Patent Grant
10137239
Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to systems and methods for monitoring corneal tissue, and more particularly, to systems and methods for monitoring an eye for the presence and distribution of a photo active agent.
Description of Related Art
A variety of eye disorders, such as myopia, keratoconus, and hyperopia, involve abnormal shaping of the cornea. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is one of a number of corrective procedures that reshape the cornea so that light traveling through the cornea is properly focused onto the retina located in the back of the eye. During LASIK eye surgery, an instrument called a microkeratome is used to cut a thin flap in the cornea. The cornea is then peeled back and the underlying cornea tissue ablated to the desired shape with an excimer laser. After the desired reshaping of the cornea is achieved, the cornea flap is put back in place and the surgery is complete.
In another corrective procedure that reshapes the cornea, thermokeratoplasty provides a noninvasive procedure that applies electrical energy in the microwave or radio frequency (RF) band to the cornea. In particular, the electrical energy raises the corneal temperature until the collagen fibers in the cornea shrink at about 60° C. The onset of shrinkage is rapid, and stresses resulting from this shrinkage reshape the corneal surface. Thus, application of energy according to particular patterns, including, but not limited to, circular or annular patterns, may cause aspects of the cornea to flatten and improve vision in the eye.
The success of procedures, such as LASIK or thermokeratoplasty, in addressing eye disorders, such as myopia, keratoconus, and hyperopia, depends on the stability of the changes in the corneal structure after the procedures have been applied.
Aspects of the present disclosure provide for monitoring an eye for the presence of a photo-active marker. In one example, a system includes a treatment system that provides a treatment to a corneal tissue. The treatment system includes an applicator that applies a photo-active marker to the corneal tissue. The system also includes an excitation source that directs light to the corneal tissue treated with the photo-active marker. The light causes the photo-active marker to fluoresce. The system additionally includes an image capture system that captures one or more cross-sectional images of the corneal tissue in response to the excitation source directing the light to the corneal tissue. Each cross-sectional image shows the fluorescing photo-active marker along a respective cross-section of the corneal tissue. The system further includes a controller that receives the one or more cross-sectional images and determines information relating to a distribution of the photo-active marker at varying depths across the corneal tissue. The controller provides the distribution information to the treatment system. The treatment system adjusts the treatment of the corneal tissue in response to the distribution information.
In some embodiments, the excitation source directs the light to the corneal tissue as slits of light, and the image capture system includes at least one camera that captures an image of a section of the corneal tissue defined by the slits of light. The at least one camera is offset from an axis defined by the slits of light and is oriented such that an image plane of the at least one camera intersects a focal plane corresponding to the section of the corneal tissue. The image capture system may include two cameras, where the two cameras combine to capture the image of the section of the corneal tissue defined by the slits of light. The excitation source may include a digital micro-mirror device (DMD) to selectively direct the light to the corneal tissue as the slits of light. Alternatively, the excitation source may include a multiple line generator using an optical grating or a scanning mirror system to selectively direct the light to the corneal tissue as the slits of light. The image capture system may further include a lens corresponding to the at least one camera, where the at least one camera captures the image of the section of the corneal tissue via the lens and the image plane of the at least one camera and the focal plane intersect a lens plane of the lens at a common line. An arrangement of the image plane, the lens plane, and the focal plane may minimize a depth of focus. The focal plane may be approximately tangential to a point of a boundary of the corneal tissue at a mid-point of the section being captured by the at least one camera. The excitation source and the image capture system may rotate about the corneal tissue to capture a plurality of cross-sectional images of the corneal tissue.
In other embodiments, the excitation source directs the light to the corneal tissue as slits of light, and the image capture system includes at least one camera configured according to the Scheimpflug principle employing a range of camera angles of approximately 5 to approximately 85 degrees and approximately −5 to approximately 85 degrees.
In yet other embodiments, the controller determines a distribution of the photo-active marker at varying depths across the corneal tissue over a period of time, thereby determining a rate of uptake of the photo-active marker by the corneal tissue.
In further embodiments, the photo-active marker is a cross-linking agent. The treatment system may adjust the treatment of the eye by applying a pattern of ultraviolet light to the corneal tissue to activate cross-linking activity in the corneal tissue. The treatment system may apply the pattern of ultraviolet light via a digital micro-mirror device (DMD). Alternatively, the treatment system may apply the pattern of ultraviolet light via a scanning mirror system.
In additional embodiments, the treatment system adjusts the treatment of the corneal tissue by applying additional photo-active marker to achieve a desired distribution of the photo-active marker. After the application of the additional photo-active marker, the image capture system may capture additional cross-sectional images of the corneal tissue in response to the excitation source directing additional light to the corneal tissue, and the controller determines additional information relating to the distribution of the photo-active marker at varying depths across the corneal tissue to determine whether the desired distribution has been achieved. The treatment system may modify an uptake of the photo-active marker by the corneal tissue. The treatment system may include a permeability regulation system that modifies a permeability of the corneal tissue by applying ultrasound energy or a pattern of radiation to the corneal tissue to increase an uptake of the photo-active marker by the corneal tissue. The permeability regulation system may apply the pattern of radiation via a digital micro-mirror device (DMD). Alternatively, the permeability regulation system may apply the pattern of radiation via a scanning mirror system. The treatment system may apply a diffusion-influencing substance to the corneal tissue.
In other embodiments, the excitation source includes a plurality of slit lamps arranged about the eye tissue, the image capture system capturing the one or more cross-sectional images of the corneal tissue in response to the plurality of slit lamps directing the light to the corneal tissue
In yet other embodiments, the excitation source directs the light to the eye tissue as a slit at an incident angle in a range from approximately 20 degrees to approximately 70 degrees relative to the image capture system.
These and other aspects of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description of embodiments of the present disclosure when viewed in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As described below in connection with
Although eye therapy treatments may initially achieve desired reshaping of the cornea 2, the desired effects of reshaping the cornea 2 may be mitigated or reversed at least partially if the collagen fibrils within the cornea 2 continue to change after the desired reshaping has been achieved. Indeed, complications may result from further changes to the cornea 2 after treatment. For example, a complication known as post-LASIK ectasia may occur due to the permanent thinning and weakening of the cornea 2 caused by LASIK surgery. In post-LASIK ectasia, the cornea 2 experiences progressive steepening (bulging).
Aspects of the present disclosure provide approaches for initiating molecular cross-linking of corneal collagen to stabilize corneal tissue and improve its biomechanical strength. For example, embodiments may provide devices and approaches for preserving the desired corneal structure and shape that result from an eye therapy treatment, such as LASIK surgery or thermokeratoplasty. In addition, aspects of the present disclosure may provide devices and approaches for monitoring the shape, molecular cross-linking, and biomechanical strength of the corneal tissue and providing feedback to a system for providing iterative initiations of cross-linking of the corneal collagen. As described herein, the devices and approaches disclosed herein may be used to preserve desired shape or structural changes following an eye therapy treatment by stabilizing the corneal tissue of the cornea 2. The devices and approaches disclosed herein may also be used to enhance the strength or biomechanical structural integrity of the corneal tissue apart from any eye therapy treatment.
Therefore, aspects of the present disclosure provide devices and approaches for preserving the desired corneal structure and shape that result from an eye treatment, such as LASIK surgery or thermokeratoplasty. In particular, embodiments may provide approaches for initiating molecular cross-linking of the corneal collagen to stabilize the corneal tissue and improve its biomechanical strength and stiffness after the desired shape change has been achieved. In addition, embodiments may provide devices and approaches for monitoring cross-linking in the corneal collagen and the resulting changes in biomechanical strength to provide a feedback to a system for inducing cross-linking in corneal tissue.
Some approaches initiate molecular cross-linking in a treatment zone of the cornea 2 where structural changes have been induced by, for example, LASIK surgery or thermokeratoplasty. However, it has been discovered that initiating cross-linking directly in this treatment zone may result in undesired haze formation. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure also provide alternative techniques for initiating cross-linking to minimize haze formation. In particular, the structural changes in the cornea 2 are stabilized by initiating cross-linking in selected areas of corneal collagen outside of the treatment zone. This cross-linking strengthens corneal tissue neighboring the treatment zone to support and stabilize the actual structural changes within the treatment zone.
With reference to
The optical elements 112 can be used to focus the light emitted by the light source 110 to a particular focal plane within the cornea 2, such as a focal plane that includes the mid-depth region 2B. In addition, according to particular embodiments, the optical elements 112 may include one or more beam splitters for dividing a beam of light emitted by the light source 110, and may include one or more heat sinks for absorbing light emitted by the light source 110. The optical elements 112 may further include filters for partially blocking wavelengths of light emitted by the light source 110 and for advantageously selecting particular wavelengths of light to be directed to the cornea 2 for activating the cross-linking agent 130. The controller 120 can also be adapted to control the light source 110 by, for example, toggling a power switch of the light source 110.
In an implementation, the controller 120 may include hardware and/or software elements, and may be a computer. The controller 120 may include a processor, a memory storage, a microcontroller, digital logic elements, software running on a computer processor, or any combination thereof. In an alternative implementation of the delivery system 100 shown in
Referring to
As the example embodiment 200B of
According to one approach, the Riboflavin may be applied topically to the corneal surface, and transepithelial delivery allows the Riboflavin to be applied to the corneal stroma. In general, the application of the cross-linking agent sufficiently introduces Riboflavin to mid-depth regions of the corneal tissue where stronger and more stable structure is desired.
Where the initiating element is UV light, the UV light may be generally applied to the corneal surface 2A (e.g. the epithelium) of the cornea 2 to activate cross-linking. However, regions of the cornea 2 requiring stabilization may extend from the corneal surface 2A to a mid-depth region 2B in the corneal stroma 2C. Generally applying UV light to the corneal surface 2A may not allow sufficient penetration of the UV light to activate necessary cross-linking at a mid-depth region 2B of the cornea 2. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure provide a delivery system that accurately and precisely delivers UV light to the mid-depth region 2B where stronger and more stable corneal structure is required. In particular, treatment may generate desired changes in corneal structure at the mid-depth region 2B.
By rapidly scanning the beam of light 341 over the mirrors in the mirror array 344, the mirror array 344 outputs a light pattern 345, which has a two dimensional intensity pattern. The two dimensional intensity pattern of the light pattern 345 is generated by the mirror array 344 according to, for example, the length of time that the beam of light 341 is scanned over each mirror in the mirror array 344. In particular, the light pattern 345 can be considered a pixilated intensity pattern with each pixel represented by a mirror in the mirror array 344 and the intensity of the light in each pixel of the light pattern 345 proportionate to the length of time the beam of light 341 scans over the mirror in the mirror array 344 corresponding to each pixel. In an implementation where the beam of light 341 scans over each mirror in the mirror array 344 in turn to create the light pattern 345, the light pattern 345 is properly considered a time-averaged light pattern, as the output of the light pattern 345 at any one particular instant in time may constitute light from as few as a single pixel in the pixelated light pattern 345. In an implementation, the laser scanning technology of the delivery system 300 may be similar to the technology utilized by Digital Light Processing™ (DLP®) display technologies.
