Patent Application
20210094801
The present disclosure generally relates to elevators, including systems and methods for efficiently and effectively monitoring the integrity of load bearing members in suspension belts.
Suspension rope systems for raising and lowering elevator cars comprise a belt having multiple steel load bearing members embedded within a coating. Each load bearing member typically includes a plurality of interwoven steel wire strands. Such suspension rope systems are critical components upon which safety and productivity often depend. Most often the belts suspend one or more elevator cars and/or one or more counterweights via one or more sheaves. Deterioration of the belt and its load bearing members adversely affects tension strength of the belt. The tension strength of a belt depends on various factors such as the belt's cross-sectional area. When one or more load bearing members of the belt stretch, tear, or permanently bend, those load bearing members are at least weakened. Consequently, the effective tension-bearing cross-sectional area of the belt is reduced. Deterioration can occur in many ways, including via normal wear and tear, impact, fatigue, and/or corrosion.
At one point, belts were only replaced upon visual detection of an irregularity. Because belts can be very long and can comprise many individual load bearing members, though, basing a conclusion about the integrity of the belt purely on a visual inspection is a questionable practice, especially considering that deterioration may occur internally and may not be outwardly detectable. For this reason amongst others, elevator manufacturers and maintenance providers eventually began replacing belts at periodic milestones (e.g., every five years) and/or cyclic milestones (e.g., every 500K cycles, with a cycle occurring each time an elevator car changes directions), if not before then upon visual identification of an irregularity.
More recently, some jurisdictions have demanded that elevator manufacturers and maintenance providers monitor the integrity of belts in suspension rope systems more actively. For instance, one jurisdiction has interpreted an elevator safety code such that a belt should be retired from service when its residual breaking strength reaches 60% of the belt's initial minimum breaking strength rating. However, there has thus far been a lack of guidance as to how to track residual breaking strength. It should be understood that 60% is a floor and that Applicant has historically retired belts and will continue to retire belts long before the 60% threshold. This jurisdiction has also opined that cycle counting—as a sole means for tracking residual breaking strength of a belt—does not suffice.
Thus a need exists for systems and methods that can accurately, efficiently, and effectively monitor the integrity of load bearing members of a belt in an elevator system.
Most recently, the elevator industry has turned to giant magneto-resistance (GMR) technology for detecting irregularities in load bearing members of belts. In short, the belt can be moved through a magnetic field, and a GMR sensor can detect changes in the magnetic field that are due to irregularities at certain locations in the load bearing members. Electromagnetic scanning, acoustic scanning, and other non-invasive forms of scanning may also be used in connection with the teachings of the present disclosure. If an irregularity is detected, the elevator car may be taken out of service immediately and the belt retired.
One method for monitoring the integrity of a belt in an elevator system with a GMR monitoring system comprises performing GMR scans of various segments of the belt in the course of transporting passengers between floors of a building. The scanned segments of the belt typically correspond to less than an entirety of the length of the belt. Nonetheless, data from the GMR scans may be compiled into a GMR profile representing the full length, or at least a substantial majority of the length, of the belt and analyzed to determine whether the belt contains an irregularity. Such a method is particularly advantageous where the building does not have the luxury of taking an elevator out of service to run a complete GMR scan of the belt from top to bottom.
Further, GMR scanning, compiling subsets of a complete GMR profile, and analyzing GMR profiles may be repeated periodically, such as daily, weekly, or monthly, for instance. Hence the integrity of the belt may be tracked over time with comparative analyses. And if the elevator car does not travel to or pass by all of the floors of the building due to passenger traffic during a given period, the elevator car may be taken out of service temporarily towards the end of the period while the monitoring system scans segments of the belt that have yet to be scanned.
Analyzing the GMR profile may entail comparing GMR values associated with points along the length of the belt to corresponding GMR values from one or more GMR profiles that were acquired prior to the most-recent GMR profile. In cases where numerous GMR profiles are used for comparison, the GMR values may be averaged or median values used. Ideally, the previously-acquired GMR profiles are acquired at a time when the belt is known not to contain any irregularities, such as before the elevator car was ever suspended from the belt or just before the elevator system was approved for passenger use. In some instances, each GMR value from a GMR profile may be compared to the average or median value of all GMR values for that GMR profile, rather than being compared to the respective GMR value of one or more different, previously-acquired GMR profiles.
