536. These reports can, for example, comprise schematic or symbolic illustrations of the system being monitored. Status information for each component can be illustrated or communicated for each component. This information can be numerical, i.e., the voltage or current level. Or it can be symbolic, i.e., green for normal, red for failure or warning. In certain embodiments, intermediate levels of failure can also be communicated, i.e., yellow can be used to indicate operational conditions that project the potential for future failure. It should be noted that this information can be accessed in real-time. Moreover, via thin client 534, the information can be accessed from anywhere and anytime.
Continuing with
Method 600 moves on to operation 604 where the virtual system model of the monitored system under management is updated in response to the real-time data. This may include, but is not limited to, modifying the simulated data output from the virtual system model, adjusting the logic/processing parameters utilized by the virtual system modeling engine to simulate the operation of the monitored system, adding/subtracting functional elements of the virtual system model, etc. It should be understood, that any operational parameter of the virtual system modeling engine and/or the virtual system model may be modified by the calibration engine as long as the resulting modifications can be processed and registered by the virtual system modeling engine.
Method 600 proceeds on to operation 606 where the simulated real-time data indicative of the monitored system status is compared with a corresponding virtual system model created at the design stage. The design stage models, which may be calibrated and updated based on real-time monitored data, are used as a basis for the predicted performance of the system. The real-time monitored data can then provide the actual performance over time. By comparing the real-time time data with the predicted performance information, differences can be identified a tracked by, e.g., the analytics engine 118. Analytics engines 118 can then track trends, determine alarm states, etc., and generate a real-time report of the system status in response to the comparison.
In other words, the analytics can be used to analyze the comparison and real-time data and determine if there is a problem that should be reported and what level the problem may be, e.g., low priority, high priority, critical, etc. The analytics can also be used to predict future failures and time to failure, etc. In one embodiment, reports can be displayed on a conventional web browser (e.g. INTERNET EXPLORER™, FIREFOX™, NETSCAPE™, etc.) that is rendered on a standard personal computing (PC) device. In another embodiment, the “real-time” report can be rendered on a “thin-client” computing device (e.g., CITRIX™, WINDOWS TERMINAL SERVICES™, telnet, or other equivalent thin-client terminal application). In still another embodiment, the report can be displayed on a wireless mobile device (e.g., BLACKBERRY™, laptop, pager, etc.). For example, in one embodiment, the “real-time” report can include such information as the differential in a particular power parameter (i.e., current, voltage, etc.) between the real-time measurements and the virtual output data.
Method 700 moves to operation 704 where the real-time data is processed into a defined format. This would be a format that can be utilized by the analytics server to analyze or compare the data with the simulated data output from the virtual system model. In one embodiment, the data is converted from an analog signal to a digital signal. In another embodiment, the data is converted from a digital signal to an analog signal. It should be understood, however, that the real-time data may be processed into any defined format as long as the analytics engine can utilize the resulting data in a comparison with simulated output data from a virtual system model of the monitored system.
Method 700 continues on to operation 706 where the predicted (i.e., simulated) data for the monitored system is generated using a virtual system model of the monitored system. As discussed above, a virtual system modeling engine utilizes dynamic control logic stored in the virtual system model to generate the predicted output data. The predicted data is supposed to be representative of data that should actually be generated and output from the monitored system.
Method 700 proceeds to operation 708 where a determination is made as to whether the difference between the real-time data output and the predicted system data falls between a set value and an alarm condition value, where if the difference falls between the set value and the alarm condition value a virtual system model calibration and a response can be generated. That is, if the comparison indicates that the differential between the “real-time” sensor output value and the corresponding “virtual” model data output value exceeds a Defined Difference Tolerance (DDT) value (i.e., the “real-time” output values of the sensor output do not indicate an alarm condition) but below an alarm condition (i.e., alarm threshold value), a response can be generated by the analytics engine. In one embodiment, if the differential exceeds the alarm condition, an alarm or notification message is generated by the analytics engine 118. In another embodiment, if the differential is below the DDT value, the analytics engine does nothing and continues to monitor the “real-time” data and “virtual” data. Generally speaking, the comparison of the set value and alarm condition is indicative of the functionality of one or more components of the monitored system.
Method 800 proceeds to operation 804 where the predicted system output value for the virtual system model is updated with a real-time output value for the monitored system. For example, if sensors interfaced with the monitored system outputs a real-time current value of A, then the predicted system output value for the virtual system model is adjusted to reflect a predicted current value of A.
Method 800 moves on to operation 806 where a difference between the real-time sensor value measurement from a sensor integrated with the monitored system and a predicted sensor value for the sensor is determined As discussed above, the analytics engine is configured to receive “real-time” data from sensors interfaced with the monitored system via the data acquisition hub (or, alternatively directly from the sensors) and “virtual” data from the virtual system modeling engine simulating the data output from a virtual system model of the monitored system. In one embodiment, the values are in units of electrical power output (i.e., current or voltage) from an electrical power generation or transmission system. It should be appreciated, however, that the values can essentially be any unit type as long as the sensors can be configured to output data in those units or the analytics engine can convert the output data received from the sensors into the desired unit type before performing the comparison.
Method 800 continues on to operation 808 where the operating parameters of the virtual system model are adjusted to minimize the difference. This means that the logic parameters of the virtual system model that a virtual system modeling engine uses to simulate the data output from actual sensors interfaced with the monitored system are adjusted so that the difference between the real-time data output and the simulated data output is minimized. Correspondingly, this operation will update and adjust any virtual system model output parameters that are functions of the virtual system model sensor values. For example, in a power distribution environment, output parameters of power load or demand factor might be a function of multiple sensor data values. The operating parameters of the virtual system model that mimic the operation of the sensor will be adjusted to reflect the real-time data received from those sensors. In one embodiment, authorization from a system administrator is requested prior to the operating parameters of the virtual system model being adjusted. This is to ensure that the system administrator is aware of the changes that are being made to the virtual system model. In one embodiment, after the completion of all the various calibration operations, a report is generated to provide a summary of all the adjustments that have been made to the virtual system model.
As described above, virtual system modeling engine 124 can be configured to model various aspects of the system to produce predicted values for the operation of various components within monitored system 102. These predicted values can be compared to actual values being received via data acquisition hub 112. If the differences are greater than a certain threshold, e.g., the DDT, but not in an alarm condition, then a calibration instruction can be generated. The calibration instruction can cause a calibration engine 134 to update the virtual model being used by system modeling engine 124 to reflect the new operating information.
It will be understood that as monitored system 102 ages, or more specifically the components comprising monitored system 102 age, then the operating parameters, e.g., currents and voltages associated with those components will also change. Thus, the process of calibrating the virtual model based on the actual operating information provides a mechanism by which the virtual model can be aged along with the monitored system 102 so that the comparisons being generated by analytics engine 118 are more meaningful.
At a high level, this process can be illustrated with the aid of
In step 904, the data from the various sensors can be processed by analytics engine 118 in order to evaluate various parameters related to monitored system 102. In step 905, simulation engine 124 can be configured to generate predicted values for monitored system 102 using a virtual model of the system that can be compared to the parameters generated by analytics engine 118 in step 904. If there are differences between the actual values and the predicted values, then the virtual model can be updated in step 906 to ensure that the virtual model ages with the actual system 102.
It should be noted that as the monitored system 102 ages, various components can be repaired, replaced, or upgraded, which can also create differences between the simulated and actual data that is not an alarm condition. Such activity can also lead to calibrations of the virtual model to ensure that the virtual model produces relevant predicted values. Thus, not only can the virtual model be updated to reflect aging of monitored system 102, but it can also be updated to reflect retrofits, repairs, etc.
As noted above, in certain embodiments, a logical model of a facilities electrical system, a data acquisition system (data acquisition hub 112), and power system simulation engines (modeling engine 124) can be integrated with a logic and methods based approach to the adjustment of key database parameters within a virtual model of the electrical system to evaluate the ability of protective devices within the electrical distribution system to withstand faults and also effectively “age” the virtual system with the actual system.
Only through such a process can predictions on the withstand abilities of protective devices, and the status, security and health of an electrical system be accurately calculated. Accuracy is important as the predictions can be used to arrive at actionable, mission critical or business critical conclusions that may lead to the re-alignment of the electrical distribution system for optimized performance or security.
In step 1008, predicted values for the various components of monitored system 102 can be generated. But it should be noted that these values are based on the current, real-time status of the monitored system. Real time sensor data can be received in step 1012. This real time data can be used to monitor the status in step 1002 and it can also be compared with the predicted values in step 1014. As noted above, the difference between the predicted values and the real time data can also be determined in step 1014.