The mirror array 344 can include an array of small oscillating mirrors, controlled by mirror position motors 347. The mirror position motors 347 can be servo motors for causing the mirrors in the mirror array 344 to rotate so as to alternately reflect the beam of light 341 from the light source 340 toward the cornea 2 (e.g., alternately directed to be part of the pattern of light delivered to the cornea 2 via one or more optical elements). The controller 120 can control the light pattern 345 generated in the mirror array 344 using the mirror position motors 347. In addition, the controller 120 can control the depth within the cornea 2 that the light pattern 345 is focused to by controlling the location of the focal depth of the objective lens 346 relative to the corneal surface 2A. For example, the controller 120 can utilize an objective lens position motor 348 to raise and/or lower the objective lens 346 in order to adjust the focal plane 6 of the light pattern 345 emitted from the mirror array 344. By adjusting the focal plane 6 of the light pattern 345 using the objective lens motor 348, and controlling the two-dimensional intensity profile of the light pattern 345 using the mirror position motors 347, the controller 120 is adapted to control the delivery of the light source 110 to the cornea 2 in three dimensions. The three-dimensional pattern is generated by delivering the UV light to selected regions 5 on successive planes (parallel to the focal plane 6), which extend from the corneal surface 2A to the mid-depth region 2B within the corneal stroma. The cross-linking agent 130 introduced into the selected regions 5 is then activated as described above.
By scanning over selected regions 5 of a plane 6 at a particular depth within the cornea 2, the controller 120 can control the activation of the cross-linking agent 130 within the cornea 2 according to a three dimensional profile. In particular, the controller 120 can utilize the laser scanning technology of the laser scanning device 300 to strengthen and stiffen the corneal tissues by activating cross-linking in a three-dimensional pattern within the cornea 2. In an implementation, the objective lens 346 can be replaced by an optical train consisting of mirrors and/or lenses to properly focus the light pattern 345 emitted from the mirror array 344. Additionally, the objective lens motor 348 can be replaced by a motorized device for adjusting the position of the eye 1 relative to the objective lens 346, which can be fixed in space. For example, a chair or lift that makes fine motor step adjustments and adapted to hold a patient during eye treatment can be utilized to adjust the position of the eye 1 relative to the objective lens 346.
Advantageously, the use of laser scanning technologies allows cross-linking to be activated beyond the corneal surface 2A of the cornea 2, at depths where stronger and more stable corneal structure is desired, for example, where structural changes have been generated by an eye therapy treatment. In other words, the application of the initiating element (i.e., the light source 110) is applied precisely according to a selected three-dimensional pattern and is not limited to a two-dimensional area at the corneal surface 2A of the cornea 2.
Although the embodiments described herein may initiate cross-linking in the cornea according to an annular pattern defined, for example, by a thermokeratoplasty applicator, the initiation pattern in other embodiments is not limited to a particular shape. Indeed, energy may be applied to the cornea in non-annular patterns, so cross-linking may be initiated in areas of the cornea that correspond to the resulting non-annular changes in corneal structure. Examples of the non-annular shapes by which energy may be applied to the cornea are described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/113,672, filed on May 1, 2008, the contents of which are entirely incorporated herein by reference.
Some embodiments may employ Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) technology to modulate the application of initiating light, e.g., UV light, spatially as well as temporally. Using DMD technology, a controlled light source is selectively reflected to provide the initiating light in a precise spatial pattern that is created by microscopically small mirrors laid out in a matrix on a semiconductor chip, known as a DMD. Each mirror represents one or more pixels in the pattern of reflected light. The power and duration at which the light is reflected to provide the pixelated intensity pattern is determined as described elsewhere. Alternatively, some embodiments may employ a scanning mirror system to apply the patterns of initiating light.
Embodiments may also employ aspects of multiphoton excitation microscopy. In particular, rather than delivering a single photon of a particular wavelength to the cornea 2, the delivery system (e.g., 100 in
Referring again to
Aspects of the present disclosure can be employed to reduce the amount of time required to achieve the desired cross-linking. For example, parameters for delivery and activation of the cross-linking agent 130 can be adjusted to reduce the amount of time required to achieve cross-linking. In an example implementation, the time can be reduced from minutes to seconds. While some configurations may apply the initiating element (i.e., the light source 110) at a flux dose of 5 J/cm2, aspects of the present disclosure allow larger doses of the initiating element, e.g., multiples of 5 J/cm2, to be applied to reduce the time required to achieve the desired cross-linking. Highly accelerated cross-linking is particularly possible when using laser scanning technologies (such as in the delivery system 300 provided in
To decrease the treatment time, and advantageously generate stronger cross-linking within the cornea 2, the initiating element (e.g., the light source 110 shown in
Treatment of the cornea 2 by activating cross-linking produces structural changes to the corneal stroma. In general, the opto-mechanical properties of the cornea 2 changes under stress. Such changes include: straightening out the waviness of the collagen fibrils; slippage and rotation of individual lamellae; and breakdown of aggregated molecular superstructures into smaller units. In such cases, the application of the cross-linking agent 130 introduces sufficient amounts of cross-linking agent 130 to mid-depth regions 2B of the corneal tissue where stronger and more stable structure is desired. The cross-linking agent 130 may be applied directly to corneal tissue that have received an eye therapy treatment and/or in areas around the treated tissue.
To enhance safety and efficacy of the application and the activation of the cross-linking agent, aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for real time monitoring of the changes to the collagen fibrils with a feedback system 400 shown in
Moreover, real time monitoring with the feedback system 400 may be employed to identify when further application of the initiating element (e.g., the light source 110) yields no additional cross-linking. Where the initiating element is UV light, determining an end point for the application of the initiating element protects the corneal tissue from unnecessary exposure to UV light. Accordingly, the safety of the cross-linking treatment is enhanced. The controller 120 for the cross-linking delivery system can automatically cease further application of UV light when the real time monitoring from the feedback system 400 determines that no additional cross-linking is occurring.
The fluorescence dosimetry system 500 also includes an optical system 540 for capturing one or more images of the eye 1 while the photo-active marker 1 is excited to fluoresce. The presence of light at the characteristic fluorescence emission frequencies of the photo-active marker 530 in the images captured via the optical system 540 is therefore indicative of the presence and/or distribution of the photo-active marker 530 in the eye 1. As will be further described below, the optical system 540 may be implemented as a Scheimpflug single or dual imaging and/or rotating optical system or as one or more slit lamps to illuminate cross-sectional portions of the cornea 2. In such an implementation, each image provides an indication of the presence of the photo-active marker 530 along a particular cross-section of the cornea 2. An image processor 520 is also provided to analyze the images acquired via the optical system 540 and determine, based on the series of images information regarding the presence and/or distribution of the photo-active marker 530 in the eye 1. The fluorescence dosimetry system 500 can also incorporate a filter 542 to advantageously block wavelengths of light corresponding to the excitation source 510. By selecting the filter 542 such that the light applied to the eye 1 via the excitation source 510 (i.e., the exciting light) is blocked while wavelengths corresponding to the excitation emission wavelengths are allowed to pass (i.e., the emissive light), the image(s) captured by the optical system 540 indicate the emissive light. For example, the filter 542 can be configured to transmit the exciting light while substantially blocking the emissive light (from the distributed photo-active marker 530). Thus, the filter 542 can improve the signal to noise of the fluorescence dosimetry system 500 by isolating the light emitted from the photo-active marker 530 from the light applied by the excitation source 510.
While the dual imaging Scheimpflug optical system 540′ is provided for example purposes, it is acknowledged that implementations of the present disclosure are not limited to dual imaging Scheimpflug systems, and apply to a variety of optical systems suitable for capturing intensity profiles indicative of intensities at a variety of depths within an eye. For example, single imaging Scheimpflug systems, slit lamp systems (as described further below), optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems, and optically similar systems adapted to capture images of cross-sectional portion of the eye 1 can be utilized as the optical system 540 illustrated in
The system 600 optionally further provides for the position of the eye 1 to be fixed via a bite bar 670. The bite bar can be a deformable material for a patient to bite down on with their jaw to thereby fix the position of a patient's head and prevent the patient's head from moving relative to the bite bar 670. The bite bar 670 can be coupled to a 3d positioner 672 that incorporates motors and the like to manipulate the bite bar 670 in three dimensions to correct and/or compensate the position of the eye 1 during a cross-linking operation according to the monitoring (“targeting”) information provided via the camera 630. Thus, the camera 630 can be utilized to both provide targeting (“positioning”) information and provide images indicative of the distribution of the photo-active marker 530. While the camera 630 is providing targeting information, the resolution of the camera 630 can be sub-sampled to allow for more rapid data collection and analysis in order to actively compensate for movement of the eye 1 during cross-linking activation. Implementations including active targeting and positioning feedback may allow for the patient to receive cross-linking therapy while sitting upright rather than lying down. Cross-linking can be done with a patient lying on their back during a surgical procedure. With the patient lying on their back, gravity directs the applied drops (e.g., drops of cross-linking agent, photo-active marker, etc.) to the eye 1 and to increase uniformity of their application.
