1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of printing and in particular, to systems and methods to implement multiple mode color blending for print devices.
2. Description of Related Art
Pixels generated by a color printer typically consist of colors from multiple color planes. For example, in a color printer that uses cyan, magenta, yellow, and black (“CMYK”), a single pixel can include color from one or more of the four color planes. A wide range of colors may be produced by a printer when colors from constituent color planes are combined with differing intensities. Color for image data is typically specified in some color space in a page description language (“PDL”), which may differ from the native color space of the target imaging or printing device.
Several modern page description languages (“PDLs”) allow for blending of colors based on some model of opacity data. In some situations, opacity data may be specified using an alpha channel, and is known as “alpha” data. In general, blending is a convex combination of colors allowing the representation of transparency and/or translucency effects. A convex combination is a linear combination of the colors, where all coefficients are non-negative and add up to 1. For example, when an alpha channel is used, the value of alpha in a color code can range from 0.0 to 1.0, where 0.0 may represent a fully transparent color, while 1.0 may represent a fully opaque color. Alpha values can be used to specify how a set of objects in a PDL, for example, interact with each other to form a final composed object. The result of such blending is typically dependent both on the opacity (alpha) value and on the color space in which the blending is performed. PDLs may allow the specification of the colorspace in which blending is to be performed. For example, in Adobe™ Portable Document Format (“PDF”) PDL, each object group in a print job may be blended in its own color space. Similarly, in Microsoft™ XML Paper Specification (“XPS”) PDL, a user can specify the blending color space for each page. In many situations, such as the PDLs described above, the color spaces utilized for blending may not have any relation to the native color space of the target device on which the job is to be displayed. Therefore, blending operations may involve repeated colorspace conversions.
Typically, flexibility in blending schemes invites color conversion costs, For example, in PDF, a stack of nested PDF groups may have distinct color spaces. As each PDF group is blended into its parent, color space conversion is performed. Color space conversion is also performed when the outermost group, termed the page group, is converted to the color space of the native device. Similarly, in XPS, color space conversion is performed from the blending color space specified for a page to the color space of the native device. Because color conversion can be computationally expensive, the conversions above can constitute a significant portion of the total rasterization time.
In some PDLs, the common color space to be used for blending two objects may be specified. This approach also fails to effectively reduce the total number of color space conversions during the course of the print job. Other approaches, which also depend on using directives in the print job, rely on the analysis of data in the print job or other heuristics to speed up rasterization. Approaches relying on print job directives are not generic enough to be widely applicable and effective.
In a further approach used in Konica-Minolta™ printers C550 and 5570, when blending was specified in an RGB color space for data in a CMYK space, the blending operation was carried out by converting from CMYK to RGB using a canonical conversion algorithm before blending; blending the objects in RGB; and then converting the objects back to CMYK. All other blending operations were performed in the native color space of the printer. This approach reduced the number of conversions when blending was not specified in an RGB space for data in CMYK space. However, for the fairly common case where blending was specified in an RGB color space using data in CMYK space, there was no improvement in speed. In addition, because canonical transformations ignore details of the specific CMYK space involved in the blending, such transformations can also result in a loss of color accuracy. In all other cases (not involving blending in an RGB color space for data in a CMYK space) blending was performed in the native color space of the printer resulting in a loss of color accuracy. Consequently, users of these printers were deprived of both flexibility and color accuracy.
Thus, there is a need for systems and methods that provide multiple mode color blending functionality at a low implementation and computational cost, while permitting preservation of printed color output quality.
Embodiments consistent with the present invention include systems and methods for performing methods for processing color documents described in a PDL using one of at least two modes. The modes comprise a first mode wherein a first specified colorspace associated with at least one PDL group is replaced with a second colorspace, which is native to a target device. Blending operations are then performed on the PDL group using the second colorspace. In the second mode blending operations are performed on the PDL group using the first specified colorspace.
Embodiments of the present invention also relate to software, firmware, and program instructions created, stored, accessed, or modified by processors using computer-readable media or computer-readable memory. The methods described may be performed by systems, including a computer and/or a printing device.
These and other embodiments are further explained below with respect to the following figures.
In accordance with embodiments reflecting various features of the present invention, systems and methods for processing color documents using one of at least two blending modes are presented. In some embodiments, the color documents may be described in the form of a PDL description and an intermediate printable data of objects generated from the PDL description may take the form of a display list.