Accordingly, meaningful predicted values based on the actual condition of monitored system 102 can be generated in steps 1004 to 1010. These predicted values can then be used to determine if further action should be taken based on the comparison of step 1014. For example, if it is determined in step 1016 that the difference between the predicted values and the real time sensor data is less than or equal to a certain threshold, e.g., DDT, then no action can be taken e.g., an instruction not to perform calibration can be issued in step 1018. Alternatively, if it is determined in step 1020 that the real time data is actually indicative of an alarm situation, e.g., is above an alarm threshold, then a do not calibrate instruction can be generated in step 1018 and an alarm can be generated as described above. If the real time sensor data is not indicative of an alarm condition, and the difference between the real time sensor data and the predicted values is greater than the threshold, as determined in step 1022, then an initiate calibration command can be generated in step 1024.
If an initiate calibration command is issued in step 1024, then a function call to calibration engine 134 can be generated in step 1026. The function call will cause calibration engine 134 to update the virtual model in step 1028 based on the real time sensor data. A comparison between the real time data and predicted data can then be generated in step 1030 and the differences between the two computed. In step 1032, a user can be prompted as to whether or not the virtual model should in fact be updated. In other embodiments, the update can be automatic, and step 1032 can be skipped. In step 1034, the virtual model could be updated. For example, the virtual model loads, buses, demand factor, and/or percent running information can be updated based on the information obtained in step 1030. An initiate simulation instruction can then be generated in step 1036, which can cause new predicted values to be generated based on the update of virtual model.
In this manner, the predicted values generated in step 1008 are not only updated to reflect the actual operational status of monitored system 102, but they are also updated to reflect natural changes in monitored system 102 such as aging. Accordingly, realistic predicted values can be generated in step 1008.
First, in step 1102, a short circuit analysis can be performed for the protective device. Again, the protective device can be any one of a variety of protective device types. For example, the protective device can be a fuse or a switch, or some type of circuit breaker. It will be understood that there are various types of circuit breakers including Low Voltage Circuit Breakers (LVCBs), High Voltage Circuit Breakers (HVCBs), Mid Voltage Circuit Breakers (MVCBs), Miniature Circuit Breakers (MCBs), Molded Case Circuit Breakers (MCCBs), Vacuum Circuit Breakers, and Air Circuit Breakers, to name just a few. Any one of these various types of protective devices can be monitored and evaluated using the processes illustrated with respect to
For example, for LVCBs, or MCCBs, the short circuit current, symmetric (Isym) or asymmetric (Iasym), and/or the peak current (Ipeak) can be determined in step 1102. For, e.g., LVCBs that are not instantaneous trip circuit breakers, the short circuit current at a delayed time (Isymdelay) can be determined. For HVCBs, a first cycle short circuit current (Isym) and/or Ipeak can be determined in step 1102. For fuses or switches, the short circuit current, symmetric or asymmetric, can be determined in step 1102. And for MVCBs the short circuit current interrupting time can be calculated. These are just some examples of the types of short circuit analysis that can be performed in Step 1102 depending on the type of protective device being analyzed.
Once the short circuit analysis is performed in step 1102, various steps can be carried out in order to determine the bracing capability of the protective device. For example, if the protective device is a fuse or switch, then the steps on the left hand side of
I
ASYM
=I
SYM√{square root over (1+2e−2p(X/R))} Eq 1:
In other implementations, the inductants/reactants (X/R) ratio can be calculated in step 1108 and compared to a fuse test X/R to determine if the calculated X/R is greater than the fuse test X/R. The calculated X/R can be determined using the predicted values provided in step 1008. Various standard tests X/R values can be used for the fuse test X/R values in step 1108. For example, standard test X/R values for a LVCB can be as follows:
PCB, ICCB=6.59
MCCB, ICCB rated<=10,000 A=1.73
MCCB, ICCB rated 10,001−20,000 A=3.18
MCCB, ICCB rated>20,000 A=4.9
If the calculated X/R is greater than the fuse test X/R, then in step 1112, equation 12 can be used to calculate an adjusted symmetrical short circuit current (Iamsym).
If the calculated X/R is not greater than the fuse test X/R then Iadjsym can be set equal to Isym in step 1110. In step 1114, it can then be determined if the fuse rating (step 1104) is greater than or equal to Iadjsym or Iasym. If it is, then it can determine in step 1118 that the protected device has passed and the percent rating can be calculated in step 1120 as follows:
If it is determined in step 1114 that the device rating is not greater than or equal to Iadjsym, then it can be determined that the device as failed in step 1116. The percent rating can still be calculated in step 1120.
For LVCBs, it can first be determined whether they are fused in step 1122. If it is determined that the LVCB is not fused, then in step 1124 it can be determined if the LVCB is an instantaneous trip LVCB. If it is determined that the LVCB is an instantaneous trip LVCB, then in step 1130 the first cycle fault X/R can be calculated and compared to a circuit breaker test X/R (see example values above) to determine if the fault X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R. If the fault X/R is not greater than the circuit breaker test X/R, then in step 1132 it can be determined if the LVCB is peak rated. If it is peak rated, then Ipeak can be used in step 1146 below. If it is determined that the LVCB is not peak rated in step 1132, then Iadjsym can be set equal to Isym in step 1140. In step 1146, it can be determined if the device rating is greater or equal to Iadjsym, or to Ipeak as appropriate, for the LVCB.
If it is determined that the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjsym, then it can be determined that the LVCB has passed in step 1148. The percent rating can then be determined using the equations for Iadjsym defined above (step 1120) in step 1152. If it is determined that the device rating is not greater than or equal to Iadjsym, then it can be determined that the device has failed in step 1150. The percent rating can still be calculated in step 1152.
If the calculated fault X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R as determined in step 1130, then it can be determined if the LVCB is peak rated in step 1134. If the LVCB is not peak rated, then the Iadjsym can be determined using equation 12 in step 1142. If the LVCB is peak rated, then Ipeak can be determined using equation 11 in step 1144.
I
MAX=√{square root over (<SYM(1.02+0.98e−(X/R)))} Eq 11:
It can then be determined if the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjsym or Ipeak as appropriate. The pass/fail determinations can then be made in steps 1148 and 1150 respectively, and the percent rating can be calculated in step 1152.
If the LVCB is not an instantaneous trip LVCB as determined in step 1124, then a time delay calculation can be performed at step 1128 followed by calculation of the fault X/R and a determination of whether the fault X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R. If it is not, then Iadjsym can be set equal to Isym in step 1136. If the calculated fault at X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R, then Iadjsymdelay can be calculated in step 1138 using the following equation with, e.g., a 0.5 second maximum delay:
It can then be determined if the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjsym or Iadjsymdelay. The pass/fail determinations can then be made in steps 1148 and 1150, respectively and the percent rating can be calculated in step 1152.
If it is determined that the LVCB is fused in step 1122, then the fault X/R can be calculated in step 1126 and compared to the circuit breaker test X/R in order to determine if the calculated fault X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R. If it is greater, then Iadjsym can be calculated in step 1154 using the following equation:
If the calculated fault X/R is not greater than the circuit breaker test X/R, then Iadjsym can be set equal to Isym, in step 1156. It can then be determined if the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjsym in step 1146. The pass/fail determinations can then be carried out in steps 1148 and 1150 respectively, and the percent rating can be determined in step 1152.
In other embodiments, an interrupting time calculation can be made in step 1170. In such embodiments, a fault X/R can be calculated and then can be determined if the fault X/R is greater than or equal to a circuit breaker test X/R in step 1172. For example, the following circuit breaker test X/R can be used;
50 Hz Test X/R=13.7
60 Hz Test X/R=16.7
(DC Time constant=0.45 ms)
If the fault X/R is not greater than the circuit breaker test X/R then Iadjintsym can be set equal to Isym, in step 1174. If the calculated fault X/R is greater than the circuit breaker test X/R, then contact parting time for the circuit breaker can be determined in step 1176 and equation 15 can then be used to determine Iadjintsym in step 1178.
In step 1180, it can be determined whether the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjintsym. The pass/fail determinations can then be made in steps 1182 and 1184 respectively and the percent rating can be calculated in step 1186 using the following:
(X/R)mod=(X/R)*60 Hz/(system Hz).
For fuses/switches, a selection can be made, as appropriate, between use of the symmetrical rating or asymmetrical rating for the device. The Multiplying Factor (MF) for the device can then be calculated in step 1304. The MF can then be used to determine Iadjasym or Iadjsym. In step 1306, it can be determined if the device rating is greater than or equal to Iadjasym or Iadjsym. Based on this determination, it can be determined whether the device passed or failed in steps 1308 and 1310 respectively, and the percent rating can be determined in step 1312 using the following:
% rating=Iadjasym*100/device rating; or
% rating=Iadjsym*100/device rating.