Implementations of the present disclosure also apply to systems lacking the bite bar 670. The system 600 also includes an infrared light source 620, which is oriented to illuminate the eye 1 with infrared radiation. Infrared radiation from the eye 1 can then be detected by the camera 630 to monitor the position of the eye 1 during a cross-linking operation (e.g., provide targeting and active tracking). The UVA light delivery system 610 can then be adjusted in real time according to the dynamically monitored position (via the camera 630 and associated image processing system(s)) such that the delivered light is directed to the eye in a substantially constant and location, with respect to the eye 1, even as the location of the eye 1 changes. For example, one or more mirrors and/or lenses associated with the UVA delivery system 610 can be dynamically adjusted according to the positioning information such that the delivered light tracks the position of the eye 1. The infrared radiation advantageously allows for illumination of the eye 1 (to provide positioning feedback) without distracting the patient, because the infrared radiation is not perceived by the patient. The infrared light source 620 and the camera 630 can also be utilized during a diagnostic interval to topographically characterize the cornea 2 prior to initiation of cross-linking. For example, the camera 630 can be utilized in combination with a multiple slit lamp configuration such as the configuration illustrated in
From the viewpoint of an observer facing the eye 1, from the behind the slit lamps 702, 704, 706, 708: the first slit lamp 702 may be positioned above the eye 1 and may direct a sheet of light downward at 45° with respect to the eye 1; the second slit lamp 704 may be positioned to the left of the eye 1 and may direct a sheet of light rightward at 45° with respect to the eye 1; the third slit lamp 706 may be positioned below the eye 1 and may direct a sheet of light upward at 45° with respect to the eye 1; the fourth slit lamp 708 may be positioned to the right of the eye 1 and may direct a sheet of light leftward at 45° with respect to the eye 1. Thus, in the schematic illustration provided in
The intensity pattern created by the multiple slit lamps illuminating the cornea 2 is directed to the camera 760 by the corneal imaging optics 710. The intensity pattern(s) detected by the camera 760 are then analyzed by the controller 120 to extract corneal topography and pachymetry information. An illustrative schematic of an example intensity pattern created by the four slit lamp configuration is provided in
The emerging light may also undergo spreading due to the diffusive optical characteristics of the corneal tissue, which influences the width(s) of the observed line(s). For example, observing relatively thicker line(s) can indicate a greater degree of optical diffusion, and thus greater corneal thickness. Ray tracing may also be employed to trace lines from slit lamps (e.g., the slit lamp 702) to the camera 760 to provide an estimate of anterior and posterior surfaces of cornea 2, and thus the shape and thickness of the cornea 2 at multiple locations (e.g., the locations illuminated by the slit lamps) may be extracted. By defining the shape and thickness of the cornea 2 at multiple locations, a three-dimensional profile of the cornea 2 can be determined. Using the camera 760, the surface estimates from the multiple slit lamp configuration may be matched to corneal surface estimates from an interferometry system to provide an even more accurate estimate of the full corneal topography and/or thickness.
By providing a three dimensional profile of the cornea 2, the controller 120 can determine the center position of the cornea 2 and/or the location and/or orientation of the corneal optical axis. The controller 120 can determine the center position by, for example, determining the apex of the three dimensional profile of the corneal surface. The determined center position may then be used in conjunction with adjustable optical and mechanical components to align any of the implementations of the feedback system 400 previously discussed.
The multiple slit lamp configuration illustrated in
Additionally, in a configuration where the positions of the slit lamps 702, 704, 706, 708 are well known, the distance may be estimated directly from the slit lamps, camera, and optical elements illustrated in
In addition to utilizing the four slit lamp apparatus described in connection with
In
Aspects of the present disclosure further provide for repeatedly implementing the embodiment 800A to study the distribution of the photo-active marker 812 in the eye 1 over time, and to extract information indicative of the rate of uptake of the photo-active marker 812. In some implementations, the presence, distribution, and/or uptake rate of the photo-active marker 812 can be indicative of a disease pathology of the eye 1.
In the decision block 950, the determined distribution of the marker/agent 914 is compared with a desired distribution of the cross-linking agent. If the distribution is as desired, cross-linking is initiated in block 960. If the distribution is not as desired, the distribution can be adjusted prior to initiating cross-linking. The distribution of the marker/agent 914 can be adjusted by modifying the permeability (i.e., the susceptibility to uptake) of the cornea 2 in block 970 and returning to block 910 to apply additional marker/agent 914. The adjustment to the corneal permeability (970) can be carried out via a permeability regulation system 972, such as, for example, an infrared, microwave, or laser system that applies a pattern of radiation to the cornea to heat the corneal tissue according to the applied pattern. Because the permeability of the corneal tissue is enhanced at increased temperatures, the permeability of the corneal tissue is modified according to the applied pattern of heat energy. The permeability regulation system 972 can additionally or alternatively include, for example, an ultrasound system to apply ultrasound energy to increase the permeability of the corneal tissue, and which can optionally include microspheres to direct and/or focus the ultrasound energy. For example, the permeability regulation system 972 can be a thermokeratoplasty applicator for conveying microwave heat energy to the cornea 2. Exemplary permeability regulation systems and schemes for operating the same are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,175, filed May 18, 2012, the contents of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some examples, the permeability regulation system includes an infrared (“IR”) radiation source that is directed to a digital micro-mirror device (“DMD”) to selectively reflect the infrared radiation and provide a time-averaged beam profile according to a desired pixelated pattern. For example, the DMD for patterning the IR to adjust the permeability of the corneal tissue can also be employed to pattern UVA on the corneal tissue to activate cross-linking (e.g., the DMD 344 of
Furthermore, while not separately illustrated in the embodiment 900 of
Additionally or alternatively, the distribution of the marker/agent 914 can be adjusted by applying a reverse osmotic fluid to the surface 2A of the cornea 2 to draw the marker/agent 914 away from the surface 2A or by applying quenching agent to inhibit, deactivate, or degrade the marker/agent 914. Example quenching agents and methods of utilizing them are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,175, filed May 18, 2012. Generally, applying either quenching agents, reverse osmotic fluids, or other chemical agents to the eye 1 can modify the distribution of the marker/agent 914 within the eye 1. Applying the various agents can be utilized to modify the distribution prior to activation of cross-linking, or can be utilized to modify the rate of cross-linking reactions as a function of depth within the eye 1. For example, applying a reverse-osmotic fluid may decrease cross-linking near the surface 2A. Additionally or alternatively, applying a quenching agent may inhibit the marker/agent 914 from being sensitized to react and thereby generate cross-linking. To create desired reaction rates and/or distributions, the concentrations of the applied substances and the duration of their application can also be adjusted. Generally, the distribution of the marker/agent 914 and/or the efficacy of the marker/agent 914 to act as a sensitizer to generate cross-linking reactions can be adjusted as a function of depth within the eye 1 through the use of quenching agents, reverse-osmotic fluids, other ophthalmological fluids, and the like alone or in combination with the permeability regulation system 972 of
Once the distribution is determined to be as desired in block 950, block 960 can be carried out. The cross-linking block 960 can be carried out to apply the initiating element 222 according to a predetermined set of parameters including duration (“T”), spectral bandwidth (“B”), quencher (“Q”), and intensity pattern (“I”). The cross-linking block 960 can also be carried out in an iterative fashion to repeatedly apply the initiating element 222 to the eye 1 a set number of times (“N”) with B, T, I all fixed. Additionally or alternatively, the cross-linking block 960 can call for repeated application of the initiating element 222 according to distinct parameters during duration(s) (“T[k]”), spectral bandwidth(s) (“B[k]”), quencher(s) (“Q[k]”), and intensity pattern(s) (“I[k]”), with k defined from 1 to N and each of the respective T[k], B[k], Q[k], and I[k] being optionally dis-similar from one another. Furthermore, in implementations where the cross-linking block 960 is itself iterative, the cross-linking block 960 can itself be interrupted to provide a fluorescence dosimetry reading (e.g., return to block 920) to monitor the distribution of the marker/agent before completing the cross-linking block 960.
Furthermore, some embodiments of the present disclosure provide for capturing cross-sectional views of the corneal tissue via an optical coherence tomography (“OCT”) system. By photo-activating cross-linking agent and providing suitable filters over the light detecting portions of the OCT system, the cross-sectional views captured by the OCT system can be indicative of the distribution of photo-activated cross-linking agent (or another photo-activated marker) within the corneal tissue. Exemplary OCT systems are described, for example, in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/542,269, filed Oct. 2, 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/550,576, filed Oct. 24, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/597,137, filed Feb. 9, 2012, the contents of each of these applications being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Thus, aspects of the present disclosure generally provide for determining a distribution of photo-active cross-linking agent according to cross-sectional images of the cornea while the cross-linking agent undergoes fluorescence. The distribution of cross-linking agent within the tissue can be determined based on the cross-sectional intensity profiles such as described in connection with equations 1 and 2, for example.
While it is appreciated that aspects of the present disclosure for measuring a distribution of a photo-active marker through fluorescence dosimetry are not limited to particular photo-active markers, excitation sources, or optical systems for capturing images, an experimental apparatus is described next to illustrate an exemplary measurement scheme and system therefore in connection with
In an exemplary operation of the system 1000a, the permeability regulation system(s) 1060 apply energy to the corneal tissue 2 to increase the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 to the cross-linking agent 1032. The permeability regulation system(s) 1060 can adjust the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 via heat application 1060a and/or ultrasound energy application 1060b. In some examples, the heat application 1060a can be achieved via a laser radiation system, a near infrared radiation system, a microwave thermokeratoplasty system, etc. Exemplary permeability regulation systems, and operation schemes therefore are described, by way of example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/475,175, filed May 18, 2012. Thus, the controller 1020 operates the permeability regulation system(s) 1060 to control the permeability (e.g., uptake rate and/or amount) of the corneal tissue 2 to the cross-linking agent 1032. By applying energy from the permeability regulation system(s) 1060 according to a non-uniform pattern, the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 can be adjusted with some regions becoming relatively more permeable to the cross-linking agent than other regions, which regions are based on the applied non-uniform pattern. Modifying the corneal permeability according to a non-uniform pattern allows the cross-linking agent 1032 that diffuses into the corneal tissue 2 to penetrate (“absorb”) according to a non-uniform pattern corresponding to the non-uniform pattern of the permeability regulation system(s) 1060.
The system 1000a further includes the fluorescence dosimetry system(s) 1050. The dosimetry system(s) 1050 are configured to dynamically monitor the distribution of cross-linking agent in the corneal tissue 2. Generally, the dosimetry system(s) 1060 include sensors (e.g., cameras) to measure characteristics of the corneal tissue 2 (e.g., images indicating fluorescence activity), and outputs to convey signals indicative of the measured characteristics to the controller 1020 such that the distribution of the cross-linking agent can be determined by analyzing the measured characteristics. The dosimetry system(s) 1060 can capture cross-sectional images of fluorescence activity (which indicates the distribution of the cross-linking agent along the cross-sectional region) via an Optical Coherence Tomography (“OCT”) system 1050a and/or a Scheimpflug system 1050b.
Additionally, the system 1000a can optionally include an additional feedback system (not shown) for monitoring biomechanical properties of the corneal tissue 2. For example, the feedback system(s) can monitor observable factors influencing (or indicative of) the distribution of cross-linking agent or the progress of cross-linking activity within the corneal tissue 2. Generally, the feedback system(s) include sensors to measure characteristics of the corneal tissue 2, and outputs to convey signals indicative of the measured characteristics to the controller 1020. In some examples, feedback system(s) include an interferometry system, a multi-camera Scheimpflug system, an Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT) system, a Supersonic Shear Imaging (SSI) system, or another monitoring system for characterizing biomechanical properties of the eye 1. For example, an interferometry system can characterize the corneal topography by comparing interference patterns of light reflected from the corneal surface with light reflected from a reference surface. Observing the corneal topography over time allows for characterization of the dynamic deformation of the corneal tissue 2 in response to subtle perturbations, such as changes in intraocular pressure, external stimuli, etc. The rate and/or amount of deformation provide an indication of biomechanical strength or stiffness (e.g., a measure of the resistance to deformation) of the corneal tissue. Thus, feedback systems operative to provide indications of the biomechanical strength of the corneal tissue 2 can indicate the progress of cross-linking activity in the eye, and thus indicate the need for additional cross-linking activity. The feedback system can optionally include systems for detecting additional biomechanical properties of the eye 1, such as corneal thickness. Further the feedback system may include a video system for monitoring the position of the cornea 2 and aligning optical elements conveying the initiating element 1040 according to the position information.