Another aspect of the present disclosure concerns systems and methods for identifying high-wear sections of the belt. If high-wear sections can be identified, a higher percentage of resources can be allocated to monitoring those sections of the belt, whether via GMR scanning, visual inspections, etc. One such method involves storing position versus time data in a storage medium for an elevator car that travels throughout a hoistway. The method may further involve determining which section of the belt engages with one or more sheaves for the full range of movement of the elevator car in the hoistway. Based on the position versus time data and at least one high-wear factor, an elevator control system can identify a high-wear section of the belt. High-wear factors include, for example, a quantity of different ways in which each section of the belt is bent during operation of the elevator system, a frequency with which each section of the belt transitions between being straight and being engaged with one of the sheaves, a total amount of time that each section of the belt spends idly wrapped around any sheave, and a frequency with which each section of the belt is engaged with any sheave when the elevator car accelerates or decelerates.
Although certain example methods and apparatuses are described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatuses, and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Moreover, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that reciting “a” element or “an” element in the appended claims does not restrict those claims to articles, apparatuses, systems, methods, or the like having only one of that element, even where other elements in the same claim or different claims are preceded by “at least one” or similar language. Similarly, it should be understood that the steps of any method claim need not necessarily be performed in the order in which they are recited, unless so required by the context of the claims. In addition, all references to one skilled in the art shall be understood to refer to one having ordinary skill in the art. With respect to the drawings, it should be understood that not all components are drawn to scale. Furthermore, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that the various examples disclosed herein should not be considered in isolation. Rather, those with ordinary skill in the art will readily understand that the disclosure relating to some examples may be combined with and/or equally applicable to the disclosure relating to other examples.
With reference to
As shown in
Analyzing the structural integrity and remaining life of the belt 130 can help ensure safe operation of the elevator system 100. Degradation of the belt 130 can result from, as one example, cyclic bending around sheaves when the elevator car 110 moves through the hoistway. Fortunately, the belt 130 can be scanned or monitored for degradation. As explained above, visual inspection methods for monitoring the belt 130 can be limited by the coating 162 of the belt 130, and the load bearing members 160 of the belt 130 can experience damage that is not always outwardly detectable. Hence the present disclosure concerns monitoring systems that comprise magnetic field producers and GMR sensor units capable of identifying irregularities in the belt 130, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2015/0239708A1 entitled “System and Method for Monitoring a Load Bearing Member” and filed on Feb. 25, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The example GMR sensor units disclosed herein and in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2015/0239708A1 are capable of identifying the position of an irregularity along the length, width, and depth of the belt 130. Targeted investigations can reduce the amount of investigation necessary for identifying defects or damage in the load-bearing members 160 and for determining the integrity of the belt 130. Moreover, the GMR sensor units are also capable of determining a degree of an irregularity. Irregularities may include, for example, diameter diminution of cables or wires, broken wires due to fretting wear and stress fatigue, holes, voids, roughing, corrosion, fractures, deformation, manufacturing defects, localized flaws, loss of metallic cross-sectional area, loss of metallic volume defects, and/or other forms of damage.
Further, the amplifier 250 may amplify a signal produced by the GMR sensor 222 in response to variations in the magnetic field 240. The amplified signal can be transmitted to a control unit 260. The control unit 260 can store information regarding signals from the GMR sensor 222 in a storage medium 261 for immediate or subsequent processing. In addition or in the alternative, the control unit 260 can activate the indicator system 270 to report a concerning GMR signal. The control unit 260 can also communicate the GMR signal to an elevator control system, an operator, building management, a maintenance schedule, etc. Communication can occur without limitation via telephone lines, Ethernet cables, or other wired telecommunications equipment; cellular communications; local area networks (LANs); wireless protocols such as Bluetooth or Wi-Fi; and streaming to electronic devices such as handhelds, computers, smart phones, and the like. The communication can be through secure and/or proprietary communication protocols. It should be understood that the control unit 260 may in some cases be understood to be part of the elevator control system.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
It should be understood that the GMR sensor unit 220 can detect the magnetic flux leakage 341 while the belt 130 is stationary or while the belt 130 is moving, although typically the GMR sensor unit 220 is operated when the belt 130 is moving. In that vein, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that the GMR sensor unit 220 may perform a higher quality scan of the belt 130 when the belt 130 is moving at a slow, constant speed relative to the GMR sensor unit 220. In some examples, a slow, constant speed may be ½ m/s. Nonetheless, by sensing the magnetic flux leakage 341, the GMR sensor unit 220 can communicate to an elevator control system the location of the irregularity 342, the magnitude of the irregularity 342, the type of irregularity 342, the time at which the irregularity 342 was detected, and so on. In most cases, the belt 130 will be taken out of service immediately if any irregularity 342 is detected. If the measured flux leakage 341 is abnormal but does not quite rise to the level of an irregularity 342, the belt 130 may first be visually inspected and/or rescanned.