For LVCBs, it can first be determined whether the device is fused in step 1314. If the device is not fused, then in step 1315 it can be determined whether the X/R is known for the device. If it is known, then the LVF can be calculated for the device in step 1320. It should be noted that the LVF can vary depending on whether the LVCB is an instantaneous trip device or not. If the X/R is not known, then it can be determined in step 1317, e.g., using the following:
PCB, ICCB=6.59
MCCB, ICCB rated<=10,000 A=1.73
MCCB, ICCB rated 10,001−20,000 A=3.18
MCCB, ICCB rated>20,000 A=4.9
If the device is fused, then in step 1316 it can again be determined whether the X/R is known. If it is known, then the LVF can be calculated in step 1319. If it is not known, then the X/R can be set equal to, e.g., 4.9, in step 1318.
In step 1321, it can be determined if the LVF is less than 1 and if it is, then the LVF can be set equal to 1. In step 1322 Iintadj can be determined using the following:
MCCB/ICCB/PCB With Instantaneous:
I
int,adj
=LVF*I
sym,rms
PCB Without Instantaneous:
I
int,adj
LVFp*I
sym,rms(½ Cyc)
I
int,adj
=LVF
asym
*I
sym,rms(3-8 Cyc)
In step 1323, it can be determined whether the device's symmetrical rating is greater than or equal to Iintadj, and it can be determined based on this evaluation whether the device passed or failed in steps 1324 and 1325 respectively. The percent rating can then be determined in step 1326 using the following:
% rating=Iintadj*100/device rating.
If all the contributions are remote, then in step 1332 the remote MF (MFr) can be calculated and Iint can be calculated using the following:
I
int
=MFr*I
intrmssym
If all the inputs are local, then in step 1334 MF1 can be calculated and Iint can be calculated using the following:
Iint=MF1*Iintrmssym
If the contributions are from NACD, then the NACD, MFr, MF1, and AMF1 can be calculated in step 1336. If AMF1 is less than 1, then AMF1 can be set equal to 1. Iint can then be calculated using the following:
I
int
=AMF1*Iintrmssym/S.
In step 1338, the 3-phase device duty cycle can be calculated and then it can be determined in step 1340, whether the device rating is greater than or equal to Iint. Whether the device passed or failed can then be determined in steps 1342 and 1344, respectively. The percent rating can be determined in step 1346 using the following:
% rating=Iint*100/3p device rating.
In other embodiments, it can be determined, in step 1348, whether the user has selected a fixed MF. If so, then in certain embodiments the peak duty (crest) can be determined in step 1349 and MFp can be set equal to 2.7 in step 1354. If a fixed MF has not been selected, then the peak duty (crest) can be calculated in step 1350 and MFp can be calculated in step 1358. In step 1362, the MFp can be used to calculate the following:
I
mompeak
=MFp*I
symrms.
In step 1366, it can be determined if the device peak rating (crest) is greater than or equal to Imompeak. It can then be determined whether the device passed or failed in steps 1368 and 1370 respectively, and the percent rating can be calculated as follows in step 1372:
% rating=Iimompeak*100/device peak (crest) rating.
In other embodiments, if a fixed MF is selected, then a momentary duty cycle (C&L) can be determined in step 1351 and MFm can be set equal to, e.g., 1.6, in step 1356. If a fixed MF has not been selected, then a momentary duty cycle (C&L) can be determined in step 1352 and MFm can be calculated in step 1360. MFm can then be used to determine the following in step 1364:
I
momsym
=MFm*I
symrms.
It can then be determined in step 1374 whether the device C&L, rms rating is greater than or equal to Imomsym. Whether the device passed or failed can then be determined in steps 1376 and 1378 respectively, and the percent rating can be calculated as follows in step 1380:
% rating=Imomasym*100/device C&L, rms rating.
Thus, the above methods provide a mean to determine the withstand capability of various protective devices, under various conditions and using various standards, using an aged, up to date virtual model of the system being monitored.
The influx of massive sensory data, e.g., provided via sensors 104, 106, and 108, intelligent filtration of this dense stream of data into manageable and easily understandable knowledge. For example, as mentioned, it is important to be able to assess the real-time ability of the power system to provide sufficient generation to satisfy the system load requirements and to move the generated energy through the system to the load points. Conventional systems do not make use of an on-line, real-time system snap shot captured by a real-time data acquisition platform to perform real time system availability evaluation.
In step 1504 a list of possible outage conditions and contingencies can be evaluated including loss of utility power supply, generators, UPS, and/or distribution lines and infrastructure. In step 1506, a power flow analysis for monitored system 102 under the various contingencies can be performed. This analysis can include the resulting failure rates, repair rates, cost of interruption or downtime versus the required system availability, etc. In step 1510, it can be determined if the system is operating in a deficient state when confronted with a specific contingency. If it is, then in step 1512, the impact on the system, load interruptions, costs, failure duration, system unavailability, etc. can all be evaluated.
After the evaluation of step 1512, or if it is determined that the system is not in a deficient state in step 1510, then it can be determined if further contingencies need to be evaluated. If so, then the process can revert to step 1506 and further contingencies can be evaluated. If no more contingencies are to be evaluated, then a report can be generated in step 1514. The report can include a system summary, total and detailed reliability indices, system availability, etc. The report can also identify system bottlenecks are potential problem areas.
The reliability indices can be based on the results of credible system contingencies involving both generation and transmission outages. The reliability indices can include load point reliability indices, branch reliability indices, and system reliability indices. For example, various load/bus reliability indices can be determined such as probability and frequency of failure, expected load curtailed, expected energy not supplied, frequency of voltage violations, reactive power required, and expected customer outage cost. The load point indices can be evaluated for the major load buses in the system and can be used in system design for comparing alternate system configurations and modifications.
Overall system reliability indices can include power interruption index, power supply average MW curtailment, power supply disturbance index, power energy curtailment index, severity index, and system availability. For example, the individual load point indices can be aggregated to produce a set of system indices. These indices are indicators of the overall adequacy of the composite system to meet the total system load demand and energy requirements and can be extremely useful for the system planner and management, allowing more informed decisions to be made both in planning and in managing the system.
The various analysis and techniques can be broadly classified as being either Monte Carlo simulation or Contingency Enumeration. The process can also use AC, DC and fast linear network power flow solutions techniques and can support multiple contingency modeling, multiple load levels, automatic or user-selected contingency enumeration, use a variety of remedial actions, and provides sophisticated report generation.
The analysis of step 1506 can include adequacy analysis of the power system being monitored based on a prescribed set of criteria by which the system must be judged as being in the success or failed state. The system is considered to be in the failed state if the service at load buses is interrupted or its quality becomes unacceptable, i.e., if there are capacity deficiency, overloads, and/or under/over voltages.
Various load models can be used in the process of
In other embodiments, the effect of other variables, such as the weather and human error can also be evaluated in conjunction with the process of
It should also be noted that National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) have mandated that facilities comply with proper workplace safety standards and conduct Arc Flash studies in order to determine the incident energy, protection boundaries and PPE levels needed to be worn by technicians. Unfortunately, conventional approaches/systems for performing such studies do not provide a reliable means for the real-time prediction of the potential energy released (in calories per centimeter squared) for an arc flash event. Moreover, no real-time system exists that can predict the required personal protective equipment (PPE) required to safely perform repairs as required by NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584.
When a fault in the system being monitored contains an arc, the heat released can damage equipment and cause personal injury. It is the latter concern that brought about the development of the heat exposure programs referred to above. The power dissipated in the arc radiates to the surrounding surfaces. The further away from the arc the surface is, the less the energy is received per unit area.
As noted above, conventional approaches are based on highly specialized static simulation models that are rigid and non-reflective of the facilities operational status at the time a technician may be needed to conduct repairs on electrical equipment. But the PPE level required for the repair, or the safe protection boundary may change based on the actual operational status of the facility and alignment of the power distribution system at the time repairs are needed. Therefore, a static model does not provide the real-time analysis that can be critical for accurate PPE level determination. This is because static systems cannot adjust to the many daily changes to the electrical system that occur at a facility, e.g., motors and pumps may be on or off, on-site generation status may have changed by having diesel generators online, utility electrical feed may also change, etc., nor can they age with the facility to accurately predict the required PPE levels.
Accordingly, existing systems rely on exhaustive studies to be performed off-line by a power system engineer or a design professional/specialist. Often the specialist must manually modify a simulation model so that it is reflective of the proposed facility operating condition and then conduct a static simulation or a series of static simulations in order to come up with recommended safe working distances, energy calculations and PPE levels. But such a process is not timely, accurate nor efficient, and as noted above can be quite costly.