The feedback system can alternatively or additionally include an OCT system or Scheimpflug system configured to dynamically characterize the deformation response of corneal tissue 2 to subtle perturbations and thereby determine the biomechanical strength of the corneal tissue. Systems and methods relating to monitoring the distribution of cross-linking agent and aspects of cross-linking activity are described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/051,699, filed Mar. 18, 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/492,553, filed Jun. 2, 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/542,269, filed Oct. 2, 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/550,576, filed Oct. 24, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/597,137, filed Feb. 9, 2012; the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Furthermore, the distribution of cross-linking agent and aspects of cross-linking activity may be dynamically monitored via the dosimetry system(s) 1060. For example, indications of the presence and/or distribution of the cross-linking agent 1032 within the cornea 2 may be detected via fluorescence of the cross-linking agent 1032. In some examples, the distribution of the cross-linking agent 1032 can be characterized in three dimensions by observing fluorescence at multiple distinct focal depths within the corneal tissue 2. As such, the application and distribution of the cross-linking agent 1032 may be controlled in response to the dynamic monitoring by, for example, adjusting the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 via the permeability regulation system(s) 1060.
Additionally or alternatively, diffusion influencing compounds can be applied to the cornea 2 via the applicator 1030 to urge the cross-linking agent 1032 to further depths within the cornea 2 (e.g., a neutral compound) or to draw the cross-linking agent 1032 from the cornea 2 (e.g., a reverse osmotic fluid). Furthermore, cross-linking agent 1032 within the corneal tissue 2 can be quenched following a cross-linking treatment by a quenching agent applied via the drug application device 132, as described in connection with
In some embodiments, feedback information from the feedback system(s) and/or fluorescence dosimetry system(s) 1050 can then be used to develop a treatment plan or dynamically adjust a treatment plan that is suited to the monitored characteristics of the corneal tissue 2. The treatment plan can be characterized by one or more applications of the cross-linking agent 1032 to achieve desired distributions within the cornea 2 and one or more energy doses of the initiating element 1040 delivered via optical elements according to desired patterns (e.g., via a DMD device or a scanning mirror system) to controllably activate cross-linking in the corneal tissue 2. Exemplary systems and methods for controlling the activation of the cross-linking agent 1032 by precisely delivering the initiating element both spatially and temporally, and optionally according to information received from a feedback system are provided in U.S. patent Ser. No. 13/051,699, filed Mar. 18, 2011, and which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/315,840, filed Mar. 19, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/319,111, filed Mar. 30, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/326,527, filed Apr. 21, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/328,138, filed Apr. 26, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/377,024, filed Aug. 25, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/388,963, filed Oct. 1, 2010; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/409,103, filed Nov. 1, 2010; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/423,375, filed Dec. 15, 2010, the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference. These and other techniques may be combined with the permeability regulation system(s) 1520 and/or fluorescence dosimetry system(s) 1050 to control the diffusion of the cross-linking agent 1032 into selected corneal regions according to a desired distribution and thereby generate cross-linking activity at selected regions of the corneal tissue 2.
Once the distribution of cross-linking agent (e.g., Riboflavin 1032) is determined, distribution can be adjusted by applying additional cross-linking agent via the applicator 1030 and/or by adjusting the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 to the cross-linking agent. Systems and methods for adjusting the permeability of the corneal tissue 2 via permeability regulation systems are discussed further herein. In some examples, the permeability of the corneal tissue can be modified by applying heat energy to the corneal tissue, such as heat energy delivered via microwave radiation and/or near infrared radiation. As illustrated in the system 1000, a near infrared radiation source 1012 can be directed to the mirror array 1040 to provide a pixelated pattern of near IR radiation to the cornea 2 according to a desired modification in permeability prior to, during, and/or after instillation of the Riboflavin 1032 via the applicator 1030. For example, where the controller 1020 determines, based on the received cross-sectional images from the rotating Scheimpflug system (i.e., the cameras 1051, 1052; lenses 1053, 1054; etc.), that the concentration of cross-linking agent is too low in identified regions of the corneal tissue 2, the UVA source 1010 can be turned off (or directed away from the mirror array 1040) and the near IR light source 1012 can be directed to the mirror array 1042 so as to treat the identified low concentration regions with additional near IR, so as to increase the permeability of those regions. The distribution of the cross-linking agent can be continuously monitored via the system 1000b until a desired distribution is achieved and cross-linking can be initiated. In some examples, the mirror array 1040 can then provide a third purpose: to initiate the cross-linking by directing light from the UVA source 1010 to the cornea 2 according to a desired pattern of cross-linking initiation.
In an experimental setup, the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer from Ziemer was used to perform experiments to detect the presence of Riboflavin in porcine corneas through a filter in front of one of the detectors in the Scheimpflug analyzer. The Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer has two detectors that rotate 180° taking several spokes (ranging from 16 to 60 spokes) of the corneal tissue illuminated by 470 nm light through a slit lamp aperture. At that wavelength (470 nm), the Riboflavin present in the cornea is excited and fluoresces at a peak of approximately 525 nm as seen in the graph shown in
A Straw colored filter (Cinegel, Rosco) is used to filter the exciting light (i.e., the 470 nm light), while allowing the fluorescence (i.e., the 525 nm light) to reach the detector. This is illustrated by the graph shown in
The experimental procedure called for debriding the epithelium of a porcine eye (1 day post-mortem) and soaking the eye in saline to inflate the eye to about 15 mmHg. The effect of varying the soak time of the eye was studied as follows. A Scheimpflug image (or series of images) was taken with the Straw filter on one of the cameras, while the other camera was not filtered, to thereby obtain two images: one with the filter and one without. Obtaining two images, one filtered and one not, allows for comparing the full spectrum of excitation and emission (unfiltered) versus emission only (filtered). Drops of 0.1% Riboflavin-5-phosphate in 20% dextran solution were placed on the eye (providing a reservoir of riboflavin solution) and allowed to pre-soak for 9 minutes. After pre-soak, the eye was placed in front of the Scheimpflug analyzer and another image (or series of images) was captured. Riboflavin was then dropped on the eye once again for another 6 minutes and an image (or series of images) was captured. The instillation and Scheimpflug image capture procedure was repeated again for 15 and 21 minutes of pre-soak times. The results of this procedure to extract the concentration of Riboflavin as a function of distance within the eye are presented in
The effect of varying the concentration of Riboflavin in the treatment solution was also studied. A porcine eye (1 day post-mortem) was debrided of its epithelium and inflated to around 15 mmHg with saline. As before a Scheimpflug image (or series of images) is captured with the Straw filter on one of the cameras to obtain two images: one with the filter and one without. Drops of 0.1% Riboflavin-5-phosphate in 20% dextran solution were placed on the eye (providing a reservoir of riboflavin solution) and allowed to pre-soak for 15 minutes. After the pre-soak, the eye was placed in front of the Scheimpflug analyzer and another image (or series of images) was captured to determine the distribution of the Riboflavin within the cornea according to the observed pattern of fluorescence. This procedure was repeated with two more eyes for 15 minutes pre-soak times using 0.25% and 0.5% riboflavin-5-phosphate solutions respectively. The results of this procedure to extract the concentration of Riboflavin as a function of distance within the eye at the different Riboflavin concentrations are presented in
The effect on the distribution of Riboflavin due to the application of a quenching agent to the eye following a Riboflavin pre-soak was also studied. Ascorbic acid can be considered a fluorescence quenching agent for Riboflavin due to its tendency to block the light reaction (e.g., photo-activation). However, as discussed above, several different substances can be utilized as quenching agents to inhibit the photo-activation of a cross-linking agent, or to degrade the cross-linking agent such that it is no longer photo-active. A porcine eye (1 day post-mortem) was debrided of its epithelium and inflated to around 15 mmHg with saline. A Scheimpflug image was taken with the filter on one of the cameras to obtain two images: one with the filter and one without. Drops of 0.1% Riboflavin-5-phosphate in saline solution were placed on the eye (providing a reservoir of riboflavin solution) and allowed to pre-soak for 30 minutes. After the pre-soak, the eye was placed in front of the Scheimpflug analyzer and another image (or series of images) was captured to determine the distribution of Riboflavin based on the detected pattern of fluorescence within the cornea. Drops of 1% ascorbic acid were then placed on the eye (providing a reservoir) for 5 minutes and another image (or series of images) was captured. This was repeated two more times to obtain images after 5, 10, and 15 minutes of ascorbic acid soak time. This same experiment was repeated on one more eye to investigate the repeatability of the observed results. Furthermore, the results were compared with a control eye where all the experimental procedures were similar except for using distilled water instead of ascorbic acid. The results of this procedure to extract the concentration of Riboflavin as a function of distance within the eye after applying a quenching agent for varying durations are presented in
The effect of applying UVA radiation (e.g., light with a wavelength of 365 nm to 370 nm) to an eye pre-soaked with Riboflavin was also studied. A porcine eye (1 day post-mortem) was debrided of its epithelium and inflated to around 15 mmHg with saline. A Scheimpflug image was taken with the Straw filter on one of the cameras to obtain two images: one with the filter and one without. Drops of 0.1% Riboflavin-5-phosphate in saline solution was placed on the eye (providing a reservoir of Riboflavin solution) and allowed to pre-soak for 30 minutes. After the pre-soak, the eye was placed in front of the Scheimpflug analyzer and another image (or series of images) was captured to determine the distribution of Riboflavin according to the observed fluorescence within the cornea. The eye was then placed under a UVA light source (365 nm) at 30 mW/cm2 for one minute and another image was then taken. The UVA light source can be, for example, a light emitting diode (LED). This was repeated two more times to obtain images after one, two, and three minutes of UVA irradiation. This same experiment was repeated on two more eyes and results were averaged. In addition, three eyes were used as control where all the experimental procedures were similar except for keeping the UVA turned off. The results of this procedure to extract the concentration of Riboflavin as a function of distance within the eye after applying varying amounts of UVA light to the eye are presented in
To analyze the effects described above, images from the Scheimpflug image capture system were exported and analyzed. Using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/), cross-sectional intensity profiles are plotted for each image for both before and after applying Riboflavin. Images of cornea with no Riboflavin provide the baseline intensities around the 540 nm to 700 nm wavelength range that are subtracted from the intensities of the cornea with Riboflavin. Intensity profiles of Riboflavin corneas minus the baseline are then fitted using a solution to Fick's second law of diffusion equation:
where C is concentration in the medium diffused, C0 is initial concentration at boundary, x is spatial distance, D is the diffusion coefficient and t is time between application and observation (i.e., the time for diffusion).