As shown in
Document processing software running on computing device 110 and/or server 130 may allow users to view, edit, process, and store documents conveniently. Pages to print in a document may be described in a page description language (“PDL”). PDL's may include Adobe™ PostScript, Adobe™ PDF, HP™ PCL, Microsoft™ XPS, IBM™ Personal Printer Data Stream (“PPDS”), SVG (an XML-based graphics description language primarily developed for the World Wide Web), Diablo, Device Independent (“DVI”), Intelligent Printer Data Stream (“IPDS”), Kyocera Page Description Language (“KPDL”), Samsung™ Printer Language (“SPL”), Advanced Function Presentation (“AFP”), and variants thereof. A PDL description of a document provides a high-level description of each page in a document. This PDL description is often translated to a series of lower-level printer-specific commands when the document is being printed.
The translation process from PDL to lower-level printer-specific commands may be involved and depend on the features and capabilities offered by exemplary printer 170. For example, printer 170 may process its data in stages. In a first stage, printer 170 may parse PDL commands and break down high-level instructions into a set of lower level instructions called primitives. These primitives may be fed to a subsequent stage in exemplary printer 170, which may use them to determine where to place marks on a page. In some instances, each primitive may be processed as it is generated. In other systems, a large set of primitives may be generated, stored, and then processed. For example, the primitives needed to describe a single page may be generated, stored in a list, and then processed. A set of stored primitives is termed an intermediate list or a display list.
Exemplary printer 170 includes devices that produce physical documents from electronic data including, but not limited to, laser printers, ink-jet printers, LED printers, plotters, facsimile machines, and digital copiers. Exemplary printer 170 may also be capable of directly printing documents received from computing device 110 or server 130 over connection 120. In some embodiments such an arrangement may allow for the direct printing of documents, with (or without) additional processing by computing device 110 or server 130. The processing of documents, which may contain one or more of text, graphics, and images, can be distributed. Thus, computing device 110, server 130, and/or the printer may perform portions of document print processing such as half-toning, color matching, and/or other manipulation processes before a document is physically printed by printer 170.
Computing device 110 also contains removable media drive 150. Removable media drive 150 may include, for example, 3.5 inch floppy drives, CD-ROM drives, DVD ROM drives, CD±RW or DVD±RW drives, USB flash drives, and/or any other removable media drives. Portions of applications may reside on removable media and be read by computing device 110 using removable media drive 150 prior to being acted upon by system 100.
Connection 120 couples computing device 110, server 130, and printer 170 and may be implemented as a wired or wireless connection using conventional communication protocols and/or data port interfaces. In general, connection 120 can be any communication channel that allows transmission of data between the devices. In one embodiment, for example, the devices may be provided with conventional data ports, such as parallel ports, serial ports, Ethernet®, USB, SCSI, FIREWIRE, and/or coaxial cable ports for transmission of data through the appropriate connection.
Network 140 could include a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), or the Internet. In some embodiments, information sent over network 140 may be encrypted to ensure the security of the data being transmitted. Printer 170 may be connected to network 140 through connection 120. Exemplary printer 170 may also be connected directly to computing device 110 and/or server 130. System 100 may also include other peripheral devices (not shown). An application to implement methods for processing color documents using one of at least two blending modes may be deployed on one or more of the exemplary computers or printers, as shown in
Exemplary CPU 176 may be a general-purpose processor, a special purpose processor, or an embedded processor. CPU 176 can exchange data including control information and instructions with memory 172 and/or firmware 171. Memory 172 may be any type of Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”) such as but not limited to SDRAM, or RDRAM. Firmware 171 may hold instructions and data including but not limited to a boot-up sequence, pre-defined routines including routines for image processing, compression, color space conversion, blending, trapping, document processing, and other code. In some embodiments, code and data in firmware 171 may be copied to memory 172 prior to being acted upon by CPU 176. Routines in firmware 171 may include code to translate page descriptions received from computing device 110 to display lists. In some embodiments, firmware 171 may include rasterization routines to convert display commands in a display list to an appropriate rasterized bit map and store the bit map in memory 172. Firmware 171 may also include memory management routines. Data and instructions in firmware 171 may be upgradeable using one or more of computer 110, network 140, removable media coupled to printer 170, and/or secondary storage 173.
Exemplary CPU 176 may act upon instructions and data and provide control and data to ASICs/FPGAs 178 and print engine 177 to generate printed documents. ASICs/FPGAs 178 may also provide control and data to print engine 177. FPGAs/ASICs 178 may also implement one or more of color space conversion, blending, translation, trapping, compression, and rasterization algorithms.