Using the systems and methods described herein a logical model of a facility electrical system can be integrated into a real-time environment, with a robust AC Arc Flash simulation engine (system modeling engine 124), a data acquisition system (data acquisition hub 112), and an automatic feedback system (calibration engine 134) that continuously synchronizes and calibrates the logical model to the actual operational conditions of the electrical system. The ability to re-align the simulation model in real-time so that it mirrors the real facility operating conditions, coupled with the ability to calibrate and age the model as the real facility ages, as described above, provides a desirable approach to predicting PPE levels, and safe working conditions at the exact time the repairs are intended to be performed. Accordingly, facility management can provide real-time compliance with, e.g., NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584 standards and requirements.
The ratio of arc current to bolted current can then be used, in step 1710, to determine the arcing current in a specific protective device, such as a circuit breaker or fuse. A coordinated time-current curve analysis can be performed for the protective device in step 1712. In step 1714, the arcing current in the protective device and the time current analysis can be used to determine an associated fault clearing time, and in step 1716 a corresponding arc energy can be determined based on, e.g., IEEE 1584 equations applied to the fault clearing time and arcing current.
In step 1718, the 100% arcing current can be calculated and for systems operating at less than 1 kV the 85% arcing current can also be calculated. In step 1720, the fault clearing time in the protective device can be determined at the 85% arcing current level. In step 1722, e.g., IEEE 1584 equations can be applied to the fault clearing time (determined in step 1720) and the arcing current to determine the 85% arc energy level, and in step 1724 the 100% arcing current can be compared with the 85% arcing current, with the higher of the two being selected. IEEE 1584 equations, for example, can then be applied to the selected arcing current in step 1726 and the PPE level and boundary distance can be determined in step 1728. In step 1730, these values can be output, e.g., in the form of a display or report.
In other embodiments, using the same or a similar procedure as illustrated in
Arc Flash Exposure based on IEEE 1584;
Arc Flash Exposure based on NFPA 70E;
Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems/Single Branch Case;
Network-Based Arc Flash Exposure on AC Systems/Multiple Branch Cases;
Network Arc Flash Exposure on DC Networks;
Exposure Simulation at Switchgear Box, MCC Box, Open Area and Cable Grounded and Ungrounded;
Calculate and Select Controlling Branch(s) for Simulation of Arc Flash;
Test Selected Clothing;
Calculate Clothing Required;
Calculate Safe Zone with Regard to User Defined Clothing Category;
Simulated Art Heat Exposure at User Selected locations;
User Defined Fault Cycle for 3-Phase and Controlling Branches;
User Defined Distance for Subject;
100% and 85% Arcing Current;
100% and 85% Protective Device Time;
Protective Device Setting Impact on Arc Exposure Energy;
User Defined Label Sizes;
Attach Labels to One-Line Diagram for User Review;
Plot Energy for Each Bus;
Write Results into Excel;
View and Print Graphic Label for User Selected Bus(s); and
Work permit.
With the insight gained through the above methods, appropriate protective measures, clothing and procedures can be mobilized to minimize the potential for injury should an arc flash incident occur. Facility owners and operators can efficiently implement a real-time safety management system that is in compliance with NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584 guidelines.
In step 1802, the dynamic time domain model data can be updated to re-align the virtual system model in real-time so that it mirrors the real operating conditions of the facility. The updates to the domain model data coupled with the ability to calibrate and age the virtual system model of the facility as it ages (i.e., real-time condition of the facility), as described above, provides a desirable approach to predicting the operational stability of the electrical power system operating under contingency situations. That is, these updates account for the natural aging effects of hardware that comprise the total electrical power system by continuously synchronizing and calibrating both the control logic used in the simulation and the actual operating conditions of the electrical system.
The domain model data includes data that is reflective of both the static and non-static (rotating) components of the system. Static components are those components that are assumed to display no changes during the time in which the transient contingency event takes place. Typical time frames for disturbance in these types of elements range from a few cycles of the operating frequency of the system up to a few seconds. Examples of static components in an electrical system include but are not limited to transformers, cables, overhead lines, reactors, static capacitors, etc. Non-static (rotating) components encompass synchronous machines including their associated controls (exciters, governors, etc.), induction machines, compensators, motor operated valves (MOV), turbines, static var compensators, fault isolation units (FIU), static automatic bus transfer (SABT) units, etc. These various types of non-static components can be simulated using various techniques. For example:
For Synchronous Machines: thermal (round rotor) and hydraulic (salient pole) units can be both simulated either by using a simple model or by the most complete two-axis including damper winding representation.
For Induction Machines: a complete two-axis model can be used. Also it is possible to model them by just providing the testing curves (current, power factor, and torque as a function of speed).
For Motor Operated Valves (MOVs): Two modes of MOV operation are of interest, namely, opening and closing operating modes. Each mode of operation consists of five distinct stages: a) start, b) full speed, c) unseating, d) travel, and e) stall. The system supports user-defined model types for each of the stages. That is, “start” may be modeled as a constant current while “full speed” may be modeled by constant power. This same flexibility exists for all five distinct stages of the closing mode.
For AVR and Excitation Systems: There are a number of models ranging from rotating (DC and AC) and analogue to static and digital controls. Additionally, the system offers a user-defined modeling capability, which can be used to define a new excitation model.
For Governors and Turbines: The system is designed to address current and future technologies including but not limited to hydraulic, diesel, gas, and combined cycles with mechanical and/or digital governors.
For Static Var Compensators (SVCs): The system is designed to address current and future technologies including a number of solid-state (thyristor) controlled SVCs or even the saturable reactor types.
For Fault Isolation Units (FIUs): The system is designed to address current and future technologies of FIUs also known as Current Limiting Devices, are devices installed between the power source and loads to limit the magnitude of fault currents that occur within loads connected to the power distribution networks.
For Static Automatic Bus Transfers (SABT): The system is designed to address current and future technologies of SABT (i.e., solid-state three phase, dual position, three-pole switch, etc.).
In one embodiment, the time domain model data includes “built-in” dynamic model data for exciters, governors, transformers, relays, breakers, motors, and power system stabilizers (PSS) offered by a variety of manufactures. For example, dynamic model data for the electrical power system may be OEM manufacturer supplied control logic for electrical equipment such as automatic voltage regulators (AVR), governors, under load tap changing transformers, relays, breakers motors, etc. In another embodiment, in order to cope with recent advances in power electronic and digital controllers, the time domain model data includes “user-defined” dynamic modeling data that is created by an authorized system administrator in accordance with user-defined control logic models. The user-defined models interact with the virtual system model of the electrical power system through “Interface Variables” 1816 that are created out of the user-defined control logic models. For example, to build a user-defined excitation model, the controls require generator terminal voltage to be measured and compared with a reference quantity (voltage set point). Based on the specific control logic of the excitation and AVR, the model would then compute the predicted generator field voltage and return that value back to the application. The user-defined modeling supports a large number of pre-defined control blocks (functions) that are used to assemble the required control systems and put them into action in a real-time environment for assessing the strength and security of the power system. In still another embodiment, the time domain model data includes both built-in dynamic model data and user-defined model data.
Moving on to step 1804, a contingency event can be chosen out of a diverse list of contingency events to be evaluated. That is, the operational stability of the electrical power system can be assessed under a number of different contingency event scenarios including but not limited to a singular event contingency or multiple event contingencies (that are simultaneous or sequenced in time). In one embodiment, the contingency events assessed are manually chosen by a system administrator in accordance with user requirements. In another embodiment, the contingency events assessed are automatically chosen in accordance with control logic that is dynamically adaptive to past observations of the electrical power system. That is the control logic “learns” which contingency events to simulate based on past observations of the electrical power system operating under various conditions.
Some examples of contingency events include but are not limited to:
Application/removal of three-phase fault.
Application/removal of phase-to-ground fault.
Application/removal of phase-phase-ground fault.
Application/removal of phase-phase fault.
Branch Addition.
Branch Tripping.
Starting Induction Motor.
Stopping Induction Motor.
Shunt Tripping.
Shunt Addition (Capacitor and/or Induction).
Generator Tripping.
SVC Tripping.
Impact Loading (Load Changing Mechanical Torque on Induction Machine. With this option it is actually possible to turn an induction motor to an induction generator.)
Loss of Utility Power Supply/Generators/UPS/Distribution Lines/System Infrastructure Load Shedding
In step 1806, a transient stability analysis of the electrical power system operating under the various chosen contingencies can be performed. This analysis can include identification of system weaknesses and insecure contingency conditions. That is, the analysis can predict (forecast) the system's ability to sustain power demand, maintain sufficient active and reactive power reserve, operate safely with minimum operating cost while maintaining an adequate level of reliability, and provide an acceptably high level of power quality while being subjected to various contingency events. The results of the analysis can be stored by an associative memory engine 1818 during step 1814 to support incremental learning about the operational characteristics of the system. That is, the results of the predictions, analysis, and real-time data may be fed, as needed, into the associative memory engine 1818 for pattern and sequence recognition in order to learn about the logical realities of the power system. In certain embodiments, engine 1818 can also act as a pattern recognition engine or a Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM) engine. Additionally, concurrent inputs of various electrical, environmental, mechanical, and other sensory data can be used to learn about and determine normality and abnormality of business and plant operations to provide a means of understanding failure modes and give recommendations.