Because the intensity of fluorescence is approximately proportional to the concentration of Riboflavin through the cornea, the diffusion equation can be approximately transformed in terms of observed fluorescence intensity. The observed fluorescence intensity is the intensity observed after instillation less the background intensity observed prior to instillation (i.e., the fluorescent images less the background). Thus, in the approximation that observed intensity, I, is proportional to concentration, C, the diffusion equation is transformed to:
where I is intensity across the cross-section of the cornea, and I0 is initial intensity at the boundary (i.e., the corneal surface) and x, D and t are the same as in Eq. 1.
During the second part of the experiment, data from various Riboflavin-5-phosphate concentrations was treated to a similar analysis. As shown in
Soaking the eye with the ascorbic acid considerably decreases the maximum fluorescence intensity observed with the Scheimpflug imager as shown in the
As shown in
This initial proof of concept work shows the feasibility of using a Scheimpflug imaging system and analyzer combined with a filter to detect the diffusion and distribution of Riboflavin in corneal tissue based on the fluorescence of photo-activated Riboflavin. As described herein in connection with
According to aspects of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for monitoring time based photo active agent delivery or photo active marker presence. Aspects further provide systems and methods for measuring the effects of conducting eye therapy, especially when a cross-linking agent is applied to stabilize desired shape changes generated in corneal tissue.
The fluorescence dosimetry system consists of a Scheimpflug optical system configured to take cross sectional images of the eye before and during instillation of a cross-linking agent to monitor the tissue uptake and drug concentration as a function of depth and/or position within the corneal tissue. In addition, a slit lamp configuration can be utilized to provide cross sectional images of the eye. It may also be used during and after the photo activating cross-linking procedure for real-time monitoring of the concentration and consumption of the cross-linking agent monitoring the amount of cross-linking achieved.
Several commercial ophthalmic Scheimpflug image capture systems are commercially available. These include the Pentacam corneal topography system made by Oculus http://www.pentacam.com/sites/messprinzip.php as well as the GALILEI and GALILEI G2 corneal topography systems made by Ziemer Group http://www.ziemergroup.com/products/g2-main.html.
The Scheimpflug systems generally provide a slit of light for illumination at the fluorescence excitation wavelengths of the cross-linking agent. This causes fluorescence emission of the cross-linking agent which is proportional to the cross-linking agent concentration within the target tissue. By periodically monitoring the cross-linking agent over time one can precisely determine the depth and concentration of the cross-linking agent within the tissue both spatially and temporally. This allows for tailored drug delivery for individual patients since drug uptake may be different based on their own particular physiology.
Scheimpflug imaging differs from conventional techniques in that the object plane, lens plane, and image plane are not parallel to each other. Instead, the three planes intersect in a line. The advantage of the Scheimpflug geometry is that a relatively greater depth of focus is achieved that is available in typical optical arrangements. The Scheimpflug principle has been applied in ophthalmology to obtain optical sections of the entire anterior segment of the eye, from the anterior surface of the cornea to the posterior surface of the lens. This type of imaging allows assessment of anterior and posterior corneal topography, anterior chamber depth, as well as anterior and posterior topography of the lens.
Referring to
As shown in
The image planes of both cameras 1701a, b (“camera plane”) are each aligned approximately 45° from the axis defined by the UV illumination, i.e., the z-axis. The focal planes for both cameras 1701a, b are parallel to the camera planes. As shown in
Referring to
The Scheimpflug system 1801a includes a CCD camera 1802a and a lens 1803a. The plane of the CCD camera 1802a (“CCD plane”) is aligned approximately 18.4° from the axis defined by the UV illumination, i.e., the z-axis. Meanwhile, the plane of the lens 1803a (“lens plane”) is aligned 45° from the axis. As shown in
To capture the profile for a corneal thickness of 0.5 mm for the 4.5 mm section, the depth of focus associated with the focal plane of the CCD camera 1802a spans over a range i, e.g., 0.88 mm. In other words, the range i allows the camera 1802a to capture image data from the nearest point N of the cornea (on anterior surface) and the farthest point F of the cornea (on posterior surface) relative to the Scheimpflug system 1801a, within the 4.5 mm section. Compared to the system 1700 described previously, a smaller range for the depth of focus is required for the system 1800 to capture the corneal profile.
As shown in
Similarly, in
Similarly, in
Advantageously, the range for the depth of focus in the system 1800 is smaller distance than the range for the system 1700 to capture the corneal profile. In particular, for a given shift in eye position, the depth of focus required by the system 1800 is smaller than the depth of focus required by the system 1700 to continue to observe a both the posterior and anterior surfaces of a 4.5 mm section of the cornea. As such, for a given depth of focus, the system 1800 is less sensitive to movement of the eye and may be more robust than the system 1700 in a clinical environment.
While the angle of the CCD camera in the example system 1800 may be 18.4°, a system employing a similar configuration of two off-axis Scheimpflug systems to capture the corneal fiber may employ other camera angles which can be selected to minimize the required range for the depth of focus in the optics employed. As shown in
While the system 1800 is described with two Scheimpflug systems, aspects of the present disclosure apply to systems with one off-axis Scheimpflug system. Additionally or alternatively one or more of such Scheimpflug systems may rotate (for example about an axis generally parallel to the corneal optical axis so as to capture indications of concentrations of photo-active substances from additional portions of the cornea.
While particular angular orientations and dimensions are provided in describing the example system 1800 for exemplary and descriptive purposes, such Scheimpflug imaging systems are generally arranged so as to minimize the requirements of the depth of focus of the Scheimpflug imaging system, particular under conditions where the position of the cornea may change dynamically during measurement (such as in a clinical environment). Minimization of the depth of focus requirements is generally achieved by at least approximately aligning the focal plane of the Scheimpflug imaging system to be generally tangential to the corneal boundary at a mid-point of the corneal surface being imaged (as illustrated by the point N in
Furthermore, some aspects of the present disclosure provide a Scheimpflug imaging system where the intersection of the CCD plane, lens plane, and focal plane is located generally below an upper-most surface of the cornea being imaged. For example, as shown in
The rate at which a particular fluorescing marker is taken up by the tissue may also be an indicator of different pathologies of disease. The mere presence of a particular fluorescing marker taken up by the tissue may also be an indicator of different pathologies of disease. Alternatively, the rate at which a particular fluorescing marker is taken up by the tissue may also be an indicator of different bio-chemical, bio-mechanical, or opto-mechanical properties of the tissue.
Utilizing various combinations of fluorescence excitation wavelengths and fluorescence emission collecting filters, one can tailor the system to monitor many different photoactive agents and markers.
The systems described herein (e.g., the system 1000a of
For example, the average soak time for drug delivery might be 10 minutes for a given formulation of Riboflavin. Measuring an individual patient with the system at 4 minutes may allow for a predicted drug delivery concentration at 8 minutes, 10 minutes or 12 minutes based on that individual's diffusion rate.
This can also be useful for understanding the diffusion rates of transepithelial Riboflavin delivery for patients with different disease states such as keratoconus. In keratoconus the cornea becomes weakened and the cornea bulges creating cone like structures. These structures often have different epithelial thicknesses and epithelial health than the rest of the cornea. By understanding the rate and/or concentration of drug delivery below these structures delivery of proper treatment may be obtained.
This system could also be utilized to understand when to place a quencher on the surface of the cornea after drug delivery to help protect the epithelium and allow for better depth penetration of photons into the cornea. The quencher is thereby acting as an optical clearing agent for the epithelium. This effect can be seen, for example, in the example results described above in connection with
The system can be used during UVA illumination to monitor the Riboflavin quenching and depletion as a function of time. The monitored Riboflavin distributions can be correlated to the amount of cross-linking and clinical outcomes to better understand differences between attempted clinical outcomes and actually achieved clinical outcomes. In this way the system could be used to determine the specific amount of UVA dose to achieve a specific outcome for an individual with a given diffusion rate and cross-linking profile. The UVA dose could be stopped at certain intervals and quickly monitored by the fluorescence dosimetry system (e.g., the system 500 having a Scheimpflug optical system or the system 600 having a slit lamp). For example, a sample can be made periodically every ten seconds for a duration of 100 milliseconds (e.g., the average of three slit lamp images at 30 fps frame rate).
The use of Riboflavin as the cross-linking agent and UV light as the initiating element in the embodiments above is described for illustrative purposes only. In general, other types of cross-linking agents may be alternatively or additionally employed according to aspects of the present disclosure. Thus, for example Rose Bengal (4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2′,4′,5′,7′-tetraiodofluorescein) may be employed as the cross-linking agent 130, or as the cross-linking agent delivered in varying concentrations 912, 1022. Rose Bengal has been approved for application to the eye as a stain to identify damage to conjunctival and corneal cells. However, Rose Bengal can also initiate cross-linking activity within corneal collagen to stabilize the corneal tissue and improve its biomechanical strength. Like Riboflavin, photo-activating light may be applied to initiate cross-linking activity by causing the Rose Bengal to convert O2 in the corneal tissue into singlet oxygen. The photo-activating light may include, for example, UV light or green light. The photo-activating light may include photons having energy levels sufficient to individually convert O2 into singlet oxygen, or may include photons having energy levels sufficient to convert O2 into singlet oxygen in combination with other photons, or any combination thereof.
Although embodiments of the present disclosure may describe stabilizing corneal structure after treatments, such as LASIK surgery and thermokeratoplasty, it is understood that aspects of the present disclosure are applicable in any context where it is advantageous to form a stable three-dimensional structure of corneal tissue through cross-linking. Furthermore, while aspects of the present disclosure are described in connection with the re-shaping and/or strengthening of corneal tissue via cross-linking the corneal collagen fibrils, it is specifically noted that the present disclosure is not limited to cross-linking corneal tissue, or even cross-linking of tissue. Aspects of the present disclosure apply generally to the controlled cross-linking of fibrous matter and optionally according to feedback information. The fibrous matter can be collagen fibrils such as found in tissue or can be another organic or inorganic material that is arranged, microscopically, as a plurality of fibrils with the ability to be reshaped by generating cross-links between the fibrils. Similarly, the present disclosure is not limited to a particular type of cross-linking agent or initiating element, and it is understood that suitable cross-linking agents and initiating elements can be selected according to the particular fibrous material being reshaped and/or strengthened by cross-linking.