In some examples, the elongated magnets 211 of the magnetic field producer 210 are aligned relative to the belt 130 and the GMR sensor unit 220. In other examples, the GMR sensor unit 220 can be aligned relative to the magnetic field 240 and the belt 130. In one example, the GMR sensor unit 220 may be aligned perpendicular to the belt 130 and to the magnetic field 240, as an axis of sensitivity of the GMR sensor unit 220 may be orthogonal to a longitudinal axis of the load-bearing members 160. Further, a degree of distortion or noise of the signal from the GMR sensor unit 220 may correspond to a degree of perpendicularity of the components. For example, distortion or noise may increase as a degree of perpendicularity between the GMR sensor unit 220 and the belt 130 decreases. Notwithstanding, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that signals from a GMR sensor 222 can be conditioned and/or amplified by an instrumentation amplifier 250 to counteract noise, distortion, and other defects.
The monitoring system 200 may provide periodic or continuous monitoring of the moving belt 130 used in driving the elevator system 100. The monitoring system 200 may be configured such that a majority of the belt 130 is positionable proximate to the monitoring system 200, and specifically, the GMR sensor unit 220, during operation of the elevator system 100. The monitoring system 200 may detect irregularities within the load bearing members 160 of the belt 130 without necessarily contacting the belt 130 directly. Also, in some examples, the monitoring system 200 may be configured along a portion of the belt 130 between ends of the belt 130 and/or between termination devices that hold the belt 130.
The handheld monitoring system 400 may in some examples include a handle 402 and a U-shaped recess 404. The handle 402 may be disposed in a location that makes the handheld monitoring system 400 easy to grasp. For example, the handle 402 may be located opposite the recess 404. The recess 404 may have a shape, such as the U-shape shown in
The handheld monitoring system 400 may be a portable, or more-portable, version of the monitoring system 200 shown in
In addition to replacing belts at least at cyclic and/or periodic milestones, as discussed further above, the present disclosure proposes using these example monitoring systems to perform GMR scans of a belt either continuously or periodically (e.g., one or more times per hour, half-day, day, week, month, etc.) to monitor the integrity of load bearing members of the belt. If an irregularity in a load bearing member is identified prior to the next cyclic or periodic milestone, the belt can be replaced immediately. This concept will be described in further detail below with respect to
In some examples, a first monitoring system 514 and, in some cases, a second monitoring system 516 fixed at a top 518 of the hoistway 512 may perform periodic or continuous GMR monitoring. The first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 may be positioned at the drive sheave 510 to minimize the likelihood of vibration in the belt 506. The first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 may be similar to the example monitoring system 200 shown in
The elevator system 500 may employ the second monitoring system 516 because the first monitoring system 514 may not necessarily be able to scan the entire length of the belt 506, even when moving the elevator car 502 between the first (bottom) floor 1 and the ninth (top) floor 9. For instance, when the elevator car 502 is positioned at the first floor 1, a “remainder” of the belt 506 (i.e., the portion of the belt 506 outside of segments A-H) that extends upward from the first monitoring system 514, over the drive sheave 510, and downward to the tension unit 504 will not pass the first monitoring system 514 during normal operation of the elevator system 500. However, the second monitoring system 516 may be configured to scan the remainder of the belt 506 during normal operation. As an alternative to the second monitoring system 516, the elevator system 500 may utilize a handheld monitoring system, such as the example handheld monitoring system 400 shown in
In one example, an elevator control system causes the elevator car 502 to travel from the first (bottom) floor 1 of the building to the ninth (top) floor 9. With respect to the first monitoring system 514, a magnetic field producer can generate a magnetic field that segments A-H of the belt 506 pass through while a GMR sensor detects and relays GMR data to a control unit for storage or immediate processing. With respect to the second monitoring system 516, a magnetic field producer can generate a magnetic field that the remainder of the belt 506 passes through while a GMR sensor detects and relays GMR data to a control unit for storage or immediate processing. By combining the GMR data from both the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516, the elevator control system may be provided with a GMR profile that indicates the presence (or lack thereof) of any irregularities. Of course, this GMR scan could also be completed by causing the elevator car 502 to travel from the ninth floor 9 down to the first floor 1.