In step 1810, it can be determined if the system is operating in a deficient state when confronted with a specific contingency. If it is, then in step 1812, a report is generated providing a summary of the operational stability of the system. The summary may include general predictions about the total security and stability of the system and/or detailed predictions about each component that makes up the system.
Alternatively, if it is determined that the system is not in a deficient state in step 1810, then step 1808 can determine if further contingencies need to be evaluated. If so, then the process can revert to step 1806 and further contingencies can be evaluated.
The results of real-time simulations performed in accordance with
The process of
Traditionally, transient stability has been the main focus of power system professionals. However, with the increased demand for electrical energy and the regulatory hurdles blocking the expansion of existing power systems, the occurrences of voltage instability have become increasingly frequent and therefore have gained increased attention from power system planners and power system facility operators. The ability to learn, understand and make predictions about available power system capacity and system susceptibility to voltage instability, in real-time would be beneficial in generating power trends for forecasting purposes.
In step 1902, the voltage stability modeling data for the components comprising the electrical system can be updated to re-align the virtual system model in “real-time” so that it mirrors the real operating conditions of the facility. These updates to the voltage stability modeling data coupled with the ability to calibrate and age the virtual system model of the facility as it ages (i.e., real-time condition of the facility), as described above, provides a desirable approach to predicting occurrences of voltage instability (or power capacity) in the electrical power system when operating under contingency situations. That is, these updates account for the natural aging effects of hardware that comprise the total electrical power system by continuously synchronizing and calibrating both the control logic used in the simulation and the actual operating conditions of the electrical system.
The voltage stability modeling data includes system data that has direct influence on the electrical system's ability to maintain acceptable voltage profiles when the system is subjected to various contingencies, such as when system topology changes or when the system encounters power load changes. Some examples of voltage stability modeling data are load scaling data, generation scaling data, load growth factor data, load growth increment data, etc.
In one embodiment, the voltage stability modeling data includes “built-in” data supplied by an OEM manufacturer of the components that comprise the electrical equipment. In another embodiment, in order to cope with recent advances power system controls, the voltage stability data includes “user-defined” data that is created by an authorized system administrator in accordance with user-defined control logic models. The user-defined models interact with the virtual system model of the electrical power system through “Interface Variables” 1916 that are created out of the user-defined control logic models. In still another embodiment, the voltage stability modeling data includes a combination of both built-in model data and user-defined model data.
Moving on to step 1904, a contingency event can be chosen out of a diverse list of contingency events to be evaluated. That is, the voltage stability of the electrical power system can be assessed under a number of different contingency event scenarios including but not limited to a singular event contingency or multiple event contingencies (that are simultaneous or sequenced in time). In one embodiment, the contingency events assessed are manually chosen by a system administrator in accordance with user requirements. In another embodiment, the contingency events assessed are automatically chosen in accordance with control logic that is dynamically adaptive to past observations of the electrical power system. That is the control logic “learns” which contingency events to simulate based on past observations of the electrical power system operating under various conditions. Some examples of contingency events include but are not limited to: loss of utility supply to the electrical system, loss of available power generation sources, system load changes/fluctuations, loss of distribution infrastructure associated with the electrical system, etc.
In step 1906, a voltage stability analysis of the electrical power system operating under the various chosen contingencies can be performed. This analysis can include a prediction (forecast) of the total system power capacity, available system power capacity and utilized system power capacity of the electrical system of the electrical system under various contingencies. That is, the analysis can predict (forecast) the electrical system's ability to maintain acceptable voltage profiles during load changes and when the overall system topology undergoes changes. The results of the analysis can be stored by an associative memory engine 1918 during step 1914 to support incremental learning about the power capacity characteristics of the system. That is, the results of the predictions, analysis, and real-time data may be fed, as needed, into the associative memory engine 1918 for pattern and sequence recognition in order to learn about the voltage stability of the electrical system in step 1920. Additionally, concurrent inputs of various electrical, environmental, mechanical, and other sensory data can be used to learn about and determine normality and abnormality of business and plant operations to provide a means of understanding failure modes and give recommendations.
In step 1910, it can be determined if there is voltage instability in the system when confronted with a specific contingency. If it is, then in step 1912, a report is generated providing a summary of the specifics and source of the voltage instability. The summary may include general predictions about the voltage stability of the overall system and/or detailed predictions about each component that makes up the system.
Alternatively, if it is determined that the system is not in a deficient state in step 1910, then step 1908 can determine if further contingencies need to be evaluated. If so, then the process can revert to step 1906 and further contingencies can be evaluated.
The results of real-time simulations performed in accordance with
The systems and methods described above can also be used to provide reports (step 1912) on, e.g., total system electrical capacity, total system capacity remaining, total capacity at all busbars and/or processes, total capacity remaining at all busbars and/or processes, total system loading, loading at each busbar and/or process, etc.
Thus, the process of
The inherent risks (to safety and the operational life of components comprising the electrical system) that harmonic distortions pose to electrical systems have led to the inclusion of harmonic distortion analysis as part of traditional power analysis. Metering and sensor packages are currently available to monitor harmonic distortions within an electrical system. However, it is not feasible to fully sensor out an electrical system at all possible locations due to cost and the physical accessibility limitations in certain parts of the system. Therefore, there is a need for techniques that predict, through real-time simulation, the sources of harmonic distortions within an electrical system, the impacts that harmonic distortions have or may have, and what steps (i.e., harmonics filtering) may be taken to minimize or eliminate harmonics from the system.
Currently, there are no reliable techniques for predicting, in real-time, the potential for periodic non-sinusoidal waveforms (i.e., harmonic distortions) to occur at any location within an electrical system powered with sinusoidal voltage. In addition, existing techniques do not take into consideration the operating conditions and topology of the electrical system or utilize a virtual system model of the system that “ages” with the actual facility or its current condition. Moreover, no existing technique combines real-time power quality meter readings and predicted power quality readings for use with a pattern recognition system such as an associative memory machine learning system to predict harmonic distortions in a system due to changes in topology or poor operational conditions within an electrical system.
The process, described herein, provides a harmonics analysis solution that uses a real-time snap shot captured by a data acquisition system to perform a real-time system power quality evaluation at all locations regardless of power quality metering density. This process integrates, in real-time, a logical simulation model (i.e., virtual system model) of the electrical system, a data acquisition system, and power system simulation engines with a logic-based approach to synchronize the logical simulation model with conditions at the real electrical system to effectively “age” the simulation model along with the actual electrical system. Through this approach, predictions about harmonic distortions in an electrical system may be accurately calculated in real-time. Condensed, this process works by simulating harmonic distortions in an electrical system through subjecting a real-time updated virtual system model of the system to one or more simulated contingency situations.
In step 2002, the harmonic frequency modeling data for the components comprising the electrical system can be updated to re-align the virtual system model in “real-time” so that it mirrors the real operating conditions of the facility. These updates to the harmonic frequency modeling data coupled with the ability to calibrate and age the virtual system model of the facility as it ages (i.e., real-time condition of the facility), as described above, provides a desirable approach to predicting occurrences of harmonic distortions within the electrical power system when operating under contingency situations. That is, these updates account for the natural aging effects of hardware that comprise the total electrical power system by continuously synchronizing and calibrating both the control logic used in the simulation and the actual operating conditions of the electrical system.
Harmonic frequency modeling data has direct influence over how harmonic distortions are simulated during a harmonics analysis. Examples of data that is included with the harmonic frequency modeling data include: IEEE 519 and/or MIL 1399 compliant system simulation data, generator/cable/motor skin effect data, transformer phase shifting data, generator impedance data, induction motor impedance data, etc.
Moving on to step 2004, a contingency event can be chosen out of a diverse list of contingency events to be evaluated. That is, the electrical system can be assessed for harmonic distortions under a number of different contingency event scenarios including but not limited to a singular event contingency or multiple event contingencies (that are simultaneous or sequenced in time). In one embodiment, the contingency events assessed are manually chosen by a system administrator in accordance with user requirements. In another embodiment, the contingency events assessed are automatically chosen in accordance with control logic that is dynamically adaptive to past observations of the electrical power system. That is the control logic “learns” which contingency events to simulate based on past observations of the electrical power system operating under various conditions. Some examples of contingency events include but are not limited to additions (bringing online) and changes of equipment that effectuate a non-linear load on an electrical power system (e.g., as rectifiers, arc furnaces, AC/DC drives, variable frequency drives, diode-capacitor input power supplies, uninterruptible power supplies, etc.) or other equipment that draws power in short intermittent pulses from the electrical power system.