In some embodiments, for example, the cross-linking agent may be Riboflavin and the initiating element may be photo-activating light, such as ultraviolet (UV) light. In these embodiments, the photo-activating light initiates cross-linking activity by irradiating the applied cross-linking agent to generate reactive radicals in the corneal tissue.
The present disclosure includes systems having controllers for providing various functionality to process information and determine results based on inputs. Generally, the controllers (such as the controller 120 described throughout the present disclosure) may be implemented as a combination of hardware and software elements. The hardware aspects may include combinations of operatively coupled hardware components including microprocessors, logical circuitry, communication/networking ports, digital filters, memory, or logical circuitry. The controller may be adapted to perform operations specified by a computer-executable code, which may be stored on a computer readable medium.
As described above, the controller 120 may be a programmable processing device, such as an external conventional computer or an on-board field programmable gate array (FPGA) or digital signal processor (DSP), that executes software, or stored instructions. In general, physical processors and/or machines employed by embodiments of the present disclosure for any processing or evaluation may include one or more networked or non-networked general purpose computer systems, microprocessors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGA's), digital signal processors (DSP's), micro-controllers, and the like, programmed according to the teachings of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, as is appreciated by those skilled in the computer and software arts. The physical processors and/or machines may be externally networked with the image capture device(s) (e.g., the camera 760, or cameras 1051, 1052, etc), or may be integrated to reside within the image capture device. Appropriate software can be readily prepared by programmers of ordinary skill based on the teachings of the exemplary embodiments, as is appreciated by those skilled in the software art. In addition, the devices and subsystems of the exemplary embodiments can be implemented by the preparation of application-specific integrated circuits or by interconnecting an appropriate network of conventional component circuits, as is appreciated by those skilled in the electrical art(s). Thus, the exemplary embodiments are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and/or software.
Stored on any one or on a combination of computer readable media, the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may include software for controlling the devices and subsystems of the exemplary embodiments, for driving the devices and subsystems of the exemplary embodiments, for enabling the devices and subsystems of the exemplary embodiments to interact with a human user, and the like. Such software can include, but is not limited to, device drivers, firmware, operating systems, development tools, applications software, and the like. Such computer readable media further can include the computer program product of an embodiment of the present disclosure for performing all or a portion (if processing is distributed) of the processing performed in implementations. Computer code devices of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can include any suitable interpretable or executable code mechanism, including but not limited to scripts, interpretable programs, dynamic link libraries (DLLs), Java classes and applets, complete executable programs, and the like. Moreover, parts of the processing of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can be distributed for better performance, reliability, cost, and the like.
Common forms of computer-readable media may include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other suitable magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, CDRW, DVD, any other suitable optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, optical mark sheets, any other suitable physical medium with patterns of holes or other optically recognizable indicia, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other suitable memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave or any other suitable medium from which a computer can read.
While the present disclosure has been described in connection with a number of exemplary embodiments, and implementations, the present disclosure is not so limited, but rather cover various modifications, and equivalent arrangements.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/488,097, filed Jun. 4, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,020,580 on Apr. 28, 2015, which claims the benefit of, and priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/492,553, filed Jun. 2, 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/566,976, filed Dec. 5, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/594,796, filed Feb. 3, 2012, the contents of these applications being incorporated entirely herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3169459 | Friedberg et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
| 4034750 | Seiderman | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4161013 | Grodzinsky et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4326529 | Doss et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4381007 | Doss | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4665913 | L'Esperance, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
| 4712543 | Baron | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4764007 | Task | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4805616 | Pao | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4881543 | Trembly et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4891043 | Zeimer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4969912 | Kelman et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4994058 | Raven et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5016615 | Driller et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019074 | Muller | May 1991 | A |
| 5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103005 | Gyure et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5171254 | Sher | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171318 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5281211 | Parel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5332802 | Kelman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5450144 | Nun | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5461212 | Seiler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5490849 | Smith | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5512966 | Snook | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5562656 | Sumiya | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5608472 | Szirth et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618284 | Sand | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624437 | Freeman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634921 | Hood et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5766171 | Silvestrini | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779696 | Berry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5786893 | Fink et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5814040 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5885275 | Muller | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891131 | Rajan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5910110 | Bastable | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6033396 | Huang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6099521 | Shadduck | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101411 | Newsome | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6104959 | Spertell | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6139876 | Kolta | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6161544 | DeVore et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162210 | Shadduck | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6188500 | Rudeen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218360 | Cintron et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223075 | Beck et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6270221 | Liang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280436 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293938 | Muller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6319273 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322557 | Nikolaevich et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325792 | Swinger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334074 | Spertell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6342053 | Berry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6394999 | Williams et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402739 | Neev | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6478792 | Hansel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6520956 | Huang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520958 | Shimmick et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6537545 | Karageozian et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6571118 | Utzinger et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572849 | Shahinian, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6617963 | Watters et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6673067 | Peyman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6918904 | Peyman | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6946440 | DeWoolfson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 7001374 | Peyman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004902 | Luce | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7044945 | Sand | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7073510 | Redmond et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7130835 | Cox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141049 | Stern et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7192429 | Trembly | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7237898 | Hohla et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7270658 | Woloszko et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7302189 | Kawahata | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7331350 | Kochevar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7402562 | DeWoolfson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7753943 | Strong | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7871378 | Chou et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7898656 | Yun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7935058 | Dupps, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8111394 | Borysow et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8115919 | Yun et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8366689 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8414911 | Mattson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8475437 | Mrochen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8574277 | Muller et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8715273 | Thyzel | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8995618 | Gertner | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9005261 | Brinkmann | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 20010041856 | McDaniel | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047012 | Desantis, Jr. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055095 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002369 | Hood | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013577 | Frey et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042638 | Iezzi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049437 | Silvestrini | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099363 | Woodward et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159618 | Freeman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164379 | Nishihara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018255 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030030908 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135122 | Bambot et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175259 | Karageozian et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189689 | Rathjen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208190 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216728 | Stern et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231285 | Ferguson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001821 | Silver et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040002694 | Pawlowski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071778 | Bellmann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093046 | Sand | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111086 | Trembly | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143250 | Trembly | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199079 | Chuck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199158 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204707 | Hood et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243160 | Shiuey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050038471 | Chan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096515 | Geng | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149006 | Peyman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187599 | Sharkey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271590 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060058592 | Bouma et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106371 | Muhlhoff et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135957 | Panescu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149343 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177430 | Bhushan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189964 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195074 | Bartoli | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195076 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276777 | Coroneo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287662 | Berry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070024860 | Tobiason et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027509 | Eisenberg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028928 | Peyman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048340 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055227 | Khalaj et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074722 | Giroux et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090153 | Naito et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099966 | Fabricant | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123845 | Lubatschowski | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135805 | Peyman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142828 | Peyman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161976 | Trembly | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203478 | Herekar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203547 | Costello et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244470 | Barker, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244496 | Hellenkamp | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265603 | Pinelli | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009901 | Redmond et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015660 | Herekar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027328 | Klopotek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033408 | Bueler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063627 | Stucke