The present disclosure contemplates a variety of methods by which such a GMR scan could occur. In one method, for instance, if a passenger places a call at the first floor 1 to travel to the ninth floor 9 (or vice versa), the GMR scan could occur while the elevator car 502 is transporting that passenger. The GMR scan could alternatively or additionally occur while the elevator car 502 is traveling to pickup that passenger, which goes without saying below. If no such passenger call is placed during a time period in which a GMR scan is required, the elevator car 502 may be taken out of service temporarily towards the end of the time period while the elevator control system schedules the GMR scan. Ideally, the elevator car 502 would be temporarily taken out of service and the GMR scan run during off-peak hours when convenient, such as when demand for the elevator car 502 is least (e.g., overnight), such as when staging elevator cars higher in a building towards the end of a workday, or such as when staging elevator cars lower in a building towards the beginning of a workday, as examples. In some cases, the elevator system 500 may reference passenger call statistics to identify time(s) when demand is least.
Some advantages to conducting a GMR scan while the elevator car 502 is temporarily out of service is that GMR scans can be performed under ideal conditions, which will enhance the consistency and quality of the GMR data. By way of example, varying the amount of weight attributable to passengers in the car 502 from one scan to the next can adversely affect the consistency of GMR data. Taking the car 502 out of service and thus clearing passengers from the car 502 before conducting each GMR scan eliminates this variable. As another example, GMR scans yield more accurate results when the pace at which the GMR scans are conducted is slow and constant. Using the non-limiting example from further above, ½ m/s may under some circumstances be an ideal, slow, constant speed at which to move the elevator car 502 relative to the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 during a GMR scan.
In some examples, an elevator control system 519 of the elevator system 500 or a control unit of the GMR sensor unit of the first and/or second monitoring systems 514, 516 may compare a second GMR profile of the belt 506 from a second time period to a first GMR profile of the belt 506 from a first time period. If the second GMR profile differs from the first GMR profile in any statistically significant manner, an irregularity may exist in the belt 506. In this example, the second GMR profile may be regarded as the “current” or “most-recent” GMR profile. In some instances, the comparison may involve comparing the most-recent GMR profile of the belt 506 separately to more than one previously-acquired GMR profile in an effort to identify any irregularities. In yet other examples, the most-recent GMR profile may be compared to a baseline GMR profile that was acquired either when the belt 506 was first produced at a manufacturing facility, when the belt 506 was first installed in the hoistway 512 prior to attachment of the elevator car 502 and the tension unit 504, when the elevator car 502 and the tension unit 504 were first attached to the belt 506 after installation, or when the elevator system 500 was initially commissioned for service after installation (which may follow verification/validation testing). In still other examples, the most-recent GMR profile of the belt 506 may be compared to an average of a plurality of previously-acquired GMR profiles of the belt 506. In some cases, the plurality of previously-acquired scans may have been acquired at the time that the belt 506 was first put into operation, or may be based on two or more of the baseline GMR profiles identified above.