Continuing with
Wave-shape Distortions/Oscillations data
Parallel and Series Resonant Condition data
Total Harmonic Distortion Level data (both Voltage and Current type) Data on the true RMS system loading of lines, transformers, capacitors, etc. Data on the Negative Sequence Harmonics being absorbed by the AC motors Transformer K-Factor Level data Frequency scan at positive, negative, and zero angle response throughout the entire scanned spectrum in the electrical system.
That is, the harmonics analysis can predict (forecast) various indicators (harmonics data) of harmonic distortions occurring within the electrical system as it is being subjected to various contingency situations. The results of the analysis can be stored by an associative memory engine 2016 during step 2014 to support incremental learning about the harmonic distortion characteristics of the system. That is, the results of the predictions, analysis, and real-time data may be fed, as needed, into the associative memory engine 2016 for pattern and sequence recognition in order to learn about the harmonic distortion profile of the electrical system in step 2018. Additionally, concurrent inputs of various electrical, environmental, mechanical, and other sensory data can be used to learn about and determine normality and abnormality of business and plant operations to provide a means of understanding failure modes and give recommendations.
In step 2010, it can be determined if there are harmonic distortions within the system when confronted with a specific contingency. If it is, then in step 2012, a report is generated providing a summary of specifics regarding the characteristics and sources of the harmonic distortions. The summary may include forecasts about the different types of harmonic distortion data (e.g., Wave-shape Distortions/Oscillations data, Parallel and Series Resonant Condition data, etc.) generated at various points throughout the system. Additionally, through these forecasts, the associative memory engine 2016 can make predictions about the natural oscillation response(s) of the facility and compare those predictions with the harmonic components of the non-linear loads that are fed or will be fed from the system as indicated from the data acquisition system and power quality meters. This will give an indication of what harmonic frequencies that the potential resonant conditions lie at and provide facility operators with the ability to effectively employ a variety of harmonic mitigation techniques (e.g., addition of harmonic filter banks, etc.).
Alternatively, if it is determined that the system is not in a deficient state in step 2010, then step 2008 can determine if further contingencies need to be evaluated. If so, then the process can revert to step 2006 and further contingencies can be evaluated.
The results of real-time simulations performed in accordance with
Thus, the process of
The HTM Machine Learning Engine 551 is configured to store and process patterns observed from real-time data fed from the hub 112 and predicted data output from a real-time virtual system model of the monitored system. These patterns can later be used by the HTM Engine 551 to make real-time predictions (forecasts) about the various operational aspects of the system.
The data acquisition hub 112 is communicatively connected via data connections 110 to a plurality of sensors that are embedded throughout a monitored system 102. The data acquisition hub 112 may be a standalone unit or integrated within the analytics server 116 and can be embodied as a piece of hardware, software, or some combination thereof In one embodiment, the data connections 110 are “hard wired” physical data connections (e.g., serial, network, etc.). For example, a serial or parallel cable connection between the sensors and the hub 112. In another embodiment, the data connections 110 are wireless data connections. For example, a radio frequency (RF), BLUETOOTH™, infrared or equivalent connection between the sensor and the hub 112.
Examples of a monitored system include machinery, factories, electrical systems, processing plants, devices, chemical processes, biological systems, data centers, aircraft carriers, and the like. It should be understood that the monitored system can be any combination of components whose operations can be monitored with conventional sensors and where each component interacts with or is related to at least one other component within the combination.
Continuing with
As discussed above, the HTM Machine Learning Engine 551 is configured to work in conjunction with a real-time updated virtual system model of the monitored system to make predictions (forecasts) about certain operational aspects of the monitored system when it is subjected to a contingency event. For example, where the monitored system is an electrical power system, in one embodiment, the HTM Machine Learning Engine 551 can be used to make predictions about the operational reliability of an electrical power system in response to contingency events such as a loss of power to the system, loss of distribution lines, damage to system infrastructure, changes in weather conditions, etc. Examples of indicators of operational reliability include but are not limited to failure rates, repair rates, and required availability of the power system and of the various components that make up the system.
In another embodiment, the operational aspects relate to an arc flash discharge contingency event that occurs during the operation of the power system. Examples of arc flash related operational aspects include but are not limited to quantity of energy released by the arc flash event, required personal protective equipment (PPE) for personnel operating within the confines of the system during the arc flash event, and measurements of the arc flash safety boundary area around components comprising the power system. In still another embodiment, the operational aspect relates to the operational stability of the system during a contingency event. That is, the system's ability to sustain power demand, maintain sufficient active and reactive power reserve, operate safely with minimum operating cost while maintaining an adequate level of reliability, and provide an acceptably high level of power quality while being subjected to a contingency event.
In still another embodiment, the operational aspect relates to the voltage stability of the electrical system immediately after being subjected to a major disturbance (i.e., contingency event). Generally speaking, voltage instability stems from the attempt of load dynamics to restore power consumption, after the disturbance, in a manner that is beyond the capability of the combined transmission and generation system. Examples of predicted operational aspects that are indicative of the voltage stability of an electrical system subjected to a disturbance include the total system power capacity, available system power capacity and utilized system power capacity of the electrical system under being subjected to various contingencies. Simply, voltage stability is the ability of the system to maintain acceptable voltage profiles while under the influence of the disturbances.
In still yet another embodiment, the operational aspect relates to harmonic distortions in the electrical system subjected to a major disturbance. Harmonic distortions are characterized by non-sinusoidal (non-linear) voltage and current waveforms. Most harmonic distortions result from the generation of harmonic currents caused by nonlinear load signatures. A nonlinear load is characteristic in products such as computers, printers, lighting and motor controllers, and much of today's solid-state equipment. With the advent of power semiconductors and the use of switching power supplies, the harmonics distortion problem has become more severe.
Examples of operational aspects that are indicative of harmonic distortions include but are not limited to: wave-shape distortions/oscillations, parallel and series resonance, total harmonic distortion level, transformer K-Factor levels, true RMS loading of lines/transformers/capacitors, indicators of negative sequence harmonics being absorbed by alternating current (AC) motors, positive/negative/zero angle frequency response, etc.
The ability to intelligently filter, interpret and analyze dense real-time sensory data streams generated by sensor clusters distributed throughout the monitored electrical facility greatly enhances the ability of facility administrators/technical staff (e.g., operators, owners, managers, technicians, etc.) to quickly understand the health and predicted performance of their power network. This allows them to quickly determine the significance of any deviations detected in the sensory data and take or recommend reconfiguration options in order to prevent potential power disruptions.
In step 2302, the power analytics server is configured to simulate the operation of a virtual system model (logical model) of the power facility to generate virtual facility predicted sensory data 2304 for the various sensor clusters distributed throughout the facility. Examples of the types of predicted sensory data 2304 that can be generated by the power analytics server include, but are not limited to power system: voltage, frequency, power factor, harmonics waveform, power quality, loading, capacity, etc. It should be understood that the power analytics server can be configured to generate any type of predicted sensory data 2304 as long as the data parameter type can be simulated using a virtual system model of the facility.
The simulation can be based on a number of different virtual system model variants of the electrical power system facility. The switch, breaker open/close and equipment on/off status of the actual electrical power system facility is continuously monitored so that the virtual system model representation can be continuously updated to reflect the actual status of the facility. Some examples of virtual system model variants, include but are not limited to: Power Flow Model (used to calculate expected kW, kVAR and power factor values to compare with real-time sensory data), Short Circuit Model (used to calculate maximum and minimum available fault currents for comparison with real-time data and determine stress and withstand capabilities of protective devices integrated with the electrical system), Protection Model (used to determine the proper protection scheme and insure the optimal selective coordination of protective devices integrated with the electrical system), Power Quality Model (used to determine proper voltage and current distortions at any point in the power network for comparison with real-time sensory data), and Dynamic Model (used to predict power system time-domain behavior in view of system control logic and dynamic behavior for comparison with real-time data and also predicting the strength and resilience of the system subjected to various contingency event scenarios). It should be appreciated that these are but just a few examples of virtual system model variants. In practice, the power analytics server can be configured to simulate any virtual system model variant that can be processed by the virtual system modeling engine of the power analytics server.