Exemplary computing device 110 may transform document data into a first printable data. In some embodiments, the first printable data may correspond to a PDL description of a document. Then, the first printable data can be sent to printer 170 for transformation into intermediate printable data. In some embodiments, the translation process from a PDL description of a document to the final printable data comprising of a series of lower-level printer-specific commands may include the generation of intermediate printable data comprising of display lists of objects. Display lists may hold one or more of text, graphics, and image data objects and, in some instances, one or more types of data objects in a display list may correspond to an object in a user document.
If more than two objects are present, the device may determine if parts of the objects overlap. For example, pixels in image objects may be associated with color and transparency characteristics. Transparency is an indication of the degree to which any pixel underlying a superimposing pixel may be seen through the superimposing pixel. Effects such as transparency or translucency effects can be implemented using blending, where one color (such as a foreground color) is combined with another color (such as a background color) using transparency information (which can be obtained from an alpha channel) to create a third color. Because blending operations are colorspace specific, a colorspace in which the blending operation is to be performed is often specified. In some instances, the colorspace may be inferred from the context or from language syntax.
Display lists, which may aid in the generation of intermediate printable data, may be stored in memory 172 or secondary storage 173. Exemplary secondary storage 173 may be an internal or external hard disk, memory stick, or any other memory storage device capable of being used by system 200. In some embodiments, the display list may reside and be transferred between one or more of printer 170, computing device 110, and server 130 depending on where the document processing occurs. Memory to store display lists may be a dedicated memory or form part of general purpose memory, or some combination thereof. In some embodiments, memory to hold display lists may be dynamically allocated, managed, and released as needed. Printer 170 may transform intermediate printable data into a final form of printable data and print according to this final form. The process of transforming document data into a final printable data is termed rasterization. Depending on features and capabilities of the PDL being processed, as well as the print processing system, blending may occur at one or more points during the rasterization process.
The target device may be a printer, plotter, facsimile device, multi-function device, display device, and/or a computing device. In addition, appropriate modifications may be made based on the nature and capabilities of individual PDLs and language processor implementations. The exemplary method illustrated by flowchart 300, may be performed by printer 170 using one or more of CPU 176, ASICs/FPGAs 178, memory 172, and/or secondary storage 173.
In step 320, group objects or constructs (“groups”) specified directly or implicitly in the PDL may be identified. In some embodiments, a language processor for the PDL may parse the PDL specification for the print job and identify groups. The minimum granularity at which a set of one or more objects may be subjected to blending operations with an explicit or implicit associated colorspace can be termed a group. Groups may be structured hierarchically, nested, and/or composed of other lower level groups. In general, a group in a PDL may be specified by the PDL, or may be inferred from the types and/or order of operations permitted on language objects. For example, in PDF™, groups may be nested and a stack of nested PDF™ groups may have different colorspaces. During processing, each group may be blended into its parent, and the outermost group (also called a page group in PDF™) can be converted to the native colorspace of the printer. As another example, nested groups in XPS™, which are called canvases, have common colorspaces. However, a different blending colorspace may be specified for a page that comprises of nested groups, and the page may be eventually rendered in the native colorspace of the peripheral device. In step 330, a colorspace may be associated with each group identified in step 320. Some PDLs may allow a colorspace to be specified for a group, and the specified colorspace may be associated with the group.
In step 340, the algorithm may determine if the user has selected “fast mode” printing. If fast mode printing has been enabled, then in step 345, the colorspace associated with the group may be overridden and can be replaced with the native colorspace of printer 170. Next, pre-defined routine 360 to perform blending may be invoked. In fast mode, pre-defined routine 360 may perform blending using the native colorspace of printer 170 rather than the original colorspace associated with the group. In some embodiments, pre-defined routine 360 may be stored in firmware 171 and copied to memory 172 of printer 170, where it may then be invoked by CPU 176.
In step 375, the algorithm determines if all groups in the print job have been processed. If additional groups remain to be processed, the algorithm may proceed to the next group in step 385 and iterate through step 345, routine 360, and steps 375, and 385. For example, a hierarchy of nested groups may be processed in fast mode so that each nested group is blended with its parent, wherein the blending for each group is carried out using native colorspace of printer 170. When all groups have been processed, the algorithm may terminate in step 395. Because, color conversions for blending are performed in the native color space of the printer 170, the number of colorspace conversions is minimized when a print job is processed in fast mode. In some embodiments, the use of fast mode may involve less computational cost and permit a higher throughput of printed pages, thereby allowing a greater number of pages to be printed in a given time interval.