There are a variety of ways in which the elevator control system 519 of the elevator system 500 or a control system of a GMR sensor unit of one of the monitoring systems 514, 516 can determine if a variation between two GMR profiles that have been compared (or one GMR profile compared with an average of several other GMR profiles) is statistically-significant enough to conclude that one or more irregularities exist in the belt 506. After all, even successive GMR profiles acquired minutes apart under the same conditions will almost surely vary, at least to some extent. As one example, each recorded GMR value from the length of the belt 506 may be compared to a corresponding GMR value from a previously-acquired baseline GMR profile. Hence, with respect to
As another similar example, the baseline GMR values for an irregularity-free belt may be 0V. If the current GMR value for the point 520 is 1.5V or higher, for example and without limitation, an irregularity may be deemed to exist and the belt 506 may need to be replaced. If the current GMR value for the point 520 is between 1.0V and 1.5V, for example and without limitation, the elevator car 502 may be taken out of service and the point 520 may be rescanned immediately under ideal conditions to determine whether the concerning GMR value was erroneous and whether the elevator car 502 can be recommissioned. In some instances, a visual inspection may also be required prior to recommissioning the elevator car 502. Further, if the current GMR value for the point 520 is between 0.5V and 1.0V, for example and without limitation, a rescan and/or visual inspection of the point 520 may be scheduled during off-peak hours to evaluate whether an irregularity exists at the point 520.
As still another example, the current GMR value for the point 520 may be compared to the median (or additionally or alternatively the average) of a plurality of previously-acquired GMR values (e.g., the first fifty GMR values acquired for the point 520, for instance). If the current GMR value for the point 520 differs from the median of the plurality of previously-acquired GMR values by more than two standard deviations (2σ), the belt 506 may be deemed to have an irregularity at the point 520—or at the very least a visual inspection and/or rescan(s) of the point 520 may be scheduled to evaluate whether an irregularity likely exists at the point 520.
In yet other examples, GMR values for the belt 506 may be compared to other GMR values from the same GMR profile generated from the same GMR scan. Thus the most-recent GMR value for the point 520 along the belt 506 may be compared to the median (or additionally or alternatively the average) of all GMR values recorded in the most-recent GMR scan. If the GMR value for the point 520 differs from the median of all GMR values from the most-recent GMR scan by more than 2.5 standard deviations (2.5σ), again, for example and without limitation, the belt 506 may be deemed to have an irregularity at the point 520 and be deemed to need immediate replacing. In another example, the GMR value for the point 520 may be compared with a plurality of GMR values that were acquired in the same GMR scan from locations along the belt 506 that are most-proximate to the point 520. Hence the GMR value for the point 520 may be compared to the median (or additionally or alternatively the average) of one-hundred GMR values, for instance, acquired from segment G and one-hundred GMR values, for instance, acquired from segment H in the same scan.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that these examples are not limiting, but instead are merely illustrative Likewise, those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that certain outlier GMR values, especially those that are not reproducible upon rescanning, may be excluded during the analysis of a GMR profile or may be excluded from GMR profiles that will be referenced in the future.
Some buildings may not have the luxury of periodically taking an elevator car out of service to perform GMR scans. This may be the case in buildings with only one elevator, in taller buildings where GMR scans can take upwards of thirty minutes, in buildings where passenger demand for an elevator system over a period is nearly uniform, and so on. In cases such as these, a method may be used to compile a complete GMR profile for the belt 506 based on separate GMR data sets acquired during the same period that correspond, respectively, to various segments A-H of the belt 506.
To this end and with continued reference to
During some periods the elevator car 502 may not necessarily travel to all floors based on passenger demand alone. If towards the end of a period (e.g., where the period if 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, or 99% complete) the elevator car 502 has not traveled to the ninth floor 9, for example, there will not be any GMR data set corresponding to segment H of the belt 506. In this case, the elevator car 502 could be taken out of service temporarily to travel to the ninth floor 9 while the first monitoring system 514 GMR scans segment H of the belt 506.
Thereafter, the elevator control system 519 of the elevator system 500 or the control unit of the GMR sensor unit of the first and/or second monitoring systems 514, 516 may compile a GMR profile for the belt 506 based on the various acquired GMR data sets. Duplicative data points (e.g., two GMR values corresponding to the point 520 along the belt 506) may be averaged and, in cases where enough data is acquired, outlier data points may be selectively discarded. Once compiled, this most-recent/current GMR profile may then be analyzed for irregularities as explained above.