In step 2306, the actual real-time sensory data 2307 (e.g., voltage, frequency, power factor, harmonics waveform, power quality, loading, capacity, etc.) readings can be acquired by sensor clusters that are integrated with various power system equipment/components that are distributed throughout the power facility. These sensor clusters are typically connected to a data acquisition hub that is configured to provide a real-time feed of the actual sensory data 2307 to the power analytics server. The actual real-time sensory data 2307 can be comprised of “live” sensor readings that are continuously updated by sensors that are interfaced with the facility equipment to monitor power system parameters during the operation of the facility. Each piece of facility equipment can be identified by a unique equipment ID that can be cross referenced against a virtual counterpart in the virtual system model of the facility. Therefore, direct comparisons (as depicted in step 2308) can be made between the actual real-time equipment sensor data 2307 readings from the actual facility and the predicted equipment sensor data 2304 from a virtual system model of the actual facility to determine the overall health and performance of each piece of facility equipment and also the overall power system facility as a whole.
Both the actual real-time sensory data 2307 feed and the predicted sensory data 2304 feed are communicated directly to an archive database trending historian element 2309 so that the data can be accessed by a pattern recognition machine learning engine 2311 to make various predictions regarding the health, stability and performance of the electrical power system. For example, in one embodiment, the machine learning engine 2311 can be used to make predictions about the operational reliability of an electrical power system (aspects) in response to contingency events such as a loss of power to the system, loss of distribution lines, damage to system infrastructure, changes in weather conditions, etc. Often, the machine learning engine 2311 includes a neocortical model that is encapsulated by a real-time sensory system layer, which is itself encapsulated by an associative memory model layer.
Continuing with
In one embodiment, the filtering mechanism of the decision engine uses various statistical techniques such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), f-test, best-fit curve trending (least squares regression), etc., to determine whether deviations spotted during step 2310 are significant deviations or just transient outliers. That is, statistical tools are applied against the actual 2307 and predicted 2304 data readings to determine if they vary from each other in a statistically significant manner. In another embodiment, the filters are configured to be programmable such that a user can set pre-determined data deviation thresholds for each power system operational parameter (e.g., voltage, frequency, power factor, harmonic waveform, power quality, loading, capacity, etc.), that when surpassed, results in the deviation being classified as a significant and clear indicator change in power system health and/or performance. In still another embodiment, the decision engine is configured to work in conjunction with the machine learning engine 2311 to utilize the “historical” actual 2307 and predicted 2304 sensory data readings stored in the archive database trending historian element 2309 to determine whether a power system parameter deviation is significant. That is, the machine learning engine 2311 can look to past sensory data trends (both actual 2307 and predicted data 2304) and relate them to past power system faults to determine whether deviations between the actual 2307 and predicted 2304 sensory data are clear indicators of a change in power system health and/or performance.
In step 2312, the decision engine is configured to take the actual real-time sensory data 2307 readings that were “filtered out” in step 2310 and communicate that information (e.g., alarm condition, sensory data deviations, system health status, system performance status, etc.) to the user via a Human-Machine Interface (HMI) 2314 such as a “thick” or “thin” client display. The facility status information 2316 can be specific to a piece of equipment, a specific process or the facility itself. To enhance the understanding of the information, the HMI 2314 can be configured to present equipment, sub-system, or system status by way of a color indicator scheme for easy visualization of system health and/or performance. The colors can be indicative of the severity of the alarm condition or sensory data deviation. For example, in certain embodiments, green can be representative of the equipment or facility operating at normal, yellow can be indicative of the equipment or facility operating under suspected fault conditions, and red can be indicative of the equipment or facility operating under fault conditions. In one embodiment, the color indicators are overlaid on top of already recognizable diagrams allowing for instantaneous understanding of the power system status to both technical and non-technical users. This allows high-level management along with technical experts to not only explore and understand much greater quantities of data, but, also to grasp the relationships between more variables than is generally possible with technical tabular reports or charts.
The decision engine 2402 is interfaced with the power analytics server and communicatively connected to the data acquisition hub 112 and the client 128. The data acquisition hub 112 is communicatively connected via data connections 110 to a plurality of sensors that are embedded throughout the electrical system 102. The data acquisition hub 112 may be a standalone unit or integrated within the analytics server 116 and can be embodied as a piece of hardware, software, or some combination thereof In one embodiment, the data connections 110 are “hard wired” physical data connections (e.g., serial, network, etc.). For example, a serial or parallel cable connection between the sensors and the hub 112. In another embodiment, the data connections 110 are wireless data connections. For example, a radio frequency (RF), BLUETOOTH™, infrared or equivalent connection between the sensor and the hub 112. Real-time system data readings can be fed continuously to the data acquisition hub 112 from the various sensors that are embedded within the electrical system 102.
Continuing with
In an embodiment, the systems and methods for monitoring and predictive analysis of systems in real-time, described herein, may be used in the context of microgrids. A microgrid is a localized grouping of electricity generation, energy storage, and loads that normally operates connected to a centralized, bulk, or primary grid or macrogrid. The microgrid may have a single point of common coupling with the macrogrid and may function autonomously from the macrogrid, for example, if disconnected. For instance, a microgrid may represent a college campus, a housing development, etc. A microgrid may comprise one or more local generation resources. A microgrid may operate with small-scale power generation technologies, called distributed energy resource systems (e.g., fuel cells, wind turbines, solar panels, and other energy source), which provide alternatives to or enhancements of traditional electrical power generation systems, such as coal, nuclear, or hydroelectric power plants.
Microgrids can be considered a microcosm of a bulk utility generator and provider environments. However, microgrids typically operate independently from the bulk grid with unique and specific requirements. These requirements may be based on specialized end use of power and the associated availability and quality of power. A microgrid may frequently disconnect from the primary grid. With specific permissions, the microgrid may operate in parallel with the bulk grid or generation and even provide emergency power needs, typically for limited or short durations.
The owners/operators of the microgrid and bulk grid may both have specific expectations and experience of how and what data can or should be presented. Bulk grid operators may also frequently be constrained by regulatory and financial systems. These constraints must be addressed in the bulk grid operator's interaction with any microgrid operator. While microgrid operators typically have fewer resources and missions, both microgrid and bulk grid operators have a strong need to exchange appropriate information and interconnectivity based on the requirements of their respective groups.
The commonality of the bulk grid and the microgrid is the power network, i.e., power generation, loads, capabilities, forecasts, and operational activities affected the power network. This commonality requires a critical information exchange for the real-time power model of the microgrid, and the constrained information returned to the utility. The ability to appropriately enable and transmit the information from the real-time power model of the microgrid to the bulk grid is essential to the proper operation of both systems. For instance, one significant interaction of a microgrid with the bulk grid is an instantaneous disconnect and reconnect based on power conditions, economic conditions, or emergency conditions. Without prior knowledge, this process, known as “islanding,” can be catastrophic to the bulk grid operator and the microgrid operator.
Conventionally, interaction of the microgrid and its operators with the bulk grid is manual and sometimes nonexistent. Microgrid operators may have a deep understanding of the operation of the microgrid and its environment, but little to no understanding of the macrogrid or bulk grid operator. The microgrid and the utility's macrogrid may be connected at a single point of common coupling, and the extent of interaction between the microgrid operator and utility may be limited to whether utility power is currently available or unavailable through that coupling. Because of this lack of interaction and knowledge between operators of the microgrid and macrogrid, microgrid operators frequently have to respond to the loss of utility power in fractions of a second. Similarly, utility or macrogrid operators have little to no knowledge concerning the operation of the microgrid, and thus, may only be able to react to changes in load and generation after the fact through the same point of common coupling. This lack of information exchange between the microgrid and bulk grid has hindered the adoption of distributed generation, and microgrids in particular.
By applying the disclosed real-time model-based management of power systems to the management of microgrids, the ability to provide critical performance and operational data from the microgrid to the bulk grid operator may be achieved. Such a management system provides significant improvements over earlier systems and methods which relied exclusively on manual information, and which simply did not allow microgrids to be connected to the bulk grid except under specific circumstances. The improvements provided by the disclosed real-time model-based management may lead to widespread acceptance and enhance the economic value of microgrids.
The real-time virtual system models disclosed herein can provide advance knowledge for both microgrid and bulk grid operators. This knowledge or information can be presented in a manner that reflects the respective roles and responsibilities of the microgrid and bulk grid operators. Real-time data is input into a power network model to synchronize the model with the actual power network. Relevant and critical analytics can then be run against the synchronized model to produce data for transmission to various other systems and operators in a form that reflects their roles and which allows them to take action as required by the mission of the power system. This solves the problem of conventional systems, in which utility operators have little to no knowledge of the microgrid and can only react to changes in loads and generation after the fact through the same point of common coupling.