et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114283 | Mattson | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139671 | Herekar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208177 | Mrochen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090024117 | Muller | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054879 | Berry | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069798 | Muller et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090116096 | Zalevsky et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090130176 | Bossy-Nobs et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149842 | Muller et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149923 | Herekar | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171305 | El Hage | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192437 | Soltz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209954 | Muller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234335 | Yee | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271155 | Dupps, Jr. et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275929 | Zickler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276042 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100028407 | Del Priore et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036488 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057060 | Herekar | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069894 | Mrochen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082018 | Panthakey et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094197 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114109 | Peyman | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149487 | Ribak | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100173019 | Paik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100189817 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191228 | Ruiz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203103 | Dana et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204584 | Ornberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210996 | Peyman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100271593 | Filar | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286156 | Pinelli | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100317588 | Shoseyov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318017 | Lewis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110044902 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077624 | Brady et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098790 | Daxer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118654 | Muller et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125076 | Kraft et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152219 | Stagni | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190742 | Anisimov | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202114 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208300 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237999 | Muller et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264082 | Mrochen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288466 | Muller et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301524 | Bueler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120083772 | Rubinfeld | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140238 | Horn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203051 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203161 | Herekar | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209051 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215155 | Muller et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283621 | Muller | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289886 | Muller et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302862 | Yun et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303008 | Muller et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310223 | Knox et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130060187 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085370 | Friedman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116757 | Russmann | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245536 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310732 | Foschini et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140066835 | Muller et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194957 | Rubinfeld et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249509 | Rubinfeld et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276361 | Herekar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277431 | Herekar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343480 | Kamaev et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140368793 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150085252 | Fujimura et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20160139390 | Bukshtab et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175442 | Kamaev et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102008046834 | Mar 2010 | DE |
| 1285679 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1561440 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1790383 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2253321 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| MI2010A001236 | May 2010 | IT |
| 2000262476 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 1376 | Aug 2011 | KG |
| 2086215 | Aug 1997 | RU |
| 2098057 | Dec 1997 | RU |
| 2121825 | Nov 1998 | RU |
| 2127099 | Mar 1999 | RU |
| 2127100 | Mar 1999 | RU |
| 2309713 | Nov 2007 | RU |
| 2359716 | Jun 2009 | RU |
| 2420330 | Jun 2011 | RU |
| 2428152 | Sep 2011 | RU |
| 2456971 | Jul 2012 | RU |
| 9316631 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| 9403134 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| 0074648 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0158495 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 03061696 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2004052223 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2005110397 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006012947 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006128038 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007001926 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007053826 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007081750 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007120457 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007128581 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2007139927 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2007143111 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008000478 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008052081 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008095075 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009042159 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009073213 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009114513 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| 2009146151 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010011119 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010015255 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010023705 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010039854 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010093908 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2011019940 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011050360 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011116306 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2012004726 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012047307 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012149570 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012158991 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012174453 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013062910 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013148713 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013148895 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013149075 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2014081875 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014145666 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014202736 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2016069628 | May 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wollensak G., et al., “Cross-linking of Scleral Collagen in the Rabbit Using Riboflavin and UVA,” Acta Ophtalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 83(4), pp. 477-482; Aug. 2005 (6 pages). |
| Wollensak G., “Crosslinking Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus: New Hope,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 17(4), pp. 356-360; Aug. 2006 (5 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Hydration Behavior of Porcine Cornea Crosslinked with Riboflavin and Ultraviolet,” A.J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 516-521; Mar. 2007 (6 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Riboflavin/Ultraviolet-A-induced Collagen Crosslinking for the Treatment of Keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, No. 5, pp. 620-627; May 2003 (8 pages). |
| Wollensak, G. et al. “Laboratory Science: Stress-Strain Measurements of Human and Porcine Corneas after Riboflavin-Ultraviolet-A-Induced Cross-Linking.” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. vol. 29, No. 9, Sep. 2003 (pp. 1780-1785). |
| Wong, J. et al., “Post-Lasik ectasia: PRK following previous stablization and effective management with Riboflavin / ultraviolet A-induced collagen cross-linking,” Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, 2006 (1 page). |
| Yang H., et al., “3-D Histomorphometry of the Normal and Early Glaucomatous Monkey Optic Nerve Head: Lamina Cribrosa and Peripapillary Scleral Position and Thickness,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 4597-4607; Oct. 2007 (11 pages). |
| Yang N., Oster G. Dye-sensitized photopolymerization in the presence of reversible oxygen carriers. J. Phys. Chem. 74, 856-860 (1970) (5 pages). |
| Zhang, Y. et al., “Effect of the Synthetic NC-1059 Peptide on Diffusion of Riboflavin Across an Intact Corneal Epithelium”, May 6, 2012, ARBO 2012 Annual Meeting Abstract, 140 Stroma and Keratocytes, program No. 1073, poster board No. A109. |
| Zhang, Y. et al., “Effects of Ultraviolet-A and Riboflavin on the Interaction of Collagen and Proteoglycans during Corneal Cross-linking”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, No. 15, dated Apr. 15, 2011 (pp. 13011-13022). |
| Zderic V., et al., “Drug Delivery Into the Eye With the Use of Ultrasound,” J. Ultrasound Med, vol. 23(10), pp. 1349-1359; Oct. 2004 (11 pages). |
| Zderic V., et al., “Ultrasound-enhanced Transcorneal Drug Delivery,” Cornea vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 804-811; Nov. 2004 (8 pages). |
| Abahussin, M. “3D Collagen Orientation Study of the Human Cornea Using X-ray Diffraction and Femtosecond Laser Technology” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Nov. 2009, vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 5159-5164. |
| Acosta A. et al., “Corneal Stroma Regeneration in Felines After Supradescemetic Keratoprothesis Implantation,” Cornea, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 830-838; Aug. 2006. |
| Averianova, O. S., “Nastoyaschee I buduschee kross-linkage.” Mir Ofalmologii, 2010, [online] [retrieved on Feb. 13, 2014] Retrieved from the internet: http://miroft.org.ua/publications/.html. |
| Baier J. et al., “Singlet Oxygen Generation by UVA Light Exposure of Endogenous Photosensitizers,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 91(4), pp. 1452-1459; Aug. 15, 2006. |
| Ballou, D. et al., “Direct Demonstration of Superoxide Anion Production During the Oxidation of Reduced Flavin and of Its Catalytic Decomposition by Erythrocuprein,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 898-904, Jul. 11, 1969. |
| Barbarino, S. et al., “Post-LASIK ectasia: Stabilization and Effective Management with Riboflavin / ultraviolet A-induced collagen cross-linking,” Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, 2006. |
| Berjano E., et al., “Radio-Frequency Heating of the Cornea: Theoretical Model and In Vitro Experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 196-205; Mar. 2002. |
| Berjano E., et al., “Ring Electrode for Radio-frequency Heating of the Cornea: Modelling and in vitro Experiments,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 41, pp. 630-639; Jun. 2003. |
| Brüel, A., “Changes in Biomechanical Properties, Composition of Collagen and Elastin, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts of the Rat Aorta in Relation to Age,” Atherosclerosis 127, Mar. 14, 1996. |
| Burke, JM et al., Abstract for “Retinal proliferation in response to vitreous hemoglobin or iron”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, May 1981, 20(5), pp. 582-592. |
| Chai, D. et al., “Quantitative Assessment of UVA-Riboflavin Corneal Cross-Linking Using Nonlinear Optical Microscopy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 2011, vol. 52, No. 7, 4231-4238. |
| Chan B.P., et al., “Effects of photochemical crosslinking on the microstructure of collagen and a feasibility study on controlled protein release;” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 4, Issue 6, pp. 1627-1636; Jul. 1, 2008. |
| Chandonnet, “CO2 Laser Annular Thermokeratoplasty: A Preliminary Study,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 264-273; 1992. |
| Chace, KV. et al., Abstract for “The role of nonenzymatic glycosylation, transition metals, and free radicals in the formation of collagen aggregates”, Arch Biochem Biophys., Aug. 1, 1991, 288(2), pp. 473-480. |
| Clinical Trials.gov, “Riboflavin Mediated Corneal Crosslinking for Stabilizing Progression of Keratoconus (CCL),” University Hospital Freiburg, Feb. 20, 2008; retrieved from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00626717, on Apr. 26, 2011. |
| Corbett M., et al., “Effect of Collagenase Inhibitors on Corneal Haze after PRK,” Exp. Eye Res., vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 253-259; Jan. 2001. |
| Coskenseven E. et al., “Comparative Study of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking With Riboflavin and UVA Irradiation in Patients With Keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 371-376; Apr. 2009. |
| “Definity (perflutren) injection, suspension [Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging],” http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=8338, revised Sep. 2008, retrieved via the internet archive from http://web.archive.org/web/20100321105500/http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?id=8338, on Dec. 14, 2011. |
| Ehlers W., et al., “Factors Affecting Therapeutic Concentration of Topical Aminocaproic Acid in Traumatic Hyphema,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 2389-2394; Nov. 1990. |
| Erskine H., “Avedro Becomes Sponsor of US FDA Clinical Trials of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking,” Press Release, Mar. 16, 2010 (1 page). |
| Fite et al., “Noninvasive Multimodal Evaluation of Bioengineered Cartilage Constructs Combining Time-Resolved Fluorescence and Ultrasound Imaging.” Tissue Eng: Part C vol. 17, No. 4, 2011. |
| Friedman, M. et al. “Advanced Corneal Cross-Linking System with Fluorescence Dosimetry”, Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2012, Article ID 303459, dated May 7, 2012. |
| Frucht-Pery, et al. “Iontophoresis—gentamicin delivery into the rabbit cornea, using a hydrogel delivery probe,” Jun. 20, 2003. |
| Gibson, Q. et al., “The Oxidation of Reduced Flavin Mononucleotide by Molecular Oxygen,” Biochem. J. (1962) 83, 368-377. |