Yet in further examples, the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 may be configured to continuously scan the belt 506 when the elevator car 502 is moving, as opposed to periodically scanning the length of the belt 506. Although continuous monitoring will generate much duplicative GMR data, for purposes of generating a GMR profile duplicative data points for locations along the belt 506 may be averaged and outlier data points may be selectively discarded. Alternatively, the elevator control system 519 or the control unit of one of the monitoring systems 514, 516 may continuously compare the GMR data being measured with some previously-acquired GMR profile, with a baseline GMR profile, and/or with GMR data measured from the same time period from other locations along the belt 506 (or an average or median thereof). If an irregularity is detected at any point, the elevator system 500 may be taken out of service and an operator, building management, a maintenance schedule, etc. may be notified.
It should be understood that there may be quality control checks involving the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516. As one example, GMR values acquired from the point 520 along the belt 506 that originate from the first monitoring system 514 may be compared with GMR values that originate from the second monitoring system 516 and are also acquired from the point 520. If the comparison reveals that for the same points along the belt 506 the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 are recording noticeably different GMR values (e.g., values that differ by ±2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%), then the elevator system 500 may report that the first and/or second monitoring systems 514, 516 need calibration, repair, replacement, etc. As a second example, the first and second monitoring systems 514, 516 may be tested prior to being put into operation and then intermittently thereafter to ensure that they are properly detecting irregularities. One way to achieve this is to have the monitoring systems 514, 516 GMR scan segments of decommissioned belts that are known to have irregularities of different sorts. An improperly-working monitoring system may then be re-calibrated, repaired, replaced, etc.
It should be understood that segment A may also be referred to as a “first segment,” segment B may also be referred to as a “second segment,” and so on. Moreover, although the belt 506 is described as having specific segments A-H, it should be understood that the segments A-H are primarily for facilitating the explanation of the present disclosure. In reality the elevator control system 519 of the elevator system 500 and/or the control units of the monitoring systems 514, 516 “know” precisely which points are positioned at the respective monitoring systems 514, 516 based on the location of the elevator car 502, without reference to the segments A-H. Likewise, the elevator control system 519 and/or the control units of the monitoring systems 514, 516 know which points along the belt 506 have been or have not been scanned during a period, without reference to the segments A-H. What's more, the elevator control system 519 and/or the control units of the monitoring systems 514, 516 are also able to account for stretch of the belt 506—however minimal—over time, over periods of high and low usage, and over different seasons of the year where different coefficients of thermal expansion take effect, for example.
However, if the elevator car cannot be taken out of service during a period, a monitoring system may perform a GMR scan 560 when the elevator car transports a passenger. If the scan of the belt is not complete 562, the elevator control system may query 564 whether the period is substantially complete (e.g., at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 97.5%). If the period is not substantially complete, the monitoring system may continue to perform GMR scans 560 as more passengers are transported. If the scan of the belt is not yet complete 562 and the period is substantially complete 564, the elevator may be taken out of service and the monitoring system may scan the one or more segments of the belt that have not yet been scanned 566. The numerous GMR data sets corresponding to various segments of the belt may then be compiled 568 into a single GMR profile and subsequently compared 558 for identification of an irregularity.
By contrast, when the scan of the belt is completed 562 based on one or more scans that occurred during passenger travel 560, the elevator control system may then query 570 whether only one scan was necessary. If so, different GMR data sets need not be compiled, and the GMR profile may be compared 558 for identification of an irregularity. If more than one scan was needed 570, the different GMR data sets may first be compiled 568 into a single GMR profile before comparing 558 the GMR profile.
The elevator system 600 may further include a first monitoring system 626 for GMR scanning the belt 606. The first monitoring system 626 may be attached to or positioned near the second sheave 616. In some cases, the elevator system 600 may include a second monitoring system 628, which helps ensure that virtually the entire belt 606 (or the entire belt 606 depending on the placement of the second monitoring system 628) can be GMR scanned. In the example shown in
Those having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that different sections of the belt 606 will experience different degrees of wear. This much holds true even for the example belts 130, 230, 506 discussed above. One example factor that causes some sections of the belt 606 to experience a higher degree of wear than others is a number of different ways in which a section of the belt is bent, as will be described in further detail with respect to
An elevator control system of the elevator system 600 may continuously track the position of the elevator car 602 in the hoistway 612 relative to time for future reference. Tracking may in one example involve storing position versus time data for the elevator car 602 in a storage medium. Consequently, because the elevator control system knows the positions of the sheaves relative to the belt 606 based on the position of the elevator car 602, the elevator control system can identify the degree of wear to which each section of the belt 606 is subjected. In other words, based on the position of the elevator car 602 over time, the elevator control system knows the number of different ways in which each section of the belt 606 is bent, the frequency with which each section of the belt 606 transitions between being straight and being wrapped around a sheave, the amount of time that each section of the belt 606 spends idly wrapped around a sheave, the frequency with which each section of the belt 606 is wrapped around a sheave when the elevator car 602 accelerates or decelerates, and so on.