The disclosed model-based approach to the management of the microgrid presents the utility with a transparent method of interacting with the microgrid. The fact that the model is calibrated continuously in real time with real-time data sources allows operators to plan contingencies in a way never before available. The virtual model can be used to compare various operational scenarios and their potential impacts. This information can provide valuable input into decisions about distributed energy resources. This real-time model-based approach allows the bulk or utility operator to work with the microgrid, as mirrored by the synchronized virtual system model of the microgrid, rather than at seeming cross-purposes. Furthermore, data is presented in terms and terminology which are consistent with the requirements and understanding of both the microgrid and utility operators.
In block 9, relevant values are measured and calculated. Then in block 10, it is determined whether imports are greater than the PCC schedule. If imports are greater than the PCC schedule, it is determined, in block 11, whether any loads can be curtailed. If so, the load is scheduled with any necessary curtailments in block 12. Otherwise, the method proceeds to block 13, described above.
If, in block 10, it is determined that imports are not greater than the PCC schedule, it is determined whether the imports are less than the PCC schedule in block 16. It should be appreciated that these determinations in blocks 10 and 16 can be reversed or combined. If imports are less than the PCC schedule, it is determined in block 17 whether any curtailed loads can be brought back on-line. If so, the loads are scheduled in block 18. Otherwise, it is determined in block 19 whether generation can be decreased or shut down. If so, the generation or reduction in generation is scheduled in block 20.
If imports are neither greater than or less than the PCC schedule, as determined by blocks 10 and 16, or if generation cannot be decreased or shut down, as determined by block 19, the process may return to block 1. However, if generation is scheduled in either blocks 14 or 20, engineering power studies can be performed in block 21. If there are any violations, as determined in block 22, the problems can be diagnosed, and settings can be adjusted in order to handle dynamic margin issues. The process can then return to block 1. If no violations exist, the load and generation schedules can be sent to the controller in block 23. In block 24, loads are curtailed and/or generators are started according to the schedules. In block 25, it is determined whether there is a request to “island” from the utility grid. If so, the process proceeds to the planned island use case. Otherwise, the process returns to block 1.
The embodiments of model-based power management described herein can be utilized with non-traditional forms of power generation, such as photo-voltaic power generation, wind-based power generation, and fuel-cell-based power generation. Such alternative power generation technologies frequently present unique challenges for both planning and operation, primarily related to electromechanical considerations and the intermittency of the fuel source. In some instances of mixed generation (e.g., mix of traditional and non-traditional forms of power generation) and use or application, it is often possible to use traditional resources to mitigate some of these issues. However, in many instances, this is not possible.
As an example, both electromechanical and intermittency issues are inherent in the operation of photo-voltaic (PV) power generation. For example, photo-voltaic power generation does not utilize rotating machinery, so traditional solutions for electric fault clearing must be dealt with in unique ways. Photo-voltaic inverter technology has progressed to provide limited support for this issue, but still requires extraordinary measures for network stability and predictability of response. These measures may include the provision of significant levels of energy storage, dramatically increasing the overall cost of the photo-voltaic power generation solution.
Advantageously, the advanced power system modeling described herein may be utilized in both the planning and real-time operation of non-traditional power generation systems. The disclosed modeling processes can be used to accurately model the actual performance of the non-traditional power generation system. Furthermore, in an embodiment in which the system comprises photo-voltaic power generation (e.g., including photo-voltaic inverter technology), the modeling can be combined with solar irradiance forecast data (e.g., power of electromagnetic radiation per unit area at the location of the photo-voltaic power generator) to predict how a photo-voltaic array will perform as a power source for a given period of time. This combination of baseline performance calibrated with real-time information and solar forecasting can provide sufficiently accurate information to enable the adequate determination and forecasting of storage requirements. In addition, the real-time model of the system may incorporate the optimization and control of the photo-voltaic power generator so as to maximize electrical performance and minimize or eliminate sudden swings in power generation (e.g., ramp-up and ramp-down) associated with the intermittency of photo-voltaic power generation in an electrical grid.
Traditionally, the primary method to deal with performance of photo-voltaic power generators is to de-rate the financial benefit of the photo-voltaic output. This reduction in both operation and financial performance reduces the use and expansion of this very clean alternative energy source, and, in some cases, is a barrier to implementation. While solar forecasting and weather forecasting have been invaluable in predicting the general performance of photo-voltaic power generators, the lack of an integrated local control that is both real-time and based on a detailed power system model has traditionally limited the availability of photo-voltaic power generation to specific areas and applications. For instance, conventionally, utility operators and power generation providers have little to no knowledge of the range of performance of non-traditional power generation sources. This lack of knowledge necessitates the inclusion of energy storage, often at multiples of the photo-voltaic system, thereby rendering the solution financially and operationally impractical or even impossible.
Advantageously, in an embodiment, the disclosed real-time modeling incorporates solar forecasting data with the detailed electrical model of specific photo-voltaic inverters and the control of those inverters. This accurate, real-time modeling can redress the variability of energy storage requirements, such that the use of energy storage may be minimized or eliminated depending on the specific operational requirements of the owner or operator of the power network.
There are two phases to the illustrated process: the forecasting and decision-making phase 2610 and the execution phase 2620. The forecasting and decision-making phase 2610 begins in step 2612 with the real-time virtual system modeling (e.g., as described above) of a system that includes photo-voltaic power generation. In step 2614, the virtual system model, which represents an accurate synchronized model of the system, can be combined with solar irradiance forecast data (e.g., as inputs into the described simulation engine) to generate a forecast of how much power the photo-voltaic power generator is predicted to output for an upcoming time period (e.g., from a scheduled sunrise until a scheduled sunset).
Once the predicted amount of power generation is forecast for a photo-voltaic generator, a ramp signal or signals may be sent to the photo-voltaic inverter in step 2622 (e.g., by hub 204). The ramp signals may be ramp-up and/or ramp-down signals. This reduces the impact of solar variability to an organized and predictable level, helping to ensure performance and confidence in the overall photo-voltaic-integrated system.
In step 2624, Volt/VAR and frequency targets may also be sent to the photo-voltaic inverter. This helps ensure that the advanced control capability of the inverter is consistent with the advanced simulation of the power model and the performance of the photo-voltaic system.
In step 2626, feedback about the photo-voltaic power generation source (e.g., real-time power output) may be provided to an energy market and/or operator, e.g., via one or more user interfaces or application programming interfaces (APIs). In an embodiment, these interfaces include or utilize the Inter-Communications & Control Protocol (ICCP) or IEC 60870-6 and related control and communications systems. The overall effect of the combined model-based real-time system is to treat previously unstable resources, such as photo-voltaic resources, analogously to traditional thermal-based generation.
The execution phase 2620 may continuously operate until the end of the solar irradiance period (e.g., sunset) in step 2628. It should be understood that, in an embodiment, the forecasting and decision-making stage 2610 and/or execution stage 2620 may continuously operate based on an updated model and updated solar irradiance forecast data.
The embodiments described herein can be practiced with other computer system configurations including hand-held devices, microprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers and the like. The embodiments can also be practiced in distributing computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a network.
It should also be understood that the embodiments described herein can employ various computer-implemented operations involving data stored in computer systems. These operations are those requiring physical manipulation of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. Further, the manipulations performed are often referred to in terms, such as producing, identifying, determining, or comparing.
Any of the operations that form part of the embodiments described herein are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The systems and methods described herein can be specially constructed for the required purposes, such as the carrier network discussed above, or it may be a general purpose computer selectively activated or configured by a computer program stored in the computer. In particular, various general purpose machines may be used with computer programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the required operations.
Certain embodiments can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data, which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes, and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
Although a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail herein, it should be understood, by those of ordinary skill, that the present invention may be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details provided therein, but may be modified and practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
This application relates to and claims priority from the following U.S. Patent Applications. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/497,913, filed on Apr. 26, 2017, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/499,993, filed Apr. 28, 2017. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/497,913 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/089,938, filed on Apr. 4, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/860,415 filed on Sep. 21, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/081,487 filed on Nov. 15, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/727,004 filed on Nov. 15, 2012. U.S. application Ser. No. 15/499,993 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/079,607, filed Mar. 24, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/850,936, filed on Sep. 10, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/836,984, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/614,929, filed on Mar. 23, 2012. Each of the applications listed above is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61614929 | Mar 2012 | US | |
| 61727004 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15079607 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Child | 15499993 | US | |
| Parent | 14850936 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Child | 15079607 | US | |
| Parent | 13836984 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 14850936 | US | |
| Parent | 15089938 | Apr 2016 | US |
| Child | 15497913 | US | |
| Parent | 14860415 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Child | 15089938 | US | |
| Parent | 14081487 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Child | 14860415 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15499993 | Apr 2017 | US |
| Child | 16117684 | US | |
| Parent | 15497913 | Apr 2017 | US |
| Child | 13836984 | US |