If fast mode printing has not been selected, then, a colorspace conversion is performed using specified group colorspace settings in step 355, prior to the invocation of pre-defined routine 360 for blending.
In some embodiments, in pre-defined routine 360, blending within a group can occur in the group's colorspace, and data can remain in that colorspace until the group is incorporated into a parent group. Therefore, elemental input objects can be converted to the colorspace associated with their group, and after that group has been processed the resulting data can be converted to the parent group's colorspace.
In step 370, the algorithm determines if all groups in the print job have been processed. If additional groups remain to be processed, the algorithm may proceed to the next group in step 380 and iterate appropriately through steps 350, 355, routine 360, and steps 370, and 380 until no more groups remain to be processed. When all groups have been processed, the algorithm may terminate in step 395. In some embodiments, one or more additional steps (not shown) may be performed after all groups have been processed to blend a root group into the native colorspace of printer 170, if the color space of the root group does not match the native color space of printer 170. Because, color conversions for blending are performed as specified in the colorspaces associated with groups, color accuracy is maintained when a print job is processed in the second or non-fast mode.
Exemplary method 300, allows users flexibility in determining printed output. For example, if quick copies are desired then fast mode may be selected, whereas a regular or non-fast mode may be used for color-accurate copies. Because print speed is often critical when documents are being created, edited, and/or reviewed, fast mode allows users the option of generating printed copies quickly. On the other hand, color-accuracy is typically desired for “final” versions of documents, and the use of a second or non-fast mode permits the creation of color-accurate printed documents.
In one embodiment, a method for performing blending may also be performed using recursive techniques. Exemplary pseudocode illustrating one approach to implementing blending operations recursively is shown below. Explanatory comments are delimited by “/*” and “*/” in the pseudocode below. In the example below, routines ProcessPageNormal and ProcessGroupNormal are invoked when using a “normal mode” (or non-fast mode) for blending operations, while ProcessPageFast and ProcessGroupFast are invoked when using a “fast mode” for blending operations.
As indicated in the exemplary pseudocode, in normal mode, when a root group such as a page group is encountered ProcessGroupNormal can be invoked from ProcessPageNormal. ProcessGroupNormal can then be invoked recursively so that a group is processed within its own rasterization space before the group undergoes colorspace conversion and blending into a parent group. As shown in the pseudocode above, in fast mode, when a root group such as a page group is encountered ProcessGroupFast can be invoked from ProcessPageFast. A similar recursive invocation of ProcessGroupFast can then occur except that, in fast mode, after being processed in its rasterization space, the group is converted to the native colorspace of the target device before being blended into a parent group.
In some embodiments, a program for conducting the above process can be recorded on computer-readable media 150 or computer-readable memory. These include, but are not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), Programmable Read Only Memory (PROM), Flash Memory, Non-Volatile Random Access Memory (NVRAM), or digital memory cards such as secure digital (SD) memory cards, Compact Flash™, Smart Media™, Memory Stick™, and the like. In some embodiments, one or more types of computer-readable media may be coupled to printer 170. In certain embodiments, portions of a program to implement the systems, methods, and structures disclosed may be delivered over network 140.