Knowing the degree of wear that each section of the belt 606 experiences is advantageous, especially when it comes to maintaining the safety of the elevator system 600. After all, an irregularity is more likely to occur in higher-wear sections of the belt 606 than in lower-wear sections. As a result, more resources can be dedicated to monitoring the integrity of high-wear sections of the belt 606. For instance, high-wear sections of the belt 606 can be scanned more frequently than low-wear sections. Likewise, more time can be allocated to scan high-wear sections of the belt 606 under ideal conditions than low-wear sections. It may also be the case that portions of the belt 606 adjacent to high-wear sections are scanned more frequently as well. Those having ordinary skill in the art should understand that even though the terms “low-wear” and “high-wear” are used in a somewhat binary fashion here, the degree of wear along the length of the belt 606 may be a continuum based on one or more of the example wear factors outlined above. Accordingly, the more wear a section of the belt 606 experiences, the more attention that section of the belt 606 may receive in terms of GMR monitoring, and vice versa.
To illustrate one of the example wear factors above,
The example method 650 may further comprise determining 654 when a first section of the belt and when a second section of the belt engage with at least one sheave in the hoistway based on the position of the elevator car. In fact, the method 650 may involve determining which section of the belt is engaged with the sheave for each and every position in the hoistway to which the elevator car is configured to pass or travel. Because the elevator car is fixed along the length of the belt, because the first and second sections of the belt are fixed relative to the elevator car, and because the length of the belt may be considered to be fixed for purposes of explaining this method 650, the elevator control system can thus also determine a considerable amount of information about the first and second sections of the belt engaging with the sheave. More specifically, the elevator control system may be able to determine, for example and without limitation, the number of different ways in which the first and second sections of the belt are bent (which may depend on the number of sheaves utilized), the frequency with which each section of the belt transitions between being straight and being wrapped around the sheave, the amount of time that each section of the belt spends idly wrapped around the sheave, the frequency with which each section of the belt is wrapped around the sheave when the elevator car accelerates or decelerates, and so on.
The example method 650 may additionally involve identifying 656 whether the first section of the belt or the second section of the belt experiences a higher degree of wear based on at least one of the example wear factors enumerated above. In some cases, the elevator control system may determine which section experiences more wear by using a combination or even all of these factors. Last but not least, the method 650 may comprise focusing GMR scanning resources on the higher-wear section rather than the other section that experiences less wear. As one example, the section that experiences more wear may be GMR scanned five times per day as opposed to the other section that may be GMR scanned once per day.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that the example method 650 is not limited to identifying merely one section of a belt that experiences high wear. Rather, the method 650 can be employed to identify a degree of wear across the full length of the belt. This may occur on a very granular level, such as millimeter by millimeter along the length of the belt, for instance. The present disclosure only references two sections of the belt for ease of explanation. GMR scanning resources can then be allocated relative to the respective level of wear for each respective section of the belt.
Again, those with ordinary skill in the art will readily understand that the disclosure relating to some examples may be combined with and/or equally applicable to the disclosure relating to other examples. As merely one example, one of the methods disclosed above could be used to identify high-wear sections of the belt based on, for instance, a frequency with which each section of the belt transitions between being straight and being engaged with a sheave, an amount of time that each section of the belt spends idly wrapped around the sheave, or a frequency with which each section of the belt is engaged with the sheave when an elevator car accelerates or decelerates. Once the high-wear sections of the belt are identified, a GMR monitoring system could perform scans of the high-wear sections of the belt (or subsets thereof) while the elevator car moves to pick up or transport passengers. Data acquired during different runs of the elevator car could be compiled into a GMR profile that is then analyzed to determine whether any of the high-wear sections of the belt contain an irregularity.