| Givens et al. “A Photoactivated Diazpryruvoyl Cross-Linking Agent for Bonding Tissue Containing Type-I Collagen.” Photochemistry and Photobiology. vol. 78, No. 1, 2003 (pp. 23-29). |
| Glenn J.V., et al., “Advanced Glycation End Product (AGE) Accumulation on Bruch's Membrane: Links to Age-Related RPE Dysfunction;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 441-451; Jan. 2009. |
| Gravitz L., “Laser Show in the Surgical Suite: Lasers and a century-old dye could supplant needles and thread;” technology review, MIT, Mar./Apr. 2009; retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22088/?nlid=1767, on Sep. 26, 2011. |
| Hafezi F., et al., “Collagen Crosslinking with Ultraviolet-A and Hypoosmolar Riboflavin Solution in Thin Corneas,” J. Catract Refract. Surg., vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 621-624; Apr. 2009. |
| Hammer Arthur et al., “Corneal Biomechanical Properties at different Corneal Cross-Linking (CXL) Irradiances,” IOVS, May 2014, vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 2881-2884. |
| Hitzenberger et al., “Birefringence Properties of the Human Cornea Measured With Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography,” Bull. Soc. Beige Ophtalmol., 302, 153-168, 2006. |
| Holmström, B. et al., “Riboflavin as an Electron Donor in Photochemical Reactions,” 1867-1871, Nov. 29, 1960. |
| How to Use Definity: “Frequently Asked Questions;” retrieved from http://www.definityimaging.com/how-faq.html, on Sep. 26, 2011 (3 pages) (date unknown, prior to Apr. 26, 2010). |
| IMEX, “KXL System: Crosslinking Para Cirugia Corneal Bibliografia Cientifica,” Product Literature, Nov. 23, 2010. |
| Kamaev et al., “Photochemical Kinetics of Corneal Cross-Linking With Riboflavin,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Apr. 2012, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 2360-2367 (8 pages). |
| Kampik D. et al., “Influence of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking With Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Irradiation on Excimer Laser Surgery,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 3929-3934; Aug. 2010. |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Collagen Cross-linking in Early Keratoconus With Riboflavin in a Femtosecond Laser-created Pocket: Initial Clinical Results”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Aug. 18, 2009. |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Keratoconus management: UVA-induced collagen cross-linking followed by a limited topo-guided surface excimer ablation,” American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2006 (25 pages). |
| Kanellopoulos, A. J., “Ultraviolet A cornea collagen cross-linking, as a pre-treatment for surface excimer ablation in the management of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia,” American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2005 (28 pages). |
| Kissner Anja, et al., “Pharmacological Modification of the Epithelial Permeability by Benzalkonium Chloride in UVA/Riboflavin Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking,” Current Eye Research 35(8), pp. 715-721; Mar. 2010 (7 pages). |
| Koller, T. et. Al., “Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking,” Journal Cataract and refractive surgery, vol. 35, No. 8, Aug. 2009, pp. 1358-1362. |
| Koller T., et al., “Therapeutische Quervernetzung der Homhaut mittels UVA and Riboflavin: Therapeutic Cross-Linking of the Cornea Using Riboflavin/UVA,” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 224, No. 9, pp. 700-706; Sep. 2007 (7 pages). |
| Kornilovsky, I. M. “Novye neinvazivnye tekhnologii lazernoy modifikatsii optiko-refraksionnykk struktur glaza. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya I oftalmologiya.” vol. 9, No. 3, 2006 (pp. 17-26). |
| Krueger, Ronald R., “Rapid VS Standard Collagen CXL with Equivalent Energy Dosing,” presentation slides; available at http://www.slideshare.net/logen/krueger-herekar-rapid-cross-linking (date unknown, prior to Nov. 9, 2009) (26 pages). |
| Massey, V., “Activation of Molecular Oxygen by Flavins and Flavoproteins,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry vol. 269, No. 36, Issue of Sep. 9, pp. 22459-22462, 1994 (4 pages). |
| Marzouky, et. al., Tensioactive-mediated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking—First Laboratory Report, European Ophthalmic Review, 2009, 3(2), pp. 67-70. |
| Lee et al., “Spectrally filtered Raman / Thomson scattering using a rubidium Vapor filter ”, AIAA J. 40, pp. 2504-2510 (2002). |
| Li, C. et al.“Elastic Properties of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms Assessed by Combined Use of Laser Ultrasonics and Low Coherence Interferometry.” Optics Express. vol. 19, No. 11, May 9, 2011 (pp. 10153-10163). |
| Li, C. et al. “Noncontact All-Optical Measurement of Corneal Elasticity.” Optics Letters. vol. 37, No. 10, May 15, 2012 (pp. 1625-1627). |
| Li, P. et al. “In Vivo Microstructural and Microvascular Imaging of the Human Corneo-Scleral Limbus Using Optical Coherence Tomography.” Biomedical Optics Express. vol. 2, No. 11, Oct. 18, 2011 (pp. 3109-3118). |
| Meek, K.M. et al. “The Cornea and Scleera”, Collagen: Structure and Mechanics, Chapter 13, pp. 359-396, 2008 (38 pages). |
| Mi S., et al., “The adhesion of LASIK-like flaps in the cornea: effects of cross-linking, stromal fibroblasts and cytokine treatment,” presented at British Society for Matrix Biology annual Meeting, Cardiff, UK, Sep. 8-9, 2008 (17 pages). |
| Muller L., et al., “The Specific Architecture of the Anterior Stroma Accounts for Maintenance of Corneal Curvature,” Br. J. Opthalmol., vol. 85, pp. 437-443; Apr. 2001 (8 pages). |
| Mulroy L., et al., “Photochemical Keratodesmos for repair of Lamellar corneal Incisions;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 3335-3340; Oct. 2000 (6 pages). |
| Naoumidi T., et al., “Two-Year Follow-up of Conductive Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Hyperopic Astigmatism,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 32(5), pp. 732-741; May 2006 (10 pages). |
| Nesterov, A. P. “Transpalpebralny Tonometr Dlya Izmereniya Vnutriglaznogo Davleniya.” Feb. 2, 2006. [online] [Retrieved Dec. 17, 2012] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://grpz.ru/images/publication_pdf/27.pdf>. |
| O'Neil A.C., et al., “Microvascular Anastomosis Using a Photochemical Tissue Bonding Technique;” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 39, Issue 9, pp. 716-722; Oct. 2007 (7 pages). |
| O.V. Shilenskaya et al., “Vtorichnaya katarakta posle implantatsii myagkikh IOL,” [online] Aug. 21, 2008 [retrieved Apr. 3, 2013] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.reper.ru/rus/index.php?catid=210> (4 pages). |
| Paddock C., Medical News Today: “Metastatic Melanoma PV-10 Trial Results Encouraging Says Drug Company;” Jun. 9, 2009; retrieved from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/153024.php, on Sep. 26, 2011 (2 pages). |
| Pallikaris I., et al., “Long-term Results of Conductive Keratoplasty for low to Moderate Hyperopia,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 31(8), pp. 1520-1529; Aug. 2005 (10 pages). |
| Pinelli, R. “Corneal Cross-Linking with Riboflavin: Entering a New Era in Ophthalmology.” Ophthalmology Times Europe. vol. 2, No. 7, Sep. 1, 2006, [online], [retrieved on May 20, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.oteurope.com/ophthalmologytimeseurope/Cornea/Corneal-cross-linking-with-riboflavin-entering-a-n/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/368411> (3 pages). |
| Pinelli R., et al., “C3-Riboflavin Treatments: Where Did We Come From? Where Are We Now?” Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, Summer 2007, pp. 36-46; Jun. 2007 (10 pages). |
| Pinelli, R., “Panel Discussion: Epithelium On/Off, Corneal abrasion for CCL contra”, presented at the 3° International Congress of Corneal Cross Linking on Dec. 7-8, 2007 in Zurich (36 pages). |
| Roberto Pinelli et al, “Transepithelial Tensioactive Mediated CXL”, Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, p. 1, URL: http://bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/pdfs/0409_09.pdf, XP055158069. |
| Pinelli R., “Resultados de la Sociedad de Cirugia Refractiva Italiana (SICR) utilizando el C3-R” presented at the Istitutor Laser Microchirurgia Oculare in 2007 in Italy (23 pages). |
| Pinelli et al., “Tensioactive-mediated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking—First Laboratory Report”, 2009, European Ophthalmic Review, 3(2), pp. 67-70. |
| Pinelli R., “The Italian Refractive Surgery Society (SICR) results using C3-R” presented Jun. 22-23, 2007 in Italy (13 pages). |
| Ponce C., et al., “Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography, Scheimpflug Imaging, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal, Keratoconus-suspect and Post-laser in situ Keratomileusis Eyes,” J. Cataract Refract. Surgery, vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 1055-1062; Jun. 2009 (8 pages). |
| Proano C.E., et al., “Photochemical Keratodesmos for Bonding Corneal Incisions;” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 2177-2181; Jul. 2004 (5 pages). |
| Randall, J. et al., “The Measurementand Intrepretation of Brillouin Scattering in the Lens of the Eye,” The Royal Society, Abstract only, published 2013 [available online at http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/214/1197/449.short] (1 page). |
| Reinstein, D. Z. et al. “Epithelial Thickness Profile as a Method to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment After Corneal Ectasis.” Journal of Refractive Surgery. vol. 27, No. 5, May 2011 (pp. 356-363). [Abstract only]. |
| Reiss, S. et al., “Non-Invasive, ortsaufgeloeste Bestimmung von Gewebeeigenschaften derAugenlinse, Dichte undProteinkonzentration unter Anwendung der Brillouin-spektroskopie”, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd, vol. 228, No. 12, pp. 1079-1085, Dec. 13, 2011 (7 pages). |
| Reiss, S. et al., “Spatially resolved Brillouin Spectroscopy to determine the rheological properties of the eye lens”, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 2, No. 8, p. 2144, Aug. 1, 2011 (1 page). |
| Rocha K., et al., “Comparative Study of Riboflavin-UVA Cross-linking and “Flash-linking” Using Surface Wave Elastometry,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24 Issue 7, pp. S748-S751; Sep. 2008 (4 pages). |
| Rolandi et al., “Correlation of Collagen-Linked Fluorescence and Tendon Fiber Breaking Time.” Gerontology 1991;27:240-243 (4 pages). |
| RxList: “Definity Drug Description;” The Internet Drug Index, revised Jun. 16, 2008, retrieved from http://www.rxlist.com/definity-drug.htm, on Sep. 26, 2011 (4 pages). |
| Saleh et al. “Fundamentals of Photonics” 1991, pp. 74-77. |
| Scarcelli, G. et al., “Brillouin Optical Microscopy for Corneal Biomechanics”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jan. 2012, vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 185-190 (6 pages). |
| Sheehan M., et al., “Illumination System for Corneal Collagen Crosslinking,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 512-524; Apr. 2011 (13 pages). |
| Shell, J., “Pharmacokinetics of Topically Applied Ophthalmic Drugs,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 207-218; Jan.-Feb. 1982 (12 pages). |
| Sobol E N et al, “Correction of Eye Refraction by Nonablative Laser Action on Thermomechanical Properties of Cornea and Sclera”, Quantum Electronics, Turpion Ltd., London, GB, (Oct. 2002), vol. 32, No. 10, ISSN 1063-7818, pp. 909-912, XP001170947 [A] 1. |
| Song P., Metzler D. “Photochemical Degradation of Flavins—IV. Studies of the Anaerobic Photolysis of Riboflavin.” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 6, pp. 691-709, 1967 (21 pages). |
| Sonoda S., “Gene Transfer to Corneal Epithelium and Keratocytes Mediated by Ultrasound with Microbubbles,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 558-564; Feb. 2006 (7 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Artificial Stiffening of the Cornea by Induction of Intrastromal Cross-links,” Der Ophthalmologe, vol. 94, No. 12, pp. 902-906; Dec. 1997 (5 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Induction of Cross-links in Corneal Tissue,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 66, Issue 1, pp. 97-103; Jan. 1998 (7 pages). |
| Spoerl E. et al., “Safety of UVA-Riboflavin Cross-Linking of the Cornea,” Cornea, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 385-389; May 2007 (5 pages). |
| Spoerl E., et al., “Techniques for Stiffening the Cornea,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 15, Issue 6, pp. 711-713; Nov.-Dec. 1999 (4 pages). |
| Sun, G.J. et al., Abstract for “Properties of 2,3-butanedione and 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione as new photosensitizers for visible light cured dental resin composites”, Polymer 41, pp. 6205-6212, published in 2000 (1 page). |
| “Tahzib N.G. et al., ““Recurrent intraocular inflamation after implantation of the Artiflex phakic intraocular lens for the correction of high myopia,”” J Cataract Refract Surg, Aug. 2006; 32(8)1388-91, (abstract) [online] [Retrived Mar. 4, 2013] Retrieved from PubMed, PMID: 16863981”. |
| Tessier FJ, et al., “Rigidification of Corneas Treated in vitro with Glyceraldehyde: Characterization of Two Novel Crosslinks and Two Chromophores,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, E-Abstract; 2002 (2 pages). |
| Thornton, I. et. al., “Biomechancial Effects of Intraocular Pressure Elevation on Optic Berve/Lamina Cribrosa before and after Peripapillary Scleral Collagen Cross-Linking.” Invest. Ophthalm,ol. Vis. Sci., Mar. 2009, 50(3): pp. 1227-1233. |
| Thornton et al (Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Mar. 2009, vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 1227-1233). |
| Tomlinson, A. “Tear Film Osmolarity: Determination of a Referent for Dry Eye Diagnosis”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Oct. 2006, vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 4309-4315 (7 pages). |
| Tomlinson et al. (Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science 2006, 47 (10), 4309, 4315. |
| Trembly et al., “Microwave Thermal Keratoplasty for Myopia: Keratoscopic Evaluation in Porcine Eyes,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 682-688; Nov./Dec. 2001 (8 pages). |
| Turgunbaev N.A. et al. Fotomodifikatsiya sklery u bolnykh s progressiruyuschei blizorukostyu (predvaritelnoe soobschenie). 2010 [online]. Retrieved from the Internet<URL: http://www.eyepress.ru/article.aspx?7484> (2 pages). |
| “UV-X: Radiation System for Treatment of Keratokonus,” PESCHKE Meditrade GmbH; retrieved from http://www.peschkemed.ch/ on Sep. 27, 2011 (date unknown, prior to Sep. 16, 2008) (1 page). |
| Vasan S., et al., “An agent cleaving glucose-derived protein crosslinks in vitro and in vivo;” Letters to Nature, vol. 382, pp. 275-278; Jul. 18, 1996 (4 pages). |
| Verzijl et al. Crosslinking by Advanced Glycation End Products Increases the Stiffness of the Collagen Network in Human Articular Cartilage. Arthritis & Rheumatism vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 114-123 (10 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Biomechanical and Histological Changes After Corneal Crosslinking With and Without Epithelial Debridement,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 35, Issue 3, pp. 540-546; Mar. 2009 (7 pages). |
| Wollensak G., et al., “Collagen Crosslinking of Human and Porcine Sclera,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 689-695; Mar. 2004 (7 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150265762 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61492553 | Jun 2011 | US | |
| 61566976 | Dec 2011 | US | |
| 61594796 | Feb 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13488097 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Child | 14696672 | US |