Other embodiments of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of one or more embodiments of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5313570 | Dermer et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5315691 | Sumiya et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5555094 | Lefebvre et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5687303 | Motamed et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5748331 | Köhler | May 1998 | A |
| 6169607 | Harrington | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178007 | Harrington | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179485 | Harrington | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195674 | Elbourne et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201551 | Loce et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222648 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236754 | Harrington | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237079 | Stoney | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246396 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246419 | Loce et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252677 | Hawes et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6259456 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269184 | Spaulding et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272257 | Prokop | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275607 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289138 | Yip et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6302522 | Rumph et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311258 | Gibson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6313842 | Tampieri | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324305 | Holladay et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6336180 | Long et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6349379 | Gibson et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6360007 | Robinson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6369909 | Shima | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6393545 | Long et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6414687 | Gibson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421140 | Hui | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6490696 | Wood et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6507898 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6515763 | Dermer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6633297 | McCormack et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6642931 | Haikin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6674536 | Long et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6707463 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6727999 | Takahashi | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6774953 | Champion et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6781720 | Klassen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6791711 | Uekusa et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792485 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6819782 | Imagawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6839150 | Sugiura et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6839461 | Tomomatsu | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6862110 | Harrington | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6870636 | Kulkarni | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6873432 | Thieret | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6876825 | Kurahashi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6886912 | Mantell | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891970 | Suzuki | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6906834 | Kagawa et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6912059 | Takahashi | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6930788 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6930809 | Kagawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6954288 | Uekusa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6972857 | Mantell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6985245 | Takahashi | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6990039 | Hirai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6995864 | Sugiura et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7012639 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7016061 | Hewitt | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7072052 | Tanahashi et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7079276 | Kimura | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7084994 | Koppich et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7092654 | Kurahashi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7116821 | Lane et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119920 | Takahashi | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119927 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123381 | Klassen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7136523 | Fukao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142318 | Lopez et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142710 | Hung | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7171442 | Huang | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7190827 | Zeng et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7263218 | Altenhof-Long et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7274487 | Fukasawa | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7283266 | Yagita | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7292949 | Ding | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7296791 | Kurahashi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7321450 | Uekusa et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7359530 | Wilson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7359576 | Worthington et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7423781 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7538896 | Tanaka | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7598964 | Olson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7804630 | Nishikawa | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7830540 | Matsuda | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7903286 | Nordback | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8432572 | Nordback | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 20010021971 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020051193 | Oki | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020057446 | Long et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063911 | Hui | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069236 | Jahnke | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075493 | Harrington | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075501 | Mantell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085224 | Price et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030016305 | Champion et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030034986 | Fukasawa | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030098986 | Pop | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138142 | Hung | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142330 | Arakawa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147088 | Kulkarni | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164971 | Kidani et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040017585 | Makishima et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040021882 | Kakutani | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040021900 | Arakawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040032615 | Kurakata | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042035 | Uejo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042037 | Uejo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042038 | Uejo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101195 | Akaishi | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135845 | Mantell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141642 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151361 | Bedard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169876 | Takahashi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184658 | Inoue | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212814 | Ishigami | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223173 | Arai | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223174 | Mikami | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252345 | Uekusa et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257596 | Mestha et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050018228 | Takahashi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021970 | Reese et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027482 | Benaoudia et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117398 | Hirai | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131907 | Matsuzawa et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135672 | Altenhof-Long et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180771 | Kurahashi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181346 | Heller | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050185840 | Sugiura et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213117 | Clark et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259287 | Watanabe | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275856 | Oki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289346 | Minagawa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060001728 | Murakami | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060013477 | Pellar | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033956 | Takahashi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034630 | Yabe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061794 | Ito et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060071938 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060245016 | Fukao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262339 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274341 | Kumada et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274939 | Yamada | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070052996 | Ota | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057961 | Enami et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086050 | Matsuda | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121172 | Hamada | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195353 | Tsunoda | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216930 | Jacobs | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005176 | Shimizu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024807 | Matsuda | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030750 | Kato | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090002765 | Nordback | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244563 | Nordback | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090245628 | Nordback | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110075164 | Nordback | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110157620 | Nordback | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 924651 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 07-306938 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 09-052392 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| H09-322008 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 2003-51939 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2006-345197 | Dec 2006 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Lorem Ipsum—“All the facts—Lipsum Generator,” Oct. 11, 2012; http://web.archive.org/web/20020123143646//http://lipsum.com/ (Jan 2002), 1 page. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,925 dated Nov. 19, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973 dated Aug. 13, 2012. |
| Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235 dated Aug. 10, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,131 dated Aug. 8, 2012. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235 dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
| Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973 dated Dec. 15, 2011. |
| Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235 dated Oct. 14, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973 dated Aug. 2, 2011. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235 dated Jun. 2, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/078,112 dated Nov. 1, 2010. |
| Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973 dated Aug. 16, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/078,112 dated May 11, 2010. |
| Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973 dated Mar. 11, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973, filed Jun. 29, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235, filed Mar. 31, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/078,112, filed Mar. 27, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,131, filed Sep. 30, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,925, filed Dec. 31, 2009. |
| Notification of Refusal mailed Nov. 20, 2012, issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-166668. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 31, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/771,973, filed Mar. 14, 2007 Nordback. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,235, filed Mar. 31, 2008 Nordback. |
| Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013 in counterpart Japanese Patent Application 2009-132648. |
| Notification of Refusal with English language translation mailed by the Japanese Patent Office on Nov. 5, 2013, in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2009-132648. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090310151 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